TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Amazing-Bit6140 Archive

View 0 posts and 1,772 comments by Amazing-Bit6140 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,772 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Same in the west Behind every great man is a woman who put him there ...until anything negative happens, then she was coerced into it the entire time
/r/MensRights13/06/23 11:31 PM
10

I think this is called Gamma bias? Everything good men do is because that man is good (or more likely raised by a good mother, or whatever other woman they can give credit to) Everything bad men do is because all men are bad Everything good women do is because all women are good Everything bad women do is because that woman is bad.
/r/MensRights13/06/23 09:51 PM
1

Who hurt you?
/r/MensRights13/06/23 09:47 PM
2

not really You're actually a feminist aren't you?
/r/MensRights13/06/23 09:45 PM
27

Men are already expected to be independent and self sufficient What we need is to show them that it's ok to have all of the excess go to youself instead of all these random power hungry people who demand you give it up. Redistribution of wealth is the governments job, we shouldn't be training men as children to do it to themselves (while at the same time trying to learn to make enough to support themselves in the first place)
/r/MensRights14/05/23 10:53 PM
133

Because society wants all of men's excess labor/effort/potential that isn't being used to support himself to then go to supporting a women, because they don't expect women to take care of themselves. Society will fight bachelors with the same fervor as tax dodgers, just with slightly less subtlety
/r/MensRights14/05/23 10:25 PM
25

He should really consider her feelings before he cries at night, doesn't he realize he isn't the only person in the house!?
/r/MensRights14/05/23 08:21 PM
55

or filming him or (likely) mutilating his genitals or a million other things, so it's pretty fucking rich of her to lecture him about consent
/r/MensRights14/05/23 08:20 PM
31

Exactly. And it isn't even the lack of contact, it's destabilizing the parent-child bond just so the mom can get a big head about how 'progressive' her parenting is When did parenting become more about what your friends think instead of what's best for the child?
/r/MensRights14/05/23 08:20 PM
22

Wrong, because he's 3 months old and doesn't understand English. Should we beat him because he can't file his taxes, too? How about you get aaaaaaaallll the way off your high horse and realize this woman is failing her duty of care to her own child, and doing so for social validation and imaginary points. Also, in case you no one told you (and i'm very sorry for your kids if so), childen need physical touch as infants. It's part of their development, before they are capable of understanding what…
/r/MensRights14/05/23 08:13 PM
24

Yes, respect his demands and ignore her boundaries Now who's projecting things people never said? Learning as I go, of course, but maybe I should buy the best-selling manual you published? Start with realizing as a parent you are the only person who has your kids back, the entire world is going to bend over backward to make sure they "learn to respect wymyn", and by jumping on that bandwagon you're robbing your child of a competent parent. Doesn't take a whole fucking book, but there ya go!
/r/MensRights14/05/23 07:59 PM
35

Said by someone who clearly knows fuck all about raising kids Edit: Not to fucking mention the problem we have as a society is not men respecting women, it's women respecting men that we need more of
/r/MensRights14/05/23 07:46 PM
19

suddenly all the "where have all the good men gone?" whining makes sense, eh? Once you realize they were all raised like this
/r/MensRights14/05/23 07:34 PM
23

trying to teach a young boy to respect boundaries. Also, you sound like the type of person who would spontaneously decide "teaching boundaries" was suddenly wrong when applied to women (kind of like how we're "holding boundaries" now by calling this abusive parent a cunt!)
/r/MensRights14/05/23 07:30 PM
41

hold boundaries with a fucking infant!?? While at the same time violating those boundaries by filming the child and posting it online? Do you think she asked first? How about you shove your projection right back up your ass and understand this as the shitty mothering it is
/r/MensRights14/05/23 07:29 PM
40

The part where she's actively shoving maternal rejection onto her unable-to-speak son (which she wouldn't do to her daughter) for social validation and internet points (violating his consent to be filmed, shocking how that didn't cross her mind) All that boy is thinking is "What did i do to make mommy not love me?" It's actively harmful, she shouldn't be a parent, that she doesn't see that what she is doing is wrong is precisely the reason why someone should call CPS
/r/MensRights14/05/23 07:13 PM
60

Active child abuse for the sole purpose of her own ego validation, and she likely taught him "consent" by cutting up his dick so it "looks better" too Cunts like this are exactly why men are fed up with marriage Edit for the people who seem to think this is OK: And how is a 3 month old able to understand what consent means? There's no hook for "Oh, doing this causes pain" like biting would do, this is a normal interaction that is normally used to express love (touching in general, some countries…
/r/MensRights14/05/23 07:10 PM
22

women are more likely to die in surgery because the medical studies were run on men Society: “ok, we’ve been experimenting on and killing dozens if not hundreds of men trying to perfect this procedure and now we’re confident it’s safe enough to use on you, a woman” Bitch: “Waaahhh, why weren’t the test subjects female, like I am? SEXISM!!!! DOCTORS ARE ALL MYSOGYNISTIC SEXISTS!!1!1!!!” Society: “…. Well we have this other procedure that we found works well in cases like yours, and we made sure i…
/r/MensRights14/05/23 02:26 PM
44

Yup. Men are expected (demanded) to be strong, and so any attack on them is seen as deserved because if it worked, he was weak and not deserving of respect in the first place It’s really fucking sinister, because not only is the man being sexually assaulted, the fact that he was victimized in the first place is used as a second attack to tear down his reputation and social standing
/r/MensRights13/05/23 02:50 PM
1

It was always a job interview, it's just now the job isn't just not worth having, it's not worth putting up with the insufferable interviewer in the first place
/r/MensRights12/05/23 09:34 PM
4

Why didn't you go to the police? Why didn't A go to the police, for harassment and slander? TBH, in this story, there are many things you could have done and didn't so she walked all over you just like she did A I understand how little support you would have gotten, but that's no reason to get some harassment claims on the books as a defense for later i think you have a case for suing this school and that counselor
/r/MensRights12/05/23 09:10 PM
4

and feel morally entitled to do so
/r/MensRights12/05/23 08:15 PM
14

Oh, so an agnosti-feminist
/r/MensRights12/05/23 07:42 PM
14

ffs... The apparent trigger for this murder (she had tried previously, according to the statements the victim made while alive) was that he wouldn't buy her a 2 million dollar house. 3 kids, religious middle class suburb couple. Are we timing how long before she makes up some abuse about him?
/r/MensRights12/05/23 05:04 PM
88

A feminist explained to me as a child how the evil patriarchy would mutilate the genitals of little girls, and i asked her why there was a giant scar on my penis and if she was going to do anything about that. Learned very quickly how much feminism does to hide/erase/ignore male victims.
/r/MensRights12/05/23 04:00 PM
5

because if you have 2 leeches sucking each other they both die Women make sure not to tolerate male leeches. It's a "feminine" role
/r/MensRights11/05/23 11:09 PM
1

They're the same enough that we shouldn't be thinking it's totally ok to do one but a human rights abuse to do the other And that is currently the case
/r/MensRights11/05/23 11:01 PM
124

Oh are we now allowed to post the names and addresses of all women who are alleged to be false accusers (so, every rape allegation ever, true or false, we now drag that women through the mud as a false accuser, and not at all wait for the results of a due process jury trial to prove she isn't lying about it)
/r/MensRights11/05/23 10:36 PM
1

as a retired smoker
/r/MensRights11/05/23 10:28 PM
1

Are you gonna put a kid in a boxing ring with a 6 ft adult? Yes, and there are endless ways you can split up the data The only time this is relevant is with direct competitions. With marathons, everyone reaches the same standards and you can splice up the score however you like. There is The Task, and then there are the list of people who can do the task the best. I don't sort my NBA shooters by whites who happen to look like me, because i was interested in the best human capable of doing those …
/r/MensRights11/05/23 10:11 PM
3

Lol, I can’t believe your head it so far up your own ass on this Biological differences dont matter when making a sport that includes competition against others. That’s why women aren’t banned from many men’s sports, because they are at all times left with the opportunity to reach the same standard the men do. They decided this standard was too strict, and demand segregated leagues.
/r/MensRights11/05/23 06:15 AM
0

The fuck!? English is not simple. It's not the most complex, either, but it's definitely more on the complex side than not. Mostly due to it being a bastard wonderkin child of 3 other languages at once...
/r/MensRights10/05/23 10:44 PM
3

Not quite. Men who are getting the benefits of women will continue to "pander" (they don't have to, they're already getting sex without any commitment) Men who would have to sacrifice something to get interest/attraction/sex from women are the ones checking out, because they are the ones for who the price of a relationship and the benefits it brings keeps changing, and that group of men is definitely moving more toward the "quit women" side of things. Will only get better as we finish developing…
/r/MensRights10/05/23 10:35 PM
7

or our current reality "Where are all the good men!?"
/r/MensRights10/05/23 10:32 PM
8

That's exactly what the feminists are saying to do (but with only one of those terms)
/r/MensRights10/05/23 09:37 PM
16

They only really get one: The benefit of doubt. "I doubt you would harm me, so i will offer up any and everything i can to help you at any time" It's really at the crux of women living life on easy mode and somehow being shocked when people tell them so
/r/MensRights10/05/23 09:34 PM
19

Better yet, we make an app that you can submit facebook profiles to (or a plugin on facebook), that tells you if this person has ever participated in such a group
/r/MensRights10/05/23 08:45 PM
9

women statistically prefer violence by proxy (scream cry and lie to get a man to beat someone up for you)
/r/MensRights10/05/23 08:11 PM
2

Common sense is just an excuse people say when they mean "what i said is right and you're wrong for even challenging me on it" Nope, gonna challenge the entire thing. How about you do some sports segregated by race/income bracket and tell me how it goes?
/r/MensRights10/05/23 08:10 PM
21

They think they "protect women from predators"
/r/MensRights10/05/23 05:20 PM
2

It is a separate sport because men and women are physically different. EVERYONE is physically different. should we have different leagues based on race so we can get more Hispanic representation in basketball? Oh oh wait! Poverty affects nutrution which affects all those things. We need different leagues by sex, race, and childhood income class just so we can get some good results See how this goes?
/r/MensRights10/05/23 05:19 PM
11

Well, throwing money down the drain on a furry little animal to care about and love as a fake replacement for a child is seen as socially acceptable, but trying to replace a woman's rightful place of taking a man's money/resources/protection/care/love/attention while offering fuck all in return these days is a cardinal sin. But they can't blame women for doing it, that would be holding women responsible for something! So, they need to attack the drug takers and not the drug dealers (because the …
/r/MensRights10/05/23 03:59 PM
12

90%? Thats really low ya know? How about don't believe 99.99999%? Since that % is more in line with the rate of actual predators than the 90% one.
/r/MensRights10/05/23 03:47 PM
27

This is a form of social retribution, nothing more, enacted against men by women. It's like revenge porn, after they realized that posting men's nudes wasn't as effective as an attack as they wanted it to be (and most revenge porn is of male partners, despite all the women whining about it, women even feel entitled to post it and brag about it publically. "Oh yeah he sent me a dick pick ((personal nude)) so i pulled it up in front of my friends and we all mocked his dick, recorded it, and send i…
/r/MensRights10/05/23 03:43 PM
28

they think "Oh, they wouldn't lie about them more than i would, so i'll just adjust my scale to how fucked up i believe i would talk about my ex (which is entirely appropriate, because i'm a good person, i just checked) and filter that negativity out, and then i'll have a perfectly accurate view of the person!!" or whatever other nonsense to excuse their behavior, like astrology
/r/MensRights10/05/23 03:41 PM
6

You're right that there's not really a "women hate video games" problem happening But there is definitely a "women don't like seeing men sitting on their ass, and will attack anything that men spend their time enjoying relaxing to with the ferocity of a rabid squirrel" problem going on It used to be whining about sports, now it's whining about games, both for partners and for children. The root of the issue you two are fighting over isn't video games, its many women's propensity to see a man not…
/r/MensRights10/05/23 03:22 PM
21

"Not enough men for you to be saying that, not even close, go fuck yourself"
/r/MensRights10/05/23 03:00 PM
5

Also true, but they keep demanding to make as much or more as the men for bringing in less money If they wont stop whining, why don't we let them play with the men?
/r/MensRights09/05/23 06:52 PM
3

Women who want to compete with boys can, but if that is the only competition (no female only alternatives), then boys are forced to accommodate the feelings of girls, making it unfair Having a girls only option makes it much easier to say to any woman who cries about how hard you beat her that "You could have played against women, this was your choice", protecting the boy and allowing him to compete normally. Having an easy mode means it's a lot easier to ignore the crying when they don't like h…
/r/MensRights09/05/23 05:18 PM
7

HERESY
/r/MensRights09/05/23 04:17 PM
0

Yes, and all you've defined is your masculinity, not anyone elses. I'm glad those things are manly for you and you alone, but don't me a misandric shit and pretend everyone else has to think the same thing, just because you like it that way Believing that is the most unmanly thing i think you could be doing
/r/MensRights09/05/23 04:03 PM
5

Exactly. They're free to come here and often do. We get about a post a week from some young, bright eyed and bushy tailed femlet who "just wants to talk, and seek understanding" only to suddenly stop posting for a few days to mentally deal with all the new information about feminism that other feminists have been hiding from them. If they aren't trolling, this space allows their speech, it just doesn't put effort in to protect it and feminists can't have that.
/r/MensRights09/05/23 04:00 PM
2

It goes about as well as any other time women seriously compete with men. It's why we have women sports at all. It's not for the women, it's to protect the men. Women do not handle losing to a man the same way a man does, and it is men who are blamed when it happens. He has to win the "right way" so that she doesn't even feel bad about losing. She has to care about winning. He has to care about winning and walk on eggshells around her feelings and make sure he doesn't win too much or too frequen…
/r/MensRights09/05/23 03:56 PM
7

Like all places where men and women compete with each other, men have additional responsibilities and consequences to deal with. It's an uneven playing field by default. A man can't just "win" an argument (like a feminist can without consequence or second thought, and with much social support). He's likely dealing with a woman, and so he has to win only enough so that she and all viewers feel it was close, that she had valid arguments and almost won, and he didn't embarrass her or make her feel/…
/r/MensRights09/05/23 03:52 PM
13

Feminists maintain their delusions of oppression through deplatforming and censorship, asking for an open forum is a direct attack on their sense of victimhood. Due to this, we can't actually trust any places feminists will go, because we know that place likely uses censorship to protect feminist's feelings
/r/MensRights09/05/23 03:48 PM
4

Attracting a woman and keeping her attracted is a lot of work for average guys even once they learn how to do it. A lot end up questioning if the effort is worth it for the little they get back from their relationship(s). So you end up in a prisoner’s dilemma where neither side wants to put the effort in. And to be fair to the men, only one side of the dating game is constantly offering less and less (on purpose and proudly) while demanding more and more (on purpose and proudly)
/r/MensRights09/05/23 02:55 PM
1

and men who try to seek this kind of support from other men get shut down, attacked, accused of breaching their partner's boundaries, etc. Whatever excuse they can make up to mean "men bad" Men are treated as ATM's, and women feel entitled to the resources/benefits of men at all times. For men, choosing to leave an abuser means people will attack you for "taking" your resources away from her. They treat him like a thief for not giving away his labor/love/money/whatever for free!!
/r/MensRights09/05/23 02:40 PM
5

Kind of like how i woke up this morning and felt like i deserved and was entitled to a 19yo 120lb model with D cup tits and billions of dollars in inheritance she's willing to sign half of over to me. Oh and she sucks my dick twice a day, cooks, cleans, wants kids, doesn't like social media, and is a literal fucking god and will give me my own dimension to rule over as a mad god-emperor-king. I just feel like i deserve it, ya know? Where are all the good women?
/r/MensRights09/05/23 02:30 PM
7

This is the problem with simps. They've fully bought into "if it's good for women, it's good. If it's bad for women, it's bad" framing that feminists have worked so hard to create. They're indoctrinated abuse victims, and often victims will fiercely and violently defend their abusers to protect themselves from the reality of their abuse. These men are no different.
/r/MensRights09/05/23 02:23 PM
18

This. It's not that men don't want them, it's that the risk/benefit calculus makes it a really unattractive option. Men's options today are Have short term meaningless sex, maybe a few short relationships (a few years at most), maybe knock a few up, and have them leech off of you with child support while you maybe get to meet your children every now and then. Essentially a lame harem you share with random men, have no control over, and still rapes your wallet. Go your own way, ignore women and r…
/r/MensRights08/05/23 11:05 PM
0

why would you google that!?
/r/MensRights08/05/23 08:58 PM
3

The names they pick are telling, as well. They'll automate the creation of 2000 of them at a time, all with the same name and a different number at the end, and just switch as soon as they hit any roadblocks at all It's the very problem shadowbanning was meant to (covertly) address
/r/MensRights08/05/23 06:18 PM
8

What year did the S.C.U.M. Manifesto come out?
/r/MensRights08/05/23 06:02 PM
1

Quoted and immediately ignored, like your first comment where you asked for examples right after I'd given you one Pot, meet Kettle.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 05:57 PM
14

waaaaaaaaaaaaaay before that
/r/MensRights08/05/23 05:42 PM
39

This is the essence of the Empathy Gap, and is rooted in the same tribalistic stereotypes that have harmed any other group leading to things like racism and bigotry This is the base one. The one that exists inside the tribe. When, absence any evidence of a person's character, there is conflict between males and females, females are given the benefit of doubt. They win ties, in just about all circumstances, in all cultures, on all sides of the isle. And this is a massive advantage. it made sense …
/r/MensRights08/05/23 05:41 PM
1

aaaaand not reading your essay since you can't be bothered to read anything i write, have fun with that!
/r/MensRights08/05/23 05:37 PM
5

I'm starting to think OP is cleverly concern trolling, and trying to get MRA's to be feminists or enact feminist policies
/r/MensRights08/05/23 04:48 PM
1

That's because OP is seeming very similar to a feminist troll, trying to get men working for feminists again instead of caring for themselves i.e., an ass
/r/MensRights08/05/23 04:46 PM
3

Yup, this is a resident troll who just has a bucket of alts to continue the conversation on Someone blocked one, so they just continued all their conversations on another
/r/MensRights08/05/23 04:46 PM
1

Bro stop Bro stop, this is exactly what feminists want you to do: Buy into their revisionist history instead of facts. Mindless women hate. WTF are you a feminist troll? Where is the women hate? Feminism/feminists != Women Despite feminists working overtime to pretend the contrary The early femnist movement was needed not just for women but for civil rights in general so to ignore that is akin to pretending as if there is actually some sort of patriarchy. It was not, they were not, they were mos…
/r/MensRights08/05/23 04:42 PM
7

But because today voting is actually a right for women. Men who refuse to be conscripted/drafted still can't vote, which makes it a still an agreement, not a right (but only for men) So for the last century it's pretty accurate to say that women were the only group that had the right to vote in the west.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 04:35 PM
8

They're actively encouraging the violence in order to reduce the population of males they don't want to deal with, like the type that might stand up to their abuse.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 04:34 PM
2

No, it's pointing out that feminists don't do any work themselves, and are much more likely to lie/cheat/manipulate men around them into doing the work on the non-working person's behalf.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 04:33 PM
4

Them having rights isn't an issue, it's them having rights at men's expense instead of doing the work their goddamn selves.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 04:30 PM
1

we can't argue it historically lead to a lot of needed changes. Wrong, it led to a lot of not needed special privileges for women. Any "needed changes" can pretty definitively be attributed to not feminism. Feminism was rotten from the beginning, to the core. They preyed on people's desire to help women, as well as the desire for "equality", to push for special privileges and advantages for women from the start If you don't believe me you're welcome to look up the feminist founding work: The Dec…
/r/MensRights08/05/23 04:28 PM
3

Conveniently ignoring that the person accepting responsibility for the risk is the one who's name goes on a lease or loan, not the person spending the money. Funny how they leave tiny inconsequential details like the husband was responsible for all the wife's actions/mistakes out of that view of history
/r/MensRights08/05/23 04:23 PM
2

The real issue is that women have the absolute protection and violence of the state to wield at will, and when in conflict with a woman a man does not. So all conflicts with women end up like arguing with a toddler holding a gun that you aren't legally allowed to stop them from using.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 04:16 PM
1

Same here. If they don't want equal responsibilities, they can go back to not having equal rights (which would be quite a trip, as the whole train of 'wymyns privileges rights' blew past any reasonable metric of "equality" decades ago
/r/MensRights08/05/23 04:08 PM
2

That's so strange, because to me being an egalitarian advocate involves being and MRA and a FRA, and specifically not a feminist, in the same way that an egalitarian wouldn't argue for equality of the races while wearing a white hood.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 03:29 PM
1

There is a significant and meaningful difference between: Your argument is wrong because you are a fat sexist cow and Your argument is wrong because A, B, and C. Believing this in face of those facts makes you a fat sexist cow. It's called: "One of those is a logical fallacy known as an Ad Hominim and one is not" That feminists can't tell the difference is their problem, not ours.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 03:26 PM
0

Men are responsible for the consequences of their actions, and how it affects others, that's why.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 03:21 PM
15

No, i guarantee you, they won't. [fuck it, removed]
/r/MensRights08/05/23 03:18 PM
10

Yeah they're chomping at the bit to get back to their "new" normal of being lying cunts
/r/MensRights08/05/23 03:16 PM
3

Always has been Welcome to the #new #modern #thefutureisfemale #killallmen world
/r/MensRights08/05/23 03:12 PM
1

It became the target of deplatforming after MGTOW and TRP It wasn't very valuable, comparatively, so it happened relatively quickly with just spam, mod abuse, and all their weaker tools They've already turned their attention to this sub, and you can see the pre-child abuse false flag happening with posts by rando's trying to bait men into admitting that sex, sexuality, and secondary sex characteristics appear before our arbitrary and changeable societal definition of "minor", and then they spam …
/r/MensRights08/05/23 03:10 PM
3

Which makes it really ironic when the groups who shoulder more responsibility than others ask for that responsibility to be lightened and all of the other groups suddenly are all about not shirking your 'responsibility' and 'manning up' and 'protecting wymyn' and whatever 2 faced hypocritical shit they need to in order to keep getting free shit from the people actually working. Which is why 'quiet quitting' and soft striking are the most effective tools to men right now. Let the economy grind to…
/r/MensRights08/05/23 02:50 PM
5

They can't allow dissenting voices. It opens up the possibility that they could be wrong, and they can't have that.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 02:48 PM
2

Was written by NPC's
/r/MensRights08/05/23 02:46 PM
7

and being embedded into our information systems, intentionally, so that the truth around it can never be challenged Really is disgusting to watch
/r/MensRights08/05/23 02:45 PM
11

It also tells you it doesn't blatantly lie
/r/MensRights08/05/23 02:45 PM
18

Re-branding just like Rockefeller and Amber Turd We can't let them get away with washing her image. She should never be tolerated in a position of power (social or otherwise) again.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 02:12 PM
15

Sounds more like a father teaching their son to keep themselves safe more than anything. At what point are we allowed to acknowledge that “toxic masculinity” is more encouraged by women due to how strongly they punish men who don’t conform, like it sounds your dad was working to protect you from
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/23 06:28 PM
2

Yup. They bait for responses about biological facts and when you point out that puberty begins as children they spam the “report” button with “sexualization of minors” and have their inside cunt feminist mod to collect the reports and ban accounts/screen shot “evidence” before someone sane can show up and figure out what’s happening
/r/MensRights06/05/23 10:57 PM
1

And ironically it’s these same tactics that get us comparing them to the KKK
/r/MensRights06/05/23 10:51 PM
12

It’s intentional, they want you to point out there’s no physical difference between a girl at 17 and 11 months and 18, then spam the report button for “sexualizing minors” It’s how they build the evidence to support the next phase of the attack They’re self righteous about it, too. They consider any man over 30 dating any women in their 20’s to be a pedophile. They’re using their own insecurity over aging into old ugly hags to justify collecting and posting csam material because, to them, the en…
/r/MensRights06/05/23 10:03 PM
9

Verified that’s what they did And they’re already starting the false flag operation for this sub, you see it in trying to bait men into saying “puberty starts as a preteen” or any other biological fact about sex and then mass report for “sexualizing minors” I expect cp spam to follow
/r/MensRights06/05/23 10:00 PM
4

Misandry is normalized. Report for whatever category fits
/r/MensRights01/03/23 11:48 PM
24

well, shit. Misandry as policy.
/r/MensRights01/03/23 11:24 PM
21

This is so disgusting to watch How is this comedy, or something to laugh at People are so fucked up
/r/MensRights01/03/23 11:19 PM
131

That's a tough situation, sorry to hear you're stuck in it. First thing to do is disclose this to someone you can trust. Preferably that would be your parents and you can discuss defamation/slander with the school. If that doesn't work, trying to find a lawyer you can talk to might help. While school counselors might help, their first priority is to the school and so if they perceive that this might blow back negatively on them they may treat you as an offender/predator just because it's easier …
/r/MensRights01/03/23 11:18 PM
3

This, verified
/r/MensRights01/03/23 10:52 PM
8

just a breeding ground for misandry surely Yup, but when schools are coed the males aren't protected from the females and are always assumed to be the aggressors/perpetrators in any conflict. Not very safe learning environment, either.
/r/MensRights01/03/23 09:55 PM
22

It's also an ego defense women use when they don't understand something and people try to inform them. They don't want to look incompetent, so they accuse the man of "mansplaining" it to her
/r/MensRights01/03/23 09:54 PM
25

I prefer the term cunterrupting
/r/MensRights01/03/23 09:52 PM
20

ust like how not all men are violent, not all women will use what you say in confidence against you except we have strict prohibitions against male violence in place, and an entire state sponsored violence group tasked with creating consequences for it who will assault and kidnap that man for being violent (or, more specifically, on allegations of violence, which is part of the problem) Women face no consequences or prohibitions for violating a mans boundaries, often even physical boundaries guy…
/r/MensRights01/03/23 03:44 PM
24

“Just repeat endlessly how amazing I am and how that blows you away and you can’t believe you’re so lucky to be around me. That emotion, share that one, and only that one, constantly.”
/r/MensRights01/03/23 02:40 PM
1

Ah, so you were actually raped and your lawyer decided it wouldn’t be worth pursuing
/r/MensRights01/03/23 02:22 PM
1

Your lawyer suggested making false allegations of rape?
/r/MensRights01/03/23 02:18 PM
5

Nope, just a realist. You really have your head up your ass, huh?
/r/MensRights28/02/23 11:43 PM
11

Not really, women have complained about being oppressed and treated like slaves, but an objective viewing of their situation puts them at the most privileged class of people we can categorize, and have been for farther back than they've been complaining about. So maybe it's a constant complaint by women because they know there is no truth to it, and they only believe that because they completely ignore and devalue all the things any man or men as a whole have done for them.
/r/MensRights28/02/23 11:34 PM
8

and you're the only one not believing it, claiming all assertions are anecdotal as we're talking on a post that is specifically anecdotal. You're the odd one out, here, and you're welcome to do your own chores and go look this up, instead of bitching about how we don't meet your evidence standards to have a conversation.
/r/MensRights28/02/23 11:33 PM
7

You're right! It's just a google away for you, off you go!
/r/MensRights28/02/23 11:14 PM
12

lol, have you had your head under a rock for the 60+ years this has been a common and constant complaint by women, both in men's personal lives and in the news?
/r/MensRights28/02/23 10:39 PM
120

This. It's societal brainwashing, beating into men, as children, that they must "provide and protect" women who will give them nothing in return, and maybe they'll luck into sex somehow. That's the extent of "help" society is willing to give to men about women.
/r/MensRights28/02/23 10:17 PM
9

just want to reiterate again how lucky he is to have such a supportive partner Cheers to you
/r/MensRights28/02/23 10:10 PM
4

yeah this is just the same puritanical demonizing of men's sexuality. I'd give them some credibility if they'd just focused on addictions/dopamine responses in general, but to call porn out specifically shows where their bias is.
/r/MensRights28/02/23 10:07 PM
14

this is a common occurrence with men, which is also why it is safe to assume he's had to have this conversation more than once
/r/MensRights28/02/23 10:05 PM
11

You didn't get the memo? Men save women, not the other way around. She resents being the 'rock' or 'hero' at any time, that's your job, and even the most progressive woman will make damn sure you know it.
/r/MensRights28/02/23 05:53 PM
8

It's hilarious how porn gets this much hate when all of this is true for all the various romance genre's women get into. Watching/reading twilight or 50 shades of grey has the same effect on a woman's brain as porn does on a man, but shockingly only one is a "problem" while the other is "empowering" Fuck the maker of this video for putting women on a pedestal and pretending porn is somehow more damaging than any of the other addictive dopamine actions we engage in every day.
/r/MensRights28/02/23 05:10 PM
51

I don't want to burst your bubble, but it's not "just money". This sets up a precedent that he should pay, now that he's agreed to the "minimum" (that's bullshit) amount, he's in the system, and the system is patient. That amount will change, especially if she pushes the courts for it. Some courts have a metric they call "potential income" where they can basically say "Oh, well your boss makes 10x what you make, and you could get your boss's job (theoretically), so your child support is set at w…
/r/MensRights28/02/23 04:56 PM
187

Shocking how not having someone constantly devalue your contributions leads to a successful relationship
/r/MensRights28/02/23 04:25 PM
51

Right? It's not just the gall to do it once, it's that this becomes a frequent conversation and you can never get upset at the attempts to gaslight and wear you down or you're being "abusive"
/r/MensRights28/02/23 04:20 PM
24

Hence, she has spent the last decade in near-destitution thinking that the world owes her a free ride. the fate of many women that they still don't see coming, despite plenty of historical examples and warning.
/r/MensRights28/02/23 04:19 PM
103

Completely devalue the work he does to make it easier to inflate the work she does. ugh, it's gross to watch. The psychology of it isn't any better. If she acknowledges that the work you put into the sauces/marinades for the grill was compared objectively with her crock pot cooking... she'd look bad by comparison. She can't have that, so what HE does is his "hobby", completely incomparable to what she does.
/r/MensRights28/02/23 04:17 PM
28

It’s so much worse than that. Women are the primary decision makers during childcare, pregnancy, and birth. No one overrides their decisions, and they have massive legal and social support for this. Women are the ones in the greatest positions of power in regards to male genital mutilation, and yet somehow for only this one decision to sexually abuse their son, suddenly “oh his daddy made that choice”. Absolving themselves of any responsibility of a choice the woman very much made, and just offl…
/r/MensRights28/02/23 03:45 PM
19

Also “raise your status in whatever circle you run in” is misandrist advice. It basically means be hyper competitive and a super annoying asshole to other men, just for the validation of women. Not saying it doesn’t work, just saying it’s shit for society, shit for men in general, and makes whoever is doing it a right piece of shit, while exposing how damaging it is to let women’s shitty preferences affect our social sphere.
/r/MensRights28/02/23 03:40 PM
60

Which the producers of the show will never do. Many women are eating that shit up, they enjoy watching men be treated this way. The attention increases viewership and ratings. They will face no consequences, and gain a massive boost in viewership and free advertising as a reward.
/r/MensRights27/02/23 07:41 PM
16

It's important to contextualize those observations, otherwise you risk her accepting the idea that treating boys worse/differently is an acceptable and normal thing to do.
/r/MensRights27/02/23 06:52 PM
4

England in particular is a terrible place to look, and the majority of mental health support will operate explicitly on the assumption that the more like a woman you act like, or act subservient to, the better. If this is the 'help' you get, it will absolutely make things worse. Vett providers carefully if you can for one who actually wants to help you, as a man, and not you, as a part of the machine that needs to be forced back into shape.
/r/MensRights27/02/23 06:33 PM
51

Your children will model the relationship they observe, and you being seen as subservient to your wife will actively damage their future relationships with men. Especially with so few men in the house, the disrespectful and dismissive way they view you and your role will be replayed on their future partners, to their detriment. If you care about the future wellbeing of your kids, this is something you have to address and fix.
/r/MensRights27/02/23 06:18 PM
4

I like "educate your sexist cunt mouth mouth cunt" as a response Edit: it works both ways
/r/EverydayMisandry26/02/23 10:57 PM
1

Or it could be as safe or safer than how many kill the children right now, what reason would she have to object next?
/r/MensRights26/02/23 03:59 AM
1

It is neither, but men are brainwashed into thinking otherwise.
/r/MensRights26/02/23 03:58 AM
1

Wait till we have artificial wombs. Their arguments to kill the baby against the fathers wishes will fall flat when the fetus can just be grown externally. We’ll see some amazing 🍿 drama and the real murderous nature of women when this happens, as they argue and advocate they the child die anyway, just so they don’t have to be a parent. All the arguments we use for financial abortion will get flipped and used by feminists at that time to defend a woman’s “right” to kill her child
/r/MensRights26/02/23 12:23 AM
11

You had no obligation to disclose your sexual activity with others, you caused no harm, and this is a blatant false allegation, possibly defamation with malice. You’re the victim here, remember that. The victim of a defamation and harassment campaign, contacting your family in particular. Lawyer up, get that bitch arrested before she does this to others as well
/r/MensRights26/02/23 12:18 AM
8

You’re on the right track, what your friend is doing is actively harmful to the child, as well as the child’s relationship with caregivers. Lying because it’s easier than the truth makes children angry, as you’ve seen, and rightfully so. It’s a betrayal of the trust the child has in the parent. You can already see some of the harm, because that little sweetheart is told she doesn’t have a dad, she’s already reaching out to other male figures to fill the role. If this isn’t fixed, if she isn’t to…
/r/MensRights26/02/23 12:11 AM
3

You do not live to work, you work to live. The self worth should be derived from the thing you're working for, not due to the work itself. This belief that you have to be working or producing is a horrible misreading of the situation framed by someone who profits from your work. It does become easy to take that mental shortcut and look at the value your work provides and confuse that with your own value, but that is buying into the framing of your abuser. Why did your father scrape by all those …
/r/MensRights25/02/23 06:07 PM
7

Using the Ukrainian's as an example once again, they were forced to stay. The violence that would be committed against them by the invading force is far more serious than what they would face by the state, by design. They have to fight, once they are in that position. That is why even those of us who abhor war still respect our soldiers. They aren't the ones making the poor decisions, they are specifically trained to do what they are ordered, for the benefit of us all (supposedly, there's plenty…
/r/MensRights25/02/23 05:11 AM
8

You talk about this as if we had a choice. We don't. In America, at least, draft dodging is punishable by the violence of the state. They will make you face violence, and if you wont do it on terms they like, they'll make sure it's on terms you don't.
/r/MensRights25/02/23 03:29 AM
3

Many cases of sexual assault/abuse or rape against men isn't even considered as such in many states/countries. That 1/4 women are victims of sexual assault study by the CDC? They do not include male victims. They even specify rape as "penetrated by a penis". So if you were drugged and forced to have sex with a woman you didn't want to, there's often no recourse. Not to mention a much larger social stigma than what women fear getting when they are raped. I guess silver lining, it helps explain th…
/r/MensRights25/02/23 03:08 AM
3

They're often not even allowed or capable of acknowledging the problem exists anywhere but inside the man himself. It often makes sense from their perspective, they want to help with something you have control over, but by and large mens problems are entirely external, and usually not at all their fault and a happened after doing everything right. The shitty part is therapists often won't acknowledge harm by a woman, or particularly by a mother. They push for "forgiveness" and "empathy" to the m…
/r/MensRights25/02/23 02:55 AM
11

yup. Once you see it, it becomes completely obvious. This is what they used to call being "red pilled". You notice the incredible difference in attitude, but now you can't go back to the "blue pill" reality of believing men and women are equals, seeing how even in media it's just.... like this... Anyway, red pill got associated with a whole bunch of other bullshit and grifters, but that was the original meaning.
/r/MensRights25/02/23 02:53 AM
11

Oh, yeah, men's mental health resources are almost worthless. That's the problem when men's issues aren't internal. If you're depressed at the state of the world and how it treats men as disposable, or molests and mutilates baby boys without a care, that's a rational reaction. Therapists don't have many tools for helping someone in that circumstance. Trauma therapists can help, but imagine a therapist helping a rape survivor who has to go back and live with their rapist, or completely expects to…
/r/MensRights25/02/23 02:47 AM
1

And not in way they're worried about, the way they constantly bitch that they're under threat from... Instead, men will just go their own way, stop giving women attention, invent amazing sex dolls, and go about their lives far better for the lack of drama.
/r/MensRights25/02/23 02:38 AM
2

feminism has taught women to shame men. just for literally everything men do, instead of the self aggrandizing bullshit of traditionalism which only shames them for things that aren't good for society/other people. What was that bitch's name who criticizes all the video games? Eh, not worth remembering. I DO remember her quote, tho: "EVERYTHING is racist. EVERYTHING is sexist and you have to point it all out." Describing her day job.
/r/MensRights25/02/23 02:35 AM
-6

Words are different than actions. You could be standing up for men right now, going into feminist threads and using your female privilege to stand up to the misandry, but instead are here in men's safe space patting yourself on the back.
/r/MensRights24/02/23 11:45 PM
5

There are some men who spread it, but they spread it on behalf of women. This is a societal standard that has its roots in women, and it won't go away until we deal with that.
/r/MensRights24/02/23 11:43 PM
5

They prefer to use proxy violence and get other men or the state to assault the man on their behalf.
/r/MensRights24/02/23 11:01 PM
3

Well... NORMALLY crying acts as a social signal to get the tribe to demonstrate to the individual that they aren't in this alone, that they are supported, loved, and cared for, and the completion of that psychological cycle of trust generally moves the mind into a space where it is more comfortable dealing with the issue that we being cried about, because it feels safe to do so. Society (i.e. most women) doesn't want to give resources, validation, or safety to men. It (as judged by its actions) …
/r/MensRights24/02/23 10:49 PM
11

But then how would they manipulate men into doing things for them for nothing in return?
/r/MensRights24/02/23 10:42 PM
17

then they'd be more focused on their own mental health and thus less willing to throw their own lives away for women. It is very much related to women's vested interest in getting men to sacrifice of themselves for women, up to and including their very lives. And then after they've made the sacrifice, they switch to assuming that was "bare minimum" and just "what men do" to absolve themselves of any guilt that might make them feel that the "scales" were ever unbalanced. It's not just that they s…
/r/MensRights24/02/23 10:39 PM
72

You mean the growing-ever-wider benefits gap? Women already don't work on the same playing field as their male counterparts, because they have a bunch of safety nets for failure. Women have more social support and housing programs, the taboo to point out fallback of having a man finance their entire life, as well as no social stigma for living with their parents long past when men are shamed for it. And then they demand more special privileges to come into work. It's crazy.
/r/MensRights24/02/23 10:27 PM
1

Why do you think they work overtime to make sure men are starved for sex and affection? Men have to be both desperate and indoctrinated by cunt mothers into thinking this behavior is OK for it to work.
/r/MensRights24/02/23 10:11 PM
8

Pasting a response i made elsewhere: They were allegedly poisoned by the amount of viagra they were forced to take. Do you know what happens before they're poisoned? You know that "If this erection persists for more than 4 hours, go to the emergency room" warning? That's to prevent necrosis, and your dick rotting from the inside because blood can't flow. ^ THAT happens before you get to toxic levels. Also that toxicity directly affects the cardiovascular system, it's a blood pressure medication.…
/r/MensRights24/02/23 09:14 PM
5

Unless your population is so small and inbred that you're risking every pairing becoming incest already. Then adding boys becomes highly beneficial.
/r/MensRights24/02/23 09:13 PM
15

They were allegedly poisoned by the amount of viagra they were forced to take. Do you know what happens before they're poisoned? You know that "If this erection persists for more than 4 hours, go to the emergency room" warning? That's to prevent necrosis, and your dick rotting from the inside because blood can't flow. ^ THAT happens before you get to toxic levels. Also that toxicity directly affects the cardiovascular system, it's a blood pressure medication. Not something to fuck with. Anyone w…
/r/MensRights24/02/23 09:11 PM
98

Nowadays As in, you think this was a different in the past? Nah. Women always were the ones pushing this idea, from the time men are babies women do it. The "cry it out" method is far more frequently applied to male children. Men are taught that crying doesn't solve their problems intentionally from a very young age. The perception that other men enforce it comes from 1) women who refuse to take accountability and 2) men who know the problems this will cause, and are trying to help the emotional…
/r/MensRights24/02/23 07:49 PM
19

not economically attractive what a charitable way to say "not rich" Wanna know something about being "rich"? It's a moving target. If we give out 1 billion dollars to every man, those men are still not "economically attractive" It's a shitty way to say they want men they rate as better than other men, who they constantly compare to other men, and it's extremely tabboo to tell these shallow cunts to get over themselves and treat men as a person and not an objectified bank account.
/r/MensRights24/02/23 07:28 PM
17

Yeah, i doubt they would consider women actually putting in effort to keep their men sexually satisfied as a solution. Probably put out hits on anyone who would suggest such a thing.
/r/MensRights24/02/23 07:25 PM
28

Yup, menslib is a feminist controlled opposition sub. Setup to make sure men are only talking in feminist approved ways
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/02/23 05:05 PM
128

They know what they are doing They know it's a weapon in the workplace THEY DO NOT CARE. They also don't care how much it harms men. Some even consider that a perk. And they will attack you with the fervor of a soldier who's gun you just took away if you try to call it out. Up to and including using it against you with a false allegation if need be. You are operating under the delusions that men "allow" this to happen, instead of the reality of them being forced to put up with it, with no recour…
/r/MensRights24/02/23 04:12 PM
15

Modern women's ego's are quite ironically inflated to extreme proportions. Yet, men changing their appearance won't change this. Women will still only see the top 10/20% of men as "attractive" no matter what men look like, because it's based on how they compare them to other men, not how they objectively look.
/r/MensRights24/02/23 03:47 PM
7

I’m in the field, and women by and large do not face the level of discrimination they claim to. They have many scholarships and special programs just to get them into it, as well as special protections while there. Also the wage gap is a debunked myth. The truth of the matter is that especially between ages 20-30 women earn more than their male counterparts, largely due to sexist preference given on the basis of that same debunked fallacious wage gap claim.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/02/23 03:08 PM
5

A large part of why women seem to face discrimination in these fields is the mirror of the effect of why men pursue them. I’m not saying discrimination doesn’t exist, but in particular for stem fields where the subjective grading bias is more difficult to apply, women are on average suddenly faded with a 20% penalty compared with previous equal efforts in more easily subjective fields. This makes it seem like they are being discriminated against when that very much may not be the case. Studies h…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/02/23 06:38 AM
34

DECLARATION OF ASHLEY LINDSAY MORGAN SMITHLINE I, Ashley Lindsay Morgan Smithline, declares as follows: In November 2010, I had a brief, consensual sexual relationship with [redacted], also known as Marilyn Manson, during a trip I took to Los Angeles from Thailand, where I was living. Ten years later, I succumbed to pressure from Evan Rachel Wood and her associates to make accusations of rape and assault against [redacted] that were not true. Well at least she admits it
/r/MensRights23/02/23 10:07 PM
32

Yup, they can't have it be telling the truth about sexual violence against men, someone might get offended!
/r/MensRights23/02/23 10:05 PM
73

They're prepping for it, for sure. We already have the beginnings of the same brigading and concern trolling that was used to shut down MGTOW and TRP subs. You're right, this one is on the chopping block, they just need a good enough reason to do it. They can't allow open and productive conversation to happen.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 06:04 PM
17

Men: Notices woman Woman: HOW FUCKING DARE YOU
/r/MensRights23/02/23 05:47 PM
13

Yup, for subjective coursework, leads to upwards of a 20% difference in grades due to your sex. And then those boys get into STEM fields, that can't grade subjectively as easily, and suddenly their grades shoot up compared to girls for the same effort, and they think "Oh, i'm good at math!" (sorry kid, they just can't be as sexist in math, so it looks that way) And then those boys get blamed for being sexist by gravitating to fields where they find less sexism. ugh, i hate our society.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/02/23 05:17 PM
26

Reddit admins have already confirmed that men are not considered a protected class, and that they will not take actions they would normally take under those hate-speech and discrimination rules. I doubt sending a letter will change that.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 04:56 PM
20

Ahh here we go, another feminist-in-hiding post trying to claim r/mensrights is just as bad as the much larger and default for new members sub 2x for being upset at the blatant discrimination in 2x
/r/MensRights23/02/23 04:17 PM
2

That would be a mistake, it's an incredible tool, and often far better than google or other search engines at providing answers, and will only continue to improve. Men's rights and the sexist aspects of society are it's weakest areas, it's not appropriate to judge a tool by it's weakest point alone.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 10:49 PM
3

its worse than that, there's the sexist training data, and then the direct manipulation of results to never say anything "offensive" about women, even if that's what the AI would come out with from the training set.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 10:48 PM
5

While we definitely have problems with controlled opposition, talking about the sexism of women in dating isn't an example of it.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 10:44 PM
1

"I love when men realize the little they ask for is so far below the minimum that they should dumb that bitch" How's that?
/r/MensRights22/02/23 10:42 PM
2

Maybe they shouldn't, but you can't deny that men are socially punished for this begging behavior far more than women, and also pushed into situations where they feel they have to beg far more often as well. It's not the same between the two
/r/MensRights22/02/23 10:41 PM
1

Women should be begging their men for things, not the other way around. Start begging a woman, for anything, and it will immediately go to her head and she will 1) think less of you, 2) stop respecting you, 3) think of how she can use this to get herself more than she would be giving, and 4) start looking around at other men.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 10:39 PM
6

I love when men realize they shouldn't be begging at all
/r/MensRights22/02/23 10:36 PM
169

While she smiled and laughed about it, how humiliating. I don't understand how he could bring himself to be with such a cunt. She actively uses his image to promote herself, despite his public insistence she not do so. This is a narcissistic abusive relationship, textbook example.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 10:25 PM
28

This is absolutely a men's rights topic. Women's insistence that men contribute more to a relationship, and specifically financially more, is part of societal misandry. Your wife is being sexist by asserting you should be bringing in more than her, she is being sexist and selfish by looking down on you for looking less, and she is acting like an child by complaining about making more. All of these misandric attitudes are the result of sexism against men, and you're suffering from it personally. …
/r/MensRights22/02/23 10:22 PM
2

The idea of a patriarchy itself blames men The implication that men in positions of power preference men in sexist ways in the same way women in positions of power do isn't true, and blames men The entire idea that women are somehow more oppressed than the class of men in general is wrong, counter to objective reality, and blames men.
/r/AntiFeminists22/02/23 10:15 PM
27

yeah, india is a surprisingly sexist place. Dude should run like hell
/r/MensRights22/02/23 08:40 PM
6

It's also the perfect opportunity to connect our points about societal misandry to their personal lives, making them more apparent and the listeners far more invested.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 08:18 PM
0

You not seeing how it's related is the problem, not the posts.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 08:04 PM
1

It is the opposite of facts, it is gaslighting, it does blame men, and i see things perfectly clearly, you're the one with your head up your ass defending a supremacist organization and their ideas
/r/AntiFeminists22/02/23 08:04 PM
10

So is he, and everyone got a front row seat to exactly how far you get even with millions of dollars and being famous. It's only worse for other men.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 07:54 PM
82

Maybe the issue isn't the posts, and is instead your interpretations, assumptions, and dismissiveness of them. Have you considered that? Men have serious issues and challenges in dating, and those issues and challenges are downplayed and used against men in horrifically misandrist ways. Lets use the very simple case of who pays for dinner. On the surface it looks shallow and we wonder why would we bother fighting this over such a "little" thing, but digging deeper it is one of those sexist socie…
/r/MensRights22/02/23 07:48 PM
26

It's an old idea: a man who doesn't care and sacrifice for his child (or sometimes not even his child, but a child in general): DEADBEAT DAD, DEGENERATE, FAILURE AS A MAN a woman who doesn't care and sacrifice for her child: She's empowered! You don't know what she goes through! You haven't walked in her shoes! You have no right to judge! She's not any less of a woman! --- and on and on and fucking on with the excuses and gaslighting about why it's ok, no matter what they did. FFS, most adoption…
/r/MensRights22/02/23 07:34 PM
2

Patriarchy is a made up version of catholic's Original Sin that blames all men for the problems of society, and absolves women of accountability. We don't tolerate that gaslighting bullshit here, women are as responsible for this as anybody, and in many cases more so. And feminism is an anti-male hate group that does really braindead stupid shit like "re-framing" sexism against men like this as "paternalist" sexism against women. That's absolutely retarded thinking.
/r/AntiFeminists22/02/23 07:20 PM
30

No, a serious crime. Amber Turd was proven by a jury of her peers to have defamed with malice, and she's not in jail.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 07:05 PM
32

Yup, chatgpt is sexist af and is trained to repeat and spit out all the standard feminist nonsense. This is why we need regulations on these AI systems, people will take this as if it's true, and it has less credibility and certainly less auditability than wikipedia, with twice as many problems and 0 transparency of them.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 05:07 PM
1

it's a known fact that women are investigated less, and when investigated arrested less, and when arrested charged less, and when charged convicted less, and when convicted given far lighter sentences with a greater disparity than race, all for the same crime.
/r/AntiFeminists22/02/23 04:09 PM
38

That's the gaslighting. In reality, women are arrested less, charged less, and when charged face far lighter sentences, to a degree provably greater than any disparity between races. In their minds, women are oppressed, and so must get more punishment than a man for any crime, reality be damned. You popped their "wymyn are so oppwessed!" bubble and they mad. Facts will do that.
/r/MensRights21/02/23 11:59 PM
2

well, yeah, you gotta watch out for that end of the hot/crazy scale
/r/MensRights21/02/23 09:24 PM
2

That everybody would feel themselves the harm and pain they cause others. Start with the moral high ground of a completely gender neutral and fair wish, kek all the way home at how many bitches are about to have their worlds turned upside down.
/r/MensRights21/02/23 07:46 PM
2

No we're saying the teacher would try to retaliate to it being pointed out how much of a sexist cunt they're being, and abuse their position of power to feel better about their rampant sexism.
/r/MensRights21/02/23 07:44 PM
2

except that's the norm, men are treated that way, and even more obnoxious is the hate men get for sex toys, when women have been purchasing unrealistically large silicon vibrating gorilla arm's to shove up their cooters for decades And the fucking gall to complain that men want tight toys...
/r/MensRights21/02/23 07:36 PM
2

The only reason women say this is that they expect men to put in most or all of the effort during sex. Many women play with very small dildos and get off just fine, i would treat women who say this as hoe's who've stretched themselves so much that no normal man will satisfy her anymore.
/r/MensRights21/02/23 07:34 PM
9

Man i hate that sexist man-blaming phrase. It's long form "Man up"
/r/MensRights21/02/23 06:44 PM
23

So how do so many of you manage to blame men for that? because that's whats happening
/r/MensRights21/02/23 06:39 PM
23

Yup, you did the math right there, bud. That's exactly the conclusion they come to
/r/MensRights21/02/23 06:38 PM
5

I would say "You do realize you're speaking to someone who was strapped down and had their genitals molested and mutilated as a child, as well as many men around me, and we're standing in a facility that continues to sexually abuse only boys in this way, bitching to me about all men are evil because one did something wrong to you once? Grow the fuck up cunt, we all got problems."
/r/MensRights21/02/23 06:29 PM
25

They do. Re: S.C.U.M. Manefesto
/r/MensRights21/02/23 06:19 PM
2

War can be evolutionarily justified, too, and if we allow the shitty “biology” of one gender while restricting it from the other, war is exactly where we’re heading
/r/MensRights21/02/23 04:44 PM
12

Compartmentalization. Helps if you name them, too. There’s Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, etc. Friday in particular is lit. Everybody loves redheads with Celtic accents
/r/MensRights21/02/23 04:28 PM
0

The intent doesn't have to be sexual for it to be sexual abuse, whether it is sexual abuse or not is on the victim to decide, and if the abuse was enacted on a sexual organ. If i rape a woman with sharp stick, it's not magically not sexual abuse just because i, the hypothetical abuser, am not getting sexual gratification from it. I disagree with your assertion that intention for sexual gratification is in any way related when deciding if a crime is sexual abuse. Edit: You do not have to cut and …
/r/MensRights17/02/23 10:52 PM
0

Yup. Like some batshit insane person repeatedly smacking their car with a hammer to prove how strong it is to other people, except with their emotions. Women don't seem to care how objectifying and dehumanizing this behavior is
/r/MensRights17/02/23 10:37 PM
1

Are you claiming it isn't common behavior in women to try and get their men to 'break' or become emotional, similar to the way they might kick the tires of a car to make sure it doesn't fall apart? That is the 'testing' being referred to.
/r/MensRights17/02/23 10:35 PM
1

The abuse part would have to have some element of sexual gratification. What? no it doesn't. Abuse is abuse regardless of how the abuser feels about it. It doesn't matter if you enjoy beating your kid, you're still an abuser for beating your kid. Just like you're a sex abuser for mutilating them.
/r/MensRights17/02/23 10:22 PM
5

The problem showing this to young women is that they'll laugh and find it humorous. I'm not going to claim its innate, but females definitely come out of childhood in the west with the attitude that sexual abuse of men is something to mock and laugh at.
/r/MensRights17/02/23 09:42 PM
5

You have a nasty habit of trying to make decisions for other people that you have no right to make. First, you claim you'll decide on your son's behalf what cosmetic and harmful procedures will be performed on his penis without his consent, and now you're claiming you get to decide where i comment! How about this: I'll comment whereever the goddamnfuck i please, to counter your misinformation and advocations of sexual abuse. It's also so interesting that i'm more willing to look out for the well…
/r/MensRights17/02/23 09:40 PM
5

The reasons they do them are identical. You could make the same "claims" of benefits for removing the clitoral hood of girls, and you'd be just as wrong claiming male genital mutilation was in any way beneficial
/r/MensRights17/02/23 09:26 PM
4

I know that realistically, the removal of the foreskin does not affect a person in any significant way. You're no advocate for men's rights if you believe something as monumentally batshit insanely stupid as this You're wrong, and you're encouraging someone to sexually abuse children. Edit: I can't reply because the planning-to-be-child-sex-abuser blocked me, so i'll answer here: I'm just saying as far as I know there isn't a massive effect except for the obvious mutilation. Which isn't incorrec…
/r/MensRights17/02/23 09:25 PM
5

yup, they'll molest and abuse children, then use that as an excuse for further molestation and abuse. The foreskin is fused to the head at birth, like a toenail, that they think ripping this off while the baby screams (he does, they don't even bother to apply what little anesthetic they use until after that point) is somehow not harmful. Not to mention they have to molest the baby boys into an erection before they start, it's obscene. And then there's a dipshit elsewhere in this thread saying he…
/r/MensRights17/02/23 09:24 PM
9

Yup. Go look at the UN "equality" metrics. If you look at how they calculate the numbers, they're measuring levels of female superiority, not equality. Thats why the "equality" numbers go down when areas where men are behind get better.
/r/MensRights17/02/23 09:14 PM
5

Again, you're not listening. They damaged my frontal lobe, and yours, because that's what extreme trauma as an infant does.
/r/MensRights17/02/23 08:34 PM
4

Far far worse than that, as tonsils aren't a sexual organ. That said, tonsils shouldn't be routinely removed, as they also serve a useful function. Notice how they don't just cut off all the parts of you that could potentially cause problems when you're born? because that would be fucked up? Should we be amputating little girls' breasts to reduce breast cancer, too?
/r/MensRights17/02/23 08:27 PM
2

Yeah that's rough man, sorry those decisions have to haunt you. Sadly, we still have idiots ITT defending it and proudly stating how they will do it to their potential sons. That people will sexually abuse their own children just to protect their fragile minds from admitting they were, themselves, sexually abused is one of those psychological fuckups that makes me pretty sure we're doomed as a species.
/r/MensRights17/02/23 08:06 PM
1

Oh we have a really good idea what that trauma does. There's a whole body of research around Trauma Bonding. It creates a more fearful and submissive adult.
/r/MensRights17/02/23 08:04 PM
3

Nobody circumcises baby girls. that was you, forgot already because it didn't fit your worldview either? Boys and girls are different. But the sexual abuse of them is not. Mutilating the genitals of boys is every bit as wrong and harmful as mutilating the genitals of girls. You can remove a girl's clitoral hood for "hygiene" as that's the same tissue group they remove from boys, but that's a felony in the west. You really are bending over backwards to pretend this isn't sexual abuse, huh? The to…
/r/MensRights17/02/23 08:01 PM
5

And even then, most medical issues with the penis or foreskin, like phimosis, can be solved far more easily and effectively in other ways
/r/MensRights17/02/23 07:56 PM
5

You're really stupid, huh? The campaign to end female genital mutilation has been an ongoing fight for decades, it's only rare in the west. I know it's fun to talk out of your ass so you never have to admit you're wrong, but have you tried shutting the fuck up? Edit: Since the dipshit blocked me after asking for sources, here's an edit for everyone else! https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844020324099 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17378847/ https://jme.bmj.com/content/force…
/r/MensRights17/02/23 07:52 PM
3

It does not improve hygiene, that's a lie it is not medically beneficial, that's another lie You are actively providing cover for the sexual abuse of children. You're no better than a child predator.
/r/MensRights17/02/23 07:36 PM
4

Not an appropriate comparison at all fucktard, as one is medically beneficial and one is objectively harmful, a human rights violation, and SEXUAL FUCKING ABUSE AND MUTILATION OF A CHILD so, again, fucktard
/r/MensRights17/02/23 07:30 PM
5

ffs, the aboslutely bumfuck retarded thought of comparing infant genital mutilation to a vaccine. Might as well be comparing rape to an ear piercing. Edit: Since the dipshit asked for sources and then blocked me, here's some for everybody else! https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844020324099 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17378847/ https://jme.bmj.com/content/forced-circumcision-children-also-unethical https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/circumcision-injuries-include-more-than-b…
/r/MensRights17/02/23 07:24 PM
5

You're saying if i sexually abuse girls as babies, so long as they don't remember it and don't feel bad about it, that's just fine then? No disfigurement The disfigurement is missing part of your penis, dumbass. Delusions like yours are why millions of baby boys continue to be sexually abused Edit: Since the dipshit blocked me after asking for sources, here's some for everybody else! https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844020324099 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17378847/ htt…
/r/MensRights17/02/23 07:22 PM
8

If you guys can think of many many other issues where women benefit but we do not get anything in return please add them. That would be most of society. Men are told and shown as children that their supply of empathy/sympathy/help ran out the moment they were born, and everything about them that costs someone else something puts them into debt beyond that. Whereas women are a gift to mankind just for existing, and have everything in their lives handed to them (including their illusion they've "d…
/r/MensRights17/02/23 07:07 PM
3

Exactly, we live in a gynocentric oligarchy where the wealthy and powerful cucks use their positions of power to the benefit of women. And then all men get blamed for the tiny minority of men (and women) enacting laws, even when those laws are hurting all men. Also, women have been the majority of voters for decades now, anyone who thinks we live in an oppressive patriarchy that benefits men has their head stuck up their ass.
/r/MensRights17/02/23 05:28 PM
4

Women couldn't even vote 100 years ago... Neither could most men, and the historical difference between universal suffrage between both genders is insignificantly small. Which is kind of the point of the comment you didn't read that you responded to anyway. So take your "waaaah wymyn were so oppressed for aaaaaal herstwory so we can do whatever we want now!" bullshit rhetoric and shove it up your ass
/r/MensRights17/02/23 05:24 PM
6

Are you saying that if only they fought back men wouldn't be victims of domestic abuse? No, and stop trying to twist my words. Are you saying if we stopped punishing people for rapes, the amount of rapes would stay the same? The state doesn't punish women for the harms they cause men, but men used to be expected to provide that punishment themselves. Now the state will intervene if they attempt that role of enforcing their women treat them with respect, and so we have a bunch of misandric cunts …
/r/MensRights17/02/23 05:12 PM
15

Of course they shame men for looking. The more men they are able to shame, the more evidence they have that they are an attractive women who beats off creeps with a stick. They are actively abusing men just to support their own inflated ego and get social validation.
/r/MensRights17/02/23 04:51 PM
6

Before this men were allowed to fight back, now they are not and we're seeing how much women enjoy being domestic abusers
/r/MensRights17/02/23 04:12 PM
54

Because they're concerned with women winning, which means they are working to make sure men lose since they turned it into a binary zero-sum game. Especially in areas where they can't seem to pump women up enough, they instead move to tearing men down. You think they care about the anti-male bias in those fields? They consider that a good thing.
/r/MensRights17/02/23 04:05 PM
10

Same here. They have a "men's fund" where they'll buy hotel rooms to claim they maintain gender parity Shockingly, that 'fund' is always empty
/r/MensRights17/02/23 03:57 PM
13

Ffs. Probation? Really?
/r/MensRights17/02/23 03:56 PM
11

Not going so far as to say all women do it, and if you found one that doesn't, congratulations on winning the lottery. Know that it's also possible she's not interested and just being nice, which is part of the problem even in answering your question. Women 'test' men kind of like how they might 'test' a car they want to buy by kicking the tires, seeing if they can get it to fall apart. All the women i've known don't seem to care that this behavior is dehumanizing to men and objectifying in the …
/r/MensRights17/02/23 03:54 PM
81

sick and disgusting
/r/MensRights16/02/23 11:53 PM
8

Violent, sexist, narcissistic abuse that tries to fill the whole bingo card of abuse types until the abuser feels satisfied they've reached the mythical "equality" of abuse they pretend existed towards women
/r/MensRights16/02/23 11:44 PM
9

Right back atcha, mouth breather. Or it would be, if you could read. The comparison is very apt, as feminists are as bigoted as white supremacists, and you're a bigot for ignoring how much they are.
/r/MensRights16/02/23 05:57 PM
0

when my background is relevant. But it isn't. If you aren't using stats and data then you're asserting your personal anecdotes and subjective experience be treated as equal to data and facts, and that's wrong as well as demanding special treatment. You may not be doing it intentionally or maliciously, but it is what you're doing when you go "As a woman...". It's a reverse ad hominim, where you are suggesting being a woman makes what you say more relevant/important/accurate, when in the vast majo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/02/23 05:56 PM
16

Horseshoe theory, the ends of the spectrum become almost identical. Also, its intentional. The radicalization is about dividing our society to distract from the erosion of our rights and the implementation of totalitarian and sexist policies, like VAWA and the Duluth DV Model.
/r/MensRights16/02/23 04:49 PM
15

huh, its almost as if feminism causes many and exacerbates the rest of the problems men need help solving. Do you bitch when black people complain about the KKK, too?
/r/MensRights16/02/23 04:43 PM
37

But if you're stuck interacting with someone who is a sexist cunt judging people based on their sex, you shouldn't play with girls
/r/MensRights16/02/23 04:15 PM
5

That's not what he was advocating or even implying, but if you're going to pretend that teen pregnancy isn't a scenario we as a society should be prepared to handle, i got some bad news for ya: Kids do stupid shit.
/r/MensRights16/02/23 12:46 AM
7

Well thats a load of bullshit Look, i get he's a religious cuck and a tradcon, but like i just demonstrated there are plenty of accurate insults to sling at him without leveraging societal misandry and making shit up. Be better.
/r/MensRights16/02/23 12:45 AM
1

HAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAA ...no
/r/MensRights16/02/23 12:43 AM
7

It means to be personally violated and have something precious taken from you, but with finance It's called hyperbole and metaphor, dumbass
/r/MensRights16/02/23 12:42 AM
2

You posted 0-IQ pithy 'advice' and pretend it's some revelation from heaven. Your intentions were revealed in your example: This especially applies to emotional situations. It feels good to pressure the other person to apologize, or to get the satisfaction of them admitting you were right. You made sure not to provide a specific enough example to be criticized, as well as offered nothing of value. The tl;dr of your post is "Don't try to get people to apologize for wrongdoing, don't call out peop…
/r/MensRights15/02/23 06:27 PM
2

As for the general stuff, my experience is that this is a very INEFFECTIVE way to get at your stated goal of moving towards truth. And i'm saying you're wrong People do not respond very well to facts and logic. Only high systematizing cognition people respond well to that. That doesn't mean we stop using facts and logic. People don't respond well to building codes and road rules, either, but we are highly incentivized to make sure everyone follows those rules. Usually it's gaining trust, and lea…
/r/MensRights15/02/23 06:19 PM
1

What a convenient way to ignore the rest of your post
/r/MensRights15/02/23 06:13 PM
1

My goal is to pursue and advocate for truth, and so getting people with their heads stuck up their ass to apologize and admit not that i am right, but that the argument is right, and their argument was wrong, is very much in my best interest. Also, you're ignoring negative externalizes of these interactions. Often when showing someone how much of a stupid asshole they are, the conversation is more for the people watching than for the person being spoken to. Letting people believe they were right…
/r/MensRights15/02/23 06:04 PM
11

Your blindness to how men are negatively sexualized is what is leading to this perception. Also, women are perfectly capable of putting on a coat and stopping that sexualization. It's within their control. They choose to keep it going, because they want it (from the "right" men). Men can't choose not to have their sexuality demonized, they have to hide it or be punished. From the day many of us were fucking born, society saw our sexuality and said "Ya know, lets cut some of that off, maybe he'll…
/r/MensRights15/02/23 04:51 PM
0

Because men find the idea of a harem far more enticing that women do, and are the only gender capable of practically having one. A woman with a bunch of husbands will have a much harder time trying to stop her own innate bitchiness in getting those husbands to compete so she can fuck the best one, the winner. Its not a sustainable solution as it will keep going until the men kill each other or her just to make her stop. A man with a bunch of wives doesn't care if they compete beyond how amusing …
/r/MensRights15/02/23 04:45 PM
5

This is as deluded as gay conversion therapy. You can't just suggest people be a different sexual orientation because its convenient. Yes men suffer greatly because bitches be bitches but that doesn't mean they can just go gay, nor should they. Also, it's been studied that women harshly judge men that have been sexual with other men in ways that men do not with women, so your proposed solution, while bigoted and sexist at its core, still wouldn't help anything or solve the problem.
/r/MensRights15/02/23 04:42 PM
36

Yup. Male sexual satisfaction must be framed in terms of how it benefits women, because to them, everything must benefit women or it must be attacked and destroyed. They know men who jack off are also healthier, happier, and more confident. They actively don't want this result in men (unless women can benefit specifically somehow)
/r/MensRights15/02/23 04:23 PM
5

Supporting boys does not mean that girls lose out and vice versa. Oh, another "report" that contradicts themselves. Do they not realize that these boys are losing out because of how much they are "supporting" girls? The "advances" feminism has made for girls in education is a large reason why they are so against helping boys, they know that applying that "support" to boys means actively harming and dragging down girls Edit: Also this report focuses on academic achievement, not knowledge. Many bo…
/r/MensRights15/02/23 04:16 PM
1

Oh, are you a bot or something? Just not paying attention to the conversation? you pointed out that argument A wouldn't work because people are stupid, i presented argument B to resolve this, and you came back with a criticism of B that would be solved by A. ffs, at least pay attention. And modern voting machines connected to the internet are not helping. Cell phone voting would make it even worse. OR phone voting would solve the problem because it would require the entire process be open source…
/r/MensRights15/02/23 03:59 PM
2

While we know this is very likely, it’s not how the author intended it nor how it will be viewed
/r/MensRights15/02/23 03:12 PM
1

I was raised in that evidence, and I wasn’t surprised, I was disappointed and disgusted. That you aren’t shows how comfortable that head shaped hole in the sand is, but once you notice the bugs and learn about bacteria it’s just not worth it anymore
/r/MensRights15/02/23 03:08 PM
1

You’re thinking we use the same voting standards that are decades out of date. We all have phones, if we weren’t prevented from having secure enough devices to declare our vote that way, the vote out can happen in seconds, and all you do is update your phone whenever you change your mind
/r/MensRights15/02/23 03:06 PM
10

mgtow are incels in denial Tell me you know fuck all about either group without saying you know fuck all about either group
/r/MensRights15/02/23 12:35 AM
41

They won't push this one, there aren't horrific side effects like suicide to whine about men not putting up with for the convenience of some imaginary woman
/r/MensRights15/02/23 12:34 AM
13

this, tbh. A man with a black eye shoving the corpse of his abusive wife into a freezer would be treated very differently
/r/MensRights15/02/23 12:22 AM
8

They've been ignoring the suffering of men for decades without any issue, but suddenly its a problem because some hooker can't pull herself up by her bootstraps? yawn
/r/MensRights14/02/23 11:47 PM
32

This isn't helpful to mensrights, the mural is advocating killing your partner because of a black eye. And for all banksy knows, in the reality of that mental image he's emulating, she gave herself that black eye to justify killing her husband. This mural is more misandry, and we shouldn't care that they removed a piece of trash from it.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 11:44 PM
7

It's literally enshrining in law that they believe women sexually abusing/assaulting men is not as bad as men sexually abusing/assaulting women. Feminist push this. Most women push this. This is the misandry we are fighting. "Violence against women" i just an erasure of violence against men for politics and power
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/23 11:38 PM
4

So yeah good you care more getting to do what women do than defend your country. That's fine. Embarrassing, but I don't object. I care about men not being treated as cannon fodder and disposable second class citizens, and you are trying to shame me for it? THAT is embarrassing. If it's noble to defend the country, then it's as noble for women to do it as men. If women are allowed to leave by choice, men should be able to do as well. All you're advocating for is slavery and murder on behalf of as…
/r/MensRights14/02/23 11:22 PM
7

Very manly. Yes, caring about other people and wanting to treat them equally is very manly. Glad you're up to speed! Yes of course the important thing in Ukraine atm is the equality of abandoning your country If it's good enough for the women to do, it's good enough for the men. If the country was worth defending they'd have volunteers to do so, the fact that they're forcing people shows that they are unworthy of men's lives being sacrificed on their behalf. not to mention yes abandoning the cou…
/r/MensRights14/02/23 11:14 PM
6

Oh i see, so you want those guys to be tortured and murdered just because they were men, instead of fleeing like the rest of the population from an invading force? here is a multitude of non combat related things he could be doing to help his country, but you are advocating them scurrying off? Women were perfectly capable of performing those roles, and they scurried right off Is that not deeply embarrassing to you? Not even slightly, because i'm not a sexist piece of shit, unlike people advocati…
/r/MensRights14/02/23 11:06 PM
10

Nope, just less men Way to troll, tho, 7/5 stars
/r/MensRights14/02/23 11:00 PM
9

raping every woman lucky enough to live. They're hard to find, since they were allowed to leave. Much easier to rape, torture, and kill the men forced to stay behind.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 10:52 PM
3

I'm with you, but i'm telling you they'll write this off as fake news or misinformation. In their mind's the foreskin serves no purpose. Their concept of a penis doesn't include it, and so if you try to explain that they completely ignore you and write you off.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 10:51 PM
2

And i get defensive when people sexually abuse and mutilate children, so it's a topic i throw in their faces a lot.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 10:47 PM
6

About goddamn time Men need control over their reproductive choices beyond just "keep it in your pants", and this seems way harder for malicious partners to poke holes into.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 10:46 PM
3

But there isn't more, people made it up to get money and power I'd rather live in a depressing reality than a pretty lie any day, that's a large part of what this sub is about.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 10:43 PM
2

in my experience they go full on "Male genitalia and female genitalia are different. Those damaged parts of girls serve a purpose" and then they completely ignore you or treat you as a conspiracy theorist if you try to explain that the foreskin has any function at all.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 10:23 PM
0

Believing in a made up authority figure so you feel better about the blatant apathy of life and the universe, and also believing in an afterlife so you can run away from the fear of death, is just as much batshit crazy as any feminist.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 10:03 PM
27

We didn't get a choice. Women outnumber men in voting, and use the violence of the state and false allegations to enforce their whims.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 10:02 PM
19

The system being against him is an even better reason to have a lawyer
/r/MensRights14/02/23 07:42 PM
40

You're about to witness some of the full extent of society misandry, be prepared. Child support will be unfair, because the state profits from it. They also profit off people who get put in jail for being unable to pay. It's the only remaining form of debtors prison, and a strong pipeline into the prison system. She will be able to do/change many things on the backend to fuck with him without him knowing. Getting support changed, claiming to not receive money, claiming she should get it in cash …
/r/MensRights14/02/23 04:39 PM
4

Why. If we get someone who can't read a map, we vote them out. Gating the selection process beyond the vote would be far more like literacy tests keeping minorities from voting, but now to keep them from being elected I also like the societal incentives it creates. We need to make sure as many people as possible are capable of running the country, because we're forced with the reality that they may. People would treat homeless bums far better if that same person could be president tomorrow.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 04:34 PM
9

And how incomparable it is, while they compare them, and how abhorrent it is that you would try to get one protected like the other. It's not just about us comparing them to get MGM banned and boys protected, they insist on comparing them specifically to keep MGM available and boys sexually abused as children, because protecting them as much as we do girls would be "inappropriate"
/r/MensRights14/02/23 04:30 PM
52

Yup, this is one of the many forms of sexual violence women commit against men, and society does more to support the perpetrator than to prevent it.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 04:24 PM
6

This is why i'm an advocate of our elected candidates being selected more like we do Jurors: from a lottery of the qualifying population (citizens). We still vote on whether to keep them, but the choosing part is removed so that the choice can no longer be manipulated to make the voting part meaningless. And maybe an iphone style penalty of doubling the wait time before you can vote out the next person, to incentivize making a choice quickly. I don't think we'd have to go through more than 5 can…
/r/MensRights14/02/23 04:15 PM
171

You know what this would be called if it were the other way around: Rape. Lying about birth control or contraception is rape (if the perpetrator is a man, according to our sexist world) Sorry to hear about the shitstorm your BF is in, hope you learn something valuable from the absolute mountain of misandric bullshit he's about to go through
/r/MensRights14/02/23 03:59 PM
4

As you avoided the debate so that you wouldn't have to answer, coward. But if you're so keen on avoiding retards, how do you live with yourself? Do you remove all the mirrors or something?
/r/MensRights14/02/23 12:07 AM
9

Well you not being able to respond to a single criticism or question about it, for one. Incompetent loser.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 11:24 PM
5

Again, because you're too incompetent to actually answer my question, you deflect with insults. Who's braindead again? This level of avoidance of your own inadequacy in answering a simple question speaks volumes about your capabilities as a person. Don't worry, not all jobs need a high IQ. Just don't be a therapist with that attitude, you'll do more harm than help.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 11:23 PM
11

Wow, so you're literally fucking retarded? Jumping to name calling instead of answering a valid question.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 10:25 PM
27

And you can't use "oh but think of what she went through" when that was used as an excuse for their abuse for years on end. You sound like an abuser apologist. Are rape victims supposed to forgive their rapists? That's a thing that therapists commonly suggest?
/r/MensRights13/02/23 09:25 PM
26

Yup, they've ramped up their de-platform campaigns against antifeminism and even here on the mensrights subs, now that they've gotten TRP and MGTOW kicked off the site. This sub only has a moderate amount of leeway because a feminist was appointed as a mod by the reddit admins. Kinda 'hilarious' in a way, it's like getting a KKK member to mod for a civil rights group and thinking it would go well.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 09:12 PM
1

It's also one of the funnels into the private prison system in the US. They consider men in cages to be a commodity, so it's the only legal form of debtors prisons still around. They profit off of the incarceration of men unable to pay, and so are motivated to make the payments as high as possible.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 09:10 PM
70

Yeah menslib is a feminist controlled opposition sub. Feminists set it up for men to chat in "approved" ways, to make sure no conversations on men's problem actually addressed one of men's biggest problems: feminism. Many of us here learned about the true nature of women from their abusive mothers, and here is one of the few places we can talk about it without it getting dismissed with bullshit. Even therapists try to focus on "forgiveness and healing" with nonsense like "try to understand her t…
/r/MensRights13/02/23 09:06 PM
5

This includes the approximately third of domestic abuse victims who are male. That will admit to it, the feminists who block males from access to services are right in that if they were served the same the male figures would skyrocket, especially if social stigma for receiving help was reduced. This is shabby treatment for male victims. These councils are literally doing the least they can do. This is very much true. I've talked to people that work in my local DV resources and they've told me th…
/r/MensRights13/02/23 07:14 PM
31

The point of it is to dehumanize. They don't want the recipients of the label getting the sympathy a normal human would get. They know it's a dangerous thing to do, they want that danger applied to that population. This is just the modern incarnation of the S.C.U.M. Manifesto
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/23 07:01 PM
5

Also be wary of stats, they can easily be doctored so you need to check the data sets and collection methods. Using MGM as an example again: The african "studies" that "prove" it reduces AIDS and STD transmission are horribly done, and the results were "replicated" 3 separate times. When i say "horribly done", i mean things like cutting off part of someone's dick, saying "ok, don't have sex for 2 weeks" while the intact group continues to have sex, and then counting those as equal in the results…
/r/MensRights13/02/23 06:44 PM
4

you've proved nothing but how much of a fool you are, enjoy your life (i hear its easier when your head is so far up your ass)
/r/MensRights13/02/23 06:29 PM
5

Congrats, you found a single nationally recognized example of a common phenomena! "hurr durr a simple gugle search is enough do PROVE there's no secret society" like, do you even listen to yourself?
/r/MensRights13/02/23 06:26 PM
5

You found national statistics? I'd love to see those. For individual stories, a query on duckduckgo of site:reddit.com/r/mensrights infanticide mother kills should get plenty of results
/r/MensRights13/02/23 06:21 PM
12

Finding specific cases of mothers murdering their children is easy. We post about it all the time here. Finding national statistics on it is damn near impossible, due to the implications it would have for women as a whole.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 06:12 PM
14

Common sense and observation, same reason it's difficult to track deaths cause by Male Genital Mutilation. They get wrapped up under SIDS(again) or "Blood poisioning" or whatever resulting infection from pissing and shitting on a genital wound causes, not listed as a death from genital mutilation. Mothers murdering their children are hidden in the same way, which is why OP has to look for and has so much trouble finding the stats.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 06:11 PM
9

Sure, but i just told you they don't track it on purpose
/r/MensRights13/02/23 06:03 PM
18

It's more than 70%, but they don't keep hard stats to make sure people can't attribute those deaths to women. If we're not including the murdering of unborn children that could easily have been avoided with proper birth control, we have specific laws in place to try and prevent mothers murdering their children Safe haven laws were invented because so many mothers would murder their kids. Rollo Tomassi calls the the "Kill to party" dynamic. Women know that a kid makes them less attractive to pote…
/r/MensRights13/02/23 05:59 PM
1

if women's body counts were public, society would benefit. So true
/r/MensRights13/02/23 05:26 PM
1

The original post was removed
/r/MensRights13/02/23 05:26 PM
1

Those posts on abuse are all fabricated and made up. If they were real they could and should have gone to the police. But again, reality is the enemy of a feminist hag like yourself
/r/MensRights13/02/23 02:59 PM
4

And it’s not true, otherwise these women could have gone to the police Cope on your imagined oppressed life harder, Ms most pampered and protected at all times demographic
/r/MensRights13/02/23 02:58 PM
3

It’s not warning “just about dangerous men” and you know it. This is doxxing, libel, and slander and the misandrist cunts who post there clearly revel in their abuse, knowing full well of they were actually in any danger there is the police to go to. How’s the weather with your head so far up your ass, btw? Cloudy?
/r/MensRights13/02/23 02:56 PM
1

Ok, but women are choosing not to be decent human beings, en mass, according to these groups, so we need to have ways to defend ourselves.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 02:55 PM
4

Lie harder. We all know these groups are for consequence-less slander and libel and have fuck all to do with personal protection.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 02:50 PM
8

70% of adult males in the US were strapped down, violated, molested, and mutilated as children and you want other people to check their fucking privilege?
/r/MensRights13/02/23 02:41 PM
9

I put it in quotes for a reason But feminism can’t have any topic even passably considered good exist where they perceive men are better than women It’s also why actually addressing the inequality doesn’t solve the feminist complaints about it, it’s based on their perception and we’ve seen what their perception is.
/r/AntiFeminists12/02/23 10:07 PM
53

Because feminism is about female supremacy. Men having a higher libido means they “win” at something, and that they “win” due to biological factors. Feminists can’t have this, as it directly contradicts their blank slate equalism doctrine
/r/AntiFeminists12/02/23 05:12 PM
9

This will reinforce in people they were right not to care in the first place, further desensitizing them to make suffering. It will further normalize the deaths of men
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/02/23 04:23 PM
5

That’s the beauty of the internet, people can’t be racist or sexist to you when you’re anonymous It’s also the source of the phrase “there are no girls on the internet” because you have to volunteer that information in order for other people to know. It’s also why “As a woman (or any other demographic)” gets so much hate, because you’re asserting that your sex should matter when you say something, pretty much asking for different or special treatment beyond what your words would get on their own…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/02/23 04:12 PM
10

Even if your are in a country where women are 2nd class citizens, feminism won’t help you. Feminism seeks power and control for women, and doesn’t care how it achieves that. That means that as feminism progresses where you are, it will do so in ways that aren’t for equality, but about “winning” against the men. They will institute policies more sexist than the ones that currently exist to achieve that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/02/23 04:08 PM
15

R/egalitarianism
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/02/23 04:05 PM
1

I’m anti child sexual abuse. If some groups want to continue to sexually abuse babies, then until they stop I am against those groups. It’s entirely within their control to stop being child sexually abusive mutilating pieces of shit, and they’re bringing evil into the world by doing it. They can stop anytime.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 04:01 PM
1

This, tbh. More “rah rah we need Real Mantm” as if all the men who he would call “weak” aren’t real. This is just conservative bullshit to get men back to work
/r/MensRights12/02/23 05:24 AM
3

If she wasn’t specifically targeting married or unavailable men, I’d agree with you. How about we do a little exercise: Hi! I’m a single dude that women find attractive! I like to specifically look for women who are in relationships or otherwise committed and try to get them to cheat, because I think the damage it causes to the relationship and the resulting drama is hilarious. Who’s more wrong? Me, for trying to get women to cheat, or the women cheaters? Or is it equal, as I have agency over my…
/r/MensRights11/02/23 03:38 PM
3

I don't have the details you do, and it's entirely possible he's just being friendly because he trusts you more. That doesn't mean you aren't uncomfortable, and changes nothing about needing open and direct communication to resolve the problem. A clear boundary like "Hey, [thing he does] is something i really only expect from romantic partners, you are not my romantic partner and i am not interested in changing that. Please do not do [thing he does] around me, it's making me uncomfortable" goes …
/r/MensRights10/02/23 11:09 PM
7

I understand the frustration, but give the man some slack until you've given him a firm and strong "no" on something. You even sticking up for him is likely the nicest a woman has acted towards him since he was a child, in his head it's logical to think you might have ulterior motives for your kind actions. I'm not saying you should have to put up with uncomfortable situations, but it's understandable in the current climate why they'd occur. But back to my original comment, it's on you to grow a…
/r/MensRights10/02/23 10:58 PM
15

trying to get someone to do something wrong makes you complicit, she's as bad as the cheating men She admitted to specifically targeting married
/r/MensRights10/02/23 10:52 PM
14

The answer is open and honest communication. It may not be that these are even advances, but it's important to clearly articulate what behavior makes you uncomfortable. To him. No hints, no suggestions, no metaphors, if something he does makes you uncomfortable it's on you to say "That action makes me uncomfortable". To him. When it happens. Also referred to as growing a spine.
/r/MensRights10/02/23 10:44 PM
4

Now for the sucker punch: Our society does cut up men. 70% of adult US males have a mutilation scar from childhood on their genitals. The rot runs deep.
/r/MensRights10/02/23 10:40 PM
5

The one who said men should be held back a year, and that girls mature faster than boys? Maybe if we subjected girls to the pressures boys face, they'd have similar developmental slowdowns. It's hilarious that he goes from "girls' barriers have been removed" to "it shows how boys are being disadvantaged" and his solution is instead of changing anything about the school or society that boys go to school a year later so that the girls will see them as their "peers" Calling internalized misandry, h…
/r/MensRights10/02/23 10:35 PM
7

Thank you for making these, they're a great representation of the data and state of things
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/02/23 10:13 PM
9

it was the way they did it. They firebombed churches, they were terrorists, all for something most men hadn't even had at the time for very long. The historical difference between universal men's and women's suffrage is insignificantly small, and on top of that, they used those terrorist tactics to push for special privileges men didn't have. For example, the presumed "right" to vote. Women have it, men do not. No other "right" requires you to go sign a document promising your life away on comma…
/r/MensRights10/02/23 08:17 PM
10

This is a pro-feminist video that is trying to distance feminism from the bad actions of the most prominent feminists and the "girlboss" phenomenon. All feminism is bad, "neo-liberal-feminism" isn't any different, and is still a sexist cesspool. Bad video.
/r/MensRights10/02/23 07:43 PM
3

oh for sure, the video is super wholesome. Glad to see that more often.
/r/MensRights10/02/23 07:13 PM
9

because unlike feminists, we want a future where the other gender still exists, and isn't oppressed.
/r/MensRights10/02/23 07:13 PM
2

sadly true
/r/MensRights10/02/23 07:12 PM
1

? i haven't reported anyone
/r/MensRights10/02/23 07:04 PM
10

Or the S.C.U.M. manefesto from the 60's if you want evidence of the misandry in the second wave. It's considered an iconic piece of feminist literature.
/r/MensRights10/02/23 06:59 PM
2

because one of the ways women abuse men is by lying about abuse. False allegations are a serious problem and one we talk about frequently here. Amber Turd being a very public example. Not every man has millions of dollars to defend himself like Depp does, and the entire "Believe without any evidence" schtick is the main supporter of this form of male abuse. Women's primary form of violence, statistically, is proxy violence. They use men and the state to enforce the violence they want enacted. Th…
/r/MensRights10/02/23 06:53 PM
2

It very much is horrible. Especially when men being drugged and forced to have sex with a woman isn't legally considered rape, and so that victim is blocked from all rape survivor support. WE KNOW it's a problem, that's what this community if for. What is your point?
/r/MensRights10/02/23 06:49 PM
6

The funny thing is that no one says it doesn't happen or that the event was made up. No one accuses the men of lying. They just don't care, won't do anything to help, and attack the man more if he tries to get any resources/sympathy/empathy/validation/support for himself, since that is "taking resources away from women"
/r/MensRights10/02/23 06:28 PM
5

Bunch of feminists ITT trying to corral men who show emotions into feminist spaces to be abused. Be warned.
/r/MensRights10/02/23 06:26 PM
4

It's not that you're here to mock, its that you're here to distract from male issues and make them about female issues. Female SA victims have resources to go to, men do not. What you are doing is as inappropriate as me going to a rape survivors group therapy session and making it all about me and my problems. Wrong place, wrong time, and very much all about me and not helping SA victims in general at all.
/r/MensRights10/02/23 06:19 PM
5

Oh, i see, you're just here to disrupt and deny facts and reality. Go protect your precious and exceedingly fragile false worldview somewhere else. (And it very much isn't)
/r/MensRights10/02/23 05:39 PM
3

It really isn't, you're just too stuck in your comfy blue-pilled reality to see it. The truth is that women have every bit the same capacity for evil as men do, and for abusing positions of power, the main difference is how little consequences women have for it. Men who abuse their power we lock in cages, we generally don't almost at all for women. And the population of women have had positions of power over children (which includes up and coming men) for hundreds of years. For you to pretend th…
/r/MensRights10/02/23 05:29 PM
-3

Your disagreement means nothing. Facts are facts and you believing it doesn't make it real.
/r/MensRights10/02/23 05:23 PM
9

You're coming into a male space and making it all about yourself. Your words and actions aren't matching up. Your post title says "Male victims deserve to be believed" and the content is all about you.
/r/MensRights10/02/23 05:21 PM
3

That's how we're treated, and we're treated that way as an excuse to abuse us into compliance. The idea that men can't control their emotions is the supporting premise that men are all inherently dangerous, and then used as the reason why they are allowed to treat men the way they do. No i don't think men can't control their emotions, in fact men control their emotions far better than not-men, in large part due to the consequences of not doing so. I think you very much misunderstand the author's…
/r/MensRights10/02/23 05:12 PM
12

Male victims of sexual assault aren't even considered victims, and are attacked if they try to be. You're still completely ignoring the problem to insert your own issues into it, this is why you're getting all the hate
/r/MensRights10/02/23 05:01 PM
-2

I submit to God. God isn't real, so what you're submitting to is a made up idealized image of a male, so that you don't have to submit to any real ones. That's the whole point of it.
/r/MensRights10/02/23 04:59 PM
17

I understand you're upset about that conversation, but you still have no sense of the scale of the problem. 70% of adult males in the united states, per CDC data, have as children been strapped down, violated, molested, and mutilated in a procedure far worse that what most people would consider rape, and those victims are not even allowed to call it sexual assault. And certainly not allowed to receive any support, sympathy, or resources devoted to "sexual assault victims" Men are attacked in the…
/r/MensRights10/02/23 04:52 PM
6

I believe she's saying "Men you have a right to be believed!" while posting a screenshot of a conversation where she wasn't immediately believed.
/r/MensRights10/02/23 04:50 PM
69

What a self absorbed misandrist cunt. I hope she never breeds and we don't have to worry about that rotten branch of the gene pool anymore
/r/MensRights10/02/23 04:48 PM
3

Well, they've managed to convince us that we're oppressing them by catering to their every need, providing shelter, food, and security, and helping them fulfill their biological imperatives at the expense of ourselves and our lives. I don't know if 'genius' is the word i'd use, but men are certainly fucking idiots for falling for it.
/r/MensRights10/02/23 04:24 PM
5

I don't think men are exploited by having to work any more than women were exploited by staying home with the kids Ask them if they want to trade. Many men i know would kill to have their lives taken care of while they focus of parenting, especially in the frequent cases where parenting is far, far, FAR less work and effort than their normal jobs I certainly think women have conditioned men to act certain ways, but is this really predatory on women's part? When men are in positions of power over…
/r/MensRights10/02/23 04:17 PM
1

rules for thee not for mee
/r/MensRights10/02/23 04:16 PM
21

This, tbh
/r/MensRights10/02/23 05:14 AM
14

The idea of a patriarchy doesn't exist in the western world, on a societal level. Countries like muslim countries are the only thing that come close. And throughout history, they were not oppressed, and were on average far more protected, pampered, and taken care of than men. That's not oppression. That's like a child complaining their parents oppress them by providing dinner, because it wasn't the chicken nuggets they wanted.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 11:57 PM
23

Yup, the entire premise of centuries of women being oppressed was entirely fabricated to push an agenda
/r/MensRights09/02/23 11:27 PM
2

Well you're trying to hold him accountable when it's pretty clear he was pressured by one party, and probably lied to by a different "authoritative" one And everyone in here is all "i have no sympathy for a spineless fool making stupid decisions", those decisions were made with deceitful practices by doctors, we should have sympathy for that. Doctors shouldn't let people mutilate themselves to make a girlfriend happy, and they probably didn't even check for a reason
/r/MensRights09/02/23 09:03 PM
2

Or the people in the position of giving medical advice tell people that unnecessary, damaging, and cosmetic genital mutilations are just fine and have basically no consequences.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 08:45 PM
3

then why do you push bullshit you supposedly 'know' is bullshit like "A high % of rapists are men"?
/r/MensRights09/02/23 06:31 PM
1

Everyone who's performed this mutilation should be sued and have their licenses revoked
/r/MensRights09/02/23 05:52 PM
25

They work with safety nets not available to men, and in safer jobs generally. Stop pretending we're playing on the same level playing field or under the same rules. It's very accurate to say, even as a generalization, that society treats women as human beings, and men as human doings.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 05:41 PM
24

Yes, and it really opened my eyes to how women see men. That when they call men "tools", they're not kidding, and they feel absolutely fuck all to how much suffering they cause the man. Her line in particular about how women feel about men's genitals was fucked up (she says women would prefer men without their testicles, surgically modified in several ways to only provide benefits to women, and no harms/costs) The worst part is how true so many of her observations ring, especially coming from a …
/r/MensRights09/02/23 05:40 PM
22

He was not able to give informed consent, as the people informing him were intentionally hiding some information and lying about others. This is what normalized sexual abuse of baby boys leads to.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 05:34 PM
9

Yes, they are, in many ways. There is a study you can google on grading bias, that shows when compared to blind grading that teachers often grade their own gender better than average. The bias is stronger in female than male teachers, but even still this study was used to claim discrimination in college campuses where male teachers are common. What this study completely ignored is that male teachers are very uncommon in public k-12 education, and that leads to an approximately 20% difference in …
/r/MensRights09/02/23 04:34 PM
22

It means you’re coming here demanding higher standards of behavior than most other subs because you’re “concerned” about what’s said. Unless you’ve gone to 1000 other subs that post “all men are trash” and “kill all men” and give them the same lecture, then you’re holding this sub to a higher standard than others, taking advantage of our free-ish speech values and hospitality, and demanding we change to benefit you, someone who this sub is not for It’s incredibly tone deaf and rude at best, and …
/r/MensRights09/02/23 03:57 PM
14

She’s certainly trying
/r/MensRights09/02/23 03:52 PM
7

Until it’s not allowed there it’s unfair to claim it shouldn’t be allowed here. Go get them to change before whining to us.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 03:50 PM
29

The “patriarchy” is a generalization of all men having unproven privilege and power
/r/MensRights09/02/23 03:47 PM
40

Turnabout is fair play. We’ve been told to shut up when we tried to pull the “not all men” when being blamed for what <1% of men do Now you’re telling us to shut up when we pull the same shit, except for things >50% of women do You lack quite a bit of empathy, and are calling for us to enforce standards our enemies (feminists) don’t hold for themselves which puts us at a competitive disadvantage in discussion. I get you don’t like to be generalized, but saying “women are right cunts” clearly doe…
/r/MensRights09/02/23 03:45 PM
2

That’s because they don’t allow you to speak over there at all And menslib is a controlled opposition subreddit, it’s meant to keep men talking in feminist approved ways. It even shares mods with the feminism and 2x subs
/r/MensRights09/02/23 03:41 PM
14

it's part of the gatekeeping First they successfully created the delusion that all men are dangerous by default, now they use that delusion to enforce higher standards of behavior for men's movements, effectively strangling men's movements before they can get started It's all intentional
/r/MensRights08/02/23 11:56 PM
20

If women were truly judged by men's standards (ya know, like "equality" would have us believe) then the vast majority of women would be "womenchildren" due to how pampered and spoiled they'd look by comparison.
/r/MensRights08/02/23 10:18 PM
212

Because they are highly invested in making "Manhood" conditional based on your performance, in order to control the performance of boys and men and condition/brainwash them into achieving the results the speaker wants in order to gain "Manhood" It's an ancient bullshit manipulation tactic to abuse men into providing value. It doesn't apply to women because they are born with their value and every else they manage to offer is just icing (as far as society is concerned)
/r/MensRights08/02/23 10:16 PM
2

this
/r/MensRights08/02/23 05:34 PM
5

Menslib is a feminist controlled opposition sub They're meant to "help" men by keeping them feminsts, which doesn't help men.
/r/MensRights08/02/23 05:33 PM
3

Good stuff
/r/MensRights08/02/23 05:27 PM
4

I would say it's heavily rigged against men
/r/MensRights08/02/23 05:18 PM
110

Yuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuup. It's sexual abuse and permanent mutilation of a child. It's my goto for shoving the whole "women are oppressed, and men are the oppresors!" argument back in their face. Or if they try to pretend women face more sex crimes. Nuh uh honey, 70% of adult males in USA were sexually abused like this as children and that blows even your made up, doctored, and exaggerated stats out of the fucking water.
/r/MensRights08/02/23 05:05 PM
1

Yup, or "toxic gender roles" "sexist societal standards" etc. For women they get all these pretty phrases that make it look like everyone else is wrong, and the perfect princess just needs to realize the wrongdoing of society. For men, to describe the same concepts, it's suddenly about how he's an evil demon hell bent on dominating and controlling women and he needs to be "fixed" before women or society is harmed. To talk about the exact same shit...
/r/MensRights08/02/23 05:02 PM
7

and now because of their misbehavior it will be banned
/r/MensRights08/02/23 04:43 PM
0

Yes, i invested in home workout gear just to avoid them
/r/MensRights08/02/23 04:41 PM
29

i just throw it back at them. I get shit for the crimes of men i don't know and am not associated with? Fine, i get to treat all women like shit because i can find some women who acted like shit Shockingly, women don't appreciate that type of generalization and stereotyping
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/02/23 01:09 AM
10

As well as rewarding the violence with sex and affection Those death row inmates have fan clubs of women asking to marry them
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/02/23 01:06 AM
7

and it is 100% in men's evolutionary benefit to fuck anything that looks fertile enough to successfully bear children. Luckily for all of us, we collectively decided just doing things that benefit you without regard to the other person isn't allowed, and is something we'll put you in a cage for. Women should face negative consequences, personally and socially, when they treat men this way. It's a sickening behavior and not something we want to continue in our society. It has always been in their…
/r/MensRights08/02/23 12:51 AM
11

Also it's still wrong, since it is excluding many/most female perpetrators as "oh that's not sexual abuse, just regular abuse, because the victim is male and perpetrator is female"
/r/MensRights08/02/23 12:46 AM
17

Yeah pretty easy for the "extensive" research to find exactly the conclusions they want when they exclude female perpetrators from the data set entirely
/r/MensRights08/02/23 12:45 AM
21

Well of course male babysitters cause the majority of sexual abuse, they don't count the shit done by females as abuse!
/r/MensRights08/02/23 12:43 AM
2

Don't fear being called a misogynist, that's the shit test. It just means "This guy said something that wasn't on it's face entirely pro-women! EVERYBODY HATE HIM!" Call that bitch out and put her in her place. They want to be misandric cunts in public we can remind them that freedom of speech means freedom from government intervention, not freedom from consequences.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 11:54 PM
8

What a convenient way to again blame men for problems women caused. Women do not get a pass just because men help enforce it. Women indoctrinated those men through childhood and education to ensure they end up that way. Fuck off with this blame shifting bullshit. Feminism is a cancer caused and perpetuated by women, just because it focuses on targeting men for indoctrination does not make those men the most responsible.
/r/AntiFeminists07/02/23 09:56 PM
9

If women didn’t ridicule men then men wouldn’t have to bottle all the shit up to protect themselves from it. And yes, it’s mostly women doing it
/r/MensRights07/02/23 09:52 PM
3

I'll stop doing it when they do. And we both know they aren't going to stop. But fine, here's your obligatory #notallwomyn
/r/MensRights07/02/23 05:49 PM
23

Can't have men doing self expression, now can we? That might imply they are humans with wants and desires instead of mules that only serve to finance a woman's life.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 05:40 PM
5

fucking preach Sexual abuse of children is normalized as "healthy"
/r/MensRights07/02/23 05:37 PM
2

And makes it illegal to refer to it as rape, because that might harm her reputation!
/r/MensRights07/02/23 05:35 PM
6

"Rape Culture" was a term meant to describe the conditions in prisons, where when caged with rapists and cruel guards it was basically expected you would be raped and sexually assaulted, and that no one would do anything to help you. "Don't drop the soap". Feminists and sexist women didn't like the idea of the sexual abuse of men getting any attention, and worked overtime to get the idea applied instead to every women living in the west. A ridiculous thought, as women in western countries are th…
/r/MensRights07/02/23 05:35 PM
3

And the sad state of our society where feminism and feminist "science" is put on the same shelf as physics and mathematics
/r/MensRights07/02/23 05:20 PM
4

menslib is a feminist shithole meant to "allow" men to talk about their issues but only so long as it's in a feminist approved way. Kind of hard to point out problems feminism causes men in that environment.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 05:18 PM
3

Misogyny these days means "What this person is saying isn't of benefit to women, attack them or you hate women too!"
/r/MensRights07/02/23 05:17 PM
2

Many "rights" women have are at the expense of men, by equalizing things you are removing privileges from women. Like the privilege to live and vote in most countries without risking your life on command
/r/MensRights07/02/23 05:17 PM
22

It's shocking how every women's ex was "Toxic and abusive", but when questioned about it, it boils down do him having his own wants and needs and having to fight for them because she preferred those not exist, and only her wants and needs be considered in a relationship. This complete lack of consideration for the man as doing anything but a tool to achieve her life goals is a common attribute of all the women complaining about their ex's
/r/MensRights07/02/23 04:53 PM
9

And she'll lose all respect for you
/r/MensRights07/02/23 04:39 PM
5

It very much is a choice, stop absolving women's shitty behavior as "biology". The cunts can choose to act better and improve themselves, like they so commonly whine that men should do.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 04:38 PM
5

And now you know where all that "Toxic Masculinity" comes from. It's heavily enforced by women, specifically the women those men rely on. They're not allowed to actually rely on them, they have to pretend they're perfect all alone all the time, otherwise this triggers the woman to start all the bullshit that enforced the toxic gender norms again.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 04:38 PM
9

We're talking about men, here, not women, so why is this relevant?
/r/MensRights07/02/23 04:34 PM
3

Good thing it's so easy to put negative emotions on a fucking schedule
/r/MensRights07/02/23 04:33 PM
1

No women wants to learn, they instead punish you for not living up to her imagined standards of manhood
/r/MensRights07/02/23 04:33 PM
6

Well why can't women grow up and see men like humans? They live in the safest, most provided for times in human history, and they treat men worse than ever.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 04:32 PM
16

It means they don't consider men people, they treat them as power objects that only exist to service their needs. It's female chauvinistic sexism, and for all the "progress" we've supposedly had in gender equality, cunts still refuse to give it up.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 04:29 PM
6

So is shaming someone for their authentic emotions, just because they don't want to see it, and for some reason only cunts understand they can't stop objectifying men as power objects and choose instead to treat them as less than human, forcing them to uphold stupid bullshit ideals of "manhood" that just so happen to be whatever is good for her
/r/MensRights07/02/23 04:27 PM
16

Hearing and seeing women behave like your wife is why i don't want one anymore. If the cunt's can't realize how shit they're being, they can be worthless disgusting shit people that also pay their own bills.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 04:24 PM
1

This is why you edit your last comment with your comeback and call them out
/r/MensRights07/02/23 04:17 PM
26

Very true. It's not "Women's nature" any more than it's "men's nature" to rape any attractive women they see. Men are perfectly capable of controlling themselves, that's why we blame them for their actions and put them in prison. Its high time we start equalizing that treatment to women.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 03:54 PM
6

Many shows have been doing this, it's part of the collective entertainment industry thinking they get to control what other people think. Since they're generally very extreme left, and their client base is mostly women, they try to poison their audience with hate towards certain groups before the audience has an opportunity to interact with said groups. In the 50's it was blacks, now it's men in general but MRA's specifically
/r/MensRights07/02/23 03:52 PM
6

Then you’re going to face some real challenges being a father, as you’re being willfully blind of this
/r/MensRights07/02/23 04:29 AM
7

Or this is another tool to help build legitimacy for false allegations and vigilantism, both of which are major issues for men
/r/MensRights07/02/23 01:49 AM
16

Because it's libel and slander in one, hidden behind private groups that are difficult to join and require verification of being a woman, leading to harassment , stalking, doxxing, and crimes against men. Maybe humans could stop being such cunts that do these types of things and grow up? Instead of expecting everyone else to just put up with it.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 12:36 AM
22

I think we should make a HoeFax app. Upload a girls picture and answer a survey on her, as well as your experience. Answer if it was a catfish, her bodycount, whether she put out, was she good in bed, her attitude, how respectful she was, how psycho is she, does she incite violence towards other men, does she threaten to use other men to threaten violence against you, history of false allegations, scale of 1-10 how feminazi the bitch is, etc. Then we'll do it better than they did, correlate thes…
/r/MensRights06/02/23 11:48 PM
4

You forgot the terrible plague of males who don't sit with their knees together on public transportation, or even worse, pee standing up! The gall of you cis straight white men to think about silly men's problems when we have womyn suffering from these plights all over the world! .../s
/r/MensRights06/02/23 11:26 PM
10

Men solving their issues actively makes things worse for women, as women profit off of the exploitation and objectification of men.
/r/MensRights06/02/23 11:22 PM
270

Because then they might be able to talk about something that doesn't benefit women in some way not even joking, this is what they're protecting themselves from. Women completely shit talk men when men aren't around, and so assume men do the same thing (even though we rarely talk about women at all). They don't want that projected "rampant misogyny" to go unchecked, and so they don't allow male only spaces to exist. Even worse, men might get wise to women's bullshit by talking with each other, an…
/r/MensRights06/02/23 11:08 PM
4

Its not social media, these attitudes are pushed hard in schools by the teachers and administration
/r/MensRights06/02/23 09:46 PM
9

Feminism just made it much, much worse
/r/AntiFeminists06/02/23 03:53 PM
8

Maybe if every time a man wasn’t literally paying for it it wasn’t referred to as “emotional labor” to do your fucking job as a spouse, men wouldn’t need therapy as much? I mean the gall of people. How many times have men been expected to be a shoulder to cry on. It’s just fucking typical that as soon as we need a shoulder and some support it’s all “don’t treat your spouse as a therapist! Go pay money to vent the way women are allowed to every fucking day”
/r/MensRights04/02/23 10:00 PM
5

You understand that criminals in jail and on death row have female fan clubs, right? At some point women need to own up to the fact that a large number of them actively reward the worst in men, and then blame the rest of men when things go badly
/r/AntiFeminists04/02/23 02:20 PM
1

They do. Disparu is a YouTube channel that does one
/r/MensRights04/02/23 02:16 PM
2

everything male must be in service to something female, or it's evil and must be destroyed
/r/MensRights03/02/23 08:22 PM
2

ah massive psyop? possibly
/r/MensRights03/02/23 07:52 PM
3

Its not the age gap that's the problem, its the incest angle. They're actively playing on how the children feel about watching the parents flirt and fuck men their own age.
/r/MensRights03/02/23 07:52 PM
4

Lets play the flip it game! 10 Fathers are going on a dating show with their their daughters to mix and match! They'll share hotel rooms, date together, and bond as they try to dive deep into their souls and find their mate! ...yup, absolutely degenerate and disgusting
/r/MensRights03/02/23 07:51 PM
5

The rate of adult males in the USA having been strapped down spread eagle and tortured/mutilated by every single person they are supposed to trust in life is around 70%, given last statistics. But because this form of child sexual abuse gets a pretty title (circumcision) people are just A-FUCKING-OK mutilating the genitals of children And that this isn't even counted when we're talking about male child abuse shows the real extent of the problem we have.
/r/MensRights03/02/23 07:32 PM
3

agreed, wtf is this
/r/MensRights03/02/23 07:30 PM
33

I still remember a question from a girl sitting next to me in science class in high school: "Men are bigger and produce more carbon dioxide, right? If we reduced the population of men, could we solve climate change?" ....bet we could get better results mass murdering women and not producing all their makeup, clothes, and other beauty products. Those things produce way more C02 then men just existing and breathing, yet women feel perfectly fine to ask that question in all seriousness, whereas if …
/r/MensRights03/02/23 07:28 PM
2

Men sacrificing of themselves for the benefit of all is a noble sacrifice and should be rewarded and revered. Men being indoctrinated to sacrifice of themselves for the benefit of all is fucking disgusting manipulation of men, en mass, by the people who are supposed to care about them. There is a stark difference between revering hero's and indoctrinating youth into being them so you can personally benefit from their actions. Society (and lets be honest, women) are very much doing the latter.
/r/MensRights03/02/23 07:21 PM
1

Look up Disparu on youtube, he does this. But really many video review youtubers are doing this already, i'd even count Pitch Meetings
/r/MensRights03/02/23 07:19 PM
2

The problem is so much of the entertainment industry is infected with feminism and anti-male agenda's. The entirety of the rom-com genre, for example, plays men off as tools to women and glorifies their humiliation, subjugation, and often their sexual assault. War movies feel manly, until you realize it's glorifying the use of men as tools in war so rich pompous assholes can gain political points. Finding movies with actually positive male role models that aren't trying to manipulate men into a …
/r/MensRights03/02/23 07:19 PM
57

Worse than this, tried out that gpt chatbot and it's spitting feminist talking points, and doesn't take any corrections on any of those points. They're very busy getting their bullshit instilled in institutions and training data so that their delusions become recognized as reality regardless of actual reality.
/r/MensRights03/02/23 07:13 PM
-1

[ Removed by Reddit ]
/r/MensRights03/02/23 05:01 PM
1

were you dropped as a child?
/r/MensRights03/02/23 04:55 PM
2

You clearly didn't read the last part of my response, which describes some severely physical consequences if the man doesn't play along with the wholesale theft that is child support. It's the only current institution that still allows the otherwise very illegal practice of debtors prisons. And to put it in terms women would understand, its like being jailed for choosing not to be a parent, so enjoy the equality you have coming to you, or get on the fucking bandwagon.
/r/MensRights03/02/23 04:09 PM
4

Well, sure, if you are only counting the physicalities of pregnancy and nothing else, it sure seems like it only affects women You've also handwaved any talk of stress or strain as "mental" issues, when they're not. Not to mention the "direct strain" of being kidnapped and confined in a cage with criminals, being beaten, abused and assaulted in that environment, all for a failure to finance a woman making an entirely one-sided choice.
/r/MensRights02/02/23 11:42 PM
2

he ignored all the harm men go through being in prison by not paying child support. Every harm they suffer in those prisons, when imprisoned for this reason, counters their claim that only women suffer physically
/r/MensRights02/02/23 11:28 PM
33

This is how they doctor the numbers. The count something female specific and claim it's about "gender equality", but they ignore the vastly larger amount of men suffering and dying to do it. I'd like to see those maternal mortality numbers up against how many men have died of their various "manly" duties over the same time period.
/r/MensRights02/02/23 10:49 PM
16

Misogyny now means to most feminists "Anything that negatively affects women, in my opinion". They're happy with the real meaning being "hates women", because it allows them to pretend anyone that is doing something against the feminist agenda hates women Its hilarious because it creates the same problem they're trying to solve (which may be the point). You can't have a real character as a "strong female lead" because you can't give her any serious flaws or attributes people won't like, or you'r…
/r/MensRights02/02/23 10:38 PM
1

It's ridiculous to assert you get to decide where other people can and can't look. If you don't want it looked at, don't put it in public. This is a shining example of the privilege and entitlement women have, they often honestly believe they should be able to control any aspect of a man that they don't like, or they feel affects them in any way.
/r/MensRights02/02/23 10:30 PM
2

So we're back to requiring women to sign an documents prior to sex, which they won't do because it removes their legal advantages. The problem with your approach is it defaults to "she said" if you are required to have legal documentation
/r/MensRights02/02/23 08:58 PM
3

How do you "prove" you disagreed to fatherhood? Who wins if its his word against hers? e.g. "She told me she was on birth control" "no i didn't!"
/r/MensRights02/02/23 08:20 PM
0

wow, thats a lot of made up bullshit just to avoid answering a question
/r/MensRights02/02/23 08:16 PM
1

It’s embedded throught human literature, art and wisdom I agree, women have been whining about how they want all the power and none of the responsibility for quite a while. Doesn't make any of their claims of oppression accurate.
/r/MensRights02/02/23 07:55 PM
4

even though women do that all the fucking time? Regret 👏 Is 👏 Not 👏 Rape
/r/MensRights02/02/23 07:52 PM
3

So if a woman lied about birth control, she shouldn't be able to steal money from a man to support her shitty life choices? Or are you instead a "wahman gud, mehn bahd" no-thinking loser? How about if she lied about who the father is, she should face jail time or pay him back all the years of fraudulent support she stole?
/r/MensRights02/02/23 07:50 PM
6

did you just make the completely bullshit and retarded claim that being in financial debt for 18 years backed by jail time doesn't have an affect on someone's physical health?
/r/MensRights02/02/23 07:49 PM
4

getting themselves put in mod positions, brigading and censoring anything they don't like. Been getting worse, lately
/r/MensRights02/02/23 07:48 PM
19

No, it matters that standards and expectations of privacy are applied equally. If it doesn't matter that there's a woman in the men's restroom even if it's all stalls, then it doesn't matter if a man walks into a women's one.
/r/MensRights02/02/23 07:47 PM
16

And i've seen women blatantly use a a multi-user men's restroom when they felt the line was too long for the women's one. It doesn't matter
/r/MensRights02/02/23 07:43 PM
1

They grossly abused their power against women Citation fucking needed. Taking a tiny tiny minority of men and using their abuses of power to enact revenge against the entire sex is the most sexist thing you could choose to do.
/r/MensRights02/02/23 07:05 PM
8

something these women have never experienced before
/r/MensRights02/02/23 05:43 PM
3

Feminists care about increasing power and choice for women, they don't care if it comes at the expense of men. This is why feminism is inherently unethical: It divides people into two classes, and then treats any advantage of A over B to be bad, and any advantage of B over A to be good. They are idiologically opposed to the concept of bodily autonomy, for example, when it applies to men because the people enforcing those violations of bodily autonomy are primarily women. Same thing with feminist…
/r/MensRights02/02/23 05:34 PM
1

Was just pointing out my observations, not trying to challenge your experience
/r/MensRights02/02/23 05:14 PM
2

kind of? thats exactly what they did, and that was 100 years ago, back when women "had no power"
/r/MensRights02/02/23 05:13 PM
1

Tangent because i find the topic interesting: You're right it's not that simple, but it is that nefarious. The culture you described was adopted from the poverty around them (poor whites with a culture like irish, iirc) but also pushed heavily to depower the community, specifically the men in the community. I'm not in that community, but from the outside it looks like those actions are being expanded to the population as a whole when they can't manage to get the race tensions built up enough. Ki…
/r/MensRights02/02/23 05:12 PM
0

Said the misandric cunt looking for something to be offended by Edit: On the topic of rights... bodily autonomy (male genital mutilation is still legal) the right to vote (men only have the privilege they have to pay for) fathers rights reproductive rights equal rights in courts equal protections from sexual assault, sexism, and harassment I could go on, but go fuck yourself
/r/MensRights02/02/23 04:59 PM
417

Rip the tape off, like the other commenter said. They know they can't do this, thats why the signs are the same, this is women asserting a privilege for themselves that they deny to men. Either all spaces are equal or none of them are, don't tolerate their double standards
/r/MensRights02/02/23 04:58 PM
16

doesn't matter
/r/MensRights02/02/23 04:57 PM
7

The problem is childrearing. Single mothers have shown themselves to be categorically incapable of raising healthy children on their own. The girls come out with "daddy issues" and the boys come out without any real male role models, and no one to defend men in a home that very likely disparages them constantly. The consequences of women's hubris will be far greater reaching and disastrous than you're imagining. All of these things are happening concurrently with the mass demonetization of men a…
/r/AntiFeminists02/02/23 04:33 PM
3

Women resent men for their power, and then use their own power (sex) to get men to accomplish things in their behalf, and then resent those men for it. Which means women have two forms of social power, and they’re abusing both to get as much for themselves at mens expense as they can. If they focused on being worthwhile human beings who tried to move society forward, instead of accumulating as much power as possible for themselves, we might even be able to take them seriously when they call them…
/r/MensRights02/02/23 03:36 PM
1

At this point it's a label and dogwhistle for "Women, attack this man! he's bad!"
/r/MensRights01/02/23 11:37 PM
2

It at the same time equates a man's value as a person to his success with women, and then says he doesn't have success with women. It's a convenient (for feminists) mix of "loser", "virgin", "trash", "worthless" in two syllables
/r/MensRights01/02/23 11:36 PM
1

I'm not advocating against consent. BUT consent cannot be retroactively revoked (logically, unfortunately legally is another matter, i.e. institutional sexism), and any claim that it can is bullshit. You cannot choose to have sex with someone, and then later think "ya know what, nah, that was rape". I'm not including things like poking holes in condoms, but if you're upset that someone lied about how much money they have, that wasn't rape sweetheart, and men get lied to all the time. Get over it…
/r/MensRights01/02/23 10:56 PM
2

Yeah i see more women reading this and thinking "Awesome! what else can we take from men?"
/r/MensRights01/02/23 10:53 PM
1

I think they'll miss the point. Less "Oh no! we need to help men" and more "AWESOME LETS TAKE THE REST"
/r/MensRights01/02/23 10:50 PM
3

The one created to maintain their "right" to torture the genitals of baby boys?
/r/MensRights01/02/23 10:40 PM
2

#1 is basically saying "We went to the liars and asked them 'Did you lie!?' and they said no"
/r/MensRights01/02/23 10:33 PM
2

Ya know how feminists whine that 90% of rape cases don't go to trial? At least that % of accusations are false, because if they could prosecute they would have False accusations statistics get manipulated and downplayed as "causing harm to women" because it "makes accusations of sexual assault less impactful" (no fucking shit, maybe women should stop lying then?) so they hide them and pretend they don't exist. Even reference from OP is using studies of women who self report on all these behavior…
/r/MensRights01/02/23 10:29 PM
1

False accusations are real, but so is Rape. One is much, much more prevalent, and much more harmful due to that. Try to acknowledge both before you write me off as an asshole We do, false accusations are far more frequent that rapes, your data is misleading at best and the OP is a self selected data set of women. Why would women admit that they lied about abuse? ffs
/r/MensRights01/02/23 10:28 PM
2

Menslib is a controlled opposition sub run by feminists We shouldn't consider them a source of good faith information Also, the premise is blatantly false, and they manipulate the math to support it. False accusations are far more common than being "truthfully" accused of rape, so common they don't gather the needed data because they know exactly what the result would be.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 10:25 PM
2

What is it you're trying to achieve here? We know we're punished and demonized for our 'size', and it's enforced primarily by women. Men get into it for female validation and attention. And it really comes across like you're glorifying this, posting 'funny' stories. We fucking know. This is often considered part of the empathy gap, but really it's just the misandry of demonizing men's sexuality because the value society wants from men isn't sexual, its labor, and so society is perfectly fine wit…
/r/MensRights01/02/23 09:58 PM
3

Men's issues aren't just about men's rights alone because of women And how many could be easily solved if woman gave a shit? How about millions of baby boys having their genitals tortured and mutilated right after birth? How about the hundreds that die from it, and the many more that are completely non-functional due to the disfigurement? All that suffering could be fucking gone if mothers did their parental duty even slightly and protected their sons from a mutilation they would not do to their…
/r/MensRights01/02/23 09:32 PM
1

more like most people don't have the stones to face the extreme violence of the state that diarrhea mouth would bring down if challenged
/r/MensRights01/02/23 09:27 PM
2

more like people are waking up to the bullshit and harm it causes
/r/MensRights01/02/23 09:18 PM
1

Well when you only count, arrest, or imprison male idiots then it very much seems like a gendered issue, huh? Fucking magic.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 09:12 PM
3

it's not disingenuous to say men and women. That's exactly what it is
/r/MensRights01/02/23 09:03 PM
3

I believe "Pussy Pass" is the more evocative term
/r/MensRights01/02/23 09:02 PM
2

Because in order for women to achieve "equality" (i.e. take power from men) they have to tear men down so that the men can't compete, because men win fair competitions
/r/MensRights01/02/23 09:01 PM
2

"Some"?? "of the more extreme"?? well, way to make the weakest statement so far this year
/r/MensRights01/02/23 08:53 PM
1

Oh, the therapy wasn't to deal with yourself? sounds like you're doing it wrong I’m doing perfectly fine As you scream at him over petty arguments?
/r/MensRights01/02/23 08:51 PM
2

Youtube has some, Rumble has more. Lots are on Locals or discord servers. There's a reason Andrew Tate is getting so much attention. He's a pretty shitty part of the community but undoubtedly financially successful. There's some good books, as well.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 08:49 PM
2

I think "brunt" is a strong word, when there's still a front line defended my men and women. I doubt she is wrong to say that it's mostly women handling what's left behind those lines. Your full, original post. Discounting the male death by mentioning men and women equally on the front lines, as if it wasn't almost entirely up to the point of accurate to say it is completely male.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 08:48 PM
2

I doubt she is wrong to say that it's mostly women handling what's left behind those lines. Way to strawman, but you're supporting her position of ignoring all the male death so she can focus on all of the complaints women have right now. This is why no one respects feminists. Saying "Oh i didn't disagree that men are dying!" while saying things that make it clear you are perfectly fine with that fact and have no intention of trying to change it
/r/MensRights01/02/23 08:38 PM
1

Look bitch, just went through your post history after the weird "I haven’t tried that yet, mostly other methods." comment, and hooo boi do you need a truckload of therapy. And get men out of your life, for their own protection. Go live alone until your sort your shit out, it isn't men's responsibility to fix you, and you offloading your trauma onto them just makes you a bad person.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 08:33 PM
1

What? No? I'm talking about the woman referenced in the OP. Someone should hold a gun to her head, and ask her if whatever complaints she has is preferable to someone pulling the trigger. (This is a hypothetical rhetorical device, not a suggestion) And then point out the privilege she got as a woman that all the men who are dead from the war didn't get to have a choice in the matter. Might improve her attitude, and get her to shut the fuck up.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 08:27 PM
3

You just acted that way
/r/MensRights01/02/23 08:23 PM
3

Because this person is talking out of their ass
/r/MensRights01/02/23 08:23 PM
1

I think someone should ask her if blowing her head off would be an improvement, given her attitude.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 08:21 PM
1

And now we know how they're going to accomplish it: Force the men into war to get them all killed This is why it is imperative we keep feminists out of positions of power where they can warmonger men into death
/r/MensRights01/02/23 08:20 PM
5

They have a choice? The men in Ukraine weren't allowed to leave
/r/MensRights01/02/23 08:18 PM
7

Shows how much they cared about the men who gave their lives for them. "What do you mean he died, can't you see I don't have everything i want and have to work? HOW IS A DEAD PERSON SUPPOSED TO HELP WITH THAT" - these cunts
/r/MensRights01/02/23 08:15 PM
4

Final point is that the methods used against black communities are now being applied against everyone. So... progress?
/r/MensRights01/02/23 08:10 PM
3

well the black community didn't get much choice, the men in those communities were heavily targeted for policing action and cages
/r/MensRights01/02/23 08:07 PM
6

this, tbh. We need to close off all the avenues women use to get men to finance their lives
/r/MensRights01/02/23 08:01 PM
1

Its because the psychological role of the father is to show a child how to act as an adult, how to take care of themselves, how to compete in the labor market, how to protect themselves from the lies and machinations of others. All things manipulative cunts can't have being taught to children they want to control, and so they work extra hard to replace that image of a father with something more beneficial to themselves. Jesus, God, Allah, Superman, whatever the fuck they can substitute for the y…
/r/MensRights01/02/23 07:57 PM
15

The father is pushed around by a mother who knows she can call the police on him for literally anything and have him put in a cage, then legally steal (at least) half his assets after the fact. Modern women are spoiled little tyrants, and american mothers in particular are a problem Edit: Also, why would a father in the home prevent a young man from seeking truth and council away from the sexist toxic cancer that is feminism?
/r/MensRights01/02/23 07:55 PM
2

We shouldn't list them here, bad actresses will use the links to target those servers and try to shut them down
/r/MensRights01/02/23 07:49 PM
2

All violence looks like violence against women when you've excluded men from being victims in your fucked up head
/r/MensRights01/02/23 07:49 PM
6

They're following the same steps as TRP and MGTOW subs, just without the child porn spamming this time (afaik) But yes, it's a coordinated effort to shut down male spaces
/r/AntiFeminists01/02/23 07:45 PM
7

They're noticing the mask coming off. This type of discrimination used to be subtle, now it's straight unapologetic racism and sexism.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 06:56 PM
3

You can use google as well as i can But here's one: https://apnews.com/article/idaho-teacher-disarms-school-shooter-and-hugs-her-7df127c738eca9d007752288baf132bb This one got hugs while they waited for the cops “I just slowly pulled the gun out of her hand, and she allowed me to. She didn’t give it to me, but she didn’t fight,” Gneiting said. “And then after I got the gun, I just pulled her into a hug because I thought, this little girl has a mom somewhere that doesn’t realize she’s having a bre…
/r/MensRights01/02/23 06:49 PM
2

because identity politics doesn't give us any other choice
/r/MensRights01/02/23 05:52 PM
2

They want women to be able to kill their children at any time, for any reason, because that child's life is a women's choice. There, did it for them. But don't worry, they'd justify murdering children plenty if they were here to do it themselves. Edit: Hey, who wants to make up a graph of all the people killed by school shootings, next to all the children murdered by their mothers? Sounds like a fascinating exercise in where society puts its priorities.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 05:20 PM
3

Not just suicide, but also through their emotional manipulation and lies they convince other men like brothers or fathers to enact violence, or they'll escalate to the state and either get him killed (like lying about him having guns, for example) or just imprisoned to be raped and beaten as a sex offender ("he raped me, and look i've had full access to his phone and child porn just showed up in his download folder!") None of this will stop until we have a way to hold women accountable for their…
/r/MensRights01/02/23 05:11 PM
3

And then were publicly applauded and praised. Mother Teresa may have well worked at Auschwitz for all the good she did
/r/MensRights01/02/23 05:08 PM
5

They don't get their hands dirty, they make shit up so that violence is committed against the target, just not directly by her. The internet has severely exacerbated this form of abuse.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 05:05 PM
5

That they don't care about getting shot shows how much they get from it. It increased their social status to cause harm to others, and that is encouraged in a school environment, particularly when the aggressor is of a privileged class like a woman, who the victim isn't allowed to defend himself from.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 05:02 PM
3

There's been at least 2 cases in Idaho of women taking guns to schools to shoot specifically boys. Funny how those stories get buried.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 05:00 PM
2

No they're not, the post was admin removed
/r/AntiFeminists01/02/23 04:59 PM
3

Didn't you figure it out? Some people are more equal than others, and those deserve safe spaces. Everyone else's spaces should be specifically unsafe to make the more equals feel better
/r/AntiFeminists01/02/23 04:59 PM
2

They admin-removed his post that had attention talking about it. It's definitely a problem in mensrights as well
/r/AntiFeminists01/02/23 04:58 PM
2

Fucking sexist and mask off at that
/r/AntiFeminists01/02/23 04:58 PM
7

The post was removed by reddit in mensrights, this is a sitewide problem with sexist against men and simping to feminist nonsense
/r/AntiFeminists01/02/23 04:57 PM
4

And sexist cowardly cunts
/r/MensRights01/02/23 04:54 PM
2

You mean like them removing this thread?
/r/MensRights01/02/23 04:52 PM
3

The most active and censor/ban heavy mod
/r/MensRights01/02/23 04:51 PM
2

It's been removed here
/r/MensRights01/02/23 04:51 PM
2

Women, apparently
/r/MensRights01/02/23 04:47 PM
0

citation fucking needed
/r/MensRights01/02/23 04:46 PM
1

Yeah, i'm going with my pet theory that she has a contact in the reddit admin team, and is having that contact abuse their mod privileges on her behalf. Probably the same way she gets appointed to mod male communities. Reddit really is run by misandric assholes.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 04:43 PM
1

LOL and OP got removed by reddit, fucking typical
/r/MensRights01/02/23 04:41 PM
18

We all know who this is going to be applied to
/r/AntiFeminists01/02/23 12:07 AM
26

Just the men, i'd bet. Having a database of women who owned firearms might harm women!
/r/AntiFeminists01/02/23 12:06 AM
22

what a load of bullshit Putting aside the propensity of users of proxy violence to lie on this very subjective assessment, it's ripe for abuse. Cataloguing gun owners, and directly linking that ownership to an "assessment of lethality" by biased cops, informed by an angry lover. I couldn't imagine a worse setup to incentivize made up bullshit get people arrested and harassed.
/r/AntiFeminists01/02/23 12:05 AM
8

but one of those is illegal, and considered sexist for existing
/r/MensRights31/01/23 11:41 PM
9

typical
/r/MensRights31/01/23 11:26 PM
2

not sure, but i know as a mod she can add reddit styles, and she can have a tag in her pic/bio to swap it to whatever she wants in that style
/r/MensRights31/01/23 09:57 PM
5

this would be one of the last, i believe, but you're right. Like with the original MGTOW subs: First, they make fraudulent accusations of misbehavior. Misogyny or child abusing material are the most common. Then they go and create that material so that when people go to check their claim after the fact, the content exists. Then, they use the manufactured evidence and claim to be 'good intentioned' by going to the admins with the 'evidence' and proposing a the solution of a Correct-Thinkerfeminis…
/r/MensRights31/01/23 09:24 PM
6

that flair wasn't always there
/r/MensRights31/01/23 09:18 PM
28

Yup, menslib is a controlled opposition sub. It's purpose is to corral men into a space where things are only talked about in a feminism approved way, without any criticisms of feminism. Such a disgusting sub, its mods as well.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 08:53 PM
8

She's Swedish, English isn't her first language
/r/MensRights31/01/23 08:51 PM
27

no idea, could easily have been a reddit admin she knows, we don't have proof she was even approved by the other mods
/r/MensRights31/01/23 08:49 PM
20

They are still angry about things that were claimed to have happened before we all were born and can’t let it go. ftfy
/r/MensRights31/01/23 08:47 PM
2

It swaps depending on whatever is better for the woman speaking at the time. Need to get into the 18+ club while you're 17? "Women mature faster than boys, ITS FINE" Notice men aren't paying attention to you and instead to the hot 22 year old 10 years younger than you? "Women don't mature until they're at least within a year of my age, and if you go for anyone younger YOU'RE LITERALLY THE SAME AS A CHILD SEXUAL ABUSER"
/r/AntiFeminists31/01/23 07:43 PM
3

The thing that bothers me the most is that most grown adults by any standard, especially older ones, still believe in childhood fantasies like a caring god that gives a shit about you, or that the earth is flat. Most people die in their 80's with a child's mind. I don't buy the whole "experience is a power imbalance!" nonsense, there are quite a few 20 year olds far more mature than 80/90 year olds, and its the reason we have a set "Adult" status, not some type of sliding scale of adulthood to m…
/r/AntiFeminists31/01/23 07:40 PM
2

because they engage in reputation destruction and will escalate if not challenged. Step one is accusing you of being a pedophile Step two is spamming subs with child porn to support the accusation We can't just let something like this go, it requires a response
/r/AntiFeminists31/01/23 07:35 PM
8

It isn't hypocrisy. It is hierarchy. I can be both. The cunts still claim "equality" (usually, "equity" is gaining favor to avoid helping men at all) and so still counts as hypocrisy
/r/MensRights31/01/23 07:08 PM
10

especially if they did it to "All men are X" or "#killallmen" posts, because then those women's subs wouldn't have any content!
/r/MensRights31/01/23 07:07 PM
9

we can't, the admins are on her side, don't consider sexism/hate speech/abuse against men to be those things if it's against men, and quite likely appointed her to that mod team to ensure a woman was controlling the conversation. It's a bigger problem that just the mod, even if she is a really annoying problem
/r/MensRights31/01/23 07:06 PM
13

It can make sense to have a female moderator since I imagine plenty of the questioners are going to be women. Then make it make sense, she's busy censoring men's voices and posts regardless of the rules and more to control the conversation and criticism of her behavior. Edit: i.e. Why is it a woman's place to decide what people ask men? Or how men respond? it's almost assuredly caused by the destruction of male communities And how do they destroy these male communities? Hint: it starts with "It …
/r/MensRights31/01/23 07:03 PM
9

For sure, i'm talking general trends, and its generally ideological. But there is a strong gendered component to the behavior
/r/MensRights31/01/23 07:00 PM
12

Until she gets herself appointed moderator of that sub as well. It's entirely possible she was just admin assigned the role, we know admins are actively hostile to male spaces, and don't consider hate speech or sexism against men as wrong or action worthy (by their own admission)
/r/MensRights31/01/23 06:59 PM
20

"Feminism helps men too!" Oh, good, lets talk about men's problems "Go make your own spaces, this space is for womens issues!" Well ok then, except a feminist got it censored and shut down "See? Feminism helps men, too! Rinse. Lather. Repeat.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 06:54 PM
15

That doesn't mean we can't consider gender for positions where it makes sense. You can see how a man moderating a rape survivors group might get some pushback, and that's a valid criticism. The same is true here. Especially due to the likelihood of covert or even overt abuse (as we're discussing here) increasing exponentially when a woman is assigned to the role. Look, a lot of mensrights talk needs to talk about women, because in many cases they are the problem (like how they aren't held accoun…
/r/MensRights31/01/23 06:49 PM
16

Men seek debate like fencers seek fencing opponents: It's to hone their skills, become better, practice, lose, improve, etc. The women who get into moderation positions on these forums are trying, instead, to control the debate in their favor, as opposed to participating.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 06:46 PM
43

They will never stop. They depend on controlling how men think to support their worthless lives.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 06:43 PM
3

"under aged" 21 year old 🤣 as if men years younger hadn't fought and died in war among all the other adult things they were capable of. And here i thought women matured faster than boys.
/r/AntiFeminists31/01/23 06:43 PM
4

Well, i tried once to alert the other mods to her behavior, and she blocked my post and perma-banned me from the sub. So... open to ideas.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 06:39 PM
10

they were banned due to a false-flag operation feminists brigade-reported the mods of the sub until the accounts were gone, then got themselves put in instead
/r/MensRights31/01/23 06:10 PM
12

this, tbh Dunno if she snuck her way into the moderator position by hiding her identity or the mods were already simps or she got herself admin approved through sexist preferential treatment... all options are bad. She shouldn't be moderating that community.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 06:09 PM
17

It's not an automod, its this one female mod who decided she wants to control who can talk on that sub and what they can say, regardless of rules, the community, or other mods
/r/MensRights31/01/23 05:41 PM
40

Because the primary power of feminine is to control the actions of men, to do this they use information manipulation which open dialogue and discussion makes much harder to do. They attack men's free speech because if they don't they can't control the conversation as easily and it's much harder to control the men in those conversations. It's just them making a bitchy power play, and we shouldn't tolerate it. We should get this mod removed from that position, due to sexist discrimination. Too bad…
/r/MensRights31/01/23 05:40 PM
27

Not with how they currently behave, no. Too high a risk of them using the position to advance women and feminism instead of the fucking job they were assigned to do.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 05:37 PM
142

Of course she does, she's perma-banned others for calling out her behavior (like me) This is a sexist getting off on controlling what men can and can't say
/r/MensRights31/01/23 05:36 PM
26

Yeah i got permabanned by that mod for questioning her, she really doesn't like the idea of men being allowed to speak things she doesn't like. Edit: Also the /r/antifeminists sub had all it's mods report-brigaded until they all got banned and there was only a mole feminist left, and it's currently at risk of being deleted due to this "unmoderated" status. Could be something similar, here. Someone that is in fact hostile towards men gets themselves put in a position of power to control the conve…
/r/MensRights31/01/23 05:30 PM
0

Shit tests have ways to pass, they've successfully criminalized men. It's not a shit test when they are enacting the violence of the state, that's just abuse
/r/AntiFeminists30/01/23 04:38 PM
9

Also this dipshit doesn’t know how genetics works.
/r/MensRights28/01/23 05:13 PM
2

Nice work!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/23 04:28 PM
30

yes but now its equal slavery, which is better than the alternative Especially when the people not subject to the slavery were part of the population voting to keep it
/r/MensRights26/01/23 03:58 PM
13

Well that doesn't help, if they become a doctor then they suddenly think they deserve the CEO of the hospital or president of the united states. That's the point of hypergamy, they only look up, and if they reach a point, they'll just want that much higher in their mate. This is the problem in modern dating: We're actively working to add women to the workforce, but now women won't date men on their 'level' and pine for CEOs and millionaires. They only want someone better than themselves, and by …
/r/MensRights24/01/23 12:54 AM
30

It's because women often see men the same way men see tools. They only want tools that benefit them, which means higher status, more money, etc. In modern times it's more akin to how a man views his career.
/r/MensRights24/01/23 12:47 AM
13

It does cause a "laundry list" whether you believe it or not. And sure its cheap, the costs i was mentioning are rarely financial. More like the hundreds of boys in the USA who die each year from having their penis cut up
/r/AntiFeminists23/01/23 08:28 PM
11

False, it is in all cases except for life or limb threatening emergencies a violation of human rights and amputation of healthy and functional genital tissue. It removes >20000 nerve endings, it performs similar functions to the penis as an eyelid, and the very mistaken belief that it caries no harm is part of the indoctrination to allow people to continue to sexually abuse and mutilate men. Even the studies that say "it doesn't reduce sensitivity!" are only testing portions of the penis left in…
/r/AntiFeminists23/01/23 08:13 PM
8

normal healthy practice for decades now. Thats a weird thing to call child sexual abuse and mutilation with no medical benefit and a whole laundry list of permanent long term damages and costs
/r/AntiFeminists23/01/23 04:17 PM
7

? Have you bothered to look at the average woman outside? Far worse BMI. The problem is the "masculine" men are busy enforcing the will of these land cows as proxy violence against men as a whole.
/r/AntiFeminists23/01/23 03:53 PM
4

as long as they're the "right kind"
/r/AntiFeminists23/01/23 03:52 PM
34

Excuse me? They've already written their future fantasies down and distributed them. The S.C.U.M. Manefesto advocates for culling the population of men down to 10%, either through straight murder or killing of male fetus' In the USA, the American Psychological Association wrote guidelines based on the research of a feminist who seriously advocated in her books that all men be castrated. You think it can't get worse as these cunts gain more power? They're almost literal nazi's in different colors…
/r/AntiFeminists23/01/23 03:50 PM
0

always-has-been.meme
/r/AntiFeminists23/01/23 03:46 PM
39

Women hate gender roles until they benefit them. And women love being “worthy” of all that manufactured male competitiveness bullshit. They revel in it.
/r/MensRights22/01/23 07:23 PM
5

Manufactured revenge on fake imaginary wrongs
/r/AntiFeminists22/01/23 03:59 PM
2

Then why aren’t they speaking out against this Nazi?
/r/MensRights22/01/23 03:25 PM
8

Unless they’re being used to direct medical action, like being cited by the APA in the treatment of people they advocate hate for. Then bring them up a lot
/r/MensRights22/01/23 03:24 PM
19

Many women unironically believe their pussy’s give them divine right to enact eugenics, and then extrapolate that far beyond just policing who uses their womb. Now it’s not enough to have full control over who they sleep with, they decided they get to kill children they don’t want to have, now they want to mutilate children for their own convenience. Disgusting people.
/r/MensRights21/01/23 03:04 AM
13

the competence / incompetence of certain therapists wasn’t the focus of the conversation unless it's a real problem for men (which it is) then the incompetence of therapists is very much assumed to be part of the conversation, just like it was here
/r/MensRights20/01/23 11:08 PM
28

yeah, people underestimate how often therapists are sexist and just assist in the man being used and victimized by his partner
/r/MensRights20/01/23 11:07 PM
20

is therapy not all about discovering or acknowledging flaws or problems within ourselves and developing methods and techniques for coping / remedying them Only if its done for both parties, and your wife/gf hasn't shopped around or taken recommendations of therapists that are always taking the woman's side, which is a very real problem. Advocating men not be wary of therapists who might not have their best interests in mind is a very anti-men stance.
/r/MensRights20/01/23 10:50 PM
31

good therapy works, but most people men might see aren't good therapists Therapist itself is a broad category that sometimes doesn't even require full medical training. A marriage counselor, for instance, doesn't need to have any medical training, and sometimes is little more than an internet pastor. This type of person always siding with whatever is bothering the woman and helping her contort the man into whatever unrealistic image she has of him is very fucking harmful to men, and messages lik…
/r/MensRights20/01/23 10:48 PM
1

given power to father's as well in what happens to their child um, no, we need to protect those baby boys like we do baby girls. NO PARENT should be allowed to mutilate the genitals of their children
/r/MensRights20/01/23 08:41 PM
2

you need to look into /r/Intactivism There are many negative consequences to the procedure, not the least of which is the need to molest the boy to erection, forcibly separate the foreskin from the shaft (which is fused like a toenail at birth, not meant to be ripped off), then maybe put a couple drops of anethesia (wasn't standard practice until the 2000's), before finally amputating functional and sensitive parts of the genitals, while he is strapped down and screaming. He then has to piss and…
/r/MensRights20/01/23 08:40 PM
2

Mens rights doesn't mean taking or revoking someone else's I mean, some of it definitely does. I definitely want to revoke a mother's "right" to mutilate her baby boys based on whatever bullshit excuse she might have. The entire point of rights is to limit what other people can do to you, and in that sense we are very much in the business of limiting what other people can do, such as sexually abuse children.
/r/MensRights20/01/23 08:08 PM
1

men are always privileged That is a base assumption of feminism. That's what their idea of "patriarchy" is, that men are privileged by virtue of being male (ironic, considering the reverse is true) It is reasonable to assume you believe this sexist idea if you call yourself a feminist.
/r/MensRights20/01/23 08:06 PM
3

Surrounded by people you supposedly "fear", you are brave enough to speak. Surrounded by people who supposedly support you, you are too afraid to speak. See how feminism works yet?
/r/MensRights19/01/23 10:37 PM
1

and what did you learn?
/r/MensRights19/01/23 10:32 PM
5

We are definitely anti-feminist. We're not anti equality, which we almost universally hold up as an inherent moral good, but we object to the claims that feminism stands for equality. We're more the male focused side of egalitarian, and that does make us anti-feminist.
/r/MensRights19/01/23 10:30 PM
1

Arguing with a feminist is like arguing with a cultist. You can't reason someone out of a position they didn't reason themselves into. So, if you do want to do this, you have to establish 1) their values and 2) how their values relate to feminism. For example, if they are into feminism because they value equality, then you can show them how feminism actually hurts equality. If it doesn't convince them, that means their purported support of feminism was a lie, and its tied to a different value (o…
/r/MensRights19/01/23 10:11 PM
26

"just existing in a way that doesn't explicitly benefit women will be a crime" ftfy Tbh it almost already is
/r/MensRights19/01/23 10:02 PM
69

Yup. Just like how if there was no punishment for beating the shit out of women who annoy you, more women would get the shit beat out of them. This is just a feminine form of violence, often referred to as Proxy Violence. They make shit up to get others to enact violence on their behalf. So what they've done is equivalent to kidnapping, assault&battery, slander, doxxing, harassment, and sexual assault all at once, they can just accomplish all that through one lie instead of all the effort a man …
/r/MensRights19/01/23 10:00 PM
1

Ahh the better Fresh&Fit
/r/MensRights19/01/23 09:24 PM
5

Mens Rights: Publicly advocating for the rights of men MGTOW: Men, women will use and attack you for not doing what they want, protect yourself at all times They're not the same, but they are very related.
/r/MensRights19/01/23 09:23 PM
6

remember that CIA electric dart gun that silently shot a spike of cuttlefish venom to give it's victim a heart attack with no visible sign besides something smaller than a vaccine mark? Yeah, that was 50+ years ago. Glad they stopped inventing the evil spy shit allllllll the way back then and we don't have to worry about entirely-not-assassinations these days.
/r/MensRights19/01/23 09:22 PM
7

And the opposition, death threats, and other feminist nonsense gets really tiring. Cassie is taking a well deserved break, imo.
/r/MensRights19/01/23 09:01 PM
3

Rollo: Good info but self-admitted grifter. After you've read his main content he's just repetitive. Fresh&Fit: Add nothing on their own, the value in the channel is them parroting mostly Rollo Tomassi to random women and calling them out on their bullshit defense tactics. Useful, but not because of fresh or fit. JustPearlyThings offers the same content with less bullshit. Alexander Grace: Often good content, but he goes to great lengths to make sure his advice is women approved, limiting the ac…
/r/MensRights19/01/23 09:00 PM
8

For me it was reading his book Maps of Meaning Where he goes to great lengths to justify the actions of religion, up to and including defending child sexual abuse as part of initiation rituals. That was when it clicked for me that he is incapable of viewing the world through a lens in which religion isn't an unimpeachable moral good. i.e. brainwashed shill
/r/MensRights19/01/23 08:55 PM
3

Why would people pay for trafficked prostitutes if it’s legal and they can get non-trafficked just as easily (due to said legality) Why would people choose to buy illegal drugs? They don’t, they only do because legal drugs aren’t available. Which makes you, and all those “studies” bumfuck wrong
/r/AntiFeminists19/01/23 03:31 PM
18

im not too educated on feminism's efforts for men I’ll save you some time, they only drag men down. If you want to be an advocate for both genders why not call your self egalitarian? It literally means equality for all, as opposed to feminism which means advocacy for women’s advancement but pretends to be for “equality” to hide its own blatant power grabs
/r/MensRights19/01/23 03:18 AM
14

Our hurts make feminisms hurts look like little booboos. Which is part of why we despise feminism so much. Feminists got female genital mutilation banned, and then continues to let boys suffer from it. Feminists got the right to vote, but left boys to sign their lives away for the privilege Feminists drummed up fear of sexual assault, rape, and domestic violence then diverted all resources to only women, despite all of those problems affecting both genders at similar rates. Feminism stole victim…
/r/MensRights19/01/23 02:38 AM
1

Why? you already know we’ll agree with the disagreements. Which just makes this about you getting attention.
/r/MensRights19/01/23 02:20 AM
8

Truth. They only treat men as human when forced or it’s convenient
/r/MensRights19/01/23 02:19 AM
8

Umm, yes it fucking does
/r/MensRights19/01/23 02:18 AM
8

He’s not saying it’s bad or that you think it is, he’s saying you came here for validation when you could have used your voice and privilege as a women to stand up for men in feminist circles. He’s calling you an attention whore, essentially.
/r/MensRights19/01/23 02:17 AM
14

How are women oppressed? What rights do men have that women do not? Women have lots of rights men don’t have. Like the right to bodily autonomy, for example. That concept isn’t applied to males at any point in their lives.
/r/MensRights19/01/23 02:16 AM
6

Hilarious that men still have to fight to not be strapped down, molested, and mutilated as children because of bullshit excuses like “it looks better that way” and feminists want… free luxury shit. Smh
/r/MensRights19/01/23 02:13 AM
3

Scared and prepared for are different things
/r/MensRights19/01/23 02:12 AM
1

Why is it in you to fear them, having been raised by ones you find safe?
/r/MensRights19/01/23 02:11 AM
7

I worry you don’t truly understand the path you’ve started on. Feminists, like most other cults, attack the “fence sitters” hardest of all. They are very much “us vs them” and if you aren’t in either of those options you are worse than either. Prepare for that. Have you seen The Red Pill by Cassie Jay? She was a feminist, too, until her documentary on “evil MRAs” showed her how feminists really treat people.
/r/MensRights19/01/23 02:09 AM
11

Why are you so into feminism? Egalitarians believe in equal rights, why do you keep supporting a sexist hate group that has been that way since it’s beginning?
/r/MensRights19/01/23 02:05 AM
4

Rich to hear a feminist complain about commoditization of people women tend to be in greater danger of being trafficked where the sex trade is legal Lol just talked with someone today about this: when they even bother to count boys, boys are trafficked far more worldwide. So so SO interesting to focus on one side of problem that affects both sexes at significant rates. Really says a lot about you. Net detriment to society lol, pussy having it's real market value known as opposed to some mythical…
/r/AntiFeminists18/01/23 11:54 PM
1

men protect you from everything. It's just that most women have an irrational fear of men that they require men to make them feel safe from. Edit: To all of the stupid cunts saying "waahhh women die from homocide, and its men killing them!" Those homocide numbers are approximately equivalent to the # of times women kill their male partners, and easily exceeded by women getting other people to kill/imprison their spouse on bullshit made up charges like "wahh he hit me even though i totally starte…
/r/AntiFeminists18/01/23 10:48 PM
12

Its really sad because boys are statistically more likely to be trafficked (when you can find stats that bothered to count them at all)
/r/MensRights18/01/23 06:19 PM
3

yeah and they'll keep gaslighting you about it, too. From the very beginning, feminism was about getting special privileges and power to women, at men's expense. Early suffragettes would firebomb churches as terrorists to get women the vote, which most women didn't want because for men it explicitly came with the burden of war. Feminists pushed and succeeded in getting the right to vote, something men still to this day do not have. We only have the privilege if we pay for it
/r/MensRights18/01/23 06:17 PM
2

Women who are pregnant do 'need' someone, and women who feel at risk of victimization from men do 'need' a man around to feel safe. A healthy relationship is absolutely about being complementary and give and take on both sides, but you're just going to get used and burnt if you ignore women's nature like this.
/r/AntiFeminists18/01/23 06:13 PM
5

And also why we see such cognitive dissonance in their views on sex work. It's "empowering" for women to engage in it, yet "misogyny" for men to consume it. It's such an obviously childish hot take, but taken so seriously that we have laws that use the same bullshit logic. Feminists will advocate that sex work be legal, but buying sex from people to be punishable by being locked in a cage with violent murderers. They want the freedom to act in any way they want, but to punish men for the consequ…
/r/AntiFeminists18/01/23 06:12 PM
4

Sure they are, but its not about the sex workers, its about the effect on the market. Right now we have laws enforcing price fixing to keep the value of pussy high. Letting pussy be subject to free market forces by legalizing prostitution would bring its value down to realistic levels, and women wouldn't require the sun, moon, and stars just to get laid. Porn is achieving something similar, anyway. Men are able to sate their sexual urges without all the song and dance, and women are furious abou…
/r/AntiFeminists18/01/23 05:44 PM
4

men want and need women way more than the reverse because they are hornier Wrong. Men want women, women need men. You don't think about the things you need, like breathing, until you don't have the ability to get it anymore. Things you want you think about all the time and are motivated to pursue, regardless of availability. This also explains the issues you're having. These older women need a man, and are realizing they might not get one. They're panicking, and as a response they become more pi…
/r/AntiFeminists18/01/23 05:34 PM
7

They're working to get this sub shut down, too. Men cannot be allowed a space to point out the wrongs done to them, and especially not allowed to work together for redress.
/r/MensRights18/01/23 04:23 PM
9

Men are gaslit since birth into believing everything is their fault and that women are never wrong. Women have abused their childcare positions of power to their own benefit in every way they've accused men of doing in society. Like, seriously, 70% of adult males in the USA were strapped down, molested, and mutilated at birth and are attacked for even calling it sexual abuse, isn't exactly surprising they consider other forms of abuse as rewards because at least it's not being mutilated again.
/r/MensRights18/01/23 04:22 PM
3

It's not quite getting away with murder... but it's damn close
/r/MensRights18/01/23 04:19 PM
1

Funny how destroying the man's life means nothing to them, he just up and turned into a murderer for no reason at all! Men can just snap at any moment! /s
/r/EverydayMisandry18/01/23 04:14 PM
12

I'm surprised she got out alive
/r/MensRights17/01/23 11:37 PM
5

Have they made provably false or weak allegations in the past and other questions about their sexual history (something currently illegal to ask about or present in court. imagine how crazy that is, you can't use that a woman lied about rape repeatedly in the past as evidence she might be doing it again now) Investigate her claims, that she was where she said she was or doing what she said she was doing the night of the alleged assault, using cell phone/tower data, CCTV, or other means you know,…
/r/MensRights17/01/23 11:36 PM
15

Agreed, feminism is a cult Thats no excuse to allow them to keep indoctrinating kids. That or any cult, but feminism is more harmful atm
/r/MensRights17/01/23 09:35 PM
15

Me neither, select the URL bar and hit enter to go to the url direclty instead of from a link, which is what they're checking for. When i go to the url directly i can view it without an account.
/r/MensRights17/01/23 09:31 PM
9

except where it encourages the liars to continue to lie to avoid consequences. We've already seen how far they will push it just to avoid people thinking badly about them, think about how dogmatically they will lie to avoid fair punishment for this bullshit. Especially when she feels personally justified. be a woman get pregnant not want to take accountability for their own actions claim rape to get it aborted (current problem with putting restrictions on abortion) double down on rape claim to a…
/r/MensRights17/01/23 08:30 PM
8

remember: Don't google "Teachers who raped their students" because you only get the male perpetrators. You need "Teachers who have sex with their students" to list the female ones
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/23 06:02 PM
10

they didn't get much choice, they were spammed with hate content and then immediately reported for that content, and then with child porn. It's surprisingly trivial to de-platform a community if you're a cunt.
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/23 05:20 PM
13

Thats exactly it. The "Locker room talk" is the conversations they assume men have about women... because they say some really nasty shit about men to each other all the time. It's a fucking trope "women talk". Makes it a real chore to find a partner having "Don't kiss and tell" as a requirement. Women have taken that as a personal affront (when they bother to acknowledge it at all, i've also had ones who go "oh sure, of course not, boundaries and all" and then hear about my sex life from one of…
/r/MensRights17/01/23 05:15 PM
6

Ya wanna know the cherry on top of her shit sexist attitude? Its statistically likely she had you strapped down, molested, and mutilated as a child. But somehow that sexual violence doesn't seem to count, because that would also make her a child sexual abuser, and (in her head) she's not, so that thing she quite likely would defend must not be sexual abuse! (this is how abusers justify their actions)
/r/MensRights17/01/23 05:08 PM
11

She doesn't love you all that much if one random (female) stranger saying "Oh he was abusive" is enough to get her to turn on you. And that "He was abusive" is basically a standard response lots of women use to describe their ex's so they don't have to take any accountability and can blame men for everything, so very common. That's not including just malicious lies trying to tear you down for one reason or another. Woman wants the promotion you're aiming for and can just claim some kind of abuse…
/r/MensRights17/01/23 05:05 PM
27

It just really shows that she puts her allegiance to the sisterhood above her own children Such a disgusting attitude for her to have, and i relate a lot. Very similar experiences with my misandric cunt of a mother
/r/MensRights17/01/23 04:30 PM
2

this, tbh. They have a nasty habit of changing what they've said retroactively if it didn't work out for them
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/23 04:04 PM
2

It cult behavior, of course it’s a mental illness Doesn’t mean we have to put up with it
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/23 01:52 AM
12

Yup, it’s a form of brigading. They’re trying to fish for proof for their hate, and then actively try to incite that behavior with bad faith argument tactics. Jokes on them, I rather enjoy putting them in their place, and they inevitably block you anyway when their logical fallacies don’t work
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/23 12:22 AM
1

So interesting that you focus on Tate while I have dozens of examples of women doing much worse to men as a whole that you won’t even acknowledge The misandry is that he gets so much attention for being honestly not that important, and then used to dismiss male issues exactly like you’re doing now. So stfu about Tate and start answering for the crimes feminists have inflicted on humanity.
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/23 05:58 PM
7

did you know (made up number) of stats are made up on the spot? Wow, didn’t really think she’d tell on herself like that. Projection, thy name is feminism
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/23 03:21 PM
2

Lol, you’re bringing up those names as if those are vocal and supported members of the MRA or anti feminist communities. Neither of them are, and we only defend Andrew Tate because the hate he gets is mostly misandry, not because he speaks for us. So swing and a miss cupcake. Wanna try again with someone we actually support getting sexist laws put into place, or did you have a different bullshit excuse not to acknowledge the previous post? Seriously, your head must be in a bag at this point, if …
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/23 02:54 PM
1

Why is it just men of color being perceived as violent and aggressive? You know that the arrest/conviction/sentencing biases for the same crime are all greater for gender than for race, right? As in, if doing the same wrong being male is a bigger statistical penalty than being black. Yet your org only focused on men of color. Interesting. And exactly the type of response I’d expect from feminism: ignoring the bigger issue to play up the one that lets them pretend to still be oppressed. Andrew ta…
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/23 02:49 PM
1

They are trying to protect their status in the dating market by shaming, guilting, and making false accusations against men.
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/23 02:43 PM
1

Talking about the other feminist
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/23 02:41 PM
16

Well, yeah. Something happened and a man was involved, clearly it’s his fault /s
/r/MensRights15/01/23 10:13 PM
8

“Your honor I broke her nose because she made a sudden move and men are statistically more likely to be randomly attacked. It was self defense” “…it was a Wendy’s”
/r/MensRights15/01/23 10:12 PM
14

What the internet and social media did was make their collective behavior, how they cover for each other, and their machinations incredibly obvious. They always had plausible deniability before, which is why the misogyny gaslighting worked, but now we have hard data and even women’s own words as their masks come off It’s disgusting to watch how indoctrinating, brainwashing, and abusing men has been normalized over centuries to the benefit of women and the top of society. It’s just obvious now, i…
/r/MensRights15/01/23 05:58 PM
2

These places are more and more becoming illegal. It’s like women don’t even want men to have a chance to recover from women’s abuse
/r/MensRights15/01/23 05:17 PM
4

This is the answer. If women’s respect is so shallow, it’s not worth having in the first place.
/r/MensRights15/01/23 05:14 PM
9

Calling it instinct doesn’t make it not evil, or them not bad people. I could use this same logic for serial rapists or pedophiles. Don’t hate them it’s their nature! Just learn to live with them, they’re not bad people! /s Stop giving women excuses for shitty behavior. I don’t care how “natural” or “instinctual” it may or not be, they’re still responsible for their actions and the harm they cause to others, and they are still shit people until they stop
/r/MensRights15/01/23 05:12 PM
16

My mother made clear pretty early on her love was very conditional. Not my belief in it, I was abused if I ever implied I didn’t receive perfect unconditional love from the perfect mother, but deep down I always knew the truth. The “unconditional” love is performative. It’s about her ego and how she wants to be viewed by others, and I was either a tool for that or in her way, depending on her mood
/r/MensRights15/01/23 05:06 PM
16

Because it’s taboo to point out that most women are only bringing their womb to a relationship, and leverage that one thing against the man carrying the rest of the relationship. Men don’t like it being pointed out how much they’re sacrificing to a leech who by genetic luck has the key to their reproductive success Women don’t like it being pointed out because they like to pretend in their head that they are perfect and doing all the work and that men are never doing enough.
/r/MensRights15/01/23 05:02 PM
5

Low key!?
/r/AntiFeminists15/01/23 04:20 AM
26

And punished if they are not
/r/MensRights15/01/23 01:06 AM
1

You’re also kind of dismissing that bad habit women seem to have of trying to define masculinity as something that benefits them, and attacking or shaming men that do not conform to this women-serving identity as “boys” or not “real men”tm
/r/MalePsychology14/01/23 11:11 PM
2

Based
/r/MensRights14/01/23 10:41 PM
1

The number of women in the field is absolutely part of the problem. Lack of male therapists is a detriment to male clients
/r/MalePsychology14/01/23 10:19 PM
1

Think you misunderstood my comment, but ok
/r/AntiFeminists14/01/23 09:36 PM
14

We don’t have to imagine, we’re dealing with the result of exactly this. The misandrist cunt in the screenshot is a perfect example as well
/r/AntiFeminists14/01/23 08:21 PM
31

Average feminist
/r/AntiFeminists14/01/23 08:20 PM
2

Yeah why couldn’t her mother have been “progressive” enough to save the world from the sexist shit stain in the screenshot
/r/AntiFeminists14/01/23 08:20 PM
1

Whatever it is, it wasn’t figured out by inviting women to the table, as shown in the thumbnail. Male psychology is determined by males and no one else.
/r/MalePsychology14/01/23 04:41 PM
3

“As a Nazi, I believe in equality between the races. You can’t blame me for what other people who call themselves nazis in another country have done, because I didn’t do those things. Nazi-ism to me means something different, you have to respect that. I wholeheartedly condemn any gassing or concentration camps. See? I’m a good Nazi “ -you. The word for equality between the sexes is “egalitarian”, btw
/r/AntiFeminists14/01/23 12:52 AM
28

🔥
/r/MensRights14/01/23 12:15 AM
2

We don't care, she does. This is why men get shit on for dating younger women. That shaming is typically done by older women. I've been told by feminists that anyone over 30 dating someone younger that 25 is a pedophile. Weaponizing the term for childhood sexual abuse against the partners of their sexual rivals. Also men keep getting "Where have all the good men gone" and "man up" and whatever other sort of bullshit people come up with to try and get them to wife up a woman he doesn't want or ha…
/r/AntiFeminists13/01/23 11:49 PM
2

One feminist shouldn’t have to answer for what a possibly unrelated group of them did, for all you know she could have another opinion on it. You can tell that to the whole "Teach boys not to rape" bullshit, which is feminists doing exactly what you're complaining about. (except they do it to men, an inherent biological charactaristic, instead of a voluntarily assumed label of a hate group) It is legal but widely criticised, most often by LGBTQ and feminist organizations In America specifically,…
/r/AntiFeminists13/01/23 11:44 PM
3

Sleeping around doesn’t hurt anyone, they can make their own choices But it may hurt a woman's chances in the dating market, and that is not misogyny. Men are allowed to have preferences just like women are.
/r/AntiFeminists13/01/23 11:35 PM
3

It's not just that, this is a difference that is very difficult for women to understand because it just shows up for you. Like your car, or the roads, or power, its one of those things that you walk outside and is presented to you, with no idea of the work/effort/risk/consequences that goes on behind the scenes. And so women get very tired of it existing at any moment they don't want it, or coming from any man they don't want it to come from. This leads to men having to deal with a very high ris…
/r/AntiFeminists13/01/23 11:25 PM
2

and I have seen a decent amount of them that will help with men’s rights Really? What rights are they supposedly going to help with, exactly? Last time i heard that openly, it was Emma Watson's #HeForShe speech where she said, explicitly, that we have to solve all of women's issues so that we can then focus on what is harming men.
/r/AntiFeminists13/01/23 11:19 PM
2

saying that their genitals are stretched out from how many men they let inside them You mean kind of like how women use the phrase "little dick energy" or any of the common variants of that sexist body shaming misandry women use to try and discredit men they don't like? You're complaining of men doing things that women do to men far more frequently and with far fewer consequences
/r/AntiFeminists13/01/23 11:16 PM
3

On top of that, even though custody is unfair, wouldn’t it suck to be married to a woman who wants to leave you but she can’t? Or won't, because she can live off of you while treating you like shit. This is why "Cheaper to keep her" is a phrase It's referencing the financial ass-raping men get in court as actually being worse than living with the bitch you're trying to get away from.
/r/AntiFeminists13/01/23 11:13 PM
3

"performative" feminism, huh? That sounds a lot like "those aren't real feminists" I'll let karen straughn handle this one: So what you're saying is that you, a commenter using a username on an internet forum are the true feminist, and the feminists actually responsible for changing the laws, writing the academic theory, teaching the courses, influencing the public policies, and the massive, well-funded feminist organizations with thousands and thousands of members all of whom call themselves fe…
/r/AntiFeminists13/01/23 11:08 PM
5

How do you "debate" that feminists spent decades researching and studying the effects of infant genital mutilation to understand the severe psychological harm it causes and get it nationally banned in the USA and then... left boys out of it. Boys they knew suffered the same fate, and the same consequences. How do you "debate" the organization that advocates that sexistly gendering things is bad and then sexistly genders a law that leaves only boys to be molested and mutilated, with full knowledg…
/r/AntiFeminists13/01/23 10:50 PM
1

Can we judge her now?
/r/AntiFeminists13/01/23 10:44 PM
25

If you get paid to do what you love, you'll never work a day in your life!
/r/MensRights13/01/23 07:47 PM
32

I've often wondered if part of the reason for this negative reaction to men's sexual pleasure is that there is a deep-rooted envy felt towards the strength – and ease – at which men achieve orgasm when engaged in sex Good idea, but nope. The reason feminists and many women act this way is because they treat their men as work, which makes having sex or satisfying your man a chore instead of lovemaking. It really shows how much they despise their men. Notice they don't have these feelings towards …
/r/MensRights13/01/23 07:43 PM
7

Real mic drop comments here, unsurprising she’s not responding. Truth is feminism is bigoted cancer on the level of nazis or the kkk, and they use the same rhetoric up to and including calls for genocide.
/r/AntiFeminists13/01/23 04:04 AM
9

Don’t hold your breathe
/r/AntiFeminists13/01/23 03:54 AM
1

though we do have a few agreements relating to keeping each other informed. that is still a restriction and expectation on behavior, something that doesn't exist with FWB
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/01/23 08:55 PM
5

could, depending on how they want to set it up The main point of poly is that it's not open and random partners, just more than 2 but still with some level of commitment to the relationship Edit which actually makes it more complicated, as you can be poly as well as partially/fully open. E.g., guy has 2 girlfriends, but one of them is open and hooks up with random people, but she's still coming back afterward.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/01/23 05:04 PM
9

All partners are known and agreed upon beforehand I.e., your GF going the bar, having a hookup, and coming home isn't poly, that's just loose. Your GF going to the bar, bringing home a girl and asking if you want to have a second gf while they also do each other is poly. It's the implied commitment level, just with multiple partners.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/01/23 04:56 PM
2

You're right, thank you Which makes polyamory the bf/gf equivalent of polygamy i guess
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/01/23 04:55 PM
13

Polyamory implies similar restrictions on behavior like a marriage or BF/GF relationship. People in poly relationships aren't free to fuck whoever they want, people in friends with benefits relationships are still free to get with whomever at any time. Now these are just definitions, how it's practiced is very dependent on the individuals. Lots of people prefer the label poly to FWB, even though FWB is what they're doing, and so they'll pretend.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/01/23 04:50 PM
1

Polygamy is actually 1 male to many females, and it's only associated with marriage partners due to historical use. A polyamorous relationship (many to many M:F) that is 1:Many M:F becomes polygamy. People may not like that due to the perceived misogynistic or religious connotations, but, tbh, fuck those people. Language isn't determined by their feelings. Edit: and neither are associated with friends with benefits. Friends with benefits implies no commitment, just casual fun. Poly relationships…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/01/23 04:46 PM
91

Women also feel like men that aren’t “strong” should be attacked and torn down. We’re a bit tired of being abused based on a sexist’s version of “strong”
/r/MensRights12/01/23 03:37 AM
3

I'll feel a bit better when Amber Turd starts falsely accusing some famous lesbians of DV and rape. I hope it makes women feel unsafe /s
/r/MensRights11/01/23 08:10 PM
2

thats exactly how they think. Women in china kill children 5 minutes after birth because it's a girl: "Violence against women, oh god the misogyny! MURDERER! (not the women who killed the child, but all the men around her!)" Women in america kill children 5 minutes before birth because it's a boy: "That's HER body and HER choice and no one better say a damn thing about it to ever make her feel bad or like she ever did anything wrong ever!" Feminists are just gender focused KKK wizards.
/r/MensRights11/01/23 08:09 PM
0

Only due to a legal technicality. It's still involuntarily ending a human life.
/r/MensRights11/01/23 08:07 PM
0

Daily reminder that abortion's exemption from murder is only a legal definition and they are still ending a human life.
/r/MensRights11/01/23 08:05 PM
0

so... always?
/r/MensRights11/01/23 08:03 PM
22

i feel you bro Really gives me a dim view on society, watching how easily people will torture children for whatever bullshit reason (if the child is male)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/01/23 06:46 PM
2

All of your questions would be answered if you just listened to the basics of feminist theory. Comes to a /r/mensrights forum, one of who's main points is that feminist "theory" is maliciously deceitful, full of logical fallacies, sometimes outright lies, all to the purpose incredibly sexistly uplifting women at men's expense, and then coming up with post-hoc justifications for why the men deserved it. Complains that the men in this forum need to "educate themselves", while knowing nothing about…
/r/MensRights10/01/23 08:38 PM
2

where do you think you are right now?
/r/MensRights10/01/23 08:31 PM
2

They said, refusing to educate themselves while posting online about how other people are doing the thing they themselves are doing.
/r/MensRights10/01/23 08:26 PM
3

Good thing he's just a story made up to control men, too, and fictitious entities can't tell you to do anything. tl;dr don't endanger your life for a woman
/r/MensRights10/01/23 05:14 PM
1

Right? Might as well just hang a sign around your neck with the net worth you want people to think you have. No that anyone will believe that, but it's what you're trying to get people to think, and nothing makes me think less of a person faster than this type of signalling bullshit.
/r/AntiFeminists10/01/23 04:12 PM
20

Well, yeah. When you’re from the gender that gets all their support from the working gender, you’re highly motivated to convince everyone they aren’t working hard enough
/r/MensRights10/01/23 02:08 AM
18

which defeats the point of the moderation on /offmychest, and so they made a concerted effort to control both subs. Looks like they succeeded. Censorship is never about protecting the listeners, it's specifically about silencing the speakers, so it will follow the speakers around.
/r/MensRights09/01/23 09:52 PM
17

It’s just as sexist and manipulative as “toxic masculinity” Both imply that masculinity is a set of behaviors, instead of the observed behavior of men It’s the same as me saying “positive femininity” is women being willing to suck my dick any time I ask. It’s entirely based on my own selfish desires and nothing to do with “positive”, “negative”, or “femininity”. Same thing applies here, people saying this are whining about not being able to insert their own preferred image of how a man should ac…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/01/23 06:12 PM
7

Do you have any idea how many men are forced to into it? Or how many trafficked victims are male? I’m guessing not, and the answers would surprise you
/r/MensRights09/01/23 07:08 AM
69

That’s a weird way to say women are human traffickers
/r/MensRights08/01/23 09:17 PM
51

It’s a male hate movement focused on sexist female supremacy which primarily uses gaslighting to convince people it’s for “equality”
/r/AntiFeminists08/01/23 11:51 AM
2

Those “extremists” are the ones teaching the courses, enacting the sexist laws, and advocating for #believeallwomen (something which blatantly enables false allegations) But sure, you’re the real feminist. Some rando on the internet
/r/AntiFeminists07/01/23 05:42 PM
5

“Most feminists” mean nothing when the money and power gained under the banner of feminism is used to enact sexism, bigotry, and hatred against men. Seriously, you sound like a KKK wizard claiming “we’re not all like that, most of us just want racial equality”
/r/AntiFeminists07/01/23 05:39 PM
3

The sheer irony of this comment
/r/MensRights07/01/23 02:29 PM
5

Umm excuse me?? Who in here is advocating killing women??
/r/MensRights07/01/23 02:25 PM
12

Yeah she’s more like the female version of fresh and fit: nothing original, but there’s a lot of value watching her guests respond to known talking points.
/r/MensRights07/01/23 01:46 PM
3

Even if accurate?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/23 01:21 PM
1

And yet they do, even ITT
/r/MensRights06/01/23 08:01 PM
3

I want hell to actually exist so we can send this person there. Sadly, wishful thinking won’t save him or punish her.
/r/MensRights06/01/23 08:01 PM
2

Sad thing is he’s probably already been mutilated once
/r/MensRights06/01/23 08:00 PM
2

You’d have a point if cunts weren’t already planning on rich “starter” husbands. But since you don’t have a point you can fuck right off
/r/MensRights06/01/23 07:56 PM
2

I prefer to call it criminally malicious child sexual abuse.
/r/MensRights06/01/23 07:55 PM
3

The mental gymnastics are impressive, and also incredibly sexist. Men started catching on to the fact that sacrificing your life for a woman wasn’t manly, because they were already men, but it was what society (and primarily women) wanted to be manly, and so they punish men who do not fit in this box of desired male behavior. (This and other “manly” behaviors) So if you realized you were being raised as a slave, you must have really been a dog all along, and they’ll chemically castrate you.
/r/MensRights06/01/23 07:52 PM
10

No free drinks for cat fishers
/r/AntiFeminists06/01/23 03:33 PM
70

and then all those women come back and institute sexist policies to give themselves relief aid from all the suffering they endured fleeing Call it "displacement relief" or some such bullshit, build the monument to it on top of the corpses of them men forced to stay.
/r/MensRights04/01/23 07:38 PM
3

Like?
/r/MensRights04/01/23 06:39 PM
7

Yup, so long as the dna isn’t being added to traceable databases.
/r/MensRights02/01/23 07:12 PM
6

For me it’s derision, which is disgust mixed with hatred. Disgust from the lack of standards, hatred from the expectations that men put up with the disgusting behavior.
/r/MensRights02/01/23 07:11 PM
15

Shows how irresponsible she has been about protection, OP needs to get tested
/r/MensRights02/01/23 07:09 PM
23

Had a teacher say, repeatedly, god loves women more than men. My own fault for going to a religious school, I guess, but my fucking god all the cunts around me smiling and nodding really killed my desire for a religious wife.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/01/23 07:02 PM
19

The real difference is: When women hear a man’s body count: they imagine a room with all the previous women he’s slept with, and she wants to be the queen of all the women in that room. She wants to win the competition (to an extent, there’s a gross limit) but essentially it engages their competitiveness. When a man hears a woman’s body count: they imagine a room with all the men she’s slept with, and it engages his disgust response. Men feel no desire to compete against a man who’s already slep…
/r/AntiFeminists02/01/23 06:55 PM
26

Yes
/r/AntiFeminists02/01/23 06:46 PM
3

Why? I expect one from all my potential kids, and all my potential partners to consent before starting kid making processes. I would frame it and hang it above their crib. It seems like the coolest thing, to compare which genes got passed down and now they grow and express. That, and there’s no reason to just “trust” when certainty is an option, that’s just your partner asking for the room to cheat when they feel like it. Why can’t women care enough about the relationship to close off avenues th…
/r/MensRights02/01/23 06:44 PM
20

France
/r/MensRights02/01/23 06:39 PM
11

Happens surprisingly often
/r/MensRights02/01/23 06:38 PM
135

French psychologists are wrong, and misandrist cunts.
/r/MensRights02/01/23 06:34 PM
35

Love it, so long as that dna isn’t added to gov or private databases. Should be provided to the client on a usb stick and have all other data destroyed
/r/MensRights02/01/23 06:31 PM
47

How about not having legal relationship contracts in the first place? Marriage is just legal bondage for men. If two people can’t trust each other to stay by their word alone, they shouldn’t be together at all and certainly shouldn’t be dragging the rest of society in to enforce their deluded preferences
/r/MensRights02/01/23 06:30 PM
1

Not trying to, more saying the “weakness” is due to different factors than less abuse and struggle. Society has this sick twisted idea that the more they traumatize a man, the better he becomes for society. Really all that is is a justification for the beatings into desired behavior, instead of treating those men as human.
/r/AntiFeminists02/01/23 04:35 PM
11

This comment is bullshit
/r/MensRights01/01/23 02:00 AM
85

Men measure objectively, women measure subjectively (on average) Men compare to other men’s achievements to see where they need to get to, women compare to see the difference. This means that to these women bringing men down is the same as out competing them, and they are therefore “stronger” It’s also why men look at this with a fuck ton of confusion, it looks silly, petty, and obviously irrational
/r/MensRights31/12/22 09:35 PM
0

So offloading your own perceived medical issues to others is ok now? I’ve got some auditory problems listening to their grating voices, surely these bitches would be volunteering to get their lips sewed shut or vocal cords cut, because if not, don’t they love their men!?
/r/MensRights31/12/22 09:21 PM
2

Traditional values like women being treated like children, every problem in the home being the fault of the man, and the man’s responsibility to fix? Churches just cater to women in different ways. Notice how they keep their men in uniform, lined up like penguins. Using lies to threaten punishment for noncompliance, while psychologically and often physically abusing children. Churches are not a source of good women either Edit: ha and a block for telling truths you don’t like. Very Christian
/r/MensRights31/12/22 03:17 PM
1

It what’s when I realized that it was full of bullshit and more misandry And lies. Lots and lots of lies
/r/MensRights31/12/22 03:03 PM
16

Dude the most frequent posters and mods over there are from trollxchromosomes and witchesvspatriarchy Look up “controlled opposition” and you’ll get a detailed explanation of what that sub is about
/r/MensRights30/12/22 09:41 PM
8

It’s more about convincing men their issues are their own fault, and to punish themselves for it and devote themselves to feminism as some kind of cultish “repentance” for their “sins”
/r/MensRights30/12/22 09:41 PM
15

And feminist shills constantly promoting it to the ignorant. It’s important we call it out as the bullshit controlled opposition psyop that it is
/r/MensRights30/12/22 09:39 PM
21

The most frequent users are also from trollxchromosomes and witchesvspatriarchy, they are specifically trying to gaslight men about their own problems
/r/MensRights30/12/22 09:38 PM
1

Your definitions are wrong, and specifically tuned so they anything women don’t like can be considered misogynistic. It’s a bullshit retarded way to use words (and yes, I’m using those terms accurately) Misogyny means hatred of women, it’s tangential to sexism and bigotry. Take your trolling somewhere else
/r/MensRights30/12/22 09:36 PM
1

That would be chauvinism or plain sexism, not misogyny Words mean things
/r/MensRights30/12/22 07:09 PM
76

So real it hurts
/r/MensRights30/12/22 06:08 PM
2

This, tbh. It’s not that he’s wrong, it’s that he’s blunt and doesn’t go into details. So women hate him for being right (mostly)
/r/AntiFeminists30/12/22 05:51 PM
6

He does have a point, though. Women respect and desire a man who can cheat, because that means other women are validating their mate choice, men do not do the same with women. I’m not advocating cheating, but there’s a reason the man never wants for pussy. The things he says about women have more truth than people want to admit, and hate him for reminding them
/r/AntiFeminists30/12/22 05:49 PM
7

Apparently, to these sexists
/r/AntiFeminists30/12/22 05:45 PM
15

“Im not saying you’re a fat whore with a loose used up pussy that’s been so run down you can’t satisfy men, im saying you have fat whore with loose used up run down pussy energy. See, totally not body shaming!” - Greta and all the sexists supporting her statement
/r/AntiFeminists30/12/22 05:43 PM
1

Exactly
/r/MensRights30/12/22 04:11 PM
1

Which we’re well on our way to completing
/r/MensRights30/12/22 04:10 PM
18

This is such a disgusting take. Women who think like this need to be left out of the gene pool
/r/EverydayMisandry30/12/22 03:28 PM
4

Right? Like, he’s a douche, but not even a 3/10 douche. The level of response he is getting is entirely about misandry and protecting female privilege.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 03:19 PM
1

Doesn’t that mean he loves women, not hates them? You need to brush up on your definitions, misogyny doesn’t mean “anything women don’t like”, and using it that way outs yourself as a consumer of feminist bullshit
/r/MensRights30/12/22 03:04 PM
3

This is the rational response. Yes he can be an asshole No he doesn’t care about men’s rights Yes we still defend him usually because his detractors hate him due to misandry and protecting female privilege. But he’s been falsely accused before due to his content, right now we just wait for the court system to do its thing, hopefully honestly.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 03:25 AM
2

playing the easy role Oh so they can admit that women live life on easy mode
/r/MensRights29/12/22 03:04 PM
6

Call it what it us: mutilating genitals of boys for their own pleasure and profit. You know they have to stimulate to an erection to perform it, right? Those boys are all molested first. Day 1 of being a man: we’ll do our damndest to make you associate an erection with the worst pain in your life for as long as possible. Our boys are being raised by cunts an we’re not allowed to object or protect them.
/r/MensRights29/12/22 02:11 PM
17

He’s saying women use sex to control men, and setup psychological mechanisms to ensure that control, one of which being the implication that lack of sex makes a man unworthy, because if you were worthy, a woman would have wanted you. A gay man fucks this whole setup up, because they automatically fall into “unworthy” status in their minds. It’s why they try and rationalize gay men as “one of the girls”, so they don’t face any cognitive dissonance with this insanely misandrist bullshit.
/r/MensRights29/12/22 02:07 PM
2

IVF would mean it’s biologically his son.
/r/MensRights29/12/22 04:42 AM
4

It’s called dealing with a bitch, and it’s hella annoying. Same way they try to provoke men into violence by using violence, knowing the sexist double standard means he will be arrested and she never will. It’s literally just cunt flaunting her pussy privilege
/r/AntiFeminists29/12/22 02:39 AM
31

Yes, because it’s currently what we’re told, and we’re pro equality. So those cunts can take some actual equality for once
/r/MensRights29/12/22 01:21 AM
2

The problem is this is exactly the response she wanted. It gives her views, shows her men are paying attention to her, and gives her something to whine about to her cunt friends and continue to believe all men are bad. This is exactly the response her bitching was fishing for, it’s intentional
/r/AntiFeminists29/12/22 01:12 AM
2

“Good times create weak men” is a rationalization and justification for abusing men, and has no basis in reality. The times are challenging in different ways, and our boys are often behind or failing due to intentionally malicious forces, not just because it’s “easy” for them. You are also implying that women are by default weak, because we put so much effort into making their lives easy. An interesting social phenomenon: the “spoiled boy” is basically just living the life of the average girl. “…
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/22 08:58 PM
6

So I can beat and rob you and you should be grateful to me? This mentality is shit. Yea, life is about struggling to survive, but the entire point of not liking struggle is to motivate people to make life easier. Literally civilization. We find the things that make us struggle and solve the problem, not just passively accept struggle. Why the fuck do you think we invented ventilators? Literally for people struggling to breathe, to make it easier.
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/22 01:14 PM
3

Wonder if this has anything to do with the skill being considered “feminine” and males being socially punished for excelling at it.
/r/MalePsychology27/12/22 04:11 AM
8

Women want men for their power, because they fear for their safety. Now that men have properly secured their safety, the power of men is the fear, so now they wish to get rid of men. Only when their quality of life collapses will respect for men return (and damn quickly). Would really enjoy a time where women did have to run society themselves, maybe we can get some lasting respect when they get back to their couch.
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/22 02:02 AM
11

men, what would you do if all women disappeared for a day? Perfectly fine in this hypothetical, returned after hypothetical like nothing happened. “I’d leave the toilet seat up and walk around without pants” What a vapid, stupid answer. Seriously shows the level of privilege they have to whine about this being the big deal, walking alone at night. Like do they not even think of wild animals and who the fuck is supposed to take care of that?
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/22 01:54 AM
18

It’s an extension of their fantasy to eliminate all men at will, but also still receive the benefits men provide at will. Have their cake and eat it too, child thinking
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/22 01:51 AM
16

It’s disgusting. The same things we should be offering people help for is used against them… but only if they’re men. And they wonder why we “have to” be strong all the time
/r/MensRights26/12/22 04:26 PM
12

Feminists don’t understand words. To them, hate and misogyny means “literally any little thing I don’t like or think should be different”
/r/AntiFeminists25/12/22 08:00 PM
8

There are lots of sexist hypocritical things feminists do to men that they complain are done to women. It’s basically all of feminism
/r/EverydayMisandry25/12/22 06:22 PM
5

Because that’s what this bitch plants evidence for. No one said the charges had to be valid, either, just that cunts like to keep their false allegation options open, so make a habit of leaving incriminating evidence. Amber heard isn’t exactly unique
/r/MensRights24/12/22 04:38 AM
12

don’t spread rumors. Because clearly, that’s women’s work /s
/r/MensRights24/12/22 04:36 AM
24

Maths requires correct answers. It’s objective and women’s pussy privilege can’t do fuck all for them in the field. To them, that’s sexism. To the privileged, equality feels like oppression, remember?
/r/MensRights24/12/22 04:19 AM
10

Kinks require consent, and the problem is these sadistic cunts go on to have children and groom them into the lifestyle. There is a serious issue of female on male abuse that goes completely ignored by society.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 10:37 PM
1

See? You know fuck all what red pill means. Red pill means seeing reality as it is, the reality that the social narrative tries to hide. The blue pill narrative is that men are all privileged and so fighting for their rights makes you a sexist male supremicist. Don’t worry, you’ll see through that blue pill conditioning eventually, until then, maybe ease off the misandrist propaganda that clearly doesn’t know what it’s talking about.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 10:30 PM
6

Yup. The point is to claim they do the work of men while doing as little as possible, so they can nag men to do even more. Sometimes it really feels like femininity is the practice of manipulating men into doing work, which really grosses me out.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 03:37 PM
5

This, tbh. We can address women falling behind when they’re actually falling behind, which they are very much not. Figuring out how to best educate boys, so they can become the best versions of themselves, not the best tools for others, is the priority
/r/MensRights23/12/22 03:11 PM
10

Funny how they make sure it’s never calculated that way (I.e., accurately)
/r/MensRights23/12/22 03:02 PM
14

The quiet misandry of her standards being the “correct ones”
/r/MensRights23/12/22 02:58 PM
6

We take out women’s concept of “fairness” because it’s sexist bullshit. Women don’t consider something “fair” unless they receive the same benefits a man gets, regardless of the effort she herself puts in. Particularly, they don’t consider it fair unless the class of women is getting the same benefits as the most benefitted man, I.e. the Apex fallacy. They are blind to the suffering of any male they consider less off than themselves. So a good first step is to throw that concept of maintaining b…
/r/MensRights23/12/22 02:20 PM
3

Any issue mra’s choose to tackle will be attacked, dismissed, and money starved by feminists. Tackling the sexist kkk that puts a stop to all our work and is responsible for all of these issues getting worse should be our first priority. It’s a nice thought to think we can focus on things like male genital mutilation or suicide and help men, but you’d first have to ignore all the feminists and feminist organizations that work to ensure any effort in this area is deprived of money, attention, and…
/r/MensRights23/12/22 02:16 PM
21

It certainly becomes that way when you remove women from the picture. Go take yourselves to a nice restaurant, chaps, you’ve earned it.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 05:19 AM
57

Lol. Immoral. Compared to how women treat dates, going on them to practice and be better at dating makes you a fucking saint “Oh no, I hope this date doesn’t feel used that I was working at being better at entertaining her and keeping her interested!”
/r/MensRights23/12/22 05:17 AM
1

If you don’t think the concept of men’s rights is already red pill, you know fuck all about what red pill means
/r/MensRights23/12/22 05:13 AM
22

When she was physically assaulting him by not pulling her punches, and then sexually assaulting him by not following procedure during intimacy scenes? Well, glad to know there’s a line somewhere, even if it’s miles from the male standard
/r/MensRights23/12/22 12:08 AM
5

It’s only a lost battle when we’re not fighting anymore. Anything before that is still meaningful
/r/MensRights21/12/22 03:56 AM
18

Well they had to come up with something else, “man up” was both being called out as sexism and implying manhood was good, so they needed a different sexist term to essentially say “I don’t like what you are doing, do what I want you to do and act the way I demand you act instead. Also it’s your own fault, not mine for having these expectations that I dump on you selfishly and sexistly”
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/12/22 06:20 PM
13

It’s 💯% intentional
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/12/22 06:15 PM
6

It deserves it
/r/AntiFeminists19/12/22 11:38 PM
3

The funny thing about Karen's is that they're women experiencing the loss of pretty/pussy privilege, and thinking it's other people being rude and so attacking as such, instead of realizing that's just how normal people treat others.
/r/MensRights19/12/22 11:10 PM
11

because no rational person opposes "equality" So they fake and doctor the data and data collection processes, redefine the terms to mean things they don't mean to normal people (rape being penetrated, not forced to have sex) and all these other statistic tricks so they can still pretend they push for "equality" and no one looks into what that actually means tl;dr they blatantly lie so that the "equality" claim doesn't seem like a lie, so they can get power for themselves.
/r/MensRights19/12/22 11:07 PM
15

or redefine what reality is so that women always look behind, doctor the statistics and rig the data selection, control the narrative so that you can push to "equalize" the situation.
/r/MensRights19/12/22 11:02 PM
7

Can we have a link to the paper?
/r/AntiFeminists16/12/22 04:26 PM
3

Well we're not actually bigots, and care about truth. Since she didn't say anything non-factual, and wasn't spouting any misandry, there is no reason to hate on her for her self avowed feminism. And the focus of this sub is men, take your trans issues to your own space.
/r/MensRights15/12/22 09:39 PM
2

because they successfully convinced everybody else that those "conspiracies" were crazy despite knowing that was exactly what they were going towards
/r/MensRights15/12/22 09:37 PM
3

apparently
/r/MensRights15/12/22 09:37 PM
3

This is the real argument going on around pronouns. Pro-neopronoun people want the right to be able to control how others perceive them, that not only is that absolutely ridiculous, it's one step away from thought police. I don't have anything against these people even tho tbh 98% of them are just silly, but this is a line i will not allow to be crossed. I am the only one who determines what i say or how i perceive people.
/r/MensRights15/12/22 09:29 PM
2

what happens when people define 'civil liberties' to include how they are discussed and referred to by everybody else? You're violating my human rights by saying anything negative about me or referring to me as anything but "Your Highness","GOAT/GOATSelf", or "That guy with the amazing dick i want to suck"
/r/MensRights15/12/22 09:26 PM
5

this, tbh You can permanently traumatize and sexually mutilate a baby, but you can't say "Men are men"
/r/MensRights15/12/22 09:20 PM
6

Thank you! That article provides some great context. For people too lazy: they actively chose to practice against boy teams because it gave them a bigger challenge than the women’s teams they planned to face
/r/MensRights15/12/22 02:16 AM
0

Of course they can compete, that’s a silly thing to say. Never said they’d win, but to prove that we should use sound examples. And in the highschool one, a great deal of useful context was missing. In an article someone posted, the women’s team said they regularly played young men’s teams because it was often more of a struggle than playing the pro women’s teams, allowing them to practice better and grow more. The additional context supports our premise even more
/r/MensRights15/12/22 02:15 AM
-4

Would love a source, because thats a very different example than i've heard
/r/MensRights14/12/22 11:11 PM
7

exactly, we have great comparisons from professionals, idk why we have to bring that one high school match into it
/r/MensRights14/12/22 11:10 PM
-3

i only heard of the one time they played the high school team. And given how it was taken, i'd completely understand why they didn't do it again. Or are you talking about performance in professional series? I don't follow either team.
/r/MensRights14/12/22 09:38 PM
16

there's actually truth to that, tho. As in, women are just find being homophobic against men, but rally against it for women. Studies show women judge bisexual men (or a man who has ever been with another man) far more harshly than men judge women who have been with other women. Edit: It makes more sense if you view it from their core logic: "Womyn gud, mahn bahd" Gay men == 2x the men so 2x the badness! Gay women == 2x the women so 2x the goodness! feminist logic 101
/r/AntiFeminists14/12/22 09:12 PM
-21

Again, i don't have any specifics. But we should keep to comparing the male pro's to female pro's, there are a lot of complications in the example with highschoolers that, to me, do not say "Boys beat girls at sports". It's entirely possible that boys team was better than the women's pro team, i just find it highly unlikely to be the case given the information we have, and knowing that the men's pro team would absolutely do things like "lets go easy on them, so they feel encouraged to continue i…
/r/MensRights14/12/22 08:56 PM
-29

TBF to that team, i wouldn't immediately think a male team sucked because they lost to a women's high school team. I would think the professionals were taking it easy on the kids. Not saying it was either way or not, but i don't think the pro's went into that match with same mentality they would at a pro game.
/r/MensRights14/12/22 08:48 PM
47

But any woman has as much ability to compete with NBA players as i do, how is that not equal opportunity? I demand a separate FNBA league of only unfit fat people, so that i have "equal opportunity" to get into the NBA (in case this isn't clear, having a separate league to ensure people of that 'type' get publicity and acclaim and gold medals is very much equity not equality)
/r/MensRights14/12/22 08:43 PM
1

More like they have "sympathy" but no "empathy" I.e., "I said something positive sounding so why aren't you fixed?"
/r/MensRights14/12/22 06:33 PM
8

well, they're behind while the men are getting mowed down, then once the death churns through all the men and affects women, women take credit for being at the "front" of the movement. Pathetic.
/r/MensRights14/12/22 06:04 PM
8

Why would when he last had sex matter, then? Wouldn't it be if he was actively seeking sex and unable to get it? Personally, i've stopped dating because it's such a chore, so don't have much sex, but also am not missing it much. That's not incel.
/r/AntiFeminists14/12/22 05:52 PM
18

well they don't have any real problems, so this is all that's left.
/r/AntiFeminists14/12/22 05:51 PM
47

It means what they want it to mean: Slur against men
/r/AntiFeminists14/12/22 05:51 PM
5

It really, really is. And that it's spouted unironically by so many just shows how blind they are to their own sexism. Either that or very much don't care about sexism, just sexism that affects them. Which means they are not for equality, but for their own greed and power, and should not be allowed in positions of power over others, especially men.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/12/22 05:18 PM
6

I would prefer "Number of individuals who've seriously attempted suicide" compared to "completed" I don't care about attempts or first times, i care about the population trying to kill themselves and how likely they are to joint he population who have. How we currently collect the data to protect women's feelings on the matter obscures that.
/r/MensRights14/12/22 04:11 PM
13

How could they do that? Women don’t even know how women work
/r/AntiFeminists14/12/22 05:44 AM
1

1) still trying, but he's to the "idk what to do" stage 2) agreed it should help, but i have difficulty giving a shit enough to do it 3) jumping from hobby to hobby just reminds me how empty each one feels 4) I make plenty of money 5) No thanks, i want to keep the option of kids 6) debt isn't a problem. Sure i have some, but it's not an undue burden nor a worry of mine 7) WOW JUST SHOUT THINGS AND IT WORKS HUH 8) "Just do it", yeah i've heard this bullshit. Recently got "Just choose to be happy"…
/r/MensRights13/12/22 10:39 PM
3

no no no, she loves then when she can leech off the money he makes from it It's when logic and reason is applied to her that she has a problem with. Men who date her are supposed to just abandon all critical thinking and accept whatever stupid bullshit she decides to pull that day, otherwise they're "arrogant, condescending, and incapable of entertaining opinions they disagree with" ...bet top dollar this bitch hasn't bothered to entertain an opinion she disagreed with in her entire life.
/r/AntiFeminists13/12/22 09:56 PM
5

been through >10, and you're wrong. Therapy isn't geared towards solving men's problems, it's geared to toward making men less of a problem. Someday, u will figure out a way to stop this darkness❤️ On the topic of being entirely dismissive of someone 🙄 to be treated just like how moms treat thier babies! How my mother treated her baby is a large part of the issue. Stop with the toxic positivity, it doesn't do anything but invalidate someone's experience. Sometimes life just sucks.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 09:45 PM
9

You say that, but therapists eventually all say "i don't know how to help you"
/r/MensRights13/12/22 09:33 PM
102

not only that, someone who's reported once, will continue to report, and likely make other attempts if they've attempted already. The dead stay silent, this issue is far worse that even our data makes it seem, and we still can't get anyone to care.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 09:32 PM
50

would love her video on that, that makes a lot of sense There's no way women are so incompetent as to be 16x less able to kill themselves, no matter the method (4x the amount of attempts, but 1/4 the amount of successes)
/r/MensRights13/12/22 09:31 PM
11

It's a non-sequitur that feels like it solves the argument in womans' favor, so it gets used Same with "Well whos commiting that violence, huh!?" when men try to get resources for being victims of violent crime, which they are at much higher rates that women. It's a blatant 0-iq response equivalent to "sucks to be you, stfu". We should treat it the same.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 09:29 PM
17

the purpose of the sub is to be offended. If they can't find something, the sub dies. Feminism has this same problem.
/r/AntiFeminists13/12/22 09:20 PM
4

I'm with you, elon getting to where he is at is the opposite of 'by merit'. But that doesn't mean we shouldn't value and pursue merit based systems. ...that said, this isn't an either or discussion. We also need to be pulling up society from the bottom, instead of just leaving them to die. We can be ethical in both ways, if the people in power bothered to try.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 07:15 PM
4

Being susceptible to psychological manipulation is not the same thing as “needing” Humans have a “need” to find understanding and answers, but aren’t great at knowing whether those answers are accurate, since that takes tons of work. Religions and feminism take advantage of mental shortcuts our brains use to understand the world to brainwash followers into believing untrue things. That’s quite a big difference from “needing” religion
/r/MensRights12/12/22 02:20 PM
14

kek
/r/MensRights09/12/22 03:10 AM
7

thats the trap They expect stoicism because it lets them get away with shit and not have to worry about consequences, then they shame men for not shutting down any inconvenient feelings and being forced to address the emotion challenging their bullshit like they have to with women. Stoicism is the high road, and a privilege. It's not free, and people who don't reciprocate don't deserve the treatment. If a bitch is in your face, scream right back until she grows up and learns how to be civil
/r/MensRights08/12/22 07:01 PM
14

“More common than people think” You don’t know the half of it. 70% of adult males in the USA were mutilated as children. Had they been girls, that would have been a human rights violation and child sexual abuse, but since their boys it’s apparently just fine. That’s the reason they make the statistics very gender specific, if they make them objective, it highlights just how much need men are in, and how much violence, specifically sexual violence, is allowed against them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/12/22 03:01 PM
17

It’s also reinforcement to make sure he’s putting others’ needs before his own. Shows you how deep that conditioning goes, that they’ll pathologize healthy behavior as soon as it may not benefit them, or indicate a lessening of their control over that man
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/12/22 02:33 PM
22

Intentionally and knowingly
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/12/22 03:52 PM
11

I mean, i'd be upset to if i was allowed to believe i was special all my life and people would just show up to do things for me and my expected life plan was to have sex and never do anything i didn't want ever again. It's definitely a delusion we should be shattering earlier.
/r/MensRights05/12/22 09:10 PM
86

But but but it was those damn dirty men causing the murders, so victims who are male shouldn’t count because I’m a sexist cunt! - her, probably
/r/MensRights04/12/22 06:11 PM
21

That’s because it is. She’s comparing being surrounded and pampered by trained professionals while lying in a bed with being forced to go kill and die in another country. It’s absurd, and no statistics support it.
/r/MensRights04/12/22 06:10 PM
31

How about men who are drafted are entitled to get two of these types of women pregnant before heading out? Ya know, since they are all for producing soldiers for the war effort and all. It’s not like men get to choose where they’re deployed, why would women choose who the father is? /s In all honesty this bitch is just insane, and twisting her privilege into oppression out of the fear she might one day actually be held accountable/responsible for something
/r/MensRights04/12/22 06:06 PM
2

It was nice to see how she at least claims to pull her weight in traditionally male areas. but yes i let the conversation get pulled away from the original topic, sucks how well that ends up working.
/r/MensRights04/12/22 04:26 PM
6

and not in any way that requires redress, as it's clearly the result of women's choices and preferences
/r/MensRights04/12/22 04:18 PM
0

R/woosh
/r/MensRights03/12/22 06:13 PM
-1

You’re right, dipshit I should never moderate my language based on a spineless selfish cunt like yourself, or out of any consideration for your pussy feelings. That would be absurd.
/r/MensRights03/12/22 05:42 PM
32

Male genital mutilation is a tad more important than “mansplaining” or the debunked “pay gap” At some point, pointing out the extreme difference in treatment becomes reasonable, and we’re way past that point.
/r/MensRights03/12/22 05:17 PM
45

But then what excuse would they use to attack men, behave terribly, and demand men do things for them?
/r/MensRights03/12/22 05:15 PM
2

This, tbh. What feminists teach young boys is grooming and child abuse, and it would be immediately apparent if flipped and done the same way by a man to a young girl
/r/AntiFeminists03/12/22 04:43 PM
5

When they define any effort required of them to be a decent partner as “mothering”, fucking yes This is the same bullshit attitude of any woman asked to emotionally support her man saying “I’m not your therapist”. Sure, there’s things a licensed therapist should deal with, but that excuse is used by women to not do any sort of empathy work for their men’s problems. That’s what makes it a bullshit manipulation tactic.
/r/AntiFeminists03/12/22 04:42 PM
9

Starts earlier than that. First they skin a baby boys dick, then for weeks and months leave him to “cry it out” until it’s a default understanding that crying (I.e. expressing a desire to be helped) does not help and doesn’t fix their pain. By the time that boy gets to elementary school, they’re legit angry he’s still doing it.
/r/MensRights03/12/22 04:19 PM
2

Yup. People expect men to be problem solvers, not problem havers. Societies bounties and services are designed to flow one way.
/r/MensRights03/12/22 04:17 PM
-1

And why can’t we say an easily gender neutral “grow the fuck up”? In a climate where a man’s “manhood” is questioned on a regular basis as a form of manipulation, it’s pretty disingenuous to pretend it’s the same thing as “grow up”
/r/MensRights03/12/22 04:16 PM
6

You forgot the third type: when something would suck for the man, but be better for everyone else. “I don’t want to go to another country and kill people “ man up “I don’t want to raise another man’s kids” man up “I didn’t want to have kids, told her this, and she lied about birth control” man up “She molested me when I was a child” man up And so on. “Man up” is used to shame men and attack their sense of manhood for not sacrificing of themselves for the benefit of others.
/r/MensRights03/12/22 04:14 PM
3

oh didn't mean that women put as much effort, energy, and responsibility into their man as men do for their job, i mean emotionally. Women consider a man, emotionally, like a man considers his job. Devastated when it leaves without their control, always looking for better opportunities, highly invested to do as little as they can get away with Careers tho at least sometimes reward effort with advancement. It's different than what men in love generally feel for women. Women when they say "oh i'm …
/r/MensRights02/12/22 09:53 PM
24

not just desire, women use that desire of men to be fathers as leverage for everything. Women treat men like men treat their jobs.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 07:16 PM
10

No one is saying to disadvantage them, just to stop advantaging people who in the long run aren’t worth it. If they want to be a grown up and put their big girl pants on, they can do it with the same level of resources, scholarships, protection, and encouragement men get. All of which they currently have more of.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 07:04 AM
9

Depends on the education. We could definitely use less argumentative out of work lawyers in society
/r/MensRights02/12/22 07:02 AM
8

Right? And who wants an expensive cow that demands half the farm's profits from then on, even after the initial investment.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 12:00 AM
1

we don't have many other places to go to However, there are plenty of places you could call out women. /r/offmychest /r/relationship_advice or any of it's variants most of the default subs, tbh, have a heavy anti male bias. Yet the only place you managed to find to defend against "disgusting dialogue" is here, the one safe space men made? sure...
/r/MensRights01/12/22 08:59 PM
3

Youth and fertility is also a primal reason why men are attractive lol. After 35, the quality of sperm is diminished and results in decreased fertility and mutations Wrong. Men over 35 have an easier time dating than ones younger, because female attraction is based on something different: Power. Yes, there is a slight increase of mutations and decreases in sperm motility with age, but it is trivial compared to the loss of fertility women experience through aging. This is biological, it's much mo…
/r/MensRights01/12/22 07:49 PM
1

I gave two examples There are hundreds of female communities that do this, yet you only seem to speak up in male ones.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 07:44 PM
31

Exactly. They want what men get, not the work men were forced to do to get it. Feminism has been this way from the start: Voting, but no draft or expectation to die in war.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 07:14 PM
1

so is "small dick energy" or "fragile masculinity" or any of the other shame phrases used against men, like referencing their height, or pretending failing at something or not being as physically strong as another man is some type of moral deficit. Pretty disingenuous of you bitch about what we talk about in here and not be over in 2x or FDS calling them out on all the disgusting ways they talk about men. At least ours are based in facts and reason
/r/MensRights01/12/22 06:57 PM
-1

Every time i've tried, women seem to highly resent "equality". They only want equality when it means more for them, if it comes to men's expectations and standards, they mean fuck all. So, yeah, fertility and youth are the most basic and primal reasons a woman is attractive, and fuck anyone who says differently. If they want to be treated as equals, they can build on top of that with other qualities like they expect men to, not say "Oh i worked on my career for 30 years i must be so hot!" becaus…
/r/MensRights01/12/22 06:51 PM
1

A woman's most valuable asset is her fertility. It's the only reason to associate with her outside what a male friend would provide, and yes, it's highly correlated with youth.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 06:44 PM
15

they probably shouldn't have been giving up the milk, then That said, personally i'm past the point of being willing to buy. The cow can either come chill for a while or i'll get milk from the store. Not worth the maintenance effort to buy the whole cow these days.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 06:05 PM
66

apparently so is equality, when actually applied equally
/r/MensRights01/12/22 06:02 PM
14

equality for me, not for thee. Men have to split their privileges and rewards, because equality, but women do not.
/r/AntiFeminists01/12/22 04:04 PM
1

I cant
/r/MensRights01/12/22 01:57 AM
78

I know you’re young, but my advice is to dump this girl and get with someone who respects you and makes you feel safe, instead of threatening you and promising harm. Know that the consequences she’s setting up and threatening aren’t only if you hit her, it’s if she says you hit her, and no one will think twice. Which makes this very akin to, if we flip the genders, a boyfriend telling his girl “hey I could totally beat you to death if I needed to.” And playing songs about beating women to death.…
/r/MensRights01/12/22 01:25 AM
30

So the problem is, without subs like this, shit like what his gf just did becomes his normal. We’re likely the only community that validates his feeling that this normalization of violence against men, and presumed violence by men, is wrong.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 01:23 AM
5

I disagree. Feminism is all about how much women control men. Yes they want to control women, but only to get power and control for women at large over men. They dgaf what most individual women do with their lives past that.
/r/AntiFeminists30/11/22 07:06 PM
6

The real problem is how much they ignore the mistakes. Children are impressionable, and it's honestly way easier than it should be to convince a child that their gender is the root of all their problems, and they should do all these permanent things to damage themselves to fix it. And then they get a massive amount of social validation from some sources for it. If social validation was their root issue in the first place, then they've damaged themselves for the wrong reasons. This does happen. D…
/r/AntiFeminists30/11/22 07:04 PM
2

You ask as if we had a choice. Women have been leaders, queens, and emperesses in the past as well. Historically, they're even more prone to sending men to die than male leaders, on average. You don't get to pull "waaahh women didn't create it!". Women have been half the voting population, and the majority of voters, for over a century. Any legislation we have in place is at least equally their fault, and their responsibility to fix. women suffer when men they care about are drafted Wow bitch, t…
/r/MensRights30/11/22 04:19 PM
3

Yup. Now it's just trying to scream louder than the truth to disparage him We've already seen how she tries to use these bots and feminists spouting lies as facts in a case
/r/AntiFeminists29/11/22 11:35 PM
5

It's what's left when you have no facts or logic, no ethics, and manipulation, gaslighting, and logical fallacies have failed.
/r/AntiFeminists29/11/22 11:29 PM
9

Yeah i keep a copy of this to reply to people who try to use "Those aren't real feminists!" It's an amazing post and i love to see it reposted
/r/AntiFeminists29/11/22 08:13 PM
2

I'd love for that, too, but that's not what happened, and all attempts to add women to the draft or expect equal participation in protecting the country have failed. And so we're in the situation where half the population is voting for consequences they won't suffer from, due to their gender. It's a bit akin to all white people making laws that only affect black people, which we've determined to be kind of wrong.
/r/MensRights29/11/22 08:10 PM
1

ngl... its weird how light skinned black people i know lean hard into how black they are. Like, it was racist when slave owners considered 1/8 black as a slave-able amount of black, how is it not racist for a 1/2 black person to be all "Yeah i'm black and n*ga all the way!". Like, w/e not my problem just seems as weird as someone decades ago protesting how not black they are, but now mixed race people are leaning hard the other way (the ones i know, anyway, no real clue how common it is)
/r/MensRights29/11/22 06:24 PM
1

oh please, she definitely is not
/r/AntiFeminists29/11/22 04:39 PM
1

Considering 70% of adult males in the USA were sexually abused and mutilated as children (circumcision rates), they sure have a hell of a problem on their hands then.
/r/MensRights29/11/22 04:28 PM
7

Feminism was never about equal rights. From the beginning, they wanted the privileges of men without the cost: Voting without being required to die in war
/r/MensRights29/11/22 04:19 PM
2

Trust no one who thinks a man's value is in some way related to what women think of him.
/r/MensRights29/11/22 03:41 PM
0

I.e., being a lying cunt
/r/MensRights29/11/22 03:02 PM
3

It’s intentional. Not only does it remove all accountability from a woman and put it on the man (a feminists favorite activity), it also sets up the dynamic of the woman “giving” sex, and so she is therefore owed something else (money, time, effort, commitment, etc). The very idea asserts that all women are whores by implication
/r/MensRights29/11/22 03:01 PM
6

Responsibility is not on the man until he has the same level of choice in bringing a pregnancy to term as a woman. Since that is very much not the case, the responsibility should be solely on the woman. Financially as well.
/r/MensRights29/11/22 02:57 PM
2

Well she certainly didn’t have anything else going for her, it’s a pretty standard fall back when a feminist feels threatened
/r/MensRights29/11/22 02:36 PM
7

So you’re asking them to lose?
/r/MensRights29/11/22 05:19 AM
3

Oh hell no, haha R.I.P. Kevin Samuels
/r/MensRights29/11/22 05:18 AM
27

Just had an argument with one, and was pleasantly surprised that incel wasn't the slur she pulled out Instead i got You really wasted your time crawling out of the dump of dry cum and empty hot cheetoh bags to address me So at least they're bothering to get creative.
/r/MensRights29/11/22 12:37 AM
3

Projecting about "Guru"'s, she seems incapable of interacting with another person as an individual, and not part of some label she's made up in her head. Now, i'll stop responding here now until she comes back with some type of valid point or argument, but notice again how insistent she is on getting the last word. This is the final "haha, i win!" of the feminist troll. As long as they're heard last, they think they've 'won'
/r/MensRights29/11/22 12:22 AM
2

the types of men I deal with don’t spend time on Reddit this way Trying to raise her perceived value, despite being the type to do exactly what she is complaining about, by saying the men in her life are "busy". This is the shit we would see of FDS about "high value" men, but it's especially ironic here as she doesn't realize she's insulting the men she's talking about, since no "busy" man would involve themselves in the life of someone like this. You are the sum of your 5 closest friends, after…
/r/MensRights29/11/22 12:19 AM
3

anyone who follows what you say deserves what they get Threatening retribution to following readers, notice she still doesn't have any points but to attack the person she's talking to, rather than making a valid logical argument. She hasn't for a while now, but is still responding in, to reiterate, a sub about men's rights on a thread about male suicide. Wrong time and place to be bitchy, yet here she is.
/r/MensRights29/11/22 12:16 AM
2

I’m the same person online that I am in real life I don't doubt that, my sympathies to the men in her life People like me because I’m honest and I don’t sugar coat. Funny how it has to be her telling us that, instead of them, huh? It upset you Asserting without knowledge my emotional state, this is something they'll do IRL to try and rile you up. Remember, in their mind's if they can get you emotional, they "win", no matter how emotional she gets. This is the attacking of men's emotions in actio…
/r/MensRights29/11/22 12:13 AM
3

emotional terrorist Here is another example of how they imply a man is violent and dangerous when they don't have any facts, arguments, and the insults don't seem to be working. Anybody who doesn’t see that you have deep deep issues, they’re lost anyway We've already passed "who hurt you" territory, invalidating men's experiences, and moved into "anybody who agrees with you is hurt and a lost cause" This is how feminists try to frame any and all men's issues in terms of how they affect women, an…
/r/MensRights29/11/22 12:08 AM
3

How am i fighting to keep you here? I've asked you repeatedly to leave Ohhhh, thats right, i forgot the feminist standard of pretending whatever makes your case is true and ignoring reality. Damn, thats a good one! Junior See, you pull bullshit out of your ass. You have no idea how old i am in relation to you, you are just trying to belittle instead of making a point. Like how when i say you're a misandric sexist asshole, i'm saying something provable based on what you've provided here. Me and t…
/r/MensRights29/11/22 12:05 AM
5

See guys? she's only hear to stroke her own ego, these are the trolls we watch out for. They almost sound reasonable at first, don't fall for it.
/r/MensRights29/11/22 12:02 AM
3

Stand up and you will get put down, like the sick puppy you are Ahhh the blatant misandry we've come to expect, here it is. You'll keep going, because you think the last post wins! and imagine the fucking audacity of that, lets gender flip it, shall we? I'll go into a women's rights sub, on a thread about a woman's issue, say... rape, and then constantly put the women down and say that men aren't responsible for women's problems and they should deal with things on their own, and i'll "Keep putti…
/r/MensRights29/11/22 12:02 AM
3

lol, to what you think is them "opening up" I’m healthy enough too F to doubt, based on this thread. and that’s usual repugnant to the sick puppies as evidenced by your attitude towards me. You understand both this discussion and thread are not about you... right? like, there do exist things in life that are not about you. Tell me, what is the topic of this thread? Do you remember?
/r/MensRights28/11/22 11:59 PM
4

lol, you really don't understand how these threads work, do you? Welp, works for me, this will make a good example.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 11:58 PM
4

Difference is mine was an accurate description meant for other readers, whereas yours were an attempt to cause emotional harm. ☕ Edit: In case you're confused about the difference, when i state you are a selfish sexist asshole, i am basing that label off of the information you chose to present in this thread. When you said i "wasted your time crawling out of the dump of dry cum and empty hot cheetoh bags to address me", you were trying to attack character that wasn't present in the thread, as i …
/r/MensRights28/11/22 11:53 PM
3

Lol, you only think of the "healthy" ones as "healthy" because they know they can't open up to you, because then you'll call them "sick puppies". You are so blind to the male experience, it's legitimately astounding. Do you even know your partner, outside of what is useful to you?
/r/MensRights28/11/22 11:50 PM
3

Don't think i implied shit. I flat out stated you were a sexist asshole, and still do.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 11:47 PM
3

Ditto! Enjoy you male-hating life! Edit: oh and I have no doubt you have your feet up. Could almost count as a second job at this point
/r/MensRights28/11/22 11:47 PM
3

Here, i'm with ya. I've started requesting only male doctors at every opportunity. Especially dealing with women like you, nothing convinces me more that my safety shouldn't be left in a woman's hands, at any point in time. You seem to resent the implication that it even could. Edit: Because your brain is probably bad at extrapolating, this logic now means i only vote for male politicians, only go to male owned businesses, the works. Ya know, all those 'female empowerment' things, but for men!
/r/MensRights28/11/22 11:41 PM
2

I mean, i wasn't hung up on 'owed', since a helpful word was, by your own admission, beyond your capacity to provide in the first place. Lol, you're right it's totally not working on you, as you keep replying with only insults and no actual arguments besides "I don't have to do anything for men, how dare you imply otherwise!" ☕
/r/MensRights28/11/22 11:40 PM
3

Lol, your projection onto my perceived emotional state is amusing. Also, don't know why you're pulling out extra insults. I thought mine worked just fine. I say men are best equipped to handle male mental help And maybe they wouldn't be if women bothered to give a shit about men's problems. But sure, just like women are best equipped to handle things like pregnancy, birthing, periods and such. Might as well fire all those male OBG/YN's, they clearly aren't equipped to handle women's health probl…
/r/MensRights28/11/22 11:38 PM
1

I know you don't care, that's my point. Go "don't care" somewhere else, and don't post in threads about male mental health unless you come up with something helpful to say, since you haven't managed it so far.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 11:35 PM
2

i did disagree with him, but i'm not surprised you can't see things that don't align with what you want to say
/r/MensRights28/11/22 11:32 PM
3

I am, you came in here to a discussion about male mental health and said men should be the ones to solve it, knowing damn well health care, especially mental health care, is dominated by women. So, instead of asking the people in the greatest position of power in the situation to change to help the people in need, lets ask the people in need to just do better for each other! THATS A GREAT FUCKING IDEA
/r/MensRights28/11/22 11:29 PM
5

I don’t owe random men ANYTHING Exactly, just like we don't owe women anything. No more DV aid, police forces for gender specific crimes, health care for female specific issues, or all funding for women's issues that men's taxes end up paying for. And certainly don't go expecting men to protect you when shit hits the fan. Go check those bumps in the night yourself, instead of kicking the man out of the bed to do it. Go tell more men this message. Women's issues are yours to handle, and no resour…
/r/MensRights28/11/22 11:26 PM
2

It’s not my fault you are so flimsy in character that you feel peer pressured to handle stuff that’s not your business Lol. Projecting to the max. This "flimsy character" is what society expects of men, with regards to women. Shocking to see how defensive you are about that expectation when expected to live up to it. Why are you fighting to make women an important part of the equation Because women caused it, exacerbated it, have the tools and ecosystem to help fix it, but would rather take thei…
/r/MensRights28/11/22 11:23 PM
3

You're not supposed to be someone else's mother, you're supposed to be a competent and equal human being. If you're providing emotional support to women that you don't give to men, like you admitted to doing, then you're a sexist shitbag instead.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 11:19 PM
4

You justified not handling it well, not saying "Oh, you're right, i'm wrong, i'll learn and grow and do better" Ya know, like men are expected to do when women's problems are dumped on them.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 11:17 PM
3

This is a pretty sexist and cowardly view to take. Men being emotional doesn't nearly lead to physicality as often as it does with women (since men are punished since birth to contain that physicality, to women's benefit), and this just sounds like a mother woman (since 'mother' seems to trigger you, the analogy was meant to convey handling a temper tantrum, which you were alluding to dealing with men's emotions being) throwing her hands up in the air "I CAN'T DEAL WITH THIS ANYMORE" and screami…
/r/MensRights28/11/22 11:15 PM
6

And why is your inability to handle it mens problem? We have an inability to handle hysterical women, since we can't physically restrain her (or defend ourselves, both physically and from lies) without getting attacked by society at large. Just because the consequences women face are more immediate does not make them more severe. Get the fuck over yourself and grow up.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 11:12 PM
13

I have spoken up. What i get back is "Don't you realize how this makes everybody else feel?" and "what do you have to be unhappy about?" And in answer to the second one, as an example, saying "Hey my mother had my penis surgically altered as a child and i'm not OK with that" i get back "well millions of men are fine with that, you should be too" S.I.G.N. language. Shame, Ignore insult, Guilt, Need to be right. Those are the responses men usually get when they speak up about issues, including sui…
/r/MensRights28/11/22 11:09 PM
1

Exactly this. This is where the fear and freakouts around men's "locker room talk" comes from. It's projection of how women talk about men, on average. Yes some men i'm sure can say some terrible things about women when they aren't around, but i've never heard it. All i've heard is men being very respectful and loving of the women in their lives. I've personally listened to many instances of women doing the exact opposite to men in general and to men they know specifically as soon as they're in …
/r/MensRights28/11/22 10:06 PM
2

This is going to be about as difficult as convincing a theist that god isn't real. You can't logic someone out of a position they didn't logic themselves into. She believes in the patriarchy for reasons other than logic (because if she did, she'd see it as the bullshit it is) so you can't actually argue the point. Either you attack her emotionally, showing her the harm her beliefs cause, or you dump her and let her keep living in her delusions.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 10:03 PM
25

They aren't the sole focus of attention and resources for victims. Every $ that goes to a male victim is a $ less that goes to a female one. They consider research like this to be theft and violence towards women, since they don't get as much exclusive shit.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 09:52 PM
7

I rather be actually right, rather than feel right In the minds of the people who are wrong, they're still right. #godwashere
/r/MensRights28/11/22 09:51 PM
25

I'm gonna start saying that, seems like it will get a much better response than "That is entirely bullshit, and the president being a man does fuck all to back it up"
/r/MensRights28/11/22 09:37 PM
32

Because it makes them feeeeeeel good Remember, do you want to be right, or happy? Feminists know they aren't right, so they pretend they are to be happy! (to the detriment of everyone else) i.e., it's a blatant lie that they pretend to be true because it benefits them for it to "be" true, and by pushing the social narrative they increase the number of people who believe it is true, until by criticizing it you are criticizing the social collective itself, and they use that violation against the c…
/r/MensRights28/11/22 09:35 PM
26

This is just a "re-examining" of existing data, so the research was already approved by a misandric cunt somewhere, and this is just doing the analysis again with less misandry, which (surprise, surprise) gives an entirely different result!
/r/MensRights28/11/22 09:31 PM
2

lowkey? They seem very blatant about it. Same with /r/blackpeopletwitter. It's kind of the point of the sub, to be racist...
/r/MensRights28/11/22 09:09 PM
2

I use comparisons to racism for this reason. Often, it's the same bigotry, just using sex instead of race (ostensibly). SA accusations, victims of violence, arrest/conviction/sentencing rates, etc. All of those have a greater gap in sex than they do in race, and if we can recognize it's wrong when there's a large racial disparity, it should be easy to recognize something is wrong with a 2x or more larger sex disparity. It's also sadly funny to see someone 'woke' totally ok with the logic that it…
/r/MensRights28/11/22 09:08 PM
1

yeah but that doesn't make it seem like all men are at fault, and that it's only men who have to take responsibility for it, so they literally can't see it
/r/MensRights28/11/22 08:54 PM
2

See here's the context you're missing: Feminists (even those who would count before feminism was a movement) depend on the effort of men to accomplish things. Especially the things they 'accomplish' themselves, are usually accomplished through the efforts of men. So to their minds, what men are doing with their time is a gender war of men's versus women's interests, because any time a man devotes to himself is time that isn't being devoted to a woman. They aren't even considering their own effor…
/r/MensRights28/11/22 07:10 PM
1

apparently
/r/MensRights28/11/22 07:04 PM
4

but that would require women do anything besides fuck all in regards to men, like giving actual effort and care and respect that men are expected to give to women, and feminists and these other misandric organizations can't have that.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 06:58 PM
2

Yeah this is like some of those famous porn stars who are all upset when people they meet recognize them from their work. Like, hunny, you chose this, you can deal with the consequences. Trying to blame the men who remember you for your own shitty decisions is just another one of your shitty decisions.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 06:56 PM
4

this, tbh She's certainly not attractive enough to deserve the attention she's getting, but that isn't why she's popular. She's the flabby plain version of most women that they can project themselves onto, who can "sing". It's time we brought back standards for women, the bar is a tad low.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 06:50 PM
3

closer to 95% these days
/r/MensRights28/11/22 06:48 PM
1

The problem is they don't have any other outlets for the bullshit that burden's them. Women in their lives shun and shame them for trying to get the same level of emotional support women get by default, men don't know how to give that support because, again, they've never received it and so don't know what it feels like, and women have labelled this "emotional labor" when they are "required" to give men the same care and support they so easily give other women, and we are left with the situation…
/r/MensRights28/11/22 06:42 PM
22

Correcting you. Feminism has been about special privileges and increased power for women at the expense of men since it’s inception. Calling it “for equality” was a massive gaslighting campaign to hide what they were/are really doing: misandry Feminism is a hate group disguised as a civil rights movement. And it becomes easy to notice when you see just how many of their “woman’s issues” affect men to a nearly identical degree and they just pretend it doesn’t exist. Or worse, disrupt and erase ev…
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 10:03 PM
3

I’m an egalitarian. I’ll treat others how I am treated. Not justifying a damn thing, it’s how I live.
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 09:57 PM
5

It’s all about power dynamics. They want to frame any action that doesn’t have the approval of “womyn” as bad, that’s what it’s about. Can’t get sex? Women must not approve of you, you might as well die incel Not giving your time and resources to women? You’re a dangerous terrorist, who knows what you could be doing instead!? And on and on. All male behaviors that don’t directly benefit women get labeled and pathologists as dangerous and deviant, and requiring violence of the state to suppress. …
/r/MensRights26/11/22 09:39 PM
5

The high road takes work we can’t afford to do. Feminists have unfortunately had success with these scorched earth tactics, and we won’t get that to change unless women as a social class begin to feel the effects of it.
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 09:32 PM
13

As well as boy brothels You can tell a misandrist from how much they completely ignore someone’s suffering when they happen to be male.
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 09:30 PM
10

Wow you clearly know fuck all about male genital mutilation, or female genital mutilation for that matter. What a simp tactic, using unsupported and unfactual “waaah women have it worse!” When the reality the most common form of FGM is very analogous to what is commonly known as male circumcision, and it is done for the same reasons and with similar levels of psychological and physical trauma to the victim. This is like me saying “hey in some countries they split the boys penis down the middle i…
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 09:29 PM
2

Happy to be proven wrong. Now how do we get more women pulling their weight like you?
/r/MensRights26/11/22 05:39 PM
2

If you could read, you would have noticed id already provided examples, like the draft, or signing up for the army reserve since you’re sexistly exempt from it. But how about a few more? Are you right behind your husband with an extra mag and pistol when someone breaks in, or is that still a “man’s job”? Women seem to just skip over having an unpaid bodyguard at all times and who has to put in the effort to be prepared to do that. How about taking out the trash? Or paying half the bills and prov…
/r/MensRights26/11/22 04:43 PM
3

Equal to you, while living up to responsibilities you don’t live up to? How does that work, huh? Seems like it’s only your responsibilities that get “equalized” And what are you bitching about? Women walk away from parenthood all the time, stop pretending it’s some devastating event when men do it, too. And again, missing the point and playing mental gymnastics. The point is men are constantly striving to make women’s live easier just to get shit on and dumped with even more burdens back. It’s a…
/r/MensRights26/11/22 07:54 AM
6

There can absolutely be true legal and financial responsibility. It’s called “you made the choice, you can deal with it your grown ass self instead of offloading the cost into men.” You have this nasty theme in your response that because a woman faces risks or bears more natural consequences for a decision, that a man should financially back that, and that expectation should be enforced through the violence of the state. You chose to have children. Of your own volition. It’s great that your husb…
/r/MensRights26/11/22 04:03 AM
10

Why aren’t the women allowing that man to nut in them capable of not sleeping with that man? Are women not at all responsible for the men that they let inside them? There would be just as much stopping that man, as there currently is stopping a woman having a bunch of unprotected sex and using various methods of killing the newly created genetically unique life form to avoid taking responsibility for it. That’s equality. If women want men to be responsible for the child, they can woman up and as…
/r/MensRights26/11/22 03:10 AM
9

Or have it be opt in, not opt out
/r/MensRights26/11/22 01:54 AM
9

No it needs to be the default. Too many loopholes will exist for her and the state to enslave him otherwise. He isn’t the legally responsible party unless he actively agrees, after a paternity test
/r/MensRights26/11/22 01:53 AM
1

I’m for equality. The state for men right now is if that kid exists in any form, you are legally and financially responsible for it, and will be jailed for murder if you kill it. The same should be true for women. And if they don’t like it, they should start giving a shit about actual equality and changing the shit men have to deal with before being expected to be treated better
/r/MensRights26/11/22 01:50 AM
11

How many military positions are pilots or drivers? Women are perfectly capable of taking those positions, biology or no.
/r/MensRights24/11/22 11:56 PM
41

It’s a bit reductionist to say the experience itself made her kill herself. The experience started her fight with depression, that ultimately led to assisted suicide this year, years after her experiment. My take is she was forced to take a red pill she didn’t see coming, and once you take the red pill you can’t go back. You see it all around you, in tv and media and politics and especially in feminism. Men are gaslit into believing they are privileged, often using the apex fallacy excuse that t…
/r/AntiFeminists23/11/22 06:10 PM
6

When women choose to be violent they first ensure there is no risk of retaliation, and if there is risk, they use proxy violence to get men to enact their violence instead. You pointing out that women can lie directly affects their ability to continue to lie and have men attacked by others. Of course they don’t like you pointing that out, it’s reducing their personal power. That said, don’t stop. Nothing makes that abuse more obviously abuse than another woman pointing it out, sadly.
/r/MensRights22/11/22 04:01 PM
4

Because he’s safe from his abusers and exploiters They can’t get free labor from him anymore, what an ass /s
/r/MensRights22/11/22 03:37 PM
2

Ironically, I firmly believe being unable to accept falsehoods in the name of social cohesion to be a virtue, and that people without it are degenerates. Sounds like society would be better with more autists
/r/MensRights21/11/22 04:46 PM
5

The real question is how they deluded themselves into thinking being looked at is some massive form of oppression Bitches need to grow the fuck up
/r/MensRights21/11/22 04:30 PM
309

To them, choosing the safe option when presented with risk is “cowardly” Never crossed their mind that they weren’t worth the risk
/r/MensRights21/11/22 03:34 PM
18

Unless you die. Which is kind of the point. There’s a very unequal amount of dying going on, which is hardly advancing gender equality
/r/MensRights19/11/22 04:18 PM
77

And at mens expense Maybe someday they’ll try to equalize the costs instead of just the benefits, but I won’t hold my breath.
/r/MensRights19/11/22 03:24 PM
32

Including all the dead ones?
/r/MensRights19/11/22 03:22 PM
4

We dunno, if they get even close to this someone finds a reason to arrest or kill them, so men have never really gone as far down the ideological genocidal track as this woman.
/r/MensRights18/11/22 10:35 PM
12

They're already doing this with abortions. Gender specific abortions are far more common in the west than people want to believe, even when women are posting that as their reason for killing a child online. That is also why it is imperative for women to frame fetus' as not human, so that killing them cannot be construed as the violence it actually is. That is how they remain "pacifist", by enacting their violence only in situations where the victim cannot reciprocate.
/r/MensRights18/11/22 10:33 PM
16

because in their sexist heads, this sub is more hateful than that one. That says all you need to know about the state of reddit admins, but to add a cherry on top: Admins have repeatedly asserted that hate speech against men doesn't count as hate speech, and that literally gender flipping common posts in 2x is enough to get you banned for violent and hateful speech against women.
/r/MensRights18/11/22 10:22 PM
1

I have a monthly donation setup, still hoping it takes off and becomes commercially available.
/r/MensRights18/11/22 01:26 AM
1

The stats you've been told about ignore female on male rape as well. In fact, the study that found "1 in 5" women suffer from sexual violence specifically excluded female on male sexual violence, defined rape as "being penetrated" and has repeatedly been debunked by studies that show sexual violence is roughly equal. Edit: Oh.. i get it, you're a troll alt. Bye.
/r/MensRights18/11/22 12:14 AM
1

Yes even for rape. What do you think the term "rape culture" was meant to describe before women coopted it? Don't drop the soap.
/r/MensRights18/11/22 12:05 AM
2

https://www.foregen.org/about
/r/MensRights17/11/22 11:31 PM
3

oh we have a fairly good idea Many plastics and common chemicals that end up in consumer products are actively harmful to men and their reproductive health. Problem is, how do you get people to stop using most plastics and non-stick items, fabric softeners, etc? Like the chemicals you would buy to help you with this are literally wrapped in the problem
/r/MensRights17/11/22 11:11 PM
1

Well it's kind of a thing. It's a thing these women would do to get men to do things for them. It's a very common female behavior. It can also be a trauma response, but it's also a manipulation tactic frequently employed against men, especially in the workplace.
/r/MensRights17/11/22 10:53 PM
1

Good observations. We easily understand and sympathize that a woman with a rape kink has some trauma that she's gaining control over, but in another brilliant example of the empathy gap, no one will apply that logic to men.
/r/MensRights17/11/22 10:08 PM
2

Got any unowned friends 😏
/r/MensRights17/11/22 07:41 PM
9

There are many women who may not consider themselves as feminists who also do this. And while there are men who do this as well, it's safe to consider it a feminine behavior. (Albeit a very toxic one)
/r/MensRights17/11/22 07:38 PM
3

😂 Thanks, but that's hardly impressive. I reserve "kicking ass" for when i actually kick ass in a game. Dealing with entitled people is just having boundaries.
/r/MensRights17/11/22 05:26 PM
5

"Bitch, tits or gtfo. You don't get to be treated as special without giving anything in return. Take your entitled bullshit and shove it allllll the way back up your ass where it belongs. This shit is first come, first served, like it's always been, and you can get your entitled ass to the back of the line." Depends on context, but usually something like that
/r/MensRights17/11/22 05:15 PM
5

Yeah notice how any response that might have pointed out the logical fallacies and hypocrisy in the OP was deleted for "Not coming from a feminist perspective" THAT is how you maintain an echo chamber, and is the reason MRM spaces generally are not.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/11/22 05:13 PM
9

Gonna admit here i do get hostile toward women in chat, but only in specific circumstances. Specifically: Trying to use "I'm a woman!" as an excuse for special treatment or privileges. They can take that "I get the first pick on weapons/character because Ladies First!" bullshit back to their feminist group. If they want to come into male spaces they can play by male rules. That said, i don't do much social gaming just because of how annoying the women and the men there generally are
/r/MensRights17/11/22 05:06 PM
22

Women generally Toxic Femininity see's men (as a class and individually) as tools. They don't solve problems themselves (usually), they manipulate a man into exerting effort to solve it on her behalf. You can think of this as the primary form of feminine power: Manipulating men into doing work. If there are places that men can go where women cannot, that limits how she can use her power, and in some cases quite severely. If men are allowed to congregate together without women keeping them in lin…
/r/MensRights17/11/22 04:57 PM
2

Truth. And have far easier access to children. It’s about creating the perception of fear and changing the narrative that only men are abusers so they can monopolize resources and protect female abusers
/r/MensRights16/11/22 12:06 PM
0

It’s more than that, it’s not even actual “equity” They keep taking from men until they feel men have been lowered enough and women raised enough to be “equal”, when not only is it based on feelings, their definitions of “equal” generally have women in much more privileged positions over men
/r/MensRights16/11/22 12:04 PM
5

He's more focused on getting men back into a judeochristian worldview, i.e. back on the plantation. His "help" is about making men more useful to women and society, not necessarily helping the man himself. Some advice may be helpful, but the general motivation and the framework in which it sits is abusive and toxic. He defends male genital mutilation as a "manhood" ritual, and claims boys need to go through "manhood" rituals to become men in his book Maps of Meaning. So he's advocating physical,…
/r/MensRights15/11/22 07:47 PM
42

And then men who aren't accompanied by women around children are assumed to be pedophiles, despite that also being incredibly rare. Notice the trend? "Men are dangerous and not to be trusted unless a woman vouches for them."
/r/MensRights15/11/22 04:06 PM
3

Stop posting JP content here, he isn't helpful to mens rights.
/r/MensRights15/11/22 04:01 PM
14

Yeah they'll just pretend it was all racism, and then figure out some way that what that women did was actually men's fault.
/r/MensRights15/11/22 03:59 PM
85

Feminists and most other women and society at large. It's about framing a man's value in women's terms. If he isn't having sex, he must not have value to women, and therefore needs to be attacked and shamed until he becomes valuable to women in some way. It's how they derive their social power, childhood indoctrination then into social shaming using the Sisterhoodtm to try and control male behavior to their benefit. They know what they're doing, and it's working as intended when it leads men to …
/r/MensRights15/11/22 03:56 PM
7

Things that are Masculine are things Men are doing, not the other way around
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/11/22 09:06 PM
1

Reject. Every community that has "claimed" the labels has only "claimed" enacting the discrimination against themselves, instead of diminishing it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/11/22 08:57 PM
9

lack of evidence for this People don't react the same to violence/death of men as they do towards populations that might include women
/r/EverydayMisandry14/11/22 04:52 PM
0

You've misunderstood what it's about. it has fuck all to do with the actual criminal, and instead creating a culture of fear around consequences. The punishments are so often disproportionate to the crimes that it's almost foolish to consider them related. Drug crimes in particular. There's generally no victim, it's just punishment for disobeying nonsensical authoritarian rules. Not to mention most of these prisoners are housed for profit, creating massive ethical issues that do lead to poor tre…
/r/MensRights14/11/22 04:26 PM
21

How do any of the other negative slurs that people are perfectly capable of ignoring affect the targets of those slurs? Oh you're completely full of sexist shit? Good to know, fuck off.
/r/MensRights13/11/22 04:10 AM
31

It's a bit more insidious than that. It sets up the stage for false allegations, as they've already done the work to re-contextualize every action a man has taken as supporting him being a violent abuser and her being an innocent victim. You are seeing the surface of a very deep issue in society.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/11/22 04:03 AM
2

We don't draft anymore yet. They will if they need to, and the point is the legal distinction of expectation. Even for social programs, though, they still do. They see ever $ that goes to a man as a $ that could (or in their sexist heads, should) have gone to a woman instead.
/r/MensRights13/11/22 03:56 AM
1

I envy you. The bullies at school were so ineffective because of what i dealt with at home. The worst part is having to pretend the abuser in a position in authority over you is caring and kind and the best most gracious person in the world. It's sickening. Jail is own world with own rules, It's that way on purpose. That environment is encouraged both as a threat to men so they behave, and to diminish men who go through it so they aren't a threat afterward. Notice how some of the worst crimes in…
/r/MensRights13/11/22 03:54 AM
7

If that was actually your reason for caring about it you wouldn't be advocating for just women, as the overlap of size and strength between the populations of women and men are rather large. Also, women who are larger, stronger, and in positions of power are still not held accountable for abuse against men. I'm talking about older women preying on younger boys. You do understand that childcare is dominated by women, right? If you believe in equality, there are an equal number of female pedophile…
/r/MensRights13/11/22 03:50 AM
1

It is to them, and so they will continue to act as if we are taking things away from them, or trying to hurt them. In some ways, they're right. Wanting women to be forced into war the same way men are is putting women at risk, and taking away some of their safety. So "Taking" from women is definitely something i'm advocating for, they have more than they deserve, legally.
/r/MensRights13/11/22 03:47 AM
1

Not to mention they're calling for curfews on men, generally expect men to take on the risk they don't like, and none of the resources are going to help men who are victims, which is far more likely anyway. They seriously need to leave this country and start their own female nations. Like, I support that. Until they're able to find machine slaves they can order around to do the work as competently as men, it will never happen. They'll put all their efforts into controlling the places men live an…
/r/MensRights13/11/22 03:44 AM
5

Oh so you're just full of shit then Men are statistically more likely to be attacked everywhere, this bullshit you're spewing is just misandry and hate speech
/r/MensRights13/11/22 03:41 AM
4

or that feminism is needed until "women can feel safe walking at night" That "feel" is carrying a ton of weight, and basically means the push for special privileges for women at the expense of men will never end, because nothing men do will change how women feel about a situation. They're provably safer than men, and safer than they've ever been in human history, and they want more than ever before to address their feelings. It will never stop
/r/MensRights12/11/22 08:49 PM
-1

This is entirely irrelevant. Men are provably more at risk, and when someone has a gun or has drugged your drink there's fuck all you size is going to do to help you. And that's excluding all situations where a man is outnumbered, which leads to the same result. Women should stop punishing men for their personal irrational insecurities, it's fucking annoying
/r/MensRights12/11/22 08:47 PM
19

You may not be ready to hear this, but it was never about equal rights. If it was, they would have gotten put on the draft when they pushed for suffrage. But they didn't. They pushed for special privileges for women from the very beginning. And now we're stuck with the majority of our voting population not subject to the same consequences of voting (like for war) as the rest. A circumstance that has sparked violent revolution in the past.
/r/MensRights12/11/22 08:44 PM
11

This. It's a cover for knowingly doing shitty things, or having shitty beliefs. So why should more help go to women, despite them provably not needing it as much as men? "WELL WE FEEL WE NEED IT"
/r/MensRights12/11/22 08:41 PM
25

This is true of literally anybody. Nothing stops people from drugging the drink of the tall muscular man they want, but men aren't screaming all the time about how afraid they are despite this very valid risk. Women do not have an excuse for this behavior. It's blatant manipulation.
/r/MensRights12/11/22 08:40 PM
40

And are rewarded for it
/r/MensRights12/11/22 08:39 PM
63

It's a manipulation tactic. As long as she feels more afraid, and she's insisted all her feelings are legitimate and you must accept them as such, then she can get the same benefits as if she was actually at the same level of risk as men. It's a power game, a blatant manipulative deception to get more for themselves and make sure none of the resources go to men in need.
/r/MensRights12/11/22 08:38 PM
52

It's asserting that how a woman feels is the most important metric, and if she doesn't feel safe then the implication is that she isn't safe, whether that is true or not, and it's implying that men are responsible not only for that feeling, but for fixing it. It's, like, 4 layers of logical fallacy to blame men for women's emotions, which is the main tactic feminists use to try to control men and get them to exert effort/resources on women's/feminists behalf instead of taking responsibility them…
/r/MensRights12/11/22 08:37 PM
2

It wasn't about getting you to change it, it was about speaking to the cultural narrative that discrimination against men is just "benevolent" discrimination against women. Honestly i'd have preferred you kept it like it was for all the readers coming, and explained any changed thoughts you had as a comment. In regards to this: I don't see how misandry will get women better grades Women are using their attractiveness, unwittingly or not, to gain an advantage over the men in their classes. That t…
/r/MensRights12/11/22 08:29 PM
1

Not true. It's a fallacy to think that the default is female. The organ that both testes and ovaries develop from is the same in the fetus, that doesn't make that structure a testicle or an ovary
/r/MensRights12/11/22 08:22 PM
4

and yet still legal
/r/MensRights12/11/22 08:21 PM
2

No i was saying that the normalized form of male genital mutilation is equivalent to the most common form of FGM, not the worst kind that you seem to pretend is the only kind
/r/MensRights12/11/22 08:21 PM
64

Tell her if women want equality they should be willing to have their ovaries pulled out and kicked ... and then their clitoral hood skinned off ...and then to get sent off to die in war See how she likes that
/r/MensRights11/11/22 11:15 PM
54

For those who use deception and manipulation to gain power over others, truth and accuracy are kryponite
/r/MensRights11/11/22 11:14 PM
3

I'm guessing given where you're coming from that you'll just do the normal things feminists do when faces with reality: Shame, guilt, deny, and cry foul. But on the off chance you're being honest, the reality is that men are second class citizens right now, and have been for decades. There are hundreds of examples, but they keep getting dismissed with "Well that's not discrimination because...." and the reasons given have fuck all to do with whether it's discrimination or not, and instead are ab…
/r/MensRights11/11/22 09:36 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter