TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AmbitiousAbalone Archive

View 22 posts and 52 comments by AmbitiousAbalone on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1046

AmbitiousAbalone/r/MensRights21/04/19 07:27 PM
74

AmbitiousAbalone/r/MensRights07/04/19 06:00 AM
71

Edu./Occu.AmbitiousAbalone/r/MensRights03/06/19 01:10 AM
57

Legal RightsAmbitiousAbalone/r/MensRights02/06/19 11:02 PM
52

Edu./Occu.AmbitiousAbalone/r/MensRights19/05/19 08:08 PM
43

Edu./Occu.AmbitiousAbalone/r/MensRights13/04/19 09:52 PM
42

HumourAmbitiousAbalone/r/MensRights23/05/19 08:34 PM
34

Edu./Occu.AmbitiousAbalone/r/MensRights23/04/19 04:48 AM
25

Edu./Occu.AmbitiousAbalone/r/MensRights20/05/19 03:45 AM
24

DiscriminationAmbitiousAbalone/r/MensRights14/04/19 06:15 PM
20

HumourAmbitiousAbalone/r/MensRights26/05/19 01:17 AM
18

Edu./Occu.AmbitiousAbalone/r/MensRights13/04/19 08:43 PM
16

AmbitiousAbalone/r/MensRights13/04/19 09:19 PM
13

FeminismAmbitiousAbalone/r/MensRights06/05/19 07:02 PM
10

AmbitiousAbalone/r/MensRights01/05/19 11:55 PM
10

Edu./Occu.AmbitiousAbalone/r/MensRights15/04/19 01:13 PM
9

Edu./Occu.AmbitiousAbalone/r/MensRights19/05/19 07:56 PM
9

Anti-MRMAmbitiousAbalone/r/MensRights17/04/19 09:02 PM
6

AmbitiousAbalone/r/MensRights14/04/19 10:26 PM
4

Edu./Occu.AmbitiousAbalone/r/MensRights20/06/19 05:53 PM
1

Activism/SupportAmbitiousAbalone/r/MensRights14/04/19 07:21 AM
0

AmbitiousAbalone/r/MensRights15/04/19 04:04 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I will send the company a note to stop holding such events or face a labor discrimination lawsuit. Hopefully they will see the error of their ways.
/r/MensRights03/06/19 07:02 PM
4

Liability is in euros not dollars: https://www.france24.com/en/20180119-french-metoo-founder-sandra-muller-sued-slander “I have been issued with a summons, in which Mr Brion demands 50,000 euros in damages for defamation, the publishing of the ruling and 10,000 euros in legal fees,” she wrote in a Facebook post.
/r/MensRights03/06/19 02:14 AM
6

Did you read the article? It has details on his viewpoint. If he did what the woman claims he did, the lawsuit should fail and the woman can then countersue. She should have sued in the first place if there was any credible claim of sexual harassment instead of slandering and a media trial.
/r/MensRights03/06/19 02:13 AM
5

gotta try that! if only to see the looks on their faces.
/r/MensRights03/06/19 02:05 AM
1

One of the reasons I think I could easily live in Canada or the Nordics.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 10:58 PM
3

And I love the reaffirmation that I am a man. I love the cold, far more than heat. 😂
/r/MensRights23/05/19 10:56 PM
5

Often men in warmer climates do not wear suits. Case in point, tech companies in California or offices in most hot tropical climates.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 10:53 PM
3

I think that may have been the point. If gender was the treatment being studied, it would have been better to explain away the effect of dressing by using it as one of the controls (or having people dress uniformly to not let it affect the results). Without that, the study is better described as the effect of dressing and temperature on cognitive performance. There is nothing fundamental about gender being studied here.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 10:52 PM
1

Often men in warmer climates do not wear ties and suits. Case in point, tech companies in California or offices in most hot tropical climates.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 10:35 PM
3

The crappy study didn't instruct people to dress uniformly. How stupid! Were the reviewers sleeping? Now, the conclusions of the bogus study (with "identified" estimates of the effect of temperature on gendered differences in cognitive performance) are all over the internet.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 09:20 PM
2

That's the first sensible thing that actor/star has said/done in a long time. Respect!
/r/MensRights23/05/19 08:47 PM
3

Jane and John, along with other partygoers, sat in a circle on the floor while John had his guitar and possibly played it in preparation for sexually assaulting Jane. Who the heck plays a guitar around friends and partygoers in preparation for sexual assault?!
/r/MensRights20/05/19 06:40 AM
3

In a subsequent meeting with Michelle, John was informed that Jane had changed her mind regarding her requested punishment: she was seeking expulsion, not suspension [of three semesters]. This is like a nightmare come to life. Changing her mind about consensual sex and alleging assault, then changing her mind about the extent of the demanded punishment. As if it's all a joke at someone else's expense.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 06:29 AM
1

Also, as we expected, Google has not had the courage to fire these people, even though they are causing workplace disruptions and therefore monetary harm to the company's shareholders. ​ https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/bgc89j/women_surprised_that_the_company_which_employs/
/r/MensRights07/05/19 09:45 PM
1

It's the former. This was on a mailing list that was not company-specific. The solicitation was for any women on the mailing list and not public to other potential applicants.
/r/MensRights03/05/19 06:18 AM
2

US
/r/MensRights02/05/19 02:16 AM
2

Sadly, that is true. :/
/r/MensRights22/04/19 06:57 PM
1

cool.
/r/MensRights22/04/19 06:06 AM
2

Legal hazards of being a corporate spokesperson I guess. I am pretty sure that off the record, these people think what you are saying. But if they say it on the record, there will be a swift media backlash and PR nightmare to say the least. Remember when Satya was a newly minted ceo and said at a women's conference: “It’s not really about asking for the raise, but knowing and having faith that the system will actually give you the right raises as you go along,” he answered. Not asking for raise,…
/r/MensRights22/04/19 05:54 AM
2

For whatever reason, I am glad that she is speaking up. God knows that a male advocate like Damore would just get squashed pretty quickly.
/r/MensRights22/04/19 05:45 AM
4

Point taken. But the issue isn't about race. It's about gender, which is why it's in this forum. Both white and asian men are being discriminated against. Asians include indians.
/r/MensRights22/04/19 05:42 AM
6

Regarding USW versus Weber, "By five to two the Supreme Court held that the affirmative action plan was lawful. The majority (Brennan, Stewart, White, Marshall and Blackmun JJ) held that Title VII did not prohibit all kinds of affirmative action programs. They held that the plan of affirmative action must first be transitional in nature and serve in fact to correct situations of imbalance by restoring equality at the starting point and should not set out to reproduce them artificially even when …
/r/MensRights22/04/19 05:34 AM
7

A scientist in the pseudoscience link: “These sex differences in neuroticism are not very large, with biological sex perhaps accounting for only 10 percent of the variance.” Firsr of all, I am sure the journalist wouldn't recognize good science versus pseudoscience. It's not for nothing that scientific training (phd) is long and difficult. Also, 10 percent is quite a large percent of variance explained by gender. Not ignorable simply as noise. The scientist seems indoctrinated, not Damore who ju…
/r/MensRights22/04/19 05:12 AM
3

A scientist in the pseudoscience link: “These sex differences in neuroticism are not very large, with biological sex perhaps accounting for only 10 percent of the variance.” Firsr of all, I am sure the journalist wouldn't recognize good science versus pseudoscience. It's not for nothing that scientific training (phd) is long and difficult. Also, 10 percent is quite a large percent of variance explained by gender. Not ignorable simply as noise. The scientist seems indoctrinated, not Damore who ju…
/r/MensRights22/04/19 05:07 AM
5

It's a feature that will be labeled as a bug! ;-)
/r/MensRights22/04/19 03:59 AM
5

"I'm not disagreeing with you or her there." I know, and neither was I disagreeing with you. Just pointing out a tangential aspect that the PM did what was best for the company. We need more of such sincere, hardworking people than victim fetishists if women are to be taken seriously in the workplace.
/r/MensRights22/04/19 03:57 AM
6

I agree that Damore should have been given the benefit of doubt both in terms of privacy and continued employment. Google failed him miserably.
/r/MensRights22/04/19 03:53 AM
4

As a program manager, she probably knows how shitty it is to put subpar employees on a project. It's great that she's voicing against incentives for actively hiring subpar employees in the name of diversity, instead of toeing the gender line and letting the company take the productivity hit.
/r/MensRights22/04/19 03:50 AM
7

That's sad to hear.
/r/MensRights22/04/19 03:40 AM
7

"To be clear, I am referring to the fact that senior leadership is awarded more money if they discriminate against Asians and white men." This is pretty much a Title VII lawsuit that needs to be taken up against Microsoft. No other way to stop active discrimination masquerading as affirmative action and diversity hiring.
/r/MensRights22/04/19 03:37 AM
9

That's terrible. I posted here recently about University of Adelaide/Melbourne's female-only hiring initiatives. It was shocking for me to discover how blatant the discrimination could be.
/r/MensRights22/04/19 03:29 AM
14

I really hope you get hired on your merits and wish you all the best. As do most men in tech to all competent women trying to enter the tech workplace.
/r/MensRights22/04/19 03:28 AM
6

“HR isn’t trying to enforce the inclusive culture that they’re talking about,” one Microsoft employee who read the latest posts by the program manager and responses to them told Quartz. “HR, Satya, all the leadership are sending out emails that they want to have an inclusive culture, but they’re not willing to take any action other than talk about it,” they said. “They allow people to post these damaging, stereotypical things about women and minorities, and they do nothing about it.” ​ In short,…
/r/MensRights22/04/19 03:06 AM
9

Exactly what I am saying here. Thanks!
/r/MensRights22/04/19 02:57 AM
8

Tell that to SJWs who at any cost want equal number of men/women in every profession as long as it is a profession where women are "underrepresented." The SJWs and allies have inadvertently led to deterioration in quality of women hired in many professions, thereby hurting the cause of women's equality. Artificial equality leads to real inequality and a consequent backlash against women hires. Of course, any issues of workplace harassment and active discrimination should be dealt with severely b…
/r/MensRights22/04/19 02:54 AM
11

Fear not, bosses come from the proletariat. Changes should come in a few years after most people realize how tiring, toxic, unproductive, and inefficient it is to be politically correct about every group.
/r/MensRights22/04/19 02:40 AM
14

The problem is that the social justice brigade already made up its mind on Damore, and everyone else was too politically correct/afraid to have an independent unpopular opinion that contradicted the loud SJWs. They were right to be afraid given how swiftly Google acted on Damore for just voicing a coherent dispassionate position on gender imbalance in tech.
/r/MensRights22/04/19 02:34 AM
2

I don't think they do. The general belief (with which I disagree) is that women are paid less than men for the same job. I suspect it's because of diversity hiring which leads to poorer performance of females on average. Feminists are huring women and men both by forcing hiring to be politically correct instead of meritocratic.
/r/MensRights15/04/19 02:10 PM
1

non-paywalled http://www.econ.upf.edu/~rferrer/files/PAPER.pdf
/r/MensRights15/04/19 01:17 PM
2

haha. true that!
/r/MensRights15/04/19 01:39 AM
3

Apparently, another Australian university, the University of Melbourne has also tried to institute female-only hiring practices: https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2016/may/19/university-of-melbourne-mathematics-school-advertises-women-only-positions
/r/MensRights14/04/19 06:25 PM
2

Also, https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2016/may/19/university-of-melbourne-mathematics-school-advertises-women-only-positions
/r/MensRights14/04/19 06:23 PM
3

It doesn't stop at preferential hiring via affirmative action. There are increasingly cases where positions are female-only: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-08-22/university-advertises-women-only-engineering-positions/10151496
/r/MensRights14/04/19 06:18 PM
7

It's amazing how all the blame is put on the male pupil instead of the school actually channeling all that energy into something productive that the pupil likes.
/r/MensRights13/04/19 09:57 PM
1

Exactly! All the credit for the accomplishment has been assigned to a single scientist by social media because of her gender. How fantastic of her to do it all by herself despite the insurmountable odds she must have faced as a woman! /s
/r/MensRights12/04/19 02:11 AM
2

Thanks. It's a sad state of affairs. Hope it gets easier for you to get the recognition your work deserves as awareness of such issues grows.
/r/MensRights11/04/19 10:37 PM
2

Yeah, women can be very decent, hard-working scientists. But they seem more likely to be duds compared to male scientists. This gets really amplified when the selection filters keep picking the best from the previous stage. The real problem happens when seniors - men and women alike - try to perform social engineering by using different standards to attain equity/equality. This leads to inclusion of poorer women scientists in larger numbers and subsequent prejudices against women for their consi…
/r/MensRights10/04/19 11:24 PM
1

I would suggest getting a bachelor's degree. It helps in the job market, even though obtaining it might feel like indoctrination, disappointing and disillusioning as you rightly put it.
/r/MensRights09/04/19 10:34 PM
3

It seems we have been through the canonical experiences. A research project I did in my phd won an industrial award. I was the first author on the paper, and completely responsible for getting access to the industrial data and submitting the report for consideration for the award. The university did a press release on the award. It mentioned praise for a female student (let's call her Z) who was working with my advisor, not an author on the paper/report, and not involved in any way in any part o…
/r/MensRights09/04/19 06:15 PM
6

Wow! And a reputable PNAS study to boot! Thanks for the pointer.
/r/MensRights08/04/19 12:21 AM
10

Tell me about it. My school hired a female professor recently (let's call her Y). Absolutely the worst attitude ever. I worked with her on a small project. A few weeks after her hiring, an administrative clerk I was talking to asked me what working with her was like in hushed tones indicative of brewing trouble. In a class she taught, multiple students complained to me (the TA) that she was using slides from professors at other universities without acknowledging them. This is equivalent to acade…
/r/MensRights07/04/19 11:09 PM
9

Unfortunately, there is none. There are typically no legal recourses for "benign neglect" in graduate programs. And the difference between benign neglect and actual advising/mentorship is what makes all the difference in academic research. Any signs that one is unhappy with the system as-is or wishes to cause trouble or question the status quo is just more likely to get one steeped into more trouble. As long as professors keep on taking self-righteous pride in nurturing female academics over mal…
/r/MensRights07/04/19 06:20 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter