TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AmosParnell Archive

View 9 posts and 39 comments by AmosParnell on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

Algonquin is 100% public. Also the post title is very misleading; yes Algonquin is the biggest college in Ottawa, but when Americans hear college, they think what we call University. There are two universities in Ottawa (University of Ottawa and Carlton Univsersity) that are both bigger.
/r/MensRights26/11/18 06:31 PM
15

But ... but ... my pitchfork...
/r/MensRights12/04/16 11:50 AM
24

Less about users siding with the son, more about not having this incident stay with him for the next seven decades. Perfect example of two wrongs not making a right.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 11:31 PM
33

Actually, the court rejected that argument when they upheld the contract.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 08:09 PM
5

Exactly. Responsible journalism demands that it remain accessible.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 01:59 AM
1

That does not make them analogous.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 09:28 PM
4

She already has, to the tune of $300,000.
/r/MensRights05/07/15 01:33 AM
1

The issue is bigger than just consent and age. She was their teacher and in a position of authority. This power imbalance removes the ability to fully consent, independent of their actual willingness to engage in adult conduct. To give another, perhaps clarifying example, doctors and nurses are prohibited from having personal relationships with their patients because they (the doctors or nurses) have power over the other. Even if both are consenting adults, it is still abuse and grounds for prof…
/r/MensRights04/07/15 06:06 PM
0

Yep
/r/MensRights20/05/15 11:06 PM
2

This is a good point; many of the news stories keep coming back to "potential criminal" acts or charges. Nothing they did was illegal. When people bring up Freedom of Speech; this is actually what free speech is. The ability to say whatever you want without the State throwing you in jail. That's it, nothing more. Freedom of speech is not freedom from consequences. But it is freedom to not get thrown in jail or have a criminal record.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 05:39 PM
13

No he was not on TV as a representative of a public corporation. He was on his own time, did something stupid, and then was essentially doxxed.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 11:01 AM
4

Nothing was signed with Iran. There was an agreement in principle on what a formal deal (whose legally binding language will be negotiated at a future date) will contain.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 09:57 PM
1

Also, it wasn't her that went after him, but the state of Kansas in her name.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 02:52 PM
7

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_Charter_of_Rights_and_Freedoms
/r/MensRights05/03/15 10:56 PM
18

Have you seen what's he's been up to vis a vie citizenship oaths? He's no friend to religious minorities or personal freedoms.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 02:38 PM
3

As with a great many things, the premise is good, but the execution is lacking. I really would like to see a widely circulated interview with MRAs that highlights their interests and goals without the author's bias getting in the way. I think the fact that people on the Internet are people in real life gets lost most of the time.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 11:26 PM
1

'Merica
/r/MensRights31/01/15 03:54 PM
1

fixed
/r/MensRights08/01/15 12:21 AM
1

You see stories like this is /r/AmIFreeToGo/ fairly often. edit: fixed link to sub
/r/MensRights07/01/15 09:05 PM
1

I think this speaks to a larger issue; disproportionate repercussions to men's lives that do not match the level of misconduct. If the gender roles were revered, would we see the same reaction? I doubt it.
/r/MensRights07/01/15 02:40 AM
29

The Times is generally regarded as a left-leaning, liberal, publication. The general thought would be that they would not publish articles that would attack feminism or SJWs.
/r/MensRights22/12/14 06:33 PM
1

As was pointed out recently, feminism's original cause, equal legal rights(voting, property, etc.) and education, has been totally accomplished in the western world. However, they are sorely lacking in developing countries and the SJWs should be paying attention to 12 year olds being married off by their families and not some t-shirt a brilliant scientist pulled out of his closet.
/r/MensRights29/11/14 04:49 AM
1

Sorry; here is the link. I will also repost with the correct link.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 07:31 PM
118

I suspect that replicating this "experiment" in multiple cities would yield the same results as Sydney.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 03:06 PM
3

It's just clickbait to generate ad revenue. And its CNN. Does anyone get their news from them anymore?
/r/MensRights03/11/14 09:28 PM
1

Change takes time. I think people forget this a lot. A culture change can't happen overnight, people just aren't wired to shift their worldview very quickly.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 04:42 PM
11

I'm not sure the two are connected. CDC is a big organization.
/r/MensRights19/10/14 03:08 PM
76

Gotta wonder what would have happened if the notebook wasn't found. Not too hard to believe that he'd be in prison instead of her.
/r/MensRights19/10/14 03:00 PM
-3

This. Going to war ought to be a decision by the People, in the interests of the People. That's not some libertarian ideology, it's how democracy should work.
/r/MensRights19/10/14 12:14 AM
11

I'm sure that would have also 'defused' the situation. /s
/r/MensRights11/10/14 08:17 PM
4

Part of the ad "it doesn't add up". Could have changed the title, but thought about it after.
/r/MensRights10/10/14 01:48 PM
9

Thats exactly what I came to say.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 01:35 PM
2

Lets just paint with as broad a brush as possible and label everyone who doesn't conform and share the same view as misogynist.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 12:19 AM
2

Well said. I'd be interested in the reaction of SRS or /r/Feminism. Sadly I think most the readers here know the answer, but if you are willing to risk it, put it there. edit; words
/r/MensRights08/09/14 08:14 PM
-10

I didn't see any pants touching/opening except in OP's title. Not in content of linked article. Yes, what you describe is sexual assault. But that's not what is being described in the article. edit: words
/r/MensRights02/09/14 03:41 AM
-46

Can you tell me what part of this assault was sexual? Is her application for probation absurd? Yes. Should she spend some time behind bars, absolutely. But I fail to see how this is a sexual assault. Simple assault, false report etc., yes.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 03:01 AM
6

If you want this sub to be taken seriously and not actually sink to what /r/srs says the MRM is, don't engage in hyperbolae like "sterilization" Does she deserve jail time, yes. But your point is totally lost when you made the second part of your comment.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 02:58 AM
1

You could also try /r/legaladvice They may have some suggestions.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 11:57 PM
3

Don't know why you are being down voted.... If it's not working, end it. If you need more than one partner, you need to talk to them about that. This sub is full of people hating (most of the time rightly-so) on female commenters endorsing questionable behaviour. Lets not think the dude is totally blameless here. Does he deserve to get taken to the cleaners extra hard, no. Is he a bad person, I have no idea, never met the guy. Is there more to the story, very probably.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 07:26 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter