TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AnalogDan Archive

View 0 posts and 20 comments by AnalogDan on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Hey, look. We're all finding a 2 month old thread! Happy New Year! :P
/r/PussyPassDenied01/01/19 04:58 AM
–

> complains about social sciences > praises evolutionary psychology Hilarious. 😂😂😂
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/17 03:34 PM
1

Actually, from a philosophical point of view, it's a simple concession made for the purpose of making an argument. If you grant your opposition one of their premises, you make your counter position stronger. For example: I will grant you that abortion is murder. Now, even with that said, I will make a moral case for allowing abortion. This is how ethicists operate. Actually, this is how philosophers in general operate. It's akin to saying, "Even if abortion WERE murder (which it's not), it would…
/r/MensRights13/10/12 11:04 PM
4

That's not what I was asking about. If a law is passed that says women can only have abortions in the case of incest and rape, and a woman claims she was raped and wants to have an abortion, when does the abortion take place? Surely such a bill would include language that the rapist must be found guilty. Otherwise, any woman could just sign a piece of paper that says "I was raped" without ever pressing charges, making the law useless. If charges must be pressed first, then the window for the pre…
/r/MensRights28/08/12 10:01 PM
–

You should decide your stance on abortion depending on whether you think it is right or not That is an opinion. Someone can not smoke weed and still support marijuana legalization. Similarly, someone can think abortion is murder and still be pro-choice (for a variety of reasons).
/r/MensRights28/08/12 09:05 PM
4

Feminists do it, therefore, MRAs should do it. Is that what you're saying? Aren't MRAs trying to be more-egalitarian than feminists rather than just the opposite of feminists?
/r/MensRights28/08/12 09:02 PM
13

Abortion/reproductive rights etc. is NOT soley a "feminist" campaign. As an egalitarian, this is precisely the point I wanted to make with this post. Thanks.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 08:24 PM
15

My title should have been "Why MRAs should be against laws that only allow women to get abortions in the cases of rape and incest," then. I was shooting for a title that was concise, followed by a subtitle with a broader explanation.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 07:58 PM
2

Thank you! That was years ago. These days I'm in university and doing quite well.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 07:49 PM
5

But how likely is it that someone could be convicted (on either side: rapist or false accuser) of the crime before it is too late for an abortion?
/r/MensRights28/08/12 07:46 PM
15

I've suffered from clinical depression in my life and in my experience: it's life threatening.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 07:42 PM
6

If a fetus is developed enough to survive outside of the mother's body it blows my mind that it is legal to "terminate" I'm not particularly familiar with the laws, but aren't abortions in the US limited to before the fetus can survive outside of the mother's body...? Aren't late term abortions already illegal? Pardon my ignorance.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 07:26 PM
–

I hope so. I just think it's important to point out that the interests of MRAs and feminists (whether the person on either side is a man or a woman) are interlocked on this issue. It's also a side to the argument that I had not personally considered before.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 07:21 PM
–

This is an argument against only allowing abortions in cases of rape and incest. This is not an argument against banning abortions all together. That's an entirely different conversation.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 07:19 PM
-9

"Standard school history textbooks mostly. Yep, most oppressors were white, but utmost majority of whites weren't oppressors." Explain to me, then, why there is a divide between whites and non-whites? Generally curious. "Yes. But everyone can vote equally." See above for why that was absolutely false less than a generation ago and still somewhat false today. "having a say in making the rules is not the same thing as making the rules" We live in a representative democracy. Voting = making rules. …
/r/MensRights27/02/11 07:50 AM
-8

"So if I were robbed by a group of black people, I can hate black people and discriminate against them?" I think it would be more fair for you to hate the system that made it difficult for those individuals to get an education and then get a job. Why should the children of people who have money get the best education? Try to answer that question without any classism present, I'd love to hear it. "What happened in the history has little meaning in today's world in terms of how people should be tr…
/r/MensRights27/02/11 07:39 AM
-11

"This is a common feminist (and not only feminist) fallacy." Please point me to which fallacy that is. If you really think white males haven't been the oppressors in history, then I want to know what history books you read. "I am a white man, yet I never made any rule, nor did anyone I know, nor anyone from my family, or my ancestors, and so on." Have you or your family ever voted? That's something white males had over non white males, and all females, for a substantial period of time. Ever hear…
/r/MensRights27/02/11 06:55 AM
-3

In Texas, hispanics were once considered "white" under the law so they could still be denied rights. It's a funny and sad world we live in.
/r/MensRights27/02/11 03:19 AM
-18

Of course. I don't plan on trying to take The Nazi Party to court if it wants to give money to white males to attend college. But I will still disapprove.
/r/MensRights27/02/11 03:16 AM
-22

Because white men have made the rules for western society for most of recent history. Because white men are disproportionately more privileged than non-white men. Also, what does "white" even mean? The term white has continually been redefined in recent history. Jews, Greeks, Italians, Irish, none of those groups were considered white in recent history.
/r/MensRights27/02/11 02:22 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter