TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AnalysisSitus Archive

View 0 posts and 17 comments by AnalysisSitus on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Well, ok. Now I know we'll have to agree to disagree. Out of curiosity, though, why wouldn't you be ok with the offender just being pricked with a needle? You have no preference between being pricked and being murdered, so surely you'd be equally ok with having the offender pricked?
/r/MensRights16/08/13 05:32 PM
1

I am conflating the two, because as I said many times, that's my entire point. Increasing the scale or the severity of an act both (in my eyes, and I suspect this is where we disagree) make the act 'more evil'. For this reason I think both are hugely relevant, and I think saying neither are relevant is basically like saying you don't care whether someone murders you or pricks you with a needle; completely ridiculous. I also suspect we'll have to agree to disagree on this, but only to clarify, I …
/r/MensRights16/08/13 02:23 PM
1

Well, sure, you can say that if you like. Again, I'm not disagreeing in that bodily autonomy is important, I'm disagreeing in that it's a binary switch which you either do not violate and everything is fine, or you do violate it and you are literally as bad as Hitler. What you call 'just an issue of scale' seems to me to be the entire point. It's not that murder is ok, but that genocide is far, far worse. (And, to me, in the situation we were originally discussing; circumcision is not ok, but ca…
/r/MensRights16/08/13 01:05 PM
2

I suspect we do disagree on genital mutilation being as evil as murder, but I suspect we disagree also about what 'as evil as' means. When you talk people trying to hide the fact that genocide is 'just murder on a massive scale', that strikes me as the entire point. I think genocide is far worse than murder precisely because it's on a greater scale. Maybe I misunderstand you, but to me it seems like you disagree with that, which, I suspect, may also be the reason you think castration (which to m…
/r/MensRights15/08/13 10:40 PM
0

It is satire, mocking the advice like "watch your drink, use a buddy system" to prevent someone from raping you. It is intended to sound ridiculous because the author probably thought said advice is also somewhat ridiculous. EDIT: I may have misspoken - I don't think the author believed the advice itself is ridiculous so much as the sentiments behind it. Though, again, I'm not the author, I would venture a guess that the sentiment being mocked is not "Watching a drink will not make you less like…
/r/MensRights15/08/13 09:54 PM
2

I'm not sure I fully understand you. "The act of violating someone by cutting their genitals is the highest form of evil, regardless of outcome." - first of all, really? Surely there are higher forms of evil? Or are you saying that circumcising (or, if you will, mutilating) a baby is as bad as or worse than genocide? Even granting that you don't think it's the highest evil in the worse-than-Holocaust-sense, surely you'd agree that me punching you might be bad, but me stabbing you would be worse?…
/r/MensRights15/08/13 09:48 PM
5

You don't see how cutting off the foreskin is significantly different from cutting off the testicles? Not even when I tell you that sperm and testosterone are both produced in the testicles, meaning that castrated men can no longer have children and also produce vastly less of a hormone significantly affecting both behavior and physical development, while the worst part about not having a foreskin (obviously depending on who you ask) is reduced sensitivity of the penis? Look, I also have a penis…
/r/MensRights15/08/13 09:35 PM
1

Then any reasonable person would say "it wouldn't lead anywhere", to which you either say "I trust you" or "I don't". I agree that this doesn't add anything that could not have been inferred, but I think the disconnect is that I think it's more honest to outright say this.
/r/TheRedPill26/04/13 07:19 PM
1

But to her, the "it just happendd"-scenario is not possible, so her behavior isn't suboptimal, which is why she wants to engage in further conversation, which is why I think 'shutting down conversation' is something only reasonable when dealing with chiødren. I think that if you are serious about a belief, and in particular when that belief affects someone else, you should be willing to engage in whatever conversations the other person wants even of you're not planning to change your mind.
/r/TheRedPill26/04/13 07:15 PM
2

Then tell her that. Seriously, this isn't rocket science. I'm not saying it's a bad reason, you are entitled to take whatever precautions you like. I just think telling people why you take the precautions you do is the adult thing to do.
/r/TheRedPill26/04/13 06:59 PM
1

Regarding intelligence, the reasonable thing to do seems to identify several categories of skills, such as visual/spatial, and test them separately. This has the advantage of knowing what the number you end up with really means. At a graduate level you are required to write a fairly substantial thesis, which I imagine is hard to do just by studying, but I wouldn't know yet, so you may well be right. However, most working mathematicians I've read the opinions of agree hard work is still hugely im…
/r/TheRedPill26/04/13 06:56 PM
1

But it's begging the question of this being sub-optimal behavior (relative to what optimization criteria, I might add?). Treating people like adults means telling them why you think what you think. If you prefer something, tell them why.
/r/TheRedPill26/04/13 06:49 PM
1

I think the burden of proof is on you, then. Besides, the fact that tons of women don't orgasm, which historically must have been even more widespread, suggests that if orgasms were actually needed help, the human race should have died out by now.
/r/TheRedPill26/04/13 06:41 PM
3

Well, if you purchase a DVD player with a warranty which breaks, and the store won't return it, that's a breach of contract. This is the same thing.
/r/TheRedPill26/04/13 06:32 PM
2

Why would you want to shut down the conversation? If you trust her, say so and let her go off and do whatever she wants. If you don't, say that. Anything else seems deceitful.
/r/TheRedPill26/04/13 06:15 PM
1

Sure, but if you want to argue statistics, mathematical olympiads form a very small data set. I don't think concluding from the participants alone that high intelligence is more likely to be found in males, because, as you say, interest is very important, which has a huge cultural component. As for your link, it's interesting, and I'll make sure to read it. I don't think the case is closef, though, and would add two things - if you want to argue that males' intelligence have a higher variance, t…
/r/TheRedPill26/04/13 06:06 PM
2

It's funny that you don't consider the recent data of Lisa Sauermann's 2012 solo perfect score. (Seriously, look into this girl, she is pretty awesome.) Also, did you consider how large a portion of the participants were female? Because if that's also 8:1, whigh I'm willing to bet it's close to, what have you really proven?
/r/TheRedPill26/04/13 07:18 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter