TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Andrew_Squared Archive

View 0 posts and 79 comments by Andrew_Squared on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

holy shit, I look our 401k's with my wife and start to wonder if we should be giving more to our investor, I'm 43. I can't imagine the existential terror that goes along with a life of decision making that puts you in that place.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 08:19 PM
5

So, to be clear, your statement is that Shield Maidens never existed? I'm not arguing "the norm".
/r/MensRights10/01/25 06:20 PM
4

Yeah, shieldmaidens are a hoax.
/r/MensRights10/01/25 04:56 PM
3

There are so many knock-on effects from this, and it's hard to have only on response to it because it's so complex. On the one hand, I empathize deeply with these women. Focusing on yourself to the exclusion of the rest of your life IS a very lonely way to live, and I feel bad for people who have made those choices and find out later in life it's not what they wanted. On the other hand, this is very much the consequences of their actions. Society as a whole needs to start taking more accountabil…
/r/MensRights20/05/24 08:28 PM
12

The event occurred in 2014. A literal decade ago, bet he's still waiting.
/r/MensRights19/01/24 05:14 PM
3

...72% of British women think they do the majority of household chores. *Think* they do the majority. Not actually do, just think, so that's mental load. That kind of self-perpetuating concept is literal insanity.
/r/MensRights11/01/24 07:51 PM
9

Just be vigilant. We've found that making it clear random and thorough looks at the phone will happen. Talking about predators, memes, social contagions, and how to filter what you see online are for conversations.
/r/MensRights10/01/24 12:59 AM
381

Their youngest child is 18 years old. That always seems telling to me. They probably function as a unit, and stayed together while the kids were children, but now that everyone is an adult, they recognize that they can be happier with someone else. It's not that uncommon for things to work out that way, whether consciously or not.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 07:12 PM
5

> Trust me No, I don't think I will.
/r/MensRights10/08/23 03:26 PM
3

In the suicide epidemic, for example, which is the biggest killer of men under 50, it is often female relatives who are left to pick up the pieces. Once again, women most affected. This columnist is trash.
/r/MensRights06/07/23 06:33 PM
2

There are serious questions over the extent of the earning gap. I've read studies (years ago now) that put it within margin of error when adjusted for career, time in the field, hours worked, and most other quantifiable personal choices. The best argument I've seen for its continued existence is that men more frequently negotiate salaries and compensation due to risk tolerance, assertiveness, and other personality traits.
/r/MensRights17/06/23 10:38 PM
7

Good luck brother, I hope if it happens to me, I'll find someone in my social activities. With two kids, if probably not be in a rush though, as I saw my brother go through it, and it was not easy.
/r/MensRights21/02/23 04:15 PM
22

This. If, God forbid, I ever have to re-enter the dating scene, an app is not the direction I would go.
/r/MensRights21/02/23 03:18 PM
29

>...more likely to date men they dont find really attractive or men that are not conventionally attractive. The linked article tells it differently. Women are MORE selective based on attractiveness in these apps. In person may be different, but that is a significantly smaller avenue of exploration in today's world. Christ, I'm glad I don't need to do this shit.
/r/MensRights21/02/23 03:17 PM
18

Don't do that.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 12:12 AM
20

For Daredevil. Was disappointed.
/r/MensRights16/11/22 12:18 AM
3

I can't express in words how much I don't care.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 02:46 PM
2

Not sure why downvoted, that is the predominant thought process. Wanting the poor conscripted bastards to die is different from knowing they will because you are mismanaging the hell out of your country.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 11:30 PM
2

Have they released all the episodes now? Has Daredevil showed up? His cameo was literally the only thing that had me remotely interested.
/r/MensRights23/09/22 01:23 AM
3

Wanda Vision tied into Multiverse of Madness well. Was also a good show, but they do seem to have been getting progressively worse. I'm actually surprised Ms. Marvel got renewed for a second season as it had much more traditional family values on display. I guess having brown people and making plots about government lead harassment made up for that.
/r/MensRights23/09/22 01:20 AM
5

Agree. We all need to work to make our lives less miserable. Noone wise will.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 11:45 AM
35

Have you tried trying your parents what you're doing to improve your situation? "What have you been up to?" Sounds like a very non-judgmental way to get you to share the effort you're putting into your life to improve it. I could be wrong, but is there a chance you're letting your frustration affect your perception of the situation?
/r/MensRights08/09/22 11:44 AM
1

The only reason I want to see anything of it, is the Daredevil reveal. I'm not watching anything of this show until I know it's more than a 30 second standin.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 11:43 AM
37

Even their own message to you is wrong. ...protects groups that are attacked based on a vulnerability... The "vulnerability" as the subject is GENDER, and RACE in your report. The exact traits of those vulnerabilities are what they have an issue with. So they are straight up lying to you, and thinking poor wordplay will confuse us.
/r/MensRights22/08/22 08:13 PM
4

Did you watch the deposition of Depp's lawyer. She asked dozens and dozens of questions, knowingly trying to breach attorney client privilege, sometimes the same question with a different subject. For an hour straight. I think she got less than a dozen answers in total.
/r/MensRights22/05/22 12:22 AM
243

I don't watch the Oscars. Saw the video clip of it, without context, and 100% thought it was a stage slap. I'm very surprised to hear it was real.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 10:56 AM
3

Ask how she enjoys having her genitals intact, and if she thinks boys should be able to enjoy the same.
/r/MensRights30/12/21 12:24 PM
2

Oh yeah, I forgot they differentiated. Good point.
/r/MensRights21/12/21 09:50 PM
5

Reserve Officers' Training Corps It's a highschool program for students who know they want a military career.
/r/MensRights21/12/21 01:30 PM
1

I would say (using a poor analogy), there is a clear difference between flour, and water. When combined they become something else entirely. Picking one non-specific attribute they share (they are a clump of cells) as evidence to support identical categorization feels imprecise and not useful. The entire argument, as you said, is the point it becomes unethical to abort a fetus. What is the litmus test for that? This question will become wildly more difficult as technology advances and medical co…
/r/MensRights02/09/21 02:25 PM
1

Why?
/r/MensRights02/09/21 11:39 AM
2

You're latching onto the word partner like it means more than sex partner.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 11:38 AM
2

I use "femsplaining" with my wife (all in good fun on both sides).
/r/MensRights29/08/21 06:53 PM
18

Is that an entire sub dedicated towards brigading and interfering with another sub? Doesn't that equally break reddit rules? I'm mostly ignorant in large part towards both of those subreddits. Human behavior is predictable when being worked up to be angry at something (like men in MGTOW from the counter arguments I hear). I'm not a part of that movement, happily married with two kids, but I get why young guys now are more cautious of marriage. I say people were too eager to get hitched in the pa…
/r/MensRights03/08/21 06:58 PM
5

It used to be common. Especially younger professionals. Once we start having kids and logistics of extra-curriculars, that slows down massively. The pandemic shut all that shit down hard though too.
/r/MensRights07/04/21 07:35 PM
6

Arguing an edge case against the majority is not a way to prove a point. Just because something CAN be a thing, doesn't mean it is. Tickling is not **inherently** sexual. So if you have case law that assumes edge cases as the default in situations like this, please provide.
/r/MensRights10/12/19 07:55 PM
2

I'm just stunned I agree with this guy on something.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 11:16 AM
1

Not surprised, but still disappointed.
/r/MensRights28/06/18 05:12 PM
1

The search results are partially based upon your previous searches. If you are signed into your Google account (which, being on mobile, I presume you are), it will tailor results to you. A good test would be to do this in an incognito browser, while not signed in.
/r/MensRights28/06/18 12:25 PM
2

Violence, threats, blackmail are in the Venn Diagram of coercion, but are not the whole set.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 02:36 PM
7

That neatly folded blanket, clean glass-top table (anyone who has had one knows that nightmare they present), and swept floors are a wreck. The closest it even gets to cluttered is the foreground work-desk with what looks like composition books, and some devices stacked. Also, I hate this travesty of a show.
/r/MensRights14/04/18 12:53 AM
9

I'm glad to see light shed on unfair practices in regards to gender for men for a change. That said, the analysis said he was 0.25% more qualified. That's such an infinitesimally small amount. I was thinking that for this type of award, it had to have been a drastic and clear difference in ability. The lady who hired really f'ed up when she mentioned underrepresentation of women. If she had just said "the woman seemed like a better candidate" likelihood is, no-one would have faulted her. It high…
/r/MensRights21/03/18 08:53 PM
5

After an hour, it's been removed as a duplicate.
/r/MensRights23/02/18 03:07 PM
4

When worth or value starts being determined based on condition or identity, in conjunction with a heirarchy based upon the quantity of determiners, it forms the very basis of a hostile and discriminatory worldview.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 01:33 PM
25

I'd never been to that subreddit, starting reading the info on the right, and felt good, until the last two sentences. Intersectionality ruins everything.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 05:00 PM
1

The article in this case said any teacher and any student. Which wouldn't inherently have a power dynamic. I wonder though, if a married couple works at the same place would that be a problem? If not, why? What's the difference? I don't even know how I feel about this, so it's an interesting question.
/r/MensRights13/02/18 12:44 AM
1

Yeah, I think what /u/LacklustreFriend says is accurate, this story is not worth the time to read, much less give consideration or scrutiny to. When something is obviously without merit, discard it.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 03:10 PM
5

She literally wrote a caricature of him as an alcohol-swirling woman-hater.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 03:06 PM
3

...which I'm assuming he gifted to her... What? Why?
/r/MensRights16/09/17 11:34 AM
9

More accurately, you said the ball was green, he said it wasn't green, but that it's blue. The court agrees it is not green, but not that it's blue.
/r/MensRights16/09/17 11:33 AM
1

I'm all for men's equality, but has anyone asked for a men's only time? I feel like a lot of times, we get worked up here for something that is a non-issue. Getting frustrated because of the principle when there's no impact is exactly what leads to where third-wave feminism is now. There's a case to be made that it's right-smack-dab in the middle of prime gym time, and it is exclusionary by that nature, but maybe ask for it to be moved instead of demanding a separate but equal portion.
/r/MensRights12/09/17 02:26 PM
11

It'd be like the judge saying I'm not sending a young man to prison for this. I see your point here, but think that the precedent of lighter sentencing for females is still in effect here.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 06:26 PM
1

Learning patterns is more important than syntax.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 04:37 AM
2

Depends on what they did. IT has project managers, business consultants, solutions architects, enterprise architects, and more that don't need the latest and greatest technical knowledge to do their job.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 07:39 PM
7

In this case, it's not marriage. Some of those men weren't in a relationship with the women who named them. This about fraud and injustice, not marriage.
/r/MensRights26/02/17 11:28 PM
9

Doubtful, he's legally listed as the father. In the eyes of the law, she is his daughter.
/r/MensRights26/10/16 11:08 AM
19

Agreed, but don't lie about PTSD or triggering.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 06:36 PM
5

No, but lying about it and saying you have PTSD makes you just as bad as the people we hate.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 06:34 PM
35

No. We need to be better than them.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 05:25 PM
3

It has, but you have to prove the lie as well, which can be difficult. If the accuser levies a charge out of an honest belief of assault, you can't charge them with perjury. It's not a simple situation, though I do wish it was more clear-cut so ridiculous accusations like this didn't happen.
/r/MensRights09/02/16 04:48 PM
23

There's a difference between a defendant being found not guilty and a false accusation.
/r/MensRights09/02/16 03:53 PM
3

She free to write more bile. At least she may not get paid for it. The market for this kind of stuff is loud, but narrow. Mainstream outlets aren't as likely to pick up her work with the stink attached to the name.
/r/MensRights13/01/16 02:12 PM
5

Almighty Nerthus, is this guy nuts? Yes, but he's correct this time. :D
/r/MensRights12/01/16 07:28 PM
3

That'd be engineering. Where theory meets practice.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 08:15 PM
0

Political satire
/r/MensRights17/10/15 04:19 PM
14

No judgement, but that's the definition of socially progressive.
/r/MensRights17/10/15 02:58 PM
188

The extra kick in the nuts: she SPENT almost all of the money he had already gotten on dodgy construction for a home in what is allegedly, a bad area. Everything is in her name. Her excuse? She was focused on raising the kid by herself and not thinking clearly. Despite having had advice from many sources to not do what she did. She is a bad person.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 05:35 PM
0

And in-general, intelligence is vastly overrated. Once a person reaches a minimum threshhold, the returns on your day-to-day aren't as great as people assume. Often, a more deterministic character of ability to advance/succeed is interpersonal relationship skills, and other non-intelligence related factors (commitment, follow-through, consistency, etc...). That's been my anecdotal experience at least.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 05:03 PM
29

That's what I was wondering. Completely ignoring the false accusation that wasted thousands of dollars, all the work of the police, detention of two innocent individuals, and the cost of bail plus the wonderful fees associated with all of that - what about her state of intoxication? I'm not from London, but isn't cocaine illegal? Isn't its use looked down upon? Do people of "good character" use it, especially mixed with alcohol? I am confuse.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 04:58 PM
7

Read the whole damn thing. Very entertaining.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 01:14 PM
14

...it's tough to see coming if you've never experienced it. Those little cute quirky things when dating you brush off... This is so true, and happened to my brother, which I got to experience second hand. I'll never forget a trip I took when pretty young (20-21 y.o.) to visit my brother when he and his then-wife were stationed out of state. She did some things that came off as just bat-shit crazy. I left the visit thinking she was a nutbag and what did he get into, but found out a week later she…
/r/MensRights27/05/15 03:05 PM
7

Presumably, all of this "support" money is coming from the government. The fear is that ridiculous cases like this drain funds, and availability from people who genuinely need help. Government run systems are notoriously bad at eliminating/preventing fraud. This woman's actions seem like a clear case of what most would consider defrauding the government.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 02:56 PM
2

I wouldn't call it liberal, I'd call it socialistic (with none of the negative connotations associated with it). Libertarian's tend to be for the promotion of individual freedoms, exempt from the trappings of governmental entanglement. This means a drastic reduction in social programs, restrictive laws that prohibit ideas/beliefs instead of actions, and interference in sectors that are unnecessary. The left, the right; the conservatives, the liberals; and the Republicans and Democrats all have s…
/r/MensRights13/05/15 12:10 PM
43

Welcome to the Libertarian party. Too regulated for the anarchists, too free for the left and right.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 11:07 PM
1

Finance is applied math (science), politics is a applies social science essentially. I guess I get the other two, though military isn't a scholastic endeavor unless its military history. Though, military uses are heavily coupled to exploration.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 05:17 PM
1

science, exploration and arts over everything else. What else is there? (legit question, everything else I'm wracking my brain for can fall into one of those categories in some way, shape, or form).
/r/MensRights28/04/15 03:34 PM
10

That's rather threatening! Well done.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 05:45 PM
1

Careful, that way lies Tumblr.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 06:54 PM
2

I'm with you. Pick our battles, make them matter, don't rally against every transgression you come across.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 02:39 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter