TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AndyWR10 Archive

View 0 posts and 94 comments by AndyWR10 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

Enforced monogamy doesn’t sound the same as forced marriage at all. Forced marriage: forcing people to marry someone Enforced monogamy: enforcing having relationships with one person only. Not forcing them to actually have that relationship, just that they have a relationship with one person
/r/MensRights27/04/22 11:14 PM
3

They meant that 63.3% of women voted and 59.3% of men voted. They just worded it badly. Simply, women were more likely to vote than men and this has been the case since 1980
/r/MensRights21/08/21 10:17 AM
29

It wouldn’t really reduce sex drive but the constant exposure of the head would mean it would lose a lot of nerve cells when rubbing against clothes. This would mean that much less pleasure is brought from sex and masturbation is much harder without a foreskin
/r/MensRights11/08/21 10:06 AM
-9

The comment was simply referring to the meme “always has been”. If you search for it you should see what I’m on about. I guess one way of viewing the argument is that feminism’s goals haven’t changed much since the beginning of women’s suffrage. Women didn’t have the rights they wanted, so they fought to get them. They still do exactly that but are still only fighting to get the rights they don’t have. This means that the rights men don’t have don’t have the same large following and the louder e…
/r/MensRights01/08/21 06:05 PM
5

Legally it was the right decision. It’s really unfortunate that he was released, especially since he admitted guilt, but the law isn’t made to be ignored by anyone, especially the courts. He should have stayed in prison for a long time but I sadly agree with the decision
/r/MensRights03/07/21 09:52 AM
2

I think it would probably look more like M - 60 F - 80 The rights of everyone in the countries you mentioned have improved drastically. I agree with your point, but men have still gained some more privilege points over the last 100 years. The reduction of the class system means that so many more people are better of than they used to be in many ways. Many of the problems you said that men had have been fixed or have been at least slightly improved, so keeping at 30 is probably too low.
/r/MensRights01/07/21 07:39 PM
2

That’s what we want. It would be much preferred for both parties to come to a mutual decision, but in the case that they are unable to agree, the woman should get a final say as it is her body going through pregnancy. If the father would prefer an abortion and that decision can not be met, he should have full freedom to leave, as men tend to be the ones who must earn and spend the money on the child
/r/MensRights22/06/21 02:47 PM
2

It doesn’t mean directly that it is a natural instinct, but I think men have a protective instinct of others they see as less able to fend for themselves (women and children) just as women have a natural maternal instinct to care for things less able (small children). It’s largely why typical gender roles exist in the first place, both genders are wired differently for the survival of the species. It’s only been a few thousand years since civilisation began, so we have not had any chance to evol…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/06/21 04:25 PM
3

I think it’s a natural instinct for men to protect women and children, hence why you always get news headlines focusing on women and children rather than men because it gets more clicks. This instinct should only be accepted on individual levels and no man should be forced to do so. On a large scale it’s definitely forced/manipulation, men are the ones sent to war to protect those at home. This is generally not the choice of the men who have to go there
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/06/21 10:23 AM
3

Some MRAs are male supremacists, just as some feminists are female supremacists. I think it’s important to address the worst of our own group if we are aiming to improve how people view the movement. If we are openly against male supremacy and put in an effort to stop people who push for it, then it can’t really be used as a stable argument anymore
/r/MensRights10/06/21 10:36 AM
-1

I wouldn’t go quite as far as calling it a hate crime but it definitely is vile and should be removed. It’s the same type of thing as KAM etc which should be treated the same
/r/MensRights05/06/21 05:16 PM
1

I think that’s what they were referencing
/r/MensRights30/05/21 10:02 AM
3

How is it not healthy? Sure, red meat, especially things like bacon can have carcinogenic properties, but I haven’t heard of any other health risks. Tradition is a part of why the meat industry is still around, but that is simply how economy works. Your goal should be to convince people to become vegan so that eventually, the demand for meat will be too low to be profitable, ending the industry. Shaming people for their choices pushes them further away and solidifies there views. Try being less …
/r/MensRights29/05/21 06:26 PM
5

The meat industry is necessary as long as it can’t be replaced. There are replacements, but it’s much easier said than done to take these products and actually replace the meat industry. It takes a hell of a lot of work, a hell of a lot of money and a hell of a big economic risk. When it can actually happen reliably and at a reasonable cost worldwide, the world can and should become vegan. Until then it won’t since veganism has only become a prevalent thing recently. Replacement can’t take hold …
/r/MensRights29/05/21 06:20 PM
4

It provides meat. There is no replacement yet that can reliably replace the meat industry entirely. There has been no possible replacement worth even considering until the past few decades. Until we can are actually able to replace the meat industry with a good source of protein and other necessary nutrients then the meat industry will remain strong and necessary
/r/MensRights29/05/21 06:09 PM
14

Different circumstances. In this case, these are men who are looking after an animal smaller and weaker than themselves with no benefit for doing so besides having a little cute animal with you. Wether who agree with the reasoning or not, the men that kill animals for meat are not doing so out of malice, but need for humanity. Animals eat food, we are animals that need food.
/r/MensRights29/05/21 03:08 PM
1

I would spell it “percent”, but “per cent” makes sense because percentage is just how much for every 100 - or “per cent” - something occurs. I agree with the rest of that but I don’t think this in particular is an error, just not the typical way of spelling it
/r/MensRights17/05/21 02:47 PM
1

I agree that we should have equal sentences. I explained their point because you didn’t understand it. It was only an explanation that they gave anyway, not an excuse. It explained why it happens, not that it should today
/r/MensRights02/05/21 08:25 AM
0

I’m not agreeing with the reason and you explicitly said that I was trying to excuse it. There’s no bias here, I simply agree with science and facts. The only thing I had an opinion on was your response to the claim since it seemed you did not understand the reasoning behind it.
/r/MensRights01/05/21 08:16 PM
0

I’m not excusing anything, I’m further explaining the point that you failed to understand. I don’t know to what extent I agree either way, but I wasn’t pledging allegiance to either side of the argument
/r/MensRights01/05/21 06:30 PM
0

Obviously we aren’t, and it doesn’t make sense based off of logical arguments made today. However, this argument suggests that women are protected more because we have evolved to give them less harsh punishments as that is the most effective method for survival in that aspect. It’s probably quite difficult to understand since evolution is no easy topic, but it simply isn’t something that can be changed in a few thousand years
/r/MensRights01/05/21 05:17 PM
2

It was clearly sarcastic to me, as it clearly contradicted each other.
/r/MensRights26/04/21 08:09 PM
10

Last time someone told me to educate myself, I asked them for help to do that. Apparently it’s not there responsibility, to do that, I have to change my point of view completely independently
/r/MensRights22/04/21 06:09 PM
6

Maybe don’t do the same “all feminists” approach? We rightfully hate it when they do it but I don’t think we should do it too
/r/MensRights10/04/21 10:33 PM
6

You’ve now just ignored the high male assault rates for women’s sexual assault rates. I already said that I realise that women’s issues are still major issues, my problem lies within the fact that the issue of assault of men, while bigger, gets little to no focus. Of course women’s problems are bad, and of course people should fight for them. Have you seen any politicians advocate for men’s issues recently that haven’t received hate? Anyone on social media that hasn’t received abuse and backlash…
/r/MensRights14/03/21 11:17 PM
8

The 97% statistic is probably not that reliable, there have been posts on this sub with more detail. It had a low number of participants and had a very broad range of criteria for sexual harassment. Men are in fact much more likely to be victims of violent crime and murder. Women are more at risk of sexual assault but men are more at risk of assault in general. Stop making this about women. We all have problems, we all agree that sexual assault is a major problem for women. However, the focus on…
/r/MensRights14/03/21 10:04 PM
6

I wasn’t saying it was a good thing btw, I was just stating what they said. I don’t agree with it one bit
/r/MensRights14/03/21 12:55 AM
7

Last time a petition like that got enough signatures, the government said they have no plans on changing the definition because they say the punishment still remains the same regardless https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/300270
/r/MensRights14/03/21 12:49 AM
1

I think that women are more likely to be victims of sexual assault, but men are most likely to victims of assault in general. This basically means that they can safely focus only on this problem while justifying their aggression towards anyone who points out that men are more at risk
/r/MensRights11/03/21 07:58 PM
4

Hence why I said “may be” rather than “is”
/r/MensRights11/03/21 06:27 PM
11

You’re data may be correct, but your own knowledge is severely lacking. If men make up 90% of crime, that doesn’t mean that 90% of men do crime. If there are 500,000 men, 10,000 crimes are committed and 9,000 are men, that means that 10% are women or other. That 10% does not mean every other man.
/r/MensRights11/03/21 04:41 PM
2

I literally leant this is history in year 8! (9th grade I think) So this is a false fact actually being taught.
/r/MensRights11/03/21 04:13 PM
3

It’s both sides. If IWD was just celebration of women, I’d be indifferent. Since it often also delves into casual sexism, I get a little annoyed, but I don’t respond and I try to ignore it. I only think about IMD when an anti-male comment is made, not simple support of women
/r/MensRights09/03/21 09:14 PM
3

Having an entire month or even just a day only creates division. Did you not notice how much sexism there was on IWD, and I’m not talking about misandrists in this case either. They only make those against it attack people more and those for it fight harder and create stronger opinions of others based of the few. We shouldn’t have any holidays dedicated to people. I even saw many women complaining about it only being a special day, and how it should just be always. Having IWD but no one even sli…
/r/MensRights09/03/21 07:47 PM
1

So... are you saying that male artists are more popular therefore definitively better? A mediocre singer will be more popular than the worlds best javelin thrower, bigger audience doesn’t necessarily equate to skill
/r/MensRights09/03/21 06:57 PM
7

You get to retire earlier than we do. Why complain about lower pension, you already live longer. I don’t see how that’s a problem any bigger than minor. Equality would be equal pension and equal retirement age. Complain about something important rather than “every little goddamn thing”
/r/MensRights09/03/21 06:55 PM
0

Are you a male musician? That could explain why your tastes match well with other male artists, since you also see the techniques they use as better to you.
/r/MensRights09/03/21 06:50 PM
5

Giving one group something that the other does not is not equal. Basic math. If it’s not equal for men to have the vote while women don’t, why is it equal for everyone but white men to get any kind of appreciation. I don’t want it. I don’t need it. But don’t try and act like it’s all equal when it clearly isn’t
/r/MensRights09/03/21 06:47 PM
6

We have sorted our problems and are still friends, but recently two of my friends were constantly and intentionally annoying me and another friend. We found it really annoying to the point it nearly risked the friendship, and they both said it wasn’t that deep and just friendly banter. As I said, it’s fine now, but many definitely just think it’s banter and this can lead to some cases where it just wouldn’t get reported and they would just have to try and deal with it alone
/r/MensRights25/02/21 01:52 AM
24

If they are so similar that it isn’t a gender issue, they should say the overall average and then separately state both statistics with equal emphasis rather than make the picture solely about affects on women
/r/MensRights25/02/21 01:48 AM
4

We should and we do. However, seeing as we aren’t a subreddit about women’s rights, we aren’t directly addressing their problems. We will address them if need be, but posts here are about men, and KAM is a frequent men’s rights issue.
/r/MensRights05/02/21 11:04 PM
2

You appear to be making huge assumptions here, or I’m misinterpreting your comment. No one here condones rape or violence, anyone who does can probably be found at the bottom with many downvotes. KAM is disgusting, anyone who says anything like that about women is also disgusting. We aren’t male supremacists here, we fight for rights, not superiority and control over women
/r/MensRights05/02/21 10:59 PM
40

Kill All Men. Apparently it’s a joke and it doesn’t actually mean “All”. It’s very disgusting
/r/MensRights05/02/21 11:39 AM
7

So he was abusive when on drugs, that’s not good at all. Therefore Amber abuses him back while not under the influence of drugs much worse? Sure, Depp may not be a role model or anything, but he’s gone through many times worse what he put Amber through while unable to think rationally
/r/MensRights01/02/21 11:31 PM
22

Indeed, Depp abused Heard by having her cut his finger off... makes sense to me
/r/MensRights01/02/21 11:18 PM
12

I know. I’m not dumb. I was stating that even if he did abuse her, she deserves a harsher sentence.
/r/MensRights03/01/21 03:28 PM
86

Even if he did, a planned murder like this still deserves harsher punishment. If he was attacking her, so she grabbed a knife and stabbed him until he died, I understand a light sentence, but you don’t tie someone to the bed for protection. 193 stab wounds is also not self-protection, it clearly shows intent to kill, he would have died long before all the stabs had been completed.
/r/MensRights03/01/21 02:43 PM
1

Sorry, I can see how it can be interpreted that way. I guess it’s more because the vast majority of black people were completely unable to earn large amounts, so only white people could
/r/MensRights27/10/20 11:46 AM
1

Can you explain what apex fallacy means in this context
/r/MensRights27/10/20 11:12 AM
-2

Ok, I can definitely agree with that. Without a doubt, all of the most privileged in society today are white and typically male. This is more likely because of their family’s past rather than success achieved alone, success which would have come very easily to white people 50-60 years ago. I don’t believe racial and gender divides are as prominent today as they used to be but there are still many remnants that won’t fade for likely centuries
/r/MensRights27/10/20 03:22 AM
7

I didn’t disagree with your individual points. I accept what you said as truth, but I do believe that men are not nearly as privileged as many think. I agree that white people are more privileged than black people but I do not believe men are more privileged than women. I think it’s either equal or even slightly in women’s favour in many places like the US and UK.
/r/MensRights26/10/20 11:09 PM
16

I did read your reasoning, I was addressing a different point. If you read what I said, I wasn’t arguing with you or trying to disprove your point. You were getting angry because of someone’s opinion, so I suggested you should take you opinion elsewhere if this sub annoys you.
/r/MensRights26/10/20 10:54 PM
15

Why are you on this sub if this is your opinion. I largely disagree with your opinion, but I’m fine with you having a different one to mine. However, if you strongly disagree with this sub, go somewhere else
/r/MensRights26/10/20 10:48 PM
32

I’m sure that would go down very well
/r/MensRights08/10/20 07:27 AM
-1

I’m really confused about your comment. I basically agree with all of it yet you are arguing with me. All I’m saying that is different is that it’s not very aware of anything while in the womb so wouldn’t have a strong will to live, especially when it’s brain isn’t well developed
/r/MensRights17/08/20 12:56 PM
-1

I guess that’s just a difference of opinion then. I personally think that abortions should be completely legal until a certain deadline but not encouraged. If an abortion is done early, the baby won’t feel or be aware of what is happening. I assume also that the abortions process is reasonably humane and quick/painless
/r/MensRights17/08/20 11:56 AM
2

I think the primary difference is that we are sentient lumps of cells and the early stages of unborn babies do not have sentience so couldn’t feel sadness/a strong will to live. People in a coma (assuming they wake up) are a fully formed human who still is alive and some studies believe that they do have some level of awareness. I’d they are in a coma and definitely won’t wake up, I believe that taking them of life support is justified
/r/MensRights17/08/20 11:43 AM
6

It never does though. If you agree or disagree, everyone upvotes. It’s really hard to tell what’s unpopular because most of the posts are just people upvoting things they agree with
/r/MensRights13/08/20 06:33 PM
158

Also gen z, can confirm
/r/MensRights04/08/20 10:17 PM
13

By legal definition, men cannot be raped. The definition is something like “forced penetration”, completely ruling out male victims
/r/MensRights15/07/20 10:17 PM
1

I love how they keep mentioning men giving their Y chromosome to women, when actually, 50% of the sperm is an X chromosome. If you are making a claim as stupid as this, they could at least be correct in their evidence
/r/MensRights11/07/20 02:58 PM
90

As can be seen from the image, she severed the tip of his finger, which I believe was later reattached successfully. That still doesn’t change the fact that she did that and she deserved a lot of jail time
/r/MensRights04/07/20 12:21 AM
1

What about my comment said that I don’t care about black on black murders? You are just assuming my opinion because I told you your statement was worded badly
/r/MensRights03/06/20 10:40 AM
1

There are quite a lot more white people than black people in the US. Proportionally blacks are killed more than whites
/r/MensRights03/06/20 09:58 AM
16

Ngl that’s higher than I thought
/r/MensRights31/05/20 11:22 PM
5

A very long story. She claimed her ex-husband Johnny Depp was abusing her and even had bruises to prove it. Turns out that she was abusing him. She used makeup to put bruises on her face, cut part of Johnny’s finger off and I think she took a shit in his bed. Johnny Depp’s career took major damage, and now it looks like Amber is getting the same treatment she gave to Johnny
/r/PussyPassDenied30/05/20 07:35 PM
2

In terms of gender roles, they were significantly stronger then than now. Don’t make it seem like I’m talking about a different argument. I’m talking about gender roles, don’t go off on a tangent about something I didn’t say
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/20 10:48 AM
0

Back to the hunter-gatherer phase, where gender roles were necessary to life. Men go to hunt, women stay at home. With all the fighting against gender roles from people like you, I’d have thought that modern day would be a better place
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/20 10:06 AM
5

While I agree it does have less significant affects, it does reduce pleasure considerably and is still forced genital mutilation of a child
/r/MensRights30/04/20 10:53 PM
-10

Not quite true. I believe women attempt it 12x as often but men use significantly more lethal methods.
/r/MensRights30/04/20 10:51 PM
1

Link?
/r/MensRights25/04/20 04:52 PM
17

Same, I wouldn’t want to miss that
/r/MensRights10/04/20 12:03 AM
5

I think it’s a rule on a lot of subs that you must blur out usernames to protect their identity. I agree but it may get the post removed
/r/MensRights27/03/20 01:15 AM
1

Not bad tbh
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/20 06:44 PM
1

In which case I am part of the 2 percent
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/20 04:25 PM
5

While the husbands, fathers and sons lose their lives to it
/r/MensRights14/03/20 08:25 PM
1

I was just assuming that the first guy was correct
/r/MensRights09/03/20 05:46 PM
1

People can get affected in different ways. Men are killed more than women, women are sexually harassed more than men. Both are wrong and I would say they are both affected
/r/MensRights09/03/20 04:04 PM
0

If you search “raped” into AskReddit, the only posts with a significant amount of upvotes are asking men their stories, very few are asking about women
/r/MensRights24/02/20 10:48 PM
36

Either way you are cutting an infants genitals without their consent. They’re both wrong, and they are definitely comparable. They’re basically the same thing
/r/MensRights06/02/20 04:11 PM
4

What even is this movie?
/r/MensRights16/01/20 07:36 PM
-2

People will probably still believe her if she does it again
/r/MensRights09/01/20 04:06 PM
1

I do not know, but I have said what I think
/r/MensRights08/01/20 12:15 AM
4

Probably
/r/MensRights06/01/20 11:03 PM
25

Then why do they confirm the amount of women dead rather than the overall death count or the amount of men who died as well
/r/MensRights21/12/19 11:23 AM
9

15 is under the American and even the British legal age (16) as they do not have the mental responsibility to decide when they actually want to give concent and are sexually driven by hormones
/r/MensRights15/12/19 08:26 AM
20

Just because you are a teacher doesn't mean you want to get in children's pants
/r/MensRights15/12/19 08:20 AM
1

It is your right to say what you want and to express your opinions, but you can't expect that your opinion will be appreciated or that you will not be hated for it. If what you say is hateful to someone, then that is hate speech and it is other people's right to see it as hate speech and react freely to what you said
/r/MensRights14/12/19 04:10 PM
1

Yes
/r/MensRights12/12/19 10:35 PM
5

Her. She is in my form at school and I sit at her table. She called me and my friend selfish for not being a vegan (that's the sort of person she is)
/r/MensRights12/12/19 10:34 PM
5

Well I know a feminist vegan "fem-queer" climate change activist. Can it get much worse than that?
/r/MensRights12/12/19 10:32 PM
47

Please do
/r/MensRights21/11/19 04:00 PM
1

Male to female because they are now female
/r/AntiFeminists03/10/19 10:57 PM
1

Tbh it's probably like 5% who are really loud dumb feminazis who go to protests and hate men. But we never hear the sensible ones so all we hear is the 5%
/r/AntiFeminists03/10/19 10:55 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter