TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AnewAccount98 Archive

View 0 posts and 111 comments by AnewAccount98 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-3

I don't know where you got that context, but if it's true, then I appreciate you bringing that to light - still don't think this is the correct way to handle it, but it does make it more reasonable in my eyes.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 12:32 PM
7

Because he wasn't assaulting her? What other reason, in your mind, justifies what she did, aside from self defense?
/r/MensRights23/05/19 12:20 PM
2

The judge is by no means obligated to give any weight to the child(s)' opinion/preference.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 03:40 PM
0

If you had read a bit further you'd have seen that the above poster advocates that looking guilty does not equate to being guilty. Stop cherry picking portions of a comment.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 06:19 PM
-6

She made her accusations in private and did not originally want any of this to be public.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 06:16 PM
1

... exactly like I said, it's a measurement of energy. My God you're a dumbass. There's no hope. Please don't procreate, it'll only hurt us.
/r/MensRights15/04/18 12:38 AM
0

Just because a person disregards calories doesn't change the fact that they are what they are. C'mon, man. They're literally a unit of measurement for fuckin' energy. You're basically arguing that you can shorten a distance by refusing to believe in kilometers.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 07:20 PM
0

You're an idiot. That is not at all true and I dare you to find one reputable source that backs your claims.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 07:16 PM
-1

Because what I'm showing is common knowledge, you're bringing in obscure facts. The onus is on you to prove your obscure theory.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 07:16 PM
0

You're right, shot in the dark. You're not obese. Actually seem to be a bit under weight. Still trying to figure out how you're so misinformed in regards to weight gain and loss.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 03:24 PM
1

And yet you can't seem to find something to support your argument that ALL excess calories leave the body as excrement. This was fun, but unless you're willing to actually try and back your ridiculous claims - its useless to debate with you.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 03:22 PM
1

Fat: https://www.sciencedaily.com/terms/adipose_tissue.htm Or is that too main-stream for you? https://www.health.harvard.edu/staying-healthy/abdominal-fat-and-what-to-do-about-it Harvard Health, eh, probably don't know what they're talking about, right? https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/10-causes-of-weight-gain#modal-close Oh, look! This article mentions Genealogy having an effect on fat-gain! Oh, wait... they caveat that statement with the mention that nature (your diet and activity level) …
/r/MensRights13/04/18 02:10 PM
6

Hah, not at all, buddy. If all the excess comes out as excrement, what exactly do you think fat is? There's a 'fat fairy' that comes by at night and puts it on you? You obviously need to stop sourcing your knowledge from some fat-acceptance movement blogs.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 02:01 PM
0

Never said I did, but now I know why you're attempting to defend your obesity.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 01:59 PM
1

I can understand and agree with that to an extent. I suppose my opinion is biased because I've found that almost every obese person I've come to know is obese because of a lack of self control in both eating and staying active.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 01:52 PM
4

And apparently neither do you.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 01:45 PM
5

Why not both? I'm upset with Trump being the president, but he's only there due to his voters.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 01:44 PM
5

Weird... aside from some extreme cases, fat is the buildup of excess intake (extreme simplification). I wonder how these non-lazy, no gluttonous people become fat then.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 01:44 PM
-1

No shit nobody wants to be fat, hah. But just because you've got poor self control doesn't mean you should be awarded any sympathy or understanding. Do you overlook an alcoholic's behavior because it's a mental illness (addiction)? Why should you overlook someone who's vice is insatiable eating?
/r/MensRights13/04/18 01:42 PM
2

The federal government drove the witch hunt. So rape accusation shouldn't be reviewed and investigated? They did their due process and she was eventually found liable. Blame the perpetrator, not the system for carrying our justice. One of the political parties, except that the secretary you mention is actually a republican and you're ragging on Obama's admin. Get off your MAGA horse. You brought politics into this by added half a sentence at the end of your summary. That removed would have kept …
/r/TheRedPill21/02/18 03:45 PM
4

Awesome, that's your opinion. I agree, she was attractive. I'm also not a fucking news outlet. There's diffierent standards when you're delivering an organization's opinion to millions as opposed to what you and I think and post on Reddit or tell a friend.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 10:43 PM
0

Somebody really oughta ban you from public, too. God you must be a terrible person to be around.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 10:40 PM
9

At least give it a full read. It isn't that long. The list isn't disparaging feminism, it is bringing to light the leaders of feminism and their nature. The nature of main stream feminism. Maybe that isn't you, but it is what main stream feminism has become.
/r/MensRights19/01/18 07:26 PM
2

Really? I've usually had "Will you rub my back" lead to something sexual. Not always ending in sex, but almost always something. Though I can completely see where you're coming from. I guess it depends on the atmosphere too. Is she sitting on your lap, or is the equivalent of her laying on a massage bed? Probably makes the difference.
/r/TheRedPill02/06/16 03:44 PM
11

I don't at all mean to sound like a dick, and hopefully others with experience can say otherwise, but you're probably too short for high-end places. To be able to pick up anything out of a crowd, you need to be able to look over the crowd. Being cut doesn't mean much in the industry. Sure, they don't want a chubby or "bear-mode" guy, but I bet they'd be much more likely to say "yes" if you were 200lbs with a small gut than 180 cut. Again, I don't mean to come off sounding like a dick - just not …
/r/TheRedPill26/05/16 08:33 PM
3

Seconded. NJ, USA. Tried at 14 and then 16. Judge couldn't have cared less.
/r/TheRedPill12/05/16 06:44 PM
2

So, if I understand this correctly, you're saying that it is doxxing until every single person in the US knows who she is? I mean, I just googled "drunk girl and uber" which is the minimum any person should be able to pull from this video and the entire first page is all in reference to this and the first one mentions her name. I suppose I just don't see the line. By your logic, mentioning Donald Trump, or Bernie Sanders by name because of a video that they were in would be doxxing, because I am…
/r/PussyPass22/01/16 06:49 PM
3

Yeah, I read it. What I am saying is that her name is already well-known and in the news. How is it doxxing at this point to post an article that has her name in it? At what point does it stop being doxxing? When its on TV, or a large news organization publishes the story? Or is it always doxxing because no one knew of her before this video incident?
/r/PussyPass22/01/16 06:28 PM
7

Is it doxxing? Serious question. He's only referencing a "news" (I say that loosely). The doxxing has already been done. If it were a guardian or buzzfeed article, would it be ok?
/r/PussyPass22/01/16 02:59 PM
14

How is that the truth? Where is the reduced risk of violence towards men, when woman know that they face very little risk of repercussion for getting violent. Even if I mouthed off to a woman in public who didn't realize that she could retaliate, I would put money on the fact that several men (or women) would at least say something to try and have me stop.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 03:38 PM
3

She made a conscious decision to put herself in a situation where the LAW, not the boy, held power over her. The boy, on the other hand, had no choice in who his teacher was.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 09:07 PM
2

I can understand where you're coming from. The term "power imbalance" can definitely be taken advantage of. Although, in this situation, one of them clearly has power over the other. Sure, it isn't physical, but it could cause a lot of damage none the less. This is a patriarchal "power imbalance". It's a situation where one (the one committing statutory rape) had the power to hurt the other's life and welfare.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 12:09 PM
11

Because of what, self defense?
/r/PussyPass11/12/15 03:37 AM
14

How would it be a false accusation? In all seriousness. Leering: look or gaze in an unpleasant, malicious, or lascivious way. Pretty much open to your interpretation of their look when you meet eyes. Then again, if you've met eyes, you both could be "leering" if the other interprets it that way. Oh jeez.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 09:57 PM
38

Wow, a throw away just for this. This hints that you aren't exactly confident in your response or your general opinion here. A large majority of your response are essentially "This doesn't happen, because I say it doesn't - here's some stats I just made-up"
/r/MensRights24/11/15 05:46 PM
18

I don't believe he was agreeing. The previous post was just pointing out the bias not represented by the title. "3 out 3 Americans believe in God" (Christian Americans)
/r/MensRights21/11/15 11:22 PM
11

The absurdity of the "trial" reminds me of when the proof provided in Monty Python and The Holy Grain, when the woman in the village is accused of being a Witch.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 08:18 PM
119

Reading about their "hearing" makes me furious. He was aggressively questioned for 90 minutes, while her 20 minutes of "questioning" sounds like it was more of a therapy session. Not to mention, that because he's a big, tough man he didn't get the right to speak with his attorney. God damn. This entire thing is just ridiculous. Its like reading about the Salem Witch Trials.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 08:15 PM
8

Yeah, but these aren't "real" feminist. /s Is the argument that I so commonly seemed used when the ridiculousness of modern feminism is brought to light
/r/MensRights26/09/15 04:30 PM
5

Out of curiosity, where does it say the money was contractually hers? She actually went against contract in hiding her spending from the military oversight.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 10:46 PM
4

I'm as close with a few best friends as I am with my significant other. I trust she'd take a bullet for me, but I also have others who I trust just as heavily. Maybe I'm overlooking something, but what areas of your relationship with your SO could not be covered by a robot that provides sex and some very close best-friends? I don't mean to phrase this in a attacking way - I'm genuinely curious if I'm missing some perspective here.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 02:59 PM
101

I started off aggravated like you, But I began to feel pity for the original author. He sounds almost depressed, like a person who is trying to smile too hard. His relationship is an abusive one, but rather than face the cold, hard facts he has decided to place the blame on himself and 'embrace feminism'.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 05:49 PM
3

Good on you for keeping your cool and continuing your attempt to educate someone as vile as that woman.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 10:56 PM
3

You're right - the best we can do is assume. That being said, we have reason to believe he hasn't been approached. Everything said about him is speculative, which gives credit to the argument that none have talked with him. If the author of this memo is prepared to include acts such as "attending plays and bake sales" as possible suspicious acts, you'd think they'd immediately include "Man has fled every time he was approached" or "man has refused to reveal his reason for spending time on campus…
/r/MensRights06/05/15 01:47 PM
1

Hey, just wanted to say, thanks for keeping this site up. This is the first I've heard of it, but it looks informative and useful.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 01:36 PM
2

I agree with you, that if the "campus" is one or two close buildings, then yeah its odd. But "campus" could also mean the buildings and surround area in this case. It seems like a private school, they may have a large plot of well maintained land, something resembling a park. My university campus had tons of people walk through it daily who did not attend the university, they just enjoyed the walk because the campus was beautiful. I think what's seriously wrong here is that it seems no one has a…
/r/MensRights06/05/15 01:19 PM
6

I don't understand the push-ups though. Pushups are a body weight exercise. They should both have the same # of pushups as a passing grade. By lowering the number of push-ups for women, it is saying that woman can be less fit than their male counterparts.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 11:50 PM
24

I do not at all understand the pushups one. It's a bodyweight exercise. It doesn't matter whether you're male or female, the only thing youre working against are your own weight and gravity. Ughhh.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 11:48 PM
3

I'm an especially big fan of all the statistics and sources they cite throughout their article.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 04:15 PM
2

I almost downvoted you because I was so aggravated reading you editor in chief's comments. Thank you for deciding that logic and statistics take precedence over feelings, as they should. Unfortunately, it seems numbers only count now if they fit the louder parties rhetoric. I believe you original article, that you posted above, was perfect.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 11:15 PM
2

I downvoted you because this sub doesn't usually agree with harsh criticism, like you've displayed. Also, your sarcasm is terrible. These aren't average people. These are the people who may be defending accused men/women in the near future. Their opinion on matters as important as this should be public. This is especially true if they have the gal to trash the opinion of 16 law PROFESSORS at Penn. Would you show a paper in a technical journal any respect if it offered no repeated evidence, no ca…
/r/MensRights25/02/15 08:28 PM
-8

The commenters largely agree that violence is bad no matter who is the victim or who is dishing it out. Also, wtf. This is really old OP.
/r/PussyPass21/02/15 01:03 AM
4

I completely agree with you, I only meant to try and clear up what seemed to be some confusion. I imagine that whether the poster in the tumblr 'thread' is 12, 18 or 30, that they're not exactly speaking for themselves. It seems like typical regurgitation of what they read in some extreme feminist / SJW blog.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 03:39 PM
5

I think what the poster above you meant is that the person commenting's age is 12. Not the women being discussed.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 01:55 PM
1

I can understand the difficulty. I imagine what's stopping something like an egalitarianism movement is thinking like your girlfriend's on both sides of the fence. It's a poor situation. A bit analogous to the US's republican and democrat parties, usually most people side with the lesser evil.
/r/MensRights14/02/15 12:56 AM
5

So, it's seems like what your saying is that on a personal level your girlfriend and her friends are very reasonable. Although, they support feminism because of the advantages it gives them even though they understand it may not be headed it the morally right direction?
/r/MensRights14/02/15 12:37 AM
14

It would be my guess that most of those stares arise from the girls trying to 'fit in'. They know they should be upset with you because their friends are. They probably don't know why they're supposed to be mad with you. Unless radical feminism and misrepresentation of MRAs have actually wormed their way into high schools. I've been out for a while, so I can't say I know what the culture is like anymore. Either way, kudos to for taking a stand. The world would be a better place with more people …
/r/MensRights06/02/15 07:57 PM
17

When one can't argue with facts, they tend to yell louder to make up for it.
/r/MensRights01/02/15 12:13 AM
3

I expect you'll actually get some agreement. Not much discussion though.
/r/MensRights24/01/15 06:16 AM
2

He at least seemed to try and get in between them. The camera guy was only prodding the situation.
/r/PussyPass06/01/15 02:31 AM
6

The camera guy was clearly trying to pain the situations because she thought it was fun and cute. What a prick.
/r/PussyPass06/01/15 02:24 AM
7

Really? I wasn't aware. Thanks for the info. But yeah, it's still terrible.
/r/PussyPass04/01/15 09:49 PM
7

"She reacted in self defense because she thought her friend was in danger" ... so, not self defense, in defense of her friend. It's like they want to alter the meaning of self defense.
/r/PussyPass04/01/15 08:11 PM
2

What I meant to say is that adding "as hard as he could" to punched makes it sounds much worse than it could possibly be. Who knows how hard this man could punch, is what I meant. The writer makes an ridiculous assumption to make the severity of the incident seem much worse than it was. If this fit, relatively large person punched someone square in the nose as hard as they could, it would probably be a lot worse than the picture shows.
/r/PussyPass03/01/15 09:20 PM
1

I don't get that. Did someone have the time to set a control group and figure out this guys maximum punching power? Then carefully compared it to how hard he punched her? Her nose doesn't look very bad at all. Very little swelling at the moment of the photo. I'm going to guess that he could have hurt her much more with a punch. either way, don't hit someone unless you're prepared to be hit back.
/r/PussyPass03/01/15 07:38 PM
2

I'd put together a little parody excel spreadsheet with some pretty looking drop-downs and all, but i'm worried it would be taken too seriously should it ever leave this sub.
/r/MensRights08/12/14 04:30 PM
28

"but instead only to the university police, who are required by recent regulations to log and publicize each accusation" Whoah. Does anyone have more information on this. ALL accusations need to be publicized? After just an accusation?
/r/MensRights08/12/14 04:22 PM
10

I'm young and live in a small, densely populated party city with a bar/club/tavern literally almosy every block. I've gone out with a lot of women who bring only enough money for their first drink or two. They count on the fact that they'll be able to find guys willing to buy them drinks. Sometimes its 5 drinks from one guy, or 5 drinks from 5 different guys. I've spoken up on a few occasions that I believe its shitty behavior. But it works. So many of the young men I got out with, and see fall …
/r/MensRights20/11/14 03:37 PM
44

They can't even fathom the stress he dealt with. That's why none of those ridiculing him can seem to understand that one of the last things on his mind that morning was what he was wearing.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 05:19 PM
6

Good point! This man had probably been awake for several straight days, with little intermittent naps. That day was the culmination of decades of time, effort and resources. I wouldn't be surprised if he was also wearing those pants for the third time in a row without them being cleaned. I bet he hadn't given any thought to laundry, meals or any unimportant things for the past few days. All these people complaining about his shirt likely have never seen a level of stress anywhere near equivalent…
/r/MensRights17/11/14 07:19 PM
13

Ah, great counter argument here. You've swayed my opinion. Men are bad and the video has absolutely no flaws because Loofa_Jam says so!
/r/MensRights06/11/14 01:38 PM
6

It's not like you made a huge leap in assuming that he was proven to be an abusive spouse. Like you said, the case is fucked. No point in arguing the small semantics when the overarching justice system has failed horribly in this situation/
/r/MensRights31/10/14 10:10 PM
7

As the article describes it, he was never "proven" to be an abuser. There was a decision that there was reasonable doubt in her attempted murder. If there was even a shred of proof that he was abusive, there would have been charges brought against him.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 09:37 PM
23

Please say something. You don't even need to talk to the guy who was assaulted. Go straight to administration and keep following the chain up until someone does something. I know this isn't your responsibility, and you really have no reason why you need to. But please, do it for the guy. Do it so that the 10s, if not 100s of other women who saw this happen and saw the outcome and decide they can do it as well.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 11:11 PM
1

Yes, I've read that article as well. Maybe it was a blog? It's been a long time. Sorry, I don't remember the name of it any better than you. Just figured I'd let you know others have seen it. Pretty sure it was posted in this sub reddit a long while ago.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 04:15 AM
2

I agree with you completely. I understand that there IS and always will be a risk associated with actions. What I really meant to argue, was that you shouldn't have to refrain from all sexual intercourse if you're not ready to be a father. Are you ever REALLY prepared for the most extreme circumstances of an activity when you just begin it? Usually, I'd wager that most people are not. If I were somehow having this conversation with you 50 years ago. I'd probably be on your side. As one the repro…
/r/MensRights21/10/14 02:31 PM
5

Your view of what sex is and it's purpose is derived from, and belongs in the past. The purpose of sex was procreation. When it was necessary for the human race to birth a certain number of children everyday to out pace the number of those dying and thus carry on the species. That WAS true. It stopped being a true a long time ago. If the single and sole purpose of sex is procreation, then the vast majority of people ( Just a guess would be upwards of 99% ) are incorrect. If this was correct, cou…
/r/MensRights21/10/14 02:21 PM
18

If you're not ready to deal with a horrific car accident, you should never drive. If you're not ready to murder someone, you shouldn't buy a gun. If you're not 100% prepared to deal with every possibility in life, then you shouldn't get out of bed. Yes, a bit ridiculous. But I wanted my point to get across. There's no reason why anyone should have to restrain themselves from an activity just because they're not prepared to deal with the most extreme of circumstances. This analogy might be a bit …
/r/MensRights21/10/14 01:47 PM
2

I can't believe that there are comments agreeing with her. That's what really gets to me.
/r/MensRights19/10/14 05:09 PM
5

There's a very big difference in the mental maturity of a 14 year old and a 19 year old. In the situation you described, there is a very good chance your girlfriend was of age to consent. Even if the age of consent is 18 where you lived, you likely could have used the "Romeo and Juliet" laws to your advantage to escape jail time. You may have known what you wanted at 14, but many don't. Hell, some boys/men are still experiencing the full effects of puberty at 14. I don't mean to say that you, or…
/r/MensRights05/09/14 03:35 PM
22

Niceeeeeeee
/r/PussyPass27/08/14 05:13 PM
3

Yeah. Absolutely no evidence to this actually being any more dangerous than going into a room of strangers anywhere ever. If you're intoxicated, and somewhere stranger with people you don't know, don't wander blindly! But just because it's a frat house, it automatically means rape. This will sound juvenile, but this really sounds like the ranting of a woman, or man , who had a terrible college experience due to their own social awkwardness.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 06:07 PM
6

If you're going to act like struggling to pay alimony every day or else end up in jail wasn't a huge possible contribution to his decision to end it, you're not paying attention. Agreed, it was likely a combination of many things but alimony was likely a large contributor. Do you really think he wanted to spend his last days in jail because he couldn't keep up his ex-wive's standard of living?
/r/MensRights13/08/14 04:30 PM
3

For the record, you brought no "evidence" to the table in your argument here.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 11:32 PM
11

Is that a skate park? Or just an area that a lot of skaters skate at? I agree its totally fucked up on her part either way. I just don't see any other things that usually would be in a skate part like ramps/pipes/bowls, though I might just be missing them. If they're not in a skate park, then the blame (up until the woman gets physical) can kind of be equally distributed.
/r/PussyPass27/07/14 06:09 PM
1

I agree with you completely with regards to standing up for yourself from the start. I don't think anyone, male or female appreciates being hit. Standing up for self and taking the high road would mean leaving an abusive relationship, not making it more abusive.
/r/PussyPass23/07/14 09:21 PM
1

Can't tell if the second paragraph is sarcastic or not.
/r/PussyPass23/07/14 07:32 PM
2

OP, you should cross-post this to r/WTF. It might not be well received at first but I think the majority of reddit will realize how outrageous this is and popular reddit links sometimes make it to larger news outlets. Especially news that is batshit insane and will catch the eyes of viewers, they really don't even have to alienate this situation to make it seem insane.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 12:51 AM
5

In case you haven't seen the top post, get a lawyer. From your story, and this woman's actions, I wouldn't be surprised if the child wasn't yours. You say both times you pulled out, not the most effective, but still effective. DON'T agree to sign a birth certificate until the child is proven to be yours through a paternity test. Until then, cut contact with her and only speaker through lawyers.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 08:37 PM
8

I hope this goes well for your friend. Please, keep us updated.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 10:41 PM
1

It kind of resembles the slow perversion of the word rape. At first it meant only one thing, and the definition applied a select group of people who had actually been raped. Then, some asshats saw the positive benefits and support those that were raped received. They then decided that they wanted to grow the size of people who could receive those benefits and support. Now we're at the point where a person who is attacked by strangers and forced into sexual intercourse by threat of death is descr…
/r/MensRights02/07/14 02:41 PM
2

I'm on a mobile right now and would like to respond in full to this when I'm back at a computer. I appreciate the discussion and would rather not half-ass a response to it.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 04:21 PM
10

You like to discuss this as if you had experienced both as well. Which, of course, you haven't. Yes, some people in terrible situations chose death over life. This much is true. It is impossible to discern, because they are gone, but it's safe to assume most humans who perish due to war would likely have kept on living given the choice. They weren't given a choice though. Look, this has deviated. I agree they're both terrible things; rape and death. This doesn't change the overall conflict many …
/r/MensRights29/06/14 03:00 PM
8

That isn't the focus here. The focus on specific cases where men are the victims and women the offenders is due to the lack of focus by the general public. Please, go ahead and try to tell me that male rape victims receive a level of support even close to that of women rape victims. We argue that there should be equal levels of support, especially when that support is funded through tax payer dollars.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 02:33 PM
17

Ah, good job trying to change the content of the discussion. We were discussing there difference between rape and death. Both of which are terrible. But rape allows for you to come back. There are, I would guess, millions who have been raped and gone on to experience some joy in the life. I'll also assume that those who have died in war experienced no further joy in life, well, because of the lack of life. Yes, many rape victims commit suicide. Many of them also live on. The same cannot be said …
/r/MensRights29/06/14 02:30 PM
1

I don't have a link to the actual study, but someone above posted a quote of the author stating this was her PHD thesis. This means that the study likely went through much more rigorous review than a normal study. I'm not saying this gives it any more validity. Just food for thought until the actual study can be uncovered.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 06:05 PM
1

I would assume, with the given statistics, that these numbers are pulled from a "young" age group. Maybe 20-30 years of age range?
/r/MensRights09/06/14 06:31 PM
0

Not really as easy as you try and make it out to be. This being said from someone who went from 160ish lbs to 205lbs of lean mass in 2-1/2 years. 2 and half years for 45lbs! You're really dismissing the fact that it isn't easy and it takes a boat load of determination and persistency to accomplish something like that. I did it slowly and with assistance, anyone who does it alone and quickly is someone worth admiring. If it was "easy" everyone would do it.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 01:25 AM
6

Even worse. The quote implies that 10% of men (m&ms) will be physically damaging if not fatal.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 04:46 PM
19

You have absolutely no idea if that number is Anecdotal evidence...
/r/MensRights24/05/14 11:50 PM
1

Very vague description of a time period. "On a whole". Do you mean the whole of recorded time itself, this past century, the past 10-20 years? If so, yes, yes, no.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 05:34 PM
2

What you're trying to do doesn't invite or allow for intelligent conversation. The matter isn't something that can be answered adequately with a "yes or no".
/r/MensRights13/05/14 06:08 AM
5

Completely agree. Of course there are body attributes that cannot be changed, such as the shape of your nose or the distance between yours eyes. But bodies can be changed drastically. To get where many female models are could be done in under a year if proper diet and training are followed. (this is assuming that the person going for this goal isn't heavily overweight) To get where many male models, with even just an intermediate amount of muscle requires heavy training several days a week along…
/r/MensRights26/01/14 10:43 PM
1

I understand where you're coming from here, but the child was what, 13 or 14? That 2-3 years shy of 16. Those few years are also very important years pertaining to the subject at hand, as those are the years teenagers begin to really become sexually active.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 07:29 PM
3

Just to let you know, you're being downvoted because you decided to personally attack govt_took_my_baby instead of responding to his comment in a meaningful and constructive way.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 07:27 PM
1

Ah, but if they can't legally consent to the "consensual sex", wouldn't it then not be consensual?
/r/MensRights16/01/14 07:24 PM
6

I don't understand this. Why should either than man or woman care what type of underwear the other wears? If it was a one night thing, I seriously doubt that a man or woman would stop a sexual advance because of the type of underwear one or the other is wearing as long as they don't display disgusting hygiene. I'm pretty sure sexy underwear is reserved for special occasions in the vast majority of relationships.
/r/MensRights26/12/13 04:30 AM
3

Man, I wish I went to the same university as you and could have helped a guy like you out through all this. I'm astonished by how calm you are about this entire situations. Throughout reading this I wanted nothing but to hear of your sweet revenge against this woman who turned your life upside-down just to keep her social image out of the mud. BUT the fact that you're so calm shows, I think, that you're actually ready to move on from this. I hope you can recover from this and eventually finish y…
/r/MensRights23/12/13 04:25 PM
2

Do you think the emotional difficulties of an abortion last 18 years? I'd also say a large part of those difficulties arise from the negative public stigma against abortions. If they were accepted as common place and not portrayed as some terrible sin, woman may be able to go through with the process and not have as many worries.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 05:53 PM
8

I don't think you understand the point being made here. A relatively tough decision for the mother shouldn't be a deciding factor in 18 years of a man's life. The fact-of-the-matter is that the woman has plenty of options even after abortion. Giving up a child may be a very difficult decision and a tough thing to do but if the mother doesn't want the child, it would be the smart and right thing to do by giving it up. Have you ever had to give up something you wanted? A job, a toy, free time, of …
/r/MensRights21/11/13 05:51 PM
2

Would all women really be emotionally damaged if their fetus was aborted within, say, the first 3 months of conception? I'm genuinely curious, have there been studies relating early termination to neurological phenomenon that cause emotional damage? I honestly think that there would be far less mothers who can't adequately care for their child in the world, if the child didn't also represent a way to get revenge on (and money from) a 'shitty-ex'. But this is just my opinion.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 05:45 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter