TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AngeloCorr99 Archive

View 0 posts and 36 comments by AngeloCorr99 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
16

I'm only a casual browser, but a lot of the stuff I see from this sub is either neutral or far right. Like, I remember a post from a few months back proposing we ban "wokeness" from this sub and proceeded to explain how trans people aren't real because of bone structure. I'm pretty far left, so it was nice having a sub dedicated to that. I think stuff from the right is so much more common here because feminism is aligned with the left. Even though the concept of men's rights isn't inherently rig…
/r/MensRights12/07/23 02:16 AM
16

Alternatively, put more into Healthcare for men so they live longer
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/23 12:32 AM
5

Being honest, I think their problem is with the 1%, which happens to be predominantly male. They label the 1% as patriarchy, and therefore, anyone who suffers as a result of it also suffers from the patriarchy. This is what's referred to as a "Ship of Theseus" argument. They treat two things as though they are the same, and are therefore interchangeable. They are replacing all of the core aspects of their argument with other things which they deem as similar to make it look like they've proven t…
/r/MensRights25/01/23 12:59 AM
14

I actually had a mandatory gender studies class where we learned that working class men also suffer under the patriarchy. I'm dead serious. If the system isn't controlled by men who are deliberately shaping the system to give men advantage at the expense of women, it's not a patriarchy. If the system doesn't benefit men exclusively, and instead benefits rich people (regardless of gender), it's not a patriarchy.
/r/MensRights24/01/23 05:44 PM
3

Hey, can we pin this to the top of the sub or something? I can't tell you how many times a list with sources like this would have been extremely useful.
/r/MensRights04/12/22 12:41 AM
1

I wouldn't say most, but even if they did, that's no reason to permanently and irreversibly mutilate them.
/r/MensRights23/07/22 12:52 PM
3

Yeah, you're totally right on that bit. I've noticed that "men who want their foreskin back" are ridiculed to a similar degree as incels, virgins, etc. I'm not sure if you've ever heard of someone called the game dude, but that was one of the things he got picked on for before going nuts. I really can't imagine why being upset about being mutilated is something to be shamed for, but I also can't imagine mutilating my son or daughter.
/r/MensRights23/07/22 04:16 AM
1

Again, this isn't a contest for which side has it worse, just stating for the record. I was more speaking on why it sparks more outrage in other people. Botched circumcisions are atrocious (and completely avoidable if we simply stopped performing circumcisions), but for the 99% of people who don't have their circumcision botched, they don't need to deal with that. Again, this isn't a contest, but women suffer as a result of the operation itself, not from when the operation fails (circumcision is…
/r/MensRights23/07/22 04:02 AM
4

This is just getting into hypotheticals now, but I think it's something to do with how the clitoris only exists for pleasure, and without it, you cannot achieve that same pleasure. Men can still have and enjoy sex (Assuming the circumcision wasn't botched). Like you said though, we shouldn't be in a dick measuring contest (pun intended) over who has it worse. Both are honestly atrocious. It's disgusting that people exist that advocate for MGM purely for aesthetic reasons. On the intactivist sub,…
/r/MensRights23/07/22 12:44 AM
2

Ah. I see. Thank you.
/r/MensRights23/07/22 12:39 AM
-1

I heard that in more extreme cases they cut the clit off. Is this not true? I haven't done much research, everything I know is what I hear on intactivist subs.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 11:00 PM
10

While I don't agree, I can understand why FGM gets much more outrage compared to MGM. Based on what I've seen, it does way more damage. HOWEVER MGM doesn't inspire any outrage outside of intactivist groups. Like, approach someone on the street and ask them about FGM, and they'll respond with outrage and horror. Ask about MGM and they either won't care, or will actively support it. It's super disgusting. At best they'll cite the "benefits" which have long since been disproven, or they'll cite app…
/r/MensRights22/07/22 10:29 PM
4

I am a man in college right now. It's shit like this that actively inspires me to try harder and do better. Not to brag, but I finished the last semester with a 4.0 (for the semester, not overall)
/r/MensRights22/07/22 05:03 PM
3

I'm really not. If I could find them I would show you, but they very explicitly stated what they were thinking. There was no subtext to misunderstand. I agree with the thing you wrote in quotes, that isn't at all what the conversation was about.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 04:57 AM
2

Two months ago, someone made a post about being kinda happy that Amber heard got what she deserved (and I kinda agree). In the comments, two people were talking about being happy about the rumor about roe v Wade being overturned, purely because women were suffering. That they had it so good for so long and now they're finally getting a taste of there own medicine. I was completely repulsed. That is not what this sub is about, never was, and never will be. We are nnot women haters. We need to be …
/r/MensRights30/06/22 10:50 PM
11

I've noticed screenshots of some of the worst things on this sub spread around on other subs regarding roe v Wade. Some of that shit was heinous and really makes our movement look bad. Glad someone is bringing attention to this.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 10:24 PM
6

I was talking more about the premise than the outcome. Isn't Dalia still tying some shit though? Or is it completely over? I haven't been following recently.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 08:58 PM
37

It sounds very similar to the Dalia Dipilito case, which was America, and also a shitshow.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 05:22 PM
6

I heard November is also men's mental health month. I've also heard both November and June referred to as men's health month (without the mental part). I'd like some clarification.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 03:59 PM
20

Okay, two things. 1) Trans man means a woman who transitioned into being a man. Trans woman is a man who transitioned into being a woman. Your post gave me the vibe you got them mixed up, it's a common mistake. 2) Trans people of either gender face very different issues to men. Whether a Trans man has to deal with many of the issues that biological man do is debatable. Probably varies a lot from person to person. However, a Trans man not having to deal with men's issues does not erase the issues…
/r/MensRights20/06/22 02:57 AM
-38

Finally... Babylon Bee has found a second joke. I'm proud. Really.
/r/MensRights20/06/22 02:37 AM
2

I know they don't deserve it, but I would recommend tackling issues like this with a little more respect. Being hostile and using words like "retard" won't really help anything. To both the person you are arguing with and onlookers, being rude is a good way to make people not want to side with you or entertain your argument. Like, let's say hypothetically, someone who isn't a feminists and is uneducated on men's rights issues sees this argument. Even though you are completely right, they may not…
/r/MensRights15/06/22 11:37 PM
9

Yes, but it was a very important first step. It served to break a lot of people's preconceived notions.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 09:12 PM
44

It's an important first step at the very least.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 09:09 PM
3

I agree with you. The original post didn't mention it at all so I left a comment saying it. Bigger issues deserve more attention, but smaller issues don't deserve to be ignored just because they are smaller. I wasn't demanding we focus on this issue and nothing else. I just wanted to give a passing mention to an extremely similar issue which wasn't mentioned.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 06:39 PM
5

Okay, I agree with you that the issue is more prevalent with women making false accusations towards men. Therefore, it is a much bigger issue that deserves more attention. I agree with you completely. However, smaller issues are no less of an issue just by virtue of being less common. I had a male friend who was sexually harassed by a gay man for years. He was afraid of speaking out because of the whole "men can't be victims" thing. Is his issue any less of an issue because that kind of thing ha…
/r/MensRights30/05/22 06:22 PM
7

Alright, I disagree, this sub is predominantly about men's rights. However, there is a small group of people who do take issue with women specifically. It should be noted that they are the minority and do not represent us as a group or as a movement. I just wish people who downvoted left comments saying why they disagree. Or if they downvoted for an unrelated reason. This could have been an important discussion. I am generally of the opinion that a group of people cannot be hypocritical. Many pe…
/r/MensRights30/05/22 05:52 AM
10

Please remember, men can also accuse other men. This is not exclusive to women. Obviously it's not nearly as common but still, in most places rape is rape, and I have seen lives ruined via false male on male rape accusations.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 02:11 AM
24

If it's about all people and not just women, call it humanism. Be a humanist.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 08:09 AM
3

I didn't read the article, but keep in mind that some of these might not be falsified. There may have genuinely been a rape and the wrong person was apprehended. There is a difference between a malicious false accusation and a genuine mistake. Same goes for any and all crimes.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 07:39 AM
0

Don't stoop to their level. If they want to act childish, let them. We are adults, and we are fighting for something we believe in. We don't need to resort to petty games to get each other banned. If we were to "give them a taste of their own medicine", despite the fact that we would be doing exactly what they are doing, they would point at us and shout "hate, sexism, incels", etc. As unfair as it is, it would only backfire on us. Also, something to keep in mind, much like all groups, feminists …
/r/MensRights22/05/22 04:40 AM
3

Alright, to be fair, I'm learning in my college sex Ed class that no matter what birth control you use, it's not 100% effective, so even if both you AND her are on the pill, you should still wear a condom if 1) you want to be extra sure 2) you want to avoid stds, which the pill cannot protect against But these women haven't mentioned either of these things. They just talk about not trusting men. Like?!?!?! Edit: it also ignores the fact that a woman could be lying about being on the pill just as…
/r/MensRights04/04/22 03:43 PM
1

Ukraine is in very different circumstances compared to the US. We most likely will never need the draft. I'm not sure what country you are in, but I am in the US. I am not talking about the draft as a concept, just in the US. And what do you mean by "eternally-assured safety of your armchair"? If there ever were a draft again in the US, I would almost certainly be one of the ones drafted. Or are you indirectly speaking to "the feminists"? Sorry, it's just kinda unclear.
/r/MensRights17/03/22 03:06 PM
0

Look, I'm not discussing hypotheticals. I know the draft is unlikely to be abolished. However, fighting to abolish the draft is undisputably a good thing. Your reasoning to do a good thing is irrelevant. The end justifies the means would imply doing anything to accomplish a goal, regardless of its moral standing. ie, killing people to accomplish a goal. Someone's motivation to do something would not qualify as the "means" part of that equation. If I killed people who supported the draft, that wo…
/r/MensRights16/03/22 09:22 PM
3

Hey, I hate to say it, but intentionality doesn't factor in here. If I give a homeless person money because Satan wanted me to do it, I still did a good thing, regardless of my intentions. If feminists want to abolish the draft, it doesn't really matter why. In the end, men will benefit from abolishing the draft. If feminists wanted to abolish the draft because they thought more children would die in 3rd world countries, it would matter. Doing a good thing for a bad reason is still ultimately a …
/r/MensRights16/03/22 07:09 PM
2

I always thought TM was just demanding men act in a certain way, regardless of how the person feels. For example, shunning stay at home dads for doing "a woman's work" etc. Demanding men act in what society deems "masculine". Like, I have a friend who enjoys hunting, woodworking, "manly stuff" etc. The way he put it is "I'm allowed to do this stuff because I take interest in it. Forcing someone to do that stuff to be considered a man would be TM."
/r/MensRights10/11/21 01:54 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter