AngryAsshole Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Brilliant social commentary from a guy who draws stuff for a living No, I just don't appreciate when websites I visit are shit upon by trolls. Stay on your side of the fence and we can be pleasant neighbors, throw your dog shit on my side of the fence and we have a problem.	/r/MensRights	09/03/11 01:48 AM
5	Dilbert author deletes his "get over it" post, but the Internet never forgets If I post a survey in r/MensRights asking their opinion on something do I expect the entire internet to answer or even all of Reddit? Would it be right for Fox News viewers to come over to Reddit and push their agenda by voting up "conservative" stories. And if as a result, the entire front page of Reddit changes, you think that would be fine? Scott didn't make his survey public, a member of r/MensRights asked everyone here to go over and vote up his submission. It is hijacking because r/MensRig…	/r/MensRights	08/03/11 10:17 PM
0	Brilliant social commentary from a guy who draws stuff for a living Scott's post was a silly diatribe written for his regular audience and it was in response to a survey he thought his regular readers were answering. Your picture was in response to an angry misinterpretation of Scott's post by people that were not his regular readers. Is that fun?	/r/MensRights	08/03/11 10:06 PM
9	Dilbert author deletes his "get over it" post, but the Internet never forgets It's like if r/MensRights asked its members to answer a survey about what issues are important to them. Then a militant women's group hears about the survey and they come over to r/MensRights and start answering the survey in a way that serves their agenda and disrupts yours. Scott wasn't asking for a general survey of the entire internet, just his regular readers.	/r/MensRights	08/03/11 03:04 PM
-2	Brilliant social commentary from a guy who draws stuff for a living It was a "shitty piece" to those that aren't regular readers of his personal blog where he typically writes silly posts. It wasn't proper for r/MensRights to hijack Scott's survey. Would you like it if a women's group monitored r/MensRights and tried to influence your surveys? In case you were unaware, Scott had a survey asking readers what his next blog post should be about. Someone on r/MensRights asked this group to hijack Scott's survey so that he would write a post on "Men's Rights".	/r/MensRights	08/03/11 02:56 PM
-3	Brilliant social commentary from a guy who draws stuff for a living He didn't issue a press release, he posted a silly post on his personal blog (like he does several times per week). And now r/MensRights is taking it like it was a serious opinion piece in the the New York Times. It's like holding someone's Reddit comments against them in real life. It was just for fun.	/r/MensRights	08/03/11 02:49 PM
1	The Dilbert Blog will write about whatever topic gets the most votes. Vote up Men's Rights. Hi, as we saw, this wasn't the best idea -- unless you hate Scott Adams, then this was a great idea. Scott has always written in a provocative way, and he didn't vary with this post. The poll was for his readers, it wasn't fair for r/MensRights to hijack it. I hope you can understand this, and try to bring about a positive end to this disturbance.	/r/MensRights	08/03/11 06:42 AM
1	Success! r/mensrights campaign raises awareness on the Dilbert Blog Why is it okay to hijack Scott's blog poll like that? Would you appreciate it if someone came to r/MensRights and started pushing some outside agenda? And what's worse, now there's a bunch of people mad at Scott for just doing what he usually does. And, there's now a bunch of people unhappy with r/MensRights. I'd suggest you try and make peace between the two and stop trying to harass the Scott Adams blog with downvotes and comments and such.	/r/MensRights	08/03/11 06:34 AM
-5	Brilliant social commentary from a guy who draws stuff for a living r/MensRights hijacked Scott's poll and now you're complaining that he wrote a post you didn't like? Just like r/MensRights is one little niche on the internet, the Scott Adams Blog is another little niche on the internet. You didn't have any right to violate it just as people don't have the right to come to r/MensRights and push some outside agenda.	/r/MensRights	08/03/11 06:28 AM
1	Scott Adams deleted his post today. Won't even man up to calling MRAs a bunch of pussies. He's lost a fan. How is it fair that r/MensRights hijacked Scott's survey? They didn't get the article they were expecting and now they're upset? If they were fans of Scott's blog, they would have realized his post was very typical of his writings. And as a regular reader of Scott's blog, I was disappointed to see it manipulated by r/MensRights in the way that it was. r/MensRights has lost a fan.	/r/MensRights	08/03/11 06:23 AM
29	Dilbert author deletes his "get over it" post, but the Internet never forgets For anyone that needs the backstory: r/MensRights sent its readers to the Scott Adams blog to hijack a survey so that Scott would write about Men's Rights. Apparently, r/MensRights has no idea of the style in which Scott writes. Scott then writes one of his typical posts, this time about Men's Rights. r/MensRights readers do not understand that Scott has a non-typical sense of humor and that he tries to be funny in his writings (remember that he is the guy that draws Dilbert comics every day). A…	/r/MensRights	08/03/11 06:12 AM