TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Anon3mous1 Archive

View 0 posts and 106 comments by Anon3mous1 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

If you need your role model to be the same gender as you then you're pretty sexist tbh.
/r/MensRights07/06/20 03:52 PM
95

The war against women is about as real as the war on Christmas.
/r/MensRights16/02/20 12:54 PM
2

They already have, repeatedly. https://phys.org/news/2017-05-female-students.html https://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-big-reason-women-drop-out-of-engineering-isnt-in-the-classroom-2016-06-30
/r/MensRights30/08/19 09:08 PM
5

It's very easy to get into nursing school and hospitals and nursing facilities love having male nurses on hand to deal with aggressive or heavy patients. If they could get away with it I'm sure they would apply incentives to get more men into nursing. The real question is whether they'll lower the entry requirements for male med students now that there are more women in that degree, lol.
/r/MensRights30/08/19 02:18 PM
4

This is just entry requirements, they still have to earn their degrees. Since the entry requirements have been lowered some of them probably won't be able to though and will drop out. Watch for the news reports in a few years which ask whether the increased drop out rate among female engineering students is due to sexism.
/r/MensRights30/08/19 02:13 PM
6

For a minimum sentence 10 years is plenty. Should be a bit lower even. On average convicted rapists serve less than 10 years.
/r/MensRights29/08/19 04:32 PM
233

An incestuous paedophile.
/r/MensRights02/08/19 08:14 PM
2

No, he should be in a dementia care facility. If they are that confused they need to be off the streets for their own safety.
/r/MensRights12/07/19 12:02 AM
3

Well I mean, if you go about your day and everyone you meet is crazy, maybe you should look in a mirror.
/r/MensRights07/07/19 05:24 AM
6

She'll get nothing. The case will be dismissed.
/r/MensRights11/05/19 03:33 AM
12

Fake news. Black men are actually 6.5%, 13% includes both black men and women.
/r/MensRights20/02/19 02:34 PM
8

Only some of them
/r/MensRights10/02/19 04:13 PM
135

Does that mean once I get a vasectomy I can rape as many women as I want with no consequences? I thought rape was about the mental and physical trauma the victims went through but apparently they were just worried about getting pregnant. I guess now we know why they say men can't get raped.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 04:10 PM
20

Which means basically she got away with her assault with no additional sentence. The tazer they got 20 months for wasn't even a tazer. “It was sold to them on the basis of it being a novelty. “The only person it had been used on was these two. He says it produced a minor sensation and didn’t incapacitate him in any shape or form. The man who sold it to them demonstrated it on both of them. If it was a real tazer they would have gotten 5 years.
/r/MensRights09/02/19 05:59 PM
48

The sentence seems fine and hopefully she will learn her lesson, but normally someone would get a harsher sentence for attacking a disabled person with an illegal weapon while their back was turned. These people got 20 months just for possessing a tazer: https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/uk-world-news/pair-jailed-tears-bringing-iphone-14888297
/r/MensRights09/02/19 05:50 PM
80

Vice is like the onion, but not as funny because they're too obviously fake.
/r/MensRights07/02/19 12:11 PM
12

OP isn't a joke though, she's just saying that she raped someone. A rape joke isn't just talking about raping someone. It's the difference between "how many babies does it take to paint a wall? Depends how hard you throw them." and "I have murdered my baby by drowning it in a bathtub." One of them is a joke.
/r/MensRights14/01/19 12:39 PM
1

They don't make as much money so they don't pay as much tax as men. 73 cents and all that. ;)
/r/MensRights06/08/18 05:50 PM
22

Obviously they should be eligible for the draft. For combat roles, only if they meet the fitness standards, otherwise they do something else when they're drafted into the army, there's no shortage of non-combat roles.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 02:03 PM
29

this isn't the government punishing someone not guilty That is literally what this is.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 01:59 PM
44

What if, hear me out on this, instead of disenfranchising women we just made them equal to men in responsibility and consequences? Radical idea I know.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 01:57 PM
4

Prepare to be supprised: https://np.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/8yfhgz/man\_wins\_390000\_in\_gender\_discrimination\_case
/r/MensRights14/07/18 02:20 PM
93

God it's good to see people being rational on both sides of the gender equality movement.
/r/MensRights14/07/18 02:18 PM
3

His apology was basically him saying that he was sorry people were offended and clarifying his position, he didn't walk back his statement. The news headlines just make it seem like he admitted he was wrong.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 11:21 AM
3

Does she go around beating people who are 100 pounds lighter than her in public? If so, the fact that she is a well known MMA fighter would defianately work against her.
/r/MensRights01/07/18 09:35 PM
16

My analogy works well with animals too. Like with dogs. If you have a big dog and it starts nipping at people you're going to treat that seriously and discipline it. If your small dog gets nippy people just laugh and call it 'feisty'. That's why so many people have little dogs that are absolute shits.
/r/MensRights01/07/18 05:00 PM
12

Yeah probably. I grew up middle class so that might be showing.
/r/MensRights01/07/18 04:37 PM
2

Yeah, don't do that. If they don't have a weapon you'd have to be rediculously inept to let someone with a weight and reach disadvantage hit you full force in your weak points, or they'd have to be some kind of professional fighter. Letting someone punch you isn't the same as letting them injure you, that's why I said you need to know how to take a punch. If they do they do have a weapon you need to get the hell out of there because you don't want to actually die.
/r/MensRights01/07/18 04:25 PM
18

I worked as an orderly in a hospital for several years. Not hitting people back is a very important skill. If you know how to take a punch you really don't have much to fear from most people if they're smaller than you. Fingernails suck though.
/r/MensRights01/07/18 04:04 PM
25

Most big guys I know are pretty chill, I think it's because they tend to learn growing up that they are absolutely not allowed to hit anyone because they're bigger.
/r/MensRights01/07/18 03:54 PM
55

Granted women have the automatic advantage in a court of law, but if you have 100 pounds on a guy you could still have difficulty making a case for self defence if you injure them too badly.
/r/MensRights01/07/18 03:45 PM
1

I think you'd be hard pressed to find any wars that were declared for literally no reason, even if the reason is not a good one. Wars of conquest don't tend to be 'declared', rather you just don't recognise the sovereignty of what ever nation you're invading.
/r/MensRights16/09/17 03:10 AM
2

Should have just said she was hysterical.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 11:04 AM
6

That's the absolute minimum, as in, they can kick you out of the army if you drop below that limit. Obviously a combat ready unit is expected to be a lot fitter than that. The test is to make sure POGs can still actually move their arse when it becomes necessary.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 06:26 PM
3

It's the hair.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 10:03 AM
1

Some of those men have a wife and kids!
/r/MensRights10/07/17 02:37 PM
1

In the same way that the side that uses chemical weapons 'wins'.
/r/MensRights30/04/17 09:30 PM
2

Are you being deliberately obtuse?
/r/MensRights17/04/17 04:29 AM
8

Don't dye your hair unnatural colours. As in, don't dye your hair a colour that human hair cannot naturally be.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 12:33 PM
4

Men Going Their Own Way - they often reject the more extreme Red Pill views (like that women lack morals and have the emotional maturity of children) but nonetheless have decided they would be better off avoiding relationships with women (without being homosexual). For some it's a personal position, others recommend that all men become MGTOW. There's some overlap with MRAs. This is all generalising of course, so #notall
/r/MensRights27/11/16 10:02 PM
-1

A better equivalence for what /u/indus360 was saying would be a woman who carries bear mace strapped to her leg 24/7 and keeps talking about how she "knows what men are like", describing a power fantasy where she overpowers and bear maces an attempted rapist.
/r/MensRights27/11/16 08:51 PM
-10

Gender Politics scale: { }Meme-tier Tumblr Feminist { }Radical Feminist { }'Rational' Feminist { }Egalitarian { }MRA { }MGTOW { }Red Pill {x}Paranoid delusions present a danger to themself and others Edit: I accuse everyone down voting me of holding whatever ideology they most disagree with. Only the people who up vote me are of the same ideology they claim to be. You wouldn't be so angry about the accusation unless it was true, but don't worry, you only did it because society has conditioned yo…
/r/MensRights27/11/16 06:35 PM
1

But Vietnam was just 'forward defence', or at least that's one of the rationales they gave at the time. A ban doesn't have much weight to it when it's interpreted by the same people it's supposed to constrain.
/r/MensRights29/10/16 02:07 PM
3

White people have had it too goddamn easy for the entire history of America, and it's time to get even. Gas the RNC, race war now. /s
/r/MensRights29/10/16 01:58 PM
5

Don't you worry your pretty little head about it honey, let us men handle those nasty numbers.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 02:57 PM
3

No they say "I hope your daughter/wife/mother gets raped".
/r/MensRights26/09/16 03:38 PM
2

If you don't get involved with any women (romantically or sexually) it makes an accusation much less likely - most false rape accusations are in some way related to relationship drama, and I think I remember reading somewhere that most of them did involve some sort of consensual sex act. I don't want to sound like a feminist here, but (in general) false accusers don't just accuse people at random for fun, they have some sort of motive be it jealousy, shame, regret or revenge. Avoiding romantic a…
/r/MensRights05/09/16 11:55 PM
1

Seeing as gender is a 'social construct' there are many options for proud penis carrying individuals who want to use this restroom. Circumgender is still trans, so if you've ever briefly doubted your gender identity you can say you're trans. Or gender fluid (your gender changes periodically), or non-binary (screw the rules, I'll make my own gender), or 'gender non-conforming' (you're a man, but you like scented candles). /s Gee, it almost seems like trans has no meaning. Perhaps we should go bac…
/r/MensRights05/09/16 05:56 PM
2

Remember, if you hold the door for a woman you're a sexist, but if you don't put the toilet seat down for a woman you're a misogynist.
/r/MensRights05/09/16 02:45 PM
2

Patriarchy? Misogyny? Take your pick. /s
/r/MensRights30/08/16 07:32 AM
5

And now you know why billionaires tend to marry people from other billionaire families.
/r/MensRights30/08/16 07:30 AM
1

Depends how long the server logs are stored.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 12:30 PM
2

Even if there were 10,000 investigations, and each of them generated 1000 documents/emails with an average file size of 1MB, that's still less than 10TB of data. Storing this data in a datacenter with enterprise level security and backups at current market rates of $0.02-$0.05/GB would cost less than $50 per year, and this is assuming the university doesn't use its existing servers to store it. Are we to understand that there there are so many 'rape trials' being conducted by universities that $…
/r/MensRights18/08/16 04:06 AM
1

IANAL, but AFAIK the intention of the 5th amendment is to prevent people from being forced into to making a confession. Things which you wrote before you were arrested wouldn't be protected by the 5th, since no agent of the state forced you to write them. Private documents written by you would normally be protected by the 4th amendment, but if they were reasonably believed to be relevant to a criminal investigation the the seizure of those documents would be warranted. If the documents were dest…
/r/MensRights18/08/16 03:45 AM
3

Lawyers are like guns. The only thing that can stop a bad guy with a lawyer is a good guy with a lawyer. Lawyers don't sue people, people with lawyers sue people. Every citizen has the right to retain lawyers to defend themselves and prevent government tyranny.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 03:34 AM
2

Right, but Gomeshi was innocent so having evidence available helped him. If you're habitually committing crimes it's unlikely that having more evidence will work out in your favour.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 03:20 AM
1

Assuming he doesn't securely erase the data, use total drive encryption or use an operating system which doesn't write to the HDD. Even if he didn't use those precautions, if his computer uses an SSD the TRIM function would most likely erase the recoverable data within hours or minutes (although that is not it's purpose) and even a HDD may not have recoverable data after a while if the drive continues to be used just by the random overwriting of the sector that contained the recoverable data.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 03:16 AM
1

Right, but the email in your sent folder confirms that the email on his computer hasn't been faked or altered.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 03:10 AM
3

With the law.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 03:07 AM
1

IANAL, but I am fairly sure that notifying the second party they are being recorded is enough, provided you have the legal right to film at that location. Note how when you call a company they advise you that you are being recorded at the beginning of the call. I would assume the same logic applies to video recordings.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 03:04 AM
1

A major one.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 03:01 AM
26

It's discrimination even if he doesn't. Remember how wage discrimination based on Sex is illegal?
/r/MensRights11/06/16 03:27 PM
1

And my axe!
/r/MensRights22/04/16 03:22 PM
27

Because showing her face might make other false accusers hesitant to falsely report things in the future.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 02:37 AM
5

No woman would lie about being raped... Unless they claim they weren't raped, then they're clearly lying.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 02:34 AM
1

They definitely can, the clearly are. Whether or not the should be is the real question.
/r/MensRights11/04/16 09:51 PM
2

If you don't have a contract then you're not really employed.
/r/MensRights11/04/16 09:49 PM
6

This is the US Navy right? I'm surprised they didn't burst into the operating room with a bottle of ibuprofen and tell you to stop malingering.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 12:32 PM
2

everyone generalises That's just a generalisation. /s
/r/MensRights30/01/16 02:47 PM
3

All DV is terrible, but at least women don't get arrested when they're the victim of DV.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 06:54 AM
4

Men know not to hit ANYONE in front of a cop.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 06:39 AM
9

Do you realise she's spoken before the UN? And received a good deal of mainstream media coverage? That's just the exposure she has outside the internet, online she has a significant speaking platform that extends well beyond youtube. Are you honestly unaware of what you're saying or are you just being disingenuous.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 01:10 PM
4

#NotAllFeminists
/r/MensRights29/12/15 01:01 PM
6

It depends, how do you take your coffee?
/r/MensRights21/12/15 11:36 AM
1

Racism is a belief, fear is an emotion. If your friend had an irrational fear that black people were going to shoot him, but he didn't believe that black people were any more likely to shoot him he wouldn't be a racist. It's the fact that he believes blacks are all criminals that makes him a racist, not an irrational fear of being shot. Now you might say 'well hatred is also an emotion' and yes hate was probably the wrong word to to use. Point is you don't have to believe a fear is rational to b…
/r/MensRights19/12/15 02:00 PM
1

You can be afraid of something without hating it. (Contrary to what Yoda might tell you.) If your friend flinches when he sees a black person because he's remembering being held at gunpoint, that's not his fault, that's not bigotry. If your friend talks about how he hates black people and/or treats them poorly, that's being a bigot. Do you see the difference? If a patient is afraid of men and flinches when I'm checking her pulse, or requests a different nurse, that's fine. If she is abusive to m…
/r/MensRights19/12/15 01:10 PM
1

You're essentially just parroting the last line of my comment, but the distinction I would draw is that you can validate someone's emotions without validating the idea that their fears are justified. For example, a woman who was violently raped might be afraid of men. Her fear is real, in the same way an arachnophobe is afraid of spiders. She probably knows her fear is irrational, but that doesn't stop her fear from being real. Maybe she does need a 'safe space' where she can start to recover. I…
/r/MensRights19/12/15 11:24 AM
2

It's acceptable to be afraid. That doesn't mean it's reasonable. In fact it almost certainly isn't.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 10:48 AM
13

Of course it's okay for them to be afraid of black people. You can't control what you're afraid of, particularly if you're the victim of some trauma. It is something they have to struggle with though, because to discriminate against black people due to their fear would be wrong. Telling someone with anxiety or PTSD that they're a bad person for feeling fear, or that they're 'not allowed' to feel a particular way is extremely counter-productive. They have to accept the way they feel before they c…
/r/MensRights19/12/15 01:36 AM
20

I hear they're a good facial moisturiser.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 09:46 AM
2

Just because you're not breaking the law doesn't mean you're not being a dick.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 10:51 AM
2

Each part individually has happened (including murdering a husband in their sleep in 'self defence' which has actually happened a number of times) but putting it all together as if it's a common occurrence does make it read as rather hyperbolic.
/r/MensRights25/10/15 12:31 PM
3

When I was growing up the first rule of the internet was "Never tell anyone your real name or location." I guess I'm just an old man at the age of 26.
/r/MensRights18/10/15 12:10 PM
5

I dislike having accounts that I can't burn and I especially dislike accounts that are tied to my real identity. Facebook drama almost got my friend fired from his workplace.
/r/MensRights18/10/15 08:23 AM
3

Consent can be revoked during sex. Consent cannot be revoked after the sex has already occurred.
/r/MensRights17/10/15 06:45 PM
3

We just call them nurses. It's a gender neutral term.
/r/MensRights03/10/15 01:52 PM
3

IRL I would have said nurse, but my reddit name is gender neutral. I suppose I could have said "I'm a man and I chose to be a nurse", but I doubt anyone was confused as to what I meant.
/r/MensRights02/10/15 10:01 PM
43

"Women are forced to choose lower paying jobs." I chose to be a male nurse, are my choices being controlled too?
/r/MensRights02/10/15 03:59 PM
7

'Obsession' isn't necessarily bad. It really depends on if it negatively affects their life. You could equally apply this obsessive behavior to athletes. Athletes are always striving to be faster, no matter how fast they are, there's always someone faster. They're never satisfied with how fast they are. Even the fastest man in the world is constantly working to improve his personal best. Constantly striving for self improvement isn't a negative thing, at least until it gets to the point where th…
/r/MensRights23/08/15 03:11 AM
2

Who are you and why should I care?
/r/MensRights18/08/15 06:17 PM
4

My litmus test is asking whether they would support egalitarianism. If they respond with "egalitarianism is an evil ploy by the MRAs to distract from women's issues", they're not the type of feminist I can support. If they respond with "I don't think there's a difference, feminism is about equality for everyone." Then there's a conversation to be had. If they respond with "I'm a feminist and an egalitarian. I just focus on women's issues." Then I fully support their conviction. It's not helpful …
/r/MensRights18/08/15 08:29 AM
11

/r/iamverysmart would love this article.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 08:03 AM
5

I'm a male student nurse. It makes me laugh when feminists try to tell me that sexism against men doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 09:22 PM
1

So some black people need to dress up in white face to see what it's like to be white?
/r/MensRights14/08/15 05:27 AM
10

I made the list for this comment: If there's cheese on your dick you should probably wash your genitals occasionally. Once per day is considered normal in most of the western world. Apparently these SJWs are pro dick cheese.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 09:44 PM
1

I disagree. Evil people know what they're doing is wrong (or at least that it will hurt other people) and do it anyway out of selfishness or callousness.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 02:00 AM
1

No, you need there to be precedent, which unfortunately for you upholds your student loans and may invalidate your prenup. "[If] The agreement contains ridiculous provisions . . . or is simply too lopsided... [It may be thrown out]" -http://www.forbes.com/sites/jefflanders/2013/04/02/five-reasons-your-prenup-might-be-invalid/ "if the agreement is so grossly unfair that one party would face severe financial hardship while the other prospered, the court is unlikely to enforce it." -http://family.f…
/r/MensRights25/07/15 11:25 PM
1

Just because someone is stupid doesn't mean they're evil.
/r/MensRights25/07/15 08:14 PM
4

If there's cheese on your dick you should probably wash your genitals occasionally. Once per day is considered normal in most of the western world.
/r/MensRights25/07/15 05:27 PM
1

A prenup like that would probably be thrown out in court as 'unfair'. And I'm not even kidding with the terminology.
/r/MensRights25/07/15 05:18 PM
11

Whether or not that's true, most supporters of communism don't believe it's true, and would oppose genocide and mass murder. It's not useful to judge someone's morals based on the unintended consequences of their hypothetical.
/r/MensRights25/07/15 01:39 PM
13

I'm not sure supporting communism is the same as supporting Stalin. That's a false equivalence.
/r/MensRights25/07/15 12:56 PM
7

My father used to tell me (although I'm sure he was quoting someone) "Have you ever noticed how all the newspaper articles are accurate, except the ones you have first hand knowledge of?” This is not a new problem.
/r/MensRights25/07/15 12:49 PM
2

No it's practically and morally stealing. Technically it's not.
/r/MensRights24/07/15 11:08 AM
1

/r/nocontext is a sub whose only purpose is to deliberately take things out of context for the purposes of humor.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 07:29 AM
2

Whoosh
/r/MensRights11/09/12 10:10 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter