TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AnonTheAnonymous Archive

View 14 posts and 434 comments by AnonTheAnonymous on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
112

AnonTheAnonymous/r/MensRights05/07/12 06:24 PM
111

AnonTheAnonymous/r/MensRights28/04/12 12:20 AM
72

AnonTheAnonymous/r/MensRights05/07/12 06:25 PM
59

AnonTheAnonymous/r/MensRights14/04/12 02:05 AM
59

AnonTheAnonymous/r/MensRights28/08/12 12:41 AM
53

AnonTheAnonymous/r/MensRights28/02/12 06:56 PM
51

AnonTheAnonymous/r/MensRights02/05/12 03:58 AM
24

AnonTheAnonymous/r/MensRights23/04/12 02:46 AM
4

AnonTheAnonymous/r/MensRights16/05/12 07:45 PM
1

AnonTheAnonymous/r/MensRights13/05/12 10:23 PM
0

AnonTheAnonymous/r/TheRedPill02/02/15 06:08 PM
0

AnonTheAnonymous/r/MensRights14/07/12 09:47 PM
0

AnonTheAnonymous/r/TheRedPill16/01/15 09:06 PM
0

AnonTheAnonymous/r/MensRights06/05/12 04:07 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Male feminists are not "man having an oppinion." They are disingenuous and will not be swayed by reason and facts. Their goal is not to promote equality but to show women that they are "not like the other guys" and "one of the good ones" in hopes to get laid.
/r/MensRights27/08/21 01:49 AM
1

They have literally cut off baby boys genitals and gender resigned them to female with female hormone treatment. None of them grew up like normal girls, all of them felt wrong and had a whole host of mental problems, most committed suicide. Gendered behavior is demonstrably nature, again, it's called sexual dimorphism. Your mind is innately gendered. This is not seriously debated by scientists. SJW non binary nonsense is the only debate.
/r/MensRights13/02/17 02:02 PM
2

These classes are not based on valid research, and the debate is like creationism Vs evolution debate. These gender theory classes are just feminist indoctrination. How many biologists are teaching these courses? Sexual dimorphism is a fact of biology. There is no debate in the scientific community.
/r/MensRights09/02/17 02:13 PM
3

No, it really isnt. The right is as identity as the left. It relies heavily on nationalism, traditionalism, and christian identity.
/r/MensRights10/08/16 01:10 PM
1

I still think it can be fun to watch them get butthurt when they see an attractive man their age with a much younger woman.
/r/TheRedPill06/03/15 04:53 PM
17

At least a limited number of swipes will stop these "always swipe right" idiots from giving ugly girls validation.
/r/TheRedPill03/03/15 07:08 PM
1

Because nobody needs the red pill associated with loons like you. You are not just a nazi, you named your self after one, and you won't stop talking about it. You are not here to discuss redpill, you are here to preach your nonsense to us. So how about you get the fuck out of here.
/r/TheRedPill01/03/15 04:03 PM
4

How about you get the fuck out of here.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/15 10:32 PM
2

Truth. I have no problem accepting I'm a born beta and will always be one underneath the logically constructed alpha act. I honestly detest natural alphas as unthinking brute scum freeloading off beta pro-social civilized societies. No matter how successful I get with RedPill approach to women, all things considered, I would 1,000% rather be Keichi with Belldandy than Kanye with Kim.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/15 04:11 PM
1

This guy is that dork running around bars trying shit pickup techniques getting shut down right and left until he finds a fatty who will fuck him. Nothing to see here.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/15 01:30 PM
1

Well, yes we are. Low sperm count and infertility are the same thing, as well as shrunken testicles, your body stops producing testosterone, but your balls go back to normal after cycle. And having smaller balls really isn't ever an issue. I've never heard of a girl praising big ball guys or laughing at small balls. I have never had problems with erections. Honestly don't be scared of steroids, they are awesome.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/15 12:51 PM
1

My point is that women can be raised to empathize with men, they simply aren't. That doesn't absolve them of responsibility. I'm all for rejecting marriage and plating younger women. If women want men to grow old with them they can change family and divorce laws, and show some respect and empathy. Otherwise they can grow old with their cats.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/15 12:04 PM
0

Oh, no true scotsman huh? Do they vote Republican? They are right wingers.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/15 12:02 PM
1

Steroids don't do anything to your pecker nor do they cause any other problems. Side effects are predominantly acne and balding and gyno, but most only get acne, which really isn't a whole lot. Don't be afraid of drugs.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/15 11:59 AM
4

This is just absurd. Women are responsible for their decisions. They aren't unthinking beasts.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/15 07:28 PM
5

Old Japanese guys are worker drones who have sexless marriages. They aren't alpha.
/r/TheRedPill26/02/15 05:22 AM
2

White Leftists? White right wingers are some beta male church going nice guy beta bucks failures. They are absolutely hooked into blue pill thinking.
/r/TheRedPill26/02/15 05:21 AM
1

This shit is nonsense. Looks don't matter? Listen, steroids, gym, 2000 calorie diet, <10% bodyfat = all the pussy in the world. You cant have abbs and not have confidence, girls will always be giving you lustful looks, that shit makes your confidence sky high. Get your asses in shape. Going around looking like an ugly saying stupid shit like I can make you come is going to get you in trouble. Remember, the difference between flirting and sexual harassment? Hot or Not. Kino or Sexual Assault? Hot…
/r/TheRedPill26/02/15 04:54 AM
1

Because steroids increase your protein synthesis ten fold.
/r/TheRedPill24/02/15 08:27 PM
1

Do I really want to eat 500 grams of protein in food every day? No. Why? Because that's way too much eating for keeping a low bodyfat percentage. Also, I don't want to stuff my gut all day. Protein shakes are great when on roids.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/15 01:39 PM
1

Also protein shakes are cheaper than buying that much meat.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/15 01:39 PM
1

Unless of course you are on steroids, then they will use more.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/15 01:38 PM
1

Steroids increase protein synthesis ten fold. So if you can only synthesize 50 grams a day without, then protein shakes are dumb. But when you can synthesize 500 grams a day, thats a lot of chicken nobody wants to stuff into their guts.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/15 01:37 PM
1

Temporarily yes, you balls will shrink on steroids. But after you go off steroids, you recover fully, take clomid to speed recovery of natural test.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/15 01:34 PM
1

Adderall is incredible! If you can get it, do so. Steroids for your brain. Tons of focus, incredible memorization skills. Also perfect for appetite suppression. Even fatties will forget to eat on it.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/15 01:30 PM
-7

I've said it before. Steroids are a magical alpha male potion. But YES you have to life HARD, and drink a ton of protein shakes, Or its a waste.
/r/TheRedPill20/02/15 11:06 PM
2

There is nothing wrong with a MMF threesome. The way this one was performed was absurd. Crying baby? Get a damn sitter for this shit fool. Also Don't have threesomes with your wife, unless you are all kinds of awesome with abbs and megacock and have no fear of anyone doing her any better than you. This guy was just too sexually incompetent for a MMF threesome.
/r/TheRedPill20/02/15 05:24 PM
1

Looks are far better. Money does nothing for SMV. It's called prostitution, except you are not promising to pay and can play her for a fool. But its still prostitution. Millions are needed to get laid by girls who want some chance at your wealth, or you could just pay them and get the same tail, for the same reasons. Looks are fucking fantastic. Women fuck you differently when they think you are hot. Hot guys get laid because girls want to get laid with them. Rich guys are just as boring in bed …
/r/TheRedPill19/02/15 09:27 PM
2

I don't really buy that notion. I think men were just unaware of their "beta-ness" due to women's not having birth control nor no-fault divorces. The beta's just imagined themselves to be alphas. Grandpa probably was a virgin when he got married, had no game, and would have no idea what he was doing trying to pick up a girl in a club. I think men in the past were hardcore chivalry which is just as blue pill as feminism is. We aren't experiencing some rise in beta males, they were always beta. Wo…
/r/TheRedPill17/02/15 09:35 PM
1

I haven't seen the movie. I have read the book. I don't read erotica so I can't compare it to anything else.
/r/TheRedPill17/02/15 07:25 PM
9

50 shades wasn't bad (the books). Considering its just girl porn. Stop looking at it as a shit story that happens to have sex. It's porn, and for porn it has the most solid story I've ever seen.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/15 05:09 PM
1

I don't know man, writing a book that gives women those kinda tingles would probably require some serious mastery of text-game if you really think about it. You'd be a tinder god. :P
/r/TheRedPill13/02/15 04:52 PM
1

Its both. I Graduate high-school at 18, went to college at 18.
/r/TheRedPill12/02/15 08:19 PM
1

Haha, 50 shades of grey was originally a twilight fan-fiction, that she altered so she could make it entirely her own.
/r/TheRedPill12/02/15 08:18 PM
1

50 Shades of Grey was not a rape fantasy, there is nothing in any of the books that comes anywhere near rape or rape fantasy. It wasn't really even BDSM, just slight bondage, and mostly vanilla sex. Playful spanking is as far as it really goes. He never really dominates her, goes full beta after the first book.
/r/TheRedPill10/02/15 10:40 PM
1

Getting your bf% under 10% does wonders for your face.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/15 03:13 PM
2

Are you an idiot? 18 is leaving for college, it is exactly when you need to know this shit.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/15 01:28 PM
1

The reason there is so much anger is because we don't want to be alpha bros pumping iron spinning plates. We are nice guys who wanted to fall in love with a nice girl and live happily ever after, but for one reason or another we hit a low that knocked us out of our illusions and forced us to see the reality of women, the godawful truth that they always viewed nice guys as pussy's, and they see ignorant self absorbed childish aggressive braggarts as confident strong and brave heroes. This leads u…
/r/TheRedPill05/02/15 03:10 AM
-5

Please. You can be a MGTOW and still do all those things. Just don't do it for someone with a vagina. Theoretically they could, without breaking their basic ideology, but generally that is not the case, look at them in their youtube videos. Flat out frumplestiltskins. And why do you think MGTOWs care? They've checked out of women. They generally weren't getting any women to begin with, so they didn't check out, they just accepted they won't get women and are now trying to fill their time with us…
/r/TheRedPill02/02/15 06:25 PM
-1

What does this have to do with red pill? This isn't the place for ultra conservative patriarchy enthusiasts. Redpill is about how to attract women in a way that gets their enthusiastic consent. You are talking about men fighting over a wife starting a war and how we need to go back to 1800's voting system because of dangers of women and betas? "Derp, Helen of troy ruined troy bcuz womenz are dangerous beasts!" What the fuck are you on about?
/r/TheRedPill01/02/15 08:10 PM
1

I make a point of not using money to get girls. Money will give you a false image of your actual desirability. They don't really like you, just your money, and even if they only like me now for my body, my body is more me than my money. It's best to keep the focus on sex appeal.
/r/TheRedPill01/02/15 12:04 AM
12

Society didn't control female sexuality, nature did. (Birth control didn't exist) Women are not things to be distributed to the most socially "meritorious". Betas are not being culled, most women who marry beta bucks have kids with beta bucks. Rome is not about to fall. Lifting weights so you are physically attractive gives you options, options give you the ability to negotiate what you want in a relationship. If all you are is a boring, frumpy, beta with gainful employment, don't complain when …
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 07:38 AM
1

Redpill is making the best of shit. Cool I got muscles and good clothes and dance well and fuck hot sluts. Beats getting bitched into submission by nagging girlfriend/wife or enslaved to an all powerful ex wife. Seriously though, magic fairy tale land would be having a Belldandy love me as a Keichi. I wouldn't care if she was the only girl I ever got with, as long as she treated me the way she treated him, I'd be her beta white knight for life. But yeah, this is real life, and all belldandy will…
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 12:23 AM
6

THIS! FOR THE LOVE OF GOD THIS!!! Do not think of steroid users as some idiot jersey shore fools, guidos act like that, not steroid users, guido is the reason for the behavior. You are a hard gainer? Steroids. You want to lift 3 times a week and be jacked for it? Steroids. You want to eat normal food (within reason) not oats n' chickin every meal, and still be cut? Steroids. You want to be naturally more assertive and alpha? Steroids. You want to be a sexual tyrannosaurus rex? Steroids. Testoste…
/r/TheRedPill29/01/15 08:54 PM
3

Honestly, you can get quality product from underground labs that have been around for years. I don't know what the rules on posting names of labs are, so i won't do it. But yeah, easy to obtain online.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/15 08:43 PM
11

If I had one wish I'd wish for true love in a heartbeat, like actual magic unicorn girl who was totally turned on by acts of beta chivalry. Could you even imagine? If it meant having a Belldandy, I'd be Keiichi Morisato over Christian Grey any day.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/15 01:09 AM
30

Thank you! I am so tired of these right wing neckbeards acting like Rome will collapse unless a HB10/10 stays a church virgin until she marries his lardass and plays with his penis daily, because he isn't gonna give society his superior brain power as a programmer otherwise. STFU, go lift, get abbs, learn to dance, dress better, and go fuck girls.
/r/TheRedPill27/01/15 05:12 PM
38

Remember, this is probably true for most men, because most men do not look very appealing, do not have V-shaped torsos, and have no game. So women are choosing men based on the only thing men do have, which is money. Game plus sexy body (and if the gods love you a sexy face and a big dick) will get you in more women's pants than money, and you aren't as likely to lose your looks, dick, or game, and the courts can't order you to give them to her either. Money is for you, not her, lift brah!
/r/TheRedPill26/01/15 01:59 PM
1

Anabolics man, there should be more acceptance of that on this site.
/r/TheRedPill25/01/15 10:52 PM
2

Yeah bro, but don't forget anabolics. Lift hard, eat protein, and watch magic take place.
/r/TheRedPill25/01/15 10:49 PM
37

Well, you can do all kinds of things to get a thrill from taboo sex. Fuck someone else's wife. Fuck a flight attendant in the bathroom. Fuck an 18 year old still in high school. Ect. But honestly I don't think its the thrill that matters. It's the damage done to us from years of loneliness and rejection. It's never being loved by a girl. It's not being desired when the women your own age were attractive, dating younger women will be fun in bed, but you can never have the same kind of relationshi…
/r/TheRedPill25/01/15 01:27 AM
1

I can spend money on personal trainer, boxing coach, flashy clothes, designer steroids, then go to club and pick up girls without telling them a damn thing about my income, or I can spend it on prostitues. Either way I am getting girls i wouldn't get had i not had the money, but one is alpha, the other is pretend alpha.
/r/TheRedPill21/01/15 08:48 PM
1

Sure, but again, they are buying alpha. Look at arnold schwarzenegger, his swagger got him rich, not the other way around. He was INVITED into the elite due to natural alpha, whereas many wealthy men just end up beta as hell. The money and the ability to control their environment does them no good. But I agree, wealth can be used to enhance alpha, if you are alpha, so rich alpha will dominate poor alpha, but rich beta will get cheated on by pablo the pool boy with a six pack and the balls to app…
/r/TheRedPill21/01/15 08:44 PM
1

Sorry, I do not. But if you look into it you can find it fairly easily. /r/mensrights has plenty on it.
/r/TheRedPill21/01/15 08:39 PM
0

Um, no it isn't. Conservative suburban six figure dads are the definition of beta bucks, liberal i dont give a fuck burn out college guys are the definition of alpha fucks.
/r/TheRedPill21/01/15 08:12 PM
1

Being rich is not really alpha. It is buying alpha. It is very easy to mistake womens interest in you as genuine. If you are rich, you are still only as AF as you would be if she didn't know you were rich, anything you gain beyond that by her knowing you are rich is feigned interest in you. Even if you don't let women use you for your money, and just sort of use it as a false promise, you are just pretending to be BB to get laid and then bailing. Which is funny as shit but still not really alpha…
/r/TheRedPill21/01/15 08:04 PM
3

Parents have power over a toddlers actions, owners have power over a dogs actions, men do not have power over a womans actions. Also, hitting a toddler or a dog with a car is not analogous to fucking a consenting woman.
/r/TheRedPill21/01/15 07:02 PM
-3

Fuck yeah! I love the term legbeard, I made it up my self, because fugly girls don't shave their legs since nobody sees them. Did you hear that term from me? Please let this take off! LEGBEARDS!
/r/TheRedPill21/01/15 04:10 PM
1

Move to the downtown area of any major city that has a college nearby. You want to be in walking distance or at least a short drive from all the night clubs, bars, restaurants, then its easy to take girls home with you.
/r/TheRedPill21/01/15 03:19 AM
1

Join military as a lawyer. They will pay to send you to law school, then you owe them 4 years as a military lawyer, shit pay lawyer wise, but fuck it, you get experience, often some epic "young me" travel experiences/stories, and free law school, and after 4 years you get to leave military and go work making $ debt free. Otherwise take your GMAT and get an MBA or something.
/r/TheRedPill19/01/15 03:38 PM
-3

The political meaning of conservative has nothing to do with conservation. Stfu you dildo.
/r/TheRedPill19/01/15 01:36 PM
-5

These kinds of posts make me envision some pathetic beta church-going good boy who gets some oneitis for a "good church girl" but finds out shes with some bad boy and only sees him as a friend. So he thinks "If only we lived in a culture where girls couldn't choose bad boys, then I'd get her." You are a lazy pussy. You want her? Go lift, then tell her you want to fuck her, then do it.
/r/TheRedPill19/01/15 01:34 PM
4

Conservative cultures are cultures where betas get to pretend to be alphas by lack of competition. They are still loser betas, and their wives still see them that way, they just don't say anything out of cultural indoctrination. So all you really want is to have a woman pretend to think you are her man, rather than having modern society throw your beta traits in your face. Conservative men are beta as fuck.
/r/TheRedPill19/01/15 01:17 PM
10

Why does god allow children to suffer? That is hardly a unique question that only a woman would come up with....
/r/TheRedPill19/01/15 01:13 PM
20

Women wanting you when all that changed was financial success is the definition of beta bucks. You may have more confidence but it is not what they are after. Sexy body is literally alpha fucks. There is no such thing as a woman enjoying sex with a frumpy man because he is wealthier. She feigns it, don't think so? Go hire an escort, watch how well she fakes. Don't use money to get women, ever. Use looks and a dominant attitude but friendly attitude.
/r/TheRedPill18/01/15 10:33 PM
3

Red pill isn't about finding a woman who is obedient and subservient through religious indoctrination. Obviously slut culture is a problem for finding women worth anything other than a one night stand. But we are here to be sexually desirable to women. Even with a virgin girl I still want to know what I'm doing to get her enthusiastic consent rather than dutiful wife consent.
/r/TheRedPill18/01/15 09:34 PM
7

Not true. Children raised by single fathers do not come out any different than children raised by two parent homes, it is only single mothers who have these issues. (children raised by children)
/r/TheRedPill17/01/15 06:13 PM
5

This^ I agree, it is important to realize hyper-gamy is female lizard brain stuff, there is still the whole, you know, actual individual personality of the girls frontal cortex, a conscious decision maker with a name. I consider it the same as men, we want uber sex models, but we can fall in love with average looking women if she has a great personality. We want to fuck multiple women, but we can remain faithful if we want to. The issue i'm pointing ut is it is easier for us to stay loyal if she…
/r/TheRedPill17/01/15 03:58 AM
0

Um, no. 20% is more than enough genetic variation, European nobility was cousins n shit. Top 20% males fathering 100% of children would include all attractive men, including smart successful ones. Don't be fooled, this is not inbreeding, this is Eugenics! Behold a brave new world! lol
/r/TheRedPill17/01/15 03:51 AM
-2

Haha. I'm tired of this "fix society" nonsense. This is the red pill, not some pro traditionalist ultra conservative club. We are here to get laid, not save 'murrica from the doom of promiscuous tarts who should be at home n da kichin. We are here to increase our sex appeal to get women to prefer us over other men when they are looking for the best, not morally guilt trip women into monogamous virgin till marriage relationship. You want to fix society, give men birth control, equal custody right…
/r/TheRedPill17/01/15 03:45 AM
-1

Thank you, this one gets it.
/r/TheRedPill17/01/15 03:37 AM
1

I understand absolutely. Beta's are largely responsible for their condition, and their frustrated emasculation causes them to act like raging aggressive imbeciles in glaring attempts to be seen as aggressively manly to women when a "scoundrel" reveals himself. I am not advocating personally approaching them. Just the general spread of Red Pill knowledge.
/r/TheRedPill17/01/15 03:35 AM
1

Man this is just stupid. Women simply weren't free to pursue premarital sex with alphas due to a lack of birth control in the 1800's. That doesn't mean they were always attracted to men. The 20% is not a status based attraction, it is a physical appearance based attraction, which hasn't changed since then.
/r/TheRedPill16/01/15 09:00 PM
19

We aren't choosing the RedPill over love-ever-after, we are choosing the Redpill over miserable marriages with wives who have no respect, and/or a psychologically brutal mind break divorce. I'd end up like Jack Nicholson over Robin Williams any day.
/r/TheRedPill14/01/15 07:25 PM
1

But it doesn't matter. That ho will ditch you for a BB when push comes to shove, she'll take your sperm and get someone else to feed her kids and put out to get it done. So much better if he has status to protect them. She will fuck me for my looks and DNA and use some BB for his money. That isn't me losing, that's me winning! lol Money is not attraction, its money, she is pretending to like you for money. She will marry for money. She will fuck for money. The catch is, if she married and fucked…
/r/TheRedPill14/01/15 04:45 PM
1

Man don't go quoting Hitler you dildo.
/r/TheRedPill13/01/15 07:03 PM
2

A greek god will not lose to a fat ugly bastard, ever, regardless of game.
/r/TheRedPill13/01/15 04:00 PM
1

Everything you said about atheists was incorrect. Most atheists are not scientists, and there are atheists who are involved in all sorts of philosophical moral ideologies. Atheism was never intended to be an alternative religion to religion, it was a rejection of religious dogma, and the beginning of a search for rational social morality. The atheists simply are not in any way united on any moral philosophy, because their is no empire, just petty little groups here and there scattered throughout…
/r/TheRedPill13/01/15 12:12 AM
6

Having Muscles does wonders for your physical appeal to women, so long as your defined. I'm sick of these guys who flat out avoid building muscles and focus only on game. Game is minor to physical appearance, guys really master the hell out of game when a little bit goes a long way for a guy with muscles. Seriously, just do roids.
/r/TheRedPill11/01/15 04:51 AM
0

I can appreciate what you are saying, but remember sexual strategy is amoral. If we are objectifying them it really isn't important. We don't need moral rationalizations, we are simply learning to be sexually desirable. Basically we are grown ass men just figuring out what women did when they were 13. "How do I look and act attractively?" EDIT: spelling and grammar
/r/TheRedPill10/01/15 04:45 PM
18

Man just do boxing. Nobody knows how to fight. Even if MMA is better 1 on 1, a.)assume above, and b.) in a bar fight punching some fool is 100% more practical than grappling him in a submission hold on the bar floor. Krav Maga break fingers shit is fucking crazy and unnecessary. You are just some neurotic beta coward approaching a bar fight like its a life or death situation. You aren't going to biker gang bars, you are going to attractive sexy city people bars. Just learn how to fight like a ma…
/r/TheRedPill10/01/15 04:06 AM
5

Stop with this leftist nonsense. It isn't leftists, there are just as many right wing conservatives who brainlessly worship women and uphold chivalrous nonsense. Do not confuse red pill with traditionalism. Conservative stay at home women fuck their husbands over in divorce just as hard and just as often, and usually with less justification since many conservatives tend to be college educated higher earning responsible fathers. (beta bucks) I'm atheist, but there really is no correlation between…
/r/TheRedPill09/01/15 12:28 AM
5

Not really, men cheat all the time. Never forget that while we aren't hypergamous, we do want to fuck everything that's hot. We can be madly in love with out wives and still want to fuck every hot girl we see. Also our grandfathers were not more alpha at all. They were white knight nice guys worse than us, there simply was not the same level of promiscuity in women before birth control was invented, so Chad Thundercock was way to risky.
/r/TheRedPill06/01/15 02:04 AM
3

We need to print stuff like this into actual free paperback books, and just anonymously mass distribute to college freshmen males. That would take Time and $$$. But that shit would put us on the map.
/r/TheRedPill04/01/15 05:33 PM
0

I don't think we can get over it. We missed the party, we can still enjoy whats left of our lives, but the "best years of our lives" are over and we missed out. At our age every woman is more experienced in relationships and sex than we are, and women our own age are not the most attractive anymore. To be with women with less experience we have to go with younger women, but its not the same as being young ourselves. So we have to accept that while sex is still an option, the kind of intimacy tha…
/r/TheRedPill22/12/14 03:32 PM
2

It doesn't matter what your political opinions are, they have nothing to do with the red pill. Feminists and leftists are not solely responsible for blue pill lies, right wing conservative parents are equally adamant about enforcing the white knight ideal of boys needing to be respectful and of constant utility to girls and to suppress their immoral male sex drive. Conservatives with housewives are some of the most hen-pecked blue pill manginas out there. Also, if anything naturally alpha frater…
/r/TheRedPill14/12/14 11:27 PM
2

"....from time to time every man must need to return to dip his bucket in the well of collective masculinity to renew and reinvigorate his own." Phrasing bro....
/r/TheRedPill14/12/14 11:20 PM
-3

Mods need to seriously crack down on shitposting. Nobody comes here to read some Alex Jones grade doomed-future because women wont give men what they want. The preservation of Glorious Fatherland America is not the goal of the red pill. It is not to go back to the 50's where women stay with their ass-hat frumpy husbands who cant satisfy them emotionally nor sexually, merely because they rely on them for financial support, the goal is not to strong arm women into submission due to some material n…
/r/TheRedPill14/12/14 03:34 AM
-4

Society isn't going to collapse, where does this impending doom of civilization nonsense come from? Nothing is collapsing because betas can't get laid. People still go to work, still pay bills, still reproduce, just fewer marriages.
/r/TheRedPill13/12/14 08:54 PM
1

Hahaha, man we are clearly talking about first world problems on this subreddit! No shit there are way more serious problems than relationships and sex, I could have been born in a Best Korean Labor Camp, but we are talking about love and coming of age, and that sort of thing.
/r/TheRedPill08/12/14 02:24 PM
0

I don't think we can get over it. We missed the party, we can still enjoy whats left of our lives, but the "best years of our lives" are over and we missed out. At our age every woman is more experienced in relationships and sex than we are, and women our own age are not the most attractive anymore. To be with women with less experience we have to go with younger women, but its not the same as being young yourself. So we have to accept that while sex is still an option, the kind of intimacy that…
/r/TheRedPill07/12/14 11:27 PM
23

Man, this is some grade A nonsense. Birth Control created the sexual advantage, feminism didn't do shit, feminists aren't more or less likely to have sex with you than non feminists either. Feminists just want to spread rape hysteria and make policies like affirmative consent to make all sex defacto rape, and teach girls men are rape monsters. Spiritual advantage is also just more sex, not happier, and also not feminism, again, birth control was not invented by feminists. Intellectual advantage,…
/r/TheRedPill12/11/14 02:20 AM
13

This is not a disservice to women, this is giving women all the power and control. They own their ex husbands as slaves. Was slavery a disservice to the white masters? Were they not independent and empowered because they owned the profits from others work?
/r/MensRights26/08/13 10:30 PM
9

It's extremely unfair to the husband, and extremely beneficial to the wife.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 10:29 PM
4

Or we could just abolish alimony.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 10:28 PM
11

....then SHE better get off HER ass and get a damn job. FTFY, this problem is NOT gender neutral, there are no women in jail for not paying alimony or child support.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 10:27 PM
1

You must be the future of the MRM.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 06:40 PM
25

This is the feminist idea of the alpha male, a fool living in delusions basing his self worth in his ability to put other men down to please women. How pathetic, and yet exactly what we all knew about him all along.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 06:38 PM
4

Compared to what, the wests divorce system, where women can unilaterally take a man to the cleaners?
/r/MensRights25/03/13 04:00 AM
3

We should probably avoid saying false rape culture unless it is to immediately respond to claims of rape culture.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 05:50 PM
-1

My problem with this article is that it is only concerned with womens agency. That is at the bottom of the list of whats wrong with calling regret rape. What about the innocent man falsely accused? That is the victim, and she couldn't care less about him.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 05:36 PM
1

Haha what a fail.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 02:59 AM
3

"A corollary of Poe's law is the reverse phenomenon: sincere fundamentalist beliefs being mistaken for a parody of that belief.[2]"
/r/MensRights13/03/13 01:26 AM
-3

"That's not very feminist of you." Censorship is a hallmark of feminism.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 07:44 AM
-3

We fight against feminists, stop being a fool. Feminism is female chauvinism. Don't pretend their is a magical "true feminism" out there. Christ you fools are useless.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 07:28 AM
4

Feminist are so full of glaring lies, you literally have to enter that article wanting to believe female privilege isn't real to not notice how terrible her entire case is. She is using a system that is heavily against men, and then saying that men not putting up a fight in a system that is so rigged against them and costs so much to put up a fight in as an arguement that their lack of putting up a fight is due to them not really wanting their kids, that is coercion. They are submitting because …
/r/MensRights05/03/13 08:51 PM
2

I understand if some of us support Israel and some support Palestine, but lets save those battle until after this one is won. Who cares if Israel wins if the Israeli men have to be ruled over by feminist madness? Who cares if Palestinians win if Palestinian men have to be ruled over by feminist madness?
/r/MensRights04/03/13 07:51 PM
1

Ideally, you should already have some other recognition. People can write you off if your only claim to fame is to be an MRA, but if you are already someone who is successful, who then says you are pro MRA, then you draw people who are not already with us into realizing we are not what feminists say we are.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 07:43 PM
1

....when battling with monsters, take care not to become one yourself.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 07:11 PM
2

God isn't real.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 07:11 PM
2

The best idea is to be in shape, funny, popular, and openly pro mens rights. The worst idea is to be a fat, argumentative neckbeard basement dweller and openly pro mens rights.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 07:11 PM
-2

Women had more rights to their children and property in a divorce in the middle ages than men do today. so gtfr.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 10:52 PM
5

Why not help men first to get the ball rolling when you have limited resources. Why should women go first? Feminism = Female Chauvinist Pig
/r/MensRights02/03/13 10:51 PM
-2

Women are not treated worse than slaves, they are not raped, tortured, nor murdered for no reason other than being women. That is nothing but feminist nonsense. That has never been the case at any point in history in any society. All of that is Feminist historical revisionism. Stop spreading feminist lies.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 10:50 PM
3

Where men are forced to die in wars at 12? Men have it worse, the UN also decided to only distribute food to women and children in Haiti, i guess men don't need food because women can't read...
/r/MensRights02/03/13 10:48 PM
5

"Go to Pakistan, Mongolia, and the Congo for some perspective. The women there ABSOLUTELY need to be empowered." Yes you did.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 10:46 PM
3

You realize the men in those countries have it even worse? Gender gaps vanishing in America? Last I checked women are soaring while men are falling ever behind.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 10:44 PM
1

Except when they know they already have more rights, then its fairly ironic.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 10:43 PM
1

Those aren't really Chinese, and that is the original quote. Not sure who said it though.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 10:08 PM
7

Yes, schools are the main source of government propaganda.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 09:57 PM
3

Feminism 30 years ago was the same hatred, feminism has been full of hate since it started. Since they were putting white feathers of cowardice in teenage boys jackets for not volunteering to be slaughtered like animals for a war, while complaining about women's gender roles.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 07:49 PM
0

There was never a time where a woman was blamed for being raped because of how she was dressed. Ever. All of that is feminism making nonsense up.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 07:46 PM
1

Listen, for the millionth time there is no middle ground between feminism and equality. Feminists are against mens rights, full stop, anything they say to the contrary is nothing but words. Their actions are always hostile to mens rights. We are not pandering to feminists so they will let us fight for our rights, they aren't going to let you do anything but submit to their self interest.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 07:44 PM
5

White women feel they can shrug off white supremacy onto white male supremacy thus alleviating themselves of "white guilt" and joining in with the "victims". Destroying the black father by replacing him with government aid and teaching the black woman "she don't need no man" was a million times more successful in putting black people back in "their place" than fire hoses, dogs, and lynchings ever were. I imagine the elite figured why not try the same strategy with whites. So far, teaching the wh…
/r/MensRights26/02/13 03:13 AM
2

How did this get taken off the front page of reddit?
/r/MensRights25/02/13 09:54 PM
4

Women would celebrate this as a great accomplishment if it were the other way around. If men do something good, its because women are too oppressed to contribute, if women do something good, its because women are better and doing it, if men do something bad, its because men are bad, if women do something bad, its because they were victims.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 05:12 PM
6

Typical Feminist projection. Men are vastly more likely to care about women's issues then women are to care about mens.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 05:10 PM
2

We need to get more actual women's studies texts and use them do prove it is not just "Radical feminism" that HATES men, it is TEXTBOOK FEMINISM!
/r/MensRights22/02/13 05:14 PM
2

I think this isn't a MRM issue. Female birth control is exactly that, female birth control. It doesn't do anything for men. We are still at the mercy of a woman's decision to use it or not. Our desire is for male birth control. If there is any taxpayer money available for female birth control, then there is tax payer money available for researching and developing male birth control. I would demand any money available go entirely to creating a male birth control, and only then would I support any…
/r/MensRights21/02/13 08:22 PM
1

There is very little misogyny, you probably just want some kind of NAFALT nonsense. We are better off without your nonsense.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 08:14 PM
4

Because mothers don't generally love their sons as much as fathers generally love their daughters? I mean fathers will generally risk life and limb to protect adult daughters, mothers would generally not do this even for younger sons. Men are more empathetic towards women than women are towards men.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 08:07 PM
16

That isn't good news. I don't know what country you are in but any amount of alcohol does not constitute as date rape, it isn't illegal to have sex while intoxicated. Also, your University almost certainly was only referring to men. This is insane that feminists are actually getting people to view drunken college hookups as rape.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 07:50 PM
5

This is just traditionalist nonsense. I don't care how feminism harms women any more than I care how Nazism harmed Germans.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 08:26 PM
1

Stop calling it "Masculism". That term is absurd. We are the Mens Rights Movement. MRA's. That is what we have collectively chosen. We need to stick to it or we will just become a confused mess of factions.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 07:57 PM
1

Because Humanists and Egalitarians are often just feminists calling themselves that. They say they are skeptics, humanists, and egalitarians, and care nothing for men. So when you say I'm an MRA, there is no room for confusion. People know that you are for mens rights too.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 07:55 PM
0

Go as an actual geneticist.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 08:20 PM
2

A theory is a scientific conclusion that is supported by all observable evidence and contradicted by none. Feminists are the clowns who make up "theories" with their ideology, and then base their ideology on those theories in a circular argument of nonsense.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 08:18 PM
1

More like when a black man attends KKK meetings, the KKK will assume he is a bad guy, when a Jew attends a Nazi meetings, the Nazis will assume he is a bad guy, and when an MRA attends a feminist discussion, feminists will assume he is the bad guy.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 08:06 PM
0

fuck the pill. there is a gel that works just fine in human trials. We can still have that. GTFO feminist apologist
/r/MensRights18/01/13 07:54 PM
-1

I believe this is exactly what we should do more of. Your cons are fairly minor, these are strong posters. Thanks for posting them at least!
/r/MensRights18/01/13 05:16 PM
1

Fuck those shit rewards. I want rights. I don't want a return to traditionalism. No, that is over forever. Equality across the board, all the way to female conscription. That is the MRM.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 06:42 AM
-1

We are not trying to take down feminism, feminism is needed in some key areas, just they sometimes overstep their bounds much like I am sure sometimes MRM does as well. We are absolutely here to take down feminism. We are not complimentary to them. They are out for their own selfish privilege at the expense of our rights.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 06:39 AM
1

This article is not in any way representative of the motivations, beliefs, or attitudes of the mens rights movement. The person who wrote it spoke their own beliefs, is not associated with the MRM, and thus does not represent it. You conducted yourself like a fool. Spoke like a fool. And drew conclusions proving either a total ignorance of the MRM, or a total desire to lie. Though lieing to us about what we believe is hardly rational. So I concluded rationally you were some absolute clown making…
/r/MensRights16/01/13 04:11 AM
1

We are not coming on board with anyone. We have had our identity forced into us as evil sex monsters since our earliest teenage years. We have had this at the hands of feminists, reading out of their feminist texts. There is no patriarchy, there is just feminism. It is vile, psychotic, irrational, sexist and hateful towards men. Feminism has created to patriarchy as an imaginary male version of itself. It is a psychological projection onto men the goals feminism has itself.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 03:43 AM
0

Also, feminists surveys are always done dishonestly. I've read their surveys before, gone through them, page by page, and they are utter nonsense. The type of studies cigarette companies used to commission to say smoking doesn't cause cancer. My third point remains totally unassailed. One in five women in the military report being sexually assaulted, and one in fifteen men in the military report being sexually assaulted. False. "In addition, only one in five females and one in 15 males in the Un…
/r/MensRights16/01/13 03:38 AM
1

Feminism means female privilege and power and the destruction of mens human rights. That is what feminism means. That is what feminism does. You are only defending feminism. Helping it harm men and boys. You are responsible for praising feminism while it crushes people. Your willful ignorance is not an excuse.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 03:19 AM
0

And what is that supposed to prove? The study that said more women were raped or sexually assaulted then died in combat came up with its own numbers of sexual assault victims according to its own definitions of sexual assault, including "unwanted sexual remarks".
/r/MensRights16/01/13 03:15 AM
1

I don't think women were discriminated against for being women. They were given status and privilege throughout history. Women didn't want to work in the past when work was hard and dangerous. Women didn't want to vote until only a couple years before women were given the right to vote, and only after they were assured that they would not have to register for conscription.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 03:10 AM
1

Fuck women style rhetoric is hardly extremist. Also, they are as you said, fringe participants. Unlike feminism, where the "equity feminists" are the fringe participants, and the heroines are the psychopaths.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 02:53 AM
5

This is exactly feminism. The education system systematically discriminates against men, and the biggest problem women have with this is that there are fewer men for women to date. Just imagine if Universities were mostly male, and an article like this was written with the genders reversed.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 08:20 PM
2

OP made it pretty obvious that it was tacked on to point out his problem with it. It isn't a lie if its clear that the OP did not intend it to appear that it was part of the original sidebar and makes it clear it is merely an inference OP is drawing. OP's point is valid and commendable. So I will upvote.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 08:04 PM
1

That is why everyone must understand before they say things like "Why can't the MRM work with feminism?" Or "Feminism and the MRM want the same thing." Or "Why can't I be a feminist and an MRA?", that the reason the MRM exists is because feminism is a SHAM. It is a lie. They want power at the expense of mens most basic rights. They care nothing for equality or egalitarianism, they fight against equality with men to expand their female privilege. If you haven't figured this out yet then you don't…
/r/MensRights14/01/13 07:59 PM
2

Feminism is what its followers make it. And there is nothing about its followers, its actions, or its leadership that suggest it is for equality. The only promotion of equality from feminism is to claim that is what they want as a form of PR to maintain a good image over their actions.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 09:57 PM
1

They are desperate to retain control of their male followers. Most people don't pay attention to anything political. I imagine many MRA's are coming from the recruitment pool of politically conscious individuals, especially concerning gender. Thus we are taking from a pool that was once exclusively owned by feminists. They are trying to smear MRA's and pretend that real feminism is all about mens rights! Just like there "men's studies" classes. That are really just feminist propaganda aimed at m…
/r/MensRights14/12/12 08:32 PM
1

You understand neither side in the slightest if you think there is anything they need to talk about. Feminists want to force men to serve women's interest, and MRA's are fighting back. Oh wait, you probably actually believe feminists also just want equality. In which case you understand neither side in the slightest.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 08:28 PM
1

Let's not.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 08:23 PM
1

There is no "new wave" feminist. Feminism is feminism, they have mass recruitment drives. Each wave is just feminism reorganizing its propaganda to reach the next generation. Its the same man hating psychotics at the top now that were there in the 70's.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 08:03 PM
1

Wrong. MRA's don't even have extremists. Anti-Feminist =/= MRA. Feminists idolize their extremists and any woman who harms men. Lorena Bobbit, Andrea Dworkin, Valerie Solanas, ect.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 08:00 PM
1

Sorry feminist. It's you who take all of men's rights away from them. And if feminism wasn't so hostile to men's rights, MRA's wouldn't even exist. We are here because we know feminists hate men. We know you are nothing but liars. We know you accuse us of hating women the way you hate men. But of course, we don't hate women, we hate feminists. Because we have a right as human beings to hate people who want us to be treated as less than human. Sorry feminists, but the days of men who are victimiz…
/r/MensRights14/12/12 07:50 PM
2

That is utterly false. SRS is strongly feminist, and is in no way in it for lulz. They are trying to mimic that to create an air of superiority, but they are all butthurt feminist fanatics.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 12:13 AM
5

Just say you were divorced. Who cares?
/r/MensRights21/09/12 02:26 AM
3

How much funding does "anonymous" have. Yet they get their will done. The issue is we need more ACTIVISTS. Men and women who will actually do more than blow off steam on this site. I must admit I am 100% guilty of this. I have done literally nothing for the MRM but post. I would like to get a Youtube Channel set up. But I really don't have the funds for anything financial, and I have no I337 Hackzors skills. But I can make a good well thought out speech when I write it down ahead of time, so I t…
/r/MensRights21/09/12 12:51 AM
1

Yes, traditionalism is anathema to mens rights. Women upgraded to feminism, which is just a new way to extort and enslave men to transfer the goods of mens work to women who do not work. It's just chivalry 2.0. The feminist narrative of history oppressing women is a total load of lies. Men were oppressed under traditionalism to serve womens interests. That was the point of chivalry. Men give women concrete services, and women give men a pat on the head and a "good boy". So the man struts off thi…
/r/MensRights21/09/12 12:32 AM
6

There is no rape epidemic in the military, feminists are just making more shit up to hate men. Lets declare mutually intoxicated sex to be rape against the man, and then lets define all women who have intoxicated sex with a man as rapists, and all men who have intoxicated sex with a woman as rape victims, and then lets say there is a rape culture against men. Because that is how idiotic we would have to be to match the idiocy of feminism.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 12:25 AM
3

"Currently reproductive rights are subject to gender segregation due to biology, not government or society. Research is going on in multiple countries at this very moment to develop a safe "pill for men", but most of the potential drugs tested haven't worked out for one reason or another. Biology isn't simple, and finding a way to safely disable sperm production in a way that can be undone easily is hard." Absolutely and undeniably wrong. Men are not given a say in whether they want to be a fath…
/r/MensRights21/09/12 12:22 AM
11

Well let me tell you what is wrong with all of what you said. Womens reproductive rights are VASTLY greater than mens. In many jurisdictions men must pay child support for ANY child their wife has even if they prove it isn't theirs, also men can be and are forced to pay child support for children that aren't theirs when they aren't married simply because they "acted as a male role model". So even if abortion were all out illegal, women would still have vastly more reproductive rights than men, n…
/r/MensRights21/09/12 12:13 AM
2

Its called Men Going Their Own Way, or MGTOW. But it is an apt metaphore as feminism is exactly like the cretins in Atlas Shrugged trying to use laws to leach off of men and also creating idiotically broad rape definitions that they WANT men to break to justify ENSLAVING them.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 11:57 PM
9

Even if they did anything to work against gender inequality towards men, doing it under the banner of feminism makes them more of a threat than a help. They help all the man hating 99% of organized federally funded feminism more by cleaning up the word feminism so they can continue to push forward against mens rights under the guise of fighting for equality as feminists, than anything they do for mens rights. If you call yourself a feminist, stay out of our movement, you are a problem. Go to fem…
/r/MensRights20/09/12 11:54 PM
12

"As a feminist, I don't think I know any feminists who would disagree with what Helen Smith says." "What precludes Helen Smith's ideas from being feminist ideology in a modern context? It says right atop the page that she's a modern feminist." THIS right here. DO YOU SEE THIS? This is EXACTLY why when you say you support equality while also flying the banner of feminism, you are supporting all the man hating feminists. Providing cover for them. Proclaiming that you care about mens rights and tha…
/r/MensRights20/09/12 11:48 PM
11

I think this has always been what feminism has been about. I don't believe women were ever worse off than men. Feminism was just a new way to better steal from men, chivalry simply was outmoded and replaced with a new system for male subservience to women. It is not enough to reject modern feminism, you must also realize that the feminist historical narrative must be rejected as well.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 11:40 PM
2

How is she a modern feminist. She is clearly not supporting feminism, except where she calls her self one for believing in equality. That of course is the worst thing any MRA can do. Feminism is clearly NOT about equality, and you are just providing cover for feminism when you give legitimacy to the idea that it is.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 11:37 PM
8

The SPLC went to radfem hub to ask for support knowing full well that site was viciously and even murderously hateful towards men. It also informed them they could earmark their donations to fight MRA's. And yes, while they never officially declared the MRM to be a hate group, they portrayed it as such.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 01:17 AM
1

Because they started using feminist ideological arguments about logic being patriarchal and feeling being a woman's way of knowing ect. i mean, when you see a crowd of people rioting in the middle east over Muhammad drawings, its pretty safe to say they are muslims.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 01:15 AM
2

This is just some fetish kink website.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 01:06 AM
8

Take back the night is a campaign of rape hysteria against men. this is just bs propaganda to combat the image of being rape hysteria man hate.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 01:04 AM
2

Notice how all the up votes are approximately 12,600. Sure, that is just coincidence, that 12,600 people up voted all the anti MRA definitions. Not at all suspicious. Feminists are so desperately pathetic when it comes to any attempt to fabricate their credibility.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 07:23 PM
4

Because feminism is not about equality, it is about enslaving men to women's interests. It may sound cliche, but Feminism really is the belief that a mans rights end where a woman's interests begin. Feminism really is a hate group, there is no getting around that.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 05:51 AM
3

"I'm just passing thru [sic] MensRights to see what it's about; it's clear yall [sic] choose to believe whatever suits your needs, no matter how idiotic." By using this single post to judge the Men's Rights movement you are guilty of exactly what this poster is guilty of. You have chosen this post to represent the Men's Rights movement because it suits your needs to dismiss the mountain of logic the Men's Rights movement has heaped upon feminism. This article has nothing to do with why we aren't…
/r/MensRights07/09/12 12:49 AM
1

.... wut?
/r/MensRights06/09/12 03:41 AM
1

not really concerned with he payee, they are the level of retarded seven year old, but it reduces the payer to a slave. Child support should be covered equally by both parents, and child custody should be 50/50.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 03:40 AM
2

Feminism is the reason his ex wife is able to do this. Your support for feminism makes you the enabling party.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 03:32 AM
2

prenup = almost useless, courts can and do and will throw them out. Men will only waste their money, hiding money will hurt you. Love doesn't last. New checklist: Don't get married Enough cash because your not married Be in love with your life
/r/MensRights06/09/12 03:29 AM
-10

Slavery is worthy of death. These women and the courts are ENSLAVING innocent men.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 03:25 AM
8

"....because we as men should hold ourselves to a higher standard and have conviction in our morals and ethics." That is a pile of nonsense. Men should NOT be held to any higher standard than women. Period.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 03:24 AM
0

Sorry but that is simply not correct. Nurture is weak compared to nature. It is irrelevant whether a behavior is a result of one gene or a combination, if you have that combination of genes to predispose you to a certain behavior then you are vastly more likely to exhibit that behavior than someone without that predisposition. Rapists are not raised, obviously nobody is raised to rape, and by nobody I mean it would be absurdly rare lol. People who are predisposed to the eroticism of power and co…
/r/MensRights05/09/12 07:24 PM
1

I would say its fairly productive as it can be better understood.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 07:19 PM
2

It means it includes Attempted forced penetration, along with actual forced penetration. Pretty clear I'd say.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 01:01 AM
1

Feminists are the ones assuming mens natural instinct is rape when they post "men can stop rape" and "rape culture" and "pedo-hysteria". Also, nobody blames a woman for getting raped for dressing a certain way. Well, at least not men. Women will do that just because they don't like other women dressing for more attention than they themselves are comfortable with dressing. Thus they say things like you will get raped for dressing like that to scare them into conformity. But the fact is nobody bla…
/r/MensRights05/09/12 12:55 AM
-8

Pretty sure they are born. Nobody creates rapists. Rapists aren't sex starved neckbeards. They are people with the need for rape to enjoy sex. Its probably as biologically genetic as pedophilia or homosexuality are.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 12:50 AM
1

lol awesome.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 01:51 AM
3

Make that 45,084!
/r/MensRights01/09/12 01:51 AM
15

Lets keep it up /r/mensrights, don't think for a moment that we will not be a real force in the future that EVERYONE will know about. EVERY change started out isolated and alone, but that didn't stop the cultural revolutionaries of the past! And they didn't even have the internet! We will grow. We will organize. We will be headline news. And one day, we will win. Imagine what a world with absolute legal gender equality would be like. Imagine what a world where there is NO fear of losing your kid…
/r/MensRights01/09/12 01:49 AM
4

I heard two women at work today saying one got "screwed" on alimony. She was married 6 months, and had been collecting alimony for two years. And that is apparently women's definition of getting screwed on alimony. Lets make women pay alimony, then they will know the true meaning of screwed.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 01:43 AM
1

Something like this list needs to be made into posters, with sticky backs, to be placed on any and all anti male posters on college campuses.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 01:36 AM
26

Firstly, it is important to note that in a rape trial Feminists assume the guilt of the accused, soley on the word of the accuser. Now, if the court rules that the accused is not guilty of rape because of exculpatory evidence, that demonstrates that the defendant DID NOT rape the accuser, feminists will deliberately misconstrue this to mean that the exculpatory evidence was used to justify the rape. Consider, the court says the man has not been proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt because; sh…
/r/MensRights29/08/12 12:59 AM
7

The defense is used when it is he said she said. He claims it was consensual, she claims it was rape. If she has a history of going out drinking and having sex with random men, and dressing to appeal to men looking for sex, his argument of a consensual one night stand is more likely, while if she has no history of one night stands and was dressed "normally?" then it is harder for him to prove it was consensual. In other words, what is nothing but flimsy exculpatory evidence in a he-said/she-said…
/r/MensRights29/08/12 12:47 AM
8

Viagra is not the male equivalent of birth control. It is a heart medication, and it treats erectile disfunction solely because erectile disfunction is a symptom of heart disease. Often it is the canary in the coal mine for a heart attack. Oh, you have a penis? Well I'm sorry, while you could have still paid for birth control as a woman, now that you have a penis, there is no birth control for you. Women are always helped before a man is helped by police. Since when are feminists voices not hear…
/r/MensRights29/08/12 12:27 AM
2

Should women who have sex with drunk men who wouldn't have had sex with them sober, e.g. "fatties" be legally considered rapists? If a man cheats on his wife while drunk when he would not have sober, does that mean he was raped? Does this mean every woman has a license to cheat on her husband as long as she gets drunk first, because that means it was no longer her fault? Drunk sex is not rape. No matter what the law says, anyone convicted of rape for drunk sex is a victim of an unjust legal syst…
/r/MensRights29/08/12 12:15 AM
25

We should be pro-choice because it is not anyone's right to take someone else's choice away. We should not be pro-choice because of the threat of false rape allegations. False allegations for any reason should result in imprisonment. We should also be pro legal paternal surrender.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 12:08 AM
1

Please do show yourself out. You are trying to prevent us from exposing feminism for the hate group that it is. We will not quit exposing them. If they frighten you, leave. To those still here all ideas appear radical at first, however it is the persistent exposure of our ideals that will make us become a mainstream view.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 07:03 PM
2

This is to illustrate how small minded pro-circumcision arguments are.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 04:30 AM
2

The point is that circumcision is UN-justified. Cutting off breasts to prevent breast cancer is suggested to illustrate the stupidity of cutting off foreskin to prevent aids. We don't need you to tell us how stupid it is, we are trying to tell you.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 04:28 AM
2

This guy thinks he gets laid, so he is accomplishing something. He doesn't even understand the purpose of the MRM. We are not here because we can't get laid. PUA's are mostly people struggling to get laid. If we were struggling with that, then we'd be PUA's. We are not here because of sex, we are here because of discrimination against us. Getting laid has nothing to do with it. He simply assumes his own issues with women are why we exist. We are gaining a following, that is all we can do for now…
/r/MensRights28/08/12 01:23 AM
78

"A man isn’t going to have everything about him filtered through the prism of his gender first. A man, for example, who gets a job isn’t going to face with suggestions that his attractiveness or that his willingness to perform sexual favors was a factor in his being hired" He will have everything about him filtered through the prism of his gender first, if he wants to be anywhere near children. "nor will he be shrugged off as a “quota hire”." Because he won't be hired to meet a quota, while wome…
/r/MensRights28/08/12 12:51 AM
1

Perfect argument.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 07:24 PM
23

Heart surgery is life threatening, it can't be decided when the infant is an adult. Any "benefits" of circumcision can wait until adulthood and the individual can decide for themselves. Circumcision isn't about health issues, those are crackpot arguments made by people who just want to maintain circumcision of boys. Circumcision is about reducing sensitivity in the male sex organs, that is why it was started. Do some research. Late 1800's and early 1900's had a fanatical religious problem with M…
/r/MensRights27/08/12 07:21 PM
4

For the same reason a female is allowed to choose not to be responsible for a pregnancy from not using the pill/ a condom and has an abortion, drops baby off in safe haven, or puts it up for adoption, the male should also be allowed to chose not to be a father. It's really not that hard to understand.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 05:37 PM
5

Pretty sure I don't want to go back to the 50's. Considering how easy housework is today it would just be the woman living life and the man slaving at work. No thanks. She can support herself.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 12:17 AM
2

Tell them to stop acting like feminists?
/r/MensRights21/08/12 12:22 AM
2

Then lets only draft women, and tell them it is less important as it only harms females and there'd be far more important things to worry about than social norms and isms. See what feminists think of that. Honestly we shouldn't life a finger for any womans rights anywhere in the world until women do something to grant men their rights.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 02:57 PM
2

No, your emotions and opinions are not just as valid if they are influenced by a disordered mental state. That is why there are things called logic, and stoicism. Because emotions already undermine reason, and a bipolar disorder compounds this.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 12:21 AM
10

"GWW being harrassed by atheists," GWW being harassed by feminists. FTFY
/r/MensRights16/08/12 12:18 AM
7

It is a fact that the official reason Assange is wanted in Sweden is for absurd sex crimes that only a feminist would consider sex crimes. It is not an opinion, that is the official reason why he is wanted by Sweden, and that is why Britain wants to extradite him. Unofficially, it is obvious this is just a ploy to get him to Sweden, so the US can drag him back to its gulags for his journalism. It is obvious that this much of an ordeal is not due to some ridiculous sex crimes, and that the allega…
/r/MensRights15/08/12 07:31 PM
0

Also, I have no idea where to go in that link, it's just a list of students and studies, might want to give more info.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 08:40 PM
1

I think this place would be perfect for samples, because it is made up mostly of men who are part of the young, politically moderate, secular generation, not someone whose going to blather on about their religious views, or what they think their girlfriend wants them to say, ect.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 08:38 PM
2

I pulled this off of the epic topic Men's Rights, it is a site promoted on it as life4men. Sorry but this shit is idiotic. "Considering that the root of the problem is Lack of Moral Values, the Enemy are the forces in society that oppose the Learning, Understanding and Adopting of Moral Values. Individuals and Organizations that side with and support the forces that oppose Moral Values are in effect on the side of the Enemy. Here are some examples for your consideration: Feminism / Feminists The…
/r/MensRights14/08/12 12:26 AM
3

For epic justice!
/r/MensRights14/08/12 12:03 AM
2

Rape is the boogeyman, not false rape allegations. Rape is punished severely, false allegations are rarely punished, and only very lightly punished when they are. Thus, the sexism is against men. Saying racism and sexism cannot happen as long as they are the majority/privileged group is idiotic. Blacks were the majority in South Africa, so majority has nothing to do with it. Jews were socioeconomically better off before the Third Reich, so being "privileged" has nothing to do with it. ANY time A…
/r/MensRights13/08/12 11:49 PM
-5

Not to mention if feminists will define sex that they later regret as rape, how far is the definition of "sexual assault" being stretched?
/r/MensRights11/08/12 02:04 AM
-8

"....students who agreed that false rape accusations, while rarer than actual rape by a long shot, are very serious and work against actual victims of rape." That is a complete pile of crap and you should have said something. Firstly false rape allegations are fucking out of hand, as many as 40% of rape allegations are demonstrably false, not counting the false rape allegations that simply don't result in a conviction but were never proven false, and even worse the false rape allegations that do…
/r/MensRights11/08/12 02:02 AM
11

There should be more MRAs. FTFY
/r/MensRights10/08/12 04:07 PM
16

CRACKED is extremely anti male. It poses as a male site, but it is run by feminist minded fools. Lets see CRACKED do an article like that on Jezebel, or any feminist site, claiming angry women get together with one sided stories about evil men and forming man hating groups. It won't happen, and it certainly wont blame all of female internet sites.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 04:02 PM
0

Its called studies and statistics, not literature, english department feminists use the word literature as if it applies to anything written. Studies and Statistics are done, literature is just writing on things.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 01:01 AM
7

Get a Lawyer, sue the police, and the mother.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 12:55 AM
1

You don't need feminism to support rape victims, or any of womens rights, society does that regardless of their stance on feminism, but only the men's rights community stands up for men's rights on anything.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 05:14 AM
1

HAHA, yeah, the mens rights movement should support the enemies of mens rights. GTFR TROLL HARDER
/r/MensRights26/07/12 10:05 AM
-2

Um, where what you want? but honestly getting made fun of for wearing dresses isn't at the top of our priorities. Rights to our children, equal education, innocent until proven guilty, equal rape definition, equal punishment, selective service, circumcision, I mean, a whole lot of things come ahead of dressing like a girl for fun.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 09:47 AM
-7

Nobody said they didn't deserve to survive. The point was that being a woman does not mean you are worthy of a mans life being sacrificed to save your own. So hopefully, these women have something other to offer humanity than just being a woman to make the sacrifice made by their boyfriends worth it.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 03:10 AM
-2

No, they were not worth it, to be worth the sacrifice, they have to be more valuable than the sacrifice. Only if you believe that the women saved were more valuable than the men who sacrificed themselves to save them can you say that they were worthy of the sacrifice. Considering the women did not put themselves in front of their boyfriends to save them, I would say they were more concerned about their own safety than his. The boyfriends were willing to put themselves in front and thus were more…
/r/MensRights26/07/12 03:08 AM
2

We cant work for equality, because nobody thinks of men when they think of equality. All who work for "equality" are only focused on women. That is why a Mens Rights Movement is necessary. I completely understand that this post looks weird and even shocking. But that is necessary. People need to notice it, they need to stop and think. That is how a new idea is born, it only seems strange because its new. Its because the idea of women as bigot and men as targets is ignored that the mens rights mo…
/r/MensRights17/07/12 06:06 PM
0

Man, you just failed....
/r/MensRights17/07/12 06:02 PM
1

So he was "asking for it"?
/r/MensRights17/07/12 06:01 PM
5

The only person who should have a say is the person its being done too. Not society, not women, not men, not the mother, not the father. Just the individual, when they are old enough to make an informed decision. Also: Women judge men for anything and everything, even made up things.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 05:05 PM
5

It is true. Sex isn't some act men do to women. It is something a man and woman both do with each other. Neither has more sexual agency. They are both drunk, they both had sex, they are both innocent of anything. Feminist white knights are just blaming the man because they can.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 04:52 PM
9

So if a male tattoo artist and a female tattoo artist both get drunk and give each other a tattoo, we should blame it on the male tattoo artist?
/r/MensRights17/07/12 04:50 PM
6

You are missing the point. That it is only women who are seen as rape victims for being drunk, and not men. So women can get as wild as they want, while men are expected to be careful. That is sexism against men, and it is wrong. Lets throw some women in prison for having sex with men when both were drunk. Lets tell the women that the men couldn't consent because they were drunk, and when the women say they were also drunk, lets tell them that isn't an excuse to rape. Lets see how women react to…
/r/MensRights17/07/12 04:47 PM
4

So why is it considered having an act done to you when you are a woman, but its considered committing an act when you are a man? Because fuck men right? Ass.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 04:44 PM
21

Murder is still murder, the act was the same. But this is saying it was specifically rape BECAUSE she was drunk. So if a drunk man and a drunk woman consent to sex, you say the woman is raped because she was too drunk to consent, and the man was a rapist because a drunk rapist is still a rapist... Thats a double standard, its sexist, its misandric, its a feminist pile of crap.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 04:42 PM
1

It is not legally considered rape when it happens to a man, only when it happens to a woman will anyone try and say it was rape. Rape is defined as penetration without consent, not sex without consent. So it is only men who would be punished for this. Go be a feminist fool somewhere else.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 04:39 PM
1

That seminar sounds fucking moronic. Your decisions are your responsibility. And drunk and passed out are not the same think. Going home with a girl from a bar or party and having drunken sex is not rape. If it is rape if your drunk, why aren't women considered rapists, why isn't every fat bitch who gets laid with a drunk guy taken to prison? Because this is about feminist using rape hysteria to spread hatred of men, not stopping rape.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 04:36 PM
2

It is not the law that if a woman is drunk she cannot give consent. Feminists are trying to make that the common belief. It is not the law, if she tries to say it was rape despite her consent because she was "too drunk", that is a point that works in the defendants favor. There is no legal definition of "too drunk" so it would be almost impossible for a man to be convicted.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 04:33 PM
2

I think that is women's reason, but we shouldn't see women as the primary victims of false rape allegations against men, we should see the falsely accused as the primary victims, whatever happens to women because women make false allegations is completely secondary. Women just want center stage as victims no matter what.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 04:28 PM
1

Stop saying someone, you know its only women. And that is the problem. Nobody is sending a woman to prison as a convicted rapist for having sex with a drunk man.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 04:24 PM
3

Only if the victim is female, don't forget that.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 04:23 PM
-1

WRONG: Rape is penetration without consent, that means only men are considered rapist if the woman is drunk, but women are not rapists if the man is drunk. Therefor this is a sexist policy and we should bring attention to it so the law is changed to be fair.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 04:22 PM
7

This is on the front page of reddit, and it is a great post. This is what we fucking stand for! If you are not for ending this men are evil mentality, or consciousness raising for the idea that women are just as likely to lie about rape as be raped, then you don't belong here.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 04:20 PM
2

No, if a woman drinks too much and then consents to sex, she still consented. Just like if a man drinks too much, and wakes up with a fatty, that doesn't mean he was raped.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 04:18 PM
4

I have a strict, don't have sex with any girls who are feminist policy. It eliminates the possibility of making any feminist happy ever.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 04:16 PM
1

The internet has plenty of atheists who are anti feminism and all its nonsense. Reddits atheist page is despised as a giant circle jerk full of 15 year old tards. Atheists don't really take that site seriously. There is the science minded atheism, and then their is the Marxist (feminism, white guilt, Don't insult islam only christianity, ect.) brand of atheism. Scientific Atheism and Marxist Atheism are realizing they hate each other. Maybe more than they hate religion?
/r/MensRights16/07/12 07:45 PM
1

If you've been an MRA for "likely a decade longer than" me, and you are still a derailing troll, please go join the feminist movement, and drive a wedge between christian and atheist feminists, someone like you does more to harm the groups they join than help. You'd help our cause more if you apposed it.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 07:38 PM
0

Obvious FNG...
/r/MensRights16/07/12 06:22 PM
3

Men score higher on IQ tests. The worlds IQ has been dropping due to the fact that the less intelligent have more offspring than the more intelligent. Also men have a higher standard deviation on the IQ scale, meaning the farther up or down you go the higher the ratio of men to women. This article was simply made up to make women nod.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 06:02 PM
-3

Yes, they "love" men, thats why they depict them as psychotic acid throwers, because they love them so much. I could show victims of crimes committed by black people, will I justify racism that way, no. And lets not forget how awesome/funny and most of all "fabulous" WOMEN, as in AN ENTIRE AUDIENCE AND PROBABLY MOST VIEWERS think cutting a mans penis off for wanting a divorce is.
/r/MensRights14/07/12 09:52 PM
2

I could rip everything you said a new asshole, but this is the MRM community, and I'm not feeding a derailing troll.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 09:56 PM
1

Hes not a brilliant biologist, hes just a biology professor who has a popular blog.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 04:49 PM
3

White knight labeling PZMyers is hardly quick. That man is a card carrying feminist loon.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 04:30 PM
3

He asked her if she wanted to go back to his room for a cup of coffee after they hung out at the bar till like 3am in the morning talking. She turned him down, he went to his room alone. Then she acted like she was almost raped.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 04:27 PM
0

The science minded atheists reject that there can even be such a thing as god, as the idea itself invokes magical super-naturalism.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 04:23 PM
0

Open minded to new ideas.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 04:22 PM
0

Its the truth, they can't hack the math themselves.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 04:22 PM
1

They ban those who don't agree with them. So they are a closed minded group of ideologically inbred tards circle jerking each other. thunderf00t didn't circle jerk and they kicked him out.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 04:21 PM
1

Science deals in absolutes. We just don't always know what they are. Math of course is absolute, but when the math behind something is too complex its hard for us to narrow it down. But ultimately it is the search for the absolute truth of the universe, what exactly it is.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 04:20 PM
1

Atheists reject the idea that religion provides any objective morality. But the science minded atheists, not the liberal ideologue atheists, (I know these are both very broad groups) tend to be very much in favor of objectivity. Science is the search for truth. The underlying reality of the world we can barely experience with our 5 senses.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 04:17 PM
29

For those who don't know, Thunderf00t is a prominent atheist youtuber, and feminism has been moist for control of the atheist community, trying to parlay their belief that Christianity is a misogynistic evil, with atheism's belief that ALL religions are simply not true. Feminism has long coveted a controlling hand in the science departments of universities, but due to their general lack of capacity for math and science in their ranks, have been unable to spread into these fields. Through the ath…
/r/MensRights05/07/12 07:25 PM
10

For those who don't know, Thunderf00t is a prominent atheist youtuber, and feminism has been moist for control of the atheist community, trying to parlay their belief that Christianity is a misogynistic evil, with atheism's belief that ALL religions are simply not true. Feminism has long coveted a controlling hand in the science departments of universities, but due to their general lack of capacity for math and science in their ranks, have been unable to spread into these fields. Through the ath…
/r/MensRights05/07/12 07:25 PM
6

Thunderf00t is an atheist youtuber, and a prominent member of the online atheist community.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 07:07 PM
3

yeah, the first video lol
/r/MensRights05/07/12 06:37 PM
16

"Free Thought Blogs" banned thunderf00t for telling feminists to get a grip on reality.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 06:35 PM
1

Fucking awesome.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 06:05 PM
5

PROGRESS!!!!! These small steps are showing that we ARE having an impact even without a major central organization, peoples attitudes are changing! Men's Rights FTW!
/r/MensRights01/06/12 11:30 PM
-1

"He denied two charges of rape/ he committed at least two rapes." That is all sorts of foul. Blatantly trying to assume he committed at least two rapes because he denied two charges of rape.
/r/MensRights30/05/12 07:25 AM
17

These are not stereotypes about boys that anybody cares about. Seriously, feminisms gender bending doesn't help boys. The stereotypes about boys that are bad are the ones about them being violent, stupid, rapists, oppressors, privileged, sex crazed, ect. Feminists can't represent mens rights because they are not men and don't have any idea what men are actually harmed by. Nobody is joining the mens rights movement because they didn't get an easy bake oven when they were a boy.
/r/MensRights30/05/12 07:22 AM
13

The good men project is exactly why MRA's can't be allies with feminists.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 10:27 PM
15

Its another attempt to stop the mens rights movement, if they can create a PC mensrights movement, men who are afraid of feminists can join that instead, and never get anything we actually want. Oh, lets fight for mens righs to cry, and boys rights to play with barbies, and mens rights to wear dresses! Instead of REAL mens rights issues, not feminist gender bending being portrayed as mens rights.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 10:26 PM
14

Women are terrorists, they are suicide bombers, and they are also very often involved in support roles like transporting ammunition and explosives under their burqas. They also raise their sons to be muslim militants. Do not believe that their are not radical Islamist women, or that they are all crying out to the big American men to save them from their evil misogynist men. There is no shortage of female radical Muslims. It isn't common sense, its common misconception.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 10:19 PM
1

Easy solution? Maybe you are missing your testicles?
/r/MensRights29/05/12 10:09 PM
-1

"Why would one continue a relationship with someone who has such a different long-term plan for life?" Not all relationships are based on a desire to be together forever, ie. highschool and college students, also, women think they can change the man, so go along and even pretend to agree with him. "Furthermore, if kids are not wanted, why does this person simply get a vasectomy and remove all chances?" Because children may be wanted at a future date. College students don't want kids, but still h…
/r/MensRights29/05/12 10:08 PM
1

"These days an unexpected pregnancy is much worse for a man (she can take the morning after pill or get an abortion, all he can do is... nothing, just hope that she doesn't take his money for the next 18 years), so shouldn't it be the other way around?" It would be, but evolution is pretty damn slow. Biologically, and thus, evolutionary psychologically, we aren't that different from our stone age ancestors.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 10:00 PM
1

Its only the naturalistic fallacy to say it is right because it is natural. There is a certain truth the idea that a woman evolved to be more sexually selective for quality reproduction as quantity was not an option, children died in childhood, and she could only have so many, and after too many pregnancies her sexual value falls. The man's reproductive quantity is only limited by his ability to get laid, he never had to choose quality over quantity because he could always have both, and the "be…
/r/MensRights29/05/12 09:49 PM
0

We cannot argue for mens rights from within the zeitgeist of feminism. That is utter nonsense. As GirlWritesWhat said in her recent video, it is like a geologist arguing with a young earth creationist without saying anything that would go against their religion. We cannot tiptoe around feminist propaganda, they WILL attack us as sexists no matter what we do. They are utterly silent about the sexism of Sharon Osborn, or the sexism of women getting a slap on the wrist for raping underage boys, or …
/r/MensRights29/05/12 09:40 PM
4

Its not the children they don't want, its the lack of ability to control their own fertility compared to women's, their lack of rights to choose to be fathers or not compared to women's rights to choose to be mothers or not, their lack of parental rights compared to women's parental rights, and their total financial responsibility to support their children compared to women's rights to receive financial support for their children, that they don't want. Given equal fertility control for men and w…
/r/MensRights29/05/12 09:32 PM
9

Nope, its only the best of whats legally available to men. You have to be single in order to have rights to your money. Living together unmarried might sound good, but remember you can be trapped in "civil union" if you live together too long, like 6 months in California, and you still wouldn't have the same rights to your children. Like I commented above, if men had equality in marriage, divorce, and parental rights, then single with money would be nowhere near the best option, because it is lo…
/r/MensRights29/05/12 08:53 PM
7

"To me the "single with money" comment is eerily similar to extreme feminists stating that men are only good for breeding. In this case women are only good for what? Nothing? To suck your wallet dry." No, a man saying a woman is only good for breeding is what is eerily similar to feminists stating that men are only good for breeding. Single with money does not harm the woman, you have taken nothing she has any right to from her. IF men had equality in marriage and relationships, as well as paren…
/r/MensRights29/05/12 08:43 PM
3

Because men are evolutionarily wired to put women first, and feminist men are the most enthralled to that primitive stone age survival requirement. At no point was a woman more likely to survive and reproduce if she was naturally inclined to put the man first. Hence far fewer women who will empathize with men than men who will empathize with women. Women do not feel like a "hero" for sacrificing their own interests for the mans, while many men do. Therefor it is nowhere near as likely to find a …
/r/MensRights29/05/12 08:31 PM
36

Why is getting a girl pregnant smart for the man and dumb for the woman? She got him for (at least) 18 years, and she got a baby, hes financially screwed. Love is dumb for him, because it will lead to her getting him in marriage. The only smart for him is single with money.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 04:08 PM
2

How about when they make underage boys pay women who statutorily raped them and got pregnant child support? Oh, never mind that, it doesn't harm any women so it doesn't matter.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 01:11 AM
1

"What's happening is that batterers are using family court to further harass their victims." Whats really happening here is that the few men who actually manage to make it through the family courts are being accused of what the women are doing to crush the rest of the men, to finish off any last hope men might have in these courts. FTFY Why would she know exactly to record this, and why didn't she just use a camera, like everyone else does? Honestly I think this is just another legal loophole to…
/r/MensRights29/05/12 01:08 AM
2

If you think permanent and forcible infant circumcision without anesthetic, permanently mutilating a mans genitals, is trivial, but some girl blacking out and not remembering sex the night before is horrific, then you never were a MRA. So, don't let the door hit you in on the way out.
/r/MensRights27/05/12 02:19 PM
2

How should women be treated? Should men snap to attention? Bow before them? People like to have sex, and hook up. This is an atheist conference, generally free from religulous beliefs about sexual purity, but feminists have all the sexual prudishness of the religious right, as far as men are concerned. Nobody did anything wrong or disrespectful to her.
/r/MensRights26/05/12 09:23 PM
8

There is nothing to improve, nothing wrong happened. This is an issue of sexually liberated people vs. prudes. With Watson being the prude. Feminism only supports sexual confidence and assertiveness for women, seriously, what if she had asked him over for coffee, and he reacted like she did? Is it that hard to imagine he would appear like a fool? Women aren't oppressed by sexual liberation, just feminists who are also prudes who can't separate their personal opinions from women's issues, thus he…
/r/MensRights26/05/12 09:19 PM
19

She turned it into a gender issue with her rape hysteria, she acted like she was in danger, because they were in an elevator, and he asked her if she wanted to go back to his room for a cup of coffee. She acted like she was afraid, because she couldn't escape. Escape what? Well, you know, a MAN!!!! He might RAPE her, because, well, hes a man! That was the implication, that men are dangerous, and that they should not proposition women for sex. If you are so anti-sex, perhaps you should leave athe…
/r/MensRights26/05/12 09:16 PM
7

That is the dumbest advice ever. You sir are a troll. Beach house with 2 girls to each guy.... "Any advice on what I need to do to get lucky here?" Oh, whatever you do, don't fuck, because you know, it will make the other girls you don't fuck jealous, and you need to show those girls you are a 'good guy'.... Essentially you are telling him he needs to not fuck so that he can get something even better, friendzoned!
/r/seduction26/05/12 08:01 PM
2

Women don't think statistics justify sexism against them, so they shouldn't use statistics to justify sexism in their favor. Statistically women are twice as likely to abuse children than men, statistically children raised by single fathers are much better off than those raised by single mothers, do we have a presumption of paternal custody? No, we have a presumption of maternal custody, because women don't care about statistics when they aren't in their favor. So why should men?
/r/MensRights26/05/12 05:13 PM
2

Well, we aren't enforcing physical standards. We are only enforcing equality for women, but ignoring men. so making women pay more for car insurance and men pay less to equalize it is the kind of equality women demand for themselves everywhere else, so it is equality to demand it of them.
/r/MensRights26/05/12 05:09 PM
6

Races aren't real.... are you serious? Pretty sure races are real, I've seen them.
/r/MensRights26/05/12 05:02 PM
-1

A. It's not about marriage, and the men are depicted as buffoons of one sort or another. B. The show is based in New York City, it was popular nation wide. C. It's based on people watching it.
/r/MensRights25/05/12 10:54 PM
3

Wait until she is out of debt to marry her?
/r/MensRights25/05/12 12:45 AM
1

We need people to say this. I understand your point, image is reality, for the masses. But at the same time there must be a shift, we have to come at this from outside the feminist paradigm, debating them without throwing out their facts as well, will never upend the system. When any successful cause starts, it always looks crazy at first, this is unavoidable, but through repeating its message over a decade or two, people get used to it, accept it. We need to simply make our standpoint openly kn…
/r/MensRights25/05/12 12:18 AM
6

Just Graduated last semester, English, literature, psychology, and philosophy classes are loaded with feminist nonsense, as well as a "men are the oppressors" attitude. Even had a teacher flat out tell the classroom that we were going to be studying emotions, and then announce that men aren't that good at this, and it's girls who have super skills, making jokes about mens abilities, to the all female laughter of the classroom, while the males just sat silent and stoic. Imagine a math teacher doi…
/r/MensRights25/05/12 12:08 AM
-2

It doesn't have to be all women. Too many are and don't realize it, and the men they ruin don't know until its too late.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 07:46 PM
1

There is nothing objective about this. Do you really think society has any idea what feminism is? Society is subject to feminist propaganda on a massive scale, and conversely has little or no knowledge of the MRM. Therefor societies opinions are not only not objective but massively skewered.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 02:42 AM
2

Well, how do you know what they are discussing if it is private?
/r/MensRights23/05/12 02:24 AM
2

Feminism doesn't have a bad name because of personal experiences with feminists shouting at men for holding doors open. It has a bad name for its actions, for constantly telling women they are oppressed, rewriting history to vilify men, making up ridiculous rape and sexual assault definitions to scare women, making absurdly broad definitions of sexual harassment, promoting double standards, ect. If men who believed in equality called themselves patriarchists, and stated patriarchy was about equa…
/r/MensRights23/05/12 12:56 AM
2

What does this have to do with mens rights?
/r/MensRights22/05/12 04:31 PM
6

Male Studies is taught by feminists. This is a terrible thing.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 02:58 AM
3

May I suggest taking ROIDS BRO!
/r/seduction19/05/12 06:59 PM
0

Yeah, us. Not some NAFALT nonsense.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 05:28 PM
9

Quit up voting this, that site is filled with misandric crap and general victim ideology. Feminists are only against Ebert's article because of its biological determinism, not to defend men. If the article had said the same things about men, but merely replaced biological determinism with socially constructed justifications, the same site would be praising it.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 05:12 PM
1

Feminists see equality as a defeat. The view feminists have of us is created by the feminists in charge. We should not help the feminist public relations (propaganda) by refusing to call feminism what it is, a female privileged anti male hate machine. They do not care for men, equality is a catchword for them, once you actually attach it to something, like equal custody, then the feminists are gone.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 05:04 PM
2

"To be fair, the show is about sex crimes, and the majority of those actually are committed by men." Sex crimes are defined by gendered laws. That is the only reason they are majority male. A girl taking advantage of a passed out guy cannot be legally tried for rape, as rape requires her to penetrate him. That is also why drunk sex is always legally blamed on the male, also women seduce men, badger them into cheating, ect. Women are twice as likely to criminally abuse children. Also almost all f…
/r/MensRights19/05/12 04:45 PM
27

Shame is the most powerful tool to mentally enslave someone. Shame is not like putting chains on you. Shame isn't about preventing you from resisting by holding you down. Shame isn't about using force to control you. Shame is about taking away your sense of self worth. Shame is when you don't think you deserve to be free. Shame is when you don't believe in your own rights. Shame is about making you agree with your own oppression. Do not let the system feed you male guilt, or white guilt, or any …
/r/MensRights19/05/12 04:19 PM
1

No, no props. This isn't about men not being worse than women as much as it is about androgeny. Feminists are not going to be our allies, and this isn't prop worthy. If you are afraid of losing the support of feminists, you really haven't taken the red pill yet.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 04:07 PM
-4

Because there is no reasoning with feminists. Honestly I know that there are alot of MRA's who mistakenly believe that MRA's and feminists want the same thing, but you are clearly noobs, and you will figure out on your own after enough time that feminists cannot be reasoned with, the "moderate" feminists are only interested in defending the name of feminism, not stopping the feminists from being sexist, just stopping us from pointing it out.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 06:47 AM
1

Feminists do all they can to destroy mens rights, and stop us from gaining any traction, when we call feminism out for this, "moderate feminists" suddenly come rushing in telling us NAFALT!!! This is all "moderate feminists" ever do. They do not appose feminism's war on men and boys, they appose MRA's when we call feminism out for its war. So they are a part of feminism, like a public relations department for feminism, nothing more.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 03:36 AM
2

Rights of the accused is not a "problem" that needs to go away. It is a right that is being violated by socially regressive backwards thinking feminists, the 60's are over, this is the mens rights era, it has just begun, one day all of feminism's hate will be recorded in history books showing what loons they were and just how inhuman they were regarding men's rights.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 12:54 AM
21

They think its funny because all it takes is a call and an insincere apology to make you happy again. If you had broken up with her, and every other man did too when this kind of shit happens, then they wouldn't think it was such a joke.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 11:14 PM
1

Its rights of the accused. (men)
/r/MensRights17/05/12 11:11 PM
1

They received it by making a false allegation against them tard. They don't allow due process for the person accused to defend themselves against an accusation.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 11:10 PM
3

This is the fault of the shelters that only want to create a culture of man hate and women victim-hood. Gay men are men, that is why they are turned away, lesbian women are abused by other women, they certainly don't want women portrayed in a negative way. So if it weren't for feminism in these programs in the first place this wouldn't even be an issue.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 11:08 PM
2

You are letting down our entire movement for not holding them up to their own standards, don't think for a minute any of them would hesitate to get you fired if you had accidentally included one of them in an email to your friends, especially if you worked in the HR department.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 10:48 PM
6

"if you can't take a joke you've got no right to tell jokes." That is the EXACT message that needs to be sent to the feminists.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 10:45 PM
4

Yes, if this were just about the email, but it isn't, its about the double standard, and that it is the HR department that is the exact same department that goes after men for this is doing it to men. So they should be raked over the very coals they lit for men.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 10:43 PM
0

It isn't about it slightly offending us, it is about women doing to us what they are outraged about enough to coldly and icily have a man fired when we do it, and calling it equality that outrages us. If you can get the person that did this fired, DO IT.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 10:40 PM
-2

You mean between 15 and 25, if we include high school guys and girls interaction, and nobody is bending over backwards for a 30 year old, 25 is pushing it.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 10:34 PM
41

If you don't report this, you can not honestly say you are a Men's Rights ACTIVIST. If we can't motivate ourselves to stand up for ourselves, we certainly wont motivate any other men too. Report it, and let us know what happens on it.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 06:26 PM
7

They cannot dismiss us forever. These responses are just attempts to say to the masses regarding the growing MRM "Hey! Move along, nothing to see hear!" "MRM? Oh, they aren't a legit group, don't look into them! Just move along man cattle, oops, I mean citizens!"
/r/MensRights17/05/12 01:27 PM
2

AGREED.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 01:23 PM
5

Its justified completely that the less sexist ones, (I wouldn't call them better) aren't anywhere near as public/political. It is the really sexist ones that are running the show. Just like the leaders of Nazi Germany are more evil than the bottom rung Hitler youth instructor. It is all part of the same machine though, whether they have the honesty to acknowledge it or not
/r/MensRights17/05/12 01:22 PM
0

What she said was that we should have both chivalrous manners classes, AND take back the night campaigns, she never said anything about teaching girls to have manners classes. She clearly stated that feminists and traditionalists should both work together. She sees the male behavior as the problem, that men aren't being gentlemen. She is concerned feminism has made men ungentlemanly, when in reality feminism has made women disgusting, and disgusting women have made men lose any reason to be gent…
/r/MensRights16/05/12 11:19 PM
10

Um, pretty sure everyone in this subreddit believes that.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 09:24 PM
-1

Because they either don't understand feminism, or don't understand what MRA's are.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 09:14 PM
-1

That isn't what he said, but, nice example of just how much reality will be distorted by a feminist.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 09:13 PM
1

Yes, traditional lives with all the power in the relationship. (Rights to their children, assets in a divorce, ect.)
/r/MensRights16/05/12 09:11 PM
8

This is definately the reasoning of PUA's. Honestly, I think we should all support the MRM, but also be PUA's until the MRM succeeds. If men still buy into the system, women wont care what they say, but if we all become PUA's, women will have to work (bring something equally valuable to the table) with the MRM. Honestly, the number 1 issue in terms of expediency for our movement is the mass availability of male birth control. Imagine, a world of PUA's with birth control, if we have that, then wo…
/r/MensRights16/05/12 09:08 PM
3

This is absurd. Feminists either actively try to destroy mens basic rights, or they actively try to defend the image of feminism as one of equality. Mens rights expose feminism for what it is and actively seek to restore equality. No mens rights activists are actively trying to give men more rights than women. This is just feminism trying to make itself look like its the same as us, it is not. Feminism is a hate group, a vicious misandric ideology. MRA's are men who have had enough of this sexis…
/r/MensRights16/05/12 02:18 PM
35

An up-vote for your epiphany.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 01:18 AM
1

This is just a pile of feminist neologistic obfuscation. Its the same crap as always, just buried in incomprehensibility.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 12:38 AM
1

Awesome post.
/r/MensRights14/05/12 03:34 AM
8

This is my comment, I doubt these endlessly moderated feminists are going to allow it. Um, this is just nonsense. Men are far more empathetic towards women than women have or will ever be towards men. Women are NOT going to risk their lives to protect men, they are NOT anywhere near as willing to support a man financially, they do NOT care when a man is physically abused or assaulted by a woman. On The Talk, the female hosts and female audience ridiculed a man who had his penis cut off by his wi…
/r/MensRights14/05/12 02:56 AM
1

Yeah, if you don't believe women when they lie about rape, or sexual assault or harassment, then you are supporting the rapists/harassers. Oh, is that it? Well, then if you do believe the women, does that mean you are supporting all the women who make false allegations? When you always believe them, and you tell anyone who doesn't to "shut the fuck up", then yes you do.
/r/MensRights14/05/12 12:08 AM
3

It is important to understand what it is that they are doing, and to let this explode in the face of the feminists who are trying to defame us. We cannot simply ignore it.
/r/MensRights13/05/12 11:43 PM
2

Haha, so all we need to do is organize under a singular leader that has all our confidence, and act as one tireless political machine, and we will win all our hearts desire? Well, why didn't anyone just say so? lol Obviously this would be awesome, but it is easier said than done.
/r/MensRights13/05/12 11:36 PM
3

Get real, we don't need to acknowledge feminism's nonsense, They say all women deserve respect, as if there aren't women in the kkk or skinheads or child-molesters. They cant criticize us for shit.
/r/MensRights13/05/12 11:33 PM
5

drunkendonuts is behind these posts, who is this fool?
/r/MensRights13/05/12 10:48 PM
12

Why doesn't he simply take them back to Canada with them? What can she do then? Poland is being idiotic ruling that the kids are already "settled in". Ok, let a man kidnap his kids, and see how they react. utter nonsense.
/r/MensRights13/05/12 10:46 PM
5

I'm fairly sure its a feminist troll. Who else would it be? Communists? Christians? There is only one ideology that despises us, only one ideology that knowingly condones the social injustice against men, and only one ideology that stands to lose if our group gets widespread acknowledgement, and that is feminism.
/r/MensRights13/05/12 10:40 PM
3

Making a false rape allegation is not "just a lie". That is absurd. It is an attempt to send someone to prison and destroy their lives. If someone asks you what is in a bottle, and you say water, but it is actually poison, and they drink it, you didn't just lie, you tried to kill someone. False rape allegations are not attempted false rape allegations, they are carried out, and therefor should not be seen as attempted crimes, they are crimes. Put the liars behind bars for a decade.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 11:31 PM
2

Our PR problems only exist because our idea is new. Its like saying gay rights in the 80s should tone down being gay because of their PR problems. It is assumed that we have a PR problem. We are new and at first people need to simply get used to the idea. But we must not sacrifice our ideas simply to be liked. If that is your goal, then just leave the mens rights movement all together and join the feminists. We have a belief that will face its strongest opposition from feminists, they must be di…
/r/MensRights07/05/12 04:49 AM
2

Because feminism will never allow that. They will do with mens rights what they do with "male studies" and just make up their own issues for men. Like we need to cry and play with dolls more, or some other idiotic drivel that none of us care about. Feminism will be damned if they allow us to actually get equal parental rights, and equal rights in marriage and divorce, as well as lose their power to invent random statistics to depict us as evil.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 04:45 AM
2

We will destroy ourselves if we feel like we must prove our selves to the feminists. Most women do NOT identify as feminists, its only like 25%ish, compared to about 50% who specifically state they are NOT feminists, and an additional 25% who are "unsure". So no, we do not need to give feminism any credibility, we need to take it on head on. There is no such thing as organized feminism that is not hostile to men. Look at feminism in Sweden. The primary reason it cant be overthrown is because it …
/r/MensRights07/05/12 04:41 AM
4

This subreddit is here to do what nobody else will, which is call feminism out for its hypocrisy. After Katherin Becker's actions caused nothing but laughter from the news anchors and the disgusting disply on The Talk, with Sharon Osborne and the rest laughing, giggling, and making up reasons why he would deserve it, all to the uproarious laughter of a female audience, and NOBODY cared, I am not sympathetic to the idea that feminism is about equality, that is a total and complete lie that is use…
/r/MensRights02/05/12 02:52 PM
0

Feminism is feminism. Feminism is not about equality. Feminists say they are about equality, and the people who believe that may equate themselves with feminism because they mistakenly believe in the feminism propaganda. Organized feminism, federally funded feminism, womens studies feminism, are ALL female supremacist nonsense. There are NO laws that favor men over women. ALL sexist laws are sexist against men.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 05:10 AM
6

Oh, so it would be totally acceptable to give men certain rights over women, because of our differences? The action is forcing an unwilling person to have sex with you, that is rape, it isn't complicated. She aught to be named a serial rapist, put on a sex offenders registry, and spend a couple decades behind bars.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 10:27 PM
10

FORCED SEX AGAINST ONES WILL IS RAPE. Not just when it happens to a woman.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 10:24 PM
2

I wouldn't say there shouldn't be a leader, there needs to be some form of order, but i would say the leader should be elected and have to answer to a committee in the same way that a CEO has to answer to a board. The leader needs to show that they are increasing the movement and not just putting the resources towards things that are not improving anything. Honestly we are not in a position to put money towards anything other than spreading our message. Right now we have 35k subscribers, there a…
/r/MensRights29/04/12 09:52 PM
1

Point blank as why you should only be pro-choice for women concerning motherhood but not pro-choice for men concerning fatherhood.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 07:40 PM
0

HAHA man, feminists don't want equality. They don't care about men. They just say they want equality. Men are the only gender that is discriminated by law. There are NO laws that discriminate against women and favor men. The best thing to do is accept that feminists ARE OUR ENEMY. They have to lose privileges for us to have equality. They are NOT going to lose privileges. The best thing to do keep your movement SEPERATE from theirs, or they will simply take it over like that joke the good men's …
/r/MensRights29/04/12 12:48 AM
-1

Men don't call anyone a spinster, that term is so archaic its absurd, only women use terms like spinster, damaged goods, trophy wife, ect. This is women's critique of other women, even slut is mostly used by women, with men it is reserved for only the most promiscuous women.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 10:52 PM
1

I'm not tarring everyone, i am specifically talking about the older women who blog and write articles about how epic they are, and how every man has something wrong with him, they literally state that they deserve the perfect man, and cannot comprehend that they are not nearly as desirable as they imagine themselves to be. Not attacking women, attacking specific women.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 10:47 PM
14

No, this issue isn't about stigmas, its about attraction. Men are not attracted to older women, and women are not attracted to younger men, (yes their are exceptions, but this is society as a whole), women start out as attractive as they are going to be in their teens, they maintain it into their mid twenties, and then it is down hill. Men are valued for their income by women, and are not less attractive for being older, so they start out at their lowest value in their teens, and peak in their t…
/r/MensRights28/04/12 10:28 PM
12

Said that women in cultures that circumcise girls accept it as normal just like men in cultures that circumcise men also accept it as normal. So if it is wrong to circumcise girls despite being accepted by the women, then circumcising boys is wrong despite being accepted by the men. Ask if it would be ok if they only removed the clitoral hood because that is the female equivalent of the male forskin.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 08:58 PM
10

How is anyone supposed to have sex with her when her head is clearly lodged up her own vagina already.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 08:56 PM
2

This study has been thoroughly debunked in many of the comments, simply asking why over and over again is just your attempt to keep pretending like you have a case. You asked your question based on the assumption that your study is valid, but it isn't, feminists are misandrists, feminism = misandry. You have been given an abundance of examples of how ALL the hate towards men in books, news articles, journalists, ect. are promoted by FEMINISTS, so to continue to sit there scratching your head ask…
/r/MensRights28/04/12 08:27 AM
0

Feminism is defined by the actions of its organized efforts. Feminists actively work against fathers rights, the rights of men accused of rape, feminists actively inflate rape and domestic violence statistics, feminists actively transformed the education system to be gynocentric. Feminism is anti-male, and therefor we are not going to allow anti-male feminists to dictate to us what constitutes as being anti-male, because that is like allowing nazis to dictate what is anti-semetic.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 08:21 AM
1

Actually, men don't just "suffer from discrimination too." we are the only ones subjected to legally enforceable discrimination. There are NO laws that give men privilege over women, all sexist laws privilege women over men.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 08:06 AM
3

WRONG MsManifesto, The circumstantial fallacy applies only where the source taking a position is only making a logical argument from premises that are generally accepted. Where the source seeks to convince an audience of the truth of a premise by a claim of authority or by personal observation, observation of their circumstances may reduce the evidentiary weight of the claims, sometimes to zero. Source: http://www.fallacyfiles.org/adhomine.html Where the source seeks to convince an audience of t…
/r/MensRights27/04/12 09:37 PM
4

Further, you only revealed some statements respondents were asked to rate their agreement with, I need to see what all the questions are. I doubt they are a good indicator of benevolence or hostility, how about one that has respondents rate their agreement with statements like "We live in a rape culture.", "Men are collectively responsible for rape culture.", "I support the VAWA.", "Fathers should have equal parental rights (custody) as mothers.", "Mothers should have equal financial responsibil…
/r/MensRights27/04/12 09:30 PM
3

"(Feminism is “when women think they are better than men”), and these definitions were coded as inconsistent with our operational definition of feminism." Specifically not including the very feminists that we are clearly talking about and then saying that a study shows that feminism isn't about female superiority or hating men is obviously a flaw, "Lets only count certain feminists, and then say that feminists are not hostile towards men!" Ok, lets have MRA's do a study, where they make the oper…
/r/MensRights27/04/12 09:19 PM
8

This study, like most feminist studies, is blatantly flawed, They basically asked women about their attitudes toward men, and their definition of feminism, and then only counted women as being feminists if their definition of feminism was what they said it was, "The definition of feminism in the present study included any reference to equal rights for women, the acknowledgement of inequality between women and men, and the need for social change on behalf of women." (pg.219),"Respondents who did …
/r/MensRights27/04/12 09:10 PM
1

That is also a feminist site....
/r/MensRights26/04/12 08:37 PM
5

That is an excellent idea. Hopefully this post catches on, it is inspiring to see the first comment be this supportive.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 03:34 AM
8

Um, this is the most absurd article I have read regarding the current trend, marriage is dying, and dying fast. Feminism has done things that make marriage a disastrous choice for men, sure women will be more miserable the more they become feminists, but that's because they can't ever control the men they want, just the feeble men. If women do decide to return to traditional roles, they will realize that far from celebrating, men will refuse. Modern men do NOT want to go back to the 50's system …
/r/MensRights16/04/12 04:03 PM
3

This fool has video compilations of guys getting hit in the groin under a rant about how sexist we are. right....
/r/MensRights12/04/12 04:12 PM
1

Not Ronnie! That guy is awesome! P.S. what is this "rape waiver"/ Can anyone send a link on this?
/r/MensRights12/04/12 03:57 PM
2

"....but it doesn't change the fact that "making them" stay at home and taking away their freedom in this way is still a form of oppression." Nobody made women do anything. Do you really think women were upset about their lot? Throughout all of history jobs consisted of hard manual labor. Do you think the lumberjacks wife was upset she couldn't be a lumberjack, or a blacksmith, or a miner, or a farm laborer, or fisherwoman, or a construction worker? You need to study history outside of the femin…
/r/MensRights12/04/12 03:46 PM
1

Feminism is not defined in a dictionary, it is defined by its collective actions, which are nothing but misandry. We will not be feminists but if you wish to aid our cause within the feminist movement that is fine. We will not however stop exposing feminism for the female chauvinist movement it is simply because of a few "true feminism" posts.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 11:33 PM
2

The slogan is wrong because it implies rape exists because men are allowing it to.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 10:53 PM
3

Charles Murray's work is overwhelmingly well accepted amongst geneticists, and hated by the media. He is a credible scientific source regarding human intelligence and heritability.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 09:59 PM
-2

I must disagree, while I believe in anonymity online, feminists are absolutely ok with dox dropping of their opponents, even PZ Myers supported dox dropping the opponents of feminism. While this is not something that should happen, it is happening, to us. As the saying goes, "One can only have peace as long as his neighbor wishes it." we can not ignore feminisms hate and need to expose these people for who they are and what they support.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 09:47 PM
13

Feminism basically just accuses the MRM of being what they themselves are. They hate men and know it, and they are accusing the MRM doing the same.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 05:25 AM
0

Considering how much work you have done for the feminist cause, what have you done for the men's rights cause? Because now it seems like you are just giving 100% of your efforts to feminism, but just saying oh, men are important too, before returning to only feminist efforts just so you can try to difuse resistance to feminism by paying lip service to the MRA's without any actual intention of doing anything to actually support them. The fact that you think feminists don't have the resources show…
/r/MensRights10/04/12 04:45 AM
17

Not sure what to make of the "men's rights friendly feminists". It is clear the overwhelming majority of feminists and their sub-reddits and organizations are hostile to men's rights, but if there are actual women within these groups who truly understand what is wrong with feminism then they can potentially be of great help. Where would women be if men had not used their influence in the system to grant women rights? Perhaps having the support of "feminists" in the system will be advantageous, b…
/r/MensRights09/04/12 11:11 PM
15

This story and every story like it needs to be ingrained in the minds of everyone. People need to realize women make false allegations of rape at least as often as men rape, and that there can be no presumption of guilt without evidence. Its insane that they were only found innocent because they video taped it, and that their accuser is not in any way punished.
/r/MensRights08/04/12 12:11 AM
3

She makes 100 grand a year. There is no reason he should pay alimony. Not one penny. So what if he makes more, once she is no longer his wife, he should not have to support her. In cases of housewives, they should not get alimony either. If they need money then that is a social issue, give them unemployment and require them to find a job. Once a man divorces a women her financial situation should not be his responsibility.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 05:24 AM
4

And like he said, if a man did this to a woman's apartment, blaming her for dating him would be called victim blaming.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 04:29 AM
17

If she is trying to use this to coerce you into sex then she is trying to rape you. Using coercion to force someone to have sex with you is rape. Do not cower, if you have the phone records, PRESS CHARGES. This movement will never accomplish anything without the courage to prosecute women like your girlfriend.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 04:13 AM
7

But feminists actively appose men's rights and try to take more rights away from them. That is the difference.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 04:05 AM
6

Feminists want women to be able to get abortions, but also campaign to make men pay as much as they can for child support with no say in being a father. Feminists fight to take away a mans right to defend himself or be assumed innocent until proven guilty if he is accused of rape, domestic violence, ect. Feminist fight to keep men enslaved to ex wives with alimony and fight to make that alimony absurdly high. Feminists fight against men having a male birth control pill, including Betty Freidan. …
/r/MensRights02/04/12 03:46 AM
-4

Here is what you do, talk to her via text about her telling police you hit her if you do not get her pregnant. Get her on record in texting you that she is going to tell police if you do not have sex with her or get her pregnant. Then she can say whatever she wants to police and you can show your lawyer and the court her saying she would tell the police you hit her if you didn't get her pregnant. Then you can say her story is fake and she is only doing it because you refused to have sex with her…
/r/MensRights02/04/12 12:53 AM
-3

Some girl got hers and told you to get the fuck out. She is just a fucking cunt. Women like this are total scum.
/r/seduction01/04/12 04:10 AM
6

Feminism is bigotry towards men. It isn't about women's rights. (almost) Everyone believes in women's rights. The vast majority of people who believe in women's rights are not feminists. Feminists do not believe in men's rights. Therefor to support men's rights you can also support women's rights, and we do, but you cannot also support feminism. This isn't a difficult concept!
/r/MensRights01/04/12 04:01 AM
7

Women have the power to choose fool. Men should too. What is your problem? Oh, that's right, you are a sexist.
/r/MensRights01/04/12 03:33 AM
8

This is exactly the issue. Women choose to gorge themselves on their status and privileges, The idea that they are victims of being infantilized by feminism is nonsense. They purposely infantilize themselves knowing full well they are not infants, so that they and their daughters can enjoy freedom from responsibility. Men and boys are not able to choose to be treated like second class human beings by the family courts, universities, media, police, jury's, judges, the legal system, ect. Therefor …
/r/MensRights01/04/12 03:16 AM
2

Utterly disgusting.
/r/MensRights01/04/12 03:09 AM
1

There is nothing here to say it is anything. Obviously most people would not do this to get into a fraternity, but most people would not do this to someone either. So if this fraternity wants to have gay sex with its initiates, perhaps it is a gay fraternity? Either way, who would go through with this without saying stop? Seriously, pretty sure I'd say something if someone tried that nonsense. So there is no telling what went down based on this alone.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 06:31 AM
15

What a joke. Of course men being the breadwinners is bad for everyone, and saying it is good is sexism, but saying women as breadwinners is good for everyone is totally not sexist.... Once again we see blatant proof of the sexist definition of sexism used by feminism. Women are only doing better because they are given success, not because of any actual abilities over men. Women's success is entirely socially engineered, and it is not good for anyone when one group is given special privileged. I …
/r/MensRights29/03/12 06:18 AM
0

Take back the night is not about preventing rape. It is about making it appear as though there is some kind of horde of men raping women at night. Acting like men are also victims is not conducive to the problem. The problem in this instance is not that men can be raped. The problem is that feminists are branding men as rapists the way nazis branded jews as global conspirators. Saying "Men can be raped too!" is as misguided as saying "Jews can be victims of the international conspiracy too!" How…
/r/MensRights29/03/12 02:00 AM
1

Yes, treat your man like you are cheating on him. Because that is all saying things like "Wouldn't you like to know." and "I'll see where the night takes me." Ok, Well lil miss dominant, I guess I'll just see where the night takes me as well, and wouldn't you like to know what that means...." I'm sure she'll appreciate it.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 08:31 PM
2

It should be titled, "Celebrate the male qualities that make a man a good servant to a woman's interests." What a pile of pseudo concern for men.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 08:27 PM
1

Gay men are men, and their rights are as important as any mans. We must not be divided on nonsense, our religious, racial, national, and sexual differences are not significant to our rights as men. We are for men's rights, all men's rights, not just the men in our individual microcosms.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 07:20 PM
3

You have drawn a correlation between the Klan as racists and men as abusers. This more than anything shows your thinking, and that is exactly what these posters are intended to do, and that is exactly why we have a problem with them. The correct correlation would be to show white people as racists, and saying that white people shouldn't be racist, instead of just people shouldn't be racists. You are turning "men" into a group of abusers like the Klan is a group of racists. That is the problem th…
/r/MensRights25/03/12 09:31 PM
2

But then feminists can use this in their absurd rape statistics. And they will.
/r/MensRights25/03/12 01:59 AM
13

This article is a pile of nonsense. Women were not commodities, they were always treated as if their lives and comfort were more important. The sacrifice of men on lifeboats and war and everywhere else wasn't because women were reproductively valuable. If that were the case why did 60 year old women get preference over 18 year old men on lifeboats? Why didn't they send 40 year old women into combat instead of 12 year old boys? Because they simply viewed women and their safety and comfort as more…
/r/MensRights25/03/12 01:04 AM
2

These feminists who go around trying to make up their own personal feminism so that they can keep a word are like people who call themselves christians who don't even know the ten commandments let alone what the rest of the bible says. Its like a christians saying it is wrong to burn witches when the bible says "Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live." They have absolutely no belief in what is in the bible, but want to call themselves christians anyway. Then they get mad when atheists criticize c…
/r/MensRights21/03/12 05:31 AM
5

Because he didn't want to? Don't even try to act like he was in any way wrong in this. She doesn't own him because she had sex with him, and has no right to demand he talk to her and make threats if he doesn't.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 04:54 PM
4

No need to ruin a life? Excuse me? She tried to ruin his life. She is deserves to be punished for her crime. She will think nothing of her actions without punishment. She needs to be legally documented for making false allegations not just so she is punished but to protect the next guy she tries to pull this with.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 04:53 PM
20

This is exactly the case. Same with circumcision, nobody who apposes male circumcision is ok with female circumcision. MRA's are against both, while feminists only think female circumcision is wrong. MRA's are ok with porn and romance novels which are blatantly female porn, but feminists are only against porn. MRA's want equal child custody, feminists only want female child custody. MRA's want boys and girls to be focused on equally in the public education system and universities, feminists want…
/r/MensRights11/03/12 04:50 AM
1

It is feminism's fault, they are the ones who made sure the government would profit by implementing feminist policies.
/r/MensRights04/03/12 05:33 PM
1

"to me" sorry, you don't get to define. Feminism is what its organized actions define it as, not what you define it as. Feminism is bigotry towards men, finding a "moderate feminist" is really just finding a feminist who doesn't really take feminism seriously.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 05:29 PM
16

We should absolutely edit any hatred towards women out of this subreddit. We are not misogynists, because we are against this organized campaign to rob men of the slightest shred of dignity, we are of course against feminism. But women are a gender, not an ideology, and women aren't some kind of collective that are collectively responsible for every womans actions. So get rid of the woman haters, they will only harm our cause, but the feminists are shit.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 05:28 PM
4

We are certainly not trying to copy the feminists.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 05:24 PM
-2

I agree we should not simply be a reactionary movement, we need to act, not simply complain about feminism. While I absolutely have no sympathy for the "not all feminists are our enemies" or "feminism did a lot of good things and made some mistakes" lines, feminism is about hating men, plain and simple, their propaganda may cause the least aware to think otherwise, but that is their ignorance, not ours, and its like saying the nazi ideology did a lot of good things at first, but made mistakes. F…
/r/MensRights03/03/12 05:22 PM
0

You do not have the slightest clue what you are talking about. 1. Pedophiles are adults who are physically attracted to prepubescent children. That is the definition. They are extraordinarily rare. "for every 40 year old they caught, there is probably a half dozen 16 year old with a bit too young girlfriends. " 1. you are making shit up, 2. teens dating teens are not pedophiles. "Many other pedophiles are actually attracted to adults as well and thus just live out normal sexual lives." you are j…
/r/MensRights02/03/12 04:11 PM
2

pathetic justification, the article writer is clearly show throughout the article to be someone who just doesn't care about dad.
/r/MensRights29/02/12 09:04 PM
1

This entire article is valuing men based off of their appeal to women. It absurdly draws a correlation between 1. not getting married, 2. looking at porn, 3. living with your parents, 4. Women being better than men, and 5. Playing video games. There is no correlation between living at home, and playing video games or looking at porn. Women are not better than men, they are given everything by feminism at men's expense. And men who are successful are not getting married either. Porn is not associ…
/r/MensRights29/02/12 08:19 PM
3

It is lying, why not say every rape allegation that doesn't result in a conviction is a false report? oh, because that would be deliberately framing it to get a big number, just like this report, not that it is honest at all.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 10:38 PM
4

WE unlike feminists, are NOT blaming women, we are blaming FEMINISTS for THEIR ORGANIZED ACTIONS. So we are NOT the same as them. ALL feminists are like that, the women who are not like that shouldn't be calling themselves feminists.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 10:36 PM
3

Feminists are the reason these people get away with it. They pave the way, and they encourage ill will towards men and boys.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 10:33 PM
13

Stop saying "true" feminist. There is no magical definition. Feminism is defined by its actions. Feminism is not a race/gender/orientation/anything else arbitrary, feminism is an IDEOLOGY. You can't be called a bigot for apposing an ideology. Feminists can write all they want about themselves, its like those fools who say "true" communism is good for workers just because the communists say so. ACTIONS define an ideology, and feminism's actions are pure female chauvinism/misandry/bigotry towards …
/r/MensRights28/02/12 10:32 PM
14

Finally, a man of thought. The MRM has is like a bunch of fat bored soldiers sitting around waiting for someone to tell them what to do. The movement needs officers, people who are educated in propaganda, the history of social movements, and how to organize this mass of willing but blind MRA's into a useful force. I'm in college now, but I spend as much time as I can studying this sort of thing, so when I am out of school I can be useful to the MRM. I think we all need to start thinking how we c…
/r/MensRights28/02/12 10:19 PM
7

It is not pointless, how many feminists do you think said that when they started their racketeering? It is the first step in a long struggle, but if Wikipedia is all it takes to break your will to fight, you are useless to the cause. Don't get mad, just realize this is gonna be a long struggle, and it has to happen.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 10:13 PM
5

Ok, not hard, imagine a poster stating "REAL WOMEN GET RAPED" and you can see why it is in WTF. The wording is obviously the problem here.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 10:07 PM
8

We need an organized lobby group that makes lawsuits against companies for this discrimination against men. Honestly, our ONLY option is to look at what feminists did, how they grew, how they became the tyrants they are today, and do it ourselves. Mens Rights Activism NEEDS to become huge, it needs to be a real political force, and it needs to be willing to do whatever is necessary. If gender war is the only possible solution feminists have allowed, then lets have it, and win. One can only have …
/r/MensRights22/02/12 05:47 PM
1

They dont need to be. Tehy need to be made aware of how absurd these policies are.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 05:40 PM
6

Women don't care if you get fired, they don't care if these policies are draconianly enforced on men, so enforce them on ALL women. Mutually Assured Destruction is damn right! Women need to know any policy they try to place on men will be placed on themselves as well. These policies have BECOME so ridiculous because women are CONFIDENT they ONLY get applied to men. ALL WOMEN should be held to the same standard, not just the feminists. Even if she is the sweetest/prettiest girl in the office, if …
/r/MensRights22/02/12 05:33 PM
-2

If men don't report women for doing things that would get men in trouble then men are allowing this to happen. Pick your balls up off the ground, brush the dust off them, put them back in your pants and go report her! I don't care if it doesn't even bother you, i honestly don't care about sexual remarks made by women, I DO care that they get to make them but not me, so I would absolutely report a harmless sexual remark. Women need to be forced to drink their own medicine.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 05:29 PM
2

I think that most American men are: -Dirty -Ugly -Stupid -Lazy -Violent -Only good for manual labor (if that) -Generally worth less than women, unless he's rare. -If we erased womens contributions to civilization, and all women quit their job, we would still be perfectly fine, but if we did the same for men, we would be in the stone age. Porn is not mainstream media, it is not propaganda. Mainstream media created the image of men as dirty ugly stupid lazy and violent, and like a mindless fool yo…
/r/MensRights17/02/12 05:09 PM
3

I hate feminism because it is female chauvinism. It fights an endless crusade against men, it tries to depict men as rapists and child abusers, it creates the broadest and vaguest definitions of rape (drunken hook-ups), domestic violence (being rude to her friends), and sexual harassment (flirting) imaginable. It makes it impossible for a man to get divorced (if he still has to support her, how is he divorced?), condones false rape allegations as a learning experience for men, creates anti male …
/r/MensRights04/02/12 11:43 PM
5

Except the mugger used a gun. A real analogy would be someone asking for money, and you not wanting too, but being afraid the person could be dangerous without reason, give them money, and then claiming you were mugged after the fact. Because even though they simply asked for money, and you agreed to give it to them, you were irrationally afraid of them when they had done nothing to make you afraid. And then you try to tell the cops you were mugged. THAT is the correct analogy to a feminist tryi…
/r/MensRights25/01/12 02:45 PM
2

EXACTLY This kind of thing is just absurd. A contract for sex? Um, how about innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? There is an idea.
/r/MensRights15/11/11 03:55 AM
3

No, it doesn't. They get all the legal privileges in divorce, they get the house, and they get the kids. Men get nothing. Marriage has always been what women want, not men.
/r/MensRights15/11/11 03:50 AM
1

Exactly, imagine if that was all it took, act against us, just apologize when you do, and the mens rights and fathers rights movements are satisfied. We are not here for an apology, we are here for real and dramatic change to absurd and man/father hating ideals like hers. To suggest that a father, any father, cannot be trusted around children, for no other reason than he is a man, is outright sexism. She wants off, the registry? Lets see her campaign and succeed in changing the rule she endorsed…
/r/MensRights30/10/11 06:26 PM
1

Um, no. She is atrocious, and apologizing doesn't change that. If a man apologizes for something he said that was sexist, is he let off the hook? He will be treated severely by whatever equal opportunity office their is. She stays on it, unless and until she totally changes and becomes a crusader for mens rights and fathers rights, she stays on it.
/r/MensRights30/10/11 06:22 PM
8

You do not understand feminism, as is apparent. It is any time a woman tries to take human rights away from a man, or give herself more than she believes a man should have.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 05:57 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter