| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Prenups are completely reasonableNo it’s not really an extreme scenario. Say Both spouses (30 yo) work, but one has saved and invested since they were 18 and the other simply didn’t know any better. They meet in their late 20’s and one has a lot more capital appreciation than the other. It would be ridiculous to expect that the saver now forfeits their lifetime of financial discipline because the lazy saver splits. But I would be interested to know how often a pre nup is determined to be biased.... when that’s the whole point o… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/02/21 12:38 AM |
| 1 | Prenups are completely reasonable.... where is the integrity in taking half of everything someone has clearly worked for? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/02/21 09:01 PM |
| 1 | Prenups are completely reasonableWhat if we both make 50k a year but she has $0 to her name and I have accumulated 400k in savings and investments? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/02/21 04:44 PM |
| 2 | Prenups are completely reasonableThis is my worry. Can they take half of their partners savings from income if they both worked (or half the difference in salary)? Such BS | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/02/21 04:42 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter