TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Anonreddit96 Archive

View 0 posts and 346 comments by Anonreddit96 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Well of course, getting pregnant and marriage are not the same thing. Men were actually willing to spend their lives with another person of a different race. Unlike women who are also willing to some extent but much less than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 01:02 AM
6

Just a small correction, it's not "stop worrying about discrimination" but stop worrying about every person that claims to be discriminated against when the ideology they follow inherently has a biased view of what constitutes as discrimination.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 12:57 AM
-2

Dick size is such an outdated topic really. We are so advanced in sex toys that men literally equip themselves with all kinds of sizes shapes and forms some of them quite freaky. There is no shortage of catering to niche preferences as well as dragon/spiky shaped. Some even come with battery and vibration. There is no way any man can compete with an eggplant sized vibrator with 10+ vibration settings as well as suction settings. And in the worst case scenario there are always penis sleeves if yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 11:04 AM
1

I mean if women are happy to be part of a harem for one man who has like 20 other wives then yeah I guess it makes sense that only men wanted push for marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 02:51 AM
14

Actually they are. For unattractive men getting married or inti relationship there is a possibility of love(which would be best but less chance) but there is a higher possibility atleast him having money which attracted some. But even if a woman is unattractive she could still get a partner much more easily than her male counterpart.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/25 10:19 PM
2

I mean women not openly expressing the disgust.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/25 12:48 AM
8

Nobody is telling women to give the same chance to all kinds of men. Just not to have disgust and look down on others. That is also fine as long as they don't openly express it. You can't blame others based on how you feel when their actions are communally accepted. Asking a woman out is not a crime.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 12:11 PM
1

And still somehow all those women still end up finding someone in life. Where as mentioned don't. Remember historically we have had twice as many female ancestors as male ancestors.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 12:08 PM
5

Yes, they are as long as you don't hint at wanting to date any one of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 12:06 PM
1

Absolutely, but then women also have to pick up the job of asking men out. You can't punish men who attempt to pick women up based on how a woman's feels and then but then also not have women do the asking men out. Cuz that's just a privilege and not fair. Cuz men CAN'T have that privilege.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 12:03 PM
6

That's not the issue here. It's about being repulsed at the audacity of them trying to ask you out on a date or mentioning that they are attracted to you. Sexual expression takes many forms while some are indeed creepy and wrong some are acceptable if you are a beautiful woman or man. But some women(most that are here) when they get complemented in hopes of dating by men there aren't attracted to they get repulsed at their guts to even ask her out. As if she thinks he is inferior in one way or a…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 12:00 PM
20

You can have excellent social skills yet have a shitty personality cue most of wall street traders.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/25 01:31 AM
–

And a sub created specificity for such gendered issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 11:56 PM
–

But that's where the op got his "revelation" from that women genuinely don't consider shaming men about their dick size isn't exactly body shaming. They aren't mad about women answering. You are just shifting the blame in such a way that it's the men's fault for asking the question. Obviously people will get mad at negative answers. If a woman asks about the deal with stupid phrases like "no seal no deal" or other such black pill comments, then obviously someone will answer about it in the comme…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 11:54 PM
0

That is literally how it is working every where.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 04:48 PM
0

It's Cuz they rarely have any assets and more often than not, the lawyers are taking a cut on the alimony ir child support that they are about to get from the dad.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 03:20 PM
2

Cuz they rarely have any assets and more often than not, the lawyersxwoukd ge taking a cut on the alimony ir child support tgstvtgey were about to get from the dad.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 03:19 PM
3

Yes, but a man who was actually supportive and contributes most of his money in the child would do so after divorce as well, even if it is more than the decided child support. And a man who wouldn't exactly contribute financially would definitely be forced to spend more due to being forced by law. So no, what you said doesn't make much sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 04:34 PM
6

Men would definitely be hypergamous as well if they could. They just can't. You can see the hypergamy in the top 10-20% of men. Unlike the majority of women. Women don't intentionally choose to be hypergamous, or with I'll intention. That's just a privilege that is invisible to them but very much visible from men's perspective.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 01:59 PM
-2

But I talk shit about everyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 01:57 PM
1

The person literally mentioned that "if she wants to".
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 11:39 AM
–

I would love to think so, but then how would you explain the rise of extreme right wing in the america world that are removing women's rights? Or other countries even in the most progressive continent I e europe? Let's not even go towards an already conservative place like africa and asia.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 08:18 PM
1

You do understand that you are following of a theory in wish all evil practise like racism, classism or any other such extreme discriminatory practices can be justified, right? By saying the system is just in what it is doing and the blame solely lies in the individual or a specific group you are compleltly shifting the blame.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 04:48 AM
0

Don't shift goal posts. The original point and this are not related at all. You want to go through the law system, fine Did you perhaps not know that even if a man and a woman commit the same crime the judgment. Is different and far more lenient and forgiving for women than men? They would get wayyy less punishment than their make counterparts. Do let me know in case you were not aware of this and would like me to give you articles about the same as well
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 03:36 AM
0

But he still did get a prison sentence that he definitely should. What happens afterwards is a different story. You only shared an article about someone voicing their own opinion with no research facts or anything like that. That doesn't prove anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 01:31 AM
0

Kyle rittenhouse is irrelevant as it is not a gendered issues and there are politics involved which greatly manipulates the media. Regarding brock Turner, please show me an article or proof of judge saying "boys will be boys".
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 09:30 PM
0

Sorry you had to go through that traumatic experience. But just incase the issue wasn't clear it's about strangers ir specifically media's opinion that is being discussed right now. Obviously the guys close relatives would have biased opinion on him. But the society itself has a biased opinion on women in a supportive way.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 11:57 AM
2

The difference is nobody is bringing in words like deserved or justified as if to let the abuser go unpunished. A guy who kills his partner for cheating ir trying to get divorce would still be fully finished. Where as a women who is getting the mentally unstable card would either go unpunished ir limited punishment.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 11:55 AM
2

Solving it requires a logical conclusion which is a wrong approach to human being behaviour.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 11:53 AM
1

Obviously it's not cheaper to the level of a burger or something. But it's much much cheaper than what we actually think. It also helps with a boost in self confidence that it gives to extremely mentally stunned people who can't even talk to women properly it's quite worth it as well. The ones who think there is something extremely wrong with them will get to know that sex is nothing special and is just another activity humans do together. It gives a rush of feel good harmones but so do plenty o…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/25 01:10 AM
1

I said his woman. Not A woman. Also do you really think there is no phase where husbands if boyfriend felt less of a man because their gf or wife were using vibrators?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 08:36 AM
1

Oh men absolutely do feel disgust seeing his women use vibrators just that nobody cares about his feelings so it doesn't matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 08:23 AM
1

Also, just a reminder to all the people who keep saying these men can't get real women, did you all forget that prostitution exists? And quite cheap that's what we think. Sex robots would become no more mainstream than porn or vibrators.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 08:13 AM
1

So basically like sexlife of Majority married couples?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 08:01 AM
2

Because unlike these videos, the videos of women hating on and Insulting men being celebrated as cool are being shoved down my throat because somehow sexism by women has reached mainstream.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 07:53 AM
9

First because they are imposing their sense of balance onto others. Second, they themselves are rarely ever in balance. Cuz if they are then they wouldn't ask others to sacrifice something or change.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 07:37 AM
14

Yeah, they want balance but dint want the burden of balancing it. They want others to balance themselves for their whims and interests. That's why they don't understand the issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 01:52 AM
0

There is difference between being single, relationship and marriage. The age of marriage has literally nothing to do with what you mentioned. The matter if fact us the male youth that grew up high speed internet, social media and online dating are the ones who are below 30 and are the ones who are struggling the most. People above 30-35 have different standards or are already married so they are out of dating market already.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 09:30 AM
–

So basically a servant that gives you money instead of taking.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/25 03:25 AM
–

Spoken like an extremely privileged person who never had to make any sacrifices because of their narcissistic tendencies and tantrums always getting their way.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/25 04:01 PM
0

Let me guess, you also consider anyone who fails as autistic?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/25 10:17 AM
7

You are looking at it from the other side, the side that chooses stable and safe. Look at it from the side that is stable and afe and how many sacrifices and compromises they have to make for being considered safe and stable.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/25 09:57 AM
8

And younger women still do it fully knowing it's a mistake. They go to the psyche of you did your mistakes let me do mine.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/25 09:49 AM
9

Sounds a lot like women's issue tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/25 09:46 AM
–

They are if what he wants doesn't exist within those women. It doesn't matter how great an cook or painter you are if what the other person wants is a musician.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/25 09:37 AM
–

Look at all the comments calling OP as the problem So basically men should not settle and have more boundaries and deal breakers but if they actually did have them which will obviously result in more break ups since most women are not used to men bring picky and having more boundaries, it will result in others calling him the problem. It's like men will result in being the problem either way.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/25 09:28 AM
–

What do you consider as sacrifices then? Should he have sold of his kidney to buy a mac book or jewelery or something for it to be considered a sacrifice?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/25 09:17 AM
–

I was about to say the exact same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/25 09:12 AM
2

You believe in just world theory which is not true at all. Plenty of otherwise actually nice girls with good moral compass and empathy still fall for all those toxic masculine features. Most wouldn't mind much as long as she is not treated or bullied in such a way. Unfortunately those bullies or abusers wouldn't really treat them badly until they are fully reeled in. Sometimes the threshold is looong term relationship, sometimes it is marriage, sometimes it is having a child together. Only after…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 01:19 AM
3

Yeah try using those "manipulation skills" when dealing with an angry drunk man while you are in a man's body. They would just get more pissed off.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 02:43 PM
-4

How are literally happened incidents where a women claimed and cried as assault when a guy was just trying to strike a conversation equals to Someone clearly believing that women exist for men's pleasure instead of existing for their own agenda? If a woman wants her boy friend or a friend who is a boy to buy her one chocolate then does that mean she "clearly" believes that men's only worth is as an ATM machine?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 07:27 AM
1

Just saying babies being swapped isn't the same doesn't mean there is no relation to the topic at hand. Answer the question. You were the one who said men do not like to raise other people's kids but left out the part where they were being betrayed into thinking they are raising their own children. Give a man his brother's children or sisters children and he would raise them as his own if the bio parents are no longer in this world. Similarly a mother would react in a similar way if she was betr…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 12:07 AM
3

Are you saying women wouldn't mind even a bit if they found out that the child they were raising was accidentally swapped at the hospital and they were raising someone else's kid? It's not just stepdads who are abusive. Stepmoms are also abusive incase you did not know that.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 10:45 PM
2

Mandatory paternity test is the same as prenup. They are also just a preventive measure to defend against paternity fraud. Again, everyone that was a victim of paternity fraud was once a trusting partner that had faith in their spouse. That is one of the. Iggest reasons to why they were victims of paternity fraud. You are just enabling people to commit more paternity fraud by saying anyone who asks for this test should be prepared for divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 03:26 PM
1

Again, by your logic there shouldn't even be any law whatsoever. You understand that your non sensical analogy applies to anything from murder to domestic violence right? You can use your same mindset and tell women saying if you didn't trust the man why did you marry him? Or saying if you didn't trust that person why were you in proximity of them? You should have ran as soon as you saw them. Such stupid analogy you have that it is soo destructive and would just lead to end of civilization. Not …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 02:56 PM
2

Your comment makes absolutely no frikin sense. You did not give any solution to the issue. Nobody while getting married both men and women fantasise about cheating in their partner (those that do can't even be considered normal human). And similarly every person that was a victim of paternity fraud was once a trusting partner. It was because he had trust and faith in his partner that he was betrayed. If he doesn't have trust then he wouldn't even have married in the first place. You honestly sou…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 01:58 PM
1

Your comment makes absolutely no frikin sense. You did not give any solution to the issue. Nobody while getting married both men and women fantasise about cheating in their partner (those that do can't even be considered normal human). And similarly every person that was a victim of paternity fraud was once a trusting partner. It was because he had trust and faith in his partner that he was betrayed. If he doesn't have trust then he wouldn't even have married in the first place. You honestly sou…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 01:58 PM
0

Wait, you do know that paternity fraud does happen in real life and is not just a fantasy right? What do you think we should do to punish the women after committing paternity fraud and how can we prevent it? Before you say stupid things like trust and faith, the man did trust the women not to cheat and that is how he ended up being victim of paternity fraud.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 07:27 AM
1

Why you gotta make it a lose/lose situation? Would you also be against prenup?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 07:21 AM
2

But they are only warranted, if cheating is proven. Vast majority of times it's difficult to prove cheating whereas it's much easier to prove paternity fraud if all the parties involved are agreeing to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 07:19 AM
-1

I agree. Paternity fraud is much much worse than DV.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 07:15 AM
1

Glad that it couldn't be you, but unfortunately there are still plenty that indeed do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 07:13 AM
1

You do know that this blind trust is what serves as s base for paternity fraud, right? Its like saying why do women need to have a bank account or freedom to work? Do they not trust their partners? And then saying, they can start working if they want but they will get divorce papers the next day.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 07:09 AM
5

Yeah, to protect the women and child. Men unlike women have always been thinking about women as well. Women on the other hand, keep women's best interest above the moral thing to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 06:57 AM
3

If it makes the situation any better, most times men didn't have a say in who they will marry either. Unless the family is financially dependent on him. And most times even then he doesn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 06:27 AM
1

Cuz the parents of the women are also hypergamous. They also want the women to go into a family with higher social status than themselves. Go check arranged marriages where they are still happening like in india. In the majority of cases the groom would be earning equally or much more than the father of the bride.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 06:24 AM
6

What are you talking about? Did you miss the viral videos of feminists talking about unrealistic beauty standards for women in video games a few years ago? The one which led to so many characters in both video games showing mostly just non standard attractive women? This has even extended to some tv shows and movies as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 01:11 AM
0

It's been 7 hours. Still waiting.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 12:35 AM
2

TRP never potrays women as evil. It just removed the illusion shows them as they are. That they are not some goody two shoes who reward you by choosing you to be thier partner based solely on your good nature but are just like any other human who has desires which are more likely than not, are also selfish and shallow. If anything TRP humanizes women more than any other movement. It doesn't potrays women as angels or uphold then to unrealistic characteristics. TRP simply says "Look vast majority…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 12:30 AM
2

But why would they? This sub is for people who want to talk about a probable topic that would be considered controversial by the main steam media. When the entire media is telling one thing, why would the men repeat the same thing? There is no point in it. I understand you are talking without much introspection. And are talking about a hopeful situation. But it doesn't fit the narrative of this sub. Cuz what you mentioned is basically what happens in almost every other sub and media.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/24 12:28 PM
5

What do you think the entire collective mainstream media has been doing for the past few decades if not policing then men on what not to do to help women feel better?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/24 12:21 PM
1

In most military less than 20% actually do frtonkine fighting. Vast majority is of support roles from data entry to medics.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 08:25 PM
2

Since you say you know military, you should also know that the people fighting on frontlines are actually the minority. Vast majority are doing other stuff like logistics, food, medic, cleaning, creating emergency shelters, passing, logging in information etc. Also regarding your babies excuse, how many % of women do you think are in between 18-35? If that is truly what you stand by then you should be allowed for conscripting women above 35 age.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 08:23 PM
1

What about women above 35? How many babies do you think they will be making in their lifetime? And how much percentage of women do you think are between ages 18 and 35? 50% ? 99? You are just looking for excuses by using women card and special features available only for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 08:19 PM
2

Less than 20% of the any army actually fights on the front lines. Large percentage of it is involved in logistics, medic, food, cleaning, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 08:16 PM
2

So where exactly do you spend time with the opposite sex? Other than work ofcourse.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 09:54 AM
–

As if left is any better. The world in general sucks for both men and women. But women can anytime they want choose to enjoy the advantages of patriarchy that the feminism conviently didn't touch whereas men have to survive on their own cuz all their advantages were destroyed by modern world.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/24 10:28 AM
-1

Lol. Finally admitting that you would just breakup with someone when they don't fullfil what you ask of them. Basically if you want them to do something and they don't you will just break up. Got the message very clearly about what kind of entitlement and self centred nature you posses. In such a case, you are correct,this situation is not applicable to kind of people like you. It's about normal people who are ok with someone not being their servant with no individual freedom.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 11:04 PM
-1

Again, this is not about different people requiring different compromises. Don't try so hard to avoid the subject with willful ignorance. It's about two people wanting the same thing, one current partner and one being the EX but if the person that made compromises for their EX isn't willing to do the same with you. Obviously if the current partner and their ex require different compromises and there is absolutely no overlap at all then the situation is not even applicable to it. Lol, I am actual…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 08:59 PM
0

OMG, again OP is deceiving a kind of situation where your partner would make compromises or willing to do things for the sake of their EX but isn't willing to do so for you. He did not make it with your life mind. You have to take the concept and see how it applies to you. Not take it literally and say it just wouldn't happen. It's like saying you don't mind abortions getting banned because you always have IUD or use protection or because you are past menopause so it wouldn't affect you. See how…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 08:16 PM
0

So basically you are just willfully ignoring the concept and just pretending such a situation wouldn't exist at all so that you can sinply ignore and not answer the question. Don't confuse between deal breakers and compromises. It's in human nature to want more. Even if he fulfills all the basic requirements there must e been something the other person would want more of cuz of not there would be no compromises at all. Are you willing to make any compromises for the sake of relationship? If not …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 07:40 PM
0

So basically you are just willfully ignoring the concept. And just pretending such a situation wouldn't exist at all so that you cansinply if ore and not answer the question. Don't confuse between deal breakers and compromises. It's in human nature to want more. Even if he fulfills all the basic requirements there must e been something the other person would want more of cuz of not there would be no compromises at all. Again what OP describes can be changed based on the situation. He is describi…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 07:36 PM
1

It's a waste of time talking to you anymore. Despite explaining everything you still Intentionally pretending to confuse between deal breakers and compromises. Even after I gave clear examples. And also pretending as if such a situation wouldn't exist in the first place so that you can simply not answer the question.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 07:31 PM
1

So basically you are just willfully ignoring the concept. Again what OP describes can be changed based on the situation. He is describing the compromises that you had to make. How would you feel if you get to know that for all the compromises were only for you and nobody else had to make any of such compromises. Like from simply taking allergy medication for previous wives or ex gf to him making an active effort to make peace with your relatives who don't like him. This post was not made specifi…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 06:18 PM
1

Again, those are your deal breakers. Not comething you are willing to compromise. Are you so Inexperienced that you don't even understand what relationships usually entail and how many number of compromises usually happen for a successful relationship to continue? What about marriages? You think giving up on not cooking one food item for dinner because he is allergic is enough to file for divorce? No right? You are intentionally dodging answering the question or you are simply too inexperienced …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 10:17 AM
1

That's just willful ignorance. Don't act like you donot understand the concept so you can just dodge the question. The question is about if a guy meets all your deal breakers but you have to make some compromises for the relationship or the marriage to work but then you found out out of all his exes only you are subjected to this behavior where you had to make compromises. It can be anything from sexual enthusiasm to extravagant fully paid vacations to gifts or basically anything that would make…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 10:07 AM
3

Dude, the comment was in your favour. She gave you the answer you are looking for and you are still saying the same thing to her.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 09:16 AM
1

Are you saying women are so selfish that they aren't willing to make any compromises or sacrifices in their relationships to make it successful or stable? I was sure that women are just as good hearted or bad hearted as mentioned and plenty of women also make plenty of sacrifices/compromises for thier partner. Any sane human in such a situation is bound to be upset when they find out that only she is being subjected to such a treatment which their partners ex didn't have to make any such sacrifi…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 09:14 AM
2

Couldn't have expressed this better. It's soo bizarre that most women aren't able to have basic empathy to understand this just cuz they have 5 hook ups and 5 fwb and 10 people who are willing to get into relationship with them immediately on their speed dial so they don't need to put in any work for getting into a relationship. That's the biggest difference in why we are getting confused. If you go to a billionaire trust fund kind and say you are worrying about savings or having to stay at a sh…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 09:13 AM
1

Are you saying women are so selfish that they aren't willing to make any compromises or sacrifices in their relationships to make it successful or stable? I was sure that women are just as good hearted or bad hearted as mentioned and plenty of women also make plenty of sacrifices/compromises for thier partner. Any sane human in such a situation is bound to be upset when they find out that only she is being subjected to such a treatment which their partners ex didn't have to make any such sacrifi…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 09:08 AM
1

Are you saying women are so selfish that they aren't willing to make any compromises or sacrifices in their relationships to make it successful or stable? I was sure that women are just as good hearted or bad hearted as mentioned and plenty of women also make plenty of sacrifices/compromises for thier partner. Any sane human in such a situation is bound to be upset when they find out that only she is being subjected to such a treatment which their partners ex didn't have to make any such sacrifi…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 09:06 AM
2

That's the thing, both men and women have gotten away with violent acts but somehow only men are stuck with the negative remark as bad influence on the society who is always dangerous.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/24 03:15 PM
5

Are you saying society treats men and women as equally capable of violence? Cuz last I checked that is not the case. As per society men are in demon mode 24/7 who are just looking for an opportunity to abuse and take advantage of you while women are wonderful creatures who are basically angels.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/24 04:23 AM
1

As I said, that is fine. Women like men throughout history, are allowed to enjoy the special exclusive privileges allowed to them due to societal circumstances. There is nothing wrong with it as long as they don't have a change of heart later and want a different thing than their younger selves. Even that is fine but they just gotta be prepared for consequences for the change in heart. There are wayyy more older women crying and whining about men bad than there are older men crying and whining w…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/24 05:09 PM
1

And that's fine as long as they don't have a change of heart in the future and then whine and complain about where all the good men went away. For the vast majority especially women, harmones are no joke. Especially once she crosses 30. But As long as she doesn't care about commitment, discloses her past very early into any possible relation and doesn't bring children into this world she is free to do whatever she wants and nobody has any rights to criticize her.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 10:55 AM
4

Lol, men are clearly not allowed to speak, that's the whole point. Go try making such claims on mainstream media and you will see how quickly it gets taken down but such extreme views that favour women will still stay online.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 04:46 AM
1

You see that's the thing, it's different if it's in group closed bias. But mainstream media supporting and not reprimand the women who open say such stuff is why men are having issues with it. Everyone says men and women are equal but if men do it then it's wrong, but when women do it they are hailed with "slay queen" or "you go girl" and the worse part is the media doesn't do shit about it. The individuals can say whatever they want, it's their freedom to do so. But I'm talking about the mainst…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 04:40 AM
-1

Or atleast normalise using prostitution services for men. They somehow normalised prostitution and removed the stigma but masterfully did it only for women. Men who seek such services are still seen as bad, unless of course they are in the top 10%.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 04:36 AM
0

You see, nobody should be drafted is this imaginary phrase that is used by feminists only because they know it won't be implemented in place. When push comes to shove, the vast majority are extremely comfortable with the ancient values where again men's lives are sacrificed because they are treated as Expendables. Where exactly are feminist pushing for women to be drafted? For every once such incident there are 10x more where they are pushing for specifically women to not be drafted and then use…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 04:33 AM
2

You can agree that current laws are disadvantages to men. See taking a neutral stance is fine but just know that this is not how it was in history. Men actively supported women's movements in the past which is why we are at the stage we are now. If they also thought "I can think about their issues all I want but I don't know how to help them, and if it involves sacrificing my inherent advantages that we accomplished through sacrificing ourselves throughout history, then I don't want to do that" …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 04:28 AM
4

Because cavier won't give you commitment. But as long as you are fine with it and are comfortable with knowing that they have no right to complain or transfer the blame to other food about commitment anymore because they are afterall consequences of their their own choices, it is fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 04:20 AM
3

Yup, cuz a known on the face enemy is better than someone that constantly stabs behind your back
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/24 06:30 PM
1

When did I say we live in a society? You are just saying whatever you want. Are you saying a random person who got betrayed by their loved ones into thinking they have a child when in reality they did not would make a better loving parent than the actual bio parents? Again don't bring adoption into this. It's a totally different topic that's not even worth comparing.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 11:58 PM
5

The fu are you even taking about? You keep on rambling about random bs and not talk about the actual topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 11:55 PM
1

Again, if this is your whole point then you really need to improve your communication skills. But that seems highly unlikely. So answer a simple question so that we can get to the end of the discussion. Do you think men who don't accept the paternity fraud and not take responsibility of the child born out of paternity fraud are not real men? Your answer to this would determine how hypocritical you are or how misunderstand your who argument is about.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 11:51 PM
1

It is not you who decide how great a family you are. It's the society. Even the child abusers would think they are great father and mother and have a great family. As I said there is a difference between a minimalist lifestyle and a poverty lifestyle. Don't confuse between them. While they might look similar they aren't.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 11:49 PM
3

Wtf are you talking about? I was the same one who is also saying the bio-dad should be responsible for taking care of the child. The women who committed paternity fraud are indeed bad. What kinda sick narrative are you even trying to build here. If you want to discuss the adults then the woman is indeed at fault. If you want to discuss the responsibility of the child then both bio -dad and bio-mom are responsible for it. Or are you saying the biological dads and moms are incapable of loving thei…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 11:46 PM
1

Who says lives and loves are not important? Nobody is saying that. You are literally deluding yourself into some faraway world and saying random nonsense. It's not about what's important but about who is responsible. It's great if the man who was taking care of the child while being betrayed by the women who he thought loves him would accept the fraud and continue taking care of the child. But not doing so doesn't mean he's not a real man. You don't get to shame men for not accepting the child. …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 11:41 PM
2

And it's also best if every relationship is fulfilling, every person is empathetic and full of love for random strangers and Everything but that's not how reality is. In such a Lovely world, the women wouldn't commit paternity fraud in the first place. The sheer act of women committing a paternity fraud disproves every single thing about love that you try to preach.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 11:37 PM
1

And that's great news. Good for you. Still it's entirely irrelevant to the topic at hand. Being in a minimalist lifestyle and not engaging in a hedonistic lifestyle is great. But it's not the same as being forced to live in poverty.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 11:33 PM
1

You are the one that is actively disregarding 50% of the entire topic. What about the biological father? Shouldn't he bear the responsibility for participating in sex that brought forth a child into this world?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 11:29 PM
1

That's exactly what I mean. What do you mean by real man? Are you saying people who refused to accept the paternity fraud done to them are not real men?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 11:27 PM
1

You do know that you are coming across as one of those that throw shame on these men in case they don't accept the paternity fraud right? You are just the flip side of those that you try to demonise. If you don't mind men not taking responsibility of the child that is not his and are only arguing about that that talk bad names for men that accept the paternity fraud then you got looooot if improvement to do cuz it looks like you want the father to accept the child from paternity fraud and anythi…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 11:25 PM
5

I'm saying it's his responsibility as the biological father to love the kid and take care of the kid. Why you neglecting or ignoring the real and actual responsibility of those involved in the baby making process and clinging to the ones that have no participation in it? It's like tomorrow if it is found that pepsi is mixing opium or other such drugs in their drinks then you go destroy the store or gas station for simply having the drink in stock and selling it. Go impose the responsibility on t…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 11:17 PM
2

This is exactly what's wrong with your entire ideology. You are calling a man who was betrayed and not willing to accept the fraud as selfish and bad and obsessed in the wrongs instead of important things. Look there is nothing wrong with raising another person's kid, but similarly there is nothing wrong with not wanting to do so either. Especially when they are betrayed into doing so by the person who they thought they loved the most. Why don't you randomly pick a kid every year from orphanage …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 11:13 PM
1

But in cases of paternity fraud, the ones who did the fraud are indeed wrong? Like why you want to disregard the central point of the topic? Also what about the bio dad's responsibility? It's him who should be taking care of the child.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 11:05 PM
3

Get off your high horse and live in reality. Even the most lovely family would not be as loving as you describe them to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 11:01 PM
2

Go to any mainstream media where there is discussion related to paternity fraud and not from men's rights perspective and half of the speakers will always prefer the man to suck it up for the sake of child and worse forgive the mother as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 10:52 PM
10

What happened to the love from the actual father?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 10:50 PM
4

Unfortunately there are plenty that would simply blame the father and curse him if he isn't willing to accept the paternity fraud.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 10:48 PM
10

I guess, the majority of us are borderline sociopathic then. Cuz there is a certain limit to repeatedly being kind and attentive to those that don't reciprocate in a similar way.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/24 12:05 PM
2

Kind of depends on how she is treating me. If she is indeed over him and is showing no signs of still in love with him then I couldn't care less who her ex is. Unless they are some kind of psychopath with powerwho would kill others or something. But if she is the perfect women and if we are in an ideal relationship then her past wouldn't really matter much. Do note that, to be considered as my ideal women she also has to be mature enough to not get into another relationship until she is over her…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/24 12:40 AM
15

The women support system survived cuz govt started to get involved with its donations and maintenance. The men's support system did not survive because not only did the govt not provide any funds, it actively participated in dissolving the institutions or making them not be exclusive anymore. The biggest reason for terf is also because those women hate to see the MTF trans people get a share of their funds and because they don't like to share the spotlight.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/24 07:31 PM
3

Yes, even Russian women standards are higher BUT they are also wayy more feminine and are Frank about their standards as well as contribute more towards their feminine role while also balancing their masculinity.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 09:02 AM
2

So basically all the mainstream media, universities and policy makers in such places are end stage internet brain worms?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 05:48 AM
2

Look it's the women who were claiming double standards. Not the men. Nobody is even listening to men's preferences anyways. It's the woman who says blue pilled stuff but is red pilled in reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 10:20 PM
5

Having different rules for different men is hypocritical yes. A woman who says she would never do ONS or causal sex is only referring to the AVG men. She would still do them with high value men. That's the hypocritical or double standards part. If she follows the 3 date rule or same rules for anyone then no she is not hypocritical.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 10:16 PM
4

Yes, similar to the hypocritical part from women who do ONS and casual sex with high value men but not with AVG men.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 10:12 PM
9

Yes, you are correct. Humans change. A women could have simply changed her lifestyle after experiencing years of ONS and Casuals sex. but she should also know that she is not entitled to men that don't care about her past. The man that Riley Reid married has tons of sex with other pornstars as well. She herself posted some videos where she brings her friends to have sex with him. That's the whole problem here. The double standards that most modern women have deluded themselves into. A 9 or 10 ca…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 10:10 PM
1

The problem is not with the standards but the double standards. The women who would have high standards against an AVG guy and wouldn't sleep on the first date would still go ahead and have ONS with high value men or "chads". Men would rarely complain in a generalized way about a woman having singular standards towards all men. They might still complain about women not following the 3 date rule but wouldn't do so if she does that with everyone. Similarly with religious people who actually do not…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 10:01 PM
0

The problem is not with the standards but the double standards. The women who would have high standards against an AVG guy and wouldn't sleep on the first date would still go ahead and have ONS with high value men or "chads". Men would rarely complain in a generalized way about a woman having singular standards towards all men. They might still complain about women not following the 3 date rule but wouldn't do so if she does that with everyone. Similarly with religious people who actually do not…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 09:59 PM
2

Yes that's what we are saying as well. A AVG guy wouldn't get with a 9 women even if he throws himself at her. But the opposite is not true. An AVG women can majority of the time get with a Chad if she is willing enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 08:00 PM
1

Hot men are not desperate because they are getting the women that they want and know that they can get it whenever they want. You can't take one part and neglect the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 07:44 PM
1

As you mentioned, you have lightly flirted. in what world can that be called as "throwing themselves at others?"
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 07:43 PM
9

Yeah, good luck with that when the last piece of action you got is 2 years ago with no signs of improvement.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/24 03:44 PM
3

The jokes on you because the one who fetishishes fictional version of the opposite gender most is actually women. While men indeed simp and fetishise for fictional women, the world beats them down to a level where the reality is often forced upon them.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/24 04:39 PM
4

It's cuz after she gets someone after lowering her standards she will feel like she settled and end up resenting the man for her own actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/24 01:47 AM
10

That would be the ideal scenario. But unfortunately we don't live in an ideal world.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/24 02:31 PM
4

If you are writing an essay about a dog or a cow or even about humans and in between wrote that they have 16 eyes and have 6 hands then I don't need a whole argument to say that you are wrong about the creature's anatomy. Similarly I also agree that a conversation definitely needs to be had about how we are actively combating with a ton if researches being done and media over focusing on the gaps on which men were supposedly superior previously there are hardly any at all that try to discuss abo…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/24 03:11 AM
1

My only point is that you can't say women benefiting from dating up as an exception because that's how the vast majority of relationships are throughout the world. You can also see the list of top 100 richest women and most got the wealth from either divorces or by inheritance.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/24 02:18 AM
-1

As I said we can't judge the ancient way of living with modern values and ethics or definitions. Regardless of whether it's called profession or occupation or simple exchange of goods this was how it's done. This was observed in a pack of monkeys or rats as well. As soon as the concept of exchanging money for food is introduced to the pack the first thing the males did is exchange it with women for sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/24 02:16 AM
-1

But the majority of women are indeed dating up. Including the women are earning more than 80% of the combined population. If a female lawyer or doctor was working in a top firm in NYC, she would typically try to marry a senior or someone who is earning even more than her. Not some waiter or McDonald's/gas station cashier or new intern in the company who will make wayy less than her. The only exception to this rule is if they bring something that can't be bought with money or if the men bring hig…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/24 02:11 AM
-1

Then there were no professions at all back then. A person can hold multiple professions as well. You can't judge ancient ways using modern values and ethics.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/24 02:05 AM
0

Are you saying there is not a single man that earns less than any woman that exists? There are soooooo many teachers and nurses that are overwhelmingly female dominant. Do you think the janitors of those places are also earning more than them?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/24 02:03 AM
0

It can't be called an exception when the majority of women indeed do the "dating up".
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/24 01:21 AM
-8

Yes, men trading food/ safety/shelter or all of them with women in exchange for sex. Hence the oldest profession.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/24 01:19 AM
0

They will if they are in a relationship. For men the numbers only matter until they are in a serious relationship or until they are married. Once a women be ones serious gf or wife their score matters little on how men treat them. Unlike women who carry forward the score even after getting into relationship but this does ki ds change for most women once they become mothers and bear a child though. But only for most not guaranteed.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 11:37 PM
3

You were the one who made the statement saying due to feminism the burden of sole income is lifted from men. When In reality and practise it rarely ever matters because very few % of women are every comfortable with marrying a man who early similar or lesser than her. Most women still go for higher status than themselves. Also nobody is actually ok or happy about bring poor or reducing their lifestyle. Not just women. The matter of fact is women right the system by marrying men of higher status …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/24 04:38 AM
4

See, while society doesn't shame a women for being stat at home mom but it is very very comfortable doing it to men. Why? Shami g either ge der is wrong but why the bias? While you say "feminism" helped men by removing the expectation to support the entire family on men's income alone, this is very rarely the practise in reality. Very rarely do women ever marry someone that is similar to her or lesser than her. And in most cases that it does happen, men would be doing part time jobs while studyi…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/24 04:11 AM
0

No, but deciding who should lead solely based on monetary value is definitely disrespectful. Because if power decisions should be based on who earns more then there never would have been women's freedom moment and development. Before you say we still got a long way to go or such stuff, look at 1800's to now. nd look at 100's to 1800's. It's because men were accomodating and accepting if women having more power in their life and having more independence and freedom that we reached this level. But…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/24 04:03 AM
–

Yeah cuz they are the face of all the fake and useless products. Not because they actually work. If we indeed created drugs that can actually increase the size of penis then the inventor of the drug would become a billionaire within 1 month.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/24 12:15 PM
–

While male porn actors and actresses do indeed take medical help to last longer there is unfortunately no pill to make the penis bigger. They can only use numbing gels or pills. The only way is surgery and 99% of those that had such a surgery would be unfit for porn because most time it wouldn't be aesthetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/24 11:38 AM
2

If there is no infidelity then love.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 11:46 AM
1

Correction - they are not getting approached by those that they want to be approached from. They want high tier people to be attracted and make the first move and take all the risk. They couldn't care any less if 1000's of respectful people approach them, if these women don't see them as attractive
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/24 09:57 PM
-3

The same way women may seem best of friends but diss each other the moment the other person is not there.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/24 09:32 AM
0

All men behave the same way. It's the women with double standards. Don't twist it into something to again blame it on men.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/24 09:30 AM
2

But who exactly is talking about ugly side of women? Literally every mainstream media is only allowing ugly side of men to be discussed. And people are also discussing only the ugly side of men. I would like to see a person that discuss both ugly sides and then we can further have a discussion on this.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/24 03:21 PM
4

Lol, it's not even legal in one of the most powerful country i.e France. I wouldn't even mention the stance on rest of the countries that are not USA.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/24 09:10 AM
4

See, there is difference between if it happens like that and claiming that this is how it already happens. Just like you have experienced your povthete are plenty of evidence both online and IRL to showcase bad divorces where the guy was screwed over by the women due to lack of experience or to support the AF/BB theory. Plenty of single mothers aren't willing to marry another single dad's either so by definition itself all the single mothers that are not marrying the single fathers comes under t…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 09:14 PM
2

Yeah that's cuz she wasn't willing to spend even one night with him and only claims that she would be happy to spend some 30+ years. A bird in hand is worth 2 birds on tree. If we are to take those words seriously, she also should prove her attraction. Without those actions those are just words.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 02:13 AM
2

There is also unfortunately another bad version of this. They will call the guy marriage material but just not for them. They meant it for some if thier struggling friends
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 01:55 AM
1

Who says women don't like that kind of romance IRL? Try blindly trusting her and giving her the power over all your assets and finances after your first date because you can feel the chemistry and know that she is the one so you wholeheartedly trust her, they would be ecstatic. Gift her yachts and diamond jewellery for the first month anniversary and such and that would make 99% of women happy as well. The key factor here is you cannot expect them to be the same. You can only keep providing a d …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 10:35 AM
1

Exactly
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 02:58 PM
3

That's the ironic part. The very women with toxic and deadbeat husbands are the ones who give birth to most children. The actual well settled couple either give birth to one child or go no child. It's the poor and criminal background people who are having most babies while societal rule following civilians are having less and less children every year.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 02:51 PM
3

Could you share your link for the status of only 10% of male population procreate? Also might I remind you that this 10% population would just have sex and leave the female to give birth and raise the kids all alone? And most of the time the kids are also abandoned by the mom soon after birth once they can get food on their own. So are you perhaps advertising hypergamy? And asking women to just have sex with the top 10% and then be content with having his sperm and nothing more?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 12:12 PM
4

Bro that is literally how evolution worked till now. Food and procreation are literally the 2 most important things for a species to survive. If your ancestors didn't care about these two then you would not even be born to argue and insult others like now. It's fine to pretend we have evolved intellectually but that doesn't mean we can let go of our core.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 12:03 PM
6

Men are fine with making the bigger contributions and taking the share of women, if they get to marry and have kids as if it is the most normal thing to do. The problem here is that even this most normal thing is becoming very scarce and is being treated as a special favor to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 12:01 PM
2

Absolutely. But getting laid is literally 1 out of 2 most important things in all living beings. The other one is food/surviving.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 11:51 AM
1

Answer the other questions first.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 12:28 PM
1

Lol, in case you didn't understand I was referring to actual feet.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 12:14 PM
1

Why are you talking like as if after menopause no women will ever want to have sex ever in life or would like to be lived and cared for? Should all women divorce their husband's after menopause?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 12:12 PM
1

Good thing I have two of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 12:00 PM
0

You say it as if they are selling the land for pennies in Walmart. The reason that's impressive is because of its scarcity and huge price.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 11:58 AM
3

Women do financially worse because in middle class average household when married they use up majority of the income. Having no rules on money distribution in marriage benefit women not men. They are always the ones who get gifts and spend most if the house income. Granted on avg women have more financial needs than avg man but that still doesn't take away from this fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 11:54 AM
1

Women below 30 are the biggest enemies of women above 30 and vice versa. Granted their competition pales in comparison to men but overall women do more harm to other women than men do towards them.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 11:44 AM
2

Don't worry. The world is pretty adamant on demonising men and reminding them how shallow and worthless they are every chance it gets. But your response doesn't answer any of questions. Do you think men are not allowed to prefer brains and personality over pretty body? The person you replied to literally mentioned that they would like to choose the kind of person who doesn't discriminate based on looks and would look for personality. Which means they themselves prefer personality over looks cuz …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 06:06 PM
1

What exactly was the point of this comment? It says absolutely nothing except hurl some offenses.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 10:52 AM
–

While I agree with your second statement that doesn't make any sense here at all. You literally just said it is fair and deserved for men who only think of having sex to not get any sex at all. Regardless of weather they are upfront about it or not. So how are men supposed to find others who just want sex without being upfront about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 10:49 AM
2

So you are saying or agreeing that women only go for the body or for the bank account? Why shouldn't a women like him for who he actually is? Or is this privilege reserved for women?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 10:46 AM
3

So you basically want men to become emotionless monks who forgive everything? Would you be saying the same statements towards women as well that complain about men? If yes then that's fine you are expecting higher standards from humans altogether. But if not then that would make it just a hypocritical sexist.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 10:41 AM
–

Absolutely. But are women actually following this? Majority aren't. They only start following or preach this when they are nearing 30 or after 30. When they actually get bored of party culture or hook up culture. Even those that don't do parties or hook up will still have casuals and FWB. It's exactly the opposite for men and women. A women never having casual sex or hook ups or FWB is as rare as a male virgin at 40 YO. Also our current 40 YO lived in a different era where there is very very lit…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 10:31 AM
–

Why is it well deserved? Do you perhaps think male sexuality itself is wrong and should be punished that anyone who wants just sex should derver no sex at all?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 10:25 AM
–

You ask when was the last time you talked to a new women in a non-work, non friends related context. I am asking where ? Any exclusively dating related events are a sausage fest. The laws nor the media are not helping it either with the mindset of guilty until proven innocent in matters related to men. Where do you think such data is collected from? Outside Hotels? In parks? All places where actual Couples or those actually interested in hook ups go for. Online dating is literally hopeless for a…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 10:21 AM
8

Point to be noted is that this % of men are increasing drastically every year despite the liberation in women's sexuality. We are going towards a very bad future that I wish we could avoid soon.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 12:17 PM
5

YES and not just for me but for the majority of men. Because women say one thing and do another. Men do it as well but it is a well known phenomenon to not trust men. Whereas "women are wonderful" is still in full throttle when women lie about what they want and what they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 12:05 PM
1

You see, that's the thing. There exist things like pretty privilege and halo effect. If the guy or girl is good looking enough we delude ourselves into thinking they are good people that we are compatible with even without them explicitly showing such behavior. For you, you would imagine the guy's personality to be good as long as he is good looking.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 11:34 AM
6

Peace
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 11:30 AM
2

It's not about them valuing it, it's about the trying to gaslit others with their virtue signalling. They say everything except money and looks in thier list. But those are the first they check in a potential partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 02:25 AM
–

Lol, you talk as of women don't have any issue with prostotution. It is women who stigmatise it majority of the time and women who view men who pay for sex as if devil's spawn on earth. Also don't you think your hypothetical scenario is just tooo convenient for women? Like what exactly did they do in arriving there except ofcourse make it more difficult ? You forget that they are the cause of issue. If this continues we will see much more radicalism the likes of which we are already seen in you …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 01:00 PM
–

Nobody said anything about forcing you. Women themselves will willingly submit and be more than happy to be provided protection. When given a choice anyone would prefer not to be forced to do violence where you can lose your lives. Just look at Ukraine or any place with war. 99% of women when given the opportunity did in fact flee from the war zone rather than "arm themselves". Also who will create the AK 47 and who will sell it to you? When it becomes a gender issue you have to think from the o…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 11:48 AM
–

And that very notion is what led to wars and what pushed women to back home into a passive role because they become objectified and a prized possessions that can be owned. One of the biggest reason for this long existing peace and development is vast majority of men being able to reproduce and then being content with thier life. If we take that away, it's back to regional wars and world wars where the surviving men share multiple women and do as they wish.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 11:19 AM
1

Unfortunately it's the mainstream feminism that actively berates the men's rights movements and say BS statements like feminism helps both mena nd women when in reality everything feminism does is at core only to benefit women. But nobody is willing to accept this straight and simple fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 04:49 AM
–

Lol, hate poor man much? I hope you also hate poor women just as much because if not then you are a hypocrite on top of classist. Women can also marry a rich man commit paternity fraud and take half his assets and then some more for child support that is not even his child for 28+ years. And that is only for one image if they had multiple children but none of them are his. Paternity test to prove legitimacy of paternity is invalid in 80% if countries including France where paternity test is stra…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 03:26 AM
3

The difference is very very huge. Women get from 6 months to more than an year for maternity. Men get like 2 weeks max for paternity. Also you basically just declared yourself as a hypocrite that don't care about using double standards to their own advantage. Nothing wrong with being a selfish hypocrite as long as you also don't claim to be striving towards a equal society and say women and men should be treated equally and should have equal rights and responsibilities etc. Just know that you ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 11:10 PM
1

I see. If you want to bring gendered differences into this, then are ok with the wage gap? Because technically men require less breaks and leaves than women. More men wore overtime and can be called to the office in emergencies even in midnights and be made to work many nights out whereas women can't. Also while we are at it, why give maternity leave at all? Since we are trying to use the gendered advantages and justify them rather than strive for equal society, let's just not hire any women bef…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 10:06 PM
1

So why can't she have enough for both of them? Or it is just hypocritical double standards that you wish not to mention.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 09:08 PM
0

You literally did not answer anything with that reply. Must be proficient with jargon. Look if you complain and blame men for Vocalising about women's dating value "deprecating" with various incidents in their life like multiple ONS, multiple short term relationships, fwb, hookups, multiple pregnancies etc then you first have to agree to that the standards of men are actually correct to justify the women's actions of gold digging/always going for men who outearn the women. If you want to justify…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 09:05 PM
-7

But are women openly agreeing to this? And actually "preserving" (as per your comment) their value? Most probably not. So basically you want to have your cake and eat it too.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 07:01 PM
-2

I legit never understood the abstract issue of people complaining about others using male/female to describe a gender. How can someone refer to a women as female be as bad as de-humananising? Like don't you think y'all are going pretty extreme and finding faults at wrong things? It's like every single action is being twisted into something unholy that is beyond redemption of any sort. And that simply refering to such words prove something.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 06:59 PM
-2

I legit never understood the abstract issue of people complaining about others using male/female to describe a gender. How can someone refer to a women as female be as bad as de-humananising? Like don't you think y'all are going pretty extreme and finding faults at wrong things? It's like every single action is being twisted into something unholy that is beyond redemption of any sort. And that simply refering to such words prove something.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 06:56 PM
10

So by your logic man is also signing up for a much worse life by being with a poorer woman. Are you seriously short sighted and non-empathetic? You can't understand this simple logic? You are basically saying women are willingly ruining the life of man by being with them because as per you when a higher income person stays with a lower income person the high income person's life gets much worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 06:51 PM
5

The reason I brought up your husband's past is because he has experienced a similar past as you regarding promiscuity so he had the tools to understand your pov and not judge you for it. Men/women who don't experience it don't have the tools to face such things. Whether we like it or not or past experience does indeed matter. Because it absolutely does change who we are and how we react to different things in life.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/24 02:57 AM
6

See nobody blames you or has any issue with you because most probably you didn't hide your past when you are about to start dating your husband and also you married a guy who has seen a similar part as you with promiscuity. The issue most people have here is when a woman with a promiscuous past tries to become the wife of a guy with no such past by hiding her past or by acting like he is wrong and perhaps insure or something for having issues with her past.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/24 02:38 AM
2

So you are saying a girl will only take dildos in anal While having sex with her man? Would she do the same even when he is not there as well? Or would she completely abstain from using them unless it's with them? Cuz if not then the use case is exactly like that. Fleshlight= dildos.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/24 12:20 AM
4

Yes but in case they seperate, would the women not show pictures of religious ceremonies and then claim 50% of their husband's networth and then some more in the name of maintainance.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/24 05:10 PM
2

Yes, any HUMAN that has had left tsnof casual sex and doesn't take being intimate too seriously will indeed have a F'ed up pair bonding. Unless they go through something traumatic or life changing events that change their view point at which point they will force this event memories to override their lack of pair bonding and stay loyal. This issue is not exclusive to men or women.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 10:31 AM
–

Classic narcissistic women, somehow she managed to blame men for women having unrealistic high standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/24 04:37 AM
0

Wth are you even talking about? So you even know in what situation the man's family would inherit the property when the wife dies? It's when the wife doesn't nominate anyone else. The same thing happens on the other side as well. If man earns something on his own after marriage and dies without any nominee then the wife inherits all of it. Regarding mariatal r@p€, just because it's not illegal doesn't mean it's legal. The punishment for literally domestic violence or dowry is already as harsh as…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 12:40 AM
-1

Exactly. And similarly men are in general stronger than women. Which is why they are the ones who participated in physical strength required jobs like robbing or assaulting others. And despite this drawback, women still somehow found a way to participate in such a physically demanding job by using their sexuality and manipulating others. I'm not bringing seperate issue but saying that one gender being majority perpetrators of specific crime doesn't indicate anything in this topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 07:16 PM
2

Maybe? I didn't personally experience or have any connections with them so your guess is as good as mine. But it's not abnormal for the kind of people who use sex workers to also tip them generously afterwards.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 06:53 PM
1

I didn't though? You were the ones who said the perpetrators of robbing are 99% men which is why I also pointed out that the perpetrators of paternity fraud are 99% women which doesn't really prove anything. And this is also why I wrote another pragraph specifically mentioning the kind of stuff that women are also involved in for robbing or frauds/scams.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 06:52 PM
-1

Ofcourse not. Men having it difficult is not equal to omen having it easy. There is a reason for all these kind of laws to exist in the first place. I just wanted to show how frikin biased the govt is against men and the kind of power a random women can hold against a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 06:50 PM
-2

And the perpetrators of paternity fraud are 99% women only. So what exactly are you saying here? Majority of scams also include women as the front who lure men into shady places by dangling sex/attraction where a group of people gang up on him and mob him.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 06:49 PM
0

Ok, let's talk about paternity fraud cases then. Why is it not illegal?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 05:47 PM
-4

If it is unsafe, then it is unsafe for everyone. Not just women. If a man goes out at night through shady street then there are as many chances that he will be mobbed and beaten up or more as much as women have chance or getting Sa'ed.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 05:46 PM
-4

Lol say you donno anything about India without saying you donno anything about it. Here are are few examples of how extremely biased the gender laws are in India. And you want them to be more severe? Or what exactly you mean by saying it neads more feminism? The system in India is so feikin biased that if a women hits her husband and hurts her finger while hitting the husband then also she can file a case against husband of domestic violence and the husband will be arrested without needing any p…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 05:44 PM
-1

Yeah cuz the punishment for the "lie about money" is seemingly similar to the r@p€. This may feel like they are giving less punishment to perpetrators or r@p€ but it's the opposite they are extremely severely treating the people accused of dowry. Just so you know the sentence can be upto 10+ years in jail for it. And this is nothing. Recently they passed a law where if a man has sex with women on promise of marriage and then breaks up with her then also he can face upto 10+ years in jail. This i…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 05:34 PM
-4

There is a difference between marital r@p€ being legal and it not being illegal. The system in India is so feikin biased that if a women hits her husband and hurts her finger while hitting the husband then also she can file a case against husband of domestic violence and the husband will be arrested without needing any proof. Literally almost all the gender related laws there in support of women require absolutely no proof at all for the man to be accused and then jailed for 2-3 months with no e…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 05:24 PM
9

Better service
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 02:23 PM
9

Exactly. Single mom and widow are not the same. Men have way less aversion to widows than they do for single mother.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 01:27 PM
-3

So basically let the some men suffer because the alternative might result in some women to suffer.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 02:09 AM
1

You are confused dear. When people were talking about women following 80/20 they were talking about hook ups, fwb, casual relationships. Not with marriage. It is literally not possible to follow the 80/20 rule in marriage. It's more like 60/40. Where the bottom 20-40% men just remain alone all their life or die in between without a partner. Unlike women.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 02:36 PM
1

Willing to settle itself implies that they are breaking the rule of 80/20.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 01:59 PM
2

You do know that you are contradicting yourself, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 03:54 AM
3

What? you think this never happened?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 03:49 PM
1

But are these women doing the traditionally female duties? Are they even looking for someone who would be doing all the "traditionally female duties? Do you think all women that are married to rich men or financially stable men, and are not working themselves are fulfilling all those "traditionally female duties"? Ofcourse not. When money is involved, all the gender norms get thrown out of the window. What do you think of those non-working women are doing? They simply hire maids, chefs, and use …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 12:18 PM
3

Plenty of deadbeat men are with their wives who are sole earners and have no problem with having sex with them. The reasons for those men not earning could be anything from accidental disability to willful laziness but there are plenty throughout world especially in lower income households where women are the sole earners. So what's your take on why their dicks aren't getting shriveled up? Those men are most definitely having more sex than any single responsible man who is addicted to video game…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 10:42 AM
11

That's a load of BS. Plenty of young, above avg looking men would do anything to be with 5 years older than them women of she is earning enough for both of them and she promises to fulfill all the wishes that most women have of men. Despite our differences, men and womena are not too different than each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 07:12 AM
11

And what exactly is stopping older women to use the same money and status to get a younger man with less money and status? Exactly the same outdated principle that she must always go for people in higher status than herself.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 06:50 AM
3

The biggest problem with all this is that, those who know and understand all these are not having kids and they will soon be extinct, while the one with extremely conservative views and has 4-5 kids in Africa or middle East who will be the vote bank in near future, so our great leaders will cater to those entire families votes rather than the single loner video game and porn addicted men or insta/attention or tinder addicted women who are most count only for one vote.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 06:46 AM
12

It's because whenever there is a men-only event or club then get cancelled via media for being sexist and discriminatory while people have no issue with women only clubs or events.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 06:40 AM
1

There you go. Op himself clarified it now. How does the egg on your face feel like?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 05:34 PM
2

Yeah ,to specify all the options that women have. Not to specify all the options that he thinks men should have. You are literally ignoring the sentence specifically made for you si that you can take this gs out of context to make it look bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 05:11 PM
1

Did you perhaps miss the part where he is saying he is not talking about rights of men that can Interfere with the delivery of the baby? You are ignoring the straight away sentence which is specifically made so that people don't misunderstand and you still went ahead and did so.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 05:07 PM
-1

It was literally mentioned very clearly that this post is talking about rights, post delivery, not pre.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 04:48 PM
8

Obviously deceit should always be punished. No doubt about it. But such things in a Relationships come under civil laws not criminal laws. Human nature itself is corrupt in lots of ways. Both men and women LIE about a ton of stuff in the beginning of the relationship. The issue is that society as a whole views only men as predatory and someone that could lie and deceit where as women can do the same thing as well. Women also lie just like men. And when everything is revealed either of them are f…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 01:46 AM
5

So you don't actually hold any contradictory views anymore. Because you now have definitive reasons for both traditional views and non-traditional views on different matters. Saying humans hold contradictory views should give passway to all kinds of non-sensical arguments and justifies them.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 01:38 AM
7

But that is true though. If you want to blame men then blame women as well for using the men to drain them of their resources. If You don't want to blame women then don't blame men as well. For everything there are two sides of coin. Just to clarify, in not saying weather men should be blamed for dating 18+ women/men or not. I'm only saying if you indeed want to blame men then you gotta blame the women as well. If not then that's just sexism at work.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 01:33 AM
0

Only if they reveal that they are one. If not then most of them have a pretty high chance with women if they truly follow the red pill ideology. Again he is not saying any lies , just not revealing their ideology is not wrong in any way.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 02:10 AM
1

Previously it was the factory of safety. Cooking and washing are far safer than hunting animals or cutting grass or being on the look out for wild animals while guarding the crop.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 11:15 AM
1

Yeah, cuz the stigma is still around. I told that we need to normalise it around the media the same way we are trying to defend strippers and women that sell porn on onlyfans.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 10:44 AM
1

We are just a few steps away from this turning into a full blown movement. We just need to remove the legality question and stigma around prostitution the same way we are bending over backwards to defend. Strippers and women that sell porn with only fans. The moment the stigma is removed and is legal for plenty of men every day exponentially realise how much they don't need women the same way women don't need men. But it will be in the similar percentage to the amount of women saying that they d…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 10:39 AM
2

Maybe not swimming but most criminals do indeed have someone back home waiting for them. The fact that plenty of criminals in jail are unfortunately could also be innocent just makes the stats even higher. Humans especially women love the whole you and me against the world troupe.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 10:30 AM
0

You underestimate how much humans will do for money. Just look at strippers or only fans or the amount of porn content.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 08:45 PM
1

Exactly, once legal without stigma the consumption will obviously increase.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 08:44 PM
-3

But there is an adversarial power dynamic already in the favor of women. I guess it is true when they say, when you become accustomed to privilege, any form of balancing becomes oppression.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 08:43 PM
-2

I never said it wasn't. I was only saying plenty of desirable men and women indeed used those services. Who would still be seen as desirable if it wasn't illegal.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 08:40 PM
2

It's the same for those who say I'm not marrying someone who drinks alcohol as well. And this number is way less than the ones you mentioned. That's exactly the kind of change that would happen if legalized without stigma.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 08:39 PM
6

They have a crisis because of the fuckin 14-16 hour everyday shift that they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 08:36 PM
0

It would actually change much more once the social stigma is removed. If weed was made legal without any social stigma then it would be the same as alcohol.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 08:34 PM
1

You would be surprised just how many rich dudes(the dude most women want to be with) have experimented with different kinds of acts with prostitutes. In fact the more rich and popular you are the more chances you used prostitutes because despite what we may think it's the safest form of sexual release for those in high places. Case in point the "island" contained women and men of all ages and not just children. And it's an open secret about how many rich and powerful men and women visited it oft…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 08:32 PM
2

If all the "chads" were indeed decent, then there wouldn't be a tsunami of women complaining that men are pigs after they had ons/casual sex and then got dumped.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 08:21 PM
-1

And men are equally repulsed by women who have had multiple ONS.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 08:17 PM
0

Ofcourse there will always be a reason. But infidelity is surprising not the only reason (as you claim it to be) for the divorce. Most of them are selfish entitled behaviors as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/24 04:58 AM
7

Thank you so much for your effort. I am saving your comment with the links so that I can reply to those that claim the same thing again in future.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/24 04:53 AM
-5

They can never do because the rules and even the law itself doesn't think so. Even the courts think when a man and women does the same crime, women can be given lesser sentence. So even if the women do just as shitty actions as men, which we arevery close to, the world wouldn't recognise it as such.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/24 08:18 AM
-10

Yeah both men and women are shit. Unfortunately world agress that mena re shit but doesn't do so for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/24 08:11 AM
4

It doesn't matter what you are pretty sure of, the matter of fact is even if you pay $10 as tax, that means you were funding almost all of govt projects in one way or another so they are allowed to at least have an opinion in them. This applies to both men and women. Unfortunately the govt does shit all for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 07:14 AM
5

Men care very much about having female friends AFTER they are in a relationship. They do care a little before as well but they are also actively searching for a partner because somehow society made it men's responsibility to find a partner and also made it their own fault if they don't have any. So yeah there is your answer. Either society should stop insulting men as vigin or incel by making it sound like his whole worth is with his sexual sucess or make it as much women's responsibility as muc…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 10:12 AM
3

Never have I ever heard anyone call anyone a drycod. Don't use new slurs and Insults that nobody heard as proof to prove a point. You can only use the mainstream ones or popular ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/24 08:00 PM
5

It's simple gate keeping techniques to feel superior and not really related to gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 06:44 PM
3

I literally just explained this phenomenon in detail and you stil sending this. It's like you have a predefined action set to execute regardless of input.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 02:02 AM
8

Check the graph again properly. It doesn't specify anything about women towards men which is what I commented. Also messaging is dependent on matching first. So if someone matched with a 5/5 person obviously every one would be messaging them first. The issue here is about the match rate itself. Most women don't even match with men below 6-7. Also not to mention that plenty of "attractive" women are either fake trying to scam you or prostitutes looking to make business.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 01:46 AM
2

Plenty of people also don't want to date celebrities ir cops or doctors. People are free to have whatever boundaries they set for themselves. As long as they stay true to them and don't play victim, all's good.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 12:57 AM
9

You forgot the most important part of him also being 7+ looks wise. Only then will he be considered above average.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 12:04 AM
1

The only issue for me is the age factor and if they have any physical of mental disability. Other than that it wouldn't matter much to me as long as they are willing to work on themselves (I would be doing the same as well). Coming to age, I probably won't be able to accept anyone above 2 years and below 6 years. Than my age. The compatibility will be too bad and the life journey would be Rocky and incomplete for either one of us.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 11:14 PM
2

And yet, a few dollars are enough to buy it and a few thousand more and you could even buy that life by buying the womb for 9 months. Despite how much hype we give to it, at the end of the day 50% of the population has it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 08:34 AM
4

Few is the key word here. The majority of the women still only marry upwards.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 05:51 PM
3

Which data are you referring to that says most women do not marry someone richer or someone earning more than themselves. The examples you gave of women out earning men are highly exceptional ones where either the man is disabled, not working at all, or is currently pursuing higher studies by taking a break in his career. Who Is saying they aren't? Stop being stuck in 1990's data and look at 2024, i.e the present. A woman who is divorced in her 20,30's or even in 40's wouldn't stay un-married if…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 05:45 PM
1

No women in 2024 is doing all these and is also marrying someone that is also earning somewhat equal to herself at the same time. As I said in the previous comment, Majority of times women marry those that are wayy above their financial curve. If she is marrying someone who is earning equal to herself then it is only fair that men do half the shitton of examples you have that ranges from everyday to yearly or once a decade errands. If anything it's the society that has over valued women's contri…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 04:58 PM
8

Because the concept of "equality" fuked with younger generation of men. They keep on hearing that men and women are absolutely equal and nobody is superior yet they see women who do absolutely nothing still be able to get into relationships with no issue at all. To makes matters worse, majority of the time teens and early 20's women go on to form relationships with absolutely bad guys and especially bullies who don't give two shots about the women. But the man who listens to adults and women in …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 04:17 PM
-1

The difference is that men's efforts equally pay off and help women as well whereas women's "efforts" don't help anybody except themselves. The standards for women didn't really change much. She only has to know how to cook/clean and take care of her children. That is all. Above this whatever she does has very little benefit to men. She is working and is earning money? 90% of the time she gets with it marry a man for whom the amount of money she is earning is peanuts and wouldn't make a differen…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 04:04 PM
3

Some men did. But majority of the time no women are un-married or single throughout their lives. Obviously the billionaire CEO who is also attractive wouldn't want to settle for a 3/10 women.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 03:59 PM
6

You say market place is set up to advantage neither gender but it is basic common sense to know how much women are valued over men in equal settings. It is almost always up to men to still make the first move and to always do the "pursuing". In an ideal world it may indeed be equal. But we most definitely are not equal in the dating aspect. Just install tinder or some online dating platform and see how much difference is there between men and women. This reflects in offline settings as well. The…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 03:41 PM
–

But that's the thing. Women love to receive the gifts and receive small "acts of kindness" but don't want to reciprocate the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 04:05 PM
-1

Most women work in law wage jobs as a hobby and to make an impact in the world. They have the freedom to do so because the bf/husband/father is there for financial security. Regarding compassion, a man will go to any lengths to help a bro out. The majority of women aren't like that and can't even be compared to the lengths men go to help their friends. Heck men used to literally March to their deaths because they used to believe in something. Basically nature had developed men in such a way wher…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 04:18 PM
1

Yeah, they are just less exposed than men and have a different way of processing anger than men. Majority of charities are done by men. Co-operative has nothing to do with the topic at hand. Yes on compassion I agree that on average women are better at openly showing compassion for others. But on the highest side it's definitely men and it's definitely men on the least side as well. Same with empathy or any such things. I'm glad you mentioned the "existing metrics of selfish and evil".
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 03:46 PM
1

What are you doing here?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 01:12 PM
1

No, that explains why the people YOU KNOW are divorcing their husband. In fact the old one reason is the abuse or actual issue. It's The modern people who say that she divorce for no reason or because she is "bored". The women leaving their husband for no valid reason is a new concept probably only in the last 2-3 decades. Previously if. Women wanted divorce there is something very serious issues going on like alcoholism or abuse. I'm not dying These issues are not present now just that you have…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 12:42 PM
8

Yeah this putting women on pedestal and then being the most sane definitely needs to go out before any proper discussion needs to be achieved. Both men and women are equally bad and stupid and selfish. Women are just good at hiding it and men let it slide, that is all. A woman can be just as selfish/evil/bad as a man. So if a woman is divorcing there is no need for there to be definitely a good reason or that she contributed significantly to the marriage and is over burdened.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 09:27 AM
6

Go touch some grass. You are too into internet discussion that you forgot about the actual word meaning of nice guy which literally means a nice guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 09:24 AM
2

As much as I agree with you in most, this is absolutely wrong. Even the government itself thinks you are wrong. Which is why they give tax benefits for nice acts.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 06:48 PM
1

Hi I'm from the future, no Google kept it as unchanged.
/r/MensRights20/11/23 12:50 AM
3

Yes but that is indeed the case sometimes as well. Just because that is not always the case doesn't mean we should ignore the cases where it is indeed correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/23 01:11 PM
3

Great that means you had the resources and energy and time to fully heal and even if your current husband shows suspicion traits from your previous boyfriend it wouldn't trigger you in anyway. Unfortunately 90% of the population are not like that. Yup. Such an extremist point of view you have. If you think couples don't fight or argue or have suspicion on anything then I guess you are living faaar from reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/23 01:10 PM
2

As I keep saying again and again every person that ever got betrayed by thier partner was once a trusting husband/wife. You think cheaters have a board on them saying we are cheaters or something? Also i hope you know that what you are doing is basically called victim blaming. Instead of blaming the cheater you are shifting the blame towards the one who got the suspicion.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/23 12:57 PM
-4

Get out of your fukin bubble and live in reality. What you are aiming for and talking about is an IDEAL world. Unfortunately we do not live in an ideal world. Man/women should indeed have faith and trust thier partners to not cheat in an ideal world nobody would ever cheat. Unfortunately we do not live in such a world. We live in a very cruel and dark reality that is sometimes giving just enough positivity to continue living.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/23 12:51 PM
9

Have you perhaps not heard of trust but verify?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/23 12:47 PM
-1

Why isn't it worth anything just because of one suspicion? That's just an extreme way of doing things. Women have the inherent privilege of knowing that the child they brought into this world is indeed thiers. Men simply don't have that special privilege. Men not having this is one of the biggest reason for Al l the oppression of women throughout history(which obviously was wrong). It eased up due to science and technology being one of the reason. Who what's wrong with proving the man with the s…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/23 12:46 PM
5

It's because you have the privilege to know that the child you have birth to is indeed yours, whereas men don't. You are literally gatekeeping his peace of mind. Are you perhaps religious? Cuz that's literally what all religions ask you to have "blind faith".
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/23 12:37 PM
4

What kind of stupid ass logic is this? It's not the paternity test that is harming the child's future but the cheating of the women which is causing it. If a terrorist attacks a country what should it do? Sit back and do nothing because searching for that terrorist in different places will cause commotion and possibly disrupt the "peaceful" public? Absolutely not.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/23 12:32 PM
10

But that's the thing. Everyone who ever got betrayed was someone who had trust and faith previously. Trust but verify.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/23 12:27 PM
1

They can be addressed and acknowledged but that is also not happening. It will only be acknowledged when we compare, make it a competition and show the difference. Unless we compare there won't be any word or action towards the issue. Literally everything you mentioned was tackled due to competition and comparison.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/23 03:48 AM
1

Then what exactly were you saying? At the end of the day results are what matters. Women made it into a competition and proved to the world about how they are victims and now they are enjoying the fruits of previous generations of hard earned labour. This is the only thing that brought change in the gender dynamics of society. Do you not want men to express thier issues? It do you not want men to express thier issues in a proven effective way like the women in history?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/23 03:31 AM
-1

I'm with you except for the statement that men also don't care about women's issues. If men truly didn't care about women's issues then they wouldn't be having all these special rights and privileges. As much it is a achievement of "feminism" and women it is also equally if not more due to the men in power who decided to give these special rights and privileges to women. And they did it because they care about women's issues. Also women receive wayyyy more empathy and support from both men and w…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/23 06:38 PM
5

Gi check literally any main stream media that demonises men for not wanting to date unhealthy women. I'm sure that very little will care if a man keeps to himself and never once dares complain about it. But the moment he complains about the bad women or him not being able to find a compatible women to date he will be demonized more than Satan himself for not dating down and having the audacity to think a women with his equal value is actually his equal value.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/23 11:22 PM
0

There is no "femcel". It's just incel. This word is gender neutral and in case it is not then it should be for women because it was women who first used this word to describe themselves and identify with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/23 12:09 AM
-2

Will work on 7/10 men. 6/10 if she is a bit overweight.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/23 02:07 AM
2

Most of the time, yup. In almost all the species it is the female who select who to reproduce with. Similarly in huma race women are the selector on whom to date. A man can do everything right and yet unless he actively seeks out, makes a move and impressed women he will remain a single. Unlike women where there are tons of people willing to be thier partner. Although most of them may have malicious reasons there are also plenty with good intentions.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/23 01:52 AM
0

And what about marriage rate?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/23 07:25 PM
1

Whom you wouldn't be attracted to in normal circumstances. Similarly money also makes you attractive to someone that wouldn't be attracted to you otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/23 05:55 PM
-4

Unfortunately future is looking really bleak. Women keep getting more and more privileges and benefits and free money from government that is collected from the single guys as well. So basically govt is literally planning on making sure that t even if most men are completely excluded from the sexual/dating market the society keep on going instead of stopping and finding what the issue is.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/23 04:56 PM
1

BS. Most of the casual sex happens under the influence of alcohol or drugs. And also very rarely would it happen purely cuz of attraction. If it is happening without any external influence then More often than not it is used as a means of getting something like a relationship from the other. People are also attracted to money and do crazy shit like ruin their entire life running after money.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/23 05:17 PM
–

As if literally half the internet doesn't call incels as disgusting while govt even goes as far as to call them terrorists.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/23 10:21 AM
1

Yeah, that's a great defence except nobody was asking Ukraine to not forcefully keep their men behind to draft for war and fight for the country. Not a single feminist did it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/23 11:22 PM
3

This is exactly the issue here. Stop putting feminism on a pedestal. It is only as good as the majority who follow it. It's just like communism, it's ideal is really very very good but practically not possible. Similarly feminism previously may have preached for equality but not once have they only ever asked for equality, they were only asking for special privileges and to make sure men do not have access to those special privileges. I agree that feminism as an ideal is a really cool idea just …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/23 05:27 AM
1

If a man has his shit together at 30 he is most likely already engaged or is married.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 08:55 PM
0

Because women generally date people that are older than themselves. And 30 is usually the age where most men are married. So most men in their 30's are usually married while the unmarried ones are either undesired by other women or are doing women less than their age
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 08:53 PM
1

Unfortunately when two people who were bullied previously in different stages of life come together they are more likely to push each other way more and more until they start misunderstanding everything and inevitably end up having a bad breakup. The quote of "road to hell is paved with good intentions" is very apt here. What you wrote can indeed happen but it's highly optimistic version of reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 06:12 PM
1

They are flawed men for her. If she can decide who to get in relationship with and men also agree and they can stay in the relationship for a long time then they are flawed men for her. They only become flawed to her when she is unable to sustain a relationship with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 05:20 AM
4

If a woman has a faulty selection then it's obvious that she might have more experiences with more emen as she constantly is picking flawed men who rarely ever fully commit to her.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 05:04 AM
9

There are always going to be bad men and women at the end of the day. Men are just seen much more easily as bad cuz of the default discrimination against men as the evil one but the opposite is true for women due to the "women's re wonderful" effect. I agree that just because a women broke up with a man doesn't mean that men are bad picks but if it repeatedly happens to the same women where she is unable to sustain a long relationship with anybody for a extended period of time the question has t…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/23 11:23 PM
1

It is also a reflection of women's flawed selection on men which results in her dating multiple men as she couldn't hold down anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/23 10:38 PM
1

He is saying that hate against man for loss of abortion is irrational because it the religion and maybe even older women that are responsible for this. Since it's the women who drive the Catholicism wayy higher and donate wayy more than anyone else. Did you now understand how you were wrong?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/23 08:21 AM
1

He is saying that hate against man for loss of abortion is irrational because it the religion and maybe even older women that are responsible for this. Since it's the women who drive the Catholicism wayy higher and donate wayy more than anyone else. Did you now understand how you were wrong?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/23 08:19 AM
3

Couldn't you say the same about male shooters as well?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/23 08:16 AM
1

Safety
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/23 12:38 PM
1

How did you get the stars symbol?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/23 02:11 AM
3

Who here though by the title of the post he was defending casual sex by both sexes but shocked by the actual post where they only criticizes it when done by women?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/23 01:24 AM
1

Just like how emotional response only works sometimes, the calm approach to someone being an asshole also doesn't work. It only rikes then up and probably will make them do stuff that might cause damage to you. Not everyone has a fully functional brain that they understand
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/23 09:30 PM
–

You do realise that men are just as discouraged from entering female dominated fields and are forced to forgi thier masculinity if they are to be part of the group? Check out teaching fields and nurses or almost any media and other such women dominated fields, a man is always an outcast and never inside the group. Doesn't mean he is discriminated against openly but it does mean that the majority there don't see him as part of the group. If you are going into a field like construction work or eng…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/23 04:55 PM
1

Absolutely agree, that man and women should both respect each other. But for most women the respect is inherent and is derived from not something she does but something she can do which is ability to give birth. Is it wrong? obviously looking and thinking of women as baby making machines is wrong but tha is inherently what gives them so much respect and attraction by default. Where as for men they are not respected by default. It's is 0 and the only respect they have is when they achieve somethi…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/23 02:58 PM
23

Everyone, please stop encouraging this psycho deranged person. She literally wants to do targeted castration based on level of attractiveness. I mean I have seen lots of f'ed up discussions here but this is truly deranged.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/23 05:57 AM
11

Wtf, did you just say that ugly people should not reproduce? And that we should do targeted castration based on what you find as attractive? Congratulations you are right up there in ideological thinking with some of the most evil people to have ever lived on this planet.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/23 05:51 AM
1

Nothing made as much sense as this.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/23 01:56 AM
2

Aren't they grand assumptions from your side? And the same can be said for men showing love in their own way. He could be doing all the hard work. He could be doing all the house repairs. He could be helping out her relatives and friends in numerous ways. He could be taking her to expensive dates and vacation every month or year. And if he doesn't do any of these and she feels he doesn't love him anymore then that is also unhealthy.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 07:01 PM
3

Yup. Now you understand why most men also do not want a woman that is constantly hating on men and blames them for every single thing wrong with her life. If you gonna treat the other gender as generalized toxic natured then don't be surprised when nobody is willing to be with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 06:51 PM
-3

Obviously that is not bad. As long as they are prepared for consequences of men not showing love their own way when they feel like women have shown zero interest as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 06:44 PM
1

Except when we actually increase our standards, men are labelled as toxic misandrists.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 06:42 PM
5

Good sex with an exciting, independent women who takes care of herself and his household and family responsibilities is also a perk and not chore. But I don't see all the women being as exciting, independent and taking care of herself and household and family responsibilities all the time. If they are indeed doing all this then that's exactly what they are supposed to do as per your comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 06:40 PM
-5

If the women don't get off and are lying about it and then thinking of it as a chore then it is 100% thier fault. If they are dissatisfied with something they should always keep on communicating it even when it seems like the other party is not listening. If they become complacent then it is thier own fault.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 06:39 PM
6

Yeah, no matter what the scenario it is least the man's fault. Women can literally never be at fault for anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 06:36 PM
-5

Because sex is a natural mood enhancer and is like a natural drug.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 06:34 PM
2

It's very simple really, do you think women are capable adults who can make independent decisions and have agency in thier own? If the answer is yes then obviously them being with criminals and toxic guys is from thier own free will and are doing so because they like such stuff. If they are not independent and don't have any agency then we can somehow twist this to against being a man's fault by saying stuff like he was threatening her or manipulating her into being with him or something. Decide…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 04:00 PM
4

You were the one who literally said it's the men's fault for picking bad women. And to pick better. And now pretending that victim blaming is wrong. So you are basically a hypocrite who thinks it's men's fault if they are with toxic women but not women's fault if they are with toxic men. Either way it's men fault only. Got it. Women can NEVER be wrong. If you said Such simple statements it would have been a lot easier.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 03:55 PM
5

It's because of the circumstances like why there is more violence in certain communities and neighbourhoods than others. Women rarely ever get into circumstances where violence is the answer or criminal behaviour is the solution. Criminality and evil are gender less and both men and women are equally capable of evil. The way they GENERALLY showcase thier hostility may differ but if given chance both would do it. Just to clarify I'm not saying women are worse than men or men are better than women…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 03:52 PM
4

So you agree that it is women's fault when they choose abusers and deadbeat partners?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 03:46 PM
5

If this is satire then there is no issue except you should add /s in the end. If not then you see how women picking abusers and dead bear dad's would also be thier own fault? Cuz they kicked bad men?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 03:13 PM
2

It's not that women will but that women CAN. In the same way women CAN get harassed if she roaming alone outside at night in sketchy areas. The Risks involved to the reward are simply not the same as they were anymore. The consequences can be anything from a polite and simple no to going viral or losing the job. The worst part is men have no way to know how it will end up because we have effectively moved away from the intent of the actions to results of the actions on how to determine something…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 06:49 AM
1

Obviously when they are facing bad consequences the women won't say see guys a man asked me out respectfully so I'm gonna insult him no they will obviously change the story in a way such that men are seen as wrong in some way. Same with getting fired from the job. They won't fire someone for asking a person out for coffee, but they will fire someone for making a women uncomfortable by making uninvited advances in her. And the worst part is unless the man is in high powerful position he is traile…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 06:28 AM
5

They are afraid for a very very valid reason. Rejection and failure 50 years ago is not the same as rejection in 2023. You can literally go viral for asking a women out or even get fired from your job.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 06:17 AM
4

But how the heck will he know whether she is interested or not?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 06:10 AM
6

The issue is that unless en show romantic and sexual desires towards women by taking a risk , women themselves will never care about it or in fact even be angry that she was not asked out by man. They will do everything in thier power to not make the first move and yet complain about it. You would not know weather the other party is interested or not unless you make it clear you are interested in them. Women showing interest and openly admitting them is rarer than rainbow on a foggy day.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 06:07 AM
–

India?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 03:38 AM
–

I agree with you but just know that literally every issue you mentioned is also widely an issue in non religious couples as well. People just like to compare any religious people to near perfect standards and any flaw is equated to the entire religion.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 03:28 AM
2

But it's genuine true issue though. For the women who actually do want to have children doing it before they hit 30 is the optimal way. Post 30 they get exposed to numerous complications and issues along with a shit ton of hospital bills for the delivery.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 12:22 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter