TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AnonyDexx Archive

View 0 posts and 83 comments by AnonyDexx on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
19

Past boyfriends are a negative for most men, so this would make this a green flag, not a red one. Not having a boyfriend but jumping on the CC is a bigger red flag. Is the boyfriend the issue or the acts that typically done with them?
/r/RedPillWomen12/09/21 08:03 PM
2

Ask anyone who's into CNC.
/r/RedPillWomen03/09/21 05:55 PM
4

respectful (of everyone), shares the same lifestyle choices / beliefs That's not a bare minimum. You packed a lot into a couple vague general phrases.
/r/RedPillWomen24/08/21 05:48 AM
5

Well it's more along the lines of: if she has a high income, she likely has the personality and drive required the achieve it, and those requirements make her less valuable. And they also influence what she wants. So it does end up being a negative as opposed to just not being a positive.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/08/21 05:36 AM
25

Many men might find heels sexy Heels are definitely sexy, though uncomfortable. But being naturally taller, is something I've never heard of.
/r/RedPillWomen08/08/21 02:49 AM
25

Interesting. I've never seen/heard of a girl want to be tall and if anything, they specifically want the guy to be taller even when they're in heels(one actually checked if I was taller when she had heels). But I suppose I've managed to avoid those women I guess.
/r/RedPillWomen08/08/21 02:47 AM
45

OK, I'm a tad confused here. Do women really think/thought men want a tall chick who then wears heels? Why?
/r/RedPillWomen08/08/21 02:18 AM
28

No, this shouldn't be a thing that needs to be fixed. This is nowhere near being a huge mistake nor a major slip up. Typically, if you've really been in a decent relationship, the other person isn't this self obsessed that this is something they'll care about. If you'd been doing it repeatedly, then it's a problem. If there was something prior where this could be a jab, then it's a problem. If it's to some guy where you're being flirty, then it's a problem. But this, is a stupid fight to have.
/r/RedPillWomen28/07/21 01:35 AM
8

For real. Unless there was an incident earlier where it's an intentional jab or it's been happening a lot, he's making a fuss over nothing.
/r/RedPillWomen28/07/21 01:27 AM
2

There IS a difference between dogs and children, though. It’s okay to prefer cats because they’re low maintenance, but also desire children. Sure, they're different, but similar enough that the conclusion will be made that you won't want children, especially of he's expecting you to be doing most of the child rearing. And to be honest, I’ve developed the opinion that it would be better to have at least two or none. That way, the children can keep each other company and entertained doesn't help y…
/r/RedPillWomen25/07/21 07:20 PM
6

Mhmm, those are options. How many of us actually know definitions of or differences between all of these?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/21 02:28 AM
6

old men who got divorced Why would young men, who see statistics, and their own anecdotes, decide to jump into the same fate? What can make them so mad It's not necessarily anger that they do this to themselves Do what to themselves? Decide to not effort into putting themselves in a position to get screwed?
/r/RedPillWomen14/07/21 03:15 AM
40

Vaush has openly stated that he only takes on people he thinks he can beat. It doesn't matter who challenged who. Vaish still had to accept.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/07/21 04:38 AM
14

Doubt she'd be one of those saying that, given that she's literally transitioning from one to another.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/07/21 06:48 AM
1

They should lower themselves so other people are better than them in comparison? No, they should t fight for the top then expect to easily find someone still above them. You really have to intentionally twist words to get to your conclusion. And a doctor can reasonably expect to date other people like doctors because they've elevated themselves to that role. And you kinda have to be ignorant of how humans work to think it's this simple.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/06/21 12:02 AM
2

I'm not buying it. Unless you're making every interaction about your differences, it's pretty unlikely that everyone would be avoiding you.
/r/RedPillWomen15/06/21 06:09 PM
2

But is that why they don't talk to you?
/r/RedPillWomen14/06/21 10:13 PM
5

If you choose to read the linked information, you would know they're controlling for jobs, experience, and other factors. You didn't read your own source. In the opening section is says that when controlling for those things, it shrinks to 7%, yet you said they're getting paid 0.80¢. You're really trying such a blatant lie dude? You're not getting downvoted for looking at the data. You're getting downvoted for looking at the data and completely ignoring it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/06/21 12:59 PM
-1

No, their analogy is apt. "Is doing bad thing X justified because the bad thing was done against them?" What X is is completely irrelevant and being "dramatic" isn't forcing people to try see the point; it's making the pint blatant to the extent that you can't really deny it. is on the same level of comparison as people who call mask mandates the holocaust. Thats not even close to a proper comparison to view situations in the same light. Wearing a mask = holocaust? This isn't even close to the a…
/r/PussyPassDenied05/06/21 11:50 PM
-8

Did the author of that article ever consider that the man didn’t achieve his dream of being an astronaut or star quarterback because he just wasn’t talented enough? You're missing the point here. Sure, if he's not talented or lucky enough, he won't make it, but at least he got to shoot his shot. It never gets to the "I flunked out" stage when he has to "grow up"
/r/RedPillWomen04/05/21 04:41 AM
4

A serious answer: A man who has money, status, confidence, plus a couple more things. Thing is, they wouldn't want lost of the women in that sub.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/04/21 04:59 AM
3

Because they don't get experience with having to actually put in work. That "hey" and "how are you" will absolutely get responses
/r/PussyPassDenied26/04/21 04:55 AM
1

When I was dating, whoever asked the other out would pay. Which is almost always the man, so saying that changes nothing in effect.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/04/21 07:11 PM
34

Teenage girls shouldn't mess with teenage boys because they'll get what they ask for?
/r/PussyPassDenied20/04/21 02:30 PM
16

Sadly, he still took some shit before he threw hands.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/04/21 02:27 PM
1

What counter point can you come up with to the fact that professions like teaching and nursing tend to be more female dominated while fields like engineering and construction tend to be male dominated? That's not what I said. I said it's easy to give counter examples to makes preferring things and women preferring people. There could be blatant factors you're skipping over. Males are typically rejected for roles that have them working young children, for example. How does that affect the number …
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/21 06:25 PM
-2

But if it's coming from you, some random person on the internet, why should I believe it? It's not blatantly obvious as you make it out to be and it would be pretty easy to throw out counter points to that last part.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/21 03:11 PM
1

They're farming karma.
/r/RedPillWomen13/04/21 03:57 PM
7

I think the generalization about bonding and etc is a bit odd. Like women can’t have love with different people. It's not something they just made up out of nowhere.
/r/RedPillWomen12/04/21 02:39 AM
4

How dare you bring up facts! It's sad that I saw the comment and knew the history of it to know that she's 100% wrong, but she never will.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/21 05:48 PM
2

The real issue is that "friends zone" isn't properly defined so two people could, and most likely will have two working definitions of the same word and have a conversation not realizing they have tow definitions. Then you expand that exponentially when a big group, like the internet, is involved.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/21 05:47 PM
3

The consider the age range and suitability of those men left behind. They'd be in their 30s and up, or in their teens. Or they'd have some kind of disability that allowed them to opt out. Remove the underaged, and those that are sterile. Of those that remain, remove those that are: married, gay, asexual and rather unnattractive. How many are left? There are other disqualifiers I didn't add. It's worse than you'd initially think.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/21 05:41 PM
13

Exactly. How the fuck can someone be that lacking in self aware. I'm not a misandrist but here's a reason I'm a misandrist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/21 07:56 PM
18

What? Filming the incident is the heat they can do. You expect them to go hold her down or something?
/r/PussyPassDenied15/03/21 06:41 AM
8

Partially, but it's mostly that most people who would care forget about it. On Women's Day, expect to see it celebrated and mentioned. For Men's Day, crickets. It was never treated as an important day so few remember it.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/03/21 04:08 AM
3

And it could every well have been that this episode just started things. Not all feminists are impervious to evidence.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/03/21 01:28 AM
2

You're screwing yourself over there if you alternate tabs because you've already dished out for one. Splitting is so that you're both equally invested.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/03/21 09:48 PM
1

I'd see it the same way actually.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/03/21 03:44 AM
3

2) It sets a precedent of being able to strip a person of UK citizenship without any due process whatsoever. It's clear cut IIRC. She freely admits to what she did and isn't apologetic. IMO she should be brought home Mhmm, but she has no "home" in the UK. They don't want her. Her being non-apologetic doesn't make them want to care about her either.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/03/21 03:41 AM
5

The mentioned article
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/02/21 04:07 AM
2

I disagree. You'd end up losing the point of the article. Regardless of the statistics, all of the offices are for females and none for males.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/02/21 03:43 AM
3

you won’t even say (type) one Granted, I think a lot of people wouldn't say it here only because they'd get banned.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/02/21 09:20 PM
2

Well there are other things that would result from that. You'd end up with less children or at least less with two parent households. And most people don't really want to be single. I don't see the level of happiness going anywhere but down as a result. Even though it's not the end of the world, it's not a great outcome.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/02/21 03:28 AM
3

Dammit, now I'm getting em mixed up.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/21 07:23 PM
27

Isn't that the article that Warren made his oh so infamous "swap the genders" article on? They lost their shit when things were swapped the other way around.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/21 05:57 PM
9

Because people used to post fake stories to karma farm so they do this and automatically delete anything that's not from a throwaway account. Makes sense to me.
/r/MensRights04/02/21 05:52 PM
1

I'll add to the 'no make-up at home' number. Imagine being with someone and rarely getting to their bare face. I don't think there are any actual statistics on it, but I'd guess the minority want makeup at home.
/r/RedPillWomen03/02/21 10:40 PM
2

I had to explain that pockets are sown in between the pants legs and your legs. So the tighter fitting your pants, the smaller your pockets are. This is the first time I'm hearing the reasoning and I'm not sure why I hadn't thought of that before. And that's probably why there's so little pushback on the "no pockets because sexism" point. Having no pockets makes sense to anyone who knows it but not many people are sew or actually look into it.
/r/MensRights31/01/21 02:50 AM
1

You're off on a couple points A good relationship is extremely fulfilling for most people, no one wants to be lonely and most people really get a lot of value out of a good partnership In general, they'd agree with that. MGTOW and WGTOW isn't necessarily giving people advice that helps them to live the best life With 'best' being the most important word there. It's about calculating the risk of failure in a relationship, knowing the consequences if it fails and waging that against not getting in…
/r/RedPillWomen26/01/21 07:53 PM
1

Nope, nowhere there is it implied.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/01/21 07:07 AM
1

It is, because the implication was that these other countries independently added freedom of speech to their constitutions Where was that ever implied? proving that that American constitution is not unique in that sense In the sense that it's not the only one with freedom of speech, which you admit was shown. Did you really just make up some imaginary opposition just to call someone disingenuous?
/r/PussyPassDenied25/01/21 06:32 AM
-3

however it's a bit disingenuous to bring them up as gotcha moment since they only have those provisions due to American involvement in writing their constitutions post world War 2 That's not disingenuous at all. If they have it, it doesn't matter who they got the idea from or what influenced the decision.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/01/21 05:37 AM
14

This is getting downvotes but it's somewhat correct given that the question is a bit malformed. Nobody's going to pick a woman they subjectively view as being ugly.
/r/RedPillWomen20/01/21 10:06 PM
1

Interestingly enough, it was incredibly popular but declining from 1936 too. It would be interesting to see it brought up again today.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/01/21 09:00 PM
13

Everybody in this time period had to sacrifice. That's coming really close to Mrs. Clinton's infamous quote when you don't really say much else. Not to mention that surely not all of these people were campaigning for women only. And then you follow up on it with a "not all". suggesting women's lives are safe and easy because only men faced the horror of war. In comparison to the men that put their lives on the line and are erased from the conversation when speaking of suffrage, it seems appropri…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/01/21 08:52 PM
3

and whoever voted aye was automatically volunteered to go What amendment are you speaking of? The Ludlow Amendment and the one I see that was based on that don't say that actually proposed the reverse: for those that would be conscripted(everyone really, but including them) have a say in whether the country would go to war.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/01/21 08:42 PM
0

It wasn't a troll, but you do you.
/r/MensRights17/01/21 03:27 PM
0

Yup. I'm here for the lulz
/r/MensRights17/01/21 02:08 AM
0

That depends on whether you are me or not. No, that's just not how conversation works. That is funny, because just as much as you are passionate about dance names, and are pedantic about it, I am passionate about people being pedantic, So you're not passionate about being pedantic at all then? I'm not passionate about dance names at all. Doing what you did, is the dictionary definition of pedantry. Your welcome. It's not, because I'm not looking at some minute difference between the two. It's a …
/r/MensRights17/01/21 01:46 AM
1

I think you misunderstand. I was not at all arguing with you or telling you were wrong about the name of the dance by posting that video. i was simply making a whole new point. Conversations work like that sometimes. You merely posted a link and nothing else. That's not how a new point is made. Cool. Why are you still here then? Because I like conversing. Are you honestly telling me the only reason you are here, talking in the comment section of a video you don't care about, is to be a pedant ab…
/r/MensRights17/01/21 01:18 AM
2

Isn't that just how they dance in Jamaica? Daggering. No, it isn't. You brought up something you really didn't know about, I gave you the answer and instead of taking that answer or inquiring further, you objected rather poorly. I really couldn't care less about the video. It's nothing more than a woman being trashy. Would a guy get in trouble for it, I have no idea. I can't recall an instance of a man doing that to be honest.
/r/MensRights17/01/21 12:32 AM
3

That's not the point. You specifically mentioned Jamaica, and that isn't what we'd call daggering, at all. To reply with some dude barely grinding on a woman and saying that's daggering is stupid. I never said only Jamaicans can do it either, but if you're square dancing and say it's ballet, you're just wrong.
/r/MensRights17/01/21 12:06 AM
1

You just commented with a video of some non-Jamaican who isn't in Jamaica.
/r/MensRights16/01/21 11:56 PM
9

No, it's not. Not with the other person just standing there.
/r/MensRights16/01/21 11:47 PM
0

There was no generalization there, but nice try, again, with the misrepresentation.
/r/MensRights12/01/21 03:03 AM
-1

No, you're just dishonest, or your reading comprehension is well below high school level. My words are very clear, and it's obviously so given that you couldn't, and still can't quote where I said either the issues or the MRA movement as a whole are right wing. You made a piss poor attempt to be dishonest instead of having a proper conversation and now you're making a piss poor attempt to wiggle out of it.
/r/MensRights12/01/21 02:01 AM
3

Holy fuck, can you actually read what I said instead of trying to be smug while clearly failing and basic English? I never said the MRA movement has many right wingers. I was referring to this sub ffs, but you know what, all you're going to do is misrepresent what I say and act stupid as to why this post exists so I won't bother.
/r/MensRights12/01/21 12:07 AM
-3

Quote and explain where I said that the thing they advocate for is right wing, as opposed to that the people themselves lean right wing. Reading comprehension isn't that hard people.
/r/MensRights11/01/21 11:37 PM
-14

Most of the people here seem to lean right pretty heavily so they're all fretting.
/r/MensRights11/01/21 10:06 PM
-4

The word assault means a verbal altercation, Neither the legal nor colloquial meaning of the word refers to only verbal. The colloquial includes both physical and verbal. Claiming that is irrelevant bit it's also blatantly wrong. You can Google the New York State statute on assault if you want more details. Or you could, because it doesn't mean what you think it means. You're accusing them of malicious intent when you claiming things that are blatantly wrong and then saying I should go look it u…
/r/MensRights09/01/21 09:23 PM
1

If the kid felt ANY pain from being tackled to the ground, it's assault. Legally, nope. This is what happens when people don't understand legal definitions. What she did would fall under battery, not assault. In no way can you categorize that as assault. but he's telling lies and pretending not to know basic facts about the incident. He's not making honest arguments. Not really. Intentions, I don't know but you guys are trying to understand legal issues without actually knowing anything about th…
/r/MensRights09/01/21 09:06 PM
-6

that's complete nonsense. she is on video assaulting the boy. You're nowhere near addressing what they said. Assault in NY is either recklessly causing harm or causing harm with intent. If the boy is fine and you can't prove intent to harm, it's not assault. She'll easily walk free in that charge.
/r/MensRights09/01/21 08:49 PM
15

I'll rephrase this? Who is this not a win for?
/r/MensRights07/01/21 11:01 PM
5

And since an abortion is needed he should pay his half. He definitely should be able to argue FOR abortion however. And should pay his half then too. This is where you lose me. I'm all for using an abortion if you want one, but if the guy's willing to take the child post birth and the woman refuses, I see no reason to force him to pay half. Either you foot the bill or you give him the child. If neither wants the child, then sure, split it.
/r/MensRights04/01/21 03:21 PM
4

There's nothing misandrist about her at all. Guys jump at her because she supports things like child support (for who has the child, regardless of gender). I've kinda blocked out most of the people posting the video because apparently if you post nudes, you can't support men's rights.
/r/MensRights02/01/21 09:39 PM
25

I'm assuming you mean this part: Women were revealed to be more likely to be physically aggressive to their partners, and men were more likely to be physically aggressive to their same-sex partners. You're not comprehending that correctly. It's comparing which relationships each gender is more aggressive is in. Males are most aggressive in gay relationships out of all of their relationships. It's not comparing male vs female gay relationships.
/r/MensRights01/01/21 08:59 PM
1

It wouldn't apply to programming. There are enough people, men and women. There just aren't enough good ones at and right above entry level. Outside of the big tech companies, they don't typically get paid as much as you'd think.
/r/MensRights20/12/20 05:05 AM
3

It uses Bing along with some of its own crawlers last time I checked.
/r/MensRights19/11/20 08:41 PM
0

Who cares if they care about us? It's a matter of principle. Why should I accept something that's false just because they don't care for us? I'd react the same way if someone falsely accused you and got this far with it.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/11/20 08:35 PM
1

By looking at the fact that in the very first incident, while he can't find sufficient evidence that it happened, he just lumped that one in, because he thought the others were true. By just that alone, it's false that all of the things he said are substantially true actually are. Then add in the burden of proof that has to be met for the typical claim to be found to be true. Then add in the claims that he completely disregarded the counter evidence. I haven't read through the entire document bu…
/r/PussyPassDenied19/11/20 08:32 PM
1

Don't "make it obvious". Explicitly stated what you want. You can't really do it any other way online generally. It's incredibly difficult to come off as creepy unless you really try to make it creepy and it's never annoying unless you get a no and still push it.
/r/RedPillWomen12/11/20 06:14 PM
33

She really has no idea how easy it would be to send her to the hospital in that position.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/10/20 02:32 AM
3

And I wonder why anyone would. Because unfortunately, they're more well known. Granted, it's usually in a mocking tone when people talk about them but it still gives the impression that a lot of women are like that.
/r/RedPillWomen07/09/20 06:16 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter