TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Anonymous--Rex Archive

View 2 posts and 329 comments by Anonymous--Rex on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

If you're being honest, you're doing nothing but harm clinging to that label. Feminists do think as you describe. Patraichy theory, duluth model, killallmen... these are feminist thoughts. You compromise your ideals associating with these bigots in such a way. If being called something is more important than your ideals, you're nothing more than a liar.
/r/MensRights19/04/26 09:40 PM
6

No. A real feminist would not advocate for both me and women's rights. You're not a feminist if you actually think men and women should be treated equally. Maybe 40 years ago this kind of gatekeeping could have an effect, but the feminists in charge of policy and activism are man-haters. Find another label and stop providing cover for these monsters.
/r/MensRights20/03/26 05:23 AM
1

It's not. That's why people won't drop the term feminism. If you want equal rights, you're not a feminist.
/r/MensRights16/02/26 06:19 PM
4

And if you point this stuff out, they call you "testerical" like that changes your point.
/r/MensRights08/07/25 05:42 PM
18

I noticed after the recent American election that resistance to the democratic party's rhetoric increased across the board. Facebook posts about dating and whatnot are now complete slugfests between men and women.
/r/MensRights13/06/25 07:08 AM
23

So much of male behavior that confuses society can be boiled down to avoiding paternity fraud. It's every bit as devastating to a man and his ability to successfully rear children as rape is for a woman. It applies direct selection pressure, so of course men have evolved to combat it. Funny how most people have never heard the term. Like imagine if most of society didn't know what rape was or why it was bad, but that's the reality.
/r/MensRights26/05/25 04:19 AM
2

This fucking trend. "This morning I man-walked to the man-store in my man-shorts, when I man-saw my man-friend man-standing on the man-corner next to his man-car, so I man-waved to my man-friend, but he man-missed me entirely, and he man-got in his man-car to man-drive to man-work before we could man-talk. I man-bought the bat-shark-repellant, I man-needed, and man-went to my man-home."
/r/MensRights22/05/25 02:48 PM
9

A few weeks ago, I was in the childrens' section of a department store looking at clothing. I was examining one of the mannequins and I look up to see this woman staring at me very strongly. I'm not sure how to describe her expression but it looked like a mix of bewilderment and disgust. It was terrifying. I immediately dropped what I was doing left the store entirely.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 02:39 PM
4

What I'm saying is that there are already words and the feminists won't go for it.
/r/MensRights18/05/25 12:51 AM
9

Anyone who cares about equality would have no issue abandoning the term "feminism" in favor of something like "egalitarian." It's very telling that they won't.
/r/MensRights17/05/25 05:18 PM
1

I think you're missing the point. If someone said "I don't talk to my mother because I got bored of her," how would you react? Cutting ties with an abuser is different than what's being talked about here.
/r/MensRights11/05/25 12:45 AM
1

This is the reality of the west now. Regardless of what anyone thinks or feels, this is how the world is working The idea that marriage creates a family has long died and that's why stable families are now so rare. All the social and legal mechanisms meant to keep families together have been either dismantled or reversed. Everyone's sad and the population and economy is collapsing. Oops. At least ceo salaries are up, right?
/r/MensRights11/05/25 12:42 AM
1

It really depends on what kind of life you want for yourself. If you want that white picket fence life, looking now is probably best. 50 with an 18 year old is different than 60 with an 18 year old. Culturally, the dating market is basically broken in the west. Very few people are equipped with the mentality or skill required to properly pair bond, and the erosion of gender roles and social rules has resulted in an environment hostile and dangerous to men, while being condusive to making no one …
/r/MensRights07/05/25 06:28 PM
19

"Get" sure. "Keep" no. A woman's biggest worry wasn't finding someone to mate with, it was whether that mate would stay and help with the child. Failing to secure or, worse yet, destroying a functional relationship was a failure as a woman. Hence she was a loser and looked down on.
/r/MensRights23/04/25 01:08 AM
22

People have forgotten that while a "loser" man is one who cannot get sex, a "loser" woman is one who can't keep a relationship.
/r/MensRights22/04/25 09:50 PM
13

This reminds me of something that happened a couple weeks ago to me. I was in a local mall in the middle of the day on a relatively crowded wednesday. I was heading upstairs to use the restroom in one of he department stores, and I got on the escalator. There were these two middle-schoolish girls a bit ways ahead of me. They were already about half-way up the escalator when I got on. I noticed they were looking back and whispering to one another, but I ignored it and turned my attention to the s…
/r/MensRights31/12/24 10:21 AM
10

You need more upvotes. Marriage was the progressive institution. Society forgot that and tore it down. There's one further point I'd like to add to your comment. Freedom of choice has an inverse correlation with choice satisfaction. Essentially, the more options a person has, the less likely they are to be satisfied with what they choose. Those bottom 60% of men don't see this effect, but most women and the top percentage of men do see this effect. This means that not only can no one be locked d…
/r/MensRights19/12/24 09:01 PM
4

You're having the female equivalent of a midlife crisis. You're probably around 40-45 and you've been with this man for 10-15 years. This is actually pretty common and why a lot of divorces happen at that age. It doesn't end well for either party, though, typically, because torching your life because you're bored by it typically just makes everything worse for everyone involved. What you're saying you want to do is not terribly different than someone saying they want to start doing drugs because…
/r/MensRights19/12/24 08:46 PM
1

Is that statistic "rounds fired" or "rounds hit"? If it's the former, both things can easily be true.
/r/MensRights18/11/24 07:42 PM
1

I'm not necessarily defending this study, but collecting data only to reach the expected conclusion is equally as important as reaching an unexpected conclusion. Having data to point to is very helpful in separating truth from bullshit. There'd be a whole lot more magical thinking without it. Plus, if no one ever tested these things, no one would find the exciting times where the results subvert those expectations.
/r/MensRights12/06/24 05:46 PM
3

Wow, this is amazing insight and snaps everything into place perfectly. It won't get much response do to the length, but I know I'll be parroting these points in the future.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 05:38 PM
1

It was the most effective way that men in the past had to combat paternity fraud.
/r/MensRights06/04/24 12:33 AM
9

That idiom means more along the lines of "They want to eat their cake now, but also save it for later." The options are mutually exclusive since you can't eat something and then later have that exact portion to eat. It's a clunky idiom, imo.
/r/MensRights31/03/24 05:33 PM
3

This was reposted to Imgur and the comments are disgusting.
/r/MensRights01/02/24 06:17 PM
2

Because most men are kind. If the average man was anything like feminists paint them as, that would be the go-to.
/r/MensRights27/01/24 12:08 PM
1

The fuck are you talking about? The reason more men don't have masturbation toys is because onaholes aren't thousands of years old like dildos are. Modern masturbators are only a couple decades old, really, so typical men know very little about them. Before that, people were really only capable of making stuff like mountain wife dolls (sennentuntschi). Compare that to a RealGirl doll and the difference is night and day. Go browse ToyDemon and you'll see there's a substantial amount of variety av…
/r/MensRights26/01/24 06:47 AM
1

If I did, do you think my post would read like speculation? I think a possible connection should be explored, though. Since I take it you don't have studies to the contrary either, my point should be clear. It was simply that the idea of a connection is never even considered.
/r/MensRights20/12/23 03:57 AM
8

Guys who say I can't nut or feel anything with a condom are full of shit and the only people dumber are the women who believe it. I've always wondered how much of this is due to mgm. People don't often ask the state of the man's penis when discussing this point.
/r/MensRights19/12/23 05:04 PM
7

This "water is wet" arguement is pretty damaging. Sure, you may not need a phd to see it, but you need empirical studies to prove it. Nevermind that failing to test "obvious" hypotheses will lead you to fail to uncover the times those hypotheses do prove wrong. EDIT: Weird. His whole account is gone now.
/r/MensRights14/11/23 10:35 PM
2

It's not always true that sexual preferences are going to be perfect adaptations to the environment. A trait can become preferred through that and continue to be reinfornced through sexual selection pressure even in sitautions where that pressure becomes maladaptive. Take for example male peacocks with their large, burdensome plumage. It's not an advantage in any situation besides wooing female peacocks, but the disadvantages have not been substantial enoigh to overcome selection pressure. This …
/r/MensRights13/11/23 08:50 PM
11

This article I read a couple months ago was about a guy with an ai waifu. He had a real girlfriend, so I don't know if he was lonely, but he clearly grew extremely attached and didn't seem to expect it. ​ I think at some point the brain is just fooled. Emotional attachment doesn't happen in higher parts of the brain. There's quote from another article that I read ages ago that's stuck with me. Some elderly were given artifical lets to take care of and the writer included this poingent quote from…
/r/MensRights24/10/23 04:17 PM
2

excess skin Oh, so you're uneducated, too. What other part of your dick would you not mind having hacked off? Your scrotum is just a piece of skin, too, after all., but we both know you'll say that that isn't comparable either because doing so would hurt your "argument." Be the kind of man who can face the fact that you were mutilated and not the kind that hides behind bullshit to preserve his own ego. "I am actually very happy they did that when I don't remember anything, it's amazing. I have 0…
/r/MensRights22/06/23 02:13 AM
4

Seems completely adequate given that if you had a valid argument, you'd have just presented it. Preemptive amputation is simply idiotic and indefensible. "I am actually very happy they did that when I don't remember anything, it's amazing. I have 0 worries about appendicitis or eating enough fiber. I do exercise regularly anyway but its a quick thing without worries. And I am (pretty) safe of these issues for my whole life until death. I'd take that deal any day of the week - but this might only…
/r/MensRights20/06/23 03:19 PM
8

You don't need more than kindergarten when the logic is so poor. Literally choose any body part, a potential complication, and a maintanence task and watch the whole thing fall apart. "I am actually very happy they did that when I don't remember anything, it's amazing. I have 0 worries about ingrown nails or clipping often enough so they don't overgrow. I do wash my hands regularly anyway but its a quick thing without worries. And I am (pretty) safe of these issues for my whole life until death.…
/r/MensRights19/06/23 11:22 PM
9

"I am actually very happy they did that when I don't remember anything, it's amazing. I have 0 worries about tooth decay or flossing thoroughly enough so I cleaned everything off. I do brush regularly anyway but its a quick thing without worries. And I am (pretty) safe of these issues for my whole life until death. I'd take that deal any day of the week - but this might only be me. The parents decide so many things for their children, this is just one more."
/r/MensRights19/06/23 07:38 PM
6

It didn't click until I saw that one. Male penguins hatch the eggs at take care of the chicks. Female chickens hatch the eggs and take care of the chicks. It's kind of esoteric.
/r/MensRights18/06/23 01:08 PM
8

I'd like to point out that male sex toys are a relatively new thing. They've got prehistoric dildos in museums, but the tech to make a decent artificial vagina is less than a hundred years old. Most people's idea of a male sex toy is still a shitty blow up doll.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 06:05 AM
20

"Onahole" is the word you google. Toy Demon is a good site to buy from.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 05:54 AM
2

He's at that age window where he's going to be hit hardest by a separation. Because of that, I think you should be particularly honest with him. He's old enough to understand the abstracted concepts, too. Tell him how sometimes people are forced to choose between two options that aren't the ideal. Explain that separating will hurt the family, but that staying together would also hurt the family. Then explain that while the second option could potentially lead to the ideal solution he wants, it's…
/r/Divorce_Men10/04/22 11:47 AM
1

Both Pretty Baby and Private Lessons were only three years apart. Even at the time, Pretty Baby was controversial. Meanwhile my cursory searches of Private Lessons yield no such thing. Different days, but completely the same.
/r/MensRights09/04/22 10:41 AM
1

Where do you think the baby came from? Rape! Checkmate literal Hitlers.
/r/MensRights04/06/20 05:55 PM
5

Comment requiring social distance is what got me.
/r/MensRights01/04/20 10:06 AM
8

It was a tactless remark, and it may have upset your acquaintance. As long as you weren't actively trying to insult anyone, there's no need to ruminate over it. It's silly to expect perfect social tact from anyone at all times. Also, AmITheAsshole is populated by assholes.
/r/MensRights29/02/20 10:45 PM
7

It has a lot to do with the logistics of reproduction. A group of one man and nine women can make nine babies roughly every nine months. A group of nine men and one woman can make one baby roughly every nine months. If a certain amount of babies are expect to die before reaching adulthood, which group is most likely to survive? It was more prudent for men to engage in anything risky because of these factors, so groups that valued their women more than their men inevitably reproduced more than gr…
/r/MensRights11/12/19 11:15 AM
1

Which of these sounds closer to a "fake" asexual to you? The one preoccupied with sex or the one who doesn't give a shit?
/r/MensRights15/05/19 01:55 AM
4

As an asexual man, this post is a load of bullocks, and as an asexual man, I'm ashamed of your victorian-style preoccupation with sex and sexuality. Being sex repulsed is one thing, but your personal hangups over the matter clearly harm both your own psychological well-being and urge you to harm others.
/r/MensRights14/05/19 10:09 PM
6

It is hypocritical because it's based on male hyperagency and female hypoagency. Women have many reproductive options before abortion is even considered while men only have condoms and "don't have sex," yet somehow men should be held responsible for these decisions. The latter "don't have sex" argument also shines a light on the hypocrisy if you can get someone to make it since it's the same argument made against abortion.
/r/MensRights11/05/19 01:10 PM
4

White knights think with their dicks while black knights can keep fighting even if it's cut off?
/r/MensRights09/05/19 05:14 PM
348

It also doesn't help that whenever the notion of male pedophilia is brought up, everyone starts grabbing their pitchforks and rope. There's so much knee-jerking over the subject that no rational discussion can take place.
/r/MensRights09/05/19 05:12 PM
3

The article actually used the term "child rape." I certainly appreciate seeing that for once.
/r/MensRights09/05/19 05:07 PM
1

I like to then say something absurd about my debate partner and then when they object say something along the lines of "Oh, your comment made me think this was the part of the debate where we make stuff up about one another."
/r/MensRights29/04/19 03:14 PM
2

Don't just ignore that they haven't addressed the argument. Point out that it isn't being addressed and ask if your debate partner has any actual disagreements with it.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 03:12 PM
19

To give you an overview, foreskin restoration is a thing that involves stretching your remaining skin to create a replacement foreskin. This won't give you back the ridged band or the nerve endings that were lost, but it will allow the head of the penis to dekaratinize and restore the gliding motion for intercourse and masturbation. ​ As for actually regenerating the foreskin as it would have been, there's nothing available yet, though foregen will be entering human clinical trials soon.
/r/MensRights27/04/19 06:26 PM
14

This sub is the exact same as when I started lurking like four-five years ago.
/r/MensRights21/04/19 01:47 AM
6

So what are the chances it's because he read some of her articles?
/r/MensRights20/04/19 12:24 AM
1

I don't think those sort of men are "wrong" so much as foolish. It's like locking your doors. If get robbed because you chose not to lock your doors, you're guilty of foolishness for not taking reasonable precaution. You are still a victim of the robbery and not somehow at fault for someone else's actions.
/r/MensRights16/04/19 12:07 AM
1

Clearly, you and I are the same person, so why don't we ever do same person things anymore? ):
/r/MensRights16/04/19 12:01 AM
1

That thought crosses my mind a lot.
/r/MensRights14/04/19 03:55 PM
20

I'd say advocacy is most important with the right mix of litigation and lobbying beneath it. I think the most important thing is loosening feminism's grip on the schools. Our biggest problem right now is still ultimately awareness. People resist our ideas in a large part because they've been trained to think this way. Tear down that bias and politics and law will eventually follow.
/r/MensRights14/04/19 03:40 PM
12

This is genuine, but it's coming from a place of feminist theory. Notice how "you can change, learn, grow" comes after "you are not an abuser." I doubt the writer is even aware of it.
/r/MensRights14/04/19 03:30 PM
2

Yeah. I think that item was supposed to be there to include the concept of reactive abuse, though.
/r/MensRights14/04/19 03:16 PM
3

If that was the intent, then it should have been a more specific item the same way "coerse for sex" doesn't just list "sex."
/r/MensRights14/04/19 03:14 PM
2

I don't know how guys like this and Bill Burr get by as comedians. I can never laugh at this sort of stuff.
/r/MensRights13/04/19 10:09 PM
3

That constitutes as an attack? Yeah, you're a troll.
/r/MensRights13/04/19 08:28 PM
9

The appropriate action here is to pee in the corner on the "wet floor" sign.
/r/MensRights13/04/19 08:12 PM
3

Because you're trying to bait me into arguing something irrelevant and derail my point. I said: "Abortion shouldn't be included. That entire debate concerns ethics that have nothing to do even do with gender." ​ You: "Abortion is bad. Women sign abortion papers, so they're guilty of doing a bad thing." ​ As if that actually matters to what I said. The person without a counterargument is you. And before you spin your wheels again, if you want to address my point, you can't do so by proving whethe…
/r/MensRights13/04/19 08:07 PM
3

You're still working backwards.
/r/MensRights13/04/19 07:48 PM
4

I don't particularly care to debate abortion itself at the moment. So long as we agree that this question isn't gendered, I've made my point. :I
/r/MensRights13/04/19 07:42 PM
5

A question that precludes any of your subsequent logic. It's clear from your language that you've already come to a personal decision, but working backwards isn't going to make a point. Let me try to rephrase my previous remark differently for you: ​ And if ending life prematurely is wrong... And if it isn't, then what? See the issue?
/r/MensRights13/04/19 07:22 PM
8

That's the rub. The question is "When should a fetus gain human rights?" Gender doesn't play into that.
/r/MensRights13/04/19 07:06 PM
29

There's a whole debate concerning it with pros and cons that have nothing to do with gender or femininity. For example, someone could support abortion because unwanted children tend to create a bigger economical strain. ​ A much better addition would be something like "lying about birth control."
/r/MensRights13/04/19 05:11 PM
49

This pyramid could be much better. Abortion in particular needs to be removed outright. Abortion is clearly disjointed from the rest of this even if there's any toxic femininity involved.
/r/MensRights13/04/19 04:57 PM
3

https://www.metro.news/woman-gave-boy-14-drug-so-she-could-seduce-him/1176348/
/r/MensRights12/04/19 11:30 PM
1

https://youtube.com/watch?v=kl39KHS07Xc For all the people who don't understand ubi.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 12:18 AM
1

Folks around here can be pretty surly at times, and I didn't want the olive branch you brought with you to be snapped underfoot. Everyone here (and nearly everyone at large) are affected by these issues, personally, or know someone who is. We've got victims of sexual abuse, divorce rape, MGM, and false allegations on this sub, and we receive a steady stream of information on the suffering of other men as well. This is all the while certain groups try to sweep it all under the rug and demonize me…
/r/MensRights05/03/19 11:20 PM
1

Since no one else said this, I want to say that we do appreciate genuine attempts at understanding and real compassion for the issues men face. When you're raised and grow up in an environment that has one uniform belief system and in which you never hear the other side, you absorb a lot of propaganda without ever thinking to even question it. Sifting through that takes time, but I encourage you to stick around the sub and form your own thoughts on the things it will present you. This place can …
/r/MensRights05/03/19 01:10 AM
8

I'm MGTOW, but a large portion of that is because I'm also asexual and fairly solitary by nature. I'm not a fan of the mgtow sub, though. I don't find it productive, and a lot of posters just seem bitter. I feel general awareness needs to be raised about these issues, so I find this sub more productive.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 01:00 PM
1

I think you provided the wrong link for "Exhibit A."
/r/MensRights12/10/17 11:40 PM
0

For a moment I thought they were bragging about having hired an indian dude. Took me another moment to notice the tits.
/r/MensRights09/10/17 04:36 PM
1

Damn. This headline is borderline word salad. "'Minister for Men' poster mocked on Twitter. Bath Councillor still backs."
/r/MensRights09/10/17 03:37 PM
1

With that claim, you just point out that it's incredibly misogynistic to white... er... manwash... the role of women in history.
/r/MensRights03/10/17 12:03 AM
3

Too masterful. The troll ended up causing everyone to explain the issue in a level-headed manner. I don't agree that anyone addressing this post has lost the argument simply by replying. I mean, I know this sub is no stranger to trolls, but no one's jimmies were even remotely rustled.
/r/MensRights02/10/17 10:06 PM
11

It's nice that you're optimistic, but, personally, I still wear my seat belt even when I'm not expecting a collision.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 09:56 PM
9

Quick, Manny! To the Man-mobile!
/r/MensRights29/08/17 04:20 PM
1

I'll look into it. Thank you.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 11:25 AM
1

Thank you. This looks like exactly what i needed.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 11:24 AM
2

Honestly, most of the circumstances stemming from these laws and biases imply most people don't actually care about the children in question. You can see this on both sides of the affair. Either way, romp culture might be a thing, but there are still four fingers there O'Brien.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 11:24 AM
1

I had a stroke of wit after some sleep and searched "teacher" on /r/pussypass This got me a lot of recent specific examples.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 11:19 AM
10

Romp Culture strikes again.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 02:21 AM
5

Well, stateside net neutrality seems to be going the way of the dodo, so they'll just pay isps to prevent you from swapping to DuckDucktube or wherever.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 10:38 PM
10

Yes, it's a very serious sub. I mean, seeing stuff like "teacher rapes child gets probation" every day starts to wear on your soul a bit, and you forget that sometimes people are just trying to give you a moment away from that with a joke.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 10:09 PM
13

Upvoted for that delightfully terrible pun of "dach-son."
/r/MensRights03/08/17 09:37 PM
2

I feel obligated to post this: http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m0305eRyPY1rq14m7o1_500.jpg
/r/MensRights23/07/17 01:17 AM
2

A game typically considered "short" is around 12-14 hours. Some are shorter, but those tend to be rarer. Multiplayer games also have theoretically infinite playtime. Some people still play Marvel vs Capcom 2 and Smash Bros Melee, for instance.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 11:45 PM
3

What does this movement mean to you? Hope. Society at large doesn't care what happens to men and boys. The simple fact that this movement exists gives credence to the idea that there ARE people who care. It gives credence to the idea that people can care about what happens to men and boys. If people can care, things can change. According to you, what is its goal? Legal equality. Anything more than that is overreaching. If this movement starts to become more important in the future, how do you wa…
/r/MensRights08/07/17 03:24 PM
1

The parents seem to literally be hiding the infant's biological sex. British Columbia Services doesn't know the sex, so they listed it as "unknown" on the card. There doesn't seem to be any conflation happening.
/r/MensRights08/07/17 03:05 PM
5

I didn't want to press charges There's your second mistake. Do you think if the roles were reversed, she wouldn't have pressed charges? You simply encouraged her to keep doing whatever she was doing.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 04:53 PM
1

Ah, I see. Oh! By the way, I'm scheduled to see a doctor about my skin condition and my tiny arms a... birth defect.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 05:49 PM
2

This is bad because you do not understand the depravity of some creatures imitating humans. I can't tell if you're a klansman talking about blacks, a feminist talking about men, or Nazi talking about Jews. If anyone doesn't understand them, it's the person who denies to very fact that these people ARE human. Pedophiles at least have instinctual biological drives as their motivations. People who think like that quote just want to hurt people. It's not about helping children.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 05:39 PM
25

I'm considering starting a crime syndicate staffed entirely by women. I'm thinking I might start out with assassinations before branching out into human trafficking. >_>
/r/MensRights06/07/17 02:37 AM
5

No, we have to repress pedophiles to the point they target real children. By 2020 we should have possession of child pornography and child molestation identically sentenced, and 2035 we should criminalize all sexual conduct by anyone deemed a pedophile by a judge. /s It's amazing how much society is more interested in its pitchforks and torches than actually helping anyone.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 02:27 AM
3

Both of your analogies are flawed because they're examining the wrong things. Gasoline and sexual stimulation are both recurring demands and can be considered comparable on that front. For our purposes we can consider them constants because we're not considering circumstances where the causes of those demands will change much. Demand isn't the driving force behind price when demand is inelastic. Supply, or in this case, scarcity is. What possession laws do is create artificial scarcity. Interest…
/r/MensRights05/07/17 10:44 PM
2

Can we ban this bot?
/r/MensRights22/06/17 10:08 PM
16

If this keeps up "romp" is going to pick up a new meaning. "Rape" is an endangered term nowadays and "romp" seems poised to take it's place. Maybe we should just cut to the chase and refer to all non consensual sexual encounters as "romps." I mean, Rape culture might not be real but "romp culture" sure seems to be.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 10:02 PM
1

Stupid bot can't tell the difference between 11 and 1. You're bringing shame to all the other computers.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 11:19 PM
3

You didn't understand what I wrote. Let me reword the first sentence. "How people treat pedophilia and pedophiles is really something that shows those the intents of those people clearly."
/r/MensRights11/06/17 01:07 AM
15

Clearly, it's the privilege of having tangible evidence of oppression. Men just have too much oppression privilege.
/r/MensRights10/06/17 03:50 PM
29

You tell him the truth but withhold your own judgement and regret. Explain to him what circumcision is and that lots of people have it done and that you had him circumcised as a baby. You can leave it at that. There's a good chance he'll ask why you didn't have his brother circumcised, though. If he asks why you that directly, explain to him that just because everyone does something, it doesn't mean it's the best thing to do. When he's a old enough understand, you can explain to him in more deta…
/r/MensRights10/06/17 05:41 AM
11

Pedophilia is something that really shows the color of one's soul. Most people seem to not give a damn about helping victims so much as lynching men and congratulating women.
/r/MensRights10/06/17 05:29 AM
5

Maybe she'll change These words have gotten people killed.
/r/MensRights10/06/17 05:24 AM
7

That's the type of thing you get when you try to use logic flowing backwards from a conclusion. You'll hear that there's no evidence that the aliens didn't build the pyramids, either, for the exact same reasons.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 03:59 PM
1

Thank you. For clarity's sake, that's solely for the year of 2010, correct? I would have rooted around for it myself, but I assumed there'd be a language barrier between myself and most of the statistical sources. Knowing the breakdown of stats like these is pretty important given how easily they're spun.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 12:08 AM
2

I've engaged that poster before and I don't think he's actually a troll. He's a bigot and incredibly disruptive, though. The comments of his that I see tend to get downvoted very heavily, too. Thats a pretty good indicator that most people here aren't supporting that kind of thinking.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 08:05 PM
19

Dem teeth. When a chimpanzee smiles at you, that woman's expression is the one they're trying to make. This article does a poor job explaining exactly what this is about. I presume "femicide" refers to any murder of a woman. If that's correct, 1 murder every 25 hours puts us at around 365 murders per year in Argentina. I don't know how accurate this is or how this compares to male murders, though.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 06:29 AM
9

New users are auto-subscribed places? I thought "home" just dumped a bunch a random popular crap. Well, twox just lost a subscriber.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 01:07 AM
12

Is that true? The only judgemental sentence I see is the first sentence of the second paragraph. "Kind of" is such powerful advocacy, don't you think? Also, if we were "all sad, disgusting little boys in this sub," wouldn't he have initially been upvoted instead? Or are you implying we're being brigaded? Ah, didn't realize this hit r/all.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 12:50 AM
2

Most of that didn't actually address what I wrote. :I Problem is guys will just take the abuse hoping to get a fuck later This did, though. I'm not going to disagree either. That's pretty much an axiom to my argument.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 12:06 AM
62

I don't know why this was downvoted. You're just explaining the rationale behind these types of laws. That's very important to understand.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 11:55 PM
5

I'm not saying that anything you've said is "wrong." Its pragmatic; it does what you want it to. But it's not viable for the entire group. You and I both know that men will never just up and take their societal infrastructure ball and just go home. Everyone still lives on the S.S. Earth, and we want to keep playing with that ball longer than the next century or so. Realistically, though, people should pick and choose their battles. Sometimes it's wiser to ignore the man-hating-feminists; other t…
/r/MensRights05/06/17 11:38 PM
3

First, its against the rules to be naked in a boathouse. Towels a must. Depends on where and when you live. We don't have to discuss anything with females, never mind irrational feminists. Get it! Sure, but someone has to. That's the crux. I'm not a farmer and you're probably not one either, but if no one was a farmer, we'd starve. Look where letting this noise go unopposed has gotten us in this past half-century. Not engaging doesn't harm anything, but it doesn't help. It just makes one complac…
/r/MensRights05/06/17 10:58 PM
9

Your opinions don't exactly dazzle either, bucko. You might as well have just quoted the old "sticks and stones" adage. Then you had to go all anti-discussion. How's that other saying about butts and opinions go? I mean, you're in a metaphorical bathhouse complaining about people being naked.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 10:19 PM
2

Notice the distinctive "no u" response whenever points are raised. The call of these majestic creatures is also often accompanied by insults and derision.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 01:52 PM
1

Honestly, from what you wrote, I don't think you handled the situation very well. It sounds like you immediately assumed the worst of it and got indignant. How long did you actually wait? The question wasn't "Where am I supposed to use the restroom?" but "How long is this restroom temporarily 'women only'?" The employee wouldn't have been standing there essentially directing traffic if this was any indefinite change. Really, that was the only pragmatic solution to this problem, and, perhaps I'm …
/r/MensRights03/06/17 05:14 AM
3

There's a lot of room for interpretation with this song. Not a lot is actually said. We've got no frame of reference, so if you assume Sylvia's been actively avoiding the guy, it seems a bit creepy, but if you assume her mother is screening the calls without Sylvia even knowing it, it takes on a pretty different tone.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 04:51 AM
1

Yes. Whether you intended to cherry-pick or not, it's cherry-picked. That said, dictionaries are ultimately descriptive. I'm not really keen on actually debating semantics; they're beside my point, really. Cosmo's an awful publication, but if you're going to criticize something as petty as using "subconscious" instead of "unconscious" at least make sure your own posts are free from similar flaws.
/r/MensRights29/05/17 10:14 PM
1

Looks like you cherry-picked that definition from the Collins English Dictionary. Most other dictionaries don't seem to agree with the very important "and semantics" part. But sure, let's use that definition. It's not like you used much punctuation either.
/r/MensRights29/05/17 07:01 PM
1

terrible diction If you're gonna call anyone out on something, at least make sure your own post doesn't do that same thing.
/r/MensRights29/05/17 05:42 PM
2

No, it isn't. But here's the kicker: that's good news. Most people aren't empathic simply because they don't understand. They don't have enough information to understand. Your average jane and joe doesn't know that most suicides are male. They don't know that the leading cause of homelessness is mental illness. They don't know that that male college enrollment is steadily decreasing. They don't know that around 100 babies die from MGM complications yearly in the US. They're just told men have it…
/r/MensRights27/05/17 04:02 PM
5

My younger brother killed himself almost a year ago exactly. It took a while for me to shed any tears at all and even now I still haven't cried much. By no means does that signify no grief. You're feeling frustrated, caged, and incredibly motivated to solve this problem. That's your grief. Don't be afraid simply because it's not manifesting how you think it should. With that said, you're not going to find a "solution," per se. There are a lot of factors, and it's not something that can be "fixed…
/r/MensRights27/05/17 02:38 PM
1

...Black Panthers or regular, feline panthers?
/r/MensRights26/05/17 09:05 PM
31

That's a pretty important piece of information that the employees didn't really have any way of knowing. Even if you were a complete stranger, just loitering around a business as it closes can appear quite suspicious.
/r/MensRights15/05/17 05:39 AM
13

In our times, while women suffer disproportionately from sexual abuse, workplace discrimination, lack of access to affordable healthcare and a myriad of other issues, you dare to pine and whine about your own victimhood? I think this says everything we need to know about this person.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 09:24 AM
4

A bit outside the scope of the topic, but are you aware you're consistently typing "farther" instead of "father"?
/r/MensRights09/05/17 12:17 PM
1

That's exactly what they're doing. In some capacity, those people were always there, but they were simply far outnumbered by the moderates. As feminism essentially achieved its goals, more and more of the saner people started to jump ship. The people that are left... These are people who are willing to censor points of view they don't like. Of course they're going to lie to make themselves look better. Feminism isn't something that's innately bad, but you don't want air conditioners in the arcti…
/r/MensRights08/05/17 07:21 PM
4

In a situation where things largely are equal, what is "advancement" if not "supremacy"? They think that because in some situations, that's the only way you can advance. A good example is the kangaroo courts on college campuses. How do you make sexual assault trials favor women? Easy. You remove due process for men. They deny facts because the facts don't support them. It's for the same reasons totalitarian governments want to control information - exactly as you said. As far as the breast-feedi…
/r/MensRights08/05/17 04:48 PM
15

That's par the course for that sub. It's modded by exactly the kind of people you're criticizing. r/mensrights gets a lot of people airing their grievances who were banned there for simply dissenting. I hear they even autoban accounts for simply posting in certain other subs they dislike, too. Despite what they advertise, feminism isn't about equality; it's about the advancement of women. If that distinction matters to you, maybe you aren't a feminist. But is that such a bad thing? It's just a l…
/r/MensRights08/05/17 04:20 PM
8

You didn't watch the video, huh?
/r/MensRights08/05/17 01:42 AM
3

I wasn't implying otherwise. I was trying to point out how shamelessly supremacist the word choice was. :I
/r/MensRights06/05/17 08:27 PM
10

"Enough equality"? I haven't read Animal Farm in about a decade, but I wouldn't be surprised if those words were somewhere in the text. It's just one step away from "more equal."
/r/MensRights06/05/17 08:00 PM
1

The wage gap and hygienic benefits of circumcision are also "well established facts." This is why when someone is asked for a source for a claim, they're expected to provide one - which the op did. Somehow you not being the op makes it worse that you went all "it's not my job to educate you."
/r/MensRights04/05/17 04:56 PM
224

My current wife is delicate. Family Law needs Reform. I recommend mandated lower costs and less reward for false claims of abuse. Parental alienation is destructive(?). I loved my children as much as a husband + father could. I see no light. Recommend: an authority consultant during high contact separations as its employed(?) in family law. Sorry Dad + Angie. I'm very sorry. I presumed if I was having trouble reading it, so are others.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 02:38 PM
2

Pack animals don't even have a greek alphabet structure. More asocial and solitary animals like cats do.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 12:41 PM
1

The milgram obedience experiments are set up quite differently. I don't believe it answers my implied questions. The conformity ones may, but I'll need to look into it more. The video on that matter you provided is essentially the same as the waiting room experiment.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 12:32 PM
1

This is a bit narrower than it would initially seem. These people aren't in a position to make a decision, so they don't. I'd like to see the results once you start adding reasons, too.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 02:11 AM
1

Yes, I'm aware. I was pointing out that that remark may have not been accurate.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 05:49 PM
1

The "workplace equality" bit is stupid, but that's on the article's author. I read some comments from someone claiming to work there saying they recently hired a male intern and 1/4 of their customers are male anyway. If this is all true, this company simply has a target demographic. There's nothing wrong with that.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 05:25 PM
5

Identitiy politics is all about pulling people apart. Anyway, as far as arguing idiots, I think it's a matter of location. When you argue someone like this, you shouldn't argue to convince them. If you argue in private, it's a waste of time, but in public, people can see them flounder and fail to defend their stance.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 02:10 PM
1

mwo is actually agreeing with you. He's saying the oppressor/oppressed lens doesn't hold up as a universal truth in even the most extreme example.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 05:15 PM
2

don't need no he-man ftfy
/r/MensRights10/03/17 05:09 PM
3

I know you're just figuratively nodding politely, but I'm pretty sure that was a joke.
/r/MensRights27/02/17 07:18 PM
3

Most studies result in something expected. Most studies are not surprising because something surprising is by definition unexpected.
/r/MensRights21/02/17 01:30 AM
3

The article asserts no argument, so the correct answer is "none of the above." What they really want to know is how many fingers you see, Winston.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 07:34 PM
1

That's outside of what /u/Kuato2012 said. The oocyte is what becomes an egg cell. They still have to come from a human female. This makes the "motherless babies" bit deceptive.
/r/MensRights14/09/16 07:12 AM
2

Three more years and she'll get her magic powers.
/r/MensRights13/09/16 06:27 PM
11

Here is a more legible upload.
/r/MensRights13/09/16 06:16 PM
1

Land of the free; home of the caged.
/r/MensRights13/09/16 12:23 PM
0

I have no idea what you're on about in that edit, but that's application of Hanlon's razor - not Occam's.
/r/MensRights12/09/16 07:53 PM
1

esk The spelling is "esque."
/r/MensRights07/09/16 09:07 PM
1

Which one? 10 points each?
/r/MensRights03/09/16 12:29 AM
2

How is this on topic?
/r/MensRights02/09/16 08:41 PM
15

Such a cute kid. If he gets prison, he's just gonna be raped again. On the bright side, maybe the jury will be sympathetic if this manages to reach trial.
/r/MensRights02/09/16 04:52 PM
12

This woman seriously went for the "He ran into my knife" argument? Did "he have it comin'"? "Squish"?
/r/MensRights02/09/16 04:03 PM
3

Most of these issues would be solved by fixing the underlying problems with the education system itself. There'll always be some sort of gap so long as it continues to print out identical products.
/r/MensRights02/09/16 03:32 PM
2

Plea deals should be illegal.
/r/MensRights02/09/16 03:09 PM
4

Oh, the bandwidth rations not enough for your family? They keep cutting them back here in Soviet Oceania, too.
/r/MensRights02/09/16 02:16 AM
2

People want vengeance not justice - that's the bottom line.
/r/MensRights02/09/16 02:13 AM
1

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3769536/Taxi-driver-stopped-texting-12-year-old-daughter-judge-said-no-need-communication-day.html For future reference, it's at the top of the archive bar.
/r/MensRights02/09/16 01:25 AM
1

Click "permalink" then copy/paste the url.
/r/MensRights02/09/16 12:36 AM
6

Lol. This is bonkers Science is based on the professional creation and certification of knowledge which is tied to powerful interest groups, notably the state, corporations and the scientific profession itself. Clearly, horses were created because we made carts and needed something to pull them. objectification of nature What's the alternative? Personification of nature? Scientific knowledge is masculine in its neglect of women’s experience So long as it's properly documented, science rejects no…
/r/MensRights01/09/16 12:55 AM
1

Aw, I feel disappointed that you're stooping to identity politics jargon, Omega.
/r/MensRights27/08/16 12:16 PM
2

Makeup? Poppycock! Clearly this is mystical orient sorcery! /s That said, this is off topic.
/r/MensRights25/08/16 03:33 PM
26

You heard her, boys, lie back and think of England. As the Guardian likes to remind us, loneliness kills - so dithering lads are actually murderers, when you think about it As the tabloids like to remind us, ancient civilizations didn't have the technology to build all these superstructures - so it must have been aliens, when you think about it. Because of daft, but very real, rules of engagement, most women really are at the whim of men to decide their dating destiny. Irony's a bitch ain't it?
/r/MensRights25/08/16 10:19 AM
1

Dude's actually got a couple that he rotates based on context.
/r/MensRights20/08/16 08:32 AM
2

This really needs more upvotes.
/r/MensRights20/08/16 08:27 AM
2

I don't think there'll be much of a market. There'll be some form of one, but I doubt it will be very large. They'll be incredibly expensive and robotics hasn't advanced enough to make them anything more than uncanny. We won't see sex gynoids until we see regular personal androids. It'll be hard to justify forking out so much cash when your hands and a hotcam do largely the same thing.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 06:57 AM
2

Did you never watch the Brave Little Toaster when you were a kid?
/r/MensRights18/08/16 07:33 AM
2

I wish I could give this more upvotes.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 06:34 AM
3

Actually, I think that's the one that isn't ok.
/r/MensRights16/08/16 09:57 PM
1

A Wild Hypno appeared! Seriously though, this sounds like a case of sleep paralysis.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 05:21 PM
1

Why is the logo a chicken? Chickens are not cuckoos! Even Zelda chickens aren't.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 10:44 AM
1

Insects aren't typically considered self-aware yet have highly complex courtship rituals. Rape certainly was an element of early human reproduction, but you need evidence to support any claims of degree.
/r/MensRights10/08/16 02:10 AM
3

In a way, with feminism's vested interest in keeping women controlled and propping up this abusive boogieman, feminism is the patriarchy. "Hail Hydra," indeed.
/r/MensRights07/08/16 12:25 PM
5

Sad as it is. Those male pigs have no hope of getting anesthesia during castration when we're still not required to give male humans anesthesia during circumcision.
/r/MensRights05/08/16 11:22 PM
9

And thus the earning gap widened more.
/r/MensRights05/08/16 09:59 PM
3

The loudest voice is also having a cyclical effect. More moderates and otherwise sympathizers are dropping or not adopting the label because of these very same people. "Feminism" is slowly becoming solely "radical feminism." For a lot of people here, it's already reached that point, so bear that in mind when you see someone refer to feminism holistically. Most people here, though, don't care ultimately what you call yourself, but there is the occasional wanker. Letting them have their voice is p…
/r/MensRights05/08/16 07:38 PM
3

Lol. If you want privacy, use PM.
/r/MensRights05/08/16 07:32 PM
3

You didn't actually defend your assertion; you merely reasserted it. I agree they probably won't cover this story, but you need proof to support that these claims are lies. Both occam's razor and hanlon's razor are working against you here, so showing how you've read between the lines isn't enough. Also, as a general bit of advice, when your response is to insult your skeptics, you damage your credibility; thus, your own experience also loses value as evidence.
/r/MensRights05/08/16 06:39 PM
1

Lol. Okay, whatever. Later.
/r/MensRights05/08/16 03:51 PM
1

Address something here. I'm not going to say anything different if you just keep saying the same thing I was responding to there.
/r/MensRights05/08/16 03:45 PM
1

No, you used an example of how you treat Toddlers to justify how you want to treat women. Well, if you insist on arguing with scarecrows, I'm done here.
/r/MensRights05/08/16 03:32 PM
1

Whoa, calm down there, Captain Extrapolation. Both of your remarks are outside anything I've said or even implied, but let's address them anyway, shall we? It's plain and simple. We don't treat adults the way we do toddlers. Period. Of course, I didn't say any of that, but why is that? Both are human beings and thereby both are fundamentally quite similar. How toddlers are treated informs their behavior as adults, so in a certain light, everyone treats everyone like toddlers. Regardless, the ver…
/r/MensRights05/08/16 03:03 PM
1

Lol. And why is that? They're a great example of emotion without justified cause - exactly the situation you're concerned with.
/r/MensRights05/08/16 02:02 PM
2

That's a good comparison. Pragmatically, yes, that's an improvement. Slaves and prostitutes have a damn good life compared to people who are being starved and tortured. Morally, this is way easier to compare. Both are human rights violations, but they're of different magnitude - as your use of them as example requires. Slavery is way more humane than prolonged torture. They're still both morally wrong, though.
/r/MensRights05/08/16 01:56 PM
1

You cannot "empathize" with her, or be compassionate with her without justifying her emotions. And why is that exactly? I do it all the time - particularly with younger children. The other day I was tending a toddler who wanted someone else's toy. She got mad, so I comforted her. She still didn't get the toy.
/r/MensRights05/08/16 01:50 PM
1

That's false equivalence. You're both arguing different subjects. You're arguing morality while /u/crazypants88 is arguing practicality. It's idealism vs pragmatism. Any improvement is a pragmatic benefit even if ideally it's not enough.
/r/MensRights05/08/16 01:42 AM
1

No. Viewing men as disposable is why they get shipped off to war. You can care about how they feel, and still send them off to war. Yes, you can, but you're not disagreeing with me. Lack of empathy is fundamental to that disposability. Also, I take it there's no objection to the other examples? Trying to ensure people don't get their feelings hurt on a macro scale is what leads to a "microagression" mentality. Where did I say we should ensure anything? You can feel compassion and empathy without…
/r/MensRights04/08/16 08:50 PM
4

Yes. Mean world syndrome is all too real. Even if not a day, a weekly sticky compiling the week's positive posts would be nice.
/r/MensRights04/08/16 05:57 PM
1

I don't disagree that this is not a rights issue (at least for anyone besides the restaurant), but a lack of compassion for how men feel is a foundational reason for why they get shipped off to war, still have their dicks mutilated, and have few domestic violence resources. You should care how they feel because you're a human being. That does not mean you have to find it justified, but you should never not care.
/r/MensRights04/08/16 05:48 PM
1

Damn, those commies are playing the long game. /s
/r/MensRights04/08/16 01:27 AM
1

The sentence you want is "Can I see a source?"
/r/MensRights03/08/16 11:53 PM
1

Feminism ignoring "average-looking men's rights" is a big reason why it's such a problem. The sentiment is very much worth our time to consider.
/r/MensRights03/08/16 11:46 AM
5

*child molester So long as we conflate "pedophile" and "child molester" the first group will never be able to get help before becoming part of the second.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 04:55 AM
1

Hope the defamation suit is fruitful.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 04:33 AM
6

I don't see robots specifically for sex ever becoming a marketable thing. Sex workers and relationships will be - in the short term at least - far cheaper, and costs will be very prohibitive for a well made robot. It's more likely that robotics will have to progress to the point where a single robot can do a multitude of tasks (think robot servants), and sexual capability will simply be an additional or modded on feature. Really, think about how many people actually own full sized sex dolls or e…
/r/MensRights31/07/16 09:09 PM
3

I don't think it matters. Mostly anonymous lies to other mostly anonymous people are probably the least damaging, so it's not a big deal if they're believed or not. It's once police and media become involved that fabrication starts to matter a lot more.
/r/MensRights31/07/16 06:47 PM
1

Facebook as a platform promotes that, too. Because it's a closed circle, typically, half truths get shared as images and the corrections get lost between shares. I wouldn't be surprised if she read the bit about women's fat differences from some image floating through her news feed.
/r/MensRights31/07/16 11:16 AM
32

Facebook is an echo chamber of lies and half-truths. If that's your only source of online information, I'm not sure you'd be able to be anything but ignorant.
/r/MensRights31/07/16 11:07 AM
5

A fool thinks himself to be wise, but a wise man knows himself to be a fool. If you argue, you're not trying to convince this person, but people reading what you write. The thing about accusations like this is that they fly both ways. You can casually point that out for the readers and let them decide.
/r/MensRights31/07/16 11:04 AM
1

Don't throw bait in the safari zone.
/r/MensRights30/07/16 02:17 AM
1

It's not actually a trilby is it?
/r/MensRights30/07/16 01:32 AM
2

Stating it as percentage is a bit deceptive. 13 out of 42 paternity tests resulted in negative. This isn't really a significant sample size, so while interesting, it's not as consequential as it sounds.
/r/MensRights30/07/16 12:13 AM
1

The balance is "If someone asks, you provide." People don't always ask for sources, but even if it's just to support the color of the damn sky, you should have something to show when asked. If there's any easily proven sources elsewhere on the forum, point to them and be on your way. Also, /u/Moonvie not simply providing a source is what's derailing the conversation.
/r/MensRights29/07/16 08:41 PM
1

Science is often used to concretely support things we already assume.
/r/MensRights29/07/16 03:08 PM
1

And yes, you do get to make judgements on everything you see. I suppose I should clarify, you get to make interpretations, but you can't cherry pick which data you ignore and which data you don't. Doing so is agenda not science. In the event there isn't some miscommunication involved somewhere, I'm not trying to convince you I'm right. If you're willing to throw out study because it doesn't support your worldview, you're too entrenched in yourself to change - exactly as those flat earthers were.
/r/MensRights21/07/16 03:29 AM
2

And thus the earth was flat. you do not get to choose which observations to reject and which to accept. I've reached the point of the conversation where I'd have to start repeating myself, so I will bid you adieu.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 10:58 AM
2

Sigh. Okay, I suppose I'll have to break it down, then. Because reality cannot contradict, there will always be an explanation for conflicting studies - i.e. differing methodology, margins of error, and erroneous conclusions and theories. Also, I'm not a tv robot. I'm not going to explode whenever I don't know why two observations appear to contradict.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 08:52 AM
1

Never. Reality doesn't contradict.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 08:04 AM
1

I don't think it's low quality; however, I do find it only tangentially related to men's rights. It's good evidence toward there being innate biological differences, but that alone isn't new information. It's pretty easy to divorce outcome differences from socialization and discrimination already, yet that doesn't stop the devout feminist from sounding convincing. "The same enough" is a pretty strong caveat for people to hide behind, after all.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 07:18 AM
2

"Defer"? There's nothing to defer to beyond reality itself. You're perfectly welcome to question conclusions and methodology. You can't dismiss a study, however, because (barring outright fabrication) observations are concrete. Reality doesn't contradict itself, and you do not get to choose which observations to reject and which to accept. You may certainly draw your own conclusions, but if you're rejecting a study outright because it contradicts your own biases, your behavior is exactly the beh…
/r/MensRights20/07/16 06:50 AM
4

That problem comes from trying to pigeonhole something as complex as politics into a dichotomy.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 01:29 AM
3

You're hanging around political subs. Other types of subs such as fan subs or hobby subs tend to be much better.
/r/MensRights19/07/16 11:32 PM
4

There is no "ideally" involved. There is hypothesis and then there's methodology and data. If you're going to ignore the methodology and data in favor of the hypothesis, you're no better than those "wage gap" and "pink tax" assholes - that is to say "you have an agenda."
/r/MensRights19/07/16 10:25 AM
7

Comments like this completely miss the point of scientific study. What's "obvious" or not is entirely irrelevant as it's little more than unsubstantiated preconception until a study is done to either affirm or contradict it.
/r/MensRights19/07/16 03:50 AM
3

Just being a pedophile doesn't mean the law's been broken, or are we establishing thought crime now? Also, many child molesters are not pedophiles. We'd actually reduce child victimization by not driving these people so far into the closet that they won't get help before committing a crime.
/r/MensRights18/07/16 02:04 PM
2

Thank god. I was certain you'd gone through with it, but I'm very glad I was wrong. Good luck sorting those things out.
/r/MensRights16/07/16 05:46 AM
2

Blacks should not be hired to enforce the law because of the risk they might be criminals, Andrea Leadsom has said. The Conservative MP and former leadership candidate said the “odds were stacked against” people who hired blacks and worried they would commit crimes. “As an employer we’re not, let’s face it, most of us don’t employ blacks as police officers, most of us don’t,” she said. “Now you can call that racist, I call that cautious and very sensible when you look at the stats. Your odds are…
/r/MensRights16/07/16 04:24 AM
1

It doesn't help that it's an obvious fake smile.
/r/MensRights16/07/16 04:17 AM
1

It's RIP trolling, and it's horrifying how little empathy some people can have.
/r/MensRights14/07/16 09:24 PM
6

It's a catch-22, so it doesn't. Amusingly, it'd probably piss a lot of women off who wouldn't understand why they can't get dates anymore.
/r/MensRights14/07/16 07:52 PM
3

An obituarary probably wouldn't show up for a few days. Someone would have to find the body - likely today, though not certain - and then someone would have to write the obituarary. I'd estimate Sunday would be the earliest that one would show up.
/r/MensRights14/07/16 07:41 PM
2

Dude, my brother just comitted suicide. There's no freedom in death; you just shackle others with grief. He even shared a lot of the sentiments you've expressed, too. My brother killed himself while under the influence of drugs, and I know his lucid self never would have. He isn't free and he'll never be free because now he's dead. He was claimed by the very thing he wanted to be free of. Look, I can't stop you from suicide if you so wish it and on some front I'm not sure I should, but what I do…
/r/MensRights14/07/16 11:37 AM
9

Title makes it sound like she broke out of jail.
/r/MensRights03/07/16 07:52 PM
3

The US justice system seeks vengeance not correction. People want blood. Even if she never returns to prison after she's released, she'll be a 58 year old woman and live the remainder of her life on welfare. Just shooting her is more humane.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 08:01 PM
1

Rapelay is a porn game. It's a bit divorced from things like Tomb Raider and GTA in much the same way Rape Sluts 6 isn't a reflection of Hollywood films.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 05:05 PM
1

Mating with yourself wouldn't be too dissimilar from cloning. Plenty of animals self fertilize already with no huge issues. The biggest problem is potentially passing on recessive carrier genes to the offspring. Inbreeding requires a few generations before genetic defects start to become prevalent over a population.
/r/MensRights12/06/16 10:26 AM
6

Technically no. The word is "ephebophile." Also, the word you want in the first place isn't "pedophile," anyway, it's "child molester."
/r/MensRights08/06/16 12:11 AM
1

Don't misunderstand, it would probably be matriarchal, but these women are going to care about their offspring. They won't just give up their boys to be slaves. After only a generation or two, the numbers will even out and things will be fairly normal.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 08:25 PM
9

Like everyone else said, get a lawyer. If you're in a single-consent recording state, record any physical interactions you have with her in the future. Also, let people know in advance that they may hear lies about you. People will be more skeptical about things they hear that way.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 10:05 AM
3

I agree with this, mostly. I think both of the single sex members would be treated as property and slaves- not just the man. I also don't think men would remain as slaves once the population evened out in vault 69. Largely, both vaults would be quite similar by virtue of driving the market value of each gender up too high. A 1:9 ratio of 100 men/900 women and 100 women/900 men would be far more interesting.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 08:41 AM
1

It strikes me that neither of them have actually thought it all through. She may not want to use a condom, but that still doesn't make it a rights issue. It's just a couple's issue. You might want to have a talk with "her", and suggest that there are "other, less invasive, options"... I totally would, but I'm worried I don't exist if you're not around to perceive me.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 08:09 AM
1

Is it really? Sure, I think demanding surgery is a bit unreasonable, but she can't force him to undergo it. At best, she can only pressure him into it. There are some crappy comments in that thread, but there's not a rights issue here. Neither party is really wrong. Neither party is being selfish either; they apparently agree insofar as no more children. They're just currently unable to come to terms for consensual PiV sex, and if they want to do that, they're going to have to make a compromise …
/r/MensRights07/06/16 07:23 AM
0

Here it is in musical form for anyone who doesn't want to read a long post. Anyway, the simplest solution is to stop having PiV sex. I don't see what's wrong with buying a quality onahole and vibrator and going to town with those for a couple decades. Everything doesn't have to be items off, missionary only, final destination.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 11:10 PM
1

Za Warudo in real life?
/r/MensRights04/06/16 05:10 PM
0

While six months strikes me as too short, it's nice to see this level of concern actually be applied to a male. I'm typically not a fan of first-time offenses ruining people's lives, but this type of sentence is also not enough of a deterrent. I suppose good sentencing wouldn't be newsworthy, though.
/r/MensRights04/06/16 04:27 PM
1

Idiot adults are just idiots. This doesn't change the point. Someone with poor competence has poor competence - regardless of cause. discovered I'd argue this is half the problem. We have legal adults getting taken advantage of as is. It's far more prudent to create a barrier that can disseminate sexual education.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 01:59 AM
1

Idiot adults prove that in spades. We should probably drop the whole age concept and go straight for a licensing test.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 08:07 AM
1

"Die non-X reproductive cells."
/r/MensRights02/06/16 07:42 AM
1

She says it on stand, I believe. Something to the effect of "I've never kissed a man before, and the stuff daddy do doesn't count."
/r/MensRights26/05/16 05:00 AM
1

You're trying to be middle of the road and open to both sides- that's a good thing, but it strikes me that you're a bit too close to feminist paradigms to really see it from an outside perspective yet. I implore you not to take my word for it, though. Stick around and listen and participate. Keep that open mind; it'll serve your purposes better than any label will.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 06:23 AM
3

Reductio ad Hitlerum Or the tvtropes version: Hitler Ate Sugar
/r/MensRights24/05/16 12:41 AM
1

I've never had a problem with holocaust comparisons because it's the next guy's comment that actually derails the conversation or not.
/r/MensRights23/05/16 06:00 AM
5

You should still try. If you do manage to get a story ran, it'll help raise awareness that female kidnapping is a thing. Plus, local news tends to be strapped for stories, and what self respecting newspaper would pass up a "Local theme park almost aids kidnapper. Is your family safe?" headline?
/r/MensRights23/05/16 05:12 AM
1

Yes, people can be a bit heartless when it comes to politics. I'm not going out of my way right now, but there's no more silence from me. Thanks for the advice and wishes, by the way.
/r/MensRights22/05/16 03:27 AM
1

Well, good luck being self defeating, Mr. Illiterate.
/r/MensRights16/05/16 01:47 PM
1

I'm saying that it's a matter of context. Always being polite is being spineless. Always being impolite is being an asshole. Both are self defeating.
/r/MensRights16/05/16 06:23 AM
1

It just struck me as a bit callous. I'm not insulted, but we also don't get anywhere by never being "polite."
/r/MensRights16/05/16 06:10 AM
1

It does. Thank you.
/r/MensRights16/05/16 05:01 AM
1

Yes, I understand absolutely. Thanks again, Jesus.
/r/MensRights16/05/16 05:00 AM
1

Yes. The groups who oppose MRAs always seem to paint this villainous caricature just shy of Snidely Whiplash. Often I doubt they know why they do it themselves, but dehumanization is almost a requirement to oppression. I know I won't kill myself. It'd betray everything I am, everything I want to be, everyone around me, and the dead himself. I found one of those boogeymen in our video game collection. There are games in there he will never finish playing with me, but I fully intend to play them m…
/r/MensRights15/05/16 01:19 PM
1

You're absolutely right. Thank you... Jesus. In a way, the words from a stranger can be stronger. Why go out of your way to give this kind of advice if you didn't feel something strong enough to mean it?
/r/MensRights15/05/16 12:42 PM
1

A wee bit crass there, mate, but while I was on the fence and probably needed a push, I was never expecting to get blown down.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 12:40 PM
1

Sort of. I could try, but he's very strong-minded himself. If he believes that ruminating over what he could have done differently is the right thing to do, I'll be damned if I can convince him otherwise. I'm here as best I can, but I've never known how to support him emotionally.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 05:13 AM
1

I guess it'll never truly go away then. That's sobering.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 05:12 AM
1

Thank you.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 05:05 AM
1

Exactly how I feel. And your words do count for something. They at least demonstrate you felt something enough to post them.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 05:04 AM
1

Yeah. I know. It's painful to think that in the US alone, roughly 31,000 families a year, or so, go through this. I want to reduce that number.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 05:03 AM
2

Is that what you're looking for? I wanted just male, but I did a quick calculation with the 3:1 ratio and came up with 30,861.75. "Nearly 31,000 per year" is good enough for casual conversation. She understands the anger but she also encourages seeing the humanity of the person you're arguing with. I don't know if you can get more middle ground than that. A lady after my own heart, so to idiom. At least I've always tried to do much the same. Within my years, it seems that it's pretty rare to fin…
/r/MensRights15/05/16 04:57 AM
0

No worries. I doubt a therapist would be able to say some fancy ass shit to make it better either. They're not genies. I try to look at people's intent. Everyone is actually saying something slightly different, even if they use the same canned phrase. Often that "I'm sorry" is actually a "I don't know what to say." It's okay, though, they're trying to be supportive even if they're not entirely aware of it. Your english is fine enough. My spanish would be worse. Haha.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 04:49 AM
2

Alright. Thanks.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 04:41 AM
1

It may be that you are just instinctively waiting until others are able to support you as well as their own grief. Good point. I have a history of that sort of behavior, too, so it's entirely possible if not likely. Watch out for Pizza as a Trigger! Haha. The pizza was a small time thing, I think. All the real triggers are still hiding under my bed like the boogeyman or something.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 11:28 PM
1

Yeah, I'm familiar with all that already. I've been lurking here a while. Japan's also got similar issues, though for slightly different reasons. Do you happen to have the hard statistic for male suicides per year on hand? I was planning to look for it, myself, but you might have the reference on hand. I like Karen. She's a very warm speaker. That's the worst part, it only takes a brief moment. Every time I think about how it all almost ended due to a single choice made over a short period of in…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 11:14 PM
2

I don't intend this to sound as callous as it may. I also don't intend to diminish any grief, but, personally, I find death much easier to take when it's someone at least middle-aged. It invariably bothers me more when it's someone young. So, I feel a bit relieved he wasn't like 28. Were you really close?
/r/MensRights14/05/16 11:06 PM
1

A thing I picked up as a kid was to "love in the moment." I used to have close friends move away after I got close to them. At least 5 or 6 during elementary school. I had to cherish the time I had and not sweat the time we didn't. It's been a pretty beneficial penchant for me, but it'll only go so far in this case I think. Only time will tell though.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 11:03 PM
1

Whatever you think.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 10:53 PM
1

What's the right way? Exactly. I feel a bit guilty about being so together. I have to remind myself that just because I don't feel sad doesn't mean I am not and even if I can only cry for a couple seconds, it's no less meaningful than an hour long session. Everyone else is distraught, but I'm cool as can be. It seems wrong, so I have to remind myself a lot that it isn't.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 10:47 PM
1

Yeah, my brother left a small bit of cash that I am beneficiary to. He had nothing else. I want to add it with my own money and use it to make more. It's what we always planned to do. As for speaking with others about it, I don't dislike it. It's nice to know family and even complete strangers care. Everyone deals with their emotions in their own unique ways, so it's understandable that you wouldn't like talking. I haven't taken any of the pm offers up, really. In part because there's no need to…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 10:40 PM
1

Thanks. I will. Like I said before, though, I am kinda fighting the guilt of not grieving the "right way."
/r/MensRights14/05/16 10:30 PM
1

Is there anything I should watch out for health-wise during the grieving process? For me and for others.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 10:21 PM
1

Thanks. I will.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 10:19 PM
1

Thanks. And thank you on my family's behalf.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 10:18 PM
2

America. I've been spouting statistics like that a lot recently. The tiny stuff is what's going to make the biggest difference. I'm not going to be silent anymore. I think he would have made a turn for the better if he had survived. I think the pills he took killed his impulse control.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 10:17 PM
1

Thank you. I will.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 10:13 PM
1

Like I told someone else. Make a habit of telling him you love him. Even if it's not a suicide, you won't get the chance if he goes first.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 10:13 PM
1

That sucks. How old was he?
/r/MensRights14/05/16 10:12 PM
1

I think the hardest parts might be yet to come for me. When I find a game he might like or want to show someone something I've drawn or written, he won't be there. That's hard to even think about. No, I didn't think it was a dream, but it is a bit weird to think of the corpse I saw as my brother. It's not him in all the ways that matter. My sister and mother have mentioned feeling like it's a dream, though.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 10:11 PM
1

Indubitably. Thanks.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 10:05 PM
1

The SKA2 gene was linked to suicidal tendencies. Basically, it controls stress hormone regulation. It makes sense. Nothing is entirely nurture much as nothing is entirely nature.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 10:02 PM
1

I will be. My brother was actually doing very well with his addictions before this month. He was taking spice for a while, but got cleaned of that. He started doing xanax, though, around a year ago, I guess, and a lot over the past month, I think. I think the pills are what allowed him to actually do it. And yeah, hug those kids. They like it.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 01:08 PM
1

Thank you.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 12:56 PM
1

I think that's part of the reason that spurned me to make this. At least to me, it puts a face on the movement. We have a lot of logos, but the pathos that drives it all needs exposure. I almost crossposted this with one of the defaults, but I was a bit afraid of just getting flooded and overwhelmed by responses. And I hope you'll never experience this. Tell your brother that you love him. I don't just mean once. Make it a habit - even if its uncomfortable. Hell, do it because it's uncomfortable…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 12:54 PM
1

Thank you. Hugs are nice. I wasn't hugged much as a child, so I'm still growing accustomed to them, actually. Haha.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 12:48 PM
1

I do, and thank you.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 12:47 PM
1

Thank you. I'll try to find time with the family, too.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 12:47 PM
2

I don't think he was trolling so much as tactless. I do think he was trying to help, though, because I think there's a "it's not your fault" sentiment buried in it.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 12:40 PM
1

Yeah, he certainly would, but that's not why I wanted to do it. ._. God, I hope the crying stops. I have no compunctions about doing it, but I find it physically painful to cry.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 12:30 PM
2

I do, luckily.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 12:23 PM
1

I understand, and I would, but I think it might be better if I make some changes. He and I were living together, but I don't see a reason to live there anymore if he's not there. I'm completely unattached, so I plan to move in with a parent. I don't want to live alone.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 12:22 PM
2

Yeah, that dastardly speeling gets me too, sometimes. Thank you, and I will be okay. You guys are helping. :)
/r/MensRights14/05/16 12:16 PM
2

Thank you.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 12:15 PM
3

Thanks a bunch. I actually have a questions you might could answer if you're an irl nurse.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 12:12 PM
3

If there is some form of afterlife and I do see my brother again, I'm gonna smack him in the back of the head and never let him live down how "he killed himself to avoid his turn doing the dishes." ...or maybe that's "unlive"?
/r/MensRights14/05/16 12:08 PM
3

There's a reason cliches are cliched, after all. That 15 minutes also means a lot, though. I thank you for your concern and time - even if you couldn't find the words. Dwarven Vow #134: Compassion benefits all men.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 11:58 AM
2

I get what you're saying about platitudes, but it doesn't strike me that they're untrue so much as not universally so. "if only he had asked for help". From what I understand, most suicides are impulsive and thereby not premeditated in any significant capacity. Just delaying the act long enough to be distracted from it by asking for help could have very well prevented it. I'm fairly confident my brother was strung out on pills and while he did reach out to someone else, that person wasn't availa…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 11:51 AM
2

I think I have a decent one. At the very least, even random anons online can be very supportive- as you guys demonstrate. Anyway, that's rough with your mother. My first instinct was to wonder which one was worse. My subsequent one was something along the lines of "Who the fuck cares? They both suck." Actually, part of me would like to just not think about it for a while, but the random little triggers everywhere make that difficult. I was trying to eat pizza and remembered how he told me that h…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 06:15 AM
11

There are no words. Sums things up rather nicely. Thank you.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 05:53 AM
6

Absolutely. Part of it is that I tend to cope by trying to fix problems. The very idea that I can help prevent something similar from happening to someone else is helpful even though I can do nothing for myself, so it's a bit like the "half full; half empty" scenario.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 05:52 AM
7

That all seems a bit too genetically deterministic for my tastes. I agree to a point, though. I know my family has a history of depression, and there's been suicides on both sides, but I've had a lot of the same thoughts he had expressed to me not long ago concerning his nihilistic views on life and while I toyed with the idea of suicide myself, I never could justify it. The only difference between he and I that I can see is environment.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 04:40 AM
1

Yeah, thanks. I do have a really close friend I can talk to as well. We spoke about three hours ago. They moved to the other side of the country recently, so we can't speak in person, though.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 04:30 AM
3

Much appreciated.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 04:07 AM
6

Thanks.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 04:07 AM
4

Thank you.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 04:07 AM
29

There's really not a lot to say. He was pretty depressed and obviously felt a lot of pressure about his future. He would have been 19 in a couple of months, and while he was going to college, he was largely failing his courses and battling drug addictions. It's literally exact scenario people talk about here. And yeah, I've got family to talk to. I'm handling it as well as I ever could have hoped, too. It's hard for me, though, because I cope by trying to fix problems when they manifest. There's…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 03:58 AM
2

The main issue is that a double entendre has two meanings simultaneously. This merely repositions a phrase in regard to something else. Again, the statement itself is pointing out there isn't a dual meaning to "sell their bodies."
/r/MensRights23/04/16 01:15 AM
3

So it only really classifies as a double entendre if you find the meaning of the colloquialism to be distinct from a straight interpretation of the words. The pictured sentence itself is addressing this by pointing out that the phrases are identical. "Sell their bodies" isn't an idiom as it's entirely literal, so there aren't two meanings. If anything, this is "double entendre for the lose" as any second meaning is created by a "moralistic view of sexuality" according to the pictured sentence.
/r/MensRights22/04/16 07:35 PM
2

It's a bit like a video game with different languages. Single X humans are like the base program without text files. It'll run, but it'll likely act weird whenever it calls text. XX humans are like the base program with the language files for the language the designers speak. XY humans are the second language with the translated language files and a few other patches for display compatibility. The game was released with both languages available for selection.
/r/MensRights19/04/16 11:08 PM
1

It's almost literally the "chicken and egg" scenario.
/r/MensRights19/04/16 10:45 PM
2

You misunderstood. Everything you said is correct but doesn't contradict the idea proposed in the article. The paradigm the article proposes is that there are two distinct drives of attachment and sex instead of simply one sexual drive that includes attachment. Sex drive exists, so the species propagates, but attachment drive also exists and affects mental health more. The infant study example was simply used as evidence toward the assertion that attachment is required for mental health. As for …
/r/MensRights05/04/16 03:25 AM
2

Give the man a break, when you're a caveman, and you're inventing sculpting, and there's no porn for reference, you're gonna get it pretty wrong.
/r/MensRights04/04/16 02:36 PM
6

Not a strawman but a simple false analogy. The logic here also applies the gambler's fallacy where a repeated application of one probability is presumed to be an increasing probability. Remember, Russian Roulette's probability increases only by virtue of removing chambers as its played. The ratio of rapists to non-rapists can only approach 100%.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 09:52 AM
1

Here, let me use my magical summoning powers for you. /u/PierceHarlan
/r/MensRights18/03/16 02:28 AM
2

This type of vengeful and demonizing mentality is why we can't actually address pedophilia in current society. It drives these people so far into the closet that the only option society is left with is reaction. It's ironic that the people who'll claim to care most about the children are really doing the most harm.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 04:19 AM
1

The technological singularity is when we create a machine AI so advanced that it is capable of creating improvements upon itself. Eventually, it will become so intelligent that humans would be unable to comprehend its thoughts. We haven't even solved the strong AI problem for an program as intelligent as the human mind. Even then, this AI would have to be able to make edits to its own programming without fucking it up to keep advancing its intelligence. This program can't just be on par with us,…
/r/MensRights16/03/16 07:40 AM
2

Always check trash cans for loot. Stand still if you're about to die from poison. Turtle in the corner. If you have to make a precision landing, make sure to jump first and then move. And finally - most importantly - use bombs wisely.
/r/MensRights16/03/16 06:22 AM
2

Next they will be claiming he is one of the Lizard People. Shh!
/r/MensRights16/03/16 01:25 AM
3

Reading that exchange, I don't know what you were feeling. Words like "upset" or "depressed" are really vague. "Upset," in particular, can mean anything from a blind rage to crying in a corner. Are you sure this counselor is asking for more expression and not communication?
/r/MensRights14/03/16 10:44 AM
0

So why does it appear that all your posts on the Ghomeshi trial have positive votes? It looks like all those downvotes came from a bunch of comments you made on /r/relationships that had nothing to do with the trial.
/r/MensRights28/02/16 11:23 PM
2

"Pedophile," "hebephile," and "ephebophile" in their most technical forms contain an age range. Colloquially, all these paraphilia are contained within the single term "pedophile." These terms all state attractions and do not extend beyond that. Words that do much the same are the sexual orientation terms such as heterosexual and homosexual and other -philia suffixed words such as raptophilia (arousal by rape) and necrophilia (arousal by corpses). "Child molester" is entirely separate in that it…
/r/MensRights27/02/16 08:41 PM
1

"Pedophile" is not a synonym for "child molester." I know a number of the former who are not the latter, so I'm not keen on your generalizations of an entire group of people based on their prison population. I also find the sentencing harsh, but by virtue of finding most American sentencing harsh. I'm not a fan of the punishment model.
/r/MensRights27/02/16 07:26 AM
2

the only evidence that you need is that it doesn't. fucking. happen. Now, I've been eyeing mwo and he's a bit heavy handed and tactless with his particular wank, but this assertion of yours is also not supported by any presented evidence and has simply been stated as truth. I have also not seen any studies on female ephebophilia that would support or oppose either claim, so I'm decidedly a neutral party concerning them.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 10:23 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter