TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Anotheronestupidnick Archive

View 0 posts and 43 comments by Anotheronestupidnick on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

You compare with the time when there were no contraceptives, labor and war required physical strength, and high infant mortality required a large number of children.
/r/MensRights26/09/21 03:06 PM
2

Is it because feminism did nothing for women? Because all the changes in society have come about because of contraception, pads and automation? Gender roles, stereotypes, etc. it is simply a consequence of material factors. For men, nothing has changed in material factors, so the roles have not changed either.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/08/21 06:54 AM
1

0,2%
/r/MensRights18/07/21 09:56 PM
9

The modern Peshmerga is almost entirely made up of men, while having at least 600 women in their ranks. 600 women 300,000 Soldiers oh cmon
/r/MensRights18/07/21 09:54 PM
7

All the down votes Not all.
/r/MensRights18/05/21 08:11 PM
10

In his link, the article "Girls get better grades than boys, even in STEM subjects, study finds". This is not a meta-analysis.
/r/MensRights18/05/21 07:36 PM
1

Yeah. In countries with free higher education, the sex ratio is different. Oh, stop. Not it's not. Until boys start doing well in school, there will be no gender equality in universities.
/r/MensRights17/05/21 08:23 AM
-4

Dude. Foreveralon has been around for decades. The Incels distinguished themselves by demanding the right to own a woman as property. This is good as long as it is imageboard trolling, but strange when it is taken seriously.
/r/MensRights10/05/21 10:25 AM
1

Welcome to the echo chamber. People cannot dispute a quality comment, but they can dislike it.
/r/MensRights08/05/21 08:07 AM
4

Remember how many TV series and films there were about a family with a housewife and three children? Did it help? Don't overestimate the importance of images and stereotypes. They reflect public perception of reality and propaganda. But they have little effect on this. What matters is the economy, income inequality, and the availability of medicine and education. For 50 years, the incomes of most of the population of Western countries have been stagnant men's incomes have been falling. It matter…
/r/MensRights08/05/21 03:31 AM
0

How do you plan to do this if the cause is bad behavior? Boys are more likely to skip school, more often not to do their homework. Teachers are often not listened to. Most schools already have systems in place to help students with lagging behind and to punish bad behavior. But when there are always more men among the bad students, you cannot demand statistical equality of results.
/r/MensRights07/05/21 02:48 PM
1

Shool dropout rates by gender https://www.childtrends.org/indicators/high-school-dropout-rates#:~:text=Differences%20by%20gender&text=In%202016%2C%207%20percent%20of,percent%20of%20high%20school%20dropouts. Undergraduate enrollment numbers in the United States from 1970 to 2029, by gender https://www.statista.com/statistics/236360/undergraduate-enrollment-in-us-by-gender/
/r/MensRights07/05/21 02:33 PM
0

Any initiative that will lead to an increase in the number of boys in universities will also lead to a drop in the number of girls.
/r/MensRights07/05/21 01:54 PM
1

School performance and university admission results. Percentage of children dropping out of school, by gender. Is it enough?
/r/MensRights06/05/21 11:50 PM
2

system that already favors you Why do you think so?
/r/MensRights06/05/21 11:39 PM
1

Practically achievable intelligence. The education system is good enough that obeying the rules is better than hooliganism.
/r/MensRights06/05/21 11:16 PM
1

Feminists are consistent. They are socialists. They want equality of results. And they get them. MRA want equality of opportunity, equality of outcome and cake. The MRA is copying the feminist agenda. Are feminists talking about rape? MRA is the same. Is this a serious problem for men? Of course not. Domestic Violence? Let's copy. At the same time, as far as I know, the movement has no achievements in the real world. There are no sanctuaries for raped or battered boys created by the MRA. You mos…
/r/MensRights06/05/21 09:04 PM
-2

Good. So you agree that the article in the OP post in particular and the MRA movement in general is nonsense?
/r/MensRights06/05/21 08:29 PM
-19

I have not argued that there is discrimination. I said that there is a gap. You either admit that the sexes are different and see no reason to panic about boys. Either you consider the need for equality of results. And then you have to help women, not men.
/r/MensRights06/05/21 08:07 PM
-26

All over the world. There is not a single state where women would earn more.
/r/MensRights06/05/21 07:06 PM
-40

They are right. Girls are smarter than boys. They are more obedient and do better in school. There is no need for nonsense about bias. This is not a significant factor. Nobody worries about gender gap in universities for a simpler reason. Education is not an end in itself. The goal of education is success in life, expressed in terms of income. Men earn more than women. Therefore, it makes no sense to worsen the position of women in education.
/r/MensRights06/05/21 06:23 PM
-4

Forced equality is unnecessary. People are different and achieve different results. The best society is not a society where everyone is equal. It is a society where everyone is given maximum opportunities to realize their potential.
/r/MensRights27/04/21 10:11 AM
-7

But women are indeed more useful to the modern economy.
/r/MensRights27/04/21 09:39 AM
-10

I'm unbelievably intelligent, but I completely failed school. lul Women are just better. Learn better, commit fewer crimes, obey the rules. There have been millennia of male supremacy, now the era of female supremacy is coming. Humble yourself.
/r/MensRights27/04/21 08:34 AM
1

Let's remove Miranda's ass from the Mass Effect, because it objectifies women. Let's make all women in games as unattractive as possible. This will save little girls from partriarchy! Let's also add Camwhore to the site with 13 year olds. It does not objectify women. When a girl sees such an example to follow, she immediately decides to start a career in STEM.
/r/MensRights25/04/21 04:22 PM
1

How your gender equality appeal will work in practice. You announce the conscription. 1000 men and 1000 women come to you. You are denying 100 men and 950 women because of physical characteristics. You got 950 soldiers instead of 1800. You were doing stupid things for gender equality at an important moment. You will start accepting women only when you radically lower your standards due to high losses at the front. ​ The experience gained in the army is of little use for a person in civilian life…
/r/MensRights25/04/21 12:39 AM
1

Nobody is trying to enlist women in intergender sports leagues in large numbers. Women's sports are needed to popularize sports among girls and improve their average health. And some women's sports are watched. Figure skating and tennis for example. And a special squad for cleaning toilets is too expensive. The soldiers will have to do it themselves.
/r/MensRights24/04/21 11:42 PM
1

Not. Why on earth? I also do not want to forbid them to serve. I would oppose the idea of recruiting women and men in the same proportion to an intergender sports league. This is a waste of resources. Women will lose all the same. And I am against the mass conscription for women, as it will make the army less effective.
/r/MensRights24/04/21 11:21 PM
1

ED related rather to the modern realities of developed countries. When society's attitude to losses matters. And the rest - to a hypothetical large-scale war. ​ When you have to decide who to die, you have to make tough decisions. I am not advocating morality. I stand for efficiency. ​ I don't think women should be banned from serving in the army. It's just that most of the soldiers will be men. The gender attribute is highly correlated with the ability to serve in the military. It is wise to us…
/r/MensRights24/04/21 11:10 PM
1

Sport. Areas that reward risk. The price of a child's birth. Why do you think that there should be some kind of fair equality between the sexes? If high levels of obedience, responsibility, social skills and low levels of aggression lead women to much more success (which we already see in the incomes of genders under 30) is that bad?
/r/MensRights24/04/21 10:59 PM
2

The bulk of the troops remains infantry. The increased role of artillery, armored vehicles and aviation does not negate the need for infantry. And the complete mechanization of the infantry does not negate the need for the physical strength of the soldier. The infantry in the same way needs to run in combat conditions, carry ammunition, overcome obstacles. Until massive exoskeletons appear, physical strength will remain the most important characteristic of an infantryman. ​ It is fashionable to …
/r/MensRights24/04/21 12:06 PM
-1

Is it because it is irrational use? Because in the Middle Ages women were used that way for rational reasons that have changed since then? As soon as pads, contraceptives appeared, and the bulk of work ceased to depend on physical strength, it became irrational to use women as housewives.
/r/MensRights23/04/21 09:31 PM
5

Malaysia
/r/MensRights23/04/21 09:25 PM
2

The army exists to fulfill all possible tasks. Not only the destruction of a lone fighter from a drone, but also a possible global conflict. Even an army of a superpower like the United States. And therefore, it should be formed on the basis of the most difficult tasks and plan options for mass mobilization. This means that the gender composition must take into account the consequences of mass losses and the physical development of the sexes. ​ In the IDF and Pershmega, women are almost never us…
/r/MensRights23/04/21 09:08 PM
-1

An army that is half female and half male will be less effective than an army that is 99% male. Do you agree? In case of victory, the nation's ability to make up for losses is important. Do you agree?
/r/MensRights23/04/21 07:31 PM
-2

Because women will be less effective in the infantry. Because the loss of a woman will lead to more damage to the population.
/r/MensRights23/04/21 07:24 PM
-6

And if the enemy who won the war kills you?
/r/MensRights23/04/21 07:13 PM
-11

Why not? You have a task - to defend the country in the event of military aggression. What will you choose: The rational path leading to a greater likelihood of victory. An equal path leading to defeat.
/r/MensRights23/04/21 07:09 PM
-17

MRAidpol vs FemStupidpol. Perfect. In fact, everything is simple. Men are physically stronger and less valuable to society (unable to give birth). Therefore, in the event of war, they are used first. It is about the rational use of gender differences, not about oppression.
/r/MensRights23/04/21 07:01 PM
5

He just wants to sleep with her.
/r/MensRights22/04/21 03:13 PM
-15

Are you talking about Indian laws?
/r/MensRights15/03/21 09:39 PM
-25

You pay your children, not your wife. Why children almost always stay with their mother is a separate question.
/r/MensRights15/03/21 09:18 PM
1

Why are you talking about patriarchy? Is this a proven phenomenon? Or is it a very broad term used in a separate theory? It is difficult to take seriously the term, which includes the brawling of young children and the collusion of multinational corporations. With the same success we can talk about ZOG. In addition, in this case we are talking about feminist politics rather than on all women.
/r/MensRights15/03/21 05:37 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter