TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Antanarau Archive

View 0 posts and 199 comments by Antanarau on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

Male Pill x Female Pill will likely have a really huge success chance , though.
/r/MensRights19/12/23 03:47 PM
1

I guess money. Reddit is entirely unprofitable (which what most believe was one of the reasons of the scandalous API change), and so it has to live off investors' money. And if anything, the investors would like a website like Reddit.
/r/MensRights30/09/23 03:53 PM
24

I assume "ahead" in that context means " girls average grade > boys average grade "
/r/MensRights22/08/23 08:08 PM
29

>The crititque of toxic feminism couldn't be any clearer. I don't see how this, with its extent and expliciteness, could be unintentional. I find it rather funny too. But the thing is, it can go both ways. You know, nothing barbie movie displayed was anywhere near new. You heard /seen everything you just described from a (toxic?) feminist at least once. Which is precisely why the affiliation of this movie is so unclear - is it anti-feminist because it shows , using itself as an example, how femi…
/r/MensRights11/08/23 07:19 PM
8

Bro, did you seriously miss the misogony bootcamp in school? The steaks were peak as well bro, you legit missed out
/r/MensRights07/08/23 03:46 PM
1

Horrific. And yeah... I forgot I can just google it.
/r/MensRights19/06/23 02:01 PM
3

Don't let the toxic patriarchy stop your daughter from being a cannon fodder! TrenchWarfareIsFemale
/r/MensRights19/06/23 08:48 AM
-7

Is there a source on this one being actually used? This seems too much like satire - looking 1 to 1 like a torture device + the name...
/r/MensRights19/06/23 08:44 AM
5

A blind dude got verbally harassed for "staring" at a woman in gym. https://www.distractify.com/p/woman-at-gym-complains-that-guy-is-staring-at-her-turns-out-hes-legally-blind So yes, being infertile won't help
/r/MensRights22/05/23 09:28 AM
3

I think that's because in some countries "rape" requires a penis by law. Which is more fucked up than just "journalist bias", but it justifies at least some of them
/r/PussyPass24/03/23 06:05 PM
7

>Such is the power of "patriarchy", we men managed to decide sexual orientation of the (almost) entire humanity. What's even funnier is that if you ask them about if, say, someone can be made gay/straight via, idk , "reeducation camps", they will most likely answer no. I believe it was called "doublethink" in a rather popular book name, something about numbers. All in all, I believe the denial of "heterophobia" at all (one could argue that its less common that aforementioned homophobia or someth…
/r/MensRights18/03/23 08:12 PM
2

I believe that women make just as good, if not even better , cannon fodder. Don't let the sexist stereotypes keep you or your daughter away from her dreams! Enlist her today! #TrenchWarfareIsFemale #MakeWarNotSandwhiches
/r/MensRights10/03/23 09:44 PM
21

Because my big bad evil race, I mean nationality, I mean sex a cannot possibly be up to any good
/r/MensRights10/03/23 09:37 PM
2

The problem is that it won't be really used as an evidence. Assuming court will be 100% pro-woman, they'll just ask you "okay, she didn't work during [time you recorded]. But what about all other time?". IDK what compressed footage is exactly, but assuming its edited , well, its edited and the court would just refuse to even take a look. And, yeah, cameras are good to have, but one definetely shouldn't treat them as some panacea against any crime/false accusation
/r/MensRights08/03/23 09:11 PM
12

I mean, as much as a good idea in general a cam network sounds, I seriously doubt you are going to be able to keep even 10 years of footage, much less 25
/r/MensRights08/03/23 04:32 PM
6

They don't need to, though, as the post isn't aimed at them, and for an average person "only 2 states out of however many in US guarantee 50/50" is enough information
/r/MensRights07/02/23 04:40 PM
2

uhh, only I know about in australia was opened in 2021 and is a "first", so...
/r/MensRights07/02/23 12:16 PM
6

For the privileged, equality feels like opression. Example : abortion and reproductive rights in general. Don't need to look too far,even : slogan "Her body, her choice" forgets that it takes two to make one.
/r/MensRights02/02/23 01:39 PM
8

There's always a bigger fish, thus there's always an "opressor" for any given woman. You need to level up your feminism, man... Else you'll be demoted from a Sperm Bank to a Sexist Hitler!
/r/MensRights29/01/23 01:00 PM
16

As they say, without double standards they won't have any at all
/r/MensRights29/01/23 12:57 PM
34

>There was a blind guy who got in trouble for staring. That's the level of insanity going on here. Yep. IIRC, he literally pointed that out to the woman and staff, yet she still insisted on making him go away.
/r/MensRights29/01/23 12:45 PM
8

That's the big thing . Nobody quite knows what exactly makes a woman, much less a transwoman. Well, they know, but they won't say it because it goes against other things they say. Which is why things like in these article are possible to happen.
/r/MensRights07/01/23 08:14 PM
3

Women don't get drafted, women get much lighter prison sentences , are generally just treated better (see Women-Are-Wonderful effect), and have reproductive rights (unlike men). These are the few that I think apply to right about any woman. Now you pray tell me what priviliges men have.
/r/MensRights03/01/23 08:35 AM
2

Isn\t Japan less "involunatary celibate " and more " can't afford / don't want a kid" ?
/r/MensRights14/12/22 08:57 PM
1

"not particularly right-wing or white" I still can't fathom how they , in their infinite equality, not only attributed it to a certain political belief (which is just stupid), but also to a race. Do they not understand that thinking of a white man when you say "incel" is like thinking of a black man when you say "criminal" ? But at least we have some progress, I guess
/r/MensRights14/12/22 08:55 PM
42

> “tons of straight women would LOVE living in the Gayberhoods of NYC! because it’s SAFE!” "tons of white women would LOVE living in the Chinatowns of NYC! because its SAFE!" Do they like, never think when they speak? Or do t hey not even bother with hiding their blatant discrimination anymore
/r/MensRights09/12/22 07:32 PM
1

Well, the problem is that the Ukraine-Russia war was caused by Russia. Breaching multiple multi-national agreedments, including promises by Putin himself, Russia has annexed Crimea. Then tried to do the same with Donbass , and now - with entire Ukraine. There's no "both parties will often be able justify their position.", as russian agression is just unjustifiable. Again, a quick google search and you will find even Putin going along the lines of "Crimea is to remain Ukrainian", not even talking…
/r/MensRights02/12/22 10:29 AM
1

Its a common "word of law" and "spirit of law" debate. Just ask them if these definitions are never changing, or ask them if someone made a dictionary where feminism was the world's evil it would automatically make it so.
/r/MensRights30/11/22 11:37 PM
4

What the hell? Like, I could imagine some compliments or "stealthy" glances, but damn. This is something you would expect to see in cheap porn, not real life
/r/MensRights22/11/22 08:59 PM
1

The fucking irony of that .... "person" posting that picture is dense enough to produce a dwarf star
/r/MensRights22/11/22 04:38 PM
28

Reminds me of a news website which had a "Men are gross for sexualizing female athletes" (or something like that ) article next to a "Top 10 male swimmer bulges!" one
/r/MensRights22/11/22 04:35 PM
3

Agree with all but the comparsion to Ukraine-Russia war. After all, there's a clear agressor here, and its Russia. And both Ukraine and NATO (even if not officially) have tried to resolve it peacefully, even largely in favor of russia (I think the terms for those agreedments in english would be "Minsk Agreedments"), and russia had none of that. But, otherwise, I agree
/r/MensRights21/11/22 11:40 AM
2

Post results to r/menkampf, which does what you are going to do , basically
/r/MensRights20/11/22 12:07 PM
1

for them its quite logical. its just that their logic is .... not exactly of the best quality
/r/MensRights16/11/22 11:18 AM
14

Ideological fanatics are not known for being good thinkers
/r/MensRights15/11/22 11:36 AM
30

Ideology. A kid who doesn't buy into your ideology will be sceptical or even against it later on. So they must do their best to indoctrinate them while they can, however they can
/r/MensRights15/11/22 10:51 AM
2

Only 200? That's so low considering there's like 30 million men in UK.
/r/MensRights12/11/22 08:02 PM
2

Its even funnier because "incel", a word directly attacking sexual behaviour, basically "virgin shaming", is spouted by mouths who support sexual freedom ( "anti slut-shaming"). This is like claiming you're against sexism and then implementing one-gender-only benefits - oh wait.
/r/MensRights12/11/22 05:53 PM
24

"Despite being only 50% of the population, women are responsible for 100% of crimes in space" They're just sexists. Literally mirror to what , say, racists would tell : "All black people want to rape me!", "All white people want to assault us!", etc. They don't have nuance because they don't need it, nor they want to have it - they are perfectly fine with their obviously sexist views because not only does it NOT get called out, it is often, silently or vocally, supported
/r/MensRights12/11/22 05:47 PM
7

FR? Absolutely insane
/r/MensRights02/11/22 11:16 AM
1

I agree with this. However, I also believe that abortion , as it affects life on not just the unborn child , but also the father in more ways than one ( father that doesn't want one would be forced to pay child support for 18 years; father that wants one would be forced too see his unborn child get rid of), should be a discussion, not a one-person decision. Of course, there's many problems to be had with this decision (Is this not too rash on the women? and etc), but, again, this is solution I h…
/r/MensRights29/10/22 05:23 PM
1

Yes. Because, again, it feels pretty sucky that one gender can just take the baby from another. It all just depends whether you value the freedom of one sex to control their pregnancy over the freedom of another to get a baby they took part in making .
/r/MensRights29/10/22 05:19 PM
1

What I mean more is, the courts would take on the role of a mediator. Again, the issue on abortion is probably the most weird one, due to multiple reasons (some believe it to be murder, some believe it to be only-female right, some believe other). Which is why, Never in the US has a court legally compelled someone to make a medical against their will, purely on behalf of another specific person. This is not exactly it. You see , there's a baby in there . So it involves another being in the equat…
/r/MensRights29/10/22 07:44 AM
1

And since the fetus can't be separated from her body without putting her body in danger or destroying the fetus, it has to stay: you get your way while she gets a bodily choice overridden by default. Why not discuss , in courts or whatnot, like we do with , say, divorce? By ruling of a court then the woman or the man get their way, . its nothing new really "I have a right to the fetus inside a woman's body's" Well, that is what reprductive right are abut really. Yes, the amount of control may be…
/r/MensRights28/10/22 11:38 AM
1

Except that's not just "her body" anymore. There's also a fetus inside. As a parent who would want a child, I would not want to see my child get aborted just because I don't have a vagina, and the parent who does just doesn't want to come to a compromise. And when it comes to the law, the law should absolutely not compel the woman to make bodily choices against her will. Well, the law would take my child to which I should have the same right as the other parent does, away. It all , again, comes …
/r/MensRights27/10/22 10:01 PM
1

If a man wants to poke holes in all his condoms under the guise of having safe sex he absolutely can get a woman pregnant against her will. Again, this should be considered rape (In fact, wasn't there "rape by deception" or something already?) He can also engage in rape and then deny an abortion afterwards. How would that happen? Unless of course you would want to give that power to the criminals, but , why? man to decide if the abortion should go through even if the woman doesn’t want a child i…
/r/MensRights27/10/22 09:58 PM
1

> impregnating women against their wishes I honestly wonder how that could happen. I mean, if you see a man just going raw and you don't want it, just say so? (or vice versa). Countinuing to have sex depsite your protests would then be , well, kinda rape. >and then denying an abortion. And since its, well, rape (you did get fucked against your consent, that is true), you can then have a special case for those type of abortions (financial or not) Not to mention, right now its literally this, exce…
/r/MensRights27/10/22 06:25 PM
1

They, not her or him. Abortion should be a family matter, not just one person having the ultimate say
/r/MensRights27/10/22 05:16 PM
1

The problem is that if we cannot regulate an abortion , then the question stands what prevents your partner to abort (Financially or otherwise) a baby? Well, that's for the people with the knowledge of law to decide, and I am not one of them
/r/MensRights27/10/22 10:36 AM
3

There's definetely a line that needs to be drawn in abortions, that I agree. Good first step would be to make them actually take consent from both parties (unless one is absent etc) , and then we can work on making it more , well, "lawful"
/r/MensRights27/10/22 08:54 AM
2

The problem is that a man should have the same rights to a baby as a woman does. When one gets to ultimately decide on whether or not the baby gets to live , this is when it becomes problematic. Coupled with absolute lack of any "soft abortions"(like ,say, not paying child support for a child you didn't want and was born despite your wishes ), its more of a his body, her choice (as financial support can be a form of slavery to some of the less wealthy stratas, sadly)
/r/MensRights27/10/22 07:35 AM
3

Abortion (or any other form of "getting rid" of a child) are still available to women. It is only men who have to suffer through the consequences. Holding people to a standard of "don't have risky sex if you don't want a baby" is fine if you hold both men and women to it, not just men
/r/MensRights27/10/22 07:32 AM
3

Oh, perhaps. Don't read feminist works, especially "literature" of that kind
/r/MensRights24/10/22 11:26 AM
1

Well, that was more.... 1:100000 ?
/r/MensRights24/10/22 11:02 AM
-11

Can't say I agree with "eradication" and "mass abortion", but you do you
/r/MensRights24/10/22 08:26 AM
28

Not really. We would likely need more than 1:100 ratio to ensure the grand(++)-children don't die out due to inbreeding.
/r/MensRights24/10/22 06:26 AM
2

As a matter of interest , why? Is it just expensive, are the doctors too busy perhaps? Or is it a tragicomedic"you don't have tits gtfo" type of a deal?
/r/MensRights08/10/22 08:24 PM
2

Yep. Its even worse because the few places that isn't "left of Mao" are being scrubbed away, one by one, by the admins. Truly a sad thing in once "free" internet
/r/MensRights08/10/22 08:16 PM
91

That Venn diagram looks more like a circle with each passing day tbh
/r/MensRights28/09/22 08:36 AM
29

Didn't the author also die of "assisted suicide" (I assume its a lethal injection) ?
/r/MensRights22/09/22 12:05 PM
16

Things like these are textbook examples of "to privileged equality feels like opression". Not to mention, its a blind date. One thing where its a normal date , the partner would at least know you a little , but expecting what's basically a complete stranger to pay for you? Really?
/r/MensRights15/09/22 07:17 AM
2

Probably. I don't exactly visit it often(= never), so feel free to correct me more if I was somehow wrong
/r/MensRights22/08/22 11:31 AM
12

If using reddit terminology ,its like if there were only general subreddits (videogames, politics, etc) that had 0-to-no rules
/r/MensRights22/08/22 05:50 AM
27

Reminds me of that story in two news headlines "Here's reasons why X is NOT for (IIRC) white heterosexual males" And the second one was like "X failing was because white heterosexual males didn't watch it because sexism" or something. It was a pretty popular meme on reddit , maybe someone remembers it
/r/MensRights18/08/22 03:08 PM
12

r/menkampf Really funny subreddit which is basically what you did in this post
/r/MensRights17/08/22 01:01 PM
1

There is. Or , well ,was. Ease of access, and having it in (usually) the best available quality on demand. (Almost) No ads as well, and having no fear of downloading a trojan or two were also considered Now, however, with how many ads and other shit are in those services , internet is back to piracy
/r/MensRights14/08/22 02:07 PM
2

>920 America has done a 180 in the other direction Did I ever say that, Mr.Strawman? Like,literally read what I said .Like,fuck,I specifically made the last part stand out so that people who wouldn't read "the big text" would at least see the ending that is a TL;DR basically.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 04:37 PM
1

I don't need to . You're (likely) an adult, do whatever. Just don't bring kids into this,please. They'll decide for themselves
/r/MensRights29/06/22 04:36 PM
6

Did I ever say that "this literally never happens to black men or women" ? No. I am just pointing out that we not even didn't fix racism in 100 years despite many attempts, we are only breeding new racism(or,rather, new racists). Like, for example, Reddit. You literally cannot be racist to white people (as per "priviliged groups are exempt from hate speech protection" rules). Speaking of reddit again, BlackPeopleTwitter needs you to PROVE you're black to comment on certain posts. Segregation, bu…
/r/MensRights29/06/22 01:55 PM
7

Yes? Tongue,hand, anything sexual that you don't consent to is either rape or sexual harassment. For example, pulling someone's pants down as a woman would be a sexual harassment. But , say, performing unconsensual facesitting would then be rape. Its just that we never have "female-perperated rape" defined in law, its always either men-only ( "rape is when penis and no consent") or genderless entirely (and it isn't a problem in itself, but it then becomes a problem when you need to define someth…
/r/MensRights29/06/22 11:03 AM
6

Then how come cutting parts of a vagina off is classified as genital multiation, but not when its a penis?
/r/MensRights29/06/22 06:22 AM
70

1920: "I'm sorry, you just aren't the race we care about" 2022: "I'm sorry, you just aren't the race we care about" Truly wild how that happened
/r/MensRights28/06/22 08:48 PM
11

Owning the cons by doing exactly what the cons wanted.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 06:02 PM
3

Men can get forced to take care of children that isn't theirs (otherwise they would have to pay child support - some can't even afford that, which means jail). How many women does that happen to? Two can play that game. Also, stop with that rhetoric. If you're really all about that equality, problems of women do not matter over problems of men. Or are all animals equal,with some just more equal over others?
/r/MensRights27/06/22 06:40 AM
1

Reminds me of that one russian song that was used in a comedy film:, and goes something like: "If I were a sultan I would have 3 wives And 3 times the beauty would then be mine And all is good from one point of view And all is worse from all the others If I were a sultan I would have 2 wives And 2 times the beauty would then be mine [Goes like that all the way to] If I were a sultan, never would I marrry! And with silence and calm would live my life! "
/r/MensRights27/06/22 04:58 AM
8

The biggest problem of abortion for men right now is the fact that you're still tied to the (unwanted) child if you cannot convince the woman to do something with it. As long as the current family courts stay,well,as they are right now, I'm afraid it won't change for the better. But otherwise,I agree fully.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 10:38 PM
1

> post birth abortion You cannot be serious
/r/MensRights26/06/22 08:41 PM
2

At least they didn't call them a nazi hitler jewish patriarchate , that's some progress from an average internet debate
/r/MensRights26/06/22 08:38 PM
12

It takes two to tango buddy. Sorry you dont want to be responsible for your vag. Making men pay helps literally no one. If anything, this is just going to ensure you actually have to work for a child you dont want. Im sorry? Lol
/r/MensRights26/06/22 08:20 PM
7

Reminds me of when AHS took down "hate" subreddits by posting CP(or something extreme like that) on them from alt accounts
/r/MensRights26/06/22 08:45 AM
1

Any extrimists (or far-X, more commonly) don't have morals. That's why they're extremists ,duh. If you're limited by something, you aren't extreme (enough)
/r/MensRights26/06/22 08:43 AM
0

That's like saying the industrial revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race. I mean, without it we woudln't have gas weapons, nor nuclear weapons! So, I propose we go back to the age of hand labour.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 06:28 PM
8

That's not exactly the stance you should have if you ever hope to convince someone that they're wrong.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 12:09 PM
23

>Just hate how people link 'white' to 'evil' as if every other race is holy and righteous. That's because you can't be racist towards white people, sweaty, read the reddit rules!!!!!! ( Without any jokes though, there was and very likely still is a rule - sitewide rule, may I add- that says that you cannot be racist towards whites (and by extension sexist towards men as well))
/r/MensRights25/06/22 11:15 AM
12

Why not? Many people still believe babies to be,well, humans and compare abortions to actual murder - which , although somewhat extreme, is not without evidence - especially if you add religion into the mix, which, I remind you, almost everyone has , and almost every religion is not exactly on board with free abortions, mostly because they view it as murder .
/r/MensRights25/06/22 11:12 AM
32

That can't be real "Your honor, the mother may be guilty of murdering her child, but she musn't serve time because one of her children just died"
/r/MensRights22/06/22 05:56 AM
3

>Reddit can have several women/feminist forums where "tone policing" is not allowed but r/MensRights is not allowed to have moderators or free discussion without having to justify every. single. post. to brigaders/feminists - Why don't men speak up more? Wait, for real? That would explain deletion of some posts that (theoretically) didn't break any rules, but , damn....
/r/MensRights19/06/22 07:57 PM
3

Abortions as well. Sure, I understand why women would be prioritized, but hello??? I also want to partake in deciding the fate of my unborn???
/r/MensRights19/06/22 07:56 PM
2

Like, really, it took me a minute
/r/MensRights19/06/22 04:29 PM
2

The existance of Female Dating Strategy kind of proved my point and more. I could probably spend few hours looking on , you know, FEMALE-dominant spaces - because you yourself know that it isn't men calling other men sexist en-masse - and find people like that, but no. Just whip out FDS web archives - or I even heard they have had a website - and take a good look. Must still be in my head, though. And, to repeat myself, the whole "plus sized women and overweight men thing" . But, expectedly, you…
/r/MensRights19/06/22 04:27 PM
2

Try to say "I am a male and I don't date fat/too thin/etc women" on any popular sub and see the "Who" for yourself
/r/MensRights19/06/22 01:25 PM
3

But when I do it, its suddenly "sexism" and "degrading women to sex-only tools"... "Plus-sized women admit they aren't attracted to overweight men" much?
/r/MensRights19/06/22 12:21 PM
2

I personally believe that the draft is really the prime example of "Its either for both of us, or for neither of us" And I am inclined to believe that the majority shares at views at least similar to mine
/r/MensRights19/06/22 12:18 PM
4

> a good while No, you don't. Really. Even if by some miracle we had enough sperm to ensure 3 billion population , inbreeding (as I doubt there's that much of sperm donors out there that would esnure ability to not hit inbreeding tens of generations (a good while) down the road ) would kill us faster
/r/MensRights19/06/22 12:11 PM
26

So its only the humbling that's irritating to you? Not the "Kill all men" part?
/r/MensRights19/06/22 12:08 PM
5

You put it wrongly. What you have to say is "If there was a gang that exclusively robbed white people AND often came through open doors, would you leave your door open?" Sure, its not "all women", but "its enough women", right?
/r/MensRights16/06/22 08:51 PM
5

Thinking "It didn't happen , and if it did - they deserved it/made it happen themselves" is a major part of it
/r/MensRights12/06/22 07:48 PM
1

Yes, but at the same time, have you thought about men? Like, why not employ women as well? This could free some men from service, allowing now their entry into the workfield Equal rights mean equal responsobilities as well. And if, for whatever reason woman is unable to serve on a whole-sex basis, how come they recieve the same amount of rights as men who have bigger responsobilities? Its all only hypothetical, of course, but stuff like "male-only conscription" (with no added benefits if you do,…
/r/MensRights12/06/22 07:44 PM
5

" I mean, it would be pretty stupid for people to believe that earth is flat in 2022" Again, those people value politics over anything else. They don't see a tragedy, they see something that doesn't fit the narrative and must be quickly concealead/masked/ spun in a way that fits the narrative. Its a theme you constanlty see with such people Woman did something bad to a man - must be justified. They don't care that the man was almost murdered , or his trauma, or whatever. They see that a woman di…
/r/MensRights07/06/22 12:51 PM
8

>Even 1 person labeling the person an incel would shock me tbh, Just visit any popular sub, be it AskReddit or anything similar, find a question even remotedly about females, and dare say anything that doesn't fit The Party Approved Narrative tm Think women are too toxic while dating, often expecting men to be just "a free dinner" ? - Incel Think that gender gap doesn't exist? (Though ,to be fair, the discussion around it died out when everybody and their dog realised that it exists, but only ev…
/r/MensRights07/06/22 11:42 AM
8

Been on the internet lately?
/r/MensRights07/06/22 11:03 AM
1

What an idiotic logic and you know it. Is that seriously your solution, how does covering non-reproductive organs solve anything? But they're also sexual! Your words, right? No they are not aside from less milk ducts and fat, do some research. Patriarchy, puritans and religion are responsible for the over sexualisation of women's bodies, tell me how they aren't responsible? Fucking look at the images and links I provided, and then spit bullshit. You think feet, legs etc are sexual, therefore by …
/r/MensRights27/05/22 06:09 AM
1

d breasts, then why shouldn't those body parts be covered too? Then I propose covering them. All of them. Or exposing them. All of them. What's wrong? Your logic biting you back into the ass? Try bringing up a valid argument and researching the difference between reproductive organs and secondary sex characteristics, that will help you to understand biology. Actually YOU do that. Holy shit, the difference between male and female breasts are worlds and worlds. Educate yourself and then spread mis…
/r/MensRights26/05/22 04:44 PM
1

Breasts still are not sexual whether they're on a male or female, lots of people find lips, feet and necks sexual, should those be covered up too? Sure then, have you way. [I expect you to wear this](https://www.learnreligions.com/thmb/OzhAIWiGCiatJd9YQqheyCGjyj0=/1000x1500/filters:no_upscale():max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/niqab-58a479575f9b58819c94685c.jpg) by tomorrow,or be completely naked. Because they're going to lust over anything,right? You're the one comparing secondary sex characterist…
/r/MensRights26/05/22 06:25 AM
1

asses are unclean and it would be inappropriate to have people sitting bare assed on things in public whereas a woman not wearing a shirt isn't unclean at all. You are missing the point here. Well, you might think about fecal matter when you look at an ass, but me, as well as many others, usually do not trouble ourselves with such thoughts. As such its not unclean, its SEXUAL. You know what's also Sexual? Bare, naked breasts. So yes, breasts aren't unclean. They're sexual. And its inapporpriate …
/r/MensRights25/05/22 04:00 PM
1

You were replying about a comment about "boob groping being sexual and non-sexual depending on a woman". Now, I am no greek oracle, but I'm pretty sure what they meant is "eye groping" (because I , in all honestly, cannot imagine boob groping that isn't inherently sexual in nature (unless its like, breast massage, but that's only technically groping)). Also it was a reply about getting topless , in public. As such I could only imagine you were talking about peeing in public as well.
/r/MensRights25/05/22 08:24 AM
1

So if I am attracted to asses - a fetish most of this planet would share for sure - I am attracted to "fecal matter" ? Please do not try to avoid the point here. Underwear itself isn't sexual Then how come I can't walk bottomless? Like, in just underwear? Almost like, just hear me out, people conceal stuff because its sensual and/or sexual, not because its gross, but maybe its just me... perceived as uncontrollable animals that can't control themselves around the female body And what does "the p…
/r/MensRights25/05/22 08:20 AM
0

>Billions of people sexualise feet, necks, hands, legs, ears, mouths and even hair, should we be covering all of that up? If you seriously compare hair to breasts, then I have no words. At that logic I should just go with my butt completely bare and naked, people would sexualize me anyway and ass is in no way,shape,or form a genitalia. >Only because of religion Except that it isn't. Attraction to breasts is not because of Bible or any other religion, its because of evolution and "strong, healthy…
/r/MensRights24/05/22 07:07 PM
1

Its you who compared flashing boobs in public to peeing, I assumed you meant public peeing as well
/r/MensRights24/05/22 06:43 PM
0

Both yes and no. No,because we don't sexualize their breasts. Yes, because we sexualize other stuff that's usually covered by a shirt (or other wardrobe piece) Not to mention the world's difference between "manboobs" and "boobs proper". And , setting aside the fact that its still pretty taboo to be topless anywhere that isn't the beach, its just less taboo than women (you still would get weird looks if you decided to take a stroll topless as a man throught a city; and good luck going topless to …
/r/MensRights24/05/22 06:42 PM
1

Uh IDK bro if I peed in public I'd probably get at least shouted at, if not fined or even jailed
/r/MensRights24/05/22 05:14 PM
2

Outfit that covers your pussy lips, nipples and anus - and nothing more would technically be covering all your "sensitive" spots but would not be any more modest Breasts are still sexualisied, and for a reason - they're something only females have, and is thus seen as a sexual object (kind of like how male abs/muscles in general are sexualised, though for another -but similar enough -reason)
/r/MensRights24/05/22 05:11 PM
1

> she throw tantrum, insult us, Those can be enough to provoke someone to punch you, you know? >try destroy our reputation And this could be a stain on your life forever. (see Sex Offender registry)
/r/MensRights24/05/22 05:06 PM
1

I would say that those who believe in toxic masculinity would think that every abusive ex/current partner must be a male. So they do agree( probably) that everyone can feel jealous , but they absolutely believe that everyone who abused anyone is male (which is nothing new, to be honest) - so, uh, overjealousy?
/r/MensRights24/05/22 05:03 PM
3

If you really looked around this sub you would know that what you spit is the finest bull since the annual bull shitting festival of 1788. I mean, you literally commented this under article that out of 11 scholars only 1 would be a man (that's literally a 10:1 ratio) , like, at least read the title or smthng?
/r/MensRights19/05/22 06:06 AM
6

Oh I see that things are way worse than I thought
/r/MensRights22/04/22 01:43 PM
8

If the man is not registered as a legal parent of a child (like , a proper legal father, with responosibilities and all ) , then nothing , very likely.
/r/MensRights22/04/22 01:04 PM
2

Here's a catch though - for her to rape, some countries would require her to penetrate someone with her penis. Simply how their law defines rape. Of course there's also "made to penetrate" , but I doubt it applies to girl-girl stuff
/r/PussyPassDenied16/03/22 10:30 AM
3

Yeah,so much easier to walk away when you can get child support'ed despite literally never laying with a woman ,being raped by a woman , among other things. Also , its just so much easier to be a single dad when you win every custody of your child, not. >This is a fact. If this is a fact, then everything is. There are more single mothers because single fathers are blocked their rights to the kid, usually by the courts, often by the mother. Quite literally read this sub you are on, there is almos…
/r/MensRights17/02/22 09:57 PM
3

Yeah, obv its much harder for a man. After all, only men have been forced to pay child support for their rapists' child, if they couldn't "walk away" in that scenario, I doubt there are that many where they are able to
/r/MensRights17/02/22 06:04 PM
4

> Like.. um... What? How? Why would a person be in trouble for... Untermensch accused of the crime of touching an aryan, rightful punishment soon arrived
/r/MensRights11/02/22 07:02 PM
9

Once you demonize some group, people will do the rest for you
/r/EverydayMisandry09/02/22 01:24 PM
2

Men's sexual drive is driven by public responses - interacting with women will bring in more testostreone -> more sex drive, and not interacting is comparable to castration. And since feminism is against interaction of men with women, they are castrating men, chemically (via the lack of testosterone)
/r/MensRights06/02/22 08:02 AM
11

Ah yes. "Men get opressed. Women most affected". I mean, sure, I get why a man on a lesbian only sub wouldn't be welcome, but damn, imagine thinking that everyone who says "my wife" on a lesbian sub is a MAN. Kinda weird,isn't it?
/r/MensRights05/02/22 08:38 PM
30

"Fellows, is it pedophilic to love adult women?"
/r/MensRights03/02/22 11:49 AM
3

The Patriarchy "theory" (more like ideology) is quite frankly: "The enemy is weak enough to be unable to witstand our assault! Unite against ut! The enemy is strong enough to make our lives a pain! The enemy is weak to be unable to protect themselves from us! The future is written by our supreme race, and for our supreme race (read as : woman)!" I really hope I am just pulling it out of my ass, but the similarities are too much.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 07:34 AM
4

In itself, it doesn't. The problem is that the TwoX is saying "If the guy isn't paying, he isn't staying", and the reverse logic is seen as problematic by society. Its not that having preference is anti-men, its ,however, anti-men to NOT allow men to have the said preferences as well
/r/MensRights29/01/22 04:22 PM
2

Keep it. Maybe you'll need it later on
/r/MensRights28/01/22 08:18 AM
2

Damn, this uniform looking kinda cool tho. NO! NO!!!!!!
/r/MensRights28/01/22 08:13 AM
1

The "not all men" is just as bad as "not all black people" (or "not all muslims" or whatever). Its all you need to say.
/r/MensRights25/01/22 07:27 PM
10

Inflate it further Teacher->Parents->Director(s)->Police-> Local activists (if any apply; they usually get enough scandalous potential to get either of the previous to work) -> Straight up court (though can be difficult if parents are not going to help you) Also you could try to tell some dudes at your school to protect you from beatings. Its a risky choice,yes, but if any of your classmates would do as much as stand nearby and look its going to make a difference. After all, one voice can be sil…
/r/MensRights24/01/22 12:17 AM
3

Hidden pen camera is excessive. Not only is it hard to obtain,may also be illegal. (If we're talking "hidden pen" as in "camera that looks like a pen". ) What he could do is take a jacket(t-shirt or whatever) that has an inner pocket , put his phone in there and cut out a hole just enough for camera to see stuff when recording. Then put it on record any time he feels he might get hit. (Unless the girl is his direct classmate, he won't be meeting her that often. Even if she is , modern phones usu…
/r/MensRights24/01/22 12:17 AM
2

Thank God you cannot be sexist nor opressive towards males, because otherwise this would be like direct discrimination,human rights violation (belittlement of a human or their group ,direct attempt at damaging dignity) and other bad things!
/r/MensRights23/01/22 10:04 PM
5

"common sense" means what most of the populace agrees on , and thus is being seen as true. In a way, gynocentrism IS common sense. After all, is it not common sense that man cannot hit a woman and etc.?
/r/MensRights22/01/22 10:59 AM
19

People who say like "She enjoyed it" "She asked for it" "He shouldv'e resisted more" and the like
/r/MensRights10/01/22 03:26 PM
20

To see what is wrong you need to do is: " "Black people get murdered too!" Yeah usually by other black people" Suddenly, the "caring" and "acceptive" comment is no longer as "caring" and "acceptive" . I wonder how people go off writing shit like this and NEVER notice that they are doing literally what they are fighting against - sexism(or racism)
/r/EverydayMisandry09/01/22 03:54 PM
14

"I would like to make a man feel more than just "a rapist" " "Um,sweaty,he is a RAPIST!!!!!!! Because there was a few percent of male rapists, so he must be one too!"
/r/MensRights27/12/21 09:15 AM
5

Well, at least we don't outright ban people that don't agree with our opinions (or I don't know of such people,either of). We can only hope a few "outsiders" will come in to unecho this chamber
/r/MensRights27/12/21 09:04 AM
12

So are men with "low" body counts. Remember, men are the only gender(though you could argue this also has to do with sex) where "virgin" is an insult. Whether they are comparable is another question,yes... But they both happen,and must be acknowledged (and resolved,hopefully)
/r/MensRights23/12/21 08:55 PM
5

Probably some OCs fortnite has, idk, its style? I think its still teens or straight up children,but a man can hope...
/r/MensRights23/12/21 08:30 PM
1

Where I heard that? You mean the housewives? Some delusional article that tried it best to prove that the pay gap exists where it doesn't.
/r/MensRights22/12/21 07:42 AM
1

Wel,to argue more there I must be a specialist in that sphere,so I am not, so I will just leave it as there.
/r/MensRights22/12/21 07:40 AM
1

That's because a lot of women already experience Like, IDK man.But whatever. And shelters ARE protection, especially for domestic or otherwise abuse. Imagine walking out half naked out of your house, with hopefully documents,phone and maybe some money in hand and as a MALE, you have literally NOWHERE to go. Friend's house? Your partner knows where that is, so you subconsciously don't want to go there(mind you,victims of abuse aren't known to be the most smart and calm) . Parents? Too far away. W…
/r/MensRights22/12/21 07:39 AM
1

Ah,so men don't get abused? Wow, and you are the "not-sexist" of the bunch?
/r/MensRights21/12/21 07:44 AM
1

Where does the doctor get their information on women? Where they have get their diploma. Like, it took me a 5 second google to get this (https://www.everydayhealth.com/news/drugs-work-differently-woman-than-man/) I suppose a competent doctor would know all of this and much more. And , like, dosage difference isn't the main issue. The biggest problem is actually how the drug itself will work, but that is entirely on your doctor and their competence to recommend you which drugs to use, and I am no…
/r/MensRights21/12/21 07:42 AM
2

Women actually get more,if not the same,pay for the same job, if they were absolutely the same as a man. The only discrimination woman may ever face on a job is relucance to hire because every woman may have a child, thus forcing the company to basically have them on paid vacation for quite a while Its just that counting housewives as actual jobs will do that for your statistics.
/r/MensRights21/12/21 07:36 AM
1

> How do you decrease one pill?You can,for starters, consult your doctor on it. Though , they should already know the stuff they give provided they are competent.>How do you decrease the danger of seat belts that are too high?It was disproven that safety measures in cars bring more harm to women.https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ricz3m/women_are_not_73_more_likely_to_suffer_fatal/Just read this, I am too lazy to manually link every source.>How are women more protected?Hmm, IDK, becaus…
/r/MensRights20/12/21 07:34 PM
3

Simply by logic, making a "bigger" dose the norm is better because you can always decrease it. Same with seats and stuff. And frowning sexual promiscuity goes both ways. Sure, women are more affected,but they are also more protected.
/r/MensRights20/12/21 01:54 PM
4

#BallsToo
/r/MensRights20/12/21 01:47 PM
27

Are you still surprised by this after literally 0 corporations ever acknowledged Men's Day? And the fact that Women's day was made into Women's month, but not the same with the Men's Day?
/r/MensRights20/12/21 01:46 PM
1

Fascist this,fascist that. How do you know about whether Kyle was a fascist? Fuck, do you even know what fascist means? And lol, out of all people you defend *the* Jacob Blake? You know, the man who almost kidnapped his own children? (Or , at the very fucking least, looked suspiciously like a kidnapper at that very moment) And for holy heavens, just ask the official, uncut recording of the whole scene. Or just the trial, instead of very unbiased World Socialist Web Site. And as a final question …
/r/MensRights27/11/21 08:37 AM
5

And here its not even funny. Some shows at least try to set up something, like the "stealer" treating the target "nicely", etc. This here (at least from what the OP has wrote)? Its fucking ridiculous.
/r/MensRights23/11/21 03:11 PM
12

Not exactly American. Its just like grammar errors , they use this little "gotchas" to undermine your debate authority. Basically, it is very similar to: "This is why..." "Lol,shut up, yo momma gay" Except it actually works because , as a rule, you will be more than likely subjected to group pressure on any sub you try to actually converse the non-popular opinion on (logical), and they will more than likely use such strategies to shut you up once deemed necessary
/r/MensRights22/11/21 07:54 AM
3

That is free speech is all about,after all. Sadly...
/r/MensRights22/11/21 07:50 AM
13

As much as horrible it sounds, draft is a necessary evil. Those not supporting their own armies will be forced to support armies of others. As much as draft sucks, unless big countries launch succsessfull army popularization campaigns so that volounteers can fill the draft void, we will be drafted. Whether we like it or not. Its either full militarization, no army at all or draft. In current world, all 3 of them suck, but one sucks less
/r/MensRights19/11/21 08:23 PM
15

IK,but,damn. Isn't life a basic human right?
/r/EverydayMisandry30/09/21 03:01 PM
25

Holy shit. There's "Not all,but enough men" stuff,and then there's "The only good men is dead man" shit like this. How does this stay on this platform...
/r/EverydayMisandry30/09/21 11:39 AM
1

That is because every day's men's day,duh!
/r/MensRights26/09/21 02:52 PM
2

Probably. Didn't read it,but remembered the headline
/r/MensRights11/09/21 07:01 PM
30

I still remember an article called " Plus-sized women aren't attracted to overweight men" ( or similar). Really shows
/r/MensRights11/09/21 07:49 AM
9

Are there any documentaries or such about how much your work is dangerous? You can show them to her, maybe some example will at least make her think
/r/MensRights03/09/21 03:21 PM
35

The "We are the main victims of war because our husbands and children die" type of beat,huh?
/r/MensRights19/08/21 06:02 PM
13

Well, few people learned that defunding the police won't do any good. Some people even presented a "brilliant" idea of replacing the police with law-making force which will respond directly to the government/its represantives. Ah,if only we had that idea before...
/r/MensRights03/08/21 01:24 PM
4

Perhaps,the sole reason why female castration leads to FGM and male doesn't is because castration is a term for an operation on male humans,dogs or whatever that has a reproductive system. Culturally and scientifically,there wasn't such thing as term-proper castration for females, which probably is the reason google finds synonimical FGM to show you as a result
/r/MensRights22/07/21 09:35 AM
2

Coincidentally, thinking about sexual stuff can help you hold out pee for a little longer. Sometimes its really do be a question of having either a boner or wet pants
/r/MensRights22/07/21 09:30 AM
1

If they're not judged similarly,then one group overpowers the other either by stereotypes or straight-up pressure. And there way too many cases of where man got imprisoned because woman said she was raped without any evidence or expertise for me to believe its men being the powerful
/r/MensRights18/07/21 08:59 AM
1

There's only so much empowering you can do until someone goes "do we really need them?" And,as far as I know, women and men are made equal by law in most western countries.
/r/MensRights17/07/21 10:46 AM
2

Today?No. But after few years,who knows. After all,its still rising.
/r/MensRights16/07/21 09:53 AM
2

Take 5 minutes a day just coming back to this sub and check if this is really "just a one case"
/r/MensRights16/07/21 09:04 AM
3

. Front-page post of today is literally "Man set free after 10 years of being an accused pedo in prison (the worst type of crime you could commit,since everyone,and I mean,EVERYone in prison will hate you for it) after daughter said that it was a lie. Daughter set free out of fear that giving her punishment will discourage actual rape victims from telling the truth to the world" ,and you think that MRA is what's boiling the pot? It can come from them,but from what I can see today, its not likely
/r/MensRights16/07/21 08:12 AM
3

Yes,they've been lead away. But do you seriously look at r/MensRights and say "Yeah, no way we're getting back here" ?
/r/MensRights16/07/21 07:52 AM
3

Maybe we sort through FDS on different filters,but I swear I saw at least one post that basically screamed "they bad lol!!!!!" And sure,the sexism will never bring genocide - men or women will never be gassed to death,killed or whatever. However,if sexism really takes its course - and seeing how much awfully sexist stuff happens in the world - you,being in this subreddit, must know of at least a few examples when false rape/harassment/etc accusations ruined lives -, will not make life for the ot…
/r/MensRights16/07/21 07:36 AM
3

There's none. Yet. But you must be a real shiny if you think that "Men not needed,women better" or "Women not needed,men better" can't lead to a genocide. It may not be a top 1,but I'm sure its at least in the top 10,if not top 3. FDS isn't about avoiding toxic men,its about how women are simply superiour. Like,really, replace man with,idk,black,and woman with white and you'll get a KKK brochure out of a good chunk of posts. It took me only a minute to search for a stuff like that. And how is in…
/r/MensRights16/07/21 07:21 AM
3

Please stop downplaying sexism. Sexism,racism and nationalism are the top-3 reasons for any future genocide. There are subreddits about men being sexist, but we are talking about women ,you see? Just because my neighbour killed a dog doesn't mean I can kill one too. And calling every man a "scrote" is pretty radical way of approaching gender
/r/MensRights16/07/21 06:48 AM
5

"That country can be genocidical,but a lot of the posts read like a racist post abut how the other race is a certain way,a few of the actions can be legitimately harmful,but please ask yourself,is this mainstream? Is this something that effects me?" Plus,FDS is pretty mainstream - it shows here and there on r/all . And,last time I checked, women do play a role in my life, so seeing them become so radicalized is a matter of concern
/r/MensRights16/07/21 06:25 AM
8

FDS - also known as Female Dating Strategy , is a subreddit that is known to be one of the most man-hating places on the internet. Awhile not inherently feminist, it can be a good example on what may happen when people screw "empowering women" into "overpowering men"
/r/MensRights16/07/21 06:00 AM
5

The girl should be punished too. Lightly,but punished. She's 11. Not 3. If she understood the concept of rape,she could understand the concept of responsobilty too.
/r/MensRights16/07/21 05:55 AM
8

F D S
/r/MensRights16/07/21 05:42 AM
5

> "Well,he shouldn't have had sex then!" Okay,who's gonna tell them? Like,that's probably the most anti-choice thing you would hear from anyone
/r/MensRights01/07/21 09:28 AM
1

You may be doing the,in your opinion,right thing but you're doing it wrongly. What modestas was trying to say was "Hey,the law states that any human who does weed is to be criminalized. What do you expect them to do,just let anyone off because reasons?" Its not the fault of police,its the fault of law. Police shouldn't just do things because they want to. After all,many people are for decriminalising open carry of guns,but that doesn't mean policemen should simply ignore anyone carrying a gun. A…
/r/MensRights19/06/21 12:30 PM
1

He is gender fluid,and has different gender for different people
/r/MensRights31/05/21 11:49 AM
6

"A woman must look for benefit instead of anything else" And add massive "men bad" to it
/r/MensRights21/05/21 07:33 AM
1

Its almost as if women make up half of the population* *After all,the war is led in high-density areas quite often so,yeah,its far from mostly-army casualties.
/r/MensRights18/05/21 06:41 PM
3

Well,it depends. It could all be satire (as in, despite being all good and healthy the "equals" don't help "the unequal" or something,to showcase some similarities to today). Didn't read the thing,but here is what I think it may(could?should?) have been
/r/MensRights18/05/21 06:32 PM
5

The problem with anything that is abstact by nature is there is no measure how far you can go. Really. Watch me try to connect love to rape culture Love -> Strong attraction to female -> Strong sex drive to said female -> Desire to have le epic sexx -> Le unepic rape culture that is based around males "loving" their femates. This took me like 20 seconds,and the longer you think the further you can go. But that doesn't make it any true,however.
/r/MensRights11/04/21 05:29 PM
2

Uhm,sunshine,you see, "white" is "bad",you see? So,uhm,stop being bad,I mean, "digitally white",and come protest with us. Awhile a horrible generalisation of the "famous" 1%, these specimen,and I kid you not, turned a meme (or,at least, a very,very niche slur) into a widespread slur - cracker for white people. I have seen lots of people use that shit unironically,and I am no longer surprised. After all,its those people that made fascist not something you should fear to even say,but a harder vers…
/r/MensRights07/04/21 09:23 PM
4

"I have altered your rights. Pray I don't alter them any futher" And about the higher court.... Well,you kinda can't. The only thing you may do is try to sue them for hatespeech and misandry,but if you would do that,I doubt this sub would've existed,you know? You can always try,though. But its very problematic since you don't have the perperator - getting the man,or woman,behind the account is not just very hard,its very much illegal. And so,unless they show up themselves or you have iron proof …
/r/MensRights07/04/21 09:16 PM
2

I never understood how literally anyone who said that they were "widely opressed" even got the chance to speak about that. Y'know, the famous meme of "Nothing happened" had some footing,and you mean to say that as a person opressed by literally half of the country/world they could let you just go and throw dirt at them??
/r/MensRights04/04/21 04:31 PM
4

I never understood how literally anyone who said that they were "widely opressed" even got the chance to speak about that. Y'know, the famous meme of "Nothing happened" had some footing,and you mean to say that as a person opressed by literally half of the country/world they could let you just go and throw dirt at them??
/r/MensRights04/04/21 04:28 PM
2

Nothing, the person's just confused. Kind of like you would go "She's 50??? But she looks as if she was in her 30-ies by most" , but reversed.
/r/MensRights02/04/21 12:22 PM
2

Before we can rationally prove it, we may as well believe in people who claim they are the perperators - after all, conspiracy theories can be built on anything and anywhere
/r/MensRights25/03/21 05:11 PM
3

But there's nothing to investigate - at most what you could gain is an IP adress or a phone number of the person who was giving orders and few people who was recieving it - everyone else was dead. And, IIRC, some radical islamist terroristic organisation said that the attack was their responsobility - and I,honestly,have no reason to not believe them
/r/MensRights25/03/21 03:46 PM
3

Planes alone can't take skyscrapers? They didn't. Fire helped greatly. And how exactly can you investigate that? Everybody's dead, par from people who allowed to bring the guns but you go try find those and get some info from them - with how recruiting works, they might know no more than their contactor from the terrorists who gave them orders. And how would they know? Its impossible for an operation this large-scale to be prepared without any information leaking - and knowing just how much peop…
/r/MensRights25/03/21 03:38 PM
5

Prove that some radical islamist group wasn't formed fully or partially of muslims, most of whom are part of islam, couldn't literally pull a plane into a tower. And,you know,"carefully executing" this attack wasn't that hard - you just needed right people who recieved the right payment at right time to allow you to get guns on the plane, and the rest is known.
/r/MensRights25/03/21 03:25 PM
1

I copied your comment back to you because its literally hillarious how you seriously consider people on subs like r/pussypass to have dating knowledge,or anything about women in general to be honest. Plus the "I would cheat too" just gets on my nerves for some reason,I generally can't bear people saying stuff like "I'd cheat" because I don't get why they got into the relationship in the first place
/r/PussyPass20/03/21 01:33 PM
0

Funny how you said "cry more" to a message that is literally yours with two changed words
/r/PussyPass19/03/21 01:19 PM
-1

TBF I can see why you think like this,cause if I was her, I'd cheat on you too Stop being a bitter lowlife,and sort your fucking life out instead of getting pissed about shitty comments. You clearly don't know anything about dating,modern or otherwise.
/r/PussyPass19/03/21 09:28 AM
7

Sometimes being blinded is what is needed to see,no matter how stupid that sounds. If someone actually made something like that,and then made a comparsion,it would at least show the double standards people have. People don't exactly see the problem with stuff like that because its a gender stereotype that a man does bad thingies,just as much as that the woman must stay at home.
/r/MensRights07/03/21 07:45 PM
18

Basically,it narrows down to "Yeah buddy,its rough being born as a rapist/whatever ,but you can and must try to be better!"
/r/MensRights07/03/21 07:42 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter