TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AnthropoidCompatriot Archive

View 0 posts and 59 comments by AnthropoidCompatriot on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
89

"Men who can't even succeed in a system built specifically for men are gigantic losers!!! Yes, obviously we only want successful men!" But patriarchy something something? Ok, so the patriarchy stuff has always been bullshit, or you're complete idiots. Either you hate the patriarchy and men and women who reinforce the patriarchy, or you love the patriarchy and the men who are rewarded for going along with it, but it can't be both.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/26 05:07 PM
60

Gen Z women outearn men by a decent margin, but they still need to marry higher-earning men because there's an overall extremely small gender gap? Is this more of that "we have to make up for thousands of years of oppression" bullshit? Do women need to both outearn men in general and only marry men who earn more than them for a few generations to make things "fair"?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/26 05:03 PM
1

"Nobody in history has EVER targeted men or boys JUST BECAUSE THEY ARE MEN OR BOYS 😡😡😡" -People explaining why they support violence against men and boys because of their sex
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/07/26 06:10 PM
1

FYI, any modern browser will easily, quickly, and accurately translate any Dutch web page into English. LLM use of overkill here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/07/26 04:58 PM
2

Oh! I was not expecting this to turn out to be a "rich people are unfairly persecuted" comment when I started reading it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/26 09:56 PM
44

This article is egregious, yes, but it's also intentional rage bait "opinion" that isn't even credited to a author. Boycott India's "Times Now Digital", rather than sending more clicks and eyeballs and attention to their page. If anyone wants to peek at an article intended to rile up up, without supporting the publisher, here's an archive link: https://archive.ph/iUfzr
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/26 07:22 PM
1

That certain set being "all of them."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/26 06:02 PM
26

The average man is equivalent to a bell-ringing hunchback for many people.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/26 10:33 PM
16

It's really bizarre that you're totally dismissing murder in order to focus on "inconsequential" violence. Violence begets violence, and there are good reasons why we shouldn't use violence. Your assertion seems to be that men should man up and be stoic and not react to violence against them the way human beings naturally react to violence, while women don't need to control their violence because they are weak and can't hurt anybody, and they have no agency over their animals instincts, so just …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/26 09:38 PM
7

Tell me, what percentage of men who attempt suicide have sought mental health care recently?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/26 09:30 PM
3

Homophobia doesn't explain anything at all. You're just using a circular definition here. "Why do people hate gays? Simple, they're homophobic." This is reactionary, divisive, and doesn't lead to any possible solutions except a fight to the death between non-homophobes and homophobes. Please do not feed into OP's blackpillism. It's neither left-wing nor make advocacy. It's nothing but doomerism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/05/26 09:12 PM
13

I'm 100% doubting their experience based on their history. I'm pretty sure this is someone suffering from a personality disorder. Everything is entirely black or white, and everybody in the entire world hates gay men, and the only possible outcomes are straight people murder all the gays, or the gays have to go start their own country and live completely separately from everyone else. There's not a single left-wing or male-advocacy bone in OP's body, every single thing they post is anti-everybod…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/05/26 09:09 PM
20

Do you live in Malaysia? I'm trying to figure out where in the world someone would have never heard of even a single gay man was accepted by straight men. I can tell it's extremely dark inside your head, and I certainly wish you peace, but every single comment and post I see from you is just looking to wallow as deeply in victimhood and self-pity as possible. Good luck my dude. I'm sorry it's been so hard for you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/05/26 09:05 PM
6

But the lesson of these is, those boys needed to be abused in order to unlock their full potential. Abuse toward men and even boys is highly romanticized. People with sick minds (most of society) still think that boys experiencing trauma—that is, the ones that don't deserve it—is a character-building experience.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/26 05:09 PM
8

Basically every single one of these songs is considered romantic by the women who listen to them. There is a tendency to romanticize male suffering, it seems to turn a certain influential segment of women on.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/26 05:05 PM
11

Right, isn't the point that Streep's character is a horrible, toxic boss lady? I don't think depicting people who are intended to be perceived as nasty people counts as either misogyny or misandry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/26 05:57 PM
1

I'm not trying to be pedantic, I am in actuality just struggling to understand what your sentiments are. Are you using the word "hardly" the way you intend? "Hardly" means "barely", but it sort of seems like you're intending it to mean "i disagree in a very hard way", which isn't a meaning of "hardly" in English. It's not like "strongly". And for the life of me, I can't tell from the rest of your comment context whether you're agreeing or disagreeing. I just cannot parse the "hardly" part.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/04/26 08:52 PM
-11

Gender liberation can't arrive until after economic liberation.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/03/26 09:46 PM
11

I developed a lifelong disgust and aversion to old women as a child because of this. Old women caked in nasty makeup and reeking of gallons of overly flowery perfume and absolutely zero respect for boundaries. 🤢🤮.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/26 06:51 PM
71

She also uses the phrase "small dick energy", but claims it has nothing to do with small dicks, it's simply because men with small dicks are insecure, so it's simply referring to insecure men. All while claiming to fight against body shaming.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/03/26 05:32 PM
6

Lol gtfo dude, this is a left-wing sub. If you don't already understand how and why becoming s billionaire does in fact make one evil, you have a hell of a lot of learning to do if you're calling yourself a leftist. If you're just a millionaire defender, the what the fuck are you even here for?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/03/26 06:58 PM
17

There is a huge spike of suicidality in men in the time after they have been abused and often discarded, which I believe absolutely needs to be considered in the effects of abuse. But of course the response from feminists is "HE SHOULD HAVE GONE TO THERAPY!" And of course, the data says that most men who kill themselves do seek out help. But that's inconvenient so let's just say it's the men who are failing themselves and not society that is failing them (as well as everyone else).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/03/26 07:32 PM
48

There is a disturbingly high number of people who love to pile on when they see a guy getting abused (by anyone) in public. Those guys at the beginning of the video, the person who laughed and crushed your sunglasses... I've experienced this myself. It's not just men who do this. It absolutely makes me sick how common it all is.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/26 06:42 PM
38

But the folks who need to hear this are going to retort with "yeah well owning guns is still extremely small dick energy. And no there's nothing wrong with small dicks, it's just that most men with small dicks have a chip on their shoulder and are insecure conservative assholes. The saying is totally divorced from actual small dicks. But if you take offense at that then you probably have a small dick."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/01/26 10:28 PM
14

That is how science works, and this is that correct way to report such findings. You're having a fundamental misunderstanding of scientific examination and reporting here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/01/26 10:25 PM
29

So, the libs are purposely trying to get a reaction out of leftist men, in order to somehow punish ICE?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/01/26 09:46 PM
22

So, every single guy who takes offense at people making fun of guys for their height, they're all just bad people who deserve to also be made fun of? You're so stupid. You're forcing yourself to not understand the point everyone else is making.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/01/26 09:44 PM
25

You are the one willfully not understanding a single point anyone here is trying to make. You literally think that men who materially suffer from being short (provable) and speak up about it are "thin-skinned little bitches." You literally think that people who don't like you saying shit about them are bad people for reacting to your poor behavior.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/01/26 09:37 PM
0

I'm disappointed in everyone else who didn't point this out.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/12/25 05:37 PM
3

Nope. I've told my story. Every single woman I've ever shared it with had no empathy at all. Most women I've known are extremely pro-circumcision, and think foreskins are gross and circumcision should be mandatory.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/12/25 09:59 PM
29

I've said it before and I'll say it again, but I've met a ton of women in the last couple decades who have had zero qualms telling me, to my face, that they find men being "involuntary pegged" by women or by other men to be "super hot". They all immediately became enraged when I said it's rape, and said that's BS because in their mental scenario, the men enjoy it, even if they don't "like it" and claim to not want it. These have all been normal, progressive, liberal women who consider themselves…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/25 02:54 PM
5

If you don't, can't, or won't understand the difference between a desire, a request, and a demand, then you have absolutely zero right or business or be in a relationship.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/25 02:50 PM
39

I've met extraordinary few self-declared feminists who don't fly into actual rage when the percentage of homeless people who are men is brought up. Most will outright deny it, say yeah well it's way more dangerous for homeless women and children, say that it's because the men are drug addicts or bad people but the homeless women are mostly fleeing bad men, because men won't ask for help which is why they're homeless and deserve to be, and so on...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/25 05:28 PM
37

I've actually never seen that response that I recall. The response I almost always see is "if you're upset about 'all men are x', then that proves you're one of the bad ones, because we obviously don't mean all men, which means you're overly sensitive [read: unmanly & bad] and one of the bad ones we're talking about." It's deeply insidious.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/25 05:21 PM
-4

Literally nobody cares if a man's penis brings him somewhat less pleasure.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/11/25 01:24 AM
5

I am quite sure they mean "material/materialist" in the Marxist sense, not in the capitalist "driven by consuming and finding fulfillment through purchasing crap" that most non-leftists think of when they hear that word. And yes, we need much more of the former and much less of the latter. I sincerely wish Marxists could find a different word without the consumerist connotation. It's very nearly opposite in meaning.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/11/25 05:05 PM
1

Huh, I didn't ever say anything about forcing anybody to do anything. You also didn't advocate for "loosening the roles". You specifically stated that men should be more androgenous. Mainly for the benefit of transgender people. And here you are again, saying that women should be more androgenous, too. You have an agenda: you want everyone to be more androgenous, to be more transgender, and you think it would be for the best. You have stated this several times very clearly. That's fine. But then…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/25 03:55 PM
2

Men need to become androgynous for the benefit of transgender people and women. That's great, you see men as purely instrumental objects to non-men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/25 12:16 AM
2

OP is specifically saying that men need to become more androgenous in order to be better men. No where is it said or implied that any of this is about allowing for the option. OP is explicit in saying that men should embrace and become more androgenous.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/25 12:14 AM
10

Is this a whatabout?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/07/25 05:21 PM
32

I don't need to get to the top. I just want to be able to afford to live. This isn't about feelings or psychology. This is economic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/25 07:06 PM
21

Yes yes, keep calling people idiots and keep gaslighting the working class that the Democrats actually do care about them, despite their policies being undeniably anti-working class. That's exactly the kind of scolding language the Dems need to win back the working class!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/25 06:44 PM
1

🤷‍♂️
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/25 10:01 PM
3

Not my implication, and I did in fact make a more precise statement than the way you're interpreting it, and I reject your responses.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/25 05:02 PM
2

No, that's patently ridiculous. Marxism is a defined system of analyzing the world. It's named after the person who developed it. It's not an "appeal to authority." Marxism is absolutely not "a vibe", and simply calling yourself Marxist does NOT mean that you follow prior Marxian analysis. What you're saying is exactly equivalent to somebody breaking the rules in a basketball game, getting hit with a foul for breaking the rules of basketball, and then complaining that "I'm a basketball player, s…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/25 04:37 PM
4

You're right, but this sub isn't actually Marxist or materialist, it's just "left wing." You'rev most likely getting download by the very liberals you're talking about who think they are "Marxist" or "socialist".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/25 09:07 PM
3

See, there is something that your defense mechanisms are just completely preventing your brain from the parsing, and it's this: The problem isn't "complexity", the problem is you are a poor communicator. You keep brushing this aside and saying, "well I can't help it if people are too stupid to understand me. I mean, this isn't difficult stuff to understand." Which, again, is a huge fucking self-own. If it's really not so difficult to understand, then you must be very bad at communicating it. You…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/02/25 01:41 AM
5

If you haven't noticed, men being vulnerable while acknowledging context is pretty much guaranteed to send liberal women into a complete rage.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/25 11:03 PM
9

In another comment, you expressly stated that men SHOULD be protecting people as their role in the world. You can't even keep your comments consistent. I take it back, you're not a skillful troll at all, you're sloppy as heck.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/25 06:36 PM
11

My God, your hatred of men is breathtakingly and painfully clear. You're a very well practiced troll, I'll tell you that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/25 06:33 PM
4

Can you give concrete examples of people or groups who hold the latter view? Because it sounds like you're speaking purely of hypotheticals.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/12/24 05:47 PM
0

What a fucking turd.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/10/24 07:37 PM
0

"No true Scotsman"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/10/24 07:36 PM
2

Uh huh
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/10/24 07:35 PM
0

Zero material analysis dude. You do not belong in a left-wing space as you have no idea what left-wing means. There's zero substance to anything you're saying. Casuistry. That's all your words are.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/10/24 07:35 PM
2

Dude, you're not operating in good faith here at all, you're just claiming to. Fuck off with your calls for "respect" when you don't show an ounce of it yourself. You're not here to have the discussion you claim, you're already fully settled into your views and your using sophistry to support them, while you preemptively dismiss outright any and all criticism, labeling disagreement as toxic or just being wrong. You're the assumptions and assertions without evidence and claiming it to be Truth. F…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/10/24 07:31 PM
5

I'm pretty sure you wrote this in an intentionally obtuse style in order to appear more intelligent or sophisticated, but I gotta say, you simply are not presenting whatever information is supposedly contained here in a way that is natural or easy to understand. At least for me. You seem to be intentionally saying simple things in as complicated as way as you can. I really can't take any of this seriously, it just smells like your farts.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/24 04:16 PM
1

You want to know what women can do? Same thing women have demanded of men for decades: LEAVE US ALONE! The false empathy thing you're doing just makes things worse, so kindly fuck off and keep your disgusting nose out of men's business/issues where YOU HAVE NO PLACE.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 11:53 PM
1

It's just that you sound like every single other person on the Internet who feels the need to take a complaint about the way society is and feels the narcissistic need to declare "NOT ME, I'M ONE OF THE GOOD ONES!" You're most likely a liar and self-deluded about how you actually felt about your supposed late husband, if in fact you were even ever married.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 11:50 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter