TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Antifa_-_-_y Archive

View 23 posts and 54 comments by Antifa_-_-_y on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
438

Fam0_sAntifa_-_-_y/r/MGTOW13/04/19 05:55 PM
229

Antifa_-_-_y/r/MGTOW12/04/19 01:47 AM
224

Antifa_-_-_y/r/MGTOW30/09/17 09:38 AM
109

Antifa_-_-_y/r/MGTOW12/03/18 01:31 AM
67

'Ho Le SheAntifa_-_-_y/r/MGTOW06/08/17 02:23 AM
56

DramaAntifa_-_-_y/r/MGTOW21/06/17 05:24 PM
55

Antifa_-_-_y/r/MGTOW19/07/17 05:39 PM
50

Antifa_-_-_y/r/MGTOW26/05/17 02:48 PM
49

Antifa_-_-_y/r/MGTOW06/06/17 06:12 PM
39

Antifa_-_-_y/r/MGTOW03/08/17 08:48 PM
31

Antifa_-_-_y/r/MGTOW26/05/17 01:35 AM
23

Antifa_-_-_y/r/MGTOW24/05/17 06:24 PM
21

Antifa_-_-_y/r/MGTOW24/09/18 06:26 PM
17

Antifa_-_-_y/r/MGTOW12/12/17 03:41 PM
14

Antifa_-_-_y/r/MGTOW27/06/17 10:01 PM
11

Antifa_-_-_y/r/MGTOW07/06/18 06:46 PM
10

Antifa_-_-_y/r/MGTOW28/06/17 10:14 PM
8

Antifa_-_-_y/r/MGTOW11/06/17 01:40 PM
8

Antifa_-_-_y/r/MGTOW06/06/17 01:00 PM
7

Antifa_-_-_y/r/MGTOW08/08/17 11:54 AM
4

Antifa_-_-_y/r/MGTOW20/11/17 04:41 PM
1

Antifa_-_-_y/r/MGTOW26/01/18 12:20 AM
1

Antifa_-_-_y/r/MGTOW30/09/17 09:31 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

I understand but you have to understand that attributing credit between academics correctly is of the upmost importance. /u/Figaro is 100% correct in what he told you about as grave as committing fraud, indeed it is considered as a form of plagiarism
/r/MGTOW13/04/19 09:27 PM
6

I don’t know about academia, but in industry which is my background, title page formatting means nothing. Then your experience is pretty much irrelevant. As /u/Fogato tried to explain you many times, attributing credit where credit is due is of paramount importance in academia and there are standardized rules when you cite your work that you must follow.
/r/MGTOW13/04/19 09:24 PM
15

The picture itself just happened to be taken at the right time, and happened to gain a lot of traction. It’s kinda similar to the V-Day, sailor-kissing nurse picture, displaying emotions, let’s not dissect it too much shall we? This is not some sneaky photo of someone doing something reprobable under the influence of intense emotions, this is taken from her talk at her new university. She made this presentation deliberately, with time to think about what she was doing, and she chose to present t…
/r/MGTOW13/04/19 09:16 PM
5

know that complaining too much about it would only make them look bad as harasser of their female coworker... Exactly! And that's the reason one would expect the burden of correcting this "error" lays on Katie Bouman. But it seems she keeps feeding the mass media narrative in subtle ways, and certainly not doing enough to correct the misappropriation of credit.
/r/MGTOW13/04/19 09:07 PM
3

Are you suggesting she didn't do her own PowerPoint presentation in her first talk as a new professor in Caltech? That would be very odd.
/r/MGTOW13/04/19 09:01 PM
4

I don't in what part of academia are you working, but in both natural sciences and the humanities is quite common to upload a video or the PowerPoint used during the conference to a website. I bet that if is format is as common as you say, you could found a presentation that shows it. Some put the group name above, below, or alongside their name. Sometimes it's in parentheses. Sometimes it's on a separate power point (which is better). That has nothing to do with presenting your work with the fo…
/r/MGTOW13/04/19 08:57 PM
7

Especially considering she says, at the beginning of that presentation, that the media said she obtained the image single handedly. She dedicates at most 10 seconds to "clarify" this, then shows that slide promoting her name repeatedly, and for several minutes in each instance. One would expect that if you know the mass media is wrongly attributing you credit, you would be at pains for correcting this error.
/r/MGTOW13/04/19 08:50 PM
17

The new narrative is that while her algorithm wasn't used, she didn't led anything but a small team that published a single paper, her work was 'foundational' or a condition of possibility of everything EHT achieved. When you show them the actual scientific papers were is clear this is not the case, they call you an incel/misogynist/whatever.
/r/MGTOW13/04/19 08:45 PM
4

Can you cite a presentation where the format ‘Indivudal name + group name’ was used to present a collaborative work?
/r/MGTOW13/04/19 08:36 PM
14

I have seen tons of PowerPoints in academic conferences, never seen an individual presenting a collaborative work as Her name + Group name/Institution collaboration. At most, she could use Katie Bouman (EHT).
/r/MGTOW13/04/19 07:43 PM
2

Who said anything about a "conspiracy"? Research institutions promote their graduates for boosting their popularity all the time. It is called marketing. I'm not objecting giving her due credit, but saying her algorithm was the one that made the image is simply misleading.
/r/MGTOW12/04/19 07:05 PM
2

I ommited this: Her algorithm was frequently better than its predecessors at reconstructing the original image from the measurements and tended to handle noise better. She’s also made her test data publicly available online for other researchers to use. This is a claim not backed up by any data and even if it is true that her algorithm was better than the previous algorithms (whatever that means) it doesn't follow that her algorithm was the stem for anything. Reading the actual scientific paper …
/r/MGTOW12/04/19 05:04 PM
2

Yes but from that particular algorithm it helped them create one that worked. She is credited in all the scientific papers, like this one No, you are reading it wrong. You are confusing a citation with crediting her with developing the algorithm that helped to create the others. While these types of imaging algorithms have been developed for decades (e.g., Frieden 1972; Gull & Daniell 1978; Cornwell & Evans 1985; Narayan & Nityananda 1986; Briggs 1995; Wiaux et al. 2009a, 2009b) and are commonly…
/r/MGTOW12/04/19 05:01 PM
2

Please, read before posting. That's from 2016. They tested the algorithm described in that article and it was discarded. Besides, the description that appears in that article is not about her particular algorithm, it describes very roughly how all machine learning algorithms work. Hardly something like that was the stem for other research. It wasn't, the algorithms that were effectively used for making the image where developed independently. That´s hardly surprising in a collaborative field who…
/r/MGTOW12/04/19 04:31 PM
3

The MIT is spreading vague statements for boosting their reputation as an academic institution, also known as marketing. The papers, where credit is attributed properly, are open to anyone that is curious enough about the science. Her algorithm was discarded and she contributed with some code and some debugging, that's all.
/r/MGTOW12/04/19 04:27 PM
2

English is not my first language so I excuse myself for your xenophobic remarks about my poor grammar. What about you reading actual scientific papers and not posting misleading journalistic articles?
/r/MGTOW12/04/19 04:01 PM
2

It seems you cannot read. She didn't wrote the algorithm that made image, she didn't wrote the first algorithm (it was written decades ago) and she didn't wrote an algorithm that was used to make the image. Her algorithm was discarded.
/r/MGTOW12/04/19 03:45 PM
1

No, read the actual scientific papers. Stop using those misleading journalistic articles that promote the feminist agenda instead of portraying the actual science.
/r/MGTOW12/04/19 03:43 PM
2

OMG!! Some journalistic articles, I'm refuted!! Haven't you read what I posted? Her astronomer colleague explained that Bouman's algorithm was not even used. She even referenced the actual scientific peer reviewed papers where the appropriate sources appear.
/r/MGTOW12/04/19 03:37 PM
1

Every one of them say it’s a team effort No, that's the reason other scientists on the project had to point out the falsehoods the media was spreading. She was the lead of one of them and it all stemmed from her original algorithm. Her algorithm wasn't even used, and that kind of work spreads from decades (mid 70s). Learn some actual science instead of gender studies.
/r/MGTOW12/04/19 03:06 PM
0

I don't buy that. She was very comfortable giving interviews where she was portrayed as the sole person behind the image. Also, she did a TED conference about the project even when is clear her contribution was not exactly major. I think is obvious now that at least his homosexual coworker made a concerted effort to portray her as the real genius behind the black hole image. It's very doubtful that she was oblivious to all of this.
/r/MGTOW12/04/19 03:43 AM
3

So she went from being the sole person that made the image possible to a leader and the creator of the algorithm and now she is a "huge contributor" that wrote and debugged some code but the most important thing is her being an inspiring leader for wymyn or something. The narrative is degenerating too quickly it seems.
/r/MGTOW12/04/19 02:50 AM
25

Yup, it seems everybody is profiting from this narrative. Universities and their PR departements, feminists and other SJWs, people that care more about diversity than truth in science. I'm suspecting that the leaders of this endeavour knew that promoting this narrative could bring some much needed funding for their research.
/r/MGTOW12/04/19 02:30 AM
5

Provider in the biblical sense precludes the assumption the the female is non-hypergamous and submissive to her husband. Then again, as a MGTOW I'm not interested in being a provider for a woman, I really don't care about the 'advatange' of her being submissive and non-hypergamous (even if that is possible, my hunch is that religion tried to go against natural selection but failed miserably). I don't have nostalgia for the restoration of the etherwise role of man as a provider, but if you do I u…
/r/MGTOW24/09/18 06:51 PM
10

Some religion may have societal expectations of men, but not all. The ones I prefer to study focus on men obeying God You're contradicting yourself in these two sentences. And by 'God' you mean obeying other men that claim to know what God wants but they promote their own self interest, since 'God' doesn't exist. Can you give me some examples of religions that don't expect men to be providers and at the same time promote the control of female sexuality?
/r/MGTOW24/09/18 06:35 PM
21

So, if you are atheist and MGTOW, how to do reconcile the two complimetary ideologies? Because religion is not only about controlling female hypergamy, but submitting men to another men authority by force and most importantly to subjecting men to reprdocution and the corresponding maintenance of wymyn. Religion is only interesting if you are a tradcon that loves being a provider for wymyn.
/r/MGTOW24/09/18 06:30 PM
13

Textbook MGTOW would be not involving yourself in a shitshow like this. As others say, OP should expect a false accusation any time. I recognize it's fun to watch her embarrass herself but it's really not worth it, even less in the current context.
/r/MGTOW07/06/18 10:45 PM
3

how he dares to express his goals and interests from the beginning and doesn't chage his mind when I want to?!?!?!? HE MUST COMPROMISE!!
/r/MGTOW07/06/18 06:52 PM
5

Can confirm. I'm 34, I work in IT and it happened to me in every job I had. If you finish your work too fast, other people get you are efficient and ask you to a shitton of job, even things that aren't not your proper job. Even your boss will get bitchy with you if you are overloaded with work and not finishing as quickly as before. As soon as you start to do everything slower, they don't bother with you anymore.
/r/MGTOW09/04/18 08:02 PM
3

And her "partner"...Jesus Christ what has happened to men. Fuck, I missed that part! In July 2015 I met Ty Smith on the dating app Hinge. I was an executive assistant for John Battelle at NewCo (while performing as an actress on nights and weekends) and he was an Android Tech Lead at Twitter. I honestly had no idea what an engineer “did” at that point. I knew that they rolled into work around 11am, wore headphones, and they really liked Patagonia. I didn’t have a concept of what “coding” was, no…
/r/MGTOW12/03/18 09:00 PM
1

Oh, you don’t have to read all of her stuff! It’s just there, in the front page of her website, chloecondon.com. Chloe is taking a break from the stage, and is now a developer evangelist/software engineer! You can read more about it on her Medium profile.
/r/MGTOW12/03/18 12:27 PM
2

That’s in her Twitter bio, in her personal website and her articles she calls herself a “software engineer” or writes about of “we, developers”. That posturing is necessary to describe the immeasurable suffering she has to endure as a woman in technology.
/r/MGTOW12/03/18 11:57 AM
19

Thank you for your post, this is scary shit indeed. You could argue that some meaningless non-technical title like "some bullshit evangelist" can be given to an incompetent female "software engineer" and no real harm is done (besides dumping all the work she should be doing to the male developers), but when safety and human lives are at stake, there is a different level of BS going on.
/r/MGTOW12/03/18 02:26 AM
1

Please, read the comments for learning about some other empowered Wymyn suing men that saves them because “he saved me but I have neck pain” or “He did a tracheotomy that saved my life but left me a scar...”
/r/MGTOW26/01/18 12:27 AM
3

Immediately after saying that there isn't a societal pressure for marriage
/r/MGTOW12/12/17 04:56 PM
2

Reading some radfem material (specially from the 70s, when the book was written, altough the same things are said today but with different vocabulary) helps a lot to understand the tone of the book, that might seem exaggerated.
/r/MGTOW24/11/17 08:21 PM
5

White knights are a problem, tough. They are extremely dangerous. Indeed, today an user of this sub posted an awful experience with them.
/r/MGTOW01/10/17 01:56 AM
1

That's exactly the reason I share those posts in this sub, they have both pedagogical and therapeutic value
/r/MGTOW30/09/17 11:30 PM
3

Also, Christianity is the best religion if you love being a cuck
/r/MGTOW30/09/17 10:11 PM
2

Are you a woman or a TRPer?
/r/MGTOW30/09/17 06:34 PM
14

I'd also like to know what else she wrote in it since she was so quick to snatch it out of his hands. Something about Chads dick, that's for sure
/r/MGTOW30/09/17 04:23 PM
2

I think the difference is that Salvador Allende was really inept (this doesn't mean Pinochet was a good President, he was a dictator and a thief that had no respect for individual freedom), but in Argentina we had Peronismo: sort of maximum welfare state that was seen as a lesser evil than full blown socialism. He promoted the usual Keynesian agenda: big government, state owned public services, price fixation, inflation as a way to "redistribute" income, strong unions (but that always obey to a …
/r/MGTOW23/08/17 12:52 AM
3

I would recommend 'Argentina's Economic Reforms of the 1990s in Contemporary and Historical Perspective' from Domingo and Sonia Cavallo. Domingo Cavallo is a polemic figure here because he was the mastermind behind pro-market politics during 1990s. I don't think "corruption" is a good explanation for what happens in my country, or in other third world countries for that matter. In any case, corruption is the consequence (and not the cause) of bad economic policy. Cavallo's book is good in that s…
/r/MGTOW22/08/17 03:25 PM
12

Argentianian here, this is false. Women only cars do exist in Brazil and Mexico but not here. Few years ago there was a public debate about implementing them in my country but it ended in nothing.
/r/MGTOW21/08/17 11:27 PM
9

What would happen if a man writes an article that is say dating short, fat or ugly man is the "bare minimum" that a woman can do? NVM helping an ex, Womyn explained me as a man you should be thankful that your girlfriend doesn't push you into suicide.
/r/MGTOW08/08/17 11:57 AM
6

OK, I'm reading the full record of Carter messages and my blood is boiling. "Creative writer" Knox says, did. For months leading up to Roy’s suicide, Carter advised Roy against self-harm and to seek counseling. Every time she urged Roy toward professional help, she implicitly admitted, “I am not enough.” Carter contradicted Roy’s suicidal thoughts (“What is harming yourself gonna do!? Nothing! It will make it worse!”). But she copy pasted that quote from CNN. What Carter actually said was this: …
/r/MGTOW03/08/17 09:40 PM
1

Most comically, she is not even 'creative': she doesn't write fiction and her articles are a tiresome repetition of her experiences at an Italian jail (where nothing dramatic or exciting ever happens).
/r/MGTOW03/08/17 09:05 PM
9

OK, just for the record: I've seen the Netflix documentary and I read Knox's book, and I believe she is innocent. At the same time, I strongly believe she was benefited from being an attractive white womyn. When I saw the documentary, it suggested she was broke, living in a small home with cats, etc. so I sympathized with her. Then I read her book and her blog, and I was in shock. She is living pretty well and her only recognizable ability is a "creative writing" degree (wtf is that, don't get m…
/r/MGTOW03/08/17 08:56 PM
17

Image if the sexes were reversed and a man kept trying to contact a woman even if she blocks him from her phone, social media, etc. He would be a creep and a sexual harasser, right? But in this case, HOW HE DARES TO HURT HER PRECIOUS FEELZ?!?!?!? Surely she cheated because he didn't make her feel special or something
/r/MGTOW19/07/17 05:41 PM
11

I saw this has been crossposted in other subs and it seems some people agree the demands are "reasonable". I never understand why demanding something more than 'Hey, what's up?' is "reasonable", I don't even know you, why should I be original? What does even that mean in a shitty dating website?! But even if you want to say something original, as you say she is not saying anything about herself. This screams 'I'm bored and I have a vagina, so a man should entertain me!"
/r/MGTOW10/07/17 05:55 PM
18

Of course, a man is to blame as usual: Seriously. Sure, she shouldn't have agreed, but he was right there starting up the crazy train and asking her to come along with him!
/r/MGTOW21/06/17 06:11 PM
5

I agree, but I bet she pressured him into marrying because her ex didn't want to.
/r/MGTOW21/06/17 06:09 PM
17

It always amazes me how the most hatred against prostitutes comes of other women, Esther Vilar nailed it in 'The Manipulated Man'
/r/MGTOW06/06/17 06:16 PM
5

Interestingly, the hottest girl (1:20) gives an honest answer that is the true explanation.
/r/MGTOW28/05/17 10:11 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter