TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AntithesisOfYou Archive

View 0 posts and 70 comments by AntithesisOfYou on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

The term white knight has existed long before red pill and black pill, its used to describe men who side with women in any situation, regardless usually when the woman is in the wrong. I won't pretend misogynists don't also use it to describe any man who defends women when they're in the right too
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/26 06:53 PM
–

Do you defend men the same way? If yes then all good
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/26 06:51 PM
7

I dont think he was justifying anything. He was giving a logical explanation of why something happens. For example do you believe that people are just inherently criminals or do you accept there are environmental factors which can lead to crime?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/26 08:01 PM
9

Are you comparing a woman with a hand? Strange. Regardless, its his opinion and desires, there's nothing inherently wrong with what he wants, similar to how many women are fulfilled without having any relationship, ge is the opposite
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/26 05:35 PM
10

Any response is valid as long as it doesn't lead to abuse, whats with the entitlement to have a relationship when someone else doesnt?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/26 05:32 PM
1

Not fat enough to be average
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/26 04:40 PM
3

Reality being complex Aka i can't admit when feminists are hypocrites because then it means my team isn't always right
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/26 03:42 PM
4

And what part of feminism tries to dismantle that? We can see that the more women earn as a result of feminism they still want a partner eho earns equal or more than them, they still want a partner who is bigger and stronger, they still want someone who pays for them, they still want to be the more beautiful person in the relationship. Just from the fact that women want a partner who earns equal or more than them despite them earning a lot, it shows the true nature of what they want
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/26 03:40 PM
3

nobody ever said all men benefit from the patriarchy. Yes they absolutely do. I'm sure you've heard the term "toxic masculinity", that literally explains how patriarchy affects men Of course ive heard of it, the words toxic masculinity and patriarchy have 0 meaning to me because there is no unanimous definition or understanding of what they mean, usually it's based on whatever will help the person win the argument you are looking for black and white explanations Im not looking for any explanatio…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/26 03:26 PM
2

Ive had feminist women claim that women can have these standards/expectations in a romantic partner and it doesn't contradict their feminist values. At the end of the day you guys love to awitch rhetorics back and forth. On one hand all men benefit from the "patriarchy" and if you didn't make something of yourself you only have yourself to blame. On the other hand the "patriarchy" is bad for men and they should suoport the feminists in trying to "dismantle" this ever present boogeyman
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/26 11:31 AM
1

Give me some examples of toxic masculinity because apparently everyone has their own definitions
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/26 11:26 AM
5

K-pop fans are largely comprised of young girls/teenagers/young women. Women who are mature/not on birth control find stereotypical masculine men attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/26 11:15 AM
1

In what way would this help them get women if the character is undesirable?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 12:59 PM
2

To you, someone not wanting to be in a relationship with a retired sex worker is understandable but you take offense to others taking it a step further. That's up to the individual on what they want, stop trying to shame them for it
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 08:54 PM
3

What you said doesn't apply to me, but I'm engaging to argue against hypocritical women who act like they have no autonomy and take no accountability. It's funny to me how you think having this standard means there are only 2 options, being alone or having casual sex. Also, saying not to complain while you're complaining about mens standards here and women in general crying and labelling any standard men have as misogyny. The funniest part is that the vast majority of men have to put up with it …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 04:52 PM
2

Why dont you actually explain why the retired prostitute is any different. We are talking about people who have presumably changed themselves, so why do you think they are any different?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 04:46 PM
4

She's not trapped, you seem to think women live in a world where they wander about and things just happen to them and they have no autonomy. Also, looking at women in the west, the vast majority of women don't even get rejected for these behaviours so what exactly are you complaining about? Its a non existent issue
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 02:28 PM
2

Yeah they arent robots, they make their own decisions which can have consequences down the line. It's not for women to decide if a man should or shouldn't have these standards
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 02:26 PM
2

Why is it unhealthy? I'm not going to get into a relationship with a retired sex worker just because she turned over a new leaf. It's an extreme example but gets the message across.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 02:21 PM
1

No sexual past is the societal default as well? Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 02:15 PM
2

Yeah they're allowed to, and the guy is also allowed to not accept that and look else where? Why do you think they should be shamed into accepting something they don't want?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 02:14 PM
1

There's nothing contradictory about the points you made. I'll give me 2 cents even though its not relevant to me. None of these standards are "impossible" just by the fact that every single woman ever born starts off this way by default. Regardless of how your relationships play out, you made the choice and if some men judge you to be less than, thats their prerogitive. Women can have all the standards they want but when a man has some absolute basic ones he's labelled a misogynist.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 02:12 PM
1

I mean this is just going off tangent from the topic. By your logic, money is free and unlimited because it is just a number on a computer, that's not the point of the conversation, and what I said stands, for 1 person to gain something it means another person losing out on it, be that jobs, homes, land, food, water etc. even if I conceded that wind and sunlight is free and unlimited, its irrelevant to the actual point being made, where someone wants a positive sum world. For someone to be a win…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 03:24 AM
0

You need a home, which resides on land, which means someone else doesn't get that home and everything along with it. That's finite regardless of the sun.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 01:03 AM
0

No exactly, by having solar panels you are using land which someone else now can't use to put there own solar panels, same with a windmill
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 12:42 AM
-1

For someone to gain something it means someone else is losing out on it. There aren't infinite resources that can be given to everyone equally.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 11:24 PM
1

I'm curious, do you give so called "undesirable" women similar advice?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 02:08 PM
3

And this is what I had to say about it I would say it's more likely that these guys relationships are less reciprocating Idk why you brought up the whole "equal attractive" scenario when that wasn't the comment
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 02:02 PM
3

More effort for the same/worse outcome I guess
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 01:52 PM
2

What's the bar you consider for men? And what do you think the bar men consider for women is?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 01:48 PM
3

I mean you are specifically saying the man is ugly, you never said anything about the woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 01:39 PM
4

You're absolutely correct that ugly/less desirable men get into relationships. These redpill folk are delusional if they deny reality. HOWEVER, there are unknowns regarding the quality of the relationship which we can't see, and I would say it's more likely that these guys relationships are less reciprocating
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 03:35 PM
4

I have empathy, but I'm curious why you want his if he's not a perpetrator? What do you get out of it?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 03:34 PM
2

He's saying they're less useful for women because they are getting "fakes"
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 10:48 AM
0

You keep just repeating your original statement without actually engaging with anything he is saying. I applaud him for having the patience lol What's there to engage with? A bunch of worthless strawman arguments that I dismantled? You can want traditionalism in some aspects of your relationship and not others. Yes, no one is stopping you, still makes you a hypocrite who has double standards. Also, this is literally how misogynistic men operate but everyone is clear in understanding how bad that…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/26 02:59 AM
0

No, you just don't understand cascading effects. It's about wanting 2 things which are incompatible, a woman wants to be treated equally, yet also wants a man who treats her as though she is unequal. This is hypocrisy, you can't expect men to treat you equally and also want to be unequal at the same time without being a hypocrite. You are just too delusional and stuck in supporting women to see the hypocrisy. The fact that you had to reframe my example Do you also think that men who are very pro…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 10:32 PM
-1

Not expecting special treatment that they either don't reciprocate or can't provide themselves is pretty much it. Most guys here are quite ridiculous though in what they expect from women, especially if they aren't religious but expect certain characteristics that are found predominantly in religious women.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 07:03 PM
0

You are addressing them like they are separate and don't relate to each other? And then you use some nonsensical example that is irrelevant. If a woman wants equality but then wants to be treated with positive inequality that is hypocrisy. The privilege of positive inequality is due to also having the negatives. The fact that you can't understand that and think the 2 situations don't have a connection is quite silly. Do you also think that men who are very promiscuous are reasonable in wanting a…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 06:44 PM
-2

Lol, why are you ignoring my comparison that relates to the scenario OP is talking about instead of your own incomparable ones? That's called creating a strawman. And it's irrelevant to the conversation
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 06:15 PM
1

"Bang maid", this must be what a femcel is.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 05:23 PM
0

Hypothetical example: Woman supports equality etc Woman ends up on average earning equal to or more than an average man. Woman still expects man to earn more than her and treat her with benevolent sexism/chivalry i.e. "traditionally" In some aspects you want to be treated equally, in other aspects you want to be treated unequally. This is called having double standards and being a hypocrite.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 05:07 PM
7

There is no hypocrisy in arguing for gender equality while wanting something "traditional" in a partner. That is literally hypocrisy.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 04:36 PM
2

I'm 5'3, can you tell me what advice you'd have for me hypothetically?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/26 09:09 PM
5

Is it the same if a guy spoiled his ex-wife etc but didn't do the same for his current wife
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/26 08:18 PM
3

Is that any different to a woman doing all the chores at home because she loves her partner? Many women would be quick to call the man a failure, no?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/26 02:00 AM
4

Like what
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/26 01:52 AM
16

Like others here have said, it's easy to say when you are the one who is being approached in most situations.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/26 01:47 AM
2

These are the sort of comments you just head-scratch at. What you did is called a strawman fallacy. Look it up and read my comment again to understand I didn't say what you did.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/26 02:54 PM
3

There was a study where women rated the attractiveness of the same man in a Bentley Vs ford fiesta. The same man was rated as more attractive by women in the bentley. Idk why you are trying to deny these obvious facts. In regards to the "body building" that you think women dislike, 99.999% of men will never get their bodies to that point where monstrous muscle mass becomes unattractive, when steroids are required and years of lifting which most men don't take, if a man dedicated himself to the g…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 11:44 PM
3

You don't know what body building is seeing as how you think it's undesirable, also sports care indicates wealth so that's always a plus. End result: you have no clue what you're talking about
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 10:26 PM
6

You're not a man, you have no idea about the sex drive they have. So stop trying to rationalise "need" as being something dehumanising towards women.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 10:24 PM
–

Yes, because saying someone can't have sex is seen as being insulting towards men lmao. Same as how women get insulted when they're called sluts and whores even if they're not. It's the same concept
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 10:21 PM
1

If that’s the case, why does slutshaming exist? Men here and also in other contexts call women sluts and ran through whores all the time. If a woman complains about someone having bad techniques or whatever, literally the first thing people say is to communicate, not find another guy. That still implies fault in the guy, doesn't matter if it's warranted or not, he is the one who needs to change to her preferences, I never see the reverse where women are told to listen to what her man wants her t…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 10:35 PM
0

It might be the fault of the woman too if she doesn’t communicate what she wants. That's besides the point, he will be seen at fault regardless. Why would he bring it out in front of her? He can use it alone. Thanks for proving my point, you don't see it as acceptable to use during sex, please also say this to women who use dildos, vibrators etc while having sex In recent years, I see women publicly and privately talking about sex toys more than men. It wasn’t always like this. That’s what I mea…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 08:35 PM
0

Why would sex be seen as PIV if it revolved around women? Because that is what the definition of sex is? What are you even asking here. Point being if a woman is not satisfied with sex, that's the fault of the man, and if the man is not satisfied, it's his own problem to deal with, therefore it revolves around women. And it is okay for men to use sex toys. Saying this doesn't make it true btw, most women would be disgusted and turned off if a guy brought a flashlight out. But women have put more…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 08:10 PM
1

Yes and you can now understand that there are some women who have sexual relationships regardless of how they feel about sex, because they are interested in something else
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 07:56 PM
0

No it's the opposite, it revolves around what women want, sexual performance is all on the onus of a guy, if he doesn't make the woman orgasm he's seen as a failure, if he doesn't please her, he's seen as a failure, regardless of what she does herself, it's all on him. See how it's okay for women to use dildos etc for pleasure, but it's not okay for guys to use the equivalent?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 07:47 PM
1

Don't get what you mean by this comment
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 07:42 PM
1

This leads to the initial point made, that women can have sexual relationships with men for ulterior reasons. Also, you say this yet you make statements like this: I don't get it honestly, mfers can't go a few days without nutting? You understand that men have much higher libido so what are you surprised by?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 07:36 PM
1

Not necessarily, if the guy was conventionally attractive and everything that entails she would be way more into it and have sex way more often. Otherwise there would be no such thing as attractive men having their pick of women etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 06:16 PM
-1

Women find most men unattractive and "below average", why would that be if they had similar desires to men?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 06:14 PM
0

The comment was saying women do enter relationships with guys they don't find sexually attractive, it didn't say all women do this. Also the fact that it's said women don't usually orgasm from PIV, what else does that indicate?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 06:11 PM
0

I don't get it honestly, mfers can't go a few days without nutting? Obviously they can if they are? The point is there's a huge difference between desires
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 06:08 PM
2

Most guys would want to have sex everyday, most women don't. From Google ai, how often do married couples have sex: Overall Average: Around 53-54 times a year, or just over once a week, according to studies. Weekly or More: A significant majority (around 60%) of married men and women report weekly or more sexual activity, though this has declined slightly over time. Less Frequent: About 30-35% have sex 1-3 times a month, while a small percentage (1-2%) report no sexual activity.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 05:29 PM
1

What do you mean
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 05:26 PM
6

Your guys logic makes no sense lol. You would rather have a romantic relationship with someone you barely know, as opposed to someone you've known for years and you get along with as a friend. The only difference is you don't feel sexual attraction towards them, wish opposes the notion many women try to say about how the bar is in hell etc. because if it was true then why would their friends not be suitable? Also you added this part "secret romantic intentions". That's a big assumption you have …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 05:23 PM
1

I've read the opposite, and everything in between. First it was men who put women on a pedestal which they can't live up to, due to making them feel too much pressure. Now it's men having normal expectations of women is them settling for them because they couldn't find anyone else. What exactly do you want then?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 01:35 PM
2

The average man cares, it's only in Europe and America that they don't, and it's not really out of choice since they don't have the option to care lest they reduce their chances even more
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 03:10 AM
1

But how are these attributes going to be shown or displayed before the relationship even begins? You seem to be speaking from the point of maintaining a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 08:51 PM
1

There are some things which are broadly seen as positive traits, the caveat being they won't make or break whether someone will consider you. I can give an anecdote where something you'd consider a positive comment was said about me but I knew it was just that and nothing more would ever come of it lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 08:46 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter