TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Any-Basis-3725 Archive

View 5 posts and 67 comments by Any-Basis-3725 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Provide some examples of how non-modern feminism benefitted both sexes.
/r/MensRights08/04/26 03:59 AM
2

Logically? Yes. Legally? No. Thanks to good ol' feminism.
/r/MensRights24/03/26 07:27 AM
4

My spidy sense is tingling at the "marriage is about sharing" statement. Do with this information as you will.
/r/MensRights20/02/26 06:10 AM
2

You lost me the moment you mentioned patriarchy. That thing is blatant feminist revisionism.
/r/MensRights12/02/26 05:25 AM
8

I still don't understand how so many people in the world still believe feminism stands for gender equality. How the hell is this femnetica or whatever not gender discrimination?! It's literally sexism-based discrimination in the purest sense.
/r/MensRights11/02/26 05:33 AM
3

A man should not ever have a woman as a therapist. You will only get gaslighted. Therapy is a woman-dominated field. It's made for women, by women, of women, at the expense of men.
/r/MensRights07/02/26 08:08 AM
4

Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. Let them taste their consequences.
/r/MensRights04/02/26 07:14 PM
2

Yeah, of course, I agree with you OP. Most women are definitely good people. It's just there is a twist. Most women are good towards only other women. Men are vile monsters, you know. Men can do so many horrible things. Every man is a potential rapist or something. So many horrible things. Yes, definitely. Most women are definitely good, so good that they spare no opportunity to demonise and exploit the other sex. I'd rather befriend a commie than a feminist, and that speaks volumes because I ab…
/r/MensRights02/02/26 08:40 PM
1

Even a male bartender will be a better therapist for you rather than a misandrist woman
/r/MensRights30/01/26 04:19 AM
3

I just ignore their opinion the moment they use any of those buzzwords to dismiss my opinions. Red pill, incel, misogynist, etc. Their brain is too smooth for any complex thought. Besides, it's not my responsibility to fix strangers. I could show them articles and stats all I want, they would still call me buzzwords and make delu delu statements.
/r/MensRights26/01/26 05:57 PM
5

The world is going bonkers.
/r/MensRights26/01/26 05:45 PM
2

You are too scared to even come to this sub with your real acc. This is a troll post and you are insincere as far as I have seen your responses in the comments.
/r/MensRights09/01/26 11:18 AM
12

Can native german men petition to change this misandrist action? How many men can the government arrest and jail when men resist the conscription?
/r/MensRights13/11/25 05:31 AM
11

That's not a woman. That's a thieving goblin. Both the white man and that goblin need jail time. Where are the feminists who stalk this sub? The wrongness of Duluth model is in clear play in this video.
/r/MensRights10/11/25 08:00 PM
2

That's a brilliant business plan
/r/MensRights07/11/25 05:48 PM
21

Automod nuked this post at least four times now. Finally solved the redd(.)it link issue. Sorry to any viewers who already upvoted or read the previous posts.
/r/MensRights07/11/25 06:40 AM
1

There's a high chance that tweets with #BanKillAllMen will get banned. Feminists have twitter in its venomous grasps since long ago.
/r/MensRights08/10/25 04:56 PM
4

Waiting for the infiltrators to come and down play the OP.
/r/MensRights31/08/25 09:49 AM
4

Femcels = feminists as far as I can see and hear on a daily basis in internet.
/r/MensRights25/08/25 10:33 AM
9

This sub has really been infiltrated by gaslighters, male feminists, and bad women.
/r/MensRights20/08/25 06:26 PM
13

Lots of deniers and dismissers in the comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 07:04 PM
7

Men have to go through four general requirement criteria to be qualified for the dating world. Be physically attractive to the person they are attracted to. Don’t be physically unattractive to the person they are attracted to. If they're physically attractive enough to the person they are attracted to, then their personality might start to matter. If none of that works, being rich can compensate. That’s the harsh version. But if a man is in his early 20s, they should focus on building confidence…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 07:37 AM
3

A life of a wimpy simp.
/r/MensRights28/06/25 06:40 PM
1

Tell me OP, why would men follow an ideology that continuously demonises them and blatantly discriminates against them and faces zero consequences for it? An ideology isn't worth following if if can't even be criticised without committing social suicide.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/25 06:37 PM
3

And feminists believe that men-only workplaces are more toxic. Hah!
/r/MensRights26/06/25 06:46 PM
31

AskFeminist is a mild version of twoxchromosomes
/r/MensRights26/06/25 03:13 PM
21

Funny how this logic never goes both ways. Men’s spaces online have constantly been infiltrated, monitored, and “corrected” often under the claim of being toxic or misogynistic. Gaming forums, men's support subs, even niche hobby circles, all have faced pressure to accommodate and sanitize content the moment women join. If they don’t? They’re labeled hostile to women. Meanwhile, when men get a glimpse into female spaces and don’t like what they hear, suddenly it's their fault for listening, or t…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 08:45 AM
3

What is true feminism? There's a shit ton of models for feminism. The famous ones are all misandry movements. Do not give feminists the leverage of saying "fake" or "real." You are harming men in that way. Feminists use this "reset button" to reject accountability for their so-called bad fruits which always eventually show the true ugly face of their movement.
/r/MensRights24/06/25 06:26 PM
11

She doesn't feel any remorse for her heinous act. She feels remorse for getting caught.
/r/MensRights24/06/25 06:21 PM
1

The only way for a man to save himself from these nefarious tactics is to become stoic. Have some hobbies that significantly give you a much bigger dopamine hit than whatever things those types of women will try.
/r/MensRights24/06/25 06:12 PM
14

There's a simple solution for this shame campaign problem. Do not let social pressure, especially from moral policers, define your self-worth and stop you from fulfilling your personal needs. Masterbation is a perfectly healthy thing to do, but that doesn't mean a person should do it too often in too little time intervals. Well, it all depends on how much libido a person has. Not everyone's needs are equal. Honestly, I'd only be concerned if someone felt ashamed of ever doing it, or avoided it e…
/r/MensRights23/06/25 09:44 AM
12

I don't know about others. But my foreskin loosened and opened up naturally during my puberty. Before that (I don't remember much), it was pretty snugly attached to the glands.
/r/MensRights17/06/25 12:06 PM
52

Well, men can't be considered to be raped thanks to the shitty laws in a lot of countries. The worst charge a woman can get after raping a man is sexual misconduct.
/r/MensRights11/06/25 05:08 PM
3

I still don't understand how feminists can claim that patriarchy existed. It was classism which mainly existed with patriarchy as it's seasoning. Women were the overprotected section of the society, not the oppressed. Though, i could understand that the line between overprotection and oppression is very blurry.
/r/MensRights11/06/25 04:54 PM
22

Actions would be more well appreciated than mere words, i think.
/r/MensRights10/06/25 03:15 AM
7

They use it to justify their bigotry. Logic? Common sense? Proper research? Facts? What are those? Feminism doesn't need those to justify it's hate movement.
/r/MensRights09/06/25 03:12 AM
1

You got me in the first half
/r/MensRights09/06/25 02:41 AM
8

I bet that their fathers disowned them. Tiktok is quite literally a war crime. It makes people stupid.
/r/MensRights08/06/25 05:28 AM
3

Maybe womanchild? But it doesn't quite roll out on the tongue.
/r/MensRights07/06/25 01:21 PM
4

Your post breaks rule 1 as far as I understand. And it was also low effort.
/r/MensRights07/06/25 01:12 PM
67

I liked a few of her songs before. I just unsubscribed because of this song. It will not make any difference to her yt channel, I know.
/r/MensRights07/06/25 08:08 AM
364

Reporting the video won't do shit. YouTube is as misandrist as Google.
/r/MensRights07/06/25 07:42 AM
5

Male feminists berate other men to stay in the good books of women. You know, they have a quest to complete, after all. That is, getting laid. Male feminists are probably the creepiest and most pathetic men I have ever seen, known, and heard.
/r/MensRights07/06/25 07:39 AM
2

Become a librarian. It's the safest job for a man in my opinion.
/r/MensRights04/06/25 04:49 PM
0

India. It's a mixed bag. Kind of. I can't really quantify it.
/r/MensRights04/06/25 04:43 PM
10

Guess who the daughter got her violent tendencies from?
/r/MensRights04/06/25 04:34 PM
5

Reverse the genders of arsonist and see how different punishments they get in court.
/r/MensRights29/05/25 08:39 PM
3

Even this sub is infiltrated by the "hijackers." Though, I will disagree with you. Keeping silent won't make the situation better or stagnant for average men unlike what you might be thinking. It will get worse because those radfems won't face any resistance from sane men (MRAs and MGTOWs) and will become more gleeful and eager to drive their dogma into every corner of human society. And there's also the simps and male feminists who have their own agenda.
/r/MensRights28/05/25 06:54 AM
1

I feel for you brother. Why do you argue with those types of girls? Let them live in their victim mindset. In fact, stay away from those types and save your braincells.
/r/MensRights25/05/25 09:43 AM
1

I understand that you're trying to highlight a serious issue, and no one here is denying that abuse or assault happens. But I think we need to be more careful about how we frame responsibility. Saying "it's not all men" but then implying that 99% of men are either abusers or silent enablers essentially contradicts the opening statement. If we applied that same framing to any other demographic, it would be rightly called out as bigotry or bias. Also, the idea that “men hear about it and do nothin…
/r/MensRights24/05/25 09:17 AM
3

Many women do not care about men's issues until and unless it starts negatively affecting the men in their families. Period.
/r/MensRights24/05/25 07:09 AM
94

Asylums need to be brought back and these commenters on that instagram post should be the first ones to get admitted there indefinitely.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 11:14 AM
2

Exactly! I forgot that men’s rights are now such a mainstream, widely celebrated movement with full institutional backing. Every corporation runs “Men’s Mental Health Month” ads, schools teach young boys how to set boundaries, and misandry gets banned on every social media platform instantly. Totally popular stuff. Clearly I must’ve misunderstood the purpose of the sub “TrueUnpopularOpinion” is only for unpopular opinions that don't challenge feminist orthodoxy. Silly me. /s
/r/MensRights21/05/25 11:54 AM
4

You’re missing the point entirely. Saying “not all men” isn’t about denying that violence happens. It’s about rejecting collective guilt. When women say, “I fear men because of what men do,” the implication isn’t abstract, it’s personal and it lands on every man reading it. When we respond with “not all men,” it’s not to dismiss their pain. It’s to defend ourselves from being lumped into that pain as perpetrators. You don’t get to say: “Men are the problem,” Then tell men not to defend themselve…
/r/MensRights21/05/25 07:06 AM
7

No one claimed that inventors, billionaires, or philosophers can’t also be rapists. That’s a complete misrepresentation of the point being made by the OC. The issue raised was this: If people are comfortable saying “90% of rapists are men,” then why aren't they equally comfortable acknowledging that 90% of major innovations, infrastructure, and life-saving technologies also came from men? If you’re going to generalize men when it’s negative, but refuse to do the same when it’s positive, that’s n…
/r/MensRights20/05/25 04:31 PM
14

According to your logic, since we don't know which man is dangerous, all men should be treated as a risk. But let me flip that: If a man doesn’t know which woman is a gold digger, a false accuser, or a manipulator, is he justified in treating all women as potential threats? If we apply your logic fairly, then everyone should treat everyone as a danger—just in case. But that’s not how a functional society works. That’s how paranoia and division thrive. You expect men to accept being generalized "…
/r/MensRights20/05/25 03:27 PM
2

The Japanese government is getting inspired by the Roman Empire's final policies before it's fall. It's bachelor tax 2.0.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 10:28 AM
2

It's the logic of radical feminists and regular feminists. If something happens less, it's not bad, it should wait in line. None of the so-called feminists (the advocates of so-called equality) ever stop to think why let even 1% happen in the first place. Even then 2-8% are just the reported false cases on men which were caught, what about the false cases on innocent men which are still not caught to this day? Those innocent men are rotting in jail alongside the actual rapists and harrassers. Su…
/r/MensRights20/05/25 09:18 AM
7

Thanks for bringing up the stats, it's good to ground arguments in data. But let’s unpack what you’re actually doing with them. You’re saying: “Because women are statistically more likely to be harmed by men than vice versa, it's justifiable to treat all men as potential threats.” That’s a deeply flawed moral argument. If we followed that logic in any other context, we’d call it prejudice: More crimes are statistically committed by young males than older males. Should we treat all young men like…
/r/MensRights20/05/25 06:00 AM
10

Most of these "real ones" exist in real life, not chronically online. The feminists we see the most in online social media apps are the radicals and the regulars. When I said, "but there is no evidence they actually exist" I was referring to the online presence of the real feminists.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 05:21 AM
17

Feminists themselves don't know what version of feminists they are. Let them scream into the void. They crave men's attention. Most of the posts and content are rage baits designed to make men act up. The types of feminists I understand are: Radicals, they openly say they hate men and act accordingly. The ones who don't want equality with men but superiority over men. The ones who vehemently deny the existence of misandry. Regulars, they say they don't hate men but act like they do. They say the…
/r/MensRights20/05/25 04:24 AM
7

Thanks for explaining your point further. I hear what you're trying to say—but you’ve basically confirmed the exact double standard I pointed out. You're saying: “Of course women know not all men are bad. We just say ‘men are terrible’ to vent about our experiences. Men shouldn’t take it personally or reply with ‘not all men’ because that derails the conversation.” Here’s the flaw with that argument: If it’s unfair for men to generalize women based on their bad experiences (“Women are manipulati…
/r/MensRights20/05/25 04:12 AM
11

I appreciate the time you took to write your response, but I think your argument has some serious logical and moral inconsistencies that need to be addressed. “Men created the system, so men are to blame.” This idea assumes that all men are collectively responsible for the design and consequences of society. That’s just historically inaccurate. The vast majority of men—probably 90% or more—never benefited from “patriarchy” in any meaningful way. Most men throughout history were farmers, laborers…
/r/MensRights20/05/25 03:47 AM
18

A person just invalidated my post in that sub because I'm in r/MensRights lol. This sub is misogynistic according to that person.
/r/MensRights19/05/25 02:44 PM
20

Anti misandrist subs get nuked but misandrist subs don't get even a single warning.
/r/MensRights19/05/25 02:15 PM
29

Logic doesn't work logic against radical feminists and regular feminists. The real feminists who are true to the roots of feminism are extinct. You can go to my profile for this same post that i posted in r/TrueUnpopularOpinion much before. You will see how few logical people are left in that sub. I wonder why misandric posts aren't scrutinised but anti misandrist posts aren't valid until someone provides dozens of research papers, journals, citations, govt stats, podcasts, and interview videos.
/r/MensRights19/05/25 02:12 PM
12

That’s a solid insight. Looking back at the replies I’ve dealt with in feminist threads, this lines up perfectly. There's lots of emotional appeals, shifting goalposts, and accusations instead of engagement. Makes sense now why trying to be logical just led to meltdowns. Appreciate this framing, it helps put the whole mess in perspective.
/r/MensRights19/05/25 01:46 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter