TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Apellosine Archive

View 1 posts and 655 comments by Apellosine on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

Can white men not be queer people? Also should we set the precedent by making white men sit at the back of the bus?
/r/MensRights25/07/26 08:49 PM
7

I too have black friends so I can't be racist.
/r/MensRights23/05/26 10:28 PM
1

Did you ever watch the show? Angelus tortured and snapped the neck of Ms Calendar. Angelus tortured Druscila before turning her he also tortured his family amd murdered his sister, there is a scene where Spike tries to rape buffy, arguably the episode where Giles is dosing Buffy to make her weak as a test from the watcher's council. This isnt an exhaustive list either.
/r/MensRights20/04/26 02:27 AM
1

I'll bet the 2nd therapist thinks hes getting away with something now.
/r/MensRights05/02/26 02:09 AM
1

No. Leviticus 25 44-46 specifically states that your slaves can be purchased by only foreigners can be purchased in this manner. It also says you may keep them as slaves for life. What you are thonking of is how workers that were israelites were kept.
/r/MensRights19/12/25 05:01 AM
5

And the bible condones the keeping of slaves and punishment ny deathbfor a number of "offenses" like being gay. We probably dont want Christians around huh?
/r/MensRights18/12/25 09:49 PM
8

And i assume that it shows up as a man arrested for domestic violence with no retraction when they arednsubsequently freed if theyre freed at all.
/r/MensRights16/12/25 02:26 AM
21

More accidents but less costly than male drivers. You think insurance companies havent done the math on that?
/r/MensRights12/12/25 06:24 AM
1

What happenwd to my body my choice?
/r/EverydayMisandry02/12/25 12:11 AM
7

Like keeping all them black folks out of the white neighbourhoods and white schools? That worked really well? Segregating people creates division and a sense of otherness to the other group.
/r/MensRights29/11/25 01:01 PM
8

Your solution to something is segregation...really? This is such a narrowminded, stupid and ignorant of the real world view.
/r/MensRights29/11/25 08:29 AM
18

Actually I rape as much as I want to, which is precisely not at all.
/r/MensRights22/11/25 02:26 PM
1

Theu could have saved a lot of space by jusy saying "No White Men"
/r/MensRights21/11/25 02:55 AM
8

It is, she isn't entitled to it though especially if her partner doesn't want to.
/r/MensRights12/11/25 02:23 AM
21

That is not the point here. She is saying that she is entitled to do something that her partner is not comfortable with. No matter how much you ask, no means no whether you're a woman, a man, no matter what they're asking to do.
/r/MensRights12/11/25 02:22 AM
0

Not every man who commits DV is some jailbird bad boy. They're the quiet church going guy, the lawyer who is friendly with everyone. Women don't seek out men that will hurt them and blaming them for doing so is abhorrent.
/r/MensRights22/10/25 03:15 AM
2

The part where we should look on single mothers as if it's their fault? Most situations that lead to a single mother are tragic, death, victim of DV, cheating etc. It's not a choice most of the time to just up and leave their partners. There should be support for single parents of both genders.
/r/MensRights22/10/25 12:02 AM
11

The reality of the situation is that she murdered a child. There is no justification, no giving her the benefit of the doubt or seeing it from her perspective. I take the stand that murdering a child is an evil act.
/r/MensRights12/10/25 12:49 AM
-19

The bride didn't hire the stripper though. He was hired by friends of hers, did you read the article?
/r/MensRights01/10/25 02:43 AM
0

I know that but this situation is a big nothing.
/r/MensRights22/08/25 12:21 PM
1

Did people read the article? She was a middle school teacher and in no way an authority over the students and the students were 17 years old which by Israeli law is old enough to consent to sexual relations. No crime was committed here as gross as it may seem to outsiders.
/r/MensRights22/08/25 12:28 AM
1

Hmm, I guess it's just September in Australia.
/r/MensRights16/06/25 11:48 PM
1

Father's day is in September is it not?
/r/MensRights16/06/25 02:14 AM
-4

Joe Rogan is not a Democrat in any sense at all. He supported Trump's run for the white house...
/r/MensRights29/03/25 04:24 PM
10

So what even if they are rare, they do happen so do something about it when it does happen.
/r/MensRights20/03/25 02:15 AM
-6

If you can't see the sarcasm and satire in this bill as well then there is no hope.
/r/MensRights12/02/25 12:21 AM
1

Does no one see the satire here? She is satirising the stupid abortion laws in highly conservative states by turning it on men. Don't fall into the trap of being outraged over satire.
/r/MensRights12/02/25 12:20 AM
-2

Outside of America they just have the Scouts, no boy scouts or girl scouts, and it's always been that way. I've always found it odd that America didn't do it this way.
/r/MensRights08/01/25 12:14 AM
13

It's only happened in cases where sperm banks were not involved as the law basically says that if a sperm bank is not involved than no one can waive their parental rights and the insemination is no different to normal procreation and childbirth.
/r/MensRights01/01/25 12:04 PM
3

The focus can be on both at the same time. Delaying a drivers license until you are 26 means you will be ineligible for the vast majority of employment opportunities, further disenfranchising young men to want to rebel and engage in dangerous activities. A proposal to do so should be seen as farcical on its face for discriminatory purposes, for economic purposes and actual, workable solutions sought to combat the problems at hand.
/r/MensRights14/11/24 07:20 AM
-3

He did worse than nothing, he actively harmed the standing of the USA on the world stage the last time he was president and there is no indication that this time will be any different and likely worse.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 11:21 AM
16

Drafted and forced to fight in war, returning dead, dismembered, with PTSD for something they didn't volunteer for. Then called baby killers and murderers by protesters when they returned.
/r/MensRights27/10/24 12:37 AM
3

I'll make a note of that as my father has dealt with 15 years of legal proceedings isolation from previous friends over accusations from my mother. All while she was believed, protected and showed no sympathy. There is a reason why my brother and I have been no contact including with her grandchildren. This ruined my father's career, social life and lead to depression. Now tell me how this isn't abuse, manipulation and privilege.
/r/MensRights04/10/24 06:37 AM
3

Fuck him. You know what women don't go through? The psychological torture of threatening to go to the police and knowing that she will be believed and make the man's life a living hell. Knowing that mentioning "abuse" to the wrong or right person will get significant physical harm to the man. Just a couple of power dynamics thaten go through.
/r/MensRights04/10/24 06:31 AM
19

Unless someone guesses her age wrong of course?
/r/MensRights01/05/24 08:27 AM
-6

Even explaining something equally to both a man and woman is often considered mansplaining to the woman, despite the fact the explanation given men and women was identical. That's not what happened here though. He treated his male and female colleagues differently and was condescending to his female colleagues. Not reading past the headline and getting outraged does no one any favours.
/r/MensRights24/04/24 08:21 PM
11

I think the point is that the prosecution had access to it and still went to trial.
/r/MensRights19/01/24 01:20 AM
11

"Staff at the Travelodge did the right thing by reporting what they believed to be suspicious activity to officers, although thankfully there was nothing untoward and it turned out to be a misunderstanding." Suspicious activity = Adult man having daughter. Interesting world.
/r/MensRights16/08/23 11:36 AM
10

Stick not a deadly weapon, used to kill person...methinks it van be a deadly weapon.
/r/MensRights03/08/23 08:47 AM
2

The right literally called to cancel a beer company this year for the spokeperson they used, their is definitely cancel culture on both sides.
/r/MensRights30/07/23 06:58 AM
1

Because extremists on either side don't define either side of politics. It would be like saying, I can't believe everyone isn't at least left of center when there are literal neo-nazis who hate you if you aren't a straight, white christian.
/r/MensRights30/07/23 06:57 AM
8

Queensland has literal brothels already active, I'm not sure how this can be the case at all?
/r/MensRights24/04/23 08:29 PM
45

The teacher preyed on someone who was grieving and with her having power over her as a teacher/student relationship. This is disgusting behavior from the judge.
/r/MensRights29/03/23 07:28 AM
33

The ones who aren't allowed to leave the country? them ones?
/r/MensRights09/03/23 08:27 AM
2

Virendra Rao, DSP City, said the police are investigating the matter and are on the lookout to nab the woman. He also said that strict action would be taken against the woman. What part of this says that the police refuse to file a case? Don't just make stuff up in your post title.
/r/MensRights02/11/22 11:12 AM
4

Given she wasn't in captivity at the time and travelled to his house with a handgun.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 01:45 AM
4

She wasn't in captivity at the time. She took a handgun to the man's house. From the article: "She traveled from Milwaukee to Volar's home in Kenosha, shot him in the head, burned down his house and stole his BMW, according to court documents. Kizer was 17 at the time, old enough to be considered an adult in Wisconsin's criminal justice system. She faces multiple charges, including arson and first-degree intentional homicide, which carries a mandatory life sentence."
/r/MensRights09/07/22 01:44 AM
2

Seeing as many states have already started to draft such laws...many
/r/MensRights24/06/22 09:16 PM
1

With the company I work for it's just a general exclusion that applies to all policies, health, motor, home.
/r/MensRights10/06/22 08:15 PM
2

Do these companies not have specific exclusions regarding injury caused by comminicable disease? Working in insurance and especially since Covid, this is a very common clause in your insu4ance documents.
/r/MensRights09/06/22 07:58 PM
4

Ukrainian men living overseas are going home to volunteer as well.
/r/MensRights06/03/22 04:12 AM
2

The point I was arguing against is that people were brushing mental illness off as "just depression not anything like schizophrenia or something". I issue with that is that Depression can be as severely debilitating as the more accepted severe illnesses and lead to psychotic breaks, paranoia and psychosis. Just saying something is "just depression" is asinine and downplays the experiences of people with mental illness.
/r/MensRights15/12/21 12:20 AM
1

There are varying degrees of depression, Major Depressive disorders that include psychosis as symptoms are not the same as other depressive disorders. I do not disagree that she needs to be locked up for a long time for treatment. Just because you get a verdict of not guilty by reason of diminished capacity does not mean that you are set free. In most cases you spend more time separated from society in a psychiatric facility, the only difference being that you get psychiatric care while locked u…
/r/MensRights14/12/21 02:36 PM
0

Unless that depression causes psychosis in the same way that other severe mental illnesses do. Suicidal, homocidal or paranoid ideations are common features of a range of mental illnesses.
/r/MensRights13/12/21 10:50 PM
-62

There are also many high functioning psychopaths, very few psychopaths become murderous and live in society just fine. This is a shitty comment to make.
/r/MensRights13/12/21 08:42 AM
-53

Major Depressive Disorder is not "just depression". It is a major psychological disorder that can also lead to psychosis and irrational thought. Please do not downplay psychological disorders in the same way that people did when women were just "hysterical".
/r/MensRights13/12/21 08:41 AM
22

Screaming at someone does not warrant a 6 month prison sentence in the slightest. It doesn't warrant any prison time at all based on what happened.
/r/MensRights10/12/21 12:14 AM
7

They want to get to parity yet in the article: About 60 per cent of the candidates nominated so far are women, Johns said, with about 70 per cent of those women having benefited from the rule change. 60% is not parity is forcing women into these candidacies regardless.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 04:07 AM
35

Since when does an ex-girlfriend who is there to collect her things go in for a shower?
/r/MensRights11/11/21 06:50 AM
0

People just aren't reading the article at all are they? She said that she knows she screwed up and is just talking about store credit cards in general.
/r/MensRights14/10/21 03:36 PM
0

Did you read the article or just skim it? Gard responded to some of the comments, explaining she was traveling over the summer and missed the bill. She stressed that she takes full responsibility for what happened and knows it is her 'fault.' 'Yes, I am the problem,' she wrote. 'That is why this is a PSA. So if other people like me have a horrendous memory, they realize how damaging this can be.'
/r/MensRights14/10/21 03:35 PM
11

Can't both genders be discriminated against in different ways, by different people?
/r/MensRights11/08/21 02:00 PM
13

The U.S. court system imprisoned Bill Cosby based on his own testimony during the civil trials. The fact that the prosecutors had made a promise to not prosecute if he did so and then used that same testimony to prosecute a criminal trial is why he has been released.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 02:52 PM
16

Statutory rape is regardless of offender and victim.
/r/MensRights29/06/21 03:22 AM
5

It's all right there in the article: ...and the term 'father' with 'parent', 'co-parent' or 'second biological parent', depending on the circumstances.
/r/MensRights20/05/21 12:14 PM
3

How does this apply to non-birth mothers? After a divorce or death or what have you, they aren't the gestational parents then.
/r/MensRights20/05/21 11:49 AM
-1

Oh yeah, there are always was around it but the general principle is to shine a light on those already breaking curfew. In no way do I endorse this based purely on fundamental rights however.
/r/MensRights01/05/21 07:46 AM
1

Any man out at night would be subject to arrest making it harder for any would be murderers to get around.
/r/MensRights01/05/21 06:02 AM
19

While the video is very cringeworthy, I agree with that much and seems almost childlike. This quote from the article is disgusting. "You know, a milkshake analogy and smearing it over the face is just - it is weird, but the weirdest thing is they've made the female the abuser and we know statistically, that is highly unlikely. It makes it harder for young men in situations like this when they don't see similar material pointing out that they can also be a victim.
/r/MensRights20/04/21 04:31 AM
10

I agree, I also don't think it should be considered rape if for example someone lies about being married.
/r/MensRights14/04/21 01:13 AM
-2

Sending a letter is not communication? That is a weird definition that you have there.
/r/MensRights11/04/21 04:01 AM
3

He did something that he was expressly prohibited from doing though. The woman had a court order prohibiting him from contacting her or her dependents including their daughter. What is the issue here, is sending a card, birthday card or not to someone that you have a court order from communicating with not contravening this order?
/r/MensRights11/04/21 03:54 AM
341

Now if we could just get all of the Muslim students to stand and apologise for the terrorists who perpetrated the attack on the twin towers. /s obviously
/r/MensRights25/03/21 09:25 AM
3

Joey court
/r/MensRights18/02/21 10:12 AM
5

Shift manager, not really a manager just a title for a shift leader.
/r/MensRights14/01/21 12:01 PM
9

I'm sorry but this millenial woman doesn't fit in with this group of middle aged men in this office, we can't have women here, especially that young....Hmmm, that sounds great to them right?
/r/MensRights14/01/21 04:44 AM
8

When I was at university in my early 20s I worked at a subway to help pay my way and one of the shift managers was a 16 year old girl who was brilliant at what she did. She was confident, got people organised and had the store running well for the shift.
/r/MensRights14/01/21 04:42 AM
1

I agree with you, I remember the one guy who harassed Kristen Wiig's character and got his comeuppance. The creepy character was creepy, the greedy character was greedy, that's how characters work in media.
/r/MensRights29/12/20 04:58 AM
2

Not to mention I can't imagine GTA 5 physical copies still being a huge seller after being out for years.
/r/MensRights07/12/20 10:22 PM
12

Then the video name is overblown hyperbole which does nothing to help anything and just makes people look stupid.
/r/MensRights07/12/20 01:44 AM
18

Australia did no such thing. K-Mart and Target removed the game from shelves following a petition. It's still not a great situation but has nothing to do with Australia as a whole banning it.
/r/MensRights07/12/20 01:42 AM
1

Yeah, this is not something that should be discussed how it is here. The father disappeared with the child after custody was taken away from him.
/r/MensRights31/10/20 02:53 AM
1

I guess the innocence project is a waste of time, the number of people who are tried for murder and found guilty but later exonerated is small so we should just lock them up as a lesson to other people that that is what happens to murderers.
/r/MensRights17/10/20 08:10 AM
158

young teenage me would have loved this power.
/r/MensRights28/08/20 04:28 PM
3

The monarchy as very little power, I'm not sure if this is something to care about.
/r/MensRights09/08/20 01:18 PM
-1

That math doesn't check out...or at least works out poorly. For every heterosexual date there is 1 man and 1 woman. So both men and women are getting the same number of dates. Given the premise that means that more lesbians are dating than gay men but the gay men are having better dates?
/r/MensRights07/08/20 12:12 AM
17

Not to mention that in what other instance where the victim of a crime has to pay the consequences that the perpetrator is engaged with?
/r/MensRights02/08/20 02:49 AM
9

An analogue clock whose hands don't move will coincidentally be correct twice a day depending on where the hands are stuck at.
/r/MensRights20/07/20 05:25 AM
40

That would seem to be a clear violation of medical privacy laws no?
/r/MensRights30/06/20 09:15 AM
12

I don't know, I have a friend who looks suspiciously like Rocket Racoon.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 01:19 AM
2

The heading is misleading. He was awarded joint custody with the mother and the child died of an unrelated medical condition that had nothing to do with the mother. A little vigilance goes a long way.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 12:17 AM
12

Did you read the article? Including the section about the father as well. Or just the first part of the story and be done with it?
/r/MensRights22/04/20 11:15 AM
1

And if they really mean yes with any answer and you turn them down then you withholding sex is probably abuse?
/r/MensRights12/03/20 09:34 AM
7

Do they not have a statutory rape type of law in the UK?
/r/MensRights22/02/20 05:21 AM
5

The man was 19, attending college and delivering pizzas as a job. Among other things having explicitly sexually charged conversations with a girl that you know to be 13 is not innocent at all. This is textbook grooming. He is not some dumb high school teenager, he is an adult and coddling him like a child is doing no one any favours.
/r/MensRights16/02/20 08:46 PM
2

What relevance do either of those questions have to do with the circumstances of the alleged rape?
/r/MensRights08/01/20 01:05 AM
8

Probably similar ways you can tell a human's gender from bone structures. Women have wider hips proportionally for example to aid in child birth.
/r/MensRights06/01/20 10:37 PM
9

If something as simple as being smiled at and having your arm touched led you to breaking down crying, struggling for months and finding it stressful to do anything then you are fragile. That is not the reaction of a normal person.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 11:18 PM
-1

It happens in actual comics all the time?
/r/MensRights02/10/19 06:03 AM
4

Why would the legal brief not use Johnny Depp's real name when discussing legal matters?
/r/MensRights22/09/19 09:20 AM
2

Long term repercussions come when there is a larger number of women dropping out of the course because their entry criteria was lowered to begin with. This leads to the university wanting to know why so many women are dropping out and doing something about that.
/r/MensRights11/09/19 03:58 AM
3

Women dropping out will be seen as them being pushed out by the male dominated field...
/r/MensRights11/09/19 03:53 AM
1

There is a term for what they call just racism/sexism, and it's "Institutional ___ism"
/r/MensRights29/08/19 12:15 AM
2

The last sentence says no: Wing Commander Fuller said sailors "skylarking, horseplay and shenanigans" gave them "implied consent" to slap each other on the bottom or pinch a "male" sailor's nipple. ​ Note the reference to a "male" sailor's nipple.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 01:06 AM
1

I am also trying to figure this out? I don't see what this has to do with anything at all.
/r/MensRights22/07/19 12:01 AM
6

The longer the match, the more ad breaks there are on television, the more time the sponsors logos are shown on screen, the more voice over promotions can be made on screen.
/r/MensRights15/07/19 02:13 AM
2

I agree wholeheartedly with this sentiment. You can't just decide to still be attracted to someone, this man doesn't deserve her love or companionship just because of some traumatic event in his past.
/r/MensRights14/07/19 10:25 PM
4

The money generated in the USA through ticket sales and merchandise is actually higher for the women's team over the men's team, these articles are talking about the money that Soccer USA pays their international players. Overall, around the world, yes the men's soccer earns far higher but in the USA the women's team easily generates more revenue for Soccer USA.
/r/MensRights08/07/19 11:15 PM
0

Captain Marvel is now a traitor to the empire that she once served at the abusive nature of her indoctrination by the Kree. She now feels the weight of all the shit that she has done in their name including helping one of their biggest enemies in the Skrulls. That is not something that is taken lightly.
/r/MensRights29/05/19 12:15 AM
-1

Seriously, wearing glasses is doing something? She was psychologically manipulated into controlling her powers and her emotions by being with the Kree in the first place. Once she is freed from them she has free reign to let those powers fly by breaking through the mental barriers she has developed that stifles them. The problem Captain Marvel has is she is basically Marvel's Superman and characters like that typically are difficult to write for. I agree that it wasn't the greatest Marvel movie …
/r/MensRights28/05/19 04:45 AM
1

What do you mean "She does nothing to gain her powers."? Like spirderman who got bitten by a spider, superman who was just born an alien and then sent in an escape pod to Earth, The X-Men that are just born with the mutant gene?
/r/MensRights28/05/19 04:03 AM
2

Because fuck people for being passionate or invested in something?
/r/MensRights16/04/19 02:42 PM
6

That doesn't apply to people in a position of authority (like teachers) or people in a position of care (doctors, therapists, care workers, etc.)
/r/MensRights11/04/19 10:46 PM
2

Agreed, that can't be allowed under Brazilian law. That is not legal under the Geneva Convention even. Article 33 states "No protected person may be punished for an offense he or she has not personally committed. Collective penalties and likewise all measures of intimidation or of terrorism are prohibited." Granted the Geneva convention usually applies to wartime but still. ​
/r/MensRights04/04/19 01:04 AM
1

She didn't do it but: > 'That clearly had a huge impact on this young woman's life and resulted in a rapid downward spiral. 'This is a very damaged young lady and it clearly had a large part to play in the way she acted.'
/r/MensRights29/03/19 02:13 AM
1

I mean those other rappers have had legal consequences as well based on their previous actions have they not? Snoop I'm pretty sure has weapons felonies for example.
/r/MensRights29/03/19 02:02 AM
8

"He made an unscheduled ride sharing trip" = Stole a car "He disagreed on the ownership of his neighbour's possessions" = Robbery
/r/MensRights20/03/19 03:29 AM
2

The trials never came to completion apparently: A jury was sworn in at the first trial at Blackfriars Crown Court and the case opened, but had to be scrapped before hearing any evidence. In May last year a second trial resulted in a hung jury after they failed to reach any verdicts on any of the charges.
/r/MensRights17/03/19 01:04 AM
1

Electing someone for your local area is not even close to being the same as having a quota for women in parliament. That's like saying after the election results are in "Nope, this election isn't valid because not enough people voted for women" and then changing some of those seats to have women winning instead of a man that was elected fairly. This is not a democratic system at all.
/r/MensRights14/03/19 05:27 AM
2

How do you have parliamentary quotas while still allowing free elections?
/r/MensRights14/03/19 01:50 AM
3

Went and saw it last night and it was quite entertaining. A little pandery in places but didn't detract from the overall experience. Also am 36 year old white man.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 03:57 AM
2

This is political grandstanding to be sure but major violent criminals will also be denied entry into the country and have been before, even in big profile cases.
/r/MensRights03/03/19 10:20 AM
1

You very rarely are found innocent in criminal cases. It is a legal distinction from Guilty/Not Guilty.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 01:04 AM
14

The artile you linked also has this gem at the top of it: ​ " Majority of women’s crimes are linked to poverty and poor mental health, finds London report " ​ As opposed to male offenders where poverty and mental health issues are non-existent?
/r/MensRights21/02/19 08:32 PM
2

They've taken the definition straight from the Oxford dictionary. ​ https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/sexism
/r/MensRights13/02/19 03:07 AM
5

Better not lock my car/house up because we told all the people not to steal so they won't.
/r/MensRights26/01/19 05:27 PM
2

I assume to protect the identity of the child?
/r/MensRights14/12/18 12:40 AM
1

Yes, all perpetrators have their face blurred out to the point where it's a joke that they're a member of the fuzzy face gang.
/r/MensRights04/12/18 08:15 AM
1

It's common for any perpetrator to have their face blurred out.
/r/MensRights04/12/18 08:15 AM
1

You notice the bad boob jobs but not the multitude of good ones that you would never pick in the same way you do for cgi. Good CGI goes unnoticed or has no complaints but when it's bad, it's bad.
/r/MensRights12/08/18 07:55 AM
1

Yeah, that's my point. Men like boobs, real, fake, whatever. As long as they aren't a bad boob job like a bad makeup job or facelift or lips, etc.
/r/MensRights12/08/18 12:30 AM
3

Is it that men like fake boobs or just, men like boobs?
/r/MensRights11/08/18 11:57 PM
39

Being a woman is a disability now.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 08:11 AM
1

I have a professor friend who has her doctorate and hates when we call her Dr. Friendname. We continue to do it anyway but all in good fun.
/r/MensRights16/06/18 01:52 PM
2

Since when is makeup considered to be part of a uniform?
/r/MensRights21/05/18 12:19 PM
2

What are you talking about?
/r/MensRights21/05/18 11:54 AM
39

I find it weird that all schools don't have uniforms in America. This is just common practice in Australia. No matter the school, private, public, whatever, you wear a uniform.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 04:13 PM
10

It's funny that you should say that final line because she has previously spoken at a high school and then complained when she was called out by the male students both at the talk and later online.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 02:44 PM
3

So they've given up on saying that men get paid more for the same work and just complaining that men work too hard?
/r/MensRights14/05/18 08:04 AM
18

The woman won't face charges because the statute of limitations has expired, the Associated Press reported. I got away with my crime for so long because no one knew that there was a crime committed (having already arrested, tried and convicted the "perpetrators"), therefore I am free from prosecution. This is absolutely disgusting.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 04:46 AM
5

I don't fear dying, I fear losing my mind like this for more than anything else that I can imagine.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 02:45 AM
2

and a third player enters the arena.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 01:21 AM
2

That totally wasn't my intention at all...
/r/MensRights02/05/18 03:01 PM
4

It's also the same start to the word gif and thus makes the same sound.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 08:31 AM
18

and had seconds and possibly thirds too based on those hash tags.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 08:30 AM
2

Rule 3: Respect goes both ways. Good joke cafe sign.
/r/MensRights21/04/18 11:06 PM
12

and if you never cast women as your villains then you don't think that women have the capacity to be strong willed enough to do so.
/r/MensRights21/04/18 12:48 PM
30

It's almost like the post is parodying the bottom post about the dentist office?
/r/MensRights21/04/18 03:01 AM
3

She threw appliances at his head? I'm not sure what level something has to rise to before it is considered domestic violence. A female victim?
/r/MensRights13/04/18 05:09 PM
45

You don't see how lowering standards to admit more women into the course will lead to those women dropping out of the course or not graduating. Thereby not increasing the number of women graduating with an engineering degree. How will they fix that? The same way they fixed it with firefighter applicants, by lowering the standards to pass. It's not that much of a stretch when it's something that has definitely been done before in other fields.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 07:17 AM
57

Until they lower the requirements for completing the degree because not enough women are getting their qualifications? Lowering standards hurts everyone.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 07:13 AM
1

Aren't they also saving money by paying their female contributors less as well?
/r/MensRights16/03/18 05:32 AM
1

Yeah, that's the original quote, it's a stand up comic I think but I can't remember which one.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 03:02 PM
15

Sex is legal, paying for legal stuff is legal so why shouldn't paying for sex be legal. This is my philosophy. That being said, a regulated industry is best for everyone, it protects the sex workers and it protects the clients.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 02:19 AM
5

more than 4% of Australian men are however circumcised because this is a fairly new trend. It says that only 4% of infants are circumcised but it used to be a lot higher so the rate amongst adults would be a lot higher as well.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 09:15 AM
3

Well, you see the women are only getting paid half as much so they need twice as many of the positions to make it close to fair.
/r/MensRights23/02/18 05:56 AM
1

And now those kids don't get to high five the cool crossing guard guy.
/r/MensRights13/02/18 12:27 AM
3

The cognitive dissonance is strong in some people, this panel is a prime example. Along with things like 1 in 5 homeless people are women.
/r/MensRights13/02/18 12:20 AM
14

The second panel: After deliberating for 25 minutes, the second panel determined the former player should have known the cheerleader had consumed too much alcohol to consent to sex, according to the lawsuit. Hadn't he also been consuming alcohol, why shouldn't she have known that he was too intoxicated to consent to the sexual activity? Especially after he was cleared by the police.
/r/MensRights13/02/18 12:15 AM
18

If I cast a film with a male and female lead do I now have to pay them the same? What if my male star is Brad Pitt and my female star is Ms. Nobody who is in their breakout hollywood role?
/r/MensRights03/01/18 10:45 PM
1

The problem is exacerbated in the film industry. Say you are making a romantic comedy with equal time on screen with both lead stars. However one of the stars is an industry veteran who has several successful films behind them, while the other is having their breakout big budget role. Should they be paid the same amount for their equal work? Or should the experience and star power count for something as well?
/r/MensRights03/01/18 10:10 PM
5

Experience in the same job can matter. Does this apply to actors. All actors must be paid the same whether they are a man or a woman, all actors are now paid the same. Experience or box office draw now has no bearing if it is a woman she must be paid the same but you can pay the male star less of course.
/r/MensRights03/01/18 08:47 PM
24

6: For the attention of being a victim and included in everything. 7: When a celebrity is involved especially the former and possibly for financial gain. 8: As a defense against being accused of sexual assault themselves. It didn't take long to come up with those 3 myself. So much for the no reason to lie about it.
/r/MensRights17/12/17 07:13 AM
9

Except this recently happened in Australia, anonymity was removed retroactively from all sperm donors. So a bunch of sperm donors that had filled in their paperwork with the appropriate "Do not give my details out" suddenly found themselves receiving letters from the children that resulted from their donations. It is not a 180 from the government it can just be politicians with "good intentions"
/r/MensRights10/12/17 09:06 PM
9

Does that take into account that for a long time the legal definition of rape didn't and in some places still doesn't include female perpetrators with male victims?
/r/MensRights09/11/17 06:01 AM
13

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-06-30/bilnd-recruitment-trial-to-improve-gender-equality-failing-study/8664888 gives the general gist. They found assigning a male name to an application resulted in 3.2% fewer interviews and assigning a female name resulted in 2.9% more interviews. It was basically urged to be stopped because it was having the wrong effect on the diversity of applicants and not adhering to their previously held beliefs that women were being discriminated against.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 03:49 AM
71

In Australia there was a government department that started taking job applications with no genders attached on the basis that it would reduce the gender bias in hiring and focus on achievements, education, etc. It lead to a high proportion of men being hired and was thus deemed a failure.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 10:18 PM
-2

I didn't think that I'd have to use a /s but I guess you can never really be sure when it comes to stupidity like this...
/r/MensRights08/11/17 03:44 AM
-4

Yeah like misogynists, racists and the KKK. EDIT: I didn't think I'd have to put a /s on this but I guess I will do so now. Is it really that hard to tell?
/r/MensRights08/11/17 12:15 AM
1

It was a country music festival -> many country music fans are from the south -> the south was part of the confederacy -> the confederacy were all racist slave traders -> racists are fascists -> who is against fascists? Antifa -> Ergo AntiFa is behind this mass shooting.
/r/MensRights02/10/17 11:38 PM
3

you suffer from an emotionally unstable personality disorder, a severe eating disorder and alcohol drug dependence. I'm sorry if this is weird but I don't want someone with an emotionally unstable personality disorder to be my doctor let alone my surgeon.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 09:50 PM
3

That is exactly what I am saying. An actual victim would need a support structure to help them through an emotionally or psychologically trying time like that.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 12:11 PM
6

This is the part that got me. Even in their skewed view of events shouldn't they allow the "victim" to lean on her support of friends and not cut her off from them in totality? Not saying that this woman was a victim but in a world where she was wouldn't the support of her friends be vital to her wellbeing?
/r/MensRights03/08/17 05:14 AM
1

If you read what she is saying as being genuine but she is implying that Nunguesser is a perpetrator in this case and that Sulkowitz is a victim. Basically saying anyone that is accused is a perpetrator and vice versa for accusers.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 04:36 PM
3

Isn't it already illegal to pay someone less based on race, gender, sexual preference, religion, etc?
/r/MensRights18/07/17 05:17 AM
2

In response to Columbia's statement, victims' rights group End Rape on Campus said it stood by Sulkowicz and criticized the school. "Broadly speaking, treating perpetrators of sexual assault as victims is not only uneducated, it is irresponsible and harmful," said Annie Clark, executive director of End Rape on Campus. "Columbia's statement is not surprising given our current culture, however; its words are reminiscent of institutions and media outlets who continue to claim that perpetrators' liv…
/r/MensRights18/07/17 05:11 AM
5

The film was quite enjoyable, if anything the message within it was more anti-war in general than anything to do with gender although there are some 1918 era gender issues at play in the world.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 09:56 AM
3

Seeing as how minimum wage out here is $17.70/hr it doesn't seem that out of the ordinary for harsher conditions like this to gather an extra few dollars at all.
/r/MensRights06/04/17 12:18 AM
4

Get in line and follow these strict guidelines for what is appropriate and inappropriate to discuss within the confines of these halls. You will learn by rote what we tell you.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 03:10 AM
8

You would think so.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 11:59 PM
3

That can't be right. There are no penises involved so how can one of them be an abuser?
/r/MensRights08/01/17 03:11 AM
49

Even though the article literally says that she was contravening a domestic violence order. The mental gymnastics you have to do to make that leap are immense.
/r/MensRights27/12/16 09:39 PM
9

So you felt you were qualified to give insight into what was happening without watching what actually happened. Gotcha. Good Job there.
/r/MensRights23/12/16 03:15 AM
4

I have the same problem, I would consider myself centrist to a large margin, leaning left on some issues and right on others. Therefore I get called far right by those on the left and far left by those on the right. Not by everyone on those ends of the political spectrum but the tribalism inherent in the left/right wing world is quite pressing.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 12:08 AM
3

Christopher Reeves also gets me going, I can tell you that.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 12:05 AM
4

So a gay couple and their two sons would be excluded from the festivities then I guess.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 11:52 PM
10

In very, very small print as well: lesbian women (41%) were more likely than gay men (28%) to report having been in an abusive relationship.
/r/MensRights04/12/16 03:04 PM
2

I was under the impression that Soccer was short for "Association Football" or is that a myth that I have heard?
/r/MensRights02/11/16 03:16 PM
1

closer to this I Don't Like Mondays
/r/MensRights31/10/16 09:14 PM
8

One of the first school shooters was female. The song "I Don't Like Mondays" by Bob Geldof is about her as that is what she said when asked why she did what she did.
/r/MensRights31/10/16 02:38 PM
2

Students at the University of California, Berkeley held a violent protest on campus Friday to demand additional segregated “spaces of color” for non-white students. Now people are fighting for Segregation? We have come full circle on this one.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 08:16 AM
2

If it's up to the discretion of the judge then there is a problem with the courts making decisions like this whether they can do so within the law or not they have the discretion to not cut off communication between the father and the child.
/r/MensRights02/09/16 05:16 AM
7

You, I like you.
/r/MensRights24/08/16 05:25 AM
2

In the article Jezebel decried it which makes me feel weird for agreeing with them.
/r/MensRights17/08/16 12:26 PM
3

We'll achieve equality by holding boys back instead of pushing girls forward?
/r/MensRights25/07/16 04:25 AM
16

The last line in that Canadian article: "The judge concluded that the children should not suffer because of the parents' wrongdoings." And by parents' wrongdoings the judge obviously meant parent's wrongdoings as in one parent, as in the mother that had an affair right? What in the hell did the father do wrong apart from assume that the children his wife gave birth to were his?
/r/MensRights21/07/16 08:27 AM
9

He can be into anything he likes as long as it's not masculine like sports or cars or guns.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 01:34 AM
13

On the day that my father was moving out my mother miraculously called the police to complain that my father had hit her and she had fallen. The fact was that she was drunk and arguing with my father at the time when she fell over of her own accord, her friends from across the road saw that she had fallen and were immediately on her side. I was staying with my parents so I could help my father move out that day. When the police came he was forced to leave the property and not come withing 100m o…
/r/MensRights14/06/16 11:20 PM
1

Or after watching the trailer i didn't laugh a single time which is not a good look for a comedy movie?
/r/MensRights10/06/16 10:18 PM
5

And who said there wasn't??? For fuck's sake... You, right here in that comment: They can give consent just fine if their partner is about their age, but not if their partner is older. Did you take lessons in hypocrisy or is it a natural born talent?
/r/MensRights04/06/16 08:51 AM
5

Fourteen academics announce their support for the protest. a.k.a. 14 academics support kidnapping/unlawful imprisonment of those accused of but not charged or convicted of crimes. Gotcha, and by academics we are talking science professors, law professors and the like i assume and not gender studies professors and such.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 12:30 PM
4

The comparison of theft to statutory rape is a very poor one as theft is always illegal regardless of who is participating. Both parties are required to take actions to consent to the act of sex. Assuming that the person who initiated the actions also goaded and forced the other to participate is assuming things that aren't known. Can both parties not be equally enthusiastic about the sex act about to take place as is the case amongst teenagers. The problem with this situation is that the agency…
/r/MensRights18/03/16 01:38 AM
3

You can be the perpetrator of the crime of statutory rape whether you ask the underage participant or are asked by the underage participant. Therefore why are both not legally responsible? The person who was asked also consented to sex with a minor. Why are you taking away their criminal responsibility seeing as they are also over the age of 12.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 12:25 AM
12

If they are both underage and one of them asks for sex and the other party agrees then they are taking advantage of the person asking for the sex too. This is the same as if a person under the age of consent asks a 20-30-40 year old for sex and the older person agrees. The initiator cannot make informed consent to seek sex either. Your logic does not hold up I am afraid.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 09:36 PM
3

So long and thanks for all the fish.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 10:36 PM
7

and then they went on to post this: .8. Last thing: IF YOU’RE A WHITE MAN UPSET THAT WE ARE LOOKING MOSTLY FOR NON-WHITE NON-MEN I DON’T CARE ABOUT YOU GO WRITE FOR MACLEAN'S
/r/MensRights19/02/16 01:38 PM
1

The Runaways was pretty good with her in it as Joan Jett.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 09:27 AM
3

So after the police investigation the DA fails to press charges for lack of evidence. The University clears him of any wrongdoing and still she sues both the university and the man she accused? All of this for an action that allegedly took place at his off campus apartment? How is anything that happens at his off campus apartment any of the University's issue at all? This entire case has me baffled.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 06:40 AM
3

She didn't really care about it just thought it was a little unprofessional. She took the apology and wanted to move on, it is the media and the ICC making a big deal about this.
/r/MensRights06/01/16 01:06 AM
12

While leaving the young men behind in refugee camps and being told that they are not to be trusted by the west. This is an excellent choice to prevent the radicalisation of young muslim men right?
/r/MensRights19/12/15 01:55 PM
12

Best place to put disaffected young men seeking refuge from war, in camps and told that they are not trustworthy by the rest. This will in no way lead to radicalisation of anyone.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 01:53 PM
1

Except plea bargains save the courts a lot of time and money that they can use to fight cases where the defendant does wish to go through the courts. Without them the court system would be bogged down in a multitude of cases that could be easily settled quickly.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 12:00 AM
-2

This woman was offered a plea bargain to save the immense cost of time and money that would have been spent taking her to trial. Even in a slam dunk case like this the costs cannot be ignored.
/r/MensRights13/12/15 08:56 PM
18

They offered her a plea deal to save the immense cost of time and money of a court trial. Prosecutors do this all the time in every country.
/r/MensRights13/12/15 08:54 PM
1

Even if this graphic were true, comparing the falsely accused men with the entirety of the rapists is disingenuous. The falsely accused number should be compared to the total number of accused/reported which makes them stand out a hell of a lot more.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 09:59 PM
3

Yep, that'll stop the rapists. More women saying no to sex, the rapists will really listen now and not rape anyone!
/r/MensRights26/11/15 09:25 PM
18

Also she told the boy to not tell anyone about what they were doing, these are the actions of someone who knows what they are doing is wrong not someone who has trouble seeing sexual boundaries as the judge put it.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 09:46 PM
8

"They are not going to want to lose their gig and that's a sad and sorry thing, but that's just the way it is. This is the problem we're actually dealing with. Some men are going to have to give up their hard won roles to allow equality." The hypocrisy is strong in this one.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 11:11 AM
3

I am assuming concealing their identities to prevent reprisals from their apparent violent enemies.
/r/MensRights06/10/15 03:30 PM
2

One could argue that they acted as a group to disturb the peace and the pulling of the alarm was a part of this act of disturbance and thus they are culpable as a group of conspiracy. This is probably pushing it too far and would be really difficult to prove anyway.
/r/MensRights06/10/15 03:25 PM
1

A 2 year sentence for this poor girl and registering as a sex offender for 7 years? Hasn't she suffered enough because of her Leukemia and being the sexual plaything of both the father and the son? Why isn't the father being arrested for taking advantage of this clearly mentally immature young girl?
/r/MensRights05/10/15 09:22 PM
16

She explicitly states here I had to put my own safety in danger to protect that girl. So she shouldn't have to put her safety in danger but a man should have to do so to protect the women?
/r/MensRights26/09/15 10:22 PM
15

"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticise."
/r/MensRights26/09/15 09:32 PM
2

Can he now sue himself (The Adult predator) as the minor victim for the exploitation of himself to himself?
/r/MensRights21/09/15 04:04 AM
5

Gotcha and actively disgusting, basically we have been discriminated against in the past so now you will be. This is definitely the way to teach people how to work together on equal footing.
/r/MensRights31/08/15 04:44 AM
23

Students are expected to "defer" to non-white students if they want to do well in the class? What the hell is that supposed to mean?
/r/MensRights30/08/15 10:18 PM
3

It even says "Consensual Relationship"
/r/MensRights27/08/15 10:17 PM
1

She didn't try to kill the child so she's fine around children just not when it comes to adult men.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 02:37 PM
2

I'm actually a little sad that my name didn't pop up on their list. I may have to start posting more I guess?
/r/MensRights28/07/15 11:42 PM
9

But it's only women who have to be afraid to go out at night because of all the scary men huh?
/r/MensRights12/07/15 12:39 AM
6

It's amazing how they think that excluding people from society will have a positive effect on their life and definitely not lead to recidivism. Just in general when dealing with the sex offender registry not in this case.
/r/MensRights06/07/15 07:51 AM
6

This was hyperbole, reading anything else into it is just disingenuous, while he was supposedly sick is when he concocted the scheme to hand over the share certificates and then obtain duplicates to make those handed over worthless.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 12:59 AM
8

He has actively defied the court and has just short of committed fraud.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 12:30 AM
3

No, they will be equal to regular police stations but separate from them. You know separate but equal, it's bound to work out perfectly!
/r/MensRights27/06/15 11:42 AM
8

Especially for someone who is pursuing a career in IT, this will change the course of his life forever.
/r/MensRights20/06/15 01:24 AM
1

Replace your fictional Alpha Centaurians with "Blacks" and this is the reason why there is a Civil Rights Act.
/r/MensRights13/06/15 05:41 AM
1

well first of all, telling the patient before they turn up for the appointment or when they are trying to make it would seem prudent.
/r/MensRights13/06/15 05:39 AM
5

I was thinking the same thing myself.
/r/MensRights07/06/15 07:21 AM
6

Or having an involuntary response from either arousal, or rubbing his crotch on a bike seat. Neither of which can be controlled.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 10:50 PM
14

An adult in a position of authority, ie a teacher.
/r/MensRights03/06/15 12:54 AM
1

"The missus" is a sexist term now? I've heard people all over the place use the term men, women, old, young, etc. Sure it's a little less informal then saying wife or partner but sexist? Trying to find offense where there is none must be tiring.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 04:34 AM
1

I was right there with you but a picture of a black woman threw me off.
/r/MensRights31/05/15 08:14 AM
2

I am assuming they are talking about Sansa and Ramsey? So, it is characterising a very definite repugnant character, terrible people do terrible things. Who knew?
/r/MensRights27/05/15 07:43 AM
4

When I watched the film I felt like I was watching a fantasy story come to life. The heroes making off by rescuing the princesses that are being held captive by the evil King. There was the sympathetic former bad guy who has a change of heart, the wise circle of elders that they meet in the desert, Dragons breathing fire on them (Trucks with flame throwers). It felt like a classic story of the heroes vs the forces of evil that has been shown over and over again for millenia.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 08:07 AM
3

There are 3 others, 2 women and a man that have come forward as well with claims of various degrees of sexual misconduct. All of them were either former friends/acquaintances of Nungesser or current friends/acquaintances of Sulkowitz.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 07:59 AM
129

It adds the male student could not appear before the appeals panel to argue on his behalf and could not present his side of the story verbally or in another form regarding the “new evidence” – nor would the panel hear live testimony from anyone who testified at the original hearing. This is the crucial point in the timeline. When the man is involved in the original hearing and is able to give testimony and present a case he is found innocent. However when he is unable to provide defense of new e…
/r/MensRights21/05/15 07:57 AM
18

oh damn, my bad. Checking my privelege now.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 07:21 AM
34

It says it right there in the sidebar that "Victim Blaming" will not be tolerated. However one of the top comments says "What goes around, comes around"
/r/MensRights18/05/15 05:30 AM
4

Let's reframe this legislation as such. Sweden forces companies to fire male board members to make way for exclusively female board members. How is this not sexist?
/r/MensRights16/05/15 11:54 PM
6

This was actually in Australia but the fact that it is spreading more and more out here too is disturbing.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 12:22 AM
8

He went through a 16 month legal process, suffered from depression, unable to leave the house due to such. This makes it quite difficult to get on with your sporting career. At the end of the article it says that he is trying to get it back on track however after the whole ordeal has finally ended.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 06:08 AM
11

Even if it wasn't, not all men want sex whenever they can get it. If he doesn't want sex and it id forced on him no matter what the reasons then it is rape.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 09:22 AM
5

Artistic expression ceases to be once it become libel and harassment.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 08:45 PM
1

So you shouldn't be able to defend yourself, self defense is as much your fault as the initiator? What are you trying to say here?
/r/MensRights20/04/15 12:02 AM
6

Ahh, the same tactic that the Catholic Church employed. Seems legitimate.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 08:31 AM
5

So they can present witnesses that seem credible saying that you were in a certain place, committing the act of rape at the time alleged. This can possibly lead to a preponderance of the evidence level of "evidence". You are then not allowed to present exculpatory evidence with video showing that you were in a completely different location. This is some Kafkaesque level bullshit.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 02:09 PM
2

Indonesia is literally getting ready to send 2 Australians and some others (not sure of nationalities but the Australians have been in constant rotation on the news out here downunder) to the firing squad for Drug Trafficking. The United states is not the only country that has the death penalty, admittedly the countries that do are in the minority.
/r/PussyPass29/03/15 01:01 PM
2

It's not that they want women to make up 50% they want at least 50% of appointments to be women. So either women will have equal numbers of positions as men or they will be in the majority. All of this regardless of merit. From the article: Victorian Government board appointments must be at least 50 per cent women, under new rules being introduced by the State Government.
/r/MensRights29/03/15 12:19 PM
12

Just though I would share Article 33 of the 4th Geneva Convention Article 33. No persons may be punished for an offense he or she has not personally committed. Collective penalties and likewise all measures of intimidation or of terrorism are prohibited. Pillage is prohibited.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 10:30 PM
1

You mean men and women are different and engage in different activities? I am shocked! I am totally shocked!
/r/MensRights23/03/15 09:48 PM
5

The violent crime rate for the worst city in the United States is Detroit at ~2065/100,000 about 2% or 1 in 50 in the year 2013. This means that the assumed rape rate is orders of magnitude higher than the most crime ridden city in the United States even giving that the 1 in 5 rate is over a lifetime.
/r/MensRights21/03/15 02:18 PM
2

Just because someone is an asshole does not mean that they are wrong.
/r/MensRights21/03/15 06:43 AM
9

Oh it's ok about the hot iron to his genitals because /s "Her role was to use these (curling) tongs but she insisted they weren't on full heat," he added. "Thankfully, there were no real injuries from that."
/r/MensRights19/03/15 01:40 PM
7

"Her role was to use these (curling) tongs but she insisted they weren't on full heat," he added. "Thankfully, there were no real injuries from that." Oh, it's ok that my client was torturing him because I could have been torturing him worse?
/r/MensRights19/03/15 01:39 PM
9

Just because someone has dumb beliefs in some instances does not make everything they say, dumb.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 09:04 AM
4

4 classes going over different fields of Gender Studies would be my guess?
/r/MensRights17/03/15 03:03 AM
1

"The only winning move is not to play"
/r/MensRights14/03/15 03:05 AM
3

and Black History month is the shortest...more opression? /s
/r/MensRights08/03/15 01:20 AM
334

I agree with part of that statement. There is no such thing as Reverse Racism or Reverse Sexism it's just Racism and Sexism...
/r/MensRights03/03/15 07:39 AM
2

It doesn't mention gender in there either.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 02:11 AM
7

It wasn't a Rape Culture lecture, it was a lecture about the due process rights of the accused as these were the fields of expertise for the law professor.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 11:16 PM
62

Sickening 13 year olds being attracted to underage girls what a pervert. /s
/r/MensRights17/02/15 08:26 AM
3

Having lived in Australia since I was born 32 years ago I have literally never heard the Liberals or the LNP referred to as the "Tories". I have only ever heard it referring to Britain.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 08:08 AM
0

Tony Abbot is the leader of the LNP, Liberal National Party (Australia's Conservative party and opposition of the ALP, Australian Labor Party). Torys are an English thing.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 06:31 AM
1

This is an old story and according to the original time I saw this, shge exited the house and went to the garage to retrieve the firearm. She then entered the house again and fired a "warning shot" that missed him by inches. Sometime later she harassed him at the place he was staying at seeing as he was no longer allowed in the house. That is the general gist of it and I may be mixing up the timelines but still.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 07:46 AM
1

In spite of Due process finding him not guilty?
/r/MensRights23/01/15 01:46 PM
5

This article has definitely been shared on this sub before, quite a long time ago in fact.
/r/MensRights18/01/15 10:49 PM
1

What is your favourite flavour of ice cream and also what flavour topping do you have?
/r/MensRights11/01/15 05:29 AM
1

Sulking is an abusive action? Childish maybe, but abusive? what in the actual fuck?
/r/MensRights08/01/15 01:50 PM
1

Single Parents or Stay at Home Parents. Both groups are very exclusively female and don't readily accept if at all men.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 01:45 PM
1

It's ok my prejudice is warranted because everyone else is prejudiced as well!
/r/MensRights28/12/14 02:55 PM
1

and of course Common Law
/r/MensRights15/12/14 10:27 PM
3

I guess the relationship with my wife doesn't exist then huh? She has always been the one of us with the higher libido. According to this though these types of women don't exist, I am in a quandary as I'm pretty sure my wife does exist.
/r/MensRights08/12/14 09:45 AM
2

The issues that my father had with my mother, her friends and the police. On the day that he was trying to move out and had hired a truck for the day she had the police come around and remove him from the property on bullshit dv charges. She had been drinking and had fallen due to being drunk all night and that morning. Because of this he was forced to leave the property and not be able to return. This made it rather difficult to move his stuff out and no amount of reasoning with the police offi…
/r/MensRights09/11/14 10:55 PM
10

and continued until she was 17. That is not usual kid's stuff.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 09:09 PM
1

Oh, in this case I agree that yes this is different to murder for hire. What I was pointing out is that you don't physically have to do physical harm to be charged with murder. Maybe not in this case but in other cases.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 02:48 AM
4

I'm pretty sure you can be found guilty of a higher crime for murder for hire even though you don't actually cause any physical harm you can still be convicted for a more serious crime.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 11:04 PM
1

the underwire will also direct some of the charge away from the heart where it really needs to get to.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 03:50 AM
4

"...this is a case of gross child abuse" which obviously requires no gaol time whatsoever, because, i dunno, he was a willing participant which the law is specifically designed to declare that the child cannot be a willing participant. The cognitive dissonance in this judge is baffling.
/r/MensRights18/10/14 01:25 PM
17

and also screwing over households with only males, or transgenders, etc.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 01:09 PM
6

not even most are bad
/r/MensRights12/10/14 07:53 AM
8

so what? Even if the vast majority of rapists are men they still make up the vast minority of all men.
/r/MensRights10/10/14 12:52 AM
1

That is why in court they rearely have a finding of "Innocent" and will walk out with a finding of "Not Guilty" there is a difference in the eyes of the law. A finding of "Innocent" means that there is beyond a reasonable doubt that the person is innocent but is rarely pursued.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 07:26 AM
1

If a student's due process is violated and he is kicked out of the university, if it can be shown that this has a negative impact on his further education goals (ie. what college will want to welcome a rapist) can he not then sue the college for defamation of character?
/r/MensRights15/09/14 11:46 PM
2

Usually based on the Duluth Model
/r/MensRights13/09/14 08:43 PM
5

There are no leaked photos of naked male celebrities. I'm pretty sure there are some rather revealing pictures of Justin Verlander amongst the Kate Upton shots...
/r/MensRights01/09/14 11:23 PM
1

other members of the team: Linebacker Frank Shannon is fighting a year-long suspension from the school stemming from a Title IX sexual assault investigation. Shannon was never charged with a crime but was suspended after the Title IX investigation by the school. Green-Beckham was dismissed from Missouri earlier this year after he allegedly forced his way into an apartment and pushed a woman down several stairs. Green-Beckham was never charged in the incident, and Oklahoma’s waiver to have him de…
/r/MensRights16/08/14 10:15 PM
8

Or the guy realised that the girls's actual friends had turned up and left to let them help her out? Seriously not every man is out to rape women, not even a majority, not even a significant number. Yet this is the world we live in apparently.
/r/MensRights20/07/14 10:09 PM
5

A guy being nice to a woman and getting her to a taxi is going to rape her? I've helped women out of a bar in the past that I didn't know and were clearly quite intoxicated to get them to a taxi and get home. This doesn't mean that I am a rapist...does it?
/r/MensRights20/07/14 09:50 PM
10

I hate this line as it can easily be reversed: prosecutors fear it could stop others from reporting sexual assaults. How about we will charge them so that it prevents people from making false accusations in the future?
/r/MensRights15/07/14 02:03 AM
2

Except a similar ad has aired with an Australian being with his inlaws (an awkward situation) and the love of fried chicken bringing them together. Hell if the Aussie cricket team had have been playing England at the time it would have been a lone Aussie supporter in amongst a bunch of pasty white guys.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 12:18 PM
3

In New Zealand, Yes: Legal Definition of Rape: Rape is the penetration of the vagina by the penis without consent. This is the case whether people are married or not. It is rape unless the prosecution can prove that the rapist had reason to think that the survivor consented. Anything else is: Unlawful sexual connection is sex that occurred without consent. Sex includes penetration of the vagina or the anus by any part of the body (such as fingers) or any object. Sex includes oral sex – the mouth…
/r/MensRights10/07/14 10:52 PM
3

especially in New Zealand, by law a man cannot be raped, not just by women but legally they cannot be raped by anyone. It comes under some other law that I can't remember off the top of my head.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 10:17 PM
20

They contradict it in the same article even with: "If the Crown proved a sexual encounter happened, it would be rape unless the defendant could prove it was consensual." Basically all sex is assumed to be rape unless it is proven by the defense to not be rape.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 10:14 PM
16

"This approach does not contradict the fundamental principle that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty." Is directly contradicted by the following: If the Crown proved a sexual encounter happened, it would be rape unless the defendant could prove it was consensual. The amount of cognitive dissonance this requires is staggering. They are basically saying that all sex is rape unless the man can prove that he got consent, this puts the burden of proof directly on the defendant which creates …
/r/MensRights10/07/14 10:12 PM
9

The support and campaign group Women Against Rape (WAR) was among more than a dozen organisations and lawyers who wrote to the judge arguing that a harsh sentence would put women off coming forward to report rapes for fear they would not be believed. If this woman who admitted to falsifying her accusations of rape and imprisonment was not prosecuted then people would have nothing to fear about doing the same thing in the future. They either get the desired result of revenge or whatever other mot…
/r/MensRights27/06/14 03:41 AM
10

Apparently after being raped women send smiley face texts to their friends after explaining that they were about to go and have sex?
/r/MensRights12/06/14 11:45 AM
2

Seeing as the police didn't even find probable cause for an arrest or further investigation I don't see how the University tribunal could find the man guilty.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 12:07 PM
6

Except no one cared until it was girls that were harmed.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 06:32 AM
11

or discourage them from doing it in the first place? This is what is known as a rock and a hard place.
/r/MensRights17/05/14 06:19 AM
33

Even if we take at face value that she was suffering from this delusion how was it a rational act to then murder her children in an effort to stop it from happening?
/r/MensRights08/05/14 09:59 PM
2

A lawyer who works 80 hours a week at a big corporate law firm is paid more than double one who works 40 hours a week as an in-house counsel at a small business. No shit Sherlock. A corporate lawyer for a large firm is likely to earn more on a per hour basis than an in house counsel of a small business would at any rate.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 08:22 AM
3

In what cases are 2 party consent laws better? How is someone supposed to protect themselves from malicious claims made by others? Have you seen the multiple stories of taxi drivers who have been accused of attacking passengers and only been exonerated by the video recording they have in their vehicle? What was this child supposed to do to protect himself? Without proof nothing would be done if he complained to those in authority at the school.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 02:09 PM
11

I have no problem with this, just don't be a hypocrite about it I believe is the point here.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 06:09 AM
4

Self deprecating humour is part of the Australian culture, every country is not america.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 01:08 PM
3

Out here in Australia it's just called "Parents with Prams" parking.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 10:11 PM
2

The man who left the bed multiple times and then returned after allegedly being groped? These do not sound like the actions of someone who was being raped. There is not indication that he was being forced to stay and as I said removed himself from the room on multiple occasions and returned to the bed every time. From what has been revealed I am not ready to vilify the alleged attacker as it is the same stance I would take if a woman had been the victim as well. Until the full facts have been re…
/r/MensRights21/03/14 01:24 AM
1

I'm just going by what the article says: "Loren Morris, 21" "with the boy, now 14" "and continued until he was ten years old." Therefore it ended 4 years ago and 21-4 = 17 The two years is rounding up obviously otherwise the rest of the facts don't line up, ie: began when she was 16, etc. The math obviously works out a bit wonky because of rounding errors. Either way, the abuse did not go on for 5 years and begin when the boy was 5 like the poster that I was replying to said.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 01:30 AM
3

I'm pretty sure you are mathing wrong. She first began when she was 16 and is now 21, it continued until he was 10 and he is now 14. This means that it ended 4 years ago when she was 17. 17-16 = 1, given the vagueness of ages it would be somewhere in the 1-2 year range that the raping occurred. This is still abhorrent but sticking to the facts is a good method to not sound like a crazy person.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 12:08 AM
3

Is the boy able to go to the police over this incident, if he sustained injuries like that there is good cause for the police to investigate and possibly press charges.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 10:24 PM
3

They shouldn't be handling rape charges at all, these are crimes that should be handled by the police not untrained faculty and students.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 12:55 AM
5

By all means they should but a private business (in this case a college) should be able to regulate what it allows on it's property (in this case firearms).
/r/MensRights17/03/14 10:53 PM
5

Taking her comments at face value were women driving in Saudi Arabia is illegal so that very few will actually risk it, 5 out of 38 guests on top gear were women this is 13.16%. In Saudi Arabia fewer than 13% of the driving population is female, therefore she fails at basic statistics right there...
/r/MensRights10/03/14 10:57 PM
7

Both parents have attempted to paint the other as unfit to take custody of their daughter. I think the parent who hires a hitman to kill ther parent is unfit to be a parent. I'm just old fashioned that way I guess?
/r/MensRights26/02/14 10:49 AM
8

and then tried to ruin the man's life by spreading the information after the incident.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 12:11 AM
10

White men can discriminate, white women can't do that, because, because, PATRIARCHY!!! shut up SHITLORD! /s
/r/MensRights14/02/14 03:13 PM
2

Logic seems sound to me /s
/r/MensRights10/02/14 03:48 AM
14

However you don't then get to go to the Neighbourhood Watch committee and have the person kicked out of their own house with little to no evidence.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 03:46 AM
98

I love the comment that starts: "And here we have the MRA, in his element. He's wandered away from his basement in search of solidarity and companionship..." The speaker here is female talking about among other things a Men's awareness group that was being started by other female students.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 01:55 AM
0

Why is she driving through a pile of leaves large enough to conceal two children in the first place?
/r/MensRights01/02/14 11:57 PM
1

Why would she drive through a pile of leaves that is large enough to conceal two children? That is not at all a safe move in the first place.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 11:56 PM
19

Running over and killing children is not a crime then?
/r/MensRights01/02/14 02:04 PM
20

Looking at this example however you have a man who disposed of evidence after the fact, and impeded the investigation, plead and received a custodial sentence. On the other hand you have a woman who hit two children whilst driving and killed them and then left the scene who went to trial and received a probationary sentence.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 08:45 AM
46

He got jail time from a plea deal and she did not get jail time after going to trial and being found guilty. You usually get shorter sentences for taking a plea deal and not taking up the time in courts.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 07:28 AM
49

No, he plead guilty and didn't go to trial, she on the other hand plead not guilty and then only apologised after she was found guilty at trial.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 07:16 AM
196

Not only that but she plead no guilty and was convicted at trial whereas her boyfriend plead guilty and received that sentence. By this one cannot claim that plea deals were the cause of the sentencing disparity either. It is a truly disgusting outcome.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 07:15 AM
2

Elijah cried harder in pain, and Fraraccio carried him around the house upside down, hitting the boy’s head on the metal stair rail and other objects, Polinske said. Fraraccio then covered his mouth and nose with her hand, suffocating him to death. These are the actions of someone who is trying to setup an excuse "He slipped and hit his head in the bath" also they are the actions of someone trying to inflict pain on a 2 year old child when she can hear him crying in pain.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 08:16 AM
2

I'll just shoo-hoo-hoo-hoot the whole school down then
/r/MensRights10/01/14 03:45 AM
1

What if you just "Don't like Mondays?"
/r/MensRights10/01/14 03:34 AM
13

Wouldn't it further be optimised to have two unisex bathrooms? Why is this not the case then?
/r/MensRights08/01/14 06:42 AM
8

Why couldn't they have a baby change table in both bathrooms then? That way mum can go and do it in the women's bathroom and dad can do it in the men's room.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 06:41 AM
9

This maybe but there were other instances in the background given by the boyfriend that definitely constitute domestic violence. Her flying off the handle, threatening him with weapons. "Burnie had on two previous occasions turned on him with a knife with Mr McMullen having to wrestle it off her" She struck him on other occasions and he even lied about an injury he received from her "Mr McMullen lied at work about a black eye Burnie had given him, but never thought she was capable of using a kni…
/r/MensRights07/01/14 06:19 AM
33

Also true, she had been reprimanded before for attacks and not once was it ever referred to as Domestic Violence.
/r/MensRights07/01/14 12:16 AM
2

They don't want to go and watch a football game? TIL.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 10:29 PM
101

She didn't realise that his wounds were so bad? She fucking stabbed him, with a knife, how idiotic do you have to be before you think that that is not a serious wound in need of medical attention. Especially if the person is lying on the ground, not moving? Also 2 years for an assault that has been said the man survived only due to the exceptional skill of the paramedics. How was this not prosecuted as attempted murder?
/r/MensRights06/01/14 10:13 PM
1

That is generally whay Not Guilty means (ie. not proven), it does not necessarily mean that you are innocent but that you could not be proven guilty. It is actually very rare for a person to have a finding of Innocent.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 04:38 AM
60

Reading helps... Information shared in this form alone will not result in anyone going through the grievance process.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 07:50 AM
1

As long as you aren't dismissive when the husband wishes to voice an opinion which I think is the issue here. You can't make the husband care but you can acknowledge and include them in the process if they wish to be involved.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 01:13 AM
2

Department of Community Services, in Australia, NSW to be exact.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 01:09 AM
2

The acts took place on the grounds of a BOY'S school the students of that school have been punished, the girl has nothing to do with said school. As the acts in no way involved the school except by association that is the reason that she has not been punished in this instance.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 06:29 AM
15

So sexism is no longer just discrimination based on sex? Racism is no longer discrimination based on race? Good old newspeak is what that is becoming now, BB is ungood.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 08:31 PM
9

"We would urge residents to continue to give information about drug dealing in their area to help us continue to bring to justice, those involved in illicit drugs." If what students or parents can expect is no support or intervention when their lives are being threatened then this is just a laughable statement to make.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 08:44 AM
1

What about forcing either parent into being completely out of the child's life if they wish to be in that child's life? You can't have it both ways where you are forcing a decision on one or both of the parents. This situation is different in any case as the mother wants nothing to do with the child and the father does. However the mother's decision is forcing the father out of the child's life.
/r/MensRights02/12/13 09:51 PM
1

Then we are in two different places when you think one half of the parents have no rights to their offspring.
/r/MensRights02/12/13 09:03 PM
2

Or both parents have the right to make up their own minds, whether they wish to be a part of the child's life or not. The woman can forgo their responsibilities and the father can raise the child, the father can do so and the mother can raise the child, they can both be a part of the child's life whether they are together or not or they can both not be a part of the child's life. The overriding principle here is choice, all parties should have a choice at all stages. The only choice that the mot…
/r/MensRights02/12/13 12:26 PM
3

The problem here is that the boyfriend is the father of the child and is every part a parent of that child as the mother is. Why then should the mother have the only say in the matter as to what is to happen to the child? As the father is also a parent of the child by what right does one parent have to adopt the child away from the father without his input on the situation? If this would not fly when the parents are married and the mother wants to take the child away permanently from the father …
/r/MensRights02/12/13 08:31 AM
11

She was not completely stripped of custody, she was given visitation rights the same that is standard for a male in similar situations. Whether or not the original court order was fair or not is of little consequence when the mother directly violated a court order and then fled the country using false documents kidnapping her child and denying the father any contact with the child. These are heinous crimes and deserve to be punished to the fullest extent of the law.
/r/MensRights30/11/13 03:37 AM
1

Was she ever actually on screen before they showed the corpses of the crew?
/r/MensRights06/11/13 03:33 PM
8

It's official, Gravity fails the Bechedel test.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 02:53 PM
4

A couple of weeks ago when I saw Gravity.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 02:52 PM
27

Similarly the recent movie "Gravity" fails this test also. Sandra Bullock only ever talks to George Clooney and the disembodied voices on the radio.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 02:52 PM
1

For Australians outside of NSW as well, stupidly there are vast differences in the education systems between the states and territories. The different systems use different grading systems between ATAR (Australian Tertiary Admission Rank - NSW), OP (Overall Position - QLD), etc.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 12:17 PM
3

We have guys from 18 up coming to our local shed with the older blokes helping out the younger ones and teaching them a thing or two. It's been a great way for my dad and I to spend some time together and get out to meet new people.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 01:25 PM
2

Yeah I have definitely gotten involved with my dad as a way for both us to make some new mates and spend some time together.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 01:24 PM
2

Glad to hear man, I don't know what I'd do without my daughter or son. She's growing up more like me every day and really is daddy's little girl with the annoying little brother.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 09:50 PM
2

There's nothing like a hug from your kids, especially if you haven't seen them in a while. Enjoy it man, enjoy the heck out of it.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 09:37 PM
9

They're basically saying that as long as you can get away with it for a sufficient amount of time then it is all ok to continue to defraud a person.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 04:13 AM
1

This is why I have a small number of organisations that I support, they are the ones with the most relevance in my life. The local Men's Shed organisation (helped with both mine and my father's depression and my father's isolation after his divorce), Red Cross (without donated blood almost all members of my family would have not made it through surgery at one time or another) and the local baseball club (Where I coach and my daughter and son both play).
/r/MensRights08/10/13 02:19 PM
2

Women can have access to any male dominated field, Mining, Engineering, Construction, etc. They have opportunities in these field as well yet choose not to take them so why should they mandate that companies be forced to appoint them as directors?
/r/MensRights08/10/13 02:02 PM
3

It says both in the article, 16 months in the summation at the top and 16 weeks in the actual article.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 10:12 PM
6

Why are the prosecuting a Criminal act in a Civil procedure? They should not be, the investigation and prosecution should be handled by the police and Crown Prosecutor or whatever you call in the states.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 11:26 PM
2

Except none of the dictionaries that they link to use this definition they all use: "One who commits rape" or "to force (someone) to have sex with you by using violence or the threat of violence" No gendered pronouns there.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 09:15 PM
5

You were probably protected from head explosion by your shield of privelege.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 02:58 PM
3

...was a disservice to the science community by reinforcing stereotypes that scientists are nerdy, old white men who can’t dance. But that is who Bill Nye is, do you want him to change into a booty shaking black woman on tv? I don't understand what this person is saying here.
/r/MensRights21/09/13 04:51 AM
2

So to get female's elected for these roles they have to force the female voters to vote for female candidates? So what they're saying here is that the female voters aren't smart enough to vote so they are prevented from voting for a qualified male candidate if that candidate represents their views and concerns.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 12:49 PM
2

That's because the Patriarchy doesn't allow books to be published by women, it's a biased reason why there aren't more popular female authors. /s
/r/MensRights09/09/13 09:51 PM
4

After the offending, Child Youth and Family tried to take the boy out of his mother's care. So after he was taken advantage of the government agency thought it was in his best interests to take him out of the care of his mother? WTF?
/r/MensRights08/09/13 09:28 PM
7

Shhh, are you saying that a woman would lie about who the father of her child is? Preposterous!!!!!
/r/MensRights07/09/13 12:26 PM
2

That's legalized slavery FTFY When the man is forced to continue working at a job that he may no longer wish to if he wants to settle down with lower paying employment he cannot. He is forced to earn as much money as he possibly can and support an ex wife. This is slavery on top of robbery.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 09:26 PM
2

If that is the case then why don't the greedy, capitalists only hire women and save 10% on their payroll? This could add up to many millions of dollars in a large enough organisation.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 08:34 AM
3

Happened to me when I couldn't prove the woman backed into me while we were both waiting to exit a local parking lot. Insurance company told me that there was no clear indication that either party was at fault so each company handled their own client and that was that.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 08:28 AM
2

Not to mention that women get 9pts for a touchdown even after all of these restrictions.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 03:37 AM
10

Not without badly disrupting the person's student career in a manner that comes with long lasting consequences the same for any person falsely accused of such crimes.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 09:40 PM
1

But but the defendant's lawyer and family are making this case: *Hunt's family says the relationship was consensual, with their lawyer claiming authorities wouldn't have gone after her if it had involved a male and a female instead of two teenage girls. In Florida, a person under the age of 16 is not legally able to consent to sex. * That is just unadulterated bullshit.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 07:13 AM
1

This is a shambles of a scheme with no source of money to pay for it after the current education reforms and the border protection policies that they want to put into place.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 05:41 AM
5

It looked a lot like a skate park where this occurred from the video so a small kid shouldn't be running around in the middle of it where people are going to be moving at speed with a limited ability to avoid sudden obstacles.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 09:05 PM
14

Except most of the comments about this post were all saying that the statistic is either true or that it is even worse than the statistic says it is.
/r/MensRights15/08/13 10:54 PM
1

Yep, Brisbane -> Mackay is basically the same as Brisbane -> Sydney.
/r/MensRights15/08/13 10:34 PM
1

Does Brisbane count? Redcliffe Peninsula to be exact. Mackay is a fair drive from anywhere to be honest.
/r/MensRights15/08/13 10:33 PM
6

Or they shouldn't cut places for male athletes if their doesn't happen to be an equal number of female athletes to balance.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 03:29 AM
10

I have never come across an MRM/MRA site that was even close to that. It's like comparing a post about someone who may have some issues with affirmative action and then linking them to the KKK website.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 10:58 AM
7

Most of those comments were disgusting and I am glad that I know of no one that would hold those opinions.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 08:09 AM
5

Except the academic meanings of words are also given in dictionaries along with the more colloquial usages. Whereas in sociological concept use the term Patriarchy in the correct way, whether or not it actually exists is the point of contention. However they are not consistently using the meaning of Matriarchy.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 06:35 AM
7

We may have a lower birth rate but there is also a much much lower infant mortality rate which was the reason to have a larger birth rate so that at least some of the children would make it to adulthood.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 01:38 AM
3

I'm pretty sure the overriding determining factor here is size with regards to levels of intoxication possibly some other factors but gender is not one of them.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 03:08 AM
3

I have had this problem before when I was taking my Niece and Nephew out for the day while my kids were at school. The follow up question was asked if they knew who I was and she seemed satisfied when my nephew piped up with Uncle Apellosine. I too was in too much shock to get mad at the time and it took me until that evening to go back and complain (Something that I never do but this was a special case).
/r/MensRights24/07/13 10:50 PM
12

"No country, however, has mandated that anything be excised from the public square merely because it provokes offense" This is precisely what many countries have done, most recently Russia has banned people actively talking about gay rights or even that gays exist by citizens or visitors. There have been attempts by many countries to introduce anti-blasphemy laws, hell they already exist in several Islamic nations.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 07:11 AM
8

The scary reality with the Doucet case is that there is nothing stopping the woman from hiring another hitman (albeit with a little more checking to make sure they aren't with the RCMP) and trying to kill her husband again. The precedent has already set that she can get away with it by crying past abuse whether he lives 200km away or not.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 04:25 AM
1

Brothels are legal in Queensland, New South Wales, Victoria and ACT whilst Prostitution is legal in the other states and Territories. There has also been several attempts in the other states and NT to push for legalisation of Brothels. I'm sorry, I had assumed that Brothels were legal country wide, there is one in my town and several in Brisbane (my capital).
/r/MensRights05/07/13 10:44 PM
2

Ahh, Brothels are legal in Australia as long as they are registered, licensed and regulated properly.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 12:54 PM
1

I can confirm this from being a Scout leader during the 90s when my brother (10 years younger) was in cubs and scouts. The girls that were in the troops wanted to be there and participates/contributed just as much as the boys in the troop.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 11:40 PM
13

Then why not have 2 Unisex bathrooms if they are both single occupancy?
/r/MensRights30/06/13 09:50 PM
0

Then why does the post say "prefer" female?
/r/MensRights19/06/13 07:16 AM
21

Replace gender with skin colour. "Preferably white (as there will be children around)" Now tell me that it still isn't discriminatory.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 07:16 AM
4

and they go out of their way to mention that the picture in the article is not of the woman in question. Maybe she wants to remain anonymous like the man in the picture that she took.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 11:36 PM
1

How is this even a law? Choose any two other differentiated groups and this just wouldn't fly. Whites pay $1000, Blacks pay $10000 or Christians pay $1000, Muslims/Jews/Atheists pay $10000, Straights pay $1000, Gays pay $10000. If it is not ok to discriminate based on these other differentiations then why is it ok to discriminate based on Male vs. Female?
/r/MensRights02/06/13 12:58 AM
16

What part of... "It's pretty easy to look at Charles Manson and go, yeah. But if look at a 32 year old woman and it's hard." ... did you miss?
/r/MensRights27/05/13 03:00 AM
8

Please be advised that our expectation is that a professional and helping manner will be maintained at all times. So is he supposed to be helpful like the letter says and hold the door or shut it in her face and never be nice to another co-worker ever and get reprimanded for being a poor team player?
/r/MensRights25/05/13 12:12 PM
52

Wow, that story has been screwed up a lot. The older girl was 17 and the younger 15 when the began dating, however on the older girls 18th birthday or very shortly thereafter the parents of the younger girl contacted the police as it was now an illegal coupling. Basically just before she turned 18 the relationship was all fine and dandy but as soon as she turned 18 she is now an evil child molester. This is appalling no matter what the genders of the people involved were.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 09:36 PM
3

“This university is not ready, in any capacity, for a heterosexual white male to be in charge in any way of diversity and inclusion,” said Coley, according to the Daily Northwestern. That word 'Inclusion', I do not think that it means what you think it means.
/r/MensRights19/05/13 10:55 AM
2

How is there even a Statute of Limitations on Fraud? That means that if you can defraud someone and they either (a) don't find out about it for for 4 years or (b) cannot afford to pursue it legally for 4 years than you effectively get away with it.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 09:33 PM
3

setting a lower cover charge for women by bars in Ontario cannot be found to substantively discriminate against men I'm pretty sure treating a class of people (In this case men) in a way that is detrimental (differences in entry fees) is the very definition of discriminatory.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 09:35 AM
2

Is this the same mother that says she doesn't want to force gender roles on her son and buys gender neutral clothing except no clothing with "masculine" graphics displayed?
/r/MensRights07/05/13 02:41 PM
12

That still does not deserve to be raped, no matter how much of a scumbag you may thing that he is.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 11:55 AM
50

"The worry is that viewing or distributing such images could support the sexual exploitation of children even if the production of the images did not actually involve the exploitation of any children" That totally doesn't sound like prosecuting thought crime at all...
/r/MensRights21/04/13 01:36 PM
2

There may be some issue with changing a man's name after a marriage in some places where it is relatively simple for a woman to do the same. I suggest that you investigate what is required beforehand rather than getting surprised when you try to do so as well.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 10:19 AM
4

This can't be true can it? Surely not? Otherwise obvious contradictions should make themselves clear like We can’t boil people down to numbers or statistics, or reject people based on the color of their skin. After stating: If I saw an application from a white male that basically was just good test scores, and activities like chess club or math club or what not then it shows me this person is not interested in a diverse environment. I'm gonna go ahead and believe that this is merely an example o…
/r/MensRights18/04/13 07:51 AM
6

"Those thoughts need to be closely monitored and watched and controlled, it's the only way to protect freedome for women." Because fuck the rights and freedoms of men, right?
/r/MensRights17/04/13 10:51 PM
4

and the mother is a victim in her complicity.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 01:30 AM
1

Yeah I know, I was responding to the article and under your post seemed the most relevant with the oppositions spelled out.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 08:47 PM
1

don't oppose same sex marriage, don't oppose immigration, don't oppose women in the workplace, don't oppose economic advancement of non-white citizens...hmm 0 for 4, pretty bad attempts there, try again later with some more accusations.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 12:13 PM
2

I think you missed: > Is a habitual liar; he twists facts to make it look as if he were the victim. Which is obviously completely out of character for any SRS like feminist.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 12:03 PM
1

and if they do it's because of some underlying psychological issue, not because women are capable of a bald faced lie or anything like that.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 09:07 PM
8

and a sexually liberated woman if he was female.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 01:43 PM
3

MRM is labeled as part of right-wing extremism. Hmm, I guess there doesn't exist any left wing, moderate right wing, or centrist members of the MRM movement then huh?
/r/MensRights31/03/13 08:03 AM
14

Or just not even be charged with rape in the first place.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 01:05 PM
1

But Hamad said the policy will help the RSU protect women’s issues, which “have historically and continue to today to be silenced.” Do they even have a sense of irony? Women's rights groups are being silenced so we shall silence any dissent?
/r/MensRights26/03/13 12:54 AM
13

Not to mention they'd probably know the most about my medical history if I wasn't married.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 12:26 AM
2

Frodo was that wizard guy right with the invisibility cloak?
/r/MensRights24/03/13 12:39 AM
11

It's not even like they can make the case that the boy was into it either as he ran away scared from the woman and didn't "consent" in any way shape or form not that he could anyway.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 07:03 AM
1

It was right there in the post. The headstart was determined by the difference in men's and women's record times.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 11:23 PM
3

So you're saying that it is in the best interests of the child to imprison the father who is often burdened with an unreasonable amount of support and thus ruin is chances of paying for future support with a felony conviction thus leading to the same situation of inability to pay for support?
/r/MensRights13/03/13 10:44 PM
2

When talking to one of the false accusers: "It was a feature of these cases that the suspect later reported that the whole thing had spiralled out of control and he or she felt unable to stop the investigation." Now imagine that there is no presumption of innocence on the accused's part.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 10:40 PM
2

The good old undisprovable Patriarchy, no matter what it is the fault of the Patriatchy, benevolent sexism if it is biased towards males and just plain old sexism if it's not.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 08:26 AM
25

You might also want to try /r/FeMRA and /r/LadyMRAs for a female perspective on these sorts of issues.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 04:23 AM
3

That's actually a good point and probably backed up by men who would need to seek such services being very sheepish at the thought of expressing their fears and problems with someone that seems to be so dismissive.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 03:06 PM
5

Not to mention, if any man does come in he will find some sort of service, mental health, homelessness, counselling, etc. Anything BUT Domestic Violence aid which is a different issue altogether and needs specific help not just palming them off on some random organisation.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 02:09 PM
6

Wow, that's deep.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 08:35 AM
2

..."asshole" developed as a homophobic (and thus woman-hating) slur;... I'm sorry but you don't get to say "thus" in this instance implying that one has anything to do with the other.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 08:32 AM
2

a close reading of “1984″ of course reveals that, whatever else it mightve been, orwells doodvolutionary work was also valuable PIV-positive, woman-hating propaganda. mystery solved. Wha? Huh? orwell himself once marveled about his own career as a writer that he had “somehow” convinced capitalism (or like, the establishment, or something) for a short time to pay him for work that was directly oppositional to its own interests. Wha? Huh? Orwell's work (1984, Animal Farm) was largely a reaction to…
/r/MensRights01/03/13 01:05 PM
6

IANAL, or american I'm pretty sure denying access to communication to a lawyer violates some sort of law and I would hope not contacting his family would also violate something. I just don't know what to say about any of it apart from the overreaction of the mother who I would assume made a complaint about his interaction with her daughter. It furthers the rational action for men to not speak to children even when spoken to by them or prompted by their mothers.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 12:52 PM
7

The line about her son being held responsible creates a situation where he is made to feel guilty about a situation that he had little to no control over. It is a means for the other to add psychological abuse on top of the physical abuse as well.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 04:18 AM
14

Unfortunately Victoria (Making the assumption that this happened in Victoria as it is a Victorian newspaper) is one of the states/territories where it is not required to inform sexual partners of an HIV/AIDS condition. Many other states have laws regarding this and treating it as a crime to engage with a sexual partner without informing them. They could be a rare couple who do not engage in sex until after marriage but it could have played a role in the judgement.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 04:16 AM
76

"I don't think there's much difference between lying about your health or lying about your financial circumstances or lying about your financial intentions," he said. Really mister lawyer, there's no difference between hiding some money and having a life threatening communicable disease?
/r/MensRights22/02/13 12:06 AM
6

Yet later in the article mentions, "...and most feminists are aware of the negative effects of patriarchy on men."
/r/MensRights21/02/13 12:14 AM
4

It also doesn't cover forced envelopment which would still come under sexual assault as it is apparently less of a crime than forced penetration. That is of course if it were to prosecuted at all.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 01:46 PM
10

I also found this from September 29 2011 Double Jeopardy, 4th column, "Surfing the OED", $800 question. Misandry is "hatred of" these.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 02:47 AM
2

About half of all marriages end in divorce in which case the man will ostensibly end up with the worst of it. About half of all women are no raped, it is a far more likely scenario that a man will experience a divorce than a woman will experience a rape.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 06:26 AM
3

Why even have Marriage if this become law?
/r/MensRights17/02/13 03:06 AM
1

I've wondered this as well. If the wife has lied to the courts is that not perjury? If she lies to a man to obtain money through deception that she is not entitled to is that not fraud? If through this lying she has gained child support is that not proceeds of crime?
/r/MensRights16/02/13 11:24 AM
13

Apparently it shows his sexual deviance. Which is bullshit as it should be considered normal sexual behaviour as far as I'm concerned.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 09:59 AM
2

What's the point in having marriage laws in the first place if these sorts of laws are enacted? I can see some sort of arrangements being neccesary when there are children involved but 2 years = marriage is ridiculous. If anything this incentivises people to leave a relationship that they aren't 100% certain will end in marriage before the 2 year mark leaving more people single when for some people it can take longer than a 2 year relationship to determine the consequences/benefits of marriage.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 12:43 PM
28

There are a number of homeless women as well but there are far more services for them than there are for men to help them get into temporary housing. Many homeless men are returned military veterans that due to psychological issues have found it difficult to re-enter society at large. Many homeless men are on some sort of Sexual Offenders register and thus find it difficult to find housing that complies with all of the regulations they are subject too (ie. not close to schools, parks or other ar…
/r/MensRights10/02/13 09:56 AM
7

Who cares what the reason is, not for sexual gratification just for money or to please a potential sexual partner it's still abuse with child victims.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 11:17 AM
2

And of course there is no liability for the woman because something must have pushed her to these actions and it's therefore not her fault. "What happened in her life to get her to that place?"
/r/MensRights08/02/13 03:15 AM
1

Most of the time you won't change the person's mind but an onlooker may see the flaws in logic or be exposed to an alternative viewpoint and that's the person you can reach. Whether it is literally another person in the room with you or just someone perusing a website forum, perhaps even Reddit!
/r/MensRights07/02/13 03:14 AM
6

The female robot that kicks the man across the room for touching the car...
/r/MensRights06/02/13 10:24 AM
26

She managed to find the ad featuring the woman beating the man to be objectifying women?
/r/MensRights06/02/13 06:01 AM
20

Fourthy - Is it impossible to believe that someone can think they gave consent yet accuse of rape anyway? This is what is known as a lie, I know it's hard to believe for some people but women have been known to lie on occasion.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 09:03 PM
3

Fantastic places, I've been to my local one a few times with my dad who finds it difficult to make friends and found the blokes there quite accommodating and instantly friendly. It was a great experience to get away from it all and just chat with other guys about issues pertaining to men specifically and learn a thing or two from people who are willing to teach.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 05:53 AM
17

Good old Pious Deceit, it's ok to lie about something so heinous as long as it's for a good cause. By perpetuating the lie they force women into a position of fear that her testosterone fuelled boyfriend/husband is going to be a powder keg.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 05:50 AM
9

Because a 12 year old boy can easily overpower a full grown 31 yo woman now? Or did I miss the part in high school where all males regardless of age are physically equal or more powerful than all females regardless of age.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 11:56 PM
3

Let me change this slightly: "He then claimed that sending her to jail would be wrong because her victims have 'largely recovered' from the injuries they sustained. The fact that the trauma was inflicted is analogous to inflicting a physical injury that heals or is repaired with a medical procedure. Just because it is no longer there does not mean that it was ok/not so bad to cause in the first place.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 11:51 PM
2

Professionals in the military are always officers and it's possible that a larger portion of females are in the military for this purpose, ie. doctors, lawyers, dentists, nurses, etc and are not actually in unit leadership roles.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 08:33 AM
8

There is a lot of literature on the subject that pre adult sexual activity has a lasting and profound effect on both males and females. Taking that yes I can make that assumption as I can make the assumption that this is the reason that a 13yo cannot consent to sex or sexual contact, especially with an adult that is 18 years his senior.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 07:34 AM
26

...and the victim didn't express much of an impact from the traumatic event, even though the victim is 12-13 and unable to accurately assess such an impact.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 04:26 AM
3

I swear they need to bring in game designers when making changes like this to the law. They are experts in the field of gaming the system to find these types of flaws within it.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 01:32 AM
8

The problem here is that there have been cases of an underage male who has been raped by an adult female and then forced to pay child support. As well as just adult men who have been raped by women and forced to pay child support. Men whose wives have cheated on them and have proved that the child is not theirs and still forced to pay child support. There are a lot of jurisdictions where a married man is liable for any births from his wife whether or not he is the father. These situations can de…
/r/MensRights22/01/13 11:27 PM
1

How can the court on one hand give his ex-wife an acquittal based on "facts" that he abused his wife and daughter and on the other hand have a government agency find that he is the better parent for their child to be in custody of?
/r/MensRights22/01/13 09:41 PM
5

Not to mention statute of limitations issues when considering prosecuting the ex-wife. Just because her lie held up for 15 years means that she will get away with it. I just hope that the man can reconnect with his children and form a meaningful relationship with them.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 10:33 PM
14

On the societal level, women’s violence against men has a trivial effect on men compared to the devastating effect of men’s violence against women. Taken straight from the Duluth Model website, clearly states that male victims of domestic violence are lesser victims than female victims as it has a trivial effect on them.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 12:40 PM
1

Except there are vast swathes of the job market dominated by women that also do not require a university degree, Clerical, retail, hospitality, maids, beauty, etc.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 09:12 PM
7

Attractive man flirts with you = OK Unattractive man flirts with you = creeper
/r/MensRights18/01/13 12:24 AM
2

"He comes from a dysfunctional family?" How is that even related, I don't even.... "He has or had an abusive or passive father, or a negative relationship with his mother." - Does an abusive or passive mother count as a negative relationship or is that an impossibility? "He rebels against authoritative figures" - again how is this even related, aren't all authoritative figures men anyway, damn patriarchy. "He is cruel to animals" - Again, not seeing the connection here. "Boastful" - Amongst a gr…
/r/MensRights17/01/13 07:53 AM
3

In this subreddit you can be pretty sure that it is not.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 07:31 AM
3

Except I don't feel like having sex every minute of the day. There may be a wide variety of reasons why a man wouldn't want sex with a woman, attractive or not but it doesn't matter if he doesn't want it, he doesn't want it. However propose a situation of a married or attached man who is in this situation, a man with an injury that would exacerbate during the act, a man that was molested as a child. No matter what the reason, if he says no it becomes rape if she continues.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 07:30 AM
30

It can't be censorship because all of feminism is right so obviously it's okay to say things like: "Please sign this petition in order to have anything and everything that is Anti-Feminist and Anti-Woman, and also related to advocacy of the "Men's Rights Movement", defaulted as terrorism, or promotional of hatred and violence, so that the content may be flagged and removed from YouTube as it should be." Basically saying that we cannot handle criticism of our arguments so they don't deserve to be…
/r/MensRights17/01/13 07:18 AM
2

While I can get behind something like this in theory, unfortunately I agree with you that as worded it is too easily abused.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 11:44 AM
1

And if people had paranoia/unease with other demographics (Race, Religion, Women) then people would have a problem but because it is men then it's obviously the men's fault. If there were a bunch of white folk that had a problem with black entering their gym because they made them feel uncomfortable it would be called out for what it is, prejudiced. However that's not the case because it is men in this case.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 07:32 AM
1

So because the men don't feel uncomfortable and the women are then it's definitely the men's fault that the women feel uncomfortable? It's not just that the women feel uncomfortable for some other reason, a belief that the men will be mean/violent/sexual/hit on them. There's a word for that, it's called prejudice and when applied to gender more specifically we call it sexism.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 03:48 AM
1

So women get to use the gym every night of the week but the men must miss out on one of those nights? If the gym use is part of the student fees then should the women pay more for more use of the gym or the men pay less for less time they may use it?
/r/MensRights11/01/13 03:46 AM
7

1) Threatens to disown you for standing up for a cause that you are passionate about that happens to be a gendered cause pertaining to men. 2) Then claims men are not treated poorly in this country. 3) Logic fail.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 01:13 PM
1

It's not politically correct to assume anything but 100% truthiness from alleged victims. Fixed that last sentence up for you there.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 01:08 PM
4

When I go through University orientation I would hope that I am not an assumed rapist and that people will give me more credit than to have to be told that raping someone is wrong.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 10:04 AM
1

No, it doesn't. He's alive, so his sperm is his property. Once he's dead, she inherits his property and his power of attorney. Even if he is alive and owns property, during divorce proceedings a partner can make a claim for half of the property. What is to stop a partner making a claim on this "property"
/r/MensRights07/01/13 04:46 AM
1

Not to mention he's a fantastic single father taking responsibility for his daughter.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 02:34 PM
1

The problem is in treating the sperm as "property" it raises issues in cases of divorce. Also once your husband is deceased, his body does not belong to you in any way shape of form. She cannot just do whatever she wants with his body, we have "Disturbing a Corpse" style laws to protect a person's body once they are deceased. Additionally, he can no longer give consent to donate sperm, he may have balked at the idea at the last second before donation but there is no way to know because he is now…
/r/MensRights06/01/13 02:21 PM
1

I'm assuming that the child was not her boyfriend's and was from a previous relationship. That is what I am hoping at least and that they did not leave the child with the abusive parent if he indeed is the father.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 02:05 PM
5

So if the man was left alone after jumping from the window and his assailant had not continued the beating then no one would be charged for anything in this case?
/r/MensRights06/01/13 06:04 AM
1

When the man began to physically attack the two women, one of them grabbed a knife to defend herself. The man attacking the women preceded them attempting to defend themselves, they did not come at him with the knife.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 11:28 AM
3

reading the article may help out some. he was stabbed in self defense after attacking not only his girlfriend but the other 2 girls who attempted to intervene.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 05:37 AM
18

I don't quite get the link in the last part of your comment. It would be like saying, hmm it's ok to shoot other people with this nerf/paintball gun , I guess it's ok to shoot other people with this real gun as well then. You aren't giving people enough faculties to make these distinctions.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 08:33 AM
2

That was sort of the point I was making, even taking that all mass murders are committed by men, the percentage of those murders still breaks down by race at ~70% white which is similar enough to the average racial population breakdown. The story was saying that if it were overwhelmingly black men or arab then there would be an outcry which is probably true as they would be committing mass murder at a higher rate than would be indicated by population breakdown.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 04:01 AM
4

One of the comments on the video pointed out that 70% of shooters were white males which weirdly is close to 72% of the population made up of whites.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 10:50 PM
8

Not only that but all of men's problems are caused by Misogyny... Of course, that's why Misandry doesn't exist because it's all just a form of Misogyny.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 12:08 PM
2

Her whole thesis boils down to, PIV is assault and you cannot consent to being assaulted. This criminalises martial arts, boxing, various forms of football, etc.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 04:27 AM
2

Up until that line I was sort of with them,using the children against the other parent, undermining their parenting, etc and then bam, "batterers as fathers" after which I lost all respect.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 06:11 AM
2

Someone needs to put this in the sidebar as a popular Poe Blog instead of posting links to it every post.
/r/MensRights24/12/12 12:34 PM
2

Under point 5: Men are more likely to successfully commit suicide and suffer from mental disorders that lead to such. Boys and men are doing worse in school and nothing is being done about it, in fact funding is consistently used to aid girls and women in the education system. These are also objectively measurable outcomes for being born into a certain group, males. People who do not fall into the Straight white male groups do not have the stranglehold on major issues.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 01:57 PM
2

Contained within this point that is trying to say that not all feminists are evil is this gem, "Many feminists would like to see pro-feminist men tackle men's issues in a way that doesn't blame women and feminism for all their problems (like MRAs)" Does this person even read what she has written? Men can only help with men's issues if it's done under the guise of feminism? Don't blame the women like all those MRAs do also.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 01:52 PM
1

And also not keeping with the supposed empowered womyn narrative of feminists.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 11:48 AM
13

Unfortunately this will not be counted amongst DV statistics in the court system as the charge was lowered to "Regular Assault" by the judge. I cannot see the reason for this other than to reduce the appearance of female on male Domestic Violence in the statistics to further bolster the DV Industries narrative that men are always the abusers.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 10:01 AM
1

If they say that technically they are not releasing your medical information or medical situation or possible medical procedures to a third party then ask why they are discriminating based on the fact that you are married or in a long term relationship vs. being single.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 09:00 PM
4

Or the fact that if you're doing it right you are most likely to break a rib whilst performing CPR, just a little side effect of a life saving procedure and all.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 08:58 PM
1

I would have to agree, my grade 11/12 Maths C teacher was a great guy, as well as my bodybuilder physics teacher (odd combo but great teacher and a great dude to talk to in general)
/r/MensRights20/12/12 07:13 AM
2

A group of feminists, both female and male, prevented access to a lecture hall for a number of students attempting to attend a lecture at the U of T campus a few weeks ago. They did so by forming a linked chain of people to prevent them entering through the doors of the building. The vehement screaming coming from the protesters was also aimed squarely at the students attempting to attend in a manner which decried the gender and attempt to learn from a visiting lecturer.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 07:09 AM
9

The problem with these laws is they only criminalise penetrative sexual assault and not envelopment sexual assault under the purview of rape.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 06:48 AM
9

Open your eyes, look up to the skies and see
/r/MensRights19/12/12 03:10 AM
2

No, they were coerced/intimidated into by their male compatriots to commit the egregious acts of sexual humiliation and torture at Abu Gharib. << Actual sentiment I have heard.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 10:24 AM
14

I'm of the assumption that equal custody should be where the process begins and after testimony/evidence/parental agreement it will either remain as equal custody or favour one parent or the other in some way. We shouldn't begin with the assumption that the mother will take primary custody and then work from there.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 12:17 AM
3

My point is they would never get away with discriminating based on race so why should they get away with discriminating based on sex?
/r/MensRights14/12/12 10:00 PM
14

This is where I like to play the "It can't be discrimination if it's against men game" and change it up a little. Whites $199 Blacks $299 Just because it's men being discriminated against does not make it ok at all.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 08:04 PM
11

Best part of the article: "Yet, despite my fears, rationally speaking, I know I am being unfair. Of all the little boys I know -- and I know an awful lot, including my three nephews -- I only know two who are really horrid, whom I avoid because they are so violent and crazed." A few paragraphs later: "And, by the same token, I know several vile little girls..." She knows several vile little girls and 2 horrid little boys and yet still has a prejudice against having a little boy? That right there…
/r/MensRights14/12/12 08:30 AM
4

After all that and the mother still gets more custody (5 days per fortnight) than most men could dream of after being model parents let alone engaging in active parental alienation.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 08:58 PM
11

There's a difference between idealogues and extremists, this post, I'm pretty sure is from one of the later that not even your average feminist would agree with. I hope at least anyway...
/r/MensRights13/12/12 08:28 PM
4

So the part of the law that reads: "...or looking insistently at a young lady up and down will be reprehensible acts in France" This is criminalising checking a woman out. Or how about: "imposing on someone, in a repeated way, words or actions that have a sexual connotation" Would be criminalising flirting, complementing a woman on their appearance, no no no mister that's 2 years in gaol for you.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 09:05 PM
5

I would also like to go with an awesome grandmother. She started her own printing business in 1956 without help from my grandfather at the time. She began a rally driving association in NSW and was a race car driver around the same time. She helped me purchase my first car. She supported my father through my mother's deplorable actions in their separation. She took on a teen the same age as my dad when he was 17 that was in and out of gaol and helped him get back on track, he's now considered a …
/r/MensRights12/12/12 01:26 AM
2

A grown man shouldn't cry like that but with such a great ending I couldn't help it. These sorts of stories need to be better publicised to show just how wrong it can go.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 12:17 AM
3

I think she's going with the whole financial manipulation, social manipulation/isolation angle.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 09:37 AM
1

Or of course vice versa, posting a nice circlejerky type of post and then edited it to make it look like the OP had support for some sort of vile position.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 07:57 AM
4

Blah blah blah, "socialism only exists stirs up strife between groups" Creates a False Dichotomy between socialism and not socialism when one can hold many views that fall somewhere along the spectrum with varying degrees of socialist or capitalist ideals. Also it assumes that any socialist views must necessarily lead to views on revolution which would be a Slippery Slope Bullet Two A heavy progressive or graduated income tax Would be Poisoning the well, just because a position is accepted by a …
/r/MensRights10/12/12 09:46 AM
2

In the same way the feminists ignore issues that men face, basically saying: "Why isn't every activist movement involved in every political/social/economic issue ever thought of?"
/r/MensRights10/12/12 08:21 AM
1

I'm not saying it's the case in this situation but some women just can't conflate someone not being a good husband/boyfriend/partner for them and at the same time being a great father to their child.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 01:39 AM
1

Whenever a woman brings up that I just don't get their women's problems I like to reply with the same about the problems of men. They can't see the inherent bias against men in several areas of life/law (divorce, child custody, schrodinger's rapist, typically female occupations, female on male abuse) because they don't see it on a regular basis or it doesn't resonate with them.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 01:22 AM
1

I think you will find that there are vast tracts of individuals who hold liberal, conservative or centrist views on different subjects and do not sway one way or the other as a whole.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 08:04 AM
1

More importantly it's Unlawful Sexual Conduct by an authority figure to a minor.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 10:46 AM
6

The family court system is the way it is (overwhelmingly favouring women) because of the feminist movement. It wouldn't have swung so far this way if there wasn't a lot of feminist advocates attempting to push it so far. There are sections of the society where this is the case (ie. the bias in favour of women), Domestic Violence, child custody, health advocacy, mental health, homelessness advocacy. Feminist thought has pervaded thought on a lot of these subjects so much to only see women as need…
/r/MensRights01/12/12 06:23 AM
26

But it can't be hate speech against men, they're the rapists and misogynists, duhh... /s
/r/MensRights01/12/12 06:16 AM
1

Of course this happens just as the world is ending!
/r/MensRights01/12/12 01:45 AM
9

I got this all the while up until my brother was a teenager, he's 10 years younger than I am. It's finally completely stopped now that he's 20 but goddamn did I get some odd looks and scowls before hand.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 09:50 PM
1

I've heard this before and heard that the reason is that women are intimidated by the patriarchal system into accepting what they're offered without putting up a fight.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 04:40 PM
11

It surprises me how someone can perform such intricate logical gymnastics to arrive at conclusions like this. Female rapists are the victims because they are rebelling against an oppressive society? A person can only "legitimately" rape someone with less "privilege". How does this work if a gay man accidently rapes a woman, is a woman more or less privileged than a gay man? What if the woman was black? What if the gay man was black? What if the man was straight and black? How far can the privile…
/r/MensRights27/11/12 04:38 PM
19

That woman deserves an honourary REAL moustache for keeping that going.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 08:00 AM
32

correct, here have a PhD in Gender Studies!
/r/MensRights27/11/12 07:59 AM
1

They don't see a connection. 1) Husband accuses wife and her colleagues of criminal activities. 2) Wife accuses husband of abuse. 3) Husband is sent to psychiatric facility for "paranoia" over the alleged criminal dealings Somewhere in the middle there is the bank uncovering the criminal dealings.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 03:46 AM
2

I see now that the children aren't in the clutches of their mother that they are dangerous to themselves and hating their father with every fibre of their being....oh wait that's not at all what is happening yet was portrayed so vehemently in the media while this debacle was ongoing.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 07:15 AM
2

not really, IVF deals with individual embryos, I can see being against the discarding of embryos but being ok with a condom for contraception.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 10:34 AM
6

If we accept that false accusers should be prosecuted it would not have applied in this case anyway as the woman in question was well under the age of legal responsibility. What could be investigated however are the circumstances surrounding the original investigation/conviction and those involved. Without knowing the full facts of the case I can only speculate but there must have been more "evidence" than the say so of an 11yo girl at the time, especially to secure a sentence as long as he rece…
/r/MensRights23/11/12 09:39 AM
65

The problem with that line of thinking is that there is no disincentive for the person to lie about the crime in the first place as they have no repercussions if they are caught. They think that they may as well try it because if it works, woohoo, if it doesn't then they aren't punished.
/r/MensRights23/11/12 06:50 AM
5

An interesting, non feminist biased story from the Huffington Post, are we in some kind of weird bizzaro world?
/r/MensRights22/11/12 09:03 PM
3

In what world is the child entitled to Higher Education tuition anyway? If her parents had still have been married they wouldn't have to pay a cent towards it but now that he is estranged and "Nothing more than a wallet" he is obligated to pay?
/r/MensRights22/11/12 08:56 PM
1

I have never let the fear of being scorned change my attitudes in public. I don't know if I'm just lucky or what but I have never been harassed for smiling, laughing or poking my tongue out with any kid.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 12:25 AM
1

Paedophile Hysteria, totally Misogyny, Women by far favoured in Divorce Settlements/Child Custody, totally Misogyny. Infant Circumcision, totally Misogyny, Rape Accusers automatically being labelled as victims with the accused automatically labelled as the rapist, totally Misogyny.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 01:56 PM
11

Show me an american/english/australian woman/gay man/black man that had to walk 10 miles to collect water? Had acid thrown at their face for attending school? No, then shut the fuck up about their problems then. Just because a group may have it better in some respects to others does not mean that they are immune to abuse, injury, emotional distress, etc. The men's rights movement seeks to fix or ammend the problems that men do face in the world, though they may be different it does not mean that…
/r/MensRights20/11/12 01:35 PM
1

Money. It's pretty simple, there is no money in it as compared to the vast swaths of wealth found in the Feminist movement and women's issues groups (health, abuse, etc.)
/r/MensRights17/11/12 02:19 PM
2

Fear of being fired is not an excuse for committing what amounts to sexual interference with a minor.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 02:08 PM
14

The fact that he has to decide is abhorrent in it's entirety.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 01:54 PM
10

Do you fully support the abolition of Women's only Gyms or Women's only spas as well?
/r/MensRights16/11/12 07:16 AM
63

Refused at best, possibly branded a pervert or worse.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 07:15 AM
1

female chickens The opposite of a Buck's Night is a Hen's Night so I really don't see how "Hen" is gender neutral.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 01:43 PM
1

How is Hen a genderless and neutral pronoun when it refers to a female chicken? Ever heard of a Hen's Night for example?
/r/MensRights15/11/12 01:41 PM
11

Since I was a teenager I saw the way my mother treated my father, lying to police, to friends and how much she was believed. No one ever believed my father that he was the victim of abuse because he was a big guy, 6'2" well built but with chronic pain that was manipulated. He wasn't a perfect husband by any stretch but he never got the help or support he needed from anywhere. It was only recently that my brother has become close with my father again after being alienated from him for so many yea…
/r/MensRights14/11/12 06:53 AM
2

I have been lied to dammit, I've been told my entire life that it was Blue Sugar and I believed my Grandfather. Hmmm how much else of this so called "French" that he taught me is wrong then I wonder? P.S. He was of French decent, as his father came to Australia from France. Because of this we have a French version of a common English surname which creates confusion and leads to constant spelling out or mispronunciations. He ingrained in both his children and grandchildren a sense of pride in the…
/r/MensRights13/11/12 10:01 PM
1

The "Boy Scouts of America" is well funded by the Mormon church. Out here in Australia they still have fairly close ties with the Anglicans but not nearly to as much of an extent, they're also a fairly Monarchist organisation out here. It was never a problem for me as a leader when my brother was coming up through cubs and the like as an out Atheist.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 02:19 PM
-1

well the "bleu" just means blue, in sauces it would generally refer to blue cheese. As an added fun fact the term "Sucre Bleu" literally means "Blue Sugar"
/r/MensRights13/11/12 01:48 PM
1

Pretty close to 50/50, 115 Won, 108 Lost.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 11:07 PM
0

I don't care if less rapists get convicted... Destined for /r/nocontext ?
/r/MensRights10/11/12 10:40 PM
1

All arguments basically come down as: 1) Men may have problem but it doesn't matter because women have problem too 2) Patriarchy 3) Corporations
/r/MensRights10/11/12 06:05 AM
3

Also using an electronic device through the phone service turns it into wire fraud a bit more serious offense.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 05:47 AM
1

Sadly that's the way that most science reporting is going these days.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 07:48 AM
1

Even as a left leaning liberal I cannot stand the Huffington Post, they just get so very many things wrong between Feminism Topics, Science, just so wrong.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 05:30 AM
2

Well I'm assuming they mean "Cold" not "Flu" as the Flu can be a very debilitating illness especially to someone that may have a compromised immune system.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 12:44 AM
3

more specifically Aus-Steyr, made for the Australian Army
/r/MensRights05/11/12 11:44 AM
12

I believe the term you are looking for is Wire Fraud.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 06:10 AM
10

I can confirm this. My mother convinced the police early in the morning that my father had hit her and pushed her down in an abusive manner. The fact that he simply pushed her away to prevent her from causing injury to an already injured leg was irrelevant nor was the fact that she was drunk at the time being the cause for her actually falling relevant. He was arrested on the spot without asking either myself or my brother what had happened (both present at the time) as she had backup from the n…
/r/MensRights30/10/12 09:15 PM
1

When I was studying full time at university I was on a government benefit called Austudy (At the time ~$470/ft) which was barely enough to cover my share of the rent, food, utilities, etc and thus I lived with others. If I had been of Aboriginal or Torres Straight Islander Decent I would have received an additional $50/ft which adds up over the course of my 4 year degree to about $5000, a rather substantial amount. However as I am of european decent I do not get this free additional stipend.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 03:29 AM
1

That would be a fantastic name for a gay bar, I want to be gay now so I can go to the "Hardware Store" and not raise any flags.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 03:24 AM
1

When I was studying full time at university I was on a government benefit called Austudy (At the time ~$470/ft) which was barely enough to cover my share of the rent, food, utilities, etc and thus I lived with others. If I had been of Aboriginal or Torres Straight Islander Decent I would have received an additional $50/ft which adds up over the course of my 4 year degree to about $5000, a rather substantial amount. However as I am of european decent I do not get this free additional stipend.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 03:20 AM
1

The last time she faced the possibility of her children being taken from her she hired a hitman to kill her husband, this cannot be taken lightly. For this minor infraction she has received a 19 month jail term and full custody of her children once released. This is abhorent, both the sentencing and the "reward" she will be receiving.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 11:17 AM
8

I wouldn't want to be a 6' tall guy with bracers at that university after this was released. Especially trying to talk to people or gasp Female People
/r/MensRights26/10/12 11:06 AM
11

It's in the release there "3rd Degree Assault" for asking if a girl was someone he knew.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 11:05 AM
1

If you had been keeping track of this story then you would know that the man has spent an extremely long time in Australia trying to fight for custody in the courts while his mother and the girl's Maternal Grandmother was hiding them from their father and the Australian court system.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 07:30 AM
2

While some of the points he made were valid (This particular woman could not do the job), some of the comments were just sexist. If the woman could have done the job at an equal level to any other employee than equal pay is warranted. Going off on a tangent saying that NO woman could do some things that men can do is taking it a bit far.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 07:13 PM
2

It was definitely self defense, she was under extreme pressure while he slept. Note, I do not in any way condone the actions of her former husband but this is plain and simply premeditated murder of an unaware victim.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 04:12 AM
1

The problem with this line of reasoning is that being in the group "men" we tend to focus on those areas where we feel shortchanged and attack those until equality is reached. The feminism movement is doing the same for those areas where they feel they do not have equality either.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 02:07 PM
3

Mormon?
/r/MensRights14/10/12 01:28 AM
22

Whether they set it up as a club or not does not remove the sexist sentiment however. Their whole premise is a sexist smear on all men.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 08:44 PM
7

And they take him back to good old Debtor's Prison for his troubles.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 08:45 PM
-2

If feminism were to be a movement for true Gender Egalitarianism then why is it named after the female gender? It'd be like using the term Negroism as a term to refer to the equality of all the races, black, white, asian, etc.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 02:07 PM
13

A fine point to make, not all representations of the genitals, breasts or behinds are sexual in nature. Most people just don't get it or understand that men can also make this distinction as well. Men don't become ravenous beasts if they catch the mere glimpse of a body part that could be sexualised in another setting.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 02:45 PM
1

Out here in Australia they are considered extra disabled parking spots. They're also known as "Parents with Prams" spots.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 01:14 AM
4

The mother is Australian and still an Australian citizen whilst living in Italy, I'm assuming that this played a role in the situation. After reading the story in the Brisbane paper this morning it is clear that the children have been subjected to Parental Alienation Syndrome. The mother repeatedly told the children that if they returned they would never see her again, that if the mother returned she would be forced into gaol for an extended time, etc. In a lengthy legal analysis, Justice Forres…
/r/MensRights04/10/12 12:25 PM
5

I was reading this story in the Courier Mail (Major Brisbane newspaper) this morning and the facts of the case that they reported presented a clear indication of Parental Alienation Syndrome. Things like the mother telling her daughters that she would be arrested should she return to Italy, that they would never see her again if she returned, that their father didn't want to see them and was only doing it to hurt their mother, etc.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 12:22 PM
1

For example, a height requirement might affect women more than men. It couldn't be a condition that employees be a certain height for, I don't know, safety reasons? Nope, it's definitely to be prejudiced against women of course.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 03:01 PM
8

Just a small bit of nagging i see in similar posts. There is no such thing as reverse racism or reverse sexism, it's just racism or sexism, plain and simple. The meaning still applies no matter what races/sexes/religions/sexual orientations are involved.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 06:13 AM
4

I feel conflicted about this, while I agree that if the genders were reversed then many feminists would cry rape, I believe that the intent is important for the crime (Mens Rea). The woman in this case had no reason to doubt that her boyfriend was a willing participant in the sexual activity and stopped immediately when he withdrew his consent/showed his lack of consent.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 01:05 AM
11

On the plus side there is a movement, at least out here in Australia and I believe other places called the "Men's Shed Association" as a space for men to get together. Although I have seen some women lament the fact as to why men need such a place.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 10:59 PM
3

In Australia you would usually use a Bail Bondsman as a temporary loan to pay for one's bail. After you are released the bond is returned to you, Bail Bondsman charge a fee for the service as well but if you were able to pay the full amount by yourself then you would receive it back in full.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 11:57 AM
2

I think the part that you're missing is that they did bring up gender into the argument with the following: "We were two women in a car being attacked by this 'Hulk' guy who was just bashing our car up." With the implication that if it was 2 men in the car then they would have been perfectly fine.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 05:52 AM
16

One of the best parts of the story: "The men, who have not been named, were arrested on suspicion of rape and spent a total of 50 hours in custody before being released on bail." So not only is she being prosecuted for her crimes, the innocent young men won't be publicly shamed for no reason either.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 01:25 AM
2

I was quoting the article about what the judge stated and then went on to say the it was not an act of kindness or mercy, did you even read what I wrote?
/r/MensRights18/09/12 09:16 PM
12

but to her credit, "took a cloth to press on the wound.", seriously is this supposed to mitigate what she did? She fucked up and was trying to conspire to fix it with her accomplice, this was merely a part of that conspiring not an act of kindness or mercy.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 08:34 PM
20

Possibly adding in Attempted Murder as well?
/r/MensRights18/09/12 08:32 PM
5

Because men are never assaulted, mugged or murdered?
/r/MensRights15/09/12 12:14 PM
6

Self defense isn't just used to defend against sexual assault, it can be used in defense to a mugging, to a beating, to protect a child or yourself or your property.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 12:11 PM
1

the owner of the shop is calling what they do "Men's Work": "It's a man's job -- dirty, tiring. There's nothing easy about it." However elsewhere in the article is offended when told about women's work?
/r/MensRights15/09/12 11:46 AM
4

Seeing the reaction the police had to my mother lying through her teeth about my father. I was staying with my parents for a bit as I was unemployed due to health reasons at the time and saw the police literally not listen to my father, to me or to my brother who were all contradicting my obviously drunk mother about his "abuse". He was taken away in handcuffs that night which made his planned moving out that much more difficult as he couldn't go within 100m of her. She wouldn't help us out by l…
/r/MensRights15/09/12 11:38 AM
2

Bris Vegas baby More specifically Redcliffe Peninsula, Queensland
/r/MensRights14/09/12 06:20 AM
2

I've never given a waiter a tip in my life, most places won't let you here in Australia either.
/r/MensRights14/09/12 04:40 AM
2

but, but it's just atheism with added precautions against racism, ableism and sexism misogyny. Oh wait, they don't care about men at all there now do they?
/r/MensRights14/09/12 01:51 AM
2

After ordering my steak "Very Rare" or "Blue" (Seared outside with minimal pink + deep scarlet on the inside all at about 40 celsius) as it is known out here in Australia, I often get asked if I know what that means. As if I'm ordering it that way for the fun of screwing around with the Chef.
/r/MensRights14/09/12 01:45 AM
2

Over 5000 names and I don't show up at all? That kinda makes me sad, although I have only had a couple of small skirmishes with SRS peoples.
/r/MensRights14/09/12 01:38 AM
2

Sociology being a subset of science is probably one of the funniest things I have heard all year. Not even my Sociology PHD Professor friend thinks that it is but she is more of an Animal Rights Activist than a feminist activist.
/r/MensRights14/09/12 01:32 AM
1

She was obligated to allow you to take custody and she didn't allow you, whether the police stopped you or not or the tire was slashed should be irrelevant in the matter.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 10:52 PM
1

At the very least you should be able to get her infracted for denying you legal custody of your children through a custody agreement? I mean slashing the tires did lead to you not taking your kids with you on your designated day after all.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 09:07 PM
2

60% are men, 40% are women, 40 is 66% of 60 therefore there are 33% less homeless women then men. I'm not sure how your mathematics works.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 11:42 PM
1

One quite prominent one at that (the mind controlling witch for example), however there have been quite a few female antagonists both social and physical.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 01:13 PM
9

Except the Big Issue already caters to all of the homeless, men and women. The money raised from this new initiative is exclusively going towards women's issues ("..., the start-up phase of the Women's Subscriptions Enterprise will focus exclusively on the needs of homeless and disadvantage women only") which they stated with their own statistics make up 33% less homeless people then men. I see that they are using the women's issues as a way to drum up support
/r/MensRights11/09/12 11:39 AM
10

That may be the case but their reasoning needs to be adjusted. They specifically state 40% of homeless are women (leaving 60% as men), 48% of couch surfers are women (leaving 52% as men). They then go on to say that women being homeless is a far greater and more complex range of needs. When the majority of homeless and couch surfers are men it is simple mathematics as to the greater need. I am not saying that we shouldn't help women who are homeless also but trying to spin any statistics to "We …
/r/MensRights11/09/12 11:06 AM
3

Hmmm, so because this obviously highly unlikely scenario happened to her it means that that is what it is like every single time she leaves the house? Or this is exactly what it is like for every female? Or this is what every male does when on the train? Or this has never happened to any man ever (I have had similar situations happen)?
/r/MensRights08/09/12 08:46 PM
7

For anyone who wishes to read about the case: The Controversial Holly Collins Custody Case - What Really Happened
/r/MensRights07/09/12 02:58 AM
10

Wow, that just boggles my mind what you went through with your female friend but I commend you for doing the right thing in the face of that kind of adversity.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 08:54 PM
15

The cognitive dissonance is strong within them.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 05:28 AM
4

Which does happen a lot and I've seen it first hand with my mother and father. The only "injuries" to my mother where caused by my father pushing her away from attacking him and preying on his disability (chronic pain, back and ankle). When the police arrived her friends claimed that he had been violent out on the front porch, ie: pushed her away and she fell over whilst drunk at the time. He was taken to the police station and my mother was given an AVO which stopped us from being able to move …
/r/MensRights31/08/12 03:54 AM
2

My favourite question is the Hugh/Elizabeth one, Hugh says he wants to have sex and then Beth gives him oral, then he moves to intercourse. However what Hugh did was wrong because consent to one type of sex does not imply consent of another. However Hugh just wanted sex and didn't consent to oral specifically therefore Elizabeth is also guilty of not getting consent for each act.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 12:10 AM
2

I agree completely with you and the charge being withdrawn was a miscarriage of justice really. However going by the facts of each of these cases, 2 were manslaughter and the other was pre-meditated murder all given similar sentences which is what got my goat.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 10:19 PM
3

Both of these attacks can definitely be charged as manslaughter, emotional stresses leading to a violent outburst, not a clearly pre-meditated murder as stated by the Justice overseeing the case explicitly.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 09:18 PM
3

The Justice in the case even said that in the hours before the killing "Chen took time to consider her various options" "She did not stab the victim until the early hours of the morning, after having considered her situation over many hours" How can this not be seen as evidence of pre-mediatation, a crime of passion (manslaughter) is not considered over hours it is by its nature the opposite.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 09:15 PM
2

Hugh expressed his desire to have sex, Elizabeth engaged him in Oral Sex and then proceeded to move on to regular sex. At no time did Elizabeth say no or protest (That is not to say that this is always consenting to a yes). So we basically have a man asking for sex and getting it. He asked for sex, she gave him sex without asking what he wanted.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 10:59 PM
5

"Would you like to know more?"
/r/MensRights27/08/12 10:55 PM
6

Then by that logic, the fact that Hugh consented to sex and Elizabeth performed sex would be the same as her giving consent sex of any sort.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 10:53 PM
1

Today/Tonight it's like the highest of high brow journalism... note: the previous comment is meant as fiction, any relation to persons living or dead or historical events is purely coincidental
/r/MensRights27/08/12 09:13 PM
3

I'm just putting it out there in writing. I Apellosine of sound mind declare the following affirmation. Until verbally or texturally explicitly revoked that I give my consent for my Wife (Mrs. Apellosine) to engage in fellatio with Me (Apellosine) without recent or implied permission. This includes when I (Apellosine) am asleep when she begins. This consent does not apply to other women, men and/or other and is legally binding.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 10:26 AM
1

Nationalities of the victims can be an important part of the story, the 2002 Bali Bombings had a high number of Australian victims as the terrorists were targeting them specifically (Hitting tourist areas/night clubs). However saying the brits were killed in the UK is probably not necessary.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 06:59 AM
3

Also not every male in a warzone is a combatant, if they merely used the value for civilian casualties then they may have a point and be making it in a less sexist way.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 06:57 AM
1

My favourite comment there "I really doubt she classifies as a pedophile. And a male would receive about the same deal in sentencing. It actually did surprise me that she DID get so much time though."
/r/MensRights26/08/12 01:01 AM
2

fair points, I may have to do some more reading about this. All the sources I read alluded to homo (man) only coming about with homo (man) sapiens (wise). Sources on the internet are wrong? I'm shocked. The history of language and their evolution is a hobby of mine with no formal education on the subject.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 12:47 AM
3

Homo is actually from the root for "Same" as in homogeneous, homosexual, homophone it only later came to mean man after the Latin Binomial Homo Sapiens was coined.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 10:23 PM
1

So the story they read was obviously: ...blah blah blah...children tell mother that coach molested them...mother beats up coach with bat...coach says sorry while being beaten... and totally missed the part about "...and warrants served on him by local police have yielded no evidence of child abuse, as of yet" I'm not saying that he is innocent or guilty but without evidence you cannot crucify him. Even with evidence of molestation you CANNOT crucify him, don't beat people up no matter the reason…
/r/MensRights24/08/12 11:43 AM
3

Case in point, I'm not a fan of criminals but all accuses deserve fair treatment.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 10:59 AM
1

In general we do but there are still some archaic laws like this on the books unfortunately.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 09:51 PM
2

This makes me ashamed for some Australian lawmakers :(
/r/MensRights21/08/12 09:51 PM
23

"Our intention is certainly not to discriminate in any way" I love how they do this by blatantly discriminating against a class of people.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 06:54 AM
28

No. humans do not begin as females until testosterone hits. All fetuses begin as neutral, if testosterone hits then they develop male genitalia and other masculine. If it does not hit then the fetus develops female genitalia and feminine traits. The gender of the fetus is decided at conception from whether the sperm provides an X or a Y chromosome this cannot change during the development of the fetus therefore the fetus is always travelling down one path or the other therefore a male fetus is n…
/r/MensRights05/08/12 05:40 AM
2

And the story here is? Reasonable people were reasonable to each other and an erroneous complaint was dealt with reasonably.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 10:55 AM
3

On a positive note the group Outlinc has expressed their faith in the police department to investigate fully to rule out what is only rumour and find what is fact. I must commend them on this for not seeking to exploit the fears and rumour-mongering.
/r/MensRights29/07/12 09:40 PM
11

You can get first hand facts from reading the article she wrote: The Question on Nobody's Lips There are some fantastic statements not just in the article but alsoi in the comments section Freud was someone who couldn’t bring himself to admit the reality staring him in the face: that men rape children. ...even with all the evidence we have that something’s not quite right with the male of the species... I think that the comments section is even worse than the article.
/r/MensRights14/07/12 10:12 AM
10

I agree wholeheartedly, user created content can certainly be moderated but it cannot be seen as the views expressed by the owners of the website to which the content is posted.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 01:31 PM
6

...unwanted fatherhood, embarrasment, shame...
/r/MensRights03/07/12 09:13 PM
2

that still does not make them fathers, they are mothers.
/r/MensRights18/06/12 12:02 PM
3

I think the link through the girlfriend's ex being a cop, presumably one of the perpetrators White-Knighting for his ex even if it wasn't the ex making the accusation? The whole beating up someone on the say so of someone else that they may be hurting a woman? It may be a stretch but it's all I could come up with.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 06:41 AM
1

To be honest our parties are named more for their fiscal policies than for their social policies. The Liberals (LNP, Libberal/National Party) are the conservatives and Labour fights for the rights of workers or the labour unions.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 07:10 AM
22

just because you are unsuccesful doesn't mean you didn't commit fraud. Also this should probably come under some sort of Perjury/Making a false report sort of penalty.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 07:28 AM
1

all things taken equally and corrected for current health complications and risk factors (smoking, excessive drinking etc.) women still pay less than men because statistically men still die earlier than women. Being male or female is in no way the only factor when determining your life insurance premiums but it is one of them.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 11:48 AM
3

If it's similar to Australian law then taking out a Domestic Violence Order (or whatever you guys call it) bars you from contacting the "victim" in anyway, phone, mail, other electronic means, through other people, especially for threatening communications. What the judge has done oversteps this as he would expect to have a patina of privacy in a private facebook post where his wife is not privy to the communication. This is the equivalent of saying something nasty about your wife to some people…
/r/MensRights19/03/12 10:10 PM
4

read the article and saw the following lines: Although some of the sites make an attempt at civility and try to back their arguments with facts, they are almost all thick with misogynistic attacks that can be astounding for the guttural hatred they express. ...that keeps a close eye on these and many other woman-hating sites seems pretty clear here what the implication is.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 05:57 AM
1

Also look up the Innocence Project. They have been helping wrongly convicted people get a second hearing after compelling DNA or other scientific evidence comes to light that was not available (As in the technology didn't exist) at the time of their prosecution. They have usually been convicted on flimsy eye witness testimony or primitive scientific testing or both.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 11:11 AM
6

Hmmm, no contact order is what was filed on the morning my father was trying to move out of my parents home. She got her friends to lie to the police and get an order to force my father to stay 100m away from her. Now try moving out when you can't come within 100m of the house. I was helping him that day anyway but we had to drag my brother out of work for the day to help pack up a moving van. It was a well timed and used weapon by the manipulative and spiteful bitch that has earnt her the right…
/r/MensRights21/01/12 10:24 PM
1

You may want to look at the ages here 19 vs 15/16 as the actual cause of the charges.
/r/MensRights19/01/12 01:51 PM
1

I'm pretty sure the sexual assault charges have something to do with the ages, 19 yo girl/"acting as boy" in sexual encounters with 15/16 yo girls.
/r/MensRights19/01/12 01:50 PM
2

I love the following part of the document under "Outcome 5": In the long-term, perpetrator and social attitudes that allow, and even encourage, the abuse of male power and control over women and children must change, along with the violent behaviour linked to these attitudes. Of course women could never be the perpetrators of violence against their intimate partners or their children, this never happens it is always a man exerting his Male power and control.
/r/MensRights07/01/12 12:58 AM
3

this would be the egregious section of the ammendments: Item 43 repeals existing section 117AB of the Act. Section 117AB requires the court to make a mandatory cost order against a party to the proceedings, for some or all of the costs of another party, where the court is satisfied that the first party knowingly made a false allegation or statement in the proceedings.
/r/MensRights23/11/11 03:26 AM
1

if you're up for some legalese reading: http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Fbillhome%2Fr4562%22
/r/MensRights23/11/11 03:25 AM
3

relevant?
/r/MensRights10/11/11 07:57 AM
9

Seriously 1 in every 3 men would rape if they could get away with it? Do they think that we are barely restrained animals only stopped by societies dislike of rapists.
/r/MensRights07/11/11 12:41 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter