TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ApplejuiceAdmin Archive

View 0 posts and 48 comments by ApplejuiceAdmin on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

I'm not OP, but look at this line that s/he said previously: The point is that anyone can read a script, but it doesn't make them the character that they portray. And even if they say they've become this person, how could they ever be trusted to be genuine again? In my mind, TRP is used a person acting like someone they are not for sexual gains. The bible is a person becoming the person they want to be for self-improvement.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/15 02:47 PM
1

First thing I learned about women is that they really suck at explaining what they want/like. But bashing women is totally fine, right? Stop being a sexist. It's really unattractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/14 12:54 PM
1

That's the most bullshit thing I've ever seen in my entire life. Literally laughing at someone who is gullible enough to believe that. Either source it or go to university yourself. I'm thinking you're trolling.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/14 12:53 PM
1

I think you're way over thinking it. I mean, Jesus, that's like...an analysis based off of your own perception of women and how you think they think. And that's okay, it's just not really how things go. A man cooking, giving back rubs, complimenting me and being open with his emotions makes me very happy. A man like that is hard to come by. It makes me respect him more. I don't respect cheaters, rapists, absent fathers, thieves, and the like. It's actually a pretty simple formula: be nice to me,…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/14 09:49 PM
1

Just because a man doesn't do enough dishes doesn't mean they should get divorced. Jesus. How fragile do you think relationships are?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/14 09:25 PM
1

Yeah, that's pretty much my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/14 10:52 PM
1

Maybe it's men who don't know how to listen.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/14 10:38 PM
-1

Some people attack the opponent (i.e. "You are retarded/the things you say are retarded!") And even saying that the things that are saying are retarded is attacking the opponent because it is an attempt to make the opponent FEEL bad for saying what they did. It's involving emotions. Making people feel bad to win is a sign that your argument isn't strong enough on its own. Whereas what should happen is you should attack the argument (i.e. "The reason this argument is invalid is because..."). No e…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/14 05:05 AM
4

"High status" usually implies physically attractive I disagree. Donald trump is about as high-status as it gets, and he's an ugly motherfucker. I'm pretty sure "high-status" is just a universally polite way of saying rich.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/14 12:25 AM
1

All I'm pointing out is that by calling names and resorting to personal attacks, you're making it seem like you can't defend your points logically. You attack the opponent, not the argument. While everyone else here has managed to do the opposite. It's not that I really feel hurt by anything you said, it's just that it says a lot about your ability to articulate your thoughts.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/14 12:21 AM
0

The difference between feminism and TRP is that I can go on TRP and find you almost 100 examples of blatant sexism towards women. You can't do that with feminism. You can maybe find an insulting blog, or a radical feminist whose made the news. But you know that that's not representitive of how all feminists feel. But you can measure by upvotes and top page posts how TRPers actually feel. But the biggest difference is that the goal of feminism is equality. The goal of TRP is asserting alpha domin…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/14 12:19 AM
0

I said that people say retarded things. And that's WAYYY less insulting. They're not retards, but what they stand for an believe in are retarded! Couldn't you have just been mature about it and left out the name calling?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/14 12:08 AM
2

Perfect mix of snark, ignoring the main implications of the posts, and digression. That's EXACTLY what they guy you're talking about did. Snarky attitude and ignored the subject of the post. I don't even see where he said whether or not his mind was changed.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/14 11:51 PM
1

They do. My point stands. So does the other guy's. You called people retarded. It's like you pushed the self-destruct button.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/14 11:42 PM
1

So tell me why you're not a TRPer.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/14 11:40 PM
1

You are a good debater.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/14 11:39 PM
-1

RP response is that sexism is not a core part of the movement. S/he JUST said this: More than half of the discussions involving RP is some variation of, "That's not what TRP believes!" "That's not what they say!" "You misunderstood!" in reference to obvious core beliefs of TRP. You just did EXACTLY what s/he said you guys do during a debate. I think that says something.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/14 11:37 PM
-1

Holy fuck how can one be so...simple... as to think this is an essay? This barely has 1000 words? 1000 words?!?! It once took me weeks to write a 1000 word essay for a final paper. That's a whole lot of words for a whole lot of nothing. Well, nothing at all relevant to the topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/14 11:34 PM
1

I feel the same way! I want to respond, because individually, I could do a wonderful job making rebuttal after rebuttal to each of these misguided assumptions, biased half-truths or outright false claims. And I'm pretty sure, using credible sources and a positive tone, I could at least make him rethink his position. But there's just so much. I don't have the energy for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/14 11:33 PM
2

TBP tends to decry things as being wrong and say that someone (in general men) should change it. But fuck feminists, am i rite? It is wrong to tell all men that they need to be a certain way, because what TRP teaches isn't an inherent truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/14 01:55 PM
2

I've found the opposite to be true. Most of women's complaints about their male partners are that they don't do enough chores, don't listen to them, are too closed off, ignore them, don't spend enough time with the kids. All of those traits seem to be things TRPers tend to do. I prefer to split our relationship equally. I make some big decisions, mainly things that concern me (i.e. whether or not I spend all of my money on student loans now, or let those pile up to make us more comfortable in ou…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/14 01:52 PM
1

So, you found the thread insulting to women. Then you go and say this? You mean a biological truth? Tell me about all of the men you know who can breastfeed. It's also the case for a lot of mothers. Your personal bias showing and you're speaking in definitive terms without really anything to back it up. Oh, but you can mention that you were raised by a single father, and you're not showing any biases at all? I'm sorry that this fact is hard for you to hear, but I'm going to say it again: fathers…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/14 02:09 AM
1

You're right it has been incredibly insulting. To women, mainly. Or are you relying on men --your father, your teenage ex-- to house, support, and feed both you and your unfortunate* offspring? ^ That was a comment to me. Because women cannot possibly support themselves. Because it's not possible for a woman to not rely on a man. The sexism here is outrageous. Look at my other comments in this thread. One of them has five sources about mother/baby bonding, and why babies prefer their mothers ove…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/14 01:23 AM
4

I don't think so. It doesn't say anything about that on the sidebar. And I can't find one single post about trying to do any of those things. Maybe making fun of TRP shows people how ridiculous a lot of it is, and people are driven away by that. But TBP doesn't seem to actively move to do anything. In fact, I image that if they shut down TRP, their source of humor would be taken away and it wouldn't be fun anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/14 04:42 PM
0

Of course they can. I'm not saying that men are useless at childcare. Just like how women are not useless at physically strenuous activities. Both genders have their pros and cons, but being a woman, I feel like being a woman is better. I'm sure that you being a man makes you feel like being a man is better. It might just be a POV issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/14 04:03 PM
3

I call them girlfriends because they like the sound of it, but it's more of a FWB thing and even then mostly benefits because they are so mindnumbingly dull. Then why would you and your superiority even have sex with them? If they're really that worthless and take so much effort, why bother? Sex? You know they make these really high-tech masturbatory aids now. Apparently they feel just like vaginas. Maybe give that a go? My point is that if you really had a lot to offer, you wouldn't be alone. I…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/14 03:11 PM
3

That's a whole lot of nothing but assumptions (not even anecdotal evidence this time). Are you going to offer anything worth debating? Like you did, just now? Was that all you were going to contribute to the conversation? It's not an assumption to know that if a woman wants to leech off of man, she won't have sex with him once then never text him back. She just wanted casual sex. Otherwise, she would have kept him. It's a really simple process. I've had casual sex. Because I wanted casual sex. I…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/14 01:58 PM
3

Because 1/2 of the relationship is my life, and her issue is affecting me. But half of it is her life, and your issues also affect her. So if you're both equally a part of the relationship, then you should both equally decide whether an issue is legitimate. Please tell us more since you speak for all "quality" women. Well, I am a successful woman. I have a good sense of self-worth and self-confidence. I've overcome numerous obstacles in my life that have made me self-reliant and self-aware. Yes,…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/14 01:55 PM
5

Then the modern women you're talking about aren't whores. Because if a woman is spinning plates, she's probably just seeking the pleasure from sex. If I were a low-quality woman and I wanted money, I'd find one man and leech off of him.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/14 01:14 PM
2

If she tells me there's an issue I'll listen to her argument and decide if I feel it's legitimate and let her know immediately. But why do you get to decide if it's legitimate? She could be more rational than you. Especially if you're insecure, drunk, angry, or any other of the millions of things that make you irrational. Let me ask you this: you both go out and she's dancing at a club and it makes you uncomfortable. You bring it up to her, and she tells you it's not a legitimate argument. She t…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/14 01:09 PM
5

A counter movement? What is TBP moving to do? I see a lot of people making fun of TRP, but not one post calling for action.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/14 01:01 PM
5

I exchange sex for pleasure. Because sex is pleasurable. Am I a whore? If I am, then every women who likes to orgasm during sex is, as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/14 12:59 PM
3

Still no. A slut is a woman who has many casual sexual partners. We don't know that she does. She says she found someone else, so I'm doubting that she's spinning very many plates right now.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/14 12:57 PM
2

I'd rather have someone who is physically stronger with me than someone who is just nicer. Being nice isn't going to save my back. Neither will someone who's stronger. In your day-to-day life, chances are that you won't encounter any danger. I'd rather have someone who's fun to hang out with. I'm curious about the shit test thing. How do you determine what is a shit test and what is a real argument? Maybe when she tells you she doesn't like you staying up at 3 in the morning playing COD, she's n…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/14 12:44 PM
2

Who pays for your housing, food, and utilities? Are you covering 99% of those costs? 50%? 15%? Me. 100%. I'm a single mother. Or are you relying on men --your father, your teenage ex-- to house, support, and feed both you and your unfortunate* offspring? Don't be rude and obnoxious. It makes you seem like you can't argue without relying on personal attacks, which makes me think you don't have much faith in your point. And no, I live alone with my son. His father is no longer in our lives. He, li…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/14 12:32 PM
2

http://bernard.pitzer.edu/~dmoore/psych199s03articles/Of_Human_Bonding.pdf That's just one about babies preferring their mother's voices. And that's understandable, seeing as they spend 9 months listing to their moms blab all day every day. But it's still a truth, regardless of the reasoning behind it. http://infantlab.fiu.edu/articles/Bushnell%202001.pdf A more interesting one about babies preferring their mother's faces. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1036151/Breast-feeding-DOES-hel…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/14 02:21 AM
2

You shit talk his performance maybe it goes down, you reward him with mind-blowing sex maybe he tries to get a promotion. I said in the scenario that the wife leaves after she gives you the dollar. This is representative of the "sperm donor" fathers who abandon expectant mothers. So in the scenario, none of the financial success can be attributed to any indirect methods by the wife. She gave you a dollar, and that's her only contribution. Some men squirt sperm into women, and that is their only …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/14 02:04 AM
0

No, men can be a big help in the family dynamic. But statistically, they're more likely to abandon their children. Biologically, they don't connect as well to their children. Single mothers struggle without men because raising children alone is hard for both men and women. Four hands are better than two. Also because two incomes make for happier families than one income. But speaking strictly on a biological level, women are better at child-rearing than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/14 01:56 AM
1

Think of it this way: your wife gives you a dollar then divorces you. You invest that dollar and spend your life working hard day in and day out, finally making millions and million off of that dollar, while your now ex-wife sits on her ass at home eating bon-bons. Did your wife play as big a role as you did in making those millions? Is she just as entitled to that money as you are?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/14 01:50 AM
1

But women do 99% of the work in ensuring children's survival after men squirt their sperm. So yes, you need sperm to make a zygote. But you need women for every single thing after that. Men play a very small role in our specie's survival, but you're right, however tiny that role may be, it's still essential. It's just that women are more essential in creating a successful species.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/14 01:46 AM
1

Women's ability to make the species survive makes them superior, in my opinion. Because strength and intelligence don't matter without survival.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/14 01:40 AM
1

You need both men and women, but women do 99% of the work in reproduction. Men are wayyy more likely to abandon their offspring. Women have maternal instincts that men simply don't have. Statistically, children prefer their mothers over their fathers. Let's not even mention the fact that women can be the primary food source for their children for several years. To me, that means more than strength. Because in today's society, strength is pretty much irrelevant. Muscles are hot, but when do you a…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/14 01:38 AM
1

Survivablity is more important that superiority, though. Who cares if you're smart and strong if your a genetic dead end?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/14 01:33 AM
2

Biologically, men are set to spread their seed wherever they can. Biologically, women are set to find the best genetic mate to ensure their offspring's survival. Men crave quantity, women crave quality. So of course it makes sense that men do everything possible to impress women, because women have their pick of the litter. Of course men are valuable to society. But when we get down to the basics, women are biologically more valuable.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/14 01:29 AM
-1

I'm honestly curious, why is physical strength and rational thought better qualities than maternal instincts, reproduction capabilities, and emotional lines of thinking? Let me go through each one. Physical strength in today's society is pretty much irrelevant. Muscles are attractive, but when will you realistically ever NEED to be strong? Bar fights? Break-ins? Meh. Rational thought is a great quality, but how often in your daily life do you encounter a situation where you need to think somethi…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/14 01:20 AM
1

All things reproduction aside? You mean, the reason that the species will and has continued to survive? Yeah, why would we count that.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/14 01:05 AM
0

If men get so easily pissed off and offended over such a non-issue, I'm going to have to go with women as the better gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/14 01:04 AM
1

I disagree. Statistically, men are more violent than women. Men mature slower than women. Women have stronger immune systems. Women live longer. Also, and most importantly, women are the best gender to ensure the survival of the next generation, with their maternal instincts. Men are statistically MUCH more likely to abandon their young. Not to mention the fact that women do 99% of the work in bringing a child into the world. They can even be the primary food source for the infant for up to seve…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/14 01:02 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter