TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Appropriate-Major649 Archive

View 0 posts and 123 comments by Appropriate-Major649 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Did you just need attention?
/r/MensRights17/07/26 09:00 PM
0

That added a lot to the conversation...or something.
/r/MensRights17/07/26 08:59 PM
3

I have come to the conclusion - this is not a joke - that not everyone on the internet is mentally ill and emotionally unregulated, but everyone who is mentally ill and emotionally unregulated is on the internet.
/r/MensRights16/07/26 02:39 PM
21

This is very common. Ask any policeman how often women cry rape or abuse to try to gain advantage at the scene of an incident. It is most often sorted out at the scene in one way or another. But every call for service does not receive a full, written, investigative report. So these false accusations are not recorded and so not counted. False accusations of rape and domestic abuse - not unfounded, but provably false - should be prosecuted just as obstruction, communicating a threat or assault* is…
/r/MensRights16/07/26 02:27 PM
1

Troll.
/r/MensRights15/07/26 03:57 PM
4

I just believe men have a lot they need to hold ourselves responsible for. To begin with, you have no business, no business at all telling me or anyone else what we need to hold ourselves responsible for. Just exactly who do you think you are? How 'bout a little trip to the mirror? Hold him accountable. Furthermore, when I look back on the last 60 years, I see no lack of reminders for men to hold themselves responsible - in fact, I see 60 years of every Western man being told they are accountabl…
/r/MensRights14/07/26 10:04 PM
10

Assertions are not reality. Capacity for violence is not the same as being violent. Women have a higher capacity for social violence. Women have a higher capacity for paternity fraud. Women have a higher capacity for false claims of rape and sexual harassment. When women commit acts of genital mutilation it is a punchline, as with all violence committed by women against men. Women more often use weapons in violence against men. Women are sentenced to far less prison time than men for similar cri…
/r/MensRights14/07/26 04:22 PM
11

Further, "men have earned their haters" no more than women have. It is either morally wrong to hate people based on immutable characteristics, or it isn't. If it isn't, women have earned their haters too.
/r/MensRights14/07/26 03:58 PM
9

Strive to be the kind of man whose existence encourages a changed mind. I will not allow my existence to be defined or my behavior dictated by people who hate me.
/r/MensRights14/07/26 03:55 PM
3

So I guess now "Reefer Madness" is true? Or only for women?
/r/MensRights13/07/26 10:38 PM
2

Any identifiable group is to be singled out and whatever problems that group has (or can be convinced they have) are entirely due to the actions of another identifiable group. In no way can any problem, large or small, be due to any factors inherent in the victimized group (The Good Guys). If there exists no way to attribute a particular problem in the victimized group to anything but factors inherent in that group, the particular problem is said to be an isolated anomaly, not as consequential a…
/r/MensRights13/07/26 06:24 PM
1

Its called the French Police Chief Joke.
/r/MensRights13/07/26 03:28 PM
26

Well yes, I think its kind of old news. It goes like this - if a man is attracted to a woman and she isn't attracted to him he needs to accept that women are not sex objects and she doesn't owe him anything and if he can't "just be friends" he s a toxic male who wants to dominate women and if he can't have sex with them his little fragile boy ego is probably why she wasn't attracted to him in the first place. If a woman is attracted to man and he isn't attracted to her, he is scum who should die…
/r/MensRights12/07/26 05:27 PM
1

It has been proven through studies that tobacco use has no link to cancer. It was once mathematically proven powered flight was impossible. I believe that no model has ever concluded it was possible for a helicopter to fly. The world is full of "studies." Here's a study for you - over 90% of people will belive any damn thing you tell them if you say it came from a "study." Here's another - studies have shown that over 90% of studies reach the conclusions the people funding the study wanted. How'…
/r/MensRights12/07/26 02:09 PM
3

No, they are not objectively harmful. Punching someone in the face is objectively harmful. Having a different opinion is nothing more than that. Further, the "psychological well being of kids" is very much in question. I find it stunning that in Mens Rights forum people are unable to recognize this. Feminists would absolutely love to have every single objection to their horrible ideology classified as "objectively harmful." That's right - because in their view, anyone who objects to feminism is …
/r/MensRights12/07/26 12:37 AM
2

"I have a history of depression and when i see different perspectives and views i get into crippling depression that pressure my chest and skull. How can i learn to accept the fact that people have different views and perspectives? " I would suggest you meditate on the fact that people who cannot accept the fact that people have different views and perspectives are the problem. The people with different views and perspectives, whatever those views and perspectives may be, are not. People who can…
/r/MensRights11/07/26 05:27 PM
1

I have found a good rule of thumb - when a word has to be modified to make your argument, your objective generally has nothing to do with the word being modified.
/r/MensRights11/07/26 05:20 PM
4

Feminism is collectivism - Collectivism is all and only about Power - Feminism is all and only about power. If A=B and B=C, A=C.
/r/MensRights11/07/26 05:18 PM
5

I hope you are right.
/r/MensRights10/07/26 10:16 PM
8

The video out of Birmingham England is a perfect encapsulation of what is going on. Three black immigrants attacking one white kid. The wade in and grab the white kid. He swings at one of the cops because he's being attacked and didn't realize it was a cop grabbing him, so they arrest the white kid and let the attackers go. They are going after the low hanging fruit. Like the police chief who surrounds the building next to the bank being robbed. When asked why he didn't surround the bank, he sai…
/r/MensRights10/07/26 10:09 PM
2

Naturally, degrees and exceptions. We have men who are cunning manipulators who couldn't do one pushup and women who explode into murderous violence at fast food establishments. The vast murky middle is going to be made up of people who will utilize whatever method works - by their own definitions of "works" - to most effectively get what they want at the moment.
/r/MensRights10/07/26 03:06 PM
9

Its also a way of attracting other guys - damseling.
/r/MensRights09/07/26 10:19 PM
15

I think, without going to deeply into it, that men are pre disposed by nature to act and confront, women to scheme and manipulate. Actions are a lot more dramatic and harder to deny than schemes and manipulation. Which is why proclaiming innocence of any involvement or ill intent is part of scheming and manipulation.
/r/MensRights09/07/26 05:18 PM
3

This is just the latest installment of "World Ends Tomorrow, Women Hardest Hit."
/r/MensRights09/07/26 05:15 PM
1

OK just didn't know - thanks for educating me. I get it now. My eyes aren't what they used to be.
/r/MensRights09/07/26 02:06 AM
0

You mean, you wish they would be open and honest about their motives? Me too. I wish everyone would. The question is, why would they? Out of kindness? Decency? Sense of Fair Play? Gender War brother. Not gender struggle, or game, or contest. War. WAR. And they are playing to win, not to be right.
/r/MensRights08/07/26 07:49 PM
2

Yes my brother. This is the way. Play the game they set up.
/r/MensRights08/07/26 07:45 PM
1

I'm sorry I don't know what this means.
/r/MensRights08/07/26 03:11 PM
2

Ok thanks bro. I stand corrected. Cheers.
/r/MensRights07/07/26 11:03 PM
1

This is bait.
/r/MensRights07/07/26 10:58 PM
5

Hannah Spier is a bad ass.
/r/MensRights07/07/26 09:36 PM
2

Because control over men's sexuality emasculates.
/r/MensRights07/07/26 09:35 PM
45

I won't be demonized for being male even if I had chosen it.
/r/MensRights06/07/26 07:57 PM
2

Yes, if I posted a picture of me fondling Venus' breasts it would be taken as someone just mocking a stone statue.
/r/MensRights05/07/26 08:22 PM
1

Just like "incel," its a term used to dismiss and invalidate differing points of view. Accuracy is not a concern, just effectiveness.
/r/MensRights05/07/26 08:20 PM
1

I am not an MRA or a member of the Manosphere. I am a man who was promised inalienable rights at birth and I will not be silent when they are shit on. Every day, more and more men like me are created.
/r/MensRights05/07/26 08:19 PM
9

"...is it still men's fault?" Yes. Always yes.
/r/MensRights05/07/26 04:59 PM
2

You can't logic and reason people out of a position they never logic and reasoned themselves into. To exhaust you chasing moving goalposts is the point. Like a pool hustler staying just a liiiiitttle ahead, you are always thinking they are on the verge of being convinced and then...poof. Its like they never heard a word you said. Because they didn't. Its just a game to them. They win when you engage with logic and reason. So don't. Go through life understanding you may not be at war with them, b…
/r/MensRights04/07/26 07:10 PM
1

I'm on a motorcycle run right now, so I don't have time for a thoughtful response even if your reply merited it. Fortunately, your reply can be summed up in one word - Disingenous. Cue now the feminists, taken aback, eyes as big as pie plates, angelic look of wonder plastered on her visage, hand to her pearls saying "whatever do you mean Disingenous???" Back to the road.
/r/MensRights02/07/26 03:55 PM
2

Yes. IF (and I mean a very big IF) men are responsible for the majority of things wrong in the world, we are responsible for just about everything that is good and right in the world as well. Go forth and be a man without any apologies.
/r/MensRights28/06/26 09:31 PM
2

I do not recommend you ever share this with a woman you are involved with. I speak as a happily married man, but with long and repeated experience prior to marriage.
/r/MensRights28/06/26 08:38 PM
4

I understand. Wasn't taking issue with your analysis, as I said. But what is a money making operation for big feminism can also be - and often is - a perpetual victimization and accountability dodging mechanism for the average armchair feminist. I think Occam's razor doesn't mean you are wrong or that your analysis isn't at all useful - I just think the majority of people have simpler, less complex motives.
/r/MensRights28/06/26 03:48 PM
17

I think it is simpler, although not saying your analysis is useless. Quite simply, oppression is their business. So far, business has been good. What is coming out about the SPLC is a good example. Feminism, like the SPLC, isn't trying to solve problems, promote understanding, or achieve *rolls eyes* equality. They are trying to keep the mill churning and the money and jobs flowing. Any of the above are inimicable to that goal. It doesn't have to make sense, be factual or coherent, because any i…
/r/MensRights28/06/26 02:31 PM
10

Just one example. And I am given to understand that they were not "evil," they were "enlightened," and any objection I had was a result of my "experiencing equality for the first time."
/r/MensRights28/06/26 02:20 PM
45

Women that were smiling in my face one day and assuring me that if I ever said anything that offended them they would tell me themselves were filing sexual harassment complaints the next because there were rewards for doing so. You just aren't worth the trouble. There is no upside to interacting with you. The best possible outcome is neutral. Women and weak men made it this way in your name for your "protection." *spelling edit*
/r/MensRights27/06/26 08:33 PM
1

Then why don't all countries have some version of sharia law w/respect to women?
/r/MensRights27/06/26 04:04 PM
1

"Shall arrest"laws at scenes of domestic violence that required arrest when the slightest contact is made morphed into "primary aggressor" laws that required arrest of the bigger stronger person when "shall arrest" laws were getting too many women arrested. The Duluth Model.
/r/MensRights27/06/26 04:02 PM
1

Voluntary non participation. From the everyday - no, I will not give up my seat to you on the subway. Oh, you are pregnant? I didn't do it, and the answer is still no. To jury nullification. Anyone can add to the list.
/r/MensRights27/06/26 03:59 PM
1

In upside down world everything is an epidemic except the things that are.
/r/MensRights27/06/26 03:56 PM
13

However much that study cost I could have reached the same conclusion for a lot less money.
/r/MensRights27/06/26 03:54 PM
43

A misogynist is a man who feels about women the way women feel about each other.
/r/MensRights26/06/26 09:55 PM
2

That is really well said. Thanks.
/r/MensRights26/06/26 03:33 PM
5

They see it as men are mostly murdered by men. So if men don't want to be murdered by men, men should stop murdering men. But most women are murdered by men, can't help being murdered by men,* so if men wanted to stop murdering women, they would. So men can and should just stop murdering and stop other men from murdering. Then there wouldn't be any murder. And if we just put women in charge they'd...Oh Jesus. My head hurts. This is truly disordered thinking. *Which is why they should be in the i…
/r/MensRights26/06/26 01:28 PM
1

There is no KKK left in America, and what there is/was is on the SPLC payroll. But there was a time the remnants were trying to re-cast themselves as a "civil rights organization," concerned with the civil rights of "all Americans." David Duke was probably the face of this risible effort. A man, any man, who believes that anyone who calls themselves a Feminist and/or wishes to address Men's issues from a "Feminist Perspective" is like a black person working with the Duke campaign to secure civil…
/r/MensRights25/06/26 05:26 PM
2

Am I the bad guy for feeling like this? No, you are not. That you are not is paradoxically best demonstrated by the hysterical invective that you will encounter in an attempt to convince you and others that you are. Or do others feel the same way I do? Yes. Welcome my brotha from down unda.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 05:20 PM
1

I think the best answer for this is to point out that women can be Airborne Rangers and Navy Seals and in the Infantry and all because gender is just a social construct. How then do we justify the idea that men are stronger than women when it is advantageous to cast them as victims, but gender is just a social construct and they can be Rambo when they desire to cast them as RiotGRRL GRRL bosses.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 05:11 PM
3

Thanks for reminding me. She was a powerhouse intellect. Also Janice Fiamengo.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 02:01 PM
3

Yes, of course they do. But here's the thing - you aren't ever, ever going to change their minds. No amount of facts or evidence is ever going to make one of them say, "you know, my Daddy issues really aren't everyone else's problem. I think I'll lose weight, take out the piercings, cover up the tattoos, get a real job and become a productive person someone might want to have around." It's the people listening you are talking to. The people watching. Remember the saying "never argue with a fool.…
/r/MensRights24/06/26 09:15 PM
15

It is characteristic of children to want what they want when they want it, with no regard for consequences intended or otherwise.
/r/MensRights24/06/26 09:02 PM
15

I agree completely that a bully will only change when it hurts more to be a bully than it does to be a victim. But acting like they do is not the answer. Like Mark Twain said, they will drag you down into the gutter and beat you with experience. Rationally, humorously and above all coolly mocking their absurd ideas and drawing attention to the consequences of their absurd ideas is more effective than anger could ever be. And believe me, I have felt that rage. So don't think I'm wagging my finger…
/r/MensRights24/06/26 06:30 PM
39

They could not get a majority of women to support Suffrage until they were able to convince a majority of women that voting rights would not subject them to the draft. Once they got a majority of women to support Suffrage, it passed. The biggest "fight" women had to get the vote was against women. It was always about the rights of men plus the privileges of being women.
/r/MensRights24/06/26 05:51 PM
3

Wendy McElroy, Christina Hoff Sommers, Tara J Palmatier...
/r/MensRights24/06/26 05:23 PM
45

Yes they do. And when you can't be shamed they really get upset.
/r/MensRights24/06/26 05:18 PM
160

Shame and ridicule are Feminisms most utilized weapons. They will use any phrase they can that they believe will shame those who challenge them, and frighten those who might be considering it.
/r/MensRights24/06/26 05:10 PM
29

Brother, this comment wins the internet today.
/r/MensRights24/06/26 05:10 PM
2

"I feel the need to smokescreen my naked and at times sadistic lack of concern with violence against men, so I will split hairs and throw out pseudoscientific terms like "systemic" in an attempt to sound like I am not being completely dismissive."
/r/MensRights23/06/26 09:20 PM
126

The woman + the number of children she has = your priority in her life. Eventually, the equation becomes woman+number of children+number of grandchildren = your priority in her life. The number after the equal sign just keeps getting bigger. The hell of it is, that's how it should be. No decent mother puts anyone above her children. These are hard cold facts. I am a stepfather. My wife never asked me to take this on. She recognized the brutal unfairness of it and would have dated me as we were d…
/r/MensRights23/06/26 09:17 PM
1

Mens rights are constitutionally protected. They are ignored by both parties, according to each party's particular brand of misandry/political needs. We must insist that the Constitutions promise of equal representation before the law/equality before the law applies to men as well. You can have equality before the law, or equality in society. You can have equality of opportunity, or of outcomes. You cannot have both. Leftism venerates equality of outcome as the only attainable form of equality. …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/26 07:28 PM
27

The feminist endgame is a world where women do what they want and men do as they are told. They will tell you what to do, think and say.
/r/MensRights22/06/26 11:08 PM
6

"Feminism is an umbrella term" reminds me of something I used to commonly hear - "feminism is not monolithic." In practice that meant "feminist" and Feminism" meant whatever was convenient for the speaker at the moment. I do mean at the moment - it could change from one sentence to the next. They want your terms defined with the greatest specificity - their terms remain infinitely malleable. This is a tactic of the liar and manipulator.
/r/MensRights21/06/26 05:32 PM
28

Remember - Men are entitled little boys for thinking they deserve credit for being a decent human being! You are SUPPOSED TO BE A GOOD FATHER!!!! But a woman who is sleeping with a billionaire whose company builds a rocket can ride in it for ten minutes and be "breaking boundaries" or something.
/r/MensRights21/06/26 05:27 PM
2

I agree. But every group besides white males disagrees. When people are singled out for victimization based on an immutable characteristic, they will eventually band together in their group interest based on that characteristic. This is not new or obscure information.
/r/MensRights18/06/26 10:17 PM
1

IOW, she is a person who cannot help calling out things that are safe to call out. Things that might have some personal cost attached is not so much.
/r/MensRights17/06/26 11:06 PM
5

Anything is possible. In this case, I think alcoholism is probably the best place to start looking.
/r/MensRights17/06/26 11:03 PM
12

Well, the endgame has been clear for awhile, I think. The feminist line seems to be that equality will be achieved only when any woman at any time has the power to accuse any man of rape and have him imprisoned upon only her word. This will put men into a state of constant terror that he could be accused and imprisoned at any time by any woman. Then equality will be achieved because as it stands right now every woman lives in a state of constant terror that any man can rape her and get away with…
/r/MensRights16/06/26 04:03 PM
4

This world contains unimaginable beauty. It also contains indescribable ugliness. One cannot exist without the other because we wouldn't know the difference. All the ugliness eats a hole in my soul. I have to fill that hole. I can fill it with beauty, or I can fill it with more ugliness. The choice is mine. It took me a long time to choose beauty. I hurt myself with ugliness for a long time. But one day I saw that I was hurting myself. No one else was to blame for me choosing ugliness. I hope yo…
/r/MensRights11/06/26 07:24 PM
15

I'm stealing that line. Fantastic.
/r/MensRights11/06/26 07:16 PM
6

If you want to know who rules over you, find out who you are not allowed to criticize.
/r/MensRights09/06/26 10:37 PM
1

"Whilst feminism as a concept is great—social, economic, and political equality for all—" I think there was another document that expressed a couple of those goals long before the word feminist ever appeared in the lexicon. Further, that document provided a framework to add amendments to the document to address areas in which it fell short, as well as a framework that allowed for identifying and addressing areas in society that fell short of that goal. Introducing another movement after the adop…
/r/MensRights07/06/26 05:50 PM
-1

They arrive from the factory pre-emasculated.
/r/MensRights06/06/26 08:40 PM
2

What planet are you on that you don't know that child support and maintenance from men is automatically required by law, and further the law doesn't really care if you are the child's father or not? Are you in favor of mandatory DNA testing at childbirth to determine paternity, or are you OK with going with whomever she lists as the father on the birth certificate? *spelling edit*
/r/MensRights02/06/26 05:22 PM
1

A woman consenting to sex is automatically consenting for child support & maintenance. Law should make it automatic. It is already automatic for men.
/r/MensRights02/06/26 05:19 PM
2

"What I think should be spoken more about is the silent crisis of men’s mental health, The harm of traditional gender expectations and Health and support services due to many preventable diseases being ignored because men typically delay treatment at the fault of social vulnerabilities." I think that a lot of mens mental health problems (and I would wager a majority of the acute cases) are due to the extremely short shrift given to the problems SA against men (by both men and women) and emotiona…
/r/MensRights01/06/26 04:18 PM
3

You mean like, on a level playing field? The kind feminists have been saying they want for a century? Yes.
/r/MensRights31/05/26 06:00 PM
3

Cameras didn't save me when I was accused. I asked them why camera footage wasn't presented to prove or disprove the claims of my dastardly assault. I was told that they didn't need to, because even if I had not assaulted her, she "perceived"that I did, and that was enough. I mused that there were medical terms for people who "perceived" things that never happened, and this was used as evidence of my hatred for women and need for therapy. Even if I hadn't assaulted her, anyone who would call a w…
/r/MensRights31/05/26 04:47 PM
3

Gosh, this is just for the safety of the woman involved - since all men are potential rapists, not all men but ALWAYS men, etc I should think feminists would demand these safeguards.
/r/MensRights31/05/26 04:39 PM
1

I've been saying for years I am essentially non conservative, but one side engages with my arguments when we differ and the other side calls me a Nazi and says I should die.
/r/MensRights30/05/26 04:07 PM
5

Today you shall be with me in paradise.
/r/MensRights30/05/26 03:38 PM
8

I have been saying this since my crucifixion - Leftists will crucify you for being a man. Conservatives are happy to let them.
/r/MensRights29/05/26 05:42 PM
2

First time?
/r/MensRights29/05/26 05:40 PM
1

You are absolutely right. I never thought of this.
/r/MensRights28/05/26 09:53 PM
1

It is very hard to get someone to acknowledge a fact they are being actively rewarded for not acknowledging.
/r/MensRights28/05/26 09:52 PM
4

Mercy, justice and common decency are innately male qualities.
/r/MensRights28/05/26 07:47 PM
4

Fantastic example. Bravo.
/r/MensRights27/05/26 10:43 PM
45

This is never going to change. Women get away with this because men enforce it. Until men men wake up, this is how it is. Right now men only wake up when they get burned by it.
/r/MensRights27/05/26 10:28 PM
8

How about we look up the dictionary definition of "equality." Or the dictionary definition of "man" and "woman." Or of "sexist." Tell you what buttercup, we can play these dictionary definition games all you want. But none of that will change the fact that the purpose of a system is what it does - and feminism just as sure as hell has not worked for, delivered or really shown any interest in equality between men and women. Far from it.
/r/MensRights27/05/26 10:19 PM
1

It won't be any easier when you are fired for cause over a trumped up, laughably false complaint of sexual harassment. Or worse.
/r/MensRights27/05/26 06:01 PM
4

"if you report that you're experiencing extreme pain, but are going on about your day just as you were before your period, chances are you aren't experiencing extreme pain." This is 100% correct.
/r/MensRights27/05/26 05:56 PM
3

Winston Churchill was once told that in the 21st century women would run the world. He said "Still?"
/r/MensRights26/05/26 06:05 PM
7

Agreed.
/r/MensRights21/05/26 02:01 AM
75

No it isn't hypocrisy. Here's why - they hate you and make no bones about it. They want a world where women do whatever they want, and men do whatever they are told. When they say they just want "equality," or when their enablers say that, it's just a plain old lie.
/r/MensRights20/05/26 11:08 PM
10

Women have stronger in-group preference than men. Put another way, women favor women over men, and so do men.
/r/MensRights20/05/26 02:17 AM
10

No. But having to lie about your sexuality for your own protection is.
/r/MensRights18/05/26 08:03 PM
4

I am sorry. I have been there and I will never forget the helpless anger I felt. Which they said justified the idea I was a threat.
/r/MensRights18/05/26 08:02 PM
8

In the US unless your calling for violence, in a university, in a government job, in a corporate job or in public, you do. FIFY.
/r/MensRights18/05/26 04:10 PM
3

I'm literally wondering how literally being a man literally means you are not literally trolling.
/r/MensRights14/05/26 09:29 PM
2

This is probably trolling. He is coming into a men's rights forum asking about small penises because obviously men concerned about men's rights would know because they have small penises. Get it? Get it? Har de har har? Ally. Mhm.
/r/MensRights14/05/26 08:39 PM
0

This is Leftism. It is the classical Marxist model that when implemented provides the air it needs to survive. A perpetual motion machine of hatred and turmoil by design, as clearly laid out by Marx himself. According to Marx, positive energy has no energy of its own. Negative energy has no energy of its own. It is only when positive and negative energy meet and clash that somehow, from nothing, they create energy together. Leftism (hereinafter Marxism) requires an enemy to organize against. Cal…
/r/MensRights14/05/26 05:08 PM
1

The hand that rocks the cradle rules the world.
/r/MensRights14/05/26 04:41 PM
1

Start documenting. Time, place, person, incident. And wait.
/r/MensRights14/05/26 04:40 PM
0

"He wanted connection. He wanted purpose. He wanted to feel respected." Women and female dominated institutions didn't give that to him? Well, I'll be darned. So he went where there were other people who understood how he felt and welcomed him? This is getting crazy now. I think you are making this up because this doesn't sound like completely predictable freakin' human nature at all. "But if your worldview turns every disappointment into resentment and every insecurity into ideology, eventually…
/r/MensRights14/05/26 04:36 PM
1

No, can't imagine why I would. But I remind you, I have and will continue to point out that I am a unique situation.
/r/MensRights13/05/26 05:15 PM
3

Many people and feminists in particular loudly decry what they call a "double standard" in which men who have sex with lots of women are seen as studs and women who have sex with lots of men are seen as sluts. Well, I guess you could say they only do that here on Earth - other planets I'm not sure. People also seem to be blissfully unaware that attacking a mans sexuality, his endowment, his ability to get/please/satisfy a woman directly reflects the attitude that a man's worth is tied to his abi…
/r/MensRights12/05/26 04:33 PM
60

Pretending not to see the point, pretending not to understand the question and claiming not to remember are three oft used feminists tactics.
/r/MensRights12/05/26 12:15 AM
10

And the consequences of being wrong keep getting higher and higher. I was thinking more in terms of losing one's spouse. Congratulations, Together we are four happy people.
/r/MensRights11/05/26 11:42 PM
3

LOL. Okay then.
/r/MensRights11/05/26 11:07 PM
2

In Jim Crow days an oft heard response to black claims of injustice was "God's the one that made you black. Blame him, not me." It's not insanity, it's hate.
/r/MensRights11/05/26 09:14 PM
6

No, it isn't. From her description it is at best socially awkward, at worst obnoxious. Stalking describes a crime that has a specific meaning and definition. This doesn't come close. Having an emotional response to another's behavior does not make that person's behavior a crime.
/r/MensRights11/05/26 09:11 PM
4

I just ask them if they are saying that sex is different for men than it is for women. Then I usually get the old "Its about power, not sex." To which I reply "then why is a girl a victim but a boy got lucky?' Also I ask "do you think its wrong that a man who has sex with a lot of women is a stud but a woman who has sex with a lot men is a slut? I wonder if the attitude you are demonstrating is a reflection of and social enforcement for that outlook." At least I did back when I cared enough to e…
/r/MensRights11/05/26 09:04 PM
2

Well, I know this - Feminists often complain about the "double standard " that labels men as studs for having sex with a lot of women and labels women sluts for having sex with a lot of men. But their go to move when faced with virtually any criticism is to attack the size of a man's genitals, his sexuality and/or his ability to get a date or please a woman. "I will consider "be a man" to be good advice when I start hearing the phrase used to compel men to act in their own self interest." - Glen…
/r/MensRights11/05/26 08:58 PM
95

Never, never sign a contract that rewards the other party for breaking it. I say this as a happily married man who knows very well how lucky he is and is married to a woman who thinks she is the lucky one. Under no circumstances would I ever re-marry. If it works out well, great. If it doesn't, it will ruin your life and the odds are heavily in favor of that ourcome. Good Luck and Gods Blessings.
/r/MensRights11/05/26 08:52 PM
3

It's an excuse for a lot of things. Hating men is just one of them.
/r/MensRights10/05/26 07:57 PM
13

"I hate internet version of stoicism. It's not longer wisdom, it's just toxic messaging about how we shouldn't show our emotions, "because nobody cares". Well, nobody does. But I don't think that is what Stoicism, internet or otherwise is about. I think it is about accepting what I can't change, changing what I can and treating myself with respect and dignity, especially when others don't. It's not swallowing the feelings - its about not letting them take the lead in my decision making. For exam…
/r/MensRights07/05/26 08:38 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter