TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Appropriate_Deer5129 Archive

View 0 posts and 164 comments by Appropriate_Deer5129 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
13

hundreds of thousands of years of evolution You aren't making sense in my opinion. If you are talking about evolution, what does being desired have to do with that? The only thing that would matter in a potential mate is what would ensure survival. Like physiological attributes or resources. Not whether this person desires you. Women wanting to be desired has nothing to do with evolution.
/r/MensRights08/10/23 09:11 PM
37

Women love to be desired and thus, want men to chase. Conversely, men enjoy the hunt. Uhm, I'm pretty sure everyone loves to be desired. This isn't a uniquely female thing. Also, do men really enjoy having to jump through a million hoops to get a woman?
/r/MensRights08/10/23 07:32 PM
3

I've got the strangest deja vu with this one. Yeah. Me too. I do think this is a repost.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 09:57 PM
7

I think you misunderstood me. What I was trying to say is that "loser" is code for "can't get women" or "incel".
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/22 10:56 PM
16

Loser = can't get women
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/22 06:11 PM
7

Stay away from that sub. It's trash.
/r/AntiFeminists01/07/22 08:55 PM
29

Until it gets banned 2 minutes after the first post is made.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 08:44 PM
3

Is this real though? Seems fake somehow... a bit over the top?
/r/AntiFeminists23/05/22 11:09 PM
6

Male and female can be nouns. Personally, I have never heard someone use either to dehumanise someone. I don't think that really happens. But I could be wrong.
/r/AntiFeminists28/04/22 03:51 AM
15

typically men because men are predators The only way I can see a man saying this, is if he himself is one and thinks that all men must be the same as him.
/r/MensRights23/04/22 01:27 PM
6

If I'm talking about a female child, I say girl. If I'm talking about an adult female, I say woman. If I'm talking about both age groups at the same time, I say females.
/r/AntiFeminists16/04/22 11:22 PM
-26

Shouldn't have given universal suffrage Unnecessary comment.
/r/AntiFeminists21/09/21 01:06 AM
1

What a lot of people fail to realize is that no one actually hates generalisations. They hate negative generalisations. You can make positive generalisations all you want and no one would care. It's when you say something negative, that's when people will come for your head.
/r/AntiFeminists20/09/21 05:46 PM
1

Hey, buddy, I think you are in the wrong sub. We are against the ideology of feminism. WE ARE NOT AGAINST WOMEN HAVING RIGHTS. I don't know why this is so fucking hard for some people to get through their heads.
/r/AntiFeminists18/09/21 09:44 AM
9

What a stupid fucking question. Why would anyone support FGM? Please can someone enlighten me? And why ask that question on this sub? How does FGM relate to antifeminism? Also, are you a troll?
/r/AntiFeminists18/09/21 12:30 AM
7

Aren't you the same person who went crying back to the left wing male advocates sub saying that you were going to leave this sub? Or did I just imagine that.
/r/MensRights08/08/21 12:41 AM
4

Oh noooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!! My one true weakness. Being called an incel. I'm melting. I'M MELLLLLLLTIIIIIIING.
/r/AntiFeminists08/08/21 12:37 AM
1

All of the reasons you listed are exactly why you ladies should not be taken seriously. Look at all the things men do for you and yet the only thing you could think of to say that you will do for men is "not being a raving difficult bitch". What? Either we get women like you where it's all about what men can do for you, or we get the raving difficult bitch who still only cares what men can do for them. Nah.
/r/AntiFeminists07/08/21 07:23 PM
1

If you don't mind, may I have a source for both those claims? Thank you.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/21 09:33 PM
16

How about instead of that, why don't you explain why you are pro-circumcision with facts that aren't capable of being written-off as circumstantial or as entirely avoidable.
/r/MensRights19/07/21 03:27 AM
0

Well, whether I was or not, everyone seems to have their mind made up. So whatever.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 04:59 PM
0

I don't know why you are being a condescending asshole. Nowhere did the op say that men are a threat to female dominance in society. They just said that men are a threat. I was asking for clarification because I didn't know what he meant.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 12:52 PM
-6

What threat are you talking about?
/r/MensRights14/05/21 06:36 PM
7

May I ask for more info please?
/r/MensRights11/05/21 10:17 PM
10

As far as I am aware, that has nothing to do with 'panicking' as you said. Let me be clear, my only issue was with the use of the word 'panic' and nothing else. I do think that everyone should be held responsible for their actions, men and women. But if women can have an out from parenthood, men should as well. Equality and all that.
/r/MensRights11/05/21 08:36 PM
9

" This is also necessary because a lot of men tend to panic and leave. " Evidence?
/r/MensRights11/05/21 08:26 PM
2

I don't disagree as well. However, it doesn't really make much sense to me personally. I can see that we are getting to a point where there are too many people on the planet. The argument that we prioritise women instead of men because women are the 'bottleneck' of reproduction should not apply today. We are human with brains that can do very complex things. Shouldn't we be above this? If it is true that we are not above thinking with our 'lizard brain' as I've heard some people call it, that ha…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/21 01:39 PM
1

Personally, the first time I saw her videos, it was kinda apparent that she was just attention seeking. I was not surprised when I learned that she had an onlyfans.
/r/MensRights09/05/21 09:27 PM
1

I don't think that you can use the fact that she has a patreon to say that she is pretending for the money. She may actually care. However, I do agree that someone getting 'rich' from other peoples' suffering is very immoral though. But, may I ask you, do you think a man making the same type of videos that she is making would have the same amount of followers? I don't think he would. There is this weird phenomenon that a woman talking about men's issues gets a lot of praise by men. But from the …
/r/MensRights09/05/21 09:09 PM
2

HAPPY FATHER'S DAY! To all the mom's who are doing both jobs as a single parent. Sorry about your wife. I have seen people get offended when this was done in the past. I was just curious what you motivation was. It does our cause a disservice, in my opinion, when people (not you) try to tit for tat with feminist. Regards.
/r/MensRights09/05/21 06:59 PM
1

As a matter of fact, I think that people think it's funny, because when a guy gets hit in the balls, he usually makes a funny face. I think that is why it is funny.
/r/MensRights09/05/21 06:50 PM
3

Right. I noticed that you didn't answer the question though. I'll repeat. If on father's day, there are women who say HAPPY FATHER'S DAY! To all the mom's who are doing both jobs as a single parent. would you get offended or no?
/r/MensRights09/05/21 06:33 PM
18

I hope the people down voting this stay quiet when the same thing gets done on father's day. Remember when the United Nations used International Men's day to ignore men's issues but talk about the men helping women and everyone hated it? This is the same nonsense you are doing.
/r/MensRights09/05/21 06:01 PM
-2

If by 'it' you are referring to people thinking getting hit in the balls is funny, then no it is not genetic. People just think it is funny. There is no conspiracy to make people think it is funny. As a matter of fact, I think that people think it's funny, because when a guy gets hit in the balls, he usually makes a funny face. I think that is why it is funny.
/r/MensRights09/05/21 05:57 PM
-6

Yeah. I don't think it is true that 'kids learn what's funny'.
/r/MensRights09/05/21 05:31 PM
12

Father's day exist for this.
/r/MensRights09/05/21 05:28 PM
8

Let me ask you, do you think it is appropriate when people do this type of stuff on father's day?
/r/MensRights09/05/21 05:28 PM
14

That would just deter people from reporting rape or confessing to false accusation, which is what we exactly don't want. Disagree. It will prevent women from making false accusations to begin with. There may be an adjustment period, but in the end, it will be a positive thing. But humour me, if you think that this is the wrong way to solve the problem, how do you propose we deter women from making false accusations? It's easy to object to things. It's not easy actually coming up with a viable so…
/r/MensRights09/05/21 03:52 PM
-13

It is common because men, in general, think it is funny. That is why. I disagree that people would be 'outraged' if a woman was kicked in the vag as you said. It is a movie. Who cares? Outside of feminist circles, can you tell me that most people would actually care about what happens in a movie? Most of the people here are only going to have a problem with it because of 'double standards'. Not because they think it is bad. Why is it bad? "Literally they are the two most reproductive organs in t…
/r/MensRights09/05/21 03:44 PM
11

'Toxic masculinity' is just a way for feminists to blame men's issues on men. Don't pay any attention to it.
/r/AntiFeminists08/05/21 12:38 AM
3

I just think in this specific case that you are talking about with the daughter, that may not apply.
/r/MensRights07/05/21 11:48 PM
0

If you are asking me if I think a random daughter would do this? I really can't say. But I think this specific daughter that the op is talking about would do that.
/r/MensRights07/05/21 11:46 PM
24

Or maybe, it's because the daughter was related to her mother but not related to you? I'm fairly certain if it was her father and some random woman, she would try to find some way to not make him seem like a bad guy. I think you are over thinking this. This is just my opinion though. Good day.
/r/MensRights07/05/21 11:27 PM
1

Right. Like I said context tells you what they mean. No, someone does not have to say some all the time. Especially if they said it once before. I don't know why you would assume that I want this to be an echo chamber. As a matter of fact, it is literally impossible for the people here to be in an echo chamber. The things discussed here usually go against the mainstream narrative that everyone is fed whether they like it or not.
/r/MensRights07/05/21 11:04 PM
1

Maybe I'm just an idiot but I can't really understand what you are trying to get at. Your post is kinda all over the place. Also, I think in the last line of the post you meant to say that there were less WOMEN in the video. That's the only thing that would make that scenario make sense in the context.
/r/MensRights07/05/21 10:54 PM
2

Here's my opinion though you didn't ask for it. Are you a troll? While obviously, the more women in the MRM the better, almost all of the comments that you seem to make is of this type. It seems that you don't actually want to help men but to police their speech. It is getting very annoying and tiresome to read comments such as yours. From what I have seen, it really seems like MOST women do not understand nuance, context and what a general statement is. You could see from the context of the two…
/r/MensRights07/05/21 10:36 PM
3

Thank you.
/r/MensRights07/05/21 03:31 PM
2

Thank you for the response. But I meant what does the specific letters OP mean. Like how LOL stands for laughing out loud.
/r/MensRights07/05/21 02:51 PM
3

Can someone please tell me what OP means as used in the title? Thank you.
/r/MensRights07/05/21 02:29 PM
4

I think you are over thinking it. In my opinion, it isn't misandry or misogyny. I could see why they will not try to ban women or FtM transgenders from men's teams. It would be redundant. It's highly unlikely that they will be able to compete with the biological men anyway.
/r/MensRights06/05/21 07:01 PM
2

OK. Thank you.
/r/MensRights06/05/21 12:19 PM
2

If you don't mind me asking, but where did you find those reviews?
/r/MensRights06/05/21 11:59 AM
0

Everyone with a brain understood exactly what the op meant. And it was not the non-sense you made it out to be.
/r/MensRights05/05/21 02:35 PM
3

Oh I know. I wasn't trying to criticise anyone here. I was just saying.
/r/MensRights04/05/21 04:14 PM
3

While I understand what you were trying to highlight here, I personally can't wait for the day when people don't have to gender these situations. It seems unnecessary.
/r/MensRights04/05/21 02:26 PM
3

Um. You do realise that we all can see the comments right? The guy was not, as you say, claiming to know what your content was. Nor did he comment on it. He commented on MGTOW, NOT your video. To be honest, in the back and forth you had with him, it was quite apparent that you were just peddling your content here. He just asked you to clarify your question but instead of doing that, you just kept pushing for him to watch your video. My opinion is that you were the wrong one there. There is no ne…
/r/AntiFeminists04/05/21 01:34 PM
3

So I guess google doesn't work for you?
/r/MensRights04/05/21 11:33 AM
2

"While growing up, most boys are taught that you should never show emotions, crying is for girls, etc." I disagree with this. Maybe you can make the argument that they are 'taught' (by taught, I mean they are shown not to do something by negative reinforcement) to not complain. But when it comes to showing emotions, men absolutely can do that. We can laugh, be jealous, embarrassed, show regret and even cry. Although I do agree that it has to be about something deep. Crying for trivial things are…
/r/MensRights04/05/21 11:32 AM
11

I don't have any issue with that at all. It lets me know who are the people to stay far away from. I wish more people were so honest.
/r/AntiFeminists03/05/21 03:39 PM
9

"nah actually I like dad bods." If anyone believes that, then I don't think they can be saved. It is obviously just women trying to appear less shallow and virtuous. Common sense should tell you that they are lying.
/r/MensRights03/05/21 01:44 AM
11

Jordan Peterson is a human being. Therefore, he can never be 100% right. I think you should focus less on who is saying it and more on what is being said. If the argument that he brings forward makes sense and the logic is sound, then good. If the logic is flawed, then disregard it.
/r/MensRights02/05/21 06:50 PM
6

You do realise that this is the same stupid argument they use to discredit men, right?
/r/MensRights01/05/21 07:27 AM
191

"he will kill me" This sounds so fake. I could be wrong, but if you think your man is gonna kill you, why would you type that into google? If sounds so inorganic. A better thing to look up would be something like "signs that your boyfriend wants to kill you" or something like that. Or maybe I just use google weird.
/r/MensRights30/04/21 11:23 AM
5

I don't cat call, my friend. I was just asking because the way the post was framed, it seems like the op was considering getting 'offended' on behalf of someone who wasn't.
/r/MensRights30/04/21 01:56 AM
1

Ok.... Good night.
/r/MensRights30/04/21 01:48 AM
1

Feminism: Equality, when convenient
/r/MensRights30/04/21 01:19 AM
1

I agree.
/r/MensRights29/04/21 11:58 PM
1

I am not a feminist. I don't know why people keep bringing feminism up here. I don't use feminist theory to come to my opinions. Jesus.
/r/MensRights29/04/21 11:58 PM
1

Don't get married. No alimony. Not oppression. Still a choice.
/r/MensRights29/04/21 11:55 PM
1

Right. I stand by my opinion. Even if men don't show emotions because no one cares, that is still not oppression.
/r/MensRights29/04/21 11:51 PM
1

What did I post. Quote it for me. Because I have no idea what you are talking about.
/r/MensRights29/04/21 11:46 PM
1

I think you have me mistaken for a feminist. I don't think any of that was oppression. Gender roles were there for a reason. And it wasn't oppression. Getting 'shamed' for not doing something is not oppression. You can choose to ignore them or not. But that is a choice.
/r/MensRights29/04/21 11:38 PM
1

And according to 'feminism' that is oppression So are we using feminism as the standard as to what is and isn't? I thought we disregarded feminists' opinions.
/r/MensRights29/04/21 11:35 PM
0

I am having a hard time understanding your reply.
/r/MensRights29/04/21 10:41 PM
8

Hello. Are you aware that there are women out there that like to be 'cat called'?
/r/MensRights29/04/21 10:33 PM
0

I agree that everyone had it bad back then. However, in my opinion, all what you said from 2 go down is not oppression. Oppression: prolonged cruel or unjust treatment or exercise of authority Having to work a physical job is not oppression. Men were not 'forced' to be providers. No one held a gun to their heads and forced them to do that. Even though I don't believe that men are not able to talk about our emotions, even if it were true, that is not oppression. Let's not dilute the meaning of wo…
/r/MensRights29/04/21 10:28 PM
1

Why?
/r/MensRights26/04/21 08:14 AM
1

r/antifeminists I think this is the better sub for this kind of post.
/r/MensRights26/04/21 06:41 AM
2

You don't let kids into a strip club because they'd never leave. Well, that isn't the reason you don't let children in a strip club. But I understand what you meant. The fact of the matter is that whether twitch exists or not, you can still access pornographic stuff easily. Very easily. So.... Also, the main issue isn't the moderation aspect. The main issue is whether this stuff is acceptable for people to look at. If you can come up logically with some negative consequences of this, that would …
/r/MensRights26/04/21 02:45 AM
2

My opinion: This is nothing new. Twitch and Onlyfans are just modern day, digital versions of strip clubs. It is just more accessible now. As long as it is used in moderation, I don't think there will be much negative consequences of it. Of course, whether someone uses it in moderation is entirely dependent on their self control. I personally do not understand the appeal of these 'services' but to each his own.
/r/MensRights26/04/21 02:24 AM
2

Ok. Well, I hope you get what you are looking for.
/r/MensRights26/04/21 02:09 AM
3

individual experiences I don't know why this matters. If you look at the sidebar, you can see all the issues that affect men generally. These are the issues that need addressing. I would think that most individual problems would stem from these issues.
/r/MensRights26/04/21 12:18 AM
6

Did you look through this sub before asking this question? All your questions can be answered by taking the time to scroll through it.
/r/MensRights26/04/21 12:04 AM
8

Yeah, you are definitely off in my opinion. Emotional support: believe it or not, but men do get emotional support from other men. It just doesn't look the same than the emotional support women give. People repeating the falsehood that 'men don't show emotions' is getting a bit tired. Non-issue. I don't think bisexual men are going to make a decision on which gender they prefer to be in a relationship with based on what 'society' says. I do not know how you came to this conclusion. Show me the s…
/r/MensRights24/04/21 04:16 AM
10

These types of posts are very weird. How about we let people think for themselves and do what they want. If they are right, good. If they are wrong, then they will have to deal with the consequences of their actions.
/r/MensRights23/04/21 03:50 PM
3

Well.... I am just personally a little annoyed with people constantly bringing up incels and mgtow here because they have nothing to do with us. But, I see what you mean and apologise for being rude and assuming things.
/r/MensRights23/04/21 08:39 AM
18

I don't know what sub you got banned from, but I do have a problem with people wanting to know about something, and instead of asking the community directly related to it, you ask someone else. Take the person who responded above you. They said that the "movement got co-opted by incels and went downhill from there." This is the response that you are always going to get with anything related to the 'manosphere' whether it is true or not. And, honestly, I think this is the response you expected an…
/r/MensRights23/04/21 06:55 AM
2

Well, seeing as the vast majority of homeless are men, if they only house women and children, it really won't put a dent in solving the problem. Seems like it is set up to fail from the beginning.
/r/MensRights23/04/21 01:28 AM
23

Well, I don't know. But what I do know is that if men were given the opportunity to opt out, you would see an exponential drop in single motherhood. Either more women would have to get abortions cause they may not get that sweet child support or they would actually have to be responsible adults now and choose carefully what men they allow access to their womb. Because if the guy is a deadbeat, they are definitely not getting any money. Either situation would be a win for 'society'. Less irrespon…
/r/MensRights23/04/21 01:26 AM
1

I don't get this logic. If what you say is true, then that would mean that if a 14 year old has sex with another 14 year old, since underage children cannot consent, they both raped each other?
/r/MensRights19/04/21 09:06 PM
18

What rights do men have that women don't?
/r/MensRights17/04/21 08:57 PM
0

I know you meant no malice with your comment but the only person she hurt is the boy. He is the only one that matters. They still have their lives. He doesn't.
/r/MensRights16/04/21 07:01 AM
2

Marriage is nothing more than a business 'contract'. The purposes you gave can be easily had by just being in a relationship together. There is no need for marriage to get that. Women push marriage because they know, whether consciously or subconsciously, that there are a lot of financial benefits to them. If we were to take away those benefits overnight, they would almost instantly stop pushing for it. " If you are in this sub, you believe that men deserve more rights than they have. That impli…
/r/MensRights16/04/21 06:48 AM
0

That wasn't an ad hominem. I said you are coming off like a dick. I didn't call you a dick. There is a difference. I really wasn't trying to attack you. That is why I said that. If we were having a face to face conversation, you would be able to tell that by the way I would have said it and my body language. But since this is text, I knew that it was possible someone might have taken it that way. " Like being a little bit softer and accomplish nothing. " I don't understand what this means.
/r/MensRights16/04/21 04:17 AM
6

The ironic thing about your comment is that you are really coming off like a dick. I am not trying to attack you by the way. I'm just saying. A little self awareness goes a long way. You know?
/r/MensRights16/04/21 03:43 AM
3

You do know that you can sort posts by new instead of hot right? That is what I do because if you don't, you'll miss a lot of the new posts.
/r/MensRights16/04/21 01:10 AM
26

Disclaimer: I am speaking for myself only. I am not speaking for the whole group. These are just a few of the issues discussed on this sub, affecting men and boys from around the globe: Male Genital Mutilation - Circumcision Education Discrimination Lack of social support Legal Discrimination Selective Service - Enforced Military Duty Custody Discrimination False Accusations Vilification Male Disposability Workplace Fatalities " I ask this despite it being an "obvious question" because every tim…
/r/MensRights15/04/21 11:37 PM
14

Plus this benefits everyone because if we start acting more mature and so on it will make the other subs that hate r/Mensrights look worse then us which they seem to not like very well. Do you not realise that people only hate us because we exist? They don't hate us because we are doing anything wrong. Secondly, all the information is out there. If someone comes here and says something stupid, I am going to go out on a limb and say that they probably have their mind made up about it already. But…
/r/MensRights15/04/21 09:56 PM
20

I don't think anyone here has ever complained about being down voted. I don't know why you would bring that up. If a feminist comes here and says something stupid then I don't see why they can't be down voted. Banning is the problem that people complain about. And from what I can see, no one gets banned from this sub. Ever. There are clear trolls here that get to make comments day after day. Never get banned. Your whole post, while I agree on being civil and whatnot, really does misrepresents wh…
/r/MensRights15/04/21 09:45 PM
3

My opinion is that this could be a men's rights issue by way of being a men's health issue. However, I don't see anyone taking this seriously. Think about it. There are some people (even in this group) who say that men are more violent because of the greater testosterone we have in our bodies compared to women. People will actually think of falling T levels as a good thing. (Full disclosure: I didn't watch the video but I have heard before about the chemicals in our everyday lives could be causi…
/r/MensRights15/04/21 03:19 AM
3

Honestly, I could barely understand what you wrote there. Is english your first language?
/r/MensRights15/04/21 01:26 AM
1

When did I say he didn't?
/r/MensRights14/04/21 07:34 PM
1

Without being there and seeing everything for myself, I am not going to take a side. How is this not being impartial, exactly? I would love to hear your explanation for this.
/r/MensRights14/04/21 05:54 PM
1

This has been the legal defence given for countless numbers of violent acts committed by women and ethnic minorities. This sounds more like a bs way of not holding them responsible for their actions. But I guess time will tell how this all plays out.
/r/MensRights14/04/21 03:18 AM
1

r/Egalitarianism
/r/MensRights14/04/21 01:59 AM
0

Well, my opinion is if it is true that some men will get violent with women because they are resentful, then we have bigger problems. You are not really making a good case for men here. It's that type of shit that makes men look bad.
/r/MensRights14/04/21 01:14 AM
1

“The State believes there is evidence that a sexual encounter occurred between the parties. However, the circumstances surrounding the incident are at issue. Based on the facts above, it appears that Crimmons would testify that he thought he was touching Jessica who he was in a casual sexual relationship with at the time. Further, Jessica would testify that she would not have been uncomfortable with this given their relationship. It seems mistake of fact as a defense could be asserted. Mistake o…
/r/MensRights14/04/21 01:09 AM
0

Still rape, people are responsible of their actions, even if they're drunk. No shit. I am not disputing that. I am questioning whether he actually penetrated her or if he only touched her. The article is not making that clear.
/r/MensRights14/04/21 12:52 AM
3

I too have some confusion on this because the article uses the word rape. But I'm not seeing how he could have done that just because she was sleeping. Would she not have woken up and tried to fight him off or something. Why is it that all these types of stories seem to leave out crucial information or be so poorly worded that you can't make heads or tails of what is going on. If I had to guess, I would say that it is written so deliberately.
/r/MensRights14/04/21 12:39 AM
1

is already causing serious resentment. I don't like to do this but can I see proof of that? It is ok if you don't want to go through the hassle though. I am respectfully asking.
/r/MensRights14/04/21 12:30 AM
3

Sex robot weren't a thing a few years ago. I don't see why banning something that up until recently did not exist would make things worse. It just won't make things better. Porn will still exist. So... Obviously I am against banning sex robots. I would love to see feminists try to ban sex robots because then they will have to ban all sex toys. Including the ones women use. Any argument that they try to make why sex robots are bad for women can be flipped around on them.
/r/MensRights14/04/21 12:02 AM
1

OK?
/r/MensRights13/04/21 11:45 PM
-4

I'm assuming that you are making a joke. Personally, I despise the fact that everyone tries to be funny online. It gets tiresome especially when talking about serious issues.
/r/MensRights13/04/21 10:46 PM
2

I wouldn't go that far. I don't see why it would.
/r/MensRights13/04/21 09:07 PM
3

I don't know what you expect us to say. To be fair, he could have done it. Obviously, she should not have confronted him the way she did but he could have done it. Without being there and seeing everything for myself, I am not going to take a side. We have to remember to stay impartial.
/r/MensRights13/04/21 07:50 PM
21

You know, I really have to wonder if there are actually people out there who believe that men don't want to wear masks because it makes them look weak. I mean there is no logic to that. Sometimes I wonder how we made it this far as a species. My god.
/r/MensRights13/04/21 02:52 PM
9

That is a much higher questioning than mine. Is it? Really? So you think me "questioning the integrity of my (your) post" is worse than you calling me a sexist? Really? Ok. Well. Have a good one.
/r/MensRights13/04/21 02:47 AM
9

That kind of assumption about all women is literally the exact type of sexism we're supposed to be fighting against. Whoa my friend. Nobody said anything about women. We are talking about feminists. Don't put words in my mouth. You are making me wonder if you came here in good faith. You are all over the place. I am not concerned whether or not there are any toxic people in the men's rights movement. I am only concerned with the issues that are needing to be addressed. From the sidebar: Male Gen…
/r/MensRights13/04/21 02:23 AM
7

Nothing vitriolic about that. Do you realise that the reason why there is no reasonable debate between MRAs and feminists is because of feminists? You need to take it up with them. Not us.
/r/MensRights13/04/21 02:07 AM
5

I'm not seeing any 'vitriol' here. What are you talking about?
/r/MensRights13/04/21 02:00 AM
1

It's not a problem. If they couldn't compete, that's their problem. Let me just make sure that everyone who sees this comment understand that I am not a feminist. I do believe in merit based promotions not diversity promotion.
/r/MensRights12/04/21 11:01 PM
1

Well, I guess it couldn't hurt to try. Good luck.
/r/MensRights12/04/21 07:32 PM
2

Do you really believe that? There have been worse things done by feminists in the past. They just get swept under the rug. No one will care.
/r/MensRights12/04/21 07:06 PM
2

Like I said, most people know this. It's just that some people's ego prevent them from admitting it. This will not accomplish anything in my opinion.
/r/MensRights12/04/21 06:59 PM
6

What exactly would this accomplish? What is the end goal of this. I'm sure that most people know that the vast majority of things that we use today were invented by men. This just kinda sounds like some tit for tat.
/r/MensRights12/04/21 05:59 PM
5

Having read it, I don't think this is going to keep any men out. If I understand what I read correctly, they created a new female only competition just to see if they can get more women in it. Because previously, the females that would have tried to compete couldn't stack up to the men?
/r/MensRights12/04/21 05:05 PM
1

Well, I was just giving my thoughts on it. I don't actually know why this is the case.
/r/MensRights12/04/21 04:09 PM
5

I disagree. I think it's to reduce the risk of being accused of sexual assault. They know that it's more likely for a woman to scream sexual assault than a man (whether it's real or imagined). If that does happen, it will be bad PR and they know that they will have women's organisations coming for them.
/r/MensRights12/04/21 12:50 AM
1

Unless those people are being identified, I disagree that it's sexual harassment. It is extremely unprofessional and inappropriate though.
/r/MensRights11/04/21 10:10 PM
1

I think you are wrong. They were just saying who the female lead character was going to be played by. You should read it again.
/r/MensRights11/04/21 09:54 PM
4

So you want people to give him more views for being an idiot?
/r/MensRights11/04/21 07:12 PM
6

I agree. Also, there are too many videos on youtube debunking the wage gap that I can't take anyone who believes in it seriously. Also, observable reality goes completely against the idea that women are discouraged from going into more male dominated (higher paying) fields. Anyone who believes these things are either sheep who let other people think for them, delusional or knows that it isn't true and is just being willfully ignorant.
/r/MensRights11/04/21 04:44 PM
6

Right. But I thought the point was for us to be better than them and not make the same mistakes.
/r/MensRights11/04/21 02:14 AM
7

OK? And? What does this have to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights11/04/21 02:09 AM
18

If they find out he's a rapist, his life could be ruined. It should be ruined if he is in fact a rapist. I don't know if you misspoke or something.
/r/MensRights11/04/21 01:27 AM
9

I think calling it oppression is a bit extreme. Too many people on this sub are over blowing trivial issues. If you don't want to buy it then don't. No one is forcing you. That is not oppression.
/r/MensRights11/04/21 12:30 AM
1

I thought everybody knew this. Everybody should. This is extremely condescending and unnecessary. I don't know why you think I don't know this. Nothing about what I said implies I don't know this. As a matter of fact, what I said should imply the opposite. Also, if everyone knows this, then it really shouldn't be that hard to beat it.
/r/MensRights10/04/21 08:51 PM
5

Firstly, are you a male or female? Secondly, how would a company know about your history? If you are talking about social media, then the obvious answer would be to get off it or have different accounts for different things.
/r/MensRights10/04/21 02:31 PM
1

Literally says 25 in the first line.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/04/21 04:47 PM
-7

This is not a race issue.
/r/MensRights08/04/21 10:56 PM
6

Cool. I was hoping that was the case.
/r/MensRights07/04/21 12:26 AM
17

" Because God knows I want fathers to be the dominant parent, the Dad gets custody thing. " This is not what the men's rights are fighting for. How is that better than the system in place right now where women get default custody? It should be default 50/50 custody. That is what I think they are hoping for.
/r/MensRights07/04/21 12:14 AM
11

Your comment is a slight bit condescending. I mean no ill will by this.
/r/MensRights06/04/21 09:42 PM
2

Um... did your partner actually hit your child? You didn't make that clear in the post.
/r/MensRights06/04/21 09:14 PM
17

This doesn't sound like a "society" issue. This sounds like an "idiot on facebook" issue.
/r/MensRights06/04/21 04:45 PM
10

Because that's the only kind of porn that exists. Right?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/04/21 10:24 AM
10

Women are less likely to apply for places like MIT because they’re told they can’t do it for quite a lot of their life I'm curious. Who tells women that?
/r/MensRights03/04/21 01:53 PM
3

Or people can watch the original video and form their own opinions. Reaction videos are cringe. Sorry.
/r/MensRights02/04/21 07:32 PM
14

Yeah. Something sounds kinda fishy there.
/r/MensRights01/04/21 07:10 PM
1

Oh ok. Thanks anyway.
/r/MensRights01/04/21 04:58 PM
1

How old is the person he allegedly raped?
/r/MensRights01/04/21 04:45 PM
-3

Could you not have googled it?
/r/MensRights01/04/21 10:06 AM
2

Well I wouldn't go that far. But I am ok with them keeping men out because I want men to be allowed to have male only groups.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 08:47 PM
8

No need for the name calling.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 05:30 PM
-6

MY OPINION: I don't think that them blaming/attacking men for everything is sexist. They are just loser women who blame their shitty decisions/outcomes on men. I still don't see how any of that is affecting men's rights. Edit: Can the people down voting me please tell me how fds are attacking men's rights? Please. I'm not seeing it but I want to. Thank you.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 04:41 PM
-4

Ok. Maybe I'm just unaware, but how do they step on men's rights? And what do you mean by " attack men left and right, knowing full well there are no men there to defend themselves." If it's a sub for women only, why would there be men there to begin with? I am genuinely curious. Not trying to be an ass or anything.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 04:04 PM
-19

My opinion... I don't see any sexism here. If they don't want men there, that should be their right. I personally don't know why people keep bringing up fds on this sub. It really doesn't have anything to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 03:53 PM
9

Well, from what I can tell, if she wants a rich man, it is more likely to find a rich white man than a rich "POC" man. She said that she is a POC to let the other women know that the advice needs to be tailored for a non-white woman getting with a white man. Kinda like how women specify their height on their profiles as a way of indicating that they want a tall man without saying it outright.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/03/21 07:44 PM
19

I disagree. I think it means quite the opposite.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/03/21 06:56 PM
0

"I'm just saying that the rape culture in third world countries is very real." Well... ok. But don't you think that it would be best not to lump all third world countries in together? Because that stuff definitely does not happen where I'm from.
/r/MensRights25/03/21 04:55 AM
3

I'm curious, are you from a third world country? Being from one myself where there is no rape culture, I get really annoyed with people from first world countries who most likely have never even traveled out of it who talk about us like if we are just savages.
/r/MensRights25/03/21 04:22 AM
1

Like I said, I wasn't trying to be an ass. Sorry it came off that way. But I have seem multiple posts basically saying the same thing you said since the killing in the uk. It is getting a bit repetitive. And it's not really adding much to the discussion. Please don't get angry with me. It's just my opinion though. I'm also not saying that your voice is not important.
/r/MensRights23/03/21 01:55 PM
1

I have been noticing an increase in posts that just seem to be whining about trivial things. Which is really unfortunate because it is drowning out actual important posts. It's doubly unfortunate because that's exactly one of the things I hate about feminists. They whine about non issues like manspreading. I'm not trying to be an asshole here. It's just an observation.
/r/MensRights23/03/21 01:32 PM
4

Justice for Men & Boys, & the women who love them Not sure if this counts though.
/r/MensRights21/03/21 06:20 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter