TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Arahkne Archive

View 0 posts and 20 comments by Arahkne on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Compromise is impossible, because feminists don't want to compromise with us, because (as you stated) feminism is currently dominant. Why would feminists want to settle for a tie when all-out victory is within their grasp?
/r/TRPOffTopic29/07/15 05:34 PM
9

Solipsism is the belief that only one's own mind exists. It means that other people literally aren't real. No one in this thread is suggesting that, simply that it is impossible to truly connect with another person.
/r/TheRedPill17/06/15 04:57 PM
1

I use "have sex" to mean a man having sex with a woman who . . . is not being paid . . . and is more-or-less as excited about it as he is (i.e. not doing it begrudgingly). You rejected this definition, so I assumed prostitutes counted too.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/15 03:53 PM
1

...ah. Well then, I see your point. But you have to admit that having sex with a prostitute is a lot less fulfilling than with a willing partner, no?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/15 03:01 PM
3

Let me put this in even simpler terms. These romantic partners you have - how did you get them? By inoffensively complimenting them? By holding doors open for them? By giving them candy and flowers and always paying for their food?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/15 01:03 PM
2

I think we might be debating from two different definitions here. In this thread, I use "have sex" to mean a man having sex with a woman who is not drunk, is not being paid, is more-or-less as physically attractive as he is (i.e. not drastically less attractive), and is more-or-less as excited about it as he is (i.e. not doing it begrudgingly). In short, with an equal. If you're using "have sex" to mean a man having sex with any woman in any condition, then you're being logically consistent and …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/15 05:38 AM
7

Alright. Let me try to explain this more clearly. Please, read this carefully and take time in formulating your response. When I use the term "advice" in this thread, I'm using it to refer to a specific thing. You may have a conception of "advice" that is different from the one I am using, considering the word can be broadly applied, but please try to put it out of your mind for now. When lonely young men ask for "advice" on relationships, this is the advice they are seeking: they want helpful s…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/15 05:35 AM
5

Then... wouldn't you agree that "be nice" is terrible advice to give someone seeking a relationship? Not that being nice is a bad thing to be, just that it won't get you anywhere. It's sound moral counsel but it's totally useless. To go further, if "be nice" is drilled into your head since youth as a foolproof method of securing a relationship, it's only natural that you're going to be entitled and expect that... holding doors open for strangers will get you blowjobs, to use your extreme example…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/15 04:42 AM
2

I think of niceness like garnish. It's nice to have, but it's a far cry from what attraction is based on.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/15 04:29 AM
8

Yes, yes, yes, the former, no, no. The traits of my particular social group aren't the issue here. I merely mentioned them as a counterexample to your previous claims. Additionally, consider that you're basically stating that men need to... * have specialized interests * be outgoing and extroverted * have the will to initiate (and do the lion's share of the work) * not be shy just to be "normal" and have sex. Women face none of these requirements, making it de facto less easy for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/15 12:36 AM
5

Then why discount online dating?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/15 11:33 PM
5

You're a funny guy. You should stick to making jokes and stay out of debates.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/15 11:07 PM
2

What is?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/15 10:51 PM
10

While your experience has value, it is hardly the end-all be-all of human interaction. I know plenty of men wanting sex (and relationships) who can't seem to find it, and those are just the men I know personally.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/15 10:21 PM
0

It's entirely possible, and should be trivially simple, to screen potential partners to see if they want a real relationship or just want to jump your bones. And I think both sexes can agree that it's better to have a lot of sex and relatively fewer real relationships than nothing at all, regardless of "sacrificed emotional investment".
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/15 09:48 PM
9

I'm having a hard time believing you're serious... How do you reconcile your statement with the thousands of people on this very website - both those who agree with your political beliefs and those who do not - who find it difficult or impossible to have sex with another person? Do you consider anyone who's in any way unattractive "abnormal"?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/15 09:37 PM
0

Attention as in potential for both sex and relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/15 09:12 PM
5

Do you realize you're the exception, not the norm?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/15 08:12 PM
1

Except if the roles were switched (as in: men get loads of attention from women, women have to work for attention) men would be overjoyed whereas women wouldn't be able to cope.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/15 08:08 PM
9

You must have an extremely broad definition of "abnormal".
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/15 08:03 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter