TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ArcarozX Archive

View 6 posts and 245 comments by ArcarozX on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

People is mostly formal because that's how they have to behave in order to coexist with society peacefully. "They wear a mask" to put it in a way, whilst on Twitter and on the internet is where the raw and unfiltered thoughts of people appear.
/r/MensRights27/11/22 08:21 PM
2

For me it's just rage-fuel. You chose right to post it here in this sub, because otherwise you would've been mocked and bullied to death in any other sub, specially in feminist subs.
/r/MensRights27/11/22 07:56 PM
4

That's something I always wondered. If a single guy lives alone and does all that stuff for himself, does he deserve the same recognition or gets he to receive all that money?
/r/AntiFeminists15/11/22 06:40 PM
–

You can use it against feminists all you want, I'm interested in how they will respond to this, if they respond at all, that is. Credit goes to JP https://twitter.com/JP_returns
/r/AntiFeminists13/11/22 08:22 PM
3

Their purpose is supposedly to make someone support their campaign against rape, not backfire and make someone be against their campaign against rape, because that's what they are doing and accomplishing.
/r/AntiFeminists30/10/22 03:01 AM
1

Not much, given that this position is less mainstream than feminism, and also has more defamation done against it. Not at the level of other positions, but at least leans more into that direction.
/r/AntiFeminists26/10/22 07:34 PM
23

One can be a genius and be a prick at the same time, though. It depends, however. If it's something planned ahead, then I think it deserves the title of genius, or something similar. If it not, then maybe just prick.
/r/MensRights17/10/22 02:02 PM
39

Due to the overall situation, I'm starting to think fathers that run away were actually geniuses all along.
/r/MensRights17/10/22 01:56 PM
5

It can't be a response to misogyny, since misogyny does not exist. And linguistically doesn't match. At this point, one might as well say “no, when I said spoon, it didn't mean spoon, it meant fork”.
/r/AntiFeminists15/10/22 03:03 PM
1

I know, I know, I just wanted to “pay back” onto what I saw in the screenshots without holding back.
/r/AntiFeminists06/10/22 05:43 PM
4

Just because of this, I hope one day there's someone crazy enough to actually burn down some of those shelters with everyone inside, just to see how others react (probably creating a lot of urban legends about the man doing that.) I'm probably going to regret making this comment later, but right now I don't care.
/r/AntiFeminists06/10/22 11:37 AM
1

It sounds like that if the Dunning-Krueger is potent in you. It's only a fallacy of false dichotomy if you have cognitive dissonance. (Seriously, I try to think of the implications of everything the dystopia represents and I'm only left wondering why people has not yet reached the conclusion that, based on that, men and women are natural enemies.)
/r/AntiFeminists06/10/22 06:07 AM
1

And nothing was said. No sound.
/r/AntiFeminists06/10/22 06:03 AM
1

1- It was the man who voted as a representative, but the real voter was the family, which is why a man without a family could not vote during the early democracies. 2- In various cases, given the incapacity of a man, women could taking this role as representatives of the family, as is recorded in England before women's suffrage. 3- Voting was a very dangerous act until well into the Contemporary Age, as it was in the Roman Republic or even in France after the French revolution; as an example, in…
/r/AntiFeminists04/10/22 08:34 PM
1

No, because relative privation (https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/logicalfallacies/Relative-Privation) involves minimising a cause for other one for being perceived as worse, whilst here there is no cause being fought, and I'm not saying “women had it bad but look at this”, what I'm saying is that the dystopia is incoherent, since groups that were severely mistreated rebelled, in fact, all of my examples are MEN being used as PROPERTY in inhumane conditions. The fact that no rebellion happened…
/r/AntiFeminists04/10/22 12:10 AM
15

This is enough to consider the dystopia as that, a myth. Not to mention women participated in certain rebellions, too, but never by a reason of gender or “patriarchal oppression against women” The dystopian myth is so absurd that is actually recognised that, within the aristocracy, people belonging to the allegedly oppressed group were allowed. Which is not how an aristocracy in a supremacy context works, like the Aryans in India. Believing in the patriarchal oppressor system in ancient and mode…
/r/AntiFeminists02/10/22 10:25 PM
0

Because it's necessary, want it or not, linguistics and semantics actually DO matter when talking and writing, and when you put it in a way or another the understanding of that topic changes, such as due to lazy scientific reporting, people confuse DNA and Genes. And what your anecdote has to do with what I said? What a prepotent.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 07:42 PM
-1

If you talk about “Marital Rape” then you have it backwards, it wasn't that you could be legally raped, is that, legally, you could not be raped, since it wasn't considered rape in the 1st place, which also applied to the man, but of course, you would never say that because you all have the stereotype that A Man Is Always Eager in mind (and I'm supposed to believe you are the opposite of Traditionalists) when discussing these topics. I assume it is the topic of “Marital Rape”, since if we talk a…
/r/MensRights29/09/22 07:32 PM
1

Also, what are they talking about when they say women had no opportunity in education? We have educated women way back into Ancient Greece, such as Hypatia of Alexandria and Axiothea of Philus, and then we have other educated women like Anna Komnene and Christine de Pizan. They could even publish letters, books, write articles and do research. So women being barred from getting education is false.
/r/MensRights27/09/22 01:22 AM
1

Tell them to go to hell. “We don't mean it towards you”. Whilst saying “All”. Again, linguistically speaking, there's nothing indicating that. Hence, they most likely mean it to you as well, just they are attempting cord pickup / backpedalling.
/r/MensRights27/09/22 12:37 AM
7

The difference in meaning he's trying to convey does not work because there is nothing in those phrases indicating that, meaning that the interpretation depends solely on the reader, hence, it's his interpretation, not what those phrases really mean. I have already said it before, those phrases should be judged instead purely on what they linguistically say on screen.
/r/AntiFeminists31/08/22 01:24 AM
9

I just hope her son grows resentful and full of hatred towards her, since that's the minimum she deserves.
/r/AntiFeminists18/08/22 12:06 AM
-1

That's just a myth, though. There's not really a preference for having girls or boys in China.
/r/AntiFeminists18/08/22 12:04 AM
1

Your own statistic shows that only 35.3% of accusations were referred to prosecution. Of that, it means that 64.7% did not. Hence, 64.7% of the accusations can be concluded to be false.
/r/AntiFeminists15/07/22 10:03 PM
6

And has more than 20K Favs minimum, so nobody can say it's an obscure account. In fact, feminists of that kind tend to have a big number of followers, more than the average antifeminist actually.
/r/AntiFeminists15/07/22 09:56 PM
1

Why were you in a feminist sub in the first place?
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/22 08:43 AM
5

“Done by men” they say... Women are not raped by anyone, the percentage of women raped is less than 0.01% of the total population. Misogyny doesn't exist other than in theory, since in practice they cannot put a single example of real hatred and now misogyny can mean anything. Sexualisation is something done by women, otherwise you wouldn't see women using their sex appeal to manipulate or provoke men, nor would they prostitute themselves, be it in the traditional way, or in OnlyFans. Objectific…
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/22 08:41 AM
9

Of course they would cite someone like Ashley Montagu, imagine my (lack of) shock. I better don't introduce them to the fact that men outnumber women in high IQ groups, for example.
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/22 08:35 AM
1

Yeah, sure, they will overcome Men when men become bonobos and obese. What a (lack of) merit.
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/22 08:33 AM
2

Well, I don't know for you, but I don't feel ashamed of being a man, for that I would have to actually agree with them. The only thing it causes on me is to feel instant hatred for them and their alikes.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 12:54 AM
2

And when I thought I was recovering. Now I have a new level of hatred I didn't know I had.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 12:47 AM
3

Graduate Record Examinations. Similar to the SAT, or Scholastic Aptitude Test.
/r/AntiFeminists18/06/22 01:31 AM
2

And I don't think their GRE scores are really that great either. Social sciences usually have mid to low GRE scores.
/r/AntiFeminists18/06/22 01:12 AM
1

For them, men are “thoughtless simpletons” because the only things they see in them are the usefulness they could have for them and the danger or damage they could cause to them, that's why they perceive men as such and think they know all about them, ignoring or trying to suppress what might not align with that vision of theirs. Men accepted the rôle given to them, but still men can be so much more, in theory.
/r/AntiFeminists16/06/22 07:22 PM
3

If there's no evidence then how do you know they are victims? Mayami confirmed it to you or what?
/r/AntiFeminists03/06/22 01:01 AM
1

How can you determine that when there is not even a fucking sentence that dictates they are convicted rapists? It's hypocritical of you all to say “only 2-10% of rape accusations are false using the percentage of rape accusations determined as such, but with the crime of rape you use directly the number of accusations. If only 1% or less of rape accusations end up in conviction then that means 99% of rape accusations don't have any substance, hence, are false.
/r/AntiFeminists02/06/22 11:15 PM
3

5267 upvotes and 19 awards, probably more by now. Not surprised, just it makes my hatred of them grow bigger. Ironically, they are the ones that are using Johnny Depp's victory over Amber Heard and the fact that some people are cheering for him to call them “obsessed” (assumptions they pull out of their own ass, as always) in order to discredit victimisation against men and say that they don't really support that cause for whatever shit they think, in order to minimise both the case AND the issu…
/r/AntiFeminists02/06/22 11:07 PM
4

They're not saying all men are trash either, they're showing the bad men only. That is either bad faith or being absolutely horrible at language, or both. Since the phrase is “Men Are Trash” doesn't have any adjective that indicates they are only referring to “the bad men”, not “men in general”, then that is the logical interpretation when you say “men” or “women” without any kind of adjective. Also, if the meaning of the phrase is determined by whatever intention they had at that time which can…
/r/AntiFeminists02/06/22 10:56 PM
2

I mean, for what other reason would they be promoting that one must believe all women? It's obvious they all want to lie and face no consequence for it.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 03:51 AM
1

To be fair, in principle, they seek "equality", but from the assumption that men are the privileged sex. Hence, it will always discriminate against men, since nothing is infinite, and if a group "has more", then, to give the group that "has less", you have to take away some things from the group that "has more". Also, a lot of them say they want "equity", which is just what I described above but with a more fitting term. Others say they seek "women's liberation" which was the initial intent sinc…
/r/AntiFeminists21/05/22 02:20 AM
9

And to think that before, NASA didn't have any issues with hiring Nazi Scientists such as Wernher von Braum. I wish that were still the case. Personally, I'd have fired HER instead. Even if the 'sexual harassment' were proven, people like him are hard to find.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 01:25 AM
13

True, a lot of jokes men make are jokes belittleing themselves, or they play with it if the joke is directed at them.
/r/AntiFeminists19/05/22 07:15 PM
11

Projection. They are the ones that get abortion as the immediate solution when it doesn't go the expected way and promoting abortion the way they do it (legal and free) is wanting to have all the fun whilst not having any responsibility Pro-lifers are against abortion and they make clear they want the man to support the mother and children if she gets pregnant. Also, pro-choice women oppose men not taking responsibility for the pregnancy using the same arguments as pro-lifers. They are the only …
/r/AntiFeminists19/05/22 07:11 PM
6

George Francis and Emil Kirkegaard did a study, recently, about that, in the areas of Anthropology, Political Science, Economics and Psychology. Apart from finding that men's output was 0.35d higher than women's (0.13d when controlling for years publishing), and apart from that academics prefer not to discriminate, 33% prefer to discriminate against men vs. 3% of those that prefer to discriminate against women. https://mobile.twitter.com/MrGeorgeFrancis/status/1527317356464119808 So, I think thi…
/r/MensRights19/05/22 06:59 PM
0

The only rape culture there exists is that against men, specially against prisoners, since a lot of people laugh at it and think they deserve it. Nobody supports rape against women, and the supposed phrases they cite as examples of it are not actually supporting that act, regardless of how much they insist on that.
/r/AntiFeminists19/05/22 05:54 PM
3

Taking credit for what some dude you aren’t even related to -The same that says men should be accountable for what unrelated men did None here have committed a crime? I'm confident on that, if you want to argue the opposite, you'll have to prove it, and remember, one is innocent until demonstrated otherwise, because it seems you all like to ignore such principle.
/r/MensRights18/05/22 02:59 PM
2

If we talk about kindness in marriage, we should talk about how husbands sacrifice themselves for their wives. And if not maintaining them, then they still contribute more to the house than her. In fact, she often doesn't do anything for him. Because those fields are easier and recquire less intelligence and skill, those in the higgest positions of those fields are mostly men, such as surgeons, anaesthetists, full professors, etc. And those excelling at those highest positions are also mostly me…
/r/MensRights18/05/22 02:55 PM
4

And most firefighters, police officers, rescue teams, and in general, people who sacrifices for the well-being of others are also men. Women don't "excell in evilness" but they don't "excell in goodness or kindness" either.
/r/MensRights18/05/22 03:10 AM
5

Crime is committed by less than 0.1% of the population, and individually speaking, none here has committed any crime, so, to answer your question: never, because there's no action committed, unless we also get credit for what geniuses, inventors and the like have done.
/r/MensRights18/05/22 02:41 AM
2

Literally one of the first lines in my comment says: "(...) but they surely think of it as less compared to FGM, or ablation, or don't care about circumcision (...)". I didn't imply they were "by and large" A-OK with it, I implied that it was divided into two parts, most of the part, generally speaking. That is, one part that "cares" but downplays it, and the other that doesn't care. You say feminists are more than happy to be responsible and incite those double standards, but I've literally nev…
/r/MensRights18/05/22 01:38 AM
2

I didn't imply they support circumcision, but they surely think of it as less compared to FGM, or ablation, or don't care about circumcision, which I have nothing against, I don't care about ablation either. And the problem with that is? If someone only wants to discredit feminism then I find that perfectly righteous. Also, feminists are always the ones that when MRAs talk about circumcision they say it's the fault of men or that is less compared to MGM (which you are justifying right now), or b…
/r/MensRights17/05/22 07:16 PM
9

Your argument is bullshit, because: 1- That reason I mentioned above is very often used. Of course, it's not the only reason that can be used, as others argue based on the levels of severity those practices have, but still a reason cited often enough. With a lot of people saying "but Circumcision is not mutilation" (it is, it is literally mutilating a part of the body). 2- Apart from the fact that those practices were performed for several other reasons, it is still wrong, since circumcision was…
/r/MensRights17/05/22 03:27 AM
19

One of the worst arguments from feminists saying that FGM is worse than MGM is because "it removes an entire organ, whilst circumcision doesn't" But an organ is a functional unity of tissues in a body that constitutes a structural unity and performs a determined function. And what foreskin is? A functional part, composed of tissues, that performs a determined function. (Skin also falls under this, so skin can also be considered as an organ, however, nobody thinks that being skinned is better tha…
/r/MensRights16/05/22 07:16 PM
0

They are simply shooting themselves in the foot saying that; - after all if a group is oppressed for nearly all of recorded history as they say, then they aren't really intellectually or creatively equal to men. Regardless - education could be given at home, and women's colleges had existed since the 19th century, though most of them had lower standards for women than men's colleges, which is telling in and of itself. Also, it must be pointed out that men still dominate those professions and car…
/r/MensRights16/05/22 03:46 AM
1

I know. That's why I say it's better to learn how to fight, in sports like Muay Thai or Karate, due to that, and also to bring with you some weapons. I have a friend that studies physics and practices Muay Thai, and carries knives and the like, that's where I got the idea.
/r/AntiFeminists15/05/22 06:14 PM
1

Well, who are the best writers there are in the Western World? (Almost) All Men.
/r/MensRights15/05/22 06:10 PM
10

Women cheerfully stave for their husbands and children. Yeah, no. That never happens and never happened either in history, not at a considerable scale.
/r/MensRights15/05/22 05:21 PM
3

Because she first tried to punch him and continued to try harm him afterward. So what if she didn't succeeded. And no, he used fist in against a woman who was using fist and also tried to kick him.
/r/AntiFeminists14/05/22 10:42 PM
7

No, she tried to harm him directly, he's more than justified. He underreacted.
/r/AntiFeminists14/05/22 10:04 PM
27

If you are going to defend yourself or retaliate against a woman, you should be an expert fighter first, because a lot of SIMPs are going to defend that worthless piece of garbage, and I'd also recommend to bring some weapons too.
/r/AntiFeminists14/05/22 08:03 PM
11

Nah, she deserves it. She hit him, he hit back. Self-defence not so much, but retaliation, and there's nothing wrong with it. In fact, I think he was too soft.
/r/AntiFeminists14/05/22 07:59 PM
1

Because you haven't said anything substantial. You, for example. The only hypocrisy is you, here calling anecdote. You, for example, again, saying the anecdote in the OP is bullshit because 'no proof', but then says his anecdote is true despite suffering from the same problems of reliability. Also, I never used anecdotes in this discussions. You've aid the same exact whinge to an extremely easy to follow line of discussion 3 times now. It's the only response you deserve with that kind of comment…
/r/MensRights14/05/22 05:33 AM
1

Also, for so much talking they do about not being sex objects, they are trying to rebel against it using SEX as a mean (Sex Strike). You can draw your own conclusions. I won't say anything more about that, but that I've already made up my mind in that issue.
/r/AntiFeminists14/05/22 05:10 AM
7

"Don't want the kid - don't do sex" I refuse to believe they are self-owning themselves that way. We can ban abortion for women then. Since, technically, there's no such thing as "unexpected pregnancy" - since if you have sex, you agree with the risk of getting pregnant, the only way they avoid it is with IUDs, or... well... with abstinence, the only 100% effective contraceptive method.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 05:05 AM
2

No, you went to the bottom of a thread and replied 3 comments deep. Not a counter against what I said. You didn't also question the posts anecdote. You specifically came to argue against the counter anecdote. Not mutually incompatible. As I said, I sensed hypocrisy on you, and I was right, if it was just a random anecdote I'd not have responded to you. This is frankly just you not being able to follow your own discussion points. "You don't follow your own points because I say so" Insulting someo…
/r/MensRights14/05/22 04:49 AM
3

I did it. Saying "it could be bullshit/false" in regards to the OP is questioning. Of course I'm mad, though I'd say mostly annoyed, (though informally is used as a synonym) annoyed at your attempts at loop, twisting the meaning of words and going in circles. You implying it is because of ignorance is a non-demonstrable behavioral hypothesis. (And ad hominems are not just insults, ad hominems are reasons to unvalidate someone, working on unrelated qualities, whilst I just insulted you, which is …
/r/MensRights14/05/22 03:45 AM
2

And my intention was also to put into question your anecdotes, and I said they cancel each other out. Another loop. "Bait" is implying it as insincere, a behavioral hypothesis that is hard to demonstrate, as of where are you standing right now. "Lol you are mad because I question it and you don't, ignorant :<sup>)"</sup> Cope, as you are the only one thinking I don't question it when I said it could be false as well. You either are an idiot, or you do it on purpose.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 02:46 AM
3

Of course you were, the same can be said about your intention of being a contrarian in this thread, asshole, but I don't care. You keep demonstrating your shit ablitiy at sentences, and I reiterate, the main point was not discussing the intention of denying. And as I said, I noticed another attempt at loop. Go to hell before this drags along more and gets worse
/r/MensRights14/05/22 01:24 AM
3

Denying and discussing the intention behind denying something is different, that demonstrates you are not good at sentences. Your IQ is 46! × —8.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 01:14 AM
2

No, the intention behind denying the anecdote was not the main focus at first, my first reply was denying your anecdote, and then we proceeded on to derail more up to that point, that's quite different. Which is not unidirectional and applies to you as well, which in turn makes them cancel each other out. I won't let slip either that attempt at loop you just tried with that last part.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 01:11 AM
3

Yes, you are. We moved from how valid anecdotes were and how one sees it, to the topic of judging one anecdote in particular, and questioning whether I'm truthful to my word or not, and now we are talking about consistency. That IS changing the subject, and moving the goalpost. "You didn't question the OP" Since the very beginning of my first response I said the anecdote could be bullshit, I responded to you because I sensed / felt there was hypocrisy coming from you. "That's bias" And I guess I…
/r/MensRights14/05/22 01:01 AM
5

For me it's just an anecdote. Also, you are moving the goalpost, and jumping from one point to another.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 12:51 AM
3

But I never intended to provide evidence, only to question your point. I don't have evidence? Sure, I mean, I can't have evidence of something I didn't claim or propose anyway.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 12:35 AM
4

Of course I'm discounting anecdotes, because you discounted the anecdote of above, and hypocritically throwing more anecdotes that you have no basis to prove and then saying that is a quality you have on your side, when you started this discussion by throwing an anecdote itself. Notice that I didn't say anecdotes are valid by themselves, for me, anecdotes and lived experiences are not valid if there's no proof to support them. So, if the anecdote on the OP is unvalid, so is your argument about A…
/r/MensRights13/05/22 11:37 PM
5

If his anecdote is bullshit, which I don't say it cannot be, then yours is also bullshit, hence, you might as well not be a father at all.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 10:47 PM
0

I'll never get over the fact you all seem to think this kind of mindset is unidirectional, and men can perfectly retaliate against women too, which would be more deserved and fitting in this case, since women are getting their 'revenge' at innocent men that never wronged women, whilst if men retaliated, the same couldn't be said, since those would be guilty of framing and slander.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 10:44 PM
1

Nah, not really, the conservatives are responsible for the cancel culture. Back then they tried to demand a lot of metal bands due to "satanism" and also said that things like Pokemon and Dragon Ball were satanic too, and they got a lot of anime censored.
/r/AntiFeminists13/05/22 10:03 PM
1

There's no, or shouldn't exist such a thing as holding back against an agressor, since that mitigates the capacity of a victim to defend himself. Then feminists say being considered "weak" is a disadvantage and whatever bullshit they pull out, but comments and situations like this demonstrate that being considered weak is a privilege, if you are a woman of course. Since nobody plays this straight when the weaker one is a man.
/r/AntiFeminists13/05/22 10:01 PM
1

It's remarkable how when he hit the girl, then suddenly they went to beat him in group instead of individually. Then they wonder why they have a lot of school shootings. If you want to defend yourself from a woman, you have to be a fight expert and have protection for sensible parts since they could leave you paralytic, or infertile, depends on where they hit you, or make sure nobody is around when you retaliate against her.
/r/AntiFeminists13/05/22 09:54 PM
2

Misogyny and similar ones are all meme words. In theory, misogyny means hatred against women, and etymologycally means that as well (greek root, miséō "I hate" + gunē "women" μισέωγυνέ). But is used in any context, even feminists get sometimes accussed of "misogyny" and as such the word is just theoretical, without any real life example that can be described as such, unlike misandry.
/r/MensRights08/05/22 12:26 AM
1

If the issue of abuse depended solely on physical strength then animal abuse wouldn't be possible, specially in issues like bullfighting.
/r/AntiFeminists02/05/22 01:17 AM
-3

A woman saying men are dumb is shooting herself in the foot, since men score like 2-4 IQ points higher than women, and have a wider standard deviation, being between 7% and 15% more variable in their distribution.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 08:23 PM
42

A lot of people saying that the boy could have raped her, but when the minor or the youngest is female nobody plays this straight.
/r/MensRights22/04/22 02:47 PM
1

Let's be honest: you can never know. Even if she says "yes" you can't never be sure if she's being really honest with you, knows what she wants, etc. So, because of this, I don't think you can actually get "consent", and I consider "body language" as mostly made up bullshit. So, every sex you could have is or could be thought as "rape" and you won't be able to do anything about it if she says the day after that she was "raped". So I recommend you to stop bothering about it, it's impossible.
/r/MensRights22/04/22 12:20 AM
1

That man that was exonerated from a wrongful rape accusation after 36 years in prison interests me, because people talk a lot about how some men convicted of rape is released months after, but nobody talks about those who are innocent and spent decades there. And knowing about the issue of prison rape, and taking into account that those accused of rape and pederasty have it worse, then that doesn't paint a good picture at all.
/r/AntiFeminists16/04/22 12:45 AM
2

I realised it long ago, it's obvious that we live in parallel worlds, so I don't bother in explaining anything to them, I'd daresay it's easier to build your own rocket launcher than to get a feminist to understand.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 10:00 PM
21

Yeah, fuck them. I'll never help a woman, for instance, since she'd never do it for me, and about that I can generalise flawlessly, at most I'll miss or get wrong a 5% of women, being generous. My 'extremism' is not the same kind of extremism feminists take, and I'm not the evil overlord for taking it. And they would have to deserve justice in the first place. Which they don't deserve either, and it's irrelevant to me anyway, since I don't want justice for them either, since that would be the ol…
/r/MensRights25/03/22 01:19 AM
1

I'll nitpick some parts first: A).- 'I don't see how "patriarchy is bad for everyone"' is a case of using 'patriarchy' just for everything, and that demonstrates their lack of preciseness since they never state the rules, the recquirements, the limitations, etc., other than "it happened when the patriarchy was functioning so it must be its fault" which is lame. And I doubt they'll say all the technological progress made before is also due to 'the patriarchy'. B).- 'causing more problems' it depe…
/r/AntiFeminists22/03/22 02:56 PM
–

It's not like saying "believe the victim" or "how can you doubt the victim?" is any different. And also, lots of times they themselves said that kind of shit about believing a rape accusation without demonstration. Every rape accusation is false until demonstrated otherwise.
/r/AntiFeminists20/03/22 03:32 AM
8

The problem with the "true feminism" is that apart from building itself on something never really existed, is 1: hypocritical and 2: oxymoronic. It's hypocritical, since they never apply it consistently. When someone does something 'good' and is a feminist or does it 'in the name of feminism' then there is just feminism, a monolith, a unified movement / worldview. But when someone does something bad and is a feminism or does it 'in the name of feminism' then now is a different kind of feminism. …
/r/AntiFeminists20/03/22 12:42 AM
13

It's funny since a lot of feminists and feminist sympathisers like to point out that men commit more suicide in those "more backguard patriarchal countries" without realising they just admitted that gender roles negatively affect men more than women, and hence they refuted a great part of their own system of beliefs.
/r/AntiFeminists19/03/22 01:20 PM
2

"Your version has a different meaning because we say so" That's literally his post. Just because he thinks it has a different meaning then surely that must be because he's right. Which means that the same can be applied in reverse. "Men suck" is because women are angry that men aren't their slaves and don't commit to every single unreasonable demand. And 'women suck' has its origin on all the shit innocent men have been through due to repulsive women and how women have little simpathy or empathy…
/r/AntiFeminists19/03/22 03:27 AM
4

"It's considered hateful for a good reason" Yes, and that good reason is the slander without epistemic-empirical foundation the media and the internet in general has thrown at the concept of MGTOW itself. They assume that just because one is or has a certain affinity to it, then he must be a "virgin loser incel who wants to legalise rape and commit genocide" against those "pure beings of light" and "divinities" called: "women" Those Mr/s. News(wo)men can go to hell.
/r/MensRights14/03/22 11:33 PM
82

Misogyny for them is when conservatism Bottom text
/r/MensRights09/03/22 11:42 PM
0

The same could be said about women. The 'problems' they face are not because of their gender. The issue with murder and rape is a criminal problem. The issue with sexual harassment is because of education, etc.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 06:13 PM
0

How can it be 'patriarchy' when the example mentioned above is preferential treatment in favour of women? That's one of the most meme terms I've heard.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 06:10 PM
1

It depends on how you define it. If you are going to apply the same vague and ambiguous definition then your example is useless. If we talk about hatred, then not, it's highly unlikely he felt any disgust towards them and at the same time wanted to have children with them. That's an UY Scuti size oxymoron. Don't think I didn't notice you are not answering any questions. As I said, you are either immensely retarded or you do it on purpose.
/r/AntiFeminists06/03/22 09:02 PM
1

The ones who had children with their slaves, certainly didn't, if they ended up having children with them. Or what, are you going to tell me the average slave owner raped his slaves or had children with their slaves?.
/r/AntiFeminists06/03/22 08:58 PM
1

Some slaves had children with their slave owners, the reason why African Americans have about 20% of european ancestry. So 'hatred' cannot be applied here. If the intention was to harm, then it could be considered. If not, then try a better example. Interesting also that you ommitted everything I explained there, even putting examples of rape as cases where it could be considered as an option. You are either immensely retarded or you are misrepresenting on purpose.
/r/AntiFeminists06/03/22 08:52 PM
1

"If you say it is possible then that means I win the discussion" as if being humanly possible was the point of the discussion. It is humanly possible, but I doubt that if he really hated women he would offer himself to have it, or would accept in case of being proposed, unless it was against his will (rape, which would only fuel his hatred if he had any before), or wouldn't enjoy it and feel disgusted by it. If not, he has a hate fucking fetish, if his hatred is really genuine. Also, again with …
/r/AntiFeminists06/03/22 08:46 PM
1

You are surely the kind of people that got only F's in school since you implied impossibility, which I didn't.
/r/AntiFeminists06/03/22 08:37 PM
1

It depends on the timeline. If she fucked men before and then later on time she became a misandrist then is not inconsitent. Inconsistent would be for her to declare she hates men, and then have sex with one, or even worse, to have a boyfriend. That's something that RadFems also have pointed out. The same applies here. The guy seems to be unironically incel, hence, he wants to have sex with women, hence, he's lying to himself in either his desire to have sex with them or in his hatred, if he eve…
/r/AntiFeminists06/03/22 08:27 PM
1

Furthermore, we all know is easier for people to hate men than to hate women. So anything negative one says about women will be minimised and maximised when applied to men.
/r/AntiFeminists06/03/22 08:20 PM
1

If this was posted by a non-ironic incel, then no, since he wants to fuck with women, unlike the misandrists, that always expressed that they feel disgusted by the idea of having sex with men. If not, if it was written by a guy unrelated to those spaces, then I might consider it as the only true case I've found, apart from me of course. PS: In a non-related note, the fact that women have started more wars than men is supported by evidence https://www.nber.org/papers/w23337
/r/AntiFeminists06/03/22 08:14 PM
1

Read this discussion to get a better grasp of what I'm saying: https://www.reddit.com/r/antifeminists/comments/sdu2kp/this_is_feminism_for_you/hummevc?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share&context=3
/r/AntiFeminists06/03/22 06:53 PM
1

The hashtags "KillAllMen"; "MenAreTrash"; and the whole narrative of men being 'potential rapists'; 'those who start war'; comments like 'I miss the times where men went to war and die' and those are the 1st ones that I could come up in the first seconds. If you give me time and if I'm in a better condition then I could make an entire wall of text with examples. Mind you, those kinds of comments are very popular or have a sense of popularity. I'll wait for any example you can come up with.
/r/AntiFeminists06/03/22 06:49 PM
1

Yes. And for that I don't have to think about serial killers or in extreme gore videos in order to come up with examples, unlike with misogyny, and that still leaves me with doubt if whether those killers were misogynystic or not. I just have to think of social media, average women and even 'moderate' feminists.
/r/AntiFeminists06/03/22 06:40 PM
1

Yes. The number of that kind of people rounds to zero, being saved from being non-existent by mere statistical law that tells you there are all kinds of people. And the definition is a little shitty, since what defines one as a negative prejudice is relative, almost subjective, with the only exceptions being those that are universally bad and are all the time directed against men.
/r/AntiFeminists06/03/22 05:53 PM
1

Do you really think copypasting it from the dictionary is demonstrating the existence of it? I guess that demonstrates that unicorns exist, since they are also defined in the dictionary. unicorn /ˈjuːnɪkɔːn/ noun 1. a mythical animal typically represented as a horse with a single straight horn projecting from its forehead. The point is that the 'misogyny' is only theoretical, since not a single instance of 'misogyny' is really 'misogynistic' since there's no hatred against women.
/r/AntiFeminists06/03/22 05:12 PM
2

Misogyny doesn't exist. It's a meme word, it's meaningless, unless you can demonstrate it.
/r/AntiFeminists06/03/22 04:56 PM
1

🔄
/r/AntiFeminists05/03/22 07:07 PM
1

A sub where you are just a clueless nerd lmao
/r/AntiFeminists05/03/22 07:04 PM
1

What I did with your comment was a comparison. And yes, I did. And?
/r/AntiFeminists05/03/22 07:01 PM
1

It's a literary resource called 'comparison' The same I tell to you thinking it does count.
/r/AntiFeminists05/03/22 01:03 PM
1

The same I tell to your existence, I guess that makes your existence objetively hilarious or a joke.
/r/AntiFeminists05/03/22 01:00 PM
1

In order to be satire I should have sent a message or a criticism using comedy, exaggeration and other humouristic resources. In this I only did a criticism without the humouristic part.
/r/AntiFeminists05/03/22 12:56 PM
0

No. The housework is easy and single men that do both, work and do the chores and cook, will tell you that, heck, I do often the chores and going to elementary and secondary school was harder than that, where is my pay for attendig school? Also, raising children is something even 15 years old girls can do. I'd be able if I didn't hate being around children. You may as well be paying people for using the bathroom and washing their hands afterwards.
/r/AntiFeminists05/03/22 02:34 AM
3

This woman doesn't know you can find gore sites all over the normal internet, fully available. And in my experience with those sites, I've found way more videos about a supposed "rapist" getting whatever punishment than of women being murdered, with luck I've encountered a video in which a woman was victim of an accident. I just found videos of rape once, and it was from a site that now has removed all of its gore. Also, I've found more vidoes of animal torture than of women being abused. I gues…
/r/AntiFeminists05/03/22 01:32 AM
8

Your argument doesn't work since conveniently gives the housework way more credit whilst to the man, what he does, is just summarised to just a line. If you want to do the comparison correctly, you should remove all that inncessary part of "cleaning, cooking, handle the money" and instead just say "doing the housework". In fact, this is a classical tactic of painting everything the woman does as way more harder and say "how hard, how horrible!" and to the man's work "how easy, not that much, how…
/r/MensRights28/02/22 01:59 PM
41

Taking into account the number of stay-at-home mothers versus the number of stay-at-home fathers it seems is totally the opposite. They are always what they accuse men of being.
/r/MensRights28/02/22 12:50 AM
2

They probably say it because the Y chromosome has less genes than the X chromosome, but there is no relationship between complexity or anything like that with the number of genes, as far as I know. For example, Humans have less genes than grapes.
/r/AntiFeminists11/02/22 08:03 PM
5

Yeah, sure, that's why we have UN Women, International Women's Day and Feminist rhetoric and discourse in T.V., Politics and Media. Patriarchy, on the feminist definition, is a myth and everyone fails at demonstrating it.
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/22 11:23 PM
5

People will call you an "incel" regardless of what you tell or specify them why it doesn't apply with you. With that I have experience. "Incel" means involuntary celibate. You know, the guy who just has confessed to his 8th crush and was rejected for the 8th time. Apart from being a non-demonstrable behavioral hypothesis, it's funny since most people that call you an incel are the same that has a lot of those qualities that would make them qualify as such. Such as being ugly, short (less than 1.…
/r/AntiFeminists03/02/22 02:03 AM
1

It always happened. Even when I was a child I noticed that same pattern.
/r/AntiFeminists01/02/22 02:16 PM
3

Every day is one step deeper in the dark side. And I want to dig deeper on it.
/r/AntiFeminists30/01/22 02:19 AM
1

I didn't say you were interested in being right. I said that the only reason I kept responding you is because I wanted to prove myself as right and righteous. It's pointless to me try to make you understand or come to an agreement with you, that's what I would do only with people I personally agree on a 90% of things. And you certainly don't qualify, since we are discussing what on my perspective are the mere basics. And the same I tell you that it's pointless to discuss with someone who doesn't…
/r/AntiFeminists29/01/22 03:37 AM
1

I also did assume on logical assumption, yet I don't see you taking my position as true.
/r/AntiFeminists28/01/22 09:32 PM
1

Neither you. You just assumed it without empirical demonstration.
/r/AntiFeminists28/01/22 09:22 PM
1

And I'm not interested in "discussing", as in "coming to an understanding with you by the exchange of points"; I'm only interested in proving myself right and on demonstrating my own points. Why? Because I'm comparing worsts to worsts. I compared the worst that has happened to women to the worst that has happened to men. The worst that women have been told are just that, at best it's "ugly bitch"; "no eggs"; "you are a slut"; to which there are their male counterparts, as in "creep"; "small dick…
/r/AntiFeminists28/01/22 09:03 PM
2

Read the comment again. Right now you are saying "Men divorce women in this case, it's true the study doesn't specify but I'm sure it is more likely and that invalidates your points because men are more likely to divorce them because I believe it so"; more or less.
/r/AntiFeminists28/01/22 08:17 PM
1

Yes. It is non-existent. You have never witnessed real hatred towards women, and you probably are never going to witness it. Most of the supposed "misogyny" is just saying: "bitch, whore, sex, slut" and other zzZZz-tier insults. That's nothing compared to what women say: "Men are potential rapists, men are trash, kill all men, I wish men would be sent to war and die, if all men disppeared all would be better, the best man is one that doesn't show vital sings" etc., or the hatred organisations li…
/r/AntiFeminists28/01/22 08:14 PM
2

It would make perfect sense in fact. You get benefits from the government, and also file a normal divorce so you can get half the money he possessed prior to the divorce. Or she could convince him to do it so they don't go bankrupt. That would be counted as the man starting it, as a false positive. That would be much more likely than men not stomaching being caretakers (which would recquire empirical demonstration in and of itself, also, one would have to factor age). With that, anyone can build…
/r/AntiFeminists28/01/22 07:56 PM
1

I know, that's why I said 'women', not 'feminists'. Since women in general use it more than anyone else. The term 'incel' is self-descriptive, then it was turned into something 'negative'. And I know people use a term wrong to refer to another concept they also misapply ('misogyny', which is almost non-existent).
/r/AntiFeminists28/01/22 03:09 AM
3

For you, selfishness is a plausible explanation but stupidity and not being able to see the full picture is not. Again, double standard in its maximum expression. And the post mentioned another possibility, which would make it plausible. Did you read the full post or not?
/r/AntiFeminists28/01/22 01:44 AM
5

For you the sick person initiating the divorce doesn't make sense but the partner leaving the other because of an illness does because...? Double standard in all its splendour.
/r/AntiFeminists28/01/22 01:40 AM
1

Then why women use "Incel" or other variants as an insult? The only complain about shaming language or slut shaming is that they don't want that applied to them as they apply it to others.
/r/AntiFeminists28/01/22 01:28 AM
11

https://www.reddit.com/r/MenLeaveSickWives/comments/leob1s/men_leave_sick_wives_is_fake_news/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share It's just a meme.
/r/AntiFeminists28/01/22 01:25 AM
6

Yeah, sure, creating laws that disadvantage men and dehumanising and demonising men with narratives such as the patriarchy that they are promoting, ridiculising men's movements (like they do in that meme) and blaming men for their problems. How helpful. At least they gave me a reminder of why I hate them.
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 11:20 PM
4

For them, it doesn't matter. If you say that thing about replacing "men" with "Jews, Blacks" or anything else, they will tell you "they are still men".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/11/21 08:00 PM
2

Because, apparently, that means, in their minds, that "is not a gender issue like women's" Which is stupid since: Even if that were true, it doesn't make it less of a problem. Something being a gender issue doesn't make it any less important, and doesn't debunk that men are still suffering more than women because of that Even when the majority of homocides are committed by men, that doesn't mean is not a gender issue. Since people tend to be softer with female victims and harsher with the male v…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/11/21 06:45 PM
9

Unironically, the number of men's accomplishments is so large, that you can't really mention or celebrate all of them in one single day. If it were to be a video, it'd be like +9 hrs of video explaining every accomplishment, and that still would be an underestimate, depending if you go all summarised and abridged, or you go deep into the details.
/r/MensRights14/11/21 11:27 PM
2

t. > THE MANS AT FAULT When is "The Man's At Fault". Again, try something that doesn't make you look like an hypocrite. P.S: > cant When is "can't".
/r/AntiFeminists07/11/21 10:16 PM
2

What kind of dumb question is that? If you state something implicitly, you are stating it regardless. Try again. Because you seem unable to put two and two together. And "Incult" is not an insult but you called me "uneducated". And on contrary to you, I've read books and at least I know what Incel is and what it implies. Tell me about Montaigne's essays and you'll prove how cult you are.
/r/AntiFeminists07/11/21 10:15 PM
1

You follow r/PokemonTCG Try something better next time because you look like an hypocrite. And this is r/antifeminism Maybe you are the one who has to flee out of hear. And stop using meme words. They are going to low your IQ even further.
/r/AntiFeminists07/11/21 10:09 PM
2

You don't know what "implicitly" means, right? Incult hick cock-head with parkinson. You are so iliterate that it didn't cross your mind that perhaps I was saying that you said it indirectly? You listed a bunch of unrealistic reasons, use your brain a little. Try to study math next time so you can actually use logic and also a dictionary so you don't repeat meme words. And don't come with anything about "I don't care xd" Just admit you erred here.
/r/AntiFeminists07/11/21 10:04 PM
2

Who said that? You. Are you blind or something? Use your brain for that, weed-head. The only thing that needs to be asked is if you'd do the same if was a video of a woman getting beat up by a group of men.
/r/AntiFeminists07/11/21 09:46 PM
1

For me, College / University always was an ineffective stupidity, since I always wondered: "What can Universities offer to me that I can't find on the internet?". Because almost everything that is taught in College can be found on the Internet. Literally hundreds of pages with free books, the online libraries (LibGen, Library Z) that have almost every book for almost every subject, online courses on the internet that cost way less than a degree in College, not to mention what Khan Academy and Ha…
/r/MensRights02/11/21 08:24 PM
4

Just a few Nazis committed the entire Holocaust thing but still people recognises Nazism as bad and don't respect it and the whole German people was punished but all of that people coming from feminism (as well as in FDS, and let's not forget about everything else they've made) and yet people still say "but feminism is good, that isn't true feminism". You imagine someone excusing Nazism saying: "but that wasn't real Nazism, those were other fake Nazis" Wouldn't it sound ridiculous? The same here…
/r/AntiFeminists31/10/21 06:17 PM
-1

Read the full picture that was posted and then you will understand.
/r/MensRights29/10/21 05:41 PM
2

Misogyny is when you post a statistic in a subreddit. LMAO nerd.
/r/AntiFeminists29/10/21 02:00 PM
3

The majority of engineers are male. So I guess the one sitting next to children could be just an engineer. And they won't be able to apply the gender roles swapped card since women are almost non-existent in something like engineering.
/r/MensRights29/10/21 04:04 AM
2

I mean, fuck, the full list of accomplished geniuses in the sciences, technology, mathematics, inventions, music, literature, visual arts, philosophy, etc., reveal the same pattern that all of them are overwhelmingly men (See, for example: Human Accomplishment by Charles Murray).
/r/AntiFeminists18/10/21 03:48 AM
2

This also happens with mental sports and the like, for example, Maths Competitions. Of course, Intelligence has less sexual dimorphism and behaves less dramatically than height or strenght, but still shows most men holding up all the records, winning in the tournaments, etc. Chess, for example: As October 2021, Hou Yifan, the highest woman, is ranked #83 https://ratings.fide.com/top.phtml?list=men The best female chess player, Judit Polgar, in terms of peak ELO rating, is ranked #54: https://en.…
/r/AntiFeminists18/10/21 03:32 AM
2

Bullshit. Feminists posted and still post feminist content where it wasn't needed. OP isn't doing anything wrong with doing the same.
/r/AntiFeminists18/10/21 12:48 AM
1

Nah, the Mexican Cartels are softer with women too. With women they just kill them. But with men they put a lot more of creativity into it and do worse kinds of murder. Source: Gore sites.
/r/AntiFeminists02/10/21 12:14 AM
1

Misogyny: The meme word.
/r/AntiFeminists29/09/21 12:49 AM
11

Well, with an attitude like that isn't like they evoke sympathy at all either...
/r/AntiFeminists28/09/21 03:56 PM
3

"BeINg UnAblE tO VotE oR oWn prOpErTy iS aCTuALlY a BeNEfiT" "If you say that something may have a beneficial side then you are saying it's a benefit on its entirety" That's what you basically said. LMAO nerd. And to put an example: in Argentina, in older times, in order to vote you had to serve into the army. And taking into account how the army trained its soldiers in that time, I wouldn't call it something as really beneficial nor worth the risk. Of course, I shouldn't expect for people like …
/r/MensRights28/09/21 01:50 AM
2

It's curious how they present their (IQ denier and environmentalist point of view) as the position held by experts, when the general position is the one of 50% genetic and 50% environmental, within adults being more genetic than environmental, and the position of 100% environmental causes is the one that is outside of the mainstream (just like that one that says that is 100% genetic).
/r/MensRights28/09/21 01:39 AM
3

Vulnerable to all kinds of abuse? Since when? And don't you think those laws would benefit them, like, when men controlled all the property, in Spain, it cause that only men could be sent to jail, even if the woman was the one that should have been sent? Of course you would say that, since you don't have discourse at all.
/r/MensRights28/09/21 01:32 AM
2

Women aren't less intelligent because they are women Strange and unclear use of words. Explain the meaning of that. They do worse on IQ test (...) Oh, so you ALREADY KNEW that men usually score higher than women on IQ tests? Or are you referring to the tail effects in the distribution? Because I don't remember referring to the mean score specifically. I just mentioned "lower intelligence profile". Which one? flaws of IQ tests Tests that are made to hide sex differences? https://emilkirkegaard.dk…
/r/MensRights28/09/21 01:23 AM
8

I'll just quote something I already said before. Every woman self-proclaiming as a feminist will be tied to a preceding history of hembrism and misandry of which she won't untie herself with a simple "I, from my feminism, don't agree with this/that". Likewise, the very election of the term "feminism" incurs on hembrism/female supremacism and the dehumanisation of men/misandry. Because electing the label "feminist" is thinking putting the priority of women first at the expense of men, since this …
/r/MensRights28/09/21 12:39 AM
5

It's curious your approach to my first example. Instead of addressing it directly, you went to 'what I meant with it'. Yes. I'm saying that women don't have the same genius potential than men, and that by extension means that they, as a collective, have a lower intelligence profile. And don't come to tell me it isn't accurate, you know it is, it's probably one of the most pronounced and accurate stereotypes. And no matter what path you choose to go, whether you are an IQ denier or not, it will i…
/r/MensRights27/09/21 07:55 PM
13

It's one of the most satisfactory things to see in life when a man refuses to help a woman. At least that's how I feel.
/r/MensRights27/09/21 04:53 PM
11

To be honest, I don't really care that they could see me as a predator or disgusting or whatever they choose to label me, it's not my intention to please any woman or women in general. The thing is how that would affect society and the law. If feminism stayed as a closed group that doesn't aim to political lectures and societal changes then I'd've been fine with it. But no. That was too good to be chosen, it seems...
/r/MensRights27/09/21 04:51 PM
27

And who do you think are the majority of great inventors and geniuses? The majority of firefighters? The majority of cops that arrest those criminals? Spoiler: Not women. (You can find more on here: https://youtu.be/j9Yn3i-DMKw) Besides that, is curious how people use that statistic in convenient ways, for when it comes to this topic, they mention is an understandable precaution, since a murderer is many times more likely to be male, but then ignore that the majority of targerts also are overwhe…
/r/MensRights27/09/21 04:45 PM
2

Just only what I observed through the years. Which of course comes with a lot of anecdotes and that is not a very good method to assess something, I know. Still, is the most I have now. When I have something better, I'll tell you. Believing it or not is just up to you, really. At least we agree on something / you are consistent with it.
/r/MensRights27/09/21 02:03 PM
3

As long as you agree under that women don't have the right to be protected from random men then sure, since they are primarly the ones with that kind of mentality.
/r/MensRights27/09/21 06:28 AM
4

It's interesting how people immediately assume those are really disadvantages. But those things don't in and of itself are disadvantages in the first place (apart that a lot of them are memetic), in order to do so, demonstrate them.
/r/MensRights27/09/21 06:19 AM
3

Don't "thanks for proving my point" me. We both know you didn't make any point and just are saying insubstantial shit. I guess you've proved my own point, right? :°)
/r/MensRights27/09/21 05:34 AM
4

Women don't feel worshipped Of course, since it's already common, being worshipped doesn't feel like being worshipped anymore. They are used to it. and often don't feel valued past what they can offer sexually It's not like they have that much to offer besides of that. So that's just reality.
/r/MensRights27/09/21 02:44 AM
1

For me at least, they don't.
/r/MensRights27/09/21 02:41 AM
4

I have to be thankful to FDS users for reminding me daily why I despise them.
/r/AntiFeminists19/09/21 03:42 AM
1

Of course, those high paying jobs require high intellect and wealth is a proxy for high IQ. And since there are less women than men with high IQ, then it's pretty much predictable that equal representation at every level is impossible. And it's not like grades are that much correlated to IQ.
/r/AntiFeminists13/09/21 04:16 PM
1

In situations like this I feel happy to be the type of person that wears a hood/hoodie all the day.
/r/MensRights10/09/21 03:35 PM
2

Every woman self-proclaiming as a feminist will be tied to a preceding history of hembrism and misandry of which she won't untie herself with a simple "I, from my feminism, don't agree with this/that". Likewise, the very election of the term "feminism" incurs on hembrism/female supremacism and the dehumanisation of men/misandry. Because electing the label "feminist" is thinking putting the priority of women first at the expense of men, since this benefited women, whilst damaging men due to the m…
/r/MensRights06/09/21 01:50 AM
3

If All Men Disappeared the human species would lose its major source of innovators and geniuses, too.
/r/MensRights09/08/21 09:59 PM
1

I could counterargue against several points like that, but I'll abstain and just mention the amount of male geniuses and inventors compared to those who are females. Compare them and let's see what it shows :°)
/r/MensRights07/08/21 10:26 PM
7

And it's hypocritical. Because with false accusations they use the conviction rate but with rape they use the number of accusations instead of the conviction rates. If you want to corner them simply ask them: How many of those accusations ended up in conviction? And what happened to those women who accused falsely?
/r/MensRights07/08/21 10:21 PM
2

:GIGACHAD:
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/08/21 03:15 PM
3

Yeah, I was surprised it existed at all lol
/r/MensRights05/08/21 06:29 AM
-2

Then I'll create r/RadMasc
/r/MensRights05/08/21 06:04 AM
2

Marriage is wasting your life on a superflous thing. Montaigne said marriage was an unnecessary enterprise. So it was 500 years before, and so it is now in 2021.
/r/MGTOW222/07/21 01:40 AM
9

Yes... I could reverse the genders of the 16 ones and almost all of them would reflect society's real double standards and would be way closer to the truth than those of that post... Let me try: RULES OF MISANDRY 1st: Men are responsible for what women do. 2nd: Men saying no to women is a hate crime. 3rd: Men speaking for themselves is exclusionary and selfish. 4th: Men's opinions are violence against women therefore female violence against men is justified. 5th: Men and Masculinists must be use…
/r/AntiFeminists01/06/21 11:26 PM
3

I remember a lot of pictures like that from pretty much every side in that war. For example, german soldiers also taking care of animals, a picture that is also seldom shown (maybe even more here because "they were the nazis") but it's always accurate to point nonetheless.
/r/MensRights29/05/21 06:06 PM
11

The classical. A boy could see his life ruined, but the most imoportant thing is that people keep believing women...
/r/MensRights23/05/21 12:08 PM
3

Stepping aside their claims of "Society has very high expectations for women to raise the menfolk and to serve a man", I don't really care about them. As long as they are consistent and then don't try to come and play the same card against MGTOW men then I'm fine [I don't expect a woman to realise the high standards men are put on] with them. I wish more women did it. Men would benefit as a result of it.
/r/MGTOW221/05/21 04:51 AM
4

If that's how things work then perhaps their "oppressors" [assuming they were really oppressed] were right about them.
/r/AntiFeminists21/05/21 04:12 AM
3

Hello there, it seems I'm not the only one :^) As for experiences, I never really had any experince with any gender. I just have been attracted sexually to people of both genders, but I never tried to engage with them. In puberty was because I was very shy and had problems with social interaction. Also I discovered MGTOW when I was 13 yrs old, so that demotivated me into engaging with women. As for men, well, you know, it's not very easy to really approach it. Let alone propose something. Now th…
/r/MGTOW221/05/21 01:26 AM
1

Yeah, sure, because saying "AWALT" in the sense that all of them are hypergamous, is on the same level some feminists reach when they call all men "potential rapists" — as for it, still has yet to be demonstrated that a) anything posted is really misogyny b) once that's done, if it really is that bad or comparable to some levels of misandry some people in FDS and Feminists reach.
/r/MGTOW221/05/21 01:11 AM
1

I wonder how much they can keep doing it. I doubt they will be 24/7 spamming autofellatio videos just to give bad image to a hashtag... As long as they don't brainwash the users in forgetting everything about MGTOW and deleting literally everything about it from the face of the internet, I doubt they will get any of that goal accomplished. At best they just will get a couple of users annoyed/confused. Tumblr As far as I know, Tumblr stopped admitting NSFW content, so good luck losing your accoun…
/r/MGTOW221/05/21 01:00 AM
4

That's a classical. When feminism, or more precisely, a feminist does something good, then it's just feminism, a quasi-monolith, the achievement goes to just «feminism», without distinction. But when it, or someone (a feminist), does something bad or says something bad, then suddenly it's a different kind of feminism, not true feminism, true feminism is about equality... And they present you an «ideal feminism» based purely on idealism, an invisible one that doesn't really exist, but it's there …
/r/AntiFeminists20/05/21 07:55 PM
1

Well, this will surely be an underachievement. Men already walked in Space. A group of women trying to do the same shit won't be special.
/r/MGTOW20/05/21 04:43 AM
1

I wouldn't say it's precisely hate, I'd rather say it's contempt and/or antipathy (although that would probably be an issue of semanthics). For me, hate is understandable but not justifiable, while contempt / despise / antipathy for me are both understandable and justifiable, of course as long as is fundamented correctly, and its justification is above in that text.
/r/MGTOW203/05/21 04:07 PM
1

This is the ultimate fate of every male that has contact with women.
/r/MGTOW203/05/21 10:06 AM
5

I wish all women converted to WGTOW or to political separatist lesbianism, men would benefit in sumptuous ways not having parasites leaving them bloodless anymore.
/r/MGTOW203/05/21 08:12 AM
2

It'd have to be seen what epistemic or empiric foundation can he use to demonstrate or support that position.
/r/MGTOW230/03/21 03:38 AM
2

Uh-huh. When women outperform men in writing and verbal skills, it's a triumph of equity and we have to celebrate it. When men outperform women in Math, Science or Visuospatial Abilities, the gap must be closed, it's a factor of discrimination. They will never ever try to close the gap that favors women in writing or verbal skills. They have an inferiority complex, never give power to a collective that has an inferiority complex.
/r/MGTOW11/03/21 10:44 PM
3

Honestly, I feel worse for rich men than rich women. At least rich men work. Rich women? Pff. Some may, but it's obvious what is the situation here.
/r/MGTOW11/03/21 10:25 PM
2

At least you were absolved of the charges after 2 years. I know cases of innocent men that were thrown in jail and weren't free after years or even raped and/or murdered in prison. Due to the effects it can have on the accused and the implications of it, the #BelieveAllWomen is crapshit. Never believe a woman, ever. Because you often don't have access to the proofs and the two sides, and the woman's word is enough. Unless is 100% certain, don't even consider believing in her. I'm glad you were a…
/r/MGTOW211/03/21 10:10 PM
3

I just go back to Colttaine's video "Equal Contribution" as a response. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=j9Yn3i-DMKw
/r/MGTOW207/03/21 03:19 PM
2

Well. It certainly is not the first time I hear that from people that dares to go beyond and actually hear a little about MGTOW. Of course there are different moods, but most of the times is quiet. I think pretty much everyone here went through what's called "Red Pill Rage". For me it lasted for 4 years or so. Now I control more the rage, if I'm in that mood. Of course is not perfect because it takes time to fully control your emotions, but it's safe to say I'm reaching that point for sure. The …
/r/MGTOW205/03/21 07:25 PM
7

You have no historical basis for that and you cannot point out to any of the most important civilisations to affirm that.
/r/MGTOW205/03/21 01:41 PM
3

At this point being unlikable to women could be considered being based af. Her: No woman will ever like you! Me: Yes. Based!
/r/MGTOW04/03/21 11:12 PM
1

I know. But I talked about misandry specifically. I don't remember where (it was time ago) but some people were accusing Illimitable Man of misandry. And I honestly don't understand why, he's actually very pro-male. I don't agree with him when he starts to talk about family and forming a relationship, but for the rest it's great.
/r/MGTOW204/03/21 10:47 PM
2

That moment I realise the phrase feminists used all the time: When you are used to privilege, equality feels like oppression It's actually correct, but because of completely different reasons rather than those they publicly state.
/r/MGTOW204/03/21 10:43 PM
20

And I've seen people accusing Illimitable Man of misandry. But why? He's actually one of the few PUA/TradCon accounts I actually enjoy to read when I enter on Twitter. He's a good fella.
/r/MGTOW203/03/21 07:59 PM
79

That's the truth. And the transition from boyhood to manhood thing actually makes a lot of sense. But yes. Unsuccessful men are treated really like 2nd class citizens. Feminists just victimise themselves when they say society treated and treats them as 2nd class citizens when they are in one of the safest positions they could get. They don't know how is to live like an unsuccessful man. They'd commit suicide if they experienced it.
/r/MGTOW203/03/21 07:57 PM
2

They should go for investigation (real investigation, for in many places the word of the woman is enough proof, which cannot be demonstrated nor ontologically, nor epistemologically, nor empirically) if they want answers of course. But for the rest of people, and for those who have kids, in cases like that, I'd always recommend being doubtful or skeptical of the accusator. Nor the condition of man, woman or child will validate their without questioning believing on them.
/r/MGTOW227/02/21 08:05 PM
3

I seriously would like to see feminists' epistemological and empirical basis for the “I believe her because she's a woman”. They should demonstrate why being female somehow makes the case an almost undoubtful truth...
/r/MGTOW227/02/21 07:37 PM
1

Yes. As you said, they don't apply redpill logic for that specific situation. However, it's incorrect not to. It's understandable, but not correct. Simply there's no empirical or epistemological demonstration for believing a child's word either. I'd also say that I'll also treat the accusation of rape by a man with skepticism too, just I do not know how widespread is men lying about rape. I know for some 2 or 3 cases of men lying about homosexual rape tho. (although for straight is more complica…
/r/MGTOW227/02/21 07:35 PM
1

Like if any man had such a high standard for women. I mean, yeah, sure, they have an idealised female figure of their own but I don't see them actually using it in real life.
/r/AntiFeminists23/02/21 03:24 AM
3

50,000 shades of misogyny LMAO
/r/MGTOW222/02/21 01:17 PM
4

I know. I just wanted to say that about FDS specifically but went out off the rails while I was writing. I realised it a little bit after publishing but well, I still hold that everything I said applies perfectly to the FDS crowd.
/r/AntiFeminists20/02/21 04:45 PM
-3

Like if they could say anything about that, when they are the sex objects par excellence. Except that they have never produced anything of value as a gender or as individuals. Never. While men have done as individuals and as a gender.
/r/AntiFeminists20/02/21 03:59 PM
1

Classical... The demands of a woman are impossible to really please them. They ask the impossible. But hey, if you get cheated on, it's your fault because you didn't know how to keep her with you, LOSER! ... They all are just worthless parasites.
/r/MGTOW13/02/21 03:40 AM
1

LIES MEN TELL But it's always women who say size doesn't matter. What the f--- are they talking about.
/r/MGTOW13/02/21 03:26 AM
3

Projekt Melody literally humiliated other e-thots in Chaturbate lmao
/r/MGTOW13/02/21 03:21 AM
1

Uh-huh. In fact, it's the traditional roles that keep exploiting us. That feminism uses them as a tool is a different thing. Patriarchy may well had given control to some men, but in the end, the responsability was always way too much for what was finally paid. In the end, all the paid for that hard work was meaningless. And the simping of chivalrous men allowed it, as we already know by far at this point. And because of that, it's not just questioning the role as provider, it's to reject it ent…
/r/MGTOW207/02/21 03:38 AM
2

Yes. I know. I've seen plenty of times since my childhood that women and girls were encouraged in some kind of proto-"MenAreTrash"-motto-like behaviour. And it seems it was present well before 2000-2005s, that is the age range when I was born. Just that today it's expanded. And when I was a kid I was pretty much following that path indeed. But at least now we've got the tools in order to change that (at least for us as individuals).
/r/MGTOW207/02/21 03:27 AM
1

I don't know, if MGTOWs really attacked her then I'd say they wasted their time on something counterproductive. But I'dn't bother much about it either. Simply go your own way and leave Twitter and the rests of Social Networks like that. They are cringe.
/r/MGTOW207/02/21 02:56 AM
2

Well, It doesn't really matter what society believes or not, if one chooses to go his own way then simply what society thinks stop mattering.
/r/MGTOW207/02/21 02:38 AM
2

Since always more like.
/r/MGTOW207/02/21 02:27 AM
1

Classical No True Scotsman Fallacy
/r/PussyPass30/01/21 12:48 AM
2

True. In this case, I think is better to let a "rapist" free until better proof is presented, than let a innocent guy be killed and raped in prison.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/01/21 03:45 PM
2

Lying doesn't equal rape but lying about it can lead to some nasty situations that could be equivalent. But well, an eye for an eye could be primitive, so I think economical compensation (a huge one) should be enough. If the accused gets something like what I described then 12 years of prison at minimum. Lying can be indeed a very serious crime. Calumny is paid with prison FYI.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/01/21 03:41 PM
2

No. The penalty should be equal to the damages caused to the falsely accussed person. I still remember when I saw a case (if I find it I'll post a link to it later, I'm talking from memory) where a man was accused, he got imprisoned, he got raped and murdered, and then it was discovered that the accusation was false. The penalty for the woman and men that did it should be equivalent for what kind of harm was done.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/01/21 03:32 PM
1

I forgot that Anita Sarkeesian existed at all lol.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/11/20 03:27 PM
2

I always find funny how they in their introduction say: “You are the prize!” and I always think: “What these women do, possess or have that could make them so valuable?...” of course they will never respond in a way that could justify their self-perceived value. But regardless of if it's justified or not. They are so full of themselves...
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/11/20 03:02 AM
26

31.9K followers Lol
/r/PussyPass25/10/20 08:21 PM
1

No, and I don't deny there could be others like the one you mentioned. (It's not the norm anyways). But using that one specific person is anecdotical evidence fallacy (or hasty generalization if you want to include more dudes on your story).
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/20 02:05 AM
1

To put your comment into perspective, that's like responding to the fact: «The majority of humans have two arms» by saying: «But I've seen one person with three arms».
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/20 02:01 AM
1

Yes, you just mentioned one, and used it as a replica against the comment made by the Indian user, and you thought it was a valid replica.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/20 01:59 AM
3

Literally, everything you're doing is a whataboutery.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/20 01:44 AM
4

You just mentioned «one». How that makes up 90% of the population of India or how that makes up a representative sample? Do you think India only has 2 inhabitants or what?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/20 01:43 AM
1

Anyways, as I said before, you don't seem to understand how nuances work. Even If men have some characteristics that can be reminiscent or similar to hypergamy, women shows those characteristics, at a way higher level, and many characteristics more. That being said, I don't have much more to squeeze out of here, I don't know if you'll respond to my comment tho. That being the case, then I'll have more.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/20 10:45 PM
1

But regardless, even if we accept at face value your theory, men are not as choosy as women and have lower standards, that would make women's hypergamy far worse for men than men's “hypergamy” (that I still hold up is just polygamy more than anything) could ever be to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/20 10:27 PM
1

But regardless, even if we accept at face value your theory, men are not as choosy as women and have lower standards, that would make women's hypergamy far worse for men than men's “hypergamy” (that I still hold up is just polygamy more than anything) could ever be to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/20 10:27 PM
1

Yes, what you expect, poor people are desperate in their situation. Of course they are, I don't know how that is an argument. God knows why for you it was difficult, not everything is black and white, neither I can make full judgment of your case because frankly I never saw you in real life, I don't even know if you're telling the truth, but for sure, the best that could be said about is that you're just an exception. Or you just were a more fertile woman in their eyes. For the rest... I cannot …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/20 10:23 PM
1

The third part is about rich men noticing instantly that «you suck» and that poorer men didn't. I don't know how this is an argument, simply men of lower socioeconomic status tend to be lower on IQ and the richer men had more observations and noticed that «you suck». Simply the poorer men were getting driven by their sex drive and were being clueless while the rich ones weren't.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/20 10:18 PM
1

The second part is talking about your experience in school and how the rich kids were hard to talk and how the poorer ones were more accepting of you... I don't know how that contributes to your theory honestly. Poorer people tend to be more humble and rich people are more egocentric. (For that matter, women present that same attitude way worse than men of their same group, just look at feminists, all of them are middle class or high class women and they're all insoportable).
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/20 10:16 PM
1

«it's much easier to get interest from men from a lower socioeconomic status» maybe because you're prettier than their women around them, you probably would get attention from them, I mean, it's not that hard, I've seen poor women and they're not pretty in any measurable way, so... It doesn't sounds weird for me. «I'm pretty sure a richer woman could roll into a poor neighborhood and steal anyone's husband if she was so inclined» that's the thing, women are not inclined towards poorer men, so yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/20 10:12 PM
4

So, the comment of above told 90% would go for a first world country given the chance, and you want to red herring it by giving the example of just one dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/20 10:06 PM
1

Now, scrolling down for the comments I can say for sure that you are trying to Tu Quoque Fallacy here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tu_quoque Dude, it doesn't matter, even if men have their «hypergamy», it's waaay more pronounced in women that it would ever be on men. “I dOn'T kNoW HoW NuAnCeS WorK” But anyways, despite your experience just being anecdotical evidence of a country that has fame of worshipping foreign women (India), let's examine it a little.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/20 09:43 PM
1

No, because men are polygamous, ie, they can reproduce with many women. Women cannot do the same. Anyways, it doesn't matter, because even women with mild level of neurofibromatosis had passed their genes.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/20 09:24 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter