TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ArchZodiac Archive

View 0 posts and 61 comments by ArchZodiac on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

And a prostitute will do what you want in bed after you give her money.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 11:29 PM
30

Overeaction to being attacked is a very difficult thing to judge. The reason why I don't judge the man for what is perceived as overkill is because when you are in those situations it's not always possible to judge how hard a punch is or how much is too much. In the case of a store owner shooting an already taken care of aggressor, it is murder. However, fighting back against someone who attacks you first, and getting punished for fighting back too hard seems like something that isn't fair. When…
/r/MensRights15/10/12 11:07 PM
6

How about we keep it the same way as before? If you can't afford to have a baby, abort it or put it up for adoption.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 01:53 AM
5

Or, you know, the woman is responsible for the kid? Or are men the only ones capable of taking care of kids? Misogyny!
/r/MensRights10/07/12 12:47 AM
9

I think it's a lack of question why hating someone for something they can't help is wrong. It is a bad thing to judge someone for an appearance that they can't help. It's being unfair to them and judging them from something other than their personal actions. Individuals are responsible for their individual actions, not their entire race or gender. But these feminists are so used to saying sexism is bad, that if they can change the definition of misandry or misogyny from just hating an entire gro…
/r/MensRights09/07/12 05:01 AM
1

Not complaining about the downvotes. Complaining about the lack of reddiquette which happened to lead to downvotes.
/r/MensRights26/06/12 08:46 PM
1

Yeah sure. We can start our own society, and we can write down a set of rules that ensure freedom and the individual's rights. Through our own strength we can fight to be free! Oh shit...
/r/MensRights26/06/12 07:58 AM
1

Fuck it, I'm buying an island. Later bitches.
/r/MensRights26/06/12 06:11 AM
-2

Ideally, people should be punished for negatively impacting society. I shouldn't have to bear the burden of idiots, and also I shouldn't have to take care of their kids because they can't. It simply isn't my responsibility to take care of someone else's mess, no matter how much anyone else feels I ought to.
/r/MensRights26/06/12 04:16 AM
0

It doesn't matter if it's expensive. I'm simply saying that someone receiving welfare shouldn't spend it on anything other than necessities. When I said its more expensive to enforce that, I simply meant it would cost more to make people do the right thing than to just ignore it.
/r/MensRights25/06/12 10:53 PM
-6

I'd like to remind you that the group was a bunch of college girls demanding free birth control. If this were about the health issue that some BC pills can take care of, then they would've/should've been complaining about insurance not providing it for those who medically need it or demanding universal healthcare in general, NOT just "free BC!" If you don't think that most young girls want free BC for socialized desserts, I think that you're a little off the mark. I might actually be fine with s…
/r/MensRights25/06/12 10:50 PM
2

That would be a healthcare issue. In which case they should argue for free healthcare.
/r/MensRights25/06/12 10:16 PM
4

Personally I think thats like asking for socialized desserts and candy. But yes it it were instituted then it should be consistent.
/r/MensRights25/06/12 08:20 PM
0

Not that you should, but it's kind of hard to enforce welfare being used correctly. It's just more expensive to enforce proper use.
/r/MensRights25/06/12 07:58 PM
4

Are you just spamming our conversation or is that actually related somehow?
/r/MensRights25/06/12 07:55 PM
2

Yeah and I corrected it to being more like chocolate than just food.
/r/MensRights25/06/12 07:53 PM
-7

Yep. But birth control isn't a necessity. It would be more like giving free chocolate to everyone. Edit: For those downvoting, please explain why.
/r/MensRights25/06/12 07:40 PM
36

Slightly related: I recently saw a bunch of women on my campus campaigning for free birth control. As a libertarian, I was tempted to ask "why not free food too?"
/r/MensRights25/06/12 07:22 PM
3

Screw Illinois. I put whatever posters I want in my break room! I'll do the right thing, but I hate petty little dictator laws.
/r/MensRights23/06/12 02:33 AM
0

It's their property. I say let them write whatever language they want to on that their property.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 05:38 AM
0

Becoming a women priest is heavily disputed in the church. Most churches believe scripture states that women are not allowed to hold the position of priest or deacon, but are allowed in equally valuable positions. Many churches debate on those verses but most churches find that women cannot hold the highest authority positions. So no. I have to disagree with the idea that women are somehow running the churches and have a stranglehold on men now through them.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 05:34 AM
0

Churches have the right to exclude anyone they want. That's because they're private. Just because they're public in the sense that anyone is welcome does not mean they are not privately owned and thus perfectly entitled to share their own opinions with their own community on their own property (which is paid for by the community)
/r/MensRights17/06/12 05:30 AM
5

Oh now I see why I'm wrong. Thanks.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 05:28 AM
-1

Public signs... On their property. The church is now a public place?
/r/MensRights17/06/12 04:24 AM
-1

This sub is turning into a male version of SRS. Let's look for ways to get offended!
/r/MensRights17/06/12 04:23 AM
6

Since we're either quoting random verses about women or changin the meaning: "An excellent wife who can find? She is far more precious than jewels." - Proverbs 31:10 It's obviously saying that getting married sucks for most men because most women are terrible in relationships.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 04:21 AM
-5

Every Christian father I know thinks these jokes are either funny or they just don't care.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 04:15 AM
2

That's the entire joke though. I hate SRS for being over politically correct shits but I also support feminism and MRM. Churches seem like the last place that would seriously imply women are better than men. Churches are of the position normally that men and women are equal but often have different strengths to compliment eachother. If churches don't believe that, then they're more likely to be of the position that men are better. My church believes men and women generally have different strengt…
/r/MensRights17/06/12 04:14 AM
11

Wanna help alleviate social problems by donating 80,000? "NO WE NEED TO STUDY TRUMPETS IN ORDER TO STOP THE PATRIARCHY! TRUMPETS ARE THE KEY TO EQUALITY!" ...What?
/r/MensRights14/06/12 07:00 PM
27

Stupid and arrogant?
/r/MensRights14/06/12 02:43 PM
6

Hell, I honestly don't mind paying different rates based on gender as long as it's a consistent business practice. If I pay more for car insurance because males are riskier, then women should too for health insurance being riskier. If you're going to promote fair coverage against sex discrimination though, just make sure you realize everyone deals with it, even the privileged group. I see a lot of people on SRS are just sexists who just want things better for them, even at the cost of fairness o…
/r/MensRights26/05/12 06:07 PM
4

Naw dude, his mom might know his username. You never know.
/r/MensRights26/05/12 05:59 PM
1

The fact that rape is illegal and people get punished for it means there is a real reason not to rape. There's no laws against MGM because nobody has pushed to punish people for it. Just because some cases aren't punished correctly (prison rape) doesn't mean rape is acceptable like MGM.
/r/MensRights25/05/12 06:54 AM
2

That means work has actually been put into it.
/r/MensRights25/05/12 05:38 AM
9

Today's feminism lesson: The tennis skill gap. The patriarchy is obviously keeping women's tennis oppressed.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 02:07 AM
-14

Lol, I ain't even mad though!
/r/MensRights06/05/12 01:57 AM
-17

Western civilizations are civilizations that are in the west. Now if you were arguing that it is a part of western culture that might actually make sense. Also, the original said "western countries". So...
/r/MensRights06/05/12 01:50 AM
-17

TIL Australia is a western country.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 01:21 AM
0

I thought the article said it was set up through facebook.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 01:52 AM
5

YEAAAAAAHHHHHHH!!!!!!
/r/MensRights17/04/12 01:45 AM
1

It isn't free. I don't understand what you aren't understanding.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 08:20 AM
1

Just by demand. It's pretty easy to tell if men want more services or not just by taking a poll, or if the men are vocal enough.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 07:48 AM
11

Like if women use their center more than men use theirs.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 06:49 AM
12

But are you white? Because if so, you're privileged and have never possibly felt racially discriminated against. And the fact that you are male means you've never been treated badly just for being male!
/r/MensRights07/04/12 10:13 AM
4

If you're white, even just a little bit, and male, you don't have any racism or sexism happen to you! You can only BE racist and sexist by definition because of your whiteness and maleness! AND we can make generalizations about race and sex without it being racist. We win, you lose.
/r/MensRights07/04/12 10:12 AM
3

Ignorant racism and sexism is still bad.
/r/MensRights07/04/12 10:07 AM
2

Looks like it's at least 50 years. At least. When a man does it, life sentence, but a woman? Eh, two years is good.
/r/MensRights30/03/12 06:43 AM
0

Sure, but there's also little things like letting the ladies in my family get their dinner plates first. It might be unnecessary, but it also used to be a tool for keeping women from being oversexualized as well. There are a lot of different aspects to chivalry, and sometimes it has nothing to do with them being weaker or needed help more than a man. I won't allow a woman to abuse that from me when she's noticed she can take advantage of it. It's entirely possible to respect ideas of chivalry, a…
/r/MensRights25/03/12 07:06 PM
-4

I'm talking about if help isn't necessarily needed. Don't be a dick when you understand what I'm talking about. I'm talking about every day situations, like holding doors open. I'll hold a door open for any dude and help my bro out, but for a lady I'll hold it open a little longer. If a dude is carrying stuff from his car and has it handled, and so does a woman carrying the same amount of stuff, I'm more likely to help the woman out. Probably because women are generally a little more fragile, ev…
/r/MensRights25/03/12 06:28 PM
-1

I agree with you. I feel like I'm one of the few people on here who still believes in chivalry and men's rights. I don't think it's right that women get special treatment in the courts, but I also believe in treating women special in every day situations. I'm equally nice to both men and women, but if a woman needs help I go especially out of my way to help. Maybe it's because women are typically less strong, but whatever man. Gender roles exist because of biological reasons, and some people lik…
/r/MensRights25/03/12 06:56 AM
1

Yes you are correct.
/r/MensRights23/03/12 05:51 PM
22

This loophole has always confused me so much.
/r/MensRights23/03/12 04:02 AM
6

I don't know why you got downvoted. We should all like her. There's no reason to dislike her.
/r/MensRights21/03/12 09:32 PM
2

ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights19/03/12 03:40 AM
1

Agreeing for the most part. It's not black and white, it's more case by case. If a family comes by and you're thirty miles down the road, well no problem by me. If it's night time and some shady looking guy offers a ride, I can walk until a friend comes. A general rule, if my appearance is around the same intimidation level as the driver and/or passengers, then it's probably safe.
/r/MensRights18/03/12 06:55 AM
1

In many states in the US, people can easily carry guns in their cars. If a guy pulls up in a shabby car at night to offer a ride, the situation is the same as a hobo following you into a dark alley and you just don't risk taking the dark road. If anything happened in hitchhiking, it would probably be some poor guy looking to do some mugging, and it's normally easy to distinguish how well off they are by the car they're driving. Stereotypes like how well dressed and car might be bad, but we all n…
/r/MensRights18/03/12 06:35 AM
1

I think it comes into questioning whether or not they would have an incentive to harm you. Walking down the street does not give incentive to get shanked, but when you're walking down a dark alley and some guy pulls up to offer you a ride you just have to consider the risk vs. gain. For some people, the risk of incentive someone might have to harm you in that situation isn't worth the reward of saving a walk.
/r/MensRights18/03/12 06:29 AM
4

Thanks for pointing that out. It's very frustrating as a man to know that me and a woman can make a decision to sleep together to make a child but I will have no say from there on as to what will happen to said child. I have no say if the child isn't aborted, and if I think the child should be aborted that doesn't matter either but I will still have to pay child support. No matter what you think about a man's right concerning a fetus that also belongs to him, it is without doubt that men have ab…
/r/MensRights05/03/12 10:37 PM
2

Perfect. I think every spoiled brat should be forced to read this book. Everyone in our society just to be safe.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 10:08 PM
9

And then she writes a book called "Eat, Pray, Love", talking about all of her difficulties with trying to be happy when she has absolutely no real problems?
/r/MensRights05/03/12 10:06 PM
3

It's just like "Love, Eat, Pray" or whatever it's called. Women love the idea of getting paid a bunch of money to write a book about their vacation after divorcing their husbands. There is nothing to praise about a woman who breaks promises and writes some stupid psuedophilisophical BS about her vacation and sleeping with a bunch of dudes.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 10:04 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter