TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Archammes Archive

View 13 posts and 182 comments by Archammes on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
171

DiscriminationArchammes/r/MensRights29/10/14 01:38 PM
119

Archammes/r/MensRights09/10/13 03:54 AM
110

Archammes/r/MensRights01/05/13 03:18 PM
61

MetaArchammes/r/TheRedPill13/11/14 09:28 PM
53

Field ReportArchammes/r/TheRedPill18/09/14 05:39 PM
32

Archammes/r/MensRights25/04/13 01:10 AM
17

Archammes/r/MensRights14/03/13 03:36 PM
16

Archammes/r/MensRights17/10/13 03:41 PM
9

Archammes/r/MensRights26/04/13 07:34 PM
6

Archammes/r/askTRP19/05/14 03:50 PM
6

Archammes/r/MensRights19/09/13 02:08 PM
3

Archammes/r/MensRights20/08/13 12:46 AM
0

Archammes/r/MensRights12/09/13 08:40 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Ham wallet.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/05/22 05:10 PM
2

Its an unfortunate personality disorder to deal with, and a difficult one for psych professionals to handle. Very clear boundaries have to be set and maintained to be an effective counselor.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/04/22 01:08 PM
5

Its got nothing to do with being hard, and everything to do with appreciating what you have and maximizing the use of your time.
/r/askTRP14/04/20 08:12 PM
28

Maybe its because I went straight into the military after high school, but I'm honestly confused what you're asking. I grew into manhood working 9-12 hour days, or 24 if I was on ambulance team. Then two Iraq deployments. When I got out after six years, I haven't found a civilian job yet that makes me feel like I dont have enough time for myself. Maybe its just your perspective?
/r/askTRP14/04/20 02:29 PM
4

Walk away or risk trouble. Be smart.
/r/askTRP25/02/20 01:54 PM
-1

What has this fucking sub come to?
/r/askTRP11/12/19 03:12 PM
3

State government contracts. State job benefits, 401k, all that jazz along with really good pay for the area. Maintained my TS clearance from my time in the service so that helps, plus by the time I hit retirement here, I can convert to doing the same job federally at a higher pay grade for a few more years and acquire a second pension before 55.
/r/askTRP21/11/19 06:50 AM
2

I get bored easily. I need to be able to walk at any point with no strings. Serious relationships come with strings.
/r/askTRP21/10/19 04:57 PM
3

Actually depending on the state, you can file a fault divorce if you can prove it .
/r/askTRP03/09/19 04:17 AM
7

Social apps like Snapchat are tailored toward providing validation. If someone has done nothing to earn your validation, why give it? Just because a woman is attractive doesn't mean she brings anything to the table, but you enter her frame by providing her validation engaging. A proper response would be "no" if you feel it will be a very limited fling. Force her to seek validation in ways that require more effort. If you see possible value, go playful. "Yea, but I only give my info to exceptiona…
/r/askTRP20/08/19 06:45 PM
1

Get your thyroid tested. Had a similar issue though I'm older (30s) and was diagnosed with Hashimotos. It will kill your T levels.
/r/askTRP24/06/19 07:13 PM
1

I'm just gonna put this out there for shits and giggles, but... Maybe she did the math and knows it's not yours. If you have any doubt, get a paternity test.
/r/askTRP15/04/19 07:30 PM
1

Didn't this guy get fired for domestic violence during his divorce? Hardly a paragon of virtue or someone we should be cheering along.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 12:57 PM
11

Ask yourself this...have you been together ten years because you stopped trying and got comfortable? Or is there an actual emotional connection? It's not unmanly or "not alpha" to love, as long as you realize you will never be loved in the same fashion. Evaluate the value the relationship has to you and proceed accordingly.
/r/askTRP15/10/18 12:59 PM
10

I don't. If I want a conversation, I talk to one of the guys I lift with, or a family member. I would suggest doing the same if you want engaging conversation. If you want to get laid, listen much, say little, believe nothing.
/r/askTRP15/08/18 04:16 AM
2

A lion does not have to tell anyone it's a lion. I've actually avoided the TRP sub itself for a while now other than the occasional review. It helped me when I needed it, and now that I've internalized the things I needed to, I continue working on me and am generally unconcerned with others "field reports" etc. I maintain a pleasant LTR without anything legally binding, so I enjoy answering questions in ask TRP based on my own experience. I think I posted one field report a few years ago about a…
/r/askTRP01/08/18 04:55 PM
1

I think the amount of teachers fucking their students answers that question.
/r/askTRP01/08/18 12:55 PM
8

Walk away. Unless she's an heiress and you get an ironclad contract with guaranteed money for fucking her, walk away. The fact that you're even asking this question means you are still working with a scarcity mentality. There are cleaner, healthier fish in the sea. Go catch one of those, not an STI.
/r/askTRP27/07/18 02:58 PM
1

Don't get me wrong, I know plenty of women, but I don't consider them friends. I trust my friends, I can confide in them, and I know they will be there if shit goes down. I don't consider my female aquaintances in the same category.
/r/askTRP23/06/18 06:12 PM
1

That's easy, I don't have them. My friends are all male. I have plenty of female aquaintances, but none I consider friends. I don't "hang out" with the girls.
/r/askTRP22/06/18 10:38 PM
-1

My advice would be stop wasting your time with bullshit research, internet dick measuring contests or comparisons and go do something constructive.
/r/askTRP30/03/18 06:50 PM
1

My question is, why are you worried about anyone elses n-count? How does that benefit you? What pussy anyone else is getting should not matter to you unless you're playing wing man to a friend that will return the favor. Focusing on other people's achievement either inspires jealousy or resentment, and successful men have time for neither.
/r/askTRP30/03/18 05:22 PM
2

I've always just been honest with my son. I've told him that I am emotionally incapable of loving his mother the way she felt she should be loved, and so we parted ways. He was a 100% planned pregnancy from the start, and his mother and I both love him as our first (my only) child. Never lie to your children. Other people, if it benefits you, do your thing. But never your child, that's your legacy.
/r/askTRP22/03/18 01:53 PM
3

Such cognitive dissonance is usually reserved for the mentally ill...
/r/MensRights22/03/18 01:47 PM
2

Remember that your time is a commodity and should be treated as such. Even in my everyday interaction with people I'm not sleeping with, I treat my time as precious and if the time they're seeking with me does not involve some benefit to me, I pass. I have shit to do, and scarcity breeds desire.
/r/askTRP11/01/18 02:58 PM
3

Personally I'd just laugh at her while saying something along the lines of "says the kid still living at home" and dismiss the statement altogether. Then I'd probably be too busy the next couple of days to be bothered responding to anything she said.
/r/askTRP11/01/18 01:51 PM
1

Fuck no. One of the biggest collections of crackpots on the web.
/r/askTRP16/11/15 08:26 PM
-4

"Oh doll, if you don't, there are four others that will."
/r/askTRP16/01/15 03:21 PM
1

Not sure what you're driving at, I thought we were in agreement that it was a dickbag move not to tell his friend what's going on.
/r/TheRedPill14/01/15 07:09 PM
3

That caveat has more to do with "law of the land" and the social contract than personal morals. Yes, speeding when its safe to do so isn't necessarily immoral, however per the social contract and the law of the land, it is wrong, and violating the law is an immoral act.
/r/TheRedPill14/01/15 07:08 PM
3

Sexual strategy is amoral, meaning it has nothing to do with morals. Sex is neither right nor wrong in and of itself. How you go about getting sex is neither right nor wrong in and of itself unless it involves breaking the law. It takes two to tango, and what one person might consider wrong is perfectly ok to the next person. A popular saying among single soldiers in the infantry is (when referencing married women) "rings don't plug holes, D.I.C.K.s do" (D.I.C.K. meaning dedicated infantry comba…
/r/TheRedPill14/01/15 06:01 PM
8

The amount of people in this sub that cannot tell the difference between amoral and immoral is too damn high.
/r/TheRedPill14/01/15 03:10 PM
0

While I agree with... TRP requires a certain threshold of lurking and RP homework before posting for a reason. Constructive criticism is always better for someone new to a set of ideas. Everyone makes mistakes.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/15 08:55 PM
1

it seems pretty shitty Perception colors reality. If you perceive it as shitty, it probably is. It's lonely and difficult. You need to accept right now that this is 95% because of you. I'm a divorced single father who has not been in an LTR in two years. I have had several STRs and a few FWBs. None of these have been my companions. My companions include my son (who I am raising to be a man,) a handful of local taekwondo instructors (we're all instructors who train under the same Grandmaster,) an…
/r/askTRP08/01/15 06:06 PM
5

Most national organizations do not allow drinking in sorority houses Most national organizations do not allow drinking in sorority houses Most national organizations do not allow drinking in sorority houses Either shut up already or name the specific sororities.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/15 02:15 PM
8

If he posted in /r/relationships, is there really any doubt?
/r/TheRedPill08/01/15 12:02 AM
2

She's also on anti-depressants, which I think is a big part of it Chances are you're right. Most anti-depressants (and other psychiatric drugs) screw with your libido. Where you're getting it wrong is confusing your comfort with the current situation with "loving the life together." Obviously, when you're saying you're not happy with the way things are, you don't love the life you have together...that's a contradiction, and you have a responsibility to yourself not to lie to yourself. Her mental…
/r/TheRedPill07/01/15 09:50 PM
12

Not wanting to subject myself to the insane rantings of /r/relationships, I sent this guy a direct message saying this. Any time a woman says that sex and blowjobs are for "special occasions," the odds are better than even that someone else is fucking her.
/r/TheRedPill07/01/15 09:39 PM
6

On her own (without a man) she would be earning about $12,000 per year, plus tips. Not sure we're talking about the same case here. Arnall is a practicing attorney and was an executive at Continental for many years. While the divorce rape is obvious and unfair, your sour grapes aren't adding anything constructive to the discussion. If you're going to be this aggressively stupid, please don't post here anymore.
/r/TheRedPill07/01/15 08:58 PM
10

Not quite. Continental was formed in 1967, originally named Shelly Dean Oil Co. Hamm married Arnall in 1988, well after Hamm had acquired Petro-Lewis and numerous other assets.
/r/TheRedPill07/01/15 08:53 PM
8

Mary is very flirtatious with John and is making suggestive comments to him She has not indicated she wishes to engage in the act Thanks for making that crystal fucking clear OU.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 06:10 PM
1

I heard about this briefly on the radio yesterday, and immediately thought it would end up here, and I think to a degree, it belongs. My thought behind that is this; while it has nothing to do with human reproduction (as I'm sure we're all aware,) it does speak to RP theory in the vein that every sexual partner a woman has leaves something behind, whether it be a hang up, trauma, dreams of a huge cock, etc. Think about it this way...Mary Jane Rottencrotch has had six sexual partners before meeti…
/r/TheRedPill10/12/14 05:42 PM
2

I had mine done at 24. I can actually attribute more sex since then to that fact. Let a woman know there can be no "oops" moments, and a lot of LMR goes right out the window.
/r/TheRedPill09/12/14 10:25 PM
2

Not your problem. Additionally, you tell him, he yells at her, and you don't get your dick sucked. No brainer.
/r/askTRP05/12/14 05:04 PM
3

"Redditor for 11 days." For this to be okay TRP has to be strictly against having sex with drunk women, so much so that it's a bannable offense. That mod is probably a conservative homophobe which has no place in TRP. Too bad Halloween just passed. I'd be this guy and pretend to slap all the hot girls. Unless you want to play your gameboy. Take the couch. When she comes back out turn it off and pretend to wake up from an uncomfortable sleep. You're so adorable. Now run along while the adults tal…
/r/TheRedPill14/11/14 03:49 PM
2

The very first thing, and I think probably the single most important thing, that I picked up when I started to open my eyes was that I have to be honest with myself, because I can't count on anyone else to be. The hamsters will lie for whatever reason serves their purpose, the betas will lie to serve the hamsters, the white knights will lie to protect the hamsters, and society just accepts this because it's had it's head stuck in the echo chamber so long it can't get out. It's almost as if socie…
/r/TheRedPill14/11/14 02:28 PM
0

Welcome to Oklahoma, where the Bible says you're not supposed to get a divorce, but the court says it will make you rich.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 05:56 PM
2

An affirmative defense is a theory of defense against a tort or other legal action that mitigates or outright eliminates the charges of the accuser. For instance, if I sue you for hitting me with your car, and you use the affirmative defense of contributory negligence, citing that I was driving intoxicated, my suit against you is going to fail because of that defense.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 01:48 PM
1

Just out of curiosity, did Sarkeesian ever provide transparency as to where the $160k in Kickstarter cash went?
/r/MensRights30/10/14 07:44 PM
0

Every journey starts with a single step.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 08:58 PM
5

As long as the law is gender/race/culture and all around neutral, I concur. I'd rather have someone guilty of beating the crap out of people in jail on my tax dime than someone who got pulled over with a bag of marijuana in the glovebox.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 08:40 PM
2

Reaching? That's what I would have called the "Yes Means Yes" deal out in California 20 years ago. Realize that while it may not be this strong, the prevailing opinion in Western society is "don't hit women for any reason." Not "don't hit anyone," obviously, because hey, UFC, amirite?
/r/MensRights29/10/14 08:39 PM
18

I won't downvote you for a different opinion, but what you're saying isn't reason. I've been a student of taekwondo since I was 11. I've competed in tournaments since I was 12. Do you know what division has the most knockouts and serious injuries? Females. I'd bet you a month's pay I can pick three females off my Facebook friends list alone that are physically stronger than a lot of men I know. she generally gets terrified of what may happen to her Any time you generalize, you immediately lose c…
/r/MensRights29/10/14 04:29 PM
10

Justice is supposed to be blind and therefor should not see gender, race, etc. But that doesn't matter here, because fuck it.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 04:24 PM
49

Article summary is a woman working at the Salvation Army is attacked by a drunk male. He does not use a weapon and the injuries are not sufficient enough to trigger a felony charge. Woman's husband rages, stating that any time a male hits a female it should be an automatic felony. This is what we're on our way towards gentlemen. Buckle your seatbelts.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 01:40 PM
2

I still don't understand why she isn't the one on the hook for the other half, it's her fucking kid, not his.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 05:51 PM
2

It's even worse in the US.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 05:06 PM
2

Actually the Goldberg case was a civil case, so it's decision, since it came from SCOTUS, is benchmark for all lower courts. Now, domestic court is absolutely different, because there is much less "judicial oversight" so to speak as far as appeals, etc. If you ever get bored of going to the circus, domestic court should be your next stop...you'll laugh, you'll cry, you'll shit yourself when you realize what some people get away with.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 04:53 PM
2

I could be wrong (I haven't worked in law in a while, things change), but at the very least, the right to confront and cross examine witnesses at a hearing was confirmed by Goldberg v. Kelley, 397 U.S. 254 (1970). The premises was different (government agency terminating benefits,) but that it helped define what constituted a hearing, and I believe set the standard for the right to appear and cross-examine witnesses, as well as receive a written opinion from the decision maker. Disclaimer I am n…
/r/MensRights03/10/14 03:18 PM
5

The rules of judicial process are no less applicable at a hearing vs. a trial. Specifically, at a hearing to extend a protective order, Eron's side absolutely should have been fully heard. Protective orders are not meant to blanket large areas of time without giving the person against who the order is issued a chance to demonstrate to the Court why the order is no longer necessary. It's bad enough this is already going to be public record, available for every employer Eron has in the future to f…
/r/MensRights03/10/14 02:26 PM
10

Firstly, I really hope Eron's attorney had a court reporter on hand to cover the court hearing. The very first thing I ever learned working in legal was "always order a court reporter." Eron absolutely has the right to face his accuser, and present evidence to the contrary. He is also innocent until proven guilty, something a lot of US courts seem to have forgotten. Honestly I don't even get upset reading things like this anymore, I've reached a state of complete apathy. This is how it is, and t…
/r/MensRights03/10/14 01:19 PM
1

A friendship is a state of mutual trust and support between allied persons. If she will come and help you set up the new entertainment surround sound system with you, and then kicks back and watches the game with a few brews afterwards, and the only thank you necessary is said brews, that's a friend. If you would never put her or could never imagine her in this situation, that is not friendship. My closest friend is female, a cousin I grew up with. We watch football together, enjoy the same auth…
/r/askTRP01/10/14 01:38 PM
1

No, I didn't miss it, and I told her it was a bullshit move later in the conversation. I made sure to call his dad and the father had his girlfriend make sure the kid made it to class. He's grading for his next belt soon, and I didn't want him to miss the extra practice just because mom was having a pity party.
/r/TheRedPill19/09/14 01:24 PM
0

they just get upset and hamster even harder. That was in full effect yesterday, and I think it was the first time I'd seen it "face to face" so to speak since swallowing the pill. It was good for reinforcement of theory and a few decent chuckles as a time killer, but overall you are correct.
/r/TheRedPill19/09/14 01:20 PM
1

It reinforces the information we gain here and perhaps gives us a better means of interacting with the hamster in the future and perhaps using it to our advantage. Exactly. I've been doing taekwondo for seven years, but if I don't continue to practice everything I've learned, it doesn't stay fresh, and I might make a mistake in competition that costs me first place. The same applies to TRP, but instead of first place, a mistake with women can cost you 50% of your assets or worse. Constant reinfo…
/r/TheRedPill19/09/14 01:18 PM
3

As I said yesterday, I enjoy arguing with everyone, regardless of gender. To be honest, arguing with the hamster just might be a little bit more entertaining, because once you see it get on the wheel, you can almost tell her what her response will be before it ever leaves her mouth, and there is almost nothing funnier than seeing a woman so flustered with the fact that you're calling her bullshit that she "can't even." So I guess in clarification, it's not really arguing with females, so much as…
/r/TheRedPill19/09/14 01:11 PM
3

I would add clarification to /u/AFPJ, emphasis in bold mine. The reason they're single moms is because they fucked up; women evolved to do one thing and one thing only: to screen for, attract and keep a male who is capable of ensuring her survival and the survival of her offspring. Single mothers are natural selection at work, in that obviously they did not do enough to maintain the interest of their mate. But then came feminism, equality, welfare and now a vagina itself is almost enough to ensu…
/r/TheRedPill19/09/14 01:08 PM
2

This is infinitely more humorous to me because the genealogy research I've been doing has recently discovered my family on my fathers side came from Scotland five generations back. Reading this just made my morning.
/r/TheRedPill19/09/14 01:02 PM
2

I made the statement that /u/tombreck2 was getting at earlier...if a single mother becomes a single mother due to a life ending event, and had been married to a TRP or at the very least assertive and masculine male, then unless she is left to her own devices for too long, she should be able to be at least considered for the possibility of LTR/marriage. Even then, if there are other options, it's best to avoid widows as well, as competing with a memory is impossible, the memory will always be the…
/r/TheRedPill19/09/14 01:00 PM
5

I beg to differ, it was a least amusing.
/r/TheRedPill19/09/14 02:59 AM
26

Whether she does or not is irrelevant to me. I have standards, she doesn't meet them, end of story.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/14 10:19 PM
3

For the same reason anyone is ever criticized about anything...a difference of opinion.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/14 10:02 PM
6

Generally speaking, thats step one to raising your SMV for everyone. The gym is gender neutral.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/14 09:21 PM
10

You can look at it that way, your opinion. It killed time today while I was at work. If it hadn't at least served that purpose, I'd be more likely to agree with you. Your view point seems highly MGTOW, which while not a bad thing, doesn't fit my particular view nor does a difference of opinion make either of us wrong. While I wouldn't have had this discussion with just any woman, I don't feel I wasted my time if for no other reason than reaffirming a theory firsthand.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/14 07:56 PM
5

I don't think she is negative so much as delusional. She has this wildly outdated view that she should be accepted and loved as she is without making any effort to raise her SMV, and tries to rationalize away hard truths. She isn't a bad person as far as being a friend...she'll babysit while I go out, she helped promote my TKD school, and she has connections relevant to my interests...she's just not very firmly anchored in reality on certain things.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/14 07:49 PM
6

By being a report based on TRP theory, AWALT. If I've mis-flaired it, the mods are free to change it.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/14 07:16 PM
21

I have no interest in her romantically or sexually. This was not a report regarding game, sexual strategy, or things of that nature. The takeaways here IMHO are outlined at the end. She is a friend, who boo hoo'd to me about being single, and then attempted to hamster away any and all personal fault for her situation. This was an AWALT affirmation report. If it didn't meet your standards or pertain to your interests, don't read it.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/14 07:10 PM
16

She's actually a pretty good friend. Her son and mine are not only in the same TKD class, but they're pretty chummy outside as well. Plus, I enjoy arguing with pretty much anyone. It strokes my brain penis.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/14 07:05 PM
62

I'm sure there are. I think they're commonly referred to as widows.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/14 05:59 PM
2

All I could think of while reading this was Stephen Moyer saying "Sookeeh..."
/r/TheRedPill17/07/14 01:30 PM
6

If I remember correctly, Banks passed on suing both her and the state that incarcerated him. I'll see if I can find the article. EDIT Apparently he did start proceedings against the state in 2012, but not against his accuser.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/14 02:15 PM
1

One thing, I often do to enforce my frame is actually to write down the beliefs I want to imbibe and I use them as affirmations daily/when I go out. Could you give me an example? Your kid is surrounded by females in kindergarten, school and he probably also has his mother. He does not need your women to be his mother. But ofc they should have a good relationship. His mom lives in another state, but she does get visitation over the summer and such. I know that he doesn't need a woman in the house…
/r/askTRP19/05/14 04:52 PM
4

"When all of your wishes are granted, many of your dreams will be destroyed". -The Man That You Fear
/r/MensRights18/03/14 11:58 PM
2

I haven't been able to find the video, but from the polls I've seen on various sites, an overwhelming majority does not consider this rape or sexual assault.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 08:27 PM
1

I hate to use the word feminism to describe the base ideology, the same way I don't use Muslim to describe extremist terrorists. I think Radfem or Neofem is more appropriate, because at the base of feminism there is still a core of a righteous movement that is simply about the empowerment of women, not the detriment of men. Because according to feminism, a woman need not express lack of consent during the act - she can withdraw consent at any time before during or after and does not need to info…
/r/MensRights17/10/13 05:28 PM
2

Looking for additional information to provide for discussion, but I have several questions regarding this incident. 1) The obvious first issue here is going to be intoxication of the parties; obviously this is a hot button issue. How much of a factor is it going to play? 2) The event was live tweeted and "at least" 10 people were present during the incident in question. If the woman was expressing in any form, shape, or fashion that she did not consent to the act, why was this not stopped by the…
/r/MensRights17/10/13 03:50 PM
0

If it's a fact, show me empirical evidence. I've presented documented, factual, and challenge-able evidence for every point I've stated thus far. it is a fact. Simply saying this does not make that the case.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 06:34 PM
-1

It would appear that in the wake of the KC Star article, the information is changing to "she was unconscious" and alleges non-consensual sex In light of this, the statement that the sex was non-consensual (as opposed to "I don't remember anything") would make this a clear cut case of rape. This is the first instance I am hearing of an actual allegation from Daisy Coleman herself that the sex was non-consensual. I really wish I had access to the sealed files to see exactly what statements were gi…
/r/MensRights16/10/13 06:26 PM
-1

Mo. Rev. Stat. §556.061 “(13) ‘Incapacitated’ means that physical or mental condition, temporary or permanent, in which a person is unconscious, unable to appraise the nature of his conduct, or unable to communicate unwillingness to an act. A person is not ‘incapacitated’ with respect to an act committed upon him if he became unconscious, unable to appraise the nature of his conduct or unable to communicate unwillingness to an act, after consenting to the act;...” You are, as I have stated multi…
/r/MensRights16/10/13 05:34 PM
2

Age of consent throughout the US Are you an attorney? Not quite yet.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 03:17 PM
-1

It absolutely is. And it is covered under Missouri statutes. So I can offer no possible explanation as to why that charge was dropped. I've tried again and again to reiterate that I'm in no way defending the conduct of these boys. I offered a possible explanation as to why the sexual assault charges were dropped based on the law. For elements of any criminal activity adequately provable under statute, I advocate for prosecution. If it gives you any additional understanding of my stance here, I t…
/r/MensRights15/10/13 03:15 PM
1

Yes it does. Most states in the U.S. use 16 as the age of consent, and most will apply a "Romeo and Juliet" four year difference as a mitigating circumstance.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 02:24 PM
-3

That's certainly a theory. Intent can be very hard to prove though.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 01:02 PM
0

No one ever reported that alcohol was forced down her throat, so the good bet would be that she indeed consented to drinking that much. As for proving whether she consented to sex prior to intoxication, you are absolutely right, that IS for a court to decide. I imagine it feels like they were let off lightly simply because Missouri law doesn't have a crime who's elements they could be charged under given the circumstances. It's shitty I know, but there it is.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 01:00 PM
-2

Mo. Rev. Stat. §556.061 “(13) ‘Incapacitated’ means that physical or mental condition, temporary or permanent, in which a person is unconscious, unable to appraise the nature of his conduct, or unable to communicate unwillingness to an act. A person is not ‘incapacitated’ with respect to an act committed upon him if he became unconscious, unable to appraise the nature of his conduct or unable to communicate unwillingness to an act, after consenting to the act;...” I'm well aware of what the stat…
/r/MensRights15/10/13 05:43 AM
-1

And yet, you are forcing it on Daisy Coleman. She never said she was raped. In fact, she said she doesn't remember what happened. Her mother Melinda made the assumption of rape given the circumstances, which is pretty much exactly what others are doing. The police gathered up all the evidence, which no one disputed, and in fact, everyone admitted to. The boys didn't attempt to hide or cover anything up (at least that I can find). I assumed that it wasn't traumatic for you because you said you en…
/r/MensRights15/10/13 05:02 AM
-1

Ok, let me break this down for you as simply as I can. I do not agree with the actions of the boys. I find them detestable. I do not agree with the actions of the girls. I find that they knowingly and willing chose to take place in risky and unlawful behavior. I do not necessarily agree with Missouri law. I do not support witch hunts, or cries of guilty based on what "could" or "might" or even "probably" happened, without a verdict of a jury of the accused's peers backing that cry. I do understa…
/r/MensRights15/10/13 04:52 AM
-1

That was not the question. You said she could not consent by reason of her level of intoxication. Therefore, in a similar circumstance, and by your logic, I could not consent and therefore I was raped. Right? You didn't feel bad about what happened to you. Again, you're assuming. How do you know I didn't jump in the sack with someone I never would have sober? How do you know I didn't get an STI as a result? How do you know? But, if you didn't find it traumatic I'll tell you a little story about …
/r/MensRights15/10/13 04:34 AM
-5

Early 30's with three associates and a Bachelor's, next question.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 04:28 AM
-1

Ok, whoa, slow down here a minute, lemme make sure I have this straight. To paraphrase, this girl "could not have consented because she was drunk as a skunk". But me, with a similar aged and intoxication, it's "my personal life and decisions". The only discernible difference is that I have a penis. Please tell me whether I was raped or not given your logic, because I'm seriously burning with curiosity right now. Why was she "not able to consent", but you don't have an opinion regarding my circum…
/r/MensRights15/10/13 04:13 AM
0

Are you saying that all of the women I had sex with while heavily intoxicated as a teen are rapists? So what is it exactly you're trying to say here? but I being a male have consented multiple times, heavily intoxicated, at approximately the same age. So...was I raped? If that's the case, why didn't you answer this question any of the three times I asked it?
/r/MensRights15/10/13 03:48 AM
1

There is a distinct difference between assumptions and opinions.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 03:36 AM
0

they clearly endangered the life of a young teen when she was already unable to defend herself and upset I haven't disputed this at all, in fact I've agreed with everyone on this point.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 03:30 AM
1

Also, if the genders were reversed in the situation you and the other MRAs would be PISSED at the treatment of the victim, no matter what evidence there was. The minute you decided you knew how I would react to any given situation is the minute I quit giving credence to anything you said. I don't tell you how you would feel/react to anything else because I don't know you, and I try real hard not to make assumptions. But I'm human and flawed just like everyone else.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 03:21 AM
1

In your opinion. Am I not entitled to mine because I don't agree with you? Perspective is, unfortunately, not a fact you can prove. Whether or not you choose to agree with me is a totally different matter. However, the facts are what they are no matter how much you or others disagree with them. And the fact is that instead of inquiring as to why I have this perspective like reasonably people, instead I've had my character and mental capacity attacked, had private messages sent to me accusing me …
/r/MensRights15/10/13 03:10 AM
-2

I don't need much empirical evidence That does seem to be the way things run in Reddit land.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 03:06 AM
1

And I absolutely believe it was.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 03:04 AM
-2

That may indeed be the case, and for the life of me I can't figure out why you people insist that I'm arguing that this was all ok! For fucks sake, is there not a single person here who understands that your opinion does not matter one bit when it comes to the law. The law is the law, until it is changed. If you cannot prove the elements of a criminal act, you cannot prove your case to the standard required. It's that simple! Was there a heinous act committed in this story? Yes! Was there a crim…
/r/MensRights15/10/13 02:46 AM
-5

Actually there is a link between minor risky behaviors such as curfew violation and additional higher risk activities.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 02:42 AM
-4

And that means that they didn't suffer? Again, I asked for facts, not supposition.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 02:35 AM
-4

I asked for facts, not supposition.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 02:34 AM
-1

It absolutely was. It was painted in such a way that any reasonable reader, without knowing anything about the law, would think "these horrible boys raped that girl, they're evil, evil people". That's exactly the way it was written and I'd love for the author to deny that fact. Not to mention, I'm pretty sure no permission was requested to use the names of the boys in a sealed file. and whatever Missouri's state law is, this was a rape And here is where you and everyone that agrees with you are …
/r/MensRights15/10/13 02:33 AM
-3

she must have been drunk as a skunk, seeing as she drank before hand at drank a ton as soon as she got their. The girl could not have consented So what is it exactly you're trying to say here? SHE couldn't have consented because she was drunk, but I being a male have consented multiple times, heavily intoxicated, at approximately the same age. So...was I raped? Or did I consent? Please explain.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 02:30 AM
-3

How nice of you to dictate how I would feel in a given situation. You do indeed know stuff. /s
/r/MensRights15/10/13 02:24 AM
-13

So today I have learned: -The MR subreddit is full of people that love witch hunts just as much as neo-feminists. -The MR subreddit apparently has little to no understanding of the law. -The MR subreddit apparently doesn't care nearly as much about the rights of the accused as they pretend to, unless it's a big nationwide case. -There are several neo-feminists sharking the MR subreddit.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 01:14 AM
-8

Where exactly did I say "since she broke the rules, she wanted sex?" Nowhere. What I said was, you cannot presume that she would/did not consent to sex prior to getting hammered, because she had already proven, by her actions, that she was willing to engage in risky behavior, had engaged in a behavior often linked to beginning a sexually active life at an earlier age (i.e. drinking), and held her personal "wants" or desires above that of the law of Missouri and the rules of her parents. In other…
/r/MensRights15/10/13 01:10 AM
-6

It does indeed. It shows that there is a severe lack of understanding of law. It also shows that people are quite visceral when confronted with facts they don't like, but then again, we were already aware humanity was that way, weren't we?
/r/MensRights15/10/13 12:59 AM
-12

So you don't think that publicly airing the names of these young men, and painting the inference that they are rapists, despite the fact that they were never convicted of a crime...you don't think that's a rights issue? Well, we might as well go ahead and put every "suspected" rapists name on the internet, right? Fuck innocent until proven guilty, lets go on a witch hunt and string them up because we have no hard evidence that a crime occurred but we think it did!
/r/MensRights15/10/13 12:57 AM
-1

Stop splitting hairs. I wouldn't be very good in my current job if I didn't split hairs. Even if she wasn't unconscious, she was still clearly unable to take care of herself Which I have addressed via the Missouri state laws...if she consented prior to getting hammered (and this is the point people continue to ignore), the consent, by Missouri state law does not simply evaporate because she's hammered. and leaving her in the cold is so shitty I can't even wrap my head around it On that we concur…
/r/MensRights15/10/13 12:36 AM
-7

That's funny, because I remember being heavily intoxicated multiple times as a young man and consenting. Are you saying that all of the women I had sex with while heavily intoxicated as a teen are rapists? Let me get you their numbers so you can call the police. Oh wait, it's only rape because she was drunk and female, right? I see your logic now.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 12:34 AM
-6

literally "You keep using that word...I do not think it means what you think it means..." she's literally conditioned to look up to socially I would be delighted if you could provide even a shred of credible empirical evidence to back up this claim. instantly it means she would be okay with having sex with him that night? Well, you can jump to any conclusion you'd like to, I won't stop you. However, my view is that the fact that she did this means you cannot automatically assume that she would n…
/r/MensRights15/10/13 12:32 AM
-7

I think the defense attorney will do what he's paid to do, which is defend his client by all legal means necessary and available. Would I has a defense attorney make an issue of the girls pattern of poor decisions and admitted law violations? As long as it was legal and relevant to the case at issue, as well as being admissible to the court.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 10:21 PM
-2

I have no issue with your argument in regards to the credibility of the boys. That would be why I didn't try and disprove it. However that was more of an issue for the prosecutor to deal with, and my opinions or observations on that are simply that because I'm not the prosecutor and I had no control over how this case developed. And I'll play to your ego here and say oh yes you're oh so right, i'm playing the victim and whatever else it was you said because frankly it's not worth arguing with yo…
/r/MensRights14/10/13 10:18 PM
-4

If no one ever tried to provide clarity to the murky, we would either still be in the dark ages or extinct.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 10:11 PM
-3

I need neither your sympathy nor your respect, or honestly anything else from you. I simply provided a little more background to what you assume you already know about me, apparently that I'm a horrible person. You haven't, in my opinion, made any effort whatsoever to comprehend what is being said or why, or to elevate discussion past "you're a bad person because you have thoughts I don't like".
/r/MensRights14/10/13 09:52 PM
-1

Here is what I see...multiple people lashing out at me for stating that I understand a possible reason the prosecution did not move forward. I see this post, and I see that quite possibly, we could discuss this as rational people do...right up until you decide that you know where I'm coming from, knowing little to nothing about me. Would it rattle your little brain to know that the statements I'm making are coming from the victim of sexual abuse perpetrated by a male? Or from someone that has in…
/r/MensRights14/10/13 09:33 PM
0

Statutory rape statutes in Missiouri are 1st degree- 1 party under the age of 14. 2nd degree - 1 party 21 or over, the other party under 17. Neither of these occurred, so no, by law, this was not statutory rape.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 09:17 PM
0

I do not, because I was not there to confirm or disprove whether consent was given prior to Daisy Coleman being intoxicated. I see it as evidence she was there, she was intoxicated, and that she and Barnett did in fact have sex. No one ever disputed that, including Barnett. I don't care for witch hunts based on what "probably happened" or what "might have happened". I know that Coleman was there, that she was, at some point, intoxicated, and that her and Barnett had sex. Whether it was consensua…
/r/MensRights14/10/13 09:11 PM
2

Having not been there personally, I cannot speak to whether or not a crime occurred at the Barnett residence, only to what evidence/statements are public and the laws of the State of Missouri. I do believe that the actions of dropping her off on the lawn in 30 degree weather warranted charges, but being accused of dropping someone off like a dickhead is not something I consider within the scope of Men's Rights, and so I did not address it.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 09:09 PM
2

Why wow? Why not back up your assumptions with evidence? I've already shown you that you're working on false assumptions pretty much all around here. Why don't you go back and re-read everything I've said, the letter, and the article, and lets discuss this like rational human beings.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 09:03 PM
-10

Not at all, more along the lines of "you can't presume she would not consent, as she has admitted to engaging in behaviors that are against the law, against the rules of her parent, and obviously places her desires above the dictates of her parent and society".
/r/MensRights14/10/13 09:01 PM
-7

That's not what I'm getting at. In a criminal trial, one of the objectives is to destroy the credibility of the other side's witnesses. The fact that Coleman admitted to breaking the law in this regard would help Defense counsel do exactly that. When your main witness has their credibility damaged, it is very difficult to build a case. See Florida v. Zimmerman.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 09:00 PM
-10

Again, you're misrepresenting the facts. Daisy Coleman was never reported as unconscious, quite the opposite. Also, the boy that was charged with rape was handled accordingly, and I've said nothing at all in regards to that matter, other than it was handled as a rape should be handled (at least I hope it was, it was an obvious case of rape). My mind is logical...it is not hindered by fanaticism or imposed morals. I think that in this given instance the prosecution was handcuffed by the law. I th…
/r/MensRights14/10/13 08:54 PM
-4

Neither the 13 year old or 14 year old said they were ever unconscious. You are factually incorrect, and I think it adds to your visceral reaction. Daisy Coleman was not, in fact, unconscious during the drive home, she was reported by both the friend and the boys involved as "crying", which given the amount of alcohol in her system, could be for any number of reasons. Alcohol is well noted for creating emotional lability.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 08:49 PM
-12

I can absolutely understand the visceral reactions to this situation. I'm sure that, if my child was involved, I'd react in a similar fashion. In /r/MensRights, I specifically try and look at things from a logical, legal and factual standpoint. I don't offer judgment (you will not find any "this is disgusting" comments in my history in regards to feminism, etc), I have an egalitarian standpoint in life, and I operate on the facts as I am able to find them. This was not, is not, and will never be…
/r/MensRights14/10/13 08:47 PM
-7

So I'm a troll for offering the actual Missouri statutes the "crime" would have been prosecuted under, for offering additional light in to the actions of the female parties and the fact that they were never charged for admitted violations of the law, and for wanting the names of young men who were not ever convicted of a crime protected? Then yes, I'm a troll.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 08:35 PM
-5

The 15 year old that raped the 13 year old was (I believe, juvenile so can't confirm) charged with rape and dealt with accordingly. I did not say that the actions of any party were justified, or correct, or anything of the sort. I offered a possible reason (which under the law, would be justified) that the prosecution dismissed the charges. I offered a little bit of light as to the actions of the parties that were "excused" from other admitted law violations by virtue of them being "victims".
/r/MensRights14/10/13 08:33 PM
-15

No, the 15 year old that had sex with the 13 year old was (I believe, juvenile so can't confirm) charged with rape and dealt with accordingly. I did not say that the actions of any party were justified, or correct, or anything of the sort. I offered a possible reason (which under the law, would be justified) that the prosecution dismissed the charges. I offered a little bit of light as to the actions of the parties that were "excused" from other admitted law violations by virtue of them being "v…
/r/MensRights14/10/13 08:32 PM
-10

I don't think it's at all dangerous to link together two dangerous behaviors engaged in by teens that often go hand in hand, see this article written by staff at the Mayo Clinic. Sexual activity. Teens who drink tend to become sexually active earlier and have sex more often than do teens who don't drink. Teens who drink are also more likely to have unprotected sex than are teens who don't drink. Additionally, the issue of consent is the sticky wicket, as it were. The Defendant in a criminal case…
/r/MensRights14/10/13 08:26 PM
-21

How do you know they didn't suffer, or continue to suffer, from that label? Unless you were a part of the situation, that doesn't really seem like you can make a factual statement of that nature. Did Daisy Coleman suffer for the accusation? Absolutely. Was that right? Absolutely not. It is never acceptable to blame a true victim. she was treated horribly and still refused to recant her statement. From what I can tell, her only statement is that 1) she was drinking before leaving the home, 2) mad…
/r/MensRights14/10/13 08:22 PM
-20

The pertinent issues here are (1) Under Missouri law, was an actual crime committed, or is this simply a case of assumed rape given that the "victim" was, at one point, an intoxicated female? (2) Is the article skewed in favor of the "victim" by simple virtue that the "suspect" was male? (3) Is the use of the male minor's names, given the fact that they were never charged with a crime, attempting to paint a target on their back and to have them held out as "rapists" in the target readership? I'm…
/r/MensRights14/10/13 08:00 PM
-30

I'm not assuming anything, I said that the act destroys the presumption that she wouldn't, simply because she had already demonstrated her willingness to violate both the law and her mother's rules. Anything else she would choose to do is up in the air.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 07:19 PM
-6

Pastebin of the letter to Dugan Arnett.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 06:42 PM
2

From what I can see in Ohio law (and from talking with a resident of Circleville, OH) it's only a misdemeanor.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 04:54 PM
1

Local or national, no need to publish something like this that carries such a strong odor of bullshit all the way through until you've done some fact checking.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 12:55 PM
11

Article Covering Her Recant Recent edit says she made up the story to cover up the use of her fathers car for drug activity
/r/MensRights09/10/13 03:54 AM
1

Huh? I don't really remember very many articles that seemed anti-MRA, maybe I missed something? Care to point a few out to me for reference?
/r/MensRights19/09/13 02:47 PM
0

Personally I think any article that mentions Anita Sakeesian as a valid authority figure on any subject loses 75% credibility right off the bat.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 02:13 PM
1

As far as I know, there is no current redesign for a male dobok. I personally think the design looks very functional. A closer fitting stretchier fabric allows for much more flexibility and range of motion. The designer is from Andorra. I'm betting he doesn't have the greatest English, and people are going to jump on the horrible crossover at translation. I think EVERYONE should be encouraged to get a good look at the healthy body image that can be achieved from participation in every sport exce…
/r/MensRights12/09/13 09:21 PM
1

A link to the original article is http://en.mastaekwondo.com/2013/08/female-taekwondo-uniform-could-be-redesigned/ Personally, I think that male doboks should be redesigned as well, for multiple reasons. I think this article is relevant on two fronts: 1) Why wasn't a design for a men's dobok presented as well? We like to be comfortable, we like freedom of movement...are we just not important enough in the sport to warrant a new uniform as well? 2) Mixed reactions from Jezebel's viewers. Some wom…
/r/MensRights12/09/13 08:46 PM
6

Oh, you mean it's not about men sending their pics to women? You mean it's really about an attempt to shame men just for having a penis? Nail. On. The. Head.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 01:07 AM
1

Congratulations on securing custody in the best interest of your child. As someone that has won not one, but two court battles to retain sole custody of my son in a "mother's law" state (Oklahoma), I can identify with the absolute hell you must have gone through to get the judgment. Her most recent attempt cost me two years of my life and $15,000.00, but the constant sound of my son's laughter in my home makes it worth an infinite amount of time and money. To gentlemen out there still fighting t…
/r/MensRights28/06/13 06:50 PM
-1

Apparently it's up and down due to heavy traffic. Not surprising.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 09:08 PM
6

Incredibly, http://jodiariasisinnocent.com/ is unavailable atm.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 09:00 PM
10

Even when you know the right thing to do, sentencing a person to death or life imprisonment is a heavy burden to bear.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 08:56 PM
5

I really hope you're being sarcastic.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 08:55 PM
15

Even money on the death penalty. Those jurors had no hesitation sounding off on their verdict.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 08:54 PM
24

And justice for all.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 08:53 PM
3

I'm on board with all except the year set. While I realize that the anger makes it seem appropriate, it's really hard to put a number on the amount of years of this mans life she could have ruined.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 09:44 PM
7

Correction, the son of Torii Hunter, Darius McClinton-Hunter, is actually the Plaintiff in the suit.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 03:19 PM
1

I'm in Oklahoma, and as I said earlier, I've seen nor heard any sign of a men's rights movement in the state. I'm not sure if I'm capable of being the spearhead, but I'm sure as hell willing to try if that's what it takes. I'm going to look in to posting flyers at the university, and researching whether or not it currently has any "men's issues" groups that meet on a regular basis, or even irregular. That's as good a place to start as any I suppose. I currently work in law, and though it's not g…
/r/MensRights27/04/13 09:50 AM
2

Support is support in all it's forms!
/r/MensRights26/04/13 08:28 PM
2

I may have to if she fails me.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 12:45 PM
3

It's become a cash machine. I hate it, but it is what it is. And tenured professors can get away with just about anything.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 12:45 PM
2

Actually, I'm sick as hell anyway, so I took it as a "almost good enough" and went home to bed. I just couldn't find civil disobedience in me while running a 102 temp.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 12:45 PM
4

She simply asked me to leave class for that night. She didn't rant or scream or anything like that, she was rather calm. My guess is if I tried to raise hell about it, she'd simply tell the department head I was being disruptive to the learning environment so she asked me to remove myself for that night.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 12:43 PM
2

I was asked to leave the class before I could get to that.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 03:13 AM
2

The department head and I don't get along. Had a run in with him last semester that didn't end well.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 03:12 AM
16

Update late because of the drive home. I attempted this ver batim and was asked to leave the class.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 03:11 AM
13

She offered to debate with me after class, but pretty much told me to shut up while she teaches.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 01:38 AM
35

That's ok, neither do they.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 04:04 PM
0

1) Realize, this is going to get worse before it gets better. Custody cases, 90% of the time, do. Buckle in for the long haul. When my ex made an attempt at taking custody from me, it was a two year $30,000 battle, but in the end, I retained custody. It made finances tight, it stressed me out, it contributed to the downfall of my marriage. But I have my son and that is all that matters to me. So, yea, be aware of what you're getting in to and expect hell. 2) Evidence can and will be used against…
/r/MensRights18/03/13 03:45 PM
1

My statement isn't that it does not. My statement is that mothers are the only ones that appeared to be valued enough to target via marketing in this fashion.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 08:58 PM
1

On the first, yea I don't expect anything of churches. Of the second, NO, but a lot of commercials appear to me to say "if you love all that your mom has done for you then buy her jewelry or she won't understand".
/r/MensRights14/03/13 08:37 PM
2

If that's your experience where you live, then the men in your area have it a bit better than the men in mine. I would advise not moving. =-P
/r/MensRights14/03/13 06:53 PM
1

I don't want to lay blame at anyone's feet in particular because frankly, I don't know where it started, I just know that it is, and it just came to a point today that it bothered me enough that I devoted two minutes to typing a small Facebook rant about it.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 06:52 PM
8

What was expected then and what is accepted now are totally different concepts. You can't complain about the "glass ceiling" with one side of the mouth, and then glorify the "mother" concept with the other. You either want the two to be one and the same and carry the same weight and responsibility (i.e. the working mother, which is the same as the working father) or you don't really want the equality that's being clamored for. That's my view on it at least.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 04:27 PM
3

The point I'm making, is that there are "more mothers given custody and rights to their children than fathers". My apologies if that meaning didn't come off as clear as I intended it to.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 04:25 PM
5

The following is an example of a response I got from a female friend: background...she cheated on her husband multiple times, spends a lot of time out drinking, and somehow managed to get custody. "Well there is a "fathers day".Im not saying i disagree with your "rant" however....when a child is born theyhave an automatic bond with the mother afterall we are the ones that carried the child for 40 weeks inside our body and gave birth. A child is suppose to stay primarily with the mother for atlea…
/r/MensRights14/03/13 04:13 PM
3

I tried to be. I know a lot of people rant in a very angry tone, and I tried to avoid that. So far, it's received a few likes, but no comments.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 03:45 PM
2

This just in: living in sin much healthier, wealthier, and wiser than marriage if you have money.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 08:52 PM
13

See, this right here is why I'm not completely against slut-shaming. Women like this should be ashamed of who and what they are.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 08:49 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter