TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Archangel1313 Archive

View 0 posts and 327 comments by Archangel1313 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I grew up in a time and place that still had a lot of old "values" attached to what a "man" is supposed to be. The fathers of my generation absolutely "taught" their sons to fight, punished them for crying, and all the other toxic traits that we've been trying to eliminate more recently. Was it "abuse"? Yes. Looking back on all of it now, it couldn't be called anything else. Was it considered acceptable? Yes...to an extent. It was certainly excused, as a "parents right". Every single bully I gre…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/04/25 01:32 AM
3

But, seriously...how do you get arrested for speeding? And then for what, now? Loitering? And a bunch of other things that literally sound made up? I have a strong suspicion that the arresting officer just has a thing for this girl, and couldn't think of a better way to get to know her.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/03/25 07:13 AM
3

That's because you're looking at it from the boys perspective. Imagine being 14, and sleeping with a hot 22 year old. That's every boy's wet dream. She, on the other hand, was doing something pretty gross. Imagine being 22 years old, and sleeping with a 14 year old. Ew. WTF?
/r/PussyPassDenied25/01/25 11:44 PM
1

That is the way it sounds.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/01/25 11:41 PM
1

He's speaking specifically about rule 1 in his comment, but in general what OP is asking for, is not something that Reddit does as a matter of policy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/12/24 10:16 PM
0

Except that's literally how reddits policy enforcement works. As long as a subs admins are engaging in some form of enforcement against individual accounts that violate the rules, then the sub stays up. The only way it gets taken down completely, is if the mods completely abandon that responsibility, or apear to be actively encouraging the rules to be broken. Everything short of that is directed at individual accounts only.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/12/24 11:29 AM
22

Oh...yeah, I read that wrong. Thanks for the clarification.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/12/24 10:50 PM
32

It's worse than that. She's 39. (Edit: sorry...38)
/r/PussyPassDenied23/12/24 10:02 PM
-3

A lot of this information is contradictory in nature. How can the foreskin be for "protection" while also having enhanced sensitivity? Either it is a sensitive organ, or it is there to protect something more sensitive. Putting the sensitive part on the outside doesn't protect it...it puts it at risk. Especially if that part happens to dangle between the legs, where it can get casually caught up on things in the environment.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/12/24 10:00 PM
1

Those two profiles are not mutually exclusive. They can absolutely be shy, reclusive basement dwellers with no social skills, AND also be dangerous to any women that happen to cross paths with them. It also doesn't mean it's a guarantee, though.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/12/24 02:07 AM
-1

I think what the admin is saying, is that unless there is evidence of "direct targeting" of individuals in your subreddit, by members of another subreddit, then there isn't a lot they can do without over-enforcing their own policies. They can't simply shut an entire subreddit down based on the meta-criticisms that take place there, even when they have failed to remove individual names or identifiers, unless those people are directly targeted with harassment. Then it's up to the individual to rep…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/12/24 07:56 PM
4

Who's the one who can't do basic subtraction?
/r/PussyPassDenied10/10/24 05:16 AM
-1

Just did... https://www.edweek.org/leadership/survey-educators-political-leanings-who-they-voted-for-where-they-stand-on-key-issues/2017/12 Not so overwhelming, after all. Far more Conservatives and independents than there are Democrats. They made up less than half overall.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/10/24 04:56 AM
0

Oh, man are you in for a shock...Illinois and Wisconsin both lean Democrat, and most of the large cities in Texas do too. So, you really haven't left the blue areas at all, have you?
/r/PussyPassDenied10/10/24 04:49 AM
-2

Lol! Wut? You should try visiting more red states. Nothing but Conservative women as far as the eye can see.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/10/24 04:43 AM
6

What makes you say they're "lefties"?
/r/PussyPassDenied10/10/24 04:36 AM
4

Can't speak for everyone, but I certainly do. Slap my ass and call me pretty, anytime.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/10/24 04:24 AM
7

It doesn't sound like they have any actual evidence against her, though...other than "this looked suspicious". It'll be interesting to see if that's all they need to convict her of something.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/09/24 06:24 PM
7

That seems like an awful lot of contradictory results just sort of swept out the way, in favor of the "positive" side. Like how the respondents can simultaneously harbor negative feelings towards men due to the belief that they are inherently more dangerous, while pairing this reaction to the belief that men and women are more similar than we often give them credit for...so, somehow these two totally different ideas cancel each other out, or even count as a net positive result? Then there's the …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/24 07:55 PM
7

As a man approaching 50, with a very clear memory of my own feelings and motivations from the past, I can tell you with 100% certainty, that the desire for sex was "obsessive" throughout my teens and most of my twenties. I don't think enough folks realize how strong those urges are, when you're caught up in that whirlwind of hormones. There were days when I would internally rage at not having sex, even though I was in a relationship and having it pretty regularly. No matter how much I got, all I…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/06/24 08:10 PM
3

If this happens, it will mean the draft is effectively off the table, going forward.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/06/24 09:51 PM
1

Unless...being sacrificed was a "privilege"?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/06/24 01:28 AM
3

Technically, no one is "at fault" for policies like those, except the assholes who implemented them. However, women were exempt from the draft in almost all cases, so it is a primarily sexist policy regardless of who's to blame.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/24 02:30 AM
2

I don't think this subject was ever intended to be a serious representation of women's true opinions. If you put two cages, side-by-side...one with a man in it and one with a bear in it...no woman would voluntarily enter the bear cage. That's just stupid. It's not meant to be taken literally. It's simply meant to illustrate how a lot of women really are scared of running into a strange man in an unsafe situation. Most bears have no intention of harming a person in the woods. Most men are the sam…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/24 01:38 AM
-30

Shouldn't all soldiers be identified as "they/them"?
/r/PussyPassDenied09/12/23 09:22 PM
11

Kind of hard to avoid exposure when you're testifying in front of Congress.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/12/23 03:17 AM
-4

It sounds like this article is saying that now that sex needs to be more consentual because "feminism", that men are now having less sex. And that the old, traditional ways of initiating it, meant men got laid more often. Ah, yes...darn feminism and actually needing the woman to want sex too, instead of the good old days, when women just did as they were told. Amiright, guys?
/r/MensRights11/10/22 09:51 PM
0

Yes, it's an oversimplification, but what they are trying to say is that you are responsible for your own behavior, and the outcomes that it brings. This is psychology 101. Sure, there are a ton of overlapping factors that got you here...but only you can change yourself.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 01:14 AM
1

Overt expressions of male chauvinism. Basically, when a man takes his masculinity to such an extreme, that he becomes a walking caricature of every hostile and annoying stereotype that men can possess.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 06:26 AM
1

What are you even talking about?
/r/MensRights25/09/22 03:09 AM
1

What does any of that have to do with anything? What you are saying, is that she would need the guys permission to do any of those things...so mentioning all that would be irrelevant. And if he decided that he wants the kid, then what? She has to go through 9 months if pregnancy, and a painful delivery, followed by weeks or even months of recovery? You are not forced to stay in bed after a fight. You have the right to check yourself out of the hospital.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 02:17 AM
1

Yes. In a literal sense, he would be choosing for her to carry that child to term, against her will.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 01:46 AM
0

So, you would give the man full control over the woman's right to abort?
/r/MensRights25/09/22 01:39 AM
0

Gee, thanks Russia.
/r/MensRights23/09/22 11:28 PM
2

Don't assume her bad mood when you bring up money, is judgement against you. She may be feeling guilty about not contributing more, and is feeling judged by you, when you mention that money is tight. You might want to talk to her about it, in a non-stressed way...casually, as opposed to bringing it up as a problem. Like, "I notice that you seem a little upset sometimes when I mention money is tight...I would love to know how you're feeling in those moments. Help me understand what you're thinkin…
/r/MensRights21/09/22 07:43 AM
1

This definition only applies to systemic discrimination. That particular definition never includes personal/individual discrimination. Different types of discrimination have different definitions. (Edit: systemic discrimination is also referred to as institutional discrimination)
/r/MensRights17/09/22 10:21 PM
-2

Man, this is one of those topics, where it is so obvious that either you don't understand what these words even mean, or are just so grossly uninformed, that you don't know how they matter. Saying that "because there was a Queen in England, that there is no evidence of a patriarchal society", is pretty close to the most ignorant thing I have heard on this sub. You are completely ignoring thousands of years worth of historical fact. There are so many ways that men get a bad rap, in modern society…
/r/MensRights16/09/22 09:11 AM
-8

Lol! Oh boy. Maybe start with high school history class, go back anywhere before 1900, and actually listen to the instructor tell you what life was like. Don't just wave your hand at it, like it couldn't have possibly been that bad...because it was usually worse than what they tell you.
/r/MensRights16/09/22 04:52 AM
1

So...3.5 days, instead of 4? Not sure if I'm understanding the split.
/r/MensRights16/09/22 01:09 AM
2

This is basically a study based on people's opinion of other people's feelings? Hmmm. Totally accurate, I'm sure. /s
/r/MensRights15/09/22 05:07 AM
2

Claiming that someone is a slut, or that they were asking for it, is a form of victim blaming that directly targets the victims credibility. If a jury is led to believe that the victim somehow instigated the assault, by behavior, appearance, or simply based on their past reputation, they are less likely to feel they were victimized...and/or that the rapist genuinely believed that the assault was consensual. This is a fairly common assertion in court, and in the past at least, it was pretty succe…
/r/MensRights15/09/22 12:29 AM
-1

This is every rapists main defense, in court...right after, "It wasn't me."
/r/MensRights14/09/22 11:36 PM
1

No offense, but I will sometimes cross the street to avoid walking passed some guys, in certain parts of town, late at night. Caution is not only advisable, but necessary. Don't take it personal.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 05:32 AM
1

Sounds like Olivia wanted to make an art-house porn film, but Florence wasn't into that, so Shia quit, and Olivia asked her new boyfriend to take his place. Awkward. I feel bad for everyone who had to go through this...except maybe Oliva. She created this mess.
/r/MensRights12/09/22 06:15 PM
1

Anecdotal evidence is what you call it when you are trying to conduct scientific research. In real life, it's called first hand experience, or an eye witness account. You can't always use it to write a scientific paper...but you can use it to make personal evaluations about life.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 12:26 AM
-5

No. It's optional, as it should be. No one is forcing you to do it, and no one is forcing you not to.
/r/MensRights10/09/22 06:30 AM
0

That depends on the job. The physical requirements applied for acceptance, are often arbitrary to the duties and requirements of actual service.
/r/MensRights09/09/22 07:36 PM
1

Dude...all men have been through this. This goes back generations. As long as there have been court cases regarding divorce and child custody, the outcomes have always put the financial burden on the man. At what point was this not the case, as far as you are aware? I would love to know how far back you are going for this lost "golden age", where men were not on the hook for alimony and child support.
/r/MensRights09/09/22 12:18 AM
-2

To put it another way... The laws have never changed. Feminists didn't "change" them. They have always been this way. These are the same laws that keep women in the kitchen, and men tied to the desk. Feminists organizations have been trying to protect women from this legal apparatus. Men need to start doing the same thing, based on the same arguments. There will always be people who use these laws to exploit their partners...and they will always argue that their rights need to be protected, base…
/r/MensRights08/09/22 10:30 AM
-1

Do you not understand the balance of traditional gender roles, in regards to the family? These organizations are seeking to protect mothers under the umbrella of traditional family roles. The only "feminist" angle here, is that they are trying to prevent fathers from exploiting their role, against women. But these are not "feminist" ideals. When people say that "feminists" are responsible for the laws that discriminate against men, they are ignoring the fact that those laws were written by men. …
/r/MensRights08/09/22 09:58 AM
-4

Lol! The clothes were on loan, for the photoshoot she did. And she went to the party to troll the rich white men, not to hang out with them.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 07:02 AM
1

America has Y'all Qaeda instead.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 06:59 AM
-2

Those rulings actually had very little to do with feminism, and more to do with traditional gender roles. Most of the judges that have set those precedents, were men...and it has been a standard for many decades. The idea that men should pay for women, and that women are the "stay-at-home" mom's, that need to be taken care of, even after a divorce, is not a feminist ideal. Real feminists would argue that a woman is just as capable as a man, when it comes to taking care of herself.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 01:27 AM
0

Wut? Who cares if lobster-boy got suspended?
/r/MensRights07/09/22 11:32 PM
1

Buddy, everything you just said is a fucking disgusting mess of male entitlement and misogyny. You are just a caricature of a real man. Your insecurities are abundant, and obvious. You do not represent the rest of us, when you say shit like this. You represent everything those toxic feminists say about us. You are everything wrong with the men's rights movement...the same way those toxic feminists are everything wrong with Feminism. You are exactly what they say "all men are..." You should be as…
/r/MensRights03/09/22 12:18 PM
3

I think what you are describing, is toxic. There are plenty of women out there, that aren't like that. Too many men, think with their dick. They ignore the red flags on the field, because they just want to score. Never stick your dick in crazy...it isn't worth the drama, no matter how much you might want that instant gratification. I am a 45+ year old ex-married man, who met the woman of my dreams and now have a three year old daughter. I changed what I was looking for, and ended up finding exac…
/r/MensRights03/09/22 09:43 AM
1

Buddy, you aren't telling the truth, though...you're making a sweeping generalization. What that does, is includes everyone who isn't like that, in your description...which automatically makes it false. So, no...it isn't "true". It's just your shitty opinion. And you aren't even being honest about my argument, or your own. What I am saying, is that both men and women should have the right to choose when and/or if they become a parent. Both should have that right...not neither. And that includes …
/r/MensRights03/09/22 03:18 AM
1

First of all...ew. Your generalization of Ukrainian women is actually just disgusting. Second if all, progress isn't made overnight. Especially when it comes to legal matters like child support and parental rights. You need strong, outspoken advocates who can make iron-clad arguments in support of a man's right to choose...in this case they would need to be lawyers, convincing a judge. Once precedent is established, it will continue to grow. At this point, though...there is no possibility that t…
/r/MensRights03/09/22 01:30 AM
-3

Or, you could just find a woman who isn't a total toxic mess, and just have a kid. Why be weird about it?
/r/MensRights02/09/22 11:06 PM
1

What country are you living in? There is no draft anymore in the US. And the only way you are getting more parental rights for men to opt out, is if the mother has that choice too. If she chooses to have that child against your wishes, you should not have to be responsible for it. That is the only acceptable argument you could make for not taking responsibility for a child, is if she had a choice whether or not to do it alone. If she has no choice, then neither will you. Do you get how that work…
/r/MensRights02/09/22 06:37 PM
2

No. At this point, everyone loses. You can't treat human rights like a hostage negotiation. As soon as abortion is illegal, men will be obligated, more than ever, to have to pay for those unwanted pregnancies. You don't gain the right to opt out...you make it harder.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 03:42 AM
1

That's a negative sum argument. It isn't valid. If you want those rights, but feel you don't have them...the solution shouldn't be to take away those rights from someone else. You are simply arguing away your own rights, by arguing that it's ok to take theirs away. Your argument should be that we ALL deserve those rights...not just one or the other, and especially not neither.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 11:55 PM
1

And if he changes his mind later?
/r/MensRights01/09/22 11:49 PM
-1

Downvoted for #1. Men should have the right to choose what's best for their own sons. You want to take that right away from men, and still call yourself an advocate for men's rights? You need to check your prejudice.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 04:21 AM
1

There is a difference between the two scenarios that needs to be pointed out... In the case of the drink girl, you also have control over your actions, regarding what to do about her. In the case of her driving drunk, you don't. You can choose to avoid the situation and potential fallout from taking advantage of the drunk girl...but the drunk driver doesn't give you that choice. Then there's the fact that the drunk girl isn't putting anyone else in danger, while the drunk driver is.
/r/MensRights27/08/22 02:48 AM
2

So, anything with a female lead character, and some anti-gay stuff sprinkled on top just to make sure there's no way to misinterpret your point here? WTF? What does this have to do with men's rights? This sub is going downhill fast. More and more posts are just turning the conversation into a right-wing circle jerk. Go to r/conservative if you want to cry about how the SJW's are taking away your white-only penis parties.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 08:57 PM
-1

Man, if you are talking about the legal precedent of forcing men to pay child support for kids they didn't agree to have, then I am with you 100%...but I have never heard of a feminist organization that is working towards keeping those laws intact, or making them more severe. Maybe you can provide some links, so that I can be more informed. As for the "point" you seem to be trying to make...you get that you sound exactly the same as an angry, man-hating feminist, when you talking like that, righ…
/r/MensRights19/08/22 04:54 AM
0

All this moment is teaching feminists, is that when their rights are being taken away, a so-called "Men's Rights" subreddit, is celebrating, and calling it a teaching moment for feminism. How does that do anything other than make it look like this sub is full of whining incels? It not only undermines our entire movement, it makes us look exactly like the stereotype we are trying to push back against. It makes those angry, toxic feminists look right about us, and gives them even more ammunition t…
/r/MensRights19/08/22 12:18 AM
-4

Lol! Buddy, I'm talking about a religious attitude towards women, and you think that makes me a misogynist? If that makes sense to you, then you'll have to try harder.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 10:03 PM
-5

No. They aren't. The pro-life movement is being pushed mainly by the religious right, in the US. With the majority against a woman's right to choose, being men. And the women who are pro-life, also happen to believe that women should be subservient, to men. Spreading misinformation about this topic doesn't help anything. It just muddies the water. ... https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2022/06/13/about-six-in-ten-americans-say-abortion-should-be-legal-in-all-or-most-cases-2/ ...
/r/MensRights18/08/22 09:54 PM
-4

Seriously...wtf people? You know women have only had the right to choose for a little more than two generations, and now it's being taken away again. By men. You think this is some kind of victory? What is wrong with you? This is not the way. This incel bullshit is not "men's rights". It's petty, bitter, and does literally nothing to advance men's rights. You sound just like toxic feminists.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 07:57 PM
1

I genuinely don't understand what that quote is trying to say.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 09:50 PM
1

All her money goes straight up her nose.
/r/MensRights14/06/22 10:05 PM
15

I wish some of these people with such strong opinions in this, would actually watch the trial. This person obviously didn't...or maybe they spent the entire time with their fingers in their ears, crying "la, la, la!", at the top of their lungs. She lied. She exaggerated every event. She presented heavily edited evidence to support her claims. An every time the unedited version was shown...it made her look like the abuser, not the victim. But do any of these columnists acknowledge that? Nope.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 09:30 PM
2

Wut? During both WW1 and WW2, the majority of factory work was done by women. Not to mention that women have always made up the majority of textile factory workers, which had an insanely high accident rate, including a crazy number of work related deaths. This has been the case for the entire industrial revolution. https://www.library.hbs.edu/hc/wes/collections/labor/
/r/MensRights31/05/22 12:29 AM
0

Wut? During both WW1 and WW2, the majority of factory work was done by women. Not to mention that women have always made up the majority of textile factory workers, which had an insanely high accident rate, including a crazy number of work related deaths. This has been the case for the entire industrial revolution. https://www.library.hbs.edu/hc/wes/collections/labor/
/r/MensRights31/05/22 12:29 AM
0

How has it been addressed? You keep saying that the study is somehow missing these things, when it isn't. It covered the full range of sensory stimuli, and found that while the foreskin ranks highest in tactile response, it falls way behind in all other areas. The conclusión they come to is valid. It isn't the most sensitive part of your penis. Not even close. And considering that sexual gratification comes from a combination of heat, pressure and tactile stimulation, the foreskin is by far the …
/r/MensRights19/05/22 09:17 PM
0

Man, they were looking at all the stimuli your nerves are able to detect. That's not pre-selecting anything...that just includes everything.
/r/MensRights19/05/22 07:49 PM
-1

"The foreskin of intact men was more sensitive to tactile stimulation than the other penile sites, but this finding did not extend to any other stimuli (where foreskin sensitivity was comparable to the other sites tested). Conclusions Findings suggest that minimal long-term implications for penile sensitivity exist as a result of the surgical excision of the foreskin during neonatal circumcision. Additionally, this study challenges past research suggesting that the foreskin is the most sensitive…
/r/MensRights19/05/22 02:28 AM
-1

How does it contradict its own data. Because when I read it, it seems fairly straightforward. What am I missing?
/r/MensRights19/05/22 12:23 AM
-1

I'm not. Nothing about what that generation of "scientist", brought to the table, was productive. They came up with the stupidest theories about things that have been known for centuries, all because they chose to look at the world through a very narrow, religiously biased perspective.
/r/MensRights19/05/22 12:17 AM
1

Well, thank God those women got a chance to vote, and the new majority set workers rights forward enough to change things like this.
/r/MensRights18/05/22 09:16 PM
-2

No, it isn't. My younger brother got circumcised when he was 18 of 19. He said there were parts of his penis that were always at least partially covered by his foreskin, that once it was gone, he realized just how sensitive they actually were. In particular, the ridge behind the head. His girlfriend also noticed it way more after circumcision, simply because it was so much more pronounced without the foreskin bunched up against it. As for that study...you should really read it again. The conclus…
/r/MensRights18/05/22 09:10 PM
-2

Lol! So that guy is clearly misunderstanding the results of Bossio's study...probably on purpose, because he doesn't like the results. See, most real scientific studies are not intended to make broad, overarching claims about a multitude of concepts...they are intended to test a single claim, in detail. Bossio's study was testing the claim that when the foreskin is removed, the rest of the penis becomes desensitized as a result. That claim, is the underlying assertion that when you remove the fo…
/r/MensRights18/05/22 08:05 PM
0

And I'm starting to think you're just a bot, working for the white supremacists that first came up with your rhetoric. Are your masters targetting my user name now?
/r/MensRights18/05/22 10:03 AM
-2

Are you seriously bringing up the opinions of someone who lived and died over a hundred years ago, as if his bullshit ideas actually mattered to why people all over the world, for thousands of years, have been practicing circumcision? Did you know that western scientists at that time, also believed that you could measure a person's IQ based on the bumps on their skull?
/r/MensRights18/05/22 10:00 AM
-2

No. I am a man. A father. And a human being. Go fuck yourself.
/r/MensRights18/05/22 09:56 AM
-3

See, you guys keep comparing the foreskin with the clitoris...but they are not even close to comparable. The clitoris contains the same kind of nerve density as your tongue or your fingertips. It has among the highest density of any part of the human body. It's more than twice the density found in your other sensory tissues, including the foreskin. Don't get me wrong...I'm not implying that it isn't sensitive...it is. But it is nothing like the clitoris. The foreskin is meant to protect the more…
/r/MensRights18/05/22 02:46 AM
-2

https://www.vox.com/platform/amp/2016/4/17/11439740/foreskin-sensitivity
/r/MensRights18/05/22 02:33 AM
0

Enough with the hyperbolic propaganda. Talk facts, or don't bother.
/r/MensRights18/05/22 12:34 AM
-4

This isn't a religious issue...it's about hygiene. Most of the benefits of circumcision occur during early childhood, before your kids have learned how to keep everything down their clean. Mild infections are common, although not terribly serious. Getting it done when your kid is a baby just means they won't even remember the procedure, their at an age where the parents are responsible for taking care of the wound, and before the child reaches an age where keeping their penis clean becomes an is…
/r/MensRights18/05/22 12:32 AM
-1

A lie is not unknowing, my friend. If I didn't know, then I didn't know. A lie is an intentionally misleading statement. And what do you expect me to find when I google "mutilation industry"? That sounds like the name of a heavy metal band. Just the fact that you keep using that term, seriously...makes you sound like an idiot.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 10:08 PM
-1

Sure, but no one ever posted an actual link. My experience from most of you guys is that you repeat the same hyperbolic, emotionally charged propaganda, ad nauseum. Why would I bother to look something up, that sounds so completely ridiculous? Even in this case, you are still making it sound like some kind of "industry"...when what it really is, is a niche market supported by a small group of rich American women. Again...hyperbole. And saying that people on here who are defending circumcision, m…
/r/MensRights17/05/22 08:20 PM
-4

Man, do you even understand how disingenuous that entire statement is? You are literally repeating slogan propaganda created by white nationalists in Europe, hoping to deter Muslim immigration. You are demonizing all men who get this done, without even attempting to understand the reason. It is mindless, dehumanizing terminology like that, that undermines your entire argument. It shows a complete lack of empathy, or comprehension of this subject.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 08:12 PM
-1

That is fantastic, that you love your own penis. How about you show the same respect to the rest of us...and fuck right off with your condemnation of ours.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 09:28 AM
-3

How does not knowing about that until today, make me a liar?
/r/MensRights17/05/22 02:48 AM
0

How does not knowing about that until today, make me a liar?
/r/MensRights17/05/22 02:48 AM
-17

Buddy, there is a structural difference between regular skin and the tissues that make up the clitoris, for example. The nerve density and tissue composition in the foreskin are just like any other regular skin. There is nothing special about it, except for where it is located.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 02:47 AM
-3

You guys are literally saying that men who are circumcised have had their dicks "mutilated"...and are somehow less functional than uncut men. How does that not fit the definition of dick-shaming?
/r/MensRights17/05/22 02:44 AM
0

My younger brother got circumcised when he was 18 or 19. The only thing he said about the differences for him during sex, was that he never realized how sensitive the ridge at the back of the head was, since his foreskin was always in the way. His girlfriend also noticed how much more pronounced that ridge felt on her g-spot after his foreskin was gone. He said it was a win-win for both of them.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 02:41 AM
-1

How can you say they "don't know any better"? You're talking about someone else's penis. And depending on who you talk to, toes are an eroginous zone, same as armpits and assholes. It's all just skin. What you get out of it, is purely subjective.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 02:37 AM
0

Yeah, someone just sent me a link to that shit. That's fucked up...but that also isn't normal. You're talking about a bunch of rich, Oprah fans from the US. It's not like there's some global market for that shit.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 02:33 AM
1

Buddy the only ones brainwashed are you guys that think there's actually something wrong with a man's penis after circumcision. You know all this is only a thing because some right-wing assholes want to deter Muslims and Jews from immigrating to their countries, right? That's literally where all this bullshit started.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 02:30 AM
0

WTF? Ok...that's actually pretty sick. Rich folks will spend money on anything, as long as Oprah endorses it, I guess.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 02:27 AM
-11

That's a myth, buddy. It's based on a flawed study that relied exclusively on self reporting, in a very small batch of participants.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 10:07 PM
-21

https://en.intactiwiki.org/index.php/20,000_nerve_endings You guys are so full of shit. Even your own wiki, desputes this claim. A woman's clitoris only has about 8,000 nerve endings and it is considered to be even more sensitive than a person's tongue. Your foreskin isn't magic. It's just skin.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 09:08 PM
-5

I know. This whole subject is toxic as fuck. None of these munsters even realize the whole reason this topic has been so politicised in the last several years, is because right-wing political groups in Europe have been trying to use it to discourage Muslim immigration to their countries. They've saturated the conversation with so much negative propaganda, that all these idiots think when they hear the term, is that it's "evil", "barbaric", and "mutilation". They've been so brainwashed that they …
/r/MensRights16/05/22 09:03 PM
-15

Yeah, they think they're advocating for men...but really all they're doing is dick-shaming men for being circumcised. It's pretty fucking sad.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 08:53 PM
-44

Dude. The foreskin is nowhere near the most sensitive part of your body. It's just normal skin.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 08:20 PM
-18

You're not the odd one out. Don't let these people gaslight you into thinking there's something wrong with you dick. There isn't.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 08:19 PM
1

Sorry, I don't get the reference. I haven't watched family guy in years.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 06:37 PM
-4

First of all, there's no "mutilation industry". You sound like a moron talking like that.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 06:36 PM
2

This is an easy answer. Men who've been circumcised know that what you are saying they've "lost" is not as big a deal as you make it out to be. They don't experience any loss of pleasure or function...and their penises are much easier to keep clean. You guys are just gaslighting yourselves, and everyone else on this issue. You act like the foreskin is some magical organ, and without it, the world loses all it's joy and color...except that no one who's circumcised actually feels "mutilated", the …
/r/MensRights16/05/22 06:34 PM
-5

My brother had it done as an adult, and he said it made no difference at all, except that it was just different. He also had a lot of problems growing up, with rashes and skin infections associated with his foreskin...so he would have gladly had it done as a baby, when it would have done him the most good.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 06:23 PM
-1

No one who gets this done as a baby, is traumatized by it. You guys love all this invented drama...but it's all for yourselves. I have never met someone circumcised, that had a problem with it.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 06:21 PM
1

Saved this one for last because it's so chock full of delicious bullshit, that I wanted to savor it. Are you seriously comparing female genital mutilation to male circumcision? The reason why one is considered "barbaric" and the other isn't, is the intent behind the procedure. If all they were doing for girls, was removing a little bit of the outer skin of the labia...then I would say "who cares?" Women are actually getting that done all the time, as a form of cosmetic surgery, for aesthetic pur…
/r/MensRights12/05/22 09:47 AM
0

This one gave me the best laugh I've had all day. That link is a survey. They asked a couple of hundred people if they knew the term they used...and made the assumption that if you'd never heard that term before...then that must mean you don't experience it. Funny thing...I've never heard that term before. I had to look it up. Honestly, no one had ever used that name for it...but, of course I know what it is, based on a pretty comprehensive google dive. Everyone I know, knows what that is. No on…
/r/MensRights12/05/22 09:21 AM
0

Dude, you really aren't even trying to hear what I'm saying. You're right...my younger brother is a perfect example of "normal"...and so are my older brother and myself. Normal for being circumcised, means not having to worry about any of that. Normal for being uncircumcised means having to grow up with a whole different set of risks. It is not the same. UTI's are as much as ten times more likely in early childhood for uncircumcised boys. I grew up understanding this. I shared a bedroom with my …
/r/MensRights12/05/22 09:09 AM
0

Oh...so are you seriously saying that the only count you will believe, is one that is based on actually asking every single man on the planet, directly, whether or not they're circumcised? AND, that YOUR assumption of those numbers is somehow more accurate? ​ But hey, at least regenerative medicine will be available in 2 years Don't tell me you're one of those QAnon folk, that believe "medbeds" exist?
/r/MensRights12/05/22 08:59 AM
0

What are you talking about? Are you actually saying that a four year old boy doesn't retract their foreskin a little, when they pee? They just leave it all the way forward? My younger brother wasn't circumcised and he could only retract it halfway up the head until he was close to puberty. When he let go of it, it slipped back over the whole thing. You get something on the end of your penis and let the foreskin cover it...then retract it again...it works its way further in, and is that much hard…
/r/MensRights12/05/22 04:58 AM
1

That isn't true. It has the normal amount of nerve endings for regular skin. It is just as sensitive as the palm of your hand. The type of nerves and their concentration are the same. And again, I find it rather odd that you think you know what my penis feels, better than I do.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 04:51 AM
0

Why cure an infection when you can prevent them? Talk about barbaric. Just let your son get an infection, all because there's antibiotics for it? Cool.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 04:49 AM
0

According to the last studies, between 37% and 39%. I was being approximate when I said "closer to 40%". https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4772313/#:~:text=The%20present%20study%20provides%20the,of%20men%20globally%20are%20circumcised. And I find it really telling that you think you know more about my own penis than I do.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 04:47 AM
0

Lol! Really? It's actually more like 60%...and also weird that 40% of the population are doing just fine without foreskin, despite how critically important you guys tell yourselves it is.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 12:22 AM
0

It's a medical procedure intended to prevent the possiblity of infection. That's all.
/r/MensRights11/05/22 02:16 AM
0

It's a medical procedure intended to prevent the possiblity of infection. That's all.
/r/MensRights11/05/22 02:10 AM
0

That's a myth. Circumcised men enjoy sex just as much as anyone else. The tissue and nerve concentration in the foreskin is the same as any other piece of skin on your body. It has no special properties.
/r/MensRights11/05/22 02:09 AM
0

People take precautions all the time to prevent infections from even happening...they don't just wait until they get one, and then let their immune systems do all the work, without any assistance. The best medicine is preventative in nature. And even good bacteria leave behind waste material that needs to be cleaned out once in a while, or you will wind up with surface infections, or toxins in your system. Acting like personal health and hygiene is some passive automatic process that doesn't req…
/r/MensRights10/05/22 09:09 PM
0

But if it's just too tight to pull all the way back, and a little bit of pee gets in there, it's really hard to rinse out before it becomes irritated and sore. And that's IF your kid is hyper aware of those sensations and tells you something is wrong right away. A lot of kids won't say anything until it really start to hurt. By then, it creams or ointments, and maybe even antibiotics to the rescue. But unfortunately in some cases, it gets worse than that.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 07:10 PM
1

It really all depends on weighing the risk of removal against the benefit. In this case it's kind of even. As long as nothing goes wrong with the procedure, your boy has a greatly reduced risk of local infections, and a much easier time keeping his penis clean in general. For a lot of parents, that is a risk worth taking.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 06:54 PM
0

Yes, we would. Every single time you cut your finger, you are risking infection and disease. That's why it so important to clean a wound...and see your doctor as soon as you notice anything is not healing correctly. That is a constant risk, when it comes to cleanliness. This has nothing to do with the evolution of your individual body parts, other than some are more at risk than others. If you don't take extra care to make sure they are clean...they will get infected that much more often. Most o…
/r/MensRights10/05/22 06:49 PM
0

Exactly. Which leaves the ever-present possibility that something gets under there and gets infected.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 06:45 PM
1

It's the same kind of choice every parent makes when they decide to get their kid vaccinated for a half dozen things that may or may not ever be a problem. You don't wait until your kid is too old to benefit from them, just so that you can ask if they wanted it or not. By then, it's too late. You either roll the dice with the their health and wellbeing, or you take precautions to protect them ahead of time. Why is this so hard to understand?
/r/MensRights10/05/22 06:42 PM
1

They don't. That's exactly my point. Pull up as many articles as you want...it doesn't "win" this argument. Nothing does. It's just a choice.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 10:03 AM
1

Man, if you don't know how to use Google at this point, or are simply unwilling to challenge your own assumptions, then you are not worth arguing with.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 09:38 AM
0

Cool, man. I can also pull up dozens of articles saying the opposite. So, how about put aside the fact that the pros and cons on this issue are fairly balanced against each other. Taken on average, the risks are about the same either way.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 04:53 AM
2

Sure. I know it has nothing to do with "intelligent design". If evolution dictated that every part of your body functioned perfectly, and without any risk of infection or disease, there would be no such thing as infection or disease.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 04:52 AM
1

You didn't know that not all boys can retract their foreskin all the way, until they are older? https://www.chop.edu/conditions-diseases/care-uncircumcised-penis#:~:text=Some%20boys%20can%20retract%20their,skin%20is%20stuck%20to%20skin).
/r/MensRights10/05/22 04:48 AM
0

Wow. I take it you are circumcised then? Because anyone with foreskin knows that you don't force a young boys foreskin back, until it's ready. That can sometimes be puberty. Until then, it can only be retracted partway, and it's it's difficult to make sure everything under the skin is always clean. This means minor skin irritations and rashes can occur during early childhood...which may also lead to more serious infections that can have more serious, long-term conequences for their health later …
/r/MensRights10/05/22 02:41 AM
-9

r/badmensanatomy called, and wants a word with you.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 02:32 AM
-10

Can you teach a boy to pull his foreskin all the way back, before it's ready, so that he can fully clean under the hood?
/r/MensRights10/05/22 02:14 AM
-20

That's because male circumcision does carry health benefits for boys.
/r/MensRights09/05/22 10:00 PM
0

Wow. So, you really don't know anything about this subject? Or are you just trying to sound clever?
/r/MensRights09/05/22 08:54 PM
1

Dude. I think you're talking about someone else's post then. The ones I posted were meta analyses based on reported insurance claims, and an enormous analysis of boys, reduced down to several thousand with nearly identical health conditions, aside from the circumcised/uncircumcised part. Neither study mentions premature births, and both were corrected for outliers between groups. The third thing I posted was an article running through the common myths and misconceptions about circumcision...beca…
/r/MensRights07/05/22 11:18 PM
1

Lol! Current, as in people still alive today. And seriously where are you getting the idea that they were only looking at premature births when it came to uncircumcised boys? Both those studies go out of their way to mention that they corrected both groups for similarities...not differences. You didn't actually read them, did you?
/r/MensRights07/05/22 05:02 AM
1

Dude. You have already decided not to acknowledge all of the studies that have proven that. What more information are you asking for? Are you asking me if there are medical records going back to before WW2 in the UK? How should I know? Maybe look that up. You might actually notice that the occurence did go up from pre-1950's numbers...or you might find that the data you're asking for doesn't exist. Or...you can look at studies done using current data, and see that all of them point to an obvious…
/r/MensRights06/05/22 08:15 PM
2

The constitution is already clear. The 1st amendment prohibits any law based on the religious beliefs of the lawmaker. This means any anti-abortion law needs to be grounded in secular reasoning...and none of these "point of conception" laws do that.
/r/MensRights06/05/22 08:07 PM
1

Ummm, yeah. Because it isn't essential. It's considered an elective procedure.
/r/MensRights06/05/22 10:04 AM
1

Oh...so it's MY cognitive dissonance that's getting in the way of me making shit up, in order to dismiss the information I don't want to hear? Try again.
/r/MensRights06/05/22 12:16 AM
1

Oh...so it's MY cognitive dissonance that's getting in the way of me making shit up, in order to dismiss the information I don't want to hear? Try again.
/r/MensRights06/05/22 12:16 AM
1

So you're adding your own layer of speculation to the results, in order to dismiss them? Cool.
/r/MensRights05/05/22 07:37 PM
1

Super weird then, that circumcision still seems to benefit kids without compensating for those risk factors. Do you think there's a connection there? /s
/r/MensRights05/05/22 04:47 AM
1

First of all...not the same kind of issue I'm talking about. Second...how do you come to that conclusion based on the necessity of having to get surgery? As for real world statistics, here... ... https://adc.bmj.com/content/90/8/853 ... ... https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6119846/ ... ... https://www.nvpeds.com/blog/myths-and-facts-about-circumcision#:~:text=Myth%3A%20Circumcision%20doesn't%20offer%20any%20real%20health%20benefits&text=One%20of%20the%20immediate%20benefits,kidneys%2…
/r/MensRights05/05/22 02:36 AM
1

The problem with this entire argument though, is that you are basing your entire opinion on misinformation. There are absolutely benefits to circumcision that have nothing to do with religion...and they apply specifically to early childhood. So getting it done later, is pointless. And not getting it done when your kid is a newborn is cruel. If it's done right away, the kid isn't even going to remember anything about it, and even a reasonably attentive parent will be cleaning their kid a dozen ti…
/r/MensRights04/05/22 10:23 PM
1

If a circumcised boy has a 1 in 1,000 chance if developing an early childhood infection versus 1 in 100 for uncircumcised...then it is a benefit. I am in no way advocating that all babies should be circumcised...only that parents that choose to get it done, due to the obvious benefits, are not the monsters you make them out to be. You guys just love demonizing people...men and fathers...because of a choice they make to protect their sons health and well-being. It is disgusting.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 10:14 PM
1

Dude there are different kinds of female circumcision...and the kind that people refer to as mutilation is when they remove the girls clitoris. When you use the same word to describe what they do with boys, you are making a false equivalence. You are applying the same term to something that has nowhere near the same intention, or application.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 10:02 PM
1

See, this is how propaganda works. You choose terms designed to attach a negative emotional response to concepts where previously there was none. The fact that you can say that it's not mutilation when an adult does it to themselves sums this up perfectly. You are being manipulative and dishonest. This entire campaign was originally concocted by white nationalists who wanted to demonize the religious practices of Muslims and Jews, in a effort to deter immigration. You guys have all fallen for it…
/r/MensRights04/05/22 09:30 PM
0

Oh right...my profile history? Of the last two days of this one argument? It's been going on across several different threads on one or two posts. That's just a snapshot of my opinion on one single topic. You don't know shit about me.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 08:50 PM
2

What does that have to do with anything? Again, you're equating unrelated things here.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 08:37 PM
1

See, when you say the words "evil" and "vile"...you just lost the argument. All you've done is broadcast the fact that you don't know anything about this, aside from the propaganda you've read on the internet.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 08:36 PM
1

I know. Both circumcised men and uncircumcised men are all living just fine. What I take issue with is the misconception that circumcised men have been "mutilated" for no reason. That is personally insulting to me...and I can tell you from first hand experience, that 90%+ of the "information" people share on this subject is all hyperbolic bullshit, based on hypothetical social outrage...not reality.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 08:34 PM
1

Simple answer...because by then it's too late. The benefits of circumcision all happen in early childhood.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 08:29 PM
2

You're comparing a one-and-done procedure, that no child would even remember, with a years-long practice of repeatedly breaking and re-breaking someone's bones? Are you sure that's the analogy you think applies here?
/r/MensRights04/05/22 08:25 PM
-5

See...this is where this whole argument loses all credibility. If you think the two practices are the same, then you are either completely ignorant about both, or you are being hyperbolic to the point of absurdity.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 08:20 PM
1

Wow, that's a lot to read, and even more to respond to, so I'm just going to say this...according to your own quoted statistic, if you know 100 uncircumcised men...then one of them for sure, grew up with an infection of some kind. Now tell me again how weird it is, that everyone seems to know someone that's experienced this. You know, aside from the keyboard warriors at home who pretend like that's not a significant number of people.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 08:18 PM
-2

That's entirely different, and the fact that you are equating those two practices, only tells me how little you really understand this subject. Or how disingenuous you are about it.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 08:14 PM
1

I'm not opposed to men's issues. I happen to be one. I just don't think that men's rights and women's rights need to be addressed as if they are competing with each other. They aren't...and making this shit into some kind of outrage fueled culture war, is exactly what men complain about when they talk about feminism, isn't it? It doesn't help at all, when men start acting the same way.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 08:12 PM
1

Nope. Definitely not Christian. And no, I haven't watched the video...my phone only has so much data per month.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 08:09 PM
1

That's actually not what I'm talking about. I'm talking about basic hygiene. Once a kid has started potty training, the role of the parents in keeping that kids penis clean, become less and less, and fall more and more on the habits of the child. I assume you don't have kids, otherwise you'd know how dirty they can get at that age. You find the weirdest shit stuck in the strangest places, all the time. They don't know that cheerio would up in their ear...or how chocolate found its way into their…
/r/MensRights04/05/22 08:04 PM
1

Looks who's talking about being brainwashed. Of course the child isn't old enough to make that decision...that's why the parents make it for them. If you wait long enough for them to make the choice themselves, it would be way passed the time when it would have helped them.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 07:55 PM
1

Oh, that sketch again? Yeah, that's actually not true. That study implies that the foreskin is sensitive like the clitoris is, as opposed to the outer labia, which is far closer in structure.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 07:51 PM
-8

For the same reason you don't let babies decide when bed time is. Or whether or not cake is for breakfast, lunch and dinner. Parents make those choices, because babies aren't old enough. How many other decisions do you think children should have before they've even learned to speak?
/r/MensRights04/05/22 11:03 AM
1

Jesus Christ, man. I don't need you to speak for me. You don't know what the fuck you are talking about. Do me and every other circumcised man a favor, and fuck off with your bullshit. You are talking out of your ass.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 11:00 AM
1

People who are pro-circumcision always have first-hand anecdotes about the benefits. I have my own childhood, as the reason why I support it. I don't go on what other people tell me about it. I base it on my own life experience. When you see the differences for yourself...it becomes an easier decision to understand. When all you have is propaganda and speculation...then it's not so easy. Infections are common. Pretending that they aren't, is wilful ignorance. Pretending that kids are born with t…
/r/MensRights04/05/22 10:56 AM
1

So, basically you're saying you have no idea why people get circumcised? Everything from minor skin irritations, to urinary tract infections and even more sever bladder infections. All of which can occur during early childhood...before a kid has "learned" how to avoid these issues. Depending on how severe the infection is, long term side effects are always possible.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 10:03 AM
1

The Supreme Court already confirmed the document is legit. It just isn't "binding" yet, until they make their ruling official. But it still reflects the background opinions of the majority of justices on this subject. And abortion rights were never codified into the Constitution, specifically...so their interpretation is up to the Supreme Court to define. So far, they've given that choice to the individual...not the state. This repeal, will reverse that...and allow the state to decide for the in…
/r/MensRights04/05/22 09:51 AM
-5

Wow. So, good that we all get to suffer the shit end of the stick together? How fucking great. Welcome to the bottom of the barrel, where equality is concerned. If this is where this sub is heading...I'm out. This is not the equality I'm looking for.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 09:44 AM
1

Apparently the Supreme Court is about to repeal Roe vs Wade, and push abortion rights back to the state to decide. No more constitutionally protected right for a woman to decide what happens with her own body...now it's up to elected officials to make that choice for her.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 09:39 AM
-4

How many people in here know that she's talking about the repeal of Roe v Wade?
/r/MensRights04/05/22 05:01 AM
1

You have no idea how much easier it is to keep a wound clean on an infant, than it is for any other age group from toddlers to teenagers. Babies won't pick at it, or rub it...and as long as the parents are even halfway competent, they will already be cleaning that kid a dozen times a day. Being a baby is the cleanest state your body will ever be in, all the way up to adulthood. Which is also why the best time to get it done is when you're a baby. Getting it done later increases the risk of compl…
/r/MensRights04/05/22 04:57 AM
1

Buddy, this whole "issue", wasn't even an issue until right around the time the Syrian refugee crisis started. Then all of a sudden, up pops dozens of astroturfed movements against circumcision...all paid for and promoted by far-right political lobbies, pushing hard for legislation to be enacted, that would ban circumcision. Why? To make their local areas as unappealing to Muslim immigrants as possible. See, you can't ban them for their religion directly...but if you can convince enough people t…
/r/MensRights04/05/22 12:33 AM
1

Buddy, I'm not accusing you of being anti-Semitic...I'm saying that you are mindlessly repeating white nationalist propaganda. All this outrage over something you even admit isn't a problem for you. It's all about the "thought of it"...not about the reality.
/r/MensRights03/05/22 08:52 PM
-23

Oh, yaaay. Another anti-circumcision circle jerk.
/r/MensRights03/05/22 08:22 PM
-1

Dude, I'm questioning the sincerity of your story, that's all. As to the human rights issue, how is a parent wanting to make things easier for their kid, a violation of their rights, any more than any other medical decision they make without their child's consent? Even if it isn't "necessary"...there are a million decisions that a parent makes, that a child can't consent to, that have the potential to do unimaginable harm if something goes wrong. Majority of the time, nothing does...and no one c…
/r/MensRights03/05/22 07:14 PM
0

What exactly was going in your life at the age of 7, that made you feel bad about what your dick looks like?
/r/MensRights03/05/22 12:26 AM
1

Complications occur when something goes wrong...which is far less likely when you're dealing with an actual pediatric surgeon. You are right though, that you can't eliminate all possibility of something going wrong. But you can reduce the chances to less than the occurence of complications due to leaving the foreskin intact...because complications occur there as well.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 02:20 AM
1

The entire reason any of that is the result is because, as you say, people are already doing it outside of hospitals, and not by people who know what they are doing. If you want to ban anything, you should think about banning it outside of hospitals, and by people who don't know what they are doing. Banning it inside hospitals, only guarantees that the only place to go is a mohel etc.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 12:25 AM
1

Buddy, as long as it's done by an actual pediatric surgeon, in a proper medical facility, the complications are nearly non existent. The only time things go wrong, is when the procedure is performed somewhere else, by someone who isn't qualified. All this push to ban circumcision is what's going to cause more incidents, by forcing people to go outside the proper channels to get it done.
/r/MensRights27/04/22 09:37 PM
1

That isn't a credible study. It's based on self-reported data, that is entirely subjective in nature. Like all the studies that go into this subject. It is impossible to accurately quantify the full extent of what is considered "more or less" sensitivity from two separate people's internal perspectives. That's not how science works. The type of nerves found in the foreskin, and their concentration, are comparable to the palm of your hand. They are not "sensitive" in the same sense that your fing…
/r/MensRights27/04/22 09:25 PM
1

I wasn't making it seem like that was the problem. I told you it was a medical procedure, like getting your kid vaccinated. You asked what the benefit was. I said because it was easier to keep clean, and prevent unnecessary rashes and infections as a kid. That's it.
/r/MensRights27/04/22 09:17 PM
-1

But the promotion of online propaganda and misinformation regarding this subject, in an effort to negatively impact public opinion towards Jews, is anti-Semitic. You have to take the source of the campaign into account when you decide to jump on that bandwagon. Do you really want to march along side those people, for this cause?
/r/MensRights27/04/22 09:10 PM
0

Buddy, it doesn't matter to me what reasons your parents had for making this decision. What's anti-Semitic is the fact that this issue is being used by far right groups to deter Jewish people from moving to their countries.
/r/MensRights27/04/22 06:42 PM
1

Dude. It was because he didn't clean his dick well enough, when we would go out and play in dirt all day. We'd swim in the local river, and air dry before hiking home...jump in all the irrigation ditches on the way home trying to catch frogs or fish...and when we had to pee, we'd just go behind the nearest tree. We'd be out from morning till dark, and come home completely covered in mud. He was the only one who ever got an infection on the end of his penis.
/r/MensRights27/04/22 02:49 AM
1

Not that I know of, but he only came to live with us when he was four. Before that, who knows?
/r/MensRights27/04/22 02:27 AM
1

He honestly had no opinion on the subject.
/r/MensRights27/04/22 02:15 AM
1

Buddy...I'm not the one equating any if this with sexual assault. You are. I'm telling you this is a medical procedure. You're the one saying it's the same thing as diddling children. All I did was provide you with another example of a medical decision that parents make, before their kid has a say in it.
/r/MensRights27/04/22 12:25 AM
1

Yeah...except as any circumcised man will tell you...that is bullshit. It doesn't decrease desire, or enjoyment. This is basically the same thing as thinking that whipping yourself will somehow purge you of sin. It's just religious mumbo-jumbo.
/r/MensRights27/04/22 12:21 AM
1

He was my step brother, from my step father's first marriage. He started living with us when he was four years old. The three of us were all two years apart, respectively...my older brother, then me two years younger than him, then my step brother two years younger than me.
/r/MensRights27/04/22 12:17 AM
1

If you want my personal experience on the subject...it's the regular occurences of childhood skin irritation, and the occasional urinary tract infection that comes along with not cleaning your hood after you pee. My younger brother wasn't circumcised until he was an adult...and that was his biggest complaint. My older brother and I were cut, and he hated the fact that when we were kids, all we ever needed to do was find a bush, pull it out, give a few shakes and put it back in our pants...no pro…
/r/MensRights26/04/22 10:28 PM
-4

As much as you might like to use the word "mutilation"...it doesn't mean the word applies.
/r/MensRights26/04/22 10:23 PM
2

You know that a lot of women in the US have the outer "lips" trimmed, as a form of cosmetic enhancement, right? That's an accurate comparison. Saying that it's the same thing as having a girls clitoris removed, is disingenuous bullshit. There is no comparison between the two practices.
/r/MensRights26/04/22 10:20 PM
1

I know. I fucking can't stand assholes who think they are advocating for the rest of us, when all they're really doing is spreading misinformation.
/r/MensRights26/04/22 08:33 PM
0

This isn't a dodge attempt. I'm asking you to think about your position. I had my daughter vaccinated when she was a baby. She couldn't "consent"...she was too young. I made that decision on her behalf, because I believed it was the best thing for her health and wellbeing. Are you seriously saying to me, that what I did was the same thing as sexually abusing my own daughter? Think very carefully about your position here. What the fuck are you actually accusing people of?
/r/MensRights26/04/22 08:30 PM
-4

Not just anti Semitic...but also Islamophobic. Back at the height of the Syrian refugee crisis in Europe, several far right groups began funding bogus studies trying to promote the idea that circumcision was somehow the same thing as female genital mutilation. The goal was to bring laws into place that would ban the practice completely, in the hopes that it would deter immigration to those countries. Since then, it's been recycled, repeated and amplified online, until here we are. It's just anot…
/r/MensRights26/04/22 08:27 PM
-2

So, in your mind sexual assaults is the same thing as having a medical procedure performed on you as a child? Give your fucking head a shake.
/r/MensRights26/04/22 08:17 PM
-1

Point being, you guys need to quit dick shaming men who've had this done. As long as you all keep referring to it as "mutilation" or "the only way to fix a defect", you are not advocating for all men. You are being bigoted assholes.
/r/MensRights26/04/22 08:16 PM
-2

If you don't understand how different these two topics are...then there is something very wrong with you. I would suggest talking to a professional about your perspective on what constitutes "abuse".
/r/MensRights26/04/22 08:12 PM
-5

How do you gaslight someone into believing something they can clearly see for themselves? Gaslighting would more be like trying to convince someone that something they have had no problems with their entire lives, was in fact a brutal assault on them, by their parents. You guys are toxic.
/r/MensRights26/04/22 08:06 PM
1

So, he's "defective" now? You guys need to clear your perspective.
/r/MensRights26/04/22 08:04 PM
-2

You know there are a lot of men out there, that you are disparaging with this closed-minded bullshit, right? Take your anti-Semitic crap where it belongs...back to the alt-right subs where it started.
/r/MensRights26/04/22 08:02 PM
-1

This is exactly what I'm talking about. You've illustrated exactly what's gone wrong with the "feminist movement". The men's rights movement should not be encouraged to follow in that pattern. It is a mistake to characterize either initiative as a "class war between men and women". That completely undermines any credibility the movement may have, and only distracts people from the intended goals.
/r/MensRights23/04/22 09:34 PM
2

We need to remember that promoting men's rights does not necessarily require us to bash women. The point of both movements is equal rights...not "your side needs to fix its shit first". It's not constructive to focus on what they are doing wrong...that should become obvious on its own, once more women understand what men are actually going through. One of the biggest setbacks to the feminist movement, was the rise in popularity, of bashing men whenever women had an issue to overcome. That's when…
/r/MensRights23/04/22 08:01 PM
-7

So, you're saying incels are too sexually promiscuous? I think you need to check your analogy...it's backwards.
/r/MensRights17/04/22 05:52 PM
0

They wouldn't say anything about either one, if there wasn't the direct threat of violence involved.
/r/MensRights16/04/22 08:47 PM
1

Calling it attempted rape is going too far. That's ridiculously hyperbolic. But your point is solid.
/r/MensRights16/04/22 06:23 PM
0

There are also men only gyms. Whereas there were no establishments where white people were not legally allowed to enter.
/r/MensRights16/04/22 06:05 PM
1

Most were just saying how it's bullshit that men don't get a choice in the matter...and a lot were doing the standard complaining about women in general, taking advantage of their "privilege" to do whatever they want. But in the end, what choice are they expecting men to have? The right to "veto" her decision? That's not a right men should have over women.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 09:10 AM
0

The problem with all that, is when it comes to this particular decision, it's a little harder to say, "I have a right to decide what you can and can't do with your own body". I think there should be more mutual respect for each other's feelings on the subject, for sure...but at the end of the day, it really is her final call. Anything else, and you are absolutely taking your "rights" too far. So, yeah...the right to "opt out" should be legal for men. Just like it is for women, when they choose t…
/r/MensRights15/04/22 01:20 AM
1

Not at all. I'm just saying this sub is all over the map on this subject. One day it seems like a violation of a man's rights to keep the kid...another day it's violating his rights to not keep the kid. It seems like folks are mad, either way.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 12:27 AM
-5

As long as it comes with cold pizza...I'm good.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 09:16 PM
-10

Saw a post here yesterday, about that woman who was arrested in Texas for having an abortion...and the takeaway was how devastated her husband was, that she did it without his consent, as if his rights were violated. The comments were a raging cesspool of anger over it. Today...it's all about his right to not get trapped into an unwanted pregnancy. This post is literally a role reversal of that one, but the punchline is the same.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 09:15 PM
-14

And if you think this is bad...then how do you feel about men forcing their wives to carry a child to term, that they do not want?
/r/MensRights14/04/22 07:27 PM
-7

Abortion pills can only be taken up to 10 weeks into a pregnancy. It takes at least 12-14 weeks to determine the sex of the child. Fuck off with this bullshit.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 02:25 AM
0

Jordan Peterson is a pseudo-intellectual grifter, that likes to redefine words to mean whatever happens to back up the narrative he's trying to push. He's a stupid person's idea of a smart person.
/r/MensRights13/04/22 10:08 PM
0

Seriously...how has one toxic relationship, so perfectly summarized the entire "me too" movement, and it's failings? Everyone involved is damaged. They're both abusive. They're both victims. This whole thing is just embarassing to watch. It's a candid view into someone else's private nightmare. I wish we could all stop looking at it.
/r/MensRights12/04/22 10:40 AM
3

Old people don't always realize how old they are, and say shit they always wanted to say when they were younger, but didn't have the nerve back then.
/r/MensRights11/04/22 02:10 AM
1

What's wrong with just calling them "women"?
/r/MensRights11/04/22 12:34 AM
-1

My brother had it done when he was an adult, and said it only got more sensitive, not less.
/r/MensRights09/04/22 08:50 PM
0

Why wasn't this being done in a hospital?
/r/MensRights27/03/22 11:11 PM
2

Talking about what is frustrating you, without getting angry, for starters. It also helps to avoid applying blame to others when discussing how you feel, and just talk about the feelings themselves. And try to keep the person you are talking to about them, in your focus...meaning don't forget to be aware of how they are reacting to what you are saying, while you are saying it.
/r/MensRights27/03/22 06:36 PM
2

It means you need to learn HOW to express your emotions in a constructive, and/or positive way.
/r/MensRights27/03/22 06:04 PM
3

Lol! Equality is sexist?
/r/MensRights22/01/22 02:23 AM
2

I'm not trying to invalidate your "trauma" here...but I didn't read anywhere in there that you actually suffered any. Except the trauma that you continue to inflict on yourself anyway. Your feelings may be valid...but you don't have to be traumatized by them either. You are in control of how you feel. Since nothing you said, mentions any negative physical or performative consequences from being circumcised, then your parents didn't "mutilate" you. They trimmed a little skin off the end of your d…
/r/MensRights03/01/22 02:35 PM
-5

It hurt his feelings that his parents did a thing without his consent.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 09:11 PM
1

Don't get me wrong...it's all bad. But I still agree with first guy who said comparing the two as if they are equivalent, is not really true. Sometimes, it's actual rape...like when a kid is actually being sexually abused, where not only are they too young to give consent...they straight up don't consent. This also covers anytime they are too young to even understand what's happening, and are being victimized by someone they trust. Rape is something that is done TO YOU...not WITH you. Other time…
/r/PussyPassDenied17/12/21 09:20 PM
3

Statutory rape is often consensual...and there is a big difference between consensual sex and rape.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/12/21 05:23 PM
1

You always get a reduced sentence for taking the deal...it just also requires you to plead guilty. If you really feel that you are innocent, and can prove it in court...then you are rolling the dice with the full sentence as punishment.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/12/21 05:22 PM
-3

Except that the current running meme on this topic, is that if a woman has a height preference, you should ask her how much she weighs, just to show her how superficial and wrong it is to have that preference. That's preference shaming. It shouldn't matter if someone has a preference...as long as they aren't an asshole about it. It's fine to want a woman with large breasts, or a guy that's over 6' tall...just don't be out there making everyone who doesn't fit that template feel inadequate, just …
/r/MensRights25/10/21 12:56 PM
-13

Ok, but seriously...all the guys complaining about their preferences being treated as sexism, while also complaining that the height thing is sexism, is pretty ironic.
/r/MensRights25/10/21 01:00 AM
-1

No...I don't. What "problem" do you see with all that? All this shit should be a standard part of sex ed, as far as I'm concerned. Not just what part of the body goes where, and how to put on a condom. A person's sexual education should also cover the emotional and mental challenges associated with it. There should be entire chapters reserved for things like respect, etiquette, personal hygiene, relationship expectations, etc. You want people to grow up with a mature and realistic understanding …
/r/MensRights06/10/21 01:23 PM
-10

How is this a feminist agenda? I think it's important that boys learn this...especially if they're going to an all boys school. I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of these kids have almost no regular contact with girls, so everything they're likely to "know" about them, is going to be learned from other 14 year old boys. Imagine the bullshit that they're going to have unlearn, once they get out into the real world, and actually start interacting with real girls.
/r/MensRights06/10/21 03:48 AM
6

Why did it take 35 days to get a DNA test, and why was he in jail while they waited for it?
/r/MensRights02/09/21 05:46 PM
4

Skaters use the iron cross all the time in their board art and graffiti. It's only considered a white supremacy thing, if it's accompanied by the swastika. And to be fair...I've seen the pictures...hers looks like it might just be a four leaf clover.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/06/21 05:58 PM
1

No, dude...this was a judge. As in, someone who sets real legal precedent in cases like this.
/r/MensRights13/05/21 01:46 PM
10

This is just as disgusting as forcing an underaged girl to give birth to her rapists child. Whoever the fuck makes these decisions, needs a psychiatric evaluation.
/r/MensRights13/05/21 01:12 AM
1

That's fair.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/01/21 07:48 PM
2

Honestly...I don't think statutory rape is ok. I think the woman should be charged and prosecuted...and at least sentenced to some kind of psychiatric care, if not prison. But I also don't think applying the label of "rape victim" to a 15 year old boy, who most likely consented to the situation, is appropriate. I doubt he sees himself as a victim, so calling him one is probably going to do him more harm than good.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/01/21 07:40 PM
4

It doesn’t fucking matter if one party “consented” it’s still fucked up and not right legally or morally. Stop excusing rape. It is a slippery slope...you're right. Rape isn't consensual. It is a violation...physically, mentally and emotionally. Do you know how fucked up it makes someone, when something they would have otherwise enjoyed, is labelled by society as "sick" or "disgusting", or in some other way "immoral" or "wrong"? I'm pretty sure this kid doesn't need that additional stigma attach…
/r/PussyPassDenied07/01/21 07:36 PM
1

So, you know a 15 year old boy who had consensual sex with an older woman, and yet also believes he was raped? That's messed up.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/01/21 07:19 PM
1

"People like me" know a lot about 15 year old boys...seeing as how I used to be one. How about you?
/r/PussyPassDenied07/01/21 06:51 PM
1

Well it's a good thing he's got people like you to tell him he's a victim...because otherwise he probably wouldn't know that.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/01/21 06:42 PM
1

You're right...stealing a car involves an actual victim.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/01/21 06:26 PM
-2

That's like saying if he helped a 25 year old steal a car, he'd count as the victim. This kid participated.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/01/21 06:22 PM
-6

That's true...but I doubt he was objecting to that law being broken. In fact, I'm pretty sure he's an accessory to the crime.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/01/21 06:19 PM
-1

"By law" be damned. If a 15 year old is old enough to shoplift, he's old enough to willingly break this law too...and you better believe he walked right into this, with both eyes open, and zero hesitation about the consequences. Sure, she should have known better than to do this...but calling this "rape" does nothing but diminish real cases of violent sexual assault. Being raped is a big deal...willingly having sex with an older woman is not even close to the same thing.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/01/21 06:16 PM
3

I'm sure the fact that his mom found out, is the only trauma he's experienced.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/01/21 06:10 PM
1

It was going on for nine months...either someone else figured it out, or the kid just couldn't stop bragging about it. /s
/r/PussyPassDenied26/11/20 10:57 PM
1

Or if the victims would only stop high-fiving each other. /s
/r/PussyPassDenied26/11/20 10:54 PM
1

Don't stick your dick in crazy, son. She sounds kind of fucked up.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/11/20 10:54 PM
1

This was "statutory rape", as opposed to what you used to call rape. /s
/r/PussyPassDenied26/11/20 10:53 PM
1

So...part of treatment is that you have to admit to other crimes? Isn't that a violation of her 5th amendment rights? For clarity: I'm not defending her actions...just wondering out loud if this is considered "fair game" given the fact that it does seem to violate the 5th.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/11/20 10:52 PM
-7

Sounds like she needs to get the divorce then. Lol!
/r/PussyPassDenied24/09/20 11:54 PM
0

Agreed. If you aren't happy with your situation, change it. This isn't a "man/woman" thing...it's just a basic life-lesson.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/09/20 11:53 PM
-10

Wut? Dude...if you don't want your own wife touching you, get a fucking divorce.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/09/20 11:28 PM
2

Expecting men not give their stones a little breathing room, is like asking women to keep their arms crossed at all times.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/05/20 11:12 PM
-10

Sorry...you lost me at Tucker Carlson.
/r/MensRights27/02/20 02:06 PM
1

Is she trying to imply that changing tires is a "man's job"?
/r/PussyPassDenied08/01/20 11:08 PM
0

Jeezus people...look at her. What 15 year old boy wouldn't sleep with her?
/r/PussyPassDenied11/12/19 08:56 PM
2

these women I think you're getting "these women" mixed up. What celebrities and rich people are you talking about? The teenaged boys?
/r/PussyPassDenied05/11/19 01:38 PM
21

Unpopular opinion...those boys were all high-fiving each other afterwards. Not one of them got emotionally disrupted by this.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/11/19 12:25 AM
7

r/woooosh
/r/PussyPassDenied15/10/19 01:34 PM
1

A number of people have been calling for the death of white men Are you talking about twitter idiots? Yeah, there are all kinds of assholes in the world...the trick is to not BE one of them. Isn't this what allegedly happened in Nazi Germany? No, it isn't. As in, literally...no. Making this comparison is so intellectually dishonest it's ridiculous. But lets get back to the point... I have no idea how many white men have lost jobs because of such policies First of all, you can't lose a job you ne…
/r/MensRights26/09/19 03:04 PM
1

So, you don't care that your argument is effectively pointless in reality? You're sticking with it because it helps you justify your misplaced persecution complex? Have fun with that.
/r/MensRights26/09/19 12:34 PM
1

Hmmm. You know what I'd be really curious about? How many white, male applicants actually lose a position to a woman and/or minority? I'd be willing to bet the reason they throw that disclaimer on there is because they simply don't get any applicants that qualify and also happen to be women and/or visible minorities...especially if there are "several hundred" job openings available. That implies there aren't a lot of qualified applicants in general...so I'd assume they'd take as many people as t…
/r/MensRights25/09/19 11:35 PM
1

I probably have several hundred job advertisements in my inbox that specify explicit hiring preference for women and minorities. What positions are only hiring women and minorities? I'm curious. And you need to remember...if white people ever do become a minority in Canada...then those very same rights and freedoms you disagree with now, will be there to protect you, as well. That's what they're for.
/r/MensRights25/09/19 06:40 PM
1

Equality Rights Equality before and under law and equal protection and benefit of law 15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability. Marginal note:Affirmative action programs (2) Subsection (1) does not preclude any law, program or activity that ha…
/r/MensRights25/09/19 12:44 PM
1

Where? I don't remember reading anything in the Canadian constitution about that.
/r/MensRights24/09/19 10:15 PM
2

"Positive" discrimination?
/r/MensRights24/09/19 10:14 PM
0

That's completely different. The only reason female circumcision is performed, is to prevent a woman from enjoying sex. They don't just remove the skin around the clitoris...they remove the whole thing. It would be the equivalent to removing the entire head of your penis, and not just the foreskin.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 10:50 PM
-3

Most immigrants are not circumcised and if anything they are discriminated by their race you massive donkey. Muslims practice circumcision. I'm not sure which immigrants you think outnumber the total of Muslims that have recently settled in Europe...but after the refugee crisis that started in 2015, there was a major push in several European countries to ban the practice of circumcision altogether. White nationalist groups were pumping millions of euros into the effort, hoping that the laws woul…
/r/MensRights07/08/19 10:35 PM
-6

You guys need to stop thinking you're "speaking up for all men" on this issue. You're only speaking for yourselves, not circumcised men. Most of you are grossly uninformed on this subject, and don't even realize that this whole movement was started by white nationalists in Europe to discriminate against immigrants and their cultural practices. It has literally nothing to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 09:16 PM
2

Yeah, most of the time the courts tend to treat them the same, unless you actually follow through on the the threat. In cases of extortion, you can also be charged with additional things like assault, vandalism, etc, which can add to your sentence considerably...whereas blackmail is usually non-violent in nature, so tends to be a stand-alone charge.
/r/MensRights06/08/19 11:09 PM
7

Same concept...slightly different execution. Extortion is when you directly threaten someone, in some way, in order to obtain something from them. ie...I'll throw you in jail, if you don't go to war. Blackmail is when you threaten to reveal something about someone, in order to obtain something from them. ie...I'll tell everyone you're gay, if you don't go to war.
/r/MensRights06/08/19 10:47 PM
2

This is the same retarded logic that right-wingers use against Muslims. Well, well, well...how the turntables.
/r/MensRights05/08/19 04:16 PM
1

I don't understand why there's so much hate for guys who spread out a little. You try pinching your thighs together and then sitting on your own nut-sack...see how comfortable you are. Ladies...imagine having to shove your breasts under your armpits and hold them there, just so that some childish men on the bus don't get all "offended" when you "shove 'em in people's faces" by just letting them hang out in front. I guarantee you, you hear that comment more than twice, and you'll stop wearing a b…
/r/PussyPassDenied24/07/19 10:38 PM
1

I only focused on the take-away you seemed to be focused on...which was a little weird, considering all the other stuff in that article.
/r/MensRights08/06/19 01:06 PM
0

Oh really? What are "Americans" then? Because the last time I checked, there were millions of Jews and Muslims in America. Are they not "American" enough?
/r/MensRights08/06/19 01:05 PM
-5

Circumcision exists because some doctor thought it would cure leg paralysis Ummm...sure buddy. I guess that explains how Jews and Muslims have been doing it for centuries, huh? Because some dude in the 1870's had an idea about paralysis? It's a pretty common practice among many cultures that originate from hotter climates, as it keeps the penis clean and dry, and reduces the chances of skin irritation and childhood infections. But sure...let's pretend it was because of some American guy...becaus…
/r/MensRights08/06/19 04:57 AM
-16

Lol!! Why are uncut men so threatened by circumcision? It's like when feminists attack other women...it only hurts your cause.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 08:15 PM
6

I sure hope Alabama has top-notch investigators looking into every rape allegation, then...because this could go seriously side-ways, real fast.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/05/19 11:07 PM
-1

I think you're still talking about when it doesn't work. When it does work...kids get found before they wind up buried in a shallow grave out in the woods...and the person who would have put them there, is behind bars. And just so you know...potential criminals don't "look up to" child molesters, unless they're potential child molesters themselves. This should, if anything, be a deterrent for those. If anything, the system should also include a follow up, explaining the result of the alert. In t…
/r/MensRights21/03/19 08:35 PM
2

And yet, when it works...
/r/MensRights21/03/19 07:58 PM
1

I wasn't "hurt", you arrogant, self-righteous idiot. How dare you include me in your bullshit. How dare you include anyone else in your bullshit. You are speaking about things you have never experienced, and are categorically wrong about. Not only that, you are helping to promote laws that are overtly discriminatory towards refugees and religious minorities in Europe. You should be ashamed of yourself, patting yourself on the back like you're some kind of Saint. You're nothing more than a stooge…
/r/MensRights03/03/19 08:58 PM
1

Well then I guess that makes you a gullible rube, who's being used to push right-wing propaganda on-line. Congratulations.
/r/MensRights03/03/19 06:59 PM
1

And I have to thank you for this argument...I had no idea this whole issue was being pushed by anti-immigration groups across Europe. I just thought you guys were just misinformed...now I get it...this is all a white nationalist anti-immigration propaganda campaign. You guys need to grow up.
/r/MensRights03/03/19 06:34 PM
1

Wow...so you're just an idiot. Do you even know how to check references on-line? Do you even bother trying? You have shown yourself to be completely ignorant and uninformed...and apparently have no intention of learning anything. Have fun in your racist facebook groups, dude.
/r/MensRights03/03/19 04:52 PM
1

Wow...so you counter an actual medical study with a list of anti-Muslim advocacy groups and outdated public statements about not recommending "routine circumcisions" in some countries? Ok..so ignoring the far-right bigotry for a second...do you even know what it means when medical associations don't recommend "routine" procedures? It means that they don't recommend that it be done as a matter of "standard policy". That does NOT mean that they don't think it has any benefit...and it definitely do…
/r/MensRights02/03/19 05:26 PM
1

Read the fucking study I posted earlier, dude. Check the data. Do the math. Jesus Christ...learn something.
/r/MensRights01/03/19 11:57 PM
1

What does this have to do with circumcision, except to illustrate the fact that this would never happen to someone who is circumcised?
/r/MensRights01/03/19 09:33 PM
1

You keep talking about this like there are no health benefits to doing it. There are. Just because you want to ignore that, doesn't mean it's any less true. And when you start talking about taking away a parents right to make decisions for their kids health, based on that ignorance...then you've stepped over a line from simply having an opinion on the subject, and being one of those facebook moms that seriously needs to take a step back and have a good hard look at themselves. What latent issues…
/r/MensRights01/03/19 09:30 PM
1

Majorities don't mean shit when you're talking about opinions. It doesn't make them any more true, no matter how many people share them. Making laws based on your opinions is one of the worst things a society can do...all it does is promote ignorance and discrimination. I find it hilarious that you think people should be "glad about their dick"...as long as it looks like yours. Very inclusive...you're an inspiration to us all.
/r/MensRights01/03/19 09:04 PM
1

Get off your high horse, dude. You still haven't shown any reasons for it being bad, except that you don't agree with it. That's not a reason to ban it, any more than banning ear-piercings or tattoos, if you simply consider it for the appearance aspects...or nasal bypass surgery to stop someone from snoring and to help them sleep better, for the sake of enhancing their quality of life. They aren't "necessary" for anything...but they're still options for those who want them, for the sake of conve…
/r/MensRights01/03/19 08:22 PM
1

a pro mutilating culture Jesus, man...stop clutching your pearls. Like I said...you sound exactly like a facebook mom talking about teatree oil. You don't make assumptions about genital mutilation (and how natural penises work?) since it was done to you and it is all you've ever known? And you think you know what it "feels" like to be circumcised...except that you don't. You're basing your entire argument on the purely subjective idea that people who are cut are somehow negatively impacted by be…
/r/MensRights01/03/19 07:11 PM
1

What's even stranger, is that you keep assuming I'm American. You seem to make a lot of assumptions.
/r/MensRights01/03/19 06:03 PM
1

I was referring to the part where you think it's normal that everyone smells...not the part about cleaning your junk. It sounds like someone who tries to justify their body odor by saying how "natural" it is.
/r/MensRights01/03/19 04:26 PM
1

I can only go on the one example I've personally seen...my little brother (step-brother). He wasn't circumcised until he was 18...and it was his choice to get it done. He had a bunch of issues myself and my older brother never had to deal with growing up, and was pretty pissed at his Dad (my step-father) for not getting it done. None of it was life-threatening, or even terribly serious...but it was enough to affect his quality of life to the extent that he went out and had it done.
/r/MensRights01/03/19 04:20 PM
1

Women complain about.. wtf are you on about? Women/men if they dont wash they will smell.. jesus christ. The fact that you find this normal, just tells me my parents made the right decision. ​
/r/MensRights01/03/19 04:11 PM
0

It IS my dick. And of course it matters what I WOULD do. If they hadn't had me circumcised as a baby...I would have gotten it done as soon as I was old enough to sign the consent form. I've always known this. Not "having the choice" as a baby, is what's irrelevant. I'm glad they made that choice.
/r/MensRights01/03/19 02:03 PM
1

Huh, sucks to be you guys then...it sounds like you have a lot more work to do, just to keep yourselves clean. No wonder women complain about the smell. I didn't need "lessons" on how to clean my dick...but sure, if that's what you're into...then be my guest, and raise your sons however you want. It's your choice.
/r/MensRights01/03/19 01:51 PM
1

Sure, I googled it...what are you expecting me to say? That people in Europe use more condoms? No shit...considering the US has the worst education system in the western world when it comes to sex. Everything there is religion-based...so of course they have more STD infections...they teach their kids NOT to use condoms. But none of that has anything to do with circumcision, does it? Those aren't even the kinds of infections that study is talking about...so nice strawman...would you care to try a…
/r/MensRights28/02/19 09:16 PM
1

Holy crap. The "guy I referenced" is referencing actual medical data. He's not making this shit up...he's drawing on case data from all over the place. Are you claiming that the source material is biased because the guy who looked it up has some kind of agenda? And what exactly IS his agenda? Do you think he just likes "mutilating babies" for fun? Is there some kind of big pay-day involved in the "circumcision industry"? Do you even listen to yourself with this shit? You sound like a soccer mom …
/r/MensRights28/02/19 08:52 PM
1

Do some research, buddy...claiming that it only happens in North America is total bullshit. It happens less in places that have higher rates of circumcision. Rates of infection increase in places that don't. ... https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5439293/ ... Seriously...read that study, and just start to wrap your head around the sheer number of potential infections that you're exposing your son to, and the rates for each of them. We're talking about hundreds of thousands, if not mill…
/r/MensRights28/02/19 07:58 PM
1

Citations please, on the number of people who've been negatively impacted by a successful circumcision? I get that if you botch the job, there are potential long-term consequences...but if not, where are the down-sides? If anything, we should be working on better methods to reduce complications...but that's the same for any medical procedure. An outright ban, just drives people to adopt more risky methods. This isn't a matter of debate...it's just a fact. And to say that it serves no purpose is …
/r/MensRights28/02/19 06:43 PM
1

Except that's the only reason you guys are against it...and yet, there's literally nothing wrong with my dick. So, yeah...this whole argument is based on a made-up issue, because you guys are into auto-outraging yourselves. There are plenty of things children aren't old enough to "decide for themselves". Parents make those decisions because if there's even the smallest possibility that it might help their kids at some point...they do it. Should we stop letting parents make any of those decisions…
/r/MensRights28/02/19 04:06 PM
1

Oh look...pictures of penises.
/r/MensRights28/02/19 03:47 PM
0

It's my dick. What I think is the only thing that IS relevant. If I'd had the choice, I'd have made the same one.
/r/MensRights28/02/19 03:47 PM
0

Screw you guys...I'm glad I'm cut. Best decision my parents ever made. 10/10 would do it again.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 11:25 PM
1

It doesn't...people are just ridiculous.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 11:23 PM
-5

Ok, now I'm really confused...what are you mad about again? The fact that they don't make videos about that kind of thing? Are you saying they should? What exactly is your beef here?
/r/MensRights20/01/19 04:34 PM
-4

No, it's not...and I don't. I'm just wondering if Gillette actually puts out ads that do shit on men, or if you're just making hypothetical comparisons? I haven't seen any, but maybe I just missed the offensive stuff.
/r/MensRights20/01/19 04:09 PM
-6

So it's a "what if Gillette was willing to shame men" sort of thing? I'm confused. Did they actually put out an ad where black men criticize other black men?
/r/MensRights20/01/19 03:59 PM
3

Lol!! This is like the Onion, right?
/r/MensRights23/12/18 10:37 PM
1

How nuts do you have to be to hold a grudge for several years, and THEN take your "revenge"?
/r/MensRights16/11/18 09:59 PM
3

She must have realized she only likes 'em young.
/r/MensRights16/10/18 07:02 PM
13

So in other words...still physically capable...just a piece of shit.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 07:26 PM
33

"Requires that the payment amounts be maintained without regard for the physical capability" How's that work now?
/r/MensRights19/09/18 05:16 PM
4

Your a man now...shut up and just deal with it. ;)
/r/MensRights21/08/18 08:12 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter