TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ArchangelleVader Archive

View 0 posts and 89 comments by ArchangelleVader on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

The gender roles are most likely rooted in a varying mixture of nature and nuture. It's your interpretation that masculinity means that a man who cooks is pussified. It's not what was meant at all. Traditional masculine values are independence, honour, self-restraint and willpower, etc. Attributes valuable, of course, also in women, but primarily associated with masculinity through history, not only fifty years ago.
/r/MensRights14/07/12 11:46 AM
-5

A gross oversimplification. And what's the alternative in reality? That new norms replace old ones, not some kind of liberty where people magically let go of their tendency to build group identities. And suppose gender roles are partially rooted in biology, as is likely. Then you will forever be fighting something which can never go away, and those who prefer traditional behaviour will be demonized by the PC thought police as they already are now every now and then.
/r/MensRights14/07/12 01:11 AM
-6

Yes, not to mention their foul sexual practices.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 08:34 PM
-4

Actually they were rather accurate compared to modern conceptions.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 07:50 PM
-7

Homophilia.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 07:50 PM
1

It is one thing to be tolerant of deviations from the norm, but if it in reality is the case, which many things indicate, that biology matter a lot then trying to completely remove all established norms is a futile, possibly even damaging endevour.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 07:48 PM
-9

Well, they weren't. They did have the sense to not normalize perversions, though.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 07:41 PM
1

Have you ever thought that there could possibly be biological reasons? And that the proportion of biological influence compared to societal influence for people's choices is not clear at all? Not only in this question but in many others.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 07:40 PM
-14

How comfortable for you to simply dismiss others as trolls. Perhaps you would belong better in /r/circlejerk if that's what you want men's rights to be.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 06:30 PM
-2

You think you're being original claiming that "homophobe" = closet case? Were most people in 1950 closet cases, you think?
/r/MensRights13/07/12 06:20 PM
-7

lol
/r/MensRights13/07/12 06:13 PM
-13

Does this "society" exist independently of its citizens? If not, should these citizens who apparantly are slaves to whatever is the popular opinion rather than independently thinking persons have the right to vote? Surely they cannot be very competent if they let "society" control their thoughts and actions like sheep. Such zombies should obviously not determine the future of the country. Even if we could reason in terms of what "society" wants, a society which glorifies metrosexuality and weakn…
/r/MensRights13/07/12 06:11 PM
0

The reality is that men seek money because men are taught that their identities revolve around it. That's new to me. Who is doing this teaching? When does it happen? No one ever said to me I must make a lot of money or that I'm a loser as a man if I make average pay.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 06:01 PM
-21

Nope. I can say fuck you to a lot of people while not believing they should have less than equal legal rights. Also, "society" doesn't force shit. People make choices. Funny how some praise democracy on the one hand, completely trusting the public's ability to make sound judgements and choose well, while on the other hand they demonize "society" as a "thing" that basically brainwashes and controls its inhabitants.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 05:53 PM
1

Yes.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 05:50 PM
3

They too are best kept in private. Can't believe some people think it's nice when people go exposing themselves or perform sexual acts in public.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 05:39 PM
-29

Don't know what manhood academy is except that they spam links here. While I believe in equal rights, I don't think abolishing all gender norms is a good idea. In fact, it is an idea primarily promoted by radical feminists for their own twisted ideological reasons. In practice, it means rootless and confused rather than free men and women.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 05:31 PM
0

They are free to leave and move to any of the many black countries and see if they feel less oppressed there.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 05:27 PM
-10

Disgusting perversions have no place in the public.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 05:20 PM
1

If we ship them back to their beloved Africa they can go live free of the oh so horrible white man. Problem solved.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 05:16 PM
-86

If the supposedly fantastic lack of traditional gender roles mean pussified men and metrosexuals, then no thanks.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 04:56 PM
17

and also cited her psychiatrist (she believed that she was an honest-to-God vampire) and her online community of 'friends' ("The important thing about children raising is getting them to drink blood early so they develop the desire for it. Otherwise, like me, you'll have to force them accepting their sanguine heritage.") as further evidence that she was harmful to the children. Wow.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 11:53 PM
5

Don't underestimate the number of white knights in the male population. They would support feminist politicians even though they themselves get discriminated against by his policies.
/r/MensRights11/07/12 07:48 PM
2

Theft is not only a legal term. People tend to use the term murder even when it's technically not. I don't care if killing civilians legally is called collateral damage or whatever, and it doesn't really matter that North Korea doesn't call shooting defectors murder, I'm still going to call it murder and you don't see many objecting to that. They object to calling taxes theft though because of ideological conflict. The legitimacy of linguistic sloppiness is clearly related to ideology.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 11:05 PM
2

Squirrel may be gender neutral, but now they have another problem: speciesism!
/r/MensRights09/07/12 09:47 PM
4

That's hilarious. Usually feminists are very quiet about Muslims though. I wonder if they realize how hypocritical they are when they ignore Islamic sexism because they are afraid of offending immigrants by criticising their garbage culture.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 09:41 PM
1

I just think it's very human to be an asshole and every society necessarily has it's share of them - of course, not importing more of them would be good policy... It's not like some would have you believe, that poverty makes people go out at night and rape people, just because rapists tend to be poor. The left basically has unlimited belief in social engineering and in reforming people. The problem is, some persons are just trash in a human disguise and born that way. The constructive way to dea…
/r/MensRights08/07/12 08:55 PM
1

Oh yes, the prisons in Scandinavia are a joke. A common source of frustration for decent people too, when you regularly read in the news about criminals (most often immigrants) who are let out after a short vacation in the cell only to further terrorize the community...
/r/MensRights08/07/12 08:29 PM
2

Like in A Clockwork Orange. Yeah, sounds much better.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 05:17 PM
2

reactionary lol
/r/MensRights08/07/12 05:16 PM
0

Just a bad joke.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 02:47 AM
4

Her body is her body only if my wallet is my wallet.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 11:11 PM
-4

He's also black.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 11:03 PM
-1

They are a highly positive force in the natural sciences, and in the technology sector, or at least they were, I don't know how many of them are involved there now but Israel's doing well on that front. It's not black and white; however, their past involvement in certain social movements do deserve to be analyzed rather than ignored.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 09:51 PM
-2

Jews have been a destructive force in social justice and civil rights movements. The crazy feminists leaders were an example. As for why, it is hard to say. Perhaps they feel uncomfortable as a minority group and take it out on others by advocating ideas intensely critical of their host society, even if the ideas make little logical sense.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 09:07 PM
-2

It shows that in some way ethnicity is a factor in this. If it was the motivations of feminist "thinkers" that was the subject...
/r/MensRights06/07/12 08:36 PM
1

I think it's a noble goal, though perhaps going a bit too far - I wouldn't eliminate all animal testing, but striving for everyone going vegetarian or even vegan is a worthy though ambitious goal. There's massive suffering in many of the industries using animals. As for the kill rates, other animal shelters don't kill as much because they let kill shelters do that for them. There's simply not enough resources for all the animals that irresponsible people have abandoned. It would be wonderful if …
/r/MensRights06/07/12 07:37 PM
2

Why don't you have to concede it? I won't argue the second point however.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 06:50 PM
2

Perhaps euthanasia is the more merciful option when resources are limited and the alternative is letting the countless of millions of abandoned animals die from disease and starvation.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 06:32 PM
-2

Very many of the most influential crazy feminists were Jews: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Jewish_feminists
/r/MensRights06/07/12 06:23 PM
1

Lol @ you defending Communist mass murderers.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 12:00 AM
1

Well all evidence points to it... Reddit is full of batshit, powerhungry, oversensitive leftists. When they get any real world power, millions die. When they infiltrate academia, they start spreading reality denying bullshit around like postmodernism, patriarchy theory etc. Where are the positive examples? They don't make the news anyway.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 10:51 PM
0

Not talking about economics bro. The left is so much more than that. Social democracy is fine, but a typical radical leftist is a rotten soul striving to inflict her misery upon the world.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 10:31 PM
0

I'm just saying their ideas are related, and that they tend to belong to the same kind of circles, not that they all agree on everything. Everyone knows the radical left has a gazillion branches on it's poisonous tree, but they all deserve to be chopped off and burned to ashes with a healthy dose of scepticism and common sense.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 08:19 PM
-2

Perhaps you didn't notice that feminists are almost always leftists? There's huge overlap in those circles and quite often the social justice warriors are both feminists, socialists, "anti-racists"... Just look at SRS or r/anarchism for local examples. So it's no coincidence when they see the world in a similar manner, always looking to portray themselves and selected groups they identify with as helpless victims in a world ruled by some Western, male, white, or rich conspiracy.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 07:35 PM
-1

Obviously they got their obsession with the world being divided into oppressors and oppressed from Marxism. They do it with men and women instead of capitalists and workers, just as Marxist-inspired "antiracists" do with Whites and non-Whites, etc.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 07:20 PM
2

My post only partially right, but the statistics still support the idea that teachers grade unfairly. According to a magazine for teachers, the girls still perform better than boys on the anonymous exams, but the gender gap is significantly smaller on them. http://www.lararnasnyheter.se/lararnas-tidning/2011/02/09/pojkar-missgynnas-betygsattningen However, this was for anonymous exams given to high school students. For anonymous exams given to mainly young adults for testing college aptitude, me…
/r/MensRights02/07/12 02:25 PM
2

1 Corinthians 11:3 But I want you to understand that the head of every man is Christ, the head of a woman is her husband, and the head of Christ is God. 1 Corinthians 14 33: ...As in all the churches of the saints, 34: the women should keep silence in the churches. For they are not permitted to speak, but should be subordinate, as even the law says. 35: If there is anything they desire to know, let them ask their husbands at home. For it is shameful for a woman to speak in church.
/r/MensRights01/07/12 07:20 PM
9

It should be noted that boys didn't perform worse on anonymous exams. Which may mean that teachers are prone to giving girls better grades unjustly.
/r/MensRights01/07/12 07:11 PM
-2

What they say is that you can be born a male, and then when fashionable decide that you're now a woman (or a goat, or both) and no longer a man, but you still have your male organs left so you could get prostate cancer anyway.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 06:13 PM
-1

The "everything is a social construct because biogical reality doesn't confirm my liberal ideology" people would say a womyn (or a dragon or an electric motor) can get prostate cancer if he/she/it was previously a man.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 05:50 PM
-1

There are those who argue that a person born with prostate, penis and all can still be a woman if he really, really wants to because gender is a social construct.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 05:45 PM
5

Perhaps increasing the PC-ness to ridiculous levels may work against them.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 04:06 PM
0

Well according to some people women can get prostate cancer...
/r/MensRights30/06/12 03:49 PM
-6

Fuck off SRS
/r/MensRights28/06/12 11:16 PM
1

You have a point, but people seem to regard, for example, profiling as racist. Because targeting groups, regardless of intent, is seen as offensive (except, curiously, in the case of affirmative action). I don't think it's always bad, but one should at least be consistent.
/r/MensRights25/06/12 04:45 PM
1

Race is a hard to define term as I believe you know. Ethnic group is a better fit as it includes cultural aspects. And it is certainly true that it's possible to dislike and discriminate members of the ethnic outgrup regardless of possible biological diffferences. For example, white Americans earlier had low opinions of some white Europan groups, like the Irish, and Hitler hated Slavs. I would argue that Gypsies' dislike of non-Gypsies (this is simplified of course as there are several kinds of …
/r/MensRights25/06/12 03:53 PM
2

How about... If the gypsy exclusively targets non-gypsies in his crimes, can he be concluded to be racist? What would this imply about gypsy culture, assuming that such behaviour was relatively common?
/r/MensRights25/06/12 03:28 PM
8

Surely you don't mean to imply that a major feminist organization would represent a large portion of feminists.
/r/MensRights25/06/12 03:25 PM
1

Is it racism when a gypsy attacks a white person?
/r/MensRights25/06/12 03:18 PM
16

patriarchal lol
/r/MensRights24/06/12 03:39 PM
3

Would you have a problem with your wife or daughter sleeping with dozens of men?
/r/MensRights23/06/12 10:40 PM
5

As the comments show, this only shows that the median would be a more meaningful measure than the average. The average says nothing about how the sex is distributed.
/r/MensRights22/06/12 09:46 AM
1

Unfortunately. But there is power in being many. If enough MRAs were dedicated to edit warring at Wikipedia it would not be so easy for feminist editors.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 12:16 PM
1

That sounds lovely.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 11:35 AM
0

Common knowledge is not thought provoking.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 07:14 PM
4

Then edit the Wikipedia page.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 07:04 PM
0

Oh. Sorry. I thought you were the other poster and serious about the Wikipedia thing.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 10:10 PM
-7

Really now. If you made a study, do you not think a majority of people who identifies as feminists would agree to conspiratorial and bigoted statements like "men have too much power in society" or "we should support affirmative action for women"? How about "there's an epidemic of male violence against women"? The fair feminists, who are merely interested in equality, that people talk about when we criticise feminism seem almost mythical in reality.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 08:55 PM
4

Source?
/r/MensRights17/06/12 08:41 PM
1

Most males are against violent behavior - that's enough proof that violence can't be said to be part of masculine norms in general.
/r/MensRights07/06/12 03:46 PM
1

Because some biological arguments are false, every is? No, our culture does not glorify violence and violence is not part of masculine norms except in criminal subcultures.
/r/MensRights07/06/12 03:20 PM
2

How about Jewish privilege? Jews are overrepresented in the halls of power (academia, media, government) and statistically are financially much better off than the average citizen.
/r/MensRights07/06/12 12:28 PM
1

Bullshit. Being violent is not a part of any common masculine norms because most men despise violence and most successful men, who are seen as highly masculine, are not violent at all. Glorification of violence is more of a subculture thing. That most violent people are men is probably because of biology, however.
/r/MensRights07/06/12 12:26 PM
1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allied_war_crimes
/r/MensRights07/06/12 12:37 AM
1

There were many Allied war crimes. They just chose to ignore them and as victors they had the power to do that.
/r/MensRights07/06/12 12:23 AM
1

Funny thing, how they did not care about Allied war crimes. Sure sounds like impartial judges.
/r/MensRights07/06/12 12:10 AM
1

One good thing they did. Another is banning cruel Jewish slaughter methods.
/r/MensRights07/06/12 12:09 AM
1

I'm sure he will be scarred for life by this traumatic experience.
/r/MensRights02/06/12 08:57 AM
3

Then edit the article to reflext that.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 12:52 PM
3

The question then is why anyone should care whether they support it.
/r/MensRights26/05/12 04:58 PM
0

There is also, more importantly, the question of whether what Jeffreys and her supporters say about trans people constitutes hate speech. As of two days ago, the Conway Hall expressed their concerns about the legality of trans exclusion, and about hate speech, to the conference organisers. It's hilarious when PC activists get a taste of their own totalitarian medicine.
/r/MensRights26/05/12 11:23 AM
3

The women's centre should not have any authority on what a men's centre should do. Imagine if there existed a men's centre but no such place for women, and some students rightfully wanted a women's centre but then people associated with the men's centre came with a bunch of demands. It would be equally bizarre.
/r/MensRights26/05/12 11:05 AM
1

Do you have proof of this jury being racist?
/r/MensRights26/05/12 10:37 AM
12

http://regender.com/swap/http://www.forbes.com/sites/jennagoudreau/2012/05/21/a-new-obstacle-for-professional-women-the-glass-escalator/
/r/MensRights23/05/12 11:27 AM
1

So a former president of a large feminist organization supports financial abortion? Did she when she was still president?
/r/MensRights22/05/12 10:48 AM
1

Yes. My point was that rich people are not villains either. They just have had the resources to do massively bad things sometimes.
/r/MensRights20/05/12 08:11 AM
1

But most famous philosophers, artists, scientists were "rich" too... Poor people did not have much of a chance to become famous.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 10:59 PM
1

Is it really true that most molesters are male? Why would it be so?
/r/MensRights18/05/12 04:56 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter