TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ArgKyckling Archive

View 1 post and 44 comments by ArgKyckling on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
11

Edu./Occu.ArgKyckling/r/MensRights23/09/15 08:41 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Gender being a construct or not has nothing to do with biology affecting behaviour though. Everyone agrees that biology affects behaviour.
/r/MensRights25/11/22 03:10 PM
1

What does this even mean, of course biology affects behaviour literally everyone agrees with that
/r/MensRights25/11/22 03:05 PM
1

I guess I was wrong. This is really cool actually! It seems he did consume small amounts of sugar and milk, and "unspecified amounts" of yeast, but still, I didn't think you'd survive with just that even if you had this much body fat to begin with.
/r/MensRights16/11/22 12:44 PM
1

I can believe the 2-3 week fastings, sure. The 3 weeks without food is a bit false, more meant as a guideline for when you can die, not meant as the absolute longest anyone can go. The true maximum time is a few months if you're lucky, but over a year without food is absolute bullshit. It's like those people who claim they live just off of their faith and haven't eaten in 10 years. Yeah, sure. These people are lying.
/r/MensRights16/11/22 05:44 AM
2

Well I can't say I know what definition libertarians use, but everyone else defines it as when the businesses, industry, and trade in a nation are owned by private individuals to produce profit. I know libertarians desire small government, no intervention in the market, etc. But I wasn't aware they used a different definition of capitalism. What would the libertarian definition be? Would it have to be an absolute free market with no rules or regulations on it to be real capitalism? Or is it enou…
/r/MensRights13/09/22 11:02 AM
1

Aren't like 99% of all democracies capitalist though? Unless I'm misunderstanding the quote it seems like the opposite of reality.
/r/MensRights13/09/22 01:00 AM
2

This article states that the Social Democrats would get 60% of the vote if only women voted, and 40% of the vote if only men voted. However this article is talking about a survey done by the news station of voters on election day. It is not actual votes. The social democrats ended up actually getting 30.5% of the total vote in the election so the survey turned out to be very innacurate anyways, but that was to be expected. No one thought they would get 40% of the vote, that would be unthinkable.
/r/MensRights13/09/22 12:56 AM
5

Very important to mention that according to the article that defense actually worked, and then another very similar case happened not too long after. This law seems over the top and unneccessary at first glance, but "well they didn't fight back" cannot be allowed to be a legal defense against rape, so it might actually be a needed law change there.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 02:16 PM
1

Nothing magical about it really. We just keep moving forward as a society. We moved past slavery, we are moving away from racism, and we are moving away from homophobia. On a side note calling a sexual preference an illness will never not be funny to me. Absolutely horrible and disgusting, but funny. Like, imagine if people who preferred redheads were put away, or anyone who liked tall partners got put in jail. The whole situation is frankly absurd.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 11:22 PM
26

I think that literally all he's saying is that for her to go to prison, a second, separate trial would have to be held, on the matter of her crime, be that slander, obstruction of justice, or perhaps perjury. No one can be convicted of anything during someone elses trial. I think that's all he's saying.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 11:52 PM
1

...Is this some kind of joke or are you actually misunderstanding this? The dude used an anecdote to highlight an injustice/problem with a system, you used an anecdote to pass judgment on all women. Do you really think these are comparable?
/r/MensRights17/05/22 08:07 AM
2

I'd say isolation is its own piece, perhaps more important than the other two pieces.
/r/MensRights03/12/18 08:06 AM
3

Sure, admitting the murder doesn't fix everything, but it stops further damage, so a fine is a reasonable punishment. Right?
/r/MensRights29/03/18 04:09 PM
-9

Completely agree with you. You cannot be held responsible for what someone does after you talk to them unless you intended to make them commit a crime. Otherwise I could murder someone, say that it was because person x said something that made me angry, and then person x is responsible for the murder as well. Anyone can see that wouldn't work.
/r/MensRights15/12/17 08:01 AM
3

Probably gonna need to post some sort of source for this. Doesn't look impossible that this is true, but without a source you can't really know as the reader if it's legit or not.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 02:38 PM
3

It depends. If you have any siblings some of it might default to them. That reminds me of a famous case 69 years ago where the farmer got pinned under a tractor. In his last moments, he scrawled into the side of the tractor for everything to go to his wife, and the judge ruled in his favor.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 03:06 PM
6

I think I know the one you're talking about. If I remember correctly there was a famous case 69 years ago where the farmer got pinned under a tractor. In his last moments, he scrawled into the side of the tractor for everything to go to his wife, and the judge ruled in his favor.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 09:11 AM
44

See, this is a trick question. If she hit him and he called the cops, she probably wouldn't go to jail, and worst case scenario is that he would be the one going to jail.
/r/MensRights13/12/15 10:35 PM
3

That's Hillary-ous* FTFY
/r/MensRights01/11/15 02:35 PM
10

And are we going to receive backlash for it? Don't worry. You'll recieve backlash no matter what you do!
/r/MensRights01/10/15 04:23 PM
3

It's so shitty that it pretty much takes several occations of observed abuse of the children for the man to get custody in our society. I applaud you for staying strong and sticking to the end!
/r/MensRights28/09/15 05:57 PM
8

You were never married and you still got primary custody? Holy... How did you do it? I thought that was pretty much impossible
/r/MensRights28/09/15 03:02 PM
1

Definitely an interesting question, and while I can see the value in decreasing the pool of applicants, that is usually done in the form of "the applicants with the highest grades get to take the test, then they do the test to see if they are suitable for the job".
/r/MensRights24/09/15 06:53 AM
2

TL;DR: Men need to score higher on strength requrement than women, just so the "average woman" should have an equal chance of becoming a police as the "average man". Their explaination is this:. It may just be me, but doesn't women and men face the same challenges as a police? So why doesn't the women have to be as strong as the men? Won't they have to "lift a drunk person" as well? Or will they get one of the males to do that? I really don't know what the people responsible for this was thinkin…
/r/MensRights23/09/15 08:41 PM
1

Well, it would be logical seeing as how the other species' females are more agressive, but I think it's pretty hard to measure that accurately in people. Also it's probably difficult to see (human) females as more agressive than (human) males, since males are generally stronger, which sort of makes the women look like victims more often, I guess. Doubt you can find any real study on this subject though :/
/r/MensRights01/09/15 04:56 PM
-6

I'm not saying I agree with the short punishment, but I think that in that case the main focus was getting the children safe and possibly rehabilitated as soon as possible, and dragging them into a courtroom to testify can bring up the bad memories again, which wouldnt be great.
/r/MensRights30/08/15 08:38 PM
1

I'm sorry you feel that way about us, but I promise you, there are some rational people here too. The problem is that the feminist indoctrination starts early in our teenage years, and that does leave a mark.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 05:52 PM
2

I really like how the responses in the comments seem respectful to him, it seems that is becoming more and more common.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 01:09 PM
2

I agree, but I find that many of the vids he posts are very informal, so I watch them anyways.
/r/MensRights16/08/15 11:03 PM
-1

I also like how the results clearly shows how the female-voiced bot played on average 30% worse, making the entire "research" unusable.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 04:30 PM
19

Thanks for sharing this. I don't think I would have seen it otherwise, but I'm glad I did.
/r/MensRights12/07/15 10:39 AM
9

Well personally I would start off by saying that there is absolutely no advantage with circumcision whatsoever. If they say it's more hygenic you just explain that the only time it's more hygenic is if they let him go like, a few weeks without a shower, which I personally hope that they don't. After that you could begin explaining the negatives. It hurts. A lot. That much pain at such an early age is (according to some studies, but not all of them I have to admit) bound to do some damage to the …
/r/MensRights12/07/15 10:34 AM
25

Another clear case of "Men cheat because men are pigs. Women cheat because men are pigs"
/r/MensRights10/07/15 11:21 AM
1

It seems to be deleted. Have you got a screencap?
/r/MensRights10/07/15 04:13 AM
1

If youre trying to tell me that women can't go to prison in Scotland ever, no matter what they do, then I really need some hard evidence to support that. Pretty sure they can still go to prison, just that they are more likely to get less severe punishments.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 06:55 PM
1

I don't think they're closing ALL the female prisons, just some of them. It wouldn't make a lot of sense to give a murderer community service, although, when has feminism ever made sense. Got a source saying they're closing all of them?
/r/MensRights08/07/15 01:21 AM
17

Tell your GF about this and talk through it with her about what would be the best way to handle it. She probably knows her sister well and might know how she will react. If she knows she reacts strongly to people questioning her views, maybe it's best to avoid the sister as much as possible if you don't want to hear her opinions.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 02:16 AM
1

Once you put it up, where can i find the video? I'd be more than happy to watch it. Also, I hope it's Mike Buchanan. That guy is awesome!
/r/MensRights23/06/15 07:16 PM
4

As soon as he leaves the child over to the school it's the schools responsibility. If they don't losten to his advice on how to handle the child then he can't really do anything else.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 01:31 AM
5

Judge Wildblood said on Friday that Ms Minnock "should not see herself as being backed into a corner" and urged her to come forward with Ethan, adding: "Everything possible will be done to ensure that Ethan has an effective relationship with both of his parents." Wait what? Are you seriously telling me that the court said that the man should have full custody, but after she kidnapped the child they say the parents should share custody? If this was a man kidnapping the kid he would never get to s…
/r/MensRights12/06/15 08:48 PM
21

That poor woman only got 10 million of her husbands money. How will she survive?
/r/MensRights08/06/15 11:59 AM
12

And in this article we can see a clear case of male privilege.
/r/MensRights07/06/15 07:18 PM
20

I'm sorry to hear that, but stay positive! It's your cakeday! :D
/r/MensRights07/06/15 07:07 PM
3

I think it's still classified as rape since he was a minor, even though he agreed to it.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 06:47 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter