TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Arizth Archive

View 1 post and 401 comments by Arizth on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

You realize that most women don't ascribe to the feminist "kill all men" lunacy, right? You can't let a vocal cabal of crazies convince you that regular, normal people are the enemy.
/r/MensRights10/11/22 01:01 PM
1

but understand why this conversation is about transwomen, but not transmen. Women have the right not to want men in their spaces, even if they've bolted on fake breasts and out on a wig and makeup. Same way men have a right not to want women in their spaces, even if they've hacked off their breasts and shaved their heads. Its not a question misandry or misogyny. It's a question of sex-based rights and responsibilities.
/r/MensRights10/11/22 12:45 PM
0

Women can't be men, no matter what they "identify" as. The definition of a man is "adult human male", the same way "woman" means "adult human female". Definitions are critical, and must not be infringed to cater to people suffering from mental and emotional disorders. People are not an amorphous blob of "peopleness" with sprinkles of adjectives that you can partition out as you please. They have distinct qualities that make them differ on fundamental levels, and one of those is basic biology.
/r/MensRights09/11/22 10:37 PM
8

Transgender people exist all across the world. Gender confused people pop up in places where gender ideology can reach. Head out past the range of the cell phone towers and ask some African tribesmen about it, see what they tell you. You ever notice how recent these people "who are everywhere" and have "existed since forever" are? Go back a few decades (perhaps before John Money sexually abused some minors and published some research coining the word "gender"), and you'll notice it's mostly of n…
/r/MensRights20/10/22 04:41 AM
28

Well, yes, because in parts of the world where people have actual problems, there isn't any gender ideology. There's just boys and men, girls and women. I honestly wonder if people aren't hard-wired to simply invent problems if we can't find enough real problems.
/r/MensRights19/10/22 11:28 PM
17

I swear to the flying spaghetti monster, anything other then veneration on the trans shrine is "hate" and "discrimination" nowadays. People have a right to call a spade a spade. You can pretend to be whatever gender in your own mind all day, but it doesn't mean anyone else is required to play along with you.
/r/MensRights19/10/22 11:27 PM
9

Someone like the ACLU Considering they've been ideologically captured for years now, I can't see the modern ACLU doing this, unfortunately.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 07:48 PM
2

The far right feminists PRESS [X] TO DOUBT Those are opposing positions.
/r/MensRights21/09/22 10:26 PM
26

He enjoyed his "privilege" to be the sacrificial bulwark. Probably didn't even really think about it, just cast himself into the line of fire like society conditions men to do.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 04:32 AM
1

I don't think the bot is malicious, mate. It's more of a "so you know", not a "you fucking illiterate punk".
/r/MensRights07/08/22 11:20 PM
1

What makes you think it’s the same though? There is no evidence of the hallucinations schizophrenics face being real. There is merit to the idea that people are born in the wrong bodies I don't "think" it's the same, I have good evidence supporting the theory that it is the same. You ARE your brain and body. You, by definition, only exist as an emergent process of your brain as supported and maintained by your body. You CANNOT be in the wrong body. And even if you want to try to make that claim,…
/r/MensRights06/08/22 01:19 AM
1

why aren’t you holding body dysmorphia up to the same standard? That's the thing. I am. Telling a "trans" whatever "you're a real boy/girl" is the same as telling a schizophrenic that the voices are real. Affirming trans people objectively lowers suicide rates, this is indisputable. It's actually quite disputable. The overwhelming majority of social "science" claims cannot be replicated under identical conditions, and so their conclusions are always suspect. The leading cause of these suicides i…
/r/MensRights04/08/22 07:00 PM
1

Because reality matters. Because "affirming their identity" is telling the schizophrenic that the voices are real and valid instead of telling them to take their medication. Because all this "affirming" and mutilation surgeries still sees a near-50% suicide rate. Because people would be better served understanding that they ARE their body and their brain, and that they CANNOT be "in the wrong body". Because men and women are different, and I'm tired of pretending we aren't. That's "why not thoug…
/r/MensRights04/08/22 05:29 PM
1

Hey, I support men of all stripes. Even men wearing a dress and insisting they're women. I'm just not going to pretend that second case is a woman, any more then I'll pretend a woman is a man.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 02:59 PM
1

There's being polite, and then there's internet prog-doublespeak. You shouldn't mix the two up.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 12:35 AM
3

Sir, I'm gonna need to see your permit for projection of that size.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 12:34 AM
-10

That's cute, but that's not what the social cues are saying, and you know that. It's only on reddited places like, well, reddit that people talk like this.
/r/MensRights03/08/22 06:08 PM
0

No, it means pretending, since a "trans" anything will never be a real man/woman.
/r/MensRights03/08/22 06:06 PM
-9

That's great, and I'm happy he was able to leverage his autism into a field that's really autist-friendly. And I'm saying that as someone in technology as well. Doesn't change the fact that you can absolutely excel in one thing or field, and be absolutely clueless in another. Having a skill is something you can pick up, but being unable to do basic human things like make eye contact or pick up on social cues still makes you lower functioning in basic, normal human behaviors.
/r/MensRights03/08/22 01:41 PM
1

"Trans", in a social context, means "pretending to be the other". So, a "trans woman" is a man pretending to be a woman, and a "trans man" is a woman pretending to be a man.
/r/MensRights03/08/22 12:40 PM
1

Pretending to be a woman doesn't make you any less of a man, my dude.
/r/MensRights03/08/22 12:38 PM
-25

neurodivergent Gods below, I hate this term. It's such an exemplar of the modern "let's tape cotton over everything and sand down all the edges" sensibilities. You're not "divergent", you're "reduced function". Being unable to function to normal spec is not a "divergence" that's "equally valid", any more then a tofu burger is a "divergent", "equally valid" steak. Its not to say that lower-function people are bad, inherently; just that we need to stop this babying, softening bullshit and acknowle…
/r/MensRights03/08/22 12:34 PM
5

Being naturally larger and stronger =/= being a "tough brute".
/r/MensRights03/08/22 12:29 PM
11

As a counter point, there is a reason you should judge a book at least in part by its cover. People consciously choose how they look; their dress style, their hair, their level of fitness, all of these things are ways in which we non-verbally communicate certain things about ourselves. And the hardcore "yes all men" types do tend to share a certain...look, for lack of a better word. Perhaps don't discard people like that immediately, since it could be crossed-wires signaling or something, but ce…
/r/MensRights18/07/22 01:56 PM
4

Because fewer men then women go to the doctor before they have critical symptoms. Its not a sign of societal oppression via moderately dangerous disease on the same lethality spectrum as the flu. I feel like large swathes of the world have forgotten the fact that diseases existed before the coof panic, existed during the coof panic, and exists after the coof panic. People get sick sometimes. People unexpectedly die of mild disease occasionally. This is not unique to coof, but the world-wide mask…
/r/MensRights10/07/22 02:55 AM
-3

Pffffffttttt hahahahahahahahahahahahaha. That's rich, /u/Pissonmycock40 Gods below, you think telling people to take a thin piece of cloth that wouldn't block paint fumes off is some kind of "hate". We truly are in the "Soft men make hard times" square.
/r/MensRights10/07/22 01:17 AM
-23

You've got a sample size bias, my dude. Also, you can take the face diapers off, healthcare theater is over for the quarter.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 11:03 PM
3

They shouldn’t be, but they are. What, based on studies done in sub-saharan africa decades ago? Among population groups without regular access to appropriate hygiene? Yeah, I'm gonna call bullshit on those. If your "study" has results that are directly contradictory to all logic and science in the field, then either you've made an absolutely revolutionary discovery, or your study was flawed in some way. I'll let you guess which one happens most often.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 03:10 AM
1

So, you're repeating the orthodoxy, then. And, when challenged, retreating the the Motte of "but I never said we SHOULD, just that we COULD hint hint nudge nudge". Classic orthodox trains cult bullshit.
/r/MensRights03/07/22 06:26 PM
4

You have to sort of ‘undo’ puberty and that is really hard. Do...do you even hear yourself? Or is this just repeating the orthodoxy? You want to undo the normal, natural growth that a human body is designed to do. That's like advocating that someone should mature in reverse, or lop off an arm or a leg or something. No, don't quibble on the word "designed", I'm not using it in the "intelligent design" nonsense sense. You are NOT SUPPOSED TO TRY TO UNDO PUBERTY. This is a critical stage in the dev…
/r/MensRights03/07/22 05:05 PM
1

Trans people who go through surgery, a life changing decision, regardless of it was the right one or not that’s not my concern, should be treated as men, because they clearly didn’t do it cause it’s trendy or “convenient.” I'll take "Why is hacking off your healthy genitals considered socially acceptable, but removing any other healthy limb or organ considered crazy?" for $650, Alex. Look up what the "transition" surgeries entail, what the failure rates are, what the maintenance requirements are…
/r/MensRights03/07/22 03:20 PM
0

And are you discussing social LARPing (I. E. "socially transitioning") or social LARPing with a side of mutilation (I. E. "medically transitioning")? Because, given that being a train is trendy, most of them are social LARPers who scarpered off at the first hint of trouble. And that small percentage of people who found unethical, immoral chopshops to hack off healthy body parts are massively medically compromised, and require such a specific lifestyle and support structure that their life experi…
/r/MensRights03/07/22 02:57 PM
-1

Doesn’t it also sort of show how fragile and Un-impactful these biological differences are though? Not in the slightest, no. A man LARPing as a woman, or a woman LARPing as a man, will be identified as their correct sex in two centuries when their remains are uncovered and examined by archeologists. The biological differences are so significant as to be baked into your very bone structure.
/r/MensRights03/07/22 02:46 PM
0

FTMs aren’t allies to men, they’re men I think you need to retake intro to biology. Unkedd you're speaking sociologically, in which case this statement is also bullshit. It can be disproven by the simple example of the women LARPing as men in the ukraine until the draft came, at which point they painted their nails, took off their binders, and scurried on through and out of the country while all the actual men were conscripted to fight and die.
/r/MensRights03/07/22 02:43 PM
-1

You only need "allies" in a fight. We are not at war with women. We do not need allies against them. Also, women cannot become male, no more then men can become female. There is no such thing as a "female to male" transition. There does not need to be such a thing; plenty of women advocate for men's rights, just as many men advocate for women's rights. This post is just more TRA nonsense, trying to dilute a single-issue community into a multi-issue community.
/r/MensRights03/07/22 02:39 PM
4

After sixty seven years, you're not going to get justice. You're only going to get vengeance. I'm not judging you either way, but don't lie to yourself about your motivations.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 10:07 PM
-3

Many people confuse justice with vengeance. Sixty-seven years in, there is no justice to do, only vengeance to inflict.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 05:37 PM
6

I lock my doors in general.
/r/MensRights16/06/22 08:09 PM
7

It's kinda weird how modern SJWs think calling so etching "gross" is a powerful, mature epithet. When all it does is, like you said, make them sound like children.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 12:07 AM
5

No hospital worker will refuse medically necessary treatment for a patient. Working in a hospital is a dirty, difficult, often thankless job. People generally do it because they want to help people. Thst said, getting your dick or tits hacked off, or having your cunt sewn shut and covered with a tube made of excised thigh meat is absolutely not medically necessary under all but the most outlandish scenarios. The same is true of demanding hormones or puberty blocking chemicals. If they were medic…
/r/MensRights11/05/22 04:59 AM
5

It's not a phobia These people have redefined phobia to include "irrational dislike of (thing)". And, of course, any dissent from utter worship and obedience to the sacred trans-cow is classified as irrational dislike. It's very clever, as much as it is terrible.
/r/MensRights11/05/22 03:59 AM
2

I identify as a yeti. There is no biological evidence, as it doesn't need any. It's not a biological theory, it's what I identify as.
/r/MensRights11/05/22 03:56 AM
3

Agreed, both genders have issues, and deserve to have those issues recognized.
/r/MensRights11/05/22 03:54 AM
-10

I love that you just double down on it. Anyway, have an awful day.
/r/MensRights07/03/22 02:34 PM
-10

white woman child abuser tears Racist says what?
/r/MensRights07/03/22 02:26 PM
7

In fact, it's my experience that other men will show me courtesy while women never do. In my experience, it's not so much courtesy as it is a learned social survival technique. If a woman walks into a man, statistically she'll be shorter and less massive then him, and will likely bounce off, possibly fall. The man, again statistically, may fall, but will likely stumble and catch himself. How does it look, to the passerby only catching a split-second glimpse, to see a fallen woman with a man stan…
/r/MensRights10/12/21 10:18 PM
5

If you broaden the potential labor pool, wages drop. This is basic economics, my dude.
/r/MensRights23/11/21 02:35 PM
14

Ooooooo...kay. Well, have a nice day, laddie.
/r/MensRights18/11/21 04:47 AM
16

Are... Are you arguing with yourself? Or did you forget to change sockpuppets?
/r/MensRights18/11/21 04:41 AM
18

If it matters so little, why change it? Conversely, if it matters enough that you feel the need to change it, why is it so unreasonable for others to find it important enough to object to the change?
/r/MensRights18/11/21 04:37 AM
3

r/witchesvspatriarchy What the fuck? I'm not curious enough to click that link and find out, but just the name...
/r/MensRights13/09/21 02:43 AM
13

Apparently it's also physically dangerous. Well, yeah. It's an Olympic forced march event, sans a fifty kilo ruck full of gear and supplies.
/r/MensRights10/08/21 12:52 AM
1

Really? That's interesting. What sort of insults? Is it more racial/ethnic (ex "look at the gorilla dick"), or just size-related?
/r/MensRights08/08/21 03:41 AM
3

If you have a 25cm penis you also will be ridiculed and make fun of, on top of having serious problems in sex. The second one, aye, definitely. But the first one? I dunno, I think a lot of guys are shallow enough to see a man with a horse penis and feel at least a little, uh, small. And what kind of insult can you even give for a too-large penis? "haha, everyone, look at this man, with his MAGNUM DONG, how sad and pathetic be he". I mean, call me shallow, but i recognize that I'd have a hard tim…
/r/MensRights08/08/21 12:21 AM
3

I'm sorry, that sounded really perverted. That is NOT my intention. I'm so sorry. Don't apologize for not knowing in-depth how the other sex's biology works. That's absolutely no fault of yours, no more then a man is at fault for not understanding the precise workings of a woman's vagina.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 02:53 AM
17

Multiple people's sources are "I personally saw it happen" and your response is "well I never saw it, so your points are invalid". Typical.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 11:51 PM
24

Living around them. If you live in an actual multicultural area, you'll very quickly see the friction points.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 11:36 PM
1

Ah, the mournful refrain of the internet keyboard warrior who feels directly attacked by diction.
/r/MensRights27/06/21 03:55 PM
-7

Nah, it's actually an old bit of internet sarcasm. When you say "your" instead of "you're", you're implying ownership of the thing. So, he's not saying "you are about to summon a million feminists", he said "(you have ownership of) about to summon a million feminists", to which the traditional response is "His/her (thing you implied ownership of) what?" I admit, this does require having a reading level somewhat above the fifth grade, so it does, statistically speaking, fly over the head of about…
/r/MensRights27/06/21 10:48 AM
-3

Someday, people will learn the difference between your (as in, belonging to you) and you're (as in, the contraction of "you are"). Sadly, that day has not yet come.
/r/MensRights27/06/21 10:34 AM
-10

His about to summon a million feminists what?
/r/MensRights27/06/21 01:34 AM
5

"Technically not a girl, but a young woman". Still want to play the "but technically..." card? Because I'm fairly certain "oh, we didn't molest a girl, but a young woman, it's fine, teehee" isn't going to go over well.
/r/MensRights25/06/21 04:41 PM
17

That's backwards. Elective cosmetic surgery should be entirely banned for minors. It's one thing for some guy to do a dumb and have his penis carved up to "look better" if he makes the decision as an adult, a d it's entirely another for a parent to decide "a little off the top, that's a good chop chap" while you're a child. And for all the fuck nuggets who say "hurr durr parents make huge decisions for kids all the time", A) no they the fuck don't, the choice of public school and whether to buy …
/r/MensRights25/06/21 04:39 PM
16

it's almost a basic right for a patient to see a doctor privately. You realize that's not the issue here, right? The issue is FORCING the husband to leave, even if the wife requests that he stay. I mean, FFS, medical professionals aren't morons (generally, at least...some people...never mind, unrelated). You can tell when someone is being pressured, or when a third party is trying to seize control of responses. You should ask the spouse to step IF you see them trying to manipulate the conversati…
/r/MensRights25/06/21 02:05 AM
5

insist on a prenuptial agreement Don't most divorce courts throw those out like compost for various bullshit reasons?
/r/MensRights31/05/21 03:15 AM
3

No, you aren't. Murder is a legal term, and you need a conviction to be guilty of murder. You can still be a person who killed another person; that's a physical definition of states that doesn't require a legal, cultural, moral, or ethical framework to justify itself.
/r/MensRights31/05/21 03:13 AM
39

OK, let me state this simply, so as to leave no room for miscommunication or misunderstanding: I do not care if you find me using "autistic" as a negative comparator offensive. You cannot make me care. You cannot compel me to change my method of expression on the basis that your comfort takes precedence over my own, especially insofar as we're discussing here, over word choice. Kindly take your tendency towards policing tone and vernacular towards some gray and blobby bland, inoffensive mildness…
/r/MensRights27/05/21 01:01 PM
31

autistic or varients of the term like this is derogatory Tough. Autism is not a positive thing. Being autistic is not a good thing. Being born with autism doesn't make you a bad person (at least, not inherently as a function of having autism, though your behavior can make you a bad person, autism or not), but having autism is not a good thing, and using it as a negative comparative is an acceptable use of language.
/r/MensRights27/05/21 12:29 PM
317

I'm sad to say this is a known quantity. There's always going to be people who want to track the wrongthinkers, either to harass them directly or to report them to the Oprichniki for some good 'ol party-approved gulag fun time. Even if you somehow got this taken down, there'd be a new one up in hours if not days, using the same data under a new name. This isn't a technology problem, it's a human nature problem. Best solution I can think of is to keep these accounts anonymous, and never post any …
/r/MensRights27/05/21 07:22 AM
3

There's lots of kittens that aren't cute in the slightest. Same thing with babies, puppies, and so forth.
/r/MensRights16/05/21 11:18 PM
1

I read that as "no top butok" and was briefly confused.
/r/MensRights16/05/21 11:17 PM
16

Uh huh. OK, I see. Well, given how hostile you are to simple questions and your behavior in the rest of the thread, I'm just gonna go ahead and leave. You have a good one, buddy.
/r/MensRights03/05/21 06:23 PM
12

Why?
/r/MensRights03/05/21 06:18 PM
2

Women pretending to be men generally aren't doing it to try to climb the social ladders or mask sexual deviance, unlike men who pretend to be women, so you don't really have the same visceral "Stop muscling in on our turf" reactions that women have to men pretending to be women.
/r/MensRights25/04/21 12:19 PM
0

I, too, lived in a highschool romcom anime world long enough that I think this is a reasonable question.
/r/MensRights25/04/21 12:10 PM
2

Most would try and defend themselves by force if they must. What are you in about? Most people piss themselves in a corner. It takes a specific kind of brain structure to be comfortable in combat, which most humans do not have and must be trained extensively to emulate. Additionally, you're simply quibbling semantics here. The likelihood of effective self defense by an unarmed, unarmored, and untrained civilian VS an armed, armored, and trained soldier is so negligible as to approach zero. It do…
/r/MensRights30/03/21 10:50 PM
4

There were always "legitimately passive" people in wars. Didn't stop them from being raped and butchered when the barbarians broke down the gates all the same. War never changes, because nature is war, and nature hasn't changed.
/r/MensRights30/03/21 10:31 PM
15

Historically? Children were good future slaves, and women were good uh, involuntary breeding stock for the capturing army. Men were just there; if you can capture them to sell as slaves, great, but if not, no big deal, just stick 'em with the pointy end. Modern times? Same logic, but couched in modern sensibilities. Children are "our future", and women are "important for families". Men are just there; if you can grbs them as a PoW to work the mines, great, but if not, no big deal, just remember …
/r/MensRights30/03/21 10:29 PM
6

If you're going to do the time, might as well do the crime. Give her a real punch next time she hits you, really lay her out. You'll have to suffer through more kangaroo court bullshit, but you were gonna get that anyway. I'm 95% certain that she won't want to risk a third time, though, and leave you alone.
/r/MensRights30/03/21 10:13 AM
17

"The order of the White Feather" And into the bin it goes. Honestly, arguing rape statistics with someone claiming membership in something like that is like arguing the merits of Judaism with a member of the Order of the National Socialists.
/r/MensRights20/03/21 09:55 AM
6

Feminism isn't like what it was. Old school feminisism knuckled down and got stuff done. They were inspiring. Mainstream feminism is exactly the way it was before, and the White Feather society sends its greetings. Don't get me wrong, I do believe that a lot of good people worked under that umbrella and accomplished a lot of good, but it was despite the movement not because of it. Any organization that bills its mission as just or righteous will invariably attract and promote to its highest eche…
/r/MensRights20/03/21 09:51 AM
0

They generally do, yes. Mental illness requires treatment, not celebration.
/r/MensRights20/03/21 09:46 AM
1

Nah, screw that. Many "consumer protection" laws are just government interventionism and censorship by another name. Let the market take care of it. The vast majority of people would not shop at such a place. Men (because who besides some virtue signaling soiboi wants to pay extra for a substandard product for no reason) and women (because what kind of raging cunt approves of such nonsense) both would avoid this shop in general, and it would crash and burn on its own, no need to get big brother …
/r/MensRights20/03/21 09:45 AM
30

Let's be honest. You know most of them aren't reading this, and the few that are are selectively editing it to fit their biases. That's how extremists and cultists work.
/r/MensRights17/03/21 03:31 PM
3

The reality is an admixture of government-enforced "you go grrrlll" advertising and "you must build additional diversity pylons" hiring, a fading culture amongst older men in positions of authority to promote other men into positions of authority (the "old boys club" bogeyman; there's definitely some of it, but it's going the way of the dodo, and fast), and fear mongering by professional victims that makes the average NPC think they've been violently raped when a crude man catcalls or an awkward…
/r/MensRights26/02/21 03:47 PM
22

Everyone used to trade slaves. Hell, the USA has a navy because of Muslim slavers in the Barbary Isles who refused to stop raiding and enslaving US citizens even when provided with a large sack of gold to do so. Double hell, a bunch of Muslim and African nations have real life slaves right this very second. There's correcting, and then there's grossly over correcting.
/r/MensRights17/02/21 12:41 PM
77

It's not to feel better, mate. It's to stop overt race-based and sex-based discrimination. Swear to god, you'd never hear this shit if a "stunning and brave" pox woman of coloring crayons went to court to lower the pay rate of colleagues who were getting paid more because they were evil white heterosexual males.
/r/MensRights17/02/21 12:39 PM
2

Or you could just fuck off with that nonsense.
/r/MensRights16/02/21 11:16 PM
0

Stooping down to their level and wallowing in their mire of shit and hatred is not the way forward. Call them on their nonsense, but be polite and professional. You're unlikely to change the mind of a cultist, but you can try to away the audience and deprive them of potential converts.
/r/MensRights10/02/21 12:23 AM
18

I don't even know where to start with how stupidly fucking wrong this shit is, and I'm seriously wondering if it's worth even engaging with you, given the evidence. Fuck off, glowie.
/r/MensRights09/02/21 12:53 PM
1

What it seems to come down to is, if you want to engage in sexual congress during your college years, you better get that consent signed in triplicate and officially witnessed.
/r/MensRights03/02/21 09:39 AM
2

That attitude generally lasts until someone else picks up a stick and demands your stuff.
/r/MensRights03/02/21 03:54 AM
132

Having brain matter exit the skull? Unlikely. Even if he's physically technically alive, the destruction of any significant amount of brain matter kills the neural net that makes up the person.
/r/MensRights20/01/21 10:36 PM
9

Such as the treatment of women in the middle east. This one always gets my goat. There's places in the world with actual institutionalized misogyny. Literally everything they bitch and moan about and pretend is rampant in the West, and yet they do fuck all. They act like they want to slay a big bad misogyny dragon, and then hang around in the starter town and insist the passive slime mobs are big, scary, fire-breathing, princess-eating lizards. There be the dragons, ladies and white knights. The…
/r/MensRights11/01/21 12:56 PM
9

If I don't, it just proves that the moderator is biased and a sexist, hooray While I applaud the scientific acumen of repeat testing, I do feel like the data we've already got is pretty definitive on that front. The janny who locked that thread is 100% a biased and sexist jerk.
/r/MensRights07/01/21 09:04 AM
1

Its wrong both ways Citation strongly needed. Sleeping around, male or female, is an expression of loose morals and a desire for self-gratification in the extreme. Find a partner who loves you and stick with him or her, don't just fuck strangers every day of the week.
/r/MensRights03/01/21 11:07 PM
-5

I'm stumbling on this hours later, and I can definitely see someone downvoting someone who "cries weekly". I mean, I dunno, maybe their life circumstances are so shite that they need a weekly cry session, but if they have the time and energy to post on reddit, that's a big 'ol [X] DOUBT for me. Most people who claim to cry all the time on social media are hamming it up for victim points.
/r/MensRights03/01/21 11:04 PM
1

That still doesn't make it your responsibility. Like I said, you can't compel charity, especially to strangers. That's what separates charity from coercive resource extraction.
/r/MensRights10/12/20 06:42 PM
5

That's very rude of you Boohoo. Mean words, oh goodness, oh gracious, oh golly me. Whatever shall we do? Wherever is my fainting couch? You have zero obligation to someone for their own decisions. You may decide to give of yourself so they may benefit, but you are not compelled to do so. That is the whole idea behind charity. Compelled charity isn't charity, it's coercion.
/r/MensRights10/12/20 01:35 PM
1

Yeah, yeah. You people never want to actually address this, so it's always "lol hate speech m8". Have a nice life.
/r/MensRights15/11/20 05:20 PM
1

It strikes me that you assume that I'm being unreasonable because I refuse to play pretend with adults, rather then assuming that they're being unreasonable by demanding that everyone else play their stupid little game. But that's the mind rot of the T-virus. Clearly, if less then half a percent of the population refuses to get their shit together and behave like normal adults, the rest of the 9 billion people on Earth must be at fault.
/r/MensRights15/11/20 05:00 PM
1

But in polite conversation you just play along Absolutely not. I don't play along with psych patients who think they're a rhinoceros, either. They can do whatever pretend play they like in private, but they cannot compel others to ignore reality with them.
/r/MensRights15/11/20 04:41 PM
2

Nah, he's still a guy named Bradley manning, he just wears a dress and goes by Chelsea now. And all the sealions honk and clap, because that's what they've been trained to do whenever that happens.
/r/MensRights15/11/20 03:32 PM
2

It's disappointing in the extreme that you think people should be forced to play the socjus PC language bullshit game. People don't like men's rights because they don't want to give up power, not because some people here will openly admit to not caring for the tranny brigade and their bullshit.
/r/MensRights15/11/20 03:30 PM
-1

Your use of cross dresser as a slur Sad to see the T-virus has spread its brain rot here too. Calling a man in a dress a cross dresser isn't a slur. Men can't become women, nor can women become men, and I'm tired of being told to pretend they can.
/r/MensRights15/11/20 03:24 PM
1

Years of the frog being slowly boiled. The snake oil salesmen of the oppression olympics remain in power so long as the "(X) are oppressed" narratives remain strong and the snake oil remains the only "solution". They're well aware then putting in a dress doesn't turn a man into a woman any more then putting on pants makes a woman a man, and they're well aware that the overwhelming majority of people will back those statements. Ergo, easy "oppression" narrative, easy snake oil sales.
/r/MensRights14/11/20 01:06 PM
7

I mean, that isn't anything new. Prostitution is the "oldest profession" for a reason, after all. Hoes and thots have been riding the boner express since the dawn of our species.
/r/MensRights09/11/20 05:16 PM
15

"Here's a wealth of scientific evidence to back up my statement" That's him. "Yea but bruh do you even anecdotes?" That's you.
/r/MensRights05/11/20 10:37 PM
2

That would be the ideal, yes. Unfortunately, as with many things humans do, in practice we have quite a number of errors in our methodology.
/r/MensRights23/10/20 07:58 PM
3

Pish, here's your honorary white man card. Remember to swipe it before committing any thought crimes; every ten gets you one free! Meetings are on Tuesdays and Thursdays, but you have to bring your own mayonnaise.
/r/MensRights21/09/20 02:49 AM
1

I like how you can't really defend your position with logic, so you jump to nonsequitors. No, mate. I'm not accusing OP of anything; I'm denying OP's assertions and asking for proof. Onus of evidence is on the claimant.
/r/MensRights11/09/20 03:16 AM
1

Uh, no, sorry mate. That's not how it works. At all. You make a claim, you must provide evidence of it. Any claims made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. We presume innocence in court because we presume the accuser is lying, not because we presume the accused is telling the truth.
/r/MensRights10/09/20 10:08 PM
10

Not really. Planes don't just "fall out of the sky"; they're aerodynamic enough to glide, and properly trained pilots are supposed to be able to fly the thing in at least a semi-controlled manner even if all the avionics and electronics go out (manual steering is generally designed to be highly fail-resistant, so if you're looking at full electronic AND mechanical control failure that's probably sabotage and/or enemy fire). Assuming you don't lose forward propulsion over, say, a mountain range, …
/r/MensRights10/09/20 04:48 PM
1

The experience you're assuming happened, you mean? If you haven't noticed, OP hasn't deigned to respond as of yet. And yet, here you are, jumping to milady's perceived defense.
/r/MensRights09/09/20 09:51 PM
1

Telling people to learn to take care of themselves is not apathy, and having empathy does not require coddling people.
/r/MensRights09/09/20 09:50 PM
5

Bad things happen to people. Being a past victim of a crime is not a reason not to take the steps necessary to protect yourself in the future. If a guy went out and was robbed, beaten, and/or raped, you'd be all over yourself telling him to take martial arts or learn to avoid trouble spots and ambushes or something to protect himself in the future. I merely extend the same courtesy to women.
/r/MensRights09/09/20 09:08 PM
8

This is exactly the victim mindset that people want to foster, you realize?
/r/MensRights09/09/20 08:49 PM
7

never be able to walk alone at night, I'm sorry to say that, unless you live in a high crime, low income neighborhood, you've swallowed the bait hook, line, and sinker. We live (especially in the civilized west) in the safest and most peaceful societies in history. You can walk alone at night all you want, and so long as you keep mindful and alert (as men are constantly told to), you'll be fine. On top of that, if you're really, really, really worried, just get a purse gun and learn to use it. A…
/r/MensRights09/09/20 07:13 PM
1

Conversely, "you go to jail because you smoked" (anything, be it tobacco, marijuana, or anything else" is a great reason in my opinion. Fuck drugs, fuck drug producers, and especially fuck drug users. Though, honestly, I'd sentence those smoking ass clowns to enforced community service. Lots of shit places around the country could use an army of forced laborers cleaning them up.
/r/MensRights14/08/20 12:57 AM
10

Abby wasn't written as the antagonist. She was supposed to be protagonist # 2 that everyone loved. All because Neil is a hack with a misery porn and muscle ma'am fetish.
/r/MensRights07/08/20 02:02 AM
14

Unless you can give me a solid reason to stay here, I am leaving. Nobody here is beholden to you, mate. You wanna go, you can go. You wanna stay, you can stay. It's a free country.
/r/MensRights15/06/20 04:22 PM
5

Thatsthejoke.png
/r/MensRights01/06/20 08:55 PM
35

It's always weird for me to see common sense arguments like "biological men remain men, even if they wear a dress, grow their hair out, and take hormones intended for use by the other sex" have the controversial mark. Like, what sort of "feels before reals" idjits are wandering the threads, looking to go "umm sweaty, that's not what THE SCIENCETM says" to anything about car transmissions?
/r/MensRights19/05/20 05:22 PM
1

Sure. NIMBY: "Not In My BackYard". https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/NIMBY No True Scotsman fallacy: https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/logicalfallacies/No-True-Scotsman
/r/MensRights11/05/20 08:49 PM
2

Seriously? All she did was spew illogical nonsense and top it with a layer of NIMBY and No True Scotsman.
/r/MensRights11/05/20 05:55 PM
3

Imagine being so lost they you compare modern capitalism to vikings, mongols, and feminists.
/r/MensRights11/05/20 05:51 PM
3

What, has that guy done something else? Last I heard he was on the receiving end of a lawsuit and was pleading insanity.
/r/MensRights31/03/20 03:49 AM
16

That's fine, we figured out abortions ages ago. Shits bad enough that a draft has been declared, no one gets out. I mean, it's either that, or we reinstate camp followers. Service equals citizenship, after all. Would you like to know more?
/r/MensRights26/03/20 03:58 AM
10

Well, let me try to reframe it. Every functional section of your body exists because it fulfills some role that was beneficial enough to help your distant ancestors out-breed the competition. The ubiquitous nature of most human morphology means that these adaptations were useful enough that there was never an environment where not having them, or having something else in its place, made the resulting human fitter (meaning better able to reproduce and spread their genes, which can be argued to be…
/r/MensRights10/03/20 01:14 AM
3

I was typing out a comment about there perhaps being a middle ground here when I realized it'd likely get me out on a few lists. Good 'ol society.
/r/MensRights26/02/20 07:06 AM
11

The modern laws of self defense were written by weak men and women who wanted a framework that creates more weak men and women through fear. All it does is place the government into the role of "biggest bully", who has final say over whether or not you had the right to defend yourself, your loved ones, and/or your property against an aggressor, and arbitrarily punishes you if it feel like it didn't like your actions. If a person decides they want to attack me, and they actually attack me, then I…
/r/MensRights23/02/20 04:49 PM
29

No, that's a correct response. Don't start none, won't be none. I'm not an advocate of random violence, but I agree with the classic Satanist perspective: in all things treat people kindly and fairly, but if they attack you, destroy them fully and utterly, because they have already made the calculations and decided that destroying you was an acceptable outcome. Honestly, even a shove can kill a person if they fall badly and hit or break something important. If you cross that line, you have no re…
/r/MensRights23/02/20 04:28 PM
1

Darkness would like to know your location.
/r/MensRights14/01/20 06:16 PM
3

Obvious troll is obvious.
/r/MensRights09/12/19 07:30 PM
27

It shouldn't happen to anyone. For fucks sake, I really don't understand why it's so difficult to explain to people that forcing someone to have an cosmetic surgery because of cultural or religious bullshit is not OK. It's like, it sunk in the it's barbaric to cut bits off young girls because it makes it "look better", but everyone just goes "but muh religion!" or "muh culture!" when you point out its barbaric to cut bits off young boys to make it "look better".
/r/MensRights02/11/19 06:43 PM
5

Okay, please get back to us with this proposal when you find that magic incurroptible human to put in this hypothetical position, and we'll definitely talk.
/r/MensRights26/10/19 05:22 AM
13

For everyone knee-jerk down voting (I know I would of I wasn't aware), please be aware this is a meme. More info here: https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/islam-is-right-about-women
/r/MensRights24/10/19 07:58 PM
2

Vanir gets so much stupid from Wis, he looks like an idiot by association. Poor Vanir. He just wants to run his shop, screw Kazuma on IP law, and generally contribute to the destruction of humankind. Is that so much to ask for?
/r/MensRights14/10/19 02:13 PM
5

That just makes you an asshole. Unironically.
/r/MensRights13/10/19 02:37 AM
14

This is "all men are trash" but with the labels flipped, right here. You have a nice day, buddy.
/r/MensRights09/10/19 08:08 PM
28

Care about PEOPLE'S issues, mate. Don't try to tell someone "I don't care about your issues because you're [X]". Men have problems. Women have problems. Some of these problems are the same, a lot are different. There's nothing wrong with just trying to help people in general.
/r/MensRights09/10/19 08:04 PM
23

Careful with that edge there, you might cut yourself. I miss the days when I could just care about people's problems, and not have to check the labels beforehand.
/r/MensRights09/10/19 05:56 PM
11

And the father, as a free human being, has every right to disapprove of her behavior and withdraw his financial support. You know that most people don't have parents who pay their entire tuition, right? This girl is obscenely privileged.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 08:56 PM
2

What the hell is your problem?
/r/MensRights19/05/19 10:37 PM
3

Stands and plot holes, mostly. I miss Hamon JoJo...
/r/MensRights18/05/19 12:14 AM
1

Excuse me, it's DA JOOS, thank you very much.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 12:12 AM
8

And a Cue is also a term meaning "give a signal for something to happen", so we're coming full circle back to cue here.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 01:37 PM
2

You're not wrong, but everything you've said doesn't invalidate my point. She was holding a tool that also doubles as a lethal weapon, and she employed it with reckless disregard. That makes this a murder. You don't throw knives to hurt, same as you don't discharge a firearm to wound. You throw a knife to kill.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 04:05 AM
3

Why would you throw a KNIFE at someone if you aren't intending grevious harm or death? A knife is a severing implement and, when properly cared for, can very easily slice flesh and even damage bone. If I threw a knife at someone, I damn well intend for them to get it stuck in their chest. I could see you making this argument if she threw, for example, a ladle or spoon. Even a small pot, since those are all blunt kitchen implements and have to hit a very specific spot to kill someone. But a knife…
/r/MensRights21/03/19 12:36 AM
-1

The top ranked nation to favour women over men is claimed to be Saudi Arabia, with a score of -0.001554. DOUBT.
/r/MensRights08/01/19 06:06 AM
1

You sweet summer child.
/r/MensRights29/12/18 04:38 AM
4

Welcome to modern leftist ideology. May I take you coat?
/r/MensRights29/12/18 03:40 AM
-3

ITT: a fuck ton of misogynistic bullshit getting upvotes. "Don't talk to females", "females are toxic and ruin everything", et al. Do you guys not understand you sound exactly like those feminazis with their "Kill all men" and yesallmen bullshit.
/r/MensRights24/11/18 03:26 PM
1

Speaking as someone in medicine, strangulation leaves marks. If he tried to strangle her, and she stabbed him in self defense, you would see long red finger-like marks on her neck from where the pressure deformed the skin and burst capillaries. She would later have severe bruising in the same areas, which would last for days. Her neck looks fucking pristine. If it really happened, and she waited long enough to stab him that even the bruises faded, this isn't self defense, it's aggravated assault…
/r/MensRights29/10/18 01:50 PM
61

education system favors men Ahh, so close to full marks...
/r/MensRights21/10/18 02:37 PM
4

What do you mean, couldn't? She could literally grab a fork and jam it into his eye of neck. I really wish people would stop assuming a woman can't hurt or kill a man. Maybe not in caveman days, but we have so much sharp shit lying around nowadays, it's insane.
/r/MensRights20/10/18 09:25 PM
1

You know nothing about me or my life, mate.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 11:00 PM
0

Those people were weak, and made mistakes. We should not judge ourselves by the failures of others.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 12:22 AM
5

It's never better to be dead, since to be dead is to not be, forever more. Existence, even an existence of pain, is infinitely preferable to not being.
/r/MensRights23/09/18 03:36 PM
4

It's just some punk trying to denigrate everyone here. Downvote, block, move on. This is just trolling.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 09:55 PM
4

Fuck that. Don't be a fucktard with an official, "you" branded account. Thsts the easy fix to not ruin your life with social media. This guy (the "victim", not the councilor), if he's going to be an asshole to random people, deserves to enjoy the consequences of his dickishness.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 03:59 PM
3

We're just fucking up at different things in different ways.
/r/MensRights12/08/18 11:54 PM
4

Oh, so I'm not crazy.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 03:27 PM
3

Goddamned Sheeptar.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 08:08 PM
8

Using an official company Twitter account. Which I'm fairly certain is the actual reason he was let go. Not that I agree with that horseshit, but come on. Don't shit where you eat.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 05:51 AM
6

I just answered yes to everything because I like free points in my exams. 100/100 bitches. See y'all in the As.
/r/MensRights07/01/18 11:10 PM
1

No thanks, friendo. I don't use any drugs, including alcohol. Can't stand the stuff. But, you enjoy those criminal possession charges. I hope they were worth being slow, stupid, and foul smelling for a brief period of time.
/r/MensRights30/12/17 03:39 PM
1

The one with no felony convictions? I dunno, man. I just got the saddle waxed and a new bridle. It's actually fairly comfortable up here.
/r/MensRights30/12/17 10:29 AM
1

I feel like a broken record at this point, but I feel almost obligated to say it at this stage. You know the easiest way not to have a felony drug charge on your record is to just... Not do drugs? You can go on and on about how weed "isn't that bad" or whatever happy hippie horseshit you like about pot, and if smoking that mindrot is your thing then whatever, go ahead, just do it far enough away from me that I don't have to smell it and all that, but you have to be fucking cognizant that, whatev…
/r/MensRights30/12/17 06:45 AM
8

To everyone saying "I hope he gets rich off a lawsuit" keep in mind that the suit wouldn't be against the accuser or the officers or lawyers or judges. It's against the municipality. Which means it's your tax dollars that would pay any settlement here. So in the end, we're still getting fucked. Just a tad more indirectly.
/r/MensRights17/12/17 05:37 PM
3

Nice, sex shaming. I expect this sort of shit on Tumblr. But, sure, let's just reduce men to sexual objects. That's progress, right? Drag everyone down into the mud and shit, and that's equality too.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 04:36 PM
13

Oy. Fuck off with that shit. I work in Healthcare. You get some dumbasses, but most nurses are wonderful people who busted their ass to get their degrees.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 07:27 PM
8

A cosmetic surgical alteration to his penis? Maybe some nice surgical scars and traumatic base memories for extra fun? FFS, you sick bastard. Your ancestors had smallpox. Do you want smallpox? How about polio? Jagged wounds from predators? Do you plan on caning your son if he disobeys your shit, too? Your ancestors "educated" people like that, after whips were deemed not so great.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 03:01 PM
2

Man, this is fucking Cosmo. Cosmo has their head so far up their ass that it's coming up out their neck again. Don't get me wrong, this is the sort of shit that you see contributing the the cultural bullshit against masculinity, but I don't think using Cosmo articles for anything other then shitposting is a good argument. The only people who look at Cosmo articles and don't roll their eyes hard enough to turn an industrial turbine are insane radfems. Everyone else knows it's a rag.
/r/MensRights04/11/17 04:44 AM
7

Sure, pumpkin. Whatever makes you happy. Do you want some crayons, too?
/r/MensRights11/10/17 06:49 PM
6

Ahh, either a retarded child or a troll. Never mind, you're just an asshole.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 06:34 PM
9

You're not wrong, in that it usually more dangerous then not to take a st some lady being a cunt with regards to being dogpiled by white knights, but you're an asshole. Ain't gonna catch no flies with all that salt.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 06:16 PM
1

Yeah, crass, sure. Or, you know, actually willing to use the damn words instead of hiding behind asterisks or [X] word nonsense labels.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 12:23 PM
0

Cstarnts? Casterisknts?
/r/MensRights27/09/17 05:34 AM
6

What's wrong with traditional gender roles, exactly? Those did evolve for a reason. They didn't just wink into existence one day after the grand high wizard of the cisheteroablebodyneurotypical evil completed the sacrificial ritual of ten thousand gang raped sex slaves to the boner lord atop his rock hard throne. Some people prefer to follow those roles. So long as you aren't being coerced into them, there's nothing wrong with traditional gender roles.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 05:31 AM
2

Err... Mate,did you actually check your claims before you made them? TRP is just a weird, awkward, sort of assholeish strategy to getting sex. It's not a life philosophy to make well adjusted people, it's a life philosophy of "look like this, do these things, and act like this, and you'll get someone to agree with sex with you tonight". Where are you getting "hates women" from? The aggressive approach to soliciting sex?
/r/MensRights27/09/17 05:27 AM
1

I like dogs. I always see it as sort of worse to kill someone's pet dog (not wild dogs though. They're vicious) them another human. Humans, even baby humans, have agency that animals will forever lack, and dogs are just so unshakablely loyal to their masters (unlike children. Or cats.) that it just feels worse. Objectively, it's no worse nor better, though.
/r/MensRights24/09/17 11:35 PM
1

I'm always a little annoyed at how people get worked up over babies and children dying, like it's somehow worse then an adult man or woman dying. I'm of the mind that there is a baseline badness value to people being murdered, and that there aren't any multipliers for age or sex. A murdered baby is just as bad as a murdered old lady is just as bad as a murdered young man.
/r/MensRights24/09/17 10:35 PM
2

Because men and women both can be coerced, tricked, or otherwise made to engage in sex against their will?
/r/MensRights22/09/17 01:33 PM
12

Sometimes it IS the victims fault. You can blame the victim for being stupid AND the offender for offending at the same time, you realize?
/r/MensRights19/09/17 03:23 PM
9

Those are sexes, mate. Humans have two functional sexes and a small variety of genetic fuck ups. Gender is defined as a series of actions and expectations enforced by the social contract, and gender roles are a subset of that contract. The social contract in most of the world has two genders. It, very rarely, has three, and that third is always more of a social class. Ergo, two genders. You can buck the trend and reject the social contract, but you can't change it unless you get a majority vote …
/r/MensRights13/09/17 10:43 PM
15

... Uh... You know what, I'm just going g to no engage. I don't see a conversation here panning out well when you make absurd claims like "scientifically there are more then two genders". You, uh, you have fun.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 10:11 PM
14

It's kind of hyperbolic to say "any other" when there are two, isn't it? It's like saying "In a set of one and two, one is far more odd then any other number!"
/r/MensRights13/09/17 09:34 PM
3

What the fuck are you talking about, mate? Are you seriously implying that an adult, who theoretically should have taken and passed junior high school physics, is too stupid to understand a simple explanation involving anything more complicated then "hurr durr just plug it into the wall"? How about if we talk about combustion consuming all available oxygen in a container as being an explanation for why you shouldn't light open flames to cook your food in a closed room? Is that too technical, sin…
/r/MensRights08/09/17 01:07 AM
11

What the hell? No. Aboslutely not. Jargon has a solid deifnition. It's not a "relative" term any more then mass is a relative term. jar·gon1 järɡən/ noun special words or expressions that are used by a particular profession or group and are difficult for others to understand. Jargon would be if I decided to talk to you about, from my own fields, creating complex Windows deployments through an ecosystem using AD to provision accounts, WSUS for patch management, and remote content hosting through …
/r/MensRights07/09/17 09:33 PM
11

But, amperage and voltage AREN'T jargon. No more then millimeters and milliliters are.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 08:48 PM
4

A lot more cancer on the feminist side of things, I've noticed.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 07:53 AM
26

MRA and Red pillers are two entirely different groups, mate. MRAs are primarily a activism group dedicated to pointing out gynocentric aspects of American society and trying to ensure that "equality" means equal for both, not equal rights but more responsibilities for one side. Red pillers just want to get laid, and their whole ideology is about the best way to get laid, morals ethics and occasionally good taste be damned.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 07:52 AM
7

Crazy, sure. It's crazy to have strong opinions about an elective surgery that removes a piece of your penis being forced on newborns for barbaric reasons. Crazy.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 02:00 AM
1

What a worthless topic. And you're linking to incels. I know a broken clock is right once per day, but incels ain't a clock, they're a metronome.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 01:58 AM
3

I mostly agree with you, but I think we should extend that to any person, not just children. People put children on waaaaayyy too high a pedestal. Adults have a much greater capacity for suffering then children do, but people always want you to "think of the children".
/r/MensRights25/08/17 06:58 PM
-1

Piss off with that nonsense.
/r/MensRights24/08/17 01:50 AM
3

What part of "on the dark side of things" did you miss, mate?
/r/MensRights10/08/17 01:03 AM
3

You're not getting it. It isn't child support, because the child was never his. This is straight-up extortion; the demanding of money with the threat of negative reprocussions if the money isn't given up. If he doesn't pay he will be jailed. For "child support" for a child that isn't his. It's a nice bank account he's got there. Be a shame if any "child support" happened to it.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 06:48 PM
2

This isn't child support, though. The child isn't his. The paternity test proved that.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 04:14 PM
4

You keep using that term. I do not think it means what you think it means.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 07:29 AM
8

Han Solo is a drug runner and smuggler, a womanizer, and a murderer even before he got caught up in the whole "war" thing. I wouldn't really paint him as a role model.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 07:29 AM
4

Never trust a man named Joe or a woman named Phyllis. It is known.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 11:40 AM
14

Islamic terror hate group.
/r/MensRights08/07/17 03:51 PM
1

One day, maybe.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 12:40 AM
0

Yes, I am advocating using force to prevent people from making stupid decisions. That's the benefit of facts. Facts are objective. Being vaccinated is objectively better then not being vaccinated. If you don't want to, then you can either fuck off to somewhere where your obstinate stupidity cannot hurt the people around you or suck it up and get with the program.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 12:01 AM
2

They are if they want to benefit from the. Social contract of the race. Want to use public utilities and roads, browse the internet, buy shit online, shop in grocery stores, etc? Then you have an obligation.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 08:28 PM
1

Those people are idiots, then, and their opinion can be safely disregarded. Unless they volunteer to relocate to remote asteroids and live entirely on their own, they are obligated to contribute to social safety under the social contract.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 08:26 PM
0

Your right to be willfully ignorant and stupid stops at other people's, people who cannot use the vaccine for reasons beyond their control, right to not be infected with lethal, preventable diseases by your stupid ass. If you want to go live on an asteroid, then sure, don't vaccinate. But as long as you live in society and use social services and utilities, you have an obligation under the social contract.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 08:25 PM
-2

Do you or do you not understand the concept of herd immunity? Its really starting to sound like you do not.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 07:51 PM
1

Do you or do you not understand the concept of herd immunity?
/r/MensRights02/07/17 07:23 PM
11

I always say that breast cancer can be prevented by removing the breast buds from young females before they develop, but we don't do that for some reason, even though cancer is so much more lethal then the average STI.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 07:03 PM
0

You can absolutely force someone to become vaccinated. Are you aware of herd immunity?
/r/MensRights02/07/17 06:59 PM
22

This is the sort of thing social safety nets are designed for. Send the kid to foster care, or put it up for adoption. The rape victim should not be liable for its care unless they choose to do so, and who the fuck is letting the rapist raise the child? Especially in cases of child rape like this? Who the fuck said "you know, she's already raped one child. Another one should be perfectly safe under her care, right?"?
/r/MensRights28/06/17 07:27 PM
1

Amazingly, not quite. Try saying something negative about the middle east or their culture the a modern neoliberal or modern leftist, you have a greater then average chance of hearing "Islamophobia!" and being told your input is unwelcome. I don't know what to think anymore. I feel like I'm taking crazy pills.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 07:23 PM
3

To hell with the kid at that point. Report the situation to CPS and wash your hands of it.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 07:25 PM
5

Assuming it existed at all.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 09:04 PM
13

I highly doubt it, considering the place hasn't been burned to the ground by white knights.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 09:02 PM
3

Mate, all you're doing is being a cunt, and people upvoting you are just giving the cunts on the other side ammo to cherry pick for their "hurr durr MRAs are soggy knees" shit.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 09:16 PM
3

There's no tone policing hers, mate. I'm just discouraging people from up voting stupid shit like "women are biologically disposed to being bitches". It's both untrue and useful cherry pickable ammo for "MRAs are soggy knees" idiots. How would you feel if some assholes were parroting "men are biologically predisposed to rape"?
/r/MensRights19/06/17 09:14 PM
11

Let's not upvote stupid shit like this, yeah?
/r/MensRights19/06/17 06:07 PM
6

What? Come on, man. The rules don't mean anything if we don't all follow them. You know what to do now. Here's a newspaper. Commit sudoku to regain your honor.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 06:09 AM
1

That's fine. Neither your nor my feelings are law, either in nature or in society. I feel that weaponized autism carries an attitude of grudging respect.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 10:53 PM
2

No, it really isn't. Aside from assholes, nobody goes "haha, look at that retarded boy. He's so retarded!". People tend to make fun of retarded behaviors. "Damn, you get angry about everything super quickly. Are you retarded?" or "You kicked the sleeping bear? Are you fucking retarded? What did you think would happen?" etc.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 10:51 PM
2

I'd just like to point that NOT being retarded or NOT being disabled isn't privilege, it's normal. Being retarded or handicapped is a disability for a reason; it prevents you from functioning at the normal human level.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 10:49 PM
3

I think there is a marked difference between a disagreement over policy and a disagreement over slang. Slang is subjective, and you're free to consider it as profound or explicitly stupid as you please.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 04:07 PM
5

But gamergoobers are the biggest soggy knees hate group ever! I have soruces, too! Polygon wrote something, it got crossposted to Kotaku, picked up by Ghazi, and now Wikipedia has a new entry with three MSM sources.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 01:52 PM
1

Illegal insittuionalized racism. The problem right now isn't the laws on the matter, but the people enforcing the laws. We still have a lot of old judges who grew up in "niggers sit in the back of the bus" times, and short of replacing them with younger men who grew up in better times, there's nothing that can really be done about that. In another ten or so years, most of them will die/retire, and the problem will begin to ameliorate itself.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 01:49 PM
30

It's history, though. History is almost entirely rote memorization of historical data and, on better exams, data interpretation. Being able to access data records would, I think, result in better data interpretation results, since you don't need to spend time on checking your students for rote memorization ability. It's not like our casual access to vast data stores capability is going away. Hell, the entire text archives of Wikipedia are on the phone I'm using to type this response out.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 06:02 PM
3

Use another injury as an example. "I dumped boiling water in my first son because the holistic medicine people said this was a good idea. It wasn't, and I'm not inflicting it on my next child."
/r/MensRights10/06/17 11:41 AM
2

Black men just understand how worthless women are. ^ This is what I was talking about. I won't argue about the rest of his comment, but using this shit as a closer is actual, honest misogyny. Not the feminist soggy knees variety, but some actual "I hate women" nonsense. Trying to state facts about statistics is one thing, but this sort of shit (and the fact that people are upvoting it) is just another arrow in the "MRAs are evul muh soggy nists" quiver.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 11:17 AM
3

Factual statements about dating preferences are all fine and good, but when you conclude your thought with Black men just understand how worthless women are. then you turn an interesting thought into clickbait ammo and sound like an asshole to boot. Like, this sentence is actual, honest misogyny. Not feminist soggy knees, but actual "I hate women" sort of bullshit.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 11:14 AM
6

What the fuck, man. This sort of shit is just ammo for the idiots who cherry pick ignorant comments to paint MRAs as sexist assholes.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 01:46 AM
17

Jesus fuck. I mean, I'm usually one of the first people to shout "don't demonize non-offending pedophiles, that prevents them from reaching out and getting help", but this makes even me sick, and my ability to process any emotion other then hate died long, long ago. What the fucking fuck. What the fuck, you rapist whore. What the fuck, you white knighting cuck judge? What the fuck, you crazy cunt not only defending a woman who literally raped an eight year old REPEATEDLY and KNOWINGLY, but sayin…
/r/MensRights01/06/17 08:43 PM
3

Mate, I'm assuming you've never heard of jokes before, but just in case, I'd like to caution you stop stop being such a casual cunt. Your face'll stick.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 05:12 PM
8

Easy solution, keep an SMG in your back pocket. Oh, being rushed by white knights? Well, good thing I have is MP5! ... Or something. Fuck, I don't know. I stay away from people. Safer that way.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 04:12 PM
2

Yea, I know it's a reference to that fucking idiot. I just wanted to make my point as well.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 04:11 PM
11

In a perfect world, in a perfect universe, absolutely. If you find one of those, let me know, please.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 03:07 PM
-10

Yeah, we do. Some good old fashioned self defense and/or martial arts training makes rape by a single assailant fairly difficult to pull off. Shockingly, women have this option too buy very few people actually pursue self defense training, for whatever reason.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 02:38 PM
1

That was such a depressing book series.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 11:35 PM
7

Live long enough, you can one grown in a tank.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 11:32 PM
1

About people understanding basic biology? Yeah, you can say I'm a little invested in the people who are allowed to vote to be educated and not hold idiotic, unscientific beliefs. Just a bit invested.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 09:05 PM
7

If you feel less confident and less "stable" when you masturbate, you may want to speak to a clinician or psychiatrist, because something is definitely broken. Masturbation is just sexual stimulation to the point of orgasm. The dopamine and assorted chemical secretions of the brain are identical to an orgasm reached through sex. It's not some magic evil addiction that ruins your body like alcohol or tobacco or marijuana or heroin, because your aren't introducing any foreign elements to your body…
/r/MensRights20/05/17 08:05 PM
23

It always bothers me to see nofap given a positive spin. There's nothing wrong with a good fap, and you dont get fucking super powers by not fapping. All you get is an increased likelihood of colon cancer.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 07:28 PM
3

You don't chase someone at high speeds over four lanes of highway without the intent to do something when you catch up to them. And what else are you going to argue a car chasing a motorcycle was going to do if not hit it? Was she chasing him down with the intent of giving him a blow job?
/r/MensRights30/04/17 04:26 PM
8

Then what the hell are you saying? She chased him over four lanes of highway at over ninety miles per hour. How is that not intentional?
/r/MensRights30/04/17 04:07 PM
7

Like, oh my god, what a fucking faggot. But, seriously, I miss being able to just call someone a faggot because they're being a faggot. It's like, to a certain generation faggot doesn't mean "gay", it just means somewhere between "dumbass" and "asshole". As for "n-word", I'm honestly sick and tired of nigger being an unacceptable word for ANYONE TO SAY EVER unless they are "black enough". It's some weird sort of racist logic; it's okay for one color person to do something, and not okay for anoth…
/r/MensRights24/04/17 12:54 PM
4

"Someone said a word I didn't like, so I immediately considered knocking over the sandcastle, taking my ball, and going home." Okay, friend.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 12:50 PM
38

Geez, god forbid someone express frustration in a manner you disapprove of. What a bloody prima donna.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 01:00 PM
5

It seriously sounds like you either never took them, or failed them so badly that you've somehow gained misinformation. God, I don't have the time and energy for this. Not after that dumb fucker elsewhere in the thread with the circumcision article. Could someone please get the knowledge hammer and beat /u/smellslikecat upside the head with it, please? Thanks.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 06:06 PM
21

Just skimming this article, let's fuckin go. Circumcision decreases the risk of urinary tract infection. Lolwut? UTIs arise when bacteria move from the external environment to the inside of your urethra. Having a foreskin in place actively reduces the surface contact area of the mucus membranes and the urethral opening with the external environment. Yes, you need to wash your cock, but you need to do that fucking anyway. Circumcision reduces the risk of heterosexually acquired HIV infection in m…
/r/MensRights30/03/17 06:04 PM
5

Can't tell if troll or poe. Seriously. I've actually met people as stupid as you in the real world, so my troll barometer is shot.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 05:48 PM
9

...dude, have you ever taken any basic human biology or anatomy courses?
/r/MensRights30/03/17 05:46 PM
1

There's no E in Utopia.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 05:45 PM
4

I'd like to piggyback on this, since I see a lot of race baiting and arguing going on in the lower comments; Arguing over whether or not the judge would have given a similar sentence to a white man or black man is irrelevent. There is a small variance in judicial bias in sentencing on a racial basis (typically black males will receive something on the order of 10-15% longer sentences then white males, but males in general get about 60% harsher and longer sentences then women, no matter what cray…
/r/MensRights16/03/17 05:00 PM
1

There's a difference between narcotics, like heroin or cocaine, mild stimulants, like caffeine, and aerosolized burning foul smelling shit, like tobacco or marijuana. I'll get you help for the first one, we all use the second in some form or another, and for fucks sake stop smoking the third around me.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 06:50 AM
0

Jesus, what the fuck, man. What the hell happened to "respectful discussion"?
/r/MensRights18/02/17 05:24 AM
3

Doesn't matter. It's not self defense of you've decided to pursue them. Once he was off the property, it went from self defense to aggravated assault with a deadly weapon.
/r/MensRights17/02/17 07:53 PM
3

Awesome. Thank you!
/r/MensRights17/02/17 05:15 AM
5

Anywhere I can watch it online? I haven't had conventional cable in years.
/r/MensRights17/02/17 04:42 AM
8

is it just me, or has there been an uptick in obvious troll posts like this? Or are the mods busy with something else and more of these are slipping through the cracks?
/r/MensRights17/02/17 04:40 AM
2

I don't believe people should be able to force their religion on others, even their own children. I mean this in the more extreme ways like raising kids outside the influence of society. Taking them to church or reading them scripture is fine(by me) since they will grow up and make their own decision as to whether they believe or not. I also disagree with Jehovah's witnesses withholding life saving blood transfusions from their children as well. I'd like to challenge this one. In a perfect world…
/r/MensRights06/02/17 01:43 PM
6

This context is haram!
/r/MensRights17/12/16 04:29 AM
10

Did someone say HERESY?
/r/MensRights21/11/16 03:44 AM
9

Well, yeah. Feminists want equal rights, not equal lefts. She was fairly certain that she wasn't going to get smashed in the face, no matter what she did.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 10:37 PM
18

You know, I honestly think that being murdered is just a teensy weensy bit worse then being a sex slave. Since, you know, you have a chance to escape sexual slavery and maybe even get some revenge on your rapist, but when you're dead, you just kind of, oh, I dunno, stop existing forevermore!
/r/MensRights28/10/16 02:08 AM
9

Dude, what the fuck is wrong with you? Calm down. This shit is vile and /u/tankertodd is a troll, but you're coming off like a frothing-at-the-mouth rabid dog.
/r/MensRights18/10/16 07:05 PM
8

I wouldn't go so far as to call him/her a pedo. Just an unempathetic asshole idiot that gives religion a free pass on logic and ethics. You don't need to be sexually attracted to children to be a religious idiot.
/r/MensRights18/10/16 07:04 PM
4

Boggles my mind that we can have a sub dedicated to calling out one type of ingrained illogical evidenceless societal bullshit, but as soon as someone brings up another of the same it's suddenly down votes and "no, man, you can't have that opinion on here". Why does religion get a free pass on evidence and logic?
/r/MensRights18/10/16 05:19 AM
5

You know what? I, personally, hate the idea of hookups and one night stands. I would much prefer to meet someone in an intellectual setting, and I'm not a fan of the idea of sex without an emotional connection. So, you know what I do? I don't go to bars, I don't engage in hookups, and I don't have one night stands. And, amazingly, I've never been attacked by a rabid mob of bar-hopping, hookup-loving, one-night-standing hooligans intent on forcing me to adopt their way of life. It does not hurt a…
/r/MensRights06/10/16 06:18 PM
15

Because it was an actual unpopular opinion meme, and people got tired of hearing them. IIRC, there was some flimsy excuse of "puffins are used for racism" at the time, but it was really just a part of the sanitizing campaign reddit has been waging on it's defaults.
/r/MensRights25/08/16 07:44 PM
3

What the fuck, you guys?
/r/MensRights24/08/16 01:27 AM
3

Mate, don't take this the wrong way. Fuck you. Fuck you, fuck your title, fuck your petty, small minded "whee, she gon git hurz" bull fucking shit. That kid is DEAD. He didn't die in his sleep, he didn't die in an accident, he didn't die while unconscious. He died if dehydration. He died as his organs shut down, as his veins constricted, as his throat felt like sandpaper over sand, as each agonizing heartbeat slowly, ever so slowly, gave out. Who the fuck cares if she "got more". That is a level…
/r/MensRights31/03/16 11:02 PM
5

That's...basically what I said? I'm confused as to what point you want to make, mate.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 07:20 PM
9

Battery, as in "being battered". Like you batter a door if you whack it repeatedly with your fist.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 05:53 PM
7

I think she relies too much on shock humor, personally. I like some of her stuff, but not most.
/r/MensRights13/03/16 07:03 AM
25

Kids make mistakes, but consequences are independent of age. Her actions killed him. She should not be off the hook.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 08:46 PM
5

...wut. So, wait. We have roughly 300,000,000 people in the country. If we assume that aprx 50% are female, we're at 150,000,000 women in the country. Of those, 500,000 rapes a day would equal something on the order of 0.33% of all women in the country being raped per day, and literally every woman in the country being raped every 300 days or so? All of my wut. So, is it like, an annual occasion? Every woman gets a birthday, and a rapeday?
/r/MensRights06/02/16 07:33 AM
1

Significant difference between acting like a fool and this. Being foolish or silly doesn't cover attacking someone or breaking their shit.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 08:25 PM
2

Still not seeing that evidence, mate.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 11:37 PM
1

I can't tell if this is a strawman, or if you're just responding in character.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 12:32 PM
7

Ahahahahaha. You must be new to this species, mate. Bad people are gonna do bad people shit. Stupid bad people will get caught, smart bad people may get caught, but both types are gonna do bad people shit. Seriously. Unlike major crimes, like a bank heist or wall street, very few petty criminals will wake up and say "Gonna mug a dude, let's go to the whiteboard and plan this op" or "Dude raped me in a dream, let's go to the whiteboard and get my story straight". It's usually like "aww sheet nigg…
/r/MensRights05/01/16 12:15 PM
4

Ahh. Well, then you deserve your downvotes. Enjoy!
/r/MensRights30/12/15 04:19 PM
4

You forgot the /s, mate.
/r/MensRights30/12/15 04:14 PM
17

Doesn't make it right. Don't stoop to their level.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 03:16 AM
17

Fuck off with that shit, mate. Don't go all tumblr feminist on us. Don't stoop to that level of shitty.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 07:06 PM
3

Mate, I agree wholeheartedly with you sentiment here, but video evidence shows this woman initiating conflict, and then escalating it. She got exactly what she had comjng to her. If anything, I applaud the man's restraint. I'd have likely decked her, if only because that's my ingrained response to someone hitting me.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/10/15 06:47 AM
1

What the fuck, dude? He ain't getting downvoted for being reasonable. He's being downvoted for being a twat with a "holier then thou" approach to an issue that reaosnable people feel is fucked up beyond measure. Yes, the law states that minors (under 18s, because arbitrary numbers) cannot make informed sexual decisions. Yes, the law states that an over-18 cannot sex a under-18 except in specifically defined Romeo and Juliet clauses with regards to age ranges. However, the law also states that, f…
/r/MensRights20/09/15 09:35 PM
1

Having worked with a lot of nurses in the last few years... Eww. Like, no.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 08:10 AM
17

To be fair, if I was cut like He-Man, I'd likely dress like He-Man. Bitches LOVE the power of Greyskull.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 11:26 PM
26

You know, I remember reading the Hawk and Fisher books by Simon R Green, and a certain line about Fisher's clothing always stuck out to me as amusing. She has decently large breasts, and would always leave a few buttons at the top of her shirts unbuttoned to give a generous cleavage window. Then, when male assailalnts invariably got distracted by "ooh, boobies!", she'd punch their lights out. It was amusingly effective. On another note, I would disagree that the male physique on display in video…
/r/MensRights01/09/15 06:02 PM
0

Run Through is usually used to refer to impalement of the body by a large blade. Often with the one holding it at a run, or mounted on horse back. But yeah. You don't run someone through with a knife; knife blades are too short. Get a sword or spear.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 10:05 PM
1

I'm confused. What the hell are you guys talking about? Give me a name or title or SOMETHING that I can punch into a search engine, not some half-assed talking points with no details.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 08:50 PM
2

Yeah. I watched that movie because my girlfriend wanted to, and it was very uncomfortable to watch, what with... Everything, really.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 07:34 PM
8

Because, you little shit, posts from TRP are nonsense rhetoric for how to sociopathically have sex with of-age women. This is a rapist getting significant legal leeway because she "felt bad" for raping an eight year old! An actual crime, which has been actually prosecuted, of which she has actually been proven guilty.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 08:21 PM
3

Things are so screwed up you definitely don't want a woman living under your roof ATM This is an incredibly toxic attitude to have. If you had said "don't want a crazy woman living under your roof", I'd be more agreeable to you sentiment, but just throwing ALL women in the "crazy" pile is insane. There are good women, and bad women, just as there are good men and bad men.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 08:15 PM
6

Poe's law?
/r/MensRights13/08/14 06:58 PM
3

That's because you're a condescending jackass, as your user history proves. Yes, yes. Literally hitler. Moving on. White supremacism is the belief that white people are naturally better, and that the reason that white people do better than PoC is because they're nautrally better. Hence, white supremacists tend to oppose affirmative action and believe that it's racist. That is the connection being made. The scary thing is that this statement made sense in your head. Look, mate. Affirmative action…
/r/MensRights04/06/14 09:27 PM
0

You know, that's hilarious. Now I don't know whether I want to upvote or downvote him.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 08:57 PM
1

You get treated the way you do because you regurgitate the same arguments that white supremacists make and then claim that they're arguments for "racial equality." Amazing how this suddenly turned into a "we" vs "they" argument, but OK, sure. Look, I don't have a way to make this sound non-condescending, because this really should be common sense: Advocating for equal treatment of ALL people and the preferential treatment of NONE is not white supremacism. Being against hiring quotas for ethnic g…
/r/MensRights04/06/14 08:56 PM
6

The fact that someone speaking for racial equality is responded to in this manner goes a long way towards explaining why MRAs get treated the way we do. Something I agree with? Hoo-fuckin-ray. Something I don't agree with? Literally hitler. Affirmative action is a cancer, both in gender politics and racial politics. Judge people by their merits, not their gonads or melanin count.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 08:10 PM
10

Fascinating trolling, buddy. But we get this on a daily basis. Please either go away, or come up with new material.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 05:57 PM
1

Wanna clarify that statement? As far as I'm aware, you either have balls or ovaries. If balls, male. If ovaries, female. If had balls but now ovaries, female. If had ovaries but now balls, male.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 12:04 AM
0

Sure. Let me borrow one of your fedoras for the road?
/r/MensRights01/02/14 09:41 PM
1

Because millions of years of evolution making us want to breed can be overcome through "willpower". Yes, actually. I haven't been thinking with my dick since I found it. It's not "willpower", mate. It's "stop trying to make every social interaction with a woman about your penis in her vagina". Not what is being discussed here. Lots of women don't sleep with lots of men. We are discussing the act of manipulation and its consequences on its victims. Your definition of manipulate seems to include n…
/r/MensRights29/01/14 01:47 PM
6

That's bullshit. It's on men to stop thinking with our fucking dicks. Get it through your heads, lads: Not every woman wants to, nor needs to, be in the least bit intent on fucking your stupid ass. If you can't understand that, then stop hanging around women. There is no fucking "friend zone". There is "I didn't have the balls to express myself clearly and misundertood the whole situation" zone aplenty, though. Guess where you are?
/r/MensRights29/01/14 06:43 AM
1

That took some time, but done. Will the results be published anywhere? I'd like to see them. I'm curious to see how many others answered similarly to myself.
/r/MGTOW16/01/14 02:58 AM
12

No, dipshit. When it's depicted as a man doing it to a man, the reaction is "Oh my god, that's horrible!" But when it's a woman doing it to a man, it's "Ahahaha bet he had it coming. What did he do?" Which is horseshit.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 03:18 PM
3

Easy answer: Go to class, get good grades, ignore everyone equally.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 08:43 PM
9

News articles, anyone?
/r/MensRights17/12/13 08:41 PM
0

Oh, come on. You cannot possibly be this stupid. https://www.google.com/search?q=define+racist rac·ist ˈrāsist/ noun noun: racist; plural noun: racists 1. a person who believes that a particular race is superior to another. synonyms: racial bigot, racialist, xenophobe, chauvinist, supremacist More "he was exposed as a racist" (racially) discriminatory, racialist, prejudiced, bigoted "a racist society" adjective noun: racist; plural noun: racists; adjective: racist 1. having or showing the belief…
/r/MensRights05/12/13 10:15 PM
5

And you see this as a good thing? You want to go to a dingy establishment, pay too much for shitty alcohol, all in the hopes of getting laid? You are part of the problem, mate. There are better ways to meet females then the fucking pub.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 10:12 PM
-1

You must not have been there long.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 10:02 PM
1

Much as I agree with this image, do we really want to sink to their level just for a few cheap laughs?
/r/MensRights21/11/13 09:48 PM
2

Dat positive discrimination.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 09:44 PM
-6

Your argument is equivalent to: "why is murder illegal? It's not like we can revive the victims!" Bullshit. You're arguing from extremes here. What Bartab is saying is that people who distribute sexual photos of others w/o consent aren't likely to be affected by this ban. If they can't post it up on the clearweb, they'll go onto the darknet and post it to a Tor site. Anyone asks, they can deny it and say their phone or computer was hacked.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 05:56 PM
2

Right, right. Marshall. Excuse me.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 01:19 AM
41

On the bright side, it mentions towards the end that the police asked the bus driver if he wanted to press charges, not the woman. So we've got that going for us.
/r/MensRights18/11/13 09:38 PM
4

Well, glad to know someone appreciates me...
/r/MensRights05/11/13 07:47 PM
5

that doesn't really make since because fandom culture started so recently. That's ridiculous. The term "fandom culture" may be new, but the personalities and insanities underlying it have been around for millenia. We just used to call it "idolatry", "cults", and "organized religion".
/r/MensRights05/11/13 02:48 PM
7

NAFALT Getting real sick of hearing this one. Not all, but enough. Most people I know who actually care about equality under the law identify as egalitarian, not feminist. Most feminists I've had the displeasure of interacting with are horribly toxic individuals. NAFALT, but MFALT.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 03:48 AM
0

congratulations you lack humanity. Thank you, thank you. It's nice to get recognition. This was a long, hard road, but I have indeed managed to shed these ridiculous things you lot call "emotions". You have no idea how much less bullshit you need to put up with without them.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 01:09 PM
-2

Isn't justice great? Also, please keep in mind that I am not looking for legal justification for my actions. I have a very strong "don't get mad, get even" personality, and the fool who dares cross me rarely lives long enough to regret it.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 03:02 AM
-1

No, I don't, and no, I don't care to. But the concept of being raped doesn't reduce me to quivering fear tears. I would lose nothing, and it would give me a excuse to murder some assholes.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 01:49 AM
-8

The concept of protecting virginity is crazy. Sex is Sex. There is nothing inherently special or magical about bumping uglies until the serotonin peaks. I pity the individual who is so concerned about their virginity as having internalized an insane worldview. And to say that the male equivalent is to lose his job is about level of concern with being raped. I have savings, and would go in search of a new job. You can't equate rape with a debilitating injury that causes you to be unable to work, …
/r/MensRights18/10/13 01:08 AM
-10

No, I completely agree. Well, everything but losing the street fight. I hate losing fights. But, yeah. I also feel that people blow rape WAAAAYYYY out of proportion. So long as your rapist isn't some psychopath that tortures you while they rape you, you aren't left with any physical scars to show for it, and aren't really the worse for wear. At worst, it might cause you to become mistrustful of others, but frankly if you go around trusting people, you are just setting yourself up for a world of …
/r/MensRights18/10/13 12:06 AM
2

Holy crap, how many years has it been. I feel old.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 11:26 PM
4

Gonna toss out that I'm a first generation immigrant from Russia. My family has lived for a few generations in and around Moscow. Never had any slaves. What am I supposed to be guilty of, exactly? Being white?
/r/MensRights10/10/13 02:48 AM
-1

I don't care to be racist, but somehow, as I read the article, I was not at all surprised to see the perp as an overweight negro female. Holy shit, if she woke me up at 4 AM and demanded sex with her and her fuckbuddy girlfriend, I would have said no. ^^And ^^demanded ^^to ^^know ^^how ^^she ^^got ^^into ^^my ^^house, ^^but ^^that's ^^another ^^story. But, yeah. Something about the article just screamed "crazy fat lesbian negro". You may feel free to be outraged at my usage of the word negro, if…
/r/MensRights09/10/13 09:13 PM
2

Very true. My issue is that articles describe male perps as "This fucking asshole, Chui, the cismale privilege fucker, dared to talk back to his holy matron Cheng. Fucker got what he deserved when mistress Cheng beat his bitch ass 'till he needed hospitalization", and female perps are, at best, "arrested under suspicion of general assault". Equality under the law, and equality in journalistic representation. Neither of which we are getting.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 05:21 PM
14

The 20-year-old woman, named Cheng, was later arrested on suspicion of common assault, while the victim, 23-year-old Chui, was taken to hospital. Shit, yeah. Suspicion of assault. Because, you know, the camera footage with audio and the fact that the victim had to be treated at a hospital really casts doubt on the allegations. Fucking hell. *Edit: This is faster then responding to everyone one by one. I definitely see what you gentlemen are getting at, and I agree. My issue is mostly that, were …
/r/MensRights08/10/13 04:16 PM
0

On a technical level, you are completely correct. And in a perfect world, the technical definition would be the only one that mattered. Unfortunately, we do not live in a perfect world. We are constantly affected by gender politics, and unfortunately for men, feminist politics are the current hot spot. As such, within our culture, masculism is seen as sexist, because feminism is leading the cultural climate.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 09:24 PM
-2

Look, you seem to not understand something. At it's base, how can a movement that's about equality be called feminism? The name itself says that it's not concerned about "Women and Men being equal", but with female superiority. Why is Feminism considered acceptable, but Masculism is somehow sexist?
/r/MensRights02/10/13 06:38 PM
1

And suddenly a bunch of annoying anime tropes make so much more sense. And now I feel bad.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 09:25 PM
24

I'm pretty sure he drove away after he was told that no one had seen his dog.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 08:48 PM
27

To be fair, if you check the vote beneath the article, almost 90% of votes cast say that this is sweet, rather then sexist. So, once again, the vocal and idiotic minority ruins things for the quiet and understanding majority.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 07:19 PM
0

What were you expecting me to say, mate? It would be the height of hypocrisy to claim it didn't bother me, then shy away with my tail between my legs when you called me on it. If you have counterpoints to present, then by all means do so. My view on things tends to be a little...distinct from how many others might view a similar situation.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 04:04 AM
2

Go ahead. Just keep in mind, and this I swear is not any lame attempt at "internet tough guy" that unlike the gentleman in this story, I have no compunctions about shoving my fist through your face. I've faced greater indignities (invasive surgery, anyone? Anyone fancy a tube in your neck and your pancreas for 8 hours /w no sedative?) then someone fapping to my fat ass. I know how to respond to them. Rage, not mortification. Violence, not passivity. Revenge, not regret. I didn't spend years taki…
/r/MensRights24/09/13 02:28 AM
0

Ignoring the feminist-friendly speech of the poster (White, privileged male? Come now.) Personally, I feel he's making mountains out of molehills. So some douchbag masturbated at you. How has that physically hurt or affected you? People masturbate to other people all the fucking time. You just happened to see it this one time. It's probably happened before, and it's possible it might happen again. How has this changed your life for the worse? You "felt violated"? No, you just made an issue of so…
/r/MensRights23/09/13 07:10 PM
2

Not sure how you meant for that to be interpreted. The men took photos and tried to get a tag number. If the guy was legit and just helping the girl on her way, then ok. If the guy was a rapist looking for an easy score, they have a face and truck. The woman at the end was so ridiculously overprotective, it's not even funny. Teens are a hormonal mess, and of course someone might break down and cry when given the chance. She just ran away from home, so she might be just the teensiest bit emotiona…
/r/MensRights20/09/13 09:31 PM
3

I do think someone deserves it on te basis of their sex, though. Men deserve it for being men. Women deserve it for being women. Duh.... wait. Fuck.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 05:33 PM
2

Evolutionarily, I think it makes sense for women to do exactly what they've BEEN doing: sleeping around /w young, virile, hypermasculine men who can donate big, strong mangenes to her baby factory, then settling down with a caregiver individual, male or female, to raise said babies. For men, same thing. Sleep around /w young, virile, hyperfeminine women, getting each in turn pregnant. The man is not technically then needed for the birthing and the raising, but he should stick around, lest his/he…
/r/MensRights19/09/13 12:48 PM
2

I disagree. First of, what exactly IS marriage? As I understand it, marriage is a institutionalized and culture-wide attempt to have a system in place wherein two individuals can legally call dibs on the other, emotionally and sexually. For a species that is naturally polygamous, this is an attempt to, using environmental, societal, and legal pressures, force two people into monogamy. I'm unsure of it's need in our modern society. STDs are rare, the global population is oh my god billion strong,…
/r/MensRights18/09/13 11:19 PM
1

Geh, stop making me feel old. Skirts > Pants, unless I'm watching a martial arts match. Then tight pants all the way. ... Why the fuck did I...no, don't care. Typed it already. post
/r/MensRights18/09/13 11:12 PM
3

Who or what is that a quotation of?
/r/MensRights18/09/13 11:09 PM
1

You would find me a terrible person, methinks. To be fair, I hold myself to the same standard. I tend to withdraw from situations in which I am not contributing meaningfully.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 11:06 PM
6

/r/fifthworldproblems is a humor subreddit. We mostly keep to ourselves, since we tend to have problems that don't translate well into a mere 4 dimensions. /r/feminism is feminazi central. fifthworldproblems doesn't go on downvote brigades, or shut down opposing views, or shit like that.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 01:19 AM
8

Isn't that /r/fifthworldproblems? Looks like fifthworldproblems to me.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 10:13 PM
1

Bullshit. Seriously. Bullshit. This isn't a NEGATIVE comment about a single guy watching a movie by himself. This is a PARODY comment about a guy watching a movie by himself and oh my god why is he here alone? he can't possibly have any friends because who does stuff alone lol amirite #yolo#swag#durrr Seriously. Learn2Onion.
/r/MGTOW27/08/13 05:35 PM
3

Violently, in my case. Fucking bigoted idiots.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 09:59 PM
1

Did you apologize and pay reparations? Because, if you didn't...
/r/MensRights14/08/13 10:08 PM
6

Holy shit. Lesson learned; Always go armed, because white knight faggots might try to kill you for a whiff of pussy.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 09:06 PM
7

They also have a far greater potential to fall off the lifeboat and drown. Just putting that out there. I would also value my life over a stranger's child.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 04:00 PM
-2

/sigh Googling "American Case Law" no more makes you a lawyer then WebMD makes you a doctor. But, since you can't seem to grasp something as simple as "Other people have different opinions then you do" without resorting to childish name calling and ad hominem, I'm cutting this conversation short. If you can even call it a conversation.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 06:22 AM
-7

If that's true, why will you get a CIA / FBI visit for saying, "I want to kill the President of the United States of America"? (Dear CIA / FBI this is an example) Because it isn't true, fool. You have every fucking right to stand inside your home and yell "Fuck Obama! Die Obama!" etc whatever, because that is an expression of your free speech. Go out into public and start yelling I want to kill the president, then expect to be stopped by your local PD. You may be charged with loitering, inciting…
/r/MensRights03/08/13 06:01 AM
-6

It's only illegal once you've made realistic, do-able plans (Conspiracy to commit murder) or actually stuck a knife into him (Aggravated assault /w deadly weapon, attempted murder/murder third degree premeditated, second degree crime of passion). Saying "I'd like to introduce that asshole to my good friend Shotgun" is about as illegal as yelling "Fuck off and die!" when some asshole cuts you off in traffic, or when some idiot with no understanding of Us legal code tries to debate you on tha inte…
/r/MensRights03/08/13 05:13 AM
-10

Opinions are opinions, mate. Even if you disagree with 'em.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 03:24 AM
1

Look, I'll have your leg!
/r/MensRights31/07/13 12:02 AM
5

I'm curious as to why this is getting downvoted. This opinion, while perhaps unpopular, is entirely true. While I would never go so far as to assume that, if crime, therefore black culprit, somehow saying "did you see the video where that black guy robbed X" is somehow "worse" then "did you see the video where that white/asian/hispanic/martian guy robbed X", and I'll be damned if I understand why. Oh, wait. Never mind. I know why. Because slavery apologists and blah blah blah feelsbadman.jpg Shi…
/r/MensRights29/07/13 09:32 PM
2

That's what practice is for.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 02:29 AM
2

Pretty much this. The effects of manipulation are heavily reduced if you are aware that manipulation is going on. Just be aware that the tits are trying to hypnotize you, and look away.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 09:56 PM
1

I am slightly amused that, apparnetly, my neutral reaction to people, regardless of "attractiveness" (which is an intersting label, because the only time I judge someone as attractive or not is when my dick is erect, and he doesn't really have much preference outside of "Under 300 lbs, alive".) is apparently non-standard. Weird, but apparently useful. Time to not-reproduce and not-ass this on to my not-decedents.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 09:55 PM
1

The law is the law. So long as it is the law, the state must apply it equally. To do otherwise is to excuse the injustices some face out of fear that people like you will face similar injustice. While you, as a private citizen, can take this stance, it is inherently unjust for the government to do so. Excuse me? This is a perfectly valid opinion.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 04:25 PM
1

I can't stop laughing at the overall incompetence and appeals to emotion this lawyer spews forth. "Now, 70 years, while a stiff sentence, is not life!" Err, yes it is. Most people barely make it past 80 nowadays. "Seperation of powers. Because she was not granted a plea deal, the judicial branch is trying to harm her." Yeah, OK bitch. The state doesn't HAVE to give you a plea deal. She did it, she was convicted. She's gonna have to deal with it. "This court doesn't allow for mitigating factors" …
/r/MensRights17/07/13 11:44 PM
11

Agreed. We should just grab shotguns, storm into the murderer's neighborhood/apartment complex, and start gunning people down. That'll teach em.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 11:07 PM
29

I'm not sure why this is getting downvoted. Yes, the sentence is ridiculous, but the opinion this post is expressing is perfectly valid.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 11:06 PM
7

Right. Troll, rather then idiot. Never mind. Report and move on.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 04:28 AM
11

But victim blaming is what you put up with all the time. FTFY, asshole.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 04:12 AM
11

Because we go against the grain. Whenever a person's opinion is different from a widely held opinion, others will try to convert them to the "correct" opinion. And, if they don't bend, out comes the ad hominums and insults, because how dare you disagree with me?!
/r/MensRights22/06/13 02:22 AM
2

Basically.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 02:48 AM
4

Reverse the game, though. Slap and electrocute her into the perfect girlfriend. Play now! Imagine the outcry. Why is suddenly OK just because it's "him" instead of "her"?
/r/MensRights16/06/13 11:18 PM
1

Foreveralone untill the law isn't batshit crazy, that's what I think.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 07:00 PM
4

What's wrong with lucid dreaming?
/r/MensRights14/06/13 08:15 AM
7

Look at the child-rearing climate for men nowadays. I don't blame you. Fuck, I agree.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 08:14 AM
1

I remain of the opinion that, so long as the possibility exists, no matter how small it is, it should not be discounted. Unlikely as it is, it's not inherently a bad idea. It just usually is.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 07:54 PM
2

Is it sometimes ok? Only, and I include this possibility because despite being a low statistical possibility is still a possibility, if the relationship is kept strictly outside of the student-teacher relationship, does not affect treatment of the student or teacher within the normal student-teacher relationship, and does not break sane consent laws (I.e. a primary school teacher and an 8 year old is insane, but a high school teacher and a 16/17 year old isn't that crazy) Is it sometimes NOT rap…
/r/MensRights13/06/13 07:40 PM
7

Male teacher sleeping with student = rape (which it is) Not necessarily, mate. It may usually be, but to put it down with a blanket statement like that is a great way to sound like an ass. Not disagreeing that a teacher fucking a student is wrong, just pointing out that blanket statements are bad.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 07:22 PM
1

That was a pretty bad speech.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 12:55 PM
2

I'm just curious; If you're so disillusioned with females, why bother continuing to pursue them? If the game is boring, and even one-night sexytimes are starting to lose their appeal, why do you bother? Mind, I'm actually asking a quesiton as opposed to being snarky. I decided fuck that shit at about 16, and haven't bothered since. I'm content as hell, so I'm just curious why you are pursuing what seems to me to be a big 'ol hamster wheel.
/r/TheRedPill14/05/13 04:11 AM
6

Electrodes and tape.
/r/TheRedPill27/04/13 01:14 PM
5

Agreed. On the other hand, do you want to be a statistic? I don't. I find it easier to just assume people are out to fuck me over, and respond appropriately.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 05:00 PM
5

Or, as it seems, a great deal of young women.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 04:46 PM
11

Went on to a successful career as a transvestite escort, actually.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 04:12 AM
15

It's not Men's Whining, mate. To call the shit we put up with in the gender-biased culture, legal system, and media of the modern "enlightened" western world whining is like calling Jews that are still bitchy about the whole Holocaust thing Jew's Whining. There is recognizable slight, recognizable discrimination, and many men are convicted or made social pariah for shit Womyn (wtf is up with that word, anyways?) can do for the fuckall of it. So, sit down, shut up, and let people vent. We're not …
/r/MensRights02/04/13 08:06 PM
-1

...Who would rape...that, exactly? A blind but exceptionally horny man? ...no, I think at some point he would touch her face, so... Nope. I'm confused.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 12:14 AM
4

Some of that is just innaccuracy because of modern schooling, and some of that is just plain nonsense. Why were women expected to cook, clean, and pop out babies each year? Food and economics. For all the political posturing of the nobility and the warleadership, one cannot rule a starving empire, and weapons and armor don't just pop up out of the ground when you need them. Men were needed not just to fight wars, but to stay home and man the farms. Pound for pound, a man is capable of at least 3…
/r/MensRights05/02/13 01:22 PM
2

Then moving to a different state?
/r/MensRights11/01/13 03:20 PM
2

I am a firm believer in Men's Rights to make jokes. In fact, it is our privilege!
/r/MensRights10/01/13 04:11 PM
13

STOP HAVING FUN GUYS. STOP IT RIGHT NOW.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 03:20 AM
1

So, what? Club them in the wild and drag them by the hair back to the man-cave? What the fuck. Civilization is going backwards again.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 03:18 AM
5

I'm still waiting for a Twilight video game. I can't wait to put my neckbeard on and complain about how this shit is ruing my favorite entertainment genre.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 03:25 AM
-2

I love those kinds of people. IRL I'm overweight but I have a punch like a dump truck. It's always fucking hilarious when one second some wannabe "alpha" guy is in my face saying something akin to "Whatcha gonna do fat boy?" and the next he's laid out on the ground bleeding from the mouth.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 03:22 AM
2

I love reading the translations of modern rap lyrics. It boggles my mind when you guys actually pull meaning from what looks like Infinite Tourettes Monkeys with infinite grimy typewriters. /offtopic
/r/MensRights02/01/13 09:33 PM
1

The short and simple response to that is, this goes both ways. Women can knock themselves up? Fertile eggs have been cloned from skin cells. Marriage? Men can marry men too, ya know. LGBT is not just about the dykes. Women can do any job a man can? The military had to LOWER their PT standards to allow women to pass muster, and I can count the amount of women in high end positions that involve doing more work then sitting on your ass directing phone calls or somesuch on the fingers of one hand. M…
/r/MensRights30/12/12 01:49 PM
2

Oh, man. That was tried on me in high school. I did the same thing I did in junior high: Kicked a few asses and made a few scary faces, and made sure to destroy all the evidence.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 02:52 AM
1

He's right. Try to aim higher next time.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 02:09 AM
10

I have a hard time commenting on this one. On one hand, I seen so gods damned many of the exact kind of feminist this letter is bashing in my life that my preprogrammed "Grr I am mad guy!" response is...well, Grrr. I am mad. Where are my rocks, I must throw them?, and etc. On the other hand, I have also met a goodly amount of women who aren't like that at all, and I hesitate to throw rocks at them just because a host of others who happen to share the same genitalia have pissed me off in the past…
/r/MensRights19/12/12 04:41 AM
5

Right on, man! Fight the Postal Service!
/r/MensRights20/10/12 04:11 PM
5

Funnily enough, I always read that as For the Fucking Yes. I have no idea why.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 04:10 PM
7

Hairy? Lady, I need to shave with a industrial saw every other day. Back off on the hairy thing. God damned Russian decent making me part bear.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 05:40 AM
-6

/sigh. It's hard not to develop some fairly strong misogyny whenever I read about shit like this. Hang in there, dude. Suggestions: Get a video camera. Keep it charged. Spend some bitcoin and hire someone to...remove this problem for you.
/r/MensRights14/09/12 02:43 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter