TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Arkhamguy123 Archive

View 1 post and 169 comments by Arkhamguy123 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Arkhamguy123/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 06:49 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Uh huh
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 01:18 AM
3

You do though
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 01:17 AM
0

Oh my god dude you were on to something raw and veracious then you slipped up and exposed the incel/right wing slant with the “high body count on woman = gross” childish thinking Now I can’t even take this post seriously when you were on the verge of a real hard hitting truth
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 12:08 AM
5

“ the man is not relating to an actual woman but his own mental image that he has projected onto her.” Stopped reading right there. The epitome of cringe worthy pseudo intellectual Reddit speak
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 12:00 AM
1

Well if they settled hard then they don’t… get what they want…?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/26 07:23 AM
1

bro what? I’m a huge misanthrope but some obscure Russian spy story doesn’t say anything about women lol
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 06:18 AM
3

Yeah I feel like you’re pulling that out of your ass and it isn’t actually true at all Even women in their 30s don’t want young men typically. I’m gonna side with the studies that showed women want men in their general age range whereas with men it’s the exact opposite cause that reflects observable reality
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/26 06:03 PM
6

for a woman who engages on purple pill debate arguments on Reddit it might not be (ostensibly) but for most normal regular women it kinda is Breaking news! Humans don’t like loneliness
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/26 06:01 PM
1

swap money and game but yeah
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/26 05:58 PM
1

huh? This is erroneous. didn’t the studies find that for women it’s pretty tethered to their age cause they are more status obsessed. 20s want 20s, 30s want 30s, 40s want 40s, 50s want 50s. etc. Whereas for men it was found basically every age group are all locked dead center on early-mid 20s women for attraction
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/26 05:47 PM
–

*a top 1% commenter on the purple pill debate subreddit doesn’t get sexually aroused by men* Wow interesting
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/26 05:43 PM
0

Oh of course
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 09:38 PM
1

“100s of women in queue on multiple apps” Riiiight….
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 05:32 PM
1

This is like a 3rd grader convinced his imaginary sword he thought of at recess scares the adults Most men don’t really care about women’s career like that dude. And plus it takes an outrageously weird and insecure man to feel intimidated by a woman’s job anyways
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 05:29 PM
5

this mf seriously thought hes the only man in here who’s had sex
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 04:33 AM
1

I knew before I finished reading this that the comments would be empty Disney movie platitudes and irrelevant disingenuous side steps as the only counters Then I scrolled down and yeah. Right on the money. Nobody can actually engage with anything uncomfortable or bleak. It’s as predictable as the sun rising. I’d love to see OP sit down with someone 1 on 1 or 1 on 2 and actually discuss these sagacious ideas in depth with someone who disagrees but is intelligent. Like an old bill Maher panel or s…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 07:55 PM
–

I wish I were as naive and foolish as this but unfortunately I understand reality Absolutely hilarious you tried to counter with “it’s all about personality” as if this was a astute profound rebuttal and not tired, cliche, laughable, erroneous Disney movie drivel
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 07:57 AM
–

*basically impossible Not very hard. Nigh-impossible
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 06:53 PM
–

Nope. This is more man coping just like the whole when I’m old and aged women will like me more thing. Women gatekeep both 99.99999% of the time. Guys that look like James Bond get to gatekeep relationships from women while still getting sex and that’s it
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 06:45 PM
–

Your first mistake is thinking it’s about these extrinsic personality attributes and not facial hotness. Facial hotness trumps all. Everything. Especially with women. These things, boring, fun, mediocre, energetic will be liked and/or justified post hoc if the guy is hot
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 06:41 PM
0

Uhhh no offense but an Indian tech workers dating experience will probably be uhhh let’s just say different than other men maybe
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 06:36 PM
1

That’s awesome lady so please put fourth your supporting evidence for your claim
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 03:52 PM
1

No we weren’t. You are now, because you’ve tried to change your premise after being thoroughly refuted, but if you recall you started this at a much different place talking in absolutes. I’ve slowly checkmated you into this position now granting “exceptions” So where are your counter examples? Also couldn’t I just circumvent your rubric by going pre civilization to hunter gatherers? Who didn’t have these customs and just fucked who they liked?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 03:33 PM
0

Yeah obscure cultures like renaissance era medieval Europe. Also all of it disproves your point. You staked your whole entire claim on an absolute blank statement that relationships never functioned that way ergo even 1 example shatters your entire ridiculously broad and callous initial statement. Furthermore you have provided 0 counter examples yourself. Youre projecting modern dating on ancient societies and to say “see! They didn’t have that! I’m right!” This is absurd. It’s laughable. It’s n…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 03:16 PM
1

Jesus Christ lady “Throughout history, most civilizations relied on arranged marriages for economic and political stability. However, some notable exceptions actively practiced free-choice marriage, based their unions on romance, or bypassed traditional marriage entirely. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] The Mosuo People Residing in the southwestern provinces of China, the Mosuo Culture practices no traditional marriage and avoids the institution entirely. Instead, they trace lineage entirely through a matriarch…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 02:54 PM
0

We’re literally talking about the ai summary on Google dude. It’s a few paragraphs. You are working overtime to weasel out of this lol. Just say you lost the argument next time
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 02:45 PM
0

I literally. Literally. Literally. Just offered to dm you the findings. You reply back with juvenile snark I have the findings I’d just rather not clog up the comments section. You are literally plugging your ears now and going “la la la la” because you know your whole argument is obliterated by a 1 second Google. So do you want to advance this discussion or not? I have a handful of societies I could dm you.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 02:38 PM
0

Okay so first of all this is a very binary and goofy way to think of it as hunter gathers wouldn’t “date” in the traditional sense we do in the same way they wouldn’t play video games or go to McDonald’s. Your argument requires you to force a modern construct on ancient societies and when they fail by your arbitrary metric you somehow see this as fodder that supports you. It doesn’t. Furthermore since you puzzlingly insist on having me baby you because you’re hoping Google won’t yield results or…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 02:00 PM
0

You typed out all of that instead of taking 5 seconds to google “historical societies that didn’t have arranged marriages”…? Which I guess would be inconvenient for your narrative
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 01:48 PM
0

That absolutely was a thing are you out of your mind? What the hell are you talking about? Is this your thing? You’ve just cast yourself as the wise cynic who sees the reeeeal gritty bleak truth and this is just part of your identity now? Makes you feel smart?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 01:15 PM
-1

Yes… still…? What does that change? Now obviously due to societal conditions women faced greater pressure and that led to a lot of transactional marriages but now you’re backtracking. First of all you just said “relationships”. Second of all you started with a beyond cynical take, got called on it, now you’re giving the actual nuanced take you should’ve started with
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 12:56 PM
1

Anyone with an iq higher than my dog should be aware of this lol It’s a sad coping mechanism unsuccessful men adopt. No hot early to mid 20 somethings genuinely want some old ass ugly fucking guy for anything beyond the most vacuous transactional “buy me things for sexual access” dynamic They don’t want to accept they’ll have to start romantically and sexually pursing women who look and act older because they’re not attracted to older women who look aged and old (which… you can argue is fair and…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 12:42 PM
0

So you’re the authority and expert on every heterosexual relationship pre ~2015-2020? That seems like a beyond arrogant and silly comment to start with presupposing you’re just omniscient and privy to the nature of all non modern relations through time
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 12:32 PM
0

It’s just nature bro. Literally no force in this earth can change it. You can accept it and do your best or… well… actually that’s it. There is no other option. But i understand venting can be very therapeutic To be fair too let’s be real most men are repulsive and kinda disgusting. With literally laughably poor social skills. If I were a hot chick I’d be doing the exact. Same. Shit. Filtering out 90%+ and just going for the most pristine or at least the least icky guys I could find. But from th…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 12:24 PM
8

Where did you get the 75% from
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 12:15 PM
1

Yeah just don’t be a human. Brilliant
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 09:14 PM
1

They’re both biological facts aging isn’t an invention of the Andrew Tate incel community wtf was this assessment? Just trying to sound smart? Until some kind of earth shattering cell research breakthrough or medical breakthrough, everyone. Ev. Ery. One. Will get old and ugly. For women this is generally more pernicious in dating and starts earlier than for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 08:59 PM
1

“I believe having deeply depressing existential suicide inducing natural fears about living a isolated life bereft of all romance and intimacy makes you a huge coward basically” Wtf
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 10:18 PM
3

Ah the old trying to sound deep and smart by making no sense at all Okay so a millionaire agonizing over not having steak and lobster for dinner is the same as a homeless person agonizing over having no food at all? Ya know, since they’re both “fighting over what’s valuable to them”?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 10:08 PM
1

Searching my username doesn’t lead to any post though
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 04:05 AM
1

How would you know my account is private
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 03:32 AM
1

Weeeeeell….
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 09:55 PM
1

Except you didn’t specify many at all lol. Only after I just called you out. Your original one 100% reads like you’re saying all men So even if it’s “many”. You concur there’s plenty of others that are what I’m saying. So I’ve been right this whole time
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 09:20 PM
1

So let me get this straight. I oversimplify while you cast sweeping generalizations of an entire gender of billions, options aren’t actual options because… well they’re just not, aaaand it is literally simply impossible for you to select a single man with your equal standards of cleanliness? Do I have everything right?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 09:09 PM
1

Uh huh yes and? Do you understand now? Is this you concurring?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 08:21 PM
1

The word “idiot” or any synonym of idiot isn’t even in a single one of my comments to you. I’m seeing since you SELECT. Since you CHOOSE. Since you PICK. There’s no excuse to not get what you want here. Your entire argument is laughably goofy This is like there’s an assortment of Easter eggs. Blue. Pink. Green. Yellow. And you can pick literally any one you want in the whole row. And you’re like “gah I haaaate blue why do I have to have a blue egg waaaaa”
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 07:29 PM
1

Wrong. You’re misusing solipsism as a failed attempt to help your narrative. Not once did I claim every male does, it’s simply 70iq basic reasoning that there are other men on earth who do as well. Ergo, you can find them. If you concur that, then why even try to go down this “solipsistic” rabbit hole? Isn’t that completely superfluous? Was it just to try and sound smart?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 05:05 PM
1

Yes… egocentrism… selfishness… and I literally explained before you even typed this in my last comment why even this definition doesn’t work in the slightest for your argument and you go and try to quote it anyways I’ve debunked this before you even posted it. Let’s look back “ Even if that applied that wouldn’t help your argument unless you meant to imply I’m the only man on earth would do that which would be a very poor argument”
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 04:38 PM
1

Solipsism is selfishness genius. What I described is literal textbook selflessness. You’re using words you don’t even understand. Even if that applied that wouldn’t help your argument unless you meant to imply I’m the only man on earth would do that which would be a very poor argument And no that’s goofy. Women don’t pick? Are you insane? Men don’t gatekeep shit except the top 10% of guys women chase. So I guess if you’re going for men out of your league yeah you might have to compromise. Otherw…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 03:15 PM
2

Then that defeats what you said even more. Like I noted, it’s archaic. Modern times it’s usually more of a divide. I did hella house chores for my ex when she’d be at work. We live in a more progressive era where men can cook and clean And again, for the third time, since you are a woman, you PICK the man not the other way around, so just chose a man who will do these things. It’s really really really easy dude
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 02:55 PM
3

Because it’s outdated and antiquated as fuck referring to a time when women were just exclusively expected to be chore robots And again… you’re the chooser… it’s as easy and simple as choosing a man out of your 80 trillion options who will do… the bare minimum of obligatory labors like that. You have exactly 0 room to complain about this, this is very silly
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 02:19 PM
6

To be fair they don’t really like our dicks visually the way we like ass and tits visually Like not even close. Not even in the ballpark
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 07:48 AM
4

What is this 1950? So you’re the selector, just… select a man who will do basic adult chores…? Problem solved? This is like the meme of the giant horse tied to the baby chair thinking it can’t move A completely failed attempt at whataboutism
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 07:46 AM
15

This was the most bloviating way to just say “I don’t like sexual attention from people I find ugly”
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 07:39 AM
2

Pretty quixotic and disingenuous Psychological breakdowns would ensue pretty quickly if someone tried this very reddit advice here
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 07:35 AM
2

Huh? You named two actors. People in an artistic field
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 03:56 PM
2

Absolutely not. “Desirable” men are going to be even more shallow and looks focused than their “undesirable” counterparts Desirable men are just hot men. That’s it. Maybe you can a good job on top of that but both are superficial. Men with the most matches on dating apps aren’t the ones sitting around contemplating the deep naturalist order and beauty of the world and ruminating about the potential future discoveries of quantum mechanics while they agonize over the paucity of empathy in modern s…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 08:45 AM
2

It wasn’t different looks though? I don’t understand how you’re not following Women are replying more to the top % of guys they exclusively send likes to Guys have a far, far, faaaar more even distribution of likes sent but sometimes only replied to their hottest matches It’s literally 1:1 except guys weren’t as shallow while sending likes
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 04:13 PM
3

They didn’t. They heavily replied to hotter women whereas they sent likes to all ranges Whereas women only sent likes to the hottest guys and then in that niche a more even distribution of replies
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 04:07 PM
1

I guess
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 02:44 PM
4

It sounds like someone who understands basic common sense “Proven” lol. Right. That’s why men’s likes on apps follow an even distribution and women’s likes are comically slanted towards the hottest guys. Brilliant conclusion you made
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 02:09 PM
2

It kinda is
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 01:36 AM
3

Well yeah dude it sounds like you just haven’t had the right experience yet. I can tell you for a fact it’s possible to have both. When it’s right it’ll be both. And yeah it’s all fucked. I suspect most of Gen z women will go unmarried or you’ll see divorce rates spike and I suspect most of Gen z men will die alone. But faced with this dilemma there’s a choice. You can be intrepid, and go out and push through the sadness and frustration and rejection, or capitulate and be firmly in the “unmarrie…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 01:15 AM
1

…. Huh Edit: actually ya know what, don’t bother explaining. Lol I’ll just say sure. Yeah. I’ll just declare neutrality on whatever you just said lol
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 01:06 AM
2

But you can though. If you give up you go from maybe about a 3% chance to a 0% chance. And 3>0 last I checked Sides there’s no need to get a kinda spectrum like fixation on attractiveness. Anymore than there is getting worked up that you have to sleep and take a shit every now and then. Or that you can’t breathe underwater or fly. We’re just humans man. You don’t want a girl that looks like Quasimodo and a girl not wanting a man that looks like the hunchback of notre dame either doesn’t preclude…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 01:04 AM
2

Yeah for sure. I agree. It is good retort to say that well most relationships sucking is more consequential than most video games or restaurants sucking. I’ll grant you that. One is far less trivial. But there’s still always a chance for a non surface level connection
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 12:51 AM
1

Right but that’s not a mind blowingly deep philosophical revelation Most everything sucks. Most resturaunts suck. Most movies suck. Most music sucks. Most games suck. Most books suck. Most apps suck. Most people suck. And yes most relationships are transactional and shallow as you put it Buuuuuut there are always outliers and exceptions to all of these so theres no need for full despair
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 12:48 AM
3

1 note. Something can be a basic involuntary tenet of human nature AND be shallow at the same time
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 12:43 AM
2

*most Cmon you can’t be absolutist like that when talking about sociological things. If you even said 99.9999% I could agree but I’ve seen, we’ve all seen, with our own 2 eyes, women that genuinely love and date ugly and/or broke men
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 12:41 AM
1

Well I mean that’s every human right?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 12:40 AM
5

No but they neglect to mention that it’s most women. Just as most men are shallow. Just as most people are shallow Though I’d perhaps venture to argue men are slightly less shallow romantically
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 12:38 AM
–

Shit. Actually a good rebuttal It’s EXCEEDINGLY rare a Reddit reply to me is actually smart and I can’t think of an immediate and obvious refutation. Well played. Username checks out
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 11:03 PM
1

Women don’t compete. Women select.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 04:08 PM
–

Women: literally biologically programmed to involuntarily seek the top 5-10% and weed out the rest OP: “stop doing that”
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 03:58 PM
1

Just handsome. You can maybe throw white in there too for western counties. All the other traits you named are more or less irrelevant and will be rationalized post hoc after the handsome/hotness threshold is cleared
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 10:43 PM
1

👆🏽👆🏽👆🏽👆🏽👆🏽👆🏽👆🏽 He’s right
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 10:40 PM
1

I don’t think anybody is arguing that. Nobody serious at least. The frustration I think for some men is that while nobody is technically “entitled” to it, any women that doesn’t look like Igor can get it and summon it as easy as getting a fast food meal, whereas for these socially inept and/or physically unattractive men, seeing a woman naked is literally as impossible as flying around like Superman. I believe, that’s the whole core of the incel “movement”. Of the male ire
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 10:37 PM
1

Yeah let’s all just strive to not be normal regular human beings and biological mammals! Genius! Brilliant!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 10:30 PM
4

*~35 By 45 unless she’s in a top 1% of aging genetics she’s already having an existential crisis and her romantic experience is starting to vaguely resemble an average man’s experience from 18-death
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 10:20 PM
3

99% agree. We don’t have to call it “the wall” and get into bitter incel 4chan rhetoric but saying women are pursued vigorously well into their 40 and 50s is complete and utter bullshit. I’m sorry. It is. Hell even if you said the 30s that would be a very arguable and iffy statement. 40s and 50s is actually laughable to say
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 10:18 PM
1

At the end of the day man, most people, yes women too, in dating, are vacuous pieces of shit. Both genders. Broadly speaking, (I live in America so only speaking for this country not the world) women just want a hot white guy with a great job. That’s it. No further bloviating needed. There are exceptions that venerate more substance but by and large that’s the whole thing. In all its shallowness If you don’t have 3/3 of these yeah dating will be on hard mode
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 10:03 PM
14

This is the mother of all strawmen 😂 this is the Superman of strawman Who in the fuck on gods green earth is saying that it’s a “moral failure” for women to not fuck men they aren’t attracted to other than the most trivial, niche of fringes out there
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 09:57 PM
1

Okay now that’s gettin kinda weird. College kids look young. A lot of them almost high school level young looking You really think women 23,24,25,26,27,28,29 are just hideous? Seriously? They’re vastly uglier than college babies to you? :/
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 09:04 AM
1

He’s 10000% not getting thousands of likes on tinder in any big American city I promise you He employed hyperbole and deceit when he saw your counterpoint about tinder slightly discombobulated his thesis
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 08:13 AM
2

All due respect to you, you seem like a smart guy, I’m sure you’re a great guy, But me personally, also 27, I couldn’t fucking fathom buddying around with college babies to try to get invited to college kid parties in hopes of bagging college kid ladies. Would be utterly unconscionable to me as I’m almost 30. The personality/maturity gap is as vast as the Grand Canyon in my experience
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 07:53 AM
1

I don’t speak Spanish
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 05:30 AM
1

You realize just because it doesn’t arouse YOU, some weirdo on Reddit, doesn’t mean it doesn’t broadly excite most other WOMEN right? The billions of women worldwide who aren’t sexually stunted wackos who argue on Reddit that women don’t like men? You are so solipsistic all of your arguments are just projecting your own feelings to a whole gender Also you struggle with correlation and causation. Because you don’t understand basic rationale. First of all preferences on ONE porn site for users in …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 05:23 PM
1

What is your premise even? You’ve changed it about 5 times as you continue to get refuted
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 05:15 PM
1

Are you 4 years old? I literally quoted it for 3 fucking times. You’re just wrong. You got embarrassed by your own source to where all you can do is pout like a little kid and repeat “no!” Over and over And no you don’t because it’s common fucking sense you literally just admitted to being attracted to that yourself What the fuck are you talking about women don’t sexualize muscles? That’s a fucking fact that’s like acting to prove grass is green it’s obvious to anyone with eyes. Women sexuality …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 06:41 AM
1

No you literally just agreed with me dude You have literally zero point and no evidence. The evidence you’ve posted contradicts you lol
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 06:27 AM
1

No you haven’t you’ve been denying it for 2 days straight you only just now came to a reasonable position by agreeing with me finally
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 06:14 AM
1

For the 1000th time. The study found it was equal. Not less. Equal. Please stop saying nonsense Yes you’ve given me studies that prove my point. yes and okay I’m not saying it’s the exact same but it’s undeniable women sexually desire hot men. And the majority like physically exceptional men. That’s a fucking fact. You don’t need a formal study to tell you women want to fuck hot sexy buff men. That’s the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard in my life
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 05:57 AM
1

I’ve literally said this about 400 times. Yes women are less horny than men. And no what im saying is that obviously straight women still get turned on by men. Obviously
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 05:52 AM
1

Uh yes you can because the studies note it was also from watching men specifically No not period. We’ve already established sexual preferences are a thing. You’re again projecting your own tastes. No it was one of the top categories. And plenty of women watch and cum to videos of muscular men. Are you telling me this doesn’t happen? And you don’t need a formal study it’s fucking common sense in the same way men liking ass and tits is. Do you need a study to tell you there’s fish in the ocean?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 12:14 AM
1

Okay for the 1000000th time you don’t need to keep saying lower than men’s we’ve already established this So do you agree with what I just said though?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 12:11 AM
1

Dude, listen to me, now you’re just going in circles repeating something ive already said 100 times that we already agree on. Yes. Women get less horny than men. Women are generally less sexual than man. You don’t need to restate that when my reply was literally dedicated to that Visual stimuli from a man’s body is going to be dependent on many different variables. Generally I would agree with you just you can’t just say “men’s bodies” as a monolith and just claim that as a flat statement. There…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 09:15 PM
1

Yes both studies showed genital arousal in women viewing men You have zero evidence it “doesn’t do much” when it empirically does Now here’s what I’ll grant you, MOST men’s bodies yes aren’t gonna do much for women sexually. Most men are physically unimpressive. I will concede that point. I will grant you that. BUT, an exceptionally ripped buff man will sexually arouse most heterosexual women. This is a fact. It’s demonstrable. It’s axiomatic.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 09:12 PM
1

Wrong. Study you sent this morning said they’re equally aroused by both. Try again Right and everything you just said is disproved by both common sense and the two studies you tried to use. Heterosexual women are sexually aroused by men. That’s literally a definition of a heterosexual woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 08:55 PM
1

Huh? Sexual arousal between someone naked and porn is going to vary person to person. How do you know my preference? You’re just projecting yours. There’s this thing called personal preference. You may have heard of it. It’s gonna be different from person to person. You can’t say “inherently more arousing” anymore than you can say steak is “inherently” better than salmon. Its preference Yeah like an 8 story building is smaller than the Empire State and like an elephant or a gorilla is much small…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 08:42 PM
1

So how does that prove women don’t like also looking at men? Aren’t bixesuals a thing? If I eat an orange does that I can never eat and hate apples? By the way, sex is kind of a two way act between men and women 95% of the time so any porn women watch will incidentally also include women. Again, how does women watching women porn prove women don’t like men?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 08:38 PM
1

At every point? Go re read your comments yesterday and today I’m not diverting anything we just talked about the stats. Also I didn’t even include any emojis in that last reply what? Even if I did an emoji is waaaay less childish than repeating “no im right no I’m right no I’m right no I’m right” over and over when you get defeated in an argument What are you right about? Heterosexual women don’t like men? LOL yeah genius point. Not wrong at all. You’re so smart
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 08:25 PM
1

Ignore it? I’ve literally acknowledged it 4-5 times now. What’s your evidence it would be smaller for just a man? What’s your evidence? How do you know? That’s not what the studies indicate. And again, this depends heavily on WHAT kind of body the man has. You can’t just say “man’s body” as a blanket statement. That’s dumb. And you’re wrong again. This is like saying an elephant is small compared to a blue whale. It was just smaller than man’s. Which is obvious. Actually the second article noted…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 08:21 PM
1

You literally just said that 2 seconds ago in your other comment to me Nope. I’m demolishing them by reading the studies you sent. Reading the conclusions back to you. And watching you childishly dance around by saying “you lost! I’m right! You lost! I’m right” like a little kid over and over and over with no actual refutation
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 08:07 PM
1

There is literally nothing in the article that says or supports that. If a man is naked fucking a woman guess what. They’re seeing the naked man too and getting aroused. The article even notes this but you didn’t read it so you wouldn’t know LOL. Fact is, women do get aroused from seeing a man’s body BOTH studies you’ve sent showed that. And yes it said some looked at women more as they project themselves as the women it never said they don’t look at, and get excited by, the men at all And lol b…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 08:05 PM
1

You literally said exactly that multiple times now you’re changing what you said And I literally accepted the studies and used them against you to demolish your arguments to which your only response was “nu uh” so what are you talking about. You’ve been wrong this entire time and continue to be. It’s hilarious.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 07:54 PM
1

Well that’s an odd statement without any specificity of the man’s physique. Fat and shredded are going to get different reactions. And yes much lower than a man’s with much more testosterone isn’t necessarily low. That’s like saying an eight story office is “small” because it’s not as big as the Empire State. You’re using dumb logic And lol you have no evidence it’s not visual arousal from looking at men. The article literally states it was from looking at both genders. You’re just arguing again…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 07:52 PM
1

How are these excuses? Furthermore you realize women lookin at women getting fucked by men is not evidence women don’t also like lookin at men right? The gay man analogy doesn’t work because as per your own study women and men perceive porn and sexual acts differently so that’s not a valid argument at all
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 07:37 PM
1

Okay so now youre just back to regurgitating the study from yesterday I’ve already responded to. They did not show “minimal” arousal they showed it’s lower than a man’s. And the women looked at the other women more because women project themselves as the woman getting fucked by men and this is a turn on for them. The study makes this clear. You also have zero evidence that arousal to a hot man would be less. Saying something doesn’t make it true. For the third time because you’re not understandi…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 07:35 PM
1

Couldn’t that be pretty easily explained by the fact that women are over presented in the pornstar profession and/or lesbian woman users?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 07:26 PM
1

It’s banned in my state
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 06:59 PM
1

Oh my god dude you are punching air right now the 2nd study literally word for word said arousal for women was equal when looking at both genders and yet you keep insisting it wasn’t because you’re just being a child now 😂 I even quoted it for you TWICE and yet you still assert your own conclusion that is directly contrary to the study. You have lost this argument no less than 10 times by now. You go in your study, find one out of context quote, twist it for you narrative, and try to pawn it off…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 06:39 PM
1

I can’t access the link cause I’m in America. Link a third party source
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 06:36 PM
1

You’re not even reading what I said I literally explained that 😂😂😂 go re read my last paragraph “ Which clearly shows that they were not aroused by watching men”? The study… LITERALLY FOUND THEY WERE AROUSED BY MEN NUMEROUS TIMES I EVEN QUOTED IT FOR YOU IN MY LAST REPLY 😂😂😂😂 You just loooove arguing against facts don’t you? “Tee hee heterosexual women aren’t heterosexual at all” yeah I’m gonna laugh at you when you argue about this I’ll copy and paste again for you since you can’t read “ For wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 05:16 PM
1

I can’t take you seriously when you accuse me of doing something that’s literally been 90% of your replies since yesterday “And even if” LOL. I hate to break it to you but they are. Also what’s your evidence of the lesbian porn claim? You keep saying it but there’s no source? Heterosexual women are aroused by attractive male bodies. Cope with this fact. It’s so weird that this hurts your ego
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 05:13 PM
1

Women getting aroused by a man’s body does indicate sexual desire that’s literally almost the dictionary definition of arousal 😂😂😂😂 and an attractive man’s body will always generate sexual arousal in most heterosexual women. You think they get sexually aroused and think “hm yeah I have 0 sexual desire to this thing I’m sexually attracted to”? LOL. This is hysterical. You have just made this so part of your identity you’re just denying reality now because your weird crazy ego for some reason can’…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 04:20 PM
1

It’s not though that depends on the body itself of the man and also the mood and situation of the woman. You’re trying to make an absolutist statement and you have no clue what you’re talking about. Also you did say those things but got defeated on every point and had to back track No actually it’s you who doesn’t understand your study. It demonstrated point blank the opposite of your claim. Your own source debunked you. That’s it. You’re just wrong. There’s nothing you can say that will magical…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 01:37 AM
1

I don’t speak Spanish
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 01:02 AM
1

Where did I lie? Lol you didn’t give me a damn thing. Your “study” didn’t even support your claim for the 100th time. Women get aroused by seeing men this is an axiomatic fact and you’ve failed every attempt to try and say otherwise. “Also I know you’re right”? You’ve literally had to back track and agree with me numerous times from where you started. Your entire premise is laughably ridiculous. Absurd. “Straight women don’t find men arousing” is like saying “grass isn’t green” and trying to arg…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 01:00 AM
2

“Women don’t have sex because they have sexual desire” Absolutely laughable take on the situation. Every human has sexual desire dude
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 09:27 PM
2

I’ve learned this girl is a misandrist psycho who frequents this forum getting into these kinds of arguments routinely
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 09:23 PM
1

LOL you have to be kidding me with these acrobatics. From “nu uh not at all” and “okay well uhh it was “minimal””. 😂 oh my god dude. You just got caught. Sides what’s minimal? Minimal compared to a males? I literally JUST SAID THAT 3 TIMES! And you disagreed every time until I guess you actually read it and realized you were wrong and now you agree. So no it does not “support” your argument it literally just defeated it as I said. And lol okay now my friends are made up and I’m a liar 😂 so you g…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 08:57 PM
1

Lady. You can say it until you’re blue in the face. It’s still incorrect. First of all the study was 90 women and IN the study itself it notes how it’s small sample size is a flaw in the study. So I don’t know where the hell you got “most women” from. Second of all, it’s not proven Jesus Christ for the third time that’s not even what your study says. And there’s so many variables the study didn’t even go into. Let’s say for the sake of argument hypothetically that your study did say that (it doe…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 08:44 PM
1

Aw man now how am I gonna get your humiliatingly atrocious rebuttals
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 08:40 PM
1

Lady, I DONT SPEAK SPANISH 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 07:08 PM
1

Why would I take you seriously? You don’t read your own study, you lie, you contradict yourself, your arguments are atrocious, and you are seriously convinced heterosexual women don’t want t have sex and aren’t turned on by attractive men? None of the above warrants taking someone seriously. Its sounds like rambling of a crazy misandrist
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 07:00 PM
2

Okay soooo let me help you out, simply restating something, doesn’t make it true 😂 what is this arguing tactic? It literally doesn’t. Seriously. Go look. It found women get sexually aroused in both ways but less than men. Demolishing your argument. Also even if it didn’t, which it does, no random single non peer reviewed study is going to “completely prove” your wack fringe “point” So here’s the other thing, this is peak Reddit debate club argument tactic. Do you really think, you can draw up a …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 06:56 PM
1

Bro I don’t speak Spanish 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 06:41 PM
2

Have YOU read your own study? Because it directly refuted everything you’re saying and supported what I’m saying. And it never even weighed in on them wanting sex or not
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 06:34 PM
1

Also just read your non peer reviewed study and it actually completely destroyed your argument and supported mine LOOOOOOL Did you even read it? Its findings were that women do get objectively and subjectively sexually aroused just less so than men. Which is what anyone with an IQ above 10 could’ve told you. A reasonable position. Instead of ya know, “it’s literally impossible for women to get sexually aroused and that never happens” absolute nonsense you spouted
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 05:46 PM
2

The thing is they do register it as physically arousing. Your entire argument is “women can’t be physical aroused by men” which is not only absurd but also has about thousands maybe hundreds of thousands of years of evolutionary biology to refute that. Maybe YOU don’t get aroused by men due to some weird psychological issue but women broadly most certainly do I don’t think you realize the ridiculous nature of what you’re postulating and trying to dress up as scientifically sound. Again, to repea…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 05:16 PM
2

Not really because you only named superficial traits as you presupposed men select like women… superficially. Me? Off the top of my head. Someone who’s funny. Goofy. Unserious. Serene. I like nerdy/geeky. I like a fun adventurous spirit. Someone who’s down. And spontaneous. Also intellect is huge. Give me someone cerebral. Someone sharp. Someone who can engage in deep conversations. See it’s not hard to have non physical non vacuous preferences.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 06:55 AM
2

What in the holy hell of disingenuous Reddit arguing is this? You are actually arguing women don’t get aroused by physical qualities of a man? So a guy shirtless who’s ripped a woman’s brain registers the same as blank white wall? This is nonsense. What the hell is this stance even? So women are just asexual like worms and only come to life sexually in the face of nebulous grand emotional services? Get the fuck out of here. You might be able to fool these Reddit geeks but I actually have a lot o…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 06:15 AM
9

Embarrassing and dishonest attempt to construct a false equivalence to make the bleak reality the guy you replied to posted more palatable “Hehe if you just somehow had a magic wand and completely fundamentally altered nature as we know it, uhhh hypothetically men might be as shallow and cut throat as women”
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 06:05 AM
1

Disagree
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 06:20 PM
1

I didn’t. Try again
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 05:10 PM
2

Bingo
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/26 04:20 AM
2

Huh maybe so!
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/26 07:52 PM
0

Dude… that’s a saying 😂 you’ve never heard that? It just means “not your best work/effort” Also lol man who came to me in two separate messages whining accusing me of whining. Hilarious. And I’m not 3 years old if you come to me, which… ya know, you did. Multiple times, I’ll engage with you as long as the discourse goes for. I’m not like “ew no I hate him” and throw my phone away just because you’re weird and came with ad hominem as your substance
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/26 07:48 PM
0

I didn’t ask? :/ but I hope the vet visit goes well! I just took my dog out. But she hates the rain Anyways I’ve already made the point about 3 times now. Public? Yes. Budding in out of nowhere on a conversation you weren’t in? Also yes. It’s not binary. And I’m honed on it cause it happens so rarely and it’s weird. You came out of nowhere swinging to something not even addressed to, then when engaged you go “well uhhh STOP TALKING TO ME THEN”. Just utterly bizarre behavior Ah yes ad hominem ins…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/26 07:19 PM
-1

Homeboy YOU came to ME 😂 TWICE 😂 Unprompted both times This was weird man. Not your best day at the office
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/26 07:08 PM
-1

There’s nothing “serious” about any of your messages here man lol And it clearly does you isolated it and commented on it numerous times
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/26 07:03 PM
-2

Yeah but nobody was talking to you though. You were/are budding in on 1-1 arguments with others Also lol ranting about me supposedly ranting. Offended by cursing 😂😂 EDIT: also the typical Reddit pseudo concerned performative “are you okaaaay bro?” Is cringe dude
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/26 06:59 PM
-4

How the actual fuck did you interpret my reply as that Also who even are you and why are you commenting on my arguments with other people lol
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/26 06:40 PM
1

How
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/26 05:38 PM
–

Nope. Wrong again. The only example you could cite, sex, is 100% reciprocal. So you have utterly failed to substantially back up this “every loving relationship is actually transactional” eye rolling, tired, pseudo intellectual, cliched drivel that I knew you’d trot out If anything you’ve actually somehow managed to make women look worse by doubling down on the fact that they demand a million and one non reciprocal things on top of the act that is literally 100% organic and inevitable in romance…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/26 05:24 PM
1

Uh no that’s still bullshit. That’s like saying “love is conditional on seeing each other”. You don’t just get to set arbitrary “hehe without this major condition it doesn’t work!” When it’s something literally naturally emergent and expected in every fucking adult relationship. That’s like saying “life is conditional on breathing” Furthermore even if we take this very odd view as valid (it’s not) for the sake of discussion your logic still fails. Because there is still a demonstrable difference…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/26 05:08 PM
3

Yea only women experience anything negative ever in any relationship… brilliant… genius stance to have… And dude for the 3rd or 4th time, you did that by reducing sex to just a male exclusive perk and robbing them of agency and enjoyment they could have themselves
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/26 05:43 AM
2

By portraying them as helpless subservient bystanders in their own sex lives for about 3 messages straight now? Not sure how you missed that? Very strange way of “empowering them”. Also YOU saying MY arguments are bereft of substance means nothing to me. I can’t take that seriously. I’ve substantively engaged with everything you’ve brought up. The inverse is not true
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/26 02:04 AM
3

Again this is such a moot and superfluous thing to say then. This is like “could I beat a bear in a fight? Oh well uhhh yeah if you had super strength and invulnerability and super speed 100%!”. It’s not a good sign where you if you stick to reality instead of nonsensical hypotheticals your whole premise crumbles. Also Jesus Christ I’m begging you stop infantilizing women for 2 seconds as fodder for your terrible arguments please. Women. Like. Sex. Too. Women. Get. Horny. Too. Do you understand?…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/26 01:30 AM
1

How could you possibly know that though How are you evidencing that
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/26 12:08 AM
3

Not equally I would say transactional love (which is an oxymoron by the way) is more slanted towards women Also no thats fucking not a “transaction” you literally just had to basically qualify the man as a goddamn rapist to fit into your weird warped view of transactional romance. If a man is forcing sex that’s not a transaction he’s just a fucking rapist, that is an absolute terrible argument. The other one about forcing the woman to stay home was equally abysmal. What is this 1939? That would …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 10:32 PM
1

Still you because he literally said they’re in “business” What else would he mean when he when he says “use you for what you offer” After saying that? A handshake? What do men always bitch about when they talk about women and transactional love? Use your head Plus even if he didn’t specify “mutual benefit” you would still have zero point because if sex is mutually beneficial your point is moot and superfluous. You basically just said “yellow is yellow” as if that’s some kind of sophisticated got…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 10:03 PM
0

That’s such bullshit dead bed rooms kill relationships for both men and women alike it’s not a male only issue
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 09:36 PM
-1

The first two things are 100% mutual or should be. So that’s not even a good counter. You could actually argue all 3 are reciprocal in a good relationship so you really actually have no argument there
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 09:34 PM
2

You didn’t prove it’s not real you just defined it in a hyperbolically clinical and reductive way though
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 09:32 PM
0

Complete bullshit anti feminist false equivalence that actually diminishes women’s sexual satisfaction and liberation Sex is supposed to be mutually beneficial for both. OP is talking about one party exclusively reaping the benefits of the others finances and if not bye bye. It’s not even close to the same You’re better off just owning being a shallow materialist instead of trying to justify it to yourself with these acrobatics
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 09:30 PM
2

He’s talking about shallow materialism not profound human connection. You’re conflating or just being obtuse
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 09:29 PM
5

The fact that you thought that was this huge intellectual gotcha when it’s just easily subverted by just answering “who they are inside. Their character.” says volumes about you That was like that meme of the horse tied to a little toddler chair thinking it can’t move
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 09:27 PM
-1

She actually might be being serious though bro
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 09:00 PM
2

Wait what? When do women say what ever?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/26 08:57 PM
–

I was gonna say I literally couldn’t believe the disconnect here. It’s the exact inverse Go to any bar street in your city or town or look up any dating app statistics and even the most cursory overview of either will bear out the exact opposite of what she said
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/26 08:46 PM
–

Women sexuality being more romantic and interpersonal seems extremely erroneous Women are not these saintly paragons of society. Most of them screen off surface level things like career and hot face and then rationalize the personality post hoc It turns out, most women, are shallow and shitty like most men, like most… humans. Period. You guys are not exempt from shitty human nature. Far from it. In fact I’d argue men actually see romance more intimately and personably
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/26 08:45 PM
–

This is accurate
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/26 08:39 PM
0

All the histrionics and debate here and it really ultimately boils down to this for most sensible men
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/26 08:38 PM
0

Jealousy may be OP just being a hater, but let’s be honest, less desirable is just the bleak gods honest truth
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/26 08:27 PM
–

Wow. You countered bitter nonsense with pseudoscience nonsense! Impressive!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/26 08:25 PM
5

Agree on all
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 03:02 AM
12

Breaking news! Humans (men AND women) both crave romantic intimacy and companionship and will cope and lie if they don’t find it to make themselves feel better about their failure to obtain that! Other breaking news, Batman is Bruce Wayne!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 09:13 PM
–

Women have a vagina. Men have a penis. Men want vagina about 400,000x more than women want penis That’s all it is. When you cut through all the noise that’s the root of why dating is harder for men ultimately. If I NEED a car more than the dealer NEEDS my $10,000 I’m at a significant disadvantage in negotiation
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 08:25 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter