TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Armageist Archive

View 1 post and 193 comments by Armageist on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

I would never hire a woman over a man if things were equal, but they never are Wait, what?
/r/MensRights28/03/15 06:22 PM
1

This....this was beautiful. I love how she blocks them all.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 05:39 AM
14

I stopped reading at this: It is about not being weird or different. Men strive to attain this ideal, and as they do so, women are held back.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 12:52 AM
21

Plus, if you think about all the stupid shit we spend money on to make ourselves more attractive to men (hair removal, highlights, clothing, etc Wat??? Ummm, no. Last time I heard, you bitches do that shit to make you "feel pretty about yourself", not to be catcalled and/or admired by Men. Never mind the fact that many men (certainly not all) put just as much effort into grooming and hygiene with shaving / shavers, hair styling, tans, hair trimming, expensive name brand clothing, etc. as women.
/r/MensRights16/02/15 05:50 AM
9

You mean it already hasn't?
/r/MensRights30/01/15 07:25 PM
36

It's funny how we can find a sympathetic hormonal reason for women to be justified in killing their kids / people but when it comes to the human that has a hormone KNOWN for causing risk taking and aggression known as TESTOSTERONE there's no excuse whatsoever and we're supposed to overcome our animalistic instincts because we have a conscious. So women don't have a conscious when driving their kids into the ocean, huh? Once again, finding an excuse for the woman to be a victim of SOMETHING, whil…
/r/MensRights30/01/15 07:23 PM
15

What do we hear from men when the subject in question is men? Not a peep. It's the same reason why you see comments from men who snicker at the idea of a man being raped by a woman, or outright laugh at a man being beaten/abused by one. The same reason why men will deride a boy who told authorities about having sexual relations with a female teacher/authoritative figure. The same reason why men deride and chide "betas" who can't get laid or aren't successful at work, at women, at sports, at life…
/r/MensRights30/01/15 07:16 PM
1

Next time drop this shirt off for him
/r/MensRights27/01/15 02:20 PM
7

The implication that men are creeps for liking to look at women is fairly common and has a place all over reddit.
/r/PussyPass28/12/14 07:59 PM
3

Her promiscous behavior is what led to her making false accusations. It's like saying not to call someone a thief because they resort to stealing things to get a lot of things. Give me a fucking break.
/r/PussyPass28/12/14 07:57 PM
1

Glad to hear that. I stand corrected then.
/r/PussyPass27/12/14 06:27 AM
1

The point of this topic was that the movie will make you angry because it shows how CURRENT society values accept pussypassing. Now Assflek could either be pointing this out to garner awareness and challenge politically correct notions, or hes putting it out to gain acceptance for women being victims no matter what like the bleeding heart that he is. Judging by his past political leanings like his interview on Bill Maher and Islamists, I'm sure his message is the latter.
/r/PussyPass27/12/14 12:16 AM
1

Ehh, then why is everyone saying it'll anger you and confirm pussypassing? I've heard this here, mensrights, etc.
/r/PussyPass26/12/14 11:51 PM
-9

Not gonna watch a ben assfleck movie, pm me the spoilage please.
/r/PussyPass24/12/14 07:30 PM
6

I apologize for dumping all that baggage on you.
/r/MensRights16/07/14 10:23 AM
13

But the difference between vibrators and fleshlights is that many women can't manually masturbate to climax because of how our bodies work. That certainly hasn't stopped women from creating all manner of gadgets and gizmos to stimulate anything and everything they can, from vibrators to dildos (the equivalent of a fleshlight), to dildos that also have a "creepy" appendage (I say creepy to drive a point home) at the top to buzz the clit (lord knows the ridicule men would get for a penis AND ball …
/r/MensRights16/07/14 06:56 AM
4

This is something the MRA movement should get behind as a whole, like many Feminists get behind women that are victims of assault. It's a shame he's obviously been chastised enough already to back down from it and the majority of the people here are just saying, "Let the Law handle it", as in, Cops who couldn't care less and have already given her a pussypass.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 08:44 AM
3

I have no clue, but I'd think the best place to look would probably be Hindu / Chinese / Roman sexual practices before religious reformation took over.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 09:51 PM
3

As far as your last example, I'm not sure it is completely accurate. I think a better comparison being if guys preferring "tighter" vagina. Since the size of a dildo or the tightness of a vagina could be directly related to sexual pleasure, while breasts would have more to do with visual stimulation. Good point. I'd agree, though cultural marketing and self insecurities has placed emphasis on the aforementioned body parts. You don't see late night tv infomercials about making your vagina tighter…
/r/MensRights10/06/14 08:49 PM
0

I'm willing to bet that Jenny Block toes the 'party line' and shares the same stunted vitriolic logic that Erin Ryan does. Secondly. The discussion of 'female masturbation' is about as 'brave' as sex tips in every issue of Cosmopolitan and trojan twister commercials on every TV Channel. Are you still going to praise her for breaking the taboo of talking about it 10 years from now too? So no, she won't get any praise from me for such a contrived and cliche topic.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 08:38 PM
1

Then according to feminist patriarchy theory logic, you're clearly under the influence, and so is Jezebel, or you're just sexist. The notion that guys that have to use sex toys to get off are losers/creeps relies on the patriarchal idea that all guys should be very capable of having sex with a woman and/or should be judged accordingly based on their ability to do so; an alpha male / red pill bullshit doctrine, that feminists supposedly reel against (unless of course it's only affecting men in a …
/r/MensRights10/06/14 08:19 PM
4

Just tell her it's the same reason why she has a vibrating dildo with a clitoral stimulator (if she has one of course).
/r/MensRights10/06/14 12:03 AM
8

A recent analysis of BJS data, for example, turned up that 46 percent of male victims reported a female perpetrator. Umm, no.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 07:30 PM
1

So the best friend knows he's getting married but doesn't stop to think his best bud getting a blowjob is a problem? Either his friend doesn't really give two shits or he just expected it was okay for his friend to cheat, which would means both of them do.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 08:37 AM
2

But this wasn't malpractice this was some humor at the expense of the patient. In a final remark caught on tape, Ingham allegedly said she would make a note on the man's file that he had hemorrhoids even though he didn't. I'd say that's malpractice. While I understand your desire to not become the thought-police SJW's and Women love to be over being "offended", the fact is they have to suffer the same fate we do when it comes to situations like this.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 06:52 PM
0

Are you kidding me? The very fact that the "Guy buying a girl a drink"; something that has been become very abused by modern women and shouldn't be supported in the first place, has become so pervasive that women think they're now entitled to have it bleed to other forms of social interaction, should definitely offend you. The added insult that he's a douche because he jokingly said it should be under $10 should anger you. This female is a typical self-entitled bitch typical of today's privilege…
/r/MensRights26/04/14 06:37 PM
0

I don't agree with your views on suicide at all, but you have perfectly valid points here.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 05:53 PM
7

Funny you say that, considering Christianity is...on the decline.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 09:55 AM
16

The thing that amazes me the most is that if this was race revearsed there'd be outcries of a racist bully. This type of shit happens to many a white kid in urban and suburban schools and buses.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 01:21 AM
11

Then we should be circumcizing the hood of the clitoris. It's not hygenic to leave it un-exposed like that. /s
/r/MensRights01/04/14 07:00 PM
17

For women, it's funny, because they can't stand that "lazy good for nothing husband/boyfriend man-child" that spends all day playing video games instead of doing what she needs him to do to satisfy her own desires while she's away.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 06:56 PM
3

Commercial in Question: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-FYwLj_P_j0
/r/MensRights25/03/14 06:52 PM
19

I noticed the same commercial. You'll get poo-poo'd here for being too sensitive but that's bullshit, and so is this commercial. It's amazing how the attitudes and what happens in these commercials these days, we're just supposed to take for granted and not question it.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 06:11 PM
5

Best comment on that link. Personally, I find it utterly laugahble that a wife could 'forbid' her husband from going to strip clubs. Screech and nag about it, sure, but forbid? I have long since lost patience with 'modern' women in general. A more unhappy lot I have never seen. People tend to create their own happiness or their own misery, and in this sense I feel bad for the plethora of 'modern' women, they've been taught since girlhood what should make them happy, they grow to womanhood thinki…
/r/MensRights25/03/14 09:30 AM
1

Jesus, could he have at least proof-read it before submitting it? I suppose that adds to the satire of the whole thing anyways though. Also, I have a feeling these Alpha Bros are baiting MRA's (Betas in their mind) as much as any Feminist.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 02:24 AM
1

Fucking Awesome.
/r/MensRights25/02/14 10:31 AM
81

Goddamn that was poetic and philosophical all in one.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 03:32 AM
1

Right....Art.
/r/MensRights09/02/14 06:31 PM
10

Then he's a fucking genius., and so are you for noting as such.
/r/MensRights08/02/14 03:06 PM
-11

That dipshit is completely out of touch with reality. What woman would find sympathy for an average weight (note: not muscular, flabby) balding older man (Not an attractive age relevant student, but a 'creepy' older man, perfect for rape scare victimization) in tighty whities holding his hands out like a zombie in a uncanny-valley'esque statue never before or hardly ever before used out in a random spot on a sidewalk at an all-girls school of all things???? The statue makes no sense whatsoever, …
/r/MensRights08/02/14 02:54 PM
-1

This is what happens when you're a male feminist/white knight involved with Toronto Tumblr Types.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 10:11 AM
1

Well, if you love her, that's all that matters. Carry on. Edit: Wait, no that's bad advice, even if she can only be a friend.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 01:16 AM
15

And you're still friends with 'it' because...
/r/MensRights22/01/14 01:23 PM
6

Ahhh, yet another nightmare scenario story to put the feeling of anxiety in me and raise my blood pressure/heart beat a little like standing on the edge of a cliff. Thanks for giving me a little sobering 'scared straight' and reminding me why it's good to be Single and an FA (Forever Alone).
/r/MensRights21/01/14 03:48 AM
2

There are 1.3 million single women aged 25-34 living in Australia. In the same age bracket, however, there are only 86,000 single, heterosexual, well-off or "eligible'' men earning above $60,000 a year, he said. And that about wraps that whole bullshit up right there.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 11:23 PM
2

While you definitely have a point, your title is just screaming to be ripped and posted on the Feminists sites/subs about MRA's gleeful about violence against women. Just a very poor choice of words on your part.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 11:11 PM
1

These aren't just against women, they're against the whole Millenial Generation, much of what's on Reddit.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 11:09 PM
18

Because everything has to effect them and us on 'equal footing' or make it worse for us because Patriarchy. They're already emotionally petty enough to feel they have the short end of the stick, what with dealing with pregancy, menstration, etc, all the while at the sametime being quick to "take pride in that 'responsibility' in being able to make a life which a man can't do" when it comes down to that control being threatened.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 11:32 PM
2

My assistant manager got out of very warped relationship a little over a month a go. She came to work with cuts, often talked about her depression and suicide. Yea..'warped'. Now you know who was REALLY warped in the relationship, if there ever was really one and she wasn't just doing this all to herself. She eventually starting coming to work with fresh cuts along her arm.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 11:07 PM
2

You may have 'survived' a lot of things, but this does not sound like a healthy relationship. Turn her loose and she'll see how much you're getting 'for free'.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 08:38 AM
0

Your 'speculation' is about as 'fair' as assuming her 911 call wasn't frantic and hyperbolic about a dangerous black man. The police reacted based on the contents of the 911 call. It's pretty safe to say they reacted accordingly and therefore she's to blame for placing the pre-assumptions into the minds of the officers that showed up. A rational person could've easily asked the person at their door what they wanted before even opening a door and telling the 911 operator there 'story' even if the…
/r/MensRights17/09/13 09:57 PM
-3

Bullshit. If a man would've lived there, he wouldn't have jumped to conclusions about a 'dangerous black man' trying to break in and if he had called the cops, they wouldn't have responded so aggressively because she more than likely exaggerated the situation on the phone.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 09:49 PM
12

The article is just another man'gina eager and overzealous to prove himself to his tumblr feminist fandom/overlords.
/r/MensRights15/09/13 11:02 AM
7

I'm surprised you got past this: men who have been screwed over in more ways than one over the course of their lives have every right to be angry, and that with the exception of the MRA/MGTOW permavirgins, men get over their anger eventually and move on. He's a typical alpha male that considers men who group together nothing but whining pussies. The only solution in his book is the classic solution, deep-seated anger on an individual level.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 11:30 AM
6

If you're stupid and rich enough to fall for it, oh well.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 10:03 PM
197

You should consider talking to your superiors about your ability to record instances of enforcement aka 'doing your job' in the future so that you have this to fall back on in the case of legal matters like this bullshit coming up. The signs should then be revised indicating as such that trespassers are recorded/monitored and then the next time something like this arises, record your actions with a camera and immediately let them know they're being recorded before even engaging them.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 01:44 AM
2

And women don't do the same nowadays? Not only do they look at how much money being made, but they too also look at physical appearance. So spare the pot calling the kettle, as they haven't changed their ways at all for the better to reflect their 'modern work ethic', they've just continued to look for the same things while adding more requirements and expect the same benefits and get new benefits because they're 'so persecuted and discriminated against by the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 07:43 AM
6

I knew there was a really good way to put the irony of this. Thank you for that.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 12:58 PM
17

There's nothing much more empowering than turning down your lady for sex because she's turned you off with her attitude or something else. It's like suddenly their one stupid trick in the book for putting up with their bullshit doesn't work.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 12:50 PM
10

They should've just said off the record, easier to read.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 10:01 PM
1

Media won't care, they'll label him as a 'whining male' that obviously doesn't have bigger problems in life to deal with and his standing with the company will be tarnished anyways for bringing this and the company into the light.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 09:59 PM
7

This is the same attitude that allows women to take stupid shit like this to court to destroy men's lives. In order to point out the sheer ridiculousness of such actions by women, one must do the same to them so they can see the error in their own ways. You'll never change shit if you allow them to have the stereotypical attitude that women can play the victims for the most inane shit but men have to 'take it like a man' because they 'always want sex anyways'.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 09:57 PM
5

I would NEVER interact with HR not "on the record." Ever. I would NEVER interact with HR NOT "on the record." Ever. I would NEVER interact with HR NOOOOOOOOOOT "on the record." Ever. As in, "I would NEVER interact with HR ' OFF the record.' Ever." Understand now?
/r/MensRights29/06/13 09:53 PM
7

Time to sue, not quit.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 09:46 PM
5

Your point is definitely valid, but even then, I'll take getting in touch with my own individuality and independence rather than playing some 'roll' for a woman's affection. In the end, they always find fault with you one way or another anyways.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 09:44 AM
3

It's the difference between, "It's the way the world is", and "The world is what we make it".
/r/MensRights13/06/13 09:35 AM
3

They don't call the show 'Totally Biased' for nothing.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 12:18 AM
1

Perhaps if she was more articulate than the valley girl "like, um, okay, um, like" . I would expect a journalist/writer to be able to express her thoughts on a subject held high to her a lot more fluidly than what actually transpired.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 11:37 PM
1

Sorry, this is more like a Conservative Woman's view on Feminism. Not that her points aren't valid, but they're coming from a soapbox that has always preached such things anyways.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 08:43 AM
3

It's a politically correct way to stereotype men, nothing more, nothing less. Slap the word 'culture' on it, and suddenly it's not prejudice, it's observation.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 11:26 PM
1

Dead spot on.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 11:49 PM
2

You're right, not all women will have this attitude. But this was technically in response to her essentially tarring all women with the same brush saying women don't care about such things when clearly, some of them do.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 01:18 PM
6

Pretty sure it's a troll post fishing for quotes. An answer to that question in the wrong direction provides their ammunition.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 12:58 PM
4

Yep, I can already see them saying "MRA's advocate such and such" considering people are advocating to ask her such and such in response to the male circumcision.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 12:40 PM
8

Look at 'his' responses above. Why would he ask for how to manipulate back? And notice how his answers are patronizing in the sense of getting further responses for some kind of 'vindication' of preventing her from 'doing it' to someone else while justifying/excusing her actions of spying. And such a nice response to your accusations. "Deal with it". If that doesn't smell of SRS/troll fishing, I don't know what does.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 12:27 PM
13

2 Looks like you're trying to get someone here to advocate bad behavior. As someone else has said, you sound like a troll. No one here in their right mind would advocate manipulating back. That would make you no better than her. Go home troll.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 12:23 PM
23

"Like, omg! Women get so much attention dressing up like sexy characters from nerd fantasies! I want to do that too!" "Why are all these nerds looking at me like a donut they can't have!?! Ugh, So disgusting!!! Such weirdos!!!"
/r/MensRights24/04/13 05:55 AM
2

Agreed. It doesn't happen, or shouldn't, at the beach when women and men wear bikinis and shorts, why should it happen at a convention? As for the stares, no she doesn't need to welcome them, but they shouldn't be unnerving or rather un-expected either. Remember, it wasn't but 10 years ago going to such conventions for comic books and star trek and the like was considered odd, and you'd expect to end up meeting very odd people. Just because it's become popular or more mainstream doesn't mean you…
/r/MensRights24/04/13 04:55 AM
1

Oh of course, as a society, we definitely tell our kids not to steal. That's when you learn such basic fundamental rules/things. To me, that's why as adults we (should) know it's wrong. Our schools are no different in how to treat human beings, but you're still going to have immature / jackasses / generally bad people who will justify criminal acts in their mind who still try to get away with things they would otherwise know they shouldn't be doing. In the end, this will probably get further out…
/r/MensRights24/04/13 04:44 AM
-1

My point is, why are we criticizing the people who are upset about sexual harassment... and not at all talking about the sexual harassment? The same reason why we don't talk about theft? We know it's wrong to do, yet people still do it. When there's an outcry about rampant theft, we ramp up police/security actions in order to thwart it, catch those that do it. That means store owners have to take some self-responsibility and protect themselves while security/police enforce laws and catch them af…
/r/MensRights24/04/13 03:00 AM
21

I don't think so. "It was more like creepy stares if anything...." This tells you right here she's directing it towards the people who give 'creepy' stares. Men and possibly, though doubtfully women, who are staring at her in a manner of lust. Sexually, not comparatively/competitively/jealously. "I felt like the only cookie on a platter in a room full of overweight frumpy office worker women that have been dieting for a week, She feels like a piece of food or meat, a common analogy used to compa…
/r/MensRights24/04/13 02:25 AM
4

Yeah, I can't deny she's quite the wordsmith.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 01:19 AM
5

My point is, there are people out there that would argue that. You said nobody would. Now that I've shown an example, your next line of defense is to marginalize her. How do we know your cosplayer friends are the norm and not the fringe? No, their experience might not be invalidated, but they also might not represent the norm of cosplayers out there either. You haven't provided anything more than I have to suggest otherwise.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 01:15 AM
69

A good example of the above summary http://i.imgur.com/Y6iiVqs.jpg
/r/MensRights24/04/13 12:50 AM
7

We'll remember that the next time Feminists label MRA as a hate group / Misogynists. But I'm sure you're here because you're trying to prove otherwise.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 12:49 AM
89

http://i.imgur.com/Y6iiVqs.jpg Right, whatever you say.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 12:46 AM
9

Here you go. Not those specific characters but something definitely similar. http://i.imgur.com/Y6iiVqs.jpg The nerve of the guys looking at her. Creeps, right?
/r/MensRights24/04/13 12:46 AM
-1

When they complain about men objectifying them, they don't mean nobody is allowed to find them attractive. They're talking about the guys who try to grope, and ask rude sexual questions, and harass them with crude innuendo Really? You sure about that?
/r/MensRights24/04/13 12:39 AM
9

I don't condone the touching/grabbing/catcalling. But your rights as a cos-player stop where my eyes begin. I can look at you all I want, especially if you're choosing to dress up as a character, that, like you said, portrays a character created by male artists in comics and games. If you dress in a manner that reveals your body in a sexualized way, I'm going to look at you sexually whether you like it or not. It's within men's nature to be visually attracted to women in such ways and it would a…
/r/MensRights23/04/13 11:52 PM
3

We need more of you within game design so you can design the games women want and satisfy the needs of people like Anita so that men can also have their games without the constant criticism of them. But that means not just game design, but game publishing. Women like you need to be able to publish your own games because as a designer, I'm sure you're well aware of designs that get shot down by publishers. There's no reason why we both can't have our games as a representation of what the original…
/r/MensRights23/04/13 11:39 PM
2

http://youtube.com/watch?feature=related&v=wse_hgca220 Now imagine this on a significant quantity of inhibition diminishing alcohol. It's like a runaway freight train. Just get the hell outta the way and stay far far away.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 02:40 AM
5

This seems too satirical to be real. This last statement a lone contradicts itself so ridiculously it's hard to see it as anything other than satirical humor. The lesson here is that people are multi-dimensional. We can’t boil people down to numbers or statistics, or reject people based on the color of their skin. I’m happy to say that I approved nearly 90% of all female minority and 80% of all (white female applicants especially if the girls want to study math or science) while rejecting over 5…
/r/MensRights18/04/13 10:13 AM
1

but I also do quite a bit of work to stop the problems that affect men. Really? So what kind of work have you done?
/r/MensRights13/04/13 05:26 AM
1

If you ever need volunteers in the greater Los Angeles area, count me in. It would appear these occur in Canada though.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 05:19 AM
7

dehumanizing and taking away the agency of trans people by calling* cis people normal nor·mal /ˈnôrməl/ Adjective Conforming to a standard; usual, typical, or expected. Noun The usual, average, or typical state or condition. http://helenhill.wordpress.com/2011/06/04/ucla-study-estimates-approximate-700000-transgender-people-in-the-usa/ Key findings from the research brief are as follows:  An estimated 3.5% of adults in the United States identify as lesbian, gay,or bisexual and an estimated 0.3%…
/r/MensRights06/04/13 11:59 PM
6

What I posted in response to this video in /r/SRSsucks: "Why do you look up fraudulent rape claims, why aren't you looking up rape claims?" Ooooh, I don't know, maybe because he's concerned about the victims of fraudulent accusations and charges just as much as these 'people' would be concerned about false murder charges and opposing the death penalty. She totally ignores the mere potential of a person being a victim of a false rape accusation, and the asian 'guy' put it best when he said "I don…
/r/MensRights06/04/13 10:23 AM
1

I think the guy was trying to lead the older lady on by classifying rape with inclusion of the 'regret' thing, which she was going nuts over saying was stupid, and then he tried to ensnare her by saying, "Then you agree with me". But she wasn't understanding the fact that he was trying to point out the idiocy of it and he wasn't doing a good enough job of conveying it.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 10:21 AM
9

So maybe the next time a campus speech occurs, they can get some volunteers to watch the fire alarms and take pictures of those that approach/pull them so they can be properly handled by the authorities? I'm not sure why Campus Security wasn't made aware of a similar situation occurring at a previous speech to prevent it and punish those accordingly that take to such tactics. You'd think this would've been common sense to the Organizers at this event.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 02:16 PM
2

These are the types of males the feminists of the western world want http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7P-Khs6lz8&sns=em They cut out the part where she says he sucks at folding laundry.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 01:57 PM
5

wife After what you've described...why?
/r/MensRights31/03/13 11:18 AM
3

But she got caught in the act, so clearly every other rape charge that goes through is accurate and the men are guilty, right guys? Right?
/r/MensRights31/03/13 04:09 AM
1

"Triplett had been at UCSC to attend a Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender conference, prosecutors said." Yep.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 04:08 AM
1

Point taken, and I had assumed there was a reference to general film making. But then she specifically cites on how to make it look as good as Porn. Still not sexist, but it can be offensive to people that don't like porn. However, it would appear the majority of people, including women, didn't have a problem, considering a woman was the one using this title. Never the less, you have shown it's not just used as a term for porn.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 12:09 PM
5

You brought a lurker cockroach out of the woodwork with your powerful meme img. I'm impressed.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 11:53 PM
-1

Yea it would appear the geek culture has a long way to go in proper etiquette, but hell if I know.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 01:41 PM
0

Ha, don't thank me, thank this guy. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1aqlh1/adria_richards_fired_from_sendgrid/c900lrz Not sure if he made it either.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 10:10 AM
5

Just post a link to this on twitter http://i.imgur.com/nynpfko.jpg
/r/MensRights22/03/13 05:44 AM
19

Many women don't see that as a perk, they see it as patriarchy in action, especially the ugly ones. The pretty ones will be more than happy to go a long with it, until you call them out on it, and then you're just a hateful spiteful misogynist like how we call out hateful spiteful misandrists/feminists. I'm not sure what the right way is to go about it. Calling everyone out on their ways to get ahead, or accepting the ways to get ahead as just the way it is, thereby not really changing anything …
/r/MensRights22/03/13 12:04 AM
2

I hate to agree. All it will do is breed/foster more hate on both sides of the fence as we see with Jezebel and Feminist Frequency. We see it as justice, they just see it as Patriarchy (All boys club) in action, whether that view is justified or not. But in all honesty, they will never see things that work in men's favor in an oppressive environment to men as justice and right, just as many don't see the same for women from their viewpoint as everything being oppressive and unjustifiable.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 11:59 PM
3

That's the new standard of modern feminism/activism. Didn't you get the memo?
/r/MensRights21/03/13 11:53 PM
4

This is beyond ridiculously awesome.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 11:48 PM
6

In all honesty, there is no 'freedom' when you're on the corporate dime. There is only 'Corporate Policy'.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 11:46 PM
5

Are these the first firing shots of a cold war gone hot?
/r/MensRights21/03/13 11:43 PM
2

Evidently only men can perform rape since a woman 'could never overpower a man or force a man to have sex'....but women are just as strong mentally, emotionally, and physically as men!
/r/MensRights20/03/13 07:22 AM
0

So I responded with a comment about if women's rights/gender equality activists want to be equal than the she should treat men and women all the same. What? And THEN I said "As for rape, a man can never be raped because it only happens to women. All men give consent and are pigs/slobs who do the raping".... Umm, you're not helping your case here. My response... Wait, your 'response'? So did she say the stereotypical crap above or you? "so what do I tell one of my good friends who is gay and was …
/r/MensRights20/03/13 07:17 AM
5

Yeah. This is a "point score" straw man system of beliefs the op imagines is Anita's position, which has nothing to do with Anita Sarkeesian's actual position. Dramatic violent nut-punching has nothing to do with the Damsel trope. In fact, it's another entirely different trope. So now there's two tropes against women. So I'm gonna assume that when they show a man hitting the woman in games, it's the man that's the victim of a trope , right? Because right now, if that's the not the case in your m…
/r/MensRights19/03/13 06:31 AM
2

People keep re-posting it as they've some how come upon a revelation that other MRA's haven't already posted a million times over.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 06:21 AM
6

Do people who consider this video to be an effective "dismantling" of Sarkeesian's arugment actually disagree that this is how women are often represented in video games? Or do you agree that this is the case but think it's a good/neutral thing representation of women? Sure, they used to be often represented this way in video games, primarily from a culture that isn't nearly as 'feminist' friendly as the West is, and also because the west accepts it because almost if not every fairy tale was thi…
/r/MensRights19/03/13 06:17 AM
1

You mean this one?
/r/MensRights16/03/13 12:24 PM
2

Some people treat facebook like a webforum for girltalk/guytalk. I think they tend to forget how public their comments truly are. I also think she was being slightly bitchy sarcastic where she might know what she's saying but it's her 'space' to complain within her social circle.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 04:00 PM
1

This picture makes me envision the exact opposite of Islamic Fundamentalist society (where women are required to completely cover themselves and restrict themselves for their men's unethical behavior/weakness). I'd imagine if the feminists have their way, men will be required to wear some type of vision blocker/shades/head cover (worse than sunglasses) as well as a mouthpiece to prevent speaking.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 03:23 AM
2

Wow, all I can say is bra-fucking-vo. I think you did plenty well, better than I could have.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 02:22 PM
1

This. So this. His shit sounds like troll advice. Who in this fucking day and age actually believes pulling out works for anything?
/r/MensRights11/03/13 12:47 PM
-5

It's stories like these that really piss me off about the medical establishment hemming and hawing on getting male contraception established. Of course, you could've had a vasectomy (they're reversible), or you should've been wearing a condom. I know, easier said than done, but this is what we have to fucking deal with when we don't take responsibility for ourselves. She keeps telling me she's in love with me and we are still having sex (I know, I know) The fact that you're willing to do this kn…
/r/MensRights11/03/13 12:11 PM
1

How do you accidentally punch someone in the throat? I'm trying to visualize that but I can't. I won't lie, I raised my voice, and I reached for the door nob, she pushed me again, there was a scuffle where I tried to push her hand off me, where it was gripping my shirt and not letting go and it ended in her accidentally (and I stress, it was an accident) punching me in the throat. I'm going to assume she was grabbing around his chest, he was pulling her hand away, she was forcing back, he slippe…
/r/MensRights10/03/13 02:23 PM
-7

Recently I was shopping and ran into one of my older brother's friends. He is 19 years old. I am 16. I was attracted to him. He invited me to his house and I went. He kissed me. I wanted to make out with him, but I did not want to go all the way and told him so. No you don't have to be a mind-reader. You just have to be smart enough not to fuck a 16 year old when you're over 18, especially when she told you she didn't want to go all the way. Of course, if you're dense enough not to read the arti…
/r/MensRights09/03/13 01:59 PM
3

Goddamn I'm glad to be single.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 08:39 AM
2

Good riddance to bad rubbish. Saved yourself time and effort on someone who doesn't deserve it and can be used on another friend.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 12:44 PM
8

That's what this subreddit is for. Get that shit off your chest so you can deal with another day of it. Good luck.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 09:39 AM
14

You need to send her this, ha. Man that so needs to be said to her fucking face.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 09:23 AM
15

And in the classic fashion of those with privilege, they played the victim, changed the rules, and refused to give the thing they had the power to give. In this case, sex. Oh, the irony. It burns, it BURNS!!!
/r/MensRights02/03/13 09:20 AM
3

My mistake, didn't realize you were talking about the event organizer that had informed her. As a man in this 'modern brave new world', the last thing he wants is problems with a feminist organization.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 11:26 PM
5

Same here. I unsubscribed and stopped going there, not just because of that, but because of the general culture of Kotaku and Gawker invading it as a whole.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 11:20 PM
-1

It wasn't a man. It was a woman.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 11:18 PM
1

Umm, this wasn't a man. Violet Blue is a woman. You'd think her profile photo in the upper right corner would've given this away.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 11:17 PM
8

Do you not get that this was NOT a genuine case of a rape survivor? The feminist group was using the rape card as an exploit to get what they want, which is clearly something that is said 'never happens' or 'happens rarely' by feminists when the reality is clearly quite different considering they just used it on their own kind. This is a classic example of a broader context of leftist groups who decry unethical and corrupt behavior but are perfectly willing to utilize the same tactics to get the…
/r/MensRights27/02/13 11:13 PM
11

Hahahahahaha, so the Feminist/SRS virus strain is now invading other other feminists and infringing on their freedom of speech. How ironic and delightful. Oh well.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 11:09 PM
1

Men's Rights and Women's Rights are much more to the point, and keep the focus on what is sought, namely equal rights, rather than some endless gender-based agenda. That made completely no sense. By calling either/or and not human/equal rights YOU ARE labeling it and therefore making it a gender-based agenda.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 02:08 PM
1

Feminism focuses on women's empowerment and rights. It shouldn't take a rocket scientists to then conclude Masculism or Masculinism focuses on Men's empowerment and rights. I don't see the problem. It's calling us what we are. Anyone who says feminists are working towards men's rights is full of shit. This subreddit doesn't focus on women's rights, it's called MEN'S RIGHTS for a reason.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 02:05 PM
15

I think the wording's great.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 11:41 PM
0

This deserves more attention whether it's a joke or not. A guy wouldn't get away this as a 'joke', and that's the point.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 10:57 AM
7

as long as she accepts your feelings as valid. Clearly she doesn't if she feels he's over-reacting. Clearly you don't either if you couldn't even gather that from the original post.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 10:39 AM
7

Yea considering if I sent out a tweet about curbstomping women, I think I'd be labeled a creepy psycho. She's not just/really a feminist, she's crazy.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 09:57 AM
2

"You get back in life what you put out". Besides the fact that these wolf avatar psychos support this murderer, if what was said above were true, then she obviously deserves to be on trial and if she's found guilty she deserved it. But this is besides the point. Do people who spout this karmic bull shit even take notice of the crap that comes out of their mouth?
/r/MensRights08/02/13 07:24 AM
1

Get a little more creative man. You're message will have more impact. Source of picture: http://www.suradiolive.net/wife-yelling-at-their-husbands/
/r/MensRights07/02/13 09:31 AM
4

That depends. Is he saying 2% or rape reporters are lying or 2% of overall women will lie about being raped. Assuming the latter, he's saying 2 out of 100 will lie. 1 in 6 or 17 out of 100 will be claim being raped. Half of them will report it, or 8 out of 100. Since 2 out of 100 are lying, but are a part of those 8 reporting, that means 2 out of 8, or 1 out of 4, or 25% of rape reporters are liars. If 50% of rape reporters are intimidated not to report, that would be 50% of actual rapes (not th…
/r/MensRights07/02/13 09:11 AM
0

More like... Are there any Men's Right activists Suckers who would like to be a featured guest tricked into being in front of a live firing squad at a Women's Feminist's Center Discussion at my school this friday? Free food bait!!!
/r/MensRights07/02/13 01:16 AM
3

Other than that I would urge you to not think that you need to do anything. Realize that you don't really need to do anything, and from there do things because you either want to or need to do them. Whaaa??? Awesome advice there.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 12:00 PM
1

Exactly. It shouldn't be forced or enforced by someone.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 11:45 AM
1

Are you serious? Ooooh, I don't know, maybe Rosa Parks?
/r/MensRights02/02/13 11:43 AM
3

It's like saying, "hey it's an urban myth (easy way of saying prejudice) that that black guy walking in front of you is likely to rob you, but it does raise awareness of the high crime rate of black people so it's good for you to cross the street anyways and keep an eye on him".
/r/MensRights02/02/13 11:32 AM
1

I think he's trying to say peace out, only with a 'lithsp', not sure though.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 09:19 AM
1

Once a reality whore, always a reality whore with many of the Real World/Road Rules people
/r/MensRights02/02/13 09:10 AM
5

So by telling him to 'man' up, you're essentially telling him to fulfill the stereotypical role feminists and women in general place on men thereby allowing them to enforce this bias on men in the first place through the actions or inaction of law enforcement. Brilliant, douche. It's one thing to sit there and take it and not document it or let people know, but he's doing the RIGHT thing in this situation short of leaving her which is the next step.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 11:02 PM
1

Super
/r/MensRights29/01/13 03:40 PM
10

"You know you're working in a patriarchal society when the word feminist has a weird connotation" "You know you live in a ('term used to justify female dominance') society when the word ('feminine dominated word adequately revealing female dominance ideology' ) has a ('unnerving to some rational men and women') connotation. The irony burns deep... Didn't she star in a movie where she rapes a guy and is a classic manipulative female that tugs on strings females are used to tugging on (Seduction) …
/r/MensRights28/01/13 08:23 AM
2

Are you kidding me? I'm sure there was a tinge of racism in the white guy for the 'angry black woman', and I'm damn sure there was a tinge of racism in the black girl for 'obnoxious white man'.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 11:39 AM
1

Hence the name Fem'inist. You can't hide the fact that feminine rights take precedent in their 'fight for equality'. It says it right in the name. Might as well call us Masculists.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 12:14 PM
1

I agree whole-heartedly. That didn't sit well with me from the get-go.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 10:29 AM
2

You realize that even if you block a door or shut a door and prevent her to leave a room because you're arguing and you want her to hear you, this can be used as domestic abuse and you can be arrested for this. And now, with this push to make it a requirement for healthcare to forcefully screen your wife for abuse, all bets are off. If anyone knows about abuse, it's the government and it's ability to abuse every law out there, including ones that give them more money/funds/support/etc. Marriage …
/r/MensRights25/01/13 10:27 AM
1

So 75% are run by an independent biker organization that may perform illegal activities such as drug trafficking, extortion, money laundering, murder, etc. Okay, fair enough. Have they even seen the latest news about major Banks supporting funds for Terrorist organizations and getting a 'wrist slap' for it?
/r/MensRights21/01/13 09:46 PM
7

While I get your sarcasm over your 'heterosexual' objectification, I think you're over-reacting because he's defining himself gay here only in the context of how it's an issue within the feminist community and how he's treated due to this, and whether or not he'll face the same issues here. Therefore this is the 'defining' issue that's placed upon him even though he doesn't define himself solely on that issue. You feel it comes off that way because right from the get-go he's clearly explaining h…
/r/MensRights21/01/13 03:01 AM
1

No you're right, can't blame it on women, because we've had plenty of men that did rape and lie to get to this point. It is what it is.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 02:13 AM
0

Instead of removing it, there should've been a mirror site calling out all the 'nice' bitches that nag you in their profiles before even meeting anyone, contradicting themselves by saying not to judge them or accept them for who they are while selectively discriminating against who can even reply to her. That would've been a much better approach to this. Now instead it's just cheap censorship.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 08:38 AM
1

It is axiomatic that specific intent can be negated by voluntary intoxication where the intoxicated party does not understand the nature of what they are agreeing to.. If there is no consent, then a sex crime may have been committed. If there is consent then its perfectly fine to have sex while drunk. But how do you determine there was consent when she can easily lie and say she was drunk when she consented? That's bullshit. If she's passed out or near passing out, yes, that's obviously not cons…
/r/MensRights20/01/13 08:33 AM
0

If you have sex, you don't really hurt others, and instead, there is a good chance someone is instead taking advantage of your condition. Really? So you can't hurt someone else by not disclosing that you have STD's because you're too drunk? Or the fact that you can easily change your mind afterwards and say you didn't consent? In anycase, I think its more important to focus on the fact that driving drunk is illegal, while having sex drunk is not. Though considering nowadays we have too drunk to …
/r/MensRights20/01/13 08:24 AM
1

With the students yes. But with that administration official at the beginning....depends on where he was to me. If they were in her office and the door was closed...but living in California, I'm wary of doing such things.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 03:09 PM
1

For the same reason you wouldn't want the government to spy on you inside your house without your knowledge. While it's your conversation, such a conversation that he was having in her office can be deemed private or confidential, and his goal of distributing it for others to hear that weren't involved is subterfuge. If they were in public, then it can be deemed that it wasn't meant to be private and intended for only their ears and no one else. Google it
/r/MensRights17/01/13 02:49 PM
2

On a sidenote, why does that revolutionary pre-cooled engine look 'limp'?
/r/MensRights17/01/13 11:40 AM
2

I 'watched' or rather, listened up to the second student he was informing. I didn't hear that, my apologies. Crazy you only need your own consent. Good 'ol Texas.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 11:32 AM
-4

I don't mean to be a party pooper, but isn't recording someone without their consent or knowledge illegal? Be careful. I'm surprised the school hasn't gone after you for that.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 11:10 AM
1

By using those words in a diminished way, you're negating the true history and burden those words came with and are ignoring the vitriol and hatred that people did terrible things in the name of. It's a tough balance between not having a true concept of such negativity, which would be considered good, and forgetting what was done in the context of such negativity by displaying one's ignorance in using such words without consideration of that, which is bad. In the end, history can be allowed to r…
/r/MensRights16/01/13 11:13 PM
23

Because so long as the ladies come, the guys will obviously follow. They'll get some money out of the ladies but a ton out of the guys. Charge the ladies and they'll go somewhere else, and the guys will follow. Vagina is a powerful moneymaker.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 11:39 AM
5

Fixed that for ya
/r/MensRights16/01/13 05:14 AM
2

You don't get it, he IS the OP.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 04:23 AM
1

I guess the same way we explain male SRS's ? Which is...?
/r/MensRights16/01/13 04:07 AM
3

I doubt that. I'm more willing to believe there's a disconnect at what many of them are actually laughing at. They really just don't get it because they've been programmed to believe men deserve it (Even when it was just divorce and nothing on cheating, they automatically assume he was probably cheating and probably deserved it). The demographics of this show are soccermoms/housewives who're probably very passive aggressive and hold a resentment towards their working husbands and can't wait for …
/r/MensRights14/01/13 11:33 AM
2

When you've been married to a bumbling rich 'degenerated by drugs' man that has supplied you with everything in your life with nary a question because you essentially own and manage him, her ridiculous attitude doesn't surprise me.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 11:25 AM
5

This should be permanently posted at the top of Mensrights as a reminder on why such a subreddit is needed in this day and age. This a mainstream woman's talk show. It doesn't get any more representative of the female gender in this day and age than that.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 11:07 AM
0

By this logic, every teen/adult human being should be locked up to protect children because every one them is capable of harming/corrupting children. And since humanity itself is capable of destroying all life on the earth and or ruining the earth itself, we should all be locked up and/or exterminated. I mean really, how far down that cancerous pulp ridden dirty colon anus hole do you want to travel to explore and rationalize such logic?
/r/MensRights11/01/13 06:31 AM
2

Exactly.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 11:06 PM
0

I stand corrected.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 10:04 AM
1

Gotcha, I stand corrected.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 10:03 AM
-13

As great as this is, these aren't the type of guys that strike me as wanting equality. These are the type of guys that want superiority over women and other guys. Typical alpha assholes that say the same shit of 'manning up' as feminists. So if he goes to court over the woman hitting him, what does he think he's going to do to this "Misc." snitch? Beat the shit out of him? Hope he expects jail time and his own life wrecked then.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 06:49 AM
2

Perhaps it's come up in recent years after the surge in vasectomy's occurred after the economical drop in 2007-2008 because guys realized they couldn't afford to have another mouth to feed and the women in their lives wouldn't stand for that.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 10:53 PM
9

Some asshole, or some bitch?
/r/MensRights20/12/12 10:48 PM
1

She'd marginalize them one way or another most likely. Or her thoughts on them would be the same as ours on the male femi-nazis?.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 04:06 AM
4

They're probably the trolls that email them. I can imagine they get tons of email from d-bags all the time, it is the internet after all.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 02:13 AM
1

I guess you didn't happen to notice yourself belittling Atheists/ /r/atheism.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 10:04 AM
0

This is what should happen to all White Knights of the Sleezeball/Alpha male variety, as the Beta Male Feminist White Knights always end up staying in the friendzone anyways and don't get laid, if they're not gay anyways.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 10:52 AM
7

There's nothing wrong with protesting, even if they're in the wrong. I think they definitely took it past that when attempting to block the doors and potentially getting violent.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 02:05 PM
1

So by acting like a sociopath at work, you refrain from actually having to become a sociopath in life and at work. Makes sense (Sarcasm).
/r/MensRights27/11/12 01:31 PM
14

It's not just men that view it as a weakness. The ultimate hypocrisy comes when a man will actually have the guts to complain about victimization and feminazis will actually use the tropes they love to hate for being used against them, against the male, telling them to 'man up'.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 01:03 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter