TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Armagetiton Archive

View 1 post and 153 comments by Armagetiton on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

You're moving the goalposts for the argument. I'll humor you though. The rate for males is 280% higher than females, and its increasing as well. This was already acknowledged in the parent comment. While the rate for men is higher and is increasing the fact that as a gender the rate for women has typically been more stable, a sudden increase is more of a story. Are we done arguing in circles here?
/r/MensRights17/09/17 11:36 PM
7

You're right. In the grand scheme of things, it's a small number compared to the total population. However it's still a large enough number that when it nearly doubles, it signifies a dramatic new trend in behavior and makes it being a statistical anomaly astronomically unlikely. Which was my point in the first place.
/r/MensRights17/09/17 11:29 PM
13

No, they're not. They're small fractions of very large numbers, and those fractions are still large numbers. We're talking about going from about 4,000 suicides per year to 7,000 suicides per year. (assuming this per 100,000 is in the US) This is a dramatic change.
/r/MensRights17/09/17 11:13 PM
9

In what universe is it not a dramatic change when the rate of something happening nearly doubles?
/r/MensRights17/09/17 10:18 PM
–

Somebody engages in man hating activities for other reasons, besides hating men. Hilarious. Yes, it is hilarious, how you sound EXACTLY like a fucking SJW right now.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 06:52 PM
–

Except for the part where they didn't give us any reason to believe that they're doing the female only screening because they hate men. That's just your own hateful thinking putting words in their mouths. Nice try, though.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 01:25 PM
–

Yeah.. no. Judging by the twitter profile that originally posted this I'm 100% sure this was a racially charged post and has nothing to do with sexism.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 01:23 PM
1

That's a good question, but my point is to not stoop to the same level.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 10:07 PM
–

Ah, well I didn't see those threads, though I'd still consider the top one with only 280 upvotes to not have much traction. Then there's other posters with the same opinion as mine. One that stands out though is the "what if the genders were reversed" reply, because I do have a rebuttal to that. Why fight to have the same result as if the genders were reversed? Would it not be better to fight for the idea that you could have an all male screening without a negative reaction?
/r/MensRights26/05/17 09:55 PM
–

I have the same opinion there as well. Actually funny story about how came across this thread. My girlfriend texted me asking if I cared about this screening, because she read an article about how "outraged men" were protesting the screening. I told her I bet there's barely a mention in the men's rights subreddit about it and most wouldn't care. So, I looked here. Looks like I was half right, this thread is here but it's barely caught any traction. I told her before you even mentioned this, that…
/r/MensRights26/05/17 09:33 PM
–

Honestly, why care? It's a private business, if they want to do a promo to generate headlines (mission accomplished) and garner female interest, let them. If you don't like it, don't give them your money.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 07:23 PM
1

To be fair though, steroids aren't as bad as a lot of people think. You can abuse them, and you can use them responsibly with zero or near zero side effects. Do research and remember that it's cheating if you play any competitive sport. You can't say the same for eating disorders.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 02:19 AM
1

Stop feeding the SRS troll, numbnuts
/r/PussyPassDenied29/10/15 01:56 PM
26

Actual numbers of those stupid tarts would stop lying would be more like 1/1000, if even that much. Not THAT low, but it's pretty damn low according to the Department of Justice. The rate of rape and sexual assault was 1.2 times higher for nonstudents (7.6 per 1,000) than for students (6.1 per 1,000). This data includes estimated numbers of assaults that go unreported... so while feminists say "1 in 4", the DOJ says "naw, more like 1 in 150".
/r/MensRights16/09/15 03:15 AM
29

What's with people thinking, oh my god, this stuff is dangerous, why isn't it regulated? Why don't they regulate chainsaws? Why don't they regulate garden tools? Why don't they regulate office scissors? That's how stupid people sound when they suggest these things. So many things are potential weapons, but their intended use isn't a weapon and risk of abuse is very low, so that's why it isn't regulated. I used to work at Lowes, do you people have any idea how much DANGEROUS SHIT besides acid the…
/r/MensRights21/12/14 11:32 PM
30

It's a click bait article. These kind of authors are the lowest of the low, they write like this with the express purpose of pissing off a group and baiting them into visiting the website. You fell for it, good job. He's not directly quoting anyone. This is what he said. And general complaints about how "that bitch got my job because she has a uterus" It's not a direct quote from anywhere, it's a form of mockery. Here, let me give you another example. And general complaints about how "patriarchy…
/r/MensRights30/05/14 10:59 AM
6

affirmative action
/r/MensRights20/01/14 04:48 PM
13

I disagree, I think he has every right to film It's not a matter of opinion, in the US, you have no expectation of privacy in public. The law says you can record whoever or whatever you want whenever you want in a public place, and do whatever you want with the recording.
/r/MensRights18/11/13 07:58 AM
22

Because women are considered minorities in certain fields. A black female is the holy grail of human resources.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 03:38 AM
2

It's impossible for a rich minority to oppress a poor majority then? That oppression definition is very weak.
/r/MensRights06/10/13 07:08 PM
6

What information we have: he is 28 and she is 21. With that information in hand, we can very safely assume he married her mother while the daughter was a teenager or older. Teenagers have a very hard time seeing stepfathers as authority figures in normal conditions. Considering their ages and the circumstances, the idea that she saw him as any kind of fatherly figure is ludicrous. A more likely scenario: Rebellious young daughter has no respect for her cougar mother who probably married eye cand…
/r/MensRights02/10/13 05:53 AM
3

still not sure how that's supposed to be better than colored person Because there isn't really a better way to say "everyone but white people" in the first place.
/r/MensRights24/08/13 08:18 AM
2

If you take the users on Tumblr seriously you're an idiot. Whatever you do, don't visit /r/TumblrInAction , you might have an aneurysm or something. The place is a hotbed of Poe's Law, mentally challenged radicals, and middle class kids who fight over who is more "oppressed".
/r/MensRights24/08/13 07:59 AM
5

She actually confessed only 6 months after the trial, read the whole story. The prosecution and the judge decided she was lying about her confession to free her father. She's been trying to get her father out of jail for nearly 16 years.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 08:52 AM
7

It's a little kid being allowed to wander around a skatepark. Also, that kid was in full sprint towards the skateboarder when he hit him.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 10:35 AM
48

No, a lot of fathers would react the same way. The real reason is because it was the parent's fault they let the child get hurt (in this case, they let the child walk into the path of the skateboarder). The parent gets upset that they fucked up, and takes it out on the innocent party, shifting the blame in an attempt to make themselves and other people think that they are good parents. There's no denying that women see less consequence for assaulting men, though. Just saying that this is a typic…
/r/MensRights18/08/13 05:51 AM
5

I'm more concerned about the government sending my tax money overseas for shit I don't care about during a financial crisis than anything else.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 09:31 AM
5

I never claimed it was the official thought pattern for America, and I'd appreciate it if you didn't put words in my mouth. I'm not putting words in your mouth. I'm exaggerating for effect a bit. You say prevalent. That's what I was going for there. Loud radical feminists do not have a large platform like a major news network from which they speak, and they are not as numerous as the victim blaming twitter users, though I don't really understand what radical feminists have to do with this anyway…
/r/MensRights11/08/13 06:47 AM
3

Some people will defend their friends and loved ones to the grave when they are red handed. Then again, I could be wrong. Small towns can have strange cultures, and they are hardly representative of the larger populations. I suppose there could be a sort of culture that allows for these kinds of things to happen in some smaller areas. When I think about it, I honestly can't completely dismiss the possibility that rape culture exists in some small towns. When you're cut off from mainstream societ…
/r/MensRights11/08/13 06:42 AM
8

The rape-apology and victim blaming was not limited to Steubenville though. CNN had a correspondent talking about how sad it was that the future's of these boy will be tarnished and people from around the world took to twitter to denounce the victim as a slut and a whore, despite video proof that she was gang raped. The words of radicals and people stirring up controversy for fame. Some loud radical feminists shout from rooftops of the internet that all heterosexual sex is rape because women are…
/r/MensRights11/08/13 06:28 AM
2

Also wanted to add that I've changed my stance after thinking about this whole thing, and made an edit to my first post. Edit 2: Through discussion, I'm changing my stance a bit here. I theorize that by our culture demonizing rape, it is significantly reducing the rate at which it occurs. Dwelling on that, I've come to the conclusion that these anti-rape campaigns aren't hurting anything, but actually helping this reduction in rape crimes. The campaigns that focus on male rape are hurting feelin…
/r/MensRights11/08/13 06:12 AM
10

The Steubenville case is an interesting one because of the attitude displayed by the male students, but I feel as though it can be easily explained. These kids were high school football players in a small town that idolized it's team. These kids had it in their minds that they do whatever they want and get away with whatever they want, and step on people to get it. They were half right, the town tried their best to cover up the incident lest their fabled football team be tarnished, but the cat w…
/r/MensRights11/08/13 05:59 AM
23

Hold the downvotes people, this is a valid question. I only disagree that rape culture exists in western civilization in present times. Rape culture exists in many countries around the world, there's no doubt about that. Here in the first world countries though, it doesn't happen. To suggest that joking about rape and things of that sort is rape culture is idiotic. People joke about dark things they would never actually consider doing all the time. The only culture pertaining to rape in the US a…
/r/MensRights11/08/13 04:34 AM
10

post was edited to add source
/r/MensRights11/08/13 04:22 AM
5

post was edited to add source
/r/MensRights11/08/13 04:21 AM
98

I can agree with this. This idea that "rape statistics are out of control, we need to educate people" is not only ridiculous... it's a lie. In fact, rape per capita in the USA has dropped 85% since 1980. 2.4 in 1000 people were raped every year in 1980. It's now at 0.4 per 1000 people per year. It is a sharp decline. Violent crime in general is declining fast. To suggest that there is some kind of rape culture encouraging rape to happen is fucking lunacy. Edit 2: Through discussion, I'm changing…
/r/MensRights11/08/13 02:13 AM
2

Maybe not literally 5 minutes, but I remember he stated he was given a very short amount of time to decide, as in less than an hour.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 10:22 PM
10

I read this story quite a while back. They put him in a room with a no contest bargain to sign and told him he had 5 minutes to decide. His lawyer advised him that the jury would see a guilty nigger (not those words exactly, but pretty much to that effect) as soon as he walked into the courtroom. His lawyer and the system is to blame.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 06:17 PM
2

I'm anti-deodorant kin, you scum. It's my right to be all natural and smell the way I do, you check YOUR hygiene privilege.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 05:46 AM
2

In response to the "spent too much time on tumblr" thing, hopefully you'll get over it and learn to just laugh at them instead. Realize that the only people taking them seriously anymore are themselves. They have no traction, thankfully. Knowing this, I spend a lot of time on /r/tumblrinaction and /r/ineedfeminismbecause and laugh instead of getting upset. Those people are jokes and are to be treated as such.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 05:34 AM
1

Fine, have it your way. The womb is an automated factory and the sperm is raw materials. Now explain how that comparison makes this post How so? They're both equally as necessary for reproduction. Any less valid.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 06:59 AM
29

Ah, no. More like comparing a factory to a factory's workers. Neither can produce the end product without the other, and both are equally important.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 07:37 PM
1

Well, you have a point in your last post, but it just doesn't have anything to do with gender. Attractive people are privileged, there's no doubt about it. It's human nature... hell, it's in the nature of all animals. It's not really something you can change. Good looking people advance further in careers, they get into clubs and places like that more, ect ect, because people like to look at good looking people and want them around.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 09:43 PM
2

Uh, ok. Does the "fat ugly person not getting into the club" not apply to men or something? Because I'm pretty sure if you aren't pleasant to look at, and you dress poorly on top of it, you're going to be denied access regardless of gender. Clubs have standards they want to uphold. Most of them want attractive, money carrying people to meet the same in the opposite gender. It's what keeps people coming back. There are establishments that cater to fat bald lesbians, and these clubs aren't one of …
/r/MensRights22/07/13 08:48 PM
5

If you think that women are underprivileged in these establishments because men are security and owners, you are either smoking crack or brainwashed by the idea of patriarchy. Choose one. It's in the best interest of these people to make the women there feel as privileged as possible.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 12:46 AM
21

The law pertaining to what might happen if they were to stop them from cutting and the girls escalating the situation.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 12:29 AM
10

Here's the funny part... I didn't know "god damnit" was a bad thing to say if you're a kid at that time. I just observed adults saying it in frustration, and yelled it to show my own.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 10:29 PM
15

I was expelled from a preschool. I received a 5 minute time out for not letting a boy take my building blocks when I was building something, then got expelled when I yelled "god damnit" as I watched him knock my hard work down from time out.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 09:36 PM
3

Correctional systems are supposed to be just that, correctional. First time offenders deserve a look at to see what drove them to the crime in the first place and try to fix that so it does not happen again. Hard punishment can and does simply create a situation where the criminal is desperate enough to just go out and commit crimes again, because he/she has no choice but to do so just to get by and not be homeless. Some criminals are put back out on the street with no home to go back to because…
/r/MensRights08/06/13 02:20 AM
0

Why does it have to be a mother though? Men sometimes get off the same way because they are a father (though I doubt it's nearly as often). I also really don't want to get into an argument about our correctional system either, but just because 45 days of jail time is worse than 45 days of community service is worse doesn't make it right. I think that just locking people up for petty crimes turns them into harder criminals, because it makes them more desperate (can't find a new job, ect).
/r/MensRights08/06/13 02:11 AM
5

Don't get me wrong, it's still a big problem. People should not be punished differently based on their situation in a big case like this. Smaller charges like stealing and such when you have kids and going on house arrest instead of jail time, that's acceptable, but this is not... especially when the child has a potential caregiver that isn't setting people up for multiple counts of attempted murder.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 01:49 AM
17

I'm going to go out on a limb here and say she's getting lesser charges because she's pregnant. This is probably less likely a case of "because she's a woman" and more likely a case of "think of the children!"
/r/MensRights07/06/13 11:02 PM
3

/r/MensRants /r/rage /r/TumblrInAction Plenty of subreddits where these kinds of posts belong, and this isn't one of them. The mods here the idea that zero moderation is good for free speech. I think it's good for making you guys look like idiots for getting angry over what is most likely a troll post.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 04:23 AM
3

You're obviously not subbed to /r/TumblrInAction. Please, allow me to explain why someone told you to post it here (though it really doesn't belong here anyway). You see, this post you found is very tame compared to most content on Tumblr. They would find this boring. Tumblr users get much worse: They also hate white people, straight people, and people in average to good shape (see: "thin privilege"). Oh, they also hate people that are sane... the people that say they hear voices in their head (…
/r/MensRights26/04/13 04:24 PM
5

A concern troll is someone pretending to support a movement, but showing false concern over a viewpoint to cause misdirection and manipulation in a discussion. Example: "I don't think we should say X because that might offend Y", or "I think this is too controversial, we shouldn't be doing this" Concern trolls are also a source of paranoia in discussions for obvious reasons.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 08:10 AM
11

You're comparing apples to oranges. The words tranny and midget are different from racial slurs, because those are just words that those people decided were derogatory one day. Racial slurs on the other hand are words constructed to be derogatory in the first place, and people know they are derogatory when they learn them. You can't really compare "not really people" to "not really a woman" because there's actually some truth to the latter.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 11:51 PM
26

Transphobic =/= uneducated. Statements like "tranny" Most people do not understand that this word is considered derogatory. It's kind of like how people didn't understand that little people don't like being called midgets until very recently... many still don't know that. "she calls herself a woman but I tend to disagree" Poorly worded, perhaps, but remember that he did use the pronoun "she" instead of "he". I believe what he was trying to convey there was that he does not agree that she is a wo…
/r/MensRights05/04/13 11:34 PM
2

Sure, it makes it attainable if you have excellent genes for it.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 02:12 PM
2

I think within the context of this thread it's very safe to assume something like that is sarcasm.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 05:33 AM
4

Ask yourself what's more likely... that the author meant to put emphasis on the word, or meant to use it ironically? Keep in mind that the word naturally is commonly used ironically in this context.
/r/MensRights16/03/13 01:09 AM
6

"A woman in Pennsylvania was extremely frustrated with her boyfriend after he refused to have sex with her, so, naturally, she attacked him." Read that sentence out loud. Notice the commas on both ends of the word "naturally". That implies the word "naturally" is being used ironically. "A woman in Pennsylvania was extremely frustrated with her boyfriend after he refused to have sex with her, so naturally she attacked him." Now read that one out loud. With the commas removed, irony is no longer i…
/r/MensRights15/03/13 11:19 PM
2

I posted this to facebook. If you do that, you get an image that you don't see in the article... I cannot link it or upload it to imgur because if I try to download it I get nothing (some kind of image protection). Anyway, the image is of a guy playing x-box with a stupid look on his face. It suggests that he deserves it because he's a video game playing moron.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 11:10 PM
-3

Downvote and suggest that subreddit whenever you see these here. We're seeing these here because people are upvoting them
/r/MensRights15/03/13 05:33 AM
0

Dude, I was trying to give friendly advice and you're attacking me for it
/r/MensRights14/03/13 08:49 PM
0

I think it was plenty warranted. You were being hostile and refusing to acknowledge a valid point
/r/MensRights14/03/13 07:44 PM
0

No, there's nothing to project. I'm with you on the false accusation issue. However, you are being irrational and not listening to logic. For the sake of yourself and this subreddit, take a deep breath and stop making an ass of yourself.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 06:19 PM
1

I think your anger towards this issue is clouding your ability to reason. Take it easy.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 10:15 AM
4

Can we stop downvoting people that make valid points if they oppose your views guys? God forbid we have a discussion and not a circle jerk. I am a man that has hair longer than a lot of women. Still pay less.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 10:08 AM
7

Seriously, what kind of brands is this guy looking at? My Hanes boxer briefs are quite nice and those are like 3 for 10 bucks.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 10:06 AM
2

Ah, you misunderstand. I am not arguing these points for the sake of seeing them removed, and I believe a lot of MRAs feel the same way. We argue these points to point out that they can be just as misandric as they are misogynistic. It's either all or nothing, you can't demand that they remove ideas people find sexist against women without demanding they also remove ideas that are sexist against men. Remove them both, and the shows would likely be pretty stale, so it's just better to leave them …
/r/MensRights14/03/13 10:00 AM
2

In Spongebob, both Spongebob and even moreso Patrick are borderline retarded. Sandy is the smartest character on the show. Adventure Time, Princess Bubblegum is the smartest character on the show. Finn isn't too bright and makes hasty decisions often. Ben10, Ben is a bit of an idiot and a huge hothead. His sister is very bright, only smarter character is their grandfather. Never watched Avatar or Kim Possible. Edit: MRAs, can I have a discussion with someone without everyone downvoting that pers…
/r/MensRights14/03/13 08:31 AM
3

I agree that Disney doesn't have a very good track record showing women in a positive light when you look at the bigger picture. On the other hand, most modern cartoons on television do. I can name several modern cartoons off the top of my head where a female character is the smartest character in the show and plays a large role. In addition, male characters are not only stupid... they are often borderline retarded. If they're not exaggeratedly stupid, they're brash and it gets them into trouble…
/r/MensRights14/03/13 07:20 AM
2

Yes, yes it is because they are men. It's not every man that drives recklessly, but they are over 3 times as likely to do so because of their sex. I'm sorry that you have to pay more because of what other men do, but your insurance company does not know you on that level, they cannot be in the car with you every time you drive and observe that. They simply see you as more likely to be in a serious accident due to statistics. Even though you haven't been in an accident yet or had any citations, f…
/r/MensRights14/03/13 01:36 AM
5

I think this will help. Men are: 3.41 times more likely to be cited for reckless driving 3.09 times more likely to be cited for DUI The number of accidents between men and women are about even... HOWEVER, men are about 3 times as likely to be in a fatal accident. Men drive more aggressively and take more risks, therefore they cause more damage when they get in accidents. There is no fluke here, this is irrefutable. That aside, you did bring up an interesting point in your article. Why not charge…
/r/MensRights14/03/13 12:52 AM
1

False rape accusations that are proven to be false is what is truly rare. That is, there was more than enough evidence to show that the accuser was lying. There is no way to determine the true frequency at which it occurs.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 09:18 PM
1

Millionaires often make stupid decisions because their shareholders force them to. The Kardashian's company is private and has no shareholders except themselves. ... look at the stupid decisions facebook has been making since it went public.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 03:37 PM
1

See, this is why I don't find it impressive. You're comparing trash to people with good heads on their shoulders. I have a good head on my shoulders, I wouldn't call anything I've done impressive, though. Even Paris Hilton had lines of merchandise that were selling quite well. Her behavior made that a temporary thing. People soon realized she was a spoiled brat not to be respected, and her brands burned to the ground because of it. The Kardashians have the ability to behave, so they can still se…
/r/MensRights13/03/13 03:30 PM
1

Yes, I'm not impressed that they had the foundation to make millions laid out in front of them and they put it to good use. I'm not arguing that they haven't made good choices. I simply just don't find it impressive building an empire on a foundation that's already been poured.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 03:22 PM
1

Alright, well you're entitled to your opinion. I just don't find it impressive when you didn't start from the bottom in that business.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 03:09 PM
1

Have you ever heard the phrase, "you need money to make money"?
/r/MensRights13/03/13 03:01 PM
2

You're missing the point. Having a head start in Hollywood by knowing the right people and having money to start with makes things easy for you. Building up from there is not impressive. For example, Nick Cage is Martin Scorsese's nephew. He changed his name to Cage to hide the fact. You think he got where he is on acting alone? He was guaranteed fame. Impressive would be moving to Hollywood and serving tables until you get your break. Even then, if you have talent, it's all luck, it's all who y…
/r/MensRights13/03/13 02:49 PM
6

His wording was pretty harsh, but he's right. Hollywood success is all about who you know and how much money you have to start with. They had both.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 04:24 AM
2

Look at how people react to what you do in the military. In the national guard? Do you man artillery? Fuckin pussy. Marines infantry? No other military occupation is more revered. Marine infantrymen are cannon fodder. They are considered most expendable and first to die. On the other hand, you could call it a necessary evil... Without this reverence of cannon fodder, who would do it without being forced to?
/r/MensRights12/03/13 10:16 PM
1

There is a "male pill" in the human trials and its showing 100 percent effectiveness, even better than the female pill. It's a shot you receive in your scrotum. The injection tears sperm to shreds magnetically. The injection costs less than the syringe used to administer it, lasts 10 years, and is reversible before then
/r/MensRights07/03/13 09:55 PM
5

You also have the benefit of being successful. Those of us that live paycheck to paycheck do not have the resources or time to do this.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 08:14 PM
2

Poe's Law taking effect here.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 11:20 PM
1

Here's another one http://youtu.be/C2vWhqkd4Nw 5th grade girl is reprimanded for "paper gun" (a piece of paper in the shape of a gun). School administration threatened to call the police. I understand the issue that boys are treated unfairly in schools, but to immediately shift the focus of this story to that is petty bullshit and we shouldn't be doing that. Zero tolerance is hurting everyone, and the gun hysteria going on in our country right now is making it worse.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 07:59 AM
2

From the comments You guys are assholes! I'm her little brother - it's my job to defend my sis! She and her friends are INNOCENT, you redneck 'tards. It was a little white lie for goodness sakes! Women have so much pressure in our modern society that sometimes they need to let a little steam go and the jackass wouldn't let them smoke! My sis lives in a society that's where misogynist and I HATE that. Women make 75% of what men make. They get treated like shit.  Let them have a little fun! Good …
/r/MensRights02/03/13 12:29 AM
10

Yes, I used to believe in anarchism in the way you describe it when I was in high school too. Then I grew up and realized theory is sometimes impossible in practice.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 03:56 AM
2

If he's bartending and likely getting a W-2 tax form, he didn't need to go to an accountant in the first place. In that scenario, there's nothing an accountant can do for you that Turbo Tax or other tax form programs can't... except piss off the IRS.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 12:41 AM
7

While he probably made a poor choice of words there, this isn't the place to discuss the US's foreign policy.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 11:40 PM
8

I think the numbers would be more interesting if the polling was only done by people of drafting age. Understand that both men and women that are older than the drafting age are more supportive of the draft when they aren't eligable. Edit: looks like this was already pointed out
/r/MensRights18/02/13 11:37 PM
1

What the fuck is going on? Stop with the downvotes and answer this guy's question, I would like to know too.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 08:10 AM
4

Yes, if you want to go on the incredibly unrealistic male standards a video game might make, then go with Gears of War. Literally every male character in that game series is built like a tank... Though all you have to do to understand why the male characters in Gears of War (and also the Unreal series) are like that is take one look at it's creator.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 11:19 PM
11

At least Duke Nukem isn't trying to hide anything about how he got like that. Steroids are a powerup in the game.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 05:52 PM
2

I got further proof that many feminists are just trying to selfishly further their agenda of elitism when a friend of mine, a male-to-female transgendered person, was outed and harassed recently. There were feminist blogs that said that "he" didn't deserve the same rights and privileges as a woman because he was just a "sick perv trying to get attention." Insane. "he" didn't deserve the same rights and privileges as a woman But... women don't have any privileges and rights according to feminists…
/r/MensRights24/01/13 04:28 AM
39

The current standards for a US Army grunt aren't very high.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 03:57 AM
2

Thank you. I was having a hard time understanding the abuse there with no explanation given.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 03:53 AM
-1

Alright, that makes sense. Is it a reference to "The Honeymooners"? "One of these days Alice... pow, right in the kisser!" That would make sense, but being a guy in his 20s I'm not one to make that connection immediately...
/r/MensRights21/01/13 01:32 AM
2

Ok... so a man and a woman are in a relationship. The man has a job, the woman does not. The man controls his money and allows her to have some of his money to spend for herself, and this is abuse? Sorry, I don't see it. He's not controlling the money. He's controlling his money. I'll put it this way. I know a couple where the man works and the woman doesn't. He allows her to use his bank card. Unfortunately, she often spends more than she should. Fuck, now he can't pay for internet or his cell …
/r/MensRights21/01/13 01:24 AM
40

Hahaha, oh wow. That poster is some piece of work. My favorite bullet point on it is under "Economic Abuse". *Giving her an allowance Yes, I'm abusing the shit out of you by giving you my money. "Using Emotional Abuse" *Honeymooning her What the fuck does that even mean or imply?
/r/MensRights20/01/13 06:49 PM
0

Repost it with the source and bottom explanation cut off maybe
/r/MensRights18/01/13 03:53 AM
2

Ex-GF was obsessed with IWABO. Can't stand it... I prefer my metal to sound like uh... music, you know? Also, maybe you're not a fan of female vocals because it's hard to find good ones in the progressive metal/power metal genre (just going on the bands you listed). Those genres are dominated by the idea of "manly men doing manly things" (Manowar is a pretty outstanding example of this), but I've found a few obscure bands with great female vocals.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 08:13 AM
6

It pisses me off much more when that some people think it's insulting to give up your seat for a woman in the first place. That's why they say chivarly is dead, and women killed it. I say screw it nowadays, I'm only giving my seat up for the elderly and disabled now.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 08:06 AM
4

As someone who's been kicked in the nuts countless times, I envy you. You obviously never played soccer when you were a kid.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 07:57 AM
8

Waves his dick at passerbys while shouting nonsense? I think we have a winner.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 01:23 AM
4

Yes, and a page is 1 step below squire, which is 1 step below knight. We need something that can never blossom into something of power. Stableboy? They shoveled shit, slept in the stables with the horses, and could only hope to ever graduate to feeding and caring for a knight's horse.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 12:03 AM
5

I think this 4chan post sums this up pretty well
/r/MensRights14/01/13 02:03 PM
3

Said it before here... you can either agree that women are too stupid to successfully kill themselves, or that they are more likely to be just crying for help and don't actually want to die. Your reason stated just went the "women too stupid" route. Why would someone eat a bunch of pills somewhere that someone could easily find them in time to rush them to the hospital? Because they don't really want to die. Do you have the internet at your disposal? Then you have a tool that is happy to tell yo…
/r/MensRights09/01/13 03:17 PM
0

It's really not that hard to successfully kill yourself when you actually want to die. Jump off a bridge, a building, eat a whole container full of aspirin, the list goes on for very easy ways to kill yourself without fail. So here's what that leaves you with to decide on: either women are too stupid to kill themselves reliably, or many of the attempts are cries for attention. I'll personally believe the latter.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 10:05 AM
1

I've played online games for about 15 years. There are 2 major draws to online gaming: Competition and socialization. Men are more often drawn to the competitive side of online gaming, while women are often drawn to the social side. Women are treated poorly in online games, not just FPS games, for several reasons, and I'll list them here. Because women are drawn to the social aspect, they often go out of their way to seek attention. Not all of them do this, but it's done enough that players are …
/r/MensRights07/01/13 07:36 AM
85

It wouldn't be enough unless she specifically said "I'll lie to the police and tell them you raped me". If she simply texted "date me or I'll tell everyone you raped me", the police can take it as "you raped me, and now I'm going to tell everyone unless you date me".
/r/MensRights05/01/13 10:42 PM
8

It's nothing harmful. It's pointing out the ridiculousness of the idea of the patriarchy with humor. There is nothing wrong with doing that, it's not spreading a ridiculous or radical idea. Think about it this way... what's an easier way to convince someone that the idea of the patriarchy is silly? With a long winded argument? Or with equal sillyness? By using silly to combat silly, people can quickly make a connection there. Humor isn't everything obviously, but it helps open people up to ideas…
/r/MensRights04/01/13 03:13 AM
6

Yes, humor can be almost as powerful as music in this right.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 03:07 AM
12

Ron Jeremy's success only strengthens the point that you can't be a fat ugly stud. Why? Because pornography is fantasy. Ron Jeremy portrays the fat ugly stud as a fantasy similar looking people can't reach, and that's why he's successful - he's playing a role people could only fantasize about.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 11:24 PM
2

The false accuser getting criminal charges doesn't surprise you? It surprised me.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 04:22 AM
49

Yes, I imagine if a male sexual predator was caught and he looked like Ryan Gosling, then they would consider pointing out that he's "hot" to be unprofessional.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 08:44 PM
7

I'm glad they sell these T-shirts. It makes it easier to spot women that have zero respect for men, just like men that wear similar t-shirts disrespecting women.
/r/MensRights23/11/12 07:59 PM
1

Most of what I learned about WW2, I learned myself out of my own interest. For example, you would NEVER learn in a school that the US prolonged the war by using a spread out attack instead of a spearhead attack, because a spread out attack looked better for the papers (and for the presidential elections).
/r/MensRights20/11/12 08:46 PM
1

I wouldn't have a problem with learning more about the civil rights movement if they didn't ONLY teach about civil rights for blacks and women. There are important civil rights movements to teach about such as the employee rights movements in the 20s and 30s that they completely ignore... because it mostly only effected white males at the time (but set the bar for ALL employees today, in hours worked, workplace safety, ect).
/r/MensRights20/11/12 08:44 PM
5

Because when a fat ugly girl drags you home and rapes you, your friends will think it's hilarious. If she's attractive, your friends will say you were lucky.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 11:21 PM
3

Don't be a single issue voter.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 03:42 AM
2

He's asking you to use racially neutral words to describe people on a forum for equality, I don't think it's much to ask. Besides cultural ways and outside appearances, there isn't much difference between trashy white people and trashy black people.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 09:48 PM
1

Few years ago here in my town some high schoolers busted up a bunch of headstones in a civil war graveyard. The police had no leads until they started bragging about it in school when it was in the news. People are stupid.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 09:40 PM
4

I have one thing to add, and it would be advice to the girl that wrote the article. Bring friends, and stick with them. They'll protect you from these situations. It sounds like she was cornered there, and that's why I highly disapprove of the guys with the camera's behavior. She should be glad she had her wits about her. Cons can be big places with a lot of people, like a rock concert. You're going to be hard pressed to find an official to help you, and there's going to be assholes and perverts…
/r/MensRights18/10/12 07:36 AM
6

I wouldn't consider being ejected from a con an extreme punishment. No, they don't deserve the punishment that would entail from true sexual harassment in say a workplace. However, it's a group mentality thing. People see this kind of behavior go unpunished and people think it's ok to follow in the act. People go to these things to have fun, it's not in good very spirit to have fun at someone else's expense there. There's also the issue of age - I can see a group of teenagers doing this kind of …
/r/MensRights18/10/12 07:14 AM
3

Great analogy there, that pretty much hits the nail on the head.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 06:52 AM
4

I think it was a pretty harassing. One joke or oggle is to be expected in this situation (I'm a nerd myself, and we don't exactly have the best social tact). Making repeated jokes and gestures is harassment, and awkward... especially when you're being put on the spot in front of a camera and a crowd. Edit: She's exaggerating when she says "her costume is tame compared to others", though. It really isn't. I've been to cons, I have friends that go to them all the time and post pictures on facebook…
/r/MensRights18/10/12 06:47 AM
1

Thanks, I actually found that exact line and used it the same way a couple minutes before you posted it :D Any other flaws in this research anyone could find would be most helpful.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 05:06 AM
2

Does this remind you of your grandfather?
/r/MensRights17/10/12 09:37 PM
2

Being a bomber crew member was not a fun experience. Those huge planes didn't just blow up when they got shot like in the movies. No, shrapnel flew all over the interior, shredding crew members to pieces. Many crew members witnessed bloodbaths inside their bombers.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 09:31 PM
3

Haha, I'm sorry, what? And these WWII veterans, they did what, took the women's place to build more tanks and artillery shells, and took the office chairs to write more KIA letters to imaginary families after the war was over? What an idiot this professor is.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 09:29 PM
3

My grandfather was a marine in WWII as well, and my grandmother tells us he had night terrors until the day he died. Never talked about it until 1 month before he passed, then he wouldn't shut up about it, like he knew he was going to go soon and wanted to finally tell his tale. Struggling to speak through the effects of a previous stroke, he told us of his landing on Iwa Jima, how he witnessed best friends torn in half by MG nests 5 feet in front of them that they couldn't see until they all op…
/r/MensRights17/10/12 09:18 PM
3

I'm Polish. My ancestors lived through horrible wars and invasions from Russia since before 900 AD, and then my ancestor's country was completely leveled by the Nazi blitzkrieg. Countless generations of strife and misery, but I get no sympathy because I'm white. Thing is, I don't need that sympathy. Neither does anyone else who's ancestors suffered but they didn't. I hold no grudges against the Russians for what they did to my people, and I go to Oktoberfests and drink with germans, because they…
/r/MensRights13/10/12 05:03 PM
1

Makes me think about the time when (Time magazine I think it was?) published an issue with Sarah Palin on the cover, and you could see her mustache. Palin supporters were outraged, my guess is because if she's unattractive, she gets less votes.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 06:06 AM
0

I stopped at "moist for control". It set the tone for what was going to be a fairly hateful rant.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 07:00 AM
2

You're right, it depends on the person and if you're sure that your life is in danger. Even still, in the US state laws on self defense vary. In some states, you could have multiple stab wounds, and they find the corpse of your attacker still gripping the knife wet with your blood, and they'd still charge you with murder or at least man slaughter for shooting your attacker dead.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 02:23 AM
1

If a woman attacks me and poses a serious threat to my personal safety Not hitting with fists, but a serious threat. For example, trying to hit you with a baseball bat. Or a knife.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 01:58 AM
2

I am concerned with the legal and political aspects of men's rights, but I feel that the social ramifications of feminism and the emasculation of men is an equally troubling issue.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 04:25 AM
5

Not sure if being sarcastic or has never seen the Robot Chicken episode where Shatner's hair piece is an international spy.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 02:09 PM
1

Unless the quote from the Jim Carry movie Liar Liar is based on a true incident, the instance of a burglars falling through sky lights and getting cut on idle knives is just a joke from that movie.
/r/MensRights28/05/12 09:08 AM
3

Yeah, I don't understand the idea that it's ok to discriminate on insurance based on gender, but not based on race or ethnic background. Do it all or don't do it at all. For example, it's a well documented fact that black americans are notably more prone to cancer than other races, but I doubt they pay more health insurance for it. Companies are deathly afraid of racism, even if it costs them money. They aren't scared of sexism though... especially when the party getting the short end of the sti…
/r/MensRights26/05/12 09:03 PM
1

If you meant it sarcastically, I apologize. Sometimes sarcasm doesn't translate in text. It just sounded silly and I jumped on it, I thought it sounded like you were bragging more than complaining.
/r/MensRights26/05/12 07:17 PM
1

"I would have to run 1.5 miles in about 3 minutes" There's only been a little over 1,000 people in the world to run a mile in under 4 minutes since 1950, and the vast majority finished in 3:50. Lie more, internet tough guy
/r/MensRights26/05/12 02:03 AM
0

This needs to go to the top. Please don't post unreliable sources... especially tabloid sources. This news is more fake than Fox News.
/r/MensRights14/05/12 02:34 AM
1

Unfortunately more often than not, the most extreme members of a movement are also the most vocal ones.
/r/MensRights13/05/12 06:35 PM
4

Seems the TL;DR crowd with poor reading comprehension is downvoting you, when you're simply suggesting not to fight fire with fire.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 03:48 AM
2

So I couldn't help but notice a lot of people pointing out that "he promised to pay", even though police have had no contact with him yet. It ever occur to anyone that his date and her friends are just saying that?
/r/MensRights17/04/12 09:04 AM
2

Yep, I'm from a neighboring equally safe neighborhood. We call Westlake Yuppie Central around here. To give you an idea of what kind of neighborhood these are, we haven't had a murder here in over a decade. Edit: Our cops are also very, very bored. I'm actually not surprised they put out a warrant. They literally have nothing else to do except camp outside bars at night.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 08:59 AM
1

I'm from a neighboring town to where this happened. Waterville, where your optometrist is in, is 100 miles from westlake. The article also says he's from Sheffield Village, which is 10 miles from the date in Westlake. Edit: Crocker Park is a shopping center in Westlake. It's a pretty yuppie place, but not even the fancy looking steak house there is going to charge you $95 for a meal. $50 bucks at most if you ordered a steak and 2 or 3 beers.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 08:51 AM
7

Perhaps a lot of people did :| It's too early on a sunday morning for people to catch that, damnit.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 04:00 PM
8

Key words, proven beyond a doubt. In cases where maybe there is video evidence that rape didn't happen. Or the accused has an alibi; e.g. he was hosting a party across the city from where and when the rape allegedly took place. Something has to be done to punish these people. Half of rape allegations are false. That is a problem on a huge scale, and it happens because there are no consequences of pointing a finger that ruins someone's life. P.S. No one here is going to take your opinion seriousl…
/r/MensRights15/04/12 03:43 PM
12

Not sure why you're being downvoted for this, you're just speaking it how it is. He made mistakes in how he handled his sperm donation, in that he represented himself as the father. He seemingly wanted some hand in the child's life, albeit a fairly insignificant one... but with all good intentions. Now he's being screwed for his good intentions. He should have donated the sperm and signed a legal document saying he had no affiliation with the resulting child, but perhaps he, as a good person, fe…
/r/MensRights15/04/12 03:46 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter