TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Arronicus Archive

View 0 posts and 114 comments by Arronicus on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

I feel like I'm the only one here who wants to hear her reasoning process for a preference of diamonds to dogs being an intelligent preference, besides for industrial applications, allergies, and avoiding bites.
/r/MensRights22/07/19 04:55 PM
53

Ladbible is even bigger garbage than she is. They're very anti-men
/r/MensRights15/07/19 07:52 PM
7

How is that likely? Shitty people are common.
/r/MensRights14/07/19 07:45 PM
13

Nobody could be that awful. Thatswhereyou'rewrong.jpg There's a LOT of people around who're that selfish and shallow.
/r/MensRights14/07/19 07:44 PM
9

Oh man, that's actually funny to read. It's genuinely like you're listening to a comedy show, where they're trying to argue the most ridiculous, mental gymnastics point possible.
/r/MensRights12/07/19 11:22 PM
16

I bet you even touch penis sometimes when you look at women naked. GAY.
/r/MensRights12/07/19 11:20 PM
15

sords. Checkmate, femsplainist!
/r/MensRights12/07/19 11:19 PM
8

Piggybacking on top comment for awareness: Edit*- I had someone point out to me that the the word assault was misused in the title of this, which I agree with! Sorry about that boys. This is COMPLETELY WRONG. Op was sexually assaulted, and the person who told him otherwise is just mocking men for getting sexually assaulted, and trying to trivialize the harms.
/r/MensRights12/07/19 10:27 PM
4

Seriously. The only thing worse here than /u/undergroundman646 's bullshit is /u/xDrCoconutx taking it at face value without any further thought.
/r/MensRights12/07/19 10:25 PM
4

Don't, they're completely wrong. Assault involves any form of unwanted physical content, and in some countries, includes the threat thereof. From a legal standpoint, what this girl did is sexual assault, and you'd be a fool to listen to u/undergroundman646
/r/MensRights12/07/19 10:24 PM
1

Great, super useful, thanks for sharing what you totally definitely would have done. Glad to know you respond to one problematic behaviour with another.
/r/MensRights12/07/19 10:22 PM
7

No, nor should we be. It's completely wrong for you to grab someone's ass without their consent, and even more wrong for you to do it repeatedly. But please, tell us how bad intentions don't matter, when we're sexually assaulting someone else just because we're attracted to them and want to have a bit of fun. These are highschoolers, they're not 7 year olds who don't know any better. Sexual assault is a problem even under 18, and the first step to dealing with it is combating the very harmful vi…
/r/MensRights12/07/19 10:21 PM
4

What the fuck is wrong with you? Get out of here with that bullshit.
/r/MensRights12/07/19 10:16 PM
2

Tiniest bit odd that he's talking about Whites, Blacks (People of African and Caribbean descent. Yes, I'm aware Caribbean people originated in Africa, but we still call blacks from the Caribbean as such, and not African), and Asians, but you comment on Whites, Asians, and Brown (Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi, etc) guys.
/r/MensRights12/07/19 09:30 PM
2

Rust, age, a bad fuse? Could have been any of those things. Rust wouldn't affect this, the parts involved with pulling and igniting a fuse are not susceptible to rusting. Also, age doesn't matter much. Things like this can operate for many decades with reasonable levels of service and maintenance. Further, if it was a bad fuse, then it wouldn't have fired when it was properly pulled. The only issue at play here is she was incapable of pulling with the appropriate level of force. She was the wron…
/r/MensRights12/07/19 09:22 PM
5

What? How is it not her fault that she can't pull hard on a cord?
/r/MensRights12/07/19 09:19 PM
2

Now they’re actually incels. Good for them. They're bringing about equal representation.
/r/MensRights11/07/19 06:43 PM
4

Ah I hate to be that guy, but they don't share chromosomes, they're different people and have different chromosomes.
/r/MensRights09/07/19 10:44 AM
20

Not complaining, just jealous. You should be complaining. Dress codes that unfairly discriminate against men are problematic, and should be ended, and that's only going to happen with complaints.
/r/MensRights09/07/19 10:42 AM
2

A vocal minority that ends up at the bottom where it belongs.
/r/MensRights08/07/19 10:19 AM
2

Which you know, means they're just a minority of people who don't reflect the views of most of the people there.
/r/MensRights08/07/19 10:19 AM
3

Implying other women believe her.
/r/MensRights07/07/19 11:56 PM
28

They're mostly horrible to each other. Which really is a shame Good, imo You are the cancer that makes people think Men's Rights is about hating women.
/r/MensRights07/07/19 11:47 PM
2

Yes but she's not interested in you, only in the kid.
/r/MensRights06/07/19 12:17 AM
1

Comments don't sort by time posted, by default. So it's not a matter of 'stupidity', that it looks like OP forgot to change accounts and replied to himself.
/r/MensRights02/07/19 02:45 PM
1

Anywhere outside of Europe makes sense. The US is outside of europe, and doesn't make sense for him.
/r/MensRights02/07/19 02:43 PM
1

when did a few subs with garbage moderators become the whole world?
/r/MensRights02/07/19 07:58 AM
7

Hell they don't even allow you to discuss circumcision there. His body, her choice, dontcha know.
/r/MensRights02/07/19 07:57 AM
12

Reply: BC Man outraged that PEI mother wants to mutilate her son's genitals.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 08:14 PM
30

Male Genital Mutilation is not a joke.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 08:13 PM
1

What is facked? Surely you mean fucked? Or does mumsy get mad when you say 'fucked', so you use special characters to make sure she doesn't take away your bath toys?
/r/MensRights22/06/19 06:40 PM
2

The attempt itself comes off a bit insulting. It suggests that we should even consider changing father's day, and mother's day, because a small group of people are offended by father's day, and think that it should be about single mothers too. It's trying to appease a minority of people, at the expense of the majority, who like the way things are.
/r/MensRights16/06/19 09:27 PM
6

I just see "It's Fat's Day" and that's almost as mentally retarded as the (really) (her) part.
/r/MensRights16/06/19 09:25 PM
3

Tbf it's still nice to do something nice for him on father's day, so that he doesn't feel unappreciated, when he is bombarded with hearing what everyone else did. When you don't participate in fathers day, you're not sticking it to society or the corporations, you're just making your dad feel a bit unappreciated. You don't have to buy shit, just do something nice.
/r/MensRights16/06/19 09:23 PM
2

"I don't care about taking a moment one day a year to tell my father I really appreciate everything he has done, because I can't possibly imagine doing that any other way, than subjecting myself to the consumerist pressures from multinational corporations" - u/w33b_lord, with minor paraphrasing from myself. Get real dude, you don't have to buy ANYTHING to make your dad feel appreciated for one day of the year, and he will care.
/r/MensRights16/06/19 09:21 PM
2

Probably a typo.
/r/MensRights16/06/19 12:18 PM
8

Great tits though. Wait. That's Tessa Fowler. Nevermind. Time to cancel Tessa Thompson.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 05:41 PM
4

Why? It's a cryptid. "the men in black" is a thing that existed before the movie, and it doesn't refer only to men.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 05:40 PM
5

As a caucasian heterosexual male, this would exclude me. Feminists would see this as a major victory, because my demographic is evil and needs to be destroyed, according to them, but white straight men are NOT included in the rainbow banner, of which we're told repeatedly. "This place is not for you!"
/r/MensRights13/06/19 05:37 PM
1

It doesn't even make sense. The Men in Black is a term that refers to a specific group or event. Or as others put it more clearly, a cryptid. To say The People in Black or The Agents in Black misses the entire point. Just change the entire name of the movie at that point.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 05:35 PM
6

So she can try to change it, be involved in part of the filming, then threaten to quit and throw tantrums when they don't change the fucking title to appease her.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 05:34 PM
6

Actually it would be Thompsdaughter. Thompson is a combination of (Thom?) + 's + son. But instead of being Thompsson, you just end up with the one s. Thompsdaughter would still carry the one s, just as you see in other 'daughter' names, which yes, are out there. Quote explaining it: Jón Einarsson's daughter Sigríður's last name would not be Einarsson but Jónsdóttir. Again, the name literally means "Jón's daughter" (Jóns + dóttir). Note the critical addition of the s
/r/MensRights13/06/19 05:32 PM
9

If you're using 'woke' at all, you're already retarded, does woker really make things much worse?
/r/MensRights13/06/19 05:29 PM
19

Hollywood doesn't do new. Their modus operandi is essentially as follows: If it generated a good profit before, do it again. This means either remaking old movies, sometimes over and over and over like hulk/spoderman, if they continue to generate good money, or it means recycling the same concepts, movie styles, or themes. But further, it also means, if something seems like a risky venture that's really artsy or untested, then don't do it, heavily modify it to fit the model of something else tha…
/r/MensRights13/06/19 05:27 PM
20

She would, she would think it's grammatically incorrect, and she would suggest "Women of Colour" because she's retarded.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 05:24 PM
24

Naw, we'll just start seeing "Look how much money men are wasting to troll this amazing movie!!!"
/r/MensRights13/06/19 05:21 PM
2

Dental floss for the mice :>
/r/MensRights13/06/19 06:58 AM
1

a Kitchen Aide stand mixer for her birthday, my mom would have been super excited. That's a $400 piece of equipment that most people will never own or use outside of a professional kitchen. I agree with the sentiment of your post, but I STRONGLY disagree with you on the stand mixer. I have a kitchenaid, they're expensive but they work well, and I use mine very regularly. It's an enormous reduction in work for baking almost anything.
/r/MensRights12/06/19 06:07 PM
4

If you had money, to donate to conde nast and pad a tiny bit of some investor's portfolio, you'd buy this guy a gold star icon?
/r/MensRights09/06/19 07:46 PM
13

Everyone here being outraged or discussing whether or not you would/should help a member of the opposite sex when in distress, and noone talking about the most shocking, outrageous part of the article: Osborne was dead for 15 minutes and the stranger gave him CPR on the side of Midland Road in the St Philips area of the city. Brenda said: 'If he had gotten into his car people would have thought he was sleeping. He died three times, twice on the pavement and once in the ambulance. 'Although he wa…
/r/MensRights02/06/19 04:50 PM
2

This is a really fucking creepy name for a suicide resource bot. Holy shit.
/r/MensRights02/06/19 04:47 PM
9

SAVE A STRANGER WOMEN What about a less strange woman?
/r/MensRights02/06/19 04:46 PM
-11

Why? Many men simply wouldn't care, just as they don't now, and this would cause problems for many families, where there wouldn't otherwise be problems. DNA testing should by mandate be available to those who want it, but it should NOT be mandatory to do so.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 05:49 PM
-2

Unpopular opinion here apparently: If my father wasn't my biological father, fuck off, I'd rather not know, and I'd be bloody pissed at the doctor who said otherwise. This absolutely is an ethical quandry, and to deny it is to bullheadedly assume that your moral beliefs are the only acceptable ones, even if you haven't taken the time to flesh them out and understand them. Men should have the right to be able to quickly and easily discover if they are, or are not the father, if they want to, and …
/r/MensRights01/06/19 05:47 PM
1

Hey gDayWisher, you're a cancer on reddit.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 05:44 PM
12

I highly, highly doubt there's any jealousy involved here. She likely really does think that people who have a differing opinion from her are horrible.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 03:31 AM
1

That's irrelevant to my point. You can see that I quoted the specific part that I was replying to, which made no reference at all to paedophilia.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 03:28 PM
8

This isn't about age. The students could have been 30 years old, this is still statutory rape.
/r/MensRights27/05/19 02:51 PM
4

As a European, I find it really hard to understand outrage towards statutory rape when it's so close to the legal age. Age is irrelevant here. This is a Teacher/Student relationship, meaning that even if the student is 40 years old, and the teacher is 40 years old, it's still statutory rape. ADDITIONALLY, the students are in special education, and so there's additional considerations there. But please, feel free to defend how you don't think there's anything wrong in sexual relationships where o…
/r/MensRights27/05/19 02:50 PM
4

No, she only fucked the special ed kids. If she was fucking a teacher, it wouldn't have been a big deal.
/r/MensRights27/05/19 02:47 PM
4

sleeping with special Ed kids is an especially harmonious crime Really? Are you positive it's a harmonious crime? Are you SURE that's the word you were looking for?
/r/MensRights27/05/19 02:47 PM
4

Not legally binding in many places that are worth living. Like BC, Canada, for example.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 11:19 PM
2

Yikes. Why do you hate Canada so much?
/r/MensRights22/05/19 02:01 AM
1

He strikes me as a wolf in sheep's clothing. What? Honest question. WHAT part of JT possibly says "Wolf" to you? hairless mexican dog at best.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 02:00 AM
0

El Mundo reported that the prosecutor’s office for minors in Huelva opened an inquiry into whether the school had violent student’s rights. The fact this isn't in the comments here already suggests most people here truly didn't even read the article. Shame on you guys.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 04:02 PM
-5

Read the fucking article. It specifically explains the reasoning behind the proposed action. You don't have to agree (or disagree) with it, but at least you won't be asking such stupid questions.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 04:01 PM
13

No she shouldn't. She should be getting punished for a false accusation, and for inciting violence causing death. The rules of our laws shouldn't go out the window or be bent just to meet your satisfactions, they should be properly applied to bring justice here.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 04:32 PM
-3

Unpopular opinion: No she shouldn't. The charges would never stick, taxdollars would be wasted, additional anguish would be brought to the victim's family, and it would have a negative impact on the possibility of appropriate charges being successfully applied. Laws have specific legal definitions, and making a false accusation that could reasonably be foreseen to lead to violent consequences does not fit the criteria of a 2nd degree murder charge. Second-degree murder: any intentional murder wi…
/r/MensRights13/05/19 04:31 PM
9

Huh, TIL Argento's lawyer has a reddit account with the username /u/StopTop. A few months different age-wise, and he wouldn't have been able to make an issue of it. How about that. A few months different age-wise, and she wouldn't have been engaging in sexual interactions with a minor. How about that? Perhaps come down off your victim-shaming high-horse for a moment to see that even IF Bennett had led Argento on, or orchestrated things, Argento took part, got involved, and engaged in illegal act…
/r/MensRights30/08/18 05:29 PM
2

Seriously, that's just rude. Dove is obviously a man. Look at his facial characteristics.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 05:25 PM
2

I fail to see the problem here. Why can we not trade her in for him?
/r/MensRights30/08/18 05:24 PM
13

Your question doesn't make sense, because there was no possibility for consent. The victim was of an age where he was not legally able to consent to the encounter, so by default it is statutory rape.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 05:24 PM
-3

It calls into question certain aspects of their personality, but doesn't suggest anything about reliability.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 05:22 PM
41

FGM is a non issue, children are starving to death every day in africa. There can only be one issue at a time, obviously.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 07:39 PM
2

Your archived post still has the paywall for me. http://prntscr.com/kljv6l
/r/MensRights22/08/18 09:25 AM
8

A strawman argument in the form of a question is not a question. No True Scotsman argument is not answering a question. Epic fail.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 11:14 PM
9

her crime is not the same as when a man does it. It's exactly the same, because it's about age, and position of authority. She raped a minor, while in a position of authority.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 11:12 PM
3

Your command of English is deep and good. That's not exactly a good way to say what you're trying to say, and it's not accurate. /u/perplexedm 's English is good for an ESL, but their understanding of English grammar and syntax demonstrates regular errors, to where the intent of their message is occasionally misunderstood. I'm not criticizing them in any fashion, and I certainly think it warrants respect not only that they have this much of a grasp of at least a second language, particularly a c…
/r/MensRights25/07/18 05:40 AM
12

No, I'm pretty sure gay white males are included in the societies oppressors category. Male whiteness overrides being gay.
/r/MensRights23/07/18 09:23 PM
1

No one goes to the theater to see movies like Saving Private Ryan or Enemy at The Gates or Fury expecting them to be a documentary. They don't expect it to be a documentary, but MANY think that they are historically accurate. A disclaimer doesn't change this.
/r/MensRights15/07/18 07:35 AM
-4

A lawyer can't make her show fake emotion.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 05:48 AM
2

i wanna do it an noone help! FTFY. Your version is NOT what a 4 year old would say.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 10:06 PM
157

Of all people I know about sexual abuse. In other words, of all people, she should have known better.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 04:03 PM
7

Because that's common in parking lots, and where it isn't, it magically stops at the end of the parking lot, right? /s
/r/MensRights02/06/18 12:06 AM
13

Number of DV shelters for men... Is 0 a number even? That's how many there are here.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 10:01 AM
14

You can say [USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST] Can you though?
/r/MensRights18/05/18 08:36 AM
1

rude
/r/MensRights30/04/18 10:44 AM
5

Canadian men who have traditionally voted for liberal or NDP or Green need to start emailing their MP's and telling them why they will no longer be receiving your vote: anti-male discrimination and misandry. Haven't noticed this as a problem for the Greens or NDP in my province to any worthwhile degree. Heck, at all in the past year.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 10:43 AM
2

It's also worth noting that with "good behaviour" you'll be out in 1/3 of your sentence, or less.
/r/MensRights02/04/18 06:30 AM
2

Actually, it turns out her just couldn't read. He thought it said 18%.
/r/MensRights24/03/18 05:22 AM
2

Not an effective rebuttal.
/r/MensRights24/03/18 05:21 AM
3

You're missing the entire point. No one is disagreeing that men are more violent. The joke, and the part that bothers us, is that the women are willing to accept that there are biological differences leading to criminal behaviour, but only where it concerns gender. Where it might possibly concern race, it's automatically all about oppression.
/r/MensRights24/03/18 05:20 AM
5

I didn't saw there wasn't any difference, just not as much. No, you didn't say there wasn't as much of a difference, you said there isn't much difference, which suggests that the difference is negligible, or can be regarded as irrelevant, when in fact that difference IS significant.
/r/MensRights24/03/18 05:18 AM
-2

The word you're looking for is plaintiff I think, but that's only for civil cases. In a criminal case, which rape is, the charge is brought forward by the state, so the appropriate term would likely be alleged victim.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 12:44 PM
3

No wonder kids these days behave like shit. Ah, yes, because they were any better 50 years ago, and teachers were never abusive 50 years ago.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 09:05 AM
4

Honestly, if you drink to that point, I would say there is part of you that DOES want to drink until you puke.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 09:05 AM
2

god bless the fleshlight. Wouldn't be so bad if they didn't start smelling like rotten cum after a couple weeks without cleaning it.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 08:54 AM
3

The child needs to be kept away so that the child doesn’t learn that domestic violence is normal and acceptable. How about the child needs to be kept away so the mother doesn't freaking beat it up or try to smother it with a pillow like she did to him on his wedding night?
/r/MensRights06/03/18 08:53 AM
6

Dude, read the frigging article. She got a restraining order and nothing more. No community service.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 08:49 AM
30

Why do you think they were joking? Completely serious question.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 08:41 AM
2

Isn't worth shit, she claims duress, or that he took her phone while she was in the washroom, gg.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 11:19 AM
3

Won't hold up for a single second in court. "He made me" "I thought he would ____ if I didn't" "I didn't want to" "He took my phone" "I lost my phone that night" "I've never seen that app before".
/r/MensRights16/01/18 11:18 AM
-6

She didn't blow him.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 11:16 AM
4

Look, I agree with everyone else here, this is complete bullshit what happened, but what you're describing hasn't been the case on commercial passenger airlines in the past 40? years. It's not "Extremely difficult to hear" even when you're right next to the bathroom. I've flown plenty, I have bad hearing, and it's not significantly more difficult to hear people on planes, let alone 'extremely'.
/r/MensRights06/01/18 08:15 AM
5

The fuck he doesn't. He said he didn't say surprising, when he said surprising, clear as day, in a 2 sentence post. That deserves every downvote it gets.
/r/MensRights31/12/17 11:21 AM
4

If you say you didn't mean that, we have no reason at all to believe you meant anything you've said, given that there was no obvious sarcasm. It's equally likely you don't mean it when you say you didn't mean it.
/r/MensRights31/12/17 11:20 AM
1

It makes sense, though. Law enforcement officers are measured by the number of crimes they prevent/stop/whatever. This is wrong. They're measured by the crime rate. If in 2017, there are 24 assaults per 10,000 people, and the officer makes 10 arrests, and 'prevents' 5 assaults, and in 2018, there are 50 assaults per 10,000 people, the officer makes 48 arrests, and 'prevents' 85 assaults, the officer's department is seen to be doing a FAR worse job in 2018, than 2017. Police effectiveness is only…
/r/MensRights26/12/17 12:09 AM
3

Taking photos of an underage human's genitalia against their will is the fucking definition of child abuse. ftfy
/r/MensRights09/12/17 11:15 AM
9

No, it is not a right, "God-given" or otherwise, to discriminate against particular groups of people. Particularly so when you're dealing with an international social media platform like fecesbook.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 04:00 PM
6

Not for long.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 03:59 PM
11

good bot
/r/MensRights04/12/17 03:59 PM
3

It's clickbait. Please, please just instantly delete threads that do it, and people will stop doing it.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 02:35 PM
3

That's simply not true at all. If an attractive guy isn't interested in an unattractive woman, that is sexual harassment too. Apparently.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 02:34 PM
6

The Nazis saw the rest of the world as the enemy. No they didn't. The Nazis saw the Jews as the enemy, and those who aided the Jews. Most of the rest of the world they were varying degrees of indifferent toward.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 05:12 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter