TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Artear Archive

View 0 posts and 318 comments by Artear on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I never believed you the slightest bit capable of doing so to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 12:40 PM
10

You constantly use evasive language. You're not real about anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 08:28 AM
–

Even more proof that women are pathological manipulators. Also fucking great job disproving the idea that women are good at communicating.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 08:14 AM
2

He's not the one stealing other people's struggles for clout.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 08:13 AM
4

The fact that the truth makes you uncomfortable doesn't make it wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 08:13 AM
–

Oh fuck off. Don't pretend for even a second that you people actually base your behavior off comments on this fucking subreddit. You're so immensely full of shit. You're just looking for an excuse for your own shitty behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 08:12 AM
3

If you fall for a barrage of pretty words and immediately shut down all your critical thinking, then you're kinda dumb. Sorry.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 09:10 PM
3

Well, you're a woman so I'm already expecting you to have zero empathy. Also, have you noticed that the difference is that women's abuse issues are something they bring upon themselves as the selectors of relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 07:58 PM
5

Women are wary of all the wrong men, as the stats seem to show. Also nobody expects you to tolerate abuse, but you sure seem to love staying with abusers anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 07:53 PM
3

Lmao. Women are coddled their entire lives by pretty much everyone. If women are neglected, then I don't even have a word for what is happening to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 07:33 PM
4

Yeah, all women are "victims". Thanks for acknowledging the victim complex. Like you'd give half a fuck about any man no matter how much he's suffered, and his issues likely aren't 95% self-inflicted.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 07:28 PM
26

Yeah, you've probably seen all four of them, likely just for an ad campaign.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 07:05 PM
3

I don't think you're stupid, I think you're dishonest.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 06:24 PM
2

Most people are terrible actors. Stop pretending like you're being outplayed by some Machiavellian schemer.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 06:14 PM
6

You sure seem to subscribe to the hivemind, given the fact that you're all using the same pathetic excuses.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 05:45 PM
5

People are calling it a bar, verbatim, in this fucking comment section. I don't like this framing since it posits that all men who are chosen as partners by women are "nice" while the ones that aren't chosen are probably faking it or whatever. The entire "nice guy" trope is entirely reliant on this falsehood.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 05:44 PM
2

Not positively, but I'm not claiming that I'm only looking for someone who is just "nice". It's fine to not have sex with people just because they're "nice". It's not fine to then gaslight them about it, if the real reason is something completely different. I'm not claiming that the men I find unattractive are morally inferior to the men I do find attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 05:39 PM
5

But that makes it worse. It's saying that these men aren't even good enough for terrible women.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 05:36 PM
3

Most abusers have red flags that could be seen from mars.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 05:35 PM
5

Anything to protect the ego.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 04:38 PM
7

Yeah, it's like that "women sniffing out if a guy is on the spectrum vs sniffing out if a guy will violently abuse them" meme. Hilarious how full of shit they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 04:36 PM
7

But if it's supposed to be the bare minimum, how are people arriving at the goal without meeting it? The answer is, because it doesn't matter. It's a completely tangential characteristic that isn't central in determining attraction. If bad behavior was universally punished by women, in the relationship/sexual context, there simply wouldn't be so many women constantly getting into relationships with the most blatant red flags known to man.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 04:31 PM
5

The empathetic and intuitive gender, rofl. Women sure love to characterize themselves like children when it gives them an excuse for dumb choices.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 04:27 PM
7

So your thesis is that women are socially incompetent, and easily manipulated. Being suckered as the party with the most choice in the process is pretty sad. It's not like you're desperate and only have one man who would be willing.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 04:26 PM
8

It's a perfect example of both women's in-group bias and their massive social desirability bias. It's basically just an admission to trust nothing they say. It's like when thin women pretend that their morbidly obese friends are beautiful. Complete horseshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 04:20 PM
6

This argument is retarded, since it's so demonstrably false. There are actual admitted child molesters who get into relationships with women if they're attractive enough. If normal, boring, average-looking men are failing to do so, failing to get with anyone, are you actually claiming that they're less decent than that? Women will never stop lying to men, but they really need to stop lying to themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 04:14 PM
1

Well relationships are a central part of non-job related life, so of course you'd need to weigh types of relationships against each other. And yeah, for most people, having a long term partners means living for their approval on a pretty important level. If you were truly set on decentering men, you'd not be together with one. Family is basically the center of one's world. How is that decentering on any level, except pretend that you don't need something that you've never had to be without? It's…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 04:07 PM
6

People tend to value romantic relationships far above friendships, so yes, duh.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 03:19 PM
7

Because the vast majority of them are still in relationships with men. Of course they don't care about men as a group though. Nobody seems to. But it's more like people who tell others that romantic relationships are overrated, while they themselves have basically never not been in one. Hypocrisy isn't convincing.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 02:49 PM
3

But that's ultimately still gynocentric, and therefore ultimately not in men's best interest. "Men should better themselves for the sake of women" is basically the entire message of "bluepill" statements online.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 02:47 PM
5

There might never be true fairness, but there certainly will be unrest.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 02:45 PM
11

And a lot of them are fucking liars.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 02:44 PM
8

I'm not saying otherwise, but most people tend to want some amount of fairness, and are usually not swayed by "Sucks to be you. You're just inferior". Feminism itself is an example of this.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 02:40 PM
1

Which is extra hilarious considering the vast majority of these women are basic-ass shitlibs with no real progressive ideas. If feminism wasn't considered progressive, and it shouldn't be, they would basically be center-right.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 02:37 PM
10

Yeah, but men get mad since this doesn't apply to women, even when they advocate for "equality". Women can whine their way into success. Women can act like spoiled children and not become social outcasts. Women don't need to fix their shit, they can just force people to put up with them. Every single neurotic depressed woman seems to be in a relationship, so that can't really be an obstacle either. People are not just gonna let go of perceived unfairness just because others say it's their lot in…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 02:35 PM
7

No, you're right, the gender empathy gap basically makes it so that the thing women did, whining their way into a dominant position in society, is not feasible for men, since nobody cares. It's not strange that men would feel otherwise though, since they can see women do that exact same thing and succeed. They'll get it once they figure out that women effectively see them more like machines than people.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 02:31 PM
3

You have universal experiences with men you're attracted to. That says more about you than it does about men. Maybe you're all just into shitheads.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 08:40 PM
2

Just a heads up. If you wanna sound non-monolithic, maybe you should stop writing like you're all reading from the same script. Also, it might help if you were not all largely the same, especially relating to preferences. Oh well. "Women stop pretending that outliers invalidate trends challenge (impossible) ".
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 08:32 PM
1

But the stats hold true in countries where gun ownership is heavily restricted, and the gap remains in studies that control for method.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 10:35 AM
3

I don't even think the studies about suicide themselves deny this, so I'm not sure why you are. As I've said before, the only real other explanation for why women are less likely to succeed in suicide by all methods is that they're fundamentally incompetent. And I'm just not sure why you would want to support this angle. It's not like it helps those women to pretend like their parasuicidal gestures are actual attempts either. Understanding the actual severity of their suffering is kind of import…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 10:01 PM
0

"Most effective" can just be the best of a handful of terrible alternative solutions, that all have awful effect sizes. When presenting only in relative terms, it is entirely possible for all alternatives to be absolutely awful. If all five contestants in a hypothetical 100 meter sprint trip and break their necks before reaching the halfway point, the one that made it to the 45m mark was the most effective, if the others only made it to 20m, but all of them did terrible. The best is still bad in…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 09:44 PM
-2

"most effective treatment" doesn't mean "effective".
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 09:24 PM
0

Yes, one is even worse than the other, yet both are bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 09:21 PM
0

And I would claim that you solved your own issues, yet give the credit to therapists, like religious people give credit for their own happiness to god.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 08:59 PM
2

It's obviously not *the answer*, since the efficacy rates are fucking atrocious. It's the answer you want to be true, because it allows you to completely individualize any issue that doesn't affect you, and means that you never have to do anything for others.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 08:57 PM
2

It's honestly insane that women haven't figured out that most of the benefits of therapy are incidental changes in mood and motivation that you would expect to see over a period of several years.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 08:40 PM
2

It definitely does, especially considering that the ratio of women to men who go to therapy is about as lopsided as can be. Of course the majority of women's "suicide attempts" are just cries for attention, but even then it hardly speaks in favor of women generally being ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 08:39 PM
2

That's not funny. It's tragic.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 08:36 PM
3

"The healing crystals aren't curing your cancer because you don't believe hard enough." If therapy was scientific, you'd think that they wouldn't have so many useless therapists. Even proponents of therapy point out that you have to "shop" around, potentially for years, to find a "good" therapist, which is just not the mark of a field with any kind of rigor.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 08:35 PM
0

Yeah, I'm sure there are many cool specializations for chiropractic too. Unfortunately those are also based on junk science. Must be nice to be a "medical professional" in a field with no standards or any real oversight. Pretty much the perfect place for grifters.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 08:31 PM
3

Every single woman I know who espouses the virtues of therapy and psychiatry have been going there for over 5 years, and are showing basically no material improvement, outside of getting boyfriends that take of them. Most of the time the only thing gained in therapy is the sense that one now understands oneself better, which, if true, should reasonably manifest in improvement and/or solutions to one's problems. However that rarely seems to happen. If you go to therapy for years and eventually ge…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 08:28 PM
2

Because mental "healthcare" is ultimately idealist. It's basically a religion. You even get the same excuses when it doesn't work. "You didn't 'do the work'" is ultimately no different from "you didn't believe hard enough".
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 08:20 PM
0

You do that. About as useful on a practical level as a master's in chiropractic.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 08:15 PM
-1

Therapists are neither professionals, nor engaging in healthcare. No more than the average homeopathist, anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 06:57 PM
0

Women already have incredibly inflated standards, and even when they get what they want, they're still not happy. Nothing is ever good enough. Maybe women simply aren't capable of being satisfied.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 03:42 PM
4

It's apparently utterly essential, and one of the most important aspects of attraction, yet you can't describe it in quantitative or qualitative terms? rofl.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 03:30 PM
1

You just want to instinctively protect women's shitty behavior from criticism by using "personality" as a vague placeholder for their actual preferences.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 03:27 PM
10

It's the in-group instinct of always supporting the sisterhood clashing with their extreme desperation for being unique and non-monolithic, which is ironically the exact same wording used by every single one of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/25 12:49 PM
–

Another pathological liar lol. Do you people actually buy your own bullshit?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/25 12:36 PM
–

Thanks for proving that women don't feel shame.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/25 12:29 PM
–

Women are sociopathic narcissists at every age. They are never happy with what they have. That's why it's such a fucking joke when women talk about "maturing" when they settle for a partner they don't really want, but who can provide them with material things.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/25 12:27 PM
–

Yes, women are perpetual victims, which is why they twist every example into a pretzel to never have to admit to having advantages.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/25 12:26 PM
5

So you replaced it with false hope? That's worse, and you'll come to realize that.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 05:56 PM
9

Women receive lesser sentences for the same crime in pretty much all western nations, so the thing you're describing does happen, just not for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 05:54 PM
4

Professional help is a smokescreen. Pseudoscientific nonsense meant to hide away problematic individuals. You cannot fix societal ills with meandering conversations and chemical lobotomy. Every single person that I know who has been in contact with mental health "care" has gone there for years on end, with no meaningful improvement. We are not curing anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 05:45 PM
8

People are just venting because it makes them feel better, just like how most women are only here to feed their own superiority complexes. Making them shut up about it can only make things worse. And eventually, if issues are not solved with words, they will be solved with violence, like all real progress in history, that we've papered over with idealism about peaceful discussion or whatever.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 05:38 PM
12

Congratulations on uncovering the open secret that discussion and debating doesn't change anything. How often does a political debate make people change their positions. The answer is "almost never".
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 05:32 PM
10

Yet all modalities have basically the same success rates, and therapist outcomes don't improve with experience, neither of which make therapy look useful or scientific.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 05:29 PM
4

Women should not be allowed to complain about how men can't read through their plausible deniability bullshit signals when they themselves are never put on the spot in the same way. What the fuck do you know about it? You're entirely passive in the exchange. You don't have to do anything. You wouldn't know social skills if they hit you in the face, since you've never had to develop any.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 05:25 PM
21

Equally ineffective you mean, since the efficacy rates of therapy barely exceed placebo.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 05:12 PM
3

"Women in relationships with men provide emotional support". LMAO. In what world? The man is almost always the one who has to regulate her emotions for her, and who has to center her emotions before his own, even in situations where she's at fault.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 05:10 PM
2

In what world are women intelligent about interpersonal dynamics? We're talking about the gender infamous for inane mind-games and communicating through subtle gestures (plausible deniability) instead of using their words. You're not socially adept. You're playing the social game on baby mode. A woman could get attention even if she was socially retarded. The bar is below hell for women. You have nothing to be proud of. The idea that undesirable men's issues would be solved if the just learned t…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/25 08:47 PM
9

Consider communicating using your words instead of passive-aggressive gestures. You're a human being, not a monkey.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/25 07:08 PM
9

If you can't find an actual argument against a rationally expressed idea, just claim the person saying it is a bad person. Oldest fucking trick in the book for manipulative assholes. "I know I'm a neurotic mess that can't respect anyone else's standards and I'm gonna make it everyone else's problem".
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/25 07:05 PM
0

Women and taking credit for other people's achievements and struggles. Name a more iconic duo. "People 300 years ago that I've never known, and that I have nothing in common with, suffered. How do I make this about myself? Their struggles are mine because we're both women, but never forget that women are not a hivemind monolith."
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/25 02:00 PM
1

Lmao, fuck no. Women indulge in true crime because it provides constant reinforcement for their inane victim complexes. Women always feel like they're the most in danger. It's just another facet of wanting to feel important. It's narcissism all the way down.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 04:19 PM
8

Lmao, sure. Why are they then higher than the stats for straight relationships? Logically, you'd assume they'd fall somewhere between straight relationships and gay male relationships, but they don't. Guess why. It's because most abusive situations are initiated by women.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/25 02:02 PM
1

You can't find something that never existed.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 11:14 PM
-1

Lmao at the notion that most women would even mildly inconvenience themselves in the face of oppression. Yeah, I'm sure you'd starve yourself, lmao. You'd give up on day two. Otherwise, owing to your delusional idea of "history", women would already be extinct, right? Because men enslaved all women, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 11:10 PM
0

Why not? Are all generalizations inherently wrong? If so, I think feminists might be in a bit of trouble. If you don't wanna be called pathological liars, you could just stop lying, you know. Feel however you'd like about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 11:09 PM
2

Nobody will tolerate abuse forever. And expecting them to might be more evil than the abuse itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 11:07 PM
-1

If men were such monster as that, why are you currently not enslaved? Why are you allowed to express any of these opinions at all? And before you come up with some bullshit about fighting for your freedom, remember that an adult woman would lose against a 12 year old boy in a fight.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 10:59 PM
3

Oh believe me, if I could live life without ever having to interact with one of you petty overgrown children again, I would.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 10:58 PM
-1

Every woman sees herself as a victim, and women are pathological liars, so their claims are hardly reliable. Also the things women consider harassment are so fucking funny. I'm surprised your paper-thin skin doesn't just tear apart the moment you step out of your home. They know the value of victimhood and will miss no chance to manipulate people.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 10:50 PM
3

I'm not interested in women, so I interact with them as little as possible already, thanks. Women do not hold up anything except their own massive egos, oh and the practice of spending other people's money on useless bullshit. Women are great at that, even at the societal level. So immensely wasteful. Women bitched and moaned about actually having to do hard work for once while men were sent off to die.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 10:46 PM
2

If men truly hated women, there's no way society would be as "equal"(biased in favor of women) as it is. It would look like the hellscape that exists in every neurotic feminist's brain, that she pretends is reality. If men were truly the monsters they see them as, why are they allowed to do anything? Why do they have any rights? Why can they openly spew hate against men with 0 repercussions? It's just so obviously not the case. Oh well, victimhood is power it seems.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 10:40 PM
1

Accountability: -100. Women are not abused en masse. They're making their own choices and then blaming the consequences on men, as usual.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 10:35 PM
3

Women are perpetual victims of everything. If they don't win just by participating, they'll cry and scream until men change the rules so that they can win, and then they'll unironically claim that they fought for said victories. The entirety of women's suffrage was just whining for somebody else to do the fighting for them. Absolutely useless at anything other than manipulation.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 10:33 PM
3

People are animals.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 10:29 PM
4

Well, you come up with an explanation for all the petty bullshit it seems that every woman feels a need to engage with.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 10:28 PM
1

Nah, women are only capable of loving themselves, which is how they can love children, by seeing them as extensions of themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 02:57 PM
0

Controlling your emotions. Not expecting other people to provide for you. Not holding onto petty grudges. Not acting like you're still in high school. Taking responsibility for your own choices. Etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 02:54 PM
-2

Flagellating yourself for feeling bad, while giving women whatever they want anyway, of course. Women are never the ones who need to change.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 02:52 PM
-1

Feminists have only ever acted to remove women's gender roles, while cementing the gender roles of men even more. Lip service is not proof of any kind of belief.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 02:50 PM
-1

Which is why women never seem to grow up, I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 02:46 PM
5

Asking women to do the impossible is kinda mean, I guess. After all, women barely even see men as human.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 12:39 PM
6

The obvious answer is that women assume that men in power would favor other men because they themselves would favor women, given the massive in-group bias that women have. This is only a mystery to women since they refuse to accept any evidence that doesn't make them look like angels.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/05/25 12:21 PM
192

It's like that for office jobs too. Among the entry-level staff at my workplace, the ratio of men to women is about 1:3.
/r/MensRights30/05/25 03:17 PM
1

I'm not the one claiming otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 01:18 PM
1

This is not debating, on any level.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 12:58 PM
1

You would not spend the amount of time here that you do if you didn't care. You're fooling nobody.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 12:56 PM
1

Congratulations on being a prime example of how women only communicate in plausible deniability. Whenever you get called out for your inane statements you can just say "no I meant the other good". Spineless.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 12:50 PM
2

Affirmative action started applying to them when they became a minority in university, for the little while that policy remained in effect.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/05/25 11:16 AM
7

Why not? Were either of these places excluded from the survey? Would that even matter? From what I can see the sample size is good, and the response rate is honestly great for a survey study. They've weighed the data in relation to demographic variables and the surveys were sent to random addresses. Sure, there's always self-selection bias, but there are no gaping holes in the methodology that I can see. Yes, it's not a perfect representation of all real people in the nation, but this is statist…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 06:25 PM
9

Oh sure, it would be better, but in all likelihood only in a very marginal sense. You talk about critical thinking, but it's clear that you're rejecting the data based on ideological opposition to it, which is fine, but let's not pretend this is really about sample sizes for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 06:11 PM
8

You will never get a perfectly accurate demographic sample, but 8000 is more than good enough. Why would you need 400000 specifically? There's not any guarantee that they would be less prone to uneven demographic representation. Having a relation between sample and population at a certain percentage is really only meaningful when we're talking about small populations, not large ones. And sure replication is good, but that was not your argument. You argued that 8000 is too few, and it's really no…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 05:58 PM
13

I'm pretty sure there also used to be affirmative action for university admissions for minorities based on relative number of admissions here in Sweden, and that it was promptly dismantled when women became the majority of admissions and men started to benefit. Yay, equality.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/05/25 04:35 PM
11

These people have no idea how sample sizes are calculated. They honestly believe that we need to ask like 2 million people or something. Lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 04:30 PM
18

That's generally how sample sizes work, yes. The sample size for a given confidence level and margin of error doesn't scale in a linear manner compared to population size. You'll hit the point where you can just keep adding zeroes to the population number without changing the necessary sample size fairly quickly. A sample of 8000 is honestly massive compared to many studies.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 04:24 PM
7

"Like a guy spends the weekend with his buddy and never asks about the kids, wife, work, mental health, dreams, goals, etc... just what lure to use and what fishing spot is the best". What do you get from this? A man is simple. A man does not care to learn about others. A man cares only about his own pleasure. Men do not dwell on complex matters. Male friendships are shallow and circumstantial. And the obvious implication that women are not like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 08:36 PM
3

Don't know. It was a fairly dull conversation. Not really much to lie about that wouldn't be blindingly obvious.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 08:30 PM
4

Today. About 4 hours ago to be specific. Did you think me incapable of speaking with women?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 08:28 PM
6

I don't believe in souls. I believe in the demonstrable gap between words and actions. And women just can't stop lying, even when there's nothing to gain. I can display emotion just fine, to men. Luckily I'm not of the type of sexuality that ever requires me to be vulnerable to women, but I can't help but feel for my straight friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 08:26 PM
14

It's not what you said, but it is what you feel.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 08:23 PM
8

They're scared to discover that they actually don't care about the men in their lives. That they just wish they did. That their true feelings to men's emotions are revulsion and fear, since their stalwart protectors actually aren't invincible after all. It's not even about being consciously mean. It's about protecting their own ego. Everything that comes after is just excuses.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 08:21 PM
14

How is one woman being openly sociopathic when it comes to men in any way a rebuttal to the idea that most women are at least secretly sociopathic when it comes to men? You just managed to find a woman who is both evil and stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 08:14 PM
22

Because the likelihood of lots of short men approaching you after such a statement are way higher than those of a man daring to bare his emotions after a lifetime of being shown that voicing them is like inviting someone to stab him. In other words, it gets in the way of women's goals, which are to never have the type of guy they find viscerally disgusting approach them, while maintaining an air of moral superiority.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 08:10 PM
29

Yeah, you're right. Men are just shallow meat-automatons with no complex feelings, motivations or desires, that are physically incapable of expressing ourselves at the level of our highly regarded female betters.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 08:06 PM
4

To weed out the undesirables. Also, if it wasn't completely obvious to everyone by now, virtue-signaling is like a drug addiction for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 07:57 PM
2

Whining isn't fighting.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 07:01 PM
5

Endless excuses, as always. Nothing is ever a woman's fault. It's actually a man who has set her up to fail. I wonder why women are not respected.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 06:59 PM
1

The most common quality among all forms of traditionalism is hypocrisy.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 02:31 PM
4

Of course she wouldn't, "trad pill". She'd make him pay for it. Isn't that what you parasi...I mean traditionalists are all about?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 02:20 PM
3

The reason this wouldn't work is that they would also be the children of extremely neurotic women. So any good traits that a sperm donor would bring in would simply be balanced out by the mother's genes. And that's assuming the mother has any reasonable grasp of how she would choose donor traits anyway. Of course, she's a woman, and thus believes she's god's gift to man, but in reality she's just some average crazy person. Also, nobody would agree to this. Nobody.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 02:14 PM
3

Defend yourselves. Why do you need a man to do everything for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 12:03 PM
2

Well that's their own fault. After all, women are such narcissists that they can only get off to thinking of themselves. Guess those women have some self-improvement they should be getting on with.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 12:00 PM
5

Let's start applying those same standards to race then. Black people dying in america doesn't matter, because they're being killed by other black people, and therefore they deserve it, I guess...Serves them right for not using their black hivemind powers to protect themselves, like how men according to the women here exude some kind of field that dissuades male attackers so that they can walk safely at night. Are women retarded?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 11:55 AM
5

Sure
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 08:39 PM
8

If dating required effort, then no woman would ever end up in a real relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 08:13 PM
5

Love bombing is just another excuse that women use to never have to feel bad about their own decisions.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 02:58 PM
1

It's literally just the red pill fact that "men's faults are men's problem to deal with, and women's faults are society's (men's) problem to deal with", but phrased in a defensive way. Hilarious.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 02:54 PM
2

Women are on average addicted to attention, which is why they engage in constant virtue signaling. They get off on being told how progressive they are. Their true thoughts are only revealed in instances where they are asked to actually be supportive and do something, or where they risk not standing to gain anything by holding a position.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 09:12 PM
1

Pretty much every feminist argument for women's asshole behavior is derived from some variety of an appeal to risk of harm. The reality is that women are massively paranoid, and also apparently extremely shit at understanding statistics. You know you can just own being an asshole, right? You don't need to make excuses. You're a woman, nobody will give a shit even if you're just terrible all around.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 09:09 PM
3

That's literally every single post here. "Women are not a monolith" is the most inane rebuttal ever, and it's the focus of the top upvoted comment every time a study is published that doesn't make women look perfect.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 03:02 PM
3

And yet it is the most commonly held belief, and I'm sure you wouldn't want to raise a single father's child either, if it came down to it. You just want to be the kind of person who isn't shallow and awful.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 06:56 PM
8

As an adopted child, I can tell you from the insults I've received that the idea that you're "second rate" to having a biological child is held deeply by both men and women. All children are created for narcissistic reasons. You can't create an entity to serve the interests of its current non-existence. I'm not saying this is right, I'm just saying it is, and it's not male specific.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 06:51 PM
2

Lmao. Sure, you found nothing. Totally. Maybe you should examine your biases.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 06:40 PM
16

Lmao. Do you all come pre-programmed with the same three responses? Come on, rub those two braincells together and come up with a new insult.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 06:24 PM
20

Most of those relationships implode too, because now you have two separate selfish units, and nobody who could spend an inordinate amount of time and effort on dealing with the other's responsibility. That's why single women don't choose single dads. They want to burden somebody else, not be burdened themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 06:20 PM
23

The entire school system is doing affirmative action for women through grading bias and lesser punishment for similar offenses. I had plenty of female classmates in university who could barely spell, and they still made it through because of pity grading. The bar is in hell for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 06:14 PM
2

Do you wanna know why that doesn't work? It's because women perceive men advocating for their own issues as them "shitting on women's issues". Not centering women is by itself seen as misogyny. And then women flood in to whine about how their problems are worse, which is just fucking hilarious for the most coddled demographic in all of history. It's just like when men try to create their own spaces. Useless women who can't create anything bully their way in and rip apart everything of value in t…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 06:08 PM
14

Women are prone to all kinds of mystical woo-woo. Horoscopes, crystals, witchcraft, pretty much any form of minority religion (think spirituality). And the only thing women care about when it comes to politics is themselves. Outside of that, they don't really have beliefs.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 04:00 PM
–

Assuming everyone is telling the truth, that is. It has also created an arena for people to spew their bullshit unfiltered onto gullible morons. Which is how we end up with nonsense beliefs like women being more likely to be the victims or violent crime, or in this case, how every bad ex was a secret abusive mastermind.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 01:43 PM
-1

HAHAHAHAHA. Self-reported of course. Just go through the posts on like aita or something where women complain about doing so much, and then you find out that they counted the entire time the washing machine is running as "labor". Has there ever been a context where a woman isn't claiming she does more than everyone else? Women represent their "unpaid labor" in the same way that Elon Musk presents his hours worked in a day. In other words the gap is probably even more in women's favor than they w…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 01:39 PM
–

It's even worse than that. Any time dadbod discourse comes up on twitter it's always like Jason Momoa when he's off the steroids for a little while. So, still a bodybuilder, just with a tiny bit of fat over the muscles. Fucking hilarious. Women are deluded.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 01:31 PM
2

Women will agree with anything other women say, as long as it doesn't personally affect them in any way.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 10:39 PM
7

I mean, just look at the "no contentless rhetoric" rule on this sub. It only exist so that mods can remove anything they don't like, and there's no consistency with how they apply it. Same with the be civil rule.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 10:38 PM
2

So it's ok to treat men like a homogenous group that shares certain characteristics, (men are bad at reading people) but for women, despite all evidence, we need to pretend that you're all unique special snowflakes who are 100% heterogenous, despite the fact that anyone who has spent any amount of time with groups of women know that they turn into near-hiveminds the moment they're challenged on anything. That is not a rebuttal, it's gibberish. Your "readings" are just the result of prejudice and…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 10:35 PM
3

Yeah, but women legitimately believe that complaining until a man fixes your problems for you is "taking action" so all answers to that question will be nonsensical.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 10:29 PM
3

This mystical sixth sense belonging to women sure makes it strange how women keep complaining about abuse, or lazy partners, or partners being bad parents. Are you of the opinion that women voluntarily inflict such things on themselves by ignoring their "readings" of other people? No, it's women that are shit at reading people. You're just such massive narcissists that you can't admit to being wrong, even to yourselves. That's why every bad boyfriend was some secret manipulative mastermind.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 10:22 PM
1

I'm sorry if the truth offends you. Yeah, "suicidality" in women manifests itself in a plethora of inane parasuicidal gestures that are ultimately nothing but cries for attention. And of course they do that, because it fucking works. It just doesn't work for men, so they might as well go through with it. Nobody is gonna give them a helping hand, just shame them.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 10:07 PM
0

That's true for 99,8% of all issues raised by feminists, but we don't see that sort of self-censorship coming from them. It's not wrong for men to advocate purely for their own issues. We're people too, and our problems matter. We don't have to water it down. We don't have to say, "and for women too, of course" every single fucking time. They're certainly not showing us any such courtesy.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 05:23 PM
0

Now imagine you'd been a boy. You'd probably be dead. Certainly seems to be how the disparity goes. I know of plenty of women who nearly offed themselves as teenagers, but only of boys among those who actually did.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 05:20 PM
2

Of course, we couldn't possible allow it to look like men are human beings, that might deserve to have anyone care about their issues. That's only allowed for women. Men can only be helped if doing so will incidentally help another group, that has actual value.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 05:11 PM
2

That has never existed, outside of small isolated "tribal" communities where you literally couldn't afford to lose any member of the tribe.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 05:07 PM
2

Yeah, as I said in another comment, Sweden is extremely atomized. Go to any post on reddit where someone talks about moving to Sweden, or moving within Sweden, and see how the main topic is often that it's next to impossible to penetrate existing social circles. And this is for people who do have friends. Imagine what it's like for the people who don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 05:05 PM
1

I mean that's not really data, either. And europe isn't one place with one social climate. Here in Sweden, people are plenty individualistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 05:00 PM
-1

They tolerate behavior that they wouldn't have if said person was a man. That's the entire point, and is not really up for discussion anymore. Deny reality if you wish. It's not like anyone in real life dares to call you out for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 04:59 PM
1

Most people don't want to give men "community". Or rather, nobody cares if men are lonely, as long as they themselves are not desperately lacking for company. Men are only valued for what they do. A man who has already failed to establish relationships has little value to people that haven't. And a man that can provide something of value is still ultimately a tool, and tools can be replaced by any other functional tool. Nobody cares about men, as people, and no amount of urban planning will chan…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 04:56 PM
-2

So am I, as well as between the genders. Women receive more "grace" from both men and women. This has been widely studied for a long time. Pretty much everyone is biased in favor of women. Are the women also tolerating it, since they have some hidden sexual agenda, or are you just proving my point, that women give no benefit of the doubt to men? Women should stop talking like they understand men, because they've made any effort to. Your life is on easy mode. If women were to fail at the same rat…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 04:38 PM
2

Better urban planning won't fix women's insane stance on men. The idea that it will is just nonsense. European cities are internet famous for having better urban planning, but we have all the same issues that the americans have.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 04:33 PM
-1

It's easy to say that when you're a woman, since being a woman means that nobody will ever mete out the type of social punishment that a man could expect to get if they engage socially in a way that is on any level perceived as weird. Socializing as a woman is like cycling with training wheels. I know tons of women who think they're great conversationalists, when the reality is just that the people around them will tolerate them being awkward or a bit rude. You know, "women are wonderful" and wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 04:27 PM
2

Because I've seen women get together with blatant assholes in real life, multiple times. Most people are morons, and thus it follows that most asshole abusers are also morons, and thus not machiavellian schemers. Like, fuck off with this. What happened to "women's intuition", because my men's intuition seems to pick these people out just fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 10:56 AM
1

Demonstrating that women don't understand statistics and hypocritically place *their* anecdotes on a level above evidence, while simultaneously claiming that men's anecdotes are worthless? Maybe come up with a real argument in place of this narcissistic drivel.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 05:10 PM
1

Pretty much all studies about in-group bias would say that's false, but sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 11:58 AM
0

They absolutely are. You're full of shit. Literally nobody would tolerate if men did what women do in response to generalizations in the real world, which is throwing a tantrum, like an overgrown child. You'd get laughed out of the fucking room. Only women are allowed to display 0 self-control without being punished for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 11:56 AM
2

She's younger, and therefore not a mature adult, even though feminists love spreading the propaganda that women "mature faster". Guess she risks losing out on her human right of being a gold-digger. If she's old enough to be an internet prostitute, you'd think she'd also be old enough to have sex. I guess the harpies that frequent this sub are mad about not being young and desired anymore? I mean, I don't pity the guy for stepping on a landmine like this, but come on. Anyone who lowers themselve…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 08:04 PM
-2

Unless you're a woman, in which case you can freely make your own problem everybody else's without consequence. Women trauma dump all the time, most people just lack the sense to tell them to shut the fuck up.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 03:33 PM
6

Whose definition? The one true feminist scholar? Any one dictionary? A descriptive one for the work feminists actually do? No, your answer is of course "whichever one will never force me to face the idea that feminism can do wrong". Hiding behind a dictionary is fucking pathetic.
/r/MensRights27/04/25 01:58 PM
11

Actual feminists as decided by whom? The council of womankind? God?
/r/MensRights27/04/25 01:48 PM
8

Wow, what a shocking and brave post. I've totally not seen this same regarded rant 7000 times over on twox before. You're just such a clever little original thinker, aren't you? "Women are not a monolith", yet they all seen to share the same inane thoughts about their place in the world. Was it your turn to use the one collective braincell this week?
/r/MensRights27/04/25 01:47 PM
1

Men are judged on how they look genetically, not on how they use makeup and clothes. Men are judged on actions and appearance. Women are barely judged at all. And yeah, of course you're some hyperconservative stereotype. Pretty much all bluepillers are. You're one of those rubes who take women at their word, because they're all so honest and caring, against all evidence. Sorry, but I can't even imagine being that gullible.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 01:33 PM
1

If you're unattractive, yes. If you're attractive, no. Any other answer is bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 11:30 AM
1

Stats point to the fact that women care more about appearance, not less. But of course, you people are so dishonest that you would reject any generalizations about women at all. You treat the fact that "women are not a monolith" as if it's saying that "no two women are similar when it comes to attraction" which is obviously horseshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 11:28 AM
1

Unless you're chained up in the basement, abuse ultimately happens because you let it happen, whatever the reason behind that is. By the standards you've set for men's accountability, the only reasonable conclusion is that these people are themselves to blame for being abused, and for enabling an abuser.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 11:22 AM
1

Women are incapable of having honest debates, because the moment they start feeling like they might be wrong they just call you any variation of virgin and disengage. Hilariously, this is the same gender that constantly calls men insecure. There might be only a handful of feminists in the world who are actually driven by principle, and not narcissistic self-interest.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 11:18 AM
0

You mean like the massively dishonest way that women frame their own supposed oppression? Like how all violence that happens to affect women is automatically assumed to be based in misogyny? Or is it just different when you do it?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 11:15 AM
3

Yeah, deal with your own issues and stop burdening others with them. Is that not what you're advocating for? Most abusers are so obvious that anyone with more than three braincells could point them out. Why waste anything on helping people who chose to ruin their own lives? They're responsible for themselves, and should fix their rather simple problems without wasting other people's time or resources, so that those can be saved for helping people who did not choose their problems. If you're not …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 04:34 PM
2

All of it is wasted, regardless. As is the sympathy they are given.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 04:19 PM
2

Any amount of being a useless burden on my taxes is too much. Make better choices the first time around. Why keep paying for people who will just keep going back because they get off on getting beaten?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 04:16 PM
3

Well, the "abuse" is just the result of women's bad choices in dating. If it's just their own fault, then why are we wasting so much money when we could just like send them a letter telling them to stop being retarded?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 04:06 PM
2

Great. Time to shut down all those abused women's shelters. Man, what a waste of money.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 04:03 PM
5

But the historical argument is just so strange anyway. Sure, I may be a man now, but I've never lived in the "ages of patriarchy". I have basically the same amount of "oppressed" female ancestors as these women have male "oppressor" ancestors. What gives them a greater claim to historical oppression than us? It's not like with race, where it at least makes a little bit of sense.
/r/MensRights23/04/25 07:00 PM
2

I'm talking descriptively, because even the women on here talking prescriptively don't believe the shit they're spewing. They're always the first to reach for the various "virgin" insults the first moment they feel slighted by anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 05:45 PM
5

Not for women, no, but for men, absolutely.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 03:24 PM
3

Or constant attempts at one-upping each other while still trying to seem humble.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 08:34 PM
–

I find the subject matter interesting. Are we not allowed to engage with matters that are not primarily about us?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 08:33 PM
–

Common sense = "agree with my insane logic"
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 07:39 PM
2

Generally, not really.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 06:34 PM
6

No, it's a performative virtue-signalling gesture. There's no attempt at undersranding involved.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 05:50 PM
1

Social media is performative
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 05:12 PM
1

No, It's a copout answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 05:08 PM
1

Studies have shown that many men who kill themselves have sought help, they've just not received any. People love talking about help, but are not very eager to provide it, to men that is.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 05:06 PM
1

Of course you'd say that. I just don't believe you. Nothing I've observed supports that idea. And I trust my own eyes more than I trust people's words.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 05:05 PM
5

No, they don't even like it in concept. They like feeling virtuous and being praised. That's why every answer on this sub about dick-size, height, personality etc etc is completely full of shit. They're addicted to positive attention, like toddlers. That's why they like having orbiters, too, and why they get off on posts from men like op, who put them on a pedestal.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 04:38 PM
1

Because women are overgrown children, who can't fix anything on their own, so they scream until someone else deals with problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 04:36 PM
6

Women are pathological liars. They only communicate in manipulation. Unfortunately for them, they're also bad liars, which is why we're seeing the most retarded, unfunny comebacks ever conceived in this thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 04:34 PM
0

And by "nuanced", you mean "an abject lie and completely full of shit", right? Nuanced = makes women look good. No matter how much data is given, women just can't stop fucking lying, can they? The only language you speak is manipulation.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 04:28 PM
–

Hope you eventually stop being a condescending shithead
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 04:23 PM
3

Every post on this subreddit is just whining. Why else are you here? You don't seem very happy yourself. If you were, you certainly wouldn't hang around here.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 04:15 PM
8

Women are viscerally disgusted by most feminine men.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 04:05 PM
5

There's no point to understand. And no, I don't give a shit about your anecdotes.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 04:04 PM
1

Yeah, I think that would also ultimately be meaningless, but at least it would be fairer. And yeah, never gonna happen. The gender empathy gap is too strong. There are both men and women on here every day that will happily justify women returning to their abusers and putting themselves, and their children, in danger. OP is such a perfect example of how men will not even defend their own interests against women. He'll happily shit all over his own gender, his friends and his acquaintances, just t…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 02:58 PM
5

But remember that according to op, women choose partners based on personality. Lmao, what a self-report if these are the types of personalities chosen.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 02:52 PM
4

The average woman is pro-herself, and if war suits her interests, she is pro-war
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 02:50 PM
2

I agree, in a vacuum so to speak. But the people who complain about having dated terrible men sure seem to think so. The same is true for "violence against women", as tracked by most states, where any violence inflicted by a man unto a woman is considered misogyny. The real point is that women will tolerate almost any behavior from a man they find attractive enough, including outright misogyny.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 02:46 PM
6

Yeah, getting repeatedly conned does in fact make you stupid. In most of the abusive relationships that I've witnessed, the man has had red flags so big that they could be spotted from mars. So they're either stupid, or get off on being harmed. I don't know which one is worse. And then they have the fucking gall to blame their own inability to stay away from obviously awful people on everyone but themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 02:27 PM
6

Women are only "left-leaning" because feminism is considered "left-leaning". And feminism is just a women's self-interest movement, so they're hardly virtuous for adhering to it. There's nothing progressive about only pursuing your own interest. Take it out of the equation and women are just as traditional about men's behavior in dating, just as homophobic, and just as transphobic as men are. Believe me, as a gay man, I can tell you that most women are only "supporting" as long as they can get v…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 02:24 PM
4

If you took a second to think about it, you'd realize you're describing a world where men will tolerate women who act masculine, but where women won't tolerate men who act feminine. People aren't virtuous, they act on incentives. If men are "toxically masculine", it's because that is the behavior that is rewarded. You're basically asking men who already suffer a lot in society to ostracize themselves further, and harm-themselves, just to achieve some new gender standard that will never exist, an…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 02:19 PM
8

You need help if you think platitudes are authentic.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 02:16 PM
2

If they aren't, why do they do nothing to stop it? The only thing women do to men who don't wish to die in wartime, is shame them. Just look at any argument about the draft, and how it only affects men, and it's just a barrage of women saying they shouldn't have to sign up. They'll cover their selfishness in the non-answer of "nobody should be drafted" but will make no effort to strive towards the abolishment of the draft. They see men as tools, and that will never change.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 02:12 PM
2

So women are socially retarded? Is that actually your idea? The empathetic and sensitive gender, lmao. How do they even survive into adulthood?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 02:09 PM
5

You think this is me being emotional? I'm mildly amused at this situation. I do have control of my emotions, unlike women who can only make their emotions everyone else's problem. You posted a page-long simp-rant about other men, to placate women who would hate you just as much as they hate those other men, so I think you're far more pathetic than me.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 02:08 PM
6

You can call anything a debate, even if it's a complete farce. Most "debates" on youtube or on social media also aren't debates. "Men are kinda shit" is a position one cannot really argue against on any meaningful level.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 01:12 PM
2

Well, duh, at some level they absolutely will. The main difference between the two would of course be their natural propensity towards seeking social approval. In other words, men and women aren't necessarily equally likely to engage in such bias, or may differ in which contexts they mostly to do so, eg. relating to sexuality or diet or fitness etc. One would also need to take into account what the social standards already look like. As far as I can tell, men are already expected to be shallow a…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 01:07 PM
14

The glorious pacifistic unity of the ideal sapphic relationship is being disrupted by the patriarchy field emanating from the nearest straight relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 01:00 PM
6

OP didn't make any argument. He made a series of rude statements with no backing outside of "trust me, bro". If you think this a "debate" on any level, then find a doctor who can remove the brainworms before they become terminal.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 12:55 PM
6

Google the term "social desirability bias" and learn why people lie, even about important matters. Most people will not readily admit to being shallow, for what I assumed were obvious reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 12:54 PM
10

Yeah, but engaging in the just-world fallacy is so much more comforting than admitting that the world is often shallow and awful, and that your life's outcomes are largely based in factors you have little to no control over.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 12:51 PM
0

You're just one person. Maybe you just have shitty taste in male friends. None of my male friends are these mean caricatures that you've constructed. Maybe you're just a shitty person. You know, birds of a feather?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 12:44 PM
8

Using big words that don't fit the situation doesn't make you seem smart. When women are called gold-diggers, and they get offended, is that also cognitive dissonance? Are all stereotypes actually correct? Prejudice is good, actually? Also, yes, that was an argument, that you apparently can't pick up on. "If you insult people, they get insulted". Groundbreaking, I know.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 12:41 PM
7

Statistically, reported domestic abuse figures, as well as the knowledge that most abusers are serial abusers and are not that many in number, seem to imply that many women would have to return to the same abuser multiple times for the numbers to match. But, yeah, I'm sure it's all just a big coincidence. Unless your thesis is just that women are stupid, or that their brains shut down when they spot an attractive man.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 12:38 PM
10

Wow, people get upset when you target them with awful remarks? Damn, you gotta contact some journals. They really need to get updated about this shocking development in psychology. Do you seriously think you're clever, or novel. There's 50 posts like this every week.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 12:34 PM
11

Yeah, and those check-ins are about as genuine as those "mental health warnings" people send through reddit. Try to actually get real support from any of them, even if you've supported them before, and watch them vanish from your life.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 12:32 PM
26

"Nice guy" will never stop existing. It is the ultimate example of how women remove accountability from themselves. A man she dislikes, but who is actually a good person, must in reality be a horrible person pretending to be good. And any person who is an obvious piece of shit, that she's actually attracted to, just so happens to be a real nice guy pretending to be a shithead because he's protective or whatever. They're just ways for women to never have to admit that they're shallow too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/25 12:29 PM
28

Yes, it's a typically female idea that a "good friendship" consists largely of a constant barrage of inane messages, and plans for outings that are never realized.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 12:24 PM
15

Wow, what a shocking and brave opinion to express on this subreddit. I can't be bothered to search through your profile, so I've just gotta ask; are you a self-hating man or a woman who pretends that she hates the people she's actually attracted to?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 12:22 PM
0

Statistically untrue. Your brain must be soup at this point. Women have never, ever ever, been the majority of victims of violent crime. Never in recorded history.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 12:09 PM
1

You don't? Must be nice to be that gullible.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 11:49 AM
0

That doesn't mean that it does not provide a skewed and dramatized understanding of the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 11:10 AM
0

Yes. Pretty much all of true crime exists only to validate women's insane paranoid delusions about reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 06:57 PM
3

Why? People dissolve friendships for all kinds of reasons, many of them petty, and many not. Confessing one's feelings alters the dynamic of your interactions. Maybe hanging out feel awkward now. Maybe they just want to spend more time with someone who might be a more likely prospect for a future relationship. You know, you people sound mighty entitled when you argue that people need to spend their time on you, when you can't provide what they want in a relationship, platonic or otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 11:25 AM
1

I mean, I get that you obviously don't understand this, but it can feel really shitty to have to be around someone who you care about, who doesn't feel the same way. Unrequited affection can hurt quite a bit and "staying friends", despite the fact that the dynamic has changed, can feel a lot like self-harm. Not being around said person also makes it easier to not indulge in false hope that things will change. I've had women confess their interest to me, and when I've rejected them, I didn't auto…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 11:21 AM
11

Yeah, I'm sure all four of them are feeling really left out right now.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/25 05:04 PM
2

Sure you're not a woman? You sure argue like one.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/25 08:00 PM
2

Wow. Sick insight, bro. Are you sure you're not gonna call me a narcissist instead? Seems more on-brand for you drones.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/25 07:59 PM
4

Most therapists are largely useless to anyone with the slightest bit of introspective ability. Some of them being marginally less useless within a specialized focus group, I hardly find impressive. You don't sound like you know anything about therapy either with that generic explanation. Therapy "working" is just the placebo effect at work. The low efficacy of psychiatric treatment and therapy is hardly news within the field, but marketing trumps reality every time.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/25 07:48 PM
0

And the material component is biology, which dictates people's behaviors when it comes to gender. Thus people uphold gender roles, and the hypocrisy that follows, and this will likely never change.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/25 02:13 PM
6

That's such a cop-out answer though. If that's your metric then you might as well just be describing the placebo effect. Eventually you'll "get better" just by chance, if you see a significant amount of therapists in your life. If therapy is a scientifically grounded discipline, then why are there so many bad therapists? What do these people learn at university? The way people talk about therapy really makes it seem faith-based. It sounds like homeopathy, or any other scam. "No, the healing crys…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/25 02:01 PM
0

Systems are made, and perpetuated, by people
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/25 01:00 PM
0

So, just like the vast majority of women who have "depression", or are "suicidal". What a shocking coincidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 02:42 PM
3

I thought women were supposed to be socially adept, and yet they can't even see through the manipulation ability of the average person. LMAO, how full of shit are you people?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/25 02:35 PM
6

It will take forever if nobody even tries.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/25 02:31 PM
1

It doesn't work when the punishments get so weak that they stop being a deterrent at all. Also, I sincerely do not give a shit if a life sentence is "optimal" for a rapist, or not. Here in sweden we just keep releasing them so that they can rape again, and again, and again. Nobody learns anything.
/r/MensRights14/03/25 03:38 PM
2

No. They should also rot forever, or be put down. Unfortunately, women are the ones who are constantly pushing for lesser sentences and more lenient criminal law, so I figure they can reap what they sow.
/r/MensRights14/03/25 03:31 PM
16

And she's gonna get 6 months, and be released after 2/3 of the sentence, as usual.
/r/MensRights14/03/25 12:27 PM
8

I know, but that doesn't make the punishment less insulting to the victim. 20k is less than the average monthly income after tax.
/r/MensRights14/03/25 09:29 AM
8

I mean, he's still not gonna get shit. The swedish legal system just doesn't do big payouts like that. Especially not from a woman.
/r/MensRights14/03/25 09:21 AM
8

The average fat man is much stronger than the average fit woman. You severely underestimate the difference between the sexes.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 03:54 PM
8

Most machines are heavy too, and much manual labor still requires you to use your body.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 02:17 PM
10

It has to be men because the vast majority of women are so physically weak that they're largely a burden in many fields of manual labor.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 12:07 PM
13

People who find this kind of shit profound must live truly vapid lives.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/03/25 12:09 PM
6

But men have higher success rates for all methods barring drowning, which is the only one with gender equality.
/r/MensRights09/03/25 02:26 PM
20

Because most "attempts" are just attention seeking. Had a female friend who told me that she had attempted recently (relative to when she told me). Found out later through the grapevine that she had taken like 10 paracetamol pills, with her family still in the house, and then immediately called for medical attention. It's just so fucking hard not to roll your eyes at this shit. If I did something like that, people would just be angry. As someone who has been suicidal for a long time it just feel…
/r/MensRights09/03/25 02:24 PM
1

Most people will gladly abandon all of their principles, if it gets them what they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/25 08:50 AM
2

Have you ever been without a relationship for a significantly long period of time? Like for multiple years of your adult life? Because it's hard to understand what the lack of something would do to you, if you've never been without it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/25 07:50 AM
1

Depends on how attractive he is.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/25 07:48 AM
3

Good luck finding a woman who won't consider herself the cream of the crop.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/25 06:26 AM
17

They're literally just weaponizing their own anxiety, and then getting mad when you don't make yourself miserable too.
/r/MensRights06/03/25 02:07 AM
3

I'm not assuming anything. They did perform poorly in the elections.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 08:32 PM
3

No, it's basically a synonym for society, or perhaps even sociality itself, making it even more unfalsifiable than if it were just about outright sexism. Patriarchy is anything a woman doesn't like about society, and a way to explain away women's responsibility for putting in any actual effort to make the world better. "Men's problems are caused by men. Women's problems are caused by patriarchy (society (men))".
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 05:20 PM
6

"Equality" is when women perform poorly but get rewarded anyway, because they're all just sooo wonderful and perfect.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 05:16 PM
1

Is the woman in this scenario chained to a radiator in a locked basement, with a partner that never leaves, never goes to the bathroom, never sleeps, never hangs out with people who would take offense at him murdering her in front of them? If the answer is "no", then she can literally just leave at pretty much any moment. Whether she wants to or not is the actual problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 08:32 PM
10

The problem is that damages being too low means victims get no real justice. Here in Sweden the payouts are so absolutely pathetic that it feels like mockery to the victim.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/02/25 12:37 AM
1

Yes, everything is a man's fault.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 05:44 PM
1

Pathetic persecution complex. Most women don't even know pain, much less torture.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 05:01 PM
1

lmao. You cannot even understand how coddled you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 04:41 PM
-1

Women are pathological liars. Or perhaps pathological manipulators is the better term.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 03:13 PM
1

Help from whom? From other people in our lives, who all feel exactly as uninterested as you? I know this is unfathomable for a woman, but nobody gives a shit about how men feel. Reaching out for help is a privilege only extended to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 03:12 PM
0

LMAO. Yeah sure, and it takes about 7000% more emotional volatility than it would take to insult a man for being too emotional.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 03:09 PM
2

That's literally not what proven false means. Lack of evidence is not 2-10% of cases, it's more like 80%. Proven false is a higher burden of proof to meet than proven true.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 09:33 PM
-2

Women want to be paid like maids for simple chores, but don't wanna be treated like maids, because they're massively entitled.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 04:21 PM
5

It's a meat market because there are no consequences for treating it like that. Online dating is what people want real life to be like. People are more honest with their preferences when there are no consequences.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 04:14 PM
8

But the people on dating apps are real people, who are choosing other real people as partners. They have no reason to fake their own desires. If anything people are far more fake in real life, where you can't hide behind distance and pseudo-anonymity.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 04:00 PM
7

No? Women have completely different standards for appearance depending on if it's a photo or in real life? Why? How?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 03:04 PM
4

"Not to be dramatic but...[insanely dramatic statement]."
/r/EverydayMisandry31/01/25 12:58 AM
2

I "intuitively know" that people are opportunistic liars.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 07:48 PM
2

You're literally just describing the halo effect and then doubling down on how it's totally not distorting your perception.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 06:48 PM
5

It was revealed to me in a dream (totally not fake anecdote).
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 06:47 PM
-6

So that the mother can't live parasitically off of the money that's supposed to go to the kid.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/25 01:56 PM
3

Women get men to commit violent crime for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/25 01:54 PM
8

Well, one potential factor could be how the respondents asked for raises. How much was asked for? At what point in their employment, early or late? Did they have skills or experience that is scarce on the market, or could they be easily replaced? Did they outright ask for "a raise" or did they simply hint at deserving more? Not to mention that this is just one study, and the way confidence intervals work means that any type of study being repeated enough would inevitably hit at least one non-rep…
/r/MensRights17/01/25 04:42 AM
11

Also, there's basically no way of knowing which, if any, of the accusations are true. How long does it take to fake a chatlog in a photo editor? 20 minutes? With a monetary incentive I wouldn't put it past them.
/r/MensRights10/01/25 02:32 PM
50

In addition to the other answer, empathy can also be used for manipulation, rather than compassion. For example, con artists are often highly empathetic, since it allows them to probe for weaknesses, so to say.
/r/MensRights06/01/25 05:51 AM
0

I though women were supposed to be the gender in tune with emotions and "good with vibes" or whatever, lmao. Are all shitty men Machiavellian masterminds or is it more likely that women are just kinda terrible at reading people? To answer your question, no. It is very unlikely that most "shitty men" are just playing some fucking long con on you. Way to remove even more agency from women. You sure know your audience.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/25 05:35 AM
8

Какое облегчение!
/r/MensRights04/01/25 06:40 AM
29

Are the russian bots in the room with us right now?
/r/MensRights04/01/25 06:26 AM
1

Isn't that kinda the one justification for murder, though?
/r/MensRights21/12/24 07:52 PM
10

It literally has to shut down for the holidays to prevent the thoughtcrimes from getting through.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/12/24 05:04 PM
78

Nothing is gonna happen, as usual.
/r/MensRights20/12/24 04:59 PM
7

Aren't gay men like insanely more likely to suffer physical violence and harassment, compared to lesbians? I mean men are more likely to be targeted for pretty much all kinds of violence after all.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/12/24 02:22 PM
18

It does often feel like women are allergic to brevity.
/r/MensRights11/12/24 03:33 PM
40

Isn't this basically just prostitution?
/r/MensRights06/12/24 10:57 AM
6

But that holds true for the attacker as well
/r/MensRights02/12/24 02:57 PM
6

Men are way ahead even when you control for method, with the exception of drowning, which is pretty evenly split.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 09:56 AM
1

Diagnoses certainly haven't gotten more scientific. Psychiatry is even faker of a science than economics. They're just voted in and out of the DSM based on social perception and political acceptance.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 09:17 AM
1

Agreed. Just look at the typical excuses that come out of therapy proselytizers when met with failure. "If it failed, you didn't try hard enough" is the mantra of every snake oil salesman ever. "No, the healing crystals failed to cure your cancer because you didn't believe hard enough". That's a great defense to hide one's dogshit efficacy rates behind.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/24 10:01 PM
-1

Those still just sound like excuses to me. And in the end, it's still their fault for ever accepting these conditions to begin with. The first time someone hits you, you leave. The first time someone blatantly manipulates you, you leave. Allowing yourself to get entrenched means you've simply chosen that other factors outweigh the supposed abuse.
/r/MensRights27/11/24 06:09 PM
31

Honestly, most abuse stories like this just sound insane to me, because they all characterize themselves like children. I mean, you're not chained to a radiator all day or anything. Same for much of physical abuse. Just leave. Go to the bank, or the police, or any friend you have. Edit: Eventually you're just left with the conclusion that these people want to live like this, like the ones who go back to their same abuser multiple times.
/r/MensRights27/11/24 01:35 PM
5

Nah, you're right, most supposed drink spikings also aren't substantiated by evidence. Probably doesn't help that getting blackout drunk can erase your memory of drinking too much. Most of these alleged incidents are just people too ashamed to admit that they have no self control.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/11/24 03:12 PM
26

Because these people are miserable cunts who want to justify changing people for their own benefit. Subs like "incel exit" and the like have the same problem, where most content is just focused on shitting on the people who want to become "better", for ever having been "bad". It's not about improvement for people with problems. It's about vindication for the people who already hate them for who they are. It basically ends up being the same on subs about suicide and depression, which end up focus…
/r/MensRights23/11/24 01:05 PM
54

If feminists wanted the term to be productive then they would have changed it by now. The fact that it remains as is despite its obviously hostile undertone just proves that they want it to be used as a bludgeon. Remember that this is the same group that got policemen and firemen rebranded due to "sexist language".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/11/24 10:02 AM
2

Yeah, but like, even then it has to be on the more benign end of potentially deceptive marketing, right? We've "known" about the pink tax for years (decades?) now, so if they're still falling for it, well...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/11/24 05:18 PM
6

I mean, feminism basically tells its adherents that men are defective women. In other words, just women's collection of qualities with some of those qualities removed. But there are no unique positive qualities associated with masculinity, which is why they can never think of any when you push back on the toxic masculinity narrative.
/r/MensRights19/11/24 04:22 PM
3

No greater endorsement of the validity of the methods of one's profession than saying that you might have to go through 10 useless practitioners before finding one that can create the slightest positive effect, right? lol. lmao.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/11/24 01:49 AM
1

I mean, all platitude peddlers think that they're saying something profound. If therapy had real answers that showed meaningful effects, then why woukd there be so many bad therapists?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/11/24 01:46 AM
5

As far as I'm aware, the difference between "gross sexual assault" and "rape" is the lower bound of the sentence. For rape, the sentence is 3-6 years. For gross sexual assault, it's 1-6 years. So, yeah, that's basically a year and a half off the "just" punishment.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 08:58 PM
2

Postpartum depression is also basically the favorite excuse to bring out when some mother kills or abuses her kids. As if depression just turns people into murderers, which it obviously doesn't, since then we'd be living in a society full of serial killers. Can you imagine if a depressed man tried using that excuse.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 10:15 PM
33

There's literally a comment going "I usually don't feel bad for child-killers, but...". Lmao. What a fucking clownshow.
/r/MensRights31/10/24 03:16 AM
31

You can certainly argue against women's assumption of what men think, since that's an area where feminists seem to constantly overstep their own experiences. You can also argue that the second part is only displaying paranoia on the behalf of women, which I don't see feminism fixing, when questioning women's feelings is anathema within the movement. The fear may be real, but that does not mean that the fear is rational.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/24 06:46 AM
29

Most feminist subs consider menslib to be too misogynistic. There is no amount of male focus that will be accepted by feminists.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/09/24 08:00 PM
47

And also like, parenting in general. Women constantly insist that they do the vast majority of childrearing (also daycares) and yet we supposedly teach boys to support rape culture, and to bully girls, and to have strictly gendered career aspirations, and to not play with the wrong gendered toys? Who is teaching these boys this? Their supposedly semi-absent fathers, according to women? Or like, are they asserting that boys learn through some patriarchal genetic memory?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/08/24 04:24 PM
10

Twitter is full of supposedly progressive women making fun of gay men. No wait, sorry, they make fun of white gay men, which is better...I guess. Extra funny when those comments come from white women, the most coddled demographic in the west. I've also noticed an uptick in complaining about gay men groping women, but surely the opposite is far more common, given that straight women love invading gay male spaces and treating gay guys like pets, or accessories.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/24 11:39 PM
-1

Because the issues are just petty bullshit. It's just as inane as hearing rich people whine about the problems that money brings. If it's so horrible just get rid of it. But they don't.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/24 01:10 PM
1

I like how your immediate assumtion isn't that i'm right but that the "real" evidence is somehow buried. Edit: Also, unironically using anything from jezebel is just...wow.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/24 01:00 PM
3

Wow, a single quora page. Consider me debunked, lmao.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/24 12:59 PM
3

Ugly people are treated like objects too, just not in the nice way. Also, get fucked, nobody offs themselves for being too pretty.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/24 12:32 PM
5

Women tend to "commit suicide" for attention. It's just strategic, because women do get attention for it. Men don't. That's why women choose less lethal methods. Taking 10 tylenol and then calling 911 is not an attempt at suicide. Any moron with access to the internet could figure out that pills probably won't kill them. It also doesn't help that stats can be based on multiple attempts for a single person, which tilts the numbers towards women who aren't actually trying to die.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/24 05:36 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter