~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | This toxic neofeminism have to end"men were doing all the hard labors" poor women usually didn't have the "mercy" of being a full-fledged housewife, and also had to work in the fields or the looms. Also, childbirth. The poorer the couple, and the further we go into the past, the worse the experience got. If it makes you feel any better, then in the past and somewhat still today some people would excuse male adultery and cheating and domestic violence as "he just had a bad day at work, we're all tired while you get to rest in you… | /r/MensRights | 13/06/25 02:50 PM |
| 1 | This toxic neofeminism have to endWomen being privileged in the Midde East? Am I hearing this seriously? | /r/MensRights | 13/06/25 02:47 PM |
| 1 | This toxic neofeminism have to endVoting rights were also given to men who weren't able to be conscripted for whatever reason, tho? | /r/MensRights | 13/06/25 02:46 PM |
| 1 | This toxic neofeminism have to end"To the detriment of the army" is only true if you're reducing standards in front-line positions (which, yes, is something I disagree with). But indoor military jobs exist and logistics exist and I don't really see women having a hard time in those fields. "...you'll finally understand why nothing you wrote matters" no it still fucking does. And I assume on the last paragraph you're referring to child support? But you do know that in the so very enlightened patriarchy people will sometimes force… | /r/MensRights | 12/06/25 02:32 PM |
| 1 | This toxic neofeminism have to end"men didn't use their political power to take from women as a group" Nah, that's exactly what we did until the early 20th century. Did you forget that there was a time when many universities didn't accept women, or in some places when women couldn't have most formal education in general, and when wives couldn't initiate divorce, and domestic abuses by the husband was tolerated and sometimes condoned, and when female adulterers could be stoned while males in some countries could have multiple wiv… | /r/MensRights | 12/06/25 02:01 PM |
| 1 | This toxic neofeminism have to end"It's entirely how the world works" assuming that is true, which way is more moral then? | /r/MensRights | 12/06/25 12:52 PM |
| 1 | This toxic neofeminism have to endWtf is "Bureaugamy"? So we can just put "gamy" after every word now like "maxxing" and "pilled" and shit? "Vast majority of MRA problems could be traced to female suffrage" yeah thats just how many systematic social issues work, an allegedly more politically powerful demographic using their power. But most of the civil rights movements against these issues advocate for equality, and for a change in societal mindset, not politically silence the opposition demographic entirely. Look bud, I don't r… | /r/MensRights | 12/06/25 02:44 AM |
| 1 | This toxic neofeminism have to endThis subreddit is a pro-Men's-Rights community, not an anti-Women's-Rights echo chamber. At least, that's what the community is supposed to be. I've already explained to you why things are the way it is. I've already explained why trying to do otherwise will lead to things probably being worse. I've also explained why your perspective is really misleading on the actual subject being presented here. But you do seem to have imagined something like one of those femdom fantasy worlds where women are… | /r/MensRights | 11/06/25 02:48 PM |
| 1 | This toxic neofeminism have to endSure sure, but "government doing stuff" isn't always a bad thing, is it? Is it actually bureaucratic bloat or is that money going into places like welfare and education and stuff, which many people are in favor of? And is that always the case in all of the 149 currently existing republics, because you cited like 4. | /r/MensRights | 11/06/25 01:20 PM |
| 1 | This toxic neofeminism have to endThere are a total of 149 recognized republics existing in the world. All of them have equal suffrage, and all have different economic situations of their own that could either be improving or worsening since the day they allowed women voting (which could be as early as the same day the republic was established). And if your line of thinking is "the good ol' days had x, therefore if x happened again then we would be back in the good ol' days", should we also undo every other civil rights movement… | /r/MensRights | 11/06/25 12:25 AM |
| 1 | Man is raped.No big deal.Islam in maritime SEA is nowhere as extremist and fundamentalist as in MENA, tho. | /r/MensRights | 11/06/25 12:03 AM |
| 1 | This toxic neofeminism have to endNeither do you. The only thing I can think of is cutting affirmative action if and only when it isn't needed anymore (in non-Western countries it pretty much still is). But considering women's lower income and the need for maternity leaves and stuff like that, the positive tax gain would never exceed very much (and trying to do so would probably lead to even more problems). | /r/MensRights | 10/06/25 03:25 PM |
| 1 | This toxic neofeminism have to endNo, its just that you keep insisting on the false dilemma that either men are forced to be "second-class citizens" or women are, which I'm not subscribing to. 72% of US congressmen are men, and 70% of federal judges are men. If men are actually "second-class citizens" then you're the most damn politically powerful second-class citizens history have ever seen. Also, as I've said this before, having a low income and therefore small taxes doesn't bar you from the right to vote. | /r/MensRights | 10/06/25 02:44 PM |
| 2 | This toxic neofeminism have to endThe 80% of welfare could be partly welfare to mothers, including maternity leave (which technically belongs more to their children), and could also be because of affirmative action. I won't delve into an in-depth argument of whether or not affirmative action is still needed in the West (yet), but considering the shit that happens in the US's Bible Belt I could probably understand the reasons for their continuance. > And that's why you find that the only answer is to remove women's suffrage. Don'… | /r/MensRights | 10/06/25 01:39 PM |
| 2 | This toxic neofeminism have to endSo what solutions are you proposing? Cut back welfare? Forcing women to work jobs with higher salaries, and abolish maternal leaves so they have higher salaries and are taxed more? Conscript them? Repeal the 19th Amendment? And how tf did you interpret "women still deserve voting rights" as "men should be second-class citizens"? | /r/MensRights | 10/06/25 01:16 PM |
| 2 | This toxic neofeminism have to endMen who were unable to be conscripted for whatever reason can still vote. Men who are homeless and NEETs are still allowed to vote. So even if women are as useless as you claim, they're still entitled to their voting rights. | /r/MensRights | 10/06/25 07:12 AM |
| 1 | Drop your go-to MRA statWomen pay less taxes? | /r/MensRights | 10/06/25 07:06 AM |
| 3 | Man is raped.No big deal.No, misogyny is still pretty much real, just not as much in the West. I live in a Southeast Asian country, those stuff still exist. | /r/MensRights | 10/06/25 06:59 AM |
| 1 | Man is raped.No big deal.It usually happens in more traditional countries and usually not on the internet's comments. | /r/MensRights | 10/06/25 06:58 AM |
| 3 | Reactions to Corbie Jean Walpole burning a man alive for a sexist comment.Okay, I was wrong. The fact is that statistics have shown a correlation, albeit weak, between brain size and cognitive abilities. And it seems that the cause is more likely how large brains are usually structured rather than the direct consequence of their size. I think you can find surveys and studies yourself on the internet, or just look at the summary provided by the built-in AI. But the first one on my browser search (from Penn Today) still confirms that there is little cognitive difference… | /r/MensRights | 28/05/25 05:29 AM |
| 0 | Working with hostile womenDude, please, people with penises are capable of narcassism as well. | /r/MensRights | 28/05/25 12:33 AM |
| 1 | Reactions to Corbie Jean Walpole burning a man alive for a sexist comment.Also, I remembered I only did say "people like you (referring to the previous commenter) is why people view the subreddit as a sexist place" which is different than saying the subreddit is actually sexist | /r/MensRights | 28/05/25 12:17 AM |
| 0 | Reactions to Corbie Jean Walpole burning a man alive for a sexist comment.One of the deleted comments, from what I've remembered, had a count of 18. But of course, as you've said, there's no way to check, so its entirely your right to assume that its actually -109 and that the subreddit is a wonderful place that stands against misogyny as much as misandry. And as I have said before, censorship says more about the attitudes of the moderators rather than of the general people in the community. These types of comments are already not that rare in the first place. I liter… | /r/MensRights | 28/05/25 12:03 AM |
| 1 | Men’s Opinions on Feminism?Baseless accusation isn't really the way to go, dude | /r/MensRights | 27/05/25 11:51 PM |
| 1 | Reactions to Corbie Jean Walpole burning a man alive for a sexist comment.Nothing. It correlates with nothing. | /r/MensRights | 27/05/25 11:51 PM |
| 1 | Reactions to Corbie Jean Walpole burning a man alive for a sexist comment.I did not say that. | /r/MensRights | 27/05/25 11:49 PM |
| 0 | Reactions to Corbie Jean Walpole burning a man alive for a sexist comment.So are you negating my argument or not? | /r/MensRights | 27/05/25 03:18 PM |
| 1 | Reactions to Corbie Jean Walpole burning a man alive for a sexist comment.I still don't know mate. Its only the higher ups who want to censor them, the comments themselves still had a pretty positive upvote ratio | /r/MensRights | 27/05/25 03:06 PM |
| 3 | Reactions to Corbie Jean Walpole burning a man alive for a sexist comment.Tribalism is irrespective of gender. We're not smarter | /r/MensRights | 27/05/25 09:53 AM |
| 0 | Reactions to Corbie Jean Walpole burning a man alive for a sexist comment.It really isn't the truth | /r/MensRights | 27/05/25 09:49 AM |
| 2 | Reactions to Corbie Jean Walpole burning a man alive for a sexist comment.And from where did you get this information from. Larger brains doesn't correlate with intelligence. Larger brain-to-body-mass ratio also doesn't correlate with intelligence. If you actually think human males are more logical then I suggest you to put that logic to good use. | /r/MensRights | 27/05/25 09:48 AM |
| -1 | Reactions to Corbie Jean Walpole burning a man alive for a sexist comment.Don't use logic to these kinds of people. Its "facts don't care about your feelings" until you start to pull out facts that also don't align with their feelings. | /r/MensRights | 27/05/25 09:46 AM |
| -1 | Reactions to Corbie Jean Walpole burning a man alive for a sexist comment.People like you is why other people label r/MensRights as just another sexist site. Its like people complaining why "white power" is seen as racist unlike "black power" until you started looking into people saying it and realize they're actually just racist. Your argument is formed from literally just the oldest logical fallacies in the book. Ancient civilizations also commonly enforced slavery too, so it must be a good thing and we're going to collapse as a civilization if we don't bring it bac… | /r/MensRights | 27/05/25 09:45 AM |
| 1 | Men’s Opinions on Feminism?Exposed? Lmao. | /r/MensRights | 27/05/25 09:41 AM |
| 1 | Men’s Opinions on Feminism?I'll take this as you not wanting to argue further. | /r/MensRights | 25/05/25 01:57 PM |
| 0 | Men’s Opinions on Feminism?I can assure you that I wasted my time and effort arguing with you completely for free. There was no script. Also, my examples on other civil rights movements are definitely not "off-topic". My point is that, even IF, and thats a very big if, the feminist movement was formed with the original intention of promoting misandry somewhere down the line, it was pretty much still an important factor in securing women's rights worldwide. | /r/MensRights | 25/05/25 08:09 AM |
| 0 | Men’s Opinions on Feminism?Tell me one instance where civil rights were improved without the need for a movement. For colored people in the US to have equal rights there was a movement. For gay people to stop being discriminated there have to be movements to support them. Now, there have indeed be accusations (mostly from right-leaning people) that some movements might be too radical that they have apparently turned to advocating hate against white people and straight people. But that's just what they are; radical outlier… | /r/MensRights | 23/05/25 01:17 PM |
| 0 | Men’s Opinions on Feminism?Does "no it didn't" mean that feminism didn't improve women's standing or that improving women's standing isn't a good thing? | /r/MensRights | 22/05/25 12:40 PM |
| 1 | Men’s Opinions on Feminism?Traditional gender roles are definitely not guaranteed to be the most successful. Does India and Afghanistan's societies look very successful to you? | /r/MensRights | 21/05/25 08:19 AM |
| 0 | Men’s Opinions on Feminism?It still improved women's standing tho. Which is a good thing. | /r/MensRights | 21/05/25 08:17 AM |
| -12 | Women: "Why are all men leaning right-wing?"Another "vagina = emotion" comment. You do realize that most people on earth are still functional stable adults right? Same reason not all men are violent. | /r/MensRights | 21/05/25 07:52 AM |
| 1 | Bitch Management – Laying Down The Law – The Uncle Vaz RemixYou could have and love multiple children with only one wife, yes. Of course, could practice polygamy if you want and use your money to attract the whores, I can’t prevent that. But it probably will not be the best kind of relationship you guys would want to commit to. | /r/TheRedPill | 19/12/23 12:55 PM |
| 1 | Bitch Management – Laying Down The Law – The Uncle Vaz RemixDo not use whataboutism here. Yes, homosexuals and women that do these kinds of polygamy - I despise them too. Also, you could have multiple children with only one wife. And lastly I do not know where you get the >50% of marriage ending in divorces came from. The society I’m living in does not experience such things. The West, probably. | /r/TheRedPill | 17/12/23 07:29 AM |
| 1 | Bitch Management – Laying Down The Law – The Uncle Vaz RemixPolygamy is polygamy. If you think it is bad, then it is bad for all kinds of people. And if you treat a relationship like something that can be negotiated and upgraded, then you probably shouldn’t have a relationship at all. The red pill community always talks about how women are only attracted to their partners’ money and status, and yet it’s probably money and status only that you used to “collect” that much partners. You can not always be in your prime forever, and this kind of wannabe relat… | /r/TheRedPill | 16/12/23 07:14 AM |
| 1 | Bitch Management – Laying Down The Law – The Uncle Vaz RemixYes, but my point was…you’re dating multiple women. Unless you’ve never had sex with any of them I doubt you had few body counts yourself. | /r/TheRedPill | 15/12/23 12:12 AM |
| 1 | Bitch Management – Laying Down The Law – The Uncle Vaz RemixDo “sluts” means actively being a prostitute or just having a past? Because as far as I know you’re the one having multiple partners, I suspect at this very moment? | /r/TheRedPill | 13/12/23 11:48 PM |
| 1 | Bitch Management – Laying Down The Law – The Uncle Vaz RemixContrary to your assumptions, I have never known what Lifetime is. I know that isolation from the community is a possible sign of abuse - with my sources also taken directly from Dr. Google, with a little bit of YouTube. Many accounts of manipulation on victims in children-parents and lover relationships always start with some kind of “x Knows Best” type of gaslighting. For China, I suppose I have nothing more to excuse other than the fact that they are (or claimed to be) trying to improve the s… | /r/TheRedPill | 12/12/23 03:49 AM |
| 1 | Bitch Management – Laying Down The Law – The Uncle Vaz RemixEither way “keeping her world small” is a BIG red flag in and of itself. Everyone could figure out by themselves just how much potential of manipulative abuse one could do by isolating their victims. Even parents abuse their children this way, by gaslighting them into these “Father knows best” lies which serves as an excellent way to silence these children from ever coming out of their cage. And then there’s North Korea. No reason to block interaction from the outside world unless what you’re do… | /r/TheRedPill | 12/12/23 12:16 AM |
| 1 | Bitch Management – Laying Down The Law – The Uncle Vaz Remix“…that setting any rules is “controlling!” and “insecure!”” Except that your rules sounded like they were perfectly copied from a dictatorship’s code-of-laws. Did you set these out just to piss off George Orwell? You also don’t need to “keep her world small” or use GPS and all sorts of that to lead her. Cohesive structure can exist without authoritarianism. Discipline can coexist with equality. And no, women need not be led. Otherwise it would’ve been quite shameful for you, no? Since your manos… | /r/TheRedPill | 11/12/23 08:57 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter