TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ArtificialN Archive

View 0 posts and 21 comments by ArtificialN on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

"It is considered negative because appearance is heavily determined by genetics, which are out of people's control. " So are a lot of behavioral traits. Adult general intelligence and personality a lot of other traits are also incredibly stable and pretty much impossible to change. Genes don't just code for your appearance, they also code for your brain that makes up who "you" are. Why isn't looking for someone intelligent as shallow as looking for someone with a specific appearance? Dumb or ave…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/15 05:15 AM
1

Wrong about breasts. Breast size preference varies a lot and it's usually not as large as you think http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_attractiveness#Breasts "Women aren't as picky as you think about height. It's something that we like. It doesn't mean that we're not going to take your average 5' 8" guy" Wrong again. It would be considered a very large disadvantage to a lot of women. It's probably the single factor that best predicts a man's mating success. ex. https://d2jm4qw7a11yde.cloudfro…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/15 05:11 AM
1

Nope. http://westhunt.wordpress.com/2013/02/04/elementary-my-dear-holmes/
/r/TheRedPill04/12/14 12:19 AM
11

Lmao. Reminds me of a funny study I once read in archives of sexual behavior http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-013-0081-5%20/fulltext.html Previous studies of men’s breast size preferences have yielded equivocal findings, with studies variously indicating a preference for small, medium, or large breasts. Here, we examined the impact of men’s oppressive beliefs in shaping their female breast size ideals. British White men from the community in London, England (N = 361) viewed figure…
/r/TheRedPill01/12/14 04:48 AM
14

"In the poll of 5,000 women for That’s Life! magazine" Non-representative sample.
/r/TheRedPill26/07/14 11:46 AM
2

It is rape by definition. You are not using the usual definition: 1) the unlawful compelling of a person through physical force or duress to have sexual intercourse. 2) any act of sexual intercourse that is forced upon a person. Regardless of whether or not she wants it, if it's forced upon her it's rape.
/r/TheRedPill25/07/14 10:27 PM
2

No, you're wrong. Look it up with a simple google search there are studies done and across cultures women admit to saying no when they want the man to keep going.
/r/TheRedPill25/07/14 10:10 PM
4

No it means they haven't consented. They can still want it. Rape is the right word.
/r/TheRedPill25/07/14 09:47 PM
4

Interesting, so you believe that a man's love towards a woman is similar to a woman's love for her child. Is there actually any good evidence to support this? If we actually did a study and asked that question are you sure we would get that gender difference? I'm not yet convinced.
/r/TheRedPill25/07/14 05:12 AM
7

Source? Some extra words for the bot.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 03:09 AM
2

Lol, are you serious? Anyway start here: http://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/wp-content/uploads/David-Buss-Evolutionary-Psychology-The-New-Science-of-the-Mind-2007-496p-Evolutionary-Psychology-3rd-ed.pdf
/r/TheRedPill12/07/14 04:36 AM
1

Ok. Is this supposed to be a disagreement with what I wrote? I don't doubt men have higher risk tolerance, work harder and have higher creative output. After all we are descended from far more women than men.
/r/TheRedPill28/06/14 05:20 AM
15

Yes it is. Hyde and Mertz are agenda driven hacks. And who the fuck is Michael Veldman? You are posting the article of a student newspaper. Not a bad thing by itself but he hasn't done his research. "The SMPY researchers identify children 13 years of age and younger who are mathematically advanced and administer the SAT to them. Near the program’s inception in the early 1980s, the ratio of boys to girls who scored above a 700 on the math section was 13-to-1; in 2005 it was 2.8-to-1." What utter …
/r/TheRedPill28/06/14 12:24 AM
1

You fool, this isn't just about us.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/14 02:05 AM
1

No, look at the graph. Sequencing will become so cheap that it will be commonplace, a normal part of life. Everyone will have their dna readily accessible. Paternity will no longer be able to be hidden from fathers. edit: You are probably right thought that most people will no longer have children via regular intercourse. I have no idea why anyone would choose that over the power of embryo selection: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vr5n_ZOZ6E8
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/14 02:01 AM
12

The lack of empathy towards men on this forum and in nearly all human cultures is appalling. Luckily this specific issue will go away soon, probably within the next 10 years as genome prices continue to drop http://www.genome.gov/sequencingcosts/
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/14 01:37 AM
6

1% of men raising illegitimate children is not a serious issue what the fuck
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/14 01:18 AM
2

Article reviewing the science on the topic: "Given the current scientific knowledge reviewed above, the share of children having false paternity beliefs is plausibly estimated at roughly 5%" http://purplemotes.net/2009/12/13/social-fundamentals/
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/14 01:12 AM
1

So the 90% are pawns as you call them, they do the grunt work what the 10% tells them to do. 10% of the population gets 90% of the shit done. Are you literally retarded?
/r/TheRedPill14/04/14 04:29 AM
1

Full study for this article? I want the real numbers. N=98 from the sex diaries by ardnt paints a pretty grim picture. There is an interesting discussion from Baumeister in his paper on sexual trends. Googling the author in the article I get this study: http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Sexual+Motivation+and+the+Duration+Of+Partnership&btnG=&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5 "The sample of N=1865 includes only students aged 19-32 who reported to be heterosexual and to live in a steady partnership" Not quite a …
/r/TheRedPill12/04/14 08:44 PM
3

http://www.madinamerica.com/2014/01/psychiatry-gone-astray/ http://www.amazon.com/Deadly-Medicines-Organised-Crime-ebook/dp/B00G353WCE/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1383517560&sr=8-1&keywords=deadly+medicines+and+organised+crime+how+big+pharma+has+corrupted+healthcare some studies, use google scholar for more: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11229449 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2848770/
/r/TheRedPill12/04/14 12:40 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter