TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Asenueh Archive

View 1 post and 46 comments by Asenueh on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
208

Social IssuesAsenueh/r/MensRights19/11/22 05:00 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

It might have to do with the social consequences for sexual activity differing between men and women. Also, for most of history, women were not considered to have sexual agency; rape being treated like an affront to male family honor, as women were regarded as the possession of either their fathers or their husbands. In the Bible, there is the mass abduction and forced marriage of women by the men of the Tribe of Benjamin who survived the campaign of genocide committed against them by the other …
/r/MensRights22/11/22 02:57 PM
1

The problem with even using SA against villains is that it sends a message reflecting that SA isn't objectively wrong and that respect for sexual agency is a privilege and not a right.
/r/MensRights22/11/22 02:22 PM
0

The dictionary does not prescribe the meanings of words. Hence, it's fallacious to claim that, because the dictionary says so, therefore it is so. So, you're denying the actual function of a dictionary...
/r/MensRights20/11/22 06:20 AM
0

And AGAIN, Merriam-Webster begs to differ: "noun fem·​i·​nism | \ ˈfe-mə-ˌni-zəm \ Definition : belief in and advocacy of the political, economic, and social equality of the sexes expressed especially through organized activity on behalf of women's rights and interests" Since you devoted a lot of time acknowledging my recitation of facts, instead of providing evidence to refute my claims of patrilineal surnames and couverture, it's obviously not a "selective portrayal," when I gave you examples …
/r/MensRights20/11/22 05:24 AM
1

No. You're using a strawman argument and contrived a definition of "Feminism" favorable to your agenda, rather than accepting its meaning of supporting gender equality for women. Equality. Patriarchy isn't a Feminist fantasy, when it's an honest-to-gosh actual title for the male heads to religious institutions in Eastern Orthodox and other churches. It's not a Feminist fantasy when surnames were passed down through the male line and the legal doctrine of couverture existed, as the basis for deny…
/r/MensRights20/11/22 04:44 AM
0

The literal dictionary definition of patriarchy refutes your argument, since it's defined as a male-dominated hierarchy.
/r/MensRights20/11/22 04:28 AM
0

And again, the article was presented in a vacuum without any cultural or historical frame of reference, so I have no opinion on it, other than what I have stated as my personal opposition to excluding men from legal protections against rape.
/r/MensRights20/11/22 03:30 AM
1

A quote from a literal Karen oozing "pick me girl" energy, as her claim to fame. I can't roll my eyes hard enough. I don't live my life caring about what Karen Straughan thinks. SHE doesn't matter to me. She doesn't define me or inform my thinking in any way and I couldn't pick her out of a crowd of two.
/r/MensRights20/11/22 03:22 AM
-1

Like I said, India's legal procedures don't work the way ours do, so I'm not going to accept an article's claim in a vacuum. Just because male supremacists make a claim doesn't mean it's true... That's the reverse of your claim. Do you see how ridiculous your claim of branding everything adverse to a group of men as "Feminist" sounds? Human rights aren't like pie; if someone is struggling for the same rights as you, it's not a loss for you.
/r/MensRights20/11/22 03:18 AM
1

India's standard of probable cause and due process aren't what we're used to and until that changes, they might have valid concerns about being cross-charged, as a way to pressure the victim into withdrawing her complaint. I have literally seen articles of Hindu women protesting IN DEFENSE of rapists in their own communities whose targets were Muslim women., so I wouldn't know what thread to pull to begin to unravel that dysfunction.
/r/MensRights20/11/22 03:02 AM
2

Feel free to use those arguments.
/r/MensRights20/11/22 02:49 AM
1

It appears, from the Times of India article, that the rationale for excluding men from the staturory definition of rape is that file will file cross-charges: "Activists argue that apart from situations where women hold .." Read more at: http://m.timesofindia.com/articleshow/18840879.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst Their legal system and societal structure aren't modeled on the U. S. system, so I don't think a meaningful comparison can be made. Like how India c…
/r/MensRights20/11/22 02:35 AM
1

I'm not on the 2X subreddit, nor have I seen their content, so I have no opinion of them. What I can tell you, given all the possible biological causes of gender dysphoria, how they even know for sure they are "2X"? Since women also produce testosterone, as well as other androgens and are required for our optimum health, as well as the fact both sexes have analogous tissues, what biological basis do they even have for citing claims of being that different, biologically? I mean, how can one ratio…
/r/MensRights20/11/22 02:05 AM
1

The Merriam-Webster definition is the one I use and for evidence, one need look no further than the centuries-long struggle of women in the U. S. for basic human and civil rights. The fact that women taking their husband's last names is still practiced, as well as children, by default, are given the surname of their fathers are also enduring examples.
/r/MensRights20/11/22 01:41 AM
0

The petition is adversarially worded.
/r/MensRights19/11/22 09:26 PM
-2

I'm a Feminist and I acknowledge men can be victims of rape and think they are equally deserving of protection. It's patriarchy who socializes everyone to believe men can't be victims. Like any hierarchy, patriarchy is a cutthroat competition with little room at the top, so competitors are eminently dispensible. Being acknowledged as a victim is considered a sign of weakness and vulnerability, so men are pressured to not come forward. Disavowing male sexual assault victimhood works against Femin…
/r/MensRights19/11/22 09:25 PM
5

Yeah. I remember someone who ended up in jail for a week for contempt of court, because his ex-wife lied about him meeting the purge conditions of a contempt judgement. I filed a declaration during that week pointing out that there was no coercive effect of incarceration, so he should be released. He was and for a while after that would introduce me as his "parole officer" and he credited me with his release. He spoke of rampant systemic abuses that he observed and were recounted to him during h…
/r/MensRights19/11/22 04:55 PM
-2

You do realize that your reply is an admission that man-positive statements of men being entitled to feelings and self-care is a feminist position, right? Your claim is that "Feminist brainwashing" involves the acknowledgment of men's feelings and defends the rights of men to acknowledge them and make use of them in their spiritual wellbeing. Well, gosh! Sign us all up then!
/r/MensRights19/11/22 04:31 PM
1

In my home state, Washington state, the legal definition of rape is non-consensual sexual contact that includes men, so again, your assessment is inaccurate.
/r/MensRights19/11/22 04:27 PM
0

Other relies to this post have specified where legislation has been passed, in response to prison sexual violence, so you can't tell us that it isn't a thing.
/r/MensRights19/11/22 04:25 PM
0

A lot of comedy is holding up a mirror to society and outsourcing vigilantism to our collective shadow, i. e. inmates isn't an extremist observation. Among the chilling implications is that the trope of prison-sexual-assault-played-for-humor tacitly expresses that society doesn't hold a collective objection to sexual violence, when there are pockets of incidents against marginalized populations that lack objective and unanimous outrage, as a response.
/r/MensRights19/11/22 04:24 PM
-5

It's implausible to collectively hate an entire gender, as long as there is at least one beloved person of the other gender in someone's life. Being born into any ~archy is being born into a dysfunctional and bigoted social construct. It's a destructive and predatory status quo.
/r/MensRights19/11/22 04:07 PM
-2

If you think that, it proves the patriarchal brainwashing has been working. Men are entitled to acknowledge and examine their feelings in constructive ways. It's self-care for the psyche.
/r/MensRights19/11/22 03:52 PM
0

What likely gets subreddits banned is the encouragement of rhetoric promoting hate and violence against groups of people. There have been incel subreddits who did that, because that's a feature, not a bug, of an ideology that blames a group of people for the problems of another. The incel ideology is born of the idea that women are collectively denying a contrived category of men sexual access. This is born of the patriarchal notions that male worth is premised on sexual conquest and that women …
/r/MensRights19/11/22 03:46 PM
-22

You can tell the thesis of the post is dogwhistle misogynist hate speech, because when men are convicted, they aren't described in terms of gender ideology in matters unrelated to gender. In comparison to Bernie Madoff, if headlines touted him by Jewish identity, there would be cries of "anti-Semitism," because everyone knows that using an adjective that applies to a non monolithic group in of people in an adverse context is bigoted. It's a tactic of marginalization, trying to paint all members …
/r/MensRights19/11/22 03:28 PM
-5

Patriarchy is the biggest problem of men, because its first demand of men is that they disregard their emotions, which are valuable data reporting the state of one's psyche. After all, emotional discomfort is a symptom of one's boundaries being violated and when you're taught to disregard the symptoms, then you can be gaslit,... er- I mean "socialized" into toxic worldviews, behaviors and actions. Being told that the very traits that can save you and advance your wellbeing are discouraged and de…
/r/MensRights19/11/22 03:19 PM
-1

The fact that someone would deride deferring to someone's opinion based on the identity of the person asserting the opinion is a logical fallacy, "Ergo Decedo." Women are rightly resentful of the non-constructive intra-male bullying of men who treat women like equal fellow human beings with valid opinions, experiences and a command of facts, instead of a lower caste not worth listening to.
/r/MensRights19/11/22 03:06 PM
-6

I don't know that it's "obsessive hatred" toward men, as much as resentment against the patriarchy, since the most toxic traits attributed to manhood are actually dysfunctional strategies to cope with being born into a hierarchy and aspirationally simping for it. The sentiment on the t-shirt is rather artlessly articulated though. After all, if someone is deferring to something they oppose as factors in deciding their actions, they are also ruled by that thing. In fact, the argument above might …
/r/MensRights19/11/22 02:56 PM
5

It appears to be a combination of outsourced vigilantism, expecting inmates to do society's dirty work, as the shadow side of society, as well as schadenfreude.
/r/MensRights19/11/22 02:41 PM
3

I know. When I was a service officer for The American Legion, I had a male MST client and I took him just as seriously. It's an atrocity that men are imposed upon by patriarchy with the idea that being in perpetual rut (sexual potency) is a sign of manhood. Control over oneself is the only real power and people have the right to protect and apply discernment to that aspect of themselves.
/r/MensRights19/11/22 02:17 PM
0

The content of another subreddit that isn't targeted toward men's rights violates rule number one of this subreddit.
/r/MensRights19/11/22 04:18 AM
0

Seriously? Because we women ask the same thing about men all the time, like why do so many feel threatened, when women gain something men have always had and taken for granted they have a right to. They act like human and civil rights are a pie and more for others means less for them. My point is that if you believe false allegations are objectively bad, then you'll want to raise support from any quarter you can get it, including those who care more about women being victimized. If you place con…
/r/MensRights12/07/22 05:14 PM
1

Dang. I really think that no-fault states are the way to go, when it comes to divorce, so parties can part ways without unnecessary hostility. https://youtu.be/HKgZf-m_PjE
/r/MensRights12/07/22 03:03 AM
1

Ah, yes, the old, "If you don't leave right now, I'll accuse you of domestic violence," gambit. My ex-husband's second wife made that threat. I was his third wife and he and I were married for 15 years without any such problems. He and I lived in a no-fault state, so we could part amicably and not have to gin up hostilities to be granted a divorce. Then there's a nuclear option of filing a DV restraining order petition to force the other party to move out with maybe 15-20 minutes to get their th…
/r/MensRights12/07/22 02:13 AM
1

The first crucial piece of advice is to respond, respond, RESPOND to summons and petitions to preserve your right to file pleadings and provide a defense in the public record. Don't think you can blow it off, thinking, "She'll never get that granted." Ex parte temporary orders are often granted with a low threshold of proof, out of an abundance of caution by the court. That's why a response and showing up at the hearing is crucial. You see, family law is a subset of civil law, where the burden o…
/r/MensRights12/07/22 12:59 AM
1

The exception would be if you were planning to file a defamation suit, which would only be advisable, if you could conclusively prove the allegations false, like Camille Vasquez did for Johnny Depp. In that case, you'd want to demonstrate damages, since that's a necessary criterion for a defamation suit.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 12:24 AM
1

No. Speaking as someone who has drafted legal documents to help men who were in those situations, a better strategy would be to write a book on how men were able to prevail against false allegations. If all you do are sob stories, then all you're doing is tipping your hand to let the perpetrators know their tactics worked.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 12:08 AM
-1

No. It victimizes everyone. And that is the fact that should be led with, because it elicits more support for opposing it. I'm not in the business of isolating people from support, when an injustice is perpetrated against them, but why are you?
/r/MensRights11/07/22 11:02 PM
1

I do have a problem when people omit information, then act like it's some kinda "Gotcha."
/r/MensRights11/07/22 10:59 PM
1

My statement of opposing books targeting EITHER gender for malicious destruction still stands.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 09:34 PM
1

It's not a flaw, when that information was withheld, so couldn't be factored in.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 07:05 PM
-5

No, I can't just not say that, because I don't subscribe to the false dichotomy that acknowledging injustices against one gender is tacitly supporting injustice against the other. One can be outraged at both. Also, it's inaccurate to assume that individuals making choices to exploit the zeitgeist and maliciously harm others are doing so as an act with any collective values in mind. Their mindset is typically, "As long as I get mine, screw everyone else." When Amber Heard tried to ride that wave …
/r/MensRights11/07/22 07:03 PM
0

No. As a feminist I oppose content advocating defamation and false allegations against either gender, so I would oppose both books.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 05:22 PM
1

No. If you do that, then you're proving that you have no objective opposition to perjury and that you're objection to it is solely informed by the identities of perpetrator and victim.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 05:20 PM
2

I'm of two minds on this; that a how-to book on making false allegations is highly unethical an no one should be enriched from the publishing of such a book, but on the other hand, knowing the risks of entanglement with an unethical person is helpful in managing risks.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 05:05 PM
7

Speaking as a woman, I've had three men in my life victimized by such things, because the women in question wouldn't end a relationship in an ethical and mature way. Women who make false allegations make it harder for real victims to be believed and those false allegations enrage the rest of us, not only for that reason, but because those allegations target our brothers, sons, and friends.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 04:58 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter