TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Ashali Archive

View 1 post and 126 comments by Ashali on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
14

Ashali/r/MensRights02/04/11 03:25 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Instead of linking directly to the image, you could have linked to the page with the image, which has a number of people hating on the artist(and mensrights) for this. Here it is
/r/MensRights26/02/12 09:23 PM
4

The REAL issue here is why men are rejecting that mold - because it is a raw deal for them. It is in purely economic terms a "net loss" to. I have explained this time and time again as to my own choice to stay single. Nobody wants to understand it.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 11:13 PM
12

Q-Q-Q-QUAD POOOSSSTTTTT.
/r/MensRights13/12/11 12:50 AM
23

it's wierd when people don't constantly conform to stereotypes their entire lives Even more so when those same people demand that others do. I think we have a word for that...
/r/MensRights21/11/11 01:38 AM
4

At any rate, to the younger generation of men out there I say have your fun, but trend lightly for now there be dragons. All too true. I'm one of those guys from the younger generation(s) (21 years old). My parents tried to teach me those values, but about five years ago, I took a hard look at them and came to the conclusion that those older values are no longer valid(If they even were in the first place).
/r/MensRights05/11/11 09:34 PM
5

Similarly, some courts have found no duty to retreat exists when a victim is assaulted in a place where the victim has a right to be, such as within one's own home. The Model Penal Code suggests statutory language that also recognizes an exception to the usual duty to retreat when the victim of the attack is in his or her own dwelling or place of work. It doesn't fit in this case.
/r/MensRights17/10/11 07:38 PM
2

Porn, videogames, and guns(at the nearby gun range). The holy trinity of having fun "alone".
/r/MensRights16/10/11 04:20 PM
1

As much as I commend your effort, I'm not lonely. I've made my decision and I'm quite happy with it(I have been for over five years now). :) In any case, I said what I said because sometimes a little hyperbole goes a long way(until women grow up, etc.). I've weighed the risks and how much I would want to even date women, etc., and found that it simply isn't worth the risk. Marriage, as a whole, has something like a 50% failure rate, with something a 90%+ rate of the woman taking the man's assets…
/r/MensRights16/10/11 04:14 PM
4

I don't think my mind will change. Unless something big happens, like the complete downfall of Feminism, I'm not likely to re-evaluate my decision. I've spent countless hours watching, reading, observing, and so on, and I've thought long and hard about this. As a side note, I don't know why people are downvoting you. You made a good comment, even if I don't agree with you.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 08:39 PM
19

I'm a 21 year old guy, and I agree with them. I would not marry anyone, regardless of circumstance, because there is too much risk and no benefit for marrying(Ooh, those tax benefits are gonna help you when she makes off with half your stuff and a paycheck from you every month, and have you seen the divorce rates?). I also am one of the guys that doesn't even date, because I've found that most "women"(and I use the term lightly) expect you to put in all the effort into dating them, when nothing …
/r/MensRights15/10/11 04:52 PM
18

They already are.
/r/MensRights09/09/11 04:36 PM
2

checks comment history Brutal, man.
/r/MensRights01/09/11 04:52 PM
7

"Rouge" is a color.
/r/MensRights01/09/11 03:22 PM
1

FYI, you got a double-post.
/r/MensRights20/08/11 11:18 PM
2

Source says the original text is from March 22, 1987. The page appears to have gone up sometime around '01 or '02. Just thought I'd throw that out here.
/r/MensRights20/08/11 08:34 PM
5

There, their, they're.
/r/MensRights18/08/11 08:02 PM
3

You're right. There is no possible way for this world to be perfect or equal. Though that doesn't mean that no one should encourage understanding and hope to help make the world a better place. I know that the chances of a post on an internet forum won't make much difference, but I was hoping that just a few people would read it and think about it and realize that a gender isn't to blame for all their problems. Except that wasn't what you originally said at all. Maybe before you attempt to lectu…
/r/MensRights12/08/11 06:13 PM
11

If you hadn't done this before I got home and got on reddit, I most certainly would have. I salute you for fighting the good fight.
/r/MensRights11/08/11 08:13 PM
2

Even with that, /MR gets a lot of downvotes by trolls and people that are dedicated to hating MensRights.
/r/MensRights05/08/11 04:15 AM
2

Yes. The difference between the view counter and the like counter is that the view counter can easily shoot up to thousands and tens of thousands in under an hour, while the likes counter will likely only rise by a few hundred or a thousand in the same time frame. The view counter changes every time someone requests and loads the page, while the like counter only changes when someone hits like. A person can hit the view counter multiple times, while the like counter can only be hit by a person o…
/r/MensRights23/07/11 05:24 AM
2

Thanks for 'mansplaining'. I hope you know your patriarchal information rape caused me to attempt suicide with a dull box cutter. sniff LOL. You're welcome. ;) ☆TheMoreYouKnow~~~
/r/MensRights23/07/11 04:12 AM
1

They have to render it to display for new viewers, and that takes resources. It's a lot easier to send the same data to multiple people than to generate the page with a slightly different number every time it is requested.
/r/MensRights23/07/11 04:10 AM
9

The system tracks the views in real time until around 300, when it's switched off to another system that doesn't update in real time, so there's a delay between when the video gets a ton of views, and the counter getting updated. In an hour or two, you'll see tens of thousands of views on the counter. Likes are always tracked in real time because it's expected that they won't climb as quickly as views. The system they have set up is to make certain that they don't bog down their servers with cal…
/r/MensRights22/07/11 11:33 PM
3

There's a guy called Reality from the US that did a huge flowing web-page of pictures he'd photoshoped with his own observations and opinions, its absolutely brilliant. Link? I'm interested.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 09:02 PM
12

I wish could remember the link to "Best Restraining Violation Ever" which happened when a man's ex visited him in jail and then complained that he violated the restraining order she had against him. And yes, he was found to have violated the restraining order. In that situation, it is logically fallacious to argue that someone with minimal physical mobility could violate a restraining order(A restraining order is to deter people from coming within a distance from which they could harm the recipi…
/r/MensRights27/06/11 05:03 PM
7

Fuckin' amazon affiliate spammers.
/r/MensRights25/06/11 02:51 AM
2

Here is the link he posted It probably wasn't obvious because it was a single word(Straus).
/r/MensRights19/06/11 03:51 AM
4

I don't bring up MRA stuff with people I know anymore. It's because if I say anything about MRA subjects, I'm immediately accused of being a women-hating rape-supporter. To my face! I've got better things to do than engage fools in mudslinging and insults.
/r/MensRights20/05/11 05:22 AM
4

I would like to see that, too. However, I'm far too lazy.
/r/MensRights18/05/11 05:43 AM
1

It's so smooth, it's like it's not even there, bro.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 09:45 PM
2

That's because you're just about in the middle between the pansy "MRA's"(Who most assuredly are not committed to any MRA cause) and Paul.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 12:03 AM
2

Use Reddit Enhancement Suite. It adds the ability to save comments.
/r/MensRights16/05/11 12:55 AM
1

Thank you.
/r/MensRights15/05/11 05:51 PM
3

You misspelled "rhetoric"(rederic).
/r/MensRights15/05/11 05:22 PM
1

Aye. I was also being a bit sarcastic originally, in a more of a roundabout way(Sorta of a double-ironic play on meanings). I just wanted to explain myself a bit. :)
/r/MensRights04/05/11 12:57 AM
2

It really sticks in my craw how feminists will on one hand say that they're being wildly discriminated against because they're "just as good as men!", and on the other they'll talk about how quotas and other things that basically reinforce the mindset that women aren't as good as men, and need to be pandered to. There's absolutely no consistency between their "WOMEN ARE EMPOWERED" schtick and their demands for preferential treatment. It boggles the mind that someone can simultaneously keep both …
/r/MensRights04/05/11 12:06 AM
1

It's clearly because they're less able than men. CLEARLY.
/r/MensRights03/05/11 10:10 PM
5

That's because it is.
/r/MensRights01/05/11 01:06 PM
6

Those damn white niggers! </s> Yeah, black people get blamed with a lot. :(
/r/MensRights01/05/11 12:20 AM
7

Banning is a rare thing around these parts.
/r/MensRights24/04/11 01:29 AM
9

Indeed. For anyone who's looked at the MRA movement ever since it started to begin online, you could see this stuff happening. Back then, I was only 10-12 years old, so I didn't know much about MRA stuff, but I occasionally looked over them because they were interesting, and seemed more like reality than the feminist drivel that I heard day-in, day-out, that did not match with reality. What I saw was the death of many forums because feminists and women would join them and derail conversations, o…
/r/MensRights09/04/11 12:00 PM
4

I believe you missed the sarcasm, bro.
/r/MensRights09/04/11 01:18 AM
1

"We pitch it the way we think you're going to read it and pick up on it," says Kaffie McCullough, the director of Atlanta-based anti-prostitution group A Future Not a Past. "If we give it to you with all the words and the stuff that is actually accurate—I mean, I've tried to do that with our PR firm, and they say, 'They won't read that much.'" As Fidelbogen says, you see a lot of this kind of stuff coming out of feminist sectors, especially those that are seeking funding. It's also truly disgust…
/r/MensRights02/04/11 03:32 AM
2

I do enjoy his blog and have it bookmarked. His writing style is that of an academic who enjoys his writing, and that turns a lot of people off of it because it sounds like someone up in their ivory tower. Meh. The best part about him is that he makes his points extremely precise and will go on at some length about the issues that matter about MR/non-feminism/anti-feminism and Feminism. It's certainly not something to read if you only have a couple minutes.
/r/MensRights31/03/11 10:11 PM
4

Because of the good old boy's club! Hyuk, hyuk.
/r/MensRights26/03/11 09:58 PM
11

Well, that was possibly the most biased article I've read all year(The year is young yet, but still). ಠ_ಠ It basically says "women rule the internet" because: Women spend more. Women waste more time on Facebook and Zynga games. Women send the most online messages. etc. Except they say nothing of the quality of the messages, time, or money spent. It also has a small comment about Digg having more male users than female, of all things. Digg is pretty much dead! Talk about being divorced from reali…
/r/MensRights24/03/11 09:07 PM
3

It's also the country where the most men are becoming disillusioned with feminism because of the retarded extremist shit they're doing, which explains the article author's experience.
/r/MensRights23/03/11 05:57 PM
2

I've got your back, bro.
/r/MensRights16/03/11 11:50 PM
1

A number of us here believe that the concept of honor is exploited today, so some of us would be perfectly happy putting aside our honor in favor of less time in prison. The fact that it is widely known that sexual offenders in prison are at a higher risk than murderers means that I would say that it would be far more preferable to go to jail for murder than going to jail because someone accused me of rape with no solid evidence. That is the current state of our judicial and societal systems. It…
/r/MensRights09/03/11 10:31 PM
2

He's not even a good one. A troll that had class would turn people on each other, instead of being so obvious that absolutely everyone takes pot shots at him for amusement. wistful look I remember the good old days when a proper troll could wipe out a board that had thousands of members...
/r/MensRights06/03/11 06:52 AM
3

In all respect, your "opinion" was on the level of "I'm an ignorant fuck" and "target-practice". Starting with "I just skimmed it" and continuing ever onwards with examples of the true pinnacle of human thought such as "the idea I got from it was women-hating" and "Good luck getting far in life hating women.", I see that your intellect is truly so bright that no mere mortal could ever compare. Protip: Starting a conversation by obliquely insulting everyone everyone in the forum, spouting ignoran…
/r/MensRights06/03/11 05:19 AM
1

T-T-T-Triple Post!
/r/MensRights04/03/11 08:32 PM
0

Does anyone know what happened to Dick? He just sorta disappeared or stopped being active. Also, he was downright hilarious.
/r/MensRights02/03/11 06:20 AM
1

You talking about me? In that case, it's he. :) Just wanted to clear that up. This account name is just a nick I used on a MMO on a female character.
/r/MensRights02/03/11 05:51 AM
7

To be honest, I'm quite amazed that the grand majority of them continue to write the same tripe, never learning anything. It's a symptom of subscribing to an ideology so completely that any facts that do not support it are simply waved away. It's been years and years and they continue to spout the same arguments, in the same way, with absolutely no variation. It takes either incredible dedication or incredible stupidity to continue to speak a viewpoint that is so irrational for so long. As some …
/r/MensRights02/03/11 05:45 AM
10

I dunno, she seems pretty le-pfftftftftfpftHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Is she serious? She tells everyone else off for making generalizations, then makes a gigantic one of her own? What kind of stupidity or intellectual dishonesty does it take to do that? It's plainly ridiculous.
/r/MensRights02/03/11 01:45 AM
0

wat. Redditor for 9 months with only 4 comments? Are you a sockpuppet or a pre-made throwaway?
/r/MensRights26/02/11 05:39 PM
4

"If the Bar tells me I have to, then I will litigate The Florida Bar that it's unconstitutional." He's correct. It is unconstitutional. Private businesses have the right to deny any potential customer for any reason. Personally, I'd love to see the Bar attempt to make them take female clients. They'd steamroll the Bar in the courts.
/r/MensRights23/02/11 03:45 AM
7

Even so, I salute him for having the balls to go through with it.
/r/MensRights23/02/11 03:34 AM
-4

Actually, while it may have been a direct response to that post, it's also a more general response to the guys that post something like this every week. To be honest, it's getting rather tiring.
/r/MensRights20/02/11 03:25 AM
5

Disappointingly, the grand mass of people don't truly believe and internalize statistics, because they're, you know, merely numbers. People don't respond favorably to numbers and statistics, because they're abstract. "It couldn't possibly happen to me!" is the main point against the effectiveness of statistics. What really gets people riled up, and makes them believe, is stories. Why else would the American public have been so terrified of terrorists to the point of irrationality for years, even…
/r/MensRights20/02/11 03:22 AM
0

This has already been posted here.
/r/MensRights19/02/11 08:48 PM
2

Of course she doesn't. The women who tend to make articles like this one are usually self-centered and don't think much about why things are happening. They just complain and want the men to fix it for them, even if the men in question have a vested interest in telling these women to fuck off. Articles like this are not-so-subtle attempts to shame men in general into settling down with some bimbo they wouldn't otherwise(Articles like this have been showing up for years now, and have becoming mor…
/r/MensRights19/02/11 05:06 PM
8

Hell yes that's a perfect night. Video games are a great way to relax and cut loose without drugs. Gaming and messing with buddies? Hell yeah. If you do a cost-benefit analysis on getting married, you quickly see that the risks far outweigh the rewards. >50% divorce rate in two years, with the wife taking half your assets and alimony for life? No thank you. The only reason you should marry is if you're absolutely certain you've found an outstanding person you can live the rest of your life with.…
/r/MensRights19/02/11 07:22 AM
7

Hey look, this article again. You know, the same thing that women have been saying over and over again, more often as time passes and men backlash against the entitlement-mentality that's become more predominant in women in the past few decades. Boring.
/r/MensRights19/02/11 07:12 AM
2

That would be awesome to watch.
/r/MensRights05/02/11 02:01 AM
4

I believe The Spearhead ended up autobanning them or something.
/r/MensRights02/02/11 01:50 AM
17

Apparently, rantgrrl should have used sarcasm tags. Poe's law, etc. etc.
/r/MensRights22/01/11 09:25 PM
3

IMO, you shouldn't have made this submission so long. You could've gotten your point across with quite a few less iterations of adhom(It's kinda annoying). =/
/r/MensRights09/01/11 04:07 AM
1

Not sure if serious...
/r/MensRights03/01/11 07:18 AM
2

The science channel.
/r/MensRights03/01/11 07:03 AM
1

Agreed. Also, is it just me, or have the articles being posted on MR sites been of higher quality more recently?
/r/MensRights22/12/10 01:12 AM
1

There's not a lot we can do about it besides try to educate as many people as possible. Even still, that's a losing battle. Many big questions and debates have already been answered, and can be linked to relatively easily. It's not as necessary for people joining this subreddit to discuss things as deeply as they used to. Despite all that, you can see the growth in popularity of mens' rights in general as a good thing. More and more people are realizing that the reality isn't anything like what …
/r/MensRights16/12/10 06:54 PM
6

What happened people? First of all, there's still a lot of good comments here, but they're not most of the discussions taking place now. Probably a combination of factors about why there's more noise. The first would very likely be how much more popular this sub is now. The more people involved, the harder it is to find deep discourse on a subject and the harder it is to keep it from getting sidetracked. The second would be... how popular this sub is now. Because we're actually pretty popular, w…
/r/MensRights16/12/10 06:10 PM
3

Something like six or seven months ago. I've since lost my post that had the link to his post in it.
/r/MensRights16/12/10 05:51 PM
3

You mean Kloo2yoo? He's still here you know. He's cooled it a bit since the old days, though.
/r/MensRights16/12/10 05:35 PM
2

By posting this here and nowhere else, and making hardly any effort at all, you're most definitely attempting to troll /MR. Perhaps you should go out and get a life? It appears that you came in here with your mind already made up with this ridiculous idea of assuming that guys actually give a shit as to what you call them. You made no attempt to even talk about the subject that you seem so angry about. You came in to a subreddit that doesn't agree with your point of view and simply shouted into …
/r/MensRights27/11/10 05:21 AM
2

Not your personal army, imbecile.
/r/MensRights16/11/10 12:19 AM
2

Anyone who has even the slightest understanding of the modern economies knows that there's no pay gap. Companies are almost forced to cut costs as much as possible to insure profits for their investors and low prices for their consumers, and if women were being paid less to do the same job you wouldn't see a single man employed today. To say otherwise is to admit your ignorance of how companies have to operate to remain competitive.
/r/MensRights18/10/10 12:00 AM
8

You really hate Paul Elam for calling you out, don't you?
/r/MensRights15/09/10 12:59 AM
6

┌─┐ ┴─┴ ಠ_ರೃ I am disappoint.
/r/MensRights14/09/10 04:30 AM
10

Another article with a title likely to piss off people who don't understand that you're ridiculing society and feminism/old-style chivalry. Another article that again comes with a great deal of quality content. I always enjoy these. Your writing is still as intense and aggressive as ever, and that's a good thing. It's the literary equivalent of bitch-slapping someone into reality and to make them think for themselves as a self-aware person instead of just assuming everything is as they're told.
/r/MensRights14/09/10 03:43 AM
3

Is it just me, or are the posts on FRS going up 2-3 days early? That said, this is an excellent article in every way, and everyone who is even passingly interested in Men's Rights and/or Feminism need to read this in its entirety.
/r/MensRights11/09/10 07:02 AM
1

Yeah, I agree that the comments really aren't all that bad. Someone could misunderstand one or two of them and think they're terrible, though(meh). My problem, and I will grant you it is a problem at times, is that I don't suffer idiots very well, particularly those addressing MRM issues, which I happen to be very invested in. I take criticism all the time, and learn from a lot of it (though not from the totally generic and vague kind that you closed your comment with). That's because I can't re…
/r/MensRights10/09/10 02:26 AM
1

Welcome to the club. :)
/r/MensRights09/09/10 10:15 PM
4

Just downvote and report the manhood101 idiot. The guy makes a new account to troll the same copypasta every time he gets banned here.
/r/MensRights09/09/10 10:02 PM
5

If I may clarify for tehgimpo, he was saying that your article was a reasonable criticism, but the comments on that post tend to be more radical than your post. His comment was a bit ambiguous, but you went ahead and assumed that his comment was personally criticizing you and the article(Instead, you should have asked him to clarify if he meant you or the commentators). Personally, I'd say your writing in general in more recent times have become better and more reasonable than your past articles…
/r/MensRights09/09/10 09:58 PM
6

Hey, what can I say, you started with the cliché shaming language and name-calling. I am not the person who is so extremely pissed off here. I have no reason to take action, and I can deal with women just fine. It is you who should take your weak little arguments and circlejerk elsewhere, little boy.
/r/MensRights06/09/10 08:31 PM
4

And thus, rational discourse is thrown out the window. Quite disappointing. To be honest, I don't care about what you think about women, or me, or any other person. The only reason I still make comments to you now and then is because your arguments are lacking on many fronts, and are so bad that it could be said that they display intellectual cowardice. If you are so angry about women and feminism right now, why haven't you done something about it yet? Why don't I see your name on the news? Are …
/r/MensRights06/09/10 08:18 PM
5

I find it amusing how so many people assume I'm female because of this feminine username. To the great chagrin of many, I'm male, in my twenties, and college-educated. I support men's rights to a great degree. I know where the main audience from which the most followers of men's rights are coming from, and how best to appeal to them to look at all the inequality against men on their own, and come to their own conclusions to join men's rights. You will find no person as committed to an idea as a …
/r/MensRights06/09/10 07:56 PM
7

Ah. I didn't see that post. I approve of your comments and agree with nearly everything you've said. I'd give you a thousand upvotes if I could. Posts like those go a long way in improving the quality of posts and comments by MRAs, though some of the more prolific commentators and posters(Who shall remain unnamed) tend to act as if they're above being criticized for making bad arguments.
/r/MensRights06/09/10 07:45 PM
6

Oh, I know. I just respond to these accounts once in every while, hoping the guy will finally understand what he's doing to himself and manhood101.
/r/MensRights06/09/10 07:16 PM
6

You know, people might actually find a good point or two in your comments, if they weren't such extremely disorganized rants that drown out any semblance of a legitimate message with a storm of vitriol. I do see what points you do have. However, if you don't moderate your message to the point that someone can read it without thinking you're an imbecile, you'll never gain followers. I know you, like many men, are righteously pissed off. Despite that, you do not have any reason to so quickly jump …
/r/MensRights06/09/10 06:38 PM
0

Some crappy poem site? They seem to be spamming this shit here lately.
/r/MensRights05/09/10 11:53 PM
-1

My dick is bigger than yours.
/r/MensRights05/08/10 03:30 AM
4

While I disagree with some things you say sometimes for various reasons, this is truly an excellent piece. I applaud you. Also, when did I miss you updating how your site looks(I haven't been there in a couple of months)? It's much easier on the eyes now.
/r/MensRights01/08/10 09:57 PM
3

Yeah, it's pretty awesome. As a hardcore gamer, I agree with this article wholeheartedly. Gamers don't give a damn about what your gender is, we only care about your skill(And some of us are so skilled that we're used to winning ridiculously uneven fights against us... like 10 vs 1. Then we get called sexist from some retarded woman because of some silly insult we made to the guys we beat). Everyone gets called names by pretty much everyone else, all the time(And most of it is just banter and QQ…
/r/MensRights11/04/10 04:14 AM
1

Sorry I haven't gotten around to writing it up yet. I've got a bad cold and yesterday I hurt so much I could hardly get out of bed. :( Don't think I'm gonna get around to it in the next day or so, cause once I get better, I have tons of homework due for the week. /sigh
/r/MensRights03/04/10 07:48 PM
3

I'll mostly just explain the main events and people that drove how /mensrights worked over the history of the subreddit, and probably include the general focus/feel of the subreddit during each period. I'll write up and post it sometime tomorrow, cause today I'm sick and have lots of college classes. :( I already posted a mini-summary(Inside a post about something else that was related) of the beginning 2-3 months that focused mainly on pn6 in a post something like a month ago. I'll make a self …
/r/MensRights01/04/10 08:46 PM
9

In the beginning of this reddit, pn6 was pretty extreme in his views and rhetoric(He's since cooled off, and is posting under another account), and this reddit also drew a lot more of the extreme people. I've been here since the beginning on another account. There was quite a few events that led to this subreddit really mellowing out on the extreme views, and finally becoming probably one of the better forums for mensrights I've seen. It was more of a gradual shift from the extreme anti-woman se…
/r/MensRights01/04/10 01:39 PM
-1

Well, I dunno about the first two, because I almost get run over by some bimbo while biking on the roads to and from college at least once a week. 3 I can't speak on. 4 is true, more men are outspoken when some dumbass fucks up and almost kills someone. 5 is plainly ridiculous. 6 is true, but men are also far more likely to be the victim of violent crimes like homicide.
/r/MensRights31/03/10 08:50 PM
3

Or you can see if it's at your local library and put a copy on hold if there is one... If they don't have it, you can ask for a request and hold. Costs you nothing. But I agree with your sentiments. Can't really comment on something you haven't read, and aren't likely to be able to read soon.
/r/MensRights28/03/10 08:15 PM
1

Actually, you haven't offered a single coherent argument at all. In fact, your comments have gone so far that it's pretty reasonable to state that they're demonstrative of intellectual cowardice. If all you have to offer is name-calling and spam from multiple accounts with hit-and-run posts, that can't possibly be called an argument. You can't debate or argue with someone who has nothing substantial behind their posts.
/r/MensRights23/03/10 12:01 AM
10

Apparently, they're still spamming the same comments and links everywhere, including in this thread. Despite their comments including "intellectual integrity", they also seem to be displaying none at all in any of their comments. A ban would be nice. Edit: For the record, I've reported every single instance of these ridiculous posts. I would encourage everyone else to do the same.
/r/MensRights22/03/10 05:50 PM
2

Everyone's so incredulous because: I didn't look and I fell in. Is incredible. What this sentence displays a complete lack of attention to the world around you that hardly anyone has even experienced without the aid of mind-altering drugs, unless they were unconscious.
/r/MensRights26/02/10 06:19 AM
4

I agree with you wholeheartedly. MensRights may become more about activism in this next decade or so, but for now all we can really do is help those who have discovered how biased society and the courts are.
/r/MensRights14/02/10 08:12 PM
2

Despite my feminine username, I'm a guy. I support MR as you well know. Because we disagree on a number of things doesn't give you any right to make idiotic, broad assumptions about me. Attack the message, not the person, etc. etc. etc. Ad hominem and all that.
/r/MensRights13/02/10 09:48 PM
5

I don't find him extreme, I find him amusing and honest. His views aren't that extreme. His writing style, however, is. This is an important distinction. I didn't see anyone else talking about The Daily Show or the other articles he touched on. reddit already had a short discussion about it, and it's been getting picked up on various other fora over the past several days. The Tony Abbott post was already picked up and attacked by many non-MR people, because what he did was a stupid political stu…
/r/MensRights11/02/10 02:32 PM
15

Kloo2yoo is correct, a banhammer wouldn't help at all with the downvote bots unless you could actually catch them, and they don't comment. Also, I disagree that everything that you posted deserves to be on the front page of /MR. Porky makes some good points, however, he leans far too heavily on hyperbole and emotion himself to bring over moderates or people who aren't decided, which is who you have to argue for at this point, since MR/feminism is such a polarizing issue. As AnnArchist said: The …
/r/MensRights11/02/10 03:33 AM
6

I'd seen this comedy routine sometime last year, I think. It's still funny now. :) Thanks for reminding me about it.
/r/MensRights10/02/10 08:16 AM
3

Originally, I found the mens' rights movement(It's still a pseudo-movement, not having accomplished much, tbh), and agreed with it because of things I'd observed in society in general, and due to things I've seen in my own life. I'd also agreed because the MRAs arguments were logical and compelling, and the arguments society gave at the behest of feminism in general were completely illogical and fallacious on the whole. Several months later, I discovered that my girlfriend of a little over a yea…
/r/MensRights09/02/10 06:34 AM
3

I remember when this subreddit was new(My old account is inactive now, pretty much). You were definitely a lot more angry then. You've mellowed quite a bit since, your arguments are better all around, and this subreddit has matured nicely. :)
/r/MensRights09/02/10 05:47 AM
3

He said that this has nothing to do with men's rights and that it's an anti-women post. Dimwit didn't even read your comment before posting his.
/r/MensRights07/02/10 02:35 AM
4

You know that Jay preemptively shot down that argument about two hours ago, right?
/r/MensRights06/02/10 09:42 PM
5

Yep. She basically chooses a stereotype to play and finds people to (mis)represent for cheap laughs(and a bit of social commentary). Nearly everyone who knows this got a good laugh out of her segment. She ALWAYS finds the groups who are the most ineffective/useless to represent the group/movement, then plays on that for laughs. I thought this one was goddamn hilarious. Warren did a pretty decent job, and the things Samantha said at the support group were just funny.
/r/MensRights04/02/10 07:42 PM
3

It's still funny as hell.
/r/MensRights04/02/10 04:59 PM
5

We be hatin', cause you be trollin', trollin', trollin'.
/r/MensRights31/01/10 02:05 AM
1

Isn't there a bridge somewhere you should be under?
/r/MensRights19/01/10 07:17 PM
7

As you have gone so far as to use Trivial Objections, I no longer feel the need to be polite as I have ample cause to believe you aren't going to debate rationally. Fuck off, troll.
/r/MensRights10/01/10 01:33 AM
7

When I read that I automatically added <sarcasm></s> to it because of how you wrote it. Have an orangered and an upvote.
/r/MensRights09/01/10 10:09 PM
11

"X always" is commonly used as a replacement for "All X". Men always try to inhibit frank discussion This is a hasty generalization(And also a straw man), as men do not always try to inhibit frank discussion. It is, in fact, quite rare to see men do such. Because it is a hasty generalization, and a false one, that comment is a troll, whether or not you meant for it to be.
/r/MensRights09/01/10 07:07 PM
19

To be honest, there's no way you can view that comment as anything but a troll. It's even using the "All X do Y" fallacy(Which probably falls under Hasty Generalization).
/r/MensRights09/01/10 06:54 PM
2

Usually, when you do say such, and have the stats handy, you get a large group of people simultaneously jump down your throat while shouting as loudly as they can to drown you out, usually with the generic "OUR PROBLEM IS MORE SERIOUS, WHY CAN'T YOU UNDERSTAND THAT, [Generic namecalling]" feeling behind each argument. It's annoying as hell that when you're trying to bring another related problem to light(Yes, that is a problem and I'll help you work towards fixing it, but this is just the same, …
/r/MensRights08/01/10 12:58 AM
3

As an aside, why not link to the original article? I know that the blog gives credit to the original author, but isn't this borderline blogspam? Agreed. Especially so when the blog's color scheme is black on light blue. cringe
/r/MensRights06/01/10 05:26 PM
4

Wait wat.
/r/MensRights06/01/10 04:30 AM
6

He is an excellent writer, and even if he does tend to rant a little sometimes, he still keeps the topic firmly in view.
/r/MensRights29/12/09 10:35 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter