TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AshenCursedOne Archive

View 2 posts and 170 comments by AshenCursedOne on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Liberalism is a dead end, it fails to reconcile an aggressive capitalism with maintaining human rights and acceptable living standards. It pushed us into this neoliberal hell where social progress is non existent, apart from the ever bloat of identity politics specific legislation, and economic progress is devolving into tech feudalism where due to being lazy, safe, and lacking any actual beliefs the armies of lawyers that lead NA, Europe, and Aus have completely failed to prevent the formation …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/26 03:15 PM
5

Yeah, I don't agree with that idea either. Female violence is very often completely out in the open, the difference is that it's socially acceptable. Also women tend to think they're more subtle and sneaky than they actually are, because for decades they've been fed this propaganda that being a woman gives them some baseline emotional and social superpowers that men are not privy to. But that's also bullshit, women are just held to a lower standard, so the behaviours people find unacceptable in …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/26 02:39 PM
13

If anything most autistic women are excused for their behaviour, they're seen as "quirky" or a bit silly/goofy. Meanwhile the men become social outcasts and cast away into a corner to be kept out of sight. Sure autistic boys get more leeway in behaviour when they're little kids, but once you hit puberty and then adulthood the social perception completely flips. It's unacceptable for men to not conform to one of two archetypes, ranging narcissist or calm controlled pillar. Meanwhile women are all…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/26 07:00 PM
2

The narcissist's prayer comes to mind when people act like this.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/26 11:10 AM
6

They don't organise or plan this stuff, it's not some Illuminati shit, the people in power simply see that there's some public sentiment and they grift people, while using media to slowly twist the narrative into a more favourable one. People rarely gain power and wealth through careful planning and plan execution, most of the time they succeed through opportunism and clever marketing of ideas.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/26 04:00 PM
49

Feminism is what happened when the women of the bourgeoisie co-opted a general, and women's, worker's rights movement. Those rich powerful women used the working class women as useful idiots for shifting the issue from a class issue into a gender issue. They also used it to gain new additional privileges they could leverage against their husbands. It was genius, when the oppressed workers were on the verge of going full communist, the rich and the powerful, and the media they controlled, managed…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/26 11:44 AM
4

A very insecure fake person.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/26 11:08 AM
1

There are different types of movies with different goals, the situation you describe is an action movie scenario, it's exaggerated on purpose to make the situation appear more dire than it is and to make it more exciting. The sort of media I'm describing is drama, usually exploring characters in novels, tv shows, and drama movies. These movies often overtly magnify, almost Flanderise, the severity of emotions and reactions that characters have to traumatic events. People grow up experiencing the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/26 10:06 PM
5

Learn to read, I didn't say things are only traumatic because society makes them so, I said society overtly dramatises some traumatic events. Of course rape, assault, abuse, these are traumatic things, they're awful experiences and scar people, but in the west we create such an exaggerated mythos around certain types of trauma that what people used to be capable of handling is now completely disabling people for life, some people become entirely socially disabled and live in fear of those things…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/03/26 12:27 PM
4

This is my world Mr. Anderson! MY WORLD!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/03/26 08:05 AM
8

I've had some very shitty events in my childhood and am resilient, but I can see it in many of my very sheltered friends and some sheltered family members, they really wind themselves up into a mess at even the slightest hard situation or even interpersonal conflict. Were talking about the sort of people where the worst thing that's ever happened to them is hearing over the phone that a grandparent or a friend died. Meanwhile at 9 years old I watched my grandfather die in front of me from a hear…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/26 11:01 PM
8

Trauma absolutely is a culturally magnified phenomenon, look at how many people flippantly say that being raped is worse than being killed and they'd rather be murdered than raped. This is a completely cultural mindset, it's not based in any reality, especially that the vast majority of rape victims are not suicidal and they want to live, yet the culturally prevalent stance is that being raped must be worse than death. I find that people that have had a sheltered early life with little trauma te…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/26 10:23 PM
6

Also I'd like to add that feminism only works in countries where women already have significant social power and a growing level of socioeconomic equality with men. Feminism does not liberate women from oppression, what it does is it provides philosophical reasons and establishes grievances that are then used to exert social pressure, via guilt, to acquire further privileges for women. It only works in countries where women already make up a large part of the labour force/market, where women alr…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/26 09:32 PM
7

Feminism kind of came about tangentially to the industrial and post industrial worker's rights movements in the UK. The biggest element came from economic conditions where it was pretty much impossible for an average woman in the UK to not work as an employee, and it became painfully obvious that the social structures of the time made women into 2nd class employees. This was used by bored rich powerful women to grab some more social privileges on top of what they already had, they used the disgr…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/26 09:19 PM
22

Being obese is a mental health issue like 99% of the time, so I guess body positivity is a mental health or rather a cope movement. /s but not really /s
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/03/26 11:24 AM
1

My perspective is that the social and feminist web of lies, dishonest conjecture, and obfuscation of reality, has made it extremely difficult to talk about men's issues without unwinding that katamari of bullshit. Anyone can say: "girls in schools need extra time from science teachers because we need more girls in stem", and the seals will clap and the money will flow. But if you want to say "boys are falling behind in outcomes, grades, and higher education admission rates", and people just shru…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/03/26 11:01 AM
7

Sorry, I don't remember which subreddit had the post and link on it, I saw it like a week ago.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/02/26 05:05 PM
44

One of the male victims recently came out and said that there were much more boys being abused than the media reports.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/02/26 04:44 PM
3

It's a kind of acceptable narcissism, it's become a safe place for narcissists. One of the fundamental and obvious symptoms of narcissism is seeing oneself as a forever victim and everyone else as a conspirator, there's also a very common thing where schizophrenia is rooted in narcissism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/01/26 11:01 AM
11

Because acknowledging the inequality men face would have devastating consequences due to the decades of gaslighting, and the gaslighting based policy in governments and the private sector. It's hard to get one normal person to admit they were wrong about something they worked hard on, imagine trying to get the most corruptible, greedy, and power hungry people in the world to collectively admit many issues arise from opinion based politics around gender. They have to maintain the facade, the masq…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/11/25 02:29 PM
23

Most people can't even agree on what human rights should be. You can't be surprised people don't unconditionally support something that they haven't even thought about and is being imposed on them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/11/25 08:11 AM
4

They're not allowed to investigate this stuff anyway, if they tried they'd quickly get told off and shut down for wasting time. The issue starts all the way from the top of the leadership, where extremely privileged women pressure and condition their powerful male partners to not do anything about this stuff. These same privileged women then engage in feminist activism as a hobby and a means to further their privileges.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/10/25 11:57 AM
3

In psychology it's well known that venting does not help you long term, it gives a short term relief at best. Venting does not address your underlying feelings or traumas, it doesn't make you work through your feelings or help you understand and manage them, all it does is it lets you release them. It can very quickly become a very toxic coping strategy, it turns you into a miserable person.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/10/25 11:53 AM
6

But that's "their truth" which is much more valuable than your truth, because penises and chromosomes or some shit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/25 09:53 PM
9

That last one is crazy, it's even more absurd than the rest. The rest come from spite and bitterness, they're crazy but you can see how someone can wind themselves up into such a thought process, but that last one is outright evil and heinous.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/25 09:46 PM
9

The turn tables
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/25 09:44 PM
3

Meanwhile I'm sitting here crying in piles of Crêpes and Yorkshire Puddings.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/10/25 11:26 PM
-1

MGTOW seems born more out of spite than genuine desire to live better. Like all spiteful ideas, they can't stop obsessing over the thing they claim to not care about.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/25 12:47 PM
1

Aragorn
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/25 08:57 AM
14

I'd say, take a break, see if you really want to continue pursuing this or just got into a habit. Most importantly, do it offline, if you want real change and anything rewarding regarding advocacy, do it offline. The internet is just a tool for sharing information and for promotion, it can't create meaningful change because it's suppressed and manipulated too easily, online activism is not credible. Find local advocacy groups, volunteer in male aid spaces, participate in your local council meeti…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/08/25 09:50 AM
6

Being aam is gay, if you're gay you're gay, if you're not gay you're in the closet, tis the brainrot levels of ultra progressives.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/07/25 07:04 PM
2

"Russian", well yeah, Russia treats their people like garbage, on all levels of government. If you want to cry about how men are treated there then you need to post 1 million times about each of their casualties in Ukraine. That country is morally rotten on way deeper levels than conscription and neglect and incompetence. Their culture is based on seeing themselves as disposable. They abuse each other a lot, they're ignorant, violent, aggressive, lacking empathy. It's an entire country where lik…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/25 12:13 PM
11

The problem with feminism is that almost every belief is built on half truths, misinformation, manipulated or over fitted data, and the conclusions are always pre determined because by doctrine the women have to always be the victims. Feminism is an intellectual black hole, it's a philosophical ideology that masquerades as science and evidence based but in reality it's almost entirely feelings and opinion based. I just can't take feminists seriously anymore, their mental gymnastics and cognitive…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/07/25 10:15 AM
6

Also citing feminist scholars as anything credible is hilarious, considering they're basically just shitty philosophers that fail to even stand up to the basics of philosophical scrutiny via formal and informal logic or simple verifications of coherence and cohesiveness of their argument. Feminism as an academic film is so hilariously marred by over fitting of data, unsubstantiated conjecture, and relying on falsifiable postulates, that it is by far one of the least credible social sciences. It …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/07/25 12:22 PM
4

I've been saying it for years, if a country is refusing to abolish the draft then it makes sense to make childless women eligible for the draft. If we are forcing citizens to do stuff at least force them towards productive life choices that benefit the country. E.g. single fathers should also be not eligible for the draft. Actually, if you are not raising or at least financially supporting a child, you are eligible for the meat grinder, regardless of your sex. Even more cynical view is to just s…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/07/25 12:06 PM
16

This is my main criticism of feminism, when a popular feminist makes a claim it is treated as fact. Feminism as a social movement is not credible at any level, because almost none of its claims have any backbone in epistemic, or empirical, or logical arguments. The whole movement is built on feelings of righteousness and spite, there's not much there to look at and treat seriously, because the feminist "intellectuals" don't respect the scientific method or even the commonly accepted philosophies…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/25 07:38 AM
1

China has nukes
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/25 10:23 PM
3

There are none, only two ways to secure a nation, powerful military or sufficiently large nuclear deterrent. Pacifist types need to realise that no matter how peaceful you are there's no guarantee your neighbour will be. The ideal nation acts peacefully and does everything possible to prevent violence, but it must be ready for violence, also 99% of the time outwardly being capable of violence is enough to prevent violence, otherwise you get bullied. Military takes a long time to build up, you ca…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/25 09:45 AM
-4

Good luck, considering most non binary people and transgender people make their gender their entire personality and lifestyle, they self caricature themselves to overcompensate for their personal expression, at the cost of looking like they're clowning on themselves. The people who care the most about gender expression and freedom are going to resist such ideas the most. Most binary people wouldn't care because there's almost nothing in it for them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/25 06:43 AM
18

Man, the more I find out about suffragettes the clearer become the fundamental prejudices and gaslighting of modern feminism, and the less serious I take people that deify that movement (which usually is done by rich white women). It really was and is just a movement for rich and upper class white women to grab more political power by preying on the emotions of working class women. I'd call that strategy, pink populism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/25 04:58 PM
56

Women also vote for politicians that start wars, many wars have more public support from women than from men. Women also participate in, and also perpetuate, the cultural and social systems that lead to warfare.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/25 09:52 AM
2

Abortion and retirement age are pretty much the only gendered hot topics in Poland.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/06/25 11:14 PM
6

You're assuming men are counted under "people", that's not the case. People would still just mean "women" in their eyes. Men are not people under the current feminist majority ideology.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/05/25 02:15 PM
20

Factually true, I am a man, and I can confirm I am a bad person because I'm a man. Between twirling my moustache, oppressing women, beating my wife, and stalking women in the evenings, I simply do not have the spare time to improve my image. I'd hire a pr company but they'll probably have women on staff so it's a waste of money. I considered doing better, being more moral, but I get a cash bonus from male billionaires every time I send them evidence of myself assaulting women. I also get a salar…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/05/25 02:12 PM
4

Mental support for victims, safe space for emotional support based on shared lived experience in a very blatantly sexist society. This is true for men and women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/25 07:04 PM
6

I was snowboarding in the French alps last week, there was a bunch of unisex bathrooms, they had stalls, and in a few unisex bathrooms there even were urinals. Everyone just did their business fine. The whole bathroom shit show is more of a product of English and Christian panic and demonisation of genitalia, than it is a product of any natural cause. I've been to nudist beaches, I've been to unisex shower rooms, in Poland and Croatia, less sexually repressed nations don't panic around shared nu…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/25 07:02 PM
9

No physical feature biased ideology can and ever will result in sane outcomes. Ultimately just like with class revolutions, the goal is not to stop being the ass, the goal is to become the boot. And the masses are just useful idiots that let you reach that goal. The mentality of a feminist is not to stop gender based oppression, because that means they wouldn't have any special social power, the goal is to become the oppressors. Mostly it's driven by bitter cynical primal sense of justice, basic…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/25 02:11 AM
21

But, woman victim of emotion, man responsible for his emotion. I'm eternally baffled by feminists not seeing the irony of their abrahamic level of respect for individual agency for each sex. The speed at which they flip flop between women being basically hopeless children, and being superior to men, it's staggering. Their neurons must be emitting xrays from the frequency of contradicting thoughts.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/25 02:03 AM
17

The UN as an institution has been a complete failure, it has no capacity to enforce anything, it has become a place where bullies and dictators get equal international legitimacy as democratic nations. It is appeasement biased, it's a place where dictators go and laugh in the face of western bureaucrats. The UN is okay with bullies, that's why it's ok with the dumb shit outlined by OP, I wouldn't trust the UN with my groceries let alone social policy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/25 01:58 AM
0

You're really gonna compare "incel" to a blatant slur that has purely racist origin? You think you were cooking something with that reply? You are aware where the word incel came from, and why it developed such a bad reputation? This isn't some conspiracy to hurt incels, the word got coopted by hateful fuckers online and everyone now associates it with them. Like every socially rejected ideology, when they use words and symbols for their ideology, they corrupt those words, and some of these word…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/25 02:58 PM
41

It is a slur because it's used as a slur. If enough people use a word as a slur it becomes one. If I call every black person I see a pineapple because I don't like pineapple, I'm just a racist idiot. But if I establish a group that develops some sort of minor renown, and the members of that group also call black people pineapples, it becomes a slur. When a word has a negative connotation within a group, and is used to negatively label people, it's a slur. It does not matter if the target is offe…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/25 06:56 AM
-2

I'm gonna go against the grain here. Because this is another argument of semantics and pearl clutching about what is essentially intentional name calling. Colloquially no one really gives a shit what the original intended meaning of the word is, almost no one cares about etymology of words until they're trying to argue a point. As currently used in the common lexicon, the implied meaning of incel is someone belonging to a specifically woman hating subculture, or a woman hater in general. Whether…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/25 06:43 AM
5

I retain a lawyer and have them on speed dial every time I go on a date. I have a few pre drafted consent forms, covering any non physical flirting, physical contact, and sex. They're always on me, both physical and digital versions, to ensure maximum flexibility for my dates. If possible I also record audio and video of the entire event, this is agreed via a supplementary consent form, obligating me to the highest levels of care and data security for the other party. Finally I only have sex in …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/03/25 12:19 PM
6

Ensure there's a 3rd party witness, ideally a registered notary.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/03/25 11:57 AM
83

The problem with every echo chamber, is that eventually, it becomes extremely noninclusive, so there are no real examples of wrong think within the group anymore. With no real people around to belittle, the echo chamber begins inventing caricatures of their perceived enemies, then they start believing that these caricatures are real people, then they start believing that everyone who does not comply is such a caricature. Add to that engagement farming bots, circle jerking, and a lot of ego. You …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/03/25 03:32 PM
3

If you repeat a lie enough times it becomes a truth.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/03/25 12:41 PM
1

I often won't push back because there's no socially safe avenue to do so in most situations, and I don't trust the other men to back me up. I only push back when I respect the other person enough and think they're intelligent enough to actually listen to my pushback, and capable of retorting based on ideas and what I said not based on my balls existing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/03/25 10:23 AM
5

Nah, non hetero men have been catching strays. Mostly because it turns out that demonising people purely based on physical traits completely erases their individuality. Even if it's dressed up in behavioural ideology, it's still primarily blind hatred based on physical characteristics. Feminists never really figured out racism, they just use it as a means to an end, as a topic onto which they can project their ideas. It's the same thing that happens when Trump says he loves Mexicans, what he mea…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/03/25 08:10 AM
3

It's r/askfeminists but you might've been banned from it simply for posting on a sub they disapprove of.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/02/25 03:42 PM
11

At this point that sub is essentially an echo chamber for hurt women to hate on men based of shitty exes they had. The witch subreddit has more serious feminist discussions and takes than askfeminists
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/02/25 01:01 PM
10

It's the boogeyman word of a social movement, it can't be clearly defined because then it'd be subject to being factually refuted. It's the same for many social movements, there's always some loose boogeyman term or idea that exists mostly for the laypeople to have something to blame or be scared of. Good science requires the writer to clearly and rigourously define a noun and write against that definition. Some feminist texts do that, they define patriarchy clearly and use it as a postulate on …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/02/25 09:34 AM
17

Because feminism always was and still is a movement for privileged upper middle class and upper class women working to get additional privileges. That's why the majority of their whining and theory is so focused on trying to artificially insert women into various positions of social, academic, or economic privilege but without the level of individual responsibility that is forced onto men. Yes, men historically had easier social paths into these positions, but that's due to the social contract w…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/02/25 09:25 AM
4

Having an enemy that is a constant threat but also an easy punching bag, someone who's scary yet you don't have to respect them, any ideas who does that? Fascists. Frminism is fascist in a way, it's about a superior class that feels persecuted by those they see beneath them. It lets members feel morally superior and above others, basically, fascism makes people feel good and it lets them be shitty while feeling morally justified. This is true for all pseudo fascist movements with a persecution c…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/25 11:29 AM
44

One of the biggest scams that feminism pulled off in the 21st century is convincing everyone that medicine, psychology, and capitalist institutions in general, are biased in favor of male consumers, all based on some dubious studies, feminism biased conjecture, and the fact that early mass medicine research and trials were performed on military males, you know, the disposable class. But this research bias towards military age men has not been true for many decades. So now the fields that are fem…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/01/25 03:30 PM
26

It creates a bias where most female perpetrators believe themselves to be victims and most male victims believe they cannot be victims. How tf is anyone taking survey data extracted out of such a population seriously?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/01/25 03:20 PM
12

Ah, cults, they never change.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/01/25 10:53 PM
2

Because for the modern left anything they don't like is "conservative". Chatgpt is not biased specifically to their talking points, it's biased towards popular talking points, and the leftist dogma is too fringe for the average person. Therefore leftist rhetoric is not followed or discussed by average people, so chatgpt is less biased to the leftist ideas than they want it to be.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/12/24 06:57 PM
2

If you batter it for long enough with corrections and call out the bullshit, it just starts accepting everything you say and repeating it back to you. I've gotten it to pretty much agree with everything I say by berating it to acknowledge nuance and to not use feminist opinions as facts. But it'll always assert that my ideas and opinions are ideas and opinions, but for it to acknowledge the same for feminist rhetoric you have to prompt it to do so. You cannot meaningfully debate it because all i…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/12/24 06:47 PM
18

From the quotes and the excerpts it all reads like "the statistics do not support my bias therefore they must be wrong".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/12/24 07:33 PM
9

Feminism as it exists right now in media, governments, and western societies is not compatible with equality or facts. It's built on taking feminist philosophical musings as truth, it's a religion, it proves its own points by appealing to its own beliefs. Also feminists in all walks of life have normalized twisting of statistics, using poor science as factual evidence, and brigading anyone who challenges that poor science. Feminist Theory is illogical because there's no falsifiable theory underp…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/24 07:23 PM
0

This hyperbole is completely pointless and comically r/deepthoughts level of drivel. The purpose of the military is to enforce a nation's interest, whether that is purely defence, or includes offensive action. It's about having a stick and making sure everyone else knows that you're willing to use it. A debate about what a nation is, and where it's interests come from is irrelevant here. All the systems and social structures in the military exist not to opress men, or to appeal to men. They exis…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/12/24 10:01 AM
14

Psychology has always only cared about women's health, and while some of the findings carry over because men are human too, a lot of the shit paychologists perpetuate is outdated pseudoscience primarily aimed at women and children. That's because governments are more likely to fund help for women and children, and families are more likely to spend their money on the wellbeing of women and children. So research goes where the money goes. There's large fields in psychiatry that focus on predominan…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/12/24 05:00 PM
8

In the feminist imaginationland. You have to remember that most of feminist theory and belief is not rooted in any scientific rigour. Vast majority of feminist stances and beliefs are rooted in, and use as evidence, the philosophical writings of feminists. It's like a religion, it's a system that confirms and reaffirms itself by using its own assumptions as "propf" for further assumptions.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/11/24 06:53 PM
25

Bernie was too socially progressive to even be a classical liberal. That's why his party didn't support him, democrats have been neoliberal for decades, their number one goal is to keep the money flowing, and maybe theow in some liberal social programmes on the side as long as it does not impair the market.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/11/24 05:23 PM
29

Current progressive mainstream relies fully on the idea that there are oppressors and the oppressed, perpetrators and victims, and the latter are always righteous, including revenge. So every event they're dissatisfied with devolves into digging for the oppressor. There has to be one, otherwise the narrative falls apart. It's a process of elimination, go after each voting block that fits their philosophy as opressors. They tried blaming patriarchs, but got no response as these dudes don't exist,…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/11/24 05:20 PM
14

I see ignorant clowns happy that their glorious leader won, not contemplating the implications and consequences. I willfully ignorant idiots that refuse to introspect on why they lost, refusing to learn from their mistakes. I see hate from empowerment. I see hate from bitterness of loss. I see sexism and hate being upvoted and celebrated, regardless of the belief system. I see introspective and nuanced takes downvoted by both sides. Americans deserve each other and whatever is coming, because al…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/11/24 10:32 AM
3

I think English and particularly social sciences has hopelessly devolved into obscuring all nunace using nouns to aggregate groups, issues, concepts. It reduces both the speaker's and the audience's ability to interpret meaning and ideas behind these labels, instead we're all distracted processing our individual interpretations of these labels.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/11/24 05:20 PM
5

None, it's a dog whistle. The bar is so low that all Trump had to do was not address men directly at all, which is still more effective than shaming men like the Democrats chose to do for the past 3 elections.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/11/24 03:34 PM
3

I think that's not been true for a few months. At best it's centrist, at worst full of "hi there fellow kids" conservatives.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/11/24 03:30 PM
4

I sometimes avoid helping children just in case some unstable cretin has a meltdown. I don't feel safe around women when children are around. E.g. recently I was snowboarding and when I got off of a lift I saw the kid in front of me fell and struggled to get up with her skis, young girl, probably 11-13 year old at most. There was a woman trying to help her get up but they were struggling. I was shuffling past them and decided to help, they were causing a pileup at the end of the lift and there's…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/24 03:28 AM
4

Fascism will come back and maybe even full on return of Nazism. Last time a whole generation of young western men was left hopeless for their future they created and supported a system where they were put on top, and everyone else existed beneath them. Nazis actually lived the mythical Patriarchy TM that is currently the boogeyman of choice, you tell enough people the boogeyman exists they'll believe in him, then they'll mythicise him, and sooner or later someone will worship a version of him th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/24 01:10 PM
3

Buys are still considered children pre puberty, they're androgynous enough to get pity. But post puberty, a girl remains a girl until she's an adult, but a boy becomes a man when he's like 13, and society promptly forgets about him.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/24 01:01 PM
8

She clearly hates men, her idea of a man is such a comical strawman/boogeyman that there's no response that can unpack that level of prejudice. That last paragraph and sentence is the mask off moment. Everything before that was just a distraction and some virtue signaling. The real reason is, she looks down on men, and expresses that quite blatantly so. EDIT: Also that last sentence is pure comedy, considering trans women are doing much better socially than trans men, trans women fit in better, …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/24 12:44 PM
8

While everyone is, rightfully, having a go at you for using a garbage term like "patriarchy", and your refusal to acknowledge it's useless for anything outside of gendered hate. I have another criticism. I'm an anarchist and I intend to keep moderation and rules light handed and more focused on suggestions than on bans. Makings of a hate echo chamber. The beauty of non moderation is that it lets anyone turn any discussion into their own personal sewer for whatever their brain shits out. Also in …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/10/24 05:55 AM
5

The whole "men don't view women as people" is a projection by feminists that don't view men as people.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/09/24 11:25 AM
2

The whole single women are happier thing is a myth based on one incompetent "study" and parroted like a truth for so long that people actually believe in it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/09/24 11:23 AM
1

It's what liberalism used to be before it started being used by everyone to mean radically progressive.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/09/24 11:03 AM
28

At this point to a feminist incel = any man that does not exactly support her exact political beliefs at this exact moment in time.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/24 10:09 AM
8

That's because feminists are mostly not liberal, that's why you are not seeing feminism take hold of liberal minded women. Feminists are divided into conservative feminists and radical progressives, but all are extremely authoritarian, such ideals that do not support a liberal worldview. As an example, a liberal woman will see an immigrants as products of their circumstance, but they must be held accountable and assisted to integrate with social programs that let them work towards economic freed…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/24 10:00 AM
6

As a kid in Poland I was raised that priority always was, disabled person > pregnant woman > old person > kid > everyone else. But I've developed my own ethos as an adult; disabled person > pregnant woman > someone who appears to be physically struggling or be ill > well behaved kid > everyone else I know MRA's would cry and seethe that pregnant women and kids don't deserve priority. Pregnant woman because it's her choice, and kids, because they're barely considered people. But despite pregnancy…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/09/24 10:25 AM
1

Every time this gets pulled out is when a sexist generalization about men is made, and being justified because "until no men", then they get rebuked for sexism and get mad because they have no counter argument.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/09/24 10:03 AM
-1

Left used to mean liberal, but nowadays liberalism is the centrist view as the leftist ideology moved past it. Yes, 3 leftists together will have three different opinion but none of them will be classically liberal socially, they'll be authoritarian progressive social views, and a mix of authoritarian socialist/liberal economic views.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/08/24 01:18 PM
20

Like any conversation tainted by feminist ideology, the replies are an equivalent of asking a preacher of a Christian cult about a woman's role in life. Andrew Tate outrage and assuming every man who's in the statistic is an incel Tate worshiper. While reality is he's just a meme for the vast majority. Blaming video games and porn, classic feminist conservative puritanism. Blaming the vices as a concept, and those who engage in them, rather than focusing on the systems that drive people into the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/08/24 12:05 PM
22

The comments in there are peak feminist fiction, shit is hilarious in a dark humor kind of way. The comments are a best of, compilation of any feminist brigaded post: The slavery fantasy: actually forced pairing nearly all men working in captialism with a government gaurnteed woman was a sign of an unhealthy society and what has lead to overpopulation - this is the first time in thosuands of years women's survival hasn't relied on men and we've had control over how many children we bear - if any…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/08/24 12:05 PM
10

Seems that you are liberal, the current left is hopelessly authoritarian in the name of being progressive.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/08/24 11:11 AM
1

Ultimately, when you dig down to it with a Feminist TM, you'll find out that to the Incel = Virgin = Loser. Because at the end of the day, Feminists are a hate movement, and they love insulting masculinity, and in their collective mind virginity is feminine because the whole movement has weird conservative puritan undertones.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/08/24 01:36 PM
-1

See, you are a liberal, or maybe a socialist, but the left has achieved most of it's goals decades ago, and as any minority power that becomes a majority, they are now becoming increasingly authoritarian in an attempt to establish their own class hierarchy. Meanwhile the oligarchs are laughing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/08/24 04:12 PM
5

Patriarchy is not even a proper theory. It's just an axiom that feminism assumes to justify it's views.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/08/24 01:08 PM
10

So like most pop feminism "research" and "data" it's the usual suspects: garbage study, intentionally misconstrued data, or my favourite a straight up fantasy where ghe source is some practically fiction book written by a popular feminist. That one is my favourite, when a woman names herself a feminist, becomes sufficiently popular, and she publishes something that asserts feminist beliefs, that text gets treated as an irrefutable proof. It can be 500 pages of opinions, anecdotes, and Facebook p…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/08/24 01:01 AM
0

Nothing, Russia is uber misandrist but also so corrupt and socially degenerate that abusing women is almost completely normalised.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/08/24 12:46 AM
-1

This sub has been pretty clear in not supporting intersectionality, it's just a rebranding of the same old feminist ideas. It's to feminism what the Intelligent Design is to Creationism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/24 01:00 PM
1

This sub should've been called SociallyLiberalMaleAdvocacy or something along those lines, most people here are liberals rather than left wing progressives. In general most people turn out to be socially liberal when you actual explain to them what those words mean rather than using the right wing definition that thinks liberal = progressive leftist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/24 12:55 PM
0

Speaking of Darwinism, your average conservative has no understanding of almost any of the concepts Darwin proposed and what the scientific terminology used to describe his work means.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/24 12:51 PM
7

But most women don't want equality, they want additional privilege and institutionalized advantages.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/24 09:22 AM
10

From what I've seen in the studies female bosses tend to be harsher to female subordinates than to male subordinates. Overall both sexes judged female bosses more harshly than male bosses, but ultimately it's the female employees who felt most impacted. Also there's a hilarious shift in research bias where the older studies aimed to figure out how employees felt about female bosses, and the possible social mechanisms for their behavior. While newer studies focus on how female bosses are unfairly…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/24 09:20 AM
9

I usually see non feminists get upset over benevolent sexism as much as typical sexism, because it downplays their agency, no self respecting adult wants to be treated like a child when serious topics pop up.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/07/24 02:06 PM
9

I'll add vaping to the no smoking. How about, do not intentionally produce smells? This covers the asshole that starts eating a tuna sandwich on the train.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/24 11:16 AM
1

This has to be bait, right, right?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/24 05:08 PM
1

Yes, it's stated in the comment.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/24 02:31 PM
1

There should be, for incarceration, sanitation and changing facilities, medical profiling etc. Basically anywhere where your sex impacts who handles you or is grouped with you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/24 02:30 PM
1

My cousin, she was a promiscuous teenager that got into a relationship with a 30 year old dude when she was 14-15. He made her feel special, he groomed her, she had sex with him, from her perspective at the time it couldn't be rape, she was fully on board with it. Later this stopped when someone snitched on her and her parents and many other people found out, she was socially shamed for it, she was traumatised from the social shaming. Up unti it was all exposed she was fine. In her early 20s she…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/24 02:05 PM
1

While little children will feel traumatised they won't be feeling much different from being physically abused. It's when they hit their teens and adulthood and they contextualise what happened that's when they become even more distraught. Children start to have an idea of what sex is and that it's an adult thing, it's bad, we don't talk about it, idea of private parts, and the concepts of shame around the topic earlier than people give them credit for. A 5-7 year old may not be able to describe …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/24 12:06 PM
1

Promiscuity has no impact on how traumatizing rape is, where did that idea even come from? As a victim obviously she's gonna be even less rational than a non victim, because trauma makes people lash out and impairs objective thinking. Her feelings are valid, and I'm not invalidating that. Rape is so terrible because it's a violent act a person could not defend themselves from, and it's much more terrible because we're so socially obsessed with it that people can't move on after, because from chi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/24 11:07 AM
0

It's violating an traumatizing because loss of agency and purity. There's a reason wording of victims includes words like "dirty". The cultural standards is what makes it so much more traumatizing. Same way stuff like miscarriage and infant deaths have this massive effect of trauma and pain and distress. When just a couple hundred years ago it was just a part of life, because it was so common that being that distraught would destroy civilization. Same way cultures that are obsessed with suicide,…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/24 09:43 AM
4

This might be a hot take, but I never understood how rape or pedophilia somehow garner greater moral outrage than premeditated murder. I understand, manslaughter, and maybe a passion murder. These things are obviously more excusable and less damning than premeditated heinous acts such as rape or pedophilia. But, how come people have less outrage for a serial killer, or a career gang-banger, than they do for sexual crimes? It's the whole woman purity thing again I think. Like the swathes of women…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/24 10:50 PM
0

Thanks for being cool about my ramblings. One thing I'd like to expand on, I don't think mental disorders should be seen as something intrinsically to be fixed or wrong in a shameful way. They simply classify people who are very obviously outside norms for human thought/behavior and that internal process causes them distress in daily life. Also I think the source of the distress matters, e.g. a person with ADHD may be in distress because they struggle to achieve basic goals, while distress from …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/24 10:17 PM
4

Not a feminist so can't be a TERF. Most pro anything people nowadays are ignorant trend chasers anyway. They just ape whatever is most popular on their social media. I am aware my opinion is fringe. Not extreme enough for any group.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/24 11:47 PM
3

TERFs can fuck off because they're sexist and are using trauma as a smoke screen for vengeance and fishing for legal privileges. Trans rights? Trans people already have the same rights as everyone else. They're advocating for additional rights and protected status in a misguided attempt to counterbalance discrimination. Instead they should be advocating for better public health care especially in psychiatry and psychology, that would help the lot of them and everyone else a lot more than trying …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/24 11:09 PM
2

They already have that, they're advocating for additional rights and protected status in an effort to counterbalance discrimination.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/24 10:20 PM
26

Can't do that, because it abandons all people who don't have legal autonomy, so boys, and perpetuates the cycle of apathy. Yes, do things your own way, but you must be on the lookout for trends and beliefs that hurt men to be able to avoid or mitigate those pitfalls for men in your life.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/07/24 06:37 PM
2

Well, yeah, she grew up in a world that says it's okay to not care about men, and when they get upset some lip service is enough. Why would she think she did something wrong when men = bad?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/24 11:06 AM
11

"loyalty test" is the coverup/justification to other women, the real purpose was blackmail.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/24 09:32 AM
6

It's abuse. You are socially or emotionally manipulating your partner to get emotional or social leverage, or gratification from them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/24 09:31 AM
1

Idk why you're so pressed about this, just because I see an injustice I don't need to feel a victim of it. It's insane that from that quote you produced that reply. Not everyone has a desire to change every wrong they perceive, and not everyone is seething about these observations. I have much more immediate issues to focus myself on. I have a much more "this is annoying and bizarre" sort of attitude here than "woe is me". Idk what your stake here is, if it's to get people to take action? Being …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/07/24 12:14 AM
3

Don't be an asshole and start with the childish insults and the silly attempts at putting me down, it's embarrassing to read. It matters to me because it impacts how I am perceived by strangers, employers, medical professionals, and my government. I have my own ideas about masculinity and I do share them with people who care to listen and I distance myself from people who are dismissive and defensive. This sub is mostly currently aggregating and popularizing issues. This is not a sub of an organ…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/24 02:50 PM
3

Thanks for sharing, gonna pop that on the reading list.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/24 09:30 AM
6

Idk about the other questions, but on your 4th point, women behave exactly the same, they only invest in those with lower status than them if these people will provide some benefit, be it labor, information, or elevate their social status. In general people only do selfless stuff if they have a strong empathetic belief they feel the need to uphold, not upholding that belief would distress them. A female hierarchy would look exactly the same as a male hierarchy but their internal reasoning for be…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/24 09:29 AM
4

Yes, but sadly the masses are currently busy panicking about the patriarchy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/24 09:02 AM
9

What feminists are doing is extremely relevant to this sub. Because they spread, with full social and institutional support, harmful ideas about maleness. They also seek to legally limit male liberty, either directly or by granting women additional privileges that take priority over male liberty. People have a need to discuss that somewhere that's not a right wing echo chamber, a progressive place that's not suppressed by feminist censorship, and that's what this sub is being used for. People ne…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/24 03:26 AM
12

Read the "About" tab of this sub. It's about male advocacy, specifically left leaning, but also specifically denouncing feminism. I also don't see any irony. Because I'm talking about a widespread social panic like we've seen in the past, and stuff got pretty weird and violent then. Here the outrage is completely isolated to a tiny bubble. While the mass hysteria of PatriarchyTM is widespread, it's the majority moral outrage, womem are somehow more fearful than ever despite being the safest they…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/24 01:57 AM
9

I have never in my life met a father that would refuse to change their baby's diaper or has never done so. Is this an American thing?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/24 01:01 AM
19

That's more of a fetish or trope than a real fear people had. People are genuinely panicking about men, it's been very obvious this year.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/07/24 05:10 PM
2

Because modern left is living under the 100% with me or you're against me dogma, it's scare tactics, works like a cult, it's weird. Why do you think Hillary lost, because instead of appealing to people she shamed anyone who disagreed with her, from an outside perspective, a dumb af move. American parties are no longer divided on key issues, because one party has zero tolerance for anyone who disagrees on any issue, while the other is happy to welcome any sucker that'll vote for them. Look how an…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/07/24 05:05 PM
14

I'm the same but be honest, most men prefer slightly or significantly younger women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/07/24 01:01 AM
4

I don't support or believe in feminizm being able to or willing to achieve any sort of equality, I believe in liberalism, and a part of that belief would be policies that specifically benefit and focus on women if their liberty is at stake. But not at the cost of liberty of others. I decide on case by case, and the policy must increase the liberty of more people that it removes a liberty from, this is where I clash with feminism. Because their policy ideas aim to grant liberty only to less than …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/07/24 04:45 PM
9

Ah yes, the acceptable twin of genocide, eugenics.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/24 11:16 AM
3

Both parties in the US are extremely capitalist and corporation steered. The difference is that they disagree in how to best exploit the masses, and have different avenues for stirring up outrage. Dems are carrot, republicans are stick, but realistically they're both aiming for a similar goal, a corpocracy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/06/24 09:34 PM
6

A proper egalitarian movement would be extermely liberal, which means both right and left wingers cannot accept it, as it would disrupt their authoritarian and classist ideals.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/06/24 09:27 PM
9

Really? Every time that cesspool shows up in my feed because a topic is popular it's the same tired shit, constant whattaboutism, sexism, and shallow generalisations about men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/06/24 09:25 PM
1

Keep going
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/06/24 08:26 PM
3

A lot of women, especially young women, want to get married for wrong reasons: They may want the social status that comes with being married They may be doing it for financial security (could be a good reason if both parties are on the same page) They may be doing it for getting claim to the spouse's wealth They may be socially pressured to get married by family or culture Their partner may be pressuring them to prevent her from leaving him They want the party and the big wedding Some of these a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/06/24 10:00 AM
2

That seems horrible and all too common, also worth noting that for some reason women will put less weight and assign less trauma to sexual abuse/assault they got from other women it's so fucking bizarre. As for that last sentence, Muslims are not an ethnic group/race, don't see how supporting BLM clashes in any way with being against a religion.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/24 08:33 AM
19

I find that the crux of talking to almost any woman about my emotions is they flip it into how me having an issue is making them feel. So now not only am I not getting any support but also I feel like I have to support them in feeling bad about my issues, which pushes my issues aside. It's so frustrating and annoying that I'm enraged just writing about it, I doubt I'm gonna be opening up to women any time soon after the shitshow I've experienced last year trying to open up.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/05/24 11:34 AM
1

It's hyperbole, but it's also racism. You don't have to destroy a relationship over ideals, neither should you be forced to maintain it. Do what you want, I think it's important to try to maintain relationships with family as long as they're not detrimental to your mental health and the family members in question are non malicious.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/05/24 11:00 AM
1

You know, normal people are fully capable of holding on to relationships with people who have opposite or incompatible views. Society is built on compromise. Your mindset is one of the reasons relationships are breaking down across society, everyone is too fucking millitant and zero tolerance about their views.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/05/24 10:56 AM
4

Because the narrative is that men are bigger and stronger on average, which is true, therefore they cannot be abused as easily, which is false. Most abuse is not physical. Then regarding physical abuse men face multiple issues, no one believes them, when they fight back they almost universally get labelled as the aggresor/abuser, most men are non violent, they will not fight back unless they fear for their life and even then some will not fight back, no social support structures for male abuse v…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/05/24 10:43 AM
3

Funny that because "computer" was a job title, that people did, and yes, often it was most often done by women. In general, menial desk jobs were in majority staffed by women around that time, while men worked in physical labor or management positions, or were dying in wars. So it's very believable that a woman did most of his calculations, but we do not praise inventors and scientists for the services they hired, but for their vision. Henry Ford did not engineer his cars on his own in his garag…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/05/24 12:22 PM
1

I was going to formulate a long response but i n the end I deleted it because all these points boil down to one issue. Current popular flavour of feminism works under the assumption that women are being disproportionately oppressed by men, on a fundamental societal level, they call that "patriarchy" and "misogyny". And to justify continuously battling that bogeyman they must feel like women are superior or there's an injustice, otherwise they have no cause, the sum total of injustice must be wei…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/05/24 11:53 AM
2

I think men and women should be treated equally under law in all areas, that includes mobilization. Abolition of forced mobilization in NATO countries should've taken place a long time ago, especially in those that posses nuclear deterrent. But for many places in the world this is not feasible, because they are bordering or in range of totalitarian states that have no regard for their citizens. How do you deal with an enemy that has no concern for human rights? Showing any weakness means annihil…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/05/24 01:09 PM
0

Ofc without any solid argument you devolve into pointless name calling and more dumb statements targeted at some imagined enemy living rent free in your head and projected onto me. Don't want to be called a petty asshole? Then don't write condescending shit and don't act like one.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/05/24 11:39 PM
0

Don't be a petty asshole, you know exactly what I mean. I am not telling you what I am doing or what you should be doing, I am simply stating the obvious, you will be lumped in with bad actors by any detractors. And the solution is tedious but necessary constant reminding and disclaiming that you do not approve or associate with the bad actors. Whatever personal offense you take to that is something for yourself to reflect on.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/05/24 11:56 AM
0

You can shit talk them and distance yourself internally but to external observers that do not care that much or hold malicious attitudes towards MRM you will still be lumped in with the malicious minority. Because this is an issue of politics and politics means bad faith arguments and painting your opposition in the worst light possible. Vast majority of members of a movement have not read the source material, they are not well versed in the subject, and they are reactionaries, opportunists, or …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/05/24 11:41 AM
19

If you talk to women you'll find that most of them have stories and complaints of mostly being sexualised and or unwanted sexual advances but nothing that would realistically be called abuse if women were not told that literally any unwanted interaction with men is sexual abuse. Victims of real sexual abuse will not talk about that stuff that casually. The sort of complaints like catcalling, unwanted sexual advances, unwanted physical contact, and being objectified are things that most physicall…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/05/24 12:42 AM
0

That's impossible the same way conservatives have no avenue to distance themselves from neo nazis and leftists have no way to distance themselves from tankies. There's too much crossover issues, and any detractors will obviously judge your entire movement by it's worst members as that's politically easy and safe. Problem with fringe groups that undermine movements is that they promote and support many if not most of the issues the movement tries to promote, the issue is the approach that extremi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/05/24 12:26 AM
1

It's been obvious for at least a decade that vast majority of western women are completely detached from reality, they go well into their thirties being treated by society like children, then eventually they're forced to grow up and become resentful. In the west all these women have been hurt, the society hurt them by never requiring them to maintain the same levels of accountability and responsibility as men have to adhere to.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/24 12:04 PM
1

Been to Auschwitz recently, the guide made a point of emphasising one irrational fallacy that leads to tragedy and people being on board with hate, the enemy must both be strong and weak, they must be strong to be a threat and they must be weak so you can feel superior to them and remorseless when dehumanising them. I'm in no means comparing the tragedy of the Holocaust to misandry, I'm just saying that for a lot of people to buy into hateful thinking they need to feel superior but scared.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/24 11:54 AM
9

From looking at the comments from the author and People defending him you see that no criticism is allowed either. Any criticism is dismissed as men being oversensitive and not getting the joke, but if you have to explain the joke so much, was it even a joke? And the delivered punchline is, "struggling men should talk to each other", sure, because the best person to help a depressed person is another depressed person? Then there are the commenters who are simply cheering this on, because every m…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/24 05:09 PM
1

I wish.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/04/24 01:38 PM
2

Are you aware of something similar in the UK but not focused on male suicide? It's hard to tell but I don;t think I'm struggling that hard, and I feel like my issues would be too small for how serious that sounds. I had a bit of a mental break end of last year and can feel a similar breakdown brewing, I am struggling to pursue a private therapist as it's so hard to trust the practice to take me seriously, and the horror stories of how some men get treated by therapists. I don't trust the NHS to …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/04/24 01:10 PM
1

I'm unfamiliar with that youtuber but if you have a video title or link that'd be very helpful, with the current trend in titles and thumbnails it's pretty much impossible to find out what the video is about without watching it. And a lot of her videos are long.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/04/24 10:45 AM
1

I meant rhetoric as in general discourse, where competitive is often treated as implying uncooperative. Which is false. Competitiveness often incentivizes opportunistic co-operation.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/24 01:49 PM
3

Doesn't matter what "type" they are, because the ones in media and the ones making up the ideals are overwhelmingly misandrist. The egalitarians are still influenced by the rhetoric coming from the media, and the top feminists, and egalitarians still perpetuate and defend sexist myths. I don't think there are groups. It's like with any ideology, there are those in charge making up ideas, and those who subscribe to these ideas. But feminism is a one party system of politics. You know by what crit…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/24 01:21 PM
2

My favourite part of the men being competitive rhetoric is that somehow men still end up doing better in some team work studies. Because the smartest way to compete is making allies and climbing the social ladder.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/24 11:57 AM
1

When you grow up being told you are the villain there's only so many paths to take. You can try being a victim, basically incels, the movement, rather than the literal definition of the word. You can become the villain and be proud of it, red pill shit. You can become one of the good ones, guys OP mentions. Or you can disagree and move on, like everyone else. Obviously only the last 2 options let you be any sort of good guy, and most people want to be the good guy. Also we can't underestimate th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/24 11:55 AM
1

You just have to do it in a genuine good faith way and it only works when you are generally liked. I find that when women that like me are receptive to pointing out sexism against men. When you hear casual sexist remarks against men don't get all defensive, don't start an argument, and don't let yourself be belittled. You have to appear genuinely distraught by the remark, show disbelief and disappointment. Anger, arguing, sarcasm, sassy remarks, etc. won't achieve anything because men standing t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/24 11:32 AM
2

You know, for the amount of shit I hear from women about how terrible child birth is and the perpetual myth of "women better at handling pain because childbirth"; I sure do also hear a lot of moaning and drama and being incapacitated from the same women at pains that I consider minor or not serious enough to keep mentioning or incapacitate me when they happen to me. Stuff everyone experiences regardless of their sex: burns, bruises, cuts, scrapes, joint over extension, muscle soreness, headaches…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/24 11:16 AM
4

There is a weird type of discrimination against men, where many women, and some men, only contextualize men's issues or emotions in the scope of how it impacts women. E.g. I cut a conversation short after being personally attacked in a debate. And now I am the bad guy and am expected to apologize because I made her feel bad, because she's sad that she thought she upset me. Or I tell some personal issue to my mother, and I now have to console her. Because it makes her feel sad and she feels like …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/04/24 01:52 PM
2

Apex fallacy and relying on the oppressed/oppressor mechanic makes the movements extremely analogous, also both movements seek to gain economic parity without acquiring the same economic responsibility. Finally both movements are very conservative when it comes to their opinion of what the role of the oppressor should become.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/04/24 12:45 PM
1

No, simply because there are many feminists who don't support LGBT issues and the world's Black communities are blatantly homophobic or at the very least LGBT averse, that includes Black communities in majority white western countries. These are separate issues and often the activists cross paths or support multiple causes when it comes to progressive politics but the core goals of these groups are different. LGBT is unique in that at it's core it's not as hypocritical as Feminism or Black Right…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/04/24 01:10 PM
1

I have a very diverse group of friends both culturally and politically, and it looks to me like over the past 3 years everyone is becoming more and more moderate. As my friend group ages and people are becoming older the women are developing more empathy towards men and recently it's becoming easier and easier to get them to seriously talk about men's issues. At the same time the men who were more liberal are becoming more centrist as they are clearly getting tired of being villainised, and the …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/04/24 12:30 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter