TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Asriel-SIU Archive

View 0 posts and 77 comments by Asriel-SIU on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

Relationships have become too tiresome, it seems. When this phenomenon gains in popularity, it will become appearant that children have become a commodity.
/r/MensRights24/03/24 10:58 AM
32

This guy is nuts for women I get what you mean, but for others who may not, Gabriel Attal, the French Prime Minister, is gay. I believe what OP means is that he, and others, are victims of the "women are wonderful" effect to such an extent that they would never take some time and think about making valid advances to men's rights linked to abortion as well.
/r/MensRights05/03/24 07:05 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1auktc2/an_honest_look_at_the_gender_pay_gap/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button The Korn Ferry Pay Index, calculated on data from 12.3 million employees across 14,284 companies in 53 countries find that, between a man and a woman, for the very same job, the paygap is 0.5% (in the same company, at the same function)
/r/MensRights05/03/24 04:52 PM
26

As generations and time advance, online discourse influences people's real lives outside of screens more. Thus, Gen Z suffers more from harmful feminism as they live more online, and as they're younger, lack the ability to dissociate themselves with what they read/hear, if that is even possible past a certain point of saturation where every adult/girl tells you you're essentially an evil predator.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/02/24 10:08 AM
4

Duh seems logical to me. Everyone saying you're doomed to be violent, a pervert/anything bad, just because you're a guy is depressing.
/r/Male_Studies10/07/23 01:19 AM
1

You also see a lot of guys complaining online about their situation. But IRL, you won't be bothered by it. Women want to stay alone, they ask and they receive.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/23 05:25 AM
3

Its easy to see what causes it. The more education and options to control birth for whatever reason women have and this all comes with economic development, the birth rate craters. While it is true, does that imply your solution would be to tank women's education and their access to careers? No, the documentary presents another cause for that. The cause being the difficulty of bring financially secure, which pushes women down their long careers. They want to be financially independent and who wo…
/r/MensRights21/05/23 05:12 AM
20

And is it an unrealistic prediction that there will be an opening of many economic opportunities once the older wealthier generations peacefully passes away? Unless their riches are redistributed to society at large, which is something that even the most socialistic countries among the western democracies do not dare to do, then no, there is no hope. All this accumulated wealth will be passed down to their descendants, maintaining this plutocracy we live in.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/05/23 12:02 PM
30

Does this fact not offer a glimmer of hope? Millenials, Gen Z, and Gen Alpha men and women will harbor more sentimental and less materialistic values than the previous generations. This is a luxury belief. You can only "free" yourself from attachment to "material values" when you're properly materially comfortable. You don't see the poor talking about "materialistic values". Plus here, I'm not talking poorer as in "consuming less". I'm talking poorer as in "difficulty to find housing" or "diffic…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/05/23 08:34 AM
41

I personaly believe that capitaism might play a role: rising wealth inequality, longer working hours, To me, it is obvious that capitalism plays a role in this. This friend crisis is also a crisis of purpose for men. Capitalism is devoid of purpose beyond greed (wealth accumulation). Everything is pricier everywhere in the West (western democracies, not just the US), and wages do not keep up. The job market sucks, working culture is toxic. Our current generation will be poorer than the previous …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/05/23 07:29 AM
6

Every action you take or refuse to take in life is by definition the result of a choice, no matter what fancy word psychologists like to call it. That is basic definitions. Now, I can get that some choices are heavily stacked against you, so much so that it's "do or die". But at the end of the day, the resulting action is tve result of a choice, no matter how unfair. A choice doesn't have to be fair nor free. Few are in life. The essence of current society especially in consumer economics is to …
/r/MensRights16/05/23 11:10 PM
5

Abandoning is a choice. Every decision is. The reality is what it is and it won't change to allow everyone to pursue relationships. Don't deny it just because they have given up due to very real circumstances. Abandoning is chosing to remain single, despite not chosing it because said person wants monkhood or something.
/r/MensRights16/05/23 10:04 PM
11

As weird as it may seem to you, yes, there are men who choose to remain sexless. They are a minority but they exist. Not saying the whole 63% are. Not saying most of the 63% are. However, a growing number of men do actually choose not to date because the "game" isn't worth it anymore. When society tells you you're just a potential rapist and predator, that you don't have the profile to be attractive, and all the other depressing reasons that exist to push men away from dating.
/r/MensRights16/05/23 05:15 AM
32

First, the 18-30 stats, women just date guys aged 30+ who make more money. There never was a problem for women in this category. Besides, I have to highlight what you said too. If they (us men) choose to remain single, well it's no problem isn't it? Feminism is all about choice after all. If they prefer porn over women? Well, feminism is all about acceptance of sex work is it not? Even if most men would prefer real meaningful dating and sex over porn, it's our freedom to prefer one over the othe…
/r/MensRights15/05/23 08:56 PM
29

I have been shamed by my mother for liking videogames as a teenager lol. My father never shamed me for having "childish" pastimes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/23 09:17 AM
25

My central point is that there are issues that we can and should discuss and raise awareness I mean, it is true that "toxic masculinity" is a buzzword which generates well... buzz. But it doesn't prevent people in our circles, especially here with people like TinMen blog, to be aware of such problems. So we are aware of it. As for the broader society? Try and spread those messages if you dare. By trying to deconstruct the feminist liberal myth of male patriarchal oppression on women, you are lit…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/23 12:08 PM
-17

I feel like as much as society at large seems to hate sexless men, and complain about ways they perceive them to behave I don't know, I agree that it is a pervasive expectation in society that men must have sex and relationships past a certain age (old virgin men are shunned by women and men alike, but especially women if they try to enter relationships), but I don't really agree with the fact that society hates them out loud. Recently, we have seen, what, 1 or 2 articles made by extreme left-le…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/23 11:53 AM
2

I wanted to highlight the fact that since men still earn more than women, the inequality is swept under the rug. I guess it's only when men wil start earning less than women (which, at this rate, is only a matter of decades), then we will see some changes.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 09:14 AM
1

I know a woman who settled down and had kids at 24 and it was considered "weird" how young she was. Many people said she settled down too soon and that she could have spent more years "enjoying life". That's crazy because 24 is not that young and 50 years ago it was considered perfectly normal to have kids at that age. It's true that today, a woman settling down at 24 is considered "weird and young". But taking society as it was 50 years ago as a reference for normality is not a good example. 50…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/23 11:33 AM
3

I don't know about other dudes, but I have never been in a relationship. Never been that social too. From my (arguably isolationist) perspective, there is absolutely no pressure on men to get with a girlfriend. Sometimes my mother tells me to find a girlfriend, but that topic just disappears when I rebuke her. I mean, I'm 25, I have never been a seducer, I won't start now lol. ​ What I will say is that I honestly believe that most single men would be better off pursuing self-improvement and self…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/23 10:41 AM
3

While we're on the topic, viewing dating and human connection as a market is not just fucked up morally, it is actively detrimental to your success. It is not a matter of internalizing it or not. With dating apps, commodification of dating is a reality, whether you acknowledge it or not. If you unironically use terms like 'high value man' you are sabotaging yourself. I do not see myself as a high value man. Doesn't mean they do not exist. Female hypergamy is fact. It implies the existence of hig…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/23 07:27 AM
–

Older women actually do have trouble finding mates. Especially career driven older women. The documentary "Birthgap" by Steven J Shaw showcases the struggle of women in their 30s or 40s wanting to find a mate, start a family, and cannot anymore, due to several circumstances, one of them being that they waited too long.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/23 11:29 AM
–

60% of men aged 18-30 are single, contrasted to only 30% of the women in the same age bracket. Several solutions to this paradox - some women date the same guy (happens, but not that much) - most women in this age bracket date guys aged 30+ 2nd explanation makes a lot of sense because women search for status, which includes economic safety and revenues. Men aged 18-30 are figuring shit out, not making 6 figures income. Men aged 30+ are more likely to do so however.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/23 11:21 AM
–

Depends. Slut shaming is something both men and women do to women. But I would say that it is mostly women. It is intrasexual competition to do so afterall. Men who shame them are jealous/conservative religious people. Men shame older women who date younger guys, and women shame older men who date younger girls. I don't really get why. The second case will become a lot more prevalent in the years to come anyway. Better become acquainted with it fast.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/23 05:51 AM
6

Isn't it "single and childless"? I heard something like it in Chris Williamson's podcast. But yeah, dating dynamics and economic reality just push men and women apart. Both sexes want financial safety, children are a financial risk. While being in a couple makes living easier at a microeconomic scale (2 revenues, costs are not multiplied by 2), dating market dynamics and feminist culture finishes off people getting together. 50% of men aged 18-30 are not looking for a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/23 06:46 PM
11

Writer of the article: "These men are TOXIC, but huh, sometimes, toxicity helps. Maybe they're not toxic..? Yeah, no, who am I kidding?"
/r/MensRights18/04/23 04:17 PM
7

Society is still not used to the idea of people not wanting children so we shame men and women who do not want kids Is it public shaming, or private shaming? I see it more as a private, and generational thing. Older people in the family, like parents/grandparents, shaming the person because they don't want relationship and/or children. In public, well, no one will take the extra step to blame you. And people on the internet are way more open to this kind of attitude, aren't they?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/23 09:38 AM
1

For men, a crisis of meaning, of hope. For women, further disinterest, and more childlessness. Men are retiring from the labor force because the game is not worth playing anymore. They have also lost all hope when it comes to dating, because while dating apps were made to facilitate relationships, it actually made them harder, displaying everyone's characteristics like they're items for sale, and reinforcing women's choosiness (which is their right, no doubt about that, it just screws men and re…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/23 09:48 AM
1

Status and beauty (when evaluating women) can change based on culture. There are slight nuances in terms of what is desirable in differentultures. Some may value women with certain physiques over others but I would agree that in the west the same attributes are what people seek across the board. True, but that has its limits. There have been movements to promote "plus size women" in the US. Do you think that made these fat women more popular to men? It didn't. Simply because biology affects us s…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/23 09:19 AM
1

Different sectors of society have different definitions for what makes someone “high value” What do you mean by "sectors" of society. I believe that in our current ultracapitalistic society, men's value to women is kind of the same everywhere, barring cultural nuances, but those are very few and far between, and do not distract from the greater picture. Basically, a man is worth chasing if he is as rich, or richer than a woman, tall (very important), and moderately handsome (least important, bec…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/23 08:51 AM
1

Women are not attracted to personal power. They're attracted to status, which is societal power. It is the power perceived by women and other males in a given group. They're attracted to the top dog, not the strongest one. Being handsome is only one requirement of male status. Socioeconomic status is as important, if not more. How many women are willing to enter relationships with older, sometimes more, sometimes less attractive men?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/23 08:42 AM
2

A lot of Red-pill content says that women are attracted to men that don’t need them and can walk away as it conveys “higher” value. Women are attracted to men with status. Status changes with societies. Nowadays, it's looks and riches. These men (minority of men) are highly sought out by a majority of women, at least on dating apps. Dating apps are not the entirety of the dating market, but they represent a significant portion, hence making it hard to ignore. As for the rest, it's just nonsensic…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/23 08:27 AM
3

The solution that is "bringing women down" is not really something that should be wished for, in my opinion. We should aim to bring men back up alongside women, rather than bringing women down.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/23 07:10 AM
1

Yes all boys are different but just like men and women, they are more similar than different.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/23 03:05 AM
2

It is already gendered by the way it works. It calls forth qualities like "focus" or the "ability to stand still during long times" which are easier for girls than boys. Working to make an education more adapted to boys IS necessary. Unless you want boys and men to become bigger and bigger idiots with every generation.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/23 03:04 AM
19

And contrary to popular (feminist) belief, neither is better than the other. Just because males tend to have overt conflict rather than covert does not mean women have no capacity for violence, which they absolutely do. Which feminism absolutely denies in favor of making men the source of all ills in the world.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/23 02:53 AM
6

I’m not making this post to shit on men for their preferences. I’m just bringing to light that there is definitely an inverse AF/BB for women. A similar pattern exists for men being the safe choice or "2nd choice" for women as well. It's where the "alpha and beta" bullshit (which, depending on how it is defined, suddenly is not such bullshit anymore) comes from. You’re chosen because you’re convenient and reliable. You’re the safest option. Not the most desirable option, just the safest. You’re …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/23 02:46 AM
31

I mean, as the world advances in time, the worst it will get, for men, and for those who stand up against this state of things. I myself do not have the courage to stand up and even say anything, because you would be looked at like you're an alien. The feminist propaganda of a world dominated by men, for men, at the expense of women is so strong, that saying otherwise makes you a pariah.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/23 01:49 PM
8

I came here to debate around interesting ideas, but I am a tad disappointed about the lack of nuance and depth in the topics discussed.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/23 04:51 AM
0

Men and women generally speaking have been socially conditioned to use each other, in one way or another in their relationships Sometimes it is conscious, sometimes it is not, but yeah. ​ So through out history, men have used women for their bodies and women have used men for their resources, and this is still common today. Yes, because men are biologically enticed to spread their genes with as many partners as possible, while for women, the cost of pregnancy requires a faithful partner willing …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/23 11:37 AM
12

So, this post is all about how fatherlessness is bad for children and especially boys. Are we going to talk about the elephant in the room? I do not know the percentage of families broken down because the father is a deadbeat dad, and I do not doubt it is significant. But can we really ignore the dissolution of the "traditional" family? Let us be very clear. Gay people are free to marry and adopt children and raise them. It is a good thing for society. For children, it will always be better to b…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/04/23 03:01 PM
3

Now of course Conservative men are more likely to view bad men as "not real men" little boys, or not masculine at all. What do you mean by "bad men"? I guarante you both a Feminist or Conservative would agree with the narrative that women should be protected True, there is this "we need to protect women" instinct in humanity. But in the details, feminism say that women needs protection from men. Not protection by men. Feminists essentialize men as all violent and power-hungry, like we're all pot…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/23 08:11 PM
3

No, men as a whole do not have privileges. We live in a capitalistic society. The ultra rich have privileges, be they men or women. Go ask the homeless men if they're privileged. The idea of a patriarchy in and of itself is the height of stupidity and another "useful idiot". The real struggle is between economic classes, those who abuse their power by throwing their money at the laws to bend them.
/r/MensRights09/04/23 05:55 AM
4

En route to Mediocracy.
/r/MensRights07/04/23 06:04 AM
2

So I guess the problem is that people have trouble accepting the expansion of our definition of masculinity without pushing for a complete alteration of masculinity? No, what I am saying is that masculinity is already more multi-faceted than what feminists tell you. That feminists carry in themselves dangerous ideas, that they sometimes are aware of, and sometimes not. When they do not, they just have a vague idea that "education" would change little men for the better. It's funny because if we …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/23 04:46 AM
7

So is part of the solution to change our ideas about masculinity to include sensitivity and vulnerability? That's what feminism already tries to do, and fail, because at the end of the day, they date the top 20% most hyper masculine men on dating apps and regret it afterwards. Because at the end of the day, you cannot force attraction. Attraction is rooted in both culture and biology, you can't make it exclusively cultural, as we have discussed earlier in the thread. And while I agree with you t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/23 03:33 PM
0

But is there a reason to believe it's settled and will never change? In our timeframe? Yes. In your children, grandchildren's timeframe? Yes. In a thousand years? It might change. In tens of thousands years' time? It may change. Our biology not changing as fast as our technologies and social conducts is an established fact. A fact that corporations have deeply noted and exploit the hell of to make us addicted to stuff. The best example of that is the concept of attention economy, which concerns …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/23 11:48 AM
4

I don't think that's the right conclusion. It's an evolutionarily developed instinct to secure the best mate to provide for her offspring. I will be called names and stuff ("call to nature" I think the sophism is called), but I totally agree with you. It literally is a case of "it's natural" and there's nothing you can do about it, and judging it on a moral standard is stupid. It would be the same as saying "natural selection is bad". Hypergamy is not good or bad, it just is.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/23 09:27 AM
9

Came here to add that I've seen/heard plenty of cases of self-identified feminists that openly admit they simply aren't attracted to men that aren't traditionally masculine. If you have any sources, I would be interested in having a link, if you would. I remember on a french sexuality podcast a listener that asked "why am I only attracted to very macho men. I'm a feminist, one of my main focus is to help society forgo toxic masculinity nad give birth to more sensitive men, yet I am not attracted…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/23 08:40 AM
36

The scientist will explain these women's choices as their instincts but don't you think according to the time you need to change? Men's preferences for physical attractiveness and women's preference for higher status or hypergamy (more revenue, in today's world), is never going to change. This comes from the deep recesses of men and women's minds. It is their mating strategies, honed through thousands of years of choosing, and obeying instincts as old as mankind itself. Which is why feminists wa…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/23 04:46 AM
23

This is social engineering and propaganda targeting vulnerable minors. No one tells little boys at school to be bad to girls. On the contrary. This is a legitimate feminist threat. They all suggest "we do something about it" from a young age.
/r/MensRights04/04/23 04:45 AM
13

Current toxic feminism that lashes out against men is just liberalism and capitalism's latest "useful idiot". If you think about it, it is capitalism which profits the most out of everything feminism has accomplished, and what its current degenerate form continues to do: split men and women apart so that instead of being united together, they fight against one another. Divide and conquer. With that backing, feminism became the only right thing to say. Thus, in public spaces where you don't know …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/23 04:33 AM
13

It is about status. If you showcase weakness, you kill any illusion of status you display and lose any attractiveness you may have had in the eyes of women. Furthermore, if you are surrounded by men who are not your friends, of course they are going to take the first opportunity to bring you down so that they in comparison, look "good" in front of women.
/r/MensRights02/04/23 05:10 PM
8

I’m anti-patriarchy, because patriarchy negatively affects men and women. Patriarchy is, essentially, the set of rules that says men do this, women do this, men are this, women are this. And this set of rules is extremely dangerous for men. So you presume that there are people out there disseminating subliminal rules for men and women to follow? Where does that start and where does that end? Your definition is very murky, and poorly explained. Patriarchy remains a catch-all term. Do you count bi…
/r/MensRights01/04/23 01:23 PM
15

With feminism having a backlog of academics doing all sorts of research going in their direction, sometimes it feels like reality itself backs up their claims. With men lacking such institutions and support, it is logical that we would have very little data to argue back when necessary. I refuse to believe that reality is as simple and black and white as feminists describe it to be.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/03/23 04:31 PM
11

This is certainly a useful post when a feminist accuses men of not seeking help, or that male suicide is somehow due to "toxic masculinity". Thanks for making those. Shows that just as society abuses women, it ignores men's pleas for help.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/03/23 03:15 PM
3

You seem a tad idealistic to me. Starting with raising awareness raising awareness doesn't necessarily lead to change. At all. One of the biggest points of my comment is that culture changes a lot faster than nature. You cannot change the biases that we inherit from biology and evolution. You cannot give men, in a society with both men and women, a value other than the work and resources they provide. Men are built to work, to provide, and to protect. They are on average, all more physically str…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/03/23 07:10 PM
1

Mattering is an interesting concept, and I think you’re missing acritical piece. Women don’t necessarily “matter” more but rather areinherently valuable. The difference being that women are traditionallyseen as goods whereas men are seen as actors. This is very correct. A lot more than I could put it in my words. But I would disagree with "actors" for men. Yes, they have more "agency" than women (for all it's worth, which really depends on the struggle you're facing in your daily life - some pre…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/23 04:27 PM
28

Men deal with so much bullshit. From high rate of early deaths, suicides, and homelessness to laws that don't even protect us from sexual assault. Feminists act like I was going to enter this world of extreme privilege and all I did was enter a world with unique issues. As a transmen, you saw the problems of both genders. Women deal with a lot of shit. Men too. Women's issues tend to come from the tradition of a society where men have power, and abuse it. Men's issues come from the fact that mos…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/23 01:32 PM
14

Since peterson's been back on the benzos, he's been pretty unhinged tbh There's stuff to like, and not to like. But I do not agree with the "unhinged" part. ​ Peterson's seems to be a nebulous sorta 'western values' are underattack, 'wokeness' is the great threat to civilisation, somethingsomething cultural marxism If we both do not cherrypick, I will agree that he says that. But he also says a lot more relevant stuff. Showing that boys in academia, and pretty much everywhere struggle, that ther…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/23 01:02 PM
45

In typical New York Times fashion, they put Jordan Peterson and Andrew Tate together. As if they were a similar kind of influential figure. They're not even remotely the same. It's insulting without using insults.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/23 07:55 AM
49

there are unique issues to be analyzed for groups of people at the intersection of their identities that can't assessed from each of the components of their identity separately. Intersectionality also defends that people who do not fit the special profile of the oppressed category cannot talk for them. For instance, only a black transgender man can talk and defend the point of view and share his experience as a black transgender man. And no one else. Yet, the staunchest, and most numerous defend…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/03/23 01:49 PM
2

Sure, but ending the analysis there dismisses a lot of nuance. The kind of nuance that has existed throughout our history and which continues to exist in some countries is well-known to everyone. I don't think OP is trying to avoid it on purpose, simply because it's not a true counterargument to the claim that "women have a fundamental reproductive advantage, and a real power over men in that particular domain, being the sexual marketplace". ​ But OP's stated goal is to apply Marxist thought to …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/23 09:50 PM
5

The means of reproduction do not end with the female reproductive organs, or any reproductive organs since reproduction does not end at birth but continues on into adolescence and arguably beyond. Yes it does. Reproduction is giving birth to a new generation of a given species. Bringing up children is not part of reproduction, it's another step entirely. Education, whatever you want to call it. Women and men have both traditionally experienced numerous restrictions as to who can they reproduce w…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/23 09:10 PM
32

This is a fantastic post. This post and subsequent theory also underline one very underrated problem in both feminists and the left today. Online, and in the street, you can see a lot of men and women telling you that if you go too much in-depth with this topic, you think that "men are entitled to sex" or that "your only focus is to get laid, and people don't act with sex in mind all the time". The left hates evolutionary psychology, which is the discipline this theory belongs to, or can be easi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/23 08:56 PM
1

The reason men are drafted and not women simply has to do with male disposability. Women are more necessary to the survival of a group than men are, simply because of how reproduction works. Add to the fact that men are biologically better suited to fight, and this is why men are drafted and women are not. Men and women are more similar than they are different, but these differences are crucial.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/23 08:01 AM
1

I don't get your point. What are you answering to?
/r/MensRights01/03/23 07:25 AM
4

I agree with the sentiment, man, but you're torturing yourself, by reading this kind of shit magazine that no one except its devoted audience reads. It does not represent an opinion that is shared in the majority of society, by men and women. It's just a piece of garbage written by some person on the verge of unemployment hoping for easy buck. Men and women in society do not complain about the other sex's presence, or lack thereof on the dating market. People only care about their small sphere o…
/r/MensRights28/02/23 03:00 PM
9

Is it? Youtubers, Instagrammers, and other influencers know that they have an audience, they just don't know them personally. Sounds like CamGirls to me. It's not important, just me arguing definitions and terms here, but to me, parasocial is adapted to this context.
/r/MensRights27/02/23 10:20 AM
3

I mean, you can get rid of feminism by replacing a population which adheres to its principles by one which doesn't. But at this point, feminism has left nothing in its wake, since the old population has disappeared. And that's only if we consider feminism as the sole responsible for the mating crisis, which it is not. Complex problems do not have simple solutions.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/02/23 08:32 AM
9

TL;DR : It's the same left-leaning, feminist garbage that dismisses men's problems, assumes that men and women want the same things the same way. That there is no real problem. After all, if there are less couples, no problem, there is immigration. I have no problem with immigration. But when the population that comes from immigration faces the same problem as the current population does now, what then? It is a global phenomenon. Just look at Japan, for instance, which was the 1st country in the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/02/23 05:53 PM
12

Same situation as you. It also concerns me when I finally decide to search for companionship, if I do one day. Society usually doesn't care whether or not you get laid, but prospective partners (women) kind of do. A part of them at least, given the number of testimonies told by virgin men rejected because they were "too old to be virgins" basically.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/01/23 09:12 AM
57

Thing about the patriarchy argument has always been incorrect. It's an essentialization of men as one. Even though the men on top, who dictate society, have no interest at all in uplifting men below them. Knowing men's intrasexual competition, it should be the opposite, in fact. For the very little sexual instincts & behaviors influence these successful men's decisions. Everyday men do not benefit from societal structures. Rich people, powerful people, do. But it's always the same topic we talk …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/01/23 08:16 PM
35

I really like one of the sentences pronounced by Williamson on the topic of toxic masculinity. He says that toxic masculinity is a catch-all term, that is made to surround any and all expressions of masculinity. So much so that it can be compared to the original sin. As if being born a man was being born as this fallen creature bearing a sin in themselves that they could not do without, a tainted being. Some might think that he is exaggerating with this comparison, but I think that if you take t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/01/23 01:10 PM
2

The video is good because the pictures it dresses about the problem is accurate, but it's true that he doesn't give a whole lot of solutions, good or bad.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/01/23 01:00 PM
1

You're right. But with all the cases of violences against women, rape, the 2 World Wars in the last century, I get the feeling that men are being thought more and more as "devils/beasts" to be tamed. Individuals who are inherently bad, rapists waiting to be discovered, etc. What I mean by that is that listening to most feminists, we men are always oppressing by virtue of existing. As someone who has never been in a relationship, nor has had many women friends, I find it quite sad to hear such di…
/r/MensRights11/11/22 02:56 PM
14

It's true. Nowadays, masculine ways of doing things, of behaving, is seen as bad, while the way women do things should be applauded and become the norm. Men have lost their role models and there is nothing to replace them. Women are not changing to help men change as well, simply dictating that men have to change and that's it.
/r/MensRights11/11/22 10:42 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter