TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Aston77 Archive

View 0 posts and 20 comments by Aston77 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Don't subscribe to the doom culture. Such statistics are most likely made up or out of context.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/23 01:43 PM
2

High earners are not left behind, most of them just choose careers over relationships. So they are single by choice. And less and less women need a provider, so a relationship is no longer important for their very survival. And the hot waitress you are talking about is not to be chosen. She’s the one choosing because she surely has a lot of men to choose from.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/22 11:19 AM
5

Most people out there don’t know and never heard of the RP/Manosphere. Women nowadays have higher standards and ask for more from their partners because they are in a better socioeconomic position than at any other point in history.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/22 06:55 AM
1

“After having kids with the 30 year old woman” that’s the dumbest thing I have read on here.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 04:22 PM
3

You can't build relevant statistics on 4 answers
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 05:05 AM
0

I'm in a relationship now and I want to be single again. When I was single I wanted to be in a relationship...
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/22 11:15 AM
1

They are making money out of it. And money is always a great incentive
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/22 11:15 AM
1

Not being physically attractive is a deal breaker for both sexes. You wouldn't want to date a fat woman with an ugly face no matter how much of a great personality she has. Having great traits, an exciting lifestyle and interesting hobbies will greatly improve your overall attractiveness level, as long as you meet that minimum threshold for looks. And it applies to both men and women
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/21 02:53 PM
4

Aparently looking for an unmarried man between 35 and 50, only 5’6” (well below average for US), who’s not obese and making a mere 35k/year (well below average) puts a woman on 3 out of 5 on the delusional scale and makes her an aspiring cat lady, having less than 10% chances of meeting such a man. how’s that so? as those requirments are not even by Red Pill’s standards high. In fact those standards are below average
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/21 05:14 PM
5

Using accurate statistics in a misleading way is an old trick in TRP handbook. or politics in general
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/21 06:17 PM
7

A woman won't get alimony from a guy earning the same or less than her.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/21 11:18 AM
10

Then why would the low income men are at the highest risk of divorce? If women are interested primarily in money? Those men don’t have much to offer in alimony payments
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/21 09:16 AM
12

Yeah, I don’t know about that. Considering divorce rates of roughly 50% in the U.S. with women initiating roughly 80% of those divorces, it means 40% of women are not happy with their marriages
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/21 06:37 AM
1

No they are not. In fact most of them are just as good as your average Joe and well above this dreaded bottom. But they have a tougher than usual time with women because they get in their own way and fail to see their own worth which makes them act in less than attractive ways towards women. So the odds of getting rejected sharply increase.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 05:54 PM
8

yes but sometimes that woman who's asking for a taller than average guy who's earning more than the average Joe is herself a 4'9" bum working a minimum wage job and average looks at best. So she'd be a solid 5 yet she's not open to date a guy who's a 5 as well. That's what people here mean by unrealistic standards because frankly such a woman would indeed have unrealistic expectations and an over inflated view of her self worth.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 05:42 PM
14

Yeah, but those are not the standards people here are complainig about. The issue is that these traits you have listed don’t matter at all because women will screen guys on criteria like height, physical appearance and paycheck long before the traits you have listed are even remotely relevant. Hence your own observation and the common complaint around here that women go out with guys that treat them horribly. So it’s not because “they tend to accept men who are really low on these benchamarks” i…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 02:05 PM
0

point me to one of such studies. “hypergamy” is probably something the women would do if they could more so than what they are actually doing. And it probably applies to men as well. If I could I would very much date Megan Fox. If my girlfriend would be able to she’d probably date Bradley Cooper istead of me. In reality both men and women are dating in their “leagues”. that means a woman who’s a 5 probably also date a man who’s a 5 and a woman who’s a 10 would date a man who’s a 9 or 10 himself.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 09:45 AM
3

That’s just a reddit thing. I have never heard the word “hypergamy” in real life. But for the sake of it, your stance on it is totally impractical. If women are intersted only in the top 20% of men and considering the gender ratio in the western world is roughly 50/50 that means at any point 5 women will compete for the attention of a top man. So 4 of them will lose out. So they will actually have to lower their standards if they want a partner because there simply aren’t enogh top men for all t…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 09:05 AM
1

Where did you get that Tinder data from?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/21 08:03 AM
1

What’s a N-count?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/21 09:30 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter