TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Atavisionary Archive

View 43 posts and 294 comments by Atavisionary on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
894

ScienceAtavisionary/r/TheRedPill26/05/17 11:43 AM
730

Men's RightsAtavisionary/r/TheRedPill24/09/14 09:02 PM
559

Men's RightsAtavisionary/r/TheRedPill22/09/14 04:03 PM
331

ScienceAtavisionary/r/TheRedPill27/03/18 10:43 AM
330

Men's RightsAtavisionary/r/TheRedPill17/09/14 03:53 PM
253

Atavisionary/r/PussyPass23/09/14 03:54 PM
240

Atavisionary/r/PussyPass03/03/15 05:50 PM
237

Men's RightsAtavisionary/r/TheRedPill15/10/14 05:59 PM
215

Off TopicAtavisionary/r/TheRedPill17/09/14 06:42 PM
116

Men's RightsAtavisionary/r/TheRedPill25/09/14 01:54 PM
103

ScienceAtavisionary/r/TheRedPill28/05/18 03:09 PM
97

Men's RightsAtavisionary/r/TheRedPill05/12/14 03:03 AM
74

ScienceAtavisionary/r/TheRedPill15/10/17 01:05 PM
59

Men's RightsAtavisionary/r/TheRedPill30/07/14 08:08 PM
58

Atavisionary/r/PussyPass24/09/16 04:52 PM
44

Atavisionary/r/PussyPass05/03/15 07:29 PM
40

Red Pill TheoryAtavisionary/r/TheRedPill22/09/14 07:05 PM
40

Men's RightsAtavisionary/r/TheRedPill18/09/14 03:05 PM
29

Men's RightsAtavisionary/r/TheRedPill23/09/14 06:08 PM
27

Men's RightsAtavisionary/r/TheRedPill14/08/14 02:43 PM
25

Men's RightsAtavisionary/r/TheRedPill29/09/14 01:35 PM
22

Red Pill TheoryAtavisionary/r/TheRedPill17/09/14 01:59 PM
21

Atavisionary/r/TheRedPill17/09/14 02:38 PM
21

Red Pill ExampleAtavisionary/r/TheRedPill06/09/14 05:26 PM
20

Red Pill TheoryAtavisionary/r/TheRedPill17/09/14 04:31 PM
18

Blue Pill ExampleAtavisionary/r/TheRedPill17/09/14 01:31 PM
17

Atavisionary/r/PussyPassDenied15/12/14 05:48 AM
15

Atavisionary/r/TheRedPill23/09/14 09:25 PM
14

Atavisionary/r/TheRedPill17/09/14 03:41 PM
14

Atavisionary/r/MGTOW22/10/18 05:23 PM
14

Red Pill TheoryAtavisionary/r/TheRedPill05/08/14 02:00 PM
13

Red Pill TheoryAtavisionary/r/TheRedPill08/07/14 06:19 PM
8

Atavisionary/r/TheRedPill16/07/14 10:00 PM
8

Atavisionary/r/TheRedPill17/09/14 02:15 PM
5

Red Pill TheoryAtavisionary/r/TheRedPill13/08/14 01:36 AM
3

Red Pill TheoryAtavisionary/r/TheRedPill05/12/14 03:59 AM
3

Blue Pill ExampleAtavisionary/r/TheRedPill17/09/14 09:19 PM
2

Atavisionary/r/TheRedPill29/07/14 04:02 AM
1

Atavisionary/r/PussyPass17/07/14 01:32 AM
1

Atavisionary/r/askTRP16/01/15 12:15 AM
1

Atavisionary/r/TheRedPill06/08/14 03:33 PM
0

Rant/VentingAtavisionary/r/TheRedPill14/08/14 02:47 PM
0

Men's RightsAtavisionary/r/TheRedPill06/08/14 04:40 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
39

Ya, holy shit she looked possessed.
/r/PussyPass13/02/19 01:53 PM
1

'I plan to be the first female NFL player. Drafted or undrafted, as long as I get there, with God's will.' Gnon's will is for her to get less stupid, or die trying.
/r/TheRedPill06/02/19 12:56 AM
12

I don't know where this got his numbers, but he claims the APA membership is 58% women, 75% of graduates students are women. This roughly matches my own research which found that 62% graduate level psych grads were female a number of years ago. It could have increased since then. Psychology as a field is mostly far-left liberal. Social psychology "is essentially an ideological and political echo-chamber that is considerably more left-wing politically than the general population. 80% of social ps…
/r/TheRedPill18/01/19 01:13 PM
7

"The Village" sounds an awful lot like the cathedral discussed in other circles....
/r/TheRedPill17/01/19 07:56 AM
3

Goldigging women are not mutually exclusive with scumbag hollywood types. These people seek eachother out.
/r/MGTOW03/08/18 04:55 PM
1

stop watching tv. Reduce every tax you pay. contribute as little as possible, without being criminal, to the system. It will collapse on its own. Don't pay for it in time, effort, or money.
/r/MGTOW13/07/18 12:03 PM
2

I don't normally post on pol. You can feel free to copy and paste the excerpt there if you want, or there is a link to the original article in the post. I am aware there has been an occasional thread on /pol/ which discusses this book. Although, this excerpt was only published a few days ago so this particular content wouldn't have made its way there.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/18 11:27 PM
3

female entryist. The entire first two-thirds of the book explain, with citations, how intelligence is X linked and how that explains female underachievement.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/18 08:10 PM
6

The earth is an abundant planet. We really have everything we could possibly ever want. The major inhibitor to the fair distribution of that is fiat currency. A system which can never be paid off is a slave system. Anyway, women are far more susceptible to being tricked by their nature. Giving them decisive power basically guarantees that we will all be effed.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/18 07:46 PM
2

Everything you said is correct from a certain perspective. However, learn more about fiat currency. It is quite amazing and by definition requires any nation who agrees to it to be perpetually in debt without any way of escape. There is a reason Americans abolished central banks many times.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/18 06:23 PM
6

I would love to help with a documentary. However, it doesn't seem most are ready for anything like that.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/18 06:19 PM
6

This is incorrect. Try it elsewhere.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/18 06:18 PM
4

Well, there are lots of citations. However, you might benefit from a philosophical understanding of charity. http://atavisionary.com/stripping-charity-of-virtue/
/r/TheRedPill28/05/18 06:16 PM
11

We have opted as a society to pay for bastards within the last 100 years. Are there more bastards now than in 1900? You get what you pay for.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/18 04:21 PM
19

Point made. The major problem is incentives. If women know they can get away with it, you get a lot more bastards.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/18 04:03 PM
69

Not really. The point of the article is to show that you are "married" whether you like it or not. If you pay taxes, you are paying for single mothers. Every man is "married" via the coercive power of the state.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/18 03:31 PM
18

I forgot to link two studies at the beginning which show the increase in taxation and spending of governments after enabling women's suffrage. Here they are: Link 1 and link 2.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/18 03:21 PM
5

Hmmm. The SJW levels of this article are astounding. The victim Olympics are depicted in all the snake-eating-tail glory here. Though I suspect we differ quite a bit on our perception on that.... Anyway, I find the concept that the women of different races vary on their tendency to use the social coping strategy of crying to resolve conflict interesting. For one thing, I am of the impression that women of all races almost certainly use this strategy to one degree or another. But I can believe th…
/r/PussyPass08/05/18 07:26 PM
2

Well. I don't know how to make people embrace honesty at all times. It would be a lot easier for all of us if honesty was valued more highly, but the vast majority of people prefer lies. Female blackbelts who could be destroyed by some strong thug is an example of this denial. I wish I knew how to fix this problem.
/r/TheRedPill31/03/18 08:09 PM
3

High female promiscuity substantially raises the risk of divorce. http://atavisionary.com/study-index/politics-government-culture/premarital-sex-premarital-cohabitation-and-the-risk-of-subsequent-marital-dissolution-among-women/
/r/askTRP30/03/18 02:52 PM
2

you don't actually utilize the data in any way to reach your conclusion. You can say that, but the book utilizes over 300 citations to reach its conclusions. That is 300 more than you have used.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/18 10:02 AM
1

Not if intelligence genes are often recessive. Based on IQ distributions, it is a safe bet that many are because it explains the greater variability pattern.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/18 12:44 AM
2

In short, intelligence is x linked to a large extent. The phenomenon of pseudo-dominance causes the male intelligence distribution to be more variable. So there are more very smart and very dumb men. Women cluster around the middle. In addition, hormonal influences lead to advantages in spatial ability and generally make men more "thing" focused. Women have verbal advantage and are more socially or people focused. These two patterns come together and pretty much explain entirely why men seem to …
/r/TheRedPill28/03/18 11:35 PM
1

Here is a very good review and summary from Roger Devlin, author of sexual utopia in power: https://www.counter-currents.com/2016/11/why-most-high-achievers-are-men/ Here is a list of all currently available excerpts and reviews: http://atavisionary.com/smart-and-sexy-links-post/
/r/TheRedPill28/03/18 11:16 PM
2

Coincidentally came out today. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5392363/Army-wont-require-recruits-throw-grenade-far-enough.html
/r/TheRedPill28/03/18 03:47 AM
2

Coincidently came out today http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5392363/Army-wont-require-recruits-throw-grenade-far-enough.html
/r/TheRedPill28/03/18 03:47 AM
3

Ya, well this is an incomplete excerpt. It doesn't go over "unexpected" pregnancies, false rape accusations, or the full extent of injuries. Women cause a lot of trouble where ever they go, and it is especially bad in the military.
/r/TheRedPill28/03/18 01:14 AM
1

Exceptions do not disprove the rule or the trend. A closer examination of the data would almost certainly show most of those women rarely on the front lines.
/r/TheRedPill28/03/18 01:08 AM
1

This is used in the behavioral ecology sense, which is valid. The jargon is different in the red pill since that concept isn't very useful when the focus is dating.
/r/TheRedPill28/03/18 01:03 AM
3

sources are in the link, as stated at the beginning of the article.
/r/TheRedPill28/03/18 01:01 AM
1

has the strength and endurance to compete with men in the military, What you aren't taking into account is proneness to injury. Older women develop osteoporosis at much higher rates, but the seeds of that differences are already present in youth and women break bones and tear ligaments at much higher rates so actually strength and endurance aren't enough even when they rarely meet the minimum.
/r/TheRedPill28/03/18 01:00 AM
2

Ya, the book this excerpt is from goes into great detail about that. Thanks for the links.
/r/TheRedPill28/03/18 12:58 AM
2

I don't think anyone is opposed to women being able to enjoy sport, and there is even interest in watching when the amount of clothing is low. However, it is often combined with the delusion that women can compete well with men very often. In most reasonable circumstances, they can't.
/r/TheRedPill28/03/18 12:56 AM
1

While I am not an expert in military training history, I suspect the minimum was a fair amount higher before they started trying to integrate women. I would have to double check though.
/r/TheRedPill28/03/18 12:54 AM
4

I have come to think of the denial of truth, especially in obvious cases like this, to be some sort of spiritual sickness. There is no shortage of facts, so the only thing left is willful denial. Well, what possesses some people to rail so hard against truth. Mere ignorance cannot explain what we see in the mass wo(man)
/r/TheRedPill28/03/18 12:53 AM
3

Well, that is probably why it was published as part of a book instead of as a phd thesis. No point in going the traditional academic route if telling the truth will have you end up in employment purgatory.
/r/TheRedPill28/03/18 12:49 AM
6

don't forget spatial ability as well.
/r/TheRedPill28/03/18 12:47 AM
6

You are very correct. Spatial reasoning and intelligence are also quite different and contribute to pretty different outcomes between gender. The book this essay is an excerpt from goes into great detail on this. In fact, it spends substantially more time on intelligence and psychology since those differences, while salient, are quite a bit more nuanced.
/r/TheRedPill28/03/18 12:47 AM
49

pretty common story. Imagine how much worse it must be now. We have "progressed" so much since then...
/r/TheRedPill27/03/18 12:02 PM
5

No problem, hope it was or will be helpful.
/r/TheRedPill27/03/18 11:22 AM
1

what you are looking for are the asch experiments: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asch_conformity_experiments Bonus: mouse utopia http://www.cabinetmagazine.org/issues/42/wiles.php
/r/TheRedPill27/03/18 11:15 AM
12

Modern sensibilities against this are correct for genetic reasons, but it was a common enough occurrence a hundred years and more ago. Charles Darwin married his cousin, for example. Probably a good time to think about the usefulness of forgiveness.
/r/MGTOW02/03/18 02:39 PM
7

They cry out in pain as they strike you.
/r/PussyPass26/01/18 12:54 AM
3

Why are most high achievers men?
/r/PussyPass22/01/18 02:33 AM
2

Chromium is open source and brave is based on it..... Also, try adnauseam to block ads. Its the best ad blocker right now.
/r/TheRedPill10/01/18 04:26 AM
9

Ideally, there should be complete freedom of association in work and everywhere else. However, leftists made these rules and I suppose it is only appropriate to force them to adhere to them when they don't want to. It should be fun to see what happens.
/r/TheRedPill09/01/18 11:57 PM
9

You should watch this youtube interview review of Cordelia Fine's BS book by Red Ice. Her only contribution to understanding gender differences is the beating of straw men. However, she is fairer than most leftists. Not a high bar to jump though. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DcUBTsENEa0
/r/TheRedPill09/01/18 11:53 PM
4

I suggest you take a look at this article: Why are most high achievers men. It is a review of a book, Smart and Sexy by Roderick Kaine, which goes into great detail about the biologically determined differences in cognitive function between males and females.
/r/TheRedPill05/01/18 11:11 AM
23

Ya, /u/wiseprogressivethink should post it in /r/darwinawards instead. He clearly wanted her to do it, so he is a moron. She is also a moron to agree, but there was no anger here only stupidity.
/r/PussyPass20/12/17 06:08 AM
3

False rape accusations are a real and big problem. Situations like regretting a drunken hookup or revenge on a spurned advance are a real issue. However, politicians and hollywood big wigs really are a disgusting bunch. Please remember it isn't just women talking about this, these scummy power players were also molesting little boys. You should not equate rape hysteria on campus to the truly perverted scumbags that have power in politics and media. http://atavisionary.com/an-open-secret/
/r/MGTOW17/11/17 06:43 AM
5

Testosterone is about the same, but estradiol concentrations are higher in blacks. Estradiol is one small change from testosterone and does serve an important masculinizing role in fetal development. Whites had more androstenedione, a precursor of testosterone. Hard to say how much these differences ultimately impact behavior, but they probably do somewhat. https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article/92/7/2519/2598282/Serum-Estrogen-But-Not-Testosterone-Levels-Differ http://press.endocrine.org/doi/10.…
/r/TheRedPill17/10/17 02:51 AM
10

Feminists man. They are some sick puppies.
/r/TheRedPill16/10/17 10:55 AM
4

uuhhh.... Thanks for sharing?
/r/TheRedPill16/10/17 06:07 AM
9

It truly is amazing what a perverted and weak foundation all this gender is a social construct stuff has. How much damage its caused to so many. Yet the feminists and other leftists lie through their teeth about it without even a hint of remorse. It's a sick, sick world where these people walk free.
/r/TheRedPill16/10/17 01:45 AM
9

Rat sex is obviously a social construct. Seriously though, experments like this have been done many times and the verdict is in. The sexes are different and it is mostly due to biology. Too bad the people in control of major institutions can't accept that.
/r/TheRedPill15/10/17 05:29 PM
2

I can't link to the old RP post directly because of automod, but I discuss this in this article a link to that old post within it. JD Unwin wrote a book which analyses various historical societies and how they all gave women equal rights then promptly crashed and burned.
/r/TheRedPill15/10/17 04:57 AM
8

Why are men better at tech, and math, and physics, and sports, and lots of other things? Why are most high achievers men? Also, something like this was done at github as well.
/r/TheRedPill06/10/17 01:19 PM
4

Not intentionally. My internet was cutting in and out so it got sent multiple times on accident.
/r/TheRedPill19/09/17 05:51 AM
11

Here ya go.
/r/TheRedPill19/09/17 03:27 AM
6

For more information on gender differences in major choice I suggest the articles "women in the university" and "'there is no such thing as a worthless degree'" (sarcasm). In addition, for how women liberalize socities, check out this paper by John Lott: "how dramatically did women's suffrage change the size and scope of government" In addition, for more on gender differences in intelligence and cognitive abilities, I recommend the book Smart and Sexy by roderick kaine. Here is a very thorough r…
/r/TheRedPill19/09/17 03:26 AM
37

For more information on gender differences in major choice I suggest the articles "women in the university" and "'there is no such thing as a worthless degree'" (sarcasm). In addition, for how women liberalize socities, check out this paper by John Lott: "how dramatically did women's suffrage change the size and scope of government" In addition, for more on gender differences in intelligence and cognitive abilities, I recommend the book Smart and Sexy by roderick kaine. Here is a very thorough r…
/r/TheRedPill19/09/17 03:25 AM
1

Not philosophy, but if you want to really know about sex differences in intelligence. Smart and sexy by roderick kaine. Below is a good summary. http://www.truthjustice.net/politics/why-most-high-achievers-are-men-why-we-cannot-afford-sexual-egalitarianism/
/r/askTRP13/09/17 08:00 AM
1

See also, physical differences between the sexes: https://altright.com/2017/08/16/physical-strength-differences-between-the-sexes/
/r/MGTOW08/09/17 01:15 AM
1

https://www.counter-currents.com/2016/11/why-most-high-achievers-are-men/
/r/MGTOW04/09/17 01:14 AM
1

He is missing a subtlety by only talking about hormones when X linkage in intelligence is also important.
/r/TheRedPill02/09/17 01:03 AM
1

Hormones act pretty much exactly how you say. However, another important contributing factor is X linked intelligence. Pseudo-dominance on the X and a lot of nervous system related genes on it mean intelligence has a sex-linked pattern of inheritance. So, at the two tails of the bell curve, you are going to have way more men than women, while women will cluster closer to the average. You should check out "Smart and Sexy" by Roderick Kaine. It goes over all the latest research which fairly conclu…
/r/TheRedPill02/09/17 01:01 AM
2

This woman is off her rocker. The vast majority of tests show men better on average by about 3-10 points, depending on the test and content focus. Among the highest scorers there is about double the number of men than women. This is well known and well established. In so far as some tests, the minority, show women slightly better on average, it is almost certainly due to test design rather than a real difference that favors women. In other cases it is based on tests on very young children which …
/r/MGTOW07/08/17 01:09 AM
1

You might find this interesting: https://altright.com/2016/12/22/autism-and-the-extreme-male-brain/
/r/MGTOW06/08/17 01:16 PM
1

Well, evolutionary psychology suggests that the two female strategies involve either preference for resources (beta bucks) or preference for genes (alpha fux). Preferably both in one male, but a dual strategy for those women who can't get both in one male. Presumably this female behavior requires interaction with the reciprical male madonna-whore strategy. Determining absolutely the cause is rather difficult however, and even if the evolutionary rationale is most likely you might need to merely …
/r/askTRP24/06/17 06:29 PM
2

Yes, more sex partners increases likelihood of divorce. The first partner outside of husband increases the likelihood by 50% alone. For men it doesn't seem to matter that much.
/r/askTRP24/06/17 02:18 AM
2

This isn't the first time github has jumped the shark.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/17 04:46 AM
5

Ya, it is kind of ridiculous especially considering there is well established science showing that men and women think differently and have different aptitudes. No one with any understanding of the facts on the ground would expect there to be all that many women in coding industries because of the dearth of both talent and interest. But no, it is better to ruin companies and projects than to face reality.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/17 04:43 AM
19

This isn't the first time GitHub has been going nuts on SJW causes. They thought police and bitch about communication if everyone isn't being perfectly pleasant to one another Yep, no reason to catch and fix fuck ups. Fake smiles, frivolous compliments, and disingenuous actions are the only things that matter. The world would be so much better and peaceful if run by women.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/17 12:10 AM
9

If a blind, merit-based selection process favors men over women, then the selection process must be flawed. There is absolutely no reason to believe men and women are equally suited to every role. Is boot camp flawed because it favors men? no. Men really are stronger and more athletic thanks to innate biological differences. Well, the same is true for mental differences between the two genders.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/17 12:07 AM
1

GitHub has a history of SJW nonsense, so I am not surprised. The reality is men are better suited to coding because of biological differences that occur during development. No one should expect the top coders to be women.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/17 12:04 AM
1

Here is a good post related to this topic: Of Madonna's and whores Its a free rider problem. Women are not cooperating with what is necessary for civilization and thus it is slowly but surely collapsing.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/17 03:57 AM
4

The Eyferth study is crap. Two main problems, blacks who were accepted were made to pass an IQ test and the lowest 30-40% were not drafted. These fathers weren't representative of the population. 2 they were half white, so of course their iq wouldn't vary as highly. This study has not been replicated in the 50 years since it came out, yet plenty of other studies have been done which are better and show race differences are real. Yet leftists still cite it as if it was relevant.
/r/TheRedPill27/05/17 06:49 AM
4

Well, you can believe that if you want, but it isn't true. Small genetic can and do have large effects, including on intelligence.
/r/TheRedPill27/05/17 06:37 AM
7

The degrees are worthless because they cost too much and don't confer much benefit to the actual work. Especially if you are going all the way to the tertiary level. Obviously young children need to be looked after. You shouldn't need to go through 4-8 years of "well-rounded" (i.e. sit through courses extraneous to what you are actually going to do) and go into massive debt to take care of young kids, or handicapped people, or various other things.
/r/TheRedPill27/05/17 12:59 AM
5

What I find astonishing is that there are some people in this sub who have no problem accepting IQ differences between men and women, but balk when you say there are race differences. How can you accept group differences in one instance and not the other? Especially since genetically men and women of the same race aren't going to be that different, and thus the causes of salient differences are much more subtle and nuanced. Racial differences should be easier to accept because there has been any…
/r/TheRedPill27/05/17 12:45 AM
6

When you combine it with the increasing amount of debt, a lot of that extra income washes out. Thus useless. As time goes on, and new students debt level increases, the more useless the degree is despite increasing income modestly.
/r/TheRedPill27/05/17 12:37 AM
4

I cite 2 reason for the wage gap in this very article, women do not work as many hours as men. The work part time more often. Less money. They choose useless degrees. Again less money. Additional reasons that are well sourced in the book. They opt out of high paying careers at a high rate. They leave the workforce entirely at a high rate.
/r/TheRedPill27/05/17 12:32 AM
10

30 years of research on racial differences in intelligence
/r/TheRedPill26/05/17 04:34 PM
0

We do not and cannot know what we might lose by excluding them. Sexual harassment and false rape allegations are hugely expensive. Even real instances are extremely expensive and arguably avoidable. A real case can be made that keeping the door open for a small minority isn't worth the overall externalities.
/r/TheRedPill26/05/17 03:05 PM
9

The more a women's income or education increases, or the greater their innate iq, the less likely they are to have children. Of the three, education has the worst negative effect on female fertility. http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/591690 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016028961000005X
/r/TheRedPill26/05/17 03:02 PM
1

Ya, women opt out of all career paths, but it is worse for some careers than others, and it is probably the worst in medicine. People need doctors, and there is only so much capacity to train them. We have the same problem in America. It isn't the only important factor, but it does make a difference in the high cost of health care here. Less supply=higher prices. And less access to healthcare. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/12/opinion/12sibert.html
/r/TheRedPill26/05/17 02:53 PM
4

Ya, an in depth analysis of tax differences is also in the book. Basically men pay way more taxes, and women receive way more government benefits. You can be as alpha as you want personally, but the government makes every man who works a beta bucks slave. I imagine the return of kings article was mostly based on this recent study from new Zealand. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2375926
/r/TheRedPill26/05/17 01:31 PM
6

I didn't include the data here, but the average opt-out from the workforce rate for women with university education is on average between 40-60% depending on the field and university tier. Often because they get married to rich men who end up paying for their debt. It explains the irony that women who went to the high end universities are also the most likely to opt-out. They have access to the (eventual) highest earning men.
/r/TheRedPill26/05/17 01:20 PM
22

sources: Degree and gre scores: Templar, tomeo (2002) Mean graduate record examination (gre) score and gender distribution as function of academic discipline. Personality and individual differences. volume 32, issue 1, 5 january 2002, pages 175-179 Work hour preferences: Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P. (2006). Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth after 35 years: Uncovering antecedents for the development of math-science expertise. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 316-345
/r/TheRedPill26/05/17 12:06 PM
6

Welcome to the club for anyone who legbeards don't want to talk to. It isn't especially exclusive, but it is something to be proud of. [edit] I, along with tons of other people, also received the ban message. I commented there once a year or two ago.
/r/PussyPass21/05/17 07:06 AM
1

well, from a technical standpoint, looks are heritable so offspring would be attractive if both parents are. (with extremely rare exceptions due to random mutations.) Something tells me sound biology isn't the solution to this problem though...
/r/askTRP14/05/17 03:25 PM
3

not complete withdrawal. Just a partial withdrawal. part time or low paid work that isn't stressful, but also doens't pay much in the way of taxes. This is already happening, and sex robots in all likelihood would accelerate the trend.
/r/TheRedPill14/05/17 02:23 PM
4

ya, and because marijuana is illegal no one can get it. Governments will be fucked by mass withdrawal from the labor market and thus low taxes. Although robots were set to take everyone's job anyway so it is hard to say what this will cause other than a greater likelihood of acceptance of the human race being replaced. Take a look at horse populations after cars were invented....
/r/TheRedPill14/05/17 01:59 PM
6

yes, r the redpill was very important for my own development. A voice of sanity in the wilderness. But it can't end there. The world is changing in almost unimaginable ways. No one can make a better, non-feminist future by themselves. LIke minded men need eachother in order to actually create the world they would like to live in. That is the art of the red pill. Ultimately red pill men are going to have to commit to creating their own separate communities run by them and for them, and to tell ou…
/r/TheRedPill07/05/17 01:21 PM
6

"Smart and Sexy" by Roderick Kaine. It is about biologically based sex differences in intelligence explains why and how claims of discrimination are crap. Here is a review written by Roger Devlin who himself authored "sexual utopia in power" which is another great read and listed on the sidebar: https://www.counter-currents.com/2016/11/why-most-high-achievers-are-men/ An interview with the author: https://redice.tv/red-ice-radio/smart-and-sexy-biological-differences-between-men-and-women 6.95 on…
/r/TheRedPill04/05/17 12:23 AM
27

Please provide your "Absolute, unpublishable cancer" here /u/The_g0yim_know We are curious
/r/PussyPass22/04/17 02:58 PM
36

Should have disowned her. Pretend like she never existed.
/r/PussyPass21/04/17 03:55 AM
2

nation of Islam is to Islam like Mormons are to Christianity. It is basically a cult adapted by black nationalists for black nationalists. In short, it is pretty crazy and diverges considerably from Islam proper. It is not a middle eastern religion.
/r/PussyPass19/04/17 08:54 AM
13

Well, that sucks but its not like you knew about it. She is is the slut. If she did that to him, she would have probably done it to you at some point so just put it out of your mind.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/17 12:04 PM
1

Karma is a bitch you spurned.
/r/askTRP20/03/17 11:14 AM
6

here are some more specifics on sex realism http://www.counter-currents.com/2016/11/why-most-high-achievers-are-men/
/r/PussyPass28/02/17 03:12 AM
12

Changing the victims and oppressors in a propaganda piece is a very effective way of showing people the bullshit that is being peddled as truth these days in the mainstream fake news media. I call it polarity shifting and have made several similar articles with this style in mind. I think it is great for red pilling people on the lies of mainstream culture. Here are my similar articles: http://atavisionary.com/happy-heuristic-for-the-holdiays/ http://atavisionary.com/polarity-shift-2/ http://ata…
/r/PussyPass28/02/17 03:08 AM
2

its time to shrug. http://atavisionary.com/shrug/
/r/PussyPass15/01/17 07:06 AM
10

(facepalm)
/r/askTRP12/01/17 06:34 AM
2

The worst part about these career climbing women is they are not even suited to the roles they are in for biological reasons: http://www.counter-currents.com/2016/11/why-most-high-achievers-are-men/ If it weren't for affirmative action, the vast majority of these women would not be in these positions because they either wouldn't exist or they would be filled by more competent men. So not only do they not get to experience the benefits of what is most natural to their god-given gender, they life …
/r/askTRP12/01/17 06:34 AM
0

‘There stands, my friend, in yonder pool, An engine call’d a ducking stool: By legal pow’r commanded down, The joy and terror of the town, If jarring females kindle strife, Give language foul, or lug the coif; If noisy dames should once begin To drive the house with horrid din, Away, you cry, you’ll grace the stool, We’ll teach you how your tongue to rule. The fair offender fills the seat, In sullen pomp, profoundly great. Down in the deep the stool descends, But here, at first, we miss our ends…
/r/PussyPassDenied14/12/16 07:31 AM
3

But her stupid hamster cant comprehend that when you make a baby with a bald man you will have a bald son. Actually, MPB is X linked so you actually need to blame your mother. You didn't get it from your dad, maybe from your maternal grandfather though.
/r/askTRP12/12/16 03:04 AM
1

It also applies to intelligence, there are biological reasons why more men are high achievers than women. http://www.counter-currents.com/2016/11/why-most-high-achievers-are-men/
/r/PussyPassDenied11/12/16 02:51 AM
1

Ya, and it doesn't just apply to strength either. It also applies to intelligence. There is a biological reason most high achievers are men. http://www.counter-currents.com/2016/11/why-most-high-achievers-are-men/
/r/PussyPassDenied11/12/16 02:50 AM
1

The vast majority of the academic establishment is far left wing, which encompasses radical feminism. The work actively to suppress any views that don't fit the narrative. And it is well documented.
/r/TheRedPill23/11/16 06:52 AM
2

Its only a few months? Just shut your mouth and and ignore it as best you can. Use uh-huhs and oks but never actually participate in conversations you aren't particularly interested in. He will either get the hint and stop talking or get bored because their is no interaction and change the subject/stop talking. Don't be rude, don't criticize, but don't reward things you don't want to see more of. By reward, I mean actually engage him in a meaningful conversation. Unless it is actually interestin…
/r/askTRP15/11/16 11:34 PM
2

Smart and sexy by Roderick Kaine. It is on the biological causes of sex differences in intelligence. http://arktos.com/product/smart-and-sexy/
/r/askTRP14/11/16 06:05 AM
1

Drive uber while looking for other jobs.
/r/MGTOW13/11/16 02:59 AM
1

Ya, this kind of crap goes on a lot. We talk about it a lot over on r / darkenlightenment. Our "leaders" are actively importing millions of new voters so they can make discrimination against white men permenant and have troops when we eventually rebel. There isnt much time left until the west repeats the experience of the congo, south africa and rhodesia. Whites will have everything forcably taken from them and be forced to live in ghettoes. The clock is ticking.
/r/TheRedPill05/10/16 06:01 PM
-1

I detail this study and a few more in more detail in my book, "smart and sexy." This book is mostly about sex differences in intelligence, but I cover a few related subjects as well, this being one of them. You can read a review of the book here.. Just earlier today I posted an excerpt from the book on what causes autism in r tardtales if you would like to get an idea about the tone and writing style. (I can't link directly, but you will see it if you go there, or if you go through my submission…
/r/TheRedPill21/09/16 09:46 PM
1

Well, technically it would be very useful in electronics because of how conductive it is, and it doesn't really rust at all so it actually could have value based on usefulness. But ya, it main source of value is an illusion which probably limits it being implemented in more practical applications.
/r/TheRedPill19/09/16 02:18 AM
3

Yes, I have discussed this sort of thing as well. basically, testosterone causes changes in brain development (mainly in the fetus) which alters its emotional vs. logical reasoning. Test. basically creates the autist in all of us and moves us towards systematizing reasoning. Logic basically. Without that, (i.e. females) you get empathetic/emotional reasoning. The later helps you understand and manipulate people better, but it doesn't help you create the next greatest technology. recently, chatau…
/r/TheRedPill24/08/16 03:03 AM
2

Ya, and it overlaps with their dating. They definitely talk about their dating, or lack there of, way too much. It is completely unprofessional. Female in high ranking management position partially inspired the following post: http://atavisionary.com/it-just-didnt-happen/
/r/TheRedPill24/08/16 02:51 AM
2

Ceo is a tough job, it takes a lot of innate ability. Men are more likely to express that ability thanks to pseudo-dominance expression on the X chromosome in males. I am not saying there are no good female ceos, but it is an extremely rare occurrence. You see so many women fail because they are getting there as a result of affirmative action, not skill. In reality, there may be some small percentage of women, clearly less than the 5% in there now, that would be good ceos. It doesn't make those …
/r/TheRedPill24/08/16 02:47 AM
3

Hey man, you inspired me to write this post. Hopefully it will make you feel better about "female only credit cards". http://atavisionary.com/vanity-marketing-for-women-only/
/r/PussyPass03/08/16 01:23 AM
3

female supremacy trend I would say it was simple female vanity, and that it has been omnipresent for pretty much forever.
/r/PussyPass02/08/16 02:43 PM
44

They probably just have higher interest rates, but know if it says "for women" women will get it regardless of how bad a deal it is because they become really stupid in vanity. I was grocery shopping once and I walked down the medicine aisle when I saw a laxative that was "for women." I thought this marketing was preposterous because intestines do not vary by gender in their response to laxatives. Sure enough the ingredients were all the same as every other brand. It was just stupid marketing to…
/r/PussyPass02/08/16 02:40 PM
33

The strength distributions of men and women barely even overlap at the tails. Virtually no women would ever be able to meet the same standards as men, so either they aren't allowed in or the standards are changed. Chances are they will change the standards because no one wants to admit women are weaker than men. This trajectory will likely get people killed if they stay the course.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/06/16 02:38 PM
3

Recently there was a soccer game between the australian olympic women's soccer team and a group of boys 14 years or younger. The teenage boys beat them 7-0. If adult women can't beat boys just starting puberty how the hell are they going to beat grown men in combat?
/r/TheRedPill17/06/16 09:02 PM
15

It is like that saying "the market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent."
/r/TheRedPill13/05/16 12:47 AM
2

I hate to interject on your quite excellent subreddit which is for women exclusively and it should be, but this post seems to beg my thoughts. Mainly because the question you ask is relevant to evolutionary psychology and I am not sure you will get the best answer from the other side of things when that is the main component of the question. Males in almost all species are required as part of evolution to impress the female. There are exceptions, but humans aren't one so we needn't talk about th…
/r/RedPillWomen04/05/16 05:14 AM
1

ya, they are going to have both print and e copies available.
/r/PussyPass12/01/16 03:43 PM
2

not having a facebook at all I have a facebook, I just don't use it. I never post anything and only occasionally chat. It isn't that hard. You don't have to lose the ability to contact random people if you want to in the future. I would never, ever ever ever use facebook to comment on a third party website. I think people who do that are dumb as a block of rocks.
/r/TheRedPill09/01/16 07:56 PM
2

It is the cathedral in action. A lot of the time topics related to this isn't appropriate for theredpill because of its narrow focus. If you want to discuss politics, cullture, and society more generally but also from a very red pilled perspective, please join us at the /.. . r.. ./ darkenlightenment subreddit. We discuss HBD, Red Pill, politics as well as other topics a lot.
/r/TheRedPill05/01/16 09:30 PM
3

It is the cathedral in action. A lot of the time topics related to this isn't appropriate for theredpill because of its narrow focus. If you want to discuss politics, cullture, and society more generally but also from a very red pilled perspective, please join us at the /.. . r.. ./ darkenlightenment subreddit. We discuss HBD, Red Pill, politics as well as other topics a lot.
/r/TheRedPill05/01/16 09:30 PM
3

A 5 or 6 years ago I tried editing the article on "sex and intelligence" and experienced the exact thing that your did. Without going into the details, males and females have different intelligence distributions which is fairly rigorously supported by scientific literature. When I tried to update the article, a horde of feminists launched an attack and I was overwhelmed, banned, and ultimately gave up. The article went through lots of progressive (pun intended) changes which were meant to suppor…
/r/MGTOW31/12/15 03:37 AM
3

I wrote a book which mainly deals with sex differences in intelligence, it should be available from Arktos in january or february of 2016. Tentatively, it is going to be called "smart and sexy," but we will see. However, I also go into a little bit of detail on physical differences as well and used military studies a lot in that analysis. Here is the part on injury risk between men and women, with sources at the end. Beyond simply having less physical strength, the female body also appears much …
/r/PussyPass07/12/15 01:02 AM
7

They do that for anything to do with political correctness. I detailed one example here: http://atavisionary.com/wikipedia-in-action-on-race/
/r/MGTOW05/12/15 03:00 AM
1

brotherhood for all men Well, that was a delusional desire to begin with.
/r/askTRP27/11/15 07:19 PM
1

but we don't have black people here With the way things are going in Europe, that might not be true for long. Be prepared to be a couple rungs above the bottom of status hierarchy ladder. I wonder how gypsies are going to fare with African blacks and middle eastern muslims rushing in. Hungary seems intent on preventing it more than most, but you never know. May you live in interesting times.
/r/askTRP27/11/15 04:20 AM
5

Ya, well you know how people use the nawalt excuse which we all know is BS? Well, nabalt applies here. Enough of them are like that that the generalization is true more often than it isn't.
/r/askTRP27/11/15 01:21 AM
-2

Ya, we don't really have gypsies here so I am only vaguely familiar with them. As much as people complain, it is hard to imagine them being as bad as blacks.
/r/askTRP26/11/15 06:53 PM
34

A white girl (or any girl, other than black, for that matter) that gets or has gotten with black guys..... That is a big red flag to me and would be enough to relegate her to plate status. It isn't PC to say this, but black culture is pretty stupid, low brow, violent, selfish, etc. A girl who decides to be into that is low quality. But not everyone feels that way so on to stats. These three links discuss data on premarital sex partner numbers and divorce risk. It only takes ONE previous sex part…
/r/askTRP25/11/15 11:53 PM
1

Very practical. Straight and to the point. Also, great username.
/r/askTRP05/10/15 01:03 AM
11

Ya, I think they should as well. I think the problem is that most men are brainwashed today and believe that rejecting the state's wish to turn them into a slave is immoral. In reality, paying into a system that hates and wants to destroy you is what is immoral. If men were to figure this out, the system would collapse very quickly and all the ingrates would come crawling back.
/r/TheRedPill18/08/15 10:18 PM
1

That makes sense in a sub this size I suppose. For now we just warn then ban people who violate the rule, but otherwise are pretty open about how it works.
/r/TheRedPill06/08/15 03:16 PM
4

How short is too short? Just curious. A sub I mod has a similar rule and comparison would be nice.
/r/TheRedPill06/08/15 01:26 AM
7

Ya, it could be a hoax, but I have come across this sort of thing multiple occasions which tells me that this happening is at least plausible. Here is an article in which both wikipedia and a scientific article interpret data the exact opposite as what the data says. Here is another article which addresses stereotype threat. In another example which is probably most relevant to this sub, you can see how standardized tests are rigged against boys in favor of girls. And these are just three exampl…
/r/TheRedPill22/07/15 03:17 AM
3

Ya, I wrote of one of my experiences here: http://atavisionary.com/the-common-scolds-of-america/ I think the problem has a lot to do with lack of discipline. Every one treats them like little princesses who can do no wrong, and who shouldn't be expected to control their emotions. Women are not great at controlling their emotions anyway, without some sort of discipline it gets really bad.
/r/TheRedPill18/06/15 04:17 AM
1

Sure, I will try to remember
/r/TheRedPill15/06/15 06:10 PM
-1

Blue pilling by Cohen, the guy who came up with it. It could, and probably should, have been called Machiavellian reasoning instead of empathetic reasoning. Means essentially the same thing but with more accurate connotations. I say as much in my soon to be released book on brain and intelligence differences between genders; tentatively called "smart and sexy". I am on the last proof-read and formatting phase and it will probably be available on amazon within the next couple of weeks. The last m…
/r/TheRedPill13/06/15 10:05 PM
1

Blue pilling by Cohen, the guy who came up with it. It could, and probably should, have been called Machiavellian reasoning instead of empathetic reasoning. Means essentially the same thing but with more accurate connotations. I say as much in my soon to be released book on brain and intelligence differences between genders; tentatively called "smart and sexy". I am on the last proof-read and formatting phase and it will probably be available on amazon within the next couple of weeks. The last m…
/r/TheRedPill13/06/15 10:04 PM
2

In a sane world maybe, but I wouldn't take on the liability.
/r/PussyPass08/06/15 02:48 AM
10

I see nothing wrong with a man trying to restrain a woman when she's savagely beating another woman... the first guy to try to stop a fight between women will be beaten within an inch of his life by the rest of the room. Let the bitches fight, especially if they are strangers. Isn't your problem so enjoy the show or get out.
/r/PussyPass06/06/15 10:48 PM
2

Glad I could be of help
/r/MGTOW09/04/15 03:45 AM
3

I wrote an article on a guy who did this Http://atavisionary.com/shrug/ I suggest cambodia easy visas and no extradition treaty. Getting remarried in new country reduces risk of being expelled.
/r/MGTOW08/04/15 06:04 AM
2

Wow, I can't believe we are actually forced to pay taxes to give radical left-wing wackos like this a salary. Her hero hugo chavez, what a fuckwit.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/03/15 04:46 AM
8

Michael konner is kind of a faggot. (no offense to actual faggots) Did you read the name of his book title? "the end of male supremacy" is in it. My ass. Women don't gain supremacy by occupying make work government jobs. He recently authored this trash article in the wall street journal. You really shouldn't have directly linked to that ass hat or to that leftoid trash of salon.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/15 06:38 AM
8

Don't dish it out if you can't take it back.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/03/15 06:43 PM
1

This has come up as a topic of debate in neoreaction before. I made a post about it. The short answer is that even though I could find research which addressed the question for women, I could not find any that addressed it for men one way or another. My guess is that the people doing the research found no effect of male promiscuity prior to marriage on divorce, which is an "uninteresting" result, at least from the perspective of journals. So there is nothing on it. Theoretically, preselection re…
/r/askTRP08/03/15 03:05 AM
14

Ya, there sure has been a lot of "progress" since the time when the sun never set on the british empire.
/r/PussyPass03/03/15 11:26 PM
-16

Fair enough, I can support only using "white knight" with its newly attributed meaning.
/r/PussyPass03/03/15 09:10 PM
1

Maybe, but the thing is that it took 10+ years for this all to come about. He may have knew her very well at the time of marriage. In all likelihood, she changed into something she wasn't before they married. I am not sure knowing a women well before marriage could prevent the problem.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/15 05:14 AM
9

That is what this guy did, I think it is the way to go.
/r/TheRedPill20/02/15 05:31 AM
1

thanks
/r/askTRP16/01/15 08:16 PM
2

Academia is set to be seriously pruned in the relatively near future. 1.2 trillion dollars in student loan debt can't last forever. When the student loan does pop, I am going to seriously enjoy every cultural marxist who is out on their ass with no job and lots of bills to pay. We should all drink their tears. http://www.nbcnews.com/business/personal-finance/burdened-record-amount-debt-graduates-delay-marriage-n219371
/r/TheRedPill16/01/15 03:24 AM
4

That isn't true. At least, I went down several pages and there are no links on Christmas songs.
/r/TheRedPill25/12/14 05:44 PM
2

So that is why there are so many new subscriptions today....
/r/TheRedPill25/12/14 01:59 AM
1

Are you sure you are using based correctly? How can a whole country have one exclusive personality type? Especially one which few people in any country actually have. https://antidem.wordpress.com/2014/12/13/the-basis-of-based/
/r/TheRedPill17/12/14 02:51 AM
3

Are you all going to hold out for virgins in America I think the point is to avoid marriage entirely until something changes with the legal system. I am not saying never interact with a promiscuous girl, I am just saying don't put a ring on her finger or a seed in her belly.
/r/RedPillWomen16/12/14 12:43 AM
-4

That is what I meant, thanks.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/12/14 08:24 AM
-8

You are seriously verbose. Excess verbosity is a key feature of neoreactionary disposition. Thank you for the complement.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/12/14 08:11 AM
-9

You are the physical manifestation of why users of logical fallacies should be ruthlessly banned.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/12/14 08:00 AM
-7

ok.....
/r/PussyPassDenied15/12/14 07:50 AM
-8

Thank you so much for ripping the SJW a new one. I really appreciate that.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/12/14 07:37 AM
-11

Possibly, but a mother abusing her son along gender lines seems to fit with the zietgeist of the community. It is after all a distant relative of /r/theredpill. I think this community wants to know about young boys abused on the basis of their gender because they want to stop such wretched behavior. I wonder why you care more about an arbitrary rule than the suffering of a ten year old boy. You being SJW scum seems probable.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/12/14 07:32 AM
-11

How sweet, if it were only so easy for progressives. Edit: neoreactionaries don't generally doxx because we aren't rabid crazies, but you probably shouldn't use a potentially doxxable facebook picture in your social commentary.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/12/14 07:20 AM
-12

I am really glad the mods of /r/darkenlightenment ban SJW types like yourself. You really are intolerable.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/12/14 06:41 AM
-13

There are fundamental biological bases for gender. It is innate that a boy should know that he should be masculine. To force him to do otherwise is a form of torture. It is most especially tortuous to make it obvious to the entire community.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/12/14 06:38 AM
2

Yes, I do hate the thirsty men who enable poor choices on the part of females. Apparently we just don't have enough wars anymore to make men a rare commodity.
/r/RedPillWomen15/12/14 06:31 AM
4

french Being french makes my warnings in the other comment even more severe. The french have completely outlawed DNA testing and with a straight face expect men to raise children who aren't their own. One of the worst places for a man to get married. http://www.ibdna.com/regions/UK/EN/?page=paternity-testing-ban-upheld-in-france
/r/RedPillWomen15/12/14 06:25 AM
6

http://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/2d6337/i_was_divorce_raped_dont_be_me/ http://socialpathology.blogspot.com/2010/09/sexual-partner-divorce-risk.html When everything fucks up, don't say you weren't warned.
/r/RedPillWomen15/12/14 06:14 AM
1

I'd rather spend my life alone Hmm.... The only women who get their first choices are those who run in almost miraculous luck and those too stupid to formulate an ideal—two very small classes, it must be obvious. A few women, true enough, are so pertinacious that they prefer defeat to compromise. That is to say, they prefer to put off marriage indefinitely rather than to marry beneath the highest leap of their fancy. But such women may be quickly dismissed as abnormal, and perhaps as downright d…
/r/RedPillWomen15/12/14 06:03 AM
1

This is pure BP bullshit and I'm questioning how red you really are. I hate lying as much as you, and I am glad that you ladies are working to get past it. However, so much deception on the part of women is experienced by men that the red pill is generally pretty accepting of lying to women. Fight fire with fire. I am glad you are trying to fix the situation and make greater trust possible, but in her particular situation it might not be the most helpful advice. Third, you might want to Omit The…
/r/RedPillWomen15/12/14 05:39 AM
2

At the risk of hurting your feelings, I am going to pass on a red pill man's perspective of this situation. Men by and large aren't sentimental naturally. For example, every male in my family has agreed that we aren't going to buy Christmas presents for each other because we don't care, we don't like shopping, and like saving money. At most we will buy some beer for each other the day before and get drunk a few times. I made the mistake of trying to arrange a similar situation with a female memb…
/r/RedPillWomen15/12/14 05:08 AM
3

I like that you guys have standards. Still, knowing this girls past can (and should) make men rule her out as a long term partner.
/r/RedPillWomen15/12/14 02:40 AM
1

you should join the /r/darkenlightenment
/r/PussyPass11/12/14 09:25 AM
2

aggressiveness vs. tameness is. See the wild foxes bred for tameness as well as a single mouse strain bred into both aggressive and tame strains.
/r/TheRedPill05/12/14 05:22 PM
6

Well, now they do. But in times past social pressure prevented women from being stupid. Beta men built civilization and they built it because society rewarded them for it. Don't get me wrong, I am not saying be a simp. Society has said "fuck men" and it is time we turned things around a fucked them back. However, the consequences are going to be severe, but necessary. Disregarding the respect men are due for building society deserves some punishment in terms of a bit of a dark age.
/r/TheRedPill05/12/14 07:01 AM
1

If you are interested in something political which fully and unapologetically incorporates red pill philosophy then I suggest /r/darkenlightenment. It is exactly this sort of cultural marxist take over of academia that we oppose.
/r/TheRedPill05/12/14 06:26 AM
4

99% of the world's great authors are men I implied as much. Perhaps the following wasn't quite clear enough about how much x linked intelligence actually matters. In that, it ensures that men will be the top of any and every field, even those which they have a natural disadvantage such as writing. You can add cooking and dress design to that as well. Things you would assume women would be better at. no, sorry, they aren't. x linked intelligence overwhelms all other factors in general cognitive a…
/r/TheRedPill05/12/14 06:17 AM
23

Feminists are retarded. They completely fail to understand evolution worse than a young earth creationist. The fact of the matter is women are the ones that choose who they fuck. 80 percent of women have surviving descendents, but only 40% of men do. This means that men are the way they are today because of the sexual choices of our foremothers. In the case of latinos, machismo is such a common thing because those are the men who latinas decided to fuck and bear children for. This phenomenon is …
/r/TheRedPill05/12/14 05:36 AM
8

Women have an innate biological sex advantage in language (verbal reasoning). The male innate advantage is in numerical and especially, by almost a standard deviation, in spatial reasoning. Those latter advantages you probably never get to test as an English teacher. The reason you see males way over represented at the very top is because x linked intelligence overwhelms all other factors in general cognitive ability. There are recessive genes which confer increased intelligence and these are ex…
/r/TheRedPill05/12/14 04:56 AM
1

I believe you, I just mean that with a direct link I would have been told by reddit and this whole thing would have been avoided. I will try to be more careful next time.
/r/TheRedPill05/12/14 04:39 AM
1

I didn't see it. I guess that is a disadvantage of disallowing direct links.
/r/TheRedPill05/12/14 04:13 AM
3

I believe the paper this article refers to is the first link on this page: http://www.ulster.ac.uk/sass/the-centre-for-young-mens-studies/
/r/TheRedPill05/12/14 03:39 AM
3

I don't like how tyalus frames it in white knight terms of honor. She has no honor and deserves known in return. But practically speaking, he is probably right that the state will side with her if she pushes it, even if she has no evidence. Legally evicting her is the safest bet.
/r/TheRedPill02/12/14 09:32 PM
4

Being in a relationship doesn't offend my sensibilities at all from a theoretical standpoint. But I have fucked enough women with husbands or boyfriends that I seriously discount the idea.
/r/TheRedPill03/11/14 07:27 AM
5

Traditionalism for the same general reason that Crack is illegal. Well, that and the fact that civilization benefits from men and women having stable relationships. Actually, I think the civiliasational benefit outweighs everything else. women (or men) being happy never really was a part of it.
/r/TheRedPill03/11/14 07:25 AM
1

Clearly you don't understand logic.
/r/TheRedPill12/10/14 05:04 PM
2

The madonna strategy is untenable in a culture that doesn't do everything to support it. I don't disagree. That doesn't mean that the strategy doesn't exist, just that it isn't worthwhile in a lot of circumstances.
/r/TheRedPill12/10/14 05:04 PM
5

men don't have a dual mating strategy That isn't true. If it were, then why do some men get oneitis? Some alphas even develop it. This relatively common phenomenon has to have an evolutionary rationale. The male mirror strategy to alpha fucks beta buck is the madonna whore strategy.
/r/TheRedPill12/10/14 02:06 AM
17

No other factor predicts likelihood of divorce than a women's premarital sex count. Here is a study on it. Here is social pathologists take on the same study. And here I discuss what effect premarital sex might have on men's divorce risk. The short answer is probably not too much, but it hasn't been studied for some reason.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/14 08:05 PM
1

I don't think you understand the thrust of the article. Spatial reasoning has been empirically shown to be an important form of intelligence with especial relevance to science and technology. Beyond under-servicing talented people (who don't know and thus aren't complaining) it also means that society is mis-allocating human capital to its own detriment.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/14 02:52 PM
2

That's the great thing about rejecting egalitarianism. You can actually admit when an individual has an out-sized impact.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/14 01:30 PM
1

In neoreaction, the idea that progressivism (of which egalitarianism is a subset) is a type of religion is well accepted. In fact, a bit of historical work can easily trace it back to mainline protestantism.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/14 03:20 AM
1

It actually has a lot to do with the article. I just don't focus on the religious qualities of egalitarianism which leads people to have the kind of beliefs which lead to artificially demonstrated equality.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/14 03:17 AM
12

Right, Marriage 1.0 was a business contract. A woman exchanges her sexuality for a man's provisioning. Men purchase the children with the labor and therefore should retain ownership (custody) of both the children and any property should the wife initiate a frivorce.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/14 12:05 AM
1

I don't go over it here, but unfortunately IQ is overwhelmingly determined by genetics and thus isn't very susceptible to cultural interventions. The male advantage in spatial reasoning is also determined by biology. Administering testosterone to women might improve their spatial ability, but the side effects would be more than a little undesirable. I haven't gone to the wikipedia page because frankly I don't trust them. My experience with wikipedia on controversial subjects such as this is that…
/r/TheRedPill29/09/14 09:53 PM
0

One of the studies I linked to claims that among the exceptionally able, it is probably something like 50% of well suited individuals were missed this way. That of course is only considering the upper limits of ability. One of the other studies I linked to shows that even at the mean there is a standard deviation advantage for men. In short, a whole hell of a lot.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/14 08:38 PM
1

Here is good quote from a test expert. Arthur Jensen stated in his book bias in mental testing, “The most widely used standardized tests of general intelligence have explicitly tried to minimize sex differences in total score by discarding those items that show the largest sex differences in the normative sample and by counterbalancing the number of remaining items that favor either sex. This is true, for example, of the Stanford-Binet and Wechsler scales of intelligence.“
/r/TheRedPill29/09/14 08:26 PM
0

What they do is balance items favoring one sex with items favoring the other sex. Not all such items are equally g loaded (IE, more loaded means more accurately corresponds to IQ). For example, the writing portion of the test is hardly g loaded at all. It is a shitty measure for predicting ability and achievement. But girls do better at it so its popular. The whole reason that spatial reasoning tests are ignored on the SAT and GRE is because of the huge advantage favoring males which is very dif…
/r/TheRedPill29/09/14 08:23 PM
2

Feminists are all about the money. Whatever they can do to ensure more money is funneled to women however unjustly. The fact that the tax bill is heavily biased against men never enters their thoughts.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/14 05:52 PM
2

Women forfeited chivalry when they supported feminism. Once I was picked up at the airport by my Aunt and some woman was having trouble with her (very heavy looking) bag. My Aunt told me I should help her. I turned to her and said, so anyone could hear me, that I was a feminist (lol) and that I believe women can help themselves. If she didn't want to have trouble picking up her bag she shouldn't have put so much useless shit in it.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/14 04:21 PM
3

Asking a girl permission to have sex completely fucks the mood. They don't want to be asked, they want to be taken. This law is stupid.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/14 04:14 PM
27

In the old days it was simply referred to as hysteria.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/14 04:13 PM
5

The problem with that is few people ever had their spatial reasoning properly evaluated. Two of the studies I linked to evaluate the relation between spatial reasoning and patent ownership. The longitudinal study of mathematically precocious youth pretty clearly demonstrates that more IQ is always better and even distinguishes between high ability people with similar degrees. You should be able to get the following paper at libgen.org http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19000201
/r/TheRedPill29/09/14 02:01 PM
2

The cathedraltm
/r/TheRedPill26/09/14 01:06 AM
6

Yep, Cthulhu always swims to the left. Yesterday's radical leftist is today's self righteous prig with the power to tell you what to do and think.
/r/TheRedPill25/09/14 07:11 PM
1

http://handleshaus.wordpress.com/2013/12/26/bullied-and-badgered-pressured-and-purged/
/r/TheRedPill25/09/14 06:08 PM
16

Don't think it will end here either. Cthulhu always swims to the left.
/r/TheRedPill25/09/14 05:59 PM
16

Last time I checked, keeping track of what you spend is just good common sense and fiscally prudent. Common sense and prudence are domestic violence. That would be surprising until you remember it is radical leftists writing these rules. They wouldn't know common sense if it smacked them in the head.
/r/TheRedPill25/09/14 05:31 PM
2

In theory, but for some reason I doubt this policy will be gender neutral.
/r/TheRedPill25/09/14 05:27 PM
82

The University of Chicago, on its website, defines an abuser as someone who “has a strong belief in extreme gender roles” “has a strong belief in extreme gender roles" Having an opinion that existed through most of history in virtually all cultures is domestic violence. Our great-grandfathers must be rolling in their grave.
/r/TheRedPill25/09/14 02:17 PM
1

Is it just me or does more of the same simply not seem like the right solution?
/r/TheRedPill25/09/14 01:19 PM
3

She just wasn't dedicated enough to her craft.
/r/PussyPass24/09/14 02:10 PM
9

I found this link via Christina Hoff Summers, who wrote "the war on boys" which is a good book that I recommend you buy and read. You should give her some support by following her on twitter: @CHSommers
/r/TheRedPill23/09/14 09:26 PM
1

Ok, let me reframe the statement. Because some jobs recruit almost exclusively from the right of the curve, there are some occupations that will be overwhelmingly male and that is completely justifiable because of the breakdown in IQ.
/r/TheRedPill23/09/14 01:51 PM
1

This is part of the male advantage, but men also tend to be better at math etc by a mechanism independent of IQ as well.
/r/TheRedPill23/09/14 01:28 PM
0

Its not from this study. I recommend Hedges and Nowell 1995 and 30 year longitudinal study of mathematically precocious youth.
/r/TheRedPill23/09/14 01:25 PM
1

lol. You have a point there.
/r/TheRedPill23/09/14 01:21 PM
3

The best place to start is the gentle introduction http://www.moreright.net/a-gentle-introduction-to-unqualified-reservations-pdf/
/r/TheRedPill23/09/14 01:20 PM
2

Good explanation. Too bad that info cant be used to make money.
/r/TheRedPill23/09/14 03:09 AM
0

The divergence begins well before the far right and it is more like 1percent for 7 to 1.
/r/TheRedPill23/09/14 02:55 AM
2

On the far right of the bell curve there is somthing like 7 men for every 1 woman.
/r/TheRedPill23/09/14 01:57 AM
13

Yes, they have been fiddling with tests for years with the explicit goal of minimizing differences between men and women. Even doing that, there is a persistent 3-5 point average advantage for men. Who knows what the real average difference would be if the tests weren't changed to conform to political correctness. Unfortunately for the cultural marxists, the more important difference between males and females is the larger male variability and that isn't easily hidden without making the tests co…
/r/TheRedPill22/09/14 09:01 PM
5

Honestly, if you are going to do something that extreme, I think it is the judges who decide these cases that need to be targeted. The average podunk just goes along with the flow.
/r/TheRedPill22/09/14 08:23 PM
1

I guess he'd pull the trigger with his teeth right?
/r/TheRedPill22/09/14 08:13 PM
6

I don't think he has arms. It might be kind of hard.
/r/TheRedPill22/09/14 08:12 PM
12

I think you need to improve your explanation with specific examples.
/r/TheRedPill22/09/14 07:41 PM
13

The evidence that all the old stereotypes of the feeble-minded female are more or less true (statistically) are actually fairly available in scientific literature. Of course, most academics are leftist and often try to spin it as being the fault of a vast male conspiracy. Not Richard Lynn though.
/r/TheRedPill22/09/14 07:08 PM
7

I don't know if it specifically exempts alimony. Might be open to interpretation.
/r/TheRedPill22/09/14 04:32 PM
15

Nice username. Been over to /r/darkenlightenment yet?
/r/TheRedPill22/09/14 04:21 PM
1

This particular issue is just as invasive for women as it is for men.
/r/TheRedPill19/09/14 01:58 PM
2

(serious question) The law professor on the video has a section on this and describes it this way. Are you saying he is just wrong? If so, why would he say that?
/r/TheRedPill18/09/14 05:44 PM
1

We talk about this a lot over at /r/darkenlightenment. I wrote a fairly long post on it too: http://atavisionary.com/of-madonnas-and-whores/
/r/TheRedPill18/09/14 12:28 PM
2

No, he doesn't. But some states do allow your license to be suspended if you refuse. That would be better than the 17,000 dollars or so you would get if you got convicted.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/14 12:25 PM
1

We talk about this sort of thing a lot in /r/darkenlightenment
/r/TheRedPill18/09/14 12:21 PM
2

I actually agree with you, but I find the blog writers information and perspective interesting.
/r/TheRedPill17/09/14 08:13 PM
2

She flew more than once. Not always as the pilot.
/r/TheRedPill17/09/14 07:11 PM
16

I once had a girl chase me brandishing a whiskey bottle for refusing to have sex with her (she pissed me off royally). Shit happens.
/r/TheRedPill17/09/14 04:27 PM
1

xpost from /r/darkenlightenment
/r/TheRedPill17/09/14 03:42 PM
2

xpost from /r/darkenlightenment
/r/TheRedPill17/09/14 02:00 PM
4

Occasionally husbands would also be dunked for not controlling their wives properly.
/r/PussyPass18/08/14 02:24 PM
19

Dunking insane women into water to cure them of their bad attitudes was part of british common law, and it was also used in the American colonies. I can't understand why they practice was abandoned. We need it now more than ever.
/r/PussyPass17/08/14 04:16 PM
4

I realized that I've never actually been inside a "real" church. Join us at /r/darkenlightenment. The creation of real churches is definitely a priority.
/r/TheRedPill15/08/14 04:58 AM
6

Who could have turned to whores or other women. It is far better than either of those. That let's you know how easy it is to trigger the "other woman competition" instinct in women. 2d pictures set it off.
/r/TheRedPill15/08/14 04:52 AM
2

Please add to the christian presence in /r/darkenlightenment. Traditional values are needed for civilization.
/r/TheRedPill15/08/14 04:49 AM
10

American men are pussified. It is disgusting. More disgusting than the women who take advantage of it by far.
/r/TheRedPill15/08/14 04:47 AM
18

They aren't Christians. They are churchians. The bible is very red pill about men's relationships with women. /r/darkenlightenment is a much better place for the christian man to find a place that will promote traditional relationships. Obviously it can't modify the current political system (yet) but this sort of thing has to start somewhere.
/r/TheRedPill15/08/14 04:46 AM
2

Ignoring this bad behavior is a sign of weakness that men have been forced into in our society. The individual man can do nothing about it and as an individual you advocate the correct action. But the right action, the real thing that should be done, is to punish such poor opinions. This can only be done in a society where the men actually work together for the common good. This society has declined beyond such remedies.
/r/TheRedPill15/08/14 04:24 AM
3

Honestly, the question to ask is why have any loyalty to a society that allows this attitude to become mainstream. Men have the power to create their own societies when they work together. When the time comes are you going to be on the side of a society who automatically assumes you are either a living wallet or criminal, or will you want to be a part of a new society?
/r/TheRedPill15/08/14 04:15 AM
2

I'd love to say that such assumptions are the products of diseased minds but if so, it must be a highly contagious disease It is the cathedral. Progressivism is the meme equivalent of a contagious disease and feminism is the most lethal of the progressive memes.
/r/TheRedPill15/08/14 04:11 AM
6

I probably would have cussed her out. I have done it to doctors/nurses before for getting too presumptuous and priggish.
/r/TheRedPill14/08/14 08:10 PM
-1

‘There stands, my friend, in yonder pool, An engine call’d a ducking stool: By legal pow’r commanded down, The joy and terror of the town, If jarring females kindle strife, Give language foul, or lug the coif; If noisy dames should once begin To drive the house with horrid din, Away, you cry, you’ll grace the stool, We’ll teach you how your tongue to rule. The fair offender fills the seat, In sullen pomp, profoundly great. Down in the deep the stool descends, But here, at first, we miss our ends…
/r/TheRedPill14/08/14 04:37 PM
5

That is the problem with common scolds. Women have an innate tendency to bitch and there simply isn't any reasoning with them. Frankly, the cucking stool should be brought back to cure that subset of women who have an inability to control emotional ignorance escaping their mouths.
/r/TheRedPill14/08/14 04:15 PM
1

I don't know about Europe, but this does seem pretty specific to the US. When I have traveled there was no such perception at all.
/r/TheRedPill14/08/14 04:12 PM
3

If a group of men ever decide to grow some balls and set up a society outside the current craptastic paradigm, these people like that accuser will be the first to go.
/r/TheRedPill14/08/14 03:03 PM
7

As if the university system wasn't broken enough already. It costs way too much compared to the value you get out since there are too many worthless majors. (of course this varies major by major). They force you to take shit you don't need for your career or focus of study to give you a "well rounded" education. That is just code for making you stay an extra year or two paying tuition. They now want to add even more huge layers of red tape and cost to an already overpriced system which will in a…
/r/TheRedPill14/08/14 02:53 PM
9

A man simply goes to change the diaper of his daughter at the doctor's office and several women automatically assume he is a pedophile rapist. People who do this have a lot more coming to them than simply being cussed at.
/r/TheRedPill14/08/14 02:45 PM
0

Ivy leagues offer lots of money to have a good gender ratio (in the sciences especially). So your argument there is incorrect when considering a population and not a few exceptional cases. If you mean the family that she marries into, then it is the husband that is paying, not her. I am not advocating lowering standards. Quite the opposite. It requires the lowering of standards to get more women into science. Guys who score better than women will still not get in because women are incorrectly be…
/r/TheRedPill13/08/14 03:31 PM
2

Are you incapable of reading? most studies don't find asians to have smaller brains. Those that do tend to use estimation equations that underweight head wideness relative to length or height. Identical twin studies pretty clearly demonstrate that IQ is mostly heritable. So you speculation is not really useful.
/r/TheRedPill13/08/14 01:46 PM
3

Having an Ivy League educated mother raising kids greatly increases the odds of the kids being successful Intelligence is a genetic trait. I bet those women got a lot of scholarships to help pay for those degrees. Thus they wasted taxpayer and charity money and returned nothing to society. They took up a spot at an Ivy league school which could have been used by someone who would have contributed productively after graduating. It is massively unfair to that person who couldn't get in thanks to h…
/r/TheRedPill13/08/14 01:42 PM
1

Pushing women into science and careers is such a waste of resources for society. It costs huge amounts of money and women simply will never work as hard as men do. It is a fact. The ones who even come close won't have children so whatever made them hardworking will be shredded from the gene pool. This is dysgenesis, plain and simple. Women fuck up office environments (I know from personal experience). They are constantly trying to undermine eachother and drag every productive employee into it (t…
/r/TheRedPill13/08/14 01:34 PM
2

actually no, most studies find the opposite. Including the review I link to in the post. Keep in mind, for all groups there is lots of variation regardless so averages don't tell you about individuals, but the average is still informative about the population as a whole.
/r/TheRedPill13/08/14 01:10 PM
1

I do and I will. And I won't be censored by leftists. That is why I purchased my own website.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 04:37 PM
1

Yes, I have a 40 page post filled with 50-100 citations. I am in fact reading a paper for it right now "sex chromosomes and brain gender" by Art Arnold. It is probably around half way finished. When it is done I will post it to my blog, same as my username. Next week I will probably publish a related piece on this titled "Career women are dysgenic". Also with studies cited. Check back there after next tuesday. Though it is much shorter.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 08:58 PM
2

/r/darkenlightenment Missing an n, sorry.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 03:26 PM
1

Because the purpose wasn't to understand the innate differences between men and women that might prompt men to be so pedantic to cater meticulously to esoteric subjects and why women simply don't seem to care about such things. Rather, they want to know what social bias discourages women. Except there is no such thing in the anonymous internet. Social shame or promotion doesn't exist in wikipedia editing. Only personal passions. The only correct conclusion is that personal passion is a masculine…
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 03:58 AM
1

Well, that isn't the only option for creating real men. But it doesn't seem so hopeful at the moment. Please join us at /r/darkenlightenment. We accept the truths of the red pill, but want to preserve and advance civilization as a priority. Hedonism, decay, and degeneracy may be what liberal societies deserve for their naivete, but some of us haven't quite given up yet or exhausted our capacity for forgiveness.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 03:47 AM
1

The study is useless, it was only done for ideological reasons.
/r/TheRedPill06/08/14 08:49 PM
2

I call this a men's rights issue because men pay most of the taxes, and their money is being taken and spent on useless ideological garbage studies that have no value.
/r/TheRedPill06/08/14 04:41 PM
1

I went to a pool party a few months ago for this girls birthday. We were all sitting around and the girls were talking about some nonsense. Then it comes up about how they make bad decisions and date jerks who wont commit. One girl observes: maybe that is why we are all still single. On solitary, brave feminist stands up and loudly proclaims to all the other women that she is happy that she is single and being single is preferable. Bicycle and all that. The silence was deafening. The other girls…
/r/TheRedPill06/08/14 03:43 PM
2

I agree with the other commenter. No one here gives a shit about your lesbian cousin or her perspective. Her experience holds no value for red pill men.
/r/TheRedPill06/08/14 02:11 AM
0

The only sincerity I am suggesting is the desire for alpha men/patriarchy. Islam just happens to provide that, but it isn't the only source.
/r/TheRedPill05/08/14 04:58 PM
4

You might like /r/darkenlightenment
/r/TheRedPill05/08/14 03:46 PM
1

Isn't the arab guy hot because he is alpha? That is, he is patriarchal?
/r/TheRedPill05/08/14 03:17 PM
6

Women in the UK are so desperate for alpha that they are willing to convert to Islam which of any religion imposes the most restrictions on them. More evidence that you should not pay attention to what women say, but what they do.
/r/TheRedPill05/08/14 02:58 PM
1

Maybe, but I am not sure what you you base that on. Why are NY people above that?
/r/TheRedPill01/08/14 05:34 PM
1

.... For some reason I don't think New York scores better on overall misandry.
/r/TheRedPill01/08/14 02:17 PM
1

Because women have feelz and not logic. This is why (the vast majority of) women shouldn't be allowed to control anything or be in positions of power. Emotion is bad for leadership.
/r/TheRedPill01/08/14 02:16 PM
10

That is a picture of the misandric cunts who run the board. Here is an article about what happened http://lasvegas.cbslocal.com/2014/07/01/school-5-year-old-committed-sexual-misconduct-by-pulling-pants-down-on-playground/
/r/TheRedPill30/07/14 08:11 PM
6

I really liked the first mass effect. The 2cnd was hit or miss, but the third... God damnit. I wish we could just kill the whining feminists and other cultural marxists. Tolerating that the maladapted exist does not mean giving them opportunities to ruin our games.
/r/TheRedPill23/07/14 04:48 AM
3

Sounds like you came into contact with a common scold. They used to be more forceful in punishing women who engaged in that shit. I wish they would bring it back. ‘There stands, my friend, in yonder pool, An engine call’d a ducking stool: By legal pow’r commanded down, The joy and terror of the town, If jarring females kindle strife, Give language foul, or lug the coif; If noisy dames should once begin To drive the house with horrid din, Away, you cry, you’ll grace the stool, We’ll teach you how…
/r/TheRedPill22/07/14 01:50 PM
1

I want to thank /u/superangelo64 for his post on "what constitutes an alpha female" for inspiring this post. There is such a thing as an alpha female, but I think this comes closer to answering the spirit of his question.
/r/TheRedPill17/07/14 01:52 AM
1

Here is an article that mentions her framing attempt.
/r/PussyPass17/07/14 01:33 AM
1

try libgen.org first You can also try /r/scholar
/r/TheRedPill09/07/14 01:20 PM
4

.... I see commenting in the redpill is getting lower in quality.... Anyway, preselection is evolutionarily rational for women to use as a mental shortcut. Indepedent evaluation of every male's value would be prohibitively costly and unreasonable. Preselection allows the use of other women's mental resources for mate evaluation and probably has a high fraction of true positive high value identifications compared to false negatives and false positives.
/r/TheRedPill08/07/14 08:55 PM
1

I searched google to see what links from my site were showing up and found this. Thanks for submitting a link to my site. I am not surprised this wasn't very popular on /r/mensrights. After all, MRAs generally also accept egalitarianism as true. At least a fairly large percentage do, which makes MRA's have a significant progressive character.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 04:11 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter