TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AtemAndrew Archive

View 5 posts and 433 comments by AtemAndrew on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

"It's everyone else's fault, not mine." They're playing to win, but their way is the ONLY way. See - that one survival show.
/r/MensRights23/01/26 10:32 AM
3

Doesn't help that they've spread such dogmatic hate that many think you can't be racist to White people, that misandry doesn't exist, etc etc.
/r/MensRights27/11/25 02:08 PM
1

Aiming for the symptom, not the source, and unless the source is fixed the problem will probably only get worse. Men are reluctant because, among other things, they often feel that people within the health care system may judge them, mock them, or blame them.
/r/MensRights20/11/25 12:38 AM
5

This is what happens when there's such a demand for bigotry that it is manufactured; not only do you spread the lie that your opponents wish you dead but, in turn, you naturally spread the 'truth' that it's thus alright to wish death upon your opponents.
/r/MensRights09/10/24 10:19 PM
2

Last I checked, in Western society, the onus is on the accuser to provide proof. All the defense has to do is provide reasonable doubt.
/r/MensRights16/08/24 01:13 AM
270

Reminds me of that one survival show where the dudes bro'd it up while the women basically kept ignoring the people who knew what they were doing, were given food and aid by the producers, and still mucked things up... and in later seasons they progressively got worse men and gave women more aid and it still wasn't great.
/r/MensRights30/07/24 04:58 AM
4

So, uh, just to confirm: There isn't any actual proof yet, this is just a reaction... to some footage of a guy dragging a similar-looking sleeping bag?
/r/MensRights16/07/24 02:30 AM
12

Part and parcel with the push for Men to be able to financially pull away. Ignoring various pro-life, pro-choice, and inbetween arguments - if a woman controls any and all discussion regarding abortion, then the man has all the right to know that he is the father and to, potentially, step away.
/r/MensRights03/07/24 05:04 AM
3

So... were these girls just taking IT to become secretaries, the techie version of Home Ec class? Why the heck were these classes 'only' teaching how to use Microsoft Office to begin with?
/r/MensRights27/06/24 10:54 PM
20

Same in regards to randomly being banned from r/interestingasfuck . Years of being in both subreddits, and some random mod with a stick up their ass decided to ban me and demand a mea culpa for daring to be in the men's rights sub, which they deemed a 'bad-faith subreddit' that 'spreads propaganda/disinformation/racism/sexism.'
/r/MensRights15/05/24 12:44 PM
3

Bear. If I die, I die. If I get accused, the rest of my life's hell.
/r/MensRights03/05/24 08:22 AM
4

Want tampons and birth control (or was it pregnancy tests) covered by bealthcare, but not prostate exams. Smh.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 10:37 PM
22

'wept into the dock', 'wearing prison-issue grey clothes', 'the teenager was flanked by two guards'. Comes out to 'look at this poor teenage girl, thrown into the prison system after crying her eyes out, two burly guards there to intimidate her'. Not to mention the heart-string tugging addition of, "After being told she faces the next month in custody, Betts-Ramsey tearfully asked to speak to her mother through the glass front of the dock. Afterwards, she called out “I love you” when she was led…
/r/MensRights14/02/24 10:03 PM
20

The UK, where farting in the same room as a woman is a hate crime.
/r/MensRights07/02/24 05:34 AM
281

We gonna talk about how unironically racist 'ricecel' is? (Ignoring how misandrist talk about incels usually is, of course.)
/r/MensRights04/12/23 10:19 AM
3

'You're less of a man, so you should settle with being a cuck' is certainly a take that I wo- actually, no, I FULLY expect that from modern feminism, and older feminism considering that male infertility has long been a legal reason to demand a divorce.
/r/MensRights05/08/23 07:47 PM
29

Man breaks cuffs, offs the dude presumably watching him and takes a hostage, then has 0 reaction time to her pulling out a gun to cap him.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 05:44 AM
8

At this rate, I can only hope that what's left of the 'good men' end up fleeing Scotland. From talking to friends, their culture is particularly one where men seeking help for mental health is even more looked down upon, as well as more traditional expectations for men to take care of all the money earning, all the support, etc. With stuff like this - and nonsense from the UK in general bleeding over - it looks like Scotland's just going to gradually turn into more and more of a leftist-feminist…
/r/MensRights27/04/23 09:43 PM
18

Your assumption is flawed in that you assume that they're always equally qualified. A potential candidate could range anywhere from 'less qualified' to 'very under-qualified' and still get the job due to nepotism or diversity practices.
/r/MensRights14/04/23 09:38 AM
19

Any male calling any sort of helpline needs to start recording their conversations.
/r/MensRights07/04/23 06:49 PM
4

Meanwhile we've got women groping men, flipping kilts, pantsing, Cardi B's still popular...
/r/MensRights12/02/23 11:12 PM
6

'The grass is always greener'. It'd be ignorant to deny that there aren't people who regret transitioning, and that there aren't people - especially teenagers - who are pipelined into transitioning by being fed propaganda. You can't simply have interests, you can't simply have a different sexuality, you can't simply like a particular fashion... you MUST be 'different', you MUST be 'special'. While not every transperson is a 'trender', it'd be ignorant to pretend like there aren't transwomen who …
/r/MensRights27/12/22 10:21 PM
5

A WNBA star got arrested due to smuggling and drug possession. And wants to put a stop to the national anthem because 'it was made when Black people didn't have rights!'
/r/MensRights08/12/22 11:10 PM
5

Hell, infertility is a valid reason for divorce.
/r/MensRights09/11/22 01:55 AM
5

It's truly a terrible choice to make, but she's protecting a life at the cost of her own. This is a situation where it IS her body, and her choice... but her body isn't entirely her own - something she's also chosen to respect. One might argue that the first child might be a little too young to remember their mother - depending on how many years were bought - your friend will be left with two permanent reminders of her. For better, and for worse.
/r/MensRights22/10/22 07:24 AM
2

It fits into the range of 'divide your age by half and add 5'. (In his case, 31/2=15.5, +5=20.5) The difference between this and what's going on in California is that they are two consenting ADULTS, able to frick and drink, with jobs who have to pay taxes.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 11:23 PM
2

Right, I'm going to try to avoid being overly hostile like at least one comment to this. Just as boys and girls might learn differently in schools and might lean towards certain methods thereof, men and women have different ways of dealing with mental stress and this would likewise translate to potentially needing different kinds of therapy. Though, while we're realizing that boys are getting more and more put down in school and there are, in fact, teachers that are purposefully giving some boys…
/r/MensRights02/10/22 05:23 PM
8

Because men are seen as more disposable and there are more in need of the extra income that signing up for a test study might bring. Technically women cause more accidents per capita, but men do cause more 'serious' accidents. That said, the number of male motor vehicle deaths have always been significantly higher. In 2020 alone 72% of the deaths were male, of course. 72% of standard drivers, 98% of truck drivers (and 70% of truck passengers), 87% bicyclists, 92% motorcyclists, and 71% of pedest…
/r/MensRights29/09/22 03:40 PM
1

And then, for no reason at all, the amount of LGBTQ representation in the homeless population skyrocketed.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 10:58 PM
35

Reckless endangerment and up to a year in prison for most STDs, some kind of felony/misdemeanor, and have to register as a sex offender. Potentially manslaughter or attempted murder for HIV, and can carry longer sentences. Commie-fornia, meanwhile, actually lowered the penalties for knowingly spreading STDs. Largely Democratic states - including the strongholds, of course, decided to also specifically reduce - or repeal - specific punishments for HIV itself. 'Because it's no longer a death sente…
/r/MensRights16/09/22 10:46 PM
5

Meaning... they admit that they discriminate against white people or men as a group, outright.
/r/MensRights22/08/22 09:01 PM
1

Seems quite damning.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 06:55 PM
-7

Why else would I refer to it as brainwashing? Women are being robbed of agency, responsibility, and common sense in order to give them the freedom to fuck everyone else up.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 08:48 AM
44

This is what happens when you brainwash women into believing that all men think about and want is sex, that you can't rape men, and that even if they say 'no' they mean 'yes'. She IS reaching out, she IS asking about it, and she is 'starting' to think she messed up, at least. It's too late at this point, but at least she's starting to realize what she did was wrong, that she fucked up and that she fucked HIM up. Hopefully some people will learn from this.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 05:43 AM
24

Part of the issue is that they aren't only getting into positions via quotas. Certain sectors, such as the police, firefighters, the military, have lowered the bar in regards to the physical capability required.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 07:15 PM
8

Looks like we can start using Malta as something to point to in regards to what to avoid in a political party... hopefully you can get these people voted back out.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 06:13 PM
9

Fucked over by the government, no. But - aside from the discussion as to whether or not removing a ruling that returns the decision to the states - they are right in regards to the fact that women should know accountability, should potentially be made to pay child support and share assets depending on the status of each parent or marriage participant. Things need to be equal, not tipped overly to the side of the female.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 10:17 PM
3

It's being talked around and used as political ammunition. Gun-related deaths, talks of 'toxic masculinity', further excuses to give children completely to the mother, etc.
/r/MensRights05/06/22 05:39 AM
8

Virtually every case I've read about men getting breast cancer has been mocked and males using female avatars for various streaming sites have been attacked so I'm gonna say 'no'.
/r/MensRights15/05/22 10:32 PM
6

I wonder what Stephen King would say about this.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 05:22 PM
57

Meanwhile, given jail is one of the safest places to be in late-game Monopoly... until you get out...
/r/MensRights05/05/22 09:31 PM
15

Saving this post to buy some Sauvage perfume when I have some extra cash and to show this to anyone who thinks that this current feminist-lead nonsense is healthy.
/r/MensRights24/04/22 03:12 AM
85

Remember when schools used to tell you to stand up to peer pressure? Instead of, you know, using peer pressure to brainwash you into subservience and self-hating inferiority?
/r/MensRights23/03/22 09:56 PM
1

I REALLY hope someone reports her to the cops for child abuse if she follows through with the second comment.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 08:01 PM
8

Given you resigned rather than got fired, you certainly can't say you 'lost' your job. You can CERTAINLY say you were concerned about your own safety AT that job, both in terms of job security and any future assaults from customers given your boss's reaction.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 08:57 AM
60

To say nothing of... you know, child support. "I wasn't born to live for women." Tempted to quote off of The Fine Print...
/r/MensRights10/03/22 02:16 AM
1

First would be calling out hypocrisy. Feminists seem to run on the 'poisoned M&M' principle - that is to say, much as many call all white people racist nowadays, Feminists say all men are evil or are potential evil. Second would be to bring back a focus to how 'traditional' roles can be good. Kids NEED both parents, not just one - or at least a figure to fill the secondary role. The nuclear family is tight, neat, and close and allows for some variations. It's as ridiculous to attack a homemaker …
/r/MensRights04/03/22 06:37 PM
1

More and more problems for women have been caused by Feminists. Larger dissatisfaction when it comes to jobs and having to be an earner, simultaneous pressure on both sides not to be the 'homemaker' because a housewife is tradcon bad but a househusband isn't pulling his weight, men avoiding women in the workplace, and everywhere else, due to fears of false accusation - potentially at the cost of learning opportunities and lives and the resulting paranoia being instilled in both sides - men a con…
/r/MensRights04/03/22 09:47 AM
1

By that logic, people should only be allowed to use roads that they directly chose to contribute funds for. While I'm all for having more control over where taxpayer dollars go on an individual level, they are meant to help a larger group of people rather than just yourself.
/r/MensRights07/02/22 07:45 PM
5

Alternatively, a secondary parallel program should be required for the sake of the other gender. For example, if a shelter is created for women, another equivalent shelter should be created for men.
/r/MensRights05/02/22 02:51 AM
4

I personally haven't, but I forgot the fact that there are a number of jobs with outright stated hiring preference in other countries, yes...
/r/MensRights06/01/22 11:06 PM
3

Horseshoe theory is very much in effect, yes. And while I admit that I've begun to generalize while I ahem generally don't like to do so, I've simply seen, heard, and experienced far too many on the Left simply... going along with things while experiencing those on the right actually looking into things, poking holes or needling people on all sides. Take this with a grain of salt since I can't find the studies in question (it's been a year or two, google can be bad about this stuff and I don't h…
/r/MensRights06/01/22 11:05 PM
8

While I'm more than aware that traditionalism falls under the right wing (more irony in that much of what the left pushes invalidates the notion that they're attempting to break traditional gender roles and norms, but I digress), that particular issue is a bit more complex than simply 'we don't want our women dying/getting captured' or the like, ranging from potential issues with camaraderie to sexual assault within the military to the ways in which the police, firefighters, and the military hav…
/r/MensRights06/01/22 11:00 PM
12

One might argue it's fallen into the right-wing spectrum simply due to how the left has defined themselves. It's an unfortunate case of being forced to 'define' ourselves by our enemies in that many on the left think that white people are bad, that MEN are bad, etc. Many on the left want to run on emotion rather than logic, 'listen and believe' rather than evidence, restriction rather than free speech. Any push for equality or egalitarianism, for mens' rights, will thus require pushing against t…
/r/MensRights06/01/22 10:42 PM
8

"Concentrate on your own communities" yet another reminder that segregation is back in vogue.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 08:27 AM
9

"Generally, a conviction on voluntary manslaughter will get you at least three years, and up to 20 years in a state prison, along with high fines and possibly victim restitution."
/r/MensRights25/12/21 04:30 AM
1

'Confirms'. You mean claims?
/r/MensRights03/12/21 05:26 AM
1

Don't forget that they decided to also make it Women's Entrepreneurship day as well back in 2014.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 08:12 AM
7

It's also been shown that, more often than not, the 'same' soap for men and women is not - in fact - the 'same' soap. Usually different quantities of a given ingredient if not even more ingredients.
/r/MensRights14/11/21 01:34 AM
2

Mmm, isn't teaching self defense victim blaming? Tsk, tsk.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 06:40 PM
1

Meanwhile: Johnny Depp, Bill Cosby, etc.
/r/MensRights13/09/21 10:19 PM
0

Let's see... how far has embryo freezing come?
/r/MensRights27/08/21 04:35 PM
31

It's not about equality, it's about pushing men down.
/r/MensRights25/06/21 06:01 PM
2

March 21st, evidentially. In which case, they need to shut up about this nonsense and just start making THAT a thing because I'd never heard of it until now.
/r/MensRights21/06/21 05:20 PM
20

In all honesty I don't mind recognizing single parents, they do (usually...) struggle, if not economically then mentally, and if not that then the kid suffers. The issue is those who use it to make things all about them, who play at being a victim. And, worse, those who try to erase fathers, fathers' rights, and fathers' day while holding mothers as the ONLY important parent.
/r/MensRights20/06/21 11:41 PM
9

Something about creating your own problems and self-fulfilling prophecies.
/r/MensRights26/05/21 03:49 PM
13

Look, when impotence is a valid legal reason to demand divorce and alimony/child support, I think we can assume the worst about something like this.
/r/MensRights22/04/21 07:44 PM
27

That's generally the playbook of these types of folks. Deflection, attack ad hominem, and blind emotion over factual reason.
/r/MensRights19/04/21 02:44 AM
4

Exactly. We don't have enough information to go off either way.
/r/MensRights11/04/21 02:17 AM
23

Well, it's a 'safety order'. As far as I can tell, a safety order can either be a protection order or a restraining order, but searches point towards the former. The key difference is that a protection order is temporary (some, such as the article I found on safety orders, not even forcing the person given the order from leaving the house) Does not require the presence of the accused abuser, and does not require a lawyer or a full court hearing. As far as we know from this, it could just be the …
/r/MensRights11/04/21 01:07 AM
3

slowly raises up Bill Cosby
/r/MensRights21/03/21 03:03 AM
4

Given the US just brought back the 'Violence Against Women Act' and a bunch of Dems are trying to manhunt the Republicans who voted against it as misogynistic - in some cases racist...
/r/MensRights18/03/21 09:55 PM
1

I usually mention that, yeah. And a surprising amount of people, often from cities and - surprisingly - even some country folk SEVERELY estimate hogs. Coyotes are one thing, they can be good or bad to an extent. Hogs? Nonono kill 'em all dead. Like a cockroach infestation if roaches had the ability to destroy everything.
/r/MensRights14/03/21 09:48 PM
1

You're ignoring the fact that 1. Google can be hella obscure even if you KNOW what to search, 2. Google WILL obscure things - either altering results, removing terms, forcing sites to change or outright hiding links and websites - if they want to, and 3. Not everyone knows the magical arcane lovecraftian code to get exactly what they want every time. Beyond that, not every single type of fraud has a unique name. Fraud is fraud. You wanna know what comes up if I search for 'term for someone who j…
/r/MensRights13/03/21 12:19 AM
5

Queerplungers, insurance fraudsters, and all manner of scam artists have been around forever.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 04:52 AM
7

Not every feminist or SJW is entirely brainwashed or dogmatic. Some were raised into it, some were taught that way by the system, some just thing it's the 'only' way because..hey, everyone deserves equal rights, yeah? We have multiple feminist and SJW converts among our and other similar communities, women who have spoken out on behalf of men and people who realize that things are going just too far. Some people need to see actual facts that aren't hand-picked by the media or just get told the o…
/r/MensRights10/03/21 04:21 PM
12

1/4 homeless are women. 19% of journalists killed in 2017 were women. Etc. Behold the concept of 'lie by ommission'. A form of misrepreaentation where you shape the truth by casting certain information in shadow and other into the light. That's an interesting statistic, isn't it? Held up and presented all important-like. Wow, that many women? Clearly we much march to aid them! Except, of course, both of my examples and the above will easily show that men are the most infected rather than those t…
/r/MensRights25/02/21 08:29 AM
15

In theory, good samaratin laws protect men who need to help such women. In practice, while men win most (if not all) of these cases, they become forever stained and hunted in the court of public opinion.
/r/MensRights30/01/21 01:58 AM
3

With the exception of a few current Asian market blockages which are more to do with puritanical notions rather than racism, Australia seems to have more of a feminism problem than a racism problem..except, apparently, when it comes to aboriginals. My post specifically was discussing the treatment of aboriginals vs first nationers vs native americans, specifically in modern times. Native Americans are given reservations, they're given jobs, and they're babied by people who think that people can'…
/r/MensRights04/12/20 11:09 PM
5

Another point towards 'America isn't as racist as people like to claim'.
/r/MensRights04/12/20 05:34 PM
10

What's Australia's track record on aboriginal treatment? As far as I could tell, they're generally highly regarded but it isn't a matter I've looked into. Is it better or worse than how Canadians have generally treated first nationers?
/r/MensRights04/12/20 03:10 PM
-7

While I understand the concern, asking for the name you actively post articles under so that we can look at your articles is vastly different from asking for, say, your address or license plate, let alone stuff that could be used for identity theft like ssn. Cool your jets m'dude.
/r/MensRights11/10/20 09:43 PM
8

Honestly, I'd consider the natural progression of letting them diagnose every other kid with some mental illness and drugging them accordingly. Kids and teens are kids and teens, they're gonna act out, and their hormones are gonna be out of whack. Drugging them is going to make things worse unless they have a legit issue.
/r/MensRights07/10/20 08:52 PM
3

For me, it was when I found out there were several countries they had have heavy say in particular panels while not properly enforcing anything. Further enforced by their increasing antagonism against the US in the past decade or so.
/r/MensRights08/09/20 06:16 AM
1

There've been a lot of articles and news reports about how it 'stresses women out more'. We're back at 'women are the real victims of war'.
/r/MensRights30/03/20 06:27 AM
5

To be entirely fair: Not everyone has access to proper transportation, public or private, and there are a number of jobs that require you live within a certain distance of the location. I got turned down for a pet-sitting job because it was a 15 minute drive from where I lived. Was told 'it wouldn't be efficient'. But I assume those cases are in the minority.
/r/MensRights08/03/20 06:37 PM
4

It's stuff like this that makes me want to support 3 strike laws... if not for the fact that it'd inevitably used against people who don't deserve it as opposed to people like the above.
/r/MensRights07/03/20 05:59 PM
14

Unfortunately: It's quite simple. There are a number of easy spin-offs that can be made. One with a young Jack Sparrow, perhaps based on the book series. A prequel focusing on the black flag or barbosa. Something focusing on any of the side characters, etc.
/r/MensRights02/02/20 07:00 AM
-3

So..pretty much where we are now then?
/r/MensRights07/01/20 10:34 PM
3

Many states require the consent of the recorded. Minors generally need to consent of a parent or guardian. Depending on your state, you have a good legal basis.
/r/MensRights25/12/19 09:21 PM
9

It's complicated.
/r/MensRights01/12/19 06:09 AM
5

To be fair, I think those should be included in the number. The main issue in that case is the fact that men usually don't get shelters to go to.
/r/MensRights24/11/19 12:06 AM
10

The concern is that the men might molest the women or something similar. Beyond that, there are also a number of women in such shelters that escaped abusive relationships and may then have a legitimate reason to fear men, or at least want to avoid them for a while.
/r/MensRights22/11/19 09:27 PM
-8

That's assuming, of course, that the outliers are on the high and not the low end.
/r/MensRights15/11/19 02:14 PM
1

Safe to say we can file this under 'hypocrites who don't know what they're talking about', yes? Especially as they constantly harass female artists who step outside of their boundaries while they go about smearing period blood on everything, yes? Follow a bunch of female artists myself and bought a fair amount of art from female artist at the anime convention I go to each year..which usually has a TON of female artists.
/r/MensRights23/09/19 07:55 PM
6

Honestly I was more traumatized by fire drills. My poor ears...having emergency drills are fine, maybe once a month or month a semester. Fire, shooting, etc. Teaching the boys to get themselves killed? Not fine. Granted, it seems half of boys collectively agree that if a shooter shows up they'll all charge the shooter together.
/r/MensRights19/09/19 08:54 PM
2

I have a feeling this is going to turn out like that Australian resume study.
/r/MensRights10/07/19 08:54 PM
3

"Opponents fear the changes will interfere with judicial discretion and harm older women who can’t get alimony when their husbands reach retirement age." Gee, it'd be a shame if those women actually tried to work and built up a retirement fund rather than just being parasites. Beyond that, don't some states have it so that the elderly can file for disability or unemployment?
/r/MensRights25/06/19 01:59 AM
1

Personally, so long as a single parent is responsible I think they should get respect on both days. However, they should not make a big deal out of it, and they certainly shouldn't harass the other kid or decry the other date/gender parent.
/r/MensRights16/06/19 09:38 PM
2

Making sure that men don't have to pay for the child should be a priority, and should they want the child they should be given a higher priority for consideration given what the mother did - at minimum, the child should become a ward of the state. That said, I don't believe that forcing a woman to give birth would fit our legal system, even if I am pro life.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 01:09 PM
0

I mean, she seems in the right here. You dont go and order someone drinks and then make them pay for all of them. If they start ordering beyond that and you dont feel a connection, that's fine if you have them pay for the ones they ordered. If someone saw you say some clothes looked nice and they said they'd buy it for you.. only to find out they charged it on your credit card, how'd you feel?
/r/PussyPass02/06/19 01:02 AM
5

...didnt this happen like a year or two ago?
/r/MensRights12/05/19 07:45 PM
1

'Less compliant at teamwork and collaboration' Bitch have you seen the Amish??
/r/MensRights07/05/19 11:09 PM
18

Dollar Shave Club is looking in your area
/r/MensRights26/04/19 07:54 AM
63

"Women are the real victims of Male suicide." - Hillary Clinton, 2018 /s
/r/MensRights03/01/19 03:24 AM
1

'Citizen'.
/r/MensRights25/12/18 04:53 AM
69

We live in a society.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 02:58 AM
-1

I have an uncle. Never went to college and did manual work, is now 50-something, has extreme atheritis, fibromyalgia, some other thing he has that makes it so he vomits up whatever he eats half the time. Now, he's gone to court three times. He hasn't been arrested, no. He's been trying to get on disability. Nobody will hire him, he can barely get out bed let alone eat, and certainly can't work. But they won't put him on disability. My uncle was a hard working man and can't do anything on his own…
/r/MensRights24/10/18 11:29 PM
1

So, uh, Spain? Italy? Or how about anywhere with less specific non-women only hate crime laws?
/r/MensRights18/10/18 08:47 AM
3

Firstly, there's the whole bit of lore about time lords being woven due to species wide infertility because... something. Secondly, Missy is awesome and they had a side mention of it in The Doctor's Wife. So long as it doesn't turn into total feminist drivel, it's fine. Amy Pond was awesome, River was awesome, and Clara was really cool until they made her even more of a deus ex machina than 'bad wolf'. Still not a ginger though.
/r/MensRights23/09/18 01:35 AM
3

I'm waiting for the day this comes full circle and some unwitting - probably male - person accepts their entire inheritance and then finds out that there's either nothing or in debt due to their father's built-up child support fees.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 12:38 AM
-4

You mean overdraft fees? I mean, it's generally a flat fee and can be ludicrous for lower, but you're generally going on a type of temporary loan to the bank, it makes sense that there'd be a charge.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 12:34 AM
28

Inb4 "Women are the primary victims of falsely imprisoned men!"
/r/MensRights19/09/18 07:21 PM
3

I'm pretty sure most of us 'alt-right nazi's were against this sort of thing to begin with.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 05:57 PM
1

Aren't they 'personal access units' now or something?
/r/MensRights08/09/18 11:56 PM
2

"Valjean, at last, we see each other plain "M'sieur le maire," you'll wear a different chain."
/r/MensRights08/09/18 11:54 PM
1

Aside from the sunk cost/ gambler's fallacy, to my knowledge you can't double down after doubling down. While you can double down on both parts of a split, I don't believe there's an exact term.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 10:12 PM
4

Time for me to play devil's advocate again. Just as there are occasionally mentally ill mothers who might take their own life and that of their children, the same can be said of some fathers. Not every divorce is due to feminism, not every suicide is due to visiting hours. Not to take away from the many who HAVE been wronged, but let's try not to jump off the same slippery slope and blame everything on women/feminism. Blame it on the many, many numerous examples we do have instead of a blanketin…
/r/MensRights29/08/18 09:54 AM
3

Likely specifically due to feminists of past and present.
/r/MensRights25/08/18 06:33 PM
2

I can see the headline now, "1 in 10 civilian casualties are women!"
/r/MensRights24/08/18 01:03 AM
2

Was about 50/50 in my high school. Elementary the only Male teacher I had was for bible and music, middle the only Male was PE, high school was spread all over the place. Female in stem class a one year and Male in stem class b the next, female art teacher Male compsci, year after that Male English female geography, etc.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 07:54 PM
1

Yet again proving that the only way men are considered is if it's in a way that effects women positively.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 07:49 PM
2

Great!
/r/MensRights04/08/18 07:40 PM
2

Deadpool?
/r/MensRights14/07/18 12:45 AM
3

That's not my opinion. It says it right here, 'you are a terrible person'.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 04:44 PM
2

I need some context for this, because merely showing feminist icons as examples isn't bad in and of itself, more so since a number of such icons HAVE contributed positively to art, science, etc.
/r/MensRights29/06/18 06:10 PM
1

To be fair, the same group has a batch of commercials where the situation is flipped for like alien shooter games (that is, dads doing better and moms doing bad.) it seems to be based on genre more than anything.
/r/MensRights25/06/18 09:55 PM
5

To be fair, who the heck calls their wife 'wifey'? Usually its honey or something. Not that it excuses yet another double standard.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 07:02 AM
8

Bioshock comes to mind. Mock and abuse the lower rung, dismiss and remove them. The result will be a top-heavy society that's but one small blow away from toppling into shards of stained glass.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 12:28 AM
2

Insert various philosophical and religious viewpoints here. My point being that someone should not be persecuted simply for a perceived slight, especially when such a slight may not have happened in the first place. In this case, obviously she should be persecuted, but should not. In the case of, say, Bill Cosby, the slight occured but was expected by those involved, thus he should not be persecuted. To use a literature example, Jean Valjean, he was treated as lower than scum after being release…
/r/MensRights31/05/18 06:08 PM
3

People have the right to judge nothing, we give that power to the court systems and police to uphold our laws. From there, we must follow those laws in order to uphold the social contract. In addition, there is the massive issue of various corrupt court workers, as well as the large number of people who are unjustly incarcerated in our prisons, let alone decried and slandered across the media.
/r/MensRights31/05/18 03:43 AM
9

Criminal Records, yes. However, in the Court of Public Opinion, most criminals are automatically considered lower than low, and are often treated as scum, pariah, can't easily be hired, etc. Their punishment extends past their actual punishment. Say you purchased a cheese burger. You payed for it properly, ate it, done and done. Then each day thereafter you have to pay for the cheeseburger again and again, without receiving any such cheeseburger after. In fact, in paying for the cheeseburger dai…
/r/MensRights30/05/18 11:01 PM
8

Good ol' pleading the belly.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 08:21 AM
1

Ideology: a system of ideas and ideals, especially one that forms the basis of economic or political theory and policy. The basis remains, the system built around the ideology can be changed for better and for worse. In addition, I can argue that currently both feminism and a number of activists are working against the basis of their ideologies by making things worse instead of better. There is a difference between rights and privileges. Demanding a privilege as a right is ludicrous and has many…
/r/MensRights30/03/18 02:09 AM
3

Incorrect, the current claimers of the ideology are disjoint from the purpose of the ideologies. Advocating for women's rights does not automatically mean you can't advocate for men's rights, and doesn't mean you automatically advocate AGAINST men's rights. The same applies in reverse. The same is applicable to other movements. Again, the issue is how the ideologies have been twisted. People have always used a banner to spread their own ideals, and always will.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 10:54 PM
2

Feminism isn't inherently wrong. Nor is advocating for black rights. They are equally as valid as advocating for the rights of men and white people. They are as valid as advocating for the rights of anyone. However, ideology - be it founded in religion, equality, or self-improvement - has a tendency to be twisted, resulting in the harm to self, others, or both. Modern day feminism is an example of this, harming men and women in a blind race to raise women back onto the pedestal they once occupie…
/r/MensRights29/03/18 06:15 AM
2

Top. (Wo)myn.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 02:39 AM
1

That's a nice bunch of straw men you have there.
/r/MensRights02/02/18 06:40 AM
1

Like offering straws.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 03:26 AM
3

The general idea is a combination of laws and morals put in place to protect women. Their innocence, the honor of they and their family, the damage done to their bodies and mind, potential pregnancy, etc. The idea is that murder results in death, they're no longer suffering. But if you instead 'scar them for life', then it's infinitely worse. However, it's obviously become more and more of a gendered issue. Not inasmuch as only women get raped (which depends on which country you're in legally sp…
/r/MensRights23/01/18 07:27 PM
1

More wishful thinking than anything, I hate my voice.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 08:55 PM
1

In regards to the dating part, that's less 'traditional boy pays for everything' and more me insisting on paying for stuff because I'm too nice in general. My ex and I are still friends (we mostly parted because she's more of a party-girl and because of college), whearas my current GF likes me just fine and, at least partly due to the fact that she's trans, we tend to split the bill and juggle gifts more often. So not all's that bad, just that it'd probably be better in a few ways :P
/r/MensRights21/01/18 12:53 PM
1

I'd have intact genitals, I'd have a better singing voice, I'd probably be pushed to service positions instead of working on grill (I don't like dealing with people, so that'd actually be negative), I probably would have been taken on dates instead of dropping so much on my first girlfriend, my current girlfriend who's transitioning would be happier since she prefers women, I'd probably be looked down on less due to being a white male, etc.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 12:20 PM
3

teachmennottocommitvehicularmanslaughter
/r/MensRights24/12/17 12:00 AM
1

Seeing as the police in England have a habit of ignoring this sort of stuff due to fear of 'racial insensitivity' ...
/r/MensRights18/12/17 12:56 AM
1

I mean, so far it seems like someone left wild wasteland on...
/r/MensRights16/12/17 12:49 AM
0

I'm sure no men ever wanted to have better performance or temporarily fix a limp dick.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 06:44 AM
7

A few seedier subredditors shut down, an admin changed, an the place basically became a ahem "Wretched hive of scum and villainy".
/r/MensRights16/11/17 10:30 PM
2

Is that subreddit fixed yet? I kind of abandoned it after the takeover that happened a while back.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 11:54 PM
1

It was a blind test. If you do a test without informing the subject of the content matter, then they can respond without forming an opinion ON the matter. Even better is if you don't let them know it's a test, as knowledge of observation can also create bias or behavioral changes.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 04:23 AM
1

Equal alimony. However, the amount needs to be considered. The amount given needs to be enough to protect the child(ren) and spouse with decreasing amounts per year. This would be so 1. The receiving spouse would be protected, then encouraged to get a supporting job and 2. The giving spouse has time to get their finances in order and aren't financially ruined. Perhaps have a tax allowance in the case of both spouses providing income.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 12:58 AM
2

Mind you, I wrote this up multiple times at like, 3 in the morning XD. You're pretty much right though, especially on that last bit O_o.
/r/MensRights03/11/17 04:11 AM
1

As I mentioned, I'm not that great at actually making essays and tend to detract a bit. That, and I had to look at things from both sides, so I had to list other examples. My main point, in this case, is that while there DOES need to be a focus on aiding women in the third world (where it's needed), there are active movements to remove men's rights in the first world (where feminism is mostly UNneeded)
/r/MensRights02/11/17 04:40 AM
3

By that logic, everyone in the US deserves to be made into a slave. Everyone is Germany deserves to be put into a gas chamber. Everyone in China should be beaten and starved. Everyone in Japan should be ostracized and cruelly experimented on. Everyone who farms should be whipped and beaten, every Fast Food worker should be force fed and slaughtered, every feminist should be given genital mutilation and burnt. You cannot generalize groups or organizations. You cannot group innocents in with extre…
/r/MensRights16/10/17 09:18 PM
7

What's next? Alimony for discarded sex robot? Maybe open a hot-line and shelter for abused sex bot. Robot lives matter. "All robots will be given one copy of the Laws of Robotics. To share."
/r/MensRights22/09/17 03:50 AM
13

Gag orders.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 03:27 AM
1

In which case, he could sue for blackmail.
/r/MensRights17/09/17 05:41 AM
7

Couldn't you counter use for defamation?
/r/MensRights16/09/17 12:04 AM
9

Allegedly she might try to put you into a Kafka trap. Find some evidence, prove her wrong. You should always try to have evidence regardless. Howver, you should be prepared that she might just throw away your evidence.
/r/MensRights16/09/17 12:01 AM
1

Can we just overall agree that dress code in general is sexist, often in both directions?
/r/MensRights12/09/17 07:59 PM
1

Scott Pilgrim vs The World is about one of the only examples I can think of, anime aside.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 11:04 PM
1

I agree, my point was that - as you put it - there are counterpoints and varied circumstances. I'm of the belief that feminism SHOULD take hold, just that it should be... Well, egalitarian and should focus on where it's actually needed.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 03:10 AM
1

As a note, this mainly applies to Western countries. Situations vary across the world, and there are societies in which women are oppressed, such as under Sharia Law in the Middle East.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 04:14 PM
2

Spain, for starters. Beyond that, just look at this sub or poke around Kotakuinaction or Tumblrinaction. I'll link to some examples when I get home.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 05:53 PM
1

Well yeah, that's the bloody point!
/r/MensRights31/07/17 05:32 PM
2

That's like saying that a black rights activist wouldn't be anti-kkk. The main issue is that many feminists actively work against men's right, up to and literally calling for genocide an lynching.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 05:31 PM
7

Hmm... Virtually every commercial which shows the husband as dumb/lazy or otherwise is held back from doing anything. One example would be the car/repair commercial where the wife keeps shushing and holding the husband back from changing the tire or whatever when their car stops on the middle of nowhere and then has them wait for the repair crew show up and do it for them. Then their kid in the back plays a trumpet or something.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 06:38 PM
1

I mean, it's certainly a necessity (given the reliance on natural resources as fuel until the more renewable and less dangerous methods like solar energy become wider used an more practical), but precautions need to be taken, and they need to be held responsible when the general public is in danger.
/r/MensRights22/07/17 11:19 PM
2

Chemicals in the water supply is a huge thing. Hear of fracking and it's effects?
/r/MensRights22/07/17 10:01 PM
1

Potentially either a battle in or around a Nazi death camp or a fictionalization battle. Suffice to say? Slim to no examples unless you have the female lead 'fighting' at home while her husband dodges bullets. Actually, wasn't there that one black aircraft squadron?
/r/MensRights22/07/17 04:26 AM
15

Note that being a playboy isn't generally seen as a good thing in reality. Usually that means you're a cheating bastard who few want a lasting relationship with. A 'manslut' if you will. This is further evidenced by our biased legal system which goes against men in terms of relationship troubles.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 07:21 PM
3

...WHAT THE FUCK!? Edit: capitalization for correct emphasis.
/r/MensRights08/07/17 11:30 PM
4

What about single men with children, our couples without children?
/r/MensRights02/07/17 12:10 AM
5

Various grooming inequalities as well. Obviously keeping yourself well groomed is the standard, but beyond that, men aren't allowed makeup, long hair (my workplace recently decreed that no male could have hair past their ear), jewelry beyond a single ring, etc. I've even seen a few guys getting in trouble for a little more than peach fuzz while there was at least one female coworker with a borderline 'stache.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 03:31 AM
2

While I agree with you that father's have been degraded, mocked, and kept from their rights, I am of the opinion that single parents should be honored in both holidays - regardless of gender. Fathers take up the mantle of the mother while mothers take up the mantle of the father and have to struggle with juggling jobs, children, and additional stress. This is on top of society judging you for being a single parent half the time, regardless of their praise for single mothers. My point being that …
/r/MensRights18/06/17 04:11 PM
1

You say this when I bring up Nick Fury. In addition, the other Teen Titans members are INSANELY popular, as is Storm. Frozone is also extremely popular as well and is the source of a few memes. Falcon and the Human Torch are the only ones I brought up without that much recognition/influence and that's simply due to bad movie/not yet written. Your only points are 'they aren't as prominent' abd 'they aren't as kid friendly' which are both fairly moot.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 09:38 PM
1

Spiderman - Family unfriendly deaths, has turned angsty and possessed before due to Venom, on top of other issues Iron Man - Terrorists, gun sales, the main character is fairly unfaithful and more than headstrong, etc. Superman - .....have you seen the recent stuff? While the blade movies are by no means 'kid friendly', you've got a guy killing definitively bad vampires while being all kinds of awesome. In regards to Teen Titans, Robin is the 'center' as the honorary leader. However, not countin…
/r/MensRights14/06/17 08:08 PM
5

... Did you even look at the list? Sure a few are sidekicks, but most are part of a team and aren't sidekicks, and a good chunk are their own heroes. Edit: also, comic-wise, a few of those characters are now black. It's obviously bad to focus on that though, which is pointed out by the black spiderman at least. (I'd call him by name, but I don't read comics.)
/r/MensRights14/06/17 12:09 AM
3

As for the blacksploitation portion: while many black folk (and minorities... And children... Most people back then in Hollywood, really) were exploited, they still turned up a fair amount in films. As for the actor list: nowadays, black people feature very prominently in films, taking up important roles, varied roles, occasionally being a token minority, and/or being a main character. As for the white character played by black actor thing: while 'whitewashing' is brought up, there is also a fai…
/r/MensRights13/06/17 09:39 PM
41

Yes, that they washed out with the giant amount of blacksploitation films and movies with amazing black actors like Pam Greer, Morgan Freeman, Samuel Jackson... White characters portrayed by black actors, etc. Hollywood has COMPLETELY ereased all black people from existence after all, it's not as if one movie literally had a black person as God. Get your self-righteous stick out of your ass mate.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 06:59 PM
2

Remind me, is it 5% or 10% that signifies statistical significance? That aside, simply pointing out there are more women than men won't change their mind, not until there's a SIGNIFICANT amount more (like if there were 20-30% more or something), plus they're likely to pull out BS answers anyways.
/r/MensRights09/06/17 06:59 PM
39

"I'm just a poor boy, from a poor family."
/r/MensRights09/06/17 06:56 PM
75

So... You're saying that a women's 'cold' is just the sniffles, whearas man's cold is literally dying? Well then...
/r/MensRights27/05/17 06:53 PM
1

I was using a 'normal' work week as a basis. Seemingly it'd make up for the bare minimum time list for a bare minimum employee, and then some, but it doesn't truly make up for EVERYTHING.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 02:45 AM
5

Make teacher is falsely accused: "BURN THE WITCH!" Promising female stabs man: "Now, let's not be so hasty..."
/r/MensRights19/05/17 02:06 AM
12

Give up Ankakin, I have the high ground!
/r/MensRights19/05/17 02:05 AM
1

I was going by an 8 hour workday, yeah. Aside from the fact that you aren't constantly working in jail, I was saying that while what he received wasn't insignificant, he should've received more.
/r/MensRights15/05/17 05:00 PM
1

Thanks for further elaboration~ this was basically my point, though personally I'd argue that he should have received more (at least to cover court fees, something above minimum wage, and potential housing fees for a time.)
/r/MensRights15/05/17 04:56 PM
1680

That compensation is worth about 6 years of minimum wage. Makes up for the original 4 years lost and 2 extra years for readjustments. Except, you know, minimum wage isn't enough to live by and the stigma will follow him for life. And she was barely punished.
/r/MensRights14/05/17 09:58 PM
1

According to them, white men don't know what's it's like to be attacked because it's not specifically because their gender/race. ...yeah, sure.
/r/MensRights14/05/17 09:55 PM
5

It is my opinion that, should you have a single parent, you should honor them on both days. Unless they're abusive, they're probably picking up the slack of the missing parent. It's a nice thing to do for them. This really doesn't need to be a gendered thing.
/r/MensRights14/05/17 06:58 PM
7

It would if you were a woman claiming to be a man to go into a men's locker room or toilet. Doubt it'd hold up otherwise unless you were flat out Trans.
/r/MensRights13/05/17 03:45 AM
17

"I'm totally gender fluid. When I gotta go, I feel like pushing out fluids and matter, similar to giving birth. So, I feel like a female and identify as such when I must use the restroom. Otherwise, male."
/r/MensRights13/05/17 12:40 AM
1

I wonder if she's watched Sausage Party.
/r/MensRights11/05/17 05:44 PM
8

Thank goodness.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 05:08 PM
1

Look on the bright side, it's nowhere near as bad as whatever happened to the pussypass subreddit. Edit: which might've been recently fixed, apperently. Need to check when I get home.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 07:02 AM
2

To the people attacking feminism and feminists outright, assuming you aren't being sarcastic due to the post, there are good feminists. There are places in the world were women have issues. There are good feminists like Christina Hoff Summers. (Might've misspelt her name) the issue is the sheer quantity of 'bad' first world feminists. The ones who don't focus on real issues. Men have issues. Women have issues. Everyone has issues everywhere. If you attack the entire ideology because of a sect, t…
/r/MensRights06/05/17 04:24 AM
2

I agree it should be considered assault. Attacking this, rare or not, would be a bad idea. If this goes through, then perhaps it could stand as a precident and help to illegalize the theft of sperm.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 01:11 AM
1

Sure thing. Heaven knows I end up with enough typos, especially due to autocorrect.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 01:28 AM
3

"Men also work 15% longer hours than men..." Typo there, mate.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 09:35 PM
1

This could also apply to schools. While the comparison is stupid, it does raise a point. Are there any studies on the history of wages in fields that are currently female-dominated, preferably accounting for inflation?
/r/MensRights14/04/17 01:06 AM
5

I think sports should be handled on a sort of 'weight' system, like wrestling or boxing. Obviously, with capability instead of weight. Use the requirements used for acceptance into men's leagues for the upper class, then those used for women's leagues for the lower class.
/r/MensRights14/04/17 12:58 AM
9

I mean, if you want to be technical, you could gradually work your way to toxin/poison resistance via those smaller, less dangerous bites.. Just that it's not the same with women in the real world.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 05:48 PM
2

The main issue in this case IS the social stigma. I've met or seen many who want to become teachers but are discourage because they're men, not to mention the horror stories of male teachers being falsely accused or removed because they're men and the teachers (or just administration) is uncomfortable with them. Most of my teachers were female, yes, but I was fortunate enough to have a large number of male teachers through the years. Science, anatomy,'programming, English, PE, history, philosoph…
/r/MensRights13/04/17 06:35 AM
2

Honestly my main concern about him is still capitalism and business related politics, I doubt he'll try to tone down crony capitalism, even if he focuses on helping stop the shipping of jobs over to other countries. That any any LGBTQ stuff. Honestly the SJWs are one thing, but that group does have a ton of folks who honestly need help.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 07:56 PM
5

I mean seriously, people keep trashing him, but he's one of the presidents who's actually done what he bloody said he'll do! Honestly, my main concern atm is the fact that people are trying to spy on him and spill secrets..of our president. I mean, can we look any weaker as a nation? That and walking out of the executive order meeting. That's..not a good thing.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 07:53 PM
8

I agree, it's not like the people who dive in to protect people or call cops on multi-racial families at parks. There are a few men who I've seen doing similar things, this sort of reaction to seeing something like this out of context is MUCH better than the overreaction many have.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 12:31 AM
3

My respect for Trump only continues to grow, even as the media and various friends detract from him. I'm still wary, but he's been fairly impressive so far.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 12:28 AM
0

I'm going to assume you mean the 'waitresses' bit rather than the experience bit. Unless they outright reject you for applying as a waiter, then it's fine. Many think of a waitress as service staff, rather than waiters, so it could just be that. (Think male nurses)
/r/MensRights01/04/17 12:27 AM
4

And spontaneously we also got a bunch of holocaust deniers, which is honestly more baffling than all the other stuff that this sub has descended to.
/r/PussyPass13/03/17 01:46 AM
-3

I mean.. IQ tests aren't really that accurate to begin with, and even the 'white men' who made the bloody things were rather ashamed of what they were used for.
/r/PussyPass04/03/17 11:54 PM
26

If anything, there's negative risk involved for females. They can get plenty of money from their spouse, even years after their marriage had ended, more so if the couple had children.. Even if said children were created out of wedlock or without consent (sperm theft, banks, adultery, etc.) This is especially the case for women in relationships with wealthy men, as multiple precedents have been set where men have to pay for quite a while in order for the woman to maintain the lifestyle she's used…
/r/MensRights17/02/17 05:01 PM
1

I'll alert the media.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 07:43 AM
3

I see no issue with this picture.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 01:04 AM
2

I believe I extensively went over the UK's law when their court outright rejected a petition to change it to something inclusive, if anyone cares to track down and link to that post.
/r/MensRights05/02/17 11:46 PM
2

The women at my workplace (McDonald's) refuse to do any 'grossness labor (with one or two girls who just don't care and actually do their bloody job). As a result, us guys have to wipe up blood, wash grills, mop up kiddy piss from the playroom and, yes, clean the restrooms. Multiple times I have encountered indignant women who have berated me, threatened to report me, or threatened to assault me, because I was made to clean the women's toilets. Every time, I out up a sign that someone was cleani…
/r/MensRights01/02/17 09:42 PM
3

"Terrible, horrible, no good very bad lies" I see what you did there. That said, it looks like there are plenty of irritants in the comments, though a few actual manage to respect her opinion, however 'wrong' it is, which is a bit shocking.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 10:47 AM
32

As my respect dwindles for the famous I like, my respect grows for the famous that I didn't really pay attention to (but did kinda like).
/r/MensRights30/01/17 07:41 PM
1

Theoretically, something similar to a weight class (A la MMA or boxing) could be set up, with groups set by physical capability and stamina. Weak guys can compete with weak women, strong guys can compete with strong women, and then there's the people inbetween. A straight up mixing would probably end poorly, either with people booing the guys who beat women, mocking the few who lose to women, or just straight up shenanigans.
/r/MensRights28/01/17 08:21 PM
2

I mean, considering the bunch of other shows that feature women getting their way, fighting the system, acting like bitches (and loudly, joyfully proclaiming it to the world), even if what they're doing isn't lawful or moral.
/r/MensRights28/01/17 12:18 PM
2

http://web.archive.org/web/20170127034650/https://www.google.com/doodles/bessie-colemans-125th-birthday There ya go. (I think)
/r/MensRights28/01/17 12:16 PM
2

Just wait until the first sunday of April.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 09:41 PM
-3

I mean...maybe on the first Sunday of April...
/r/MensRights26/01/17 05:00 AM
-3

And now people will get to stomp and walk all over their idiotic self-righteous fallacious semi-religious propaganda.
/r/PussyPass23/01/17 01:34 AM
1

I mean, given the state of Asian countries (China aside)
/r/MensRights23/01/17 01:32 AM
2

Chattel, by cattle. Being treated like cattle in India would be an upgrade.
/r/MensRights21/01/17 12:13 AM
0

It doesn't need to be disbanned, but it does need a serious overhaul for people still on it, in addition to a redifinition of who goes on it.
/r/MensRights20/01/17 11:40 AM
1

It's just that our politicians didn't listen. That seems to be the case all over. I mean, look no further than that petition that cropped up a while ago on changing the legal definition or rape (or something to that effect), so that it could encompass women. The parliament shut it down and told them that they wouldn't change the law, much less discuss changes.
/r/MensRights13/01/17 12:17 PM
4

Eh, I've had a number of good female teachers, though virtually all of them were at my private (read: Christian) elementary school, with one exception. Public/high school, on the other hand, had some good female teachers, but a bunch who either unjustly punished students or pushed their agendas. Most of our male teachers tended to tip toe around certain issues, but were all pretty nice.
/r/MensRights12/01/17 11:23 PM
10

I would have reported her to the principle, using the papers as proof. Hell, if she was doing that, I'm surprised she bothered grading them.
/r/MensRights12/01/17 11:21 PM
1

Hmm..this information is new to me. Granted, it's honestly not something I'd actually researched into. In which case, perhaps it has more to do with the Untempered Schism than anything, though by that logic he could just go 'mate' with Missy. (Aside from that old adage about putting your dick in crazy) There are plenty of Gallifreyans, it was just the Time Lords that were more... 'limited' for lack of a better term. Every other instance that I could reasonable excuse was resolved at one point or…
/r/MensRights10/01/17 10:08 PM
1

Simply changing a character to female, especially if it's been established as an existing possibility, does not make something biased towards women. While their motives would be questionable, given the current state of affairs, it doesn't automatically mean they would do it to push their agenda. Unless they make The Doctor's identity begin revolving around 'her' new gender, should they do such a thing, then it would be fine. Having it revolve around gender (or sexual identity, etc) is a mark of …
/r/MensRights10/01/17 09:51 PM
0

Time Lords are not born, they are weaved.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 09:47 PM
1

Going by the wikia, it looks like they didn't even bother giving it a recommendation, just that The Master had taken 'precautions'.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 09:54 AM
5

That'd be fine, so long as they were written well. It's not out of the question (it's been brought up before), so long as they don't bring another Time Lord in entirely. (While possible if a bubble universe is involved, it'd ruin a number of things) The main issue at the moment is the heavy focus given to Clara. While the numberous companions before were given development, and for good reason, she ENTIRELY encompassed the plot. She overroad the developement the new doctor had, in addition to lit…
/r/MensRights10/01/17 08:54 AM
2

As of the past year, a call has been out foward for gender neutral bathrooms (for Trans people, mainly.) however, most of these gender neutral bathrooms have replaced men's bathrooms, leaving women's and gender neutral, but no men's. Etc and so forth. I'd suggest you do your own research into it, however.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 03:24 AM
2

While victim blaming is obviously wrong (that is, actual victim blaming), there is the possibility that these attacks may have been caused by abuse, harrassement, etc. There's certainly enough stories about men being on the receiving end of such attacks, good and bad.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 03:19 AM
9

Suffice to say that it's slowly ruining Doctor Who as well.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 02:16 AM
2

Just realized I'm 'arguing' with you here as well... but I digress. Logical arguments can and do generally apply to everything. While humans aren't logical creatures (for the most part, we aren't Vulcans), we can apply it towards morality or reasonable thinking. In this case, hurt feelings is not equivalent to destruction of property. Being mad is not an excuse to drain his finances. Perhaps you were mad at a bank. Would you use that as an excuse to rob it? Perhaps you were slighted by a drunkar…
/r/MensRights09/01/17 09:52 PM
2

I'm explaining your downvotes, and pointing out that being crass won't really get you anywhere. We're not arguing for '1 victim was male', we're arguing that race, sex, age, etc. shouldn't play into things at all unless it was an actual hate crime. I, personally, am empathetic to the point that I ache if I see someone in pain, and try to be as sympathetic as I can be to people I care about. Men have most of the world's issues hoisted upon then. "man up" and what not. We are expected to be strong…
/r/MensRights09/01/17 09:47 PM
3

It may have been motivated by another 'oh look at this toxic masuline man wanting to kill the sucessful womnz' ideology. Personally, I know nothing of the author or the situation. However, cussing, being generally crass, and blaming someone for doing the responsible thing; researching, is not in the least bit professional. The main issue is that attention is being brought specifically to 'women and children' casualty listings. Key word, 'specifically'. Instead of '9 die in a fire', it's '5 of th…
/r/MensRights09/01/17 12:38 PM
9

Ah, the wonder of false equivalence...
/r/MensRights09/01/17 10:26 AM
2

Ah, reminds me of my high school days when I was in Model UN. I was thrust into a group with two girls who clearly didn't like me, one Muslim and the other a 'preppy' girl, both feminists. After much begrudged haggling, we had two topics for the MUN session we'd be leading (we were moderators, not 'ambassadors', you see): Women's Rights, and Abuse of Prisoners. This was, of course, before I had truly looked into, researched, and experienced the nonsense of today (that is, it was about 5 years ag…
/r/MensRights08/01/17 04:34 AM
3

I presume anyone on the sexual predator list would be unable to have such a child (let alone adopt), I doubt a pedophile would wait this long specifically for such an incestuous relationship, and I believe such parents would have to go through fact and psychological tests in order to be able to do such a thing in the first place (must be a 'responsible adult') As for ease... Well, almost obviously women will have it easier regardless, as we've seen in custody cases, but only time will tell.
/r/MensRights08/01/17 04:04 AM
1

I don't care if you use 'he' or 'she' in a word definition. I don't care about the special snowflakes who want to use 'ze' or 'xe'. What I do care about is law, apparently having been put onto the website and/or updated last in 2003, having a non-gender neutral phrasing. Again, the legal system should not imply guilt to a specific party, especially considering how rape cases have gone over the past few years (hell, overall).
/r/MensRights02/01/17 08:50 PM
1

They expanded rape by penetration to include oral. I believe it stated so on the petition. Here we go: "In the consultation there was a considerable amount of agreement that rape should remain an offence of penile penetration, but that the definition be extended to include penile penetration of the mouth." As I've said, they're basically completely refusing to acknowledge envelopment in order to focus on penetration. That, and the other implications of that statement.
/r/MensRights02/01/17 08:48 PM
3

Having used gender neutral pronouns would have been better in the first place. It's not the place of the law to assume the aggressor. Although, if the actual rulings use proper wording, then I'm...fine. Also, 'penetration'. Strap-ons, dildos, etc. Exist, in addition to fingers. Punishment for rape/ sexual assault by penetration: "A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable, on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for life." Punishment for sexual assault (and, by extension, ra…
/r/MensRights02/01/17 09:47 AM
36

While the e-petition has been shut down, I will respond as below. legislation.gov.uk defines rape as "A person (A) commits an offence if— (a)he intentionally penetrates the vagina, anus or mouth of another person (B) with his penis, " Specifically using male as the offender, in addition to requiring penetration, not envelopment. At most, it says that sexual ASSAULT is illegal, assuming that a party doesn't consent to being touched sexually. However, it still uses male pronounces. " person (A) co…
/r/MensRights02/01/17 06:34 AM
3

Rememer, women are the real victims of war.
/r/MensRights26/12/16 11:37 PM
10

I'm mostly referring to zero tolerance policy. Kid has a leaf that RESEMBLES (but isn't!) marijuana? Suspended. Kid HOLDS drugs then shoves it back to the other kid, then tells a teacher about the other kid? Suspend both! Better get police to infiltrate these schools to push kids into drugs, better make sure they aren't actually into it already! Children LITERALLY take the Koolaid, but it looks like crack? SUSPENDED! (can't find the story for the 'held' drug thing, but I recall reading about it …
/r/MensRights16/12/16 06:51 AM
7

Just like the drug nonsense.
/r/MensRights16/12/16 06:35 AM
5

Granted, so far the crime of 'possession' is an unfortunate case. Seeing it on your com counts as posession, having someone give it to you (against your will, there was a case a while ago where someone put it onto someone elses hardrive), etc etc.
/r/MensRights16/12/16 06:35 AM
2

I've heard honey TRAP more often than naught (as an American), with honey POT usually referring to, well, the 'honey pot'.
/r/MensRights11/12/16 09:20 PM
2

Did you hurt my dick? Yeah, they're REALLY losing their edge.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 06:04 AM
2

Coincidentally, this is what happened with my younger brother. That is, since I was always told off by my mother (occasionally my father) when I tried to bring him into line, he basically stopped respecting me, and is now a total pissant. (They also almost never punished him whenever I tried to correct his behavior). My point being that when you constantly belittle a person and take away the credibility they have, NOBODY will respect them, much less the people they're supposed to be in charge of…
/r/MensRights02/12/16 05:00 PM
1

What's an intj?
/r/MensRights24/11/16 04:43 AM
2

Ivy League is a bussword now? Also, what' ENTJ?
/r/MensRights24/11/16 01:24 AM
33

I'd like to point out that these are 13 and 12 year olds. These aren't even full fledged teens, barely or not in high school, and already they're having sex, spouting off rape, and worrying about these sort of things. THIS is just how badly fucked SJWs and this pervasive nonsense have made our children.
/r/MensRights24/11/16 01:10 AM
13

case 1, Kansas sperm doner forced to pay child support case 2, various shenanigans over stolen sperm -this being an example- case 3, more shenanigans over stolen sperm, oral sex in this case.
/r/MensRights06/11/16 04:16 PM
1

I'm worried that it'll make 8/11 of the original movie's profit.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 06:31 PM
4

Reminds me of the fact that virtually every kind of medical anti-depressant had depression as a side effect.
/r/MensRights31/10/16 03:50 AM
25

If I recall directly, wasn't there a case where a women outright stole from a sperm bank, then sued for child support from the father? Aside from other cases where women have tried getting child support from donators.
/r/MensRights28/10/16 10:28 PM
17

Goes from 'no clue what the force is' to 'able to overpower a user of the force trained by both the light and dark sides the instant she miraculously figures out how to use it due to earlier being mind raped'.
/r/MensRights26/10/16 04:20 PM
1

Or completely naked, depending on the beach in question.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 09:50 PM
5

Murdered indigenous men (pox blankets, conversion, etc): only focuses on women : sexism Only focuses on black people, all lives matter. : racist What the hell does colonialism have to do with the nonsense in the Middle East?? :general nonsense Who gives a fuck about anyone telling you they like asian women? They're flirting and find you attractive. In addition, you're ignoring females, plus I hear black women talking ALL THE TIME about their racial preference in men. : racism, sexism, AND genera…
/r/MensRights20/10/16 09:48 PM
1

Salem makes me think.. No. Many were almost certainly believed, and there were a large amount of laws regarding taking the wife of another man, on top of ravaging women generally being frowned upon. The only instance I can think of that runs opposite to this would be Islam.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 08:55 PM
10

Considering the existence of the death penalty.. This woman deserves it.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 08:44 PM
5

Yup...and we're being downvoted for this.
/r/MensRights19/10/16 05:30 PM
5

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grounds_for_divorce_(United_States)#Sexual_issues
/r/MensRights19/10/16 05:05 PM
7

Let's see...I recall impotence being on the list of reasons a woman can request divorce for a man.
/r/MensRights19/10/16 04:21 PM
1

There IS such a thing as sensationalism. Trump is a big man with a big attitude and a big self-funded platform. It's something the media uses with great frequency. It's unlikely he'll use literally extreme methods, but will advertise in such a way as to draw attention to himself. There's also the fact that a LOT of what he says or does are changed or twisted by the media to make him look even worse. However, there's also the fact that he says he supports Hillary and would do so even if she wins,…
/r/MensRights28/09/16 04:47 PM
3

Either that or they give them even MORE advantages, even if they're aweful to other employees. I swear they work on a Mean Girls system.
/r/MensRights21/09/16 04:24 PM
3

Shame that I can't do that at McDonalds..there's been a large amount of time where either a number of coworkers or I have had to do the work of multiple people on our own, in particular time where we've had to juggle both cooking food and putting it together, which is literally impossible in the middle of a rush. But we're not ALLOWED, by the owner, to actually get overtime.
/r/PussyPass20/09/16 04:15 AM
2

Well..this is a clusterfuck.
/r/PussyPass18/09/16 09:01 AM
10

It's also possible for males to get breast cancer.
/r/MensRights13/09/16 10:51 PM
2

You can in Italy now, so long as there aren't minors around.
/r/PussyPass12/09/16 03:37 PM
5

Yeah, like an invisible patriarchy.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 06:31 PM
5

To differentiate between her and her husband, or starters. Plus we get to call her 'Shillerry'.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 06:29 PM
1

I'm honestly not sure which part of this is the worst.
/r/MensRights05/09/16 11:44 AM
9

Didn't even notice this until it was pointed out.
/r/MensRights05/09/16 11:41 AM
1

I'll just leave this anime joke here...
/r/MensRights04/09/16 06:41 PM
1

Well, yes, 'female-bodied people' AKA biological females are, biologically, the only gender capable of reproduction by way of having the child, as opposed to the biological male's capability of impregnanting said woman. That's generally how it works.
/r/MensRights03/09/16 12:36 PM
4

Ignorance does not rely entirely on personal experience. Yes, we can't entirely know how it feels, but we can make educated guesses...and it certainly doesn't mean that we'll all instantly abandon our moral principles in order to protect a single person.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 06:21 AM
1

Name checks out.
/r/MensRights30/08/16 08:32 PM
14

If a female family member of mine does something despicable, I'm going to want then punished for it.
/r/MensRights30/08/16 08:30 PM
2

Pretty much already the case in Spain, if I recall.
/r/MensRights28/08/16 05:06 PM
1

We kicked Ozzie out of Texas for something similar.
/r/MensRights28/08/16 04:55 PM
8

Drunk... Drinking.. Alchohol of... Walks free because pregnant... 2+2=5.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 08:24 PM
10

Unless you're Bill Cosby, appearently.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 08:42 PM
1

I guess you watch Nostalgia Critic as well?
/r/MensRights19/08/16 04:04 PM
2

In other news, masturbation can cause blindness, hairy hands, and infertility, as well as the fact that you'll go to hell.
/r/MensRights16/08/16 12:47 AM
2

Women can't kill men? It's impossible? Guess that whole genocide schtick ain't gonna work ten, hun?
/r/MensRights16/08/16 12:46 AM
3

Probably because she's in a no-win scenario, considering that woman who's accusing Bill Clinton of rape
/r/MensRights16/08/16 12:44 AM
2

And they're all halflings...
/r/MensRights16/08/16 12:43 AM
1

There are a few more questionable cases, in my opinion, such as being able to use deadly force for a large chunk of things. case
/r/MensRights15/08/16 05:57 PM
1

...some of us do, I was mostly referring to how...free our self defense laws can be.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 05:30 PM
1

I presume it's like using the scientific name of animals, as in they have to use the 'legal' term for it as opposed to what it normally is.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 05:29 PM
-2

My Lord are you one-note. I swear, every single time I see one of your posts hovering towards the end of a comment section, you say the same thing about Chivalry. In fact, I think this is the first time I've seen one of your posts that actually says something ASIDE from the chivalry bit.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 10:06 AM
1

I presume 'lawful wounding' would fall under self defense, but... I live in Texas.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 10:03 AM
2

It's a race to see who'll fulfill 1984 Orwellian Distopia first. America with their censorship and constant racial tensions? Germany with their self-defeating and extremist appologies? Britain with their thoughtcrimes, staring, and all the cameras? Or Canada where a man was put on trial for tweeting that he disagreed with someone?
/r/MensRights14/08/16 11:10 PM
3

Cut condoms, lying about birth control, stealing used condoms, stealing sperm from banks, etc. Etc. There are MANY ways a woman can get herself pregnant after/during sex via morally and legally questionable methods, and still get her way, and that's even without going into rape and child custody issues.
/r/MensRights14/08/16 11:05 PM
2

Especially if it was an underage girl just entering high school.
/r/MensRights14/08/16 11:02 PM
9

No, an ideal world is one where people don't purposefully piss people off for fear of either gender beating either gender's asses for it. (Or, rather, just where people aren't assholes.)
/r/MensRights14/08/16 10:51 PM
0

True, but that has nothing to do with female gamers as a whole. Many games were effectively gender-neutral as well.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 09:28 PM
2

Even originally it wasn't true. Pac Man, for instance.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 06:39 PM
2

Possibly the fact that everyone's treating him like shit, mocking him, etc. Etc. And generally blacklisting him? Speaking of, anyone heard anything on Paula Dean lately?
/r/MensRights10/08/16 08:47 PM
4

Hence why taking the child and running should be the last thing he does, since he allegedly has little to know documentation outside of his word, possibly the word of his child.
/r/MensRights04/08/16 08:56 PM
8

... This IS the MensRights subreddit, right? I'm not mistaken? Then you should know about the incredible bias again men within the court system atm, especially in cases of domestic abuse, child care, etc. Etc. He takes the child an leaves, she'll spin some yarn about him abusing her, not paying any attention to her (instead fapping all day or cheating on her), not doing well enough at his job due to said distraction (not fit due to porn addiction), etc.
/r/MensRights04/08/16 08:29 PM
12

DON'T just take the child and run unless you go over things with a lawyer first, it's kidnapping otherwise. In any event, you BADLY need to divorce this woman, and this is definitely an abusing relationship with her lies, verbal abuse, and constant distractions to get you in trouble.
/r/MensRights04/08/16 05:19 PM
4

"Awaiting is instructions" Not hiding the fact that they're reprogramming kids anymore, eh?
/r/MensRights02/08/16 04:58 AM
2

Pedophilia, statutory rape, distribution of child pornography, position of child pornography, child abuse, the list goes on. "Clearly a lady who deeply loves her children"? Yeah, sure. TOO much, or not enough. Fucking bullshit. 5 years? That's it? A man would be in jail for life.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 04:57 AM
1

Yes. The movement, formed by radical users of the ideology. If anything, that only proves my point. Both use the banner, but only one group uses it to stab men in the dick.
/r/MensRights01/08/16 06:57 PM
2

I also heard that Hitler liked sugar.
/r/MensRights01/08/16 06:53 PM
1

There's a distinction between man-hating feminists who actively campaign against men, those suckered in who do little more than make a video or two, or cucks who just tweet. There are also people like Christina Hoff Summers.
/r/MensRights01/08/16 06:45 PM
0

Not every, just... a large many. Mostly idiots who don't know what they're talking about or get suckered nto it.
/r/MensRights01/08/16 06:25 PM
0

Exactly, 'Feminists'. Feminism, again, is an ideology. It's the fault of the people who wield it, not the ideology themselves. It's like claiming that every Muslim will stone you for acting against Allah. (Not sure if I spelt that right), or that every Christian is going to lead a literal crusade.
/r/MensRights01/08/16 05:12 PM
1

If by 'less than equal' you mean 'put on a pedestal and treated like perfect goddesses that we should do everything for'. ... Which they still want us to do, by the way. But remember, they're silk strong and independent!
/r/MensRights01/08/16 12:58 AM
1

And that's why we're encouraged to neuter them.
/r/MensRights01/08/16 12:55 AM
1

Depends, would you rather be literally or metaphorically shit on?
/r/MensRights01/08/16 12:48 AM
-3

It's not so much the enemy as it is apathetic to anything that isn't directly related to women's rights. The issue is the people who claim to be feminists. An ideology isn't determined by the people who use it, but by the guidelines and similarities that have been set down.
/r/MensRights01/08/16 12:46 AM
1

Yes, and YOU are the ghost.
/r/MensRights29/07/16 09:16 AM
3

The fact that madness is doing the same thing over and over again while achieving the same result, whearas feminism has 'achieved' various drastically different results, both good and bad?
/r/MensRights27/07/16 02:42 PM
76

MADNESS? This...is...FEMINISM.
/r/MensRights27/07/16 07:29 AM
5

Rivaling only Sweden.
/r/MensRights27/07/16 06:29 AM
38

How dare you claim to be innocent and provide factual testimony that proves the victim isn't a victim! JAIL!
/r/MensRights27/07/16 06:23 AM
33

"Their mindset was, if a victim comes forward they are to be believed." ...so you aren't even going to do the most basic of detective work then, eh? Just going to throw him into jail without bothering, eh?
/r/MensRights24/07/16 04:15 AM
1

Eh, considering 1984 (especially the sexual bit, the proles, and 2+2=5...)
/r/MensRights20/07/16 10:46 AM
1

Because I prefer to play peacefully and like the one-city challenge?
/r/MensRights11/07/16 12:15 AM
13

Well, to be fair, that's how every game of Civilization I've played tends to turn out. "HOW DARE YOU HAVE NO STANDING ARMY AND BUILD ALL THE WONDERS OF THE WORLD!"
/r/MensRights10/07/16 06:48 PM
3

And the people in the comments are responding wiht 'Oh you poor dear... go on, KEEP my money!'
/r/MensRights07/07/16 11:50 PM
0

Heil!
/r/MensRights29/06/16 12:40 AM
2

I value both. If I'm miserable, you damn well better pay me to suffer.
/r/MensRights28/06/16 05:51 AM
5

In my opinion, the original post is fine, pointing out that this IS gender shaming and is bad for men (in regards to questioning their...manliness, I suppose), then turned it towards women for the purpose of asking if women require said bearded tire-changing men to change a tire, because the picture is ludicrous. In that regard, you overacted a bit with your assumption that she was attempting to focus on men. Bringing women 'into the equation' is a simple thing to do due to the situation at hand…
/r/MensRights24/06/16 12:18 PM
1

cough Brock Turner cough
/r/MensRights17/06/16 08:50 AM
1

Ah. Best of luck with THAT then.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 07:38 PM
1

Seeing as it's pretty much hypothetical, not having really been put in use for..a while, I'm unsure about how it would play out.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 06:49 PM
1

Like I said 'for the most part'. It depends on the woman, in this scenario. In addition, while it may not affect soldier moral if they're killed (well.. it'll affect them as much as anyone being killed), it might affect it, either positively or negatively, if they've been captured and are being...used. But yes, it could be taken advantage of...assuming that the enemy doesn't take precautions.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 05:56 PM
1

Except men can also work said non-combatative positions. There are plenty positions in both roles.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 05:53 PM
-5

Frankly, those thoughts are true. Women are physically and mentally weaker for the most part, especially when it comes to violence, death, and the horrors of war. In addition, they will be treated worse, especially when we go into fighting people like radical Islamists, or people who ignore the rules of war that have been set up. As it is, the draft can also put people into non-combative positions, so the draft is still viable for women. Frankly, the draft should be abolished...but that's very u…
/r/MensRights16/06/16 05:40 AM
1

Because one's unavoidable and a part of life...and the other is unavoidable and a part of modern life '-_-
/r/MensRights15/06/16 08:24 AM
6

Hence the male abortion bit. Unfortunately there's a bit of difference between bodily strain (pregnancy and birth) vs financial strain, and unfortunately in legal terms, a woman's health comes before a man's financial wealth (and therefore his own welbeing). At least, so far. Currently, the child support stuff is being cut out in terms of a male 'abortion' in a few areas, but it needs to spread.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 06:40 PM
1

Considering virtually everyone Depp knows, especially family members, are defending him...
/r/MensRights01/06/16 10:24 PM
1

Is your first name Edgar?
/r/MensRights01/06/16 10:15 PM
1

Yes, and the same statistics SHOULD be asked of the general statistics for both genders. That way instead if a more general half-and-half, you actually know what groups are doing what.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 09:20 PM
11

As opposed to feelings.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 07:52 PM
1

Out if curiosity, what are the percentages of: Women using then normally/ to 'slut shame' Women using them ironically 'i'm such a slut' Women using then unironically 'I'm such a slut.' Women using them in the context of feminism; slut-walks, anti-slutshaming, etc.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 12:00 AM
4

Find an outlet. If not in creation, then in experiencing. I use music and art, reveling in the beauty mankind can create, even if I cannot. It saddens me....but I use this sadness to strive foward and do things.
/r/MensRights11/05/16 04:20 PM
1

I was referring to the idiom, and decided not to change it to mattress, but..thanks, I guess.
/r/MensRights09/05/16 07:15 PM
3

"She has been sentenced to life without any parole and an extra 30 years for child abuse." Bout fucking time that one of these women got punished properly for this shit...
/r/MensRights09/05/16 04:19 PM
3

So long as her cupcakes aren't moist and delicious.
/r/MensRights09/05/16 04:18 PM
4

I guess she made her bed, and she'll have to sleep in it.
/r/MensRights09/05/16 04:11 PM
0

Amy Schumer and her cronies = feminists As for BLM, I'm refering to the recent amount of cases of women going against black men.
/r/MensRights04/05/16 07:06 PM
1

Unless it's 'educational'. Youtube has a guideline about that, plenty of nude people and sexual acts. Besides, it's not as if every page is littered with porn.
/r/MensRights04/05/16 05:29 PM
7

It appears a fair portion of complaints are accusations of the videos being an excuse for exhibitionist, older men to jack off and show it off.
/r/MensRights04/05/16 05:00 PM
-6

So.. is it a good or bad thing that the BLM and Feminist movements are starting to turn on each other?
/r/MensRights04/05/16 03:58 PM
1

I... The hell? I didn't type 'mater worthless', I typed 'stereotypes', and it autocorrected to that.
/r/MensRights03/05/16 04:25 PM
2

Eh.. I think the few drunk driving PSAs I've seen have been without people in then. But most texting while driving commercial I've seen have had women in them. So... Mater worthless all around.
/r/MensRights03/05/16 02:48 PM
2

I believe I've found the solution
/r/MensRights02/05/16 04:53 PM
15

"Meghann Foye, 38, was jealous of co-workers clocking out for maternity leave, and decided she needed a break of her own." Good summary, good summary. Jealous woman NEEDS MORE. First world problems, amiright? "which is, to me, a sabbatical-like break that allows women and, to a lesser degree, men to shift their focus to the part of their lives that doesn’t revolve around their jobs." Well...yes. The 'part of their lives that doesn't revolve around their jobs' is a living, breathing human being t…
/r/MensRights02/05/16 04:49 PM
2

Fair enough, though I mostly mean in regards to media attention on the matter.
/r/MensRights29/04/16 04:48 PM
5

So...gimmicky female wrestler (albeit an important one), in an already niche group, vs... Prince.
/r/MensRights29/04/16 04:24 PM
1

And this is why you don't stick your dick in crazy.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 11:51 PM
3

...Who the fuck was Chyna?
/r/MensRights28/04/16 11:49 PM
2

Damnit Radcliffe, you should be better with this... even if you're going bout in weird movies (who are you, Johnny Depp?) Were you wooed by Watson?
/r/MensRights27/04/16 04:08 PM
-6

Yes, clearly. You DO realize that going 'Don't circumcise!' is basically like saying 'Don't abort!' ? I could compare it to 'don't rape', but obviously the circumstances are much more different. In either event, I'm trying to focus on the actual issue and task at hand rather than 'circumcision is bad and that's all I'll say on this topic!'
/r/MensRights23/04/16 07:11 PM
-4

You realize that a large portion of what you linked to/stated fell under the decreased bit and whatnot, right? As well as the circumstance in which the circumcision was botched. In terms of 'abnormal brain development',etc, that encompasses EVERYTHING in the neonatal state. If anything, in addition to the 3 month thing, that goes back to me stating that it needs to be regulated.
/r/MensRights23/04/16 06:24 PM
-11

Comments: HOW DARE HE CIRCUMCISE, CIRCUMCISION IS BAD! Me: Well, yes it's bad, but society deems it as a necessary evil, and some religions require it. It's been the norm of society. In addition, future decrease of pleasure aside (and botched cases aside), it doesn't affect the health of the male that much. The real issue is that he got away with BOTCHING the circumcision, fucked up 4 times, attempted bribery, and will apparently continue if he's barred... meaning that another issue is that circ…
/r/MensRights23/04/16 05:41 PM
2

Yeah...I mean, if they actually DID have pay inequality, then sure, go for it. Hell, sue your boss. Except we all know that your boss is paying you fair wage, and they either didn't negotiate, work in a low-paying field, or don't work as often...or a combination of the above.
/r/MensRights23/04/16 05:38 PM
8

So can we just consider you the TL;DR of this comment section?
/r/MensRights23/04/16 05:37 PM
-2

I was mostly putting this here due to seeing a post at some point about how Canadians are replacing one of their bills with a 'first women board member' or something. I posted this on here and kotakuinaction (can't remember which I saw that post in, but I think it may have been both.)
/r/MensRights20/04/16 06:22 PM
11

At the very least, this woman has actually done something worth recognition.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 05:59 PM
15

What would it be called if you used both then? Also, I find it hilarious that the 'rational wiki' states: "Usage of the "apex fallacy" is almost exclusively limited to the manosphere, where it is used as a critique of feminism." Among the other things on the page, I've decided that the RationalWiki isn't very rational.
/r/MensRights19/04/16 06:12 PM
1

You'd likely lose that $100, as they'd probably be complaining about it because women can't rape.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 04:04 PM
1

But remember, WOMEN are the real victims of war.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 01:10 AM
1

Remember, women are the true victims of war.
/r/MensRights14/04/16 05:09 AM
1

What bothers me more is that a few actually state that they'll specifically seat female passengers next to them if need be, and that none of them mention a similar policy in regards to women. Actually, this 'study' may be a tad misleading in that THAT half of the argument isn't being represented, aside from the 2 or 3 airlines that stated the above.
/r/MensRights11/04/16 04:22 PM
2

Because we don't call a female horse a breeding slut?
/r/MensRights11/04/16 04:19 PM
3

Sorry, I mean in that there isn't a link to said film, therefore I partially doubt the existence of said film.
/r/MensRights11/04/16 04:19 PM
2

Right, now, someone make a version of this picture where the man is in jail, while the woman is diving into a pool of gold scrooge mcduck style while the baby is being treated by mary poppins.
/r/MensRights11/04/16 04:15 PM
5

gasp that woman is sexually licking a banana! RAPE!
/r/MensRights11/04/16 04:14 PM
3

...well that doesn't seem strange, awkward, and uncomfortable at ALL.
/r/MensRights11/04/16 04:11 PM
3

Firstly, this is word of mouth and there seems to be no recorded evidence. Secondly, what song/lyrics? In either case, it doesn't matter, and there are plenty of songs about women degrading themself, men degrading themself, or women degrading men. Thirdly, the fact that it happened on a bus implies that it was off-campus, therefore it has nothing to do with campus safety.
/r/MensRights11/04/16 04:09 PM
1

You know, I say the same thing about those pregnancy posters.
/r/MensRights10/04/16 11:56 PM
2

I...actually, does the article mention them being arrested? I skimmed.
/r/MensRights08/04/16 04:32 AM
2

"At no point did Jane tell any of the men to stop, but she did begin to cry after the slapping. All sexual activity then ceased." I'm sorry, but this is clearly rape. Statutory rape. This girl is clearly underage if she begins crying and loses all sexual mood after having her ass slapped and pouts about it.
/r/MensRights08/04/16 03:50 AM
16

“inform people about the vagina and how to please it.” ALL HAIL THE MIGHTY VAGINA!
/r/MensRights07/04/16 02:52 AM
0

Remember, women are the real victims of war.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 02:51 AM
1

"excessive victim-blaming, unwelcome catcalling, mortifyingly high rates of sexual assault and rape and having your value in society based exclusively on what you look like, I will continue to exercise my God-given right to objectify you" Let's see, straight white men are automatically considered rapists by your kind, and are blamed even when they're the victims. Men are often given catcalls, have their asses pinched, are shown off to sell sex, just like some women. Men also experience rape, sex…
/r/MensRights06/04/16 04:27 PM
7

Both literally and metaphorically.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 03:23 PM
22

Especially due to the costs... seeing as we aren't given millions of advantages and help. Cost vs Reward.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 03:18 PM
44

Well they aren't giving men the right to fair trial, I'm not surprised that they're ignoring Double Jeopardy as well.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 02:51 PM
2

You know, I'm heavily reminded of the Temperance movement...
/r/MensRights05/04/16 03:32 AM
1

I presume it originated back when it actually WAS true (ie somewhere inbetween women getting more rights and women not being able to divorce) in addition to world issues (I.E. the middle east). At this point, it's being perpetuated by the infamous fake college statistics, various falsified or misread statistics, etc. ...despite the giant influx of false rape accusations.
/r/MensRights04/04/16 05:38 PM
1

As horrid as this is, it already has president considering that this essentially already happened and the girl got away with it, and that, while SJWs are now trying to do away with gays, I find it amusing, though annoying, that they only payed attention when it happened man-to-man. Also, had to stop reading and start laughing when waking up with kisses was called sexual assault.
/r/MensRights02/04/16 07:28 AM
3

...I can't help but think this is a late April Fools joke, for at least 2 reasons.
/r/MensRights02/04/16 07:24 AM
2

Thanks Obama!
/r/MensRights02/04/16 03:26 AM
1

I'm aware, my main point was that he could theoretically do it, seeing as he did it in an alternate universe.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 12:15 AM
1

..Well, more along the lines of rarely prosecuted. Mostly due to it being taken to marriage counseling or divorce cases. That said, it IS still illegal.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 09:09 PM
0

In regards to Wonder Woman, he used a nanite to force her into a virtual reality battle with an opponent that was equal to her in every way, forcing her to fight said opponent until she collapsed/died of exhaustion.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 09:08 PM
2

Well apparently he has the know-how to keep up with all their weaknesses and whatnot, to the point of having a plan to take them all out if they turn on him. (ex. Kryptonite ring for batman/ creation of red kryptonite, freezing then breaking plastic man, making Aquaman afraid of water via fear toxin, etc.)
/r/MensRights30/03/16 08:32 PM
3

In regards to the former, I'm mostly pointing out that A. She's a feminist and already assumes 'toxic masculinity' (and that she believes in such a thing) and B. that, again, she assumes the worst. In regards to polyamory, I mean in the case of having extramarital sex (in this case, adultery).
/r/MensRights30/03/16 08:24 PM
14

"the toxic masculine fetish" "legitimately attracted to both...(...hardly ever the case)" Good job, way to signal yourself as a rampant man-hating feminist right away. "I know polyamory is valid" Pretty sure it's illegal. " I decided on a compromise: she could fool around with him sometime in the future, but I did not want to be there." So.. you let her do it. End of story. " Previously, we had all agreed there would be no penetration." This was not mentioned before when you mentioned that you w…
/r/MensRights30/03/16 06:50 PM
1

Except it's possible that the picture only shows two bathrooms instead of the three, or they're on different floors/ in different sections of the store (such as a similar post on here).
/r/MensRights30/03/16 02:35 PM
15

You, sir, have a wonderful wife. My regards. I'm glad that you're one of the lucky men to have such a wife, and have your own son.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 08:16 AM
13

Just do what places like Hobby Lobby do; a multi-stall men's restroom, a multi-stall women's restroom, and a single-person unisex bathroom that can also be used by families.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 01:40 AM
6

Well, they've already HAD unisex bathrooms before (sometimes a single bathroom seperated from the gendered bathrooms with multiple toilets).
/r/MensRights28/03/16 11:30 PM
0

I pose similar questions to ANY study, be it one that cherry picks answers to entirely legitament ones. To answer your questions... Volunteer bias is where a study is thrown off by the people willing to volunteer. Namely, people who have a relation to the study will be much more likely to actually participate in the study than those who don't have any relation. In this case, men who have experienced female-on-male violence are more likely to participate than those who haven't. In the case of res…
/r/MensRights28/03/16 08:31 PM
1

What's the statistical comparison to married men vs single men?
/r/MensRights28/03/16 06:19 PM
1

Eh..I'm worried that this may be volunteer bias, possibly with a bit of response bias.
/r/MensRights28/03/16 06:15 PM
1

Close...close...aaannnddd went with the feminist agenda, right at the end. Couldn't resist throwing that bit in, could you?
/r/MensRights28/03/16 02:20 PM
1

So that's about $60 a year. Honestly not that bad, but it's certainly not needed... (oh hey, I could probably compare this to the 'pink tax' or somethin'.)
/r/MensRights28/03/16 02:15 PM
2

"'I told him he was not any kind of man and I grabbed his testicles. 'It was not my fault that he pulled away, and that’s when it happened. 'I thought maybe that some ice would solve the problem, but he insisted on calling an ambulance. 'He was pretty annoyed.' Lady, you grabbed, then tore open, his fucking nuts. Of course he's going to want an ambulance and he's going to be MUCH more than 'pretty annoyed'. Exactly what do you do, lady? Exactly why are you so horribly expectant of some flowers? …
/r/MensRights28/03/16 02:13 PM
3

Welp..maybe now more gay men will come to their fucking senses, like Milo.
/r/MensRights26/03/16 09:19 PM
1

I...what? A 'new male barbie'? You already have Ken, and what's the point of making a 'male' barbie in a position of power? That undermines your own point. Why not make it so it's a trans barbie, or the NORMAL barbie in a suit or something? At least then it makes some tiny amount of sense.
/r/MensRights26/03/16 05:07 AM
2

Welp, 'White cis gay men'. So, shall we take bets on who they'll attack next? Probably transmen/women, considering.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 03:40 AM
30

On one hand, this is a delicious turnabout. On the other...it's still fucking stupid.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 07:52 PM
1

Found the manga. 'Houou Gakuen Misoragumi'.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 06:09 AM
1

Maybe. Although obviously it's all become a bit more accepted recently. Can't really find anything on the slight anti-yuri, so I'm wracking my brain trying to remember where I read/watched about that.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 06:05 AM
1

I'd presume a number of cultural differences, such as harsher expectations and stricter gender roles.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 05:57 AM
1

Pretty much. I read about it a few years back. Almost amusingly, there's actually a short-lived manga that was universally hated that basically derided lesbians. Can't remember the name of it though...
/r/MensRights19/03/16 05:46 AM
3

Eh...essentially Yuri isn't really considered 'acceptable' (despite the obvious given fanservice), whearas Yaoi is considered fine due to 'just a phase' mentality or the mass of fangirls.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 10:54 PM
6

gasps Wowee wow, I never would've thought that would WORK! (Granted, Japan has a..slight issue with yuri (girlxgirl) vs yaoi (guyxguy), but...eh. Enough people to sort out that issue.)
/r/MensRights18/03/16 06:30 PM
27

That's because in a lot of western media nowadays, they're trying to force diversity and don't actually change their writing. As a result, we've got GRL PWWR and BLCK PWWR without any change to pre-existing stereotypes. Or, worse, they flip the table and it's the OPPOSITE, where everything is going against straight white men because MAH FEMINISM. (For example, see the Super Girl show. It's good...until they suddenly start pushing their agenda.) Meanwhile, in Japan, they've ALWAYS been doing this…
/r/MensRights18/03/16 05:21 PM
1

Remember, it's only racist if it's a white dude.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 09:28 AM
1

And thus, I have lost even more respect for the woman.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 09:20 AM
3

" “The Bible teaches us that a woman’s hair is given to her for her glory, and I would not want to take away any of her glory from her.”" I...what? Dude, stop making the rest of us look bad.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 11:03 PM
8

"“We cannot allow parents to put their children at risk,” Marcela Huaita, the Peruvian minister of women and vulnerable populations, said in Spanish according to an article on the Federation of Journalists of Peru website. “The behavior of Dustin William Kent, the girl’s father, typifies the crime of exposing a child to danger and merits a penalty of two to four years of incarceration and whoever perpetrated the crime of kidnapping could face life imprisonment.”" But... you know, the woman actua…
/r/MensRights15/03/16 11:01 PM
11

Yup. That's his reasoning. Kid can't drink wine? Eh, the 'coolest judge ever' will allow it because the mommy needs to get drunk and have 4-5 wines a day, which is TOTALLY responsible and shows that SHE should have custody of the child. Also, paying for Uber. Also, paying for a F* MAID!
/r/MensRights15/03/16 10:58 PM
3

Now I'm thinking about Red running around with a giant baster full of stolen sperm and male tears.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 08:54 AM
1

People with medical conditions or...size won't be punished.
/r/MensRights11/03/16 12:12 AM
7

"a medical condition would not be fined." Would 'a medical condition' include 'having balls'?
/r/MensRights11/03/16 12:11 AM
0

There are also cases where women have ended the relationship with the man, or has stolen sperm (various cases such as taking used condoms or robbing a sperm bank), and has then charged the father once she's had the child. Seeing as men cannot bear the physical responsibility of the child, and instead have to help bear the emotional, and often completely bear the financial responsibilities, the father should have some say in the abortion, whether it be the proposed financial abortion or otherwise…
/r/MensRights09/03/16 06:56 PM
0

I feel almost insulted that an ad for "Emma Watson's style hits" was listed below this article...
/r/MensRights08/03/16 08:25 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter