AtheismFTW Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
70	If a child is put up for adoption, neither parent has to pay child support. Yet if a woman decides to keep a baby, the man MUST pay? Someone please explain how this makes sense.		AtheismFTW	/r/MensRights	18/09/10 09:20 PM

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
3	My first time in/MensRights: Observations. Assuming the father stalked the mother around and knew exactly which hospital she took the baby to before she legally abandons it or gives it up for adoption. This, mind you, could happen in a completely different state. Furthermore, in some places and cases, it is not required by law to have a paternity test done against the mothers will. Feminist groups are currently fighting to keep it this way.	/r/MensRights	01/10/10 07:51 AM
6	My first time in/MensRights: Observations. Too late. The baby has already been adopted away.	/r/MensRights	01/10/10 07:23 AM
5	My first time in/MensRights: Observations. A woman can lie and put on the birth certificate that she doesn't know who the father is. Then she doesn't need the father's permission for anything.	/r/MensRights	01/10/10 07:06 AM
1	If a child is put up for adoption, neither parent has to pay child support. Yet if a woman decides to keep a baby, the man MUST pay? Someone please explain how this makes sense. More power to you!	/r/MensRights	19/09/10 07:49 PM
1	If a child is put up for adoption, neither parent has to pay child support. Yet if a woman decides to keep a baby, the man MUST pay? Someone please explain how this makes sense. The father doesn't sign medical paperwork? I'm sure that can count against him.	/r/MensRights	19/09/10 07:13 PM
0	If a child is put up for adoption, neither parent has to pay child support. Yet if a woman decides to keep a baby, the man MUST pay? Someone please explain how this makes sense. That is not what is being discussed.	/r/MensRights	19/09/10 09:34 AM
1	If a child is put up for adoption, neither parent has to pay child support. Yet if a woman decides to keep a baby, the man MUST pay? Someone please explain how this makes sense. Your first point is irrelevant to anything that has been said. Your second point misses the point entirely of the man's position when it's not a mutual decision.	/r/MensRights	19/09/10 09:34 AM
3	If a child is put up for adoption, neither parent has to pay child support. Yet if a woman decides to keep a baby, the man MUST pay? Someone please explain how this makes sense. Also, no you don't get a fucking choice in the abortion. You made your choice in the moments prior to and (briefly) during sex. Wow. I like how you buried that in there, sandwiched between "women should pay child support as well".	/r/MensRights	19/09/10 09:30 AM
7	If a child is put up for adoption, neither parent has to pay child support. Yet if a woman decides to keep a baby, the man MUST pay? Someone please explain how this makes sense. The statistics point to men abandoning children far more often than women. Are you including women who have abortions or put them up for adoption? See, when a woman "abandons" a child through adoption or abortion (an option men don't have), it's not being counted in your statistic.	/r/MensRights	19/09/10 03:06 AM
7	If a child is put up for adoption, neither parent has to pay child support. Yet if a woman decides to keep a baby, the man MUST pay? Someone please explain how this makes sense. Don't drive a car if you never ever want to have a car accident in it. The end. Your logic is sound.	/r/MensRights	19/09/10 02:35 AM
9	If a child is put up for adoption, neither parent has to pay child support. Yet if a woman decides to keep a baby, the man MUST pay? Someone please explain how this makes sense. Women get the choice to give their child up for adoption. Men don't.	/r/MensRights	19/09/10 02:14 AM
8	If a child is put up for adoption, neither parent has to pay child support. Yet if a woman decides to keep a baby, the man MUST pay? Someone please explain how this makes sense. So do men still have to pay child support when the woman gets remarried?	/r/MensRights	18/09/10 09:41 PM
1	When is OK to Punch Your Wife? Try reading the rest of the thread first. This has already been addressed.	/r/MensRights	15/09/10 10:08 PM
-1	When is OK to Punch Your Wife? Sure. Rape in a relationship, particularly marriage (where it can reasonably be demonstrated a sexual relationship pre-exists) has historically been ignored by the courts. This is because, in the context of such a relationship, if you have had sex with someone before under amiable conditions, the idea of unwanted sex later on does seem like such a big deal. This reflects the human notion where doing something in a friendly manner first seems to make it more acceptable to do it later on in malice…	/r/MensRights	15/09/10 08:23 AM
0	When is OK to Punch Your Wife? That argument would make sense if there were arm-punchists who jumped out of bushes or accosted people in dark allies and punched people in the arms out of malice and for no other gain. The analogy is nonsense and doesn't apply to physical violence, which is of a different nature.	/r/MensRights	15/09/10 07:16 AM
2	When is OK to Punch Your Wife? it's not about whether you hurt them or not. the thing is, if you can just hit someone when you're having a good time, then it's not going to be that much of a leap in comfort-level to hit them when you're angry. that kind of logic kind of goes without saying, and it might be at least part of the reason why you don't see too many girls fawning over guys who punch them on the shoulder when they're flirting. whether it hurts or not.	/r/MensRights	14/09/10 11:30 PM
3	When is OK to Punch Your Wife? Don't get with a girl that hits when she flirts. Ever. Especially ones that hit hard when they flirt. They are definitely abusers, and don't know how to keep their hands to themselves. Thankfully I had the foresight to make sure my now-wife didn't have those tendencies.	/r/MensRights	14/09/10 06:21 AM
11	Screw everything about this TV show. Dads are not idiots. Technically, aren't those "reality" shows?	/r/MensRights	13/09/10 06:55 AM
1	the sooner manhood101 comments are reported to #mensrights the sooner they will be removed. what giraffe	/r/MensRights	03/09/10 10:45 AM
1	the sooner manhood101 comments are reported to #mensrights the sooner they will be removed. yeah, as a mod for /r/woahdude, that's basically something I NEVER do. consider reporting a link almost completely a waste of effort.	/r/MensRights	03/09/10 10:09 AM
3	the sooner manhood101 comments are reported to #mensrights the sooner they will be removed. No. They have to go to a special page for it.	/r/MensRights	02/09/10 03:52 AM
1	Why is /r/MensRights so negative to marriage? Not every woman is out for money or a divorce. You won't be enslaved if you kill yourself either, but both marriage and life are enticing.	/r/MensRights	01/09/10 09:01 PM
1	Why is /r/MensRights so negative to marriage? Not every woman is out for money or a divorce. Maybe I've only been married about a year and half, so it's never escalated that far, but I've had some pretty serious fights and arguments with my wife, and she's never once tried to pull the D-card on me.	/r/MensRights	01/09/10 08:59 PM
2	Exercise your right to eat a chocolate cake /r/woahdude not /r/mensrights	/r/MensRights	19/08/10 08:13 AM
10	Exercise your right to eat a chocolate cake Why is this in men's rights?	/r/MensRights	19/08/10 05:43 AM
2	How not to react to a 19 year old who gives your 13 year old daughter a ride home... Not exactly men's rights in my book, though I'm sure someone will pipe up and disagree.	/r/MensRights	12/08/10 09:46 AM
5	I won, but at an unfair price. To be fair, that would have been nice to include in the original post.	/r/MensRights	30/07/10 02:26 AM
3	Tiger Woods Divorce Settlement Near - Elin to get $750 Million Divide up the time he spend with his mistresses and see how much sex with them cost.	/r/MensRights	29/06/10 05:17 AM
2	Wife Charged With Stabbing Husband To Death; Media Refuses To Label It Domestic Violence I am saying that MRA is letting me down by now discussing this, and instead just downvoting someone that does not agree with their unsubstantiated premise.	/r/MensRights	26/06/10 09:26 AM
0	Wife Charged With Stabbing Husband To Death; Media Refuses To Label It Domestic Violence I like how they're downvoting us like shameless trolls. Perhaps more people would take MRA seriously if there was some more maturity in here...	/r/MensRights	26/06/10 01:22 AM
3	Wife Charged With Stabbing Husband To Death; Media Refuses To Label It Domestic Violence I don't see where the media refused to do that.	/r/MensRights	25/06/10 10:18 PM
1	MensRights hit's 9000 subscribers - Party Inside --> I dunno, I'm looking at this post 23 hours later, and it's currently at 8,998 readers...	/r/MensRights	24/06/10 01:06 AM
8	Hi... I'm Your Sex Offender Neighbor. Man on sex offender's list for 15 years for having consensual sex with his current wife when she was 16 This article is trash and propaganda. We need more people like 7oby around here to set the record straight. Also, you know shit is up if the ACLU won't defend you. That should always be your red flag.	/r/MensRights	21/06/10 06:20 AM
9	Hi... I'm Your Sex Offender Neighbor. Man on sex offender's list for 15 years for having consensual sex with his current wife when she was 16 True that. I felt things didn't add up as soon as they said they've been married for 5 years... and yet he has a PhD...	/r/MensRights	21/06/10 06:19 AM
8	"Men Are Stupid...And They Like Big Boobs" "Women Are Stupid...And They Like Big Wallets" FTFY p.s. I agree with both sentiments, in general. People are stupid.	/r/MensRights	15/06/10 06:24 AM
1	Gary Coleman Murdered by Wife? I already trust that fact, and not because your hypothetical source said it. It has already been established. Nice try though, I bet you thought you were clever. But again, no I would don't a news group that did that on the topic of unverified information. It's just sensationalistic, and shows how lowly the source thinks of its reader's intelligence. Furthermore, if you even bothered to check the source, and went to the front page, you would have seen this very reputable looking image taking up …	/r/MensRights	06/06/10 09:05 PM
2	Gary Coleman Murdered by Wife? Can't trust a source that capitalizes entire words in the body of their story.	/r/MensRights	05/06/10 07:28 PM
2	I made a decision about whether or not to circumcise my son. This is real. Much better.	/r/MensRights	19/05/10 06:11 PM
1	I made a decision about whether or not to circumcise my son. This is real. More so, yes. I can't think of a perfect analogy yet, but that's not quite it.	/r/MensRights	19/05/10 03:06 AM
6	I made a decision about whether or not to circumcise my son. This is real. Sex too.	/r/MensRights	18/05/10 11:24 PM
5	I made a decision about whether or not to circumcise my son. This is real. Because the eyes are constantly blinking and produce tears which clean away foreign debris. The foreskin doesn't do that.	/r/MensRights	18/05/10 11:10 PM
11	I made a decision about whether or not to circumcise my son. This is real. While I agree with your position, that was a terrible analogy.	/r/MensRights	18/05/10 08:04 PM
-4	Male birth control pill seems to be coming in the near future. Do feminists seriously have a problem with this? Sensible, yes. But she's still complaining like a little bitch. That snarky commentary she made was completely unnecessary and misandonist.	/r/MensRights	17/05/10 08:38 PM
-7	Male birth control pill seems to be coming in the near future. Do feminists seriously have a problem with this? No, it's saying she doesn't trust men. Feminazi is the right word?	/r/MensRights	17/05/10 07:06 AM
-1	Male birth control pill seems to be coming in the near future. Do feminists seriously have a problem with this? Read between the lines. ...would women even trust men to take it while the consequence of forgetting remains our bodies that get pregnant? ... Until they can, it's hard to imagine women handing that responsibility over to a man, who might forget to take his Pill or change his patch. Shudder.	/r/MensRights	17/05/10 06:45 AM
0	For This Ring I Thee Sue: If the bride calls off the engagement, can she keep her diamond? No it doesn't. But I would agree that it suggests it.	/r/MensRights	16/05/10 05:14 AM
1	The reason men allowed feminism to progress is that alpha males are not harmed by feminism, and it is alpha males who have the power to grant women the privileges of feminism. Social Darwinism which, though it bares Darwin's name, has absolutely nothing to do with Darwin, and is only loosely, mistakenly based on his ideas of Natural Selection. Kind of like "Scientology" actually has nothing to do with science. You could say the same thing about memetics (see genetics). The reason the names are similar (in both cases) is because they instantly conjure up an analogous framework which is easier to understand given the context. Scientology is a terrible example, it doesn'…	/r/MensRights	01/05/10 02:17 AM
5	The reason men allowed feminism to progress is that alpha males are not harmed by feminism, and it is alpha males who have the power to grant women the privileges of feminism. The fact that an idea leads to moral corruption is not an indication of the veracity of its tenets. Its scientific underpinning is along the same lines as Darwinism and Memetics. Darwinism, for example, is true regardless of the fact that antelope get eaten by cheetahs. If antelope could reason or express themselves, they might use the same argument you just used against Social Darwinism. But again, it's not that Darwinism is false, it's just that the antelope wouldn't think it's a good moral fo…	/r/MensRights	01/05/10 01:41 AM
1	The reason men allowed feminism to progress is that alpha males are not harmed by feminism, and it is alpha males who have the power to grant women the privileges of feminism. I upvoted you even though I think Social Darwinism makes sense - it just shouldn't be used as an applied philosophy. Just like human death is also a reality, but that doesn't mean people should kill others.	/r/MensRights	01/05/10 01:28 AM
-10	Femaile activist is raped by a black man in Haiti. Who does she blame? "White patriarchy". Who cares what the source's political agenda is? That has nothing to do with the article itself. The website is nothing more than a middle-man, with source links to the original material.	/r/MensRights	25/04/10 01:58 AM
-7	Femaile activist is raped by a black man in Haiti. Who does she blame? "White patriarchy". The article itself said nothing of the sort. Maybe the hyperlink was a bit too subtle: You're engaging in the Strawman Fallacy. Read more here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man	/r/MensRights	25/04/10 01:23 AM
-5	Femaile activist is raped by a black man in Haiti. Who does she blame? "White patriarchy". This post said nothing about a white-only country.	/r/MensRights	25/04/10 12:44 AM
-8	Femaile activist is raped by a black man in Haiti. Who does she blame? "White patriarchy". Then GTFO. What the fuck is wrong with white rights?	/r/MensRights	24/04/10 08:40 PM
1	Reaction To Women Abusing Men In Public mine too you fucktard	/r/MensRights	01/04/10 03:35 AM
2	Reaction To Women Abusing Men In Public dumbass	/r/MensRights	01/04/10 12:23 AM
7	Masturbation double standards. You can probably stack gay men.	/r/MensRights	28/03/10 08:36 PM