~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | why modern feminism is White Woman’s Privilege.Author here: I touched on that topic a couple of weeks back. http://www.returnofkings.com/7504/how-black-america-was-created | /r/MensRights | 01/04/13 01:33 AM |
| 11 | How Black America Has Predicted Our Future"Just remember, just because a person is black does not mean that they fit into this archetype." "I have my own interests, hobbies, beliefs, and personality that are different from the stereotypes seems to perpetuate." I'm black. I wrote the article. You are fighting a strawman. Nobody said that EVERY black American fits EVERY bill listed in that article. The statistics cited in the text make this clear (ex: "41% of black women are obese"-that's 41%, not ALL). Absolutely NOWHERE in the article w… | /r/TheRedPill | 03/01/13 09:41 PM |
| 2 | This archive is well worth your time"Most of my friends don't particularly care about cars or sports" We already know you're an outlier. You've now shown us that most of your friends are likeminded individuals, as is to be expected. This does little to show that the pattern outlined by Tristus (and quite a bit of empirical evidence) does not exist. "framing them as inherent traits of each gender is both misleading and fallacious" I disagree. Nobody here denies a nurture element to sexual attraction, but there are certainly general… | /r/seduction | 03/01/13 04:33 AM |
| 1 | This archive is well worth your time"So you wrote a guide on 'how to trick women' so that you could afterwards accuse people of not reading the article when they called you out on being a shitbag of a human being?" No, the point was to discuss the actual nature of the content (the bit about allowance and not exertion), not to make accusations. Of course, that couldn't happen until you actually read the article, so I needed to address that first. "And not only that, but you did it on a website so craptacular that they published the… | /r/seduction | 03/01/13 04:23 AM |
| 1 | This archive is well worth your time"I'm left all a-boggled as to why you'd choose those words if you did not, in fact, want to trick women." To encourage precisely the kind of discourse we're having now. "Perhaps you should go take a long, hard look in the mirror?" No need. | /r/seduction | 03/01/13 01:49 AM |
| 1 | This archive is well worth your time"Of course, that's basically what I'd expect from a site which encourages us to 'trick women into thinking you're their dream man.' - if that's not a telling sentence, I don't know what is." You didn't read the post. I know this because if you had done so, you'd have seen that the actual recommendations within don't encourage men to trick anybody. The post is more about allowance, not exertion of deceptive effort. Source: I wrote it. | /r/seduction | 03/01/13 12:05 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter